Kevin Hassett on Tariffs & Ken Burns on The American Revolution 11/17/25

17 Nov 2025 · 44 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Squawk Pod Episode Summary: Kevin Hassett on Tariffs & Ken Burns on The American Revolution (11/17/25)

Episode Overview In this episode of Squawk Pod, hosts Joe Kernen, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin explore significant economic and cultural topics, including the rollback of tariffs by President Trump, insights from National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, and the latest series from filmmaker Ken Burns on The American Revolution.

---

Key Discussions

  1. Tariff Rollbacks and Economic Affordability
  2. Context: President Trump announced a reduction in tariffs on over 200 food products amid rising grocery prices, aiming to address public frustration about inflation.
  3. Guest: Kevin Hassett, National Economic Council Director
  4. Key Points:
  5. Hassett refuted claims that the administration's policies are solely to blame for inflation.
  6. He highlighted that the rollback is part of a broader strategy to improve affordability and that supply increases would help lower prices.
  7. The administration is also exploring other strategies such as negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to ease costs.
  1. The State of the Stock Market
  2. Guest: Lori Calvasina, RBC Capital Markets
  3. Market Analysis:
  4. Concerns over market sentiment and high valuations, particularly in AI stocks.
  5. A mix of cautious optimism exists regarding stock performance, suggesting potential for a 10% market increase over the next year despite current volatility.
  6. Calvasina discussed margin debt's rise and historical comparisons, indicating its relevance to market health.
  1. Ken Burns on The American Revolution
  2. Guest: Ken Burns, Filmmaker
  3. Project Insight:
  4. Burns detailed his decade-long work on a new PBS series exploring the American Revolution, emphasizing its historical significance and complexities.
  5. He discussed utilizing reenactments, along with rich narrative storytelling featuring notable actors, to bring history to life.
  6. Burns expressed hope that the series will foster a deeper understanding of the founding principles of the U.S. and promote national unity.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Economic Affordability: The administration's tariff rollbacks are a tactical response to inflation concerns, with a focus on enhancing public sentiment regarding the economy.
  • Market Health: There are mixed signals in the stock market, characterized by high valuations and investor caution, particularly related to AI-driven stocks.
  • Cultural Reflection: Ken Burns' documentary aims to contextualize the American Revolution in today's political landscape, providing a narrative that encourages viewers to appreciate the complexity of historical events.

---

Conclusion This episode of Squawk Pod combines economic discourse with cultural reflection, demonstrating how historical events continue to shape contemporary issues. The insights from Hassett and Burns encapsulate the ongoing dialogue about affordability, market dynamics, and the importance of understanding our nation's history.

---

Listen to Squawk Pod For more insights, tune in to Squawk Pod and follow the show for daily updates on economic news and engaging discussions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Bring in show music please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod. Affordability in America and the president's response to prices. He's cut tariffs on certain food items. A top economic advisor to the White House, Kevin Hassett. It's just kind of astonishing to me that the cost problem is somehow being blamed on us. Is it enough to tame inflation fears? What the president just did with food is decide to make like a blanket movement so that we weren't going through each deal and picking this and that. And filmmaker Ken Burns. We wanted to do a deep dive into what I think is the most important event since the birth of Christ.

0:43On his epic look at the American Revolution, nearly 250 years after the history-changing events that he says are as timely as ever. I'd like to put the us back in the U.S. Plus, is the bull market of the last few years taking on too much debt? This is where Joe Kernan, you may be right, stick with me for a second. I'm with you. After years of soaring equity prices, a noted bond investor says, hold on to your cash. Is this a turning point? RBC Capital Markets' Lori Calvacina joins us. I feel like we just have a plain old-fashioned valuation problem. And puts things into perspective. You've got the AI stocks carrying the weight of the market, but there is still a tremendous amount of jitters around those AI stocks.

1:25So we do have some bad days thrown in with the good days. It's Monday, November 17th, 2025. Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand Andrew by in three, two, one, cue Andrew. Good morning and welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We're live at the Nasdaq Market site in Times Square. I'm Andrew Ross Sorkin along with Joe Kernan. Becky is off today, but we got a lot going on on this Monday morning. Let's talk about crypto because Bitcoin fell about 8 % between last Monday and then Friday, dipped under$95 ,000 over the weekend, had some people on edge. I don't know if people will feel better this morning, but we're sitting just at about$95 ,570.

2:07What does that say to you, Joseph Kernan, on a Monday morning? We got the 92 at one point. It was 125, so it is volatile. I don't know if anyone really thought it would hold 100. I think Novogratz said it would, but he didn't really have a lot of conviction that it was going to hold 100. We're going to talk about it today, but it certainly is volatile. It was, you know, I don't know what it's correlated with, because the NASDAQ actually was up on Friday. I don't know whether that changes. The Dow was down over 300 points. So that kind of flipped. This is supposed to be like a gold thing? Is it supposed to be your digital gold?

2:45It sort of hasn't been correlated to anything except maybe AI stocks. You know, although. So Friday, the NASDAQ did better. But the NASDAQ's been, you know, the AI stocks have been obviously feeling the nosebleed. They're in nosebleed territory. A lot of people think they're expensive. We'll get a look on Wednesday. I mean, we've been talking about this for two weeks. It feels like the whole game is riding on this. For two weeks, we've been talking about NVIDIA. It's important. Big week ahead for the markets and the economy on the Squawk Planner. The bellwether, NVIDIA, is going to report third quarter results after the bell on Wednesday.

3:29It's also a key week, though, for retail. We're going to get results from Home Depot, Lowe's, Target, Walmart, and more. Meanwhile, the Bureau of Labor Statistics is going to release the shutdown-delayed September jobs report on a Thursday. So it's going to be a jobs Thursday. And Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman will visit the White House tomorrow for talks with President Trump. Saudi Arabia has pledged hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. investments in May when the president visited the Middle East. Meantime, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway taking a stake in Google parent Alphabet.

4:04This one was surprising. We learned about it over the weekend. The Colomerate's end of Q3 equity snapshot revealing a nearly 18 million share position in the company worth roughly$5 billion. Unclear if Buffett, of course, made this call himself to buy Alphabet. Could be some of his other teammates now. The equity snapshot reflecting Berkshire's position from the end of September. So again, things may have changed even since then. But at Berkshire's 2019 annual meeting, Buffett and Charlie Munger said they had, quote, screwed up by not buying Alphabet earlier, even though they saw how well Google Advertising was working for Berkshire's own operations.

4:42Of course, they did double down on Apple at the time, and that was a worthy bet. Late on Apple for them in a big way. They were late on Apple, but, you know, in this case, being late on Apple for him was not so bad. Did he lighten up on him? I don't think it's him, by the way. I'm not sure he gets involved in much anymore. I think he's sort of passed the baton at this point. He's kind of implied that. Yep. What do you do with Disney and Apple? Lightening up on both of them. Not him. What did Berkshire do? I think that they did. Yeah. On both of those cases. But let me just give you a little. You got your 13F right there.

5:27Just trying to find it. You know what? Hold on. We'll come back to that in one sec. Trump administration taking steps to reduce food costs in the U.S. Yeah, pared back on Apple, but I don't see the Disney that you're talking about. I don't know. Maybe not. To be sure. I don't remember him being in Disney. He owns actually a piece of News Corp, interestingly, by the way. Amex, Bank of America, Coca-Cola. When was the last time he was in Disney? If he's not, then he obviously, it's not wrong that he pared back, never was in it. I guess if you say so, I thought I saw a headline that said. All right.

6:10President Trump cutting tariffs on more than 200 food products, including coffee, beef, bananas and tomatoes. A White House fact sheet says given progress on trade deals, the president decided certain foods could be exempt from tariffs because they're not grown or processed in the U.S. Here's how a National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett. The prices for those goods weren't necessarily going up just because of tariffs. And so the prices will go down. Well, the prices will go down, of course. But because the tariffs have been taken off. Right. Well, because the supply of the goods into the U.S.

6:43is going to increase. Wall Street Journal reports President Trump's aides are working on a plan on plans to deal with voters frustrations over the cost of living in America, including potentially striking more deals with pharmaceutical companies, green lighting, more offshore drilling. We're going to speak with Kevin Hassett. Bond investor Jeffrey Gundlach recommending a 20 percent cash position to hedge against a severe market downturn, which he sees brewing in an overhyped promise of AI driven transformation. Gundlach making those comments on Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast. And he criticized what he called garbage lending and flagged concerns in close to$2 trillion of what we've all been talking about, the private credit market.

7:27Gunlock saying he thinks the U.S. equity market currently among the least healthy he's seen in his career. And so we're going to talk a little bit more about that this morning as you look at those equity markets. I never pay attention to him on equities. And it's been that it has served me well. Served you well? Yeah. With bonds, he seems to know, but there's been multiple times, and it's always negative, usually, on the stock market. One of these days, he could be right, I guess. We're getting closer to right than, right, like four years ago if he said that. He has said over the past, and every time he said it, it's like when Bill Gross used to talk about stocks.

8:03It's like, Bill, they never write about stocks. They're great bond investors, but that doesn't always translate. He's warned so many times about valuations. We have somebody here at the table. We do. And she is an equity expert who might have a view on all this. She's not in a great mood. Lori Calvacino, RBC Capital. She's in a great mood. This came out of hair and makeup. What about the stock market? You're worried about margin debt, I think, a little bit. Are you not? I feel like we just have a plain old-fashioned valuation problem. Like, you know, I know there have been some extremely cautious voices out there.

8:36There are some extremely exuberant voices out there. I'm somewhere in the middle. I think we can still have a good year next year. I still see more upside into next year. But, you know, we have valuations bumping up against the ceiling, and that's making people very, very nervous. And that doesn't mean we have to go back to a GFC, you know, type downturn. That doesn't mean this has to be the tech bubble. Sometimes stocks do get a little bit over our skis, and, you know, we have to consolidate a bit, have a little bit of indigestion. But you don't have to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Well, what did you calculate this past earnings season, what earnings gains were much better than people thought?

9:13Where did it come in at you? 12 percent, 13, 14? I forget the exact percentage, but if you look at earnings beats and sales beats versus consensus. Not just beats, but above the last year. Yeah, and they ticked up. We had even better beat rates than what we had had the prior reporting season. What you did see was that operating margin expectations came down just a bit. And that was really offsetting strength that we saw in tech. Tech margin expectations went up, but things like industrials, materials, energy went down. Right. It was really the AI versus kind of cyclical economy type dichotomy that you saw in that data.

9:48Investor sentiment got less bullish, which is not, that is not bearish, is it? So it's bullish. I think we're at a range now where you should be up about 10 percent or so over the next 12 months. If you look at the four week average on the AAII net bulls. What's really interesting about that data set though is it's just been chopping around over the last few months. And it basically went back up recently to the highs that it had seen earlier this summer, earlier this fall, and then pulled back in a little bit. And if you look at things like NFIB, you look at the consumer sentiment surveys, there seems to have been a little bit of a stall in sentiment across the board.

10:22Some of those indicators are stronger than others, but we've been in a very sentiment driven market. So you're sort of seeing this stall in the sentiment indicators and you're seeing the market kind of chop around and trade sideways in here, which, you know, it makes a lot of sense after a big run. Yeah. The breath had been improving most recently in your comments, just saying it's, you mentioned bad breath. Yeah. Yeah. We looked at a stat where we're just looking at the percent of stocks that are above their 50-day moving average or their 100-day moving average. We started to see that come in a little bit.

10:55And even in the post-COVID era, I usually get a little bit of a pullback in that broader S &P 500 when that happens. It hasn't happened this time. And what I think we're seeing, it's really, really odd because you've got the AI stocks carrying the weight of the market, but there is still a tremendous amount of jitters around those AI stocks. So we do have some bad days thrown in with the good days. But if you look at momentum, you know, we've had just a very strong run in that factor. You're starting to see high quality act a little bit better, low vol act a little bit better. Health care is having a big move as people are getting a little bit jittery on this market.

11:29So you're starting to see some of these kind of more defensive factors and sectors act a little bit better in here. We've had people talk about the S &P 500 trading at whatever, 23, even though it's not as bad as it was because earnings did so well. But the S &P 493 trading at much lower multiples. So you talk about hitting a valuation ceiling. Yeah. That that's still concentrated in certain names. You know, what's really fascinating. So we we look a little bit beyond the mag seven. So we have this one data series where we look at the top 10 market cap names in the S &P and we rebalance it every week and we go back a few decades.

12:07And then we look at the rest of the S &P, the 490. I think the 490 is trading a little above 18 times right now. And that's expensive. It's not expensive. But if you look at it in the context of history in 2021, we got a lot higher than that. You know, when we kind of had all this stimulus money, you know, people goosing, you know, on the retail side, big, big surge up post-COVID. Putting that peak aside, this is about as good as that particular indicator gets. And then if you look at the top 10 names in the S &P 500, we're trading around 28 times. Now, that's nowhere near the tech bubble highs, but it's pretty close to the, you know, kind of post-tech bubble highs.

12:44And I think recently I've seen that go as high as 30, but it really hasn't been able to break above that level since the fall. So both of these areas, right, even the rest of the market, which doesn't look that bad on the on the multiple itself, in terms of its own history, this is about as good as both of those tend to get. I mean, I remember that we had, I think it was Jared Bernstein came on. He had written a piece about valuations, and we kind of challenged him because the valuation he used for NVIDIA was based on a trailing 12-month price-to-earnings multiple. When you look at a future, it was half of what it was because it's growing so quickly.

13:27This just highlights how important that Wednesday number is. But NVIDIA future on forward PE, it's not like 1999. It's nothing like 1999. That's what our data shows. But some of the stuff that they're forecasting, obviously, is circular, and they've got all these weird relationships. Where do you live in the private? What do you make of what's happening in private credit? Back to the gun lack point, which is I think there's a real anxiety among some, especially focus on that space that we actually just don't know how interconnected some of these loans are, how collateralized they are, all of the things that you, in a normal world, you would want to know.

14:11And probably, by the way, back even in 2008, you'd have a better idea of knowing given that so much of the loan volume came out of banks back then. Right. No. And look, I used to be a small cap strategist, right? And one of the things we talk a lot about in the small cap world is a lot of stuff that might normally be bought by small cap value investors and still sitting in the public markets has now been kind of sucked into the private equity world. So I would say, you know, two things. One, I do think the lack of transparency makes people nervous. You know, back when we had sort of at the beginning of reporting season, we had a couple of these issues come up and Diamond made his cockroach comment.

14:46This was a big kind of point of conversation. And I think going back to the valuation comment and just how far we've run, people get more worried about this kind of stuff when you have these sorts of valuation levels. They're a little bit easier to not worry about quite as much when you haven't had a big run like this. Someone compared it to me recently to kind of the commercial real estate issue, which we were all up in arms about a couple years ago. There was a lot of focus on that issue. There's a lot of focus on this issue now, but I do think you kind of run into the transparency. Okay, but does that worry you?

15:18So that is interesting, by the way. That's a great comparison insofar as we talked about it incessantly. We wrung our hands. This is where Joe Kernan, you may be right, if you want to stick with me for a second. I'm with you. Because everybody went crazy. And guess what? Turned out to be kind of okay. Yeah, and I remember I was doing a presentation at one point where this, you know, to a group of financials folks, to be honest. Right. And, you know, this issue of commercial real estate came up a few years ago, and they were asking me what I thought. And I said, well, I care more about what you think.

15:47And I said, you know, I'm listening to everything all of you are saying and the fact that there are so many eyes on this. I've lived through the GFC. I've lived through the tech bubble. The fact that you're all so vigilant gives me a little bit of comfort. And I think that's something we have to keep in mind. Right. When you go back to these past crises, we never exactly repeat the same mistakes. Right. There's so much nervousness from people who live through those things. Frankly, you know, when we see, you know, sort of these discussions of risk emerging. And I think that's really what this is all about, is there just kind of too much risk in the system.

16:19This tends to happen. And I think older folks are a little bit more nervous about the younger folks who haven't lived through the GFC or lived through the tech bubble. I think there are enough of us with gray hair around to take some lessons from those. I don't see any gray hair. It's all covered up very expensively. You're doing great. You're doing great. Lori, thank you. You know, AI, as imperfect as it is, there is receipts. and you can ask just about any question. What's the question? How many times has Gunn-Lak predicted either a crash or that stocks were way too high? It will give you serially all the dates and times and receipts for when it's happened.

17:00So you can't get away with outliving your bad calls in the past. Cheese will be next. Coming up, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett will break down the White House plans for tackling food inflation, what's next for the Federal Reserve, and what might be driving a quiet time in the markets. I think that there could be a little bit of almost a quiet time in the labor market because firms are finding that AI is making their workers so productive that they don't necessarily have to hire the new kids out of college and so on. Squawk Pod will be right back.

17:43Welcome back to Squawk Pod from CNBC. Today with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Efforting something. Efforting? I don't like that word. I don't love that term either. Efforting. But I am efforting something. So I will, Lori mentioned, and we're talking about private credit. Yep. Margin debt is hitting a record. And just to explain to the audience, margin debt is when folks are basically buying stock or other kinds of equities or other instruments using margin, meaning using loans. Yeah. This is what I've been talking about for the last month and a half incessantly. Private credit or margin debt?

18:22Both. Well, margin debt, it goes up, and it can keep going up, and you never know when it's peaking, but it's out of record. And in the past, there have been other times where margin debt gets very high and you do get an S &P consolidation. So I'm efforting to get a 30 or 40 year FINRA margin debt chart, along with correlated to the S &P. And there could be there can be significant pullbacks from. But this was the problem in 1929. It always rhymes differently. And like anything, valuation usually doesn't all of a sudden cause a big— just because things are expensive, you can't say it's going to crash next week.

19:14That's true. Or that it's going to pull back. But there have been times—we just should say that in the past, there have been times where— but as the margin debt is going up on the chart, it's at a new high here. It's at a new high here. It's at a new high here. And then finally, in hindsight, you can see that it was predicting or not predicting. But here's the thing. JP Morgan did a put out a chart, I want to say about a month ago. And if you looked at that chart and you looked at timing the market, anytime you got above sort of a 23 times PE multiple, if you had bought into the market at that point on the index, 10 years later.

19:53You're up. not as much as you would have. You would have only been up between up 2 % or down 2%. Yeah, but then there's other things that show if you're out of the market two or three days, important days, bottoms, that you can it's better just to go ahead if you have time. If you have time. Look, if you have 30 years, you're in good shape. But, you know, so margin debt hit a high in July of 2007 and then it went down. Okay, May of 2018, it hit a high, and then, you know, things happen. March of 2020, then came COVID, and we know what happened there. So there have been times in the past, doesn't mean it's going to happen anytime, but margin debt is very high right now.

20:38So we're not Pollyannish, not whistling past the graveyard. Maybe we can get a mephredy.

20:49President Trump cutting tariffs on more than 200 food products. The administration saying that certain foods could be exempt since they're not grown or processed here in the U.S. Join us now to talk about the cost of living, tariffs and the possibility of sending Americans$2 ,000 direct payments. White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett. Good morning. Kevin, how are you? You guys had a great marriage session there, marriage counseling session. I think there's hope for you, too. There's hope. Maybe we cover the gamut. Professional optimists, professional skeptics. Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle, Kevin.

21:31And I have been fairly optimistic. When people come on about the U.S. economy, I can find a lot of positive things. Why do you think affordability is such a buzzword right now? I mean, we live through 9 percent inflation. And I think Biden years, it averaged over 5 percent for those four years. We're at the highest levels that we've seen recently at 3 percent. Why all of a sudden is it, I don't know, is it Trump's fault? Right. Well, I mean, for sure, people still are trying to dig out from the big hole that was dug by the previous administration's policies. So if you figure the typical mortgage payment, monthly mortgage payment about doubled, if you look at a typical bag of groceries, the monthly bag of groceries cost about four hundred dollars when President Trump was leaving office last time and about five hundred and twelve dollars right about when President Trump took office.

22:31And since then, it's gone up almost not at all. I think it's like five hundred to fifteen dollars, but it hasn't gone back to four hundred dollars. And so what the Democrats are doing is they're saying that this runaway spending that we gave you guys that created runaway inflation is 100 percent your fault because you haven't fixed it already. And of course, that's very economically illiterate. And I don't think really many people in markets are buying it. Well, I'll tell you, Kevin, one of the reasons I think that people are and I'm going to highlight both sides. One of the reasons people feel like they're not keeping up is because real.

23:07Average weekly wages fell during during the Biden years because of the inflation. That's right. Right. So it fell. However, the president is constantly saying prices have come down. Now, inflation is still three percent. It's still too high. Now, oil prices, energy prices, there are certain things where they have come down. But when you keep saying prices are falling, that's not true because inflation is still it's the 3 percent is on top of all the inflation we had during the Biden years. So we got all that inflation plus an additional 3 percent. And we should I think you should admit that a more a more precise way to say it, though, Joe, is that purchasing power has gone up.

23:49And so real wages, that's W divided by P for our technical people in the audience, have gone up by about$1 ,200 this year. So the way to think about it is that we've dug a$3 ,000 hole because of Biden policies, and we've gained$1 ,200 on the way out already, which should give you a great deal of hope for the future that the wage increases that we're seeing will continue. And even if inflation stays positive, make it so that people feel way better when they go to the grocery store and to buy a car. You know, we've reduced the cost of buying a car with the deductibility of interest. I mean, there's a million things that we're doing to fix this problem.

24:23But it's just kind of astonishing to me that the cost problem is somehow being blamed on us. Now, think about it, especially with the Obamacare thing. So Obamacare is 100 percent Democratic policy. It's always been 100 percent Democratic policy. What they did is they expanded the subsidies during COVID. And then all those subsidies basically went right into the pockets of insurance companies. and Obamacare insurance policies have doubled in price relative to normal policies. And so the fastest inflation in the economy is these big government subsidies thrown at Obamacare insurance. Think about it.

25:00It's kind of like if you give lots of student loans, then the tuition goes up. It's that effect. And so now they're blaming President Trump for Obamacare as well. They should have fixed Obamacare in the first place. And President Trump had a plan in the big, beautiful bill to give people some subsidies. but the Democrats didn't like it because the subsidies weren't going to their campaign contributors, the insurance companies. The whole issue of tariffs, if we're reversing some tariffs to try to help affordability, isn't that acknowledging that the tariffs were responsible for some of the higher prices and for some of the inflation that is still a problem?

Read the full transcript

25:40Well, first, this is nothing new. If you go through all the trade deals that we've been doing all the way through, then there have been things that we decided it was prudent based on the economics of supply and demand to exempt. And one of those things that we've been exempting all along is something that we don't make in the U.S. We'll never make in the U.S. or almost never. I know that in Hawaii they make some coffee. And so on-shoring that production really doesn't make sense. It's not part of our strategy. And what the president just did with food is decide to make like a blanket movement so that we weren't going through each deal and picking this and that.

26:16What what's going on with India? Just as an aside, in terms of a trade deal, we've been so close so many times. Were we ever close? Yeah, we were for sure very close. I've spoken to the ambassador and, you know, we've had visits. And I think that it's a complicated situation because the interaction between what India does with Russia and what India does with us. And so I think we're still quite hopeful. But it got pretty complicated because there are a lot of different variables in the India-American relationship. But they're good friends and we're hoping we can work it out soon. If you were the Fed, if you were running the Fed, I don't know if if that's a possibility still at this point.

26:55I know the other Kevin has an op ed piece in it. I liked it. Yeah, there's more than two Kevins. But Kevin Warsh has a big piece. I don't know if you if you care to comment on some of his what he has deduced about Fed policy. My good friend from down the hall at Hoover, Kevin Warsh, has a great piece of the Wall Street Journal. I commend it to people. I think that he's right that it's time for the Fed to turn a page and go back to really being independent and data driven. I think they've made a lot of policy errors. I think Kevin and I agree about that. And I guess that when people think of who would be the least independent to the Trump administration, people think it would be you, Kevin.

27:38But you're talking about you're talking about independent. I totally reject. I just totally reject that. I mean, the fact is there's a truck going by. You know, the bottom line is that you do the job that you have. And if somebody is going to go in, they're going to be the Fed chair, that their job 100 percent of the time is to run an independent data driven Fed. And right now, my job is to be at the White House to serve the president every day. It's just a different job. Is that truck headed over to the east wing? Can you can you see it from there? Kevin, how's it looking? No, no, you can't. You can't see it from here.

28:10But it's just it's a tiny little part of the White House. So the parts that you're used to seeing aren't really that you swing. There are some reason I brought up the Fed. If you had multiple choice, the Fed at this point, both sides of the dual mandate are at risk right now. Neither side is at risk right now for the Fed. I'd say neither side is at risk. Certainly that there's a Fed that has made some policy errors right now and we need to get ahead of the curve on that. But no, I think that the Fed has a well-defined mission, a mission that most of the time it's been able to accomplish. And it certainly can again, if it just makes sure that it's not acting in a partisan way.

28:49Well, I guess I meant is the labor market, in your view, and we're going to hear more about it on Thursday, we'll finally get some numbers. Is it slowing at this point? And is on the other side, the other part of the mandate, is inflation, are we seeing the beginnings of another trend higher, or do you think that's headed lower? No, I think on inflation, you know, the last CPI report we got surprised 48 Bloomberg economists on the downside. It even had some sort of temporary bad news because there was a refinery that was shut down, if you're looking at the top line number. I think that there have been mixed signals in the job market and really, really positive signals in the output markets.

29:31As you know, we've got GDP now running close to 4%. We've got productivity running up around 3%. And so I think that there could be a little bit of almost a quiet time in the labor market because firms are finding that AI is making their workers so productive that they don't necessarily have to hire the new kids out of college and so on. But because there's so much output growth and income growth, that's the kind of thing that a free market will work out relatively quickly as new ways to spend money emerge. When do you think we'll hear, have you been updated on Chairman Powell's successor? Yeah, I'm not exactly sure that that's a decision for the president.

30:13I think that if you think about how - You don't know when we'll hear, even? Excuse me? You're not sure when we can expect to hear? Beginning of next year? Could it be this year? Well, I think some of it might depend on when Chairman Powell announces that he's going to resign right now. You know, we've got a lot of work to do here in the White House every day just to like first get the government open and now get a whole bunch of legislation passed. So that's what we're focused on. Yeah, we didn't really get to talk about it. You think there should be another reconciliation, Bill? Definitely, at least next year.

30:45Whether there's time for one this year is something that I think the people on the Hill are looking into. Okay. All right. We didn't get to talk about the answer to Obamacare and how to reform it, but you have ideas there as well? I'll be back next week. Okay, good. You will? All right. Yeah, sir. Okay, good. We'll see you then. Still to come on Squawk Pod, documentary filmmaker Ken Burns on his new series, The American Revolution, and how it connects to the country's political climate right now. Things are really complicated, and the American Revolution is the beginning of that complication for this project, and we should celebrate that complexity.

31:31This is Squawk Pod. Stand by Joe. His mic here. You're watching Squawk Box on CNBC. I'm Joe Kernan, along with Andrew Ross Sorkin. Becky is off today. We're excited about this one. Our next guest has been making films for nearly 50 years, and he says the subject of his latest series is one of the most important events in history. Joining us right now, documentary filmmaker Ken Burns, whose new series, The American Revolution, is now on PBS. You've been working on this for a decade. A decade, yeah. Nine years and 11 months. Episode one was last night. Episode six will be Friday night. It's also available for streaming for free on the PBS app, pbs.org.

32:11Okay, so just take us back 10 years ago when you decided you were going to be here. So I was finishing the Vietnam War film, and I was looking at a map of the Central Highlands that we'd done, a 3-D map. And I said, oh, my goodness, we could do the British moving west on Long Island towards Brooklyn. Because, of course, there are no photographs or newsreels from the American Revolution, and it's at or removed from us. So what can we do to help bring it alive? And I remember looking up before the ink was dry on Vietnam series, and I said, we're doing the revolution next. Barack Obama had 13 months to go in his presidency.

32:43And yet people said, oh, you've timed this perfectly for the 250. We're like, no, we wanted to do a deep dive into what I think is the most important event since the birth of Christ, the creation of the United States. Before this, people were subjects. You know, the authoritarians wanted them dumb and distracted by conspiracies. And now they were something else called citizens. And that was a new deal, something new under the sun. OK. Did you think it was going to take you 10 years? Yes. Yeah. You always knew that. Yeah, well. You didn't know what the politics of our moment would be today. No, no, no, no.

33:18And in fact, you know, Mark Twain is supposed to have said history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. You have to be disciplined to not say, oh, isn't it rhyming? I'll give you an example. We have the voice of a German general's wife. She's making the trip to join her husband at Burgoyne's Army for the triumph of the British Army. It doesn't work out that way. That's another story. But she's worried that Americans eat cats. Now, if our film had come out last year, last fall, people would say, oh, Ken, you did this completely to do this. You just keep your head down and you don't acknowledge or point signs at it because you want people to be looking at this film 35 years from now.

33:5435 years ago was my Civil War series. And today, which is a school day in America, as it will be tomorrow, it's shown hundreds of times. Not all of it, but 40 minutes on Lincoln or Gettysburg or whatever. And you want that kind of durability. We could. We could. We could make a film on the Great Depression. On 1929, because you've done eight years. You wouldn't have to do ten years. You could use some of his stuff and just barrel it in. We've been using scholarship that has been going on for at least 50 years, new scholarship about the revolution, and it still takes to tell the story, a complete story that isn't just the superficial kind of Madison Avenue sanitized version of our revolution.

34:33We need to be told a complicated story about what it's about. It's a civil war and a world war in addition to this revolution. And it isn't just great ideas in Philadelphia. It's incredibly bloody. I have a filmic question for you, which is reenactments. Yeah. You go down this road. You don't typically do this. No, I don't. And I had to get over myself because what I suddenly realized is I don't need to film reenactors reenacting a certain battle. We can, over five or six years in every season, at every time of day or night, from every vantage in all weather, film them and collect a critical mass of footage of reenactments.

35:11Impressionistic. You don't see faces. You're not wondering what the guy is going to do and whether he's going to end up at Taco Bell after this thing. They didn't have those. They didn't? But in reenactments, they do. And so what we have is an ability to put the footage, treat them like paintings, take the paintings and treat them like they're live, add maps to it, documents. And we have not just the third person narration, but 400 first person quotes read by the finest actors in the world. We have a cast of like 60 people, Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, Sir Kenneth Branagh, Morgan Freeman, Samuel L.

35:45Jackson, Claire Danes, you know, Paul Giamatti, Jeff Daniels, Josh Brolin. And I mean, I've named a tenth of them, and they help bring the story alive. And it isn't just the bold-faced names in Philadelphia, but it's children who are fighting. It's probably a stupid question. With the Civil War, I hear that music, and not only do I get a little teary, but it's the thread throughout the entire... I don't know who picked it out. Me. You're going to be a pussycat for this one. We have some beautiful, beautiful... Same kind of stuff as it repeats. Same kind of stuff and different stuff. We have Native Americans.

36:20That's important the way you choose. And we've got a beautiful piece of music, which is our main thing, called Hector the Hero, that's almost as good as the Ashokan Farewell, which is the piece of violin music you're talking about. If you read that letter from, what was this? From Sullivan Ballou. If you read that and play that music, I turn into a puddle. A puddle. Yeah. This is a really patriotic film, but it's a complicated film, you know? There are Native Americans involved. We can't pretend they're not involved. There are enslaved and free black people involved. Women, half the population, are central to the success of the resistance leading up to the revolution and are there at every battle, sometimes fighting, certainly supporting the troops at home, running businesses and farms.

37:04It's an extraordinary sort of geopolitical story and an intimate family story and everything in between, including how it gets financed. Okay, so this is an unfair question. An unfair question because people ask me this question and I never have a good answer. Is there one lesson you wish without, I know you don't tell the lesson in the story, but now that you're here. Right. Is there one lesson that you wish this audience would be thinking about as they're watching this? I think when we're all complaining over, you know, the sky is falling, we're all divided, nobody's whatever. When an individual is in a crisis, you go back and talk to a professional pastor or, you know, somebody that can help you.

37:45Where were you born? Where did you come from? You go back to your origin story and you find it. So I hope that learning the complexity of the formation of the United States makes people more aware of our founding and what the values were. Just the power. Last night in the first episode, the power of the word liberty on a little kid, on a little girl is so fantastic. So that I'd like to say, if I had to say, and I usually don't on any film, I'd like to put the us back in the U.S. with this film. And I think we can do it. But this film is addressed to everybody. There's no focus group. I have said the same thing on the road to you, as I've said to Joe Rogan, as I've said to the editorial board of The Times, to inner city kids in Charleston and Chicago and Detroit.

38:30Everywhere I go, this is our origin story. It's complicated, which is the neon sign in my editing room. And if you know it, it will make you a little bit more optimistic about the moment. And without giving it away, is there anything that as you were working on this, you did not know before that you think is like a little Easter egg, a little nugget, a little surprise that we should get some episode that you're uniquely proud of because they're in minute, you know, minute 28. Almost at every juncture, there's something that you didn't know. There's a person that you didn't realize was central.

39:05And I remember presenting to some funders, you know, it's PBS or it's all grant funded. And someone just very much says, well, who's emerging as an important figure? And I go, oh, George Washington. Let me just say, without him, we do not have a country. Is he flawed? Yes. Is he rash? He rides out on the battlefield at Kipps Bay and nearly is killed. And if he's killed, the whole project is over. He makes bad battlefield decisions. It's almost like he has an aura around him, though, isn't it? But he thought he had an aura around him. But he's able to convince people from Georgia and New Hampshire that they're not from separate countries, as they thought, but Americans.

39:41He's able to defer to Congress. He's able to inspire people to fight in the dead of night. He's able to pick subordinate talent without a fear or jealousy that they're better than him and more than anything else. He gives up his power twice, first his military commission, and then after the presidency. Everybody was happy for him to be the military dictator. Everybody was happy for him to be, you know, president for life. And he said, no, the highest office in the land is citizen. He got what this experiment was. And all of them speak to us. They talk about the unborn millions throughout this film.

40:17And it gets eerie after a while because you realize they're not just fighting for themselves. I mean, just think. They say at the end of the Declaration, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor. Washington may be the most, the richest man in the country. Let's just think about that today. Willing to give up your life for a cause? Willing to give up your fortune for a cause? Whatever sacred honor is, we can understand, intuit what it might mean. Who among us would have the power to make a decision? Would I be a loyalist? It's a bloody civil war. Would I be a patriot?

40:52Would I be willing to die for a cause? All of that happens in the American Revolution, and we're all sitting here enjoying the fruits of their sacrifice. I see people that run into burning buildings. They're still around. They're still around. It's not me. I don't know if it's you. But I see people doing things that also. On this level where the political discourse is so fractured, where it's all either binary. You know, we have in our computer world ones or zeros. We have in our media world and political world yes or no or red state or blue state. Things are really complicated. And the American Revolution is the beginning of that complication for this project.

41:34And we should celebrate that complexity. And then all of a sudden, the person across the table that doesn't agree with me doesn't seem an enemy. Just seems somebody like them who figured out how to say, OK, that politics is the politics of the half-life. You don't get everything. We were the good guys and English were the bad guys. Can I at least say? You cannot. We have English soldiers. I know. I'm kidding. No, no, it's complicated. We did need to win. We are the good guys. We invented something that nobody else had done. We invented this idea that people could rule the thing. But if you were living here, and particularly you, both of you in your positions, you would be hard-pressed in New York City, a loyalist stronghold, making money in financial markets to say, the British constitutional monarchy is responsible for my prosperity, my health, my literacy, the property that I own.

42:31Am I going to give this up for this idea that has zero chance of success at Lexington Green, which was the climax of last night's show? This is a big question for all of us. Ken Burns. Who am I? Thank you. The show, it's not even called a show. You can call it a show. It's a movie. It's a film. It's a limited series. Yeah, six-part, 12-hour. Six-part series on PBS right now. Go out and watch it. Thank you. We're good with English. We're all friends. Yes, now we are. We're fun. Special relationship. We're fun. Very special. And that is Squawk Pod for today, this Monday. Thanks for starting your week with us.

43:09Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern. And please follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts for the best of our show, whenever you want to listen. Have a great Monday. We'll meet you right back here tomorrow. We are clear. Thanks, guys.

From the publisher

President Donald Trump is rolling back tariffs on more than 200 food products, from coffee and beef to bananas and orange juice, as the White House faces rising frustration from Americans over grocery prices. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett explains the administration’s push for affordability and the persistence of inflation. Then, Legendary Filmmaker Ken Burns walks through his newest project, The American Revolution, and the stories that shaped the nation. Plus, RBC Capital Markets’ Lori Calvasina breaks down market sentiment and Alphabet rallies after Berkshire Hathaway takes a new stake.

 

Lori Calvasina - 09:13

Kevin Hassett - 23:19

Ken Burns - 35:11

 

In this episode:

Ken Burns, @KenBurns

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk

Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin

Katie Kramer, @Kramer_Katie


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
Kevin Hassett on Tariffs & Ken Burns on The American Revolution 11/17/25Squawk Pod · 44 min
Listen in VO