In short
Podcast Notes: State of the World - Episode: Will the U.S. withdraw military forces from Syria?
Overview
- Podcast Title: State of the World from NPR
- Episode Title: Will the U.S. withdraw military forces from Syria?
- Date: February 4th
- Host: Greg Dixon
- Key Contributors: Tom Bowman (Pentagon Correspondent), Jane Araf (Middle East Correspondent from Jordan)
Introduction
- The U.S. has been conducting military operations in Syria for over a decade, primarily focused on:
- Attacking ISIS militants
- Protecting Syrian oil fields
- Current considerations revolve around the potential withdrawal of U.S. troops due to:
- Weakened ISIS presence
- The establishment of a new government in Syria
Key Discussions
Status of ISIS
- Current Situation:
- ISIS is significantly weakened but remains active in desert areas of Iraq and Syria.
- Remnants have regrouped and continue to launch attacks.
- Ideological support for ISIS persists, particularly among families of former fighters in camps like Elhal.
Potential U.S. Withdrawal
- Implications:
- Withdrawal could be interpreted as a betrayal by U.S. allies, particularly the Syrian Kurdish-led forces, who played a significant role in defeating ISIS.
- Kurdish forces lost thousands of fighters and now feel abandoned as the U.S. pivots away from their support.
Arguments For and Against Withdrawal
- For Withdrawal:
- New Syrian government capability claimed to handle ISIS and ensure stability.
- Focus on other global priorities by reallocating U.S. military resources.
- Against Withdrawal:
- Concerns that ISIS could resurge, albeit not to the scale of earlier years (2014-2015).
- Need to protect Kurdish allies and ensure the safety of oil fields from competing powers (e.g., Russian and Turkish interests).
Broader Regional Implications
- Concerns in Jordan and Surrounding Regions:
- Possible power vacuum left by U.S. withdrawal may be filled by other military forces, specifically Russian.
- U.S. bases in Iraq could be affected if troops are withdrawn from Syria, complicating the geopolitical landscape.
Conclusion
- The potential withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Syria raises significant questions about the future of regional stability, the ongoing fight against ISIS, and the reliability of U.S. allies in the region.
- The discussion highlights the complexity of U.S. foreign policy and military strategy in the Middle East.
Key Takeaways
- The U.S. is weighing the implications of withdrawing troops from Syria amidst a weakened ISIS and a new Syrian government.
- The decision could have far-reaching consequences for U.S. allies, especially the Kurds, and the balance of power in the region.
- Concerns remain about the resurgence of ISIS and the geopolitical shifts that may occur if U.S. forces leave.
Closing Remarks
- This episode offers insights into the nuanced realities of military involvement and international relations, emphasizing the importance of strategic partnerships in addressing global threats.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe U.S. Military Role in Syria
0:45 to 2:19
Explaining the U.S. military operations in Syria and their implications.
“we're going to hear from two NPR correspondents.”
The Kurdish Allies and Their Concerns
2:19 to 3:51
Discussing the impact of a potential U.S. withdrawal on Kurdish fighters.
“not have been defeated if they weren't helping U.S.”
Political Perspectives on Troop Withdrawal
3:51 to 5:10
Analyzing political arguments for and against the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria.
“So I made several trips there during that time, Steve.”
Regional Implications of U.S. Withdrawal
5:10 to 6:06
Exploring the broader regional impacts of U.S. military presence or absence.
“with Russia about whether Russia can keep its bases there.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today on State of the World, will the U.S. withdraw military forces from Syria. You're listening to State of the World from NPR. We bring you the day's most vital international stories, up close where they're happening. It's Wednesday, February 4th. I'm Greg Dixon. For more than a decade, the United States has conducted military operations in Syria. Their job has been to attack the remaining ISIS militants and to guard Syrian oil fields. Now that ISIS is severely weakened and there's a new government in charge in Syria, the U.S. is considering removing their forces from the country. But doing that might hurt some long-standing allies.
0:43To understand what the move could mean in the region, we're going to hear from two NPR correspondents. Tom Bowman covers the Pentagon and Jane Araf covers the Middle East from Jordan. They spoke to Steve Inskeep. Jane, when we talk about the remaining ISIS militants? Weren't they kind of destroyed in recent years? Well, kind of. But first, we have to think about that extraordinary reach that they had. In 2014, they rolled in and took one-third of Syrian territory, huge parts of Iraq, created their own state. So compared to that, yes, they're territorially gone. But they're still there. There are remnants of them, as you say, mostly in the desert in Iraq and Syria.
1:25And they have been regrouping and launching more attacks. Now, there are these seams between security forces where there's really no one in charge, and that's where ISIS flourishes, and that's what's been happening in these areas in both countries. And along with that, Steve, the ideology still exists. You know, I've been to the Elhal camp where the wives and children of fighters are, and particularly among some of the women, they're very much longing for the return of what was in their minds the caliphate, and they believe it will be back. Okay, so the U.S. has been fighting them. The question is whether to let that go and focus on other places.
2:05If the U.S. pulls out, would the U.S. also be abandoning some longtime allies there, ethnic Kurds? It definitely would. You know, when ISIS was driven out of Iraq and they moved into Syria in 2017, they would not have been defeated if they weren't helping U.S. forces. Syrian Kurdish-led forces is what we're talking about. Thousands of Kurdish fighters were killed. And so now, Steve, the U.S. has said to them, thanks, but we don't need you now. Syrian forces can now fight ISIS. But the Kurdish forces partnered with the U.S. for years, and it's a very different ballgame with the Syrian government forces, which are made up of a lot of different groups.
2:47So there's clearly a sense of betrayal there on part of the Syrian Kurds. So, Tom, we've heard some reasons that people might want U.S. troops to remain in Syria. What is the Trump administration's case for thinking about pulling out that thousand soldiers or so? Well, first of all, there's a new Syrian government. And basically, the Trump administration says the Syrian military can now take over this job of going after ISIS, the remnants of ISIS, the U.S. would still work with them. But again, that's the reason they want to remove these 1 ,000 or so troops. People on Capitol Hill I talk with say they may be cut back, may be completely withdrawn from Syria.
3:27But there's a push by some to, listen, we can't remove all the troops. We're still worried about ISIS coming back. Now, Trump, during his first term, wanted to remove all then 2 ,500 troops from Syria. He was talked out of it by the Pentagon. And they basically said, listen, we're worried about ISIS coming back. And also, we want those oil fields protected from the Bashar al-Assad government and also from ISIS and also Russia and Turkey seizing those oil fields. So I made several trips there during that time, Steve. And was it one oil field being protected by none other than the West Virginia National Guard?
4:04Okay. So Tom and Jane, let me ask you both, what are the implications for this whole volatile region on the U.S. decision about whether to keep these 1 ,000 troops there? Well, there's a concern among some, including Senator Lindsey Graham and also former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. We don't want all these troops to leave. We want the U.S. forces to help protect the Kurds. And also, we're afraid that ISIS could come back, not on the scale we saw in 2014-15, where they, again, as Jane said, took over a third of Syria and a good chunk of Iraq. But there is that concern that you can't remove all the U.S.
4:40troops because the Kurds have to be protected and you have to keep an eye on ISIS. Jana Raff, how does it look from Jordan? There's a lot of fear here in the region about what happens. Part of that, of course, is where the U.S. forces are. There will not be a vacuum. If U.S. forces pull out, there will be other forces that take their place. During the Assad era, U.S. forces in northeast and Syria, which is led by the Kurds were operating in the same battle space as Russian forces. And Syria is still negotiating with Russia about whether Russia can keep its bases there. Iraq would be really interesting and even more complicated than usual.
5:19The U.S. has bases in the Kurdistan region of Iraq after pulling them out in central Iraq at the request slash demand of the Iraqi government. And it uses those bases to help support the Syria operations. So if you take out the troops in Syria, and then the troops in Iraq are a question because after this agreement expires in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, Iraqi forces are there basically at the invitation of the Iraqi government in a bilateral agreement. So that's a question there as well. Tom Bowman and Jana Raff, thanks to you both. You're welcome. Thank you. And they were speaking to Stephen's Keep.
6:03That's the State of the World from NPR. Thanks for listening.
From the publisher
The United States has been conducting military operations in Syria for more than a decade. Their mission has been to attack ISIS militants and to protect Syrian oil fields. With ISIS weakened and a new government in Syria, the U.S. may pull out the troops it has stationed in Syria. But doing so might hurt some U.S. allies. We hear from NPR reporters who cover the Pentagon and the Middle East about what the move could mean.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




