The CoreWeave IPO with CEO & Co-Founder Mike Intrator 3/28/25

28 Mar 2025 · 48 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Squawk Pod Episode Summary: The CoreWeave IPO with CEO & Co-Founder Mike Intrator (3/28/25)

Episode Overview In this episode of *Squawk Pod*, senior producer Katie Kramer leads a discussion featuring CEO and co-founder of CoreWeave, Mike Intrator, who shares insights ahead of the company's IPO. The episode also includes a segment with Senator Chris Coons about governmental issues and recent remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding U.S. foreign policy.

Key Topics Discussed

CoreWeave IPO

  • Background: CoreWeave, an AI infrastructure company, is set to go public, marking a significant moment as it's the largest venture-backed tech IPO in several years.
  • Pricing Details:
  • Shares priced at $40 each, lower than the expected range of $47 to $55.
  • Expected to raise $1.5 billion vs. the planned $3 billion.
  • Implied valuation around $19 billion, contingent on diluted shares.
  • Company Focus: Provides access to NVIDIA graphic processing units for AI workloads.
  • Growth Metrics:
  • Revenue growth of 750% over the past year.
  • High demand for data centers, originally built for crypto, now pivoted to AI applications.

Challenges and Concerns

  • Market Headwinds:
  • Investors remain cautious after recent volatility in the tech sector, including uncertainties due to the DeepSeq incident in China.
  • Discussions about whether the current demand for data centers can be sustained.
  • Debt Management:
  • Approximately $1 billion of the IPO proceeds is earmarked for paying down existing debt.
  • Current debt load is substantial, around $8 billion.

Interview with Mike Intrator

  • Future Outlook:
  • Intrator shared his optimism about CoreWeave's growth trajectory despite current market challenges.
  • The company expects continued demand from large clients, including Microsoft and IBM.
  • NVIDIA Partnership:
  • NVIDIA holds a 6% stake in CoreWeave and is seen as a critical partner.
  • Contract Structures:
  • Focus on long-term contracts (3-5 years) to stabilize revenue and ensure consistent cash flow.

Political Commentary by Senator Chris Coons

  • Government Spending: Senator Coons discusses the implications of spending cuts proposed by the Republican party, particularly regarding Medicaid and its beneficiaries.
  • Doge Initiative: Addressed concerns regarding the initiative led by Elon Musk to cut federal spending, focusing on eliminating waste and fraud, and its potential impact on Social Security benefits.
  • Political Landscape: Coons reflects on the current division in Congress and the challenges in reaching consensus on fiscal policies.

Other News Highlights

  • Putin's Remarks on Trump: Russian President Vladimir Putin commented on former President Trump's geopolitical interests, specifically regarding Greenland.
  • European Union Regulation: Anticipated regulatory actions from the EU against tech giants Apple and Meta, potentially resulting in lower fines than previously expected.

Conclusion The episode presents a comprehensive look at CoreWeave’s IPO and its implications for the market while addressing broader political discussions around government spending and regulation. The insights from both Mike Intrator and Senator Chris Coons highlight the intersections of technology, finance, and political discourse in today’s landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • CoreWeave's IPO is a bellwether for investor sentiment in tech.
  • The company's strong growth metrics contrast with concerns over debt and market stability.
  • Ongoing political discussions reflect a divide on fiscal policy and government efficiency, impacting perceptions of new initiatives like Doge.

For more insights and updates, tune into *Squawk Pod* and follow the discussions on CNBC.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Bring in show music please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod. The Doge team and special government employee Elon Musk go public. They weren't like big balls and 20 years old. Rooting out inefficiency and stemming a chaotic identity. Senator Chris Coons on the fast moving, fast changing first two months of Trump 2.0. I don't think people elected him to put tariffs on, take tariffs off, put tariffs on, take tariffs off and raise our costs. And the biggest tech IPO we have seen in years. AI infrastructure company CoreWeave goes public and CEO and co-founder Mike in Trader spoke to our team before the first trade.

0:45We have a wave of demand that we are unable to build fast enough to see. Plus the rest of today's news that got us squawking. It's Friday. Finally. March 28th, Squawk Pod begins right now. Stand Becky by in 3, 2, 1, cue it please. Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We're live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick along with Joe Kernan. Andrew is off today. Almost. Almost. Almost the same color. Again. I definitely have something much closer than this to that. It's pretty close. Did you watch any of that last night? Any of the sports? You know, it's a long story.

1:30Yes, I watched a little bit. I can't stay up that late. But. Nine. No, there are games being played in Newark. I know. At The Rock. I saw it. I was watching. You can't bet on them. Oh. I just, I was thinking it would have been really fun to go watch them. First I went to Fanatics. I'm like, what's the problem? You were going to bet on Alabama or. I was probably going to take Alabama. Yeah. And I was. There were two Rutgers players. Former Rutgers players. Cliff Amore. and Mag, Malat Mag, who were opposing each other. I had to, you know how I figured it out? Perplexity. At first I tried to, it's like, I looked, fanatics, nope, not there.

2:08Okay, going over to DraftKings. Yeah, it's at the Prudential Center. Yeah. Yeah. And you can't in-state. Anything in-state, you're not allowed to bet at it. Because, you never know, I might drive over there really quickly and see some of the players going in and say, hey, I'll give you$10. Is that why they do it? I think they're worried that you have undue influence. I don't know. You tell me. But it ruined, you know, and that was the game that came on at 7. So that was when I was tonight. I'm watching tonight. And it's happening again. There's not all the games are bettable tonight. Cloud computing provider CoreWeave pricing shares in its IPO at$40 a share each and raising$1.5 billion.

2:49The share price was well below the earlier indicated range of 47 to 55. So all the way down at 40. Also, the company is able to sell 37.5 million shares and wanted to sell 49 million. So the implied valuation for the company now around$19 billion, if you use a fully diluted number it would be above that, but still it got ratcheted down and we finally get an IPO in tech that everyone was looking forward to. You can't just say it was unequivocally just great. They're going to raise$1.5 billion versus$3 billion that they had hoped. Right, and I think that the valuation would have been much higher.

3:26Yeah, and also of that, about a billion dollars is already slated to go to pay down debt, pre-existing debt for some of these issues. It's an AI play, right? They provide access to NVIDIA graphic processing units for AI training and for workloads. And despite the reduced size of the offering, it's still the biggest IPO, tech IPO, since 2021. It should provide investors a barometer of the demand for tech offerings after a couple of quiet years. Shares are expected to begin trading today on the NASDAQ symbol CRWV. And it's the age-old question. Do you want to price it low enough to get a nice jump when it opens?

4:07Or are you leaving money on the table that you could have raised by doing it that way? Always talk about that. I mean, this is such a fascinating thing. Do you want to get as much as you want, or do you want the people that buy it? Right, to buy it to get a little bit of a pop to ride with this, too. It's been such a fascinating thing to watch. They build these data centers. It's really CapEx intensive to do that. So they've got close to$8 billion in debt already on the balance sheet. But they've also been growing incredibly rapidly, 700 and almost 50 percent growth in revenue over the last year.

4:38They started out as building data centers for crypto mining and things along those lines. They shifted over to AI, hit it right at the sweet spot. So it's been an incredible growth story. But they're coming at a time when there are questions about the continued demand for these data centers, especially in the wake of what we heard from DeepSeq in China earlier this year. And don't miss Becky's interview where she is going to. I'm actually super excited about this. Any questions you have about the inner workings of this company and the actual technical expertise that they have, she's going to. I'm super excited.

5:15You actually have studied. I have. Mike and Trader is coming on and there's some huge questions to ask about. There's so much excitement around. You know, you're going to Microsoft is their biggest customer. And so that's raised some questions as well. There are issues about how they violated some of the terms of their covenant for this loan that they took out. But I mean, there's some really interesting things that they've done. And it's amazing. It's also, by the way, NVIDIA owns about 6 % of the company. Well, I'm glad we're going to have all the other viewers watching to learn about it in plus one.

5:45Because I had some other things I had to look at. And Chris Coons, who voted against, you know, voted against the president. And, you know, I really thought Democrats wanted to keep the government open at all times because they gaslight so hard with the possibility of Republicans closing the government. And then, you know, poor Chuck Schumer is going to get thrown out on his tuchus because he, you know. Because he wanted to keep the government open. We'll talk about that. But we have a lot of really big guests coming up. We do. And this is the Corweave CEO, and I'm super excited about that. Me too.

6:21Now I am. Now I am. It's a fascinating, fascinating story. Elon Musk, in the meantime, explaining his attempts to cut federal spending with the Department of Government Efficiency. In an interview on Fox News with seven other Doge staffers, Musk detailed the team's goal of cutting the deficit in half from$2 trillion to$1 trillion. We want to reduce the spending by eliminating waste and fraud, reduce the spending by 15 percent, which seems really quite achievable. The government is not efficient and there's a lot of waste and fraud. So we feel confident that a 15 percent reduction can be done without affecting any of the critical government services.

7:08Some of the fear around what Doge is doing has been focused on changes to the Social Security Administration. Musk tried to reassure viewers on that front. As a result of the work of Doge, legitimate recipients of Social Security will receive more money, not less money. All right. I'll emphasize that point and let the record show that I said this and it will be proven out to be true. Also featured in the interview was Tesla board member and Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia. He is said to have joined Doge to help the antiquated paper-based process of retiring from the government. We really believe that the government can have an Apple Store-like experience.

7:52Beautifully designed, great user experience, modern systems. And that is one of the things we talked about yesterday with Sandy Weil. If you can actually get in and fix the systems there, these antiquated systems that exist, which is long overdue, something along those lines to do that, that would be incredibly helpful. but this has been a big issue. My guess is they're going out publicly and talking about this because there has been some public pushback and real concern about what happens with social security if you're closing down the phone lines. Because of the narrative that has been spread by the people that are organizing the big demonstration for this week at Tesla dealerships.

8:30It's a fear factor. Anytime there's change, you're going to have fear. I would strap every person, I'm not going to say just Democrat, but I would strap every person that is circulating, whatever it is, hysteria or lies or misperceptions. Those guys I watched. And one by one, they said why they were there, who they were and why they were there. They were one of the most impressive groups of people that one guy was running four or five companies. Why'd you leave? Because I think I want to do this. This is my chance to be able to do something. Even Elon, either we're going to be a bankrupt country or we're going to have to take these steps.

9:07But they were so thoughtful. They weren't like big balls and 20 years old. And they weren't just at all. Well, and they're smart. They're the some of the smartest people I've seen. And, you know, if you were if you got to have Congress to do it. The Biden administration had four years to start on this. We've had the previous Trump administration. We're finally at least looking at ways to do it. And these were some of the most impressive people and patriotic people, given their time. and they could be doing a lot of other things. So, you know, when they're firebombing a dealership this weekend or having a big demonstration or keying a Tesla or whatever it is that these people are doing, I would strap them in front and make them watch the half hour with Brett Barrow.

9:50That's what I would do. What I will say is I wouldn't question the reasons for any of these people getting involved with this. They want to help their country. I think the question becomes if you move too fast, if things get, like the idea of shutting down on social security call centers and offices, makes it hard for seniors who don't know how to get the technology. They addressed all of those concerns. They said, yeah, there will be times where we don't get something right, but we immediately try to - We immediately try and fix it. We try to fix it. I don't know who else I'd rather have trying to do this.

10:20Congress is useless. There's, I wouldn't - No, but again, it goes back to the questions of the constitution, the power of the purse strings going to the Congress. Look, I think we need somebody behind me. These guys would be great to come up with all the solutions. Okay, how are you going to do it with Congress when you can't get a... That's part of the problem. You can't get a Democratic vote on a single Republican proposal. You don't need it. You need 60 a lot of times. Yeah, you don't need it right now in order to get majority issues through. They have both houses. Well, you know, I'm not going to point fingers, Democrats or Republicans, on who can't do it.

10:56But we've seen what they're capable of. Nobody can do it. We've seen what they're capable of. They don't do it. Maybe there's very little. Maybe you can vote on some of the stuff these guys find. I mean, here's the latest thing on, you know, there's no fraud in Medicaid. Yeah. Right now, Medicaid, billions of dollars, because if you get insurance, you got insurance company gets paid in one state. If you move, the insurance company can still get paid in the state you move from and the new state. Right. And this is because the systems don't talk. And this is a huge part for upgrading those systems and getting some real technology.

11:28I mean, we've seen the problems with government technology on the whole thing. I think one of the things Elon was saying last night was he looked at a survey that cost, what was it, a billion dollars that he said could have been done on SurveyMonkey for$10 ,000. Right. Ten questions, very simple thing. It's been a huge problem that you don't have the most up-to-date technology in government. And that's because you can't get the most up-to-date people who will agree to work for the government wages on some of these things. So we are getting a good service by having these experts coming in and offering what is top quality talent.

12:03And people, this is why they voted for Trump. And actually his approval ratings right now are at a higher level than they ever were in November when they voted for him and through the entire stint of the first administration. So people see what's happening. My guess is the reason they're getting out there and doing this is because there are so many questions and so many people who are nervous about changing. Well, the mainstream media would never take one side in this. The European Union is likely to hit Apple and Meta with relatively light fines under the bloc's digital competition law. That's according to the Financial Times, which says that Apple is expected to be ordered to revise its App Store rules.

12:42It said a separate investigation into the design of Apple's web browser choice screen will also be closed. That report says that the lighter regulatory touch from Europe is meant to avoid upsetting President Trump. It says Meta is likely to face a fine and an order to change its practice of forcing users to consent to data tracking or pay a subscription fee to go ad free. That's really interesting. An example of where this president's unpredictability is definitely going to help American countries, because this law was seen as an absolute way of just taking revenue and huge fines from our biggest companies.

13:20I'm going to tell the EU to just butt out. You know, when you succeed at something in terms of technology or to the extent that all our companies do, then maybe you can get involved. It seemed incredibly unfair the way they were going about this. And so this is probably some much needed and kind of necessary news to hear back here on that front. You know, there are a lot of there have been a series of things that have happened that would not have happened if he wasn't as mercurial. And sometimes I worry about the unintended consequences. Well, yeah, the case where it definitely pays off when when two countries both have like a thousand.

14:04nuclear warheads. There's times when you're thinking, let's tread lightly. Thousands. I think thousands. This is something I know how irritated so many of us were when the EU first came up with this ridiculous plan, because they can tax something like your entire global revenue and take a huge hit from the entire situation with it. Seemed patently unfair. So here's where that pays off. Definitely a positive. All right.

14:34Yeah, that makes sense. Russian President Vladimir Putin speaking yesterday in Murmansk. That's the world's largest city north of the Arctic Circle. He warned it would be foolish to dismiss U.S. President Trump's, in case, if I said President Trump, you wouldn't know who I was talking about. But President Trump's push for control of Greenland, saying the move is unsurprising, given America's longtime interest in the mineral rich territory. He noted that the U.S. had such plans as far back, he says, as the 1860s, and offered to buy Greenland from Denmark again after World War II. He described it as, in his words, an issue that concerns two specific nations and has nothing to do with us.

15:22I don't believe that. Putin's comments came ahead of today's visit to Greenland by Vice President J.D. Vance. His focus is on the minerals, not on the idea that this would also be a security issue to prevent the world from Russia making some moves we weren't able to counter. Cheese will be next. Coming up next on Squawk Pod, the political division around the doging of American government. Democratic Senator Chris Coons joins Joe and Becky on the Squawk set. Lots of Delawareans have called to express concern about their personal financial information being accessed by this unelected team from Doge.

16:02And I'm getting calls with complaints about wait times on phone calls for either Social Security or veteran services. Stay tuned. We'll be right back.

16:16Welcome back to Squawk Pod. Stand by Joe. Here's Mike. Q. You're watching Spockbox on CNBC. I'm Joe Kerner along with Becky Quick. Elon Musk, we're going to just take a quick look at a soundbite in a second, explaining his attempts to cut federal spending with Doge. In an interview on Fox News with Brett Baer, with seven other Doge staffers, Musk detailed the team's goal of cutting the deficit in half from$2 trillion to$1 trillion. You technically are a special government employee, and you're supposed to be 130 days. Are you going to continue past that or do you think that's what you're going to do?

16:56I think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars within that time frame. So in that time frame, 130 days. And the process is a report at some point, 100 days? Not really a report. We are cutting the waste and fraud in real time. So every day that passes. Our goal is to reduce the waste and fraud by$4 billion a day, every day, seven days a week. And so far we are succeeding. Some of the fear around Doge and what it's doing has been focused on changes to Social Security and to the Social Security Administration. Mr. Musk tried to reassure viewers on that front as well.

17:35It's going to affect people very positively. So the changes that we're doing here will ensure the solvency of the American government, of the United States of America. This is what we're trying to do, is ensure that people do receive their benefits in the future. And you can only receive your benefits if the country is operating in a healthy and competent way. And joining us now, Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Appropriations Committee, is in studio with us. It's good to have you on. Great to be on, Joe. Good to see you. Senator, did you get to watch any of it or are you just hearing about it?

18:15I didn't. I'm just hearing about it now. But I'm well aware of the widespread concern among constituents that Doge broke into and got access to everyone's information out of the Treasury master file. Lots of Delawareans have called to express concern about their personal financial information being accessed by this unelected team from Doge. And I'm getting calls with complaints about wait times on phone calls for either Social Security or veteran services. I think the overriding thrust of what Mr. Musk and the other members were saying last night was that we are on a course in this country of insolvency in a lot of different areas, including entitlements if we don't do something, and including just overall government spending, the total debt at$36,$37 trillion, and as a percentage of GDP by 2050, the numbers are staggering.

19:11So they're just that was the point was we are trying to address where we can. And in the most prudent way possible, we're trying to address it now before it's no longer addressable. Is there any empathy or any understanding that that's something we might want to do in the Democratic Party right now? You started to say, is there any empathy? And what you changed it to, is there any understanding? And let me get to that point. The core challenge for Democrats is how Republicans are going about with what's called a reconciliation bill that's moving through the House and headed to the Senate that will slash$800 billion, mostly from Medicaid.

19:51I did an event last week with patients who rely on Medicaid for their health care, their caregivers, their families. These are disabled children. These are folks with medically complex conditions. These are seniors in nursing homes. There's broad agreement that we have a deficit that is out of control. There's deep disagreement about how to go about dealing with it. And the bill that we are seeing come through will explode. The deficit will dramatically increase how much America is spending by giving again one of the biggest tax cuts in American history. And so you're calling you're calling spending not.

20:32Collecting enough tax taxes, it's not actually spending it. As you know, the two are a balance sheet is how much comes in, how much goes out. I understand. So, for example, laying off thousands of people from the IRS, one of the things Doge is doing, is projected to reduce Treasury receipts by 10%. Senator, Medicaid, I mean, this is just one story here. I mean, there's plenty of things to look at with Medicaid. Every one of the most of the 10 million illegal immigrants that enter during the Biden administration, If they need health care, it's Medicaid. Not that you don't want to give people health care, but it also has.

21:11It's also been expanded. It's also been expanded. A quarter of my constituents in Delaware, 250 ,000 of my one million constituents. It's been expanded far beyond disabled and poor people. It's been expanded far beyond that. It's providing substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment. Chest lessons after school. And the$800 billion that you're talking about, you're not cutting Medicaid itself. You're cutting the increases that are built in over the next 10 years into Medicaid. That's all that's got. It's still growing every year, right? Look, the priorities of our parties are fundamentally different in terms of where we'd like to reduce spending and where we'd like to invest.

21:50One of the things that got broad bipartisan support in the last Congress was investing in chips manufacturing here in the United States. The Chips and Science Act passed with bipartisan margins in both the House and Senate. Trump is determined to cut this program, to claw back investments in chip manufacturing. That both hurts manufacturing and hurts our competition with China. Do you think it was a good idea that you voted, you didn't go with the majority leader on keeping the government open? Democrats have gaslit Republicans so many times about keeping the government open. And yet, this most recent time, you know, the majority, I'm sorry.

22:30He was majority. He was. Now he's minority. I know what you mean. Minority leader was left out hanging out to dry. He had to get, you know, a couple of, I guess, a coalition of the willing that went along with him on this. But you decided not not to. And that would have shut the government down. Well, I'm an appropriator, and I thought we should have voted for a 30-day continuing resolution that kept the government open, but continued our negotiations to actually do our job and do a full-year appropriation. I'm the senior Democrat on appropriations for the Department of Defense. We have never had a full-year CR for the Department of Defense.

23:08It is harmful to our national defense. That was the position every previous time we debated a CR. We should not have a full-year CR for DOD. Would you have closed the government down? Would that have been the... That isn't what was really in front of us. But the debate inside the Democratic Party over exactly whether we should have voted for or against that CR is dwarfed by the unanimity in the Democratic Party that we shouldn't be cutting Medicaid to pay for more tax cuts. Do you think that Chuck Schumer did the right thing? Look, he had a credible argument, a strong argument, that to shut the government down right now, given the widespread cuts to different federal programs that are in violation of law and, according to several court decisions, unconstitutional.

23:52I understand why he made that decision. I do. Who's the figurehead now? Figurehead. Who's the leader of the Democratic Party right now? We don't have a president that's a Democrat right now, so you've got a leader in the House, a leader in the Senate, a new DNC leader. Is he damaged Senator Schumer at this point? You think he will will he be minority leader in a couple of years? That depends on whether he chooses to run again. If you mean, you know, four years from now, look, I think he will likely be our leader again in the next Congress. This is something we choose at the beginning of every Congress.

24:27He's tough. He's a New Yorker. He's aggressive. And that's what I think Democrats are looking for in this moment. There was a striking outcome in a state Senate race in Lancaster, where my wife is from. where a district that was plus 15 for Trump just elected a Democrat for state Senate. As you saw in your previous segment here, all the indicators, consumer confidence, projections for inflation, are going in the wrong direction. And there is widespread anger among those who said, I voted for President Trump because he was going to bring my costs down. Costs aren't going down. They're going up.

25:03Well, he's got the highest approval rating in his. He didn't have it ever this high in his first term. We've got the highest right track. A majority of Americans disapprove of what he's doing on the economy. Okay, now you're parsing. And business leaders who come in to meet with me. But it's still the highest they have. And right track, wrong track, highest level at 45 % since 2004. People elected him to do these things, and they're still on board with him for the most part. I don't think people elected him to put tariffs on, take tariffs off, put tariffs on, take tariffs off, and raise our costs.

Read the full transcript

25:33I think people were concerned, for example, about the cost of groceries. We heard that was eating your vegetables. You got to eat your vegetables before you eat your dessert. And the vegetables that we eat come from Mexico, about half of them. And the housing we want our kids to be able to afford relies on plywood from Canada and drywall from Mexico. If you look at the two biggest accomplishments of the first Trump administration, two real accomplishments, USMCA and the Abraham Accords. He's undoing both of them. This crazy suggestion that he would bulldoze Gaza and build some Riviera casino has really...

26:08But he closed the border immediately, which you said you couldn't do, for four years, and you let in 10 million illegal... A lot of our problems right now stem from a totally open southern border. And he has not deported as many as President Obama. No, but they're not coming in. You know that it's not happening anymore. What is right in front of us is his so-called Liberation Day next week. Can you tell me what he's going to slap tariffs on? Can any business tell us how they're going to plan for manufacturing and for production? You're going to know by then. I will know by then. And then the next day you'll know what changes.

26:45Business leaders, I think, had very high expectations coming in to this administration. They may have been put off by what they are seeing with these flip-flops on things. But if you ask a lot of them, they will say, we didn't think we were going to get a fair shake at all under a Harris, Kamala Harris presidency. So is there a move within the Democratic Party to try and woo any of those business leaders and try and say, OK, we would be a party that you would want to support? The sentence I just said, business leaders I'm meeting with. Yes, part of the point of my engagement is to talk to folks who are leaders in businesses that I want to attract to Delaware, that I want to help grow, that I want to make sure are employing Delawareans.

27:24And that's how I approach this. Frankly, I think they're surprised somewhat about the tariffs and economic policy. They're also concerned about this signal issue where the very top national security leaders were violating sort of the basics about classified information and the lack of truthfulness in dealing with it. Executives know when someone makes a mistake, you own it, you deal with it, there's accountability, you move on. And for Republicans and Democrats in the Senate, they have concerns about how Hegseth and Waltz have dealt with this. It did not have an impact on the mission carried out against the Houthis, but it could have.

28:03Sharing exactly when and how and where pilots were taking off and munitions were being dropped puts our service members at risk, and there should be accountability. You know, it did have an adverse consequence was, and you know where I'm going, was Afghanistan. Did you call for Lloyd Austin's resignation? Not only did we lose 13 service members, we left$70 billion worth of equipment that fell into the hands of the Taliban. A couple of years later, he was out of pocket for two weeks and didn't tell the White House. Did you ask for him to resign at this point? Are you actually asking for Hegseth and Waltz to resign when you didn't ask for Lloyd Austin?

28:42There is nothing that Lloyd Austin did by getting health care treatment. Okay, what about Afghanistan? What about Afghanistan? Did you guys forget that? The statute of limitations is over for four years? The fact that the Secretary of Defense was getting health care is fundamentally different from the Secretary of Defense sharing on an unsecure platform attack plans. You just said it was a success. Afghanistan was not a success. I am not saying that the attack on the Houthis was not a success. I am saying that he demonstrably violated a directive that was just shared in the Pentagon about don't use signal for classified information.

29:18It is not reliably secure. And one of the folks on that group chat was in Russia at the time that that information was being shared. On a secure line. Look, all of us all of us use apps like WhatsApp and Signal. You're running out the clock on Afghanistan. You're running out the clock on. It was a mistake for Donald Trump to negotiate with the Taliban an agreement. for winding down the Afghanistan war. Afghanistan was Donald Trump's fault? If you'd let me finish my sentence, I will actually come your direction. You did say that. It was a mistake to negotiate an end to that war that put Biden in a box.

29:51The execution of the withdrawal from Afghanistan was badly handled. And the loss of those 13 Marines was a tragedy. Should you have asked for Lloyd Austin's resignation from that? I don't know whether Lloyd Austin's the person who should have been held accountable for it, but there should have been accountability for that. General Miley said he would tell China if we were ever going to launch an attack. Because he was so concerned about signals that the Chinese believed we were about to. So, again. You don't have a problem with him giving them a heads up and telling the Chinese leaders, you'll hear from me if anything's planned?

30:27I think you're mischaracterizing that exchange. That's pretty close. I think it's a whataboutism. I mean, I think we can all look at the signal. The point is that you're going to complain about a splinter in one eye and ignore a two by four in the other eye. I don't think that's I don't think, Joe, the career of any military officer would not survive what just happened. And it shows a blindness to concerns about informational and operational. About Mayorkas, you let him stay for four years as 10 million people came across the border. Should you have asked for his resignation? Look, what you're trying to change the subject from is what just happened in the Trump administration.

31:07It is a willful and demonstrable lack of accountability for violating basic requirements for confidentiality. Are you calling for either Waltz or Hegset to resolve? Yes. You're calling for both of them to resolve? I have. But not Lloyd Austin. Lloyd Austin is not the secretary to defend. You didn't back down. Okay. I just, I think that's the splinter two by four. I appreciate the scriptural reference. Most Democrats wouldn't. That's what I said yesterday on Twitter. None of them have heard about the Bible. All right. Thank you, Senator. Thanks, Joe. Thanks, Becky. You knew it was going to be fun, right?

31:43You always get my blood pressure up. That's good. I do. I don't want mine to go up. That's the last thing I need. Next on Squawk Pod, today is set for the largest technology IPO in years with the NASDAQ debut of CoreWeave. This is a software company that provides access to heavyweights like NVIDIA and AI for graphics processing and other artificial intelligence infrastructure needs. That's a mouthful. The company's CEO, Mike Entrader, joins us before CoreWeave's opening trade on Wall Street. There's a lot of headwinds in the macro. There are headwinds in the AI trade. And we definitely had to scale or right-size the transaction for where the buy interest was.

32:32This is Squawk Pod from CNBC. I'm producer Katie Kramer. And this next interview is a conversation with the CEO of CoreWeave, the morning the tech company listed on the Nasdaq market site. This is exciting for a couple of reasons. First, it's an IPO, a technology IPO. They have been few and far between since 2022, and nothing's been this big of a listing in years. Now, CoreWeave was originally hoping to sell shares at a valuation over$26 billion. But the night before the listing, it priced at the bottom of its expected trading range. So that landed at around$19 billion in valuation before it opens.

33:13It's a big write-down, but this size, this$19 billion, makes it much bigger than any venture-backed tech IPO we've seen since Lyft's debut in 2019. It's largely serving as a test for the IPO window and investor appetite for new listings. Now, another reason it's exciting is what CoreWeave does. It's an AI infrastructure company, and its customers include Microsoft Meta, IBM, and most recently, OpenAI. Kind of the culmination of AI hype. But given the write-down, there are some headwinds to think about. Core Weave co-founder and CEO Mike Intrader spoke to our team on the Squawk Box set before the company's very first trade.

33:53Here's Becky. Core Weave going public today on the NASDAQ. It is the biggest U.S. tech offering since 2021. The company priced the IPO at$40 a share. That was below its expected range. It's going to be trading later today under the ticker symbol CRWV. And joining us right now, first on CNBC, right here on set, is CoreWeave's co-founder and CEO, Mike Intrader. And Mike, thank you for being with us today. Thank you so much for having me. I'm really excited for the day. I'm really excited for CoreWeave and looking forward to speaking to your audience. I know this is a really big deal for you all.

34:30Based in Livingston, New Jersey, you all have come a long way from what you started out. You are building out databases and you started doing that for Bitcoin mining and other operations. you jumped on the AI trend and you were there early and you got to these data centers and are building them out at an incredible pace, building up revenue at amazing, phenomenal speeds. I think revenue growth of more than 725 percent for the last year. But you're also taking on a lot of debt to do it. And the IPO that came out is the biggest tech IPO since 2021, but it was below expectations. What happened when you were out there on the roadshow selling this?

35:08Yeah. So look, it's clearly a tough tape, right? Like, you know, there's a lot of headwinds in the macro. There are headwinds in the AI trade. And, you know, we definitely had to scale or right size the transaction for where the buy interest was. This is going to be a very, very exciting transaction for us. It does an enormous amount to move the company forward. It positions us for the next stage of growth for CoreWeave. And this is just an incredibly fantastic time to begin that journey. Going public is just a day in the life of an incredibly long-term transaction and business that we're building.

35:51You're raising about$1.5 billion. I think expectations at the high end would be that it could be as much as$3 billion. dollars still. One and a half billion dollars is a big chunk of change. I think about a billion dollars of that is slated to pay down debt. Is that the case? Yeah. So we're going to pull in the billion and a half dollars later today. It's very exciting. And then we're going to use that to pay down some debt. We're going to use that to continue to expand our footprint, to invest in the human resources, to build the business and continue to scale it at what has been an absolutely unbelievable pace over the past several years.

36:29It's really exciting. The pace has been breakneck. It has been phenomenal to watch. But there have been questions that have been raised this year by what we heard from DeepSeek earlier this year about whether all of these companies will continue to spend at the same pace, whether they're still going to need the same computing power. What do you say to investors who are looking at this and have some of those questions? So DeepSeek was one of the most amazing dislocations that I've ever seen, right? Like from the perspective of folks who watch your show, DeepSeek triggered a bedlam, right? But on our side of the table, on the compute side of the table, where the rubber hits the road, there were only two things that actually happened.

37:13There was a massive spike for spot computing costs. And then there was, my phone just blew up. And it was all of my clients trying to figure out how to build bigger, how to build faster, how to bring on more infrastructure as they continue to move forward. Why did DeepSeek spark them wanting to bring on more computing power? Because they looked at it as this is a normal kind of progression of how compute is going to be used. And as the space continues to move forward. As the compute becomes cheaper, they're going to have an opportunity to integrate their solutions into a broader part of the economy, which will lead to more demand.

37:55So Jensen Wong of NVIDIA has said the same thing, because NVIDIA shares took a big hit when this news came out. He has said that it means that it's going to move beyond just the biggest companies, the Microsofts, the Amazons, and others who are investing on this. Have you seen that yet? Have you actually seen smaller customers who have come in and said, we want to get on board with this? Yeah. So we've seen all kinds of customers. I mean, it's been everything from the AI labs like OpenAI that just did an amazing contract with us a couple of weeks ago to JP Morgan, to IBM, to Jane Street. Right.

38:28Like it's it's just an incredible breadth of companies and enterprises that are really moving forward to begin to integrate this infrastructure into into their business models, into how they drive their business forward. Let me bring up a couple of things from just the last week or so. On Tuesday, Joe Sy, the Alibaba CEO, got up and said in front of a conference that he thinks that there is a bubble forming in the data center business at this point. The second is Microsoft passed on an option to, I think, spend another$12 billion with you. I know you placed that with someone else immediately. But what do those two things kind of add up to?

39:05What would you tell investors? Because that is something that made some investors nervous. So look, one of the things that's made us incredibly effective. The Alibaba chairman. Yeah. So one of the things that's made us incredibly effective as a business is that we kind of take a really long term view of where this space is going. And you're sitting at the first inning of a super cycle as artificial intelligence begins to integrate itself into the economy, into society. And our position on this is that our clients are telling us universally to continue to build. We cannot keep up with the scaling.

39:43And so, you know, are there going to be places where there's too much infrastructure built? Sure. But that's not the day-to-day impact that we have. We have a roadmap of infrastructure. We have a wave of demand that we are unable to build fast enough to see. How long is your average contract? Yeah, so we enter into a very specific part of the compute market. We really focus on four to five year deals. And we have deals that are anywhere between three and five. They have extensions and options that go into the sixth and seventh year. It's pretty exciting. And so, you know, in those contracts, our clients come to us.

40:27They buy a specific piece of infrastructure at a specific price for a long term. That allows us to go ahead into the debt markets and underwrite that with some of the most sophisticated lenders in the world. And we marry the debt up to a commercial contract that is incredibly accretive for our company. Right. One of those is with Blackstone. I think they loaned you close to eight billion dollars. Yeah. So there was them and a group of others. Yeah, it's a whole syndicate. It's Blackstone and BlackRock and Pimco and Magnatar and Carlisle. I mean, it's really a who's who within the planning in the private lending space that came in and understood our contracts and understood the technology and understood the offtake.

41:11And we're able to to to underwrite that transaction at enormous scale because of the quality of the entire package that we delivered to the market. One of the knocks, though, has been that your account, your oversight on some of these issues was not what it should have been. You violated some of the terms of the agreements by using that money to grow in Europe. And you didn't tell the lenders within three days. Now, they came back and they didn't charge you to change any agreements on this, which is good news. But some people have pointed to that and said, what happened with the oversight here?

41:40Yeah. So, look, we take any kind of technical issues around a contract very, very seriously. And we have been working furiously to scale our business, but in particular to scale the part of their business that addresses the controls within an organization. But but you're exactly right. Look, you know, private lending businesses are not in the business of not charging for technical defaults. They're not in the business. So if they're looking at it and they're not charging us, they're sending a very clear message that these were truly technical defaults that didn't require any type of action. And those lenders proceeded to go ahead and continue to lend us hundreds of millions of dollars after all of these issues.

42:25And I do want to kind of highlight that all of those issues that were in the S1 were self-reported. We went to them and said, hey, this looks like a little bit of a misstep here. Let's clean this up. And they were like, absolutely no big deal. Let's keep going. OK. Your partnership with NVIDIA is key. Nvidia owns about 6 % of the company and they ended up picking up, we've heard, $250 million of the$1.5 billion of this offering. How key is that partnership and are we right in our understanding of that? Yeah, so Nvidia is an extraordinary partner for us. They are an extraordinary company. They're building technology that is moving the world forward.

43:05We really, really appreciate their support. We are really excited to be part of the solution that drives technology to help bring the most performant configuration of that technology to the clients that consume their hardware, that consume our product. They've been great for us. If you are looking at where you expect to be, let's say two years from now, five years from now, What's your outlook? Yeah, look, we've got a business model. We've got a client set. We've got the most sophisticated, demanding consumers of this infrastructure in the world. These are the companies that will change the way that we function, right, and the way businesses function.

43:57And, you know, our job as a company is to really remain on the bleeding edge of this technology to continue to scale, to build a global business that's able to fulfill the needs of this seismic change that's occurring around the world. What would be a great first trade for you? What do you want? What are you looking for? So in spite of my background, I try really hard not to think of my business in terms of trades. I think of it as what is the best strategy that I wait a minute. It's IPO day. So I'm a big believer in the stock and we have you're not even going to look. I bet you you're not even going to know where it opens today.

44:37It's like, hey, I'm long term. I spent a weekend with. Would you take 48? I don't think I'm allowed to do this from the SEC rules. All right. Let me let me address it. let me address it this way. You know, we're bringing a different type of business model around how you build and deliver this technology to market. We believe that it's incredibly effective. Our partners in the private market have believed it's incredibly effective. They're so supportive of what we've done. They've been investing with us round after round as the company continues to grow and expand. And we believe that as the public markets get to know us, get to know how we execute, get to know how we build our infrastructure, get to know how we build our client relationships and the incredible capacity of our software solutions, the company is going to be very successful.

45:34With the size and the price, would it indicate something even bigger than what you're considering is maybe there's some fly in the ointment if even at 40 and with a lower offering size, if it still wasn't, you know, if it opens below 40, that would indicate something is amiss. So, look, I'm very hopeful for the stock in the short term, and I'm very hopeful for the stock in the long term. I'm way more comfortable with my belief in where the long term stock value is going to be. Okay. In the long term, we're all going to die. Well, hopefully it'll get to where I'd like it before that happens. Or it may cause me to die.

46:14That's just the expression I always hear about the long term. It's got to go in the afterlife. It is. Mike, it's been an incredible journey since you guys were founded in 2017. Good luck today. We appreciate you coming in here based in Livingston, New Jersey. So this is not a Silicon Valley company. It's right here. Don't tell me where. I think near the Bottle King. Yes. I know where that is. Yeah. Thank you for coming in today. And we hope you'll come back and talk to us again soon. I sure would like to. And I want to thank the entire CoreWeave team. This has been an unbelievable journey. And it's just so exciting to have an opportunity to do this.

46:50Thank you. And that is Squawk Pod for today and for the week. Thanks for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorgan. Andrew will be back on Monday. The gang is getting back together. You can tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern or listen anytime you want to this podcast. When you follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts, you won't miss a thing. We'll meet you right back here on Monday. Have a great weekend. We are clear. Thanks, guys.

From the publisher

Ahead of CoreWeave’s first trade, CEO and co-founder Mike Intrator discusses the company’s value in the AI ecosystem, including for clients like Microsoft, IBM, and OpenAI. Despite pricing at the bottom of the company’s listing price range, CoreWeave’s debut is the biggest venture-backed tech IPO in years, potentially signalling a shift in market appetite for IPOs. Senator Chris Coons (D-Connecticut) discusses the DOGE-prompted division among lawmakers and American citizens alike after Elon Musk and DOGE members gave an interview on Fox, explaining their intentions with America’s budget. Plus, Russian President Vladimir Putin has weighed in on President Trump’s intentions for Greenland, and the European Union might hit Meta and Apple with smaller fines than expected. 

 

Sen. Chris Coons - 20:29

Mike Intrator - 37:25

 

In this episode:

Sen. Chris Coons, @ChrisCoons

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk

Katie Kramer, @Kramer_Katie


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
The CoreWeave IPO with CEO & Co-Founder Mike Intrator 3/28/25Squawk Pod · 48 min
Listen in VO