BREAKING: SCOTUS Blocks Trump's Mail-In Ballot BS

15 Sep 2026 · 33 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode analyzes a late Supreme Court decision blocking a Trump administration Postal Service regulation that would have allowed the Postal Service to refuse to deliver batches of mail-in ballots unless states met last-minute, burdensome requirements. It argues this prevents federal election interference and keeps mail voting rules intact for the upcoming midterms, while noting other parts of the administration’s election-related executive order were not blocked.

Guest backgrounds

No guests are named; the hosts are “Ladies of Strict Scrutiny” (Leah and Melissa mentioned).

Key claims

The court’s order is a “loss” for Trump but came late enough to create uncertainty; Kavanaugh’s concurrence suggests possible future approval with more lead time; Alito/Thomas dissent would permit broad election rigging and embraces voter-fraud conspiracies without evidence.

Notable examples

Texas Ten Commandments in public schools (separate AU case); Kavanaugh’s 2028 “fair prospect” statutory authority; Alito’s “niche/tucked away” statutory argument; Alito’s “address on one side” analogy; discussion of Voting Rights Act Section 2 and mid-cycle redistricting.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

SCOTUS Blocks Trump's Mail-In Ballot Regulation

2:14 to 3:02

Analysis of the Supreme Court's ruling blocking new mail-in ballot restrictions.

“It's an old joke, but when I argue, If men argue against two beautiful ladies like this, they're going to have the last word.”

Implications for the Midterm Elections

3:02 to 3:56

Understanding the impact of the SCOTUS ruling on upcoming elections.

“Okay, so the top line most important thing to know in terms of the upcoming critical midterm elections is this.”

Kavanaugh's Dissent and Its Consequences

3:56 to 4:43

A look at Justice Kavanaugh's comments in the context of election integrity.

“So we're going to spend a little bit of time analyzing what the court did, which is going to involve a fair bit of mocking Brett Kavanaugh.”

Critique of the Current Supreme Court

4:43 to 5:40

Discussion on the Supreme Court's track record regarding voting rights and democracy.

“Shorter, Leah, do not give the Supreme Court credit for finally deciding to crack open their copies of the Constitution and read the elections clause.”

Breakdown of the Supreme Court's Order

5:40 to 6:25

Detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's reasoning behind their ruling.

“And luckily, the answer for now is yes, we will.”

The Future of Election Regulations

6:25 to 7:11

Speculation on future implications of the ruling on mail-in voting regulations.

“So let's break down the order that the court issued late Monday night.”

Reactions from Trump and Kavanaugh

7:11 to 7:56

Discussion on responses from Trump and implications for Kavanaugh's future.

“Second, the Supreme Court's order said the, quote, equitable factors do not favor the government.”

Concerns over Voter Confusion

7:56 to 9:54

Addressing potential voter confusion stemming from recent court rulings.

“But again, proving that it's never the right course to not let your whole ass hang out and proving that his appointment was never going to be free or costless for most of us, Brett Kavanaugh decided to weigh in anyway.”

Analyzing Kavanaugh's Concurrence

9:54 to 10:36

A deep dive into Kavanaugh's legal reasoning and its implications.

“I think that shame maybe still has some power for them.”

Major Questions Doctrine Explained

10:36 to 11:24

Understanding the major questions doctrine and its usage in current legal cases.

“We got a true social post from the president reacting to this.”
Show all 16 chapters

Understanding the Major Questions Doctrine

14:00 to 16:16

Learn about the major questions doctrine and its implications in recent court cases.

“to actually do this major questions doctrine thing for real, for real, because he really, really never seems to want to do it when it would apply to Donald Trump.”

Understanding the Major Questions Doctrine

18:08 to 19:13

Learn about the major questions doctrine and its implications in recent court cases.

“Between work, family responsibilities, and everyone needing something from you all day, getting together with friends can feel like a form of self-care.”

Justice Alito's Dissent Analysis

19:19 to 28:00

Delve into the key points and implications of Justice Alito's dissent regarding election regulations.

“I'm going to pivot to something not at all evolved, in fact, like very unevolved, which is the piece de resistance, the descent of one Samuel Alito, joined by one Clarence Thomas.”

Analyzing Alito's Decision on Mail-In Ballots

28:00 to 30:14

A critical look at Justice Alito's ruling regarding mail-in ballots and its implications for voters.

“To be clear, as a reminder, there is exactly zero evidence in the record of this.”

Absurdities in Congressional Testimony

30:14 to 31:27

Discussion on the bizarre testimony of Kash Patel regarding FBI hiring practices.

“He would be the victim of false allegations and attacks.”

Political Commentary and Critiques

31:27 to 32:51

A humorous take on political figures and anecdotes from the current administration.

“Obviously, we are never going to hire the criminal.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Strict Scrutiny is brought to you by Americans United for separation of church and state. It's back to school season. And this year, 5 million children across Texas are going to be greeted by the Ten Commandments in their classrooms. Texas politicians passed a law requiring the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom, forcing their religion on every kid in those schools. 28 families in Texas supported by Americans United for separation of church and state are taking the fight to the Supreme Court. And we need you to amplify their voices before the Supreme Court gets its hands on this case.

0:33We've already talked about on the podcast how the Fifth Circuit decision allowing this practice was total BS. I mean, it had to liken the Ten Commandments to basically like a poster, almost suggesting, oh, what, you triggered libs? But the reality is, there's a human cost of Christian nationalist policies like these Ten Commandments laws, as well as the decisions the Supreme Court hands down. Public schools are supposed to be accessible to all. They're not supposed to be instructing on the state's preferred religion or the state's edited version of scripture. Visit au.org slash 10C to learn more about this case and how you can help join the fight to protect church-state separation.

1:13Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest for Jewel Osco. Fall is coming, which means cough and cold season is almost here. Get ahead by stocking up on all your favorite cough and cold essentials now through September 29th. Shop in-store and online to save on products like Allegra tablets, Hulls Drops, Mucinex Kickstart, Zyrtec Allergy Relief Tablets, Tylenol Liquid Gels, One-A-Day Men's Health, and Vicks Dayquil and Nyquil Combo Packs. Offer ends September 29th. Restrictions apply. Offers may vary. Visit Jewelosco.com for more details. Hello, appliance fans. I'm here at Grand Appliance where Bill just bought a premium Bosch Benchmark Dishwasher.

1:51Talk about your experience, Bill. My salesperson was an appliance genius. She told me about their free install offer on Benchmark Appliances, and it was a done deal for me. Wow, free install from the pros at Grand? That's a no-brainer. Agreed. They make it so easy. There you have it. Grand for the win. Check out GrandAppliance.com for full details. Mr. Chief Justice, may it please report. It's an old joke, but when I argue, If men argue against two beautiful ladies like this, they're going to have the last word. She spoke, not elegantly, but with unmistakable clarity. She said, I ask no favor for my sex.

2:37All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.

2:58Hi, y 'all. It is the Ladies of Strict Scrutiny, coming to you with a quick morning after analysis of the Supreme Court's decision to block the Trump administration's Postal Service regulation, announcing that the Postal Service did not want to deliver mail-in ballots unless states adopted a bunch of last-minute, unnecessary, very burdensome, and likely impossible-to-meet policies governing mail-in ballots. Okay, so the top line most important thing to know in terms of the upcoming critical midterm elections is this. It is now crystal clear that under the law, the Trump administration cannot interfere with absentee voting via the Postal Service.

3:31That means if your state allows you to vote by mail, you will be able to do so consistent with your state's rules, regardless of the Trump administration's diabolical efforts to the contrary. The Supreme Court told the administration that it cannot use the Postal Service to steal or rig an election by throwing out thousands of ballots and disenfranchising people. I'm just going to say, right answer, took a long time to get there. Specifically, the court declined to issue a stay, which is a pause of the lower court's ruling that had invalidated the Postal Service's regulation. So we're going to spend a little bit of time analyzing what the court did, which is going to involve a fair bit of mocking Brett Kavanaugh.

4:11the most pathetic and needy pick-me justice who may have ever lived, and then Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas, who took their addled, pickled, Fox News-consuming right-wing manosphere podcast listening brains to new lows. In addition to all of that, just wanted to emphasize, do not congratulate. Do not give the Supreme Court credit for telling Donald Trump that he doesn't have the power to rig an election in the sloppiest, most chaotic, wildly illegal, last-minute-way possible. Shorter, Leah, do not give the Supreme Court credit for finally deciding to crack open their copies of the Constitution and read the elections clause.

4:51Okay. Just to remind you all, the other reason you ought not congratulate the Supreme Court is because this is the same court that just a few months ago killed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and cleared the way for a little unprecedented, completely unorthodox, mid-cycling redistricting where Republicans are authorized and indeed encouraged to cheat democracy and erase the political power of Democratic voters and Black voters in particular. This is the same court that just a few weeks ago opted not to block the underlying executive order, the same one that announced Donald Trump's plans to try and interfere with this election, including using the U.S.

5:29Postal Service to do so. And then just kind of strung us along for these valuable days as the election drew ever nearer as we all wondered, are we really going to have an election that works in any meaningful way or not? And luckily, the answer for now is yes, we will. But the court is again kind of crowning itself the ultimate decider of that critical democratic question. And just to elaborate on what Melissa was just saying, it is because of the earlier Supreme Court decision that the only thing that is blocked right now is the Postal Service regulation announcing plans to decline to deliver batches of ballots.

6:05Other portions of the lawless executive order are actually not blocked, including the portions of the executive order threatening to investigate and prosecute state and local election officials who allow individuals to vote whom the administration believes are actually not authorized to vote. This could still chill election officials' implementation of their own election rules, and that is on the Supreme Court. And the only reason we are still even having to talk about how will this midterm operate, will it actually proceed, is because the Supreme Court declined to block the executive order at a time when some states had already begun to allow people to vote.

6:42So let's break down the order that the court issued late Monday night. In just a couple of sentences, the Supreme Court order gave two reasons for why the lower court could block the Postal Service regulation, or at least why the Supreme Court wouldn't disturb that lower court order. First, the Supreme Court's order said the government is, quote, unlikely to succeed on the merits. That is, a majority of justices seem to be of the correct view that the Postal Service does not, in fact, have the authority to engage in mass disenfranchisement efforts that would supplant state election rules. Second, the Supreme Court's order said the, quote, equitable factors do not favor the government.

7:18Equitable factors include things such as whether the party seeking relief from the court, here the federal government, is likely to suffer irreparable harm and how the other parties might be harmed as well. All right. So that was the majority order. And it was very short, very spare. What wasn't spare were some of the separate opinions. And I just want to say as a pro tip to everyone out there listening, shutting up is free. Saying and writing nothing beyond that is free and costless. So whenever possible, err on the side of efficiency and just shut the fuck up. And not letting your whole ass hang out.

7:56That part. But again, proving that it's never the right course to not let your whole ass hang out and proving that his appointment was never going to be free or costless for most of us, Brett Kavanaugh decided to weigh in anyway. And again, with real cost to all of us who have to read what he had to say, Justice Kavanaugh decided that he was going to make it very clear that he actually does think that the president can use the Postal Service to wipe out state rules regarding mail -in ballots, just can't do it right now. Right? So this is what Kavanaugh wrote. Quote, there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority.

8:38But he said that applying the rule now isn't justifiable because election officials will not have enough time to grapple with it. Shorter, Brett Kavanaugh, I would still really like to be Chief Justice, Mr. Trump. So while this is a. No, do it. Do it the right way. I would still like to be Chief Justice, Mr. Trump. Please. Only you can do it that way, Melissa. I can't do that. So while it's a 7-2 decision on the bottom line of whether to disturb the lower court's injunction blocking the Postal Service regulation with only Thomas and Alito noting their dissents, Kavanaugh's concurrence signals that he's probably going to rule in Trump's favor if this issue comes up before the 2028 election with more lead time.

9:20So I think it's probably better to think of this as a 6-3 majority. majority. So thankfully, right, looking on obviously the bright side here, Gorsuch and Barrett do not join this concurrence, which hopefully means they are on board with the idea that this rule is illegal, not just now, but in general. Not sure I would totally take that to the bank, but that at least is how I am going to optimistically construe their failure to join this concurrence. The bar is in hell, Kate. Also, I know it's there, but they also, I think, and this is obviously critical, don't join the unhinged Alito-Thomas dissent, which we are going to go deep on in a moment.

9:55Because they have dignity, Kate. They still have some shards of dignity. I think that shame maybe still has some power for them. That I think is important. And also, I think they are at least somewhat, even if tenuously, connected to reality, which I think means they realize that the court would own the absolute chaos around this election that would ensue if, in fact, they decided to let Trump move forward with this order and this regulation. So I guess the best read here is that however on board they are, and I think it's enthusiastically on board with the dismantling of the Voting Rights Act, the destruction of real multiracial democracy, they're not fully on board with this sort of blatant election interference.

10:36So I just want to add late breaking. We got a true social post from the president reacting to this. Oh, really? Since we sat down? Oh, yeah. In which he refers to Thomas and Alito as, quote, legends both of his appointees. That's a T-shirt. That is a T-shirt. We got to we got to get that T-shirt for ourselves. Of the justices he appointed who ruled against him. He says, quote, these are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court. They are merely a shell of their original. They've been body smashed. He goes into the terrorist ruling that is causing all of this, you know, expense, as well as this election ruling that is destroying America.

11:20Wait, Brett doesn't even get an attaboy for the concurrence? He does not. Oh, my God. I know you have to know that Brett Kavanaugh is just fucking crying himself. Absolutely. Brett Kavanaugh with Arthur the Aardvark fists right now. Where else does he go? President closes with this, quote, it is not easy for me. to write this criticism of the United States Supreme Court. It will likely cost me dearly for years to come, sir, if only.

11:54Wow. More breaking news on this recording, ladies. I love this breaking news because, like, let's just be honest. Like, the Supreme Court nominally gave him a loss, but this whole thing has taken so much time. It's so much chaos. I'm sure that the chaos itself is by itself a suppressive action. Like there may be people who are like, do I even need to vote? Like, should I vote? There's so many questions. Like the court has given him a huge assist, even if ultimately this is a formal law. So my guy, like, take the W. Like you got a W in someone even entertaining this absolute nonsense. Well, and I think that's part of the sort of back to the kind of pragmatic sort of effect here.

12:38Yes, this should mean that people are able to vote in the way that they always have in their states. But yeah, I really do worry about all of the uncertainty that has hung around voting by mail in recent weeks because of Trump and because of SCOTUS may mean that people are confused and scared and don't vote by mail. So it's really important there be a full court press to get the word out that Trump has failed here and you get to vote the way that you voted before he tried to put this executive order into place. Thank you for that PSA. Let's go back to our originally scheduled programming, which involves dragging Brett Kavanaugh.

13:14I got to talk to you about this CavCurrence, right? I think Coach K is branching out on his CavCurrence vibes, right? So this particular CavCurrence is doing something that Brett Kavanaugh did in the birthright citizenship case. So do you remember when he wrote his concurrence in birthright citizenship? He was like, I'm ruling against you, Daddy Trump, but don't worry. I'm still preserving the option for you to later do some totally illegal shit, right? I want you to be able to do that. So this is the same vibe here. He is basically like, we're not going to do it in this election, but 2028 is coming up.

13:52And pretty sure there's some statutory authority for the U.S. Postal Service to do this here. Speaking of statutory authority, I've got to wonder if Brett Kavanaugh is even inclined to actually do this major questions doctrine thing for real, for real, because he really, really never seems to want to do it when it would apply to Donald Trump. So listeners, if you haven't been listening to strict scrutiny for your entire life, what are you even doing with your life? But let me catch you up real quick. The major questions doctrine is a totally made up fanfic thing that Neil Gorsuch likes to cozy up to every night before he goes to bed.

14:28And it basically requires Congress to first explicitly authorize any sweeping program that an administrative agency might seek to put in place. For example, student loan relief. This court loves to apply the major questions doctrine mostly to the Biden administration. It has applied the major questions doctrine to Donald Trump in the context of tariffs, but mostly because that was an opportunity to further embed this made-up fanfic into jurisprudence, not because it actually was a major question. In any event, Coach Kavanaugh here doesn't seem to ever want to do the major questions doctrine because if you applied this made-up fan fiction, it would totally apply here.

15:07This is a major program of sweeping repercussions. Shouldn't the court intervene here and make sure that Congress specifically authorized the U.S. Postal Service to completely federalize elections and take all control of elections away from the states? Because that seems pretty consistent with a major policy shift. Seems big. Yeah, it does.

15:54I do want to do hard right things. Not correct things, just hard right things. Exactly. Not the meaning here, Brett. But please see your therapist for some help for how you might be able to evolve to get on my level. Indeed.

16:16Strict Scrutiny is brought to you by Cozy Earth. I'm psyched to tell you how much I love Cozy Earth. I change into my cozy earth bamboo stretch knit wide leg pants every night at home. No joke. They're my decompression evening comfy wear. It's cooling fabric, but also soothing. I just love it. I remember the first time I felt the fabric. It's an easy stretch, nothing yucky, and it just has this cool comforting feeling to it. And it works in the summer and the winter. Unclear how it can be so temperature versatile, but it is. And as an added bonus, you can try it because it's super low pressure and risk free.

16:51There's a return and exchange window if the fit isn't right, and the pieces are backed by a warranty against manufacturing defects. Head to CozyEarth.com and use my code SCRUTINY for up to 20 % off home and sleepwear. That's code SCRUTINY for up to 20 % off on home and sleepwear. And if you see a post-purchase survey, please be sure to mention that you heard about Cozy Earth right here. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. If I could wake up tomorrow and be better at one thing, It would probably be, I don't know, putting things out of my mind, like just being able to compartmentalize stuff so I can chill and relax without having to do everything I can to handle it immediately.

17:28If I could choose a second thing, it would be small talk. Not great at it. Not good at it. Honestly, not even really passable. Better is a feeling, and it's defined by you. And for BetterHelp, it's a BetterHelp therapist who really gets you. is a focus on global emotional well-being with thousands of therapists and millions of members in over 100 countries. It's progress. That could be getting better at handling stress and work, or small talk, especially with strangers. Sign up and get 10 % off at betterhelp.com slash strict. That's betterhelp.com slash strict. Strict Scrutiny is brought to you by Z-Biotics Pre-Alcohol.

18:08Between work, family responsibilities, and everyone needing something from you all day, getting together with friends can feel like a form of self-care. Whether it's a glass of wine at dinner or a long overdue girls' night, I drink Z-Biotics pre-alcohol before my first drink. I'm intentional about what I put in my body and that doesn't stop when I'm out with my friends. Z-Biotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was engineered by PhD microbiologists to break down acetaldehyde, an unwanted byproduct of alcohol metabolism. Make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night, drink responsibly and enjoy your next day activities.

18:46Z-Biotics has sold more than 14 million bottles and earned the trust of thousands, including us. When I drink my Z-Biotics pre-alcohol, I know I will wake up the next day and be able to go for a swim or a training run and also run around the park with my dog and get in some work. These are basically my three ingredients to happiness, which means I get to have fun and do the things that make me want to have even more fun. Try for yourself today. And if you are unsatisfied, they will refund your entire order. No questions asked. Head to zbiotics.com slash strict code strict for 15 % off your first order.

19:18Zbiotics is a partner of mine.

19:25I'm going to pivot to something not at all evolved, in fact, like very unevolved, which is the piece de resistance, the descent of one Samuel Alito, joined by one Clarence Thomas. They basically indicate to LDR that they would allow King Trump to do everything and anything, including rigging and stealing the upcoming midterm elections. Where to even start with this completely unhinged dissent? Like these guys, whoa, what, like, sirs, what are we doing here? Let's highlight a few very chef's kiss features of this dissent. So first of all, this duo has a very creative HGTV-inspired approach to statutory interpretation that is rife with false equivalencies.

20:08The other thing this dissent does is it victim blames the states and Democrats for basically getting themselves into this mess because they objected to a federal takeover of the election process. Again, truly peak Leto to blame the victim. The other thing that it does is it embraces wholeheartedly with their full chest all of these voter fraud conspiracies in the absence of any evidence. I mean, it's truly I saw Goody Proctor forging mail-in ballots with the devil in the moonlight. Like, it's that kind of vibe. And all of this, I think, goes to the fact that at bottom, these two literally could not give a fuck about voters or democracy or an expression of the people's will, because really what they want is what they have right now, which is Donald Trump in office doing the most.

21:01So Alito packs a lot in. We're going to just, again, as Melissa said, take through some of the highlights slash lowlights. One is Alito claims that the Postal Service has the authority to implement this regulation that might disenfranchise literally millions of people and erase state laws governing mail-in ballots. In some ways, both on procedural and substantive grounds, both because the Postal Service has this substantive authority and because he says the Administrative Procedure Act doesn't actually allow you to challenge certain kinds of Postal Service regulations. And one of the ways he does that is by focusing on particular regulation of Postal Service power, including its power to dispose of stuff in the mail that is supposed to be limited to, quote, non-mailable matters, like stuff that exceeds size and weight limits.

21:46And he refers to this provision of the Postal Service law as, quote, tucked away in a corner and niche and thus essentially irrelevant in the context of what he views as this broad, nearly plenary power of the Postal Service to regulate all aspects of the mails. This is the very HGTV forward interior design approach to statutory interpretation. We're just rearranging some furniture here, by which I mean congressional enactments and asking whether this statute has good feng shui. But I mean, Leah, are you even surprised? This is basically the same play that Alito did in Louisiana versus Calais, where he's like, you know what, let me update section two of the Voting Rights Act.

22:28I mean, this is like - Makeovers, interior decorating and more. But this is like trading spaces when there was Hildi. Hildi was the decorator in trading spaces who would literally come in and paint your fucking living room black and put like a vase in the middle of your dining room table filled with nothing but eggs and be like, it's gorgeous. That sounds like how Melania redesigned the East Wing for that first Christmas they had in the White House. Yes, with the menopause trees. Yes, that was crazy. This is a shape rotating approach to statutory interpretation. This is textualism, guys. This is textualism.

23:01But like, seriously, I have no idea what it means to say that some statutory enactments are niche or tucked away in a corner other than that it allows the justice to say that these parts of the statute that I don't like and that prevent me from reaching my desired outcome don't count. Basically, it means what are some statutes between friends and fascists? Nobody puts Congress in a corner except Justice Lado. So, you know, justice. Where is Johnny to come and, like, redeem all of this? Johnny from Dirty Dancing. Anyway. We knew which Johnny you were talking about. I just, like, I don't know. I don't know.

23:37That was for me. I got you. No, no. It's for the millennials. Oh, the youngs. Who don't know their Dirty Dancing. Yeah, yeah. Okay, well, watch that film. Who don't know. I mean, literally, who have never, like, sweated looking at Patrick Swayze while playing a DVD and rewinding it. They haven't lived. They haven't lived. They have not lived. Anyway. Sorry, back to the substance. Folks, in truly epic false equivalencies, Justice Alito suggested in this dissent that the Postal Service regulation committing to throw out your ballots en masse, if any ballot in a batch of ballots, doesn't comply with these arbitrary rules.

24:16He says this is no different than, quote, the basic requirement to list the recipient's address on one side. Sir. water. FYI, my kids would send mail back from camp. And I'm just going to say, schools are not teaching kids how to address an envelope. And I didn't realize that I actually had to do this. So I don't know how my kids learn to address an envelope, but they can't. And the mail still got to my house. So the Postal Service still delivered it. So I'm not actually sure this is the argument he thinks it is. Anyway, the second point Justice Alito makes is that this entire fiasco is really the fault of liberals, Democrats, and the states themselves who decided to challenge this.

Read the full transcript

24:57So it's not the Trump administration's fault. The Trump administration gets no blame for announcing plans to interfere with the midterm elections by taking over the Postal Service and using it to federalize the elections. According to Justice Alito, quote, the plaintiff states and the courts bear a substantial share of the blame for the rule's timing. That is obviously because the states decided in April to challenge this and litigation cast a cloud over the government's ability to make a rule. Also might want to put the court in here too for saying that the litigation wasn't ripe in the first instance.

25:30So maybe that also put some time on the clock. I don't know. I'm not sure it's all the victim's fault here. Yeah. And just also kind of as a substantive response on this timing question, just a reminder that even though the administration was subject to an injunction. The Postal Service did go ahead and issue a rule anyway. So the litigation does not seem to be the thing that caused any delay. The Postal Service moved forward anyway. So, you know, what's, I guess, a little thing like causation when you can just say that Trump is the victim and, you know, blue state AGs and the Democratic appointees are the problem?

26:02Also, Taylor Swift. Yes. Also, to the extent Alito is suggesting that everything would have been hunky-dory had the rule been finalized by mid-August. That is just wrong. That would not have been enough time for implementation without mass disenfranchisement. States had already printed ballot return envelopes and informed voters of the election rules by that point. And in what can only be described as an effort to cultivate collegiality among colleagues, Justice Alito also tries to lay the blame for all of this on his colleagues, the other Supreme Court justices. As he puts it, quote, the government had to wait nearly another full month for this court to weigh in.

26:44This is a less than subtle attack on Justice Jackson. If you haven't picked up on this, there are stories in the right-wing media suggesting that Justice Jackson caused some delay because she deigned to put pen to paper and write a dissent. In a footnote to the order announcing that the court would immediately put into effect its ruling nullifying the Voting Rights Act, which then set off the last minute redistricting, even in places where primaries were underway, Justice Alito also suggested that that was Justice Jackson's fault because she had dissented from the order. And Justice Alito responded that the, quote, constitutional question was argued and conferenced nearly seven months ago.

27:23And that kind of language obviously set off all of these right wing takes about how Justice Jackson and the Democratic appointees, but mostly Justice Jackson, are to blame for the court unleashing chaos in the upcoming midterm election. So FYI, according to right-wing media, if Black people are disenfranchised, it's because this Black woman decided to write some stuff down. Who taught her to read anyway and to write? 100%. Yeah. And just to reveal how conspiracy theory mag-uphilled he is, Alito repeats, like with a straight face, the demonstrably false claim that the regulation interfering with mail ballots is needed to, quote, better detect election fraud.

28:02To be clear, as a reminder, there is exactly zero evidence in the record of this. There is exactly zero evidence of this period in or out of the record. And against this evidence-free conspiracy claim, Sam Alito balances the difficulty to election officials. He's basically saying, as for the equities, which we talked about earlier, the government has a strong interest in enforcing the rule and implementing it. will also enhance the visibility of federal ballot mail to better detect election fraud. Then he says on the other side of the balance, the plaintiff states invoke the practical effects of implementing the rule close to the midterm elections.

28:34So notice who is not in this scale anywhere to be found. You have the Trump administration on one hand, state election officials on the other. The millions of voters who cast their ballots by mail, nowhere to be seen, including voters who cast their ballots by mail because that is the way elections are conducted in their states or because they live in a rural area or they are disabled or elderly and voting by mail is literally their only option to vote. Those people and their Democratic interest and participation get nary a mention in Alito's balance of the equities. Let's be fair to him. He does say explicitly that he takes that problem very seriously, but it is not enough to convince him.

29:15Well, but he's talking about the burdens on election officials, not voters. I take the problem very seriously. And the problem he's talking about is the burden on election officials who have to scramble to change their rules. I thought it would have been so easy to write a sentence or to acknowledging that it's a franchise. I think he bundled the voters into that. I didn't see it on the page. I think a fair reading is that he bundled the voters into that. He just doesn't give a fuck about any of it. Look who is string to fairly read Sam Alito. I hear you on there's enough fair criticism. We don't want to do any unfair.

29:46But I actually think that when you read this closely, he is talking about plaintiff states, not members. Representing the people, because he's always believed that the states represent the people most clearly. C.D.O.P. Through their legislatures. Yeah, that's true. So probably need to wrap this up. And in some ways, the best thing about this is that Alito would be mad as hell if you even suggested that this opinion suggests he is a political hack. He would be the victim of false allegations and attacks. So definitely don't go on social media and say that Justice Alito is a political hack who listens to right-wing radio and podcasts and Fox News all the time, so much so that his brain is actually pickled.

30:27Definitely don't say that. Definitely don't say that. But what you should say is absentee mail-in ballots remain intact for the upcoming midterm. The Postal Service, Trump administration cannot interfere with them because for this Supreme Court, last minute sloppy election subversion is just too far. They would prefer that the administration lie better or implement the Republican Party's long term anti-democracy agenda rather than just going out on Trump's own, I think. That seems right. That seems right. Lie better. Also, sorry, while we were recording, we got the absolute best victim-blaming analog.

31:07So Kash Patel is currently testifying before the Senate, and Durbin asked him about the FBI revisiting its hiring criteria and no longer excluding people who had engaged in bestiality. What about the bestiality? Tell me what it said before. It automatically disqualified any individual who participated on either side of it. Obviously, we are never going to hire the criminal. This side of what? The bestiality? Yes. So you disqualified the animal? And, yes. Okay, and Kash Patel responds, applicants who have engaged in bestiality means they were victims of bestiality because they were forced to do so.

31:53The sheep made me do it. The FBI, we are not going to criminalize and prevent victims from serving. Like the FBI hiring people who were forced to have sex with animals against their will. Leah, I don't think you've really fully grappled with the full effects of the sheep state. And I'm sorry, I had to bring your attention to this, trying to monitor in the event there were any additional breaking Supreme Court related things. Nothing good happens in Congress anymore. And yet you have exchanged dirt turban as this question. Wow. FYI, if Pam Bondi had said this, she would be out. I mean, she is out.

32:34The fact that Cash Patel continues to be employed by the federal government is proof positive that not having a uterus is the single best career move you can make in this administration. Single best. Absolutely. Yeah. Very well. Glad to leave things on a line. Bye. Dual meaning there. Sheep state and animals. Yep.

33:02Strict Scrutiny is a Crooked Media production. Our show is produced by Melody Rowell and Michael Goldsmith. Our music is by Eddie Cooper. Our team includes Matt DeGroat, Ben Hethcote, Johanna Case, Kenny Moffat, Adam Lippert, and Eric Schutt. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

33:51We'll be right back. purchases on groceries and gas. Get these deals before they're gone. Offer ends September 29th. Restrictions apply. Offers may vary. Visit jewelosco.com for more details. Hello, appliance fans. I'm here at Grand Appliance where Bill just bought a premium Bosch Benchmark dishwasher. Talk about your experience, Bill. My salesperson was an appliance genius. She told me about their free install offer on benchmark appliances, and it was a done deal for me. Wow. Free install from the Prozac Grand? That's a no-brainer. Agreed. They make it so easy. There you have it. Grand for the win.

34:28Check out grandappliance.com for full details. This is Chelsea Halner from Dear Chelsea. If you travel a lot with your dog like I do with Doug, feeding them well on the road can get surprisingly complicated, especially when you're touring 30-plus cities, staying in hotels, flying, driving, and basically living out of a suitcase. Frozen dog food sounds great until you realize you don't exactly have a freezer backstage. That's why I started bringing Just Fresh from Just Food for Dogs. It's real fresh dog food made with human-grade ingredients with meat and vegetables you can see in the bowl, but the difference is it's shelf-stable, which means I don't need a freezer or a cooler and there's no prep.

35:06So now I can throw a few packs in my bag and Doug still gets a healthy meal wherever we are. Doug absolutely loves it and I like knowing I am feeding my baby something that's actually good for him. It's also the number one vet recommended fresh dog food made without preservatives or fillers. Go to justfoodfordogs.com and get 50 % off your first order.

From the publisher

Kate, Leah and Melissa hop on to break down the Supreme Court’s decision to block the Trump administration’s Postal Service regulation announcing it would not deliver mail-in ballots unless states adopted a bunch of last-minute, unnecessary, burdensome, and impossible policies governing mail in ballots. They cover Trump’s tantrum over the decision, Brett Kavanaugh’s endlessly pathetic pick-me energy, and Sam Alito’s God tier false equivalencies.

Take the Strict Scrutiny survey.

New Strict merch available here.

You can now listen to Strict Scrutiny for CLE credits in California, New York, Texas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Washington, and Oregon! More info at crooked.com/strict_cle

Get tickets for STRICT SCRUTINY LIVE on November 6th in Washington, DC: Crookedcon.com

Buy Melissa’s book,The U.S. Constitution: A Comprehensive and Annotated Guide for the Modern Reader

Buy Leah’s book, Lawless, now out in paperback

Follow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky

For a transcript of an episode of Strict Scrutiny please email transcripts@crooked.com

More from Strict Scrutiny

All 79 episodes
BREAKING: SCOTUS Blocks Trump's Mail-In Ballot BSStrict Scrutiny · 33 min
Listen in VO