Gary Cohn on the Shutdown & AI’s Impact on the Labor Market 10/29/25

29 Oct 2025 · 41 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Squawk Pod Episode Summary: Gary Cohn on the Shutdown & AI’s Impact on the Labor Market (10/29/25)

Episode Overview In this episode of Squawk Pod, hosted by Joe Kernen, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin, former National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn discusses the ongoing government shutdown, its economic implications, the state of corporate earnings, and the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the labor market. The episode also features insights from CNBC correspondents Robert Frank and Kristina Partsinevelos on the New York City mayoral race and AI-related job cuts in the tech industry.

---

Key Topics

  1. Government Shutdown and Economic Impact
  2. Length of Shutdown: The federal government has been shut down for nearly a month.
  3. Economic Effects:
  4. There’s a notable division in the economy, referred to as a "K-shaped economy," where the high-end consumers thrive while low-end consumers struggle.
  5. Government workers are facing hardships, and the shutdown is exacerbating economic inequalities.
  1. Corporate Earnings and Layoffs
  2. Strong Corporate Earnings: Despite strong earnings reports, there have been significant layoffs across corporations.
  3. Over 160,000 layoffs reported in recent weeks, notably from:
  4. UPS: ~50,000 layoffs due to decreased foreign imports and reduced freight.
  5. Nestle: ~16,000 layoffs due to high cocoa prices reducing chocolate sales.
  6. Cost-Cutting: Companies are reducing labor costs as a means to maintain profitability amid rising input prices.
  1. AI's Role in the Labor Market
  2. AI as a Factor: Cohn draws a distinction between AI being a real influence in layoffs versus being used as a scapegoat by companies.
  3. Companies may attribute job cuts to AI while also addressing over-hiring during the pandemic era.
  4. Evolution of Jobs: As AI tools advance, traditional job roles (like coding and HR) may evolve or diminish, leading to a change in workforce needs.
  5. Future of Work: Cohn emphasizes that while AI is currently used for cost-saving, its future potential lies in revenue generation through enhanced efficiencies.
  1. New York City Mayoral Race
  2. Early Voting: The New York City mayoral race is attracting attention with significant financial backing against candidate Zohran Mamdani.
  3. Donation Overview:
  4. Billionaires are contributing millions to candidates, indicating their interest in shaping the race.
  5. Notable donations from individuals like Bill Ackman and the Lauder family highlight the stakes involved.
  1. Discussion on AI Layoffs
  2. Tech Industry Adjustments: Major tech firms are cutting jobs while simultaneously investing billions in AI.
  3. Diverse Perspectives: CEOs in the tech sector argue that layoffs stem more from over-hiring during the pandemic rather than AI replacing jobs outright.
  4. Future Skills: There is a call for government assistance in retraining workers displaced by technology.

---

Key Takeaways

  • The current government shutdown has severe implications for the economy, particularly affecting low-income government workers.
  • Corporate layoffs are rising sharply, reflecting a shift toward cost-cutting amidst strong earnings, raising concerns about labor stability.
  • AI’s role in the labor market is complex; while it can optimize operations, it also raises questions about job security for many traditional roles.
  • Political dynamics in NYC are heavily influenced by significant financial contributions from wealthy individuals, reflecting broader societal issues connected to governance and economic policy.

---

Conclusion This episode of Squawk Pod sheds light on the intricate relationship between governmental actions, corporate strategies, and technological advancements. The discussions underscore the need for careful consideration of economic policies and the evolving nature of work in an era of rapid technological change.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Bring in show music, please. This is Squawk Pod and I'm CNBC producer Cameron Costa. On today's episode, a conversation with Gary Cohn, National Economic Council Director in President Trump's first administration, Cohn weighs in on the state of our economy. Overall corporate earnings, they continue to be very strong. But when you look at how corporates are getting there, it's also interesting. We've seen probably more layoffs in this round of corporate earnings than we've seen in a long period of time. Indeed, layoffs, layoffs, layoffs this tech earnings season. Christina Partsinevelis reports on AI's role in tech's labor market.

0:43Top CEOs were telling us something completely different about what's driving these cuts. And the mayoral election that's captured national attention, from billionaires even. Robert Frank reports on the money flowing for, and more commonly against, New York mayoral candidate Zoran Mamdani. New York is doing better right now than I've ever seen it, and that's what they're trying to protect. Those conversations plus$5 trillion with a T in NVIDIA's Sightline. It feels like so recently we were trying to figure out who would be the first company to go above$1 trillion. It's Wednesday, October 29th, and Squawk Pod begins right now.

1:25Stand Becky by in three, two, one, cue it please. Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We're live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick, along with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Andrew, welcome back. Thank you. It's nice to see you. I feel like I've been seeing you every day, but in different boxes. You were never really gone. Not long enough for you, but yes. If you want to wear that stupid jacket, you can wear it. Just do it here if you want to. If you want to, I'm... Is this your gift? That's my gift. That's my gift. I'm too old to worry about these trivial things.

2:03When you're sitting at the table, it feels natural. But you would like to wear it. You would like to wear it. I always like the... I like a blazer. I like a suit because it... It has been 14 years he's been yelling at you not to wear a jacket. 35 total. It's like armor. That's what it is. For me, it's like armor. For me, it's like... You think it's constricting. Constricting. And I turn into a different person. Unfortunately, people like that person more than... So maybe... I don't... I don't know. Seriously, if you... And you've got the pocket square. Well, you can do some more... You've got those beautiful suits.

2:34You've got those... You can do more fashion-oriented things, too. Peak lapels. And you can do different colored shirts. Peak lapels, different colored shirts. You know, there's a lot of options. You should take it and run with it. I may. Oh, my goodness. I don't know if I'm in a position... Because last time you wanted to do that, the guy running the place said you couldn't do it. Remember? He wanted to have the... Wasn't that under your goading? Yeah, I think that was under your goading. Wow. Is this me? You know how things actually work around here. Yeah. Let's take a look at how the U.S. equity...

2:59I like what you're... That's... Hey now. Hey now. Check this out. NVIDIA's market cap actually crossing the$5 trillion mark in early trading this morning. We're going to have more on that in just a moment. but the key number to watch on this is$205.76 a share. If it stays above that level, it will open above$5 trillion. And you're right, Joe, it was just, it feels like so recently we were trying to figure out who would be the first company to go above$1 trillion. Above a trillion. And it was Apple, I think. How many years ago was this? I don't know. They all merged together. Two, three years ago, is it feeling like?

3:36Well, you know, that where's the beef ad was 40 years ago. So I don't know anymore. I don't try to figure out when things. I remember having these conversations very recently with a lot of people. We did. And the law of large numbers. You said, oh, what, are we going to have a trillion-dollar company? Yeah, we are. We're going to have a$5 trillion. Someone's going to be worth a trillion dollars. That could never happen. Apple was above$4 trillion yesterday. It ended up not closing above that. But in the pre-market this morning, it's back above$4 trillion. So you've got three companies, two above$4 trillion, one above$5 trillion.

4:04And wow, here we are. And we could have a guy in his 50s that's worth a trillion dollars, theoretically. Yeah. It's getting close. Elon Musk. And once it happens to one, it happens to the rest. Yeah. Well, no, no, but it could happen again. I know, but it could happen again. Seven or ten companies. It doesn't usually happen in a vacuum. But yeah, it depends. Of course, the civil war will probably prevent more trillionaires from happening. Probably. We're hearing about that more and more. I think Dahlia is spouting that that that that prophecy. The civil war is coming. Just the class struggle because of not between the north and south or the rest.

4:40Oh, no. No, between the heads. Yeah, exactly. Like, let them eat cake, guillotine. Gotham type stuff. Mondani. Look, it's true, and at a point where you've got the government shut down, and that is really... No food stamps for you, but a trillion dollars. In the markets. I just saw a video of Mondani on from I don't know what year. It seems a horrible video. Where he literally says that he wants the government to seize the... Means of production. Means of production. like actually says it Marxism like actually says it communism yeah it's interesting because I talk to people in New York and even people who are supportive of him say oh Andrew he's not really a socialist he's a democratic socialist and then when you see him say it he says I'm a socialist you go oh okay it's actually Marxism if you go yesterday a couple years ago he said he's been watching the New York City police and their IDF yeah I saw that too I mean he's you know He's young.

5:38Maybe he's better now, a couple of years. It's coming. We might as well face it. Well, I don't know if you saw, by the way, Bill Ackman, you know, made this argument yesterday that he thinks the poly market and all of these prediction markets. China can be manipulated. He's basically trying. He's trying to he's trying to make the argument to people to go out and vote because he's saying, look, it's not a done deal because these these market things are not effective. It is when billionaires look like they are trying to change the election. Well, that's the other part that makes this super complicated.

6:11There's a flurry of news from NVIDIA over the last 24 hours. During a keynote presentation at the company's AI conference, CEO Jensen Wong said the company expects$500 billion in GPU sales through the end of 2026. Also said the company is now producing some of its Blackwell AI chips in Arizona. They were previously manufactured in Taiwan. and NVIDIA announced it's working with the U.S. Department of Energy to build seven new supercomputers. It's also working with Uber to build a fleet of self-driving cars. And it's partnering with Eli Lilly to build a supercomputer and AI factory to help accelerate drug development and drug discovery.

6:53Separately, it announced it's taking a$1 billion stake in networking company Nokia plans to use that money to fund its AI ventures and other general corporate purposes. OK, we need to add that. The two companies plan to work together to develop next generation 6G cellular technology, the stock sword of Nokia. It is pulling back a little bit this morning. NVIDIA is also partnering with Cisco and T-Mobile on 6G development, and it announced high-ups with Palantir and Oracle. And what I was going to say was, every time they announce they're going to spend money with someone in an investment, you can just, Andrew, you add the money, and Becky's already looking at me, because that's why I'm referencing you, because you're looking at suit jackets to wear on set now.

7:44No, but every time they spend money somewhere, you can just add that to their market cap, Which is the crazy part. Right. Just they're spending, okay, it's going to be billions or even trillions on this stuff, so just add it to our market cap. We're spending it. Why does their market cap go up when they're spending it? They're partnering with everybody and building themselves into the infrastructure of everything that matters. That deal with Nokia is a pretty big one because it's going to get them into the cell to the airwaves to go through some of these things. And once you put your equipment into these things, it's really hard to get it out.

8:15I mean, how long was that reader that I just said? because to summarize everything NVIDIA's doing, it takes that long. It's not the only reason the stock's that high. We're going to talk about it more with what we heard from President Trump, but the potential deal with China and the mention he made of Blackwell chips yesterday. Who knows if that actually happens? NVIDIA, Jensen Wang's been saying for a while that NVIDIA is looking at China as basically zeroed out that business. If it turns out that the China business is not only not zeroed out, but they can ship more than the H20 chips, but also potentially Blackwell chips, that's huge news for the markets.

8:45I don't know what Congress is going to think about that. what some of the China hawks are going to say about it, but it is part of what is pushing NVIDIA shares higher this morning. Well, the deal, the framework of the deal is start buying soybeans again and do something with fentanyl. And give us rare earths. And give us rare earths. But you do those three things and we take the tariffs off. But we take the tariffs off and, by the way, you can have chips. So it's not just the trade deals that are happening here. Oh, and give us TikTok. Yeah, national security. Okay, part of the deal, you acknowledge that it's, It's working here or is it taco?

9:20Let's see what the deal is. I've been trying to figure that out. By default. And I don't like saying taco, but it's a shorthand. By default, he moved the window. So you could say he's been. But is there a method to the madness? Is it brilliant? Look at the market. It depends if you believe in tariffs ultimately. So that's like a long-term question, right? There aren't any. They're just, they're de minimis. In the short term. The question is, has he moved the window? It was the threat of those targets that got all these deals done. and they never really happen. You think these deals never happened?

9:50No, the tariffs never really happened. The worst case scenario... The worst case scenario never happened. But there are... There are. This goes back to the$200 billion that's going to come in. So they are real. Right. And there's really hasn't been inflationary yet. Well, and that's... There are... Look, you saw, you know, meat, furniture. There are things, clothing. There are real things that are impacting people that are going to cost more. Toys, if you look at any of the impact, people are buying fewer toys. I know, but it hasn't, you know, it's been outliers. Not that we've tamed inflation, but even with inflation at 3%, it's hard to say that that is all from tariffs.

10:28There's a lot of it's coming from other places. Now that I've been on the road, I want to tell you, Starbucks just introduced a iced coffee drink with protein. This is where, yeah. Where you can get 29 grams of protein in your, and I've been drinking them everywhere I go, and they're great. I have no affiliate code. I'm not an influencer. I'm just telling you, it's, I would, I was part of it. And there were people in line just to get the protein coffee. And you're not gagging it down? No, it was really tasty. I did the sugar-free, the sugar-free version, because if you do the one with sugar, it's.

11:05So what is it? 200, 200 calories. 200. I thought it was pretty good. And we talked about this before, and I know it goes all the way back to the eating. Protein diets are high now. Seinfeld, remember the fat-free yogurt? Everybody kept eating it and they all got fat and then they had it tested and it was loaded with fat. It was not true. 29 grams, you... That's what they say, I think so. We need to test it. I haven't tested it, but what do you want me to tell you? We need Costanza to go to a lab. And find out. You think it tastes too good to really be 200 calories? I don't know, maybe there's...

11:36It's like the holy grail to find something. Look, everybody's trying to find protein. High-protein diets are all the rage right now. There are some questions about protein powder, so if that's the right way to get at it. This, I think, is through a sort of almost like a Fairlife kind of milk situation. Yeah. What is that? The milk across the board is... Fairlife is a milk company that's owned by Coca-Cola that has sort of super high levels of protein. Is it a lactating product of some animal? Yes. Yes, it's real milk. It's real milk. Somehow they strain it or do something that I don't understand.

12:09Because oat milk is not frickin' milk. No, no, it's not like that. Well, it's not milk. Right. It didn't come from a lactate. Call it something else. NVIDIA shares are... It doesn't sound as good if you call it sludge. It's a little less appetizing. Oat sludge. I was going to say this yesterday. Pea-based meat, P-E-A. Pea-based meat is not meat. Call it something else. It's made from peas, right? Yeah, it's beyond meat because it's not meat. And the stock got what it deserved, I think. But I'm not commenting on valuation. It can go back up. I don't care. Doesn't matter to me. Cheese will be next.

12:52Next on Squawk Pod, once the National Economic Council director under President Trump, Gary Cohn is watching today's economy closely. The cost of labor is not going down. and the price that they can charge the ultimate consumer is not going up. The only way to make your quarterly numbers work is to squeeze some cost out. And it feels like the cost that people are squeezing out right now is labor cost.

13:20This is Squawk Pod with Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross-Sorkin. Here's Joe. Join us now, IBM Vice Chair Gary Cohn. He served as director of the National Economic Council in President Trump's first term. Good to have you on. Great to be here with Joe. I don't know where to start on this, Gary. And Becky and Andrew, it's great to be with you. Great to see you. It's great to be with all of you. I was just complimenting Andrew on his book. I told him he needed to live more publicity. We didn't really know what was out there yet. Wait a minute. Thanks. Your book is out? Not yet. No, I'm joking.

13:54You were in the first Trump administration. And I guess it was widely talked about that if you agree with 70 percent of something, you don't want to sacrifice the perfect for the good. You had some issues, I think. And maybe in the second administration, you're not part of it, but you're not necessarily a tariff guy or some of the things. But are you a little bit surprised that as well as things are going, how divided everybody is? I'm shocked. I mean, the borders closed. The market's at new highs. We're getting these trade deals. GDP looks good. Unemployment's still low. Inflation is, you know, I don't know.

14:33Benefits are about to end. Government workers aren't getting paid. Soybean farmers are up in arms. That's not Trump. None of that. I can just let the two of you talk. This is perfect. None of that is Trump. It's the side, in fact, that's resisting Trump. The buck stops here. No, no. The buck stops here. Look, I understand that I hate what the Democrats are doing here, but ultimately the government's been closed for a month and somebody's got to figure this out and open it. somebody's got to step in and be a lawyer on this. That is a manifestation of what I'm saying about their whole resist mentality.

15:04That's why the government's shut down, because he's doing too well as we are. I think you look at this in many ways as things are going well. But we're in this, many people call it this, K-shaped economy, right? We've got one leg going up and one leg going down. When has that not been true, that there's the high-end consumer and the low-end consumer? It's always been true. Is it worse? I just think it's bigger and more divided today than it has been in a very long time. Between people that are doing well and have enormous amount of disposable income and are willing to spend money no matter what's going on in the economy.

15:41And then there's those, as Becky and you were just talking about, those that literally work for the government today who are probably standing in line potentially at food banks to be able to put food on their tables. The economy between the two of those is as wide as it has ever been. The government going back to work will help some of that. And there's a very interesting but strange phenomena. When you're a government that shuts down for four weeks and you don't pay your workers, the workers tend to cut back and they tend to make due over those four weeks. Then they get the four weeks of payback and then they go out and spend it.

16:15So in a funny but true way, it ends up being stimulant for the economy. So when those workers get their four weeks of back pay, they'll put it into the economy. And it will feel good during those periods of times. As you point out, if you look at overall corporate earnings, they continue to be very strong. But when you look at how corporates are getting there, it's also interesting. We've seen probably more layoffs in this round of corporate earnings than we've seen in a long period of time. Over the last week and a half, two weeks, you've seen well over$160 ,000. Why is that? Well, I think it's a combination.

16:48But the 160 ,000, if you put it in relationship to the conversation you were having with Steve Leisman yesterday morning, where you were talking about the private payroll data looks like about 15 ,000 jobs a week. Well, 160 ,000 is 15 ,000. That's at least 10 weeks. We've laid out 10 weeks of people in the last few weeks. Wow. You go down the list, UPS is top of the list at close to 50 ,000. That's purely a function of less foreign imports and less freight. So they're telling you this is less for this has to do a trade. You're looking at Nestle. Nestle is in here at 16 ,000. Price of chocolate is really high.

17:25Consumers are buying less chocolate. So, you know, the overall thought here, and we talked about this last time this year, input prices are going up for U.S. companies. The cost of labor is not going down and the price that they can charge the ultimate consumer is not going up. The only way to make your quarterly numbers work is to squeeze some cost out. And it feels like the cost that people are squeezing out right now is labor cost. And I said it to you guys about a month ago, and I think it's proving true in these numbers. We've seen 160, 170 ,000 layoffs in the quarter. Policy question for you.

18:00Either you're Jay Powell or you're President Trump. What do you do to fix that problem? this is like this is a tough problem but i do think they're working towards fixing it slowly and surely you know getting a deal done with china getting a deal done with japan getting a deal done with canada those are all very helpful you know once you you figure out where the final cost of goods is or the final input costs and these rare earths and a bunch of these commodity inputs, which is, you know, Japan, China, Canada, once you settle the price of those input costs down, I think manufacturers have a much better idea of what they can charge and what labor they can have.

18:45And right now, you know, we're pushing labor out of the equation. And look, there's a bit of an AI reality in there, and there's a huge AI excuse. You know how many times stocks have gone up when companies announced rationalization of operations or layoffs or whatever you want to call it. It used to happen all the time. You said, how do we fix this? Is this something that corporations have needed to do in pairing unproductive parts of their business? Can they actually, is this actually a net positive long term that this tariff cover is giving them reason to lay off people? It's a bad thing, but they're going to be leaner and meaner.

19:28It's the natural cycle. It's the natural cycle. Not for the people that are losing their jobs. Exactly right. If you're one of those people that's in the cycle, it doesn't feel very natural. It doesn't feel very fair. But if you think of the cycle we've had and sort of starts with the COVID cycle, the COVID cycle, we had the exact opposite. Every company was hoarding workers. You know, everyone who came in and said, look, I can't hire good people. I can't get good people. Anyone I get, I'm retaining, I'm attracting. We came out of COVID with workers at an all-time record high in companies. Companies were hoarding workers.

20:02And they weren't going to let them go at any cost because, heaven forbid, they should need that incremental person. They couldn't get them back. We've gone from hoarding workers at the end of COVID. And now, you know, three or four years later, we're to the point where we're going in the corporate world. We're going from hoarding workers to we're going to let's see how efficiently we can run. Let's have one less marginal worker than we need with the understanding that the environment is that I can hire back a marginal worker tomorrow if I really need them. It's not AI yet. There's a little bit of AI.

20:34Look, I'm not going to say AI is not part of this equation. It's a little bit of AI, but a lot of this is traditional workers. So, you know, 50 ,000 workers at United Parcel Service, that's not AI. That's volume going through UPS. In terms of the AI piece, so when do you think that there's a tipping point for that? I don't think there's a tipping point. I think there's an evolution. I think you're going to see companies continue to embrace AI, continually figure out how to create a company-wide enterprise solution that creates real synergistic cost savings outcomes. And as that happens, you will start to see companies.

21:09I don't know if they will necessarily get smaller, but they will definitely move people out of certain tasks that people hate to do. How fast is the evolution and how painful is it? Are we talking like watching the Wolfman when the moon comes out? We're in it now. We're in the beginnings of the evolution now. But is it painful? In the world of writing code, the skill and uniqueness of writing code is going to become an obsolete skill in our near-term future here. You know, the code assist programs are so good at writing code that instead of hiring thousands of the best engineers, you're going to hire hundreds of the best engineers and give them AI tools to help them build it.

21:48In the world of HR, the HR tools today and AI are so good that no one's ever building these huge AI departments and say, well, for every 10 or 12 or 15 employees we have to hire another HR person. You don't. The HR bot's going to be able to take care of 95 % of what that person needs. So there's going to be huge opportunity there. We're seeing that. We're seeing it. And those are what I would consider sort of operations, enterprises. They're making companies more efficient. We haven't gotten AI to sort of being the revenue producer. We've got it to be the cost center savings. I think AI, as we move down this field and we're heading really quickly into the quantum space, when we get into the quantum space, AI will go from the cost saver to the revenue creator.

22:37Because what? What happens then? The machine actually can think. The machine actually goes from doing something that you've taught it to do, because it's looked at the way you've done it, and the machine says, oh, I know what to do here, because I see the way you've done it 100 times. But that's AGI. Yeah. And then we go to quantum, and quantum says, no, it's not what you did in the past, it's what you did in the past, but you actually should have done this. We're going to add this on top. So maybe you did a net present value model, You did some of the pieces. Oh, you didn't do it in the machine.

23:10And today, AI would do those two because you would tell it that's the money you want. If you had quantum in there, they might go, oh, wait, I'm not sure those are the best answers. Let's do a discounted free cash flow without you telling it because it would know it's one of the tools. Then we hit the singularity. And then we live forever. And I'm going to keep going to church in the meantime. You do that. I think that's a good place for you, Joe. I think it's important. Do you have an idea? What would you tell people to do about this? How do you think it ends, this shutdown? Some kind of backroom?

23:44That's what Schumer wants, a backroom deal. Look, these shutdowns usually end. I think we're going to talk about this in a minute. Usually end when government workers force it to end. You saw the biggest federal union told the Democrats to vote for the CO. I got it. But you know what? That union's still showing up to work. If the air traffic controllers and TSA decides not to show up to work one weekend, the pressure on Republicans and Democrats will be very high to get this. Ted Cruz has a bill to pay the air traffic controllers, keep Americans flying, pay TSA. Is it a good thing to pass that bill or a bad thing because it means that there is not a pressure point to reopen the entire government?

Read the full transcript

24:27It's both. It's both. I think we all want to fly. We know that our economy demands us to fly. We're a country in transit all the time. So no one's going to stop flying. Knowing that reality, we need the TSA, we need the security at the airport to be secure. And even more importantly, we need the skies to be secure. It's the most visible and painful point for most Americans dealing with this. But it's terrible to have the government shut down. That has been one of the forcing functions in the past to put the government back together. When the air traffic controllers did not show up, it forced Congress to settle, to reopen the government.

25:05To do their job. Right. So look, I see both sides of it. You know, in many respects, we need to keep travel safe. We need to keep the skies open. We need to keep the economy going. But on the other hand, air traffic controllers and TSA probably have as much leverage as anyone at the table enforcing both sides together. So if we get a deal to keep TSA and air traffic controllers open, to me, that's signaling a much longer government shutdown. Yeah.

25:34You live in New York? I do live in New York. Excited? I'm very excited. Yeah? Yeah. You know that you could probably get the top floor of a place in Coconut Grove for what you paid. Would I have to be your neighbor, though? No, I'm not down there. Oh, you're not in Coconut Grove? No, no, no, no, no, no. You'd have to pay more to be my neighbor. You've got to come to Sea Island. What do you actually think of the implication of this mayoral race? That was my question. Yeah, I know. I know what your question was. You know what? You're like all the Democrats trying to not talk about it. Hakeem Jeffries, who we had on 100 times, even the day he was on, he did it later that day, wouldn't tell us that he was going to do it.

26:15No, I think you have to talk about it. And Shutdown Schumer's not talking about it. You have to talk about it. So let's... I say that just to get the Twitter stuff. Let's peel this back one bit. So, A, there's certain things you say to run and get elected. You know, there's campaign rhetoric. So we all know there's campaign rhetoric. There's every politician that's ever got elected in this country said X to get elected. The vast majority of them don't do X once they get elected, A, because they can't, or B, it's illegal, or C, they can't get support. It's just the way it is. There's no sort of guardrails on what you can say to get elected.

26:58That said, you have to hope that he would govern with guardrails, and there are some guardrails, but that means we're dependent on the city council, the state legislator, and the governor to be guardrails. And I think a lot of us are hopeful that those are strong guardrails, but we're not positive that those are strong guardrails. The distinction actually is usually politicians say things that then they can't do. I think this is actually the opposite, meaning he has said things in what he would try to describe as his prior life that now he is disavowing. And I'm not sure which version is the real version and therefore what he actually will be doing.

27:44I think when you talk to most people in New York City, even those who are supporting him, and you say, you know, do you believe he's a socialist? They say, no, no, no, he's actually a democratic socialist. He's not into these things you don't understand. And we've seen that movie before with Kamala. And that's, to me, the more sort of complicated part about this. He should have gotten a tattoo, like that other guy where you can't get rid of that thing. He should have gotten a tattoo. The guy in Virginia? Yeah, like the guy in Maine. Oh, the Virginia guy is another guy that Democrats are not yelling about.

28:13The one thing we have a bit of data on, and New Jersey has data on it, New York has data on it, it doesn't take a lot of movement of certain families outside of these tax jurisdictions to change the algebraic equation really quickly. And it's one thing I try and have with some of the younger kids. But here's the thing. I'm not sure, and maybe you disagree, the people that I know that are against Mamdami, sort of the billionaire set. Do you know anyone who isn't against them? Hold on. It's not. No, no, I know people who are for them and people who are against them. But I would say those people do not seem to be, and maybe you'll think I'm a Pollyanna about this, upset per se about somehow being taxed, that that's not for them the actual issue.

28:58For them, the actual issue is policing and safety in the city, is the prospect of anti-Semitism, is all of these other issues. Check, check, check, check. More than one thing can be true, Andrew. They can be upset about anti-Semitism. They can be upset about policing. and they're going to be upset about taxing. The one thing you realize when you do any work on tax, and I spent a year plus of my life doing nothing but tax, is when you talk about taxes to people, most of them are okay with it because they don't think it's them. It's always the other person. What they haven't figured out, and look, I talk to my family members about this, and I explain to them that it's them.

29:40You know, unfortunately, if you force out all the people earning, you know, decent to high end money and they're paying 15.8 percent marginal brackets for city and state. And you're earning one hundred thousand dollars to get the same amount of revenue, same amount of revenue in the city to give the same services. Your tax has to probably be 100 percent. I'm not sure they can collect the same amount of money. And it's an algebraic equation, which I don't understand why these kids don't understand it. David Tepper leaving New Jersey. It took a perfect storm to get here with this guy. This should never have happened.

30:16It's the weird way elections work in this city, but this should have never happened. But the crazy thing is, is that he's been endorsed by a lot of mainstream Democrats. That's the crazy thing. Including Governor Hochul. No, I wouldn't say that. You don't think it's weird we have a communist that's going to be mayor of New York? You don't think that's bad? I think it's an indictment of the Democratic Party that they're not stronger candidates. That's true. How did we get here? In this day and age, how did we get here with this guy? How did we get here? Because Eric Adams is a super flawed candidate.

30:49Cuomo was a super flawed candidate. And Mondami is a super flawed candidate, too, but in different ways. And that's how we got here. We're going to write in Gary Cullen. And we need to figure out a way to actually get better people to want to actually run. They're counting me down. I don't know what's going to happen. Thank you, Gary. Thanks, Gary. Thanks, guys. Still to come, more on two of today's biggest stories. First, the New York City mayoral race. CNBC's Robert Frank has the stats on billionaires and the millions they're pouring into defeating Zoran Mamdani. He has actually prided himself on the number of billionaires who are giving to Cuomo.

31:27And yesterday he was talking about, look, they've given more than I'm going to tax them. Then, the layoff story. with Christina Partzinevelis. Tech companies just are cutting tens of thousands of jobs, and some of them, some of them are blaming AI. More SquawkPod right after this.

31:47Welcome back to SquawkPod. You are watching SquawkBox right here on CNBC. I'm Becky Quick, along with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Early voting underway right here in New York City for the mayor and some billionaires and companies are spending millions of dollars right now to try to defeat Zoran Mondani. Robert Frank at the table this morning to talk more about that and where we really are in this race. Yeah, it's really interesting and certainly a lot of money pouring into this race because you've got pro-Cuomo and anti-Mamdani PACs raising over$40 million so far. Several billionaires and prominent New York families, some of them well-known to this show, are among the biggest donors.

32:26According to campaign filings, Joe Gebbia, he's the co-founder of Airbnb and the chief design officer for the White House, he has given the most since Mamdani's primary win back in June. Gebbia gave a million dollars to a pack called Fix the City and a million dollars to one called Defend NYC. Head fund billionaire Bill Ackman, who we've been talking about a lot this morning, gave over$1.2 million to both groups just since October. The Lauder family airs to the Estee Lauder companies. They have given over$2 million since August. John Hess, the former CEO of Hess Corp, gave$500 ,000 in August, as did Steve Wynn, the casino mogul.

33:05At least five members of the Tisch family gave six figures, along with hedge funders Dan Loeb and Ricky Sandler. Barry Diller just gave$250 ,000. That's on top of the$250 ,000 he gave back in April. And this was interesting. The world's richest woman, Alice Walton, gave$100 ,000 back in August. even though she listed Bentonville, Arkansas as her current address. A PAC supporting mom, Donnie, though, has raised about$2 million, including a gift from the daughter of late hedge fund billionaire Jim Simons. Now, for the full list of the big donors in the New York race and what it could mean for the nation's largest real estate market, the tax base, everything else we've been talking about, you can sign up for the Inside Wealth newsletter out tomorrow morning at cnbc.com slash insidewealth.

33:52Can I take Becky's question from earlier in the hour? Do you believe that the more the quote unquote billionaire class comes out and either donates money or speaks out publicly against Wambami, that that is only like an endorsement for him among the people? That's certainly the way he's used it on the campaign trail. He has actually prided himself on the number of billionaires who are giving to Cuomo. And yesterday he was talking about, look, they've given more than I'm going to tax them, which, of course, is not true because this is$40 million. We're talking about$4 billion if he raises taxes on those making a million or more by 2 percent.

34:31But he certainly used it as a foil. Now, none of these people would speak on the record, but off the record, they all say, look, no, This is not self-interest that we're fighting for. We're fighting for New York, someone with experience, someone that's going to keep the city safe and keep this economic boom that we're seeing in New York right now. We're real estate back to the office. I mean, New York is doing better right now than I've ever seen. And that's what they're trying to protect. What is the story there? So this Jim Simons daughter. Yeah. Late hedge fund billionaire giving how much to mom, Donnie?

35:10Is this a who is she? Abigail Disney. This is another Neppo baby that's never had to have a job. People, they just use that. He was criticizing billionaires. And the other side was saying, well, you're taking money from a daughter. No, I know. OK, well, just explain it to me. How does someone benefiting from capitalism and whatever you think Jim Simons did, how is that person giving money to someone who wants... Not all children agree with their parents on everything. It's like a reactionary of things. Exactly. Does she have a lot of... Abigail Disney. Hundreds of millions of dollars. Yeah. Yet, oh no.

35:46Yet, you've got the Lauder family who are also heirs and the Tisch family who are also heirs. And the Walton family. And the Walton family who are also heirs on the other side. On the normal side. Just because you're on the normal side and benefiting from the system we have in this country that enrich their people, the people that actually did something. Where do you land on this whole poly market tweet from Bill Ackman, where he effectively says out loud, maybe the quiet part that some people believe that these prediction markets can be manipulated. Now we think that. Yeah, exactly. It was only a million dollars.

36:21Joe knows. I mean, the poly market's right until it's wrong. 1.5 million. And then the other thing about if you do look at the polls, his lead is, Mondani's lead is narrowing quite a bit. I mean, the latest lead is like 10 points. It had been 20 points recently. I think this could be a close election. We'll see. You do? Oh, you do? It could be. I have no idea. But I'm just saying if you look at the polls. It is a good point because whenever I see something like that and I go, well, or my son, well, poly market's at 99%. Right. So if someone is fixing that, then that it's self-fulfilling. Yeah.

36:57Yeah. Are we finally rethinking all of this gambling that's taking place between this, the NBA, what we've heard? One would hope. Gee, what do you think happens? No, we're not. I mean, I do think between all the money coming into this race, the attention, there will be a lot of voting participation in this. No road first. That is true. Robert Frank with the lowdown on what's going on among the billionaires in New York. I did. Meantime, here is the question of the morning. Are AI layoffs real or are they a scapegoat for what's going on in the employment picture in this country? Christina Partinellos joins us now with that story.

37:32Good morning. Good morning, Andrew. Amazon, Chegg, Microsoft, Meta, Salesforce, the list continues. Tech companies just are cutting tens of thousands of jobs and some of them, some of them are blaming AI. But at NVIDIA's GTC and DC yesterday, top CEOs were telling us something completely different about what's driving these cuts. For example, Perplexity's CEO says the AI narrative is missing the point. Over-hiring they did in the COVID era when they didn't actually need to. The results of that are being seen now. So correlation doesn't imply causation. It's not because of AI that people are losing jobs.

38:07And CoreWeave's CEO, Michael Intractor, frames it as part of a bigger pattern that just happens in tech history. During each technical revolution, there is a rotation that occurs. And I think one of the roles for government is going to be to assist the rotation that's required to retrain, to repurpose, to allow people to build careers. And CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz told me AI elevates workers into controllers while AI will handle all of the grunt work. So essentially working alongside AI, that's what humans will do. The reality, though, is just more complicated. Amazon, we know, cut 14 ,000 jobs citing AI.

38:52Microsoft eliminated over 15 ,000 this year while investing about 80 billion in AI. Meta slash 600 from its AI unit. Salesforce cut 4 ,000. You get the point. All while posting almost record profits. The CEOs at GTC aren't just buying the AI replacement story their own industry is pushing. They say companies are using AI as cover to finally correct years of bloated headcount and hiring mistakes. Guys. OK, so, well, here's the thing I think about. NVIDIA to$5 trillion, that's a question about where we're all going. But the other piece of it on the employment side is for all of these companies and NVIDIA and the like to get to these valuations, they have to create remarkable amounts of productivity.

39:38So if they're as successful as we all want them to be, it also means that maybe there's going to be folks who don't have jobs to ultimately pay for all of this. Yeah, well, to your point, they're going to have a round trip idea. Yeah, well, cut jobs, you mean, in order to lower costs so that they remain more productive and keep the margins? Is that what you're implying? Yeah. So, of course. But then for NVIDIA's case, they have the money, right? They're spending like crazy. They're investing in Intel. They're announcing$1 billion in Nokia. So, I guess if you're an employee at NVIDIA, which there's no job cuts, but actually a poor example, you'd be wondering why I'd be getting laid off.

40:17The same for a lot of these other tech companies when Microsoft is spending X amount of dollars on dealing with OAI or other firms like Nebbiast, for example, to build out data centers. Why are they cutting jobs? Christina Partinevles, thank you. That's the podcast for today. Thank you for tuning in while we're still here and not replaced by AI yet. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross-Sorkin, all human. Weekday mornings on CNBC starting at 6 Eastern. You can always get the best bits of that TV show right into your ears if you follow Squawk Pod wherever you're listening now.

40:56We'll meet you right back here tomorrow. Have a great day. We are clear. Thanks, guys.

41:09Thank you.

From the publisher

The federal government has been shut down for nearly a month, and the economic effects are mounting. IBM vice chairman and former NEC director Gary Cohn discusses the health of the economy, corporate earnings, and how the AI boom is reshaping the labor market. Then, early voting is underway in the New York City mayoral race. CNBC’s Robert Frank reports on the billionaires and businesses that are spending millions to defeat Zohran Mamdani. Plus, CNBC’s Kristina Partsinevelos has the latest on AI-related layoffs hitting big tech, and Nvidia has become the first company to hit a $5 trillion valuation. 

 

Gary Cohn - 15:56

Robert Frank - 35:26

Kristina Partsinevelos - 40:51

 

In this episode:

Gary Cohn, @Gary_D_Cohn

Robert Frank, @robtfrank

Kristina Partsinevelos, @KristinaParts

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin

Cameron Costa, @CameronCostaNY


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
Gary Cohn on the Shutdown & AI’s Impact on the Labor Market 10/29/25Squawk Pod · 41 min
Listen in VO