Davos 2026: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei 1/22/26

22 Jan 2026 · 13 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

CNBC “Squawk Pod” episode covering Davos-era politics and markets: Trump’s economic/Fed rhetoric, Silicon Valley’s shift toward Trump, crypto/AI policy, Supreme Court overhaul talk, airline earnings pressure, and Fed rate-cut expectations amid tariffs and fiscal uncertainty.

Guests (backgrounds)

Eric Rosengren, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston; visiting scholar at MIT’s Golub Center. Jessica Lesin, Information editor-in-chief (tech/politics coverage).

Key claims

Trump floated keeping (or potentially firing) Fed Chair Jay Powell; wants corporate tax as low as 15% and more oil/gas drilling; Silicon Valley leaders are backing Trump mainly on AI/crypto policy despite disagreements on immigration and EVs; Biden is considering Supreme Court term limits and an ethics code; tariffs and deportations could complicate hitting 2% inflation, affecting Fed cuts.

Notable examples

Andreessen Horowitz co-founders Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz planning major Trump PAC donations; Elon Musk moving SpaceX HQ to Texas and endorsing Trump; Spirit Airlines warning of a bigger loss due to weaker non-ticket revenue per passenger.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Trump's Cabinet Speculations

0:36 to 0:59

Discussion on Trump's potential cabinet choices and economic policies.

“including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading.”

Trump's Cabinet Speculations

2:11 to 7:50

Discussion on Trump's potential cabinet choices and economic policies.

“Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC.”

Trump's Economic Strategies

7:50 to 10:10

Exploring Trump's proposed economic strategies and tax rates.

“But he said the Fed should not cut rates before the November election and give the economy and President Biden a boost.”

Political Dynamics and Taxation

10:10 to 12:08

Discussion on political implications of tax policies and their effects.

“The most interesting thing to me isn't that Trump is clueless about what he can do with Powell.”

Airline Industry Strategies

12:08 to 14:00

Discussion on Spirit Airlines' revenue strategies and ticket sales.

“I don't, you know, why do we discuss things that, they already said, he already said, I'm not doing the Project 2025, so why talk about what, do you believe that he's really not going to do all of these things?”

Travel Tips and Carry-On Woes

14:00 to 15:15

Learn about the challenges and preferences of air travel regarding luggage.

“The things I need I have in these little zippered pockets on my suit.”

Political Shifts in Silicon Valley

15:15 to 16:40

Explore the changing political landscape in Silicon Valley and tech endorsements.

“Next on Squawk Pod, Mark Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, the biggest tech names to endorse Donald Trump.”

Political Shifts in Silicon Valley

16:46 to 17:12

Explore the changing political landscape in Silicon Valley and tech endorsements.

“Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash market update podcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts.”

Silicon Valley's Republican Shift

17:12 to 19:05

Discuss the notable shift of tech leaders towards supporting Trump.

“You're watching Squawk Box right here on CNBC.”

The Complexity of Tech Politics

19:05 to 20:46

Delve into the complexities of political affiliations among tech executives.

“You talked about folks who are not speaking out now.”
Show all 19 chapters

Economic Impact of Political Endorsements

20:46 to 22:45

Analyze how political endorsements by tech leaders may influence economic policies.

“is i mean they didn't back romney really all along they always are on the side of of a party that some would view as less business friendly than than why is it like that?”

Elon Musk's Business Strategy

22:45 to 24:48

Examine Elon Musk's strategic decisions regarding endorsements and relocations.

“I mean, Musk's endorsements was minutes or, you know, right, right in the thick of the assassination.”

Federal Reserve Insights

24:48 to 26:41

Gain insights into the Federal Reserve's approach to economic challenges.

“But these days, there's actually a lot of activity, especially startup activity back in the city.”

Federal Reserve Insights

26:45 to 26:55

Gain insights into the Federal Reserve's approach to economic challenges.

“Investing involves risk, including risk of loss.”

Supreme Court Changes Discussion

26:55 to 28:00

Engage in a discussion about potential changes to the Supreme Court.

“You're listening to Squawk Pod from CNBC with Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin.”

Discussion on Term Limits

28:00 to 28:38

Exploring the concept of term limits in government positions.

“and I'm asking Joe, given the sort of...”

Federal Reserve Interest Rate Cuts

28:38 to 30:02

Analyzing the potential for interest rate cuts by the Fed and their implications.

“now a visiting scholar with MIT's Golub Center.”

Inflation and Fiscal Policies

30:02 to 32:55

Discussing the impact of inflation and fiscal policies on economic stability.

“So the first cut is indicative of conditions that now more easing is likely.”

Trump, the Fed Chair, and Legal Implications

32:55 to 35:16

Examining former President Trump's comments and potential legal ramifications regarding the Fed chair.

“Seemed to suggest that he would like to keep him in place until this term ends.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.

0:30This episode is brought to you by Schwab Market Update, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join host Keith Lansford for this information-packed daily market preview delivered in 10 minutes or less, including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash marketupdatepodcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts. Bring in show music, please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod. Nearly four months to election day, and Donald Trump is floating ideas for possible cabinet members, dialing Jamie Dimon and weighing the risks of dismissing Fed Chair Jay Powell before the end of his term.

1:20One of Powell's former co-workers, Eric Rosengren, who ran the Boston Fed, joins us. That action wouldn't be all that supportive of what either president would probably want in order to achieve a soft landing for the economy. And Trump is collecting endorsements from Silicon Valley. The information founder Jessica Lesson explains a curious shift to the right among West Coast leaders. Andreessen, Teal, Musk, they're sort of libertarian in many ways, but they're ignoring social issues where they may not agree with President Trump. Plus, President Biden considering a Supreme Court overhaul. And bags?

1:57Check. Spirit Airlines is under pressure even with all those extra fees. So I would never check a bag. Well, what if you have some type of liquid? I have hair products. It's Wednesday, July 17th. Squawk Pod begins right now.

2:13Andrew Ross Sorkin:Stand Becky by in three, two, one. Cue it, please. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We are live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick, along with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. And here we go. The chip stocks are dragging down the Nasdaq after the Biden administration floated using stronger trade restrictions to crack down on the chip sector in China. Separately, former President Trump said that Taiwan should pay the United States for defense. And we're going to have more of that interview in just a moment. Today's move, though, comes after the Dow soared by 743 points in yesterday's session.

2:52That was a gain of over 1.8 percent. The S &P was up by about six tenths of a percent. And then the Nasdaq was up by two tenths of a percent. The biggest driver for the Dow is a gain of more than six percent for shares of UnitedHealth. After upbeat earnings and guidance for that stock, you can check it out, week to date, up by 7.5%, a big part of that jump coming yesterday. And this has been a really interesting move, too, watching small cap stocks. The Russell 2000 small cap index was actually up 3.5 % yesterday. That brings its one-week gains to more than 10%. It's been trading at its highest level since January of 2022.

3:30It's still 8 % from its all-time high, but this all started last week, this major move after you got inflation numbers that looked better than anticipated. It's been a big swing from some of the mega cap stocks into the small caps, and they've seriously outperformed over the last week. Serious Goldilocks after the good retail sales, and everybody still says it's going to be September, so no one's taking the cutoff. And it's the rotation, the long-awaited rotation. And if it goes to where Tom Lee said it's going to go, he said 40 % yesterday, so we've got three and a half yesterday, so we've got another 36 and a half to go in what he said was a matter of months.

4:05Yes. Yeah. So we'll see. He's been right on a lot of things so far. SpaceX and ex-owner Elon Musk says he's moving the headquarters of both companies from California to Texas. He vowed to make the moves in response to a new law in California that was signed by Governor Newsom this week that bars school districts from requiring parents to be notified of a child's gender identification change. Musk posted on X, this is the final straw because of this law and the many others that preceded it, attacking both families and companies. SpaceX will now move its headquarters from Hawthorne, California, to Starbase, Texas.

4:47Musk recently endorsed former President Trump, plans to contribute$45 million a month to a pro-Trump super PAC. And Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz say that they plan to make significant donations to political action committees supporting Donald Trump's campaign for president. They outlined their reasoning for backing Trump in a video podcast episode that was posted yesterday that runs more than 90 minutes. Here's one of the highlights. The first topic is the blockchain and crypto, which is probably the area where we've had the most interaction with the government. This has been a brutal assault in a nation industry that I've just, I've never experienced before.

5:27I'm in total shock that it's happened. It's been intensely frustrating that it's been impossible to make progress in this with the white house. And it's just like, it's, it's a totally intolerable situation. Our old friend, Reed Hoffman kind of wrote a defense of the Biden administration. He said, you know, you should, uh, business people should, uh, endorse Joe Biden because, you know, the most important thing to business is rule of law. And I thought, wow, that's so ironic because they've basically subverted the rule of law to attack the crypto industry. I mean, like we're dealing with that right now.

6:00And yeah, this is probably the most emotional topic. Their support comes as other big names in the tech world have also thrown their support behind former President Trump, including Elon Musk.

6:13Andrew Ross Sorkin:And a big part of that interview, by the way, though, I think it wasn't just the regulation or lack of regulation for crypto, but was also around the idea of realized or unrealized gains, not as a wealth tax, but the way the White House has pitched effectively taxing what would turn out to be founders and private equity firms or venture capital firms. And so they've sort of, that was a, they went on a long, I don't know if you guys watched it, but that played a, that was a major component of the piece. Crypto was part of it, but the taxes and their own taxes and taxing startups and how that would work was something that was very frustrating.

6:50Andrew Ross Sorkin:Pick your poison. You want to list the things that normal business people wouldn't. But I'm not going to go into it. My horoscope today, you need to accept that there are some battles in life that can never be won. And one such battle is right there in front of you. Yeah. Now. Okay. In front of you now, except that it's not worth fighting over a lost cause. So, yeah, I think there's plenty of reasons. Jamie Dimon going to be Treasury Secretary? No. So many disappointments for you, though. He's not going to be Treasury Secretary. Okay, that's good. Thank God. Meantime, former President Trump speaking to Bloomberg Businessweek, where he even floated the idea that he liked Jamie Dimon enough to make him the Treasury Secretary.

7:33Andrew Ross Sorkin:It's unclear whether Jamie Dimon likes him enough to become the Treasury Secretary. But the piece talks about what his economic policies would look like if he wins in the November election. He said he would allow Fed Chair Jay Powell to serve out his term, which runs through May of 2026. But he said the Fed should not cut rates before the November election and give the economy and President Biden a boost. He said he wants to bring the corporate tax rate to as low as 15 percent, and he no longer plans to ban TikTok. He also said he wants to bring down inflation by opening up the U.S. to more oil and gas drilling.

8:07Andrew Ross Sorkin:He said he would consider J.P. Morgan CEO, Jamie Dimon to serve as Treasury Secretary, in part because he liked the comments that Dimon had made back in Davos in January. I think people should be a little more respectful of our fellow citizens. And when you guys have people up here, you should always ask the why. Not like it's a binary thing. You support Trump, you're not supporting Trump. Why are you supporting Trump? It's hard to hate 75 million of your fellow Americans. I agree. And, you know, the Democrats have done a pretty good job with the deplorables, hugging onto their Bibles and their beer and their guns.

8:40I mean, really, can we just stop that stuff and actually grow up and treat other people with respect and listen to a little bit?

8:47Andrew Ross Sorkin:Meantime, I think the most interesting component of the conversation that he had around Jay Powell was the idea that he thought that he could fire Jay Powell. It's actually unclear legally whether he could fire Jay Powell. But the implication, if you really read the sentence and how he said it wasn't just I'm going to it was I'm going to let him. But it was I'm going to let him stay in this role as if he had a choice about letting him still stay in this role. That that role, at least as far as, you know, a whole bunch of scholars and lawyers and constitutionalists and others around the Federal Reserve and that and the Federal Reserve's independence is supposed to be.

9:25Andrew Ross Sorkin:That's more interesting. That's more interesting to you than he's saying cutting corporate rates of 15 percent. When we had the individual yesterday who says he's basically putting together the plan for the Trump economy and the new neoliberalism or whatever the hell that is. Growth has gotten slower and slower. Wages have stagnated. And so, yes, people, conservatives, anyone who's paying attention is recognizing it's time to go a different direction. Neopopulism is what he called it. J.D. Vance being on the ticket means that that's going to be put forward. Then I saw Kevin Hassett yesterday said there's no way, shape, form you're ever going to have Donald Trump recommending an increase in the corporate.

10:10The most interesting thing to me isn't that Trump is clueless about what he can do with Powell. The most interesting thing is that he's saying 15%, not 20 now, saying 21 down to 15%. And actually in the journal, interesting lead piece, describing both the good and bad things about the Trump economy, what the tariffs took away from American consumers, but what some of the corporate tax rate cut, what that did do for business investment, which had started going down in the final two years of the Biden administration, about real wages going up, a lot of positive things there that came from cutting corporates.

10:47Why would you raise corporate rates now? To deal with the deficit. The answer that would come back. It's piddling. But you're asking. Corporate rates are 7 % total now. No, it's the implication of fairness and the pushback you get from. Why is it fair to tax corporations? Don't yell at me like this is mine. You're asking why. I'm not yelling at you. I'm not talking about Teddy Roosevelt or anything. I'm not yelling. The National Parks of Teddy Roosevelt, yes. Very near and dear to my heart.

11:18Andrew Ross Sorkin:I saw. Did you see the Project 2025 two-bracket tax system? That's not going to happen, Project 2025. If you believe it's not going to happen. I believe it's not going to happen. Trump said that's not going to happen. Certain parts of it are not going to happen, but when it comes to the tax piece of it, what was so interesting was that they were going to go to a two-bracket system, a 15 and 30 percent system and effectively on individuals. And what I thought was so fascinating about that actually was that if you made$100 ,000, your taxes went up remarkably. But if you were making a lot more than that, your taxes went down remarkably.

11:56Andrew Ross Sorkin:And so I don't know how you feel about folks who are paying, you know, who are making$100 ,000 or$200 ,000 and their taxes going up significantly. But people who are making$3 ,000,$4 ,000,$5 million, their taxes going down remarkably. We can have another conversation about whether Trump's going to put himself on the Federal Reserve. I don't, you know, why do we discuss things that, they already said, he already said, I'm not doing the Project 2025, so why talk about what, do you believe that he's really not going to do all of these things? Yeah, I really believe, I don't know which ones he's, I have no idea, especially with J.D.

12:27Vance as vice president. That's why we're talking about all these different, but that's. I have no idea, but he already said it's not, maybe he's lying, so he doesn't worry people, you know, at this point. I don't know.

12:40Andrew Ross Sorkin:Shares of Spirit Airlines, they are sharply lower this morning. Take a look at what's going on here, off about 6 percent more than that now. Company warning that it would post a bigger loss than expected in the prior quarter, and that's because revenue fell short. Spirit saying non-ticket revenue, which accounts for the fees that it tax on to its low-priced fares, they came in several dollars lower than anticipated. That's per passenger. Now, the airline recently revamped the way it sells its tickets, bundling its fares with add-on fees for things like seat assignments and carry-on bags that it used to sell a la carte.

13:12Andrew Ross Sorkin:The company says over time it will be able to improve its total revenue per passenger using this new strategy. Everybody always felt like they were being nickel and dimed for the extras. Now they feel they're being nickel and dimed for the entire fee. I wish they would just charge everybody to bring a bag if you're going to check it or if you're going to. If you're going to charge us for checking bags, charge people for bringing them on the plane too because it slows down the loading process, makes everything complicated. And people are fanatic. But that's what spirit does. But United doesn't.

13:47Oh, I see what you're saying. But if you've been to Newark, there's a reason that under no circumstances would you ever want to check anything. Because sometimes it's as long as the flight, waiting for the bag. But I mean, I've just resigned to it. I just have to. I've got to check it. So I watch these people. I have zippers in my suit. I have my charger. The things I need I have in these little zippered pockets on my suit. You don't have a single backpack. I don't have a single thing when I go through.

14:15Andrew Ross Sorkin:I don't carry anything. It would be so much faster. So I would never check a bag. That's what I mean. But all I do, I always have golf clubs or something. I have to. You never check the bag. I have to check a bag. But then that frees me up. Well, what if you have some type of liquid? I have hair products. I see. and those are liquids which you can't I get those little bottles you get the little bottles I use a lot this is my issue too it's the makeup stuff and hair just so you know we don't have these problems in Cheetahborough folks you don't, you're right but the people that are just obsessed with the carry-on stuff they drive me nuts because they hit you they're going by they're jamming it up they drive me nuts They wouldn't check a bag if their life depended on it.

15:04It takes so much longer to board the plane.

15:06Andrew Ross Sorkin:I know. Okay, we got to go. High-end thing to do, by the way, send all the stuff in advance. Shipsticks is a way to send clubs. Clubs, you can send skis. I've done that before. Next on Squawk Pod, Mark Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, the biggest tech names to endorse Donald Trump. The information founder Jessica Lesson explains the political shift in Silicon Valley. We surveyed information subscribers yesterday to get a slice of the tech community, and 59 % said they plan to support Biden, 27 % Trump. She says it's movement toward Republican nominee President Trump, but they're only voting on a couple of key issues.

15:46More on those issues and why EV maker Musk is endorsing EV skeptics right after this. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.

16:25My mom inspired me to dream big and work hard.

16:31What would you like the power to do? Bank of America, proud to be the official bank of U.S. soccer and FIFA World Cup 2026. Bank of America N.A. Member FDSP. This episode is brought to you by Schwab Market Update, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join host Keith Lansford for this information-packed daily market preview delivered in 10 minutes or less, including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash market update podcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts.

17:11This is Squawk Pod.

17:13Andrew Ross Sorkin:Up in Andrew, Q. You're watching Squawk Box right here on CNBC. I'm Andrew Austin, working along with Joe Kernan and Becky Quick. Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, co-founders of the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. They are reportedly now planning significant donations to political action committees supporting the Trump campaign, adding to the list of Silicon Valley tech leaders who are pledging money to the former president. Joining us right now to talk about what is going on in the Valley, Jessica Lesin, the information editor-in-chief. Good morning to you. We've been talking all morning about the video that those two gentlemen put out on YouTube, but of course, also David Sachs speaking now at the Republican National Convention this week.

17:51Andrew Ross Sorkin:And it appears calls by Elon Musk to Donald Trump that may have even led to J.D. Vance's selection as VP. Speak to what seems like a major shift or at least a visible one in the valley. Absolutely, Andrew. There has been a sea change. We've gone from loud voices in the community speaking out on behalf of Biden to now those voices being quiet. And we're seeing all the people you named. The information broke yesterday. The news about Ben and Mark, who had been very critical of Trump at Andreessen Horowitz, openly endorsing him. I think these tech leaders say they're being moved by policy. They're being moved by Trump support for crypto, for AI.

18:39But, you know, there really is not perfect alignment between Trump and the tech community. The community is at odds on immigration, even EVs, which I think is a big question for Elon Musk, who's come out in front of Trump. So we've seen a sea change, but there are many, many open questions right now.

18:55Andrew Ross Sorkin:Well, so that was the question. How much of this is a sea change and how many of these people do you think either were Republicans, closet Republicans or other things before? You talked about folks who are not speaking out now. Is that because they are still planning to back Biden? Are they shifting to Trump? When you think about some of the big companies, and I'm talking about the Googles and the Apples and the Microsofts, has the management of those firms shifted, or are we talking about sort of individual pockets? I don't think there's signs that the management of the big firms have shifted.

19:33But I think a lot of people, like people across the country, are maybe hoping that President Biden does step aside. And so they're not out there openly endorsing him. I think the big companies are really quite conflicted. You know, they are facing regulatory pressures from both sides. They have concerns about both sides. And we're not seeing those CEOs speak out, except, of course, for Elon Musk, who also controls the platform of the X. You know, we surveyed information subscribers yesterday to get a slice of the tech community. And 59 percent said they plan to support Biden. 27 percent Trump will keep doing those numbers to compare.

20:14That strikes me as as some movement towards Trump, for sure, but still the majority for Biden. Jessica, can you can you explain sort of the disparity between Silicon Valley executives and maybe more mainstream Chamber of Commerce executives just in general with democrats versus uh republicans and you know i understand tds and understand donald trump has it got some policies that that don't fit into the normal business uh regimen that that you would think of but silicon valley doesn't matter who the democrat is i mean they didn't back romney really all along they always are on the side of of a party that some would view as less business friendly than than why is it like that?

21:01And that's why this is a sea change. And not only is it a Republican, but it's Trump. You know, I think the politics, Joe, are complicated in the Valley. If you go back, I mean, way back there, there was actually very Republican support in the origin of Silicon Valley. But there's no doubt in what I think of as the Google, Obama, Eric Schmidt, Clinton era. There were Sheryl Sandberg and so forth. You know, You had a lot of strong Dem leaders around the valley. And I think what's happening now is you see these folks like Andreessen, Teal, Musk, they're sort of libertarian in many ways. But they're ignoring social issues where they may not agree with President Trump.

Read the full transcript

21:46But, you know, they're deciding to really vote based on a targeted set of issues that they care a lot about. I mean, AI and crypto, if you're talking about Andreessen Horowitz, that's how they're going to make or lose their money, those two issues. So I think it's very complicated and it's hard to say if we're swinging red or blue. I mean, the Valley and these leaders are kind of somewhere in the middle on many different issues. I also think, though, perhaps what we're seeing is the sense that Trump is going to be in the White House again. And if that's the case, it would, I suppose, make sense for some of these leaders to try and get behind him.

22:22And so it's hard to decouple that. I was going to point out, it was right after the shooting that you saw some business leaders come out immediately for their support behind them. Maybe they were counting on the idea that, yeah, that would give him an even bigger bump and thinking, OK, it's inevitable now. I want to make sure I get my chips on the table and get some some credit for supporting him now. Absolutely. I mean, Musk's endorsements was minutes or, you know, right, right in the thick of the assassination. He was close already. He's still right. He's still mad about the EV meeting that were very bar.

23:00She sold like three cars and Elon wasn't there. I mean, that's a huge it's fascinating to me. I mean, Elon's business, his fortunes rise and fall on the future of Tesla. And, you know, Trump and Vance have been very clear that they think that EV subsidies shouldn't be in the cards. So we'll see how this plays out.

23:23Andrew Ross Sorkin:Yeah. What do you I mean, do you think that his his thought about needing or wanting subsidies at this point, given the success of that company relative to the others, it just it basically makes it almost impossible for everybody else if they don't have the subsidies. Is that how you see this? Do you think it's or you think it's a broader philosophical view? I think it's so I think he's being Musk is being practical in some ways. But the easy question is not resolved. I mean, competition. I mean, many people think it's a race to the bottom with commoditization for that business. So I don't think he can be feeling confident in that regard.

24:00But perhaps he's thinking he can change his mind. And, you know, that might be why he put his cards on the table.

24:07Andrew Ross Sorkin:And then the other big one this morning, Elon Musk saying he's leaving California. I think we might have known that sort of a little bit in the back of our heads, but officially and officially over this new law around gender identity in the state. Do you think this is going to lead to other companies moving officially to places like Texas? We've seen a trickle, and I think that will continue. you, I've got to say Elon has a knack for timing these moves that probably took five years to the five minutes when there's a headline in the news. You don't move a rocket factory's headquarters overnight.

24:45It's hard to say, Andrew. I think we're seeing some of that. There's movement outside of California for sure. But these days, there's actually a lot of activity, especially startup activity back in the city. And I know many a venture capitalist who has decamped to Austin and come back. So I think we'll see in terms of the macro. But Elon's made it clear that he won't be in California. I think we're all expecting that.

25:08Andrew Ross Sorkin:Okay, Jessica Leston, the information, it is awesome. You guys might have to move to Austin eventually, guys. I don't know. You know, we're everywhere. Thank you. Appreciate it very, very much. They're in the ether. Cheese will be next. Coming up, how the Federal Reserve is reading the rhetoric from our presidential candidates with former Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren. If there's very significant tariffs, particularly if they're matched around the world, that would make it more difficult to achieve a 2 % inflation target over the next year. What's talk and what's actually walk? How fiscal policy could impact the Fed's decision on interest rates, which will impact you, right after this break on Squawk Pod.

25:53Adventure Global. We think about what can be done. not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. Building a portfolio with Fidelity Basket Portfolios It's kind of like making a sandwich. It's as simple as picking your stocks and ETFs, sort of like your meats and other topics, and managing it as one big, juicy investment.

26:38Mmm, now that's pretty good. Learn more at fidelity.com slash baskets. Investing involves risk, including risk of loss. Fidelity Brokers Services, LLC. Member NYSC SIPC.

26:55You're listening to Squawk Pod from CNBC with Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Here's Becky. President Biden has told some Democratic lawmakers that he plans to endorse significant changes to the Supreme Court. The plans under consideration include term limits for justices and establishing a binding code of ethics. changing the structure of the Supreme Court would require Congress to make a new law, and that's very unlikely while the Republicans control the House, not to mention that at this stage they've basically said they're not going to take up any big new legislation until you get past the end of the year and into next year.

27:32Andrew Ross Sorkin:By the way, I think that both of the—I mean, an ethics code, super sensible. The fact that there isn't one, shocking. Term limits, I've always—we've all been wanting term limits forever for Congress, for Senate. I think you'd want it for this. I think you'd want it irrespective of who's on it. This is term limits, I think, based on age that he's looked into some of it, too. It's just a little rich. No, I know it's rich, but I would love to see, and I'm asking Joe, given the sort of... You don't want term limits. Nine guys and gals and lifetime appointments. No, I like it exactly. And did you like that five years ago?

28:14Andrew Ross Sorkin:I think you would have said that you wanted term limits before. In the Earl Warren court. Five years ago was fine. Maybe going back to Earl Warren, which you weren't even born. But don't you think it would be reasonable for us to have terminates for everything? We've talked about that seems like a sensible thing for everything. I like Chuck Grassley. Runs five miles a day.

28:37All right, let's get to Eric Rosengren, former Boston Fed president, now a visiting scholar with MIT's Golub Center. And Eric, we got some more numbers. Everything is headed, looks like, for at least a September cut. You say that the Fed should not cut. Why? No, I actually think that the Fed probably should and probably will cut this September. So I think things are well aligned. Inflation has come down. So you didn't say that he also said the Fed should not cut interest rates before the election. So you didn't say that. I'm sorry. I read it. I actually took out something else and didn't read it.

29:18But I left that in and did read it. So anyway, never mind. Yeah. But OK, then let me get to the next question. A quarter point. Does anything improve? Does that really do anything? I mean, it's a sign of a trend, obviously, and it's a sea change. But does it help people who want to buy a house? Does it help people who are getting a loan? Does it really do that much? So as you know, 25 basis points isn't much of a change by itself. Normally, the Fed doesn't move in 25 basis point increments and then do nothing after that. So I think the market is telegraphing that they expect a series of cuts over the next year and a half.

30:02So the first cut is indicative of conditions that now more easing is likely. I would say the market is implying a steeper rate path cut over the next, you know, through April than I personally would expect. The Fed's been pretty conservative in terms of wanting to be sure that they're well on their way to get to a 2 % inflation target. And inflation still a bit higher than their target. So using the Fed's preferred measure of core PCE, we're at 2.6%. So there's still a bit of a ways to go before we get to 2%. And there's a lot of uncertainty about what exactly the inflation outlook will be next year.

30:48There's a lot of geopolitical uncertainty. There's uncertainty about what fiscal actions will be. So I think the Fed's going to move pretty slowly. And I would expect at the press conference, the chair is going to highlight that they're still looking at the data at each meeting. And they're not going to really provide any forward guidance. There is a political backdrop. Net-net, should the 10-year yield be headed higher because of the prospect of tariffs or the prospect of cutting tax rates that might be in a second Trump administration without cutting spending commensurately? Is there a sign that inflation will have a good chance of coming back if Trump becomes 47, not just 45?

31:37So fiscal policy matters. So as you think about what the rate cuts may or may not be in 2025, it does depend on what kinds of fiscal actions you expect. So if there's very significant tariffs, particularly if they're matched around the world, that would make it more difficult to achieve a 2 % inflation target over the next year. That might cause the Fed to be more reluctant to move aggressively until it gets a better sense of what exactly the tariff situation is. If you end up deporting a lot of individuals that are working in construction and service jobs, that could cause wages and salaries to not continue to go down, consistent with a 2 % inflation target.

32:25So the Fed's going to want to see, to some extent, what actions, how much is rhetoric right now and how much are actions that are actually going to be taken. So I think a cautious approach, both because inflation's been coming down relatively gradually, but we've also had some false starts. And fiscal policy will matter. And if fiscal policy causes there to be an inflation shock, then the Fed needs to react with monetary policy to offset it.

32:54Andrew Ross Sorkin:Eric, curious to get your views about what former President Trump said about if he becomes the president as it relates to Jay Powell. Seemed to suggest that he would like to keep him in place until this term ends. But if you really were looking at some of the wording, there was an implication that if he didn't do what the president wanted, that maybe he would fire him early. There's obviously a big legal debate about the independence of the Fed and whether a president can do that. Yeah, I have no idea about the legal implications. I think it's unlikely that there'd be much benefit to doing that and there'd be no reason not to have him finish office terms.

33:34So my baseline forecast would be that that action wouldn't be all that supportive of what either president would probably want in order to achieve a soft landing for the economy. We've sort of heard anecdotally, Eric, that we've kidded about who would want that job. And I think we've heard that maybe the chairman's watching and he's like, exactly. Or his wife. You know, so, I mean, if someone said to me, you know, we don't want you anymore. Really? Really? If I were to, I mean, he's doing it for us when you think about it. Nobody, nobody needs this. How much does it pay? Ten million a year. What's it pay, Eric, to be featured?

34:15Andrew Ross Sorkin:I think it's 450. What is it, Eric? I don't know what the number is anymore. I think it was about 450, right? Maybe less. It's less than 450. You know who got 450? New York. If you're the chair in New York, you get more. Right? Isn't that right, Eric? I think the chair in New York gets more than the actual chair in D.C.? That is correct. And you're still not going out to dinner every night in New York. It's not. Brookings has a paper on what happens if Trump tries to fire the Fed chair, Jay Powell. There is some precedent that Congress or I'm sorry, that the Supreme Court has taken up a case. The only time this has happened was when FDR actually fired someone who was at the FTC, the Federal Trade Commission, over policy differences.

35:03That was back in 1933. Humphrey, the guy this happened to, sued for reinstatement. He died while the litigation was pending. but the Supreme Court still took up the case and the estate won. So they said you can't do that. The Supreme Court would have to decide whether the same logic applies to the chair of the Fed's Board of Governors. But that is the closest legal precedent there is for it.

35:25Andrew Ross Sorkin:Eric, thank you. Thank you. And that's the pod for today. Thank you for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin. My horoscope today, you need to accept that there are some battles in life that can never be won. And one such battle is right there in front of you. Yeah. Now. You can tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern. And get the best of our show when you follow Squawk Pod, this very podcast, wherever you like to listen to podcasts. And if you like what you hear, let us know. Rate or review Squawk Pod on Apple Podcasts. That helps other listeners discover us.

36:04We'll meet you back here tomorrow. We are clear. Thanks, guys.

From the publisher

Dario Amodei, co-founder and CEO of Anthropic, joins Joe Kernen, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin at the 2026 World Economic Forum. He discusses the state of the AI race, how the company is positioning itself against competition, and what’s ahead for artificial intelligence in 2026. Amodei says Anthropic is largely focused on enterprise customers, which make up about 80% of its business.

 

In this episode:

Dario Amodei, @darioamodei

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk

Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin

Cameron Costa, @CameronCostaNY


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
Davos 2026: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei 1/22/26Squawk Pod · 13 min
Listen in VO