When Two Giants Intersect: Healthcare Meets Fintech

9 May 2023 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

a16z Podcast Episode Summary: When Two Giants Intersect: Healthcare Meets Fintech

Episode Overview In this episode of the a16z podcast, hosts Julie You and David Haber discuss the intersection of healthcare and fintech. They illuminate the complexities and inefficiencies of the U.S. healthcare system, highlighting opportunities for fintech innovations to address these challenges. The conversation covers the misalignment of incentives among key stakeholders in healthcare, recent regulatory changes, and the potential for fintech infrastructure to transform healthcare delivery and payment systems.

Key Topics Covered

Introduction

  • Hosts and Guests: Julie You and David Haber are general partners at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), focusing on healthcare and fintech, respectively.
  • Current State of Healthcare: The episode opens with a stark contrast between the seamless experiences in fintech and the clunky nature of the healthcare system.

The Healthcare Crisis

  • Rising Costs and Debt:
  • Medical debt is escalating, with billions lost in unpaid claims.
  • Service prices can vary drastically, sometimes up to 30 times for similar services.
  • Stakeholder Misalignment:
  • The healthcare system consists of three main players: providers (doctors and hospitals), payers (insurers), and consumers (patients).
  • These players often have conflicting incentives, leading to confusion and inefficiencies.

Statistical Insights

  • Healthcare Spending:
  • The U.S. spends approximately $4.3 trillion annually on healthcare, which is about 20% of GDP.
  • Despite high spending, healthcare outcomes are declining, exemplified by decreased life expectancy.
  • Administrative Overhead:
  • Approximately one-third of every dollar collected by hospitals goes to administrative costs, highlighting inefficiencies in the system.

Systemic Issues

  • Lack of Transparency:
  • Consumers struggle to understand costs due to opaque pricing and complex billing processes.
  • Providers and payers often operate independently, leading to a lack of price transparency and resulting in surprise medical bills.

Regulatory Changes

  • Emerging Regulations:
  • Recent initiatives, such as the No Surprises Act and price transparency laws, aim to improve cost visibility in healthcare.
  • These regulations have already led to the publication of data that can be leveraged by startups to create innovative solutions.

Innovations in Fintech and Healthcare

  • New Opportunities:
  • The hosts discuss how fintech infrastructure can simplify payment processes and provide better financial services to healthcare providers.
  • Example: Juniper, a company that automates healthcare billing and revenue cycle management, allowing providers to receive payments faster.

Founder's Perspective

  • Challenges for Entrepreneurs:
  • Founders in this space need a deep understanding of both healthcare and fintech.
  • Having hybrid expertise on founding teams is crucial for navigating the complexities of both industries.

The Future of Healthcare and Fintech

  • Potential Areas for Investment:
  • Payvider Models: Integrated insurance and provider services may offer new business models.
  • Consumer-Centric Solutions: Innovations focused on patient experiences and preventive care are needed.
  • Data Integration: Solutions that unify financial and clinical data could significantly enhance operational efficiency.

Key Takeaways

  • Infrastructure Change: The intersection of fintech and healthcare presents a unique opportunity for innovation and improvement of consumer experiences.
  • Collaborative Approach: Working with both startups and incumbents may create pathways for successful solutions that address long-standing issues in healthcare.
  • Investors' Role: There is a growing interest among investors in supporting initiatives that bridge gaps between healthcare and fintech.

Additional Resources

  • [Healthcare x Fintech Microsite](https://a16z.com/healthcare-meets-fintech/)
  • [Payvidors Unbundled](https://a16z.com/2022/06/01/payvidors-unbundled-opportunities-in-healthcare-fintech/)
  • [Financial Operating System for Healthcare](https://a16z.com/2023/02/07/healthtech-x-fintechs-biggest-prize/)

Conclusion The conversation emphasizes the significant challenges and vast opportunities at the intersection of healthcare and fintech. Founders with expertise in both domains are encouraged to explore innovative solutions that could address the inefficiencies and complexities of the current healthcare system.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Until recently, it was newly impossible to figure out what something cost. What words come to mind when you think of buying something with the click of a button? How about just tapping your card to pay? Or your credit card being paid off automatically, or even your credit card company automatically detecting fraud? Well, when I think of this, the words that come to mind are things like seamless, clean, easy. And these are affordances that the world of fintech have granted us. Now, let's do another exercise. What happens when you think of the healthcare industry in America? I assume that seamless is not the word popping into your head.

0:44And you're actually not alone if your conjure up terms like confusing, clunky, or even broken. But what you may not know is it's not just the consumer that's hurting. Every year, medical debt is increasing. Billions are lost in unpaid claims. Hospitals are in the red. Service prices can range up to 30X. There must be a better way. Well, in this episode, we talk to A6C General Partners, Julie U. and David Haibar, who highlight the emerging intersection of health care and fintech. And how changes in regulation and technology may actually enable founders to pave a better future. They talk about exactly where healthcare breaks down and how the three -party system of payers, providers, and consumers can actually be re -examined through the lens of Fintech.

1:38And if you'd like to learn a lot more about the fascinating intersection of healthcare and Fintech, our team just came out with a microsite, which you can find at a16c .com slash healthcare -meets -fintech. And of course, you can find that link in our as a reminder, the content here is for informational purposes only, should not be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice, or be used to evaluate any investment or security, and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any A16Z fund. Please note that A16Z and its affiliates may also maintain investments in the company's discussed in this podcast.

2:16For more details, including a link to our investments, please see a16z .com slash disclosures.

2:33So today we are talking about the fascinating and emerging intersection of healthcare care and FinTech. And we have two people here who know a lot about both of those spaces. And so Julie and David, I'd love if we could just start there if you could introduce yourselves and talk about why you're interested in this space in particular and how maybe your background is both as investors but also builders in your respective spaces has led you here. Well, it's great to be here. I'm Julie, you a general partner on our healthcare team. We focus on all things technology as applied to healthcare broadly speaking, healthcare to your FinTech, as we'll talk about, is obviously a huge part of that.

3:10We believe there's massive market opportunity, which is obviously one of the reasons that I'm excited about it. But I would say that the primary source of my inspiration of passion for healthcare FinTech comes from my entrepreneurial career prior to this. So I was a co -founder of a company called Kyrus. We built a scheduling -oriented product, a software product, that was sold to large provider organizations. Where scheduling is obviously a very sexy area of healthcare. We always sat right adjacent to what's called the revenue cycle in healthcare. So, you know, sort of how the payments are processed, how claims are submitted.

3:43And I was always like sort of peeking next to me at the revenue cycle space thinking, gosh, that's where the action is at, right? Like, that's where the transactions are at. That's where the payments flow. That's really where the rubber hits the road in terms of, you know, all of the weird incentive structures that drive the seemingly irrational behaviors of healthcare. I always aspired to sort of expand my product into that zone. We never quick out there, but when I came into this seat, I was very, very motivated to explore that opportunity set from an investment lens. Thanks so much, Stephanie for having us on.

4:10I'm David Heyer, a general partner here at Indriessen. Yeah, join the program a little over a year and a half ago is a GP on the Fintech team, but had spent, you know, the prior decade, both as an investor in an entrepreneur had started a Fintech company called Bond Street, which was in the small business lending space. We finance a number of practices at the time and then ended up selling the business to Goldman Sachs in 2017, enhancing a variety of strategy roles there before trying to firm. One of my core beliefs, I think both in life, but specifically, an investing is that opportunities live between fields of expertise.

4:40And I find myself really enjoying spending time at those intersections. It's one of the reasons I've always loved Fintech because I've always viewed it kind of more as a horizontal than it's a vertical. It's just been an amazing collaboration, spending time with Julian, the rest of the biome and health organization, you know, kind of going deep on this intersection. And I think bringing, again, the depths of both of our experiences and the operating platforms behind us to kind of look at this problem space through both lenses. I think having both perspectives of deeply understanding kind of the healthcare side and understanding kind of the fintech ecosystem and the infrastructure and how that sort of enables new business models, I think is really opening up kind of a ton of opportunities in the space and why we're so excited to kind of spend more time in this category.

5:19Absolutely. And I think with healthcare in particular, many people would agree, you know, Julie, use the word irrational. But I think other people may apply terms like clunky, maybe even broken. But to your point, David, they may not know the depth of that particular industry and they may not understand why it might be broken. And so maybe we can kick things off there. Julie, where do you think the healthcare system breaks down the most? Yeah, you're absolutely right that it's pretty much all broken. Or, I mean, the other way that people oftentimes talk about it is that it's actually working as designed.

5:50And a lot of that, you know, it spends back to the way that payments are designed and processed exacerbates, I think, a lot of the challenges that we experience as consumers. I often take the system view to this space. I'm very enterprise focused in the companies that I primarily spend time with. And when you look at it from the system lens, the core trifecta of stakeholders in our healthcare domain, very simply put, would be the following. So one is you have, obviously the providers, the actual doctors and nurses and all their care providers and services companies that actually deliver care. They're always the case stakeholder.

6:21You've got your payers, which are largely either insurance companies, private insurance companies, government -funded insurance, and then arguably even consumers to some degree are payers themselves for the out -of -pocket component of what we pay for healthcare. And then of course the third party being the patient themselves. And so the point there being that the people delivering the service and receiving the service are not the people paying or, you know, sort of privy to the payments flow or no services. And that very bifurcation is what causes so much of the incentive misalignment that we experience in our healthcare system today when a provider delivers a service.

6:56And I think like probably rightfully so, like they don't necessarily care about the cost of things as long as it's the right thing for the patient. But that's where you start to land in the territory of these surprise bills, you know, these prices that end up much higher than you anticipated. And when price is not a factor in the initial decision as to where to send the patient, obviously there can be a ton of lack of transparency and just surprised, you know, down the road when those bills actually come to roost. And then similarly on the consumer side, you know, a lot of us, you know, think about how do we shop for care?

7:26How do we make sure that we're getting agency in the process of determining where we should get a certain service. And yet, until recently, it was newly impossible to figure out what something cost. And it was both the price of that service as well as the mix of services that would actually be required as part of a certain encounter. So there is a little bit of legitimacy there where, you know, based on your diagnosis, you might not actually even know the full breadth of services that you need. But all of those factors contribute to the overall obfuscation of what things actually truly cost, what ultimately gets built for.

7:58And then, you know, lastly, how they get paid for. And that's, you know, the payers side of the equation is equal parts sort of obscure and obtuse in terms of the rules that each individual planned product within the carrier universe operates under in terms of determining what something should be reimbursed for under what circumstances. So it's not the case that if you get the same exact service from different providers in different locations that you're necessarily going to get the same price, which is kind of crazy. that pay or angle is I think the kind of the overlaying dimension that creates all this uncertainty and again results in this poor user experience for all parties involved.

8:35Yeah, I mean, it feels like there's a bunch of actors, a bunch of incentives that all go into this funnel and then the output of that is what everyone experiences and maybe actually what would be helpful to set the tone. It feels like listeners maybe don't need this reminder, but if we started with a couple statistics of where we are now, like almost as if the output of that funnel of those actors, of those incentives. Are there any facts or statistics that either of you have run into that, again, kind of just set the foundation or almost like the reality that we're in within healthcare? Yeah, I mean, I'll just start with the headline number of healthcare costs and healthcare spending in our country, $4 .3 trillion every year, which is roughly about 20 % of GDP, it's spent on healthcare.

9:17And I think the key thing there is not necessarily how much we're spending because if we were spending getting that much and getting amazing service and amazing outcomes, then we would all want to pay more for it because we're getting value. But I think the challenge in our country is that our healthcare outcomes are actually getting worse. I don't know if you guys saw the stats recently on life expectancy decreasing. Of course, the last couple of years, obviously, largely year in by the pandemic, but the yield of a given healthcare dollar spent in the U .S. is far, far lower than all other developed nations in the world, which is a sad, sad state of affairs.

9:49So I think that's probably like the headlines that you know that we should start from and then you know related to what I said earlier I probably call out additional stat which is you know just the administrative waste and bloat in our system due to the fact that we have this complex trifecta of payer provider patient results in a tremendous amount of spend that is completely unnecessary and gorgeous pure administrative overhead. So you know the stats that we see are roughly about the third of every dollar of revenue collected by a hospital is spent on administrative tasks required to collect it, meaning really you're only seeing roughly about a 70 % yield on every dollar that you're actually supposed to get paid for your services purely based on the work necessary to file the claims, to get claim status, to negotiate those claims and then ultimately get paid.

10:35That in and of itself sort of illustrates the amount of just embedded overhead in the healthcare system that results in these sort of cost structures that are unsustainable over time. I think the other big trend that we see in certainly over the last decade is just, you know, dollars shifting towards the patient and their responsibility for sort of paying for healthcare. And I think the status that it's grown to something about 50 % of all healthcare costs, you know, something like $370, something billion a year kind of patient -led responsibility. Half of Americans carry medical debt today, 20 % of them don't believe the law would be able to pay it off.

11:09So this is a huge cause for bankruptcy, huge cost for stress. Another, you know, issues beyond just the physical health, the financial health impact that this is having on, you know, everyday Americans is pretty significant. And so, look, it's one of the biggest industries in the country. It's also one of the biggest problems. And so it's one of the reasons why we're so excited for entrepreneurs excited to tackle these big challenges. Yeah, and I'm so excited to talk about those solutions. But I guess something that is still sitting with me is it doesn't seem like the system is really working for any of those three parties that you mentioned, Julie.

11:41I mean, hospitals are inefficient. Medical debt is increasing. That's impacting the consumer who has to sometimes pay that debt. Billions are lost in unpaid claims every year. And so again, it's not like of the three parties someone is winning, right? It's a mess all around. And so maybe just to reiterate this question, like, what is going on here? Is it the rails of the payments that we're using? Is it just the incentive structure that is misaligned between three parties that all have different goals. What really is underpinning this reality that we're in today? Yeah, I think each individual party was certainly not to blame themselves, but I think there's been a lot of pressure on the sort of the payer provider access of that trifactor that I described earlier that I would say is really driving sort of a lot of that breaking point.

12:26So, you know, to be honest, when you look back at the last couple of years, it was a super tough couple of years for all industries, let alone, you know, healthcare, but in particular provider organizations really, really suffered during that period of time. And remember, we shut down the world right in 2020, meaning no one could go in for any kind of service. The majority of healthcare spend prior to the pandemic was physical in -person visits where you were physically going to a hospital, going to a clinic, getting those in -person services, and obviously all of that was shut down, except for COVID -related things.

12:59And so literally revenue lines went to zero for a lot of service lines for these major hospital systems and clinics. Hospitals arguably were much more on their heels. Whereas if you think about the way that insurance works, right, like during those same years, we were all paying the same levels of premium dollars to our health plan, but our utilization went way down, right? So health plans were actually sitting on a tremendous amount of cash. And obviously there's regulation around the level of profits that health insurance companies can make on the core of business. But in essence, those companies were in a much, much different, and much more positive financial position than the provider set of the market.

13:34So I think there is a groundswell of pointing the fingers at the entity that is sitting on a lot of capital that did benefit from the underutilization that we experienced at that course of time. Meanwhile, last year, I think it was literally 50 % of hospitals were in the red. I think there's a lot more focus these days on the pain of the provider versus necessarily the pain of the payer. Whereas, I think there's many ways in which both sides certainly suffer through all of this. But I think that's where you thought, I just read a headline recently about how the payer provider contracting dynamic, it can be very hostile.

14:08And in these contracts come up for renegotiations every couple of years. It's always this sort of game we've actually talked about the Center of Public Podcasts, where it's kind of this dark art of contract negotiation, where the provider sort of assumes that whatever rate they contract will get negotiated down by the payer. And so they inflate the price that they present and those contracting negotiations, and it just spirals upwards. And that's actually what a large portion of the driver of the increase in price year over year and healthcare has been, is simply just that contracting motion. So no basis in reality of actual cost structure of the providers or arguably some of that might have been wage inflation related in the last couple of years, but really there are other existential factors that kind of contribute to that.

14:49So that dynamic, that sort of hostile relationship has been probably, we know, one of the primary drivers of some of the nefarious behaviors that, you know, result in this continuous bloat on the system side. And honestly, that probably contributes to longer systemic costs, but in many cases, the consumer also gets stuck in the middle because they're still paying a decent percentage out of pocket, and that number is increasing over time too. Yeah, it feels like one of the main complaints from the consumer is not just that they're paying more, but they don't have that transparency into what's happening between these other two parties that are part of the system.

15:20But a lot of the dynamics that we've talked about so far aren't necessarily new. The healthcare industry has been slow moving for quite some time. It's been, if we use that term again, broken for quite some time, but it does feel like maybe certain things have changed more recently, or at least there may be certain unlocks that allow founders to maybe step in and build within this intersection of healthcare and fintech. And so what gets you excited today about perhaps new openings within this arena and what may have changed over the last few years? It's rare that people talk excitedly about regulation, but healthcare is one of those domains where I think regulation can be a tailwind for innovation and category creation.

15:59There's lots of historical examples of this. I think the most traditional example that a lot of people point to is electronic health records you know did not really exist in adoption, major adoption, until the meaningful use law came into play, where the government literally paid financial incentives to doctors to adopt digitized technologies for medical record storage. So that was really the sea change that drove, so much of the digitization of our infrastructure layer of healthcare. Similarly, right now, we have a number of regulatory telephones that are driving payment -related reform. And so, you know, we have things like a price transparency law that went into effect over the last couple of years, that forced hospitals and insurance companies to publish their contracted rates.

16:41It was hugely controversial. There's still lawsuits in play. People are still pushing back, but the fact of the matter is we now have thousands of hospitals and hundreds of payers who have published all this data. Obviously, they're publishing it in forms that make it very, very difficult to parse. And so entire companies exist to actually process that data where investors in turquoise health, that's one of those players and actually make it actionable in the context their contract negotiations and the way that they engage with both providers and patients. But that's obviously a huge driver of change in terms of how we think about what used to be assumed to be opaque now just being out there and people not having a place to hide when it comes to comparing prices between two different providers who again are providing the same service but at widely different prices.

17:25So that's been a massive change that is only just starting to play out, I would say. So I think we have still years for it to really see through the system and address a lot of the challenges that we described earlier. You mentioned lawsuits and some pushback, just because I feel like listeners might be curious. What is on the other side of that? It seems like maybe an obvious reform that we should be able to see how much something costs if we're paying for it or someone is paying for it for us. So what was on the other side of that? Yeah, I think, again, I have some degree of sympathy for these businesses.

17:54Like effectively what we're doing is taking proprietary contracts and publishing them on the web, right? So there's been a lot of pushback from the parties to those contracts, which are the payers and the providers, who say if it's proprietary data, and we should not be forced to publish such data in a public forum, because that's our competitive advantage in our market, is that we're able to negotiate special rates with our counter parties, and we lose all of that competitive edge if we're to put it out there. So that's the crux of most of the pushback from the incumbent lens, is really that sort of propriety.

18:26The counter argument is that there had been previous laws that required things like upfront estimates for consumers if you called your hospital. You were sort of mandated to be able to present an estimate prior to coming in for a certain procedure or a certain set of services. And from a consumer lens, those never really got implemented or enforced in a way that was reasonable in my opinion. I remember my past life when that law went into effect in the state of Massachusetts, we actually did a bunch of secret shopper calls to hospitals to see what that user experience was like. And you basically got told, oh, you'll get a call back in an undetermined amount of time.

19:01It was generally one monolithic number, and there was no explanation as to what the range of assumptions that went into that number were. And again, you get the call back a week later when you might have had the procedure two days after that call. So the whole implementation was really poorly executed. So I think the argument on the consumer side of listening, you guys promised this to us years ago. The form of that just didn't address any of our concerns about limiting the amount of financial exposure that we might have related to healthcare services. So, you know, those are kind of the siren calls on both sides of the argument.

19:30And so it sounds like we now have more transparency, but it also sounds like there were a couple other regulation changes that happened alongside that. Yeah, just maybe one more I would call out, which we've talked about before is just all of the movement towards value -based payment models. So this notion that, you know, a lot of the reason that, you know, healthcare business models were not resilient during the pandemic was that they were entirely fee for service oriented, meaning you only got paid for the specific services that you delivered. And therefore, again, if the service was not delivered, you didn't get anything.

19:58Value -oriented models tend to be much more bundled in nature. So either getting a set upfront rate or price for a set of services related to an encounter. So like a value -based orientation around a need for placement surgery would be rather than charge for every individual doctor who's involved in the procedure, the anesthesiology, all the pre -visit post -visit stuff. You'd actually you just get charged one bundle for the entire journey. And then the providers at risk, right? So if they go above that budget, they are paying out a pocket effectively to cover their remaining cost. But if they stay under that budget and keep you out of the hospital and avoid errors and all that kind of stuff, then they get to pocket the difference.

20:37And so it aligns incentives for the provider and the patient in terms of staying within certain bounds, but also creates a lot more resiliency around the payment flows into the provider practice, because they're not just relying on individual services getting build and paid for. So there's been a whole set of regulation around driving adoption of those payment models. You know, Medicare Advantage, I think has been the most prominent form of that. It's very early days in terms of adoption across our industry, but it is a very, very promising means to align incentives in a fun, a different way that results in much more transparent behaviors.

21:10Absolutely. And maybe before we jump into the Fintech side, just wanted to clarify the No Suppresses Act and the Cures Act, It feels like those also were pretty fundamental to maybe changing this incentive structure that you've talked about so far. Yeah, the No Supprizes Act is very close to tied to the Transparency Act, which basically limits the ability to do surprise out of network billing for patients. And you've probably read in lots of news articles, these incidents where you go get a surgery in an in -network hospital. The actual surgeon is in network, but lo and behold, the anti -c theologyist is out of network.

21:43And all of a sudden, you're getting a bill for just that slice of the service at a rate that's, you know, outsized relative to what you would have had to pay, had it been an network doctor as part of that procedure. This act limits the liability on this side of the patient and the provider in those situations. And then the Cures Act, it's a little bit orthogonal to Fintech but certainly related in that the main provision that people care about is patient data access, enabling patients to readily access their full medical record data and that, you know, sort of limit the cost of access. So it used to be the case that you'd have to potentially pay a couple hundred dollars somebody to get access to your own medical records on paper, you know, or even like a CD -ROM, you know, this is a great example of an act that actually incentivized a whole bunch of startups to come out of the woodwork and Create apps that allow you as a patient to basically collect all your medical records from multiple providers and a single soup and really, you know, Sort of have agency over them.

22:37I think the way that it relates to the FinTech universe is that a lot of insurance adjudication acts, require access to patient data to approve certain reimbursements. This act allows much more data liquidity to support those decisions versus the traditional way of doing it, which is faxing literally medical records back and forth and having nurses look at them in a manual fashion. It does have sort of an indirect impact in the Fintech world. Absolutely. And I think it's kind of crazy to even reflect on the fact that some of this system is still running on faxes, on CDROMs. Like that's not, it's like surprising.

23:11But at the same time, I guess it aligns with, you know, the broken nature, the clunky nature that people see on the other side. You talked about these regulations as tailwinds, but another tailwind for founders can be new technology. And so David, maybe you can take this on how has maybe the FinTech infrastructure or technology that has been built up over the last couple of years or decades, maybe fundamentally changed and can be introduced into this new world. Very happy to jump it down. The only thing I would just add is I think it's important to kind of emphasize that obviously we just live through a global pandemic, right?

Read the full transcript

23:43And that's the entire kind of sheltered ecosystem. And so I think a lot of the question that entrepreneurs ask themselves, when they're embarking on building businesses, will I be able to sell them to historically slow moving incumbents, right? And I think the pandemic created a sense of urgency because everybody went remote because both the provider and peer systems were challenged in different ways. The willingness and urgency, again, to adopt new technologies, I think it's an interesting kind of, you know, tail -wended opportunity for a pretty large, and I think a really unique accountant why now.

24:13Obviously, an unfortunate one, but a reality. Certainly why are core DCs at A16Z has been that every company is gonna become a FinTech company. And Julian and I have been reflecting that, you know, either every healthcare company is already a FinTech company or is certainly gonna become a FinTech company. And I think in large part, as you mentioned, that's been enabled by new FinTech infrastructure. So, you know, our partner, Alex Rampell, is really quite a bit about, you know, FinTech really becoming kind of a third leg of business model stool, right? If you think about historically most, you know, technology companies, the core kind of monetization mechanisms were either, then you would sell advertising to generate revenue, or it was sort of transactional in nature, maybe you're paying a subscription or buying a product.

24:53I think increasingly, FinTech is becoming kind of a third stool, which can become embedded within kind of all different types of technology companies as a way to drive engagement or retention or certainly modernization. There are companies delivering kind of banking to the service, sort of enabling you to offer new car products or embed lending or embed payments. All of these are basically primitives that can kind of be plugged into transactional points of intent, right? Any time a consumer is through transactional, there's an opportunity to embed a financial product to finance that transaction or for a small business owner accelerate the working capital, right?

25:31We'll probably get into this, but a lot of the providers in the country are small businesses at the end of the day and they're delivering services and then ultimately waiting up to nine days or longer to get reversed by these big insurance companies. They've already delivered the service for a kid patient and that can create a lot of strain just in their own working capital and ability to pay employees. And one of the biggest reasons small businesses died and saw this intimately through Bond Street was just working capital. And so one, just tangible example for how, I think a really interesting kind of opportunity at the intersection of fifth -technical healthcare that we've invested in is a company called Juniper.

26:06They built effectively billing software for highly recurring healthcare. And so their insight was that areas like the Abra Health, today they serve some of the largest autism clinics in the country. These are practices where patients are visiting their provider over a hundred times a year, right? These are recurring nature of that experience creates the opportunity to automate a lot of the back -end workloads, you know, more significantly they would argue than a one -off kind of elected procedure. And so again, they built technology that essentially submit, you know, health insurance claims programmatically to the insurance companies, to the pairs.

26:42They take on kind of the revenue cycle management and deal with, again, all of the denials and adjudication that comes with submitting those claims and it really cowering the provider to get reversed by the pair, get paid by the pair. And what's really unique about that, again, having built the small business lending company is that because of the position they say if they really understand the entire kind of working capital or cash flow lifecycle of that practice, right? They're effectively processing 100 % of their revenue, right, through their system. Every patient that walks through the door, they're submitting the invoice to the payer and they're seeing statistically when and how much and at what rate, you know, those services are being reimbursed by the insurance companies.

27:24By the way, they get paid 3 to 5 % just for that, right? So for delivering that technology and improving efficiency. Historically, it's been a very manual process for a lot of these providers with a couple of folks in the back office. But again, from a think that perspective, if you understand statistically the probability of repayment and the timing of that cash flow, you can extend credit, right? So you can advance working capital to the small business or to the provider and let them get paid tomorrow, right? Or the same day for delivering that same service because you know, based on all their historical data and all of the, you know, practices in your network, the statistical probability of getting repaid.

28:02And that's a really important, and I think you're great model for a lending business because importantly, again, you're not getting, you know, negatively selected, right? They're not cherry picking a specific invoice that you're trying to essentially what's called factor that they believe they may never actually get a reversal. And ultimately, you as the lender taking that credit risk, you're seeing 100 % of their revenue and 100 % the data and statistical probability of repayment, you can extend, you can choose yourself to kind of push credit or factor it entirely, right? And just deliver that as a value proposition to the provider that, look, if you work with Juniper, you don't have to wait 90 days to get reverse.

28:41You can continue scaling your business, serving your patients, which is really why you started this practice in the first place. That was the other key insight from again, and the industry was that most of these entrepreneurs started their businesses because they were passionate about their product or their service or their craft, not because they wanted to be the CFO of their business. And so I think the ability to sort of abstract away a lot of that financial complexity and drive efficiency for these small business owners is just, it was funny, I was an angel investor in the business before joining degrees.

29:10And in my first conversation with the founders, I was like, it's awesome that you guys are a Fintech company. You're like, what are you talking about? We're in healthcare company. And I was like, ah, you're in the payments flow. You're seeing that we're in capital life cycle. And it's been amazing to watch them come up to speed on the fintech side. And six months later, Christophe and CEO is like, dude, you're totally right. We're helped you're coming in and fintech out to me. Exactly. This is the intersection that both of you have been working on exploring. And I think you mentioned this earlier, David, but there is this like unique perspective when you have the expertise from both sides.

29:44So you understand what these providers need and want. And I love that you pointed out that most of them, they want to provide, they want to operate, they don't want to be in these deep, complex payment workflows and to be dealing with invoicing. And so I think that's one very clear area where you've identified a problem that these providers have. And we talked about, you know, there's a provider, there's a payer, there's a consumer. And so within that ecosystem, it'd be great to hear from both of you what other gaps you see where healthcare and Fintech can intersect and solve a problem for one of those three parties.

30:18Yeah, I'll actually key off of a couple of themes that Dave mentioned that I think are super relevant to a lot of healthcare -finder companies that we see. One is the notion of how do you get into the full data flow of finances running through the system for a given party such that effectively you can underwrite risk in a different way than any single player who's sort of in the end time value chain of healthcare payments. And then the second piece being, you know, how do you take product that exists in other places and then make it understand healthcare. So one example that sort of covers those two themes and it completely different space than Juno Burba with a lot of the same sort of rationale is a company called Thatch that's actually doing this in the employer sponsored healthcare space.

30:54So if you think about like what David was saying about like SMB, you know, business donors and the one going into this business to want to be a CFO, same thing with a company, right? Like what's the number two line item in their P &L outside of payroll? It's typically healthcare expense, right? Because you have to cover your health insurance benefits for your employee base by law. But again, we weren't founders because we wanted to pay healthcare expenses for our employees. And yet, as a founder, you're basically faced with having to choose. You have to pick your poison, basically, of what health plan do you provide for your employee base, or do you provide an IGRAR product that just give them cash to go shop on their own?

31:28Those are pretty non -trivial decisions to make and have real everything from tax to administrative implications. And so what that's just doing is basically creating a card that has all the characteristics that you would expect of a card. but it also understands healthcare in the sense that they've coded it in such a way that it can pull from your healthcare savings account your HSA account the payments are tax advantage or the spend this tax advantage There's a whole like layer of logic that needs to be codified into the card such that it understands what it can be used for under what circumstances and sort of treat those payments one way versus you know other payments that you might be making outside of those rails and then you know because that's just then in the flow of all of the healthcare expensive that the employees or the consumers are taking on They can then, again, have just a better, sort of, underwriting chassis to then suggest better healthcare benefit products to the employer, such that every year they can optimize their spend, they can optimize the categories that they're covering, you know, deprioritize things that people are not utilizing.

32:23You know, this notion of sort of the last mile utilization data around healthcare benefits is kind of a holy grail problem, where, you know, we all sort of get coverage for our healthcare expenses, but it's very, very difficult to track exactly what benefits are being used over time. I think that's another sort of spin on some of the same themes. Absolutely. It feels like in both cases there's an element of data transparency that we alluded to earlier, which you're giving in this case the company access to that information so that they can utilize it more effectively. Are there any other themes that you call out here in terms of how founders can look at this industry and say, huh, there's this data opacity.

33:00Let me solve that. Or any other gaps that you see that are maybe also just waiting to be addressed. So many. So we wrote a piece a few months ago called payviders on bundled. And so what we did was we looked at the biggest companies in the healthcare space and even in like markets in general. Most of them are large insurance companies that also have a provider component to their business so they're called payviders because they're sort of vertically integrated across insurance and care to the resources. And we sort of did a breakdown of what are the drivers of their business models, what are the kind of key components of them, what are opportunities to basically do what they're already doing 10x better as a startup and directly compete, but then also articulated a number of underserved areas that those incumbents are not really paying attention to where there's sort of white space opportunity for startups.

33:45And so a couple of examples there, core insurance products are obviously a place where there's a lot left to be desired in terms of everything from user experience to the cost, the set of services that you get as part of an insurance plan. But we also recognize, especially from seeing insured tech play out outside of healthcare. It's a really hard business to build and a really hard business model to get right. And so that said, we think there's a huge opportunity for sort of neo -carriers, so to speak. So upstart health insurance products to be built in a tech native fashion. That number one does focus on user experience.

34:21Number two does use data in novel ways, whether it be on the under running side, whether it be on the consumer engagement side, whether it be in terms of how insurance carriers interface with their providers and maybe be helpful versus being belligerent as they traditionally might have been. That we believe is a hard and very non -tribal type of business to build. But certainly one that's right for opportunity and we have a few in our portfolio like devoted and firefly that are pursuing business models like that. And so that's an example of where again you'd be sort of competing within convinced but you know trying to emphasize user experience, constructure, efficiency, using technology.

34:56Another article we wrote which had the title healthcare context biggest prize was the financial operating system for healthcare. And I think the core kind of ethos was, you have a lot of patient data, right, living in practice management systems or INEHR, that are often unbundled or kind of separate from, you know, the cash flow life cycle of these providers. So both understanding kind of cash in and cash out in terms of expenses. And I think there's a huge opportunity, kind of reconcile or kind of synthesize both sides of that equation. And again, the example with Juniper is just sort of, We talked about a piece of it, both in enabling a provider to more efficiently process plans, understanding the full cash flow life cycle of our practice, but the implications and wedge for starting there, I think, are pretty significant because you could extend into the consumer facing experience, get on to scheduling and estimating health care expenses, getting to payroll and other expenses for the provider, enable the small business order to forecast their cash flow and improvise for business analytics for them, again, to kind of run their practices more efficiently.

36:02And I think this analogy, again, doesn't just exist kind of at the small business level, but at some of the largest kind of health systems level. And it was a great graphic, maybe Julia, you can talk about, which was like the pilots are flying blind, but not understanding kind of their own, you know, cash -wise, even for some of the biggest provider networks in the country. Yeah, we were astounded in the market work that we did on that one. And we sort of assume that like the large enterprises have their act together and it's really kind of the SMBs that need some of these tools. But it turns out it's a relatively universal problem, this notion of kind of a system of record, a source of truth for the finances of healthcare providers.

36:37And that has such significant implications on like broad swaths of workforce, right? As David mentioned earlier, just a lot of these CFLs were saying like there are months where we don't know if we can make payroll. and these places that manage staff of hundreds of providers sort of fly that blind is quite incredible. So certainly believe that there's a massive opportunity there. And I think those are also great examples where you can take software -oriented products that sort of manage financial insight, but add on financial services products to contribute to the financial health of the practices that are using them so that you have that sort of bifurcated software plus Fintech revenue stream dimension that you see outside of healthcare as well.

37:17You know, something that's coming up as you guys are highlighting the vast amount of opportunity here is that a founder or Potential founder might say you know what maybe I do have background in fintech but not healthcare or vice versa And that might sound intimidating to not really understand Let's say if you are coming from fintech to understand the like Complexity the deep complexity that exists in this world and so how would you think about that? How would you think about what problem is worth solving depending on a founder's background or how they can further get immersed in this really interesting intersection.

37:49Simply put, if you're from HealthThera, go find your David Haber. And if you're a whole Black Goh Finder, Julia, you. But it's not serious in this, I think, like, first of all, we should acknowledge like each individual space is super hard, let alone like the intersection. You know, there's just a lot of esoteria that makes it really challenging to know just off the cuff. As David mentioned, we truly do believe in this kind of intersection thesis. And we think that the only way to get it right is really to have hybrid DNA on the founding teams of these companies, such that you truly have expertise on both sides of the aisle, so to speak.

38:20I think both healthcare and fits that kind of for North York often, kid -rich spirits, right? I think a lot of like on each side, you know, both got in because there was some often overarching mission right behind kind of the business and problem that they were trying to solve. Both healthcare and financial services are fairly complicated, highly regulated industries. And so it's not that you're coming from, you know, building a DEC, e -commerce business into healthcare, necessarily, are coming from the Fintech site, from a place of understanding capital efficiency and regulation, and now applying some of those insights to the healthcare space.

38:54And Fintech has a tendency to intersect across a lot of different categories and is becoming very much of a business model. I think you've seen that play out over the past five plus years in areas like vertical software, where again, companies have started by solving a software workflow in lots of different categories. And then it become kind of layering in financial products as a business model. I think people are now recognizing that that same playbook and opportunity, you know, exists in a healthcare side. Partnering up is really mentioned with somebody who kind of understands those lip problems, whether it is from the provider, whether it is from the payer, whether it is from the consumer.

39:29And taking again, a lot of the same playbooks that exist in Fintech, which we're very happy to help with. And if you can to apply those in healthcare, I think is a huge, huge opportunity. Yeah, when we're thinking about that in terms of the investor lens, which is going to sound self -serving, but it's really a serious thing that I would think about if I were a founder in the spaces, the capital requirements of these companies tend to be pretty unique. You're building an insured tech business in healthcare. There are regulatory requirements around cash reserves and what kind of financial profile you need to have as a business to be able to stand up.

39:57And it's state by state as well. And so it's pretty complex landscape that you have to have investors who understand that and properly fund you so that you have enough runway to meet the same set of milestones that you might otherwise take less capital, frankly, with other types of business models. I think there is both a unique playbook for the founders, but also even for us, a unique way that we look at investment opportunities that have these characteristics. Yeah, I feel like if I was a listener to this conversation, I would have taken a few things away. One, healthcare system is broken. I don't think anyone needed a reminder of that.

40:30But two, there is somewhat of a why now. things are changing. Regulation has changed, the technology has changed, the infrastructure has changed, and so there is an opening potentially or several openings and gaps for founders to tackle. But also Julie I think what you pointed out is really interesting that this is like a tough intersection to address as a founder. There may be specific capital requirements. And so given that A16z is focusing on this intersection where funding companies in this space, you two have studied this space, just wanted to give you the opportunity if there are any gaps that you still see and, you know, if a founder is listening and wants to raise their hand and step up and say, hey, I want to fix this problem, anything that you'd like to highlight there in terms of what you're looking for could be the specific problem that you'd like to see solved or the type of founder that you'd like to see get involved.

41:20Yeah, I'll put out one that I consider sort of a grand challenge of healthcare from an insurance perspective. And I think there's some specific examples right now in the market that are unsolved that I think need to be solved just on the basis of trend. So the biggest class of insurance coverage in our country is employer sponsored. Right. So, you know, us three, we all get insurance through our employer. Most people have some sort of health benefit through their employer. The sort of fact of the matter is, is that churn, right, the turnover in a given employee base tends to be a few years, right?

41:52And therefore, the period of time that you are on a given health plan is relatively finite, as well as it will be short. But there's a lot of expenses, a lot of examples of expenses in health care, where you might have a very high upfront cost that doesn't play out from an ROI perspective for a very long period of time. And so if I'm your insurance carrier and I'm going to eat that cost, I'm actually not going to want to eat that cost unless I'm going to have you on my plan log enough for me to see the ROI, right? And that's what results in a lot of these seemingly not understandable, like sort of blockers on the insurance side as to why they're not covering SY or Z.

42:26And so a couple of examples that are prevalent right now, it was embec and these sort of miracle drugs that result in weight loss. They're expensive, right? Thousands of dollars a month. Employers are, you know, really struggling with how to think about supporting these drugs in terms of coverage, right? There's been a widespread adoption among folks who are willing to pay out of pocket, but obviously that's not affordable for the vast majority of Americans. if I'm an employer and I'm going to be willing to sort of put the bill for thousands of dollars per year for this drug, but when it comes to weight loss, obesity, metabolic health, oftentimes the potential heart attack that I avoided down the road, that I'm not going to see that benefit for many, many years beyond the time horizon that you're going to be an employee for me.

43:04That's one example. Another really interesting example that we encounter, given that we invest in biotech companies on the other side of the house of my fund, is these sort of one and done therapies, right? So we've heard about these sort of miracle gene therapy drugs where with one procedure, one injection, you cure a disease that otherwise might have been fatal. And these drugs can cause upwards of a million dollars, right? So very non -true expense, but obviously significant impact to life expectancy and life quality. But again, an individual carrier who pays that fee upfront, you know, again, might not see the benefit or the ROI might not be there for the period of time that the employee is on their plan.

43:42So I think there's this huge problem around how do you properly underwrite these kinds of products as people sort of switch between multiple health plans? Is there some vessel or chassis that you could, you know, sort of use to follow people as they move from health plan to health plan that distributes the load of that financial burden across multiple carriers so that, you know, no single one has to bear the full burden. And so it's a very non -tribule problem, but it's increasing in prevalence in terms of those kinds of products that have that characteristic to them. And I mean, we've spent a lot of time with incumbent insurance carriers.

44:15They have not figured this out yet. I do think that there needs to be a consumer centric type solution that solves for this, that the consumer is aware that they are carrying certain benefits across multiple years and multiple health plans. And so I would love to see that problem solve this own way shape or form, probably in partnership to currently with startups and incumbents, but probably requiring a different type of data model and just to finally different approach from the consumer lens. That is so fascinating and Julie just as a clarifier, is that also why most insurance companies won't cover preventative medicine because it's of that same dynamic?

44:49Yeah, it's a great point. Yep, exactly right. And that's where I think Medicare Advantage has shown the promise of doing it in a value oriented way with regards to preventative care because Medicare seniors tend to be on the same Medicare plan for much longer, obviously, because they're not changing employers, it's really just their own individual plans. You have much more incentive to invest in preventative care that, you know, again, will accrue benefits over multiple years because those people tend to be stickier on their health plans. Well, I mean, I think that's clearly such a big and important problem to be solved.

45:20David, what about you? Does anything jump out there as, again, this like grand challenge that you think, if solved, could really fundamentally change this ecosystem? Yeah, I mean, we've talked a lot about, you know, provider issues and obviously challenges that patients have. I think we talked less about the pairs. And one of the big kind of initiatives that we have focused on, certainly on the Fintech side that Julian, I've been beginning to work on kind of this intersection is just building deeper connectivity to the incumbent institutions in Fintech for too long, kind of the technology Fintech ecosystem and the kind of large incumbent traditional financial services ecosystem were kind of parallel universes.

45:56And I think that was really a mistake because I certainly saw this inside a gold bit, the culture of these institutions are changing very quickly, right? The recognition that they're not going to build everything in house or that they can't, and they're willing to adopt third party technologies is just accelerating. And yet, so much of the workflows of these institutions, even in a place like gold bit, which is probably one of the more progressive, kind of tech forward, large financial institutions in the world, are still like human driven processes. I mean thousands and thousands of folks that even saw like city or Dallas or Vangliru processing trades.

46:30And you can imagine that the healthcare system is in a similar place or likely even further behind. And one of the opportunities that we see here in recent is just being a bridge, right, between the entrepreneur and that started ecosystem into these large economic institutions. And then just helping both us and the entrepreneur build authentic kind of non -transactual relationships with key decision makers, you know, folks who are running these kind of really important divisions and business units. And that can obviously radically accelerate kind of the go to market or relationship building for these smaller companies who often find, and I found this very difficult to navigate, you know, these large organizations, even people within an institution like Ulvin didn't understand kind of a broader surface area in the pockets of the different business units and how they fit together.

47:16For the audience, it'd be helpful to know how big these companies are, like how many people work at Goldman and then Julie, like how many people work at United Health Group. How many employees are we even talking about? I mean, Golden was, I think now, like something like 45 ,000 employees, the last was like over 40 billion in revenue. You know, you can't even help here. It's significant. Bigger than that. Yeah. Yeah. And literally the biggest publicly traded healthcare company, I think it's like half for trillion dollars at this point, market cap. I look like the latest numbers I have are 380 ,000 employees.

47:44I remember a lot of those are, there's like the administrative set of UHG, but there's also a lot of doctors and clinicians. This is not a UHD stat, but we were speaking with another large national health plan, you know, payer and talking specifically about their call center operations. Because a lot of, you know, to David's point, like a lot of these FinTech operations have manifest in the form of call center agents. This place had 30 ,000 call center workers across their enterprise, right? So, I mean, just imagine, I mean, this gets to the point that, you know, we're making here, is that these organizations now recognize that they need to engage with innovators to be able to fundamentally transform their businesses and both reduce the cost structure through technology, but also just better engage consumers, right?

48:23Because at the end of the day, their business is heavily reliant on member engagement, that being the means for them to manage the costs of healthcare delivery by doing the proactive things as you were saying stuff and just getting ahead of potentially high acuity, high cost encounters. I think there's this sort of special window of time where the stars are aligning in terms of what the innovators are working on and what they're great at and what they're much better at frankly, then the incumbent players, and also what the incumbent players are recognizing that they need us super power to move forward.

48:53Yeah, I mean, I'd say for any Fintech entrepreneur who are healthcare curious or healthcare -ashconor, who are Fintech curious, coming out, Julia and I are often hosting. Dinner's again at this intersection in New York and San Francisco and other parts of the country. So we'd love to spend time with you. You're really excited about this space, if you couldn't tell, and we think there's some massive businesses to be built. So we're excited to hear from you. Amazing, and both of you have written extensively you and your teams on these topics and more. So we'll share a bunch of those links in the show notes as well so that people can go and dig a little deeper if they are interested too.

49:26It's awesome. Thanks so much. Amazing. Thank you. It's great. Thank you. Thanks for listening to the A16Z podcast. If you liked this episode, don't forget to subscribe, leave a review, or tell a friend. We also recently launched on YouTube at youtube .com slash a16c underscore video where you'll find exclusive video content. We'll see you next time!

From the publisher

Most people don’t need a reminder of the state of healthcare in America. But it’s not just the consumer that’s hurting.  Medical debt is increasing, billions are lost in unpaid claims, hospitals are in the red, service prices can range up to 30x…. 

In this episode, a16z GPs Julie You and David Haber explain where the healthcare system breaks down and how the three party system — between payors, providers, and consumers — can be rethought through the lens of Fintech.

Learn more about Healthcare x Fintech here: https://a16z.com/healthcare-meets-fintech/

Topics Covered:

  • 00:00 - Introduction
  • 02:50 - The intersection of healthcare and fintech 
  • 05:40 - The problems within US healthcare 
  • 09:00 - The stats behind US healthcare
  • 12:10 - Where do the problems stem from in healthcare?
  • 15:50 - New opportunities and regulatory changes
  • 17:50 - Pushback on regulations
  • 19:40 - Provider and patient models and transparency
  • 21.10 -  The ‘No Surprises Act’ and the ‘Cures Act’
  • 23:20 - Applying fintech infrastructure to healthcare
  • 26:00 - Example: how Juniper in embedding fintech in healthcare
  • 30:10 - Opportunities in the healthcare/fintech market
  • 33:05 - Payvidors unbundled 
  • 34:55 - The financial operating system for healthcare
  • 37:40 - How founders can approach the problems
  • 39:23 - The investor standpoint on company opportunities
  • 41:00 - Unsolved problems in the market
  • 45:25 - The bridge between start-ups and incumbents 
  • 47:20 - Healthcare incumbent stats  
  • 48:50 - The window of opportunity for healthcare and fintech

Resources:

Stay Updated: 

Find a16z on Twitter: https://twitter.com/a16z

Find a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16z

Subscribe on your favorite podcast app: https://a16z.simplecast.com/

Follow our host: https://twitter.com/stephsmithio

Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.

Stay Updated:

Find a16z on X

Find a16z on LinkedIn

Listen to the a16z Podcast on Spotify

Listen to the a16z Podcast on Apple Podcasts

Follow our host: https://twitter.com/eriktorenberg

 

Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from The a16z Show

All 489 episodes
When Two Giants Intersect: Healthcare Meets FintechThe a16z Show · 50 min
Listen in VO