In short
U.S.-China trade talks in Paris amid new Section 301 investigations; oil and security fallout from the Iran conflict; a DHS funding shutdown causing TSA workers to miss pay; and proposed Democratic tax changes targeting high earners.
Guests and backgrounds
- Ambassador Jameson Greer, U.S. Trade Representative (White House), leads trade policy and Section 301 actions.
- Robert Frank, CNBC “Inside Wealth” reporter, covers taxes and wealthy-focused legislation.
- Jay Johnson, former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security (Obama administration), comments on DHS/TSA funding and homeland security risk.
Key claims
- Greer: U.S.-China goods trade deficit down 30%; January imports lowest since 2004; Iran effects are expected to be short-lived (weeks) and U.S. is resilient via domestic feedstocks.
- Greer: Section 301B probes (forced labor) and other investigations aim to resolve unfair practices; tariff refund system is progressing (40–80% built; online portal by mid-next month).
- Frank: Working Americans Tax Cut Act would exempt incomes up to $46k/$92k, while raising top rates for >$1M, with a stated “zero likelihood” of passing.
- Johnson: DHS shutdown has left TSA workers unpaid for the third time this year; morale and security operations are under stress; linking policy fights to funding is harmful.
Notable examples
Dubai International Financial Center drone strike; Iran mine-laying in the Strait of Hormuz (reported); TSA long airport lines and workers requesting nonperishables; BuzzFeed doubts about 2026 viability; ByteDance building AI compute outside China with Nvidia chips.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOKC-135 Aircraft Crash Update
0:00 to 0:24
Discussion on the crash of a KC-135 refueling aircraft in Iraq.
“Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down.”
KC-135 Aircraft Crash Update
2:12 to 2:44
Discussion on the crash of a KC-135 refueling aircraft in Iraq.
“Stand back to buy in 3, 2, 1, cue it please.”
Crude Oil Price Insights
2:45 to 3:18
Analysis of current crude oil prices amidst geopolitical tensions.
“It says the cause of the crash is under investigation.”
Drone Strike in Dubai
3:19 to 4:40
Report on a drone strike attempt in Dubai's financial district.
“Well, an emergency alert was issued here in Dubai earlier today, and authorities have confirmed an attempted strike inside the Dubai International Financial Center.”
Iran's Threat to Economic Centers
4:40 to 6:41
Exploration of Iran's threats to financial centers and implications for oil.
“Navy can clear them to create more chaos and delay through the channel.”
U.S. Trade Investigations
6:41 to 7:30
Overview of new U.S. trade investigations into forced labor concerns.
“Dan, you mentioned that the drone that came in that did some damage in the building only a block away from CNBC's offices.”
BuzzFeed's Financial Struggles
7:30 to 10:17
Discussion on BuzzFeed's decline and its implications for digital media.
“And so you would expect that as a result, that building, that district firmly in the crosshairs.”
Trade Talks with China
10:17 to 11:11
Insight into the upcoming U.S.-China trade talks and tariffs.
“Company CEO Jonah Peretti saying the company believes its market value doesn't reflect the strength of its individual brands.”
Interview with Jameson Greer
11:11 to 14:01
U.S. Trade Representative discusses trade stability with China.
“Obviously, you can't talk about trade without the Iran war coming up and the effect of oil and gas.”
U.S.-China Trade Relations and the Impact of Iran
14:01 to 18:00
Explore the evolving trade relationship between the U.S. and China in the context of geopolitical tensions with Iran.
“Well, when you look at where we are with China versus one year ago, we have a much more balanced relationship with China.”
Show all 20 chapters
Tariff Refunds and Economic Impact
18:01 to 20:02
Discussion on the legal ruling about tariffs and its potential financial implications for U.S. taxpayers.
“They said that they expect that system to be up and running by the middle of next month.”
Investigating Unfair Trading Practices
20:03 to 21:28
Details on Section 301 investigations by USTR regarding unfair trading practices and the potential implementation of tariffs.
“massive imbalance in trade that we've experienced over many years because of China, Vietnam, the EU and others.”
Investigating Unfair Trading Practices
21:43 to 22:31
Details on Section 301 investigations by USTR regarding unfair trading practices and the potential implementation of tariffs.
“and the partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security leading to long lines at airports and missed paychecks for TSA workers.”
Tax Hikes and Wealth Redistribution
23:29 to 28:00
Analysis of a new tax proposal targeting wealthy Americans and its implications for taxpayers.
“Welcome back to Squawk Pod, today with Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin.”
Legislative Updates on Taxation
28:00 to 29:47
Discussion on recent legislative moves regarding tax in Washington state.
“Senator Booker is another lead legislator.”
Impact of Funding Cuts on TSA Workers
29:48 to 34:30
Analysis of how funding issues affect TSA workers and aviation security.
“TSA officers are set to miss their first full paycheck today as the Senate clashes over funding for the DHS bill.”
Political Implications of Security Funding
34:31 to 36:31
Discussion on the political dynamics affecting funding for DHS and its implications.
“There are Democratic senators who say, and congressmen, who say that this is their only tool.”
Threat of Terrorism and Security Measures
36:32 to 39:59
Insights into the current threat environment regarding terrorism and the role of security agencies.
“We had Jared Cohen here earlier in the week.”
Closing Thoughts with Jay Johnson
40:00 to 40:26
Concluding remarks from Jay Johnson on the need for attention to TSA workers.
“I hope your voice is heard in Washington.”
Closing Thoughts with Jay Johnson
42:00 to 42:29
Concluding remarks from Jay Johnson on the need for attention to TSA workers.
“Tell your doctor if you get a lump or swelling in your neck.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Your data lives everywhere. On-prem, in the cloud, across apps. Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down. Sophisticated enough to anticipate your ever-changing data needs, yet simple enough to feel like second nature. Tame your data chaos with EverPure and make storage and data management the simplest part of your business. Visit everpuredata.com to learn more. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time.
0:45So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
0:58Bring in show music, please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Zach Valisi. Coming up today on Squawk Pod. Key U.S. representatives head to Paris for trade talks with China. We speak to U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer. We want to ensure continued stability in the U.S.-China relationship. It's one of the most important economic relationships in the world. TSA workers are not being paid due to a partial funding shutdown. Jay Johnson, President Obama's head of Homeland Security, joins us. It puts the agency and its workers under a tremendous amount of stress. Plus, Democrats introducing tax cuts for many that would hike the bill on high earners.
1:43Our Robert Frank reports. What's different this time is this thing, we're going to raise taxes on the wealthy and give tax cuts for everyone else. And a drone strike appears to hit a key financial neighborhood in Dubai, our Dan Murphy. This is walking distance from the Nasdaq Dubai and CNBC's own studio here. It's Friday the 13th of March. Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand back to buy in 3, 2, 1, cue it please. Good morning everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We are live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick along with Andrew Ross Sorkin. Joe is out today.
2:29It's Friday morning and let's get you caught up to date. U.S. Central Command saying four of six crew members have died following the crash of a KC-135 refueling aircraft in western Iraq. The tanker was supporting operations against Iran. According to a post on X by Central Command, the crash wasn't due to hostile or friendly fire. It says the cause of the crash is under investigation. Let's show you the price of crude oil as well, which, as Andrew mentioned, is coming off its highest settlement since August of 2022. This morning, WTI is slightly pulling back by about 20 cents, still trading above$95 a barrel at$95.53.
3:07And Brent is above$100 a barrel at$100.80. For the latest on the Iran war, let's get over to CNBC's Dan Murphy, who is standing by in Dubai. Dan, what's the latest? Becky, good morning to you. Well, an emergency alert was issued here in Dubai earlier today, and authorities have confirmed an attempted strike inside the Dubai International Financial Center. Vision from the incident shows the damage on the outside of the Dubai Innovation 1 building. This is walking distance from the NASDAQ Dubai and CNBC's own studio here. There were reports of a loud explosion and smoke in the skyline. The Dubai media office said debris from a missile interception caused what they are calling a minor incident on the facade of that building.
3:53They said there were no injuries that have been reported. And of course, most banks and financial firms are now working from home after Iran threatened to target economic centers across the Gulf. Meanwhile, as you mentioned, the risk premium in oil is intact this morning, despite some reassuring words from the Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, on Squawk yesterday, suggesting naval escorts through the Strait of Hormuz could begin by the end of this month. I think that is quite likely the case. But again, I mean, I'll be over at the Pentagon later today, but that is what the military is working on.
4:26And yes, a lot of critical materials come out of the Straits of Hormuz. That task has been made even more challenging, with the New York Times now reporting that Iran is laying mines inside the strait. It's understood Iran is aiming to lay these mines faster than the U.S. Navy can clear them to create more chaos and delay through the channel. And at the same time as well, the Trump administration also trying to ease the price pain by issuing a 30-day sanctions break to make Russian oil available to the market. The administration calling that a short-term measure that won't really benefit Moscow because the oil is already at sea.
5:07Back over to you. That's the big question. Moscow ending up benefiting from all of this and seeing what's happening with it. You know, Dan, as you mentioned, we were told yesterday that by the energy secretary that they hope to be able to start escorting ships through by the end of the month. I would suggest the premiums that we're seeing in the market have traders wondering if that's even going to be possible, given how things seem to be escalating, not descaling. It really also reflects just how concerned the administration is about the elevation that we've seen in the price of oil as well. And the Treasury Secretary, Scott Besson, also announced that countries are now basically authorized to purchase Russian crude and petroleum products currently stranded at sea.
5:51And what's also interesting is that this follows a waiver that was granted to big consumers like India, for example, at the start of the month, reversing that previous U.S. push to have New Delhi halt Russian energy imports as well. And what's interesting here is, as well, on the mines, it seems like after the U.S. military destroyed those 16 mine lane vessels, the IRGC pivoted to using these hundreds of small, fast boats to deploy mines. Iranian officials have, of course, denied that this is happening. But you'll also recall that the Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, said that blocking the Strait of Hormuz must continue to be used as leverage, as he made that first statement as Supreme Leader late yesterday as well.
6:37So the situation is still very live in the region. And as you can see, asset markets plus the price of oil still reacting firmly to the upside on that. Dan, you mentioned that the drone that came in that did some damage in the building only a block away from CNBC's offices. Financial workers working from home, I take it you are too? Yeah, that's exactly right. And look, it's been quite a long week here in Dubai. I'm not going to lie. I think the incident that we've seen inside the Dubai International Financial Center is certainly a worst case scenario for authorities here. I mentioned earlier that Iran did say it would be targeting financial centers and banks and financial institutions that are associated, it believes, with the United States and with Israel.
7:22Of course, Dubai is one of the main commercial capitals of the Middle East. NASDAQ Dubai, a really big brand. CNBC, an enormous brand. And so you would expect that as a result, that building, that district firmly in the crosshairs. And that has also played out in the last few hours as well with the emergency alert being received this morning. So now the Gulf Financial Center is certainly on edge that we have seen this incident in Dubai. And all eyes are on exactly what Iran does over the weekend as well. Dan, I'm glad you're safe. I'm glad you're at home. And we appreciate everything you are doing.
7:57Thank you. Meantime, the U.S. launching new trade investigations into 60 countries to establish whether they've failed to curb imports of goods made with forced labor. The so-called Section 301B probes will look into China, the EU, India and Mexico, among other nations. The announcement coming just a day after another Section 301 probe was launched. Those will focus on possible excesses in industrial capacity from 16 different countries. the investigations could provide an alternate route for the White House to replace at least some of the president's tariffs that the Supreme Court recently ruled were illegal.
8:35And we're going to speak to U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer about all of that. And the government says that it is between 40 and 80 percent of the way toward building a system to refund the more than $165 billion in tariff collections that were ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. That's according to a court filing. A Customs and Border Protection official says that the agency is developing an online claim portal for importers and brokers to submit requests for refunds, which would come with interest. That system is expected to be running by the middle of next month. Chinese company ByteDance is reportedly working on building up its computing power outside of China using top-of-the-line NVIDIA AI chips.
9:20The Wall Street Journal says that the TikTok parent is working with a Southeast Asian company on plans to use Nvidia's Blackwell chips in Malaysia for AI research and development. That report says that the Southeast Asian company is also called tier one Nvidia is a tier one Nvidia club cloud partner. That means it can get priority access to the company's latest chips, which of course are prohibitive from being sold in China. I don't know what we're going to do about that. I mean, this is the problem. But this is, if you were going to hold up the TikTok deal and all of the things, and then this is the outcome, this is a pretty bad outcome.
9:57A digital publisher, BuzzFeed, saying that it has substantial doubt about its ability to stay in business. The company says it won't provide a 2026 forecast as it evaluates strategic options. BuzzFeed was popular in the late aughts in 2010s with Newsy articles you might remember called listicles. went public in a blank check merger in 2021, but its stock has fallen 98 % since then. Company CEO Jonah Peretti saying the company believes its market value doesn't reflect the strength of its individual brands. And what's so sad to me about this story and fascinating at the same time is so many people tried to chase the BuzzFeed game.
10:38We all thought that BuzzFeed was the future. Driving traffic, getting eyeballs. Getting eyeballs, living in this sort of listicles world as opposed to living in a stories-based or reporting-based world. And it and so many others at the time seemed to be upending what seemed to be the media ecosphere. And here we are. Tees will be next. Coming up on Squawk Pod, U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer joins us from the White House North Lawn as the world watches the volatile price of oil and the conflict in Iran. Obviously, you can't talk about trade without the Iran war coming up and the effect of oil and gas.
11:17I think we're talking about a matter of weeks. Our expectation is that any effects we see will be short-lived.
11:31Financial growth begins long before the first investment. It comes from understanding what you're building toward, what's at stake, and what success looks like for you. At Oppenheimer, we bring bold thinking guided by the full strength of our expertise to put capital to work building and protecting wealth that lasts generations. Put the power of Oppenheimer thinking to work for you. Wealth management, capital markets, investment banking.
12:00At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. I want to grow the game of soccer and give every kid the chance to play. What would you like the power to do? Bank of America champion street soccer advocate Kyle Martino and is proud to be the official bank of U.S.
12:42soccer and FIFA World Cup 2026. Bank of America and A member FDIC. This is Squawk Pod. Three, two, stand Andrew by. Up and Andrew, cue. You're watching Squawk Box on this Friday morning. I'm Andrew Ross Sorkin along with Becky Quick. Joe is off today. The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Besant, and United States Trade Representative Jameson Greer are heading to Paris tomorrow to meet with Chinese officials. The meeting coming ahead of President Trump's expected trip to Beijing and a new wave of Section 301 investigations. Joining us right now is Ambassador Jameson Greer. Good morning to you.
13:19Let's start with this meeting and then we can get into tariffs and everything else. What are you hoping to achieve at this meeting? It's good to be with you this morning. Like a lot of our meetings we've had with the Chinese over the past year, we want to ensure continued stability in the U.S.-China relationship. It's one of the most important economic relationships in the world. We want to make sure that we continue to get the rare earths we need for our manufacturing base, that they keep buying the kinds of things they should be buying from us, and that the leaders have a chance to get together and make sure that the relationship's going the way we want it to go.
13:52Where do you think that relationship is, given that it's one of the few countries, unlike the others that actually had reached deals on tariffs, they've never reached one. And how does that conversation change given the situation in Iran? Well, when you look at where we are with China versus one year ago, we have a much more balanced relationship with China. I've been saying for a year, where do we want to be with China? We want relations to be stable. We want our trade to be more balanced. We want it to be a non-sensitive goods. And so our trade deficit with China in goods has gone down by 30 percent over the past year.
14:263-0. That's a big change. Our imports from China in January were the lowest they've been since 2004. And again, that's not to say we're not going to trade with China. We certainly are. But it's getting to a much more balanced situation. Can we discuss, though, this situation with Iran? Because clearly that's weighing on our markets. It's weighing on the price of oil. And by the way, weighing on their economy as well. It is. So when it comes to energy and the effect of the Iran war, it doesn't so much affect U.S.-China economic relations directly between us. Obviously, China relies on oil from Iran.
15:02The United States, you know, we're a huge producer of both oil and LNG, but we do export and import a lot. We're a net exporter, but we do import a lot and we refine here. We import refined products as well. I think what you want to look is what are the feedstocks doing in China, because some of these hydrocarbons go into the plastics industry, the chemicals industry in China. I think we're more resilient on that front because we have a lot of domestic feedstocks and hydrocarbons. So we'll be watching how that might affect the Chinese economy and their ability to produce at the huge volumes they've been producing over the past several years.
15:36What is your expectation for how quickly this war in Iran is going to end? And if it doesn't, what do you think the global impact is going to be? Well, I think that we're and we're talking in terms of weeks, right? When I speak with Secretary Hegseth or the president or others, they're much closer to it. But obviously you can't talk about trade without the Iran war coming up and the effect of oil and gas and what that means. I think we're talking about a matter of weeks. Our expectation is that any effects we see will be short-lived, but we want to watch this, right? You could see other effects that affect cycles that we tend to see in commodity markets.
16:16So we're watching it very closely, especially if there are particular spikes or if there are areas where we think we have more resilience. Which piece of this so far was not on your bingo card in terms of expectations? And I only ask this because I think when the attack was first made, there was a sense that this was going to end very quickly. I don't want to say it was going to be a cakewalk, but I think there was a view that it would be something more akin to that. And it clearly is getting more complicated rather than less, despite whatever successes we seem to be having. Well, I don't work in the Pentagon.
16:52I used to serve in the military many years ago. But all I know is the Pentagon for years and decades has been planning for these kinds of contingencies. We saw the president and his security team execute historic victories in Venezuela. We saw what they did with Iran and the Fordo side last year. I have full confidence in the team that they've planned out all the different scenarios, not just the military scenarios, also the economic scenarios. Again, I think that they're looking at a matter of weeks. When I talk to the secretary, we talk about their levels of missile launches and drones. All that has gone down by 80, 90 percent.
17:31There is a finite amount of ordnance over there that the Iranians have. Pete and others are in a better position to talk to you about it. But that's how it looks from my perspective. Ambassador Greer, there was a court filing where a Customs and Borders protection official said that the government is somewhere between 40 and 80 percent towards building a system to refund the more than$165 billion in tariffs that were collected that were then ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. They said that they expect that system to be up and running by the middle of next month. they have an online claim portal where, I guess, importers and brokers will submit their request for refunds along with interest.
18:14Is there a chance that U.S. taxpayers will lose money on the tariffs that were instituted to try and bring money in if we are paying back those very tariffs with interest? Well, remember, Democratic attorneys general, they argued for these cases. They asked for the money to go back to companies that were importing goods. That was their ask to the court, and they got their wish was to take money from the U.S. Treasury that could have been used to pay down the debt or other things and give it back to companies who import foreign goods made by foreign workers. So, first of all, there is money going out of the Treasury, or that could, and it's because Democratic Attorneys General wanted that.
18:55Interest payments, those are par for the course if that happens. Any time the government has to refund money or anything like that, there's always some kind of interest associated with it. But it's U.S. taxpayer dollars that would be used to fund the interest if that's the case. Well, I don't know where Treasury is going to have that. I don't know where they pay the interest funds out. I'll talk to Scott. The point is that the attorneys general of Democratic states, they wanted this money to go back to companies who are importing foreign goods, and they got their wish. Ambassador, would you and the administration encourage companies that had higher costs during this period to seek refunds, that paid tariffs to seek refunds?
19:39And I ask because I've talked to a number of CEOs who have thus far been holding off seeking those refunds, worried potentially about the possibility for retribution for seeking such a thing. Well, if I were these companies and somehow they get this windfall, the most important thing and the smartest thing they should do is give it as bonuses to their workers. The whole reason the president imposed these tariffs was to try to reshore, to fix our massive imbalance in trade that we've experienced over many years because of China, Vietnam, the EU and others. If the companies are going to get this windfall, they should pass it along to their workers as a bonus or a raise, because that's the purpose of the program.
20:19It's always been the purpose of the program, and the American people should get it, and the companies should give it to their workers. In terms of the next stage of these tariffs, 301 and otherwise, these investigations that are taking place, how quickly do you think those investigations take place? What kind of reports need to come out of them, and then how quickly can those tariffs be implemented? So the Section 3 program, these are the types of investigations that USTR, my agency, has done in the past. They're very process-driven. They're transparent. There's an opportunity for hearing, for public comment, and then we typically produce some findings.
20:52It could be in the form of a report or otherwise. And if we find that countries have been involved in unfair trading practices like subsidies, excess capacity, allowing goods made with forced labor into their countries, we can quantify that harm to U.S. commerce and then try to resolve that issue with the country. If they can't resolve it or don't resolve it sufficiently, you can impose a tariff or a fee or something like that. We're trying to move very quickly, to your question. We're trying to move in a matter of months. And with that, we can try to resolve some of these issues that have been plaguing the global trading system for many years, and we're finally trying to solve.
21:28Ambassador Greer, I want to thank you for joining us this morning, as always, and wish you luck in your meetings in Paris. Thanks so much. Have a good one. Thanks. You too. Still to come on Squawk Pod, the tricky tax policies changing where the wealthiest in America call home. and the partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security leading to long lines at airports and missed paychecks for TSA workers. Former Secretary of Homeland Security Jay Johnson is next. We're in a heightened security environment generally, and the Department of our government that is supposed to ensure our homeland security has been defunded and basically shut down for almost a month now.
22:15Hello, I'm Ozempic. And I'm other GLP-1s, kind of like him. Are you shaking a maraca? No, I'm shaking the pill version of Ozempic, which no one should ever do except in ads like this. A nice disclaimer. Hey, thanks. Ask your doctor about which FDA-approved uses of the Ozempic pen or pill may be right for you. Call 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit Ozempic.com to view the medication guide and learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 9 mg, and Ozempic semaglutide injection, 2 mg. There's a pill version of Osambank. At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time.
23:05So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. I'm honored to make history and to make my community proud. Oh, what a brilliant tackle from Naomi Kerma. What would you like the power to do? Bank of America, proud to be the official bank of U.S. soccer. Bank of America NA member FDSE.
23:35Welcome back to Squawk Pod, today with Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin. A group of Senate Democrats coming up with another plan to extract more taxes from the wealthy while giving millions or millionaires maybe a tax break. Joining us right now is Robert Frank with more of today's edition of the Inside Wealth. What's happening here? Well, Andrew, it's really a sort of two-sided process here. The proposal is called the Working Americans Tax Cut Act, but it is also a large tax hike on high earners. So a group of Democratic senators proposing tax legislation that would exempt millions of Americans from taxes.
24:14Any income up to$46 ,000 for individuals or$92 ,000 for couples would not be subject to any federal income taxes. But to pay for that, taxpayers making more than a million dollars a year would get progressive tax hikes. So that's about one million taxpayers who would see a tax increase. Those making between$1 to$2 million would pay an extra 5 % for a top rate of 42%. The rate goes up, so those making more than$5 million would have a top federal rate of 59%. So, for someone in New York City making more than$5 million a year, the top combined state, city, and federal rate would be over 73%. And since Joe's not here and he's going to ask, New Jersey taxpayers, those who make more than a million a year, the combined state and federal rate would be over 69 percent.
25:07Democrats have made tax hikes on the wealthy a central policy this year. Washington state is poised to pass its first ever income tax. Taxpayers making more than a million dollars a year would pay a state rate of 9.9 percent. It was just passed by the Washington State House after a 24 hour debate. Interestingly, during that debate, as we mentioned here on the show Wednesday, Starbucks founder Howard Schultz announced on LinkedIn that he's leaving Seattle, moving to Miami after 44 years. The longtime Democratic donor didn't cite taxes at the reason, but he said, quote, it is our hope that Washington state will remain a place for business and entrepreneurs to thrive.
Read the full transcript
25:50Now, for more on the wealth proposals and what's happening in the tax world for the wealthy, So you go to cbc.com slash inside wealth. Sign up for that newsletter. OK, you did the numbers and the massive hike that's going to be faced with this. It's a group of Democratic senators who have come up with this. How many senators? How much support does it have? How much likelihood of passing? Zero likelihood of passing. It's at least a half dozen senators. What's interesting about this and what's notable is that it's sort of a preview of what the Democrats are really energized about. And what they will run on.
26:27What they will run on and what they will want to do if they take over the House, if, you know, slimmer chance they get the Senate. But this is really, they're looking for a message right now. And the message is not just we're going to raise taxes on the wealthy, because that hasn't worked in the past. What's different this time is just saying we're going to raise taxes on the wealthy and give tax cuts for everyone else. That is going to be harder for people to vote against because the Republicans are then going to be in a position to say, wait, why are you voting against a tax cut for 60 percent of Americans?
27:02Right. Whereas before they could just say, well, they're saying they're raising taxes on the wealthy, but they're actually going to raise them on everyone else eventually or it's going to spill. And now it's harder to make that argument when what this proposal does is we're going to tax the wealthy and give everyone else. So giant government checks. How hard is it to eventually stop a populist argument against that, where the numbers are in their favor? Like, if you're voting for your own pocketbook, this is going to get more votes. Well, I mean, taxing the wealthy is broadly popular in both parties, because, again, most people aren't in that million-dollar-plus income group.
27:40But it faces tremendous opposition from lobbyists and from people that support congresspeople, the big donors. This, I think, will just add to that pressure. It'll be interesting to see whether, you know, it's going to be harder to stop this. Who are the senators? Are they the names I would expect? Van Hollen is the lead one. Senator Booker is another lead legislator. So it's a lot of the Democratic leaders. You know, interestingly, it's not Chuck Schumer. Elizabeth Warren is not on the list. She is, you know, I think more in the wealth tax category. And that's something we're seeing in California right now.
28:19But I don't think she's on it. But but so these are traditionally I wouldn't say moderates, but not the Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren wing, which is still advocating a wealth tax. And that's something I guarantee we're going to see come up again, regardless of what happens in California. You got an update for us on the sort of Howard Schultz move to Miami. What's happening in Seattle? Last time I saw you, we were so. So, yeah, Washington state, they just, the House, as I mentioned, they passed that legislation. It'll now go to the governor. Right. And it's likely to pass. Do you have to get out of the state now ahead of that?
28:52Is that how this works? It takes effect, I think, in 2028 or 2029. So unlike California, where it was retroactive and you already had to move by the time most people found out about it, Seattle, you'll have plenty of time to leave because it's at least two years from now that it'll actually take effect. But you'll probably, therefore, limit the legal challenges. Not just the challenge. I'm sure it'll be challenged, but might make the... But the big challenge for California is the retroactive aspect of it. I still think there is already Republicans in the state of Washington have said this is not constitutional because the state forbids an income tax.
29:31This is the state's first income tax. And this comes after a long ago court ruling that ruled that income tax in Washington state It was not constitutional according to the state constitution. So regardless, even though they did leave this generous timeline, it will be challenged. OK, Robert Frank, thank you. Thank you, guys.
29:53TSA officers are set to miss their first full paycheck today as the Senate clashes over funding for the DHS bill. Staffing shortages are already leading to long security lines at many airports, with some wait times stretching for hours, in some cases three to four hours last weekend. Joining us right now is the former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jay Johnson. And Mr. Secretary, thank you for being with us this morning. Good morning. I think it's hard to think about this without thinking about the real impact on the workers who are not being paid for the third time this year. They didn't receive a full paycheck on the 28th of February.
30:31Now they're going to miss the entire paycheck. And I heard stories at SeaTac and other airports where they are actually asking people to come with nonperishable foods, with toothpaste and other items that these workers might be able to use because they can't afford them at this point. Your average TSO, we're talking about aviation security. There's the matter of long lines, but there's also simply the matter of aviation security. These are the people we depend upon to look for bombs and explosive devices on the airplane you're about to get on with your family. They live paycheck to paycheck when they're getting paid.
31:08Morale traditionally in TSA is low. And now we're forcing them to go to work without being paid at all. And it puts the agency and its workers under a tremendous amount of stress. at a time when there is no doubt a heightened security environment because we've gone to war against a nation that is a state sponsor of terrorism. There were apparently two terrorist attacks here in the homeland just yesterday. So it's a bit of a pressure cooker situation. Do you think that passengers in airports today are at risk because of this situation? Are we less secure? I won't say that passengers on aviation are at risk, any heightened risk.
32:03I think generally here in the homeland, there is a heightened security threat environment because of the fact that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. And we're not just talking about terrorist organization directed attacks like another 9-11, a large scale 9-11. We're talking about lone actors inspired by terrorist organizations or inspired by the simple fact that we've gone to war in Iran. Someone acting on their own who's deranged and sympathetic to a terrorist organization. So we're in a heightened security environment generally, and the department of our government that is supposed to ensure our homeland security has been defunded and basically shut down for almost a month now.
32:50So let me ask you, given this scenario of where we are right now, politically and otherwise, and the war that's taking place now in the Middle East, is there something that you would do? By the way, if you were the President of the United States, is there something you would do? Well, 11 years ago, I faced this exact situation when I was in office. Congress held up funding for the Department of Homeland Security over the issue of immigration. In one sense, history is repeating itself, but the political dynamic was different. And I stressed over and over again that the Department of Homeland Security is not just the immigration enforcement mission.
33:29It's aviation security. It's maritime security. It's cybersecurity. It's port security. It's the Secret Service. It's training of federal law enforcement officers. I could go on and on. And in so many respects, we depend upon DHS to protect the homeland and protect the American people. And it's being used right now as a political football. In general, we have to get out of the business of linking a major policy disagreement in Washington with funding the government. Agree 100 percent. First job of Congress is to fund the government, keep the government open. They have the power of the purse. But year after year, and now more often than year after year, we get into these funding fights that go over the line to the point where a department of our national security hasn't been open for a month now.
34:21That's not good for the American people. It's not good for the American people. It's not good for the TSA officers. It is not good for our security. But I will also say, you were appointed by Barack Obama, a Democrat. There are Democratic senators who say, and congressmen, who say that this is their only tool. They have no other tool to protest with, to use, to fight back. What would you say to them? That argument is made by whoever's in the minority. Constantly. 11 years ago, I heard that from Republicans because they were upset about our immigration policies. So this is my message to both Democrats and Republicans.
35:01we have to get out of the business of linking a policy disagreement with funding a department of our government. That is a disservice to the American people. We can have these fights over legislation. We can have these fights over border security, over immigration reform, but don't link it to funding the government. The workers are the political footballs. And so often the workers have no voice in this fight. Basically, shame on anybody who tries to do this. And how many other contexts in American life do you know where someone is forced to go to work and not get paid? Especially if it's a vital mission like aviation security.
35:47Do you find that that's a message that resonates with the party that's not in power at any point in time? Because it feels like whoever's in party. Yes, I believe it does if it's emphasized enough and it's said as loud as it can be. Because I think that the American people become frustrated with Washington in general when they see situations like this, where we're not funding the Department of Homeland Security over some political fight, whether it's instigated by Republicans or Democrats. I believe the American public just throws up their hands and say, well, this is Washington. They're all children.
36:28And this is not the job that I sent them to Washington to do. One other related question. We had Jared Cohen here earlier in the week. He had lived in Iran and he talked about the possibility of sleeper cells and other things that could be either here in the United States or other parts of the world that could present a real challenge to us. They have sleeper cells in West Africa. They have sleeper cells in the tri-border area. They could hit an embassy, a cultural center, or a consulate in any one of the 11 countries they've attacked. They did it in Argentina in the early 90s. They tried to kill Adil al-Jabr when he was the Saudi ambassador to the U.S.
37:05at Cafe Milano in Georgetown, of all places. If they were willing to do it then, why wouldn't they try to do it now? How real do you think that is? We talk about this thing that feels like it's a million miles away. It is real. Terrorist organizations are not like conventional armies. I once had a battlefield commander in Afghanistan explain to me when I was at DOD that very often for every terrorist you kill, you might inspire two more. and I have no doubt that there are terrorist operatives, terrorist organizations around the world lying in wait either for a specific direction or simply because they've been inspired by world events to go carry out an act of violence, which was probably the situation we saw yesterday at Old Dominion and at the synagogue near Detroit.
37:59You think that was part of a larger plan? See, it's not so much a larger plan. It's very often deranged individuals who feel as if they're obliged to do this because of what's happening in Iran or elsewhere, not because of some specific order by a terrorist organization. That's somewhat conventional thinking. There's the possibility of the lone wolf. We saw a spate of these in 2015, for example. San Bernardino, the Paris nightclub in Florida, where someone who is sympathetic to the ISIS cause, for example, that carries out an act of violence. How do you weigh those possibilities against, for example, if we can create, I don't know about regime change, in iran but if we can eliminate um their nuclear threat would you say to yourself that is a win uh even if it inspires or creates some kind of other terrible challenge along the way if you can decapitate uh a nation that is a state sponsor of terrorism that is a legitimate government objective however that does not eliminate terrorism that does not eliminate the terrorist threat because, as I said earlier, very often you could be taking somebody off the battlefield, but then you inspire two more to act on their own who are sympathetic to the cause.
39:24That's where agencies like Homeland Security, like the FBI, play a role in this type of environment, yet the Department of Homeland Security is defunded right now. Yeah. It defies explanation. You're right. You're right. You have to look at this from a non-political perspective. Well, here's an example of what I'm talking about. National Terrorism Advisory System, something I created when I was in office. If you go to the NTAS website right now, because you're interested in learning whether there's a heightened environment. It's not being staffed right now, right? There's a big red banner that says, due to lack of funding, this site is not being managed.
40:05Right. Wow. Jay, thank you for coming in. Thank you for talking us through this. I hope your voice is heard in Washington. I hope there is some way to make sure that these employees are getting paid and that we are safe as a result. Well, thank you for your interest in that workforce. They don't have a voice in this fight. Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Thank you. That's the pod for today and for the week. Thanks for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern. To get the smartest takes and analysis from our TV show right into your ears, follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts.
40:48We'll meet you back here on Monday. Have a great weekend. We are clear. Thanks, guys.
41:05Snoring? Gasping during sleep? Feeling fatigued? Ask your doctor about ZepBound. Terzepatite, the first and only FDA-approved prescription medicine for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, OSA, and adults with obesity. ZetBound is a prescription medicine used with a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity to help adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, OSA, and obesity to improve their OSA. ZetBound is approved as a 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, or 15 milligram injection. Z-Bound contains terzepatide and should not be used with other terzepatide-containing products or any GLP-1 receptor agonist medicines.
41:46It is not known if Z-Bound is safe and effective for use in children. Don't share needles or pins or reuse needles. Don't take if allergic to it or if you or someone in your family had medullary thyroid cancer or if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. Tell your doctor if you get a lump or swelling in your neck. Stop Z-Bound and call your doctor if you have severe stomach pain or a serious allergic reaction. Severe side effects may include inflamed pancreas or gallbladder problems. Tell your doctor if you experienced vision changes before scheduled procedures with anesthesia, if you're nursing, pregnant, plan to be, or taking birth control pills.
42:18Taking ZetBound with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. Side effects include nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can cause dehydration and worsen kidney problems. Talk to your doctor. Call 1-800-545-5979 or visit ZetBound.lily.com.
From the publisher
Trade tensions between the U.S. and China are rising ahead of a high-stakes summit in Beijing now less than three weeks away. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer discusses the administration’s new trade investigations, the state of relations with China, the impact of the Iran war, and President Trump’s tariff agenda. Then, with TSA workers set to miss their first paycheck of the shutdown, former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson explains what the Senate’s funding fight could mean for airport staffing and air travel. Plus, CNBC’s Robert Frank on Democrats’ plan to raise taxes on the rich, and CNBC’s Dan Murphy on the drone strike that hit Dubai’s financial district Friday morning.
Jamieson Greer -13:18
Robert Frank - 24:13
Jeh Johnson - 30:24
In this episode:
Robert Frank, @robtfrank
Jamieson Greer, @jamiesongreer
Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick
Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin
Zach Vallese, @ZachVallese
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

