George R.R. Martin | A Dance with Dragons

21 Mar 2025 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: George R.R. Martin | A Dance with Dragons

Podcast Details

  • Podcast Title: Talks at Google
  • Episode Title: George R.R. Martin | A Dance with Dragons
  • Episode Description: George R.R. Martin discusses his work as an author and producer, focusing on his novel "A Dance with Dragons," part of the "A Song of Ice and Fire" series.
  • Air Date: Originally published in August 2011.
  • Watch the episode: [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTTW8M_etko)

Key Themes and Discussions

Introduction

  • George R.R. Martin is introduced as a celebrated author, known for "A Song of Ice and Fire," the basis of HBO's "Game of Thrones."
  • He expresses excitement about the event, acknowledging the unique setting with audiences using computers.

The Relationship Between Fantasy and Science Fiction

  • Martin discusses the debate on whether fantasy and science fiction are distinct genres or different flavors of the same thing.
  • He argues in favor of their interconnectedness, using the audience's interest as evidence.

Q&A Format

  • The session is structured to take questions from YouTube and Google employees, focusing on the earlier books and avoiding spoilers from later installments in the series.

Insights on Writing and Character Development

  • Unused Material: When asked about cut chapters, Martin reveals he saves all material but is hesitant to publish it; many cuts may be reused later.
  • Fan Theories: He avoids fan theories to prevent them from influencing his story development, emphasizing that he wants to maintain his narrative integrity.

Adaptation and Influence

  • Martin is asked whether the success of the HBO series impacts his storytelling in the books. He maintains that both mediums are separate and he advises the showrunners but does not let the show dictate his writing.

Favorite and Least Favorite Scenes from the Series

  • Favorite Scene: The execution of Ned Stark in Season 1, lauded for its emotional impact and strong direction.
  • Least Favorite Scene: The boar hunting scene, criticized for lacking the grandeur typical in hunting scenarios in medieval settings due to budget constraints.

Mature Content in Adaptation

  • Martin discusses the creative process behind including mature content in the show, asserting that HBO's platform allowed for more freedom compared to traditional networks.

Writing Process and Character Deaths

  • He addresses the difficulty of killing off characters, noting that the Red Wedding was particularly challenging to write.
  • Major character deaths are always planned and serve the overarching narrative.

Religion in the Books

  • Martin explains the diversity of religions depicted in "A Song of Ice and Fire" and how they draw inspiration from real-world beliefs while maintaining imaginative elements.

Insights on Women in Power

  • He reflects on the challenges faced by women in leadership roles within the context of the series, acknowledging the patriarchal society and drawing parallels to historical figures.

Keeping Secrets and Future Writing

  • Martin discusses the challenge of keeping plot secrets and reveals that while he has shared some secrets with select individuals, he enjoys the suspense of unveiling mysteries when the time is right.

Conclusion

  • Martin expresses appreciation for the audience's questions and interest in his work, highlighting the joys of engaging with fans and discussing his creative process.
  • The conversation showcases his thoughtful approach to storytelling, character development, and adaptation, making it clear that he values both his readers and his narrative integrity.

Key Takeaways

  • Interconnectedness of Genres: Martin believes fantasy and science fiction share more commonalities than differences.
  • Writing Integrity: He strives to keep reader expectations separate from his creative process to avoid compromising his vision.
  • Impact of Adaptation: While adaptations offer new dimensions, they do not dictate the direction of his literary works.
  • Complex Characters and Themes: His characters are deeply developed, facing realistic challenges that resonate with broader societal themes.

This episode provides listeners with an in-depth look into George R.R. Martin's creative process, his thoughts on adaptation, and the complexities of storytelling in both literature and television.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:25George R.R. Martin is an author and a television producer and writer. He is most famous for his series A Song of Ice and Fire, which was then adapted by HBO into the overwhelmingly popular television drama Game of Thrones. In 2017, Time magazine dubbed him an American Tolkien. He joins Google for a Q &A session and to share more about his novel A Dance with Dragons. Originally published in August of 2011, here is George R.R. Martin, A Dance with Dragons.

0:58Ladies and gentlemen, the man who has given us one of the best fantasy series of all time, one of the most compelling reasons to watch television today, and the man who made it acceptable for nerds to talk about fantasy in public again. Please join me in welcoming George R. R. Martin. Thank you all. It's a thrill to be here. This is quite a kick for me. I'm on my book tour now for Dance with Dragons and visiting a city a day. It's sort of a blur where I am right now, but I've done many events. This is the first time I've done one like this. However, where most of the audience seems to have computers in their laps, that's sort of intimidating.

1:40But interesting, very interesting. So it's, you know, I came out of the world of science fiction. I wrote a lot of science fiction early in my career. And I've always gone back and forth with other science fiction writers about whether fantasy and science fiction are, in fact, two different flavors of the same thing, which is my contention, or whether they're absolute polar opposites. And fantasy is corrupting the precious bodily fluids of science fiction, which is the contention of others. And I think the fact that I'm here at this campus devoted to the world of computers and the cutting edge of tomorrow and you're all fantasy geeks is proof that I'm right.

2:23And it's all one big thing. Thank you for coming, George. We really appreciate it. And a token of our appreciation on behalf of the whole project team presented by the person who designed these fine T-shirts that we're wearing. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much. And we do expect you to wear it on your next television appearance. Oh, OK. So, for everyone in attendance and the folks on the stream, we have taken the most popular questions from the YouTube page, the moderated page, and from internal Googlers, and we'll be going through those questions today. One of the guiding principles we have, since a lot of the folks here are going to be new to the series and know it either from television or from just reading the first book, is we're not going to ask any questions that touch on content matter beyond a Game of Thrones.

3:08So even if your question got bumped up, unfortunately, we may not be asking it today. So with that, we have a question from Jigger444. You mentioned you had trouble cutting down some of the Aria chapters for A Dance with Dragons. Would you ever post the unused material on your website? No, probably not. I do save everything. When I cut material, I do save it because I may find a place for it later. and there are things that I cut out of the second book that I find a place for in the fourth book and that sort of thing is constantly going on. But I'm still carrying forward material that I cut from the first book.

3:48Some of it as short as a single pithy sentence that I particularly liked but no longer fit and others half chapters that I took out. and maybe I'll find a place for that but I have a feeling that much of that and more will still be in my files when the whole series is done but I don't know I ever wanted getting out there it's you know taken out for a reason there's one chapter from from the new book from Dance with Dragons that this does go beyond Game of Thrones, but I'll be vague. There's this Tyrion chapter that drove me crazy all through the decade, it seemed, that I worked on on Deaths with Dragons and this precursor Feast for Crows, where I kept putting it in and then taking it out and then putting it in and then taking it out and then I put it in as a dream sequence and then I took it out and then I made it a series of recurring dreams, each one going slightly further, so I put it in seven chapters and then I I took it out of those seven chapters.

5:04It's one of those chapters that I think is, by itself, is a terrific chapter. I like the way it came together. It's vivid. It's kind of spooky. It's got some really great visual imagery in it, and it leads me absolutely down a dead end, where if I take that path, I'm kind of stuck on a detour, and so I had to take it out. But that chapter I may, I don't know, publish at some point down the road, but not most of the other material. Great. So the next one is a multi-part question, and it came up a lot on the public site, and there are also some Googler questions around it as well. Have you ever, and this comes from somebody whose name I can't pronounce in Vancouver.

5:48Have you ever been influenced by some of the crazy theories your fans come up with for mysteries in the books? Have you ever changed an aspect of your story based on fan feedback? I.e. if one of their theories is better than what you originally planned.

6:02No. But I am concerned about that possibility, which is one of the reasons I don't tend to read the fan boards. I mean, when the first fan boards started occurring and they started theorizing and analyzing the books in such detail, and I'm going back now to the mid-90s, really, when the first boards appeared, Dragonstone coming out of Australia that Peter Gibran I think was the first board I was aware of and a couple others came up after that. I was very flattered and I did read all the theories and then precisely this point occurred where it says you know what if they're guessing the things that I haven't revealed yet what if they guessed them correctly how does that affect me do I then say oh my god they figured it out already I better change it or do I just ignore it and plow ahead and what if they come up with better ideas than the ones I had?

6:55Do I steal them? And I didn't like any of these possibilities. So I said it would be better for me to try to keep my distance and not go on these boards and try to... Somehow it was a futile effort because people also write me emails and people come to public forums like this and they come up to me at signings and whisper their theories in my ear and things like that. So I am kind of aware of some of the speculation out there, but I try to keep my distance from it precisely because I don't want to be impacted. I mean, you know, it's one of the drawbacks of the whole internet culture and this world that you guys have created, that something that previously maybe one reader in a thousand would have guessed, but you still had the other 999 who would have no inkling until you reveal it in a book.

7:53Now that one person in a thousand puts it on an internet message board and everybody sees it and they say, oh yeah, yeah, that's right. Now I see the clues. I got it. And pretty soon half the readership, or at least the internet savvy portion of your readership knows it. But what do you do then? Do you change it and come up with something goofy and outlandish that you haven't led the, you haven't done the foreshadowing for, that you haven't laid the foundation for just in order to surprise people? I mean, sure, I could have, like, aliens come down, and that would certainly surprise the head of everybody.

8:27No one is predicting that, but it would ruin the series. So basically you can't let yourself be influenced by this stuff, and I try not to. Great. So Rita Meyer, who is a Googler, asked, as a result, you know, as a sub-question, with the books now being adapted for a successful TV series that you also write for, do you think this will have an influence on the decisions and choices you make in the novels? Well, once again, no. I hope not. The novels are novels. The TV series is the TV series. And they're two different beasts. The TV series is very faithful so far. I do write for a series. I do one episode per season.

9:15I'm also a co-executive producer on the series. I have a great relationship with David Benioff and Dan Weiss, who are the showrunners and the main writers on the series. But ultimately, that's their baby, and the books are my baby. And there is the possibility that as faithful as we've started out and as faithful as we intend to be, that changes will come into effect, what I call the butterfly effect, which I'm sure, you know, being the audience you are, you all understand because you've read Ray Bradbury's The Sound of Thunder, you know. You step on a butterfly in the Pleistocene and it seems very minor, but suddenly you return to the future and all of human history has changed because of that butterfly.

10:00A small change can produce large changes later on. And that's a question on the show. I mean, we've already seen in the first season, as faithful as it was, at least two significant departures. One character who has his tongue torn out with hot pincers, who later in my books, that doesn't happen to him. And he's around and gets involved pretty seriously in some stuff in book three. He's not going to be around to do that. So David and Dan are going to have to remove that stuff or create a new character or somehow address that problem. Similarly, the great scene in book one or in the first season where Khal Drogo confronts the man Mago and the Dothraki blood writer and rips out his tongue.

10:55Terrific scene completely made up by largely by Jason Momoa and by Dan and David. It doesn't happen in my books. Mago is still alive in the books and still has yet to be dealt with. So these kind of butterfly effect things may produce changes down the road. But, I mean, what am I going to do? Go back and retroactively rewrite book one? Maybe I should. That throat scene was great. But, no, I can't let myself be affected. I am aware of what they're doing in the show. I advise Dan and David whenever they're about to hit the butterfly effect and sometimes they change according to that and sometimes they plunge ahead.

11:36So the two beasts are the two beasts and each one is separate from the other. Okay. So coming from Tanati in Slovenia, what was your favorite, and well now we know this, what was your favorite and least favorite scene in HBO's Game of Thrones? My favorite scene, well this of course, I suppose everybody's seen the series now, I don't have to worry about giving things away. My favorite scene had to be the end of episode 9, the execution of Ned. I thought they did that very powerfully. It was not precisely as described in the books, but it was certainly moving and evocative. The director did a great job on it.

12:19The scriptwriters did a great job. They added a wonderful grace note, which is when Ned is being led up to the stairs where he sees Arya and he says to Yorin of the Night's Watch as he passes him, he says, Baelor, to set in motion Yorin saving Arya, which is not in the books. In the books, Yorin just spots her on his own and takes his own initiative. But it was a great idea to give that little moment, that one last kind of heroic act by Ned. So I love that. I love what they did with that moment. But there were a lot of great scenes that I love. The final scene with Dany, the season closing episode, you know, which I was in considerable trepidation about because, you know, how good were the dragons going to be?

13:06That's a big CGI thing. And, you know, it's a reality of television today that television has become so good and the technical standards of television have become so good that a large portion of the audience is judging us on the basis of what they're seeing on major motion pictures. so we always have to run the risk of if we do CGI people say well it's not as good as what I saw in Lord of the Rings or in the latest big budget science fiction picture and it's so frustrating because of course those shows have immensely more time than we do and they have budgets that are 10, 20, 100 times our budget and there was a time when the audience made that distinction they did not expect expect a chase scene on an episode of TJ Hooker to match what they would see in Bullet or The French Connection or a major motion picture cop scene at the time.

14:06But now they do expect it and it's a challenge for our special effects guys and our technical guys to live up to. We have a very sizable budget for a television show but it's still a television budget and It's not a feature film budget. So we're always having to wrestle with that. Least favorite scene? You know, I don't know that I really have one. I suppose my least favorite scene that actually appeared on camera would be the hunting scene where Robert is boar hunting because there was like Robert and Renly and Barristan were sort of tromping through the woods alone. And I talked to Dan and Dave and said, you know, there should be like a hundred other guys and horses and tents.

14:58And when the king goes hunting, it's not like, okay, I'm walking through the woods with a spear here.

15:07And, you know, they don't disagree with that. I mean, they said, yeah, we would have liked all that stuff too. But once again, it's budget. You know, we had an hour to shoot that scene and our horse budget was exhausted for the season. So there we were. So, you know, the reality is, I mean, the great thing about writing books, as I do now, is that my budget is unlimited. I can write anything that I can think of. And I'm limited only by the size of my imagination and by the size of the imagination of my readers. But when you translate it to television and film, you have the realities not only of the budget, which I've mentioned, but also the shooting schedule.

15:51You know, you have to keep on schedule. And if you have a lot of trouble getting the scene you were supposed to shoot in the morning, that gives you less time to shoot the scene in the afternoon. But you can't slop over to the next day or you start getting a rolling effect and you fall further and further behind your shooting schedule. And then you're more and more over budget and it becomes a mess. So all of that impacts too. And this is all the kind of behind the scenes, I don't know, technical stuff that really the viewers should not have to worry about. The viewers really should just have to view the final product.

16:25But nonetheless, for those of us concerned with behind the scenes stuff, it's a reality of life. The actual thing, I mean for the most part I loved all the scenes that were in the books that they translated to the TV show. I think they did all of those great. I also love the vast majority of the new scenes that they did. If I have any quibbles with the show, and they are quibbles, very minor thing, it was the missing scenes, the scenes that weren't there at all. As I watched the show, frequently I would find myself thinking, oh, okay, now they're getting up to this scene, that's really good, I can't, oh, they didn't have that scene.

17:05They skipped over that scene. Some of them were scenes that I had seen the actors do in auditions. They had been scenes that actually had helped the actors get their roles. So I really expected them because I already knew, oh, the actor will do this great. I saw them do it in an audition, you know, sitting in a room in front of a curtain. And now I'm going to get to see him do it in costume on the set. And then, oh, it's not there. So I would have loved to have two more hours to have a 12-episode season instead of 10. and, of course, to have an extra$50 million. But who of us wouldn't want an extra$50 million?

17:42They did do a great job. As a fan, when your only complaint is that Syria has hair and that one guy looks like Orlando Bloom, it's a really serious... We get a fair amount of people who are upset about no purple eyes, too. Why aren't their eyes purple? Well, try wearing purple contacts to see how you like it. So Dan, we have some Googler questions that were collected through Google Moderator, and we'll kick off with one of these right now. This one's from Peter in San Francisco. He writes, the sex, nudity, violence, and gore in the HBO series, so continuing with our previous question, has been very much like the books.

18:19It preserved a similar feel. Could you please discuss the creative process around the inclusion of this mature content? Was there any pressure to tone it up or down? Well, of course, there was no pressure on me because I'm hardly involved. I mean, I am basically a consultant who writes one episode per season. And so whether there was pressure on Dan and Dave to go one way or another, I really don't know. If so, they didn't share it with me. You know, we did make some decisions early on that we wanted to include that material. and the biggest one is where we took the show. When Dan and Dave and I decided that we would do this project together and I attached them, we discussed this at some length and said, you know, we have to go.

19:12HBO was our first choice and pretty much our only choice. If HBO had said no or they weren't interested, yeah, we could have gone to another couple of our cable outlets. But I think we were all agreed right from the beginning that we weren't going to go to traditional networks, ABC or CBS or NBC or any of those, simply because they would have made us remove all of that material. Everything would have been gone and much toned down violence, no sex whatsoever or just sort of a few hints of sex and certainly no inappropriate sex. And you know, a fantasy series, they would have slaughtered us as an 8 o 'clock show.

19:53I mean, And I've been through this in my Hollywood years. I worked 10 years in Hollywood from the mid-'80s to the mid-'90s. And I worked on a couple shows, Twilight Zone, the Twilight Zone revival, and Beauty and the Beast, both of which were 8 o 'clock shows. Despite the fact on both shows we kept saying, we don't want to be an 8 o 'clock show. We want to be like a 9 o 'clock or a 10 o 'clock show because the standards and practices, the censorship of things are a little looser there. and you can do a little more material. And, you know, the network guys would promise us, oh, well, we know that.

20:28We really think of you as an adult show, not a kiddie show. But, you know, we have no room on a schedule. So we'll put you as an 8 o 'clock show, but we'll treat you as a 9 o 'clock show. And then we would be put as an 8 o 'clock show. And those guys who were the programming guys would suddenly no longer be around. And instead we'd be dealing with standards and practices guys who were censors who would say, I don't care what programming told you. You're an 8 o 'clock show. And these are our 8 o 'clock standards. So we made a decision right away. We're going to go with HBO. HBO has that kind of stuff, whether it's a 7 o 'clock show, an 8 o 'clock show, a 5.30 show.

21:03They don't care. You know, you're signing up for HBO. You're paying a subscription. You know what you're getting. And what you're getting is something you can't get on the over-the-air networks. So that's part of it. And then the other big decision we have to make to keep all that material, was the ages of the characters. You know, in the books, Danny is 13 years old when all of this begins. And I was drawing, although my books are fantasy, they're not historical fiction in a strict sense. They occur in imaginary world and imaginary kingdoms. They're very heavily based on real medieval history.

21:47And of course, I've done a ton of research about real medieval history. and basically in the middle ages they did not have our concept of adolescence of this sort of teenage year in between where we're kind of adults but we're not adults and we have different ages where we're allowed to vote at this age and we're allowed to go to war and die at a different age and we're allowed to drink at another age and to have sex at a different age depending on which state we're in all of that stuff they had child and adult and the difference between them was the onset of sexual maturity and we still have in our cultures remnants of this older structure in our ceremonies the Jewish bar mitzvah the Catholic confirmation ceremony which I went through as 13 you know reaffirming as an adult the the vows made for me by my godparents at baptism you know that's that the Catholics once considered 13 adulthood.

22:50And I promise you that even when I went through my confirmation ceremony, my parents no longer did not consider me an adult, even afterwards that I went through to write a passage. So, you know, these things are just remnants now, but they weren't remnants in the Middle Ages, and they're not in the books. We have a very different way of looking at things. So I was using that based on historical precedent. but there was no way that was going to fly in our present environment. We couldn't do that. If we had cast a 13-year-old Danny, there could have been no sexual stuff whatsoever with her.

23:29And even if we had cast like a 17-year-old actress playing a 13-year-old, there are some very stringent laws in like the United Kingdom. You can't do that. Even if you have an actress who's past the age of consent playing someone who's under the age of consent, you cannot have a sexual situation because it gets into the old child pornography thing and stuff like that. So we have a 22-year-old actress playing a 17-year-old Danny instead of a 17-year-old actress playing a 13-year-old Danny. And, you know, we did that deliberately so we could include this material. So I think that speaks to the fact that we did think it was necessary to the story we wanted to tell and all that.

24:13Of course, once you make that change, then you have to make all of the other changes, and you have to age up the other characters, because Dany's birth ties to the, you know, she was born posthumously nine months after the Battle of the Trident and the fall of King's Landing. And so the ages of the other characters have to be adjusted accordingly, and it becomes a whole, you know, once again, the butterfly effect. and said the whole thing is a tapestry and you can't just change one string without the whole thing unraveling. So Dan and David made this whole series of changes, but a long answer to a short question I guess.

24:48Good answer though.

24:52So I know you've got the prequel novellas out there, but DNJ7Lisa in San Diego asks, would you ever consider writing a prequel to Song of Ice and Fire series once it's finally done, such as the backstory of Lyanna and Rhaegar or Ned and Robert. I'd love to see how it all started. And by the way, when you're answering the questions, feel free to correct the pronunciation. It's come up a few times. You know, I don't have any plans to do any of those stories, but I never rule anything out. You know, if I get an inspiration or one of those stories suddenly takes hold on my imagination and won't let go, sure, maybe I'll do something like that.

25:35One of the things I've been trying to do with the series is to tell these stories, tell the stories of Robert's Rebellion and some of the stories of the history of Westeros in successive revelations and flashbacks and people remembering things. So at the same time the story is moving forward, it's also kind of moving backward. And gaps are being filled in. And you're learning. You hear about this event in the first book. And then you hear a little more about it in the second book. And then the third book, you hear about it from a different person who has a very different version of what happened from the previous versions you've heard.

26:09And then there's this hole in it which gets filled in the fourth book. So I hope by the time it's all finished, I will have expanded backwards as well as gone forwards. and many of the gaps will have been filled in and you'll know more about the whole Robert and Ragar and everything like that. But it's not quite the same as telling a story about them, I realize. I still have two more gigantic books to write, though. And six years to finish them. Right, yes, very fast.

26:44I don't know what I'm going to write after that. whatever seizes me. I mean, I like to do different things as a writer. This has been a huge project, certainly the biggest thing I've ever done in my life or career, but I've done other things and hope to continue to do other things. As much as I love Ice and Fire and fantasy, I also love science fiction. I want to do more science fiction work. I want to do more short stories. I love doing knows. Wild Cards, which is a series I've been working on even longer, Nice and Fire. I've been, in the beginning of Wild Cards, I wrote a lot for it as well as editing it.

27:22Now the series is still ongoing. Mostly I edit these days because I don't have time to write for it. But I'd love to go back and write some more Wild Card material about some of the characters for that. So what will I feel like writing after those six years are done? Who knows? whatever I feel like writing on that particular day. There was someone at the podium, I think, who had another... Hi. So we have another question. It is, given HBO's history of completely changing storylines, I'm looking at you, True Blood, how did you get them to stay so true as your complex-as-all-hell novels? Candy and chocolates.

Read the full transcript

28:04You know, it's David and Dan, really. David Benioff and Dan Weiss are the showrunners. I don't have any veto power. I signed a pretty standard contract where I gave them rights to adapt this and to a television series and I got certain titles and the agreement I'd write one script a year and a large dump truck full of money.

28:38And they can do, you know, they can have the aliens come down next season. They can turn the whole cast into vampires. And I'm powerless to stop them, but I don't think they will do that. They love the books, and they seem committed to telling my story in a different medium. and I knew all that before I signed any of the contracts. I mean, when these books started hitting the New York Times bestseller list, which was as early as Clash of Kings, I was approached by other people who wanted to adapt them, many for feature films. And I had meetings with those people and, you know, heard their plans.

29:20How are they going to fit this giant thing in a feature film? Well, we're going to make it all about Jon Snow and we'll drop all these other characters or we'll make it all about Danny and we'll drop all these other characters. They had various schemes of how they would do it. Or, well, we'll just make the first book up to this point and then we hope that the movie will do well enough to do what our second movie. None of these really appealed to me, so I said no.

29:52It's always said that no is the sexiest word you can say in Hollywood. The more you say no, the more they want you. And I guess that was true because they kept coming. And eventually David and Dan came and we had a wonderful meeting that lasted like most of a day. We met for lunch and we were talking and getting all animated about how we were going to do the series over lunch in a crowded restaurant in Los Angeles. And little by little it emptied out and pretty soon we were the only people there drinking our seventh cup of coffee and iced tea and still talking about it. And then more hours passed and we're still talking and the restaurant to dinner crowd is coming in and they're setting up for dinner.

30:33I think we closed that restaurant that night. So it was one of those classic meetings that you only get once in a while. But I had a great feeling about them. I mean, you know, if you're J.K. Rowling, you can go into a situation where every studio in Hollywood wants you. And you can set very stringent terms where you get to approve everything. but if you're not J.K. Rowling and virtually nobody is J.K. Rowling except for J.K. Rowling then you can't do that and you have to find people that you trust and put your faith in them and in the understanding of the story

31:13which is something that I think I also understood a fair amount of that because of my 10 years working in Hollywood and the fact that I had seen the other side of the process Sometimes I think some of my fellow novelists who have not worked in television and film are very naive about this process. You know, they get an offer and there's the dump truck full of money. And, you know, they sign it, they cash the check, and then they're not involved in the series. You know, they may get invited to the premiere and they come out of the premiere looking like, you know, all of their children have just been gassed.

31:50and with a stunned look on their face because everything has been changed. And some of them get very upset and start writing angry editorials and things like that. I haven't heard of anyone except Alan Moore actually returning the check, however. So I think there's a certain, I don't know, hypocrisy there. It's not a secret that Hollywood does change things, and maybe they change too many things. And when I have my writer hat off and I put on my reader, my fanboy hat, I get, you know, upset as anyone. And I can go on for a long time about, you know, how they change things in Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four in ways that I don't approve of.

32:37But, you know, nonetheless, you've got to know the job is dangerous when you take it, you know. Great. This one's for the nerds. So DanFoley182 in the UK asks, is it possible to warg into a dragon? Well, we'll have to see about that, won't we?

33:01Fusion, also from England, asks, how do you decide the characters that get to be a POV character? I read somewhere you resisted adding a character as a POV for a while until finally giving in. So I wondered the kind of decisions you have to make in that regard. Are there certain traits that a POV character needs or do they just need to be surviving?

33:22Well, I try to give each of my POV characters a story. And I've had an occasional POV character who only lasts a chapter and then dies. So in that case it's a very short story. But it's nonetheless a story. It should have the semblance of a beginning and a middle and end. even if it's not connected to the main story of the books, it should have a certain Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead sort of thing. I mean, that was their story, which is off to the side of Hamlet's story, but both part of the larger story. I try to resist having POV characters who are just there to be a pair of eyes. If a battle is taking place or someone is being murdered and I don't have a POV character there to see it, I tend to present that as a report that someone receives or a rumor rather than just switching into third guardsman in the left so I can have him see that because I don't like that as a reader and I don't like that as a writer.

34:30But one of the criteria, so I guess one criteria is do they have a story and what is the story of the POV character? Another thing though is the thing of pair of eyes. I mean, sometimes you need the question, is it important to present this thing on stage to dramatize it and have the reader actually go through it? Or is it sufficient that we just hear about it, hear a summary? Do you need full dramatization or is summary narrative sufficient? And if we need the scene to be brought out, then we may need a POV character there. And can I get any of my existing POV characters there? I mean, I've talked, those of you who read my Nata blog will know that with Dance of Dragons, one of the things that I wrestled with for a long time was what I called the Miranese Knot, which I can't go into in any great detail without spoiling tremendous things.

35:25But five years from now, maybe if the next book is out or something and everybody has read this book, I will talk more about that in more detail. But a lot of it simply had to do with a number of POV characters being together and some important events coming on, which some of them would see from one viewpoint and some from another, and some wouldn't really know what was going on. So how did I get these particular sequence of events across with what point of view? And I would write something from one point of view, and it wouldn't quite work. So I'd write it from a different point of view, and it wouldn't work either, and I'd try splitting it.

36:05I finally solved that problem in part by introducing a new point of view who was much more centrally located but he had been a character who had been there all along and he was deeply involved in the things and it all fell into place once I introduced that so you can have that kind of breakthrough. But I do need to kill a lot more of my point of view characters because there have gotten to be an awful lot of them. But...

36:42So, which ones will die? Well, you'll just have to keep reading to find that out. And I think the character you're referring to is the one who was asked about. Okay, yes. Another Googler question. Okay, so this question is asking, if you could take back one thing you wrote in any of your books, what would it be? One thing I wrote in any of my books? Well, I would take back the little one-page thing at the end of Feast for Crows, where I say the next book will be out within a year.

37:16That one has gotten me into no end of trouble. All I can say is I meant it at the time. I mean, I was splitting off 500 pages from a 1 ,500-page manuscript, so I only had to write another 500 pages. I can write 500 pages in a year. I've done it before. Of course, the book turned out to need an extra 1 ,000 pages, not 500 pages, and I wound up rewriting almost all of the 500 pages that I was pulling out, so I turned out to be a lot more than 500 pages. And even that being said, yeah, I can write 500 pages in a year, in a good year. I've had good years in which I have written entire 500 page novels start to finish but that's not to say I can do it every year regular as clockwork I am unfortunately a slow writer and have always been a slow writer but I'm a slow writer given to delusions of optimism that I can be a faster writer under certain circumstances and sometimes I am but more often I'm not so we had a whole bunch of questions around this so we had to pick one of the most popular ones and go with it.

38:29BT Fabian1 asks, I'm just curious. Several authors I read have discussed how hard it is to sometimes kill off certain characters, which clearly is not an issue here. You've certainly killed plenty off in your career, both in and out of A Song of Ice and Fire. Which character was the toughest to kill off? Well, I won't mention any character names, but The Red Wedding was the hardest thing I ever wrote. And those who have read the books know what I'm referring to. that chapter occurs about two-thirds of the way through Storm of Swords, but it was actually the last thing I wrote for that book. When I reached that chapter, I couldn't write it.

39:02I skipped over it. I wrote all the aftermath and, you know, the other things. I wrote The Other Wedding, in which someone else had dies. That one was easy and fun to write.

39:16Because, you know, everybody wanted to see that little shit die.

39:23Actually, I'm being glib. I should say, yeah, that was an easier chapter to write. But even at the moment that that particular little shit does die, I tried to write it so that you would feel a moment of empathy for him in his dying and bring home the point that this too was a human being who was scared and terrified and then dead.

39:55But only after everything else was finished did I go back and force myself to write the actual Wed Reading chapter simply because it was so painful to write. I invest a lot in these characters and particularly the viewpoint characters. I live inside their skin so it's a little bit like killing a part of yourself or smothering one of your children. But, you know, sometimes it has to be done for the service of the almighty God of the story. And the story always comes first. male 1st century old man in the world. And related to that, do you ever find that it would have been more expedient had you not killed the character off later on?

40:34Male 1st century old man in the world. No, not really. Not really. You know, sometimes Sometimes my readers write me and they wish I hadn't killed off a particular character, but there was a reason for all of the major character deaths. I mean, a lot of minor characters die too, and sometimes I don't even remember that they're dead. I'm saying some Night's Watch expedition leaves out and it has Fred, Bill, and Sam on it. And Elio of Westeros points out, you actually killed Bill two books ago. Oh, damn. All right. I forgot about that. He died in a Thens attack. But fortunately, I have fans who have sharper eyes than I who will point out this stuff.

41:22But the major character deaths have all been planned and are all a part of the story. And I don't regret them. Hopefully this means Syria will pop back up again. Can we have another Googler question? Okay, so this next question is, in your books there are several religious systems, such as the seven, the drowned god, the faceless man, the old gods, etc. How do you come up with such detailed yet entirely distinct doctrines? Are there any that aren't detailed in the books? Well, yes, to start with the last part first, yes, there are many religions that are not detailed. You can see some of them in Arya's Braavos chapters where she visits, passes through the islands of gods and I throw in references to 17 different obscure religions that I'm probably never going to reveal in much detail.

42:20But some of them are, of course, little tips of the hats to other fantasy authors and mythoses that I admire. I mean, there is both a Roger Selassie homage homage and a H.P. Lovecraft homage on that Isle of the Gods for those who are sharp enough to see them. I do that kind of shit all the time. The Three Stooges are in book one if you're sharp enough to find them.

42:53The major religions that actually play a significant role in the story are somewhat based on real religions or real religious systems, although I don't believe in just doing a one-to-one transformation where I'm going to take Islam and file off the serial numbers and call it Mislam or something and pretend it's the same. I take certain tenets of the religions, but then I maybe take part of this and part of that, and I meld them together, and I think about it, and I add a few imaginative elements, but certainly the old gods of the North with the trees worship, I mean, that's based on animism and traditional pagan beliefs of Wicca and various other Celtic systems and Norse systems melded into a construct of my own and with the fantasy element of the the weirwood trees added as a central element there.

43:56The faith of the seven is, you know, very loosely modeled on the medieval Catholic church. But again, with different elements. I mean, of course, the Catholic church, which I was, I'm no longer a practicing Catholic, but that was how I was born and raised, you know, has the whole concept at the heart of it, Trinity, which was, you know, explained to me as, well, it's three, but it's also one, you know, which kids can never get. It's like, okay, we have three gods. No, no, you don't have three gods. You have one god. He has three, you know, parts. Okay, so we don't have three. We just have one, right?

44:29It's like the shamrock. That was how, you know, the three-leaf clover. So I did that, except I made it seven instead of three. I have the whole, well, we have seven gods. We have seven personas. So instead of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, we have Maiden Mother Crone, which, of course, I took from paganism as the traditional female thing. I kind of hobbled the male side together, and then I added the stranger as the god of death, who's also the center of the cult of the faceless men. I mean, I think worship of death is an interesting basis for religion, because after all, death is the one universal.

45:08It doesn't seem to matter what gods you pray to, we all die in the real world and in fantasy worlds. And if there was one culture where you did not die, I suspect that god would become very popular. They will promise us eternal life, but whatever. So my faith with its hierarchies, its high septum and its seps, and its orders of essentially monks and priests and so forth is loosely based on Catholicism. And then you have the red god, the lord of light from across the sea, which has a certain Zohar asterism elements to it with the fire worship and so forth and the duality. And also a lot from the Albigensian heresy to Cathars who were exterminated by the Catholics in the great Albigensian crusade.

46:01But they had the fundamental belief, a dualist religion, that there were two gods. There was a good god and an evil god. And the world we live in was created by the evil god. which, you know, when you look at the world, particularly the medieval world, it's kind of persuasive. You know, what kind of good God would create that kind of crap? You know, what kind of good God sits around and says, hmm, leprosy, good idea. Let's give him leprosy.

46:32So the Lord of Light. So, yeah, all the religions are based. This is my general philosophy, I think, for fantasy. is not to base it in reality, but then get a little imaginative to it and rework the elements and put this with that and add your own touch to it. But the grounding in reality, I think, gives it a certain verisimilitude and plausibility where just entirely made-up religions that are unconnected to anything, it's much more difficult to make them plausible. Okay. Emel Shin in Maine asks, if you lived in Wisteros, which house would you like to be part of or in which area would you like to live?

47:18Well, you know, there's something to be said for being an honorable Stark, but you're kind of cold all the time and poor and so forth. You have a lot of land, but there's not a lot of stuff on it. On the other hand, if you're a Lannister, you have a nice house and all the gold you want and all of that stuff. So there's a lot to be said for being a Lannister. I don't know. Maybe I could probably see being a Lannister.

47:49And I would always pay my debts. Great. Let's take another Googler question. Okay, so this question asks, how do you keep all the secrets of the book to come to yourself? Are you dying to tell people what you know or do a few people already know everything? John Aucotton - I'm not dying to tell everyone what I know. Eventually, I will have to yield up all my secrets, but actually, if anything, maybe I hold on to some of these things too long. I don't know. There's always the question, when do you reveal something? How long do you draw it out? and the books are full of little puzzles and enigmas and reversals and how do you place those?

48:34You don't want to give it away too soon, but if you stretch it out too long, everybody's going to guess it anyway. So at what point is that? But I kind of like having the puzzles and you need to keep at least some of the puzzles to the end. But then again, you can't keep them all to the end. Otherwise, you end with a final chapter that's just one guy endlessly talking about, well, there's this and then there's this and the explanation for this is this and it's a very boring and not very good chapter. So David and Dan know a few things, a few important revelations. So eventually if I am hit by a truck or something like that, they would know a few things.

49:18But they don't know all by any means. and my editors know a few things and have guessed a few things. I suspect that some of the fans probably know more than anything else. I mean, I'm going to be doing the Concordance, the Ice and Fire Concordance, is the next project, the world of Ice and Fire, which is under contract to Bantam and Random House. I'm doing that with Elio Garcia and Linda Antonsen of the Westeros site. And I swear they know Westeros better than I do. I mean, Elio's knowledge of it is just absolutely amazing. When I'm writing books, I sometimes call him up and say, I'm about to introduce this character.

49:56I think I mentioned him in book three. Did I ever say what color his eyes are? Within a half hour, I get blue-gray, page 314, second book. Oh, very good. Great. I hate eye colors. Everybody should have the same color eyes. I'm constantly getting screwed up on eye colors. Just make them all purple. Yeah. So we probably have time for one more question. And I think the next one is such a good one, we should probably use a Googler one. The question is, the women in leadership roles seem particularly challenged. Can you share your insights about women in positions of power? I don't know if I have any particular views about women in position of power, although I think it's more difficult for women, particularly in a medieval setting, than for men, because in addition to all the usual problems of having power, they have the additional problem of that they're a woman and a lot of people don't want them in a position of power in what is basically a patriarchal society.

50:57So that is a challenge to all of my queens or would-be queens. And once again, I'm drawing from medieval history on that. You can repeatedly see some of the women who assume positions of power be it Cleopatra in ancient Egypt, or the Empress Maud during the Great English Civil War, the war between Stephen and Maud, who was essentially rejected simply because she was a woman, and even though her claim to the throne was very clear-cut and was endorsed by her father, the king, and yet they turned to a cousin instead simply because he had a dick. Well, to be fair, he was also charming, and she was sort of difficult.

51:43But nonetheless, there is that additional challenge. But one thing that I am trying to get at in the books, a political aspect, if you would, is to kind of show that this stuff is hard. I mean, I think an awful lot of fantasy, and even some great fantasy, falls into the mistake of assuming that the good man will be a good king. that is all that is necessary is to be like a decent human being and then when you're king, of course, everything will go swimmingly. And, you know, even Tolkien, you know, who is the, I think, my respect for Tolkien is second to none and all modern fantasy flows from Tolkien.

52:26But there's an unspoken assumption in his books there that, you know, return of the king. Aragorn is the king now. Everything will be hunky-dory. You know, the land will prosper. and it'll be wonderful and the crops will be good and there will be justice for all and the enemies will be defeated. And, you know, you never actually get into the nitty-gritty of Aragorn ruling and, you know, what is his tax policy and how does he feel about crop rotation and, you know, how does he handle land disputes between two nobles, both of whom think that they should have this particular village, so they take turns burning it down in order to establish this claim.

53:09These are the hard parts of ruling, be it in the Middle Ages or now. And, of course, it's not enough to be a good man to be an effective ruler, and it never has been. If it has been, Jimmy Carter would be the greatest president of the 20th century. I mean, he's clearly, I think, the best human being to be president in my lifetime, time, but he was not a particularly effective president for all his decency and his humanity and his compassion. And his undoubted intelligence. I mean, the man was a nuclear engineer in the Navy, but nonetheless, he failed at it. And there are some examples of medieval kings in history who were terrible human beings, but they were nonetheless very good kings for their country.

53:54So it's complicated and it's hard. And I wanted to show not just with the women, but, you know, you see in my books repeated examples of both kings and the hand of the king, the prime minister, if you would, trying to rule. and whether it be Ned Stark or Tyrion Lannister or Tywin Lannister or Daenerys Targaryen in the latest book, Cersei Lannister in the book before that, and trying to deal with some of the real challenges that affect anyone, trying to rule the Seven Kingdoms or even a city like Meereen. And it's hard. We can all read these books or look at history and say, oh, so-and-so was stupid, made a lot of mistakes.

54:40Look at all these stupid mistakes they make. But these kind of mistakes are always much more apparent in hindsight than when you're actually kind of faced with the decision about, my God, what would I do in this situation? How do I resolve the thing? Do I do the moral thing? But what about the political consequences of the moral thing? Do I do the pragmatic, cynical thing and just kind of screw the people who are screwed by it? I mean, it's hard. And I want to get to all of that and be it a male ruler or a woman's ruler. So everyone, that brings us to about time. Thanks everyone in the room for coming along.

55:18Thanks for submitting your great questions. Thanks everyone on the stream for tuning in. And George, thank you so much for taking the time out to come in, answer the questions, and grace is for the present. It's my pleasure. It's been a thrill to be here and to take place in this high-tech computer things. I think you should bring some of these strange machines of yours to Westeros. It could probably entirely replace the whole thing of tying messages to the legs of ravens. Great. Thanks, George.

56:06Thank you.

From the publisher

George R.R. Martin is an author and a television producer and writer. He's most famous for his series, "A Song of Ice and Fire," which was then adapted by HBO into the overwhelmingly popular television drama, "Game of Thrones." In 2017, Time Magazine dubbed him an "American Tolkien." He joins Google for a Q&A session and to share more about his novel, "A Dance with Dragons."

Originally published in August 2011. Watch this episode at youtube.com/TalksAtGoogle.

More from Talks at Google

All 50 episodes
George R.R. MartinTalks at Google · 56 min
Listen in VO