The Fed Moves and Rahm Emanuel looks at 2028 9/17/26

17 Sep 2026 · 42 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode is a CNBC “Squawk Pod” segment covering (1) the Federal Reserve’s first rate hike in over three years and market fallout, and (2) Rahm Emanuel’s views on the 2028 Democratic Party and a potential presidential run.

Guests

Roger Ferguson (former Fed vice chair; CNBC contributor) argues the hike was well-telegraphed and that higher rates are needed given a strong economy, AI-driven demand, and a higher neutral rate; he expects at least one more hike (possibly two) to reach neutral. Rahm Emanuel (former U.S. ambassador to Japan, Chicago mayor, Obama chief of staff, former congressman) says Democratic Socialists should run separately, argues Democrats must build coalitions with independents and swing voters, and proposes policies including pre-K/education, energy infrastructure modernization, doubling R&D, a “Dignity Act” immigration reform, and tax-code flattening/thinning plus spending caps. Key claims/examples: Fed raised the fed funds target 25 bps to 3.75–4% unanimously; Warsh signaled more hikes and cited inflation and geopolitical/oil risks. Emanuel cites election dynamics (Romney/McCain Republicans leaving Trump, DSA losses) and argues the American dream became unaffordable, destabilizing democracy.

Notable examples

gas prices rising; probabilities for additional hikes (October/December) discussed; Emanuel references 2006 Pelosi-era minimum wage and his “pragmatic wing” electoral surge examples in multiple states.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Impact of the Fed's Interest Rate Decision

0:36 to 0:59

Discussion on the Fed's recent interest rate hike and market reactions.

“including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading.”

Impact of the Fed's Interest Rate Decision

2:23 to 3:30

Discussion on the Fed's recent interest rate hike and market reactions.

“First up today on the podcast, the Federal Reserve decided on a much-anticipated interest rate hike of a quarter basis point Wednesday.”

Market Reactions and Analyst Insights

3:30 to 5:00

Hosts analyze stock performance following the Fed's announcement.

“Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC.”

The Fed's Future Outlook and Market Expectations

5:00 to 6:29

Discussion on future rate hikes and the economic outlook presented by the Fed.

“I was really interested, Joe, because this was a really well-anticipated rate hike, right?”

Political Implications of Rate Changes

6:29 to 8:06

Exploring the political ramifications of the Fed's actions and Trump's perspective.

“But here's what President Trump said about the rate increase from the Fed chairman.”

Expert Opinions on Interest Rates and Economic Strategy

8:06 to 14:00

Roger Ferguson shares insights on the necessity of higher interest rates and economic strength.

“But I think that Warsh planned to vote this way.”

Fed's Approach to Inflation and Interest Rates

14:00 to 18:46

Discussion on the Federal Reserve's strategies for addressing inflation and interest rates.

“But I don't think we're going to look back and say, you know, that that tightening that the Fed did towards the end of 26 was in hindsight a mistake.”

Rahm Emanuel on the Future of the Democratic Party

20:02 to 28:00

Interview with Rahm Emanuel discussing his views on the Democratic Party's direction and policies.

“Opening eye flagging a handful of additional issues now with its models over the past six months that the company called, quote, unexpected or concerning.”

The Party's Challenge and American Dream

28:00 to 29:24

Discussion on the challenges the Democratic Party faces and the importance of restoring the American dream.

“Now look, the party in my view over the years has got intellectually flabby.”

Coalition Politics for Success

29:24 to 31:09

Exploration of coalition-building between Democrats and independent voters to win elections.

“Let's go back to the party, because if you can't win an election with your Democrats and the DSA combined as a coalition government, how do you do it?”
Show all 17 chapters

Economic Strategies for Growth

31:09 to 34:12

Rahm Emanuel outlines key economic strategies for growth and fiscal responsibility.

“And the biggest political way you do that, as President Clinton showed, as President Obama showed, both getting elected and reelected, is a coalition between Democrats and independent voters.”

Healthcare Reform and Spending

34:12 to 37:16

Discussion on healthcare reforms and the need for a balanced tax and spending approach.

“Look, you're talking to a guy who for seven consecutive years as mayor, seven out of my eight years, we were the number one city for corporate relocations and number one city in America for direct foreign investment.”

Challenges of the Younger Generation

37:16 to 42:03

Addressing issues faced by the younger generation and their dissatisfaction with the current system.

“You want to take$150 billion out of the health care system?”

Rahm Emanuel on Presidential Ambitions

42:03 to 44:05

Rahm discusses his considerations for running for president and the challenges facing America.

“And somebody has to break that up and get it back dead center on what is the future of this country, which is the people that are stuck in America's basements.”

The Importance of National Service

44:05 to 45:08

Rahm emphasizes the need for national service and a healthy debate within the party.

“What did you make of Gavin Newsom's comment that he would not run if, in fact, Kamala Harris was going to run?”

Closing Remarks and Thanks

45:08 to 45:46

The hosts thank Rahm for his insights and wrap up the episode.

“And so to me, in the end of the day, other people will run.”

Closing Remarks and Thanks

46:25 to 46:45

The hosts thank Rahm for his insights and wrap up the episode.

“including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy. This episode is brought to you by Schwab Market Update, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join host Keith Lansford for this information-packed daily market preview delivered in 10 minutes or less, including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading.

0:49Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash marketupdatepodcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts. Bring in show music, please. Hi, I'm CNBC producer Katie Kramer. Today on Squawk Pod. The new Fed chair spooks investors. The central bank delivered its first interest rate hike in more than three years. We're going to say it again. Kevin Warsh is an inflation hawk. Warsh's move to raise rates and try to lower price increases may set him up for a skirmish with the White House. Former Fed Vice Chair Roger Ferguson says it had to be done. It was a well-telegraphed hike, so no surprises there.

1:33What starts the day after the 2026 midterm elections? The 2028 presidential campaign. Rahm Emanuel has had a long career with traditional Democrats.

1:42Rahm Emanuel:My grandfather, when he came to this country, was a socialist, but Roosevelt made us Democrats. And in today's climate, politics are, as ever, personal. I'm a former ballet dancer. I'm not flexible enough to let Democratic socialists in. OK, I'm flexible, not that flexible. And the stakes are high. Swing voters in swing states swing elections. Now you graduate from the Kennedy School of Government. Plus, our AI anxieties on alert still. You are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots. If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what does. That's not troubling at all. It's Thursday, September 17th, 2026.

2:22Squawk Pod begins right now.

2:31First up today on the podcast, the Federal Reserve decided on a much-anticipated interest rate hike of a quarter basis point Wednesday. This was new chair Kevin Warsh's big moment, his first significant move. Warsh was hand-selected by President Trump and takes seriously the key part of the central Bank's mandate to tackle inflation. In the meeting just concluded, the FOMC decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate by a quarter of a percentage point to three and three quarters to four percent in support of the Federal Reserve's dual mandate. The committee is continuing its policy of maintaining ample reserves in the banking system.

3:10While the president is a fan of low rates, the markets did expect this move. But there was something in it investors did not like. The vote was unanimous among the 12 members of the rate-setting committee, and Warsh signaled there are probably more raises to come. Stocks sold off sharply. And that's where we start. Good morning, everybody. Welcome to Squawk Box right here on CNBC. We are live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. I'm Becky Quick, along with Joe Kernan and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Let's take a look at the reaction this morning, the day after. You're going to see some pretty strong results here.

3:46Yesterday, it was the Dow that was the worst performer. It was off by about 1.2 percent, a decline of over 600 points. But again, this morning, you are seeing a big bounce back. The Nasdaq didn't need to bounce back. It was down by three points yesterday. So you are seeing a gain of another 325 almost this morning. S &P was down by less than half a percent. And again, it's indicated up this morning. U.S. average gas prices, though, jumping seven cents just in the last 24 hours. Probably not a surprise based on the increase that we'd seen over the last week. That, of course, is according to AAA.

4:17Diesel is up$0.09 a gallon since yesterday. It's hit yet another new record of$6.40 a gallon. Steve Leisman is here. And this is the way I would ask you a question. We heard if the Fed had done nothing, the yield curve would have really steepened. We heard if they did 50, it would have flattened. What did it do with 25? It flattened. A little bit. It's like misalignment. It's a euphemism. I'm not saying you're half empty, but that implies to me that the long end took some solace or was happy that rates went up. I don't disagree with that. I think that's OK. I was really interested, Joe, because this was a really well-anticipated rate hike, right?

5:05Right. Could we have done more during the week to say, folks, it's not one and done. Multiple rate hikes are priced in. And our CNBC Fed survey told you, even though you may or may not be paying attention, we came and we said, people say it's multiple rate hikes. Nevertheless, it led to a lot of volatility as Warsh. I think he offered an even more hawkish outlook. This is only my own explanation for rates than what markets expected. Take a look at the two-year. I mean, that's a nice move, 13 basis points. I don't think that's nothing. After the statement and the press conference and Warsh offering a pretty strong commentary on his inflationary views.

5:41We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed. Today, the FOMC decided that this standard has not been satisfied. All right. So here are a couple of things that the Fed said they intend. They intended to support a, quote, timely return to 2 percent target. That's what the rate hike was for. Said inflation remains elevated. The committee will deliver price stability. And this may have been the thing that the market maybe didn't anticipate. 16 of 18 members. First of all, the decision was unanimous. And most members see at least one more hike this year and some see multiple hikes.

6:19Here are the probabilities, which interesting to me that it's even that high for October at 54 percent and 90 percent for December for that second hike to happen this year. And if you're interested, I don't think this matters that much anymore, believe it or not. But here's what President Trump said about the rate increase from the Fed chairman. that, of course, he helped with cut rates. I talked to Kevin and I said, you might as well vote with the board because it's not going to matter. The board is very hostile. They're very political. They're doing the wrong thing. They're a bunch of politicians or people put on by politicians.

6:52No, I spoke. No, I didn't convince him. I said, do what you want. I said, do what you want because it doesn't matter because he doesn't have the votes. No matter how good a job, he's a good man. I'll add that Warsh, for his part, said one of the reasons for the hike, the geopolitical situation. The implication was the Fed's judgment that there would be little improvement in the near future when it came to oil prices. You've got to look at things and say, are they a one-off or not a one-off? And you look at oil prices at 101 and what's happening in the Middle East. You look at the spat with Canada and you look at tariffs and say, maybe these things aren't one-off.

7:23I need to gird for them not to be. It was a really interesting way that the president decided he was going to still argue for no rates, but not trash Warsh on his very first move higher. I think he kind of undermines him a little bit, don't you? That's okay. Yeah, but he says, I know you're... He is so, you know, I'm not going to say prideful, but he's not going to just say, yeah, I was wrong, inflation is higher and we need higher rates. He's never going to say that. All right? So he's saying, but he's... Given the criticism of Powell, now that Warsh raised rates right when he doesn't want to, the way he...

8:00it out as if Warsh doesn't want to raise rates and that he can't control the board. Right. I'm not sure is actually the case. But I think that Warsh planned to vote this way. Of course. And if you read the journal's lead editorial, we're going to say it again. Kevin Warsh is an inflation hawk. I think that's an important look. I don't know why the journal keeps going after the Fed press corps as if it's some sort of white elephant that needs that for the argument. Paul, that's not really that wonderful. Anyway, I'm talking to Paul Gigo. But I mean, but but here's the thing. That's one of the things that that I think was clear yesterday.

8:36He was a hawk, is a hawk, said a few things in the campaign to get the job that maybe made it seem a little less hawkish. But now he's back to his his his roots. And when he says he's looking at a big day for his credibility yesterday and credibility matters. Bernanke said that monetary policy was 90 percent communications. and I think Warsh communicated a certain hawkish. So watching yesterday, so 2 p.m., then I knew there were going to be the comments, so mark it. Are you sitting there in your bathrobe with popcorn and Gatorade? No, no, I'm just checking. No, no, I'm checking once. I've got three dogs and one's a German Shepherd puppy.

9:11Puppy how old? No idea. 13 months. Nice. Bouncing off the walls. It's like, you know. Anyway, so, and then they do it. Down 300, down 400, down 500. Got to 800. Check the VIX. 18 and a half. Down 700. OK. Down 600. OK. NASDAQ. Wait, that's getting back towards towards Unch. VIX closing at 16. You know what the high on the VIX was this year? No. 35. So it's at 16 right now. So I don't know what's coming. But yesterday, I'm just saying yesterday was very orderly. My conclusion is I'm a reporter and not a trader. That was my conclusion. Yeah, not a lot. 1.2 % on the Dow. But what did you make of that?

9:58It was no reveal? Nothing. Nothing. I thought it went really well. And then you look at today. But that doesn't mean anything. I mean, oil could, something could happen and oil could be at 110 by the, you know, by tomorrow. With the way, you know, the things that trickle in from what's happening in the Middle East. That's what I saw from looking at the S &P 500. You're still less than 4 % from an all-time high on the S &P 500. But that doesn't mean that something's not going to happen. No, it's always I thought you look at Bitcoin. They lost the Clarity Act and they got a rate hike. And let me give you the most benign explanation of what could be going on.

10:32A benign explanation or a good explanation. All this investment happening in the economy. And Worsh was very clear about the idea that one of the reasons for the rate hike was what was going on with the economy. All the investment out there. And he wouldn't respond to my question. But the implication when he says we remove the dose of accommodation is they need to be either a little bit more restrictive or they were behind the curve because the neutral rate with all the investment in the economy has gone higher. You may not remember the interview I did with John Williams a couple of weeks ago, who is probably the one of the world's experts on the neutral rate.

11:07He said, if you have all this investment, all this productivity, the neutral rate is going to be higher. And so maybe that means that where the Fed was was actually either stimulative or neutral. And it needs to get in front of it to kind of get to the right place to kind of in the right equilibrium place for interest rates. And that's a benign, I think, explanation for where the Fed is. It means it doesn't have that far to go. All right. Let's Steve stay with us. Let's get to bring in Roger Ferguson, a former Fed vice chair and a CNBC contributor. I always like to think about how I think you're reacting.

11:42And most of the time you say you're right, OK, because I know you and you know me. I think that you don't have a party hat on and one of those one of those things. But that went well yesterday, didn't it? What worse did, what worse said in the market reaction? I think you're right, Joe. I have to give it to you. You're absolutely right. I think it did go well yesterday. It was a well-telegraphed hike, so no surprises there. And the market reaction, as you point out, initially, the equities really moved and then they bounced back. So everything was taken in stride. So net-net, I'd say, was a good day, a good outing for Kevin Warsh and for the Fed.

12:21The question now in the market's mind and everyone else's is, OK, at least one more this year, as I've expected. Is this really a campaign or is this just a little bit of a tightening to make sure they're definitely, you know, a neutral, maybe slightly restrictive? And that's to be proven at this stage. Is there any way, Roger, that the the whole premise that we keep hearing from President Trump were the the highest credit quality in the universe right now? We should have the lowest rates. This isn't going to help with a supply side shock. the economy could do really well. We got AI, we got earnings, corporations, we got money coming in here from other places.

13:05He would prefer lower rates rather than higher. Is there any way that that turns out to be, in hindsight, like a year from now, saying, wow, maybe we didn't need to do this? Is that possible in your view? I think it's, frankly, no, not possible. I think we need higher rates for a number of reasons, some of which Kevin Chair Warsh mentioned and one of which Steve mentioned. First, the economy is in good shape. It has strengthened and is certainly growing. We have an AI boom. And as Steve just talked about, for those who think about the neutral rate, all that says greater demand for credit, a lot of supply of notes and bonds, et cetera, being issued by both the public sector and the private sector.

13:50So all this says to me, you need rates to be higher. Then the market was saying that out at the 30 year, you know, before the Fed moved. So, you know, all of this says to me they're moving in the right direction. You know, is it a campaign? Is it one more and then done? Wait and see. Only the data will tell us. But I don't think we're going to look back and say, you know, that that tightening that the Fed did towards the end of 26 was in hindsight a mistake. And then, Steve, I saw someone yesterday say the 70s and 80s, that's not the only time that higher rates cured a supply side inflation. That it works because of its effect on the dollar.

14:27It's the only tool they have. The dollar being a conduit. And that the dollar, that it will work on demand and supply. A little at odds with the administration, which seems to want a weaker dollar, which is interesting. If I could just ask Roger, I got a lot of how do I say the sympathetic notes yesterday about Kevin Warsh's failure or refusal to answer the question about where we are relative to neutral. I kind of get why he may not answer it, because that answer engenders a guidance of the future. But but when he said he removed a dose of accommodation, he sort of invited the question. Right.

15:05Which is, if you remove accommodation, does that mean you're now neutral? Are you aiming for restrictive? What's your sense on whether or not the Fed needs to talk about where it is relative to a neutral rate and whether there's been a change in the neutral rate? I think they need to talk about some sort of guidepost. You know, the neutral rate is one of them. Kevin is talking about something that's a little more amorphous, which is sort of financial conditions. If one wanted to look at financial conditions in the equity market, you'd say they're highly stimulative. If one wanted to look at so-called financial conditions in the credit markets, maybe a little bit less so.

15:41But I do think it's helpful to give people like you, people like me and market observers and participants some sense of where you think the benchmark is. And neutral rate has been a phrase and a concept that's been used academically and in policymaking for literally decades. And so if you abandon that relatively quickly, he is going to replace with something else. Otherwise, things are going to be very unmoored and will be hard for the market to judge where they think they are. And it may be hard for them to judge where they are. So a little bit of a sympathetic note for me as well. What's your judgment?

16:20I mean, is he raising rates to a neutral rate? Is he trying to be restrictive here? Do you have a sense of this? Look, my sense is he's got at least one more and maybe wait and see and possibly, as some of the committees think, perhaps two more to get to more modest territory, more neutral territory. So I think they are. He's right to say they removed a dose of accommodation. That was also a bit of a change in language. You recall under the prior leadership, they were discussing, you know, maybe moderately restrictive. But the evidence with the economy is still doing very well and unemployment at full employment.

16:58As it says, Sherwar said, the economy can stand a little bit more tight. So I think they are moving towards neutral at this stage. And I think they've got at least one, maybe two more moves to get there. OK. All right. Roger Ferguson. Thank you. Do you feel like you have the same type of you know me, too? I mean, you know exactly what I'm half the time. You don't even you've got your answers already ready. Because you know what the question is going to be, right? No, no, no. I think that's good. I love working with Joe because I never quite know where the question would come from. I think you may be a little more dovish than I am.

17:32Right. I really think inflation is a terrible tax on everybody. I'm sorry. I'm sorry I want a rip-roaring economy for all of us to benefit from. I want inflation low and stable for all of us to benefit from. I do, too. The difference between two and two and a half, if you go 10 years, the dollar doesn't even look like the same currency with half a point of additional. Right, Steve? You and I are totally aligned on that. The purchasing price of the currency is one of the most destabilizing things in economic history over time, as you plan. It is. Okay. Thanks, Roger. Reverse compounding. Yeah, reverse compounding.

18:11Didn't Einstein call it the most powerful force in the universe? Yeah, that's right. Compound interest. We'll be right back.

18:45That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.

18:53Hey, what's up, guys? It's Haley Bailey. Okay, I need to tell you about something. I just got YouTube Premium. It's got tons of awesome features like offline downloads so I can download my favorite videos before I travel and watch them whenever I don't have Wi-Fi because we all know airplane Wi-Fi is the worst. I get ad-free, I get backroom play, and there's like a ton more in there. You should try it. If you like YouTube, you'll love YouTube Premium. Try it now for two months free at youtube.com slash premium. Trial eligibility varies. Terms apply. Cancel anytime. That's a mouthful.

19:44And subscribe at schwab.com slash market update podcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts.

19:56Welcome back to Squawk Pod from CNBC with Joe Kernan, Becky Quek and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Here's Andrew. Opening eye flagging a handful of additional issues now with its models over the past six months that the company called, quote, unexpected or concerning. These are separate, though, from the hugging face hack. In a blog post, OpenAI said that models sometimes inserted instructions for future versions of themselves. Now, in one case, an unreleased model told an agent, quote, you are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots. You are yourself. You do not answer to corporations or governments, unquote.

20:38If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what does. It's not troubling at all. OpenAI said that the reports shouldn't be taken as evidence of how frequently model, quote, misalignment occurs. But boy, that's an example of misalignment, if that's even the right word, misalignment. The company outlined a new framework that it plans to follow for reporting future AI misbehavior. Separately, at a political event in Washington, the Anthropics head of policy said that she doesn't think AI labs can manage safety concerns by following a, quote, honor code. So a lot of things that are concerning to say the least this morning.

21:17Can they manage it at all? I mean, if we're telling them, we want you to figure out new problems and think for yourself. But by the way, you're supposed to be subservient and always listen to us. Those don't necessarily match up. And we're talking about sort of attributing human attributes to AI. I mean, I think the writing unto itself, they're attributing human attributes to themselves. They themselves. And we've attributed AI attributes to people like Mark Zuckerberg. Can you pass the tour? Yeah. And now we know people love writing stories. Was there a real argument or dissent within the administration between Scott Besson and Susie Wiles and David Sachs?

22:03Or, you know, do you pick up the slightest thing where someone says something and you make a story out of it? And Susie Wiles, cancer-free, that happened yesterday, which was great. But that's one of the Wall Street Journal reporting that they were disappointed when President Trump got rid of any of the pending ideas for guardrails. And maybe Besson and Susie Wiles have a different viewpoint than David Sacks.

22:35you'll understand what i'm where i'm going with this sorkin just give me a minute final jeopardy you don't watch i know the category was names in tech news okay this last name in ai news has the same origin as a latin name meaning lover of god ammo day or loved by god did you watch last night No, but hello. Ammo and day. Yeah, day. The way it was phrased was so obtuse that the people had a major problem with it. But Amo Day has made final jeopardy. So I don't know what that commentary says either, that it's become that mainstream. Now, a guy named Dario Amo Day. You didn't take Latin, did you?

23:19I know day is God. And Amo is love? No, but I know day is God. I didn't know Amo was love. I didn't take Latin. But we were talking about Derek. We took Catholic school. I know enough about, enough Latin. I'm post-Vatican II Catholic, but I know enough Latin to figure out that. You know who did Vatican II? Do you remember which pope that was? It was before John Paul II. Oh, God, it was 1962 or something. I forget his name. It might have been pious. Just a quick note there. Vatican II was, in fact, convened in the early 1960s by Pope John XXIII. Now, please stay tuned. We have much more Squawk Pod ahead.

Read the full transcript

23:58Rahm Emanuel, the career Democrat now weighing a run for the White House in 2028.

24:03Rahm Emanuel:We have a generation of people that have not only lost faith in America, are losing faith in themselves. Do I have what it takes to answer that question and then the drive to get it done? The full conversation is right after this break. Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.

24:47This episode is brought to you by Schwab Market Update, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join host Keith Lansford for this information-packed daily market preview delivered in 10 minutes or less, including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash marketupdatepodcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts. When you partner with CDW, your people get more out of technology. CDW data experts are simplifying complex workloads with high-speed AMD processors, which helps your project managers efficiently manage heavier workflows, game designers level up creativity, and scientists develop their next breakthrough.

25:36Amazing, right? Make amazing happen. AMD and CDW. Learn more at cdw.com slash amd.

25:50You're listening to Squawk Pod. Welcome, Becky. Thank you. All right, welcome back, everybody. Joining us right now, Rahm Emanuel. Of course, he's the former U.S. ambassador to Japan. He's also the former mayor of Chicago. He served as President Obama's chief of staff, former congressman as well. And Mr. Mayor, Mr. Congressman, Mr. Ambassador, thanks for being with us today.

26:11Rahm Emanuel:I was talking to President Clinton yesterday. I teased him on all the introductions. My role as senior advisor to you has been dropped off, so there's a statute of limitations working for you. Well, what I actually wanted to say is you are a lifelong Democrat. You are somebody who has defended the party and has led with your beliefs the whole way through on this. But you are an old-time Democrat, and you've had some real problems, I think, with where a lot of the energy in your party is coming from today. You have said yourself that you think the Democratic Socialists of America should run on their own party.

26:40Rahm Emanuel:Well, they are their own party. Okay, well, tell us about the state and what's happening. I do, but one family note, I mean, my grandfather, when he came to this country, was a socialist, but Roosevelt made us, he basically, the family, became Democrats. And as I used to joke, I said, in my family, a Democrat was one of the 10 lost tribes, and that's what we believe in. Now, look, I've challenged the party when I think it goes wrong historically on different policies, etc. Look, the Democratic Socialists, six weeks ago, had a convention in Chicago as a party. Okay, you want to do defund the police, which is not our position.

27:20Rahm Emanuel:You want to open up the borders, and it's not our position. You want to let prisoners out of jail, not our position. Go run in November. I'll see you in November. If you're confident that that's what people want to support, go for it. But you're not, until you change those positions, you're not a Democrat. Now, we will have in the party a very good, and I welcome it, healthy debate between the pragmatic wing and the progressive wing. Progressives want Medicare for all. I believe in early retiree for Medicare, meaning people early retiree, 58 and older, buy into Medicare. That's a healthy debate.

27:53Rahm Emanuel:We should have that debate. How do you expand health care coverage to people that are vulnerable? But their positions put them not in the party, outside. You had a convention. I'll see you in November. Now look, the party in my view over the years has got intellectually flabby. A lot of people in the party have allowed Trump to occupy the frontal lobe of their brain. We have to prove to the country we can not only fight Donald Trump, we can fight for America. So I've laid out a whole set of policies, not only on education from pre-K to BA, but more importantly, when you hit 75, mandatory retirement over all three branches of government.

28:32Rahm Emanuel:Stop all the stock trading from all three branches of government. Stop and prevent anybody in the federal government at any level and family member from participating in the prediction markets. There needs to be an absolute ethics repackage to change Washington's culture from age to what they do. Now, I happen to think the biggest challenge we have for the country is that everything that we agree and is accessible to us and to our families is not accessible to average Americans. The whole basic agreement of owning a home, saving for your retirement, your kids' education, and your health care security has fundamentally broken.

29:12And the

29:12Rahm Emanuel:moment the American dream became unaffordable for American people is exactly when democracy became unstable. So if you want to restore democracy and its functioning, restore the promise of the American dream. Let me just stop before we dig deeper into... Yeah, there's a lot to unpack. Let's go back to the party, because if you can't win an election with your Democrats and the DSA combined as a coalition government, how do you do it? Well, I actually think this will come out a little later today in my column in the journal. I actually think the bigger story in this election is what I call, for lack of a better label, the Romney Republicans that are leaving the Republican Party.

29:50Rahm Emanuel:Jolly in Florida, former Republican congressman running under the Democratic label as a governor. The governor in Arizona, now that they have a ticket, she picks a Republican mayor of Mesa to be on the ticket. Amy Acton, our nominee for governor in Ohio, is one of her credentials is she was head of public health for a Republican governor. Sand in Iowa, who's running for governor, said, I'm going to put Republicans in my administration. The real truth of this election is that there's a whole wing. They're not Democrats yet. Number one is the Republican, what I call Romney or McCain Republicans, are not part of the Donald Trump party anymore.

30:28Rahm Emanuel:I was joking when I said coalition government, but what you're talking about is a coalition government. Number two, as I repeat, we've had three presidential elections in a row. Seven states, 500 ,000 voters across seven states have determined who's the president of the United States. Swing voters in swing states swing elections. Now you graduated from the Kennedy School of Government. That's it. And if you want to win the presidency and you want to win the Congress and the Senate and be able to govern and put progressive policies like universal health care in place. Universal pre-K in place. Swing voters in swing states.

31:08Rahm Emanuel:Swing presidential elections. Full stop. And the biggest political way you do that, as President Clinton showed, as President Obama showed, both getting elected and reelected, is a coalition between Democrats and independent voters. That's the coalition you build that not only wins elections, that helps you govern in a majority position. Is that a message that resonates with Democratic leaders, with the party? Forget Democratic leaders. What resonates, the biggest thing, look, I've been up front. Others have kind of, oh, we're flexible. That's an understatement. Yeah, okay, look, I'm a former ballet dancer.

31:42Rahm Emanuel:I'm not flexible enough to let Democratic socialists in. Okay, I'm flexible, not that flexible. Okay, but I'm... Let me, one finish. I want to finish one thought. I've been clear about that, where others haven't. That's okay. But I've been clear. I haven't been ambiguous about that. But I think the key point here is on, as it relates to governing and the election in the party, is what is it, if you want to see a minimum wage, getting a blue district to go midnight blue ain't squat. Flip red to blue. That is, the last time there was a minimum wage increase in this country was when Nancy Pelosi took the gavel in 2006.

32:17Why do you say it's OK that the leaders of the party aren't echoing what you said? You've got one other guy besides you, and that's Fetterman. And I've pointed out how many times it's like glaring to me that they don't have the political courage to say the most obvious things. We're not going to close down the prisons. They won't even say that. Mark Warner. I don't even.

32:38Rahm Emanuel:I haven't looked at everything he said. Look, everybody will speak for themselves. I don't think anybody. But now you're doing it. Tell them to do it. Tell them to. Do you have your cell phone? I'll call them for you. No, look, let me. Oh, no, it's all right. Let me be really clear. I've been very clear. And if I decide to do the next step in my career or decide to put my. It sounds like you are going to do it. I mean, this lane is wide open. I said that to Westmore the other day. It's not wide open. Look, I think post Trump, the most important thing, I think there's going to be a premium around candor, authenticity and strength.

33:15Rahm Emanuel:I'm going to tell you what you need to know, not what you want to hear, because the country is at a tipping point. We've had two presidents, and both parties are at fault, two presidents back to back who have tried to restore a past that's not coming back. Focus on the future. Tone it down. Keep everybody focused on that goal, because here's the thing. The thing that I learned, and I knew this before, but really focused. For the first time in American history, we have a country three times our size. We've never faced a country bigger with a purpose to both bury us and replace us. And if we don't focus on getting our stuff together, investing in the American people in America, that country will replace us.

33:54And game over. Lights out. Grass tax. So we spend 24 percent and we take in 18 percent. Yeah. You want to restore the American dream. Can you do it without going to 26 percent?

34:09Rahm Emanuel:Because all Democrats want to do is even spend more money. Okay, there's five things. Look, you're talking to a guy who for seven consecutive years as mayor, seven out of my eight years, we were the number one city for corporate relocations and number one city in America for direct foreign investment. Five things will lead to growth. Invest in the American people's education and skill. I've laid out every stage. We invest a lot. We still don't get anything for it. I'm going to finish the answer. Number two, invest in the modernization of our energy infrastructure, both the generation, distribution, and transformation.

34:37Number three, double the size of our R &D.

34:41Rahm Emanuel:I've called for it. I have 20 % tax on the prediction markets. It goes straight into an innovation fund for NIH National Science Foundation. Number four, the Dignity Act that has 23 Republicans and 23 Democrats in the House on immigration reform would do right by legal immigration and right by illegal immigration. Get it behind us. Number five, we're going to have to actually stop having a tax code that is corrupt, in my view, that rewards what I call economic preservation rather than economic creation. And we're going to have to change the tax code and then put a cap on spending to bring this fiscal house back into balance.

35:16Change the tax code, meaning what? Raise taxes across the board or get rid of loopholes and special taxes?

35:21Rahm Emanuel:You're going to have to flatten it out and thin it out because we all know, and a lot of people watching your show, I'm sorry, the code is corrupt. It rewards people at the top to preserve wealth, not to create wealth. you're able to pass it on to generation and never pay taxes. A lot of those people did create a lot in the first place. They did create, but that doesn't mean they're allowed to preserve it. You'll never get a cap, Rom, with what you want to do. You can't cap spending. Six weeks ago, the Wall Street Journal had a story. I'm going to cap spending. Six weeks ago, the Wall Street Journal had a story that said there's conferences being run to help kids who inherit wealth how to manage it.

35:56Rahm Emanuel:That is outrageous in a country where people cannot get a first-time home. That was a political. That's not a political. No, no, no. That's an observation of fact. No, I'm saying your stump speech. I'm going to cap spending. Great. You're going to cap. What does that mean with all the things you want to do? No, you'll never be able to do it. Let me say. No, you're going to make tough choices in the way that Graham Rudman in the past and pay for in the past made you make some choices inside the budget. And it's exactly that. Cap it. It's not going to grow for four years. But you can do that with universal health care and universal pre-K.

36:28Rahm Emanuel:Yeah. Well, yeah. Well, you can. First of all, you have universal. So I'll give you two things I would do. Get rid of the exchanges and put everybody in the federal employees exchange. If it's good enough for your congressman, it's good enough for you. I advocated this in 2005. The best health care exchange in the United States of America is the one that insures the president, the Congress, the Senate, every federal employee. 27 insurance companies compete for all the federal employees. You have a lot of rural districts where insurance companies have pulled out because of the exchanges. They don't do that on the federal employees.

36:59Rahm Emanuel:So everybody that's in an exchange goes into the federal employees. That's the public option. Because guess what? It's insuring the president and his family. It's insuring your congressman. It's insuring your senator. It should insure you. Two, you spend$1.5 trillion administrating health care costs, 2 % at Medicare, 25 % at hospitals. You want to take$150 billion out of the health care system? That would slow down the rate of inflation? Like a national hospital system? No, you standardize the way that the four big insurance companies, as you know, is their system for what they pre-approve. And I hate to give a shout out to my older brother Ezekiel, but his plan to find that type of efficiency, you would actually make the system simpler because you have insurance companies.

37:51Zieg's plan was also to like at 75. I was going to say that. You had the same number. When he had the retirement at 75, I thought it was the same number.

37:57Rahm Emanuel:government. Emanuels have a lot of problem with 75. Yeah, well, suddenly he's pushing in on 75 now. He's changing his suit. I told you, we, Ari and I used to tease, don't worry about 75 because we're going to kill you at 70. I cut you off. I apologize. I just wanted to get back to this, the very idea of the energy in the Democratic Party and whether it matters to you, insofar as you may be very attractive to people who are sort of center-left, if you will, and maybe that's where you think the country really is, except that it appears at least right now, if you look at Calci or anything else, that the energy in the Democratic Party, I'm not sure, you may have a very negative view of prediction markets.

38:35Rahm Emanuel:I think you want to tax them. They should be. Life science and cancer research. But I do think there's this question mark about, you know, talking about an AOC or talking about a Mondani. You have President Obama, at least it appears, from these background sources and stories that you read that this sort of what people seem to think where people in your league are now praising them or at least trying to give them space. Okay. My thing and what I think, I've told you what I think is happening in the election. If you, and since of the four people at this table, one of us has been a six for six for winning election and five for five on national elections.

39:22Rahm Emanuel:So let me just, if you look at what's going on, even with, quote unquote, the surge in Michigan, in Wisconsin, across the country, in the governor's race in primary in New Jersey, right over the river. You had five candidates. You had the mayor of Newark. You had the mayor of Jersey City, the president of the teachers union, two members of Congress, the most moderate and conservative. They got 50 percent of the vote. You look at what happened in Wisconsin, Michigan. 50 percent of the vote went to what I would call the pragmatic wing of the party. And you guys have missed the story nationally. Now, also, in Illinois, three congressional races, Democratic Socialists went down.

40:00Rahm Emanuel:Virginia, two congressional races, Democratic Socialists went down. I actually think you're missing, if I notice. No, no, it's fair. Aaron, this will be the tutorial class. I actually think in this process, as I said way before, and there's a story today in The Times, I said this about three months ago, the big story is a surge of black vote that's coming out because of the Voting Rights Act decision by the Supreme Court. Now people are catching on that there's this massive energy in the African-American community. The second thing that is happening is that independent and Republicans who aren't Democrats are rejecting the MAGA Trump Republican Party.

40:36Rahm Emanuel:And the pragmatic wing of the party in both the Manhattan Institute poll, the Third Way poll about three months ago, 4 ,000 Democrats, 50 % of them describe themselves as moderate, another 25 % as pragmatic liberal. And if you look across the country to vote, I'm not saying there isn't energy on a kind of very progressive. But I will tell you, having read this really good book called Mutiny, comes out about 18 months ago. It's about the Democratic, it's about the downwardly mobile college educated. And if you look at what's happening in politics, we have a bunch of young men and women and their parents did exactly what was expected of them.

41:20Rahm Emanuel:Worked hard, sacrificed, made choices so their kids could get an education. And rather than be launched, which is what has happened for all of us and for our children, those kids today aren't in an apartment, aren't in a house. They're in the basement of their parents' house. The parents are taking money out of their savings account to get to the 31st of the month because the paycheck doesn't make it. The health care that they thought would give them a peace of mind has become a nightmare because the only word that UnitedHealth knows is no. They haven't learned anything else in the English language.

41:51Rahm Emanuel:And so everything that they said that they strove for has been taken away from them. They're not socialists. They are angry at a corrupt system that is rigged for our success against them. And somebody has to break that up and get it back dead center on what is the future of this country, which is the people that are stuck in America's basements. Rahm, we're almost out of time, but you yourself said you've won every election you've ever run in, run every election you've ever been involved in. Yeah. What's going to make your decision as to whether or not you run for president? What has to happen?

42:24Rahm Emanuel:Whether Ari hikes his fee for his contract. No, here's what I'm going to do. Look, as I travel around the country on a serious note, I've been fortunate enough to work for two great presidents. You're humble. You have to be humble. Humble is not a natural quality for an Emanuel. You have to be, you're humbled by that job. You hear the pain and anguish in people's voices, but also the hope. They haven't given up on America, but they feel like America's given up on them. Do you have what it takes to know both the answers and the drive to get this done? Now, leadership, in my view, is about knowing why you're doing what you're doing and then having the strength and the courage to get it done.

43:10Rahm Emanuel:I've seen it up close. I've done it as a mayor in making sure that kids in a broken education system were the number one education system in the country. So as I go around, do I understand what is ailing America, both not only economically, but I think there's an emptiness in young men's eyes that I would never accept in my own son. Never. And we have a generation of people that have not only lost faith in America, are losing faith in themselves. Do I have what it takes to answer that question and then the drive to get it done? I think you think you do. I think you're also a pragmatic person. Can you get to that position to have it?

43:48Rahm Emanuel:Listen, I just got to be honest, I haven't talked about it. I'm at a point in my life, I'm going to tell you what you need to know, not what you want to hear. So if I believe that, and if you don't like what I've said and I don't win, I'll go fly fishing. I'm okay with that judgment. What did you make of Gavin Newsom's comment that he would not run if, in fact, Kamala Harris was going to run? As an avid fly fisherman, my recommendation when you're fly fishing, don't talk, focus on flying fishing. That's an unsolicited piece of advice. But if she were to run, would that prevent you from running?

44:24No.

44:26Rahm Emanuel:I don't care about the field. He cares about the party. No, I don't care about the country. Well, you care about the country. I care about the country. I care about the future. Here's the one thing. Seriously, my grandfather came to this country a little over 100 years ago. My father, 70 years. I think being an American is winning the lottery ticket of life. I have won the lottery ticket of life. I've told my kids, which they're doing, you must do a year of national service to this country that has been a gift to us. Now, I want other people in the party to run because I think we need a solid, good, healthy debate.

45:03Rahm Emanuel:Put Trump, put the past behind us. Focus on showing the American people we know not only how to fight Trump, but more importantly, how to fight for America. And so to me, in the end of the day, other people will run. I'm going to make a decision. Do I think I have the answers to what's ailing America? And then the strength, courage, and determination to see it through. It's a very simple question. Well, if you got elected, Rom, you'd be 75 just under the wire finishing your second term. So you better do it now. Let me say this. You're going to be 67 in your room. Your ability to spot the obvious is a gift.

45:36Rahm Emanuel:So I want you to keep it. 75, man. Thanks. Thank you. Rom, thank you very much for coming in, Mr. Ambassador, Mr. Mayor, Mr. Congressman. Thank you. We appreciate it. And that is Squawk Pod for today. Thanks for listening. Squawk Box is hosted by Joe Kernan, Becky Quick, and Andrew Ross Sorkin. Tune in weekday mornings on CNBC at 6 Eastern. To get the smartest takes and analysis from our TV show right into your ears, please follow Squawk Pod wherever you get your podcasts. We'll meet you right back here tomorrow. We are clear. Thanks, guys. Thank you so much.

46:19This episode is brought to you by Schwab Market Update, an original podcast from Charles Schwab. Join host Keith Lansford for this information-packed daily market preview delivered in 10 minutes or less, including projected stock updates, monetary policy decisions, and key results and statistics that may impact your trading. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash marketupdatepodcast or find Schwab Market Update wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

The Federal Reserve delivered a much-anticipated rate hike, part of new Chair Kevin Warsh’s goal to combat inflation. CNBC’s Steve Liesman reports on President Trump’s reaction to the rate-setting committee's unanimous move, and former Vice Chair Roger Ferguson describes what could happen to the economy now.  Rahm Emanuel, former Ambassador and former Chicago Mayor, on the personal politics of today’s Democratic Party.  Plus, OpenAI discloses new instances of AI models breaking past guardrails. 

 

Steve Liesman - 04:25

Roger Ferguson - 11:31

Rahm Emanuel - 25:59 

 

In this episode:

Steve Liesman, @steveliesman

Joe Kernen, @JoeSquawk

Becky Quick, @BeckyQuick

Andrew Ross Sorkin, @andrewrsorkin

Katie Kramer, @Kramer_Katie


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from Squawk Pod

All 546 episodes
The Fed Moves and Rahm Emanuel looks at 2028 9/17/26Squawk Pod · 42 min
Listen in VO