In short
Pre–State of the Union discussion on tariffs (Section 232), likely tariff litigation after a Supreme Court ruling, Iran policy, U.S. economic conditions, and media/streaming consolidation and paywalls.
Guests and backgrounds
- Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Commerce Committee chair; Foreign Relations Committee member; constitutional lawyer background.
- Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee; Washington state senator background.
Key claims
- Cruz says tariffs can be an “effective lever point” to open markets; Supreme Court ruling will mainly cause “chaos and litigation” because other statutes still allow similar tariffs.
- Cruz expects the president to highlight national security successes and argues Iran’s regime is “teetering,” urging support/arming protesters and possible limited targeted strikes (no U.S. boots).
- Cantwell wants the president to work with Congress to open markets (e.g., soybeans to Asia, apples from WA) and criticizes tariffs for raising consumer costs.
- Cantwell says real wages are rising but affordability frustration persists; she emphasizes school choice and “Trump accounts” provisions.
Notable examples
- Tariff targets reportedly include batteries, cast iron, chemicals, and telecom equipment under Section 232.
- Media: Paramount reportedly sweetening its Warner Bros. Discovery bid; Netflix has a four-day response window.
- Cantwell warns paywalls (especially sports) can harm local broadcasters and local journalism.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOState of the Union Expectations
0:00 to 0:24
Discussion on the upcoming State of the Union address and its implications.
“Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down.”
State of the Union Expectations
2:14 to 4:03
Discussion on the upcoming State of the Union address and its implications.
“Good morning and welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC.”
AI Disruption in the Markets
4:03 to 5:28
Exploring Wall Street's concerns over AI disrupting various sectors.
“No, you used to give me this Malthusian argument is what you would tell me.”
Tariffs and Trade Policy
5:28 to 7:21
Analysis of tariffs following the Supreme Court decision and Trump's strategies.
“And Andrew, it will be interesting tonight.”
Warner Brothers Discovery Bidding War
7:21 to 8:12
Insights into the ongoing bidding war for Warner Brothers Discovery.
“But if Netflix wins, then it becomes, I imagine, a year or two year long soap opera about whether the government's going to allow the deal to go through.”
Interview with Senator Ted Cruz
9:59 to 14:00
Senator Cruz discusses tariffs, trade, and the implications of the Supreme Court ruling.
“Hey, this is Jeff Lewis from Radio Andy.”
Iran's Nuclear Threat and U.S. Strategy
14:00 to 22:32
Discussion on the implications of U.S. actions in Iran and strategies for dealing with the regime.
“But here's the point that really matters.”
Overview of Tariff Litigation and Media Dynamics
22:32 to 23:02
Insight into tariff litigation and commentary on the media landscape including streaming wars.
“Next on Squawk Pod, Democrat Senator Maria Cantwell, ranking member on the Senate Commerce Committee, weighs in on all that tariff litigation that's likely to ensue.”
Media Ownership and Consumer Rights
24:51 to 28:00
Senator Cantwell discusses media ownership, paywalls, and the impact on consumers.
“All the senator wanted to talk about was media and what we were talking about earlier with Netflix and with Warner and everything else.”
Discussion on Content Creation and Competition
28:00 to 29:15
Explore the ongoing discussion about content creation and the power dynamics in Hollywood.
“And so I'm curious on both the comments themselves of what she said and what the president said in reaction.”
Show all 14 chapters
Tariff Issues and Small Business Relief
29:15 to 30:29
Understand the concerns regarding tariffs and the impact on small businesses seeking relief.
“Senator, you'd like some clarity on what happens with all the money collected.”
Trade Policies and Economic Competition
30:29 to 33:19
Gain insights into trade policies, competition, and their effects on the American economy.
“And I'm going to have a discussion with them about trade and about how to get markets open, about how to get soybeans into Asia or apples from our state or, you know, what to do.”
Wealth Redistribution and Innovation
33:19 to 35:39
Discuss the challenges of wealth distribution and the need for innovation across regions.
“If we're not really growing the middle class in America, how can we say that's the American dream?”
The Role of Competition in Information
35:39 to 36:30
Examine the importance of competition in ensuring robust and accurate information in journalism.
“But I do think that Seattle and the governor and the state legislature is going to have to put pen to paper and figure this out and really figure out the math.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Your data lives everywhere. On-prem, in the cloud, across apps. Bring it all together with EverPure, the platform that acts like a living system, delivering the latest in data performance, security, and innovation without ever slowing you down. Sophisticated enough to anticipate your ever-changing data needs, yet simple enough to feel like second nature. Tame your data chaos with EverPure and make storage and data management the simplest part of your business. Visit everpuredata.com to learn more. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time.
0:45So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
0:58Bring in show music, please. This is Squawk Pod, and I'm CNBC producer Cameron Costa. On today's episode, gearing up for the president's State of the Union address. Joe is in D.C. on Capitol Hill with senators from both sides of the aisle. First, Ted Cruz. I'm not a tariff guy, but I will say President Trump has changed my mind on one aspect, which is I think tariffs are an incredibly effective lever point for the president. Then what Democrats are hoping to hear on tariffs tonight with Washington Senator Maria Cantwell. In a dream world, I would love the president to say, I hear the courts and I'm going to go to Congress and I'm going to have a discussion with them about trade and about how to get markets open, about how to get soybeans into Asia or apples from our state.
1:51Plus, Wall Street's fears of AI disruption keep rattling the markets. And the bidding war for Warner Brothers' discovery just keeps heating up. It's big enough and interesting enough for us to spend a lot of time talking about, which we do. It's Tuesday, February 24th, 2026, and Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand, Andrew, bye. In three, two, one, cue Andrew. Good morning and welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We are live at the NASDAQ market set in Times Square. I'm Andrew Osorkin along with Joe Kernan who is in Washington, D.C. this morning wearing a suit no less ahead of tonight's State of the Union address.
2:34Becky's off. We got a whole bunch of things going. No pocket square, Joe Kernan. No pocket square. No, but take a screenshot. This never happens. I know. I know. You without the jacket, me with the jacket. I feel like, I mean, I feel totally inhibited. I could be a totally different person. Well, we'll see how that works out. We can only hope. We're coming off some drops of more than 1 % for all the major averages. And in focus for investors, renewed fears of an AI disruption in the tech sector. Cybersecurity stocks were hit particularly hard. IBM lost 13 % on worries that Anthropa could poach some of its business.
3:11It was IBM's worst day since October of 2000. And we should mention that one of the catalysts for all this was a blog post by Cetrini Research laying out a hypothetical scenario in which AI pushes U.S. unemployment much higher and changes how payments are made. That hit bank stocks with J.P. Morgan down more than 4 percent, although I should say later in the evening, CEO Jamie Dimon said he thought the latest AI fears were overblown and that the bank would be, in his words, quote, a winner in AI. Andrew, we've talked. We've got to talk more, but we're sleepwalking into this, kind of, and we just fall back on the every previous disruption always led to initial fears that were replaced by more jobs and more productivity.
4:00One of these times that may not be the case. Now you're coming around. No, I've believed this for a while. I'm worried. And not about us, because we're... No, you used to give me this Malthusian argument is what you would tell me. No, no, Malthusian about things like oil. Not about this. All along, I'm thinking, what are travel agents going to do? What are truck drivers going to do? It just worries me. And then you saw Sam Altman the other day saying, hey, you know, humans use a lot of energy and food, too. So it's not just, I mean, he sounded like he's already turned into one of the machines.
4:37Did you hear that the other day? Did he said that, Andrew? I did, but interestingly, and I think we've talked about this, the blue-collar job may be the most protected job, maybe more protected than the white-collar job. It's clear to me the white-collar job goes first. Right, and you got a blue shirt on. You think that's going to help, but here I am with, you know, headed out of here. President Trump's looking at new ways to levy tariffs in the wake of his defeat at the Supreme Court Friday. The White House reportedly considering hitting products like batteries, cast iron, chemicals, and telecom equipment with tariffs.
5:12The Wall Street Journal says the levies would be imposed under 232, that section of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows for tariffs based on national security risks. And the tariffs are not impacted by last week's Supreme Court decision. the president has already made use of section 232 in his second term to tax products like steel and aluminum. And Andrew, it will be interesting tonight. I don't know how many of the justices will be in the front row, but holding their breath, we'll see what the president has to say. The other day, I forgot to mention when we were talking about the Supreme Court, I forgot to mention, remember Chuck Schumer?
5:53Remember that one? We know where you are, We're coming after you guys. You have started a whirlwind of problems. I mean, this is. Well, it's going to be interesting to see how many empty seats there are, because there's a whole view. I don't know if you've read about all these Democrats that may not come at all. And interestingly, some of the Supreme Court justices didn't always come. So, again, I wonder whether they're all going to come and how that's all going to work. It'll be very interesting to see. Well, it'd be nice if you don't want to come, don't come. That's fine. But I hope that there's no heckling or guys, you know, shaking their cane, that there are people ripping things up or, you know, in the past, there's been some decorum that's been.
6:35And we would far be it from us to ever violate any decorum, Andrew. I mean, I'm thinking of Marjorie Taylor Greene on the other side. Remember that? Yeah. Paramount Skydance reportedly sweetening its offer for Warner Brothers Discovery. Reports say that Paramount aimed to address some of Warner's concerns about financing with that new bid. Unclear right now, though, how much the offer is worth. Now, Paramount previously had bid$30 a share in cash for Warner Brothers Discovery. If Warner's board now favors the new deal, Netflix will have four days to respond. Reports had said Variety had put that number close to$32 a share.
7:14We'll see whether Netflix comes back, how high they can go, and what comes next, Joe. I imagine Netflix bids higher. That's my guess on this. But if Netflix wins, then it becomes, I imagine, a year or two year long soap opera about whether the government's going to allow the deal to go through. If Paramount wins, then I imagine the expectation is that they've won. Everyone should be interested. I was I was thinking, Andrew, we're so interested because we're in the media. and it actually, we have almost, we don't really have skin in the game, but because of Versa and because of, you know, the interplay between cable and streaming and new media, legacy media, I mean, we're watching so closely, but I think, I don't think it's just us.
8:01I think it's big enough and interesting enough for us to spend a lot of time talking about, which we do, right? Well, to me, it's just, I agree with you, but I think it's really like the end of Hollywood. There's the AI piece. Possibility of that, yeah. All of it. It's just a shift in all of it. Cheese will be next. Coming up on Squawk Pod, ahead of the president's State of the Union address tonight, our Joe Kernan sat down with Senator Ted Cruz in the Russell Rotunda in the U.S. Capitol. Top of mind for many in business and, in politics, tariffs. The Supreme Court decision, I don't think, is going to have much consequence other than a bunch of chaos and litigation.
8:43because there are a host of other federal statutes that let the president impose basically the same tariffs. And so in terms of our trading partners, I don't actually expect the other countries to do a whole lot different. You'll have individual companies filing lawsuits.
9:01Is Bitcoin complicated or do people just think it is? For a long time, it felt like something only tech experts or hardcore investors really understood. Between all the headlines, new terminology, and everything people say about it, it can seem harder than it needs to be. But what if getting started with Bitcoin didn't have to feel overwhelming? If you've been curious about Bitcoin but haven't made the jump yet, Cash App makes it easy. You can set up automatic purchases with zero fees or buy larger amounts also with zero fees. Start small or go bigger. It's designed to be simple either way. For a limited time, new customers get$10 added to their balance.
9:39Just use code CashApp10 when you sign up and don't forget this part, send at least$5 to a friend in the first two weeks. Terms apply. Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partners. Bitcoin services provided by Block Inc. Brand. For additional information, see the Bitcoin disclosures at cash.app slash legal slash podcast. Hey, this is Jeff Lewis from Radio Andy. Live and uncensored catch me talking with my friends about my latest obsessions, relationship issues, and bodily ailments. But that kind of drama that seems to follow me, you never know what's going to happen.
10:14You can listen to Jeff Lewis live at home or anywhere you are. Download the SiriusXM app for over 425 channels of ad-free music, sports, entertainment, and more. Subscribe now and get three months free. Offer details apply.
10:32At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
11:06Welcome back to Squawk Pod, the morning before the president's State of the Union address. Here's Joe Kernan in the U.S. Capitol in Washington. Joining us now is Senator Ted Cruz. He's the chairman of the Commerce Committee, member of the Foreign Relations Committee. Is there anything else? You talk commerce, you talk foreign? Judiciary as well, and rules. I stay busy. Yeah, it seems like it's all, but we can talk to you about anything, obviously. And the first thing I said to you when you sat down, we've had conversations in the past, and many Republicans in their previous lives, pre-Donald Trump lives, were not big fans of tariffs.
11:45And I said, you have been somewhat mixed in the past on our conversations about it. But you said used in the right way, and maybe the way the president has used them, it can be something that you're behind, that you support. Look, that's exactly the way I would put it. As you said to me before we started, you said you're not a tariff guy. And I agree with you. I'm not a tariff guy. But I will say President Trump has changed my mind on one aspect, which is I think tariffs are an incredibly effective lever point for the president. And he's shown that in the last year, that through the threat of tariffs, he's opening up foreign markets.
12:19And there are two camps within the administration. One camp wants the president to use tariffs as leverage to reduce tariffs from our trading partners to remove non-tariff barriers, to expand trade. That's the camp I'm in. I think that's the right camp to be in. There is another camp in the administration that just loves tariffs, that wants them high forever and is fine with other countries having high tariffs. I think that's a very bad policy outcome. But there is an irony, Joe. Donald J. Trump could go down as the greatest free trade president of modern times, which is not what one would expect.
12:51And I'll tell you what changed my I mean, look, I think back to the George W. Bush administration. President Bush was a big advocate of free trade. But our trading allies were not beating a path to Washington saying, let's lower our tariffs and open up our markets. With Trump, they are. The threat of tariffs incentivizes them, and it's a really powerful tool. Do they second-guess a lot of the agreements or a lot of the concessions made after the Supreme Court decision on Friday? You know, I don't think so. I think the Supreme Court decision was unfortunate. I think it's going to cause a lot of chaos, a lot of litigation.
13:26I think you're going to see billions of dollars of litigation drag on for years. That's unfortunate. You're a constitutional lawyer. I think the decision was wrong. You think it was wrong? As a statutory matter, the statute, IEPA is the statute they were interpreting, gives the president the power to regulate importation. Here's what the Supreme Court said. The president can ban imports. He can say no German automobiles are allowed in the U.S., but he can't impose a dollar tariff on it. And I think Justice Kavanaugh in dissent had the better of the argument. I think Justice Thomas in dissent had the better of the argument that with foreign policy, this is a power of the president.
14:01But here's the point that really matters. The Supreme Court decision, I don't think, is going to have much consequence other than a bunch of chaos and litigation because there are a host of other federal statutes that let the president impose basically the same tariffs. And so in terms of our trading partners, I don't actually expect the other countries to do a whole lot different. You'll have individual companies filing lawsuits, but the president will be able to use that same leverage. As Justice Kavanaugh said in dissent, he said, look, the court basically said this was a box-checking exercise, and the president checked the wrong box, that he used one statute when he should have used another.
14:36I don't think it's going to change the fundamental economic policy. What will we hear tonight about Iran and the president's objectives or plans there? Look, I think the president's leadership on Iran has been incredible. The decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities was the single most important national security decision of the president. That took some serious... It took enormous cojones, as humans would say. Exactly. Look, and it was a spectacular success. We are at a moment, Joe, where in the next six months we could realistically see the regimes in Iran, Venezuela and Cuba all fall, and we could see them replaced with governments that want to be friends with America.
15:18Now, let me be clear. There are a thousand ways that can go wrong, so I'm not being Pollyannish about that. But if that happened, that would be the biggest geopolitical shift since the fall of the Berlin Wall. And so, tonight, I expect the president to talk about historic successes over this last year because it really has been an extraordinary year both in national security and foreign policy but also in domestic policy. How would you, if you were the president, how would you approach Iran? Is it a limited, another limited strike to try to prevent nuclear enrichment and to say we're serious? Do you go beyond that?
15:54Do you hope that somehow organically it happens? Because when you break it, when you own it and you break it, we know what's happened in the past. So I talked to the president last week about this and what I urged the president, I said, listen, the regime has never been weaker. They are teetering. There are real-world consequences to losing a war. The Ayatollah lost to Israel in the 12-day war. They are weaker. The regime is weaker than it ever has been. And what I've urged the president, do not miss this opportunity. If the Ayatollah is removed from power, it will make America much safer. This is the leading state sponsor of terrorism in the world.
16:30The Iranian regime is responsible for murdering hundreds of American servicemen and women. They fund terrorists all over the world. And so what I've urged the president is, number one, support the protesters and arm the protesters. Let the people of Iran give them the ability to overthrow their government. And number two, I think there's a very real possibility we will see, potentially in a matter of days, limited strikes. What we're not going to see is boots on the ground. We're not going to see a ground presence of American troops there. But I think there's a real possibility of targeted strikes that are designed to support the Iranian people who are protesting, not designed to put America in the middle of it, but designed this regime.
17:10The Ayatollah, when he chants death to America, I believe him. We have seen new highs in the stock market, although obviously yesterday was difficult. GDP might have been higher if there hadn't been a shutdown, but it's positive and expected to by some this year with some tailwinds to be better than it's been in recent memory. Employment is basically, we're at full employment at 4.3 percent. Inflation is above the Fed's target, but it's 2.4 or so and down a little bit from when the president came in. The border's closed. Yet, yet, polls, whether you believe them or not, or just the general feeling of Americans about affordability or about the direction of the country.
18:01Can you explain the disconnect in the Biden administration? I didn't really agree with that because wages fell. Real wages fell during the Biden administration. So I understood why people felt that. But wages are rising. Real wages are rising again. Why the malaise? Why the angst? Look, on the question of affordability, people are understandably frustrated. We had four years of Biden inflation. That hasn't disappeared. The Trump administration has significantly slowed inflation, but it hasn't reversed four years of damage from Biden. That makes life more expensive for the average working American.
18:35Now, there are areas like gas prices have gone down significantly. That's a major area of success. I think the Trump tax cuts that we passed last year, many of them are going to go into full effect this year. That's going to be beneficial. I believe we're going to see significant new investment in the U.S. as a result of the president's diplomacy. I think that's significant. Illegal border crossings are down 99 percent. Murder rates are down 20 percent. Drug overdose deaths are down 20 percent. What I expect tonight to be, I hope, is for the president to give a calm, sober assessment. These are the successes we're winning.
19:10Don't pay attention. The media loves attacking the president. They hate the man. But if you look at the substance of what we're achieving, and I'll tell you, Joe, what I think will get a lot of attention tonight, are two provisions that I authored in the tax bill last summer. Number one, school choice, the biggest federal school choice provision in American history. And number two, the Trump accounts. I think those are the two most far-reaching provisions. School choice is going to unleash tens of billions of dollars of scholarships for kids all over America. Millions of kids are going to escape failing schools and have hope because of it.
19:44And the Trump accounts, you're going to see literally trillions of dollars that our kids are going to be able to invest. It's going to make a whole new generation of capitalists. Andrew. Senator, by the way, I agree with you. And I know the work that you've done with Brad Gerstner and others. And it's really quite remarkable. I had a different question just about a video that's gone viral around Kash Patel. And I know you've been a very big supporter of Kash Patel. And yet we saw him at the Olympics with the team. And by the way, that was an amazing game. And I think we're all I mean, it was one of those great moments for America as well.
20:17Having said that, you know, Kash Patel back in 2023 went after Chris Ray, who was the former FBI director and said he, quote, doesn't need a government funded G5 to go to vacations. Maybe we ground that plane. Fifteen thousand dollars every time it takes off. Just a thought. And so I'm curious what your view is of Kash Patel's use of that plane. not just to the Olympics, but around the country, because there's been a lot of questions about it. Well, listen, I'm a big fan of Kash Patel. I think he's doing a good job. I mentioned just a minute ago, murder rates across the country have dropped 20 percent.
20:54Violent crime is down. Terrorists are being arrested. Gang members are being arrested. Rapists are being arrested. Child molesters are being molested. That's a real record of success. Why was Kash at the Olympics? Because the FBI has an important job protecting security there. And I got to say, you know, it's interesting. You see Democrats right now who are paying focus groups saying, how do we connect with with real people? How do we not seem like a bunch of pofta elitists? And then then they turn around and get really mad. I can't believe Kash Patel was drinking a beer and celebrating with with the American hockey team after winning the gold.
21:30You know what? I would have loved to have been in that locker room. And I don't know a guy on planet Earth that wouldn't have been thrilled to be celebrating. I got to say, the American hockey team, that was 46 years after the miracle on ice. That was a great victory. And I was cheering along with Cash. And, you know, it was awesome when Cash called President Trump, put him on the cell phone. The president congratulated that team. I hope they come tonight. He invited them to come tonight. It was amazing. And look, Jake Hughes with the flag over his shoulder, the bloody teeth, that is one of the iconic moments in sports and history.
22:06And I think, Cash, congratulations on having the chance to celebrate with you. I'm jealous and wish I was there. All right. I was like, wow. I wish anyone would have wanted to have been there. It was really something. It's history. It happens once every 46 years. That's how long you have to. I can't wait for the next one, both of us, right? Senator, thank you very much for being on. Next on Squawk Pod, Democrat Senator Maria Cantwell, ranking member on the Senate Commerce Committee, weighs in on all that tariff litigation that's likely to ensue. Plus, how she's viewing the media bidding war for Warner Brothers' discovery.
22:49I want to go back to the eyeball world where you rent my eyeballs. I watch a lot of advertising, but I get this free content. We'll be right back.
23:02A History of the United States in 100 Objects is a brand new podcast from 99 % Invisible and BBC Studios. Each week, we're looking at a different object from across American history with a unique story to tell about who we've been, what we've built, and what we've allowed ourselves to forget. Some of these objects are well-known, many are not, but all of them carry the story of how we got to this moment. Find a history of the United States in 100 objects on the 99 % Invisible feed, wherever you get your podcasts. At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time.
23:52So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. I'm pretty confident talking into a mic. Hey, I'm doing it right now. But home projects? I second guess everything. Is that noise normal? Is that water damage? Who do I even call? That's where Thumbtack comes in. Just upload a photo or voice note and it uses AI-powered search to match you with the right top-rated local pro. So instead of guessing, you get clarity and can hire with confidence. For your next home project, try Thumbtack. Hire the right pro today. You're listening to Squawk Pod.
Read the full transcript
24:36You're watching Squawk Box right here on CNBC. I'm Andrew Ozsorkin along with Joe Kernan in Washington, D.C. Becky is off today. Live from Capitol Hill, joining us now, Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington. She's a ranking member of the Commerce Committee. Andrew, listen up, my friend. All the senator wanted to talk about was media and what we were talking about earlier with Netflix and with Warner and everything else. And she was, I learned a few things talking to her. So you want diversity? This is important. You're worried about Hollywood. I mean, all the things that we talk about constantly.
25:14So it's not just us that are obsessed with this. Well, when I heard you earlier, I thought, you know, this is great. This is the thing that we have to do is unleash the media to talk more about this. Sometimes I think the media feels suspect because of your ownership. But I met with the Versant CEO. I met with Mark. I met with Mark. I like your game plan. I like where that's going. But in the world of consumers, the interests are we don't want everything behind a paywall. And we certainly don't want all the sports behind a paywall. The consumer is getting hammered on sports content, constantly being put behind a paywall.
25:50If you think about where Amazon went with Thursday Night Football, all of a sudden you thought you could watch Thursday Night Football, and then all of a sudden you can't if you don't have an Amazon Prime account. And then when you think about local broadcasters, so much of the revenue comes from sports. and if it's all going to be put behind a paywall, how much are the broadcasters going to be able to get from that revenue? So I want to go back to the eyeball world where you rent my eyeballs. I watch a lot of advertising, but I get this free content. And so this is a big discussion, and I hope you guys talk more about it because it's an important issue.
26:25That's all we need, Andrew, is for someone to tell us to talk more about it. Don't you think? Very happy to talk more about it. What does she think should happen? Which deal does she like? Which one? It's more about, you know, so we had a hearing in the Commerce Committee about this. And literally the discussion was more, you know, what are the requirements that you should put on? And a couple of the witnesses said, yes, you should make sure that local broadcasters get access to content in a way that keeps that a healthy model. And that consumers constantly have broadcast stations in their region so that we can, you know, get localized news.
27:05That's an important aspect of the debate, too. But I think for the big behemoth that's in the room is sports. And more and more of this content is being put behind paywalls, whether it's ESPN or Amazon or getting subscriptions to it. And it's affecting the consumer. Well, Senator, let's go ahead. Just one quick one related to all of this. I'm curious, actually, both on the content of it and the impact of it. I'm curious what you thought of what Susan Rice, who's a board member of Netflix, said about the idea that Dems would come back later, if and when they come back into power and look at a lot of these types of deals.
27:51And then the president, Trump's response to that, which implied potentially that, I don't know, I don't want to push it too far, But I think a lot of people read that as a threat that if she remains on the board, that he might block that deal. And so I'm curious on both the comments themselves of what she said and what the president said in reaction. Well, I think you guys hit it this morning. This is going to be an ongoing discussion. And look, I'm a huge fan of content creation by Hollywood. And I certainly don't want to see that content creation ruined in some sort of like tech formula that's all about just putting out a lot of content and then just how much money can we get for it.
28:31I mean, I want to see true competition in content creation. But I think, you know, so this is going to continue, right? This notion of are people just going to get more and more power and then put more and more content behind paywalls and then destroy the engine of what is local journalism. I'm going to fight against that. So I guarantee you there's going to be a lot of dialogue about that in the future. But he shouldn't have threatened her, and he shouldn't threaten them. And we should really, just like this little debate that's happened in the last 24 hours, you know, Netflix CEO basically saying, hey, put up or shut up.
29:07If you want the deal, increase the offer. So that's the kind of real competition that we want to see, not this verbal, you know, jousting of, you know, threat of power. Senator, you'd like some clarity on what happens with all the money collected. Yes. Yes. And I know you said you're asking Secretary Besson. I think his answer is the lower courts are going to have to work through this. I don't think Costco and FedEx are waiting for the lower courts. And so the issue here is what about the smaller people that don't have the kind of bulk that FedEx or Costco does to bring a suit? I want to make sure that at least they share with Congress what is the amount of money that was collected.
29:50They know they know the amount of money that was collected and they they have that data and information. And we could be giving some relief to those small businesses and manufacturers. So when you think about PPP, what happened during COVID, the bigger organizations who were more organized, obviously, got access to funds. but the smaller companies who were really affected, you know, didn't didn't fare as well or as effectively. We tried to correct that. So here I want to make sure that the small businesses really try to get some relief to them. And what would you like to hear on the tariff issue tonight from the president?
30:25In a dream world, in a dream world, I would love the president to say, I hear the courts and I'm going to go to Congress And I'm going to have a discussion with them about trade and about how to get markets open, about how to get soybeans into Asia or apples from our state or, you know, what to do. You would say there's been some intransigence on many issues with Congress and it's up to him. Oh, I think every president, you know, gets frustrated. But I think the American people want us to work together and accomplish things. And so America is in this information age transition. and the global economy outside the United States is getting bigger.
31:06And we want more access to markets. And so when you look at the first Trump administration and this play, it didn't work out so well. And I would say this play because literally you're just making things artificially more expensive for consumers. But the tariffs were left on in the Biden administration, right? I didn't agree with that policy. But to me, we should be building alliances around the globe. And we've supported policies. the trade policies that the Bush administration put through. And those were challenges. I'm sure not every Democrat supported them. But those trading partners, particularly in South America and Korea, have become bigger markets for the United States.
31:44So at a time when 95 percent of consumers are outside the United States, why aren't we doing more to access those markets? And then why are we making things artificially more expensive for the American consumer? And that's what's just happened. So me, I want to make airplanes. Obviously, we want to make software. We grow great agricultural products. But we've never recovered. The U.S. markets never recovered the soybean market that was lost in the first Trump administration. The private sector, obviously, is a big deal in Washington. And hopefully it stays that way. I don't know. Sometimes we hear things, maybe some self-inflicted things, that either Seattle or Washington has done.
32:29But in general, the private sector needs to be vibrant. Do you look at the Democratic Party at this point, and do you ever feel like maybe the geographic center has moved too far up to the left in terms of anti-corporate. I think the issue of our age is that the information age is going to cause disruption. I would have said to you that you always always always always have to talk about the economy and your vision of that future but in the information age you need to double down or triple down on what you are going to do in that era to secure jobs for working class people and grow the middle class again.
33:14And somehow I think our party gets lost on talking about that in a more robust way. If we're not really growing the middle class in America, how can we say that's the American dream? And so we have to be more specific about how we think we're going to grow those middle class jobs. But I think tonight, the issue is going to be about, well, why are cost and inflation not keeping pace, right? I mean, why are they outpacing what Americans can do to give by? Real wages are rising. And that didn't happen, unfortunately, because of the early COVID and the response to COVID as well. Andrew. Hey, Senator, we've been also having a big debate over the past week.
33:56You know it well in your state about this millionaire's tax and what it means between Amazon and Microsoft and Starbucks and the like. What do you make of that? Well, I think we're going to have to constantly be competitive in what it takes to, you know, like when we think about the big, beautiful bill here, I thought we gave too much revenue away and obviously blew a big hole in the deficit that was really causing more problems for the future. So I think when you think about how you grow, I think you have to think about how are we going to be competitive with the rest of the world, and how are we going to compete?
34:36And, you know, I like our innovation economy in the Northwest. I think it's a robust innovation economy, thanks to a lot of people, you know, Paul Allen and many others who made investment. But we're going to have to continue to attract that for the future. I mean, some would say we need to spread it around a little more, you know, spread it around to Spokane or spread it around to other places because it's you. You have we we have a lot of innovation. Do you do you fear that the wealthiest in Seattle and in your state will ultimately leave the state? We've obviously seen this conversation play out now in California.
35:13You're seeing a play out in New York. You're seeing a play out in so many different places. And there seems to be a mobility to people that maybe didn't exist, you know, a decade or two ago. Yeah, well, for sure. But also, Andrew, outside the United States, too. So what is the competition for us to continue to attract innovation? So I want innovation to happen everywhere because if we're going to compete with China, innovation has to happen more than just Seattle and Silicon Valley. But I do think that Seattle and the governor and the state legislature is going to have to put pen to paper and figure this out and really figure out the math.
35:50And so I know they're going through that process now, and so we'll see what the governor does. We've got to go. Andrew, if we need a media type from Washington, I think we found someone that you haven't been on the show very many times, have you? No, but I'm happy to talk about this because it's a growing issue and it's not going away. But we know it more from local journalism. We need, when you think about information, You have to have real competition to create perfect information, right? And so the less competition you have, the less perfect information. But you guys are in the information business.
36:24So let's figure out how to have true, robust competition. Senator, thank you. Pearl Jam fan? Yeah. Yeah? Yes. Yes, me too. Oh, good. All right. Good. Good to have you on. Thank you. That's Squawk Pod for today. Thank you for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross-Workin. Weekday mornings on CNBC starting at 6 Eastern and going all the way until 9. To get the best interviews and analysis from that three-hour TV show right into your ears, follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts. We'll meet you right back here tomorrow for a post-State of the Union episode.
37:07Have a great day. We are clear. Thanks, guys.
37:42saved with Progressive between October 2024 and September 2025. Potential savings will vary.
From the publisher
Ahead of the President’s State of the Union address tonight, Joe Kernen sits down with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. First, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) discusses the Supreme Court’s tariff ruling and his outlook for geopolitical shifts in the rest of President Trump’s term. Then, Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) discusses tariff confusion and the latest development in Netflix’s and Paramount Skydance’s competing bids for Warner Bros. Discovery.
Sen. Ted Cruz - 10:48
Sen. Maria Cantwell - 24:16
In this episode:
Ted Cruz, @SenTedCruz
Maria Cantwell, @SenatorCantwell
Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk
Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin
Cameron Costa, @CameronCostaNY
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

