Meme Stocks or Manipulation?

25 Jul 2025 · 1 h 29 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Meme Stocks or Manipulation? (The Compound and Friends, Episode 201)

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Downtown Josh Brown and Michael Batnick are joined by Nick Maggiulli (COO of Ritholtz Wealth Management) and Caleb Silver (editor-in-chief at Investopedia). The primary discussion revolves around meme stocks, market manipulation, the potential growth of Bitcoin, consumer spending patterns among young people, and insights from Nick's new book "The Wealth Ladder".

Key Topics Discussed

  • Meme Stocks and Market Manipulation
  • The hosts debate whether the activity around meme stocks constitutes market manipulation or if it is simply a result of market dynamics and investor sentiment.
  • Eric Jackson's Influence: The conversation touches on Eric Jackson's predictions about stock movements and how his influence on Twitter could sway retail investors.
  • Crowd Behavior: The idea that the collective action of investors can create price movements without deliberate manipulation from individuals.
  • Bitcoin's Growth Potential
  • Discussion on how Bitcoin's market cap can grow without a ceiling, contrasting it with equities that have fundamental backing.
  • The potential systemic risks involved with Bitcoin as it integrates further into traditional finance (e.g., banks facilitating Bitcoin loans).
  • Consumer Spending Trends Among Young People
  • Young investors are increasingly spending on experiences rather than assets like homes.
  • The emergence of a new economic attitude where renting and experiences take precedence over traditional wealth-building methods.
  • Nick Maggiulli’s New Book: The Wealth Ladder
  • Overview of the book's structure which categorizes wealth into levels from less than $10,000 to over $100 million.
  • The importance of understanding these levels for varying financial strategies and how they impact wealth accumulation.

Key Arguments and Insights

  • Investment Strategies:
  • Dollar-cost averaging is highlighted as a sound strategy for investors, particularly in uncertain markets.
  • The hosts emphasize the importance of financial literacy and strategic investing over speculative trading.
  • Market Dynamics:
  • Conversations around the current bull market, meme stock activity, and how retail investors are reshaping market behavior.
  • The hosts stress the role of social media and influencers in driving investment trends, particularly among younger audiences.
  • Personal Responsibility in Investing:
  • The discussion includes personal anecdotes and commentary on investor responsibility, particularly in light of scams and poor financial choices.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Manipulation vs. Sentiment: The episode reinforces the idea that market momentum can be driven by collective investor sentiment rather than intentional manipulation.
  • Evolving Financial Strategies: Nick's book introduces a new framework for understanding wealth that can help individuals tailor their investment strategies based on their current financial situations.
  • Consumer Behavior Changes: There is a notable shift in how younger generations prioritize spending, reflecting broader societal trends toward experiences over traditional asset ownership.

Conclusion The episode provides a comprehensive discussion on the current state of the market, the implications of meme stocks, and the evolving financial landscape as influenced by technology and changing consumer behavior. Insights from Nick Maggiulli’s "The Wealth Ladder" offer valuable perspectives for listeners looking to navigate their financial journeys.

---

Additional Resources

  • Nick Maggiulli's Book: *The Wealth Ladder: Proven Strategies for Every Step of Your Financial Life*.
  • Investopedia: [Investopedia Website](https://www.investopedia.com)
  • Public Investing: [Public.com](http://public.com/compound) - Sponsor of the episode.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Nicole, take his snacks away. Why do you go get a trip to outer space? I don't want that. Oh. Don't you think he would - I'll get on. Oh, wow. Wow, wow, wow. He was in his mouth. Josh just spit food on the table. Not food, it's a mint. It's a mint that doesn't count. I feel like he would like me. If he like flipped on the channel for an hour, he'd be like, who's that guy? Keep that guy. He would love you. Especially on, maybe he'd get you a new jet ski. Isn't that a genius acquisition for him? Yes. Why? I don't get it. It's the world's leader in business news. The channel is on everywhere in the world.

1:03Why should he own it? It's a message. Because it's a messaging platform. Because somebody should own it. And it's not exactly selling at the highest ever valuation, right? And no cable TV news is. Right. It peaked. Do you know what the price tag would be? Take a guess. Well, I think last I checked, it was a billion plus in revenue. Well, it's combined with Golf Channel, MSNBC, NBC News. He was doing a billion plus in revenue five years ago. What does it go for? Two or three? I think on that type of thing, audience, five times multiple. Five. Wouldn't you? So Caleb was like a heavy at CNN money.

1:38Do you know about that? Yeah. CNN. What was your title there? Executive producer. Executive producer. I'm known for putting Josh Brown on the air. Is that the greatest thing you did the whole time? Maybe Howard Linsen, not me. I peaked. Putting Howard Linsen on television was a big step for you. I peaked. at future proof you brought who's the food guy you brought chef kwami i'm watching i did at the last future proof no in california chef jose andres yeah you know who we're having this time i don't colicchio who is that tom colicchio wait how did you get him because i arranged it we roll i don't know the food i arranged a deal tom colicchio is 11 madison park oh network cop you see whatever you do.

2:22Google him. Duck, duck, goose him. C-O-L-L-I-C-H-I-O. So, you know, I have a brain defect. When people, like, tell me numbers and letters, I can't, it doesn't. Oh, all right. So, just vibe code. Say it slowly. What is it? C-O-L-I-C-H-I-O. Tom Colicchio. Oh, there it is. What was his restaurant in the, in the, in Park South? In the 20s. Madison Park. And he was part of Gramercy Tavern with Dan and Dan. And he has a cooking show with Martha Stewart right now on one of the streamers, which I watch. Yes, he does. What the hell is that called? It's pretty good. Have you been to the… It's Jose Andres?

3:02Yeah. Have you been to the bar at the Ritz? Yes. Upstairs. Sick. And downstairs. And the restaurant's very good, too. And Zatina? Zatina? Have you been there yet? Yeah. I ate there. It's quality. Oh, wait. Upstairs? Nope. I ate at the lobby restaurant. We have to go to the bar. It is so sick. It's the best rooftop bar. Dude, it's the best thing I've ever seen. He owns all the restaurants in that building? It's like a licensing thing with his name. But I think he owns a tent. He's the chef owner. I tried going last week with Chris. They wouldn't let us in. Dress code. Let me know. The bazaar is really good.

3:35The bazaar. I've been there. I really enjoyed it. Downstairs? Yeah, I think so. Or that's a different location. Second floor. We have to go to Bryce. It is so sick up there. This is at… So, I did a deal with… um, queues. The queues are deep in the chef space. Like the NASDAQ queues? Yeah. Investor QQ. They're deep in this. They love fine food and wine. Oh, they're deep in it. Like they're into chefs. They have this, uh, video series called recipe for innovation, which is awesome where they have a chef, Jose, Tom, Kwame make recipes based on the components of the queues. Pretty good idea. Actually.

4:09Really? Explain. So they'll say, all right, chef, they put in the salad, Chef Mike, Airbnb, Honeywell, and Starbucks, go. Make me three dishes based on those companies. What inspires you? Airbnb, air, water. Maybe I'll do muscles with a foamy seaweed bat, right? But I think it's pretty smart. It's like - Honeywell, obviously. We'll cook with honey. It's a way to illuminate the components of the cues in a content marketing way, but it's shot like chef's table. It's gorgeous. And so they had this thing, and they're like, we have this beautiful series. We paid millions of dollars to do it. We pay these guys are on the payroll.

4:47We can't get traffic to it. They put it on our ETF channel on Investopedia and on Food & Wine, which we own,. - Meredith. And they're like, you, Caleb, have a presence at Future Proof. What can we do? And I've been talking to Matt for a while about bringing one of our other brands, like Travel & Leisure or Food & Wine, to Future Proof with a sponsor. And this is the one that took. I was trying to get, like, United in Travel & Leisure. I was trying to get and then this came in I was like got it are you excited? yeah I do this as I'll be our third wait did Jose Andre cook something last year? I didn't get to see it there was a ton of people watching you had a full house yeah we did you can't cook because they're uptight about it in Huntington Beach you can't like he can't fire up a stove no you can no in Miami it's a little bit different but you can have like and also they have a tight catering situation in Orange County like it's it's all locked up there so we did he has his own tin fish mussels and sardines and potato chips okay so we did fish and chips that sounds disgusting it was freaking awesome and I bring the wine editor from Food and Wine to drink to serve free wine so we do a conversation about innovation food his empire wines that go with the food and I put it all together into an advertising campaign on our sites and then this live activation experience at Feature Food That's a great package.

6:13Yeah, it's good. And you know what's cool for the people at Future Proof that are watching financial stuff all day? It's like a refresher. Yeah. It's a palate cleanser. Yeah. Here's something relevant to you, but not more fintech. And we're not jamming the Qs at them. We're giving them recipes. Yeah. Literally, here's the recipe. Quiche, five foods to start with the letter Q. Wait, you wrote a book? Quinoa. Yes. Holy shit. We should talk about it. We should talk about it. So, I don't think I told you this yesterday. I want to save it for the show. Maybe I can tell you this. That book is going to live much longer than Just Keep Buying, which was a smash hit.

6:55Just Keep Buying is one of the best silent financial books of all time. I don't need to tell you that. It's on the inside, left, and right. Okay. It's done well. I mean, it's better internationally. Dude. It's done well. Of all time. Well, what a response. Yeah, what the? Dude, we're on a podcast. Have fun. Be like, thank you. Yeah. No, I appreciate it. I appreciate it. It's very nice that you're saying that. That's a better book than the f***ing Bible. And you're like, huh. A little more data. Do you agree? Like, Just Keep Buying was great for what it is. The wealth ladder is so much bigger than that.

7:27Like, people will give that to people at all ages, at all areas of the wealth ladder, if you will. Yeah. I think that was the point, right? Like, Just Keep Buying was supposed to be my, like, hey, if I don't know anything about you, here's what I give you. Here's my financial advice. And with the wealth ladder, I said, hey, that's actually not correct, right? Like for people that are just starting out, you've got to have a different strategy. And for people that are trying to get super rich, that's a, you know, buying S &P 500. But it doesn't invalidate the first book. Of course not. It builds on it.

7:56It's a different thing, right? It's like, where are you trying to go and why? And figuring out the right strategy is more important. One of the things that you've done very skillfully in selling the first book, and I would imagine you're going to repeat the playbook. you just do every media outlet possible. And that way, during this four to six week launch period, every day there are people talking about your book to their own like, some of them are big audiences, some of them are micro audiences, but it almost doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. Because if there are sales taking place on Amazon of this book each day, even if it's three books today, they're keeping you high in the algorithm.

8:32Dude, you know what? It's not three books. Very wise. You know what his genius is? on the first day and on the second day, he buys 10 ,000 copies each day to boost the rankings. That's genius. That's a thing that people do that. I think they, so the algorithms changed a lot. They don't let you do that now. Yeah, so that's one of the issues. You can't, if I go and buy a bunch of books, that doesn't, that's not the same as a bunch of separate orders and they take that into account in the ranking. Yeah, both. New York Times takes that into account with their like, you know, bestseller list and all that.

9:00So it's gotta be much more broad-based and people have tried to gain this, but I don't. Scott Ramucci told me, like, he put out, like, the little book of hedge funds or whatever. He's like, if I told you how many thousands of copies of this thing I have in my basement, you wouldn't believe me. But I'm telling you, it's actually even more. But that's another era. Now, I think the algo is - Can I make another recommendation? Yeah. Go around to, like, the asset managers who have the new associates or the interns. I'd be like, I would love to talk to your team about building wealth for 45 minutes.

9:30I'm going to bring a book. Can you buy 20 copies? and we'll give them away and I'll sign them for the kids. And you spend, I do this all the time, not to sell books, but just to get us out there like a Trojan horse to get us into these firms. And you can literally give a step-by-step or a nice talk and take Q &A, but they'll buy 20 books as part of the deal. No talent fee, just buy books. Yeah, I mean, I prefer the pot. I appreciate that method. I think it's just kind of tough because I work. I have a job I have to do. Yeah, we don't want him doing that shit. A 30-minute podcast I can do virtually is easy.

10:02the chief operating officer of the firm. On Sundays. I was talking about Sunday. On Sunday, like, yeah. But I'm like, I wish I could just go in. Caleb has a great idea for you. Are you familiar with the term sabbatical? Yeah. We're actually extraordinarily busy this summer. We can't have Nick doing hand-hand combat. Actually, I was asking Nick the other day, I said, it feels like we're busier than we've ever been during this time of the year. Can you pull up X, Y, and Z? And sure enough. Yeah, the horse race chart shows that. We stole this from Netflix. Netflix used to report their numbers cumulatively year by year.

10:39So they would compare where are you in 2019 in April, January through April versus 2018, 2017. So we started doing that. And it's a really effective chart. It tells you all you need to know. I mean, a lot of what you need to know. Anyway, Nick has a real job and he's very good at it. We're going to talk about the wealth ladder once we get into the meat and potatoes here. That's what you're doing. I'm going. Are you ready to settle? Are you ready for this? My box. You causing a disturbance, queen? Did you see what I did to the slate? Oh, I love that. Well done, Caleb. All right. What's in the box?

11:15I have a gift. When the time is right. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Stop the clock. Here's a word from our sponsor. Today's show is sponsored by Public. Public is the investing platform for those who take it seriously. You can build a multi-asset portfolio of stocks, bonds, options, crypto, and more. You can also access industry-leading yields like the 4.1 % APY you can earn on your cash with no fees or minimums. What sets Public apart? AI isn't just a feature. It's woven into the entire experience from portfolio insights to earnings call recaps. Public gives you smarter context at every touchpoint. Fund your account in five minutes or less.

11:57Check out public.com slash compound. Paid for by Public Investing. Full disclosures in podcast description.

12:25Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.

12:39Ladies and gentlemen, children of all ages, investors, traders around the world, it is my pleasure to introduce you to episode 201 of the World's Greatest Investing Podcast. The Compound and Friends. All right. John is here. Daniel, Duncan, Nicole. Two very special guests, repeat guests. Someone call you guys returning champions. I definitely would. Ladies and gentlemen, directly across from me, Nick Majuli is the creator of Of Dollars and Data and the chief operating officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management. Woo! Thank you. All right. He also just released his latest book, The Wealth Ladder, Proven Strategies for Every Step of Your Financial Life.

13:32He'll tell you all about it. And another returning champion, Caleb Silver is the editor-in-chief at Investopedia. Caleb is frequently featured as a markets, economic, and consumer trends expert on NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, Fox Business, and many more. Caleb, so great to have you back. Thank you very much for being here. Thank you for having me. I want my own air horn, though. You're going to get one. First things first, let's just get this out of the way. Nick, you got married this summer. Yes, I did. All right. Like within the last few days almost. Within like a month, a month ago. Okay. We have a picture.

14:17the white tux jacket definitely plays. My wife selected that for me. I can't love it more than I love it. That's tough to pull off. You did it. But he did it with the bow. You need the bow tie with that to really do the whole thing. Yeah, she wanted everyone to wear white. And so like all our friends are like, are you sure? Like, yeah, she wants that. So that's what we did. We all went white and we did a courthouse wedding. I was going to say, is this City Hall? Yep, went to City Hall, did it. It was great. We were the last like session of the day. The last one is quick. You go in there and like literally someone from the state comes in.

14:45It's less than five minutes. Like, do you take yes, yes, okay, sign this, whatever. And then you're married. Did you get your marriage license from City Hall? Did you do that with Robin? No. Did you do that? I don't think I did that. I don't even know if I'm official. So we lived 25 years later. We went down to City Hall to get the license. Did you take a rabbi? No, we didn't get married there. We just got the license. But there were people getting married there. There was a whole hallway filled with brides and grooms and some of their family members waiting to get married. Okay, so that was a cool way to do it.

15:17Who are all those people on both sides? Some of my friends, some of her friends, and then a lot of her cousins. So it was a very Albanian wedding. So a lot of her family was there. My cousin with his dad. Congratulations. We're so proud of you. Thank you. We knew you'd find the one. You definitely have. She's awesome. She's a great lover. You feel any difference? No, it's actually, things are better. Wait, does he say she's a great lover? No, she's great. I love her. Oh my God. No. She's a great lover too. She's great. Love her. We both heard the same thing. Nick, I want to double click on that.

15:48Wow. Let's do it. No, so do an instant replay. Have them go back like 15 seconds. She's great. Love her. Okay. We're very fortunate. All of our wives are great lovers. All right. So I'm really proud of you. Congratulations. Hard pivot. Is open door stock market manipulation? What do you think? What isn't? I'm not going to accuse a person of stock market manipulation in this case. And we'll tell the story why we're asking the question. But it looks like manipulation on the surface. It just might not be somebody deliberately manipulating it because the crowd is doing it. It is not stock market manipulation.

16:28You say it is not stock market manipulation. Absolutely not. Why not? Who has inside information? Inside information and market manipulation are two different things. That's one of a component. Disagree. I can manipulate something with no inside information whatsoever. Okay. So what is, what is, uh, Eric Jackson was at the center of this, but hold on. I just want to just real quick before we get to, is it, or is it not stock market manipulation? The only way that you have this type of mania, cause it absolutely is a mania is with a really healthy bull market with lots of euphoria. and before we got to this stage of the market, you had a textbook rally, exactly what you wanted to see.

17:13So Chartkin made this chart. We stole this from Duality Research who is just putting out killer, killer content. So what we're looking at is, for the listeners who are not watching and you should be watching, the rolling 78-day change. Why 78? That's the bottom. In the Goldman cyclicals versus the defensive index. and you haven't seen this type of advance, this type of spread, which is 29 % since the bottom in 2009. So you are seeing the leaders leading, you're seeing tech, communications, industrials, financials, and what you're seeing lagging is the opposite. It's staples, utilities, healthcare, real estate.

17:52So this is a very, very healthy market in which led to a lot of excess, which we are living through right this second. We're hitting all-time highs, automizing in and of itself does not signal excess. But a lot of the behavior that we're seeing, open door, which we're about to talk about, is a result of a very healthy market that is now turning unhealthy. Okay, so here's the heart of the issue. Eric Jackson's a friend of the show. We've had him on the show, not recently, but he's been on multiple times. And he's been around for, I don't know, 30 years. He's a real guy. Hedge fund manager has been involved in activist campaigns at Yahoo.

18:31who he's a known quantity in the media. He came on our show three years ago, two years, 2022. The reason why this was possible, this open door mania was possible is because Eric was on this show talking about Carvana from the business point of view. It was a dollar stock. It was a dollar stock and it ran to 150, whatever it did. So he had the credibility. So when I saw this tweet, I thought, hey, maybe I should just put like a couple of grand in there. Just see what happens. You should have. It turns out you should have. Just see what happens. So Eric came on our show and said, you guys are, everyone's overlooking Carvana.

19:09This is not, like there's a lot of short sellers in it, but that's not the reason I like it. He said, I actually think it's a good business. And they threw it out with the rest of the excess of 2021. And the stock went from a dollar to whatever. It's a monster stock now. One of the biggest winners in the last three years. So a lot of people remember him. $330 today and it was a little bit harder. $330. So like the type of gain that you will never see anywhere. So he tweeted on July 14th, over the last month, my X impressions have exploded talking about BTQQF. I don't even want to look that up.

19:46IREN and CIFR because everyone is looking for the next Carvana. We think we just found another. At EMJ Capital, that's his fund, has taken a position in open. and we believe it could be a 100 bagger over the next few years. Here's why. And he did a whole thread and the thread is mostly focused on the fundamentals and comparing the situation with Opendoor to Carvana a couple of years back. Again, nothing wrong there, I think, because he's saying he bought it. That's number one. That's number one. So, right? He's like, I bought it. I own it. Okay, good. Number two, he's laying out a fundamental story.

20:30He's not saying, hey, everybody, tell your friends, let's move the stock. So that being said, this is pissing a lot of people off. What's different about this than Roaring Kitty doing his own fundamental analysis? Well, they accused him of manipulation too. Right. But never convicted. What's different about this than when David Einhorn goes on stage at Iris Sowing? Nothing. He's got a bigger stage than talking to wealthier people. But this guy is respected. obviously you've had him here. Three things are different. Three things are different. Number one, it's a dollar stock. David Einhorn doesn't do that.

21:03Okay. All right, right? Fair. Okay. You can move it. You know what you could do to a dollar stock. Anyone. Roaring Kitty. You're right. Number two, heavily, heavily, heavily shorted. Now, some would say tough shit for the shorts. Overstayed your welcome. You had a stock go down 95 % while you still short it. Totally legitimate, it. But still, when you do something like this, when you say 100 bagger of a dollar stock, you know it's going to 10. You know it's going to 10. If you have any influence whatsoever. Let me ask you this, because fine. I didn't even tell you the third thing. Fine. What is it?

21:39The venue. It's not the Iris Zone conference. It's Twitter. And the regulators just do not like people using message boards to move. Even if you have the best intentions, for whatever reason, it's different than standing on stage at Lincoln Center at the Iris Zone Conference. But market manipulation is illegal, right? Hard stop, whether it's information or text or whatever it is, that's illegal. I'm not a lawyer. What about what Eric did crosses the legal line? I don't believe anything. And I don't believe that the regulators actually care so much about this type of thing anymore. These days, probably not.

22:17Probably not. So this guy's using his loudspeaker. He's using his platform X in this case. He knows who he's talking. He's got 68 some thousand followers. He's done it before. I don't see any difference between this and Carvana. This company loses a lot of money and it's in a pretty tough sector right now. But this is his own research. And if people want to follow, they follow. But you know what's also different is we're back in that 2021 phase where everything's melting up, right? It's like a soft serve ice cream cone with sprinkles on top. Tastes good for the first couple of bites. And then you get to the middle and you're like, what am I actually eating?

22:51Put the chart up. This is open door one year performance. So it got to as high as almost, looks like almost three and a half. And again, coming from like sub$1. And I think what would really seal the deal is if like Eric blows it out now. What sells? He's not selling. I don't think so. because I think Eric legitimately likes the stock. He does. Now, I would also say I— But that would be very— We can't agree that would be very bad. I absolutely understand why professional investors absolutely hate this because it feels like cheating. It feels like a shortcut. It feels illegitimate. So I fully understand.

23:33But at the same time, I don't think he did anything wrong. Well, so I don't either. I'm just pointing out the things that people dislike. Yeah, I get it. I would dislike it too. People, including regulators. Dude, if I'm a hedge fund manager and I'm competing against him, like, this is just not fair. It feels like you're cheating. And then you fan the flames of social media on Wall Street bets and wherever else. And this is what you get. This is where we are right now. So you can hate it. But welcome to investing in 2025. I mean, why is it cheating? Just because he has an audience? Is that cheating now?

24:02Like, where is it? Yeah, I agree with that. And like, maybe that is, but like, he has the audience for some reason that this hypothetical hedge fund manager doesn't have. It feels cheating in the same way that when Kim Kardashian backs a company or Sidney Sweeney in this case, that's where the worm works. The audience is the most important thing ever. That's it. He put an$82 target on it, quote, in a few years was the last tweet in the thread. I think that's the other thing that bothers people. He's arriving there on the fundamentals. He's got a reason for 82. But again, a$2 stock going to 82 is like miraculous.

24:39It's like Bitcoin. Yeah. Yeah, even bigger than, and I'm not saying it won't do that or it can't do that, but I think when you say that out loud, that's the same thing that pisses people off about Cathie Wood. When she says her base case for Tesla is 5 trillion. All right, so look what happened. People don't like that. Well, what people also don't like is when it appears like you are doing this for your own benefit and people think that other people are going to get hurt because of the result of your actions. Yes. That's what pisses people off. So this is from Sherwood. Open door call volumes were over a million.

Read the full transcript

25:11The other day, the stock, which is a market cap of less than$5 billion, I think, traded more shares, more volume than Microsoft. So Matt Levine, as only he can do, wrote this yesterday. New meme stocks dropped. Last week, a reader emailed me. I have a funny AI thing that happened to me this week. My friends and I were talking about Carvana on Tuesday night, which got me curious. And I asked ChatGPT what the equivalent of Carvana today is. ChatGBT told me OpenDoor. So as any responsible investors do, we both bought a fair share of OpenDoor. The next day, the stock went roaring and went up by over 50%.

25:48That's the end of the email. Matt Levine wrote, nice trade for him. Very much not investment advice for you. Welcome to investing in 2025. I don't know why we should be surprised by this, but this is how a lot of people are looking at the market. Not everybody is going to the Iris Home Conference. Not everybody's coming into this office looking for really professional and sound advice. They are looking for hot things to buy. They want to make money. Fan the flames. And there we go. People want. So that's a really important reason why it's not manipulation. Eric doesn't control what other people do.

26:18Number one. And there's a whole conversation that's taken off as a result of him spotting this opportunity. That's away from his Twitter feed. It's on Reddit. It's on like Twitter. It's on other venues that he has nothing to do with. if people choose to read his opinion and agree with it or think enough other people will agree with it that there's an opportunity at a certain point like we have to hold adults responsible for their own actions nick how much open door did you buy zero i was gonna say you're suspicious i haven't had an individual stock in years i haven't because i'm sitting on it all right so back to the market environment um and where we are today bespoke has a chart showing the 100 most short stocks versus the Russell 1000, a three-month performance spread.

27:06And we're back in 2021 territory. Like we're back. We're back. Wait, these are the most highly shorted stocks as like relative to the rest of the market. It's a spread. So this is 2020 all over again. We're doing it. 2021. Yeah. I mean, it's just the meme stock stuff all over again, right? You just said it. I mean, I don't know what else there is to say on that. Why are they shorting$2 stocks again? Wasn't that, aren't the memories fairly raw and recent from like three years ago? I mean, GameStop, everyone, you start shorting and then, okay, that creates an opportunity for prices to go up very quickly because now these people have to close out their positions and it's just - It's almost the most bullish call you can make these days.

27:44If you see the hedge fund shorting stocks right now, the meme stock crowd is all over it. They've been looking for a while for something like this and the right market environment to Michael's point where anything goes right now, melt it up. So they got this, why Krispy Kreme? We're not eating more donuts. I'm not eating more donuts. But all of a sudden, this stock's up 34 % in a few days. Yeah, I saw Kohl's was up 36 % in a day. Kohl's did not come out with AI. Like, that's a short— Oh, you only can get that with a short squeeze. I guess the question is, like, has no one learned anything? Why are we shorting$1,$2,$3 stocks?

28:17Even if we think they're zeros, like, it's almost like you're asking for somebody on a message board to whip up a mob to wreck you. Yeah, the cost benefit's just not there at all. Well, how about this? If there's a lot of shorts, if 20 % of the float is short, a stock under$5, just don't do that. Like you're asking to get blown up. Here's another metric showing that this is, by this metric, it's even crazier than 2021. A lot of this is from a daily chart book, by the way. Non-profitable tech retail investor participation percent. So I guess that's measuring what percent of these non-profitable names, like whatever these dog shit names are.

28:55These are publicly traded companies with no earnings. That are losing money. Okay. 25 % of the volume is coming from retail investors, which is higher than it was at the peak in 2021. And it's working. So it won't always work, but right now it is. Yeah, right. So environment, like certain environments lend themselves well to this kind of activity. This is making people way more money than the stuff coming out of University of Chicago with small cap beta. Oh, I can earn, none of that's working. I can earn an excess of 1.5 % a year, maybe over time on average, or I could buy open door and ride a few one to three in two weeks, not in two weeks, in three days.

29:31Yeah. And blowing yourself up, especially for people that love to trade these meme stocks, it's not a big deal. Sometimes they publicize it. They were doing it back in 2021. I'm taking a flyer here. People love the drama of the bet. That's what people are doing. They're betting. Why are they doing it now? The environment is ripe for it. It's not like we have all the stimulus money coming our way, but I think people are just tired of waiting around for the next big thing. They probably missed Bitcoin. They're like, I got to get in on this. Probably missed GameStop in the early days i got to get in on this people want the action i just think there's there's something we're going to talk about this later in the show but i think this is actually caused by housing prices being too high and so all this money that would have been hey i need to buy a house i need to do that it's just money just and this is i saw this is not even really my take i saw this recently someone said i have an unsubstantiated take that like there's all this money in all these different asset classes because it's not in housing like it normally can't buy real estate like i can't afford because with rates where they're and those that even have the money to buy real estate.

30:24It's like, well, with rates where they are, I don't want to do that. So I have this money sitting in either in treasuries or I have it, you know, I'm going to bet it on things. Right. So that's how I see this playing out. It's just there's so much money. And what are the opportunities to chase? Right. Housing is not one of them. So it's meme. And it's not even just rates. It's also a lack of supply, although in certain markets, supply is coming back online. But like or it's the question that young people are asking themselves, is this the best use of my money, sinking a million plus into an asset I might sit in for 40 years?

30:55What if I want to move the family to Costa Rica for the year? And I think that's a fundamental change, especially for younger investors. That's going to affect the wealth management business, too. If all of a sudden that 30, 40 percent of their capital is freed up to do things, that changes the equation. Maybe they will. But right now, there's no point in doing it if you can't afford it. And if you have that extra money, take a flyer on a few stocks. So interesting. Or invest in experience. So the Fed is indirectly causing this. Unbelievable. They're keeping mortgage rates so high that people are sitting liquid enough to trade meme stocks when they should be making mortgage payments.

31:30What's in the box? All right. I brought a gift because I always like to bring a gift to this, one of my favorite podcasts. And you know how I roll. You know how I roll. That's nice. I had this made for - That's a sweet deck. This is a sweet deck. Nick's orange and the blue because that's how we get down. Yeah, yeah. And I'd love for you to... Let me see the other... Let me see the flip side. Oh, it's green. Sweet. Love it. Were you a skater? Were you a green? Were you a skater? No, no. I looked like one, but I wasn't one. Were you a skater? He still is. I'm a full lifetime skater. No, I've seen you on your board.

32:01Yeah. I've seen you on a long board. That's right. Did you skate here today? I skated here yesterday to drop off my subject heading for the airport. Oh, thank you. We love it. Yes, and thank you Thank you for having me on the show. We love it. So, Nick. That's going. That's getting hung up. Yeah, that's got to get hung up. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'll throw trucks and wheels on it and ride all over this office if you want. Nick is 100 % right. On Animal Spurts this week, Ben posed the same question, and I laughed at it. I said, come on. No, it's ridiculous. We got two emails. No, two is not a million, but we got two emails saying, actually, and here's one of them.

32:37Wanted to chime in on something from today's episode. Ben asked if people are using their down payments cash to invest in the market. And Michael brushed it off. For what it's worth, that is exactly what I'm doing. And then he laid out why. He's renting. They have money. They can't buy a house. So he's not the only person that's doing this. Yeah, it's tempting, right? Like, let's say you have 500 grand sitting in an account. And you're sitting in treasury bills. And you're not about to buy a house because nothing's changed. You're either treasuries or you're in the risk assets. You take 20 grand or whatever, or five grand.

33:07Yeah, yeah. You get a text and someone's like, yo, yo, yo, Eric Jackson, open door. It's like, I was going to buy a house, but fuck it. Let's go. Let's YOLO into open door. I guess I could see that phenomenon. I could see people saying, well, the money's just sitting here anyway. And look how good the market is. And look how much action. And my friends are talking about all these things they're trading. Whatever. I'll take 20 grand. I'll throw it into some stuff. See if I can turn it into 50. I'm a follower and reader of Vanda's research. Fanatrak does great research on what retail investors like us are actually doing with our money.

33:40And they track how we're investing outside of the defined plans, outside of the 401k, the IRAs, et cetera. And we are back at elevated levels, back to the close to the 2021 levels. In the trenches. Yeah. And the things that we are buying outside of our just normal allocations to our 401ks, which is all the big funds, all the big stocks, are very interesting stocks along AI. But you're going to get an open door in there. You're going to get a Krispy Kreme just because that's where the action is in meme stock land right now. So retail investors are back in it looking for opportunity because they're seeing this big melt up and want to be a part of it.

34:12In the last 30 days, I've been buying Solana, Jilby Aviation, and Archer. Oh, they're both mooning. These are the blue chips of my portfolio now. To the moon. The blue chips are bullshit. But like to that point, I see my own drift. I wasn't doing that six months ago even. Right? Right? And it's just like, now I'm entertaining ideas, even flyers, whatever. Like, I'm entertaining ideas myself, saying to myself as I'm doing it, this is so dumb. I almost bought Intel. Yeah, the talk about a money loser. So - Put this option short up. Calls are almost 70 % of the total market volume. Again, hasn't been this high since the 2021 meme days.

34:56One more, just more confirmation. The equity euphoria indicator. Last week, the Barclays equity euphoria indicator, which used an options data to quantify investors' giddiness, jumped to its highest level since late December. So I guess if you're listening to this. Yeah, we're there. You're listening. We're there. Please be careful. Maybe pump the brakes a little bit. Maybe no more individual positions for a minute. Maybe just let it breathe. Keep doing what you're doing with your 401k, your bi-weekly, whatever you're doing. But if you're going to entertain new positions, Just be a little, be careful.

35:31Isn't this the hardest thing? When your portfolio value is at a record high and you look at your holdings and in green in your app or on the brokerage website, you see like, you see all your stocks like up 80%, up 50%, one after another, after another. It's really hard to talk yourself out of how great you are in that moment. And the problem is it's at that moment where most people are like, what else should I buy? Because you're getting the oxytocin. It's like firing all your serotonin, oxytocin, all those good chemicals are firing all over your brain. And not just from the money you're making, but from you told other people and they made money.

36:17He told me to just keep buying. Yeah, yeah, Nick. No, but so right now - Does not apply for individual security. That's the danger right now. And people that might normally own 20 stocks, are buying like 30 stocks because everything they're buying is working. And they're not looking for the next blue chip stock that could go up 10%. Now they're looking for the junk. I just think it's crazy we're having this conversation. Like three months ago, April was like the world's ending. Tariffs are going to ruin the world economy. And now we're back to mean stock. It's like - Yeah, but there's an adrenaline factor to a near-death experience.

36:52That's fair. And I think three months ago, a lot of people looked at their portfolio and we're like, oh my God, this is so horrible. And it looked like, oh, this is really going to be a shitty year because this tariff thing is going to be going on all year. And then that goes away a little bit, reverses, but we just had a near-death experience. Think about it in real life. Unbelievable. People get that shot of adrenaline. They start making out with each other. Like, think about it like, oh my God, we almost died. I think you're my girlfriend now. Like that, you know? But the gaps between near death and euphoria are so compressed right now.

37:26We talked about this the last time I was on the show. The bear markets are super cute. They last a couple of weeks. And then we're back off to the races. And then we're back in this concern about a correction. And then we're back off to the races. That's because we haven't - There's no time to catch our breath. We haven't had a real economic reset. No. I know the bottom 10%, again, obviously, they're hurting always, but especially now. But a real recession that impacts everyone. Not just rolling recessions, which we've had. obviously real estate and tech in 2022, but where everyone's eating it.

37:55We haven't had it. Caleb, brag a little bit about Investopedia. So you're the editor-in-chief. And I remember when you joined there and you were talking about the opportunity. Yeah. You have largely - Came right here to this office or at the Park Avenue office. That's right. You have largely witnessed that opportunity bear out. Yeah. I mean, you guys are a super important site. I think everyone at some point in any given month that's searching for investment terms land on Investopedia in some way. What are the most search terms that people are landing on this summer? And what do you see going on in the platform right now?

38:29I'm so glad you asked. By the way, monthly active users? Monthly, we're about 12 million uniques. Okay. What percentage that America versus rest of the world? Half. Wow. Half US-based. These are, I think, a lot of self-directed investors, not by definition, but - Students, right? Two? Yeah, students is where we kind of started. I'm actually bringing Investopedia back to school next year on a university tour because I think we really belong there, helping people learn about money before they got out of school with$36 ,000 in debt. Kids studying for exams, securities industry exams. You guys are like a companion.

39:05Yeah, we are 26 years old. That's like 260 real years. In internet time. In internet time. And we've evolved, but we've evolved because financial markets have evolved. but we're still there for people to be like, what does that mean? But more and more, and as I've been there over the last decade or so, it's been about what is and now what? And that's kind of what we want to be, the voice and the guide for the educated investor. But we know a lot of advisors use us to either get smart or smarten up their clients. So we play in that space as well. But we also realize that the nature of money has changed for a lot of people.

39:38Now, some principles will always be there, compounding, dollar cost averaging, all that good stuff that we learn, that we teach, that you teach. That's always been important, but we want to be the ultimate resource for all things money for everybody. We have a great name. We have a great brand. It's an honor to be the editor-in-chief and represent it and be the face of it, even though I have a great face for podcasts, apparently. But we are lucky to still be here, and I think because the brand is so strong, it's really hard to maintain that in an AI world. I was just looking at a story out of Axios, citing where ChatGPT and the other AI platforms take content from.

40:15Are they scraping you? Oh, my gosh. Right. So what do you do about that? Dude, on my screen, I have this. I was just going to go there. I hit EBITDA, and Gemini gives me the answer. And you obviously are the first link, but now I have to scroll down to get you. Yes, and that's a problem. They're f***ing your shit up. That's a problem. And we're doing whatever we can to protect ourselves from crawlers. We just announced a partnership with a site that protects that. But we also have, through our parent company, Dot Dash Merit, a deal with OpenAI that's been well publicized where there's a licensing fee and they cite it.

40:44Yeah, like Reddit's getting paid. New York Times are getting paid. Money has to change hands. It does. And our leadership, God bless them, has been behind that 100 % since the start from our chairman and CEO at IAC on down to our CEO at Dot Dash Merit. We have to protect ourselves. At the same time, we can't just sit here and say, oh, no, AI is just eating us up like Pac-Man. And we got to find other ways to deliver content and experiences to people. We were talking earlier about these live events that I do now at Future Proof. We've been doing a lot more in video, obviously, on various platforms.

41:16I just took my podcast to Vodcast Live because I want to find other ways to engage audiences where they are. But we still have to be building the right educational experiences for investors for 2025 and beyond because we can't just sit here and let it happen. No, you have to evolve to it. So back to the question of what have people been looking for? I was just looking for the past six months. And obviously, we had a lot of people looking up bear markets when we were darn close to bear market. Call options. What are those? Best inverse ETFs. Oh, that's great. Yeah, that's always a good sign. Not ETFs.

41:49Inverse ETFs. Yeah. We had people looking up Bitcoin for the first time. If they hadn't looked it up before, what is it? How is it mined? How many will ever be mined? Like, what is this thing that just keeps exploding? If we're going to be the crypto capital of the world, they want to make sure that they understand that as well. Smoot-Hawley, we went back in history to teach him about the Smoot-Hawley tariffs. Why are they important? And then obviously around Buffett's announcement of his resignation, he's super popular on Investopedia. A lot of people looking at that. But you can see the full spectrum pretty much of America, really, but the world, but what they're worried about.

42:24And you can see the people on the bottom who are struggling. What's a hardship withdrawal on my 401k? What's the best personal loan to take right now? Should I tap my Roth IRA? To how do I leverage? Those queries are hitting Investopedia. Oh, because we have it all. We have 40 ,000 pieces of content on the site. So it's everything from how do I protect myself to how do I get promiscuous and take advantage of this upside and take advantage of this meme stock rally or this crypto rally? Do you guys have a fear greed index? We have the anxiety index, which tracks traffic to fear-based terms. Fear-based terms like recession, like correction, like...

42:58So I'm sure in April, All the way, right? All the way. Screaming like a two-year-old toddler in a toy store when it's time to go home. And for good reason. But then it switches just as quickly as our emotions switch with the market. So if you look at price, price is a great indicator of interest. Volatility is very good for us because people get worried and they're concerned and they want to do something. Learn first, then do something. And that's kind of the way I want Investopedia to evolve. Come to learn, and then we're going to help you do. You have the data on that anxiety index, the spikes.

43:29I assume it spikes. We have that going back to the financial crisis. Yeah. You sent that to me years ago. You should give that to us and let us plot different markets against it. I'd love to see if it's earlier than other fear-agreed index. That's what matters. Years ago, a hedge fund came to us and did that very, very study, and they found that it does precede the VIX. Was it Scott Bassett? I'm sure yours is better than Bull Bear. the AI stuff that is always quoted. That feels laggy. That's a survey. Yeah. That's a survey. But it's also, it's older people. It's older people. And ours is, if you think about it, when you get freaked out, what do you do?

44:04You Google something or you look it up. You're like, wait, what is that? What's it called? What's it called? The Anxiety Index. The Investopedia Anxiety Index. So we have it going back to the financial crisis because that's when, you know, we started waking up to that. I wasn't there at the time, but thankfully we started tracking that data. Being around 26 years, having as many visitors as we do, as many readers and as much content gives you a ton of data. We have an incredible data team that helps us analyze this stuff. Want to talk about dumb money? No, we'd skip it. We're going to skip that?

44:29Yeah. Okay. I thought that was my segment. It was. Yeah. Where are we going next, Mike? This is yours. Personal responsibility. Oh. So, all right. Let me tell you a story. This is a true story. This just happened. And a lot of advisors are talking about this. And I'd love to hear what you guys think. A client tells her advisor, doesn't matter what firm it is. It's a big, big RIA. Client tells her advisor, I want to liquidate my IRA. The advisor claims that they try to talk her out of it because there are taxes and penalties. And the client says, just tell me what the taxes and penalties are. In the IRA?

45:11Yeah. Like to liquidate it early. Oh, like get their money out. Like give me my money. Liquidate it. So like at the end of the day, the advisor is not the boss. The client is the boss. So you can warn a client, this is not a great idea. The client doesn't tell the advisor what they're doing with the money either, which I think is a really key part of the story. The client takes that money,$82 ,000 out of her IRA, also somehow has another$800 ,000. And this person is listed in the article as a cashier at a retail store. So I'm not a thousand percent sure how, where that money came from. Anyway, the client gets sucked in by somebody in her DMs who's running a crypto scam.

46:00It's someone actually impersonating someone else who she trusted. And it's a crypto scam. And she puts all her money in it. And$882 ,000 goes to zero. Okay. Horrible. We all agree. Nobody would say something as callous as serves you right or tough shit. Like you have to have compassion for people. Because this person's not getting that money back. But here's the thing. Now this person is suing the RIA. And by the way, only 82 ,000 of her loss came from the RIA. The other 800 grand came from somewhere else. But this person needs money. So her answer is, well, I'm going to sue the RIA because they should have talked me out of this.

46:40All right, that's over the line. I think that's like, I think it's like outrageous, but I don't think the judge is going to throw it out. I feel like this suit, either they'll settle it just to get it over with. On what merit? What is she claiming? She's claiming that the advisor did not. Here, I'll tell you exactly. And then you guys tell me what you think. They broke the fiduciary rule. Yeah. Come on. According to the lawsuit filed in New York federal court, the woman believed the firm, quote, would have her best interest at heart when operating as her financial advisor. Instead, the firm recommended a liquidation of her account to meet her objectives when it knew or should have known its recommendation was unsuitable because of the purported investment with the fraudster.

47:30The advisor doesn't know about the fraudster. The client is not saying, yeah, I want to put it all into this crypto thing that somebody DM'd me. So like at a certain point, I understand the frustration, you lost all your money, but what do you want the advisor to do? like hit you over the head with a, with a pan. Well, what we would have done, we would have just delinked. We would have said, you're not our client. Like the word, this is obviously. That is the right answer is to say, you're not taking our advice. We're not, we're not taking money. I think it depends on, on how big, okay. 80 grand, how much other money do they have with you?

48:00If that's like all her money, I, you don't know the full situation. I read the article and the advisors basically saying we were strongly against this. We told this to the client. Like, as long as you have that recorded somewhere and it's like timestamp, then like, I feel like you're going to go scot-free. At the end of the day, the client made that decision. Should you have pried the client more? Possibly. Should you have advisors that are more like better at doing that coaching? Of course. But at the end of the day, like if someone's like, no, I want this money. I want to pay the fees. What are you?

48:28They are the boss. You're right, Josh. They're the boss. Here's the complaint. Quote, this is the plaintiff, what they're saying. Despite the rising prevalence of pig butchering and cryptocurrency scams, no representative ever inquired further as to why blank's investment required an early liquidation of her retirement account. The complaint read. I find that hard to believe. Instead, the firm asks no further clarification or explanation of plaintiff's investment purpose and only asked how much she wanted withheld for federal and state tax deductions and mentioned the penalty fee for early withdrawal.

49:07So she took out most of her money in June, and didn't take long to lose it all. I don't know. I think the advisor has to say a couple of things, like don't do this, or I really don't think you should do this because. But if the client's not telling the advisor what they're doing with the money, how strenuously can you say no to someone whose money it is? I think it's just going to come down to how good is the documentation. Because like maybe, let's say the advisor is super busy and like this client says, I need to take this money out and this person is not really pushing back. they're like, sure, take it, whatever.

49:40Like, what do you need? Okay, they just want to get it done. They're not really thinking through. If there's no recommendation to not do anything with it, then she might have a case. Oh, you're right. Because the advisor might be like, oh, it's an$80 ,000. I don't have time for it. It's just fine. Imagine this client has another million with them. I know 80 grand in the grand scheme of the relationship is not that large. It's what's 8 % right, basically. So you're like, okay, yeah, whatever. No big deal. Just sign it off. And now they're saying, hey, I should have that money back. The bigger issue is this type of stuff is exploding.

50:08these scams. And it seems so obvious to us. Like, how does this keep happening? This is on tick. By the way, this is a DM on TikTok, which is incredible. So how do we, how do we as an industry and as a society do a better job of protecting these people? How loud do we have to scream? Do not give money in DMs. People aren't like this. How do, how do we do it? You could do whatever you want. They're not going to listen. They're not going to listen. But you could also have rules in your portfolio that would not allow this. And I'm sure her advisor was like, what are you doing? If they knew, I'm not sure.

50:48With AI, the impersonation and the specificity and the precision is going to get so bad that the scams are going to explode. Yeah. Yeah, they're worried. Sam Altman had a big conclave with leaders from financial services this week. Of course, he's pitching, you know, open AI services. But like cybersecurity in the age of AI, you know how you log into your brokerage account? It's a face ID on the app on your phone. That could obviously be faked. Voice print is another way. Like when I call into Fidelity, I don't have to tell them anything about myself because they identify me based on me answering a question.

51:30All of that can be faked very easily. And I think Sam Altman's message to the people from the banks and brokerages whom he met with was like, like it or not, we open Pandora's box. It's open. Like this is what it's going to be. We need Theranos to take the blood from our fingerprint to validate speaking of scams. I think what you said is right. If there are contemporaneous notes in Salesforce, I don't know what CRM, this advisory firm uses. If there are contemporaneous notes or, God forbid, an AI note taker from a Zoom call, which would be amazing, where the rep is telling this woman, do not do this, that's open.

52:11Case closed. Just give it to the judge. Why are we even talking about this? But you also think what it – because you really need those details. Without that, it's really hard to know because you're right. If it's like, oh, it's a small piece of their portfolio. Like, okay, let me just get this done. I'm busy. They don't want to get it through. Who cares? It's fine. Take your money. It's like, okay, I don't recommend that. She had an extra$800 ,000, apparently. I mean, yeah. So maybe she had a lot more money. You don't know. All right, guys, switching gears. There's$7 trillion in money market funds.

52:34Hence the crime wave. And hence open. Yep. What— Look at this. How does this line go down? What would have to happen for this line to go down? Houses get more affordable. Rates go down. Is it just interest rates come down and people buy houses? Yes. Maybe that's probably the most obvious one. Yes, literally. I mean, either housing— That's what should happen. One of three things, either house prices come down, interest rates come down, or both. That's the only way it's going to allow these dollars to go somewhere. I'm telling you, I'm in this line here. I have some treasuries that I'm waiting to buy.

53:06This won't go from$7 trillion to$2 trillion, but it'll go from$7 trillion to$6 trillion. The trajectory will only change if and when there's something else to do. What do you think about that? I totally agree. And I think a lot of people who fear the stories that we've just been talking about are just like, I'm fine here at four and a half percent. I'm just fine here. Or maybe this is the older crowd that is retired that wants to de-risk a little bit, take some off the table or keep it in savings. I think it's a lot of that. I don't necessarily think this is a shift where all of a sudden this thing flips on its head.

53:39Maybe it goes down to$5 trillion or$6 trillion, but it will be because of the big asset purchases. But it's not going necessarily into the S &P 500. Last year, when the Fed started cutting rates, we thought it would be a new rate cutting cycle. It was just a couple of rate cuts. Michael said, I really don't think people are pulling money out of money market funds. Like unless like we get to 2 % and people really get antsy, they'll probably stay put. And that's exactly not only they stay put, you can see the number go up. The money just kept pouring in. And I guess I'm curious what you guys think.

54:14At what Fed funds rate does this materially change? Is it like, what's the magic number in the mind of the investor? I think it's low. I think it's lower than three. It's not 4%. No, it is under three. Under three. Because 4 % is pretty comfortable for a lot of people that just don't like taking risks. And if people are still scared, and they should be, of scams in the market or big crashes like we had for a minute during COVID. Four is still high. relative to recent history. What's the equity risk premium for big institutional managers? They got to protect capital. They are paid to protect capital for rich people and then find alpha whenever they can.

54:54Right now, it's not so hard to find it, but I think plenty of people are very happy with the bulk of their savings, especially older people, earning for 4.5%. What do you think? Yeah, even after inflation, you're basically flat for the year. And so people are like, yeah, I can deal with that. Oh, like if inflation is 2.6, what is it now? It's just 2.9 over the last years. But with 4, so like in theory, there was a real return. You think of real returns. People don't. I know they don't, but still, you can make the argument right now that if you buy treasuries, you're basically getting like no return.

55:24I mean, yes, technically, according to the last year, we got a real return. Maybe inflation is higher than we think, and so maybe it's only, you know, it's just flat for the year. Plus, and I know you guys probably talked about this, and I'm sure you saw it, more 401k millionaires than ever were printed last year. And you talk about this as well. I've heard you talk about it. You write about it in your books. A million bucks sounds like a lot was always the number that a lot of people wanted to get to. A million bucks isn't a million bucks anymore. But for a lot of people that got there, they're like, oh, I got there.

55:50I want to stay here. And this is a way to stay. I saw something from American Express, as Ernie's called, that I wanted to talk about it. And I know American Express serves an affluent consumer, obviously. But this stood out to me. They're talking about the year-over-year growth, and they break it down by Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, and baby boomers. The year-over-year growth for Gen Z was 39%, which is wild. What is it? 39 % in terms of services build business, so spending. Equally remarkable is millennials, people my age, make up 30 % of all spending on Amex on the consumer side, which is more than baby boomers are spending.

56:32So millennials are doing all right. And Gen Z is doing all right. This is the experience economy. People are spending it on experience, not on the homes. They want to have that ultimate Instagram photo at that special place with that special chef and that special drink. So Nick, here you're going to ask. I want to give this to you in a sec. But the next chart shows millennials and Gen Z. It compares the delinquency of American Express customers versus none. and it's 4.4 % for millennials and Gen Z. Those are 30 days past due, okay? And for Amex customers in this age cohort, it's only 1.9%. And there's a similar spread on Gen X, Baby Boom Riverside.

57:11So again, Amex, I know is not representative of the entire economy, but for these people, they're doing all right. And Nick, you are these people. You spend time with these people. What do you see in terms of experience, services, spending? I mean, I think a lot of this, once again, I keep repeating the same point, but it comes back to housing. And like the whole idea of the American dream is you're supposed to buy a house and do all this stuff. I think the American dream has changed in a lot of ways. And people are traveling a lot more. TSA throughput is hitting records. Right. And so if you think about like, like I think about my parents when they were young, they did not get on airplanes often.

57:41I'm guessing your parents didn't either. Right. But now it's like very common for people like my sister went to Japan and she does not have a very high paying job. It's like people say, you know what? I'd rather not own. I'll rent and I'll travel the world and see stuff. And so you're right. Everything Caleb said, Instagram generation, that is more important to have that photo versus just like, oh, I own a house, right? I actually think it's smart, though. So do I. I love that. Now, here's where it's not that smart is they are – if you live in a top 20 city, you're throwing away a lot of money in rent.

58:10Some would dispute that characterization. It's not throwing it away. You're not throwing it away. You're consuming it. Okay, if not, we agree. But you are not building equity in an asset. That's fine. You don't have to. or maybe you work for a company that's comping you with stock options and you are building an asset. You're just built, it's not in a physical, that's perfectly fine too. I know that's more common than ever. Um, so that's where it's to me, not that great, but where it's really great. These are the times of your lives, like, like the times of our lives, I should say, like, uh, what's more important than how you spent your life.

58:45Like I spent, I spent my life seeing, going out and doing and seeing the things that I wanted to see, not anchored to a fucking pile of bricks in a suburb somewhere. I kind of find that to be really admirable about the way millennials and Gen Z are carrying on. I'm sure a lot of them wish it were the opposite and they didn't have to go out and look for so many. Because when I watch Instagram video of people standing in two hour lines in Montauk. It just looks dumb as shit to me. But I was also that age and I'm sure I was doing things equally that dumb. I just wasn't doing stuff like that. We were cut the line, kids.

59:23We knew the promoters. I come from a different world. But like, I sort of get it in the absence of the ability to buy a house. Well, yeah, we should be in Montauk waiting online to get into a bar. I also think there's a little of this going on. I have 19 and a 21-year-old, two daughters and I talked to them and their friends about investing in this whole thing. They know what I do, but a lot of them just reject the premise. They understand what investing is and how you can build wealth with it, but I get a lot of the time from them the question that I can't answer, and I think I've asked you this before, why does this keep working?

1:00:01What's this? This stock market. Why do investments continue to grow? I know it's worked forever and it's worked for the last hundred years or so, but they reject the whole premise of the fact that this market is just going to keep going up. Companies are going to keep generating profits. The stock market is a place to generate returns. So if they don't believe in that, less and less younger people may not believe in that. They see the get-rich-quick schemes, whether it's crypto or meme stocks or whatever, and they're maybe not as invested in the investment process as we were taught to be in the financial services media and the market has taught us to be.

1:00:36Maybe they just reject it and they're like i'm gonna spend it on their role models though are super involved in business this gen gen z's role models are all creators and influencers and people that have built companies and people like they look up to people like kai sanat and mr beast and they look up to like alex cooper and alex earl and these are people that created their own lane for themselves they built their own platform, their own content. They hire their friends to hold the cameras. Like iShowSpeed is a kid surrounded by his old friends that he grew up with, traveling the world doing stunts.

1:01:16But it's a business. So I do think that Gen Z is enamored with business. But to your point, I think they look at the stock market like another casino. Oh, there's no sport on I want to bet on? All right, maybe I'll do some crypto. Maybe I'll do some stocks. That part I agree with you. But I don't think they dislike the premise of capitalism and business and making money. They don't like corporate capitalism. I think they question the premise. That could be the difference. I think there's a lot of that as well. And they're also, you know, a lot of them going into a job market where they're fearing and they're hearing that AI is going to take every job anyway.

1:01:50So what's the point of it all? Why even buy into this if it's all going to come crashing down? This is a really nice segue to my answer to why does the stock market go up and why will it continue to go up hopefully forever and ever? Positioning. Obviously, yeah. And obviously, you know, with bear markets in between and lost decades and all that sort of stuff, is greed in a good way. We are all greedy. It is never enough for each of us. And it is certainly never enough for any of us. And at the corporate level, people are motivated to get up, improve their financial situation. And all of that shows up in earnings per share.

1:02:21And that is what drives the stock market ultimately. It's really that simple. So in 2018, I tweeted this pie chart. And I said, the market cap of the top five S &P 500 companies were equal to the market cap of the bottom 282 companies. And seven years ago, this seemed out. People lost their shit when they saw this, by the way. I remember that. I was on Twitter then. People seemed outraged that how could this even be? Look at this. It does not compute. Please make it make sense. Well, here we are. It's way worse. Seven years later, and they're equal to the bottom 411 companies. The top five. The top five.

1:03:03Have the same market cap as the top five. Or is it, no, the top seven. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. The top, I know what we're looking at. Just look at me for a second. The top five are now equal to the bottom 411. Oh, 411. I'm the captain now. The MAG7. The MAG7 is equal to the bottom 432 companies. It's been nice. It's just unbelievable. That's a great argument for index funds if I've ever seen one. Yeah. All right. Last thing to kick the hornet's nest a little bit before we move on to Nick's books. Last week, JC was in that chair talking about how$2 trillion is around the air,$4 trillion for cryptos around the air.

1:03:38And I'm like, dude, come on. It's NVIDIA. It's not nothing. It is a lot of money. You're sounding ridiculous. And I was thinking about this yesterday and I was telling Josh, hey, wait a minute. It's not actually$4 trillion. dollars. And the reason why it's not actually$4 trillion is because it's not a market cap. We have transposed this idea of, okay, coins outstanding times price is market cap, the same way we do with the stock market. It's not the same thing. Because hypothetically, if everybody went to sell NVIDIA, just everybody went to sell, and I know there's buyers for everybody's sellers, but if everybody went to do that, at some point, either NVIDIA would buy all of its stock back, or more likely, private companies, private consortium investors would come in, whether it's at$2 trillion or$3 trillion or$1 trillion, and say, whoa, whoa, whoa, we'll buy the whole thing.

1:04:26We'll take all of it. And give me the$90 billion in revenue, and we'll just take it all. There is a floor for these businesses because there's cash flows and fundamentals. Similarly, there is a theoretical ceiling because at some point, the numbers don't make sense. With Bitcoin and crypto, these are not real numbers because Bitcoin can theoretically go to a dollar. If everybody truly went to sell and Michael Saylor was the only buyer, nobody would want it. He's not going to want all the Bitcoin if nobody else wants a Bitcoin. So the$4 trillion is - The leverage would take him to zero way before it got to zero.

1:04:58There's no floor. It's artificial. Similarly, the cap or the ceiling for which we're thinking about these numbers, as crazy as it sounds, it might be a lot higher than we think. Because not only does everybody not want to sell, but it's a race to buy Bitcoin and there is a fixed supply. And so it might get - if this argument, if you're listening to me and you want to f***ing strangle me and this is pissing you off, it might get a lot stupider. What part do you think would piss people off that there's no ceiling? The part that I'm saying that$2 trillion. Like Bitcoin could be$25 trillion and there's no loss thing it can't.

1:05:28Because it's not actually$25 trillion. Well, that is the bull case from an investing standpoint, is that there's no ceiling, but there is a limit to the amount of Bitcoin. That's literally what the bull case is. Correct. I mean, this is true of any stock. This is true of any individual stock. No, it's not. I'm saying like if everyone goes to sell, pick a stock. If everyone goes to sell that stock, it's going to go down. And the only – just to play devil's advocate, I more agree with you than disagree. But he's saying the fundamentals would create a floor. But I'm telling you, if there's – if everyone's selling NVIDIA, I mean everyone, it's going to$1 trillion.

1:06:02The fundamentals don't exist anymore. But you're being literal. But they do exist. The company continues to sell chips and earn money. In what situation is NVIDIA down 75 % and that is like not a fundamental – like the chips aren't worth anything. 70 % in 2022 when the crypto market crashed. And I know that because I owned it. But the fundamentals of the business, they might have been up and down, but they were still earning revenue and profits. Yeah, I hear what you're saying. Trust me, I support asset ownership versus like an income producing asset, like a business over crypto. I get that. I'm just saying, in what world does that happen where this is like, you know, NVIDIA is off 80, 90 % or something.

1:06:44Pick any business. My point is the cash flow support a floor. Wherever the floor is. No, I agree. There's no floor to Bitcoin. The insight is what I gave you yesterday. It is. I said, invert! You must always invert! No, what I said was, we are borrowing this term market cap from the stock market world because it's all we know. It's like a skeuomorph. Like Apple made the icons on its desktop, the filing cabinet, the clock, because we're comfortable with that iconography. And we understand file account. Okay, I put files in there. That's why we use market cap. What it actually is, is supply, like a dollar.

1:07:23We don't talk about the market cap of the US dollar. We talk about the dollar supply. With Bitcoin, we should really be saying supply. We should not be saying market cap or shares outstanding because it's not a corporation. But too late, that ship has sailed. And I think we're stuck on this market cap mentality for the end of time. What do you think? I think things are going to change really fast here. I was at Bitcoin 2025 in Vegas about a month or so ago, and I've been to a few of these. This was very different. There were entire aisles now of Bitcoin lenders that'll give you fiat currency, legal tender for your Bitcoin.

1:07:59There are plenty of multimillionaires out there that don't own a single share of stock in the S &P 500, don't own a single treasury, have very little money in a savings account, but they have$10 million in Bitcoin. because they started buying because they heard somebody on some chat group, you know, who knows where back in 2014. But now they're in the system. That's what your point is. They're in the system and they're borrowing against it. You can now buy a home with Bitcoin. You could buy, put down money for a mortgage. And as soon as you're using it for leverage to access legal tender, fiat currency.

1:08:29More inflation coming. Right. More inflation coming our way. But if it goes to zero, what happens then? There are real assets now tethered to the value of Bitcoin. Right. So when JC, and I heard him say it on your show, if it goes to zero, or nobody's going to care. There's about 50 million people that are going to care because they own Bitcoin in some way, shape, or form. Now, there's probably about a million that own most of it. We all know that. His point was systemically. Systemically in the capital market. Bitcoin can't bring down Citigroup. Yeah, he's right about that. Not until Citigroup gets into the, yeah, we'll take your Bitcoin and give you a mortgage.

1:09:01So let me ask you a question then. That's a really great point. I'm glad you made it. This week, just an acceleration in TradFi. I hate that word. in regular financial institutions doing deals in the crypto world. You saw PNC Bank do a tie-up with Coinbase. PNC Bank has customers that are multimillionaires that want a solution to crypto in some way tied in with their regular bank account. This makes so much sense. Of course, we're going to see more of that. Coinbase is rapidly emerging as like the legitimate way for traditional financial institutions to link the traditional financial assets of their customers with their crypto holdings.

1:09:44If you had to bet, you would definitely say over the next six months, there'll be way more of that. It's just starting. It's just starting. Every single earnings call had questions about tokenization and stable coins on the financial side. Every single one that I listened to. Yeah, and you had Rick Edelman on here and he was just talking about everything is going to be tokenized. So there's going to be a proxy for everything else out there, but a lot of it is going to be based in this crypto world. So I understand it would not affect the capital markets necessarily. Not yet. But it's creeping deeper and deeper into our capital markets.

1:10:14Your argument is even at the current$4 trillion for the crypto asset level, it's plenty systemic. Yeah. BlackRock has$78 billion of Bitcoin. Yeah. Zero would hurt. Zero would hurt. Yeah. For sure. I think it would hurt. And it would be also people who have grown up with this as the next way to make money or the best performing asset they've ever seen in their lifetime and best performing asset in air quotes that we've ever seen. This would be not only that, it'd be like a confidence ripper. It'd be like ripping the rug out from under a lot of people who believe that this is the future. We asked people in our recent survey, what asset class do you think will perform best over the next four years under this administration?

1:10:55Stocks, stocks, number one, US stocks, number two, crypto. Yeah, I'm not surprised by that. I actually, if you told me the order were flipped, I'd believe that. It's pretty close. I'll tell you that. Yeah. Can we talk about just keep buying the original Nick Majuli book? Okay. Let's do it. It aged exceptionally well. So you put the book out in 2022, sold 400 ,000 copies. That's insane. You definitely did not buy most of those. The book is a huge hit, dude. 80 % of that is non-US. So let's start there. Why do you think this book translated so well to investors around the world in a way that most finance books in America really don't?

1:11:36What do you think it was? I think it was just the data I put in there. Because if I'm being honest, like Just Keep Buying is not like, I mean, the name is, I guess, original, but like the idea of, oh, you just, you know, dollar cost average over time, that is an old idea. But to a new generation of investors, it's brand new. But I also put a lot of, I think the new piece was the data. And like, I basically proved it. I was like, look, this is, you know, the subtitles proven strategies, right? So like I wanted to prove this like undeniably. And so that's, that was the point of the book. And that's why I did it.

1:12:05And that translates all the data and all that you're not going to really find that in many other books that is talking about these types of things. And so because I had all of that, it translates. But there's a chart I put in here, I think is very useful. So, you know, the biggest countries I've sold in our Japan and Taiwan, I have over 100 ,000 sales in each of those countries. And I think one of the reasons - By the way, dude, you sold 100 ,000 books in Japanese. and in Chinese. And 100 ,000 in Chinese. And in Taiwan, yeah. I mean. It's great. The Taiwan, like I knew about Japan. Kids selling investing books in a communist country.

1:12:35It's unbelievable. Wait, what about Thailand? Do you get paid in dong? No, I don't actually think I have a, no, there's no Thai version yet. It's in production, but it's being delayed. Long story. But I'm saying, look, this chart, I think, is very useful because there's a lot of Asian investors buying U.S. assets. 42 % of their assets are actually in U.S. assets. That's crazy. Not assets, foreign assets. So, and that's US stocks and bonds. And so these flow, this is from a Bloomberg article. And these flows are happening. And so like when I'm thinking about, well, how is this impacting me personally as like an author?

1:13:05It's like, that's how it's doing it. But everyone's like, they want to keep buying. What if you caused this? I didn't cause it. The Medjoolie effect. Ironically, I - What if you did? I joke that like, you know, I was born in November, 1989, that, you know, the Nikkei peak the next month. And then like my book came out in Japan in June 23. And it peaked seven months later, like in early 2024, right? or they, or I'm sorry, re-reached those highs from 30 years ago, right? So I got a 30-year drawdown. It finally, you know, 34-year drawdown, it came back. And so, no, I'm obviously not causal at all.

1:13:34I mean, in some very, very marginal way, but no, this has been happening for a long time. The Chinese are buying a lot of homes here in the United States, the apartments in New York City. You can think about all these things where there's a lot of money in Asia that's coming in here. And I think that's a big piece of it. There are a lot of Asian retail investors. There's a couple of things I love. One of the things is that the repudiation of your message, just keep buying, has always been, now do Japan. And you can say, all right, I'll do Japan, motherfucker. New record high for the Nikkei this week.

1:14:06What else you want me to do? Yeah, and I put it in there. What else you got? We have stock markets around the world now breaking out. But you did Japan. The dumbest thing is like people went all in at 1989 and they never bought another single share. Yes, Japan sucked. It happened. But what if you dollar cost average in Japan? Yeah, and that's what I did. I have a chart in the book where I say, if you put a dollar a day into the Nikkei, right? And of course, you know, with currency fluctuate, there's a lot of other things there, but let's just say a dollar a day in there, you would have kept pace with inflation, which is not great, but that is typically what you see in the worst from like 62 to 72, I think, or 62 to, I think, 82 in the US, which is like one of the worst, like 20-year periods.

1:14:42It was something similar. Like if you just kept buying dollar cost averaging over that period, you would have basically kept pace with inflation, which is one of the worst periods in US history. What's so funny is like you, one of your most known blog posts was where you answered the question with data the way that you do. What's smarter? Lump sum investment at one point in time or dollar cost average. Don't put it all in now, but put it on over time. Definitively the right answer because markets trend higher over time is the lump sum wins out over most time periods. And you proved it. But the message of just keep buying is a DCA message.

1:15:19And the reason it's necessary is because most of the people reading it don't have all the money they're ever going to make. They're going to make more money next year. So it has to be a DCA message. Yeah, and also, I mean, those are two different, I think there's a definitional issue here. So there's two different definitions for DCA, which we both use all the time. And so like, we're talking about like, oh, everyone just calls, you know, we call Bitcoin market cap. The same thing is the issue with DCA. So when you're doing like dollar cost averaging the original definition, it means like you're just buying over time, but you're buying when you get paid.

1:15:48So if you think like your 401k, you don't say, oh yeah, I'm lump summing every two weeks in my 401k. But that's what you're doing. People call that dollar cost averaging, but you're actually making lump sum investment because you're buying as soon as you have the money. That's the important piece. Like when are you buying? If you're buying one, as soon as you have the money to invest, that's like lump summing. The 401k contribution is a lump sum. Looks like a DCA because it's periodic over time, but it's a lump sum because you're not getting the withholding and piecing it into the market. You're just throwing in.

1:16:17You don't say take 15 grand out of my first, I mean, no one has a 15 grand first paycheck, but like, you don't just say, hey, I'm going to donate, you know, or contribute 15 grand, take that out of my paycheck and I'm slowly going to put it in. No, you just take it out throughout the year, right? That's a, I mean, that's technically a lump sum investment. Which speaks to what we were talking about earlier. Why does the market keep going up? You taught me this. Well, that's a really good answer. It's the relentless bid. Every two weeks we do the same thing. We don't change our allocation. That's you?

1:16:41Credit to you. The relentless bid is great. But it's, you're right about that. And we don't change our behavior at all. First of all, your books are terrific. Just Keep Buying is an amazing title. I appreciate that. For one, this book is incredible too. I've recommended it to people already. And you're great at taking the data and storytelling with it in a way that makes sense to educated investors. So let me see this. This is terrific. The Wealth Ladder. So camera two, I'm showing you Nick's new book. This is called The Wealth Ladder, Proven Strategies for Every Step of Your Financial Life. Now, you did something in here that's getting traction on social media.

1:17:17You broke people up. It's not a caste system. I saw somebody say that. I didn't see that yet. I'll have to look later. You'll love it. You'll love it. It's not a caste system. It's rungs. You're not ranking people based on where they belong in society. What you're saying, the rungs of the wealth ladder, right? So you're saying like the lowest rung, but you're not using that term. You say levels. I use levels because a lot of this is marketing. Like if I had called my first book dollar cost averaging, no one would have bought it. Just keep buying is a better thing. I call these levels. What's levels one through six?

1:17:47And where would you, where would you put me? Yeah, so this is household net worth. So it's households and then net worth is all your assets. So this is not income. This is not current income. This is literally assets minus whatever debts you have. Yeah, we'll get to this chart in a second. But for the levels, just straight up, level one, less than$10 ,000. And this is for the US, less than$10 ,000 in net worth. Level two is$10 ,000 to$100 ,000. Level three is$100 ,000 to$1 million. Level four is$1 million to$10 million. But you're calling these things something. You're saying - Oh, no. In the tweet online, I said, let me get to that.

1:18:21These are all different economic classes, which I'll get to at the end. Level five is - Wait, hang on. I know you have to drill the line somewhere. These seem a bit wide, the bands. They are wide. They are quite wide. $1 million to$10 million. Yeah, they're wide. Somebody with a net worth of$1 million does not have the same lifestyle as somebody with a net worth of$10 million. Yeah, I agree. but the one at a million is closer to level three and the one at 10 million is closer to level five. I'm saying the people, four and six are basically identical. I know you have to travel on some of that. I'm saying like four million, six million are basically identical.

1:18:47Like you're saying that's$2 million, but that person is not going to spend that$2 million. They're going to have a little bit more income. They're going to maybe have a vacation home. They're not flying private. Your lifestyle changes with massive, like a 10X logarithmic jump. That's where you're starting to see. That was your big insight. That's my big insight. And the whole reason I came up with this levels framework because a lot of people have done levels of wealth. A lot of different people have done it. The problem is there's no easy way to memorize this. And so by using the logarithms, it would just made it so much easier doing 10X.

1:19:15So, hey, if I know that level three, 100 ,000 to a million, if I know that's like the middle class, which it is in the United States, 43 % of households are in level three. What's the middle class, level three? Level three, 100 ,000 to a million. 100 to a million is 40 % of the country? 40 % of the country, 40 % of US households. Okay, but then you talk about the difficulty in getting from one level to the next. Yep. And of course, most people don't ascend into level five. Yeah. That's less than 2 % of households ever make it to level five. And level six, which is 100 million plus, that's like, you know, less than 0.0001%.

1:19:48Now, do you have to fight a main bad guy at the end of each level? No, unfortunately not. You sort of do, though. I guess there's like the bad, the thing to look out for. Yeah. In level five, like it's like, it's over concentration. Who's the final boss? I was going to say the end of level five is a mistress oh no there's that too I mean there's like the personal attack the temptations that come along of course that's everywhere at level three it's the IRS level four is Powell alright so congratulations the book came out this week yeah came out on Tuesday alright so you're doing a ton of shit yeah can we get you on Caleb's podcast it's on it's booked he gives me the best intro so I love your podcast I know you're going on Jill Schlesinger and she texted us to find out the most embarrassing thing about you that nobody knows.

1:20:32I should just send her that photo of me in high school. Maybe that's pretty good. But I should like the photo. I have to be honest. She might be in possession of that photo. You were a metalhead. Yeah, I know Ozzy. I mean, crazy. I'm supposed to be celebrating my book and everything. Ozzy dies this week. And so for me, that's like a big deal. I know that's a big deal. If you're a metalhead, Ozzy is your Jerry Garcia or Kurt Cobain. Or he's your Ozzy, basically. He's your Ozzy. He was there before all. I mean, I guess I don't know what Jericho Garcia was in the timeline. You know what's interesting?

1:21:02Ozzy's biggest songs all predate you basically being born. Yeah, for sure. I mean, he was, you know, early 80s. With Sabbath. Sabbath was the metal band. They started metal in the 70s. They started that entire genre, right? The Beatles actually started heavy metal. What song? Helter Skelter. It's debatable. I say it's more rock. It's not really debatable. The Beatles were a rock band from Liverpool. Oh, I know who the Beatles are. Thank you. Helter Skelter is the first heavy metal song. Some have said Steppenwolf, Born to be Wild. They say that's the first metal song. This has been debated. Trust me.

1:21:34I've thought about this a lot. This has been highly debated. Have you quantified it? I have not quantified it, but I think it's Born to be Wild by Steppenwolf. He says heavy metal thunder. You know, when he's 27. What was it that attracted you to metal when you were a teenager? Was it just the people you were around were into that? It was high energy. It was high energy. Yeah, there's a lot of high energy to it. I just like the sound of it. I mean, you know, I started growing my hair and I just, I liked it. For a metalhead, you quote a lot of great rappers in this book. I know. Well, I love that, too.

1:21:59You got Jay-Z. They're also high energy, right? I got Pusha T. Did you watch the Billy Joel doc yet? No. Yeah? Worth it? Not yet. I'm going to watch it this weekend. It's a requirement for a long time. I mean, you're from New York. Come on. Well, what were your—I'm guessing your music was like— Was you a skater? You were like one generation older than me. Okay. Clash? Pearl Jam. Reggae. Are you the—what? Reggae. Yeah, I have a reggae head. Reggae. Pure reggae. Dancehall reggae. I had a reggae show in college. Wow. If I wasn't doing this, I would probably be a reggae entertainer at Sunsplash. Wow.

1:22:33All right. Can we do the— Why another white guy with dreads? Yeah. That's what the world needs. Can we do that chart real quick? Yeah. Because I think this is important. Throw it up. This is showing—this is the snapshots of wealth over time from the Survey of Consumer Finances, the Federal Reserve. I've broken this into the levels, right? So the level one, less than 10K, level two, et cetera. And what you can see, that bottom dark blue in level four, that's the big story here, which is in 1989, which is the first bar, it was 7 % of US households. And by the way, this is inflation adjusted wealth.

1:23:02So this has already been adjusted for inflation. In 1989, that's 7 % of households. Today, it's 18 % of households. It's the stock market? It's stock market, home prices. A lot of different things have contributed to that. There's just more wealth than ever before, right? I think it's not just stock market, though. It's compensation. Home equity, home equity, compensation. But also, level one is shrinking. Yeah, level one was 25%. Now it's about 20%. So that, like, the poorest part of society is much smaller. And this is, once again, this is inflation-adjusted wealth. And so those are shrinking.

1:23:30And there's more, you know, in the upper middle class, as I call it, 1 to 10 million, which is supposed to be location agnostic. Obviously, if you have, like,$8 million and you're in Alabama, you're definitely upper class. But, like, I was trying to say, even in New York City, like, I'm trying to be location agnostic here. I think this is the big story here because there's more people in that bottom bucket. And that's creating a lot of competition for these resources. I wrote about this recently. And for stocks. Yeah, I mean, for stocks, I mean, house prices, you know, as I said, the Amex lounge is overrun right now.

1:23:57It's crazy. Like you go, there's lines to get in there. There's more people with these cards than ever before. I think the upper middle class is going through an existential crisis. And I think we're going to see this play out over the next few years. Right, the system is not built for this much affluence. This many people experiencing affluence. Everything is buckling. There are no more VIP experiences because everyone's a VIP. It's turned the travel rewards and the credit card rewards business on its head. If you watch what the airlines are doing with reward points, it's not what it's worth.

1:24:24On the Amex call, all they asked about, they're like, sorry to keep belabling the point, but it was all about competition with cards and rewards. It's a new game. Agreed. All right. Guys, did you have fun on the show today? What? Loved it. Loved it. I had a great time. I got to tell you, you're two of my favorite people to talk to. This is just a dream episode for me. Thank you, Caleb. The deck, the book. I'm so proud of you. Investopedia. so proud of you coming out with your newest book. This is just an awesome time to have you guys. So I want to just say thank you so much for being here. We end the show by asking people what they're looking forward to.

1:24:59So obviously I know selling a million books is on the list for you. My honeymoon, we're going south of France. So tell me what you're doing. We're doing, we're going Nice for four nights and then three nights in Paris and then we'll be back. Oh, that's a sick trip. What do you do? What do you do in Nice's beaches, right? Yeah, we do a little bit of that. You'll go to Monaco. You can go down to Saint-Tropez. There's a bunch of different stuff you can see. Monaco or Monaco? Shot to Howard. Yeah, Monaco. Yeah, we'll call it that. Now, famously, your wife is a renowned lover you shared with us. So is Four Nights in Nice enough?

1:25:31That's a great question. All right. We'll ask her. We'll do it after we turn off. Yeah, maybe we'll have you back on after the honeymoon. We'll have her come on and interview her. What are you looking forward to, Caleb? I'm looking forward to pictures from Nick's honeymoon.

1:25:49beyond that again I'm trying to arrange a university tour for Investopedia take us back to school where do you want to go? some of the biggest schools throughout the country especially those in the process of planning this? in the process of planning it looking for partners that want to be a part of it but I have this dream of making us a real part of young people's complete education because I don't think they're getting it so that's one big deal but also Future Proof's coming up shout out to that we're going to have some real fun there We've got some great panels coming up. We're thrilled to have you guys there.

1:26:21It's really an honor for us. And this has been an honor, too. But right when I'm out of here, I'm on my way home to New Mexico to see the parents and see some old friends. So I will be in the land of enchantment when this airs. Good for you. Caleb, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it. Michael, what are you looking forward to, my friend? Visiting day. Oh, shit. That's what I should say, too, right? Our kids are at a summer camp. Oh, nice. They're at a sleepaway camp. This is the third weekend, which is when you go up and see them and bring them food. What do you have to bring him?

1:26:53What snack list that he asked for? She's not like a big eater. So I don't know. He doesn't care really? Not a huge eater. I think the nugget wants me to bring him a porterhouse and Peter Lugar's. Stop. Wow. No, I bring him like an Italian hero. He's thrilled. They're not babies anymore. They're not asking for candy. Oh, Smith Street Deli. Again, it's the only deli that's open on time. I asked Shari, my hero. She said, no, it's closed. It's closed. Yeah. So we'll hit the deli. We'll hook them up. All right, guys, it's been a pleasure. Hey, shout out to all the listeners, all the viewers. We appreciate you guys.

1:27:27Thank you so much for coming to tune in. Please make sure you check out of Dollars and Data, which is Nick Majuli's blog. Buy his new book, The Wealth Ladder at fine booksellers everywhere. Check out my friend Caleb Silver's website, Investopedia. and make it, where the f*** are you going? He's already leaving. You know visiting day's tomorrow, right? See you later. This f***ing guy, can you imagine? He just Irish exited a podcast. He's going to buy some Open Door, I think. What's funny is, this is our 201st show. He knows how this is supposed to end. I've lost my train of thought. Good night.

1:28:04Goodbye. Thank you. Thanks for having us on. Thank you. I was so unbelievable. He just Irish exited a podcast.

From the publisher

On episode 201 of The Compound and Friends, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Michael Batnick⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Downtown Josh Brown⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ are joined by Ritholtz Wealth COO Nick Maggiulli and Investopedia's Caleb Silver⁠ to discuss: are meme stocks market manipulation, how much bigger can Bitcoin get, where young people are spending their money, The Wealth Ladder, and much more!

This episode is sponsored by Public. Fund your account in five minutes or less by visiting: http://public.com/compound

Buy Nick's new book!

Sign up for The Compound Newsletter and never miss out: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠thecompoundnews.com/subscribe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠instagram.com/thecompoundnews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠twitter.com/thecompoundnews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

LinkedIn: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠linkedin.com/company/the-compound-media/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠tiktok.com/@thecompoundnews⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Public Disclosure: All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for US-listed, registered securities, options and bonds in a self-directed account are offered by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA & SIPC. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1890144), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC.

Alpha is an experimental AI tool powered by GPT-4. Its output may be inaccurate and is not investment advice. Public makes no guarantees about its accuracy or reliability—verify independently before use.

*Rate as of 6/24/25. APY is variable and subject to change.

Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Josh Brown are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.

The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Ritholtz Wealth Management⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.

Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from The Compound and Friends

All 175 episodes
Meme Stocks or Manipulation?The Compound and Friends · 1 h 29 min
Listen in VO