In short
UEFA’s Roman Putsch explains how “better fan experiences create better data,” arguing that data value comes from a value exchange: fans share data only when UEFA delivers compelling services and journeys across competitions and touchpoints.
Guests (who)
Roman Putsch, Chief Marketing and Chief Digital Officer at UEFA. He leads UEFA’s marketing/digital strategy and data-driven commercial products. (Hosts mentioned: Chris Stone, community lead at Streamtime Sports; Nick Meacham, co-host.)
Key claims
- Data isn’t “gold” in raw form; it’s like “crude oil” that must be refined by experience, consent, and analytics.
- The industry over-focuses on collecting data instead of designing funnels and business outcomes.
- The key KPIs are addressable audience, active opted-in audience, and activity recency—not just views/engagement.
Notable examples
- Champions League “TuneIn” page drives territory-based viewing.
- Fantasy engagement shows distinct behavior; “deadline/draw” moments trigger higher activity.
- Data clean rooms and data collaborations (e.g., FMCG partner campaign) reportedly doubled performance vs Facebook native audiences.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOOverview of Episode One
0:45 to 1:34
Recap of the first episode featuring Genius Sports CEO Mark Locke.
“He talks specifically about the role that data plays in this relationship with fans, talking about how UEFA over the years have built up particular tech stacks, strategies on how they go about extracting value from data.”
Introduction of Roman Putsch
1:34 to 2:09
Introduction of Roman Putsch, discussing UEFA's current activities.
“So from here, I will hand things over for the interview that Nick and I had with Roman.”
UEFA Season Kickoff
2:09 to 2:55
Roman discusses the excitement and developments at UEFA as the football season begins.
“I think we're just minutes away from getting to know who's going to be kicking off against whom in the league phases of the Champions League, the Europa League and the Conference League.”
Transition from Episode One to Episode Two
2:55 to 4:09
Discussion on the shift in sports economics towards direct relationships with fans.
“So it's an exciting time as it is every time at the kickoff of the season.”
Changing Dynamics in Fandom
4:09 to 4:50
Exploration of how sports organizations are evolving to connect directly with fans.
“And it's been one of these areas of focus for the industry for many, many years.”
Focus on Data in Sports
4:50 to 5:27
Discussion about the importance of data ownership and its implications for AI.
“and what they want, what they consume and what they're interested in.”
Data as Crude Oil vs. Gold
5:27 to 7:12
Roman shares insights on how data should be viewed and utilized effectively.
“Obviously, in that initial kickoff, Mark talked about owning data and how the ownership of data can help power things like AI and other tools that we're talking about quite a bit.”
The Value of Data in Sports Marketing
7:12 to 8:06
Discussion on the importance of refining data and its impact on sports marketing.
“And that, having said that, it means that the quote unquote odd model is anything but dead.”
First Party Data vs. Audience Engagement
8:06 to 9:15
Exploration of the balance between first-party data and broader audience engagement.
“Now, when we speak about crude oil or gold, I mean, obviously, if you take gold out of the ground, you get a nugget and you're really happy.”
Commercial Objectives in Sports
9:15 to 10:10
Discussion on how sports organizations meet brand partners' business objectives.
“Roman, I'm curious, so that data as a term can kind of does mean a lot of things, and you've implied some of that just now and how you've described it.”
Show all 24 chapters
Broadcast Partners and Data Insights
10:10 to 11:12
Insights into the demands of broadcasters compared to brand partners regarding data.
“picture of the marketplace and the audience you're trying to serve?”
Industry Focus on Data Collection
11:12 to 14:01
Roman reflects on the industry's emphasis on data collection over business development.
“It is then also about how do I drive tangible incremental revenues for myself.”
The Importance of Data in Sports Marketing
14:01 to 17:24
Learn how data collection can drive value for sports organizations.
“So it's also about combining data sets of broadcasters or commercial partners in that sense and actually make our data work together.”
Evolution of Data Strategy at UEFA
17:24 to 19:46
Discover how UEFA has transformed its data strategy over eight years.
“And once I think you combine the two, the discussion becomes a whole lot more fruitful.”
Filtering Valuable Data for Commercial Use
19:46 to 23:06
Explore how UEFA differentiates between interesting and commercially viable data.
“When you're thinking about all the data that you're getting from all your different sources, how do you guys go through the process of filtering through what is interesting versus what is commercially useful?”
Evaluating Key Metrics for Audience Engagement
23:06 to 26:40
Understand which metrics are most relevant for driving commercial success.
“And in terms of metrics, are there any that particularly stand out to you?”
Surprising Insights from Data Analysis
26:40 to 28:00
Learn about unexpected patterns in data that can enhance audience engagement.
“To be honest, the surprises usually come from the fact when you combine consumer research and what you see on your digital platforms.”
Predictive Signals in Football Data
28:00 to 29:29
Explore how lighthearted signals can predict fan behavior and commercial outcomes.
“So that's also something that we probably wouldn't have hypothesized at the very beginning.”
Increasing Fan Value Over Growth
29:30 to 31:26
Discussing the balance between reaching new fans and enhancing the value of existing fans.
“And that's something that we do increasingly and hence a couple of examples.”
Leveraging Streaming Data for Insights
31:27 to 35:01
Understanding how broadcast partners' data can inform UEFA's marketing strategies.
“If you ever want to sell something, it works a whole lot better, simply because the approach is much more holistic, so to speak, and people are much, much closer or attached to what you're offering now.”
The Fragmented Fan Experience
35:02 to 37:54
Examining the complexities of fan relationships across multiple platforms and channels.
“more popular, but still fairly early, I think, in terms of adoption across the wider industry.”
Collaboration Between UEFA and Clubs
37:55 to 42:00
Understanding the collaborative dynamics between UEFA and participating clubs to enhance competition visibility.
“conversation that you can have or season-long conversation that you can have on social where you have the 90 minutes where obviously the life with the broadcaster really, really counts.”
The Role of Personalization in Broadcasting
42:00 to 45:34
Explore how different broadcasters personalize their content for audiences.
“And hence, I actually see that more than collaborative.”
Future of Sports Organizations and Fan Relationships
45:34 to 48:24
Discuss the evolving nature of sports organizations and their direct-to-consumer relationships.
“And we measure certainly both what we deliver and what the ecosystem delivers as well.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:06Nick Meacham:Hello, everyone, and welcome back to the next episode of Streamtime Sports. My name is Chris Stone. I'm the community lead. On today's episode, we're looking at part two of our mini podcast series, The New Economics of Fandom, that we're doing in partnership with Genius Sports. In episode one, we were joined exclusively by Genius Sports CEO Mark Locke. Mark took us through the relationships that have developed over the last couple of decades in the sports ecosystem, where teams and leagues have largely allowed broadcasters to monetize fans, and they've really failed to take advantage of the opportunity to build a direct relationship with fans and looking at what the future of that means for sports organizations as they look to derive more value from their fans.
0:41Nick Meacham:On this episode, we're joined by Roman Putsch, who's the chief marketing and digital officer at UEFA. He talks specifically about the role that data plays in this relationship with fans, talking about how UEFA over the years have built up particular tech stacks, strategies on how they go about extracting value from data. One of the important quotes that I took from this, and it's littered throughout the entire episode, is build the right experiences and you'll get the data right. So often from Roman's perspective, a lot of the conversation is around collecting data, but what isn't necessarily talked about is how you build experiences that fans are willing to give their data to you so that you can then make value from that, either from your own relationships or how you use that directly with your commercial partners, from broadcast partners to sponsorship partners.
1:25Nick Meacham:It's a really great conversation talking about the role that data plays when it comes to getting more value from your fans in this new economics of fandom. So from here, I will hand things over for the interview that Nick and I had with Roman.
1:43Nick Meacham:Hello, everyone, and welcome back to the second episode of the mini-series that we're running here at SportsPro on the new economics of fandom. On this episode, we're joined by Roman Push, who is the Chief Marketing and Chief Digital Officer at UEFA. I'm also joined by my Streamtime Sports co-host, Nick Meacham. So, Roman, we appreciate you coming in here today, but busy time. You know, people talk about the offseason, but what people might not be aware of is UEFA is already in full swing with Champions League. So how have things kicked off to start the season? Well, thank you, Chris. I think we're just minutes away from getting to know who's going to be kicking off against whom in the league phases of the Champions League, the Europa League and the Conference League.
2:21Minutes away, well, let's say days away, but obviously we're moving into the draw week. but having said that there's been weeks of qualifications going on already where every country in Europe has seen Champions League and European action already and obviously that then goes into the main phase of the condition we're really excited about that to kick off and obviously the first trophy had been handed over only very recently too with the PSG also winning the Super Cup in Salzburg very recently so season is in full swing club football ready to kick off national team football to follow shortly later.
2:55So it's an exciting time as it is every time at the kickoff of the season.
2:59Nick Meacham:Absolutely. No shortage of football at the moment. It seems to be everywhere. And just to kind of catch people up, this, like I mentioned, is the second episode of the mini series that we're doing on the new economics of fandom. And episode one, we had the CEO of Genius Sports, Mark Locke on. Nick, you got to be able to do that podcast. And I think, Nick, feel free to correct me if I misspeak here at any point. But the real, I think, purpose of that episode or a lot of what Mark focused on was the changing dynamics of the economics around fandom where so long historically sports has been focused around the media rights deals whereas now there seems to be a changing need evolution to build more relationships directly with fans as well as the infrastructure in place to take advantage of that relationship for so long broadcasters had owned that relationship with the fans and sports organizations hadn't necessarily develop that direct-to-consumer relationship with people, whereas now there feels to be sort of a changing of that, particularly, Nick, some of the things we've covered on the Streamtime podcast about stagnating media rights, just the urgency or necessity for sports organizations to no longer be wholly reliant on that broadcast revenue and starting to focus more around the actual relationship with the fans.
4:08Nick Meacham:So, Nick, does that feel like I've summarized that quite all right?
4:11Chris Stone:Yeah, pretty well. I mean, in short, it's basically the industry's moving away from being solely built around those third-party relationships where you sign over your rights to someone, whether it be licensing rights, media rights, sponsorship rights, whatever it may be, taking that revenue and then come back to that relationship a few years later to try and see if there can be another deal done to also taking a bit more control of that relationship with consumers and fans and also unlocking new revenue streams. And it's been one of these areas of focus for the industry for many, many years. And it really feels like we have a bit of a tipping point with regards to what those opportunities look like and what we can do with that better intelligence and insight and data around the fan and what they want, what they consume and what they're interested in.
4:55Chris Stone:So yeah, really excited to be able to have that conversation with Mark a few weeks back now. And I think continue to talk to people like Roman about how they're approaching what is, it's really quite a transformation for the industry because it means that you go back where we were 10 to 20 years ago, most of these sports organizations didn't need to have people like Roman in those types of roles. Well, now they're absolutely essential to have people driving that connectivity with fans through all the different touch points. So lots to talk about today, I'm sure.
5:22Nick Meacham:Absolutely. And today for this episode, we're going to be focusing more around the data side of things. Obviously, in that initial kickoff, Mark talked about owning data and how the ownership of data can help power things like AI and other tools that we're talking about quite a bit. But Roman, just to kind of kick things off on a more general level, talking about data, You and I had a little bit of a prep call before this. And one of the statements you made is, you know, quite often, you know, data is referred to as data is gold, but you feel it's more akin to crude oil. So maybe just talking a little bit of data from that level, sort of what you mean by that.
5:56Nick Meacham:And sometimes maybe perhaps people are a little bit excited about data, or maybe there's misconceptions about the value of data in a raw form. Yeah, I believe we are excited about data, but we need to take a step back before and also to the level of transformation that we've seen. And obviously, I often feel that we are talking very much, okay, we used to have the traditional model in the past. Now it's all about direct-to-consumer and data. And when we take a step back, actually, what are we really trying to do? The first step to create value is to make your competitions or your property, your club, your league as valuable as possible to the fan.
6:31That means it needs to have the right level of visibility, it needs to have the right stories, the right format, the right stories about the participants, the players, and obviously the right level of drama, etc. And what we've seen is that fans can get closer and closer to that. So in the past also, it was only seen on TV, or in the stadium, or in any other venue. But now obviously, the touch points are much greater. So the first effort we need to put in is to develop and deliver the right service to the fan to keep that interest up and growing. And that interest then can translate into a certain behavior that can then drive data that then can drive further value.
7:12And that, having said that, it means that the quote unquote odd model is anything but dead. It still exists. I think probably at the top end of the properties, it's even a bit more classic. And where the media rights are not as lucrative in more of a long tail of sports, it's a different challenge. I acknowledge that. But clearly, it's not an either or, it's an end. So if you want to drive greater visibility, it's about driving the right level of service to the fan. And obviously having insights of what fans are like, what they enjoy, what not, allows you to create a much better service in the first place.
7:47And that same level of data paired with what you see in behavioral data, etc, then also allows you to create more commercial value. But that is based on a value exchange, because I can only get that data if the fan agrees to it. And why would I if I'm not getting the right level of service for it? So I'm coming back to the analogy now. So if you then drive the visibility, you drive commercial value because you can translate data and visibility in combination into a commercial product or even a direct-to-consumer product, then, of course, you can really, really grow the value equation. Now, when we speak about crude oil or gold, I mean, obviously, if you take gold out of the ground, you get a nugget and you're really happy.
8:30Done. Job done. This is go to the bank and get a lot of cash for it. It doesn't work with data. If you look at data in itself, first of all, it is very, very basic. You need to start refining it. And once you refined it, you can actually use it to fuel a machine. Now, the great thing about data is that you can do that with very little data. You refine it, it grows the machine a little bit. And then once you've reached the scale, it will actually grow the machine quite a bit. But data in itself, without the machine and without the refining process is not going to drive the value in isolation. And I believe that's what I'm often missing in the conversation, because we're obviously speaking about data first, we lack definition, and then we're not talking about the verticals that that may actually fuel in order to make it credible how it drives value.
9:15Chris Stone:Roman, I'm curious, so that data as a term can kind of does mean a lot of things, and you've implied some of that just now and how you've described it. Some people are really focused on first party data. I need to have direct connection with the fan. That is everything in this new world or new era we're working in. Others go the other direction. Others say, you know what, first party data is great, but all I'm really focused on is building audience and engagement and having the macro data points of how our content's performing through the various third party channels that exist for us and monetizing those through the various means that can be done around digital advertising and sponsorship.
9:57Chris Stone:Just how do you see that dynamic? Is it simply a bit of both is needed? Are you relentless on the focus of building more first party data? Or is it just having as much as you can of everything to try and get that full picture of the marketplace and the audience you're trying to serve? Well, I guess we can take it again from two angles. One is the visibility of your competitions and the engagement with the competitions. So of course, we need the eyeballs. And that's why we need also a far and wide region distribution, both in the digital, but also in the media space, for everyone to have the opportunity to see and for the property to stay top of mind.
10:33Now, the second question then comes down to first party data and the value it drives and also the value drives through differentiation.
10:41Chris Stone:Now, imagine what the sports industry has been absolutely fantastic in doing, particularly for commercial partners, sponsors, etc. Which is to get your product, your story of your brand in front of many, many eyeballs. That is still a strength. That strength remains. Now, what happens after? So now you've gotten everyone to see your brand, but how is it going to drive the tangible business? And if I was on the brand side, I'd ask the property, how do you help me achieve my business objectives that also go far beyond just brand recognition? It is then also about how do I drive tangible incremental revenues for myself.
11:18How can I speak to your audiences? How can I contact them for transactional purposes? Which is a very fancy way of saying, hey, if I want to sell a fitness expect to somebody, I don't have my own distribution. You're not allowing me to send traffic to my third party retailer because you are afraid of association. How do I do that? So then it comes down to applying first party data to it and translating that into a commercial product because I can speak to hands, I can create certain segments, and I can obviously translate that into an audience product that then a partner can activate anywhere in digital, not just in my properties.
11:51And like that, I can drive the tangible benefit. That holds for commercial partners as sponsors, but likewise, it drives subscription for broadcasters in certain territories. And that level of thinking obviously needs to be applied on the property side because the top of the funnel, so to speak, we get a lot of people paying attention to you. That's all fair and square. But how is that actually then also driving tangible business outcomes? And that's where if I just look at the indirect part of the business, obviously where there's a significant value already and the demand that is there today, then we may want to take the conversation also to the direct level of our business, which in our case is less developed but if you look at if you look at clubs if you look at other properties where it's about selling tickets selling individual subscriptions or merchandise or even stadium tours and of course that data also plays a big role so for me it's not one or the other but the conjunction of the two which drive a full funded product for your own property and as a marketing solution for your commercial partners.
12:58Chris Stone:Sure just a quick follow-up to that you talked a bit about the broadcast partners and then obviously the brand partners and uef is really strong on both sides of that uh that framework um do you see that one side is more demanding of the first party insights than the other i'm i'm curious as to how that dynamic works or doesn't work with the broadcasters is it mainly the brand partners that are looking for that more first party level insight into uef's audiences i would clearly say that the uh that the majority of the activation and the demand comes from the sponsor partners at this point. I also believe that the potential on the broadcast side is equally strong, just not as developed yet, and also technically slightly more complicated.
13:42So if you think about the case of a broadcaster, it is a territory-by-territory approach on the one hand, and it is also more sophisticated in terms of data collaborations that you need to apply, and that's as simple as that. I mean, you may have a subscription, and if I run a subscription campaign, and you already have a subscription, you don't want to get a special offer that you can send to you, right? So it's also about combining data sets of broadcasters or commercial partners in that sense and actually make our data work together. And that obviously takes a little bit more sophistication, but it's anything but rocket science and we are increasingly investing and operating in this space.
14:18Nick Meacham:I want to come back to something you mentioned in your very first answer, talking about the thing that is missing when you talk to people in the industry. Is it your feeling that the industry has become more focused on collecting data as opposed to building businesses around the data? And if that's the case, is that because collecting data is easier to do than the actual analytics side? Is that because of the technology that's available or maybe just a misplacement and prioritization? But just you kind of referenced earlier that there seems to be something missing when you have those conversations.
14:47Nick Meacham:So how much of that do you think is due to either just how they prioritize their efforts around data or the ease with which doing it? It's easier to collect. so we'll just keep collecting if we can't do anything with it. Just sort of your thought around that piece that's missing. Yeah, I think we're having the conversation often the wrong way around because we speak about everything you've just said. But what if we asked if one day I would like to have a direct-to-consumer live TV product? What would be the kind of audience I need to develop for that in order to launch it in territory XYZ? What if I wanted to have a full funnel marketing solution to my sponsor partners ready to go in five years?
15:26What is the data requirement to actually deliver that? Or what if I want to have a completely personalized experience on a Tuesday night where you have the right level of ticker, the right level of game data and the right level of near-life clips in your Champions League app, what would that take? So I'm a big fan of having that discussion and then working back in terms of what does that mean from a data perspective and what does that mean from an infrastructure? What does that mean from a consent approach? And what does that mean for a collection approach? And what does it mean in terms of scale I need?
15:57And if I then go back to the data story, of course, we can collect data. But then again, we should have a purpose and a value exchange. So if you just look at the funnel, what data could be, it could start with something relatively impersonal, like a cookie. So that is addressable in some sort of form, reactivatable. Then it can be an account. the account may provide me some insight but it may not make it activatable without the right level of consent obviously the same holds for the cookie now that's great but that consent is valid over a certain period of time so without the right level of re-engagement strategy whatever data i have is just costing me money because i have to store it somewhere but i can't activate it because it's no longer compliant so that comes down to the fact if i have so and so many accounts how many of those are actually active people coming back and again and again and again and you can't force people to come back so it comes back to the value exchange so you need to give them the right level of experience so in that sense if you get the experience right you will get the data right and then that data will have to have the verticals ready for them to actually fuel them and that's obviously it takes a little bit of a long-term format so to speak to speak about that um but sometimes of course it is it is also much easier just to say look there's tons of data available or you're collecting data to be future proof and both is probably correct the one the you know the big numbers game or the data collection part, it's probably not capturing the nuances of the why we're actually doing this and how it's going to drive value.
17:24And once I think you combine the two, the discussion becomes a whole lot more fruitful.
17:29Chris Stone:Roman, I'm curious, you've been now at UF, I think over eight years now, if I think I saw that previously, how would you describe what the data looked like of audiences back when you first started to where you're at today? How much of, What's changed? What have you been able to had to implement to basically get things into a place that you're happy with? Well, I believe we started with a notion of importance already. So when I joined, OK, there is something here. We probably need to look at this. And, you know, that's eight years ago, which, you know, is two euros or two. One or three cycles of the Champions League.
18:03So depending on how you look at it, it's an eternity or just a couple of days. but that notion of importance was there already email marketing is still important we haven't touched on it that was also something very important back then it provides a direct access with the technology available at the time so that's what we started with and now we've taken it to a very stabilized and mature technology where we can offer these services where we can offer bespoke audiences we can offer programmatic tools We can offer analytics tools to our partners. We can do data collaborations. We can work multiple data collaborations via clean rooms, etc.
18:45So on the marketing tool, we really moved from visibility only and some level of direct to still superb visibility, but much more direct data and targeting products that can actually drive business outcomes much more. That's on the commercial side. But likewise, if I look at our digital fan offerings, it is a very similar story. So obviously social was important, still is important. Our own environment these days is much more sophisticated. We look at how fans are actually following different competitions rather than looking at one competition and another competition. We all know that football is played in various forms.
19:23A player that plays in the Champions League today plays in its domestic competition, but then again in the national team competition. So how do you drive those journeys? So on both ends, I believe it has become much more focused on value. The value has been better understood. And also those verticals have always been at the forefront of the discussion. So we've always been building towards that. And I think that's coming to our benefit at this point.
19:46Nick Meacham:And speaking about value, thinking it from the lens of UEFA and the scale of what you guys are as an international organization and not just in Europe, because obviously there's many South American players that are also playing in, you know, UEFA competitions, you know, Champions League, Europa League, Conference Championship, all that. When you're thinking about all the data that you're getting from all your different sources, how do you guys go through the process of filtering through what is interesting versus what is commercially useful? Because I think when you're collecting that much data, it could be very easy to get lost within that.
20:18Nick Meacham:So how do you guys pretty quickly filter through everything you have at scale to figure out sort of, like I said, what's the difference between something that's interesting information versus this is something that's commercially viable for us? Well, anything that can become commercially viable is based on what is actually delivered to the firm. And I'll come back to that point. If we want to define value, it is about the repeat visits, about the repeat engagement, for all the reasons I've just mentioned, but also to the fact that the more you engage with the competition the better that is so we have seen a couple of things where sometimes the engagement can be very much product-led so a fantasy gamer is a very different segment or a different it shows a very different behavior than many other visitors it's very much i'm very much about fantasy i need more information about this fantasy stuff i really would like to get my team right i want to get the maximum points so it is a superb product ultimately but it doesn't mix much with the others.
21:15So if you ask me what's the commercial value of it, I can be very clear cut about where those people are, when those people engage, based on what triggers they engage. So obviously, the 1st of September usually is a strong one when deadline day comes around, when the draws come around, when the matchups come, etc. So it's something that drives the experience on the one hand, but also with our commercial partners, we can use that according to one example. The other point is something quite simple. What happens on a Tuesday or on Wednesday, one of our busiest pages is TuneIn. So obviously, that's a very simple thing to drive people to where they can watch,
21:51Chris Stone:depending on where they are in their territory, drives direct value to our partners. So those are two examples. But you were talking about the geography. And what we do see is how people engage with our properties, depending on in which time zone they are and depending on what happens. So if you are in South America, then obviously Chemezic happens not under floodlight, but under daylight, so to speak. The game obviously happens here under floodlight, but then you have a daylight match there. So that's while you're working on your desk, etc. So the digital companion becomes super important. When you're in Asia, the matches happen overnight, highlights become super important.
22:31So just quick catch up, etc. on how that works. That, of course, including with the buildup and the benta that happens after, provides some classic behavior that is often much beyond national borders. It's more in terms of how engaged they are with the competition, etc. So take that time zone times players times clubs, who they are, where their heart is a bit more, then that drives a lot of insights and that actually drives a lot of the activatability of our data more from a fan service point. And then obviously we translate that into activation moments, contextual, then of course with the right segments and data targeting products to make it happen.
23:15Nick Meacham:And in terms of metrics, are there any that particularly stand out to you? I know kind of one of the things that we were talking about with Mark is just kind of the metrics that are changing. It feels like we've quite frequently looked at more maybe vanity led metrics, whether that's engagements or views. And Marcus started talking about intent and participation and basically looking for triggers that would identify actual monetizable or commercial value, whereas an engagement or alike doesn't necessarily mean that someone is going to take that next step. It might just be someone's a fan of the athlete or they might just have found the content amusing.
23:51Nick Meacham:There's a difference between those two things. Are there sort of metrics that you see when you, you know, you know, there was, we won't get into it, but there's sometimes big sporting events that will post these metrics about how many views they had or things like this. Are there metrics for you, you think are slightly overrated or overvalued when you see some of these announcements? Are there particular metrics that you guys are looking for across your different channels, platforms, and the way you're going about your data strategy? Well, I do believe that both metrics and some of the visibility metrics are still relevant.
Read the full transcript
24:19And that's more for the, it shows how many people are interested to what level in the competition, which then is the baseline to drive commercial value. So yes, those metrics are relevant. But then again, if you talk to a commercial partner, there needs to be a level below that. And obviously our customers are some of the biggest brands on the planet. So they are very sophisticated about that. So the kind of questions that we get is, that's great. So you've got a great reach on social. You've got a great reach on TV. How am I going to get visibility there? And then we've got our answers. The classic toolkit, book our sponsorship, branded content.
24:58You see the boards. You've got your digital assets, et cetera. Now, then, of course, the next question is great. So once people have engaged, how can I, they're warmed up. So how can I drive them to the next level beyond your properties, et cetera? So tell me about how many people you can reach there. So then the question is, what is your addressable audience? Do most properties know what their addressable audience is? So that's a combination of your proprietary cookies. That's a combination of the accounts. You need to have an answer on that one. And then that's a metric that we look at very, very strongly.
25:29Even bigger and more important is the one underneath, which is the level of activity. So the active part of that, particularly on your first-party data audiences. Active and opted in. Active meaning interacting repeatedly and recently, because that is a proxy for receptiveness of messaging, etc. So that's the quality KPI that we're looking at. Now, that also gives you a lot of ideas about who these people are, what they have in common, and how you can actually take that information and find more of them who look alike, etc. So if I come back to your question, the key metric that we look at is addressable audience, active addressable audience with consent.
26:07And then we translate that into the degree of activity. So are they active on a monthly basis, on a weekly basis, on a daily basis? and the one that's most important to us is obviously the most recent interaction. So of course, we'd love to have daily active users all the time, but with a competition, if I take the Champions League that happens every so often, that's maybe not just realistic. But then again, if they interact frequently, then that's the most important metric for us because it is the precondition for anything else.
26:40Chris Stone:Roman, I'm curious, is there any sort of data you've seen that surprised you with maybe i don't know whether there's like some certain maybe venn diagram of consumption of certain parts of the uafer ecosystem that surprisingly mean that someone's way more likely to i don't know be a be a consumer of fantasy sports on your platforms or subscribed or access uafer tv or going using some of your other partners or being subscribed to social channels do you have any that have surprised you or have been or just a really good indicator of those different touch points you have? To be honest, the surprises usually come from the fact when you combine consumer research and what you see on your digital platforms.
27:20They usually don't come when you only look at one because you're always missing something. So for example, one of the things that we find quite interesting is that in our ecosystem, we get a lot of well-informed football fans, but the most informed football fans, they would probably go elsewhere first. So that's where much more banter is, but maybe that's also Club of Legions or National Team of Legions, etc. So that leaves us with still an enormous group. But then that also lets you slightly tweak your products in a different way to cater to that audience. Now, when you look at a fantasy player, something that we found surprising is that it's actually very much on fantasy, full stop.
28:02So that's also something that we probably wouldn't have hypothesized at the very beginning. And then for the rest, we really see that actually very lighthearted signals are actually quite predictive. So as simple as it sounds, competition times participating clubs or national team times players times football context already gives you a big, big indication. So that is absolutely interesting to see. and then it is also quite powerful in the commercial applications. So in that sense, I'm probably giving you a boring answer because there are not massive surprises here, but those signals that you can get from it sometimes are very, very basic and sometimes we need to look at that too.
28:51So you can go to Meta and buy football audiences, no problem at all. You can buy Champions League audiences, but they're not as performance. We know that because we ran the A-B test, et cetera. So that's a fact that we use in our sales approach. And some other signals are also straightforward. If there's a tournament happening, guess what? People will be traveling. And when you run the ticketing, then, of course, you have a good indication of where people are moving from, how many will be in the group, and at what time they may be traveling. Because that match happens to be played at a certain date, if we think about Euros.
29:22So no surprise, for example, that we work with accommodation partners, et cetera. It makes just simple sense. And that's sometimes where we sometimes overestimate how much we already have in store in terms of signals and data that we're actually not activating yet because we haven't found the way there yet. And that's something that we do increasingly and hence a couple of examples.
29:44Nick Meacham:Something I want to dig into a little bit more, you were talking about sort of the metrics that are important to you, sort of that active addressable market. One of the things that came up in the first conversation within this mini series was the idea of it's not just simply about growth, but increasing the value of individual fans. I think that's probably one of the challenges across, you know, what we've seen in the subscription space is there's really only so many subscriptions you can sell or, you know, in this space, there's only so many fans you can grow, particularly in a mature market.
30:12Nick Meacham:How much do you at UEFA think about in terms of the data and how you're doing that is about increasing the reach for people that maybe aren't already fans of UEFA competitions or perhaps are low level that you want to be higher level fans versus how much do we get more value out of that core existing fan base? So just, you know, Mark spoke quite a bit about increasing the individual value of fans as opposed to trying to grow your audiences. I guess for you, does that resonate in terms of your guys' thought process or how you think about reach versus increasing the individual value of existing fans?
30:47It does resonate with me, generally speaking. But I believe if we look at this from a wider industry context, it really depends on where you are with your property. So if I think of Champions League, obviously the reach is there, the audience is there, and also the first party data is already there at a certain size. So for me, coming back to the funnel I've been describing a couple of times now, it is not necessary about enlarging the addressable audience, but about increasing the quality of the audience. So meaning how much can we know, how much can we interfere, and how much is the activity most importantly actually increased.
31:23So the more active those fans are, the more value it drives, simply because as an advertising segment, they work a whole lot better. If you ever want to sell something, it works a whole lot better, simply because the approach is much more holistic, so to speak, and people are much, much closer or attached to what you're offering now. If you are in a different state of a competition, then sometimes driving more visibility, of course, is what may be the priority as such. So in that sense, some of our more nascent competitions, we, of course, try to drive the visibility up. And Conference League would be an example there where you can be quite targeted in those markets where that competition resonates the most and get it up there.
32:06It's a young brand. It needs to grow. It needs to get those audiences in. And we can actually do that also by playing amongst those competitions and introducing fans to different action happening there. So my answer, I would go along here, generally speaking, provided that you have the right level of scale already as an organization. If you have that level of scale, then obviously it's about driving the quality much more once you feel comfortable about your overall scale threshold in terms of response.
32:35Chris Stone:On the scale piece, Roman, you talked a little bit about that whole divide or differentiation between what a brand wants and what maybe a streaming or rights broadcast partner wants. just what sort of insight are you getting fed from say this some of the streaming partners you might have for example that have access to audiences and data what are they able to what are they sharing with you are they not able to share with you around the audiences you're reaching on their platforms with the different competitions you've got and how how helpful is that to what you're needing to do so obviously in terms of the the audiences on the broadcast side we have a pretty good idea based on the measurements that we do.
33:14I guess another way to proxy a better answer to your question is another type of feedback, which is often when we run campaigns for partners, we obviously usually direct traffic to somebody else. So we just recently finished a campaign with one of our FMCG-based partners where we looked at, okay, they ran a campaign based on Facebook native audiences. They obviously have their experiences and now they run that based on our data clean room, match data together. What are the metrics that come out? They can measure that because obviously the traffic goes to them. The performance was twice as high.
33:52So those are the proof points that we collect and we run hundreds of campaigns in a season by now. So as a consequence, we have good proof points that this stuff is actually working and working increasingly well. and hence it becomes a more and more important topic in the conversations with our commercial partners simply because it drives more value and of course that's something that we collaborate on a lot with our partners and co-create those products as well because we often speak of brands but it makes a big difference if that brand is an FMCG brand, if that brand is a sports apparel brand, if it's a streaming partner or if it's a bank.
34:28The type of product they need is very very different. So I'll quickly circle back to the scale. And what's also important is that most of these activations happen in a certain market, which means that your scale is great when you've got global scale, but in certain markets, you need to have sufficient scale also. And then you can properly drive that moving forward. And I believe that's where we've seen the biggest step change, as this has delivered more and more uptake or has received much more uptake in the past two to three seasons.
35:01Chris Stone:Roman, just how long the idea of running a clean room and having that is becoming more and more popular, but still fairly early, I think, in terms of adoption across the wider industry. It feels like that's something that has been a work in progress for some time with the more astute businesses leaning into it and using it very effectively. Just how long have you been using that type of approach with clean rooms and that ability to share data in that sort of environment with partners and running that process? We've been probably using it in pilots, It's included probably for about 18 months. So that's on the data clean room.
35:33But of course, it also comes with other products that are taking less effort. So we're making available our data only to our partners as part of programmatic activities. Then, of course, we have certain segments that you can also activate elsewhere, going all the way back to email. So predominantly as a managed service, we run that also on social. So there's a number of different products that reach from no data at all, data on social, data on programmatic, data in data cleaner environments, and now reaching much more into data collaborations. Imagine, for example, a combination of sporting data or fan data from us and shopper data from a retailer together with a brand being present in that retailer.
36:19So those are the kinds of things that we are increasingly looking at. But then again, it is a mixture of products that we then are tuning more and more to the needs of the respective sectors that our partners operate in.
36:31Nick Meacham:Thinking about that fragmentation, I know something that's come up quite a bit, and Nick mentioned it at Sports Pro London. You know, you hear people talking about owning the fan relationship, but realistically, it feels like, you know, UEFA's got your own and operated channels. You've got your social media channels that's your third party, but then you've got your broadcast partners, your streaming partners, your sponsor partners, and then they've all got their own channels and things like that. When it comes to this idea of owning fans or what does a valuable relationship look like for an organization like UEFA in terms of trying to balance out when you're driving people towards your own channels versus you're happy to push them towards other channels?
37:12Nick Meacham:just that kind of that fragmentation of experience that fans are going to have that they don't just necessarily go to one place and trying to extract as much value out of them through your own channels but also understanding that that it is quite a a different journey for every different user well i guess i guess owning the fan i mean i don't want to be owned um and i don't think we can own any fan relationship um as such i think it's important to think again of the only thing we can do is offer value and value if that is seen then i can well that can be communicated and that hopefully drives enough motivation to actually come to our channels ideally but then again of course together with our partners we build an ecosystem of touch points where you can interact with with our competition so if you if you take that i believe there is a an interplay between the week-long conversation that you can have or season-long conversation that you can have on social where you have the 90 minutes where obviously the life with the broadcaster really, really counts.
38:10And then there is the second screen experience that we can actually take from the buildup of the match day all the way to the wind down of the match day, so to speak, where we can have a lot of value to deliver to the fan in parallel. So we look at that interplay and really try to make our competitions as easy to find, as easy to see in order to drive more value for our broadcast partners If it's behind their subscription, then of course, they need that interest as well to drive a subscription business. If it's free to air, then of course, you need to have the maximum of the audience there to also drive the advertising revenue that comes off the back of it.
38:47So build up, drive tune in, have the accompanying second screen experience, and then you're building something together. I believe it's, as you say, it's fragmented. I think that also is healthy to some extent because different players have different strength in that ecosystem. and as such I believe it works well together. I acknowledge also the fact that if you look at it as a fan also beyond one competition and you feel like you need to take subscriptions for different streaming partners in order to watch all of your football, that's a slightly different story. So I'm really looking at this from one competition basis and then that's really where all these partners can collaborate and drive hopefully a meaningful experience for the fan.
39:29And as a result of that value that you drive, you earn a relationship, but you can never force it. So if your product is not good enough, if your service is not good enough, well, then good luck on having a relationship because it is value exchange based, particular when you are a competition. So UEFA or the competitions that UEFA organizes, they have slightly less heart attacks sometimes from a fan rather than my club, my team, my player. So that's why we really look at that entertainment, that value, that utility to make up for that, because we know that our competitions are absolutely strong and absolutely shiny.
40:06But then again, it is also about that emotional engagement that also comes. So maybe they may be inclined to go somewhere else first, but we are doing our best to earn our share.
40:17Chris Stone:Roman, there's always, we've talked a lot about the commercial partners that UEFA has worked with, particularly on the broadcast and sponsor side. obviously UEFA has a huge relationship with a whole host of stakeholders including the teams that exist in the competition the nations and also the competitions themselves is there any every sort of tension on how and how you go about supporting those clubs and competitions as well because you know the teams are creating their own content trying to build their own relationships with their own sets of fans you have your competitions do you ever find that there's a difficulty there managing that dynamic or do you have you put sort of boundaries in place so it's really clear as to who does what during competitions and events i would even say that it is mainly collaboration driven so we have sharing mechanisms for everything that we put out on on social the the amount of content capture that we do on site etc throughout the competitions we happily share in real time.
41:22The more the merrier. It comes back to the point that we collectively grow the competition. The competition is nothing without the players and the teams that play in it. However, without the competition, also the players and teams don't have anything to play for. So in that sense, that's the beauty of sport, where you can actually together grow the pie even more. And it drives different angles. So if a club speaks about what happens on a Tuesday night, well, they will do that through their lens. and that is perfect perfectly fine i think that's you know if my club ever played in the champions league unlikely then i'd love to get that angle when you come to uefa you will get that in a much more uniform way you know we will not take a side we will be quite factual we will show you the good and even the funny moments but we'll not take a side you know so it's a different it's a different angle when a broadcaster does that depending on where that broadcaster is you may sometimes have a bit of a domestic screw maybe not you know in in the uk that happens to be very neutral in other markets that becomes a different story and if you if you are the brazilian broadcaster then maybe there's a bit of domestic interest as well just to put it that way so that's why it drives some level of personalization already by design you know so you have different angles and that's why i believe that collectively we we can grow the pie by actually working on the same base which is what's happening on the pitch looking at that from different angles and driving it through distributions, a different distribution means.
42:47And that drives a larger pie. And hence, I actually see that more than collaborative. And I don't think there is anything to send strong guard rails on, et cetera. Well, we, of course, are careful is that we look at the competition lands and that we protect our clubs and their IP for their usage, et cetera. That's where we have clear guard rails in place. But usually that's nothing that you would certainly notice and feel as a fan on a day-to-day basis.
43:12Chris Stone:Just as a quick follow-up to that then. So when there's moments, I don't know, I'm trying to show you examples where maybe a club does some sort of activations or players do activations on different social channels that get incredible engagement and one or two of the clubs may be doing an exceptional job with that. Are you bringing in, so when you're reporting, you're getting asked how things are performing from an audience perspective and a data perspective. Are you using actively those data points from those other stakeholders into your reporting to say, this is how things are performing through a digital lens, or are you mainly focusing on your wafer-zoned channels only?
43:48Well, in the social space, we clearly do that. And it makes a lot of sense as well, because if you think about how the personalization on social works, it comes down to the level of lenses that are most relevant to you. And as such, if we were to look at, obviously, one competition alone, and what we look at is what type of visibility engagement does the competition generate in its totality? That's metric A. And how much of that are we driving ourselves? And like that, you get a pretty good idea of where you stand overall and what your performance is within that. Now you can slice and dice it even further in terms of what the other element is that is outside of your own channels, whether that is from participating teams or creators, athletes, et cetera, or news outlets, et cetera.
44:32So, but I believe if you want to grow the pie, then it's about getting your competition in the right way, top of mind to more people. So actually getting more engagement out there for more visibility out there is a good thing. And if you can keep your absolute, absolute share of that, I'm saying absolute, even if you grow 20 % in total and you go from, let's say, to 100, 120, but you maintain your 50 that you had before just to make an illustration. well then that's fine because the competition has gained 20 and you are maintaining your performance within that so I really believe that it's a collective effort and then of course when it comes to nuances of driving into your own environment etc that's when you need the strength of your own channels on social etc that can actually drive some referral back but to be honest it's possibly not the most impactful way of working on social there's other means to get people back onto your environment.
45:29But I just wanted to illustrate that notion that growing the pie is probably what we need to do here. And we measure certainly both what we deliver and what the ecosystem delivers as well.
45:40Nick Meacham:There's still so much I want to be able to talk about, Roman. But just to kind of wrap things up here a little bit, looking forward, the sports industry continues to change, evolve quickly. Nick and I get to cover it on stream time quite a bit. But just looking forward and you think about what's going to separate sports organizations moving forward in terms of their relationships with fans. You know, we've talked about across Europe, seeing some of the media rights on Champions League and UEFA seems to be bucking that trend compared to maybe some other European organizations. But spoiler alert, League will be episode three of the miniseries.
46:15Nick Meacham:And they're going to be talking about how their situation forced them to go to a direct to consumer approach and how they've had to change things. But just in this world where media rights might not be the be-all, end-all that it used to be in this more of a need and prioritization for direct-to-consumer relationships, what are the things that you think will separate those who succeed with this new opportunity versus those who might fall behind? Just sort of what you see in the future about that direct-to-consumer relationship and where data plays a role and what you think successful organizations will do with this?
46:47Once again, I think it really depends on your starting point. But I believe what everyone has in common is that nobody can afford complacency. So we see a shift and we see it at different speeds. So I have no doubt that our model of media rights and sponsorship driven commercial model is strong and will remain strong for the near and mid future for sure. Now, I'm absolutely convinced of that. The other question, however, is we always speak of a global approach. So there will be many more approaches that you would have to be running in parallel. So even for one of the largest properties, then you may choose to actually go a different route moving forward.
47:25In order to be able to take that choice, you need to build capability. If you don't build the capability, that choice will become infinitely more difficult when you should be taking that choice. So one of the things that I really believe is necessary is to look at what it would take to go direct and what that would mean for the organizations. And everything that we've spoken about today is building capability. It's building capability to actually attract more interest into your competitions, to actually collect and retain the fan coming back again and again, which then can drive, combined with other technology, of course, drive strategic optionality if you have to.
48:05So that's a good side product of something that is valuable today because it drives the strategic optionality for the future. So long-winded answer. I believe the traditional model is anything but debt. I think it's going to be strong for a while, at least for the top line properties. But that also means that we cannot be complacent. We need to look at strategic options and we need to build capability to be ready for the change when it may hit. Yeah, it doesn't mean it will hit, but that's why the no regret move is to build the capability. And we are building that based on today's business model, but clearly also having the future.
48:41Nick Meacham:Brilliant. Well, awesome. Roman, I appreciate you joining us for this episode. Give us a little bit of insights into how UEFA is leveraging the data that you have, whether it's first party, third party, how you're working in broadcast partners and the demands that you're getting from sponsorship partners. So we do appreciate you pulling back the curtain a little bit and giving us a bit of a view into how that all works behind the scenes. Very much appreciated. I was glad to be able to share a little bit and enjoyed the conversation with you guys. Thank you. We'll catch you on the next episode of the mini series of the new economics of fandom.
49:08Nick Meacham:Thank you.
From the publisher
Sports organisations have spent years talking about data as the key to growth. But what if most are approaching it the wrong way?
In the latest episode of our New Economics of Fandom miniseries, Chris Stone and Nick Meacham are joined by UEFA Chief Marketing & Chief Digital Officer Roman Putsch to explore how one of the world's leading sports properties approaches fan engagement, first-party data and commercial growth.
Putsch explains why UEFA views data as "crude oil, not gold", how the organisation measures audience quality rather than simply audience size, and why creating value for fans must come before collecting information from them. The conversation also explores sponsorship activation, media rights, and the capabilities sports organisations need to build for the future.
The New Economics of Fandom is produced in partnership with Genius Sports and explores how sport's commercial future is being reshaped by technology, data and changing fan behaviour.
Key Points:
- How are sports organisations are thinking about data the wrong way.
- How fan value creates data value, not the other way around.
- The best metrics for evaluating audience quality.
- Why "owning the fan" may be the wrong objective for sports organisations.
- How to build the capabilities needed for sport's next commercial era.
