924: 95% of Enterprise AI Projects Fail (Per MIT Research)

19 Sep 2025 · 5 min · 3 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

MIT NANDA report claims 95% of enterprise AI projects fail to deliver measurable business impact, driven by the “Gen AI divide.” It contrasts high experimentation (40% AI pilots) with rare scaled production (5%), citing poor workflow integration and static models that don’t learn or retain context. It also notes “shadow AI”: in 90%+ of orgs, employees use personal AI accounts, often yielding better ROI than sanctioned projects.

Key claims

success requires learning, tight workflow integration, agentic systems that remember/adapt/act within constraints, and starting small on narrow critical tasks before scaling.

Notable examples

pilots stalled in production; employees using personal ChatGPT/Copilot; successful “agentic” systems vs demo bots.

Guests

none mentioned; episode is hosted by Jon Krohn.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Exploring the 95% Failure Rate

0:45 to 2:00

Understand the reasons behind the high failure rate of enterprise AI projects.

“On one side, almost every company is experimenting with tools like ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot.”

The Success of the 5% of AI Projects

2:00 to 3:30

Discover what successful AI projects have in common and how they operate.

“They argue that the number is inflated, that the 95 % figure is inflated, and they point out that the report comes from an MIT lab with ties to vendors pushing agentic AI.”

Starting AI Projects Right

3:30 to 4:36

Find out how to initiate and scale successful AI projects effectively.

“to give it the context on the kinds of solutions you're looking for, you can include the full MIT NANDO report in your chat.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Jon Krohn:This is episode number 924 on the MIT report that 95 % of enterprise AI projects fail. Welcome back to the Super Data Science Podcast. I'm your host, Jon Krohn. A new report from an MIT lab called NANDA, Networked AI Agents in Decentralized Architecture. NANDA, really catchy. That MIT lab made waves in recent weeks by declaring that 95 % of enterprise AI projects fail to deliver measurable business impact. It's a headline that stops you in your tracks. So is it true? And if so, why are so many projects falling short? The researchers at MIT call this phenomenon the Gen AI divide. On one side, almost every company is experimenting with tools like ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot.

0:54Jon Krohn:Adoption is high, but true transformation is rare. The report found that while 40 % of firms deploy AI pilots, only 5 % ever reach production at scale. Most projects stall because they don't integrate smoothly into workflows, and crucially, the models used in these projects don't learn. They're static. They can't retain context, adapt to feedback, or evolve with the business. Meanwhile, on the other hand, employees aren't waiting for official tools to be allocated to them. In over 90 % of organizations, workers use personal AI accounts to get their jobs done, a so-called shadow AI economy that often delivers more ROI return on investment than the sanctioned corporate projects do.

1:40Jon Krohn:You might be familiar with this yourself in your own work. And it shows that there is hunger for AI, but companies aren't yet delivering solutions that fit how people actually work. Now, the 95 % enterprise AI project failure rate has critics. For example, analysts at a tech research firm called Futurium, I've got a link to their rebuttal in the show notes, They argue that the number is inflated, that the 95 % figure is inflated, and they point out that the report comes from an MIT lab with ties to vendors pushing agentic AI. Still, even if the true figure is lower, the big picture holds. Most enterprise AI projects today aren't creating real impact.

2:25Jon Krohn:So assuming that that 95 % figure is correct, what about the 5 % that do succeed or the small number of projects that succeed regardless of what the exact number is? Well, these projects share a common playbook that I'm delighted to be able to share with you. The 5 % of AI projects that succeed involve models that learn, that have tight integration into workflows, and are agentic systems. Systems that remember, adapt, and act within specified constraints. Instead of a demo bot that forgets yesterday's feedback, the tools in the 5 % of projects that are successful improve with use and embed into daily processes.

3:06Jon Krohn:Winning teams also start small, prove value on a narrow but critical task, and then scale from there. The takeaway? AI isn't failing us. We're failing to deploy it right. If organizations shift from chasing hype to building adaptive integrated systems, the kind that learn and evolve, more of them can move into that successful 5%. And if you don't know where to start on building a successful AI project, you can, of course, chat with your favorite conversational AI interface, be it ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, or whatever you use. to give it the context on the kinds of solutions you're looking for, you can include the full MIT NANDO report in your chat.

3:50Jon Krohn:I've got that report for you in the show notes. And of course, if you want support from human experts on how to prioritize, develop, and or deploy AI solutions successfully, there are consulting firms out there that can help you. In the US, a particularly well-known and well-regarded AI consulting option is a firm called Tribe AI. I've got a link to them, the show notes, and they, this isn't promotional on their part. I just happen to, yeah, they're really well regarded in general. And so that's a, that's just a organic suggestion. But I do have a shameless plug for you because as of a few months ago, I also have my own consulting firm called Y Carrot, and we can also get you rolling.

4:35feel free to DM me on LinkedIn or click the partner with us button in the top right corner of ycarrot.com. Yes, there is your shameless plug of the week. All right, that's it for today's episode. I'm John Krohn and you've been listening to the Super Data Science Podcast. If you enjoyed

4:52Jon Krohn:today's episode or know someone who might consider sharing this episode with them, leave a review of the show on your favorite podcasting platform, tag me in a LinkedIn post with your thoughts. and if you aren't already, obviously subscribe to the show. The most important thing, however, is I just hope you'll keep on listening. Until next time, keep on rocking it out there and I'm looking forward to enjoying another round of the Super Data Science Podcast with you very soon.

From the publisher

MIT lab NANDA (“Networked AI Agents in Decentralized Architecture”) reveals less than promising results for the future of AI adoption in businesses. According to “The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025”, a whopping 95% of enterprise AI projects “are getting zero return” on their $30-40 billion investment. Jon Krohn takes this Five-Minute Friday to look into why this has happened, with help from a critical response to the report written by Futuriom’s R. Scott Raynovich.

Additional materials: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.superdatascience.com/924⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Interested in sponsoring a SuperDataScience Podcast episode? Email natalie@superdatascience.com for sponsorship information.

More from Super Data Science: ML & AI Podcast with Jon Krohn

All 130 episodes
924: 95% of Enterprise AI Projects Fail (Per MIT Research)Super Data Science: ML & AI Podcast with Jon Krohn · 5 min
Listen in VO