In short
Podcast Episode Notes: The Culture Journalist - "How the Job Market Got So Broken"
Episode Overview *"The Culture Journalist"* is a podcast hosted by Emilie Friedlander and Andrea Domanick that delves into cultural trends and shifts before they become mainstream. This episode features a detailed discussion on the deteriorating job market in America, with Richard D. Wolff, a prominent Marxist economist, providing insights into the historical and systemic factors leading to current employment challenges.
Key Points
Current Job Market Situation
- Sluggish Job Growth: Recent statistics indicate a slowing job growth rate, with New York City reporting the slowest job growth outside of a recession in decades.
- Unemployment Trends: The unemployment rate is on the rise, reflecting a broader issue within the economy.
- Public Sentiment: Increased visibility of job seekers on platforms like LinkedIn suggests a growing frustration among individuals in their job hunts.
Historical Context
- Long-Term Trends: The discussion highlights that the issues in the job market today are not new but are part of a decades-long trend that began in the 1970s.
- Economic Policies: Richard D. Wolff critiques various political policies, such as Trump’s tariffs and immigration strategies, arguing they are inadequate responses to complex economic issues.
Systemic Economic Issues
- Capitalism and Job Precarity: Wolff emphasizes that capitalism creates job insecurity, with the majority of jobs dependent on employers' profit motives. About 3% of the population (employers) controls job availability for the 97% (workers).
- Automation and Offshoring: Technological advancements and offshoring jobs have significantly contributed to the erosion of stable employment opportunities.
Critique of Political Responses
- Flawed Logic: Trump's approach to tariffs and immigration is discussed as a flawed strategy that fails to address the root causes of job losses.
- Scapegoating Immigrants: Wolff explains that blaming immigrants for job losses diverts attention from the corporate decisions leading to offshoring and automation.
Macro Forces Influencing the Job Market
- Market Dynamics: Historical events such as the subprime mortgage crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic have shaped current employment dynamics. The Great Resignation led to a reevaluation of work-life balance among many Americans.
- Global Competition: The rise of economies like China has shifted the landscape, making it challenging for American workers to compete.
Psychological and Cultural Dimensions
- Cultural Blindness: There is a societal tendency to overlook systemic economic issues, leading to a misinformed populace that often seeks scapegoats instead of addressing the real causes of their economic struggles.
- Denial of Reality: Many Americans live in denial about the decline of the U.S. economic position globally, further complicating discussions about the job market.
Key Takeaways
- The job market issues are a culmination of historical trends and recent economic policies that have failed to address underlying problems.
- The capitalist system inherently creates job precarity, with a significant disconnect between the employer's profit motives and the worker's needs.
- Political responses to the job crisis often misidentify the causes, leading to ineffective solutions that do not alleviate the struggles faced by the American workforce.
- Cultural narratives around job loss and economic decline must shift to promote a more accurate understanding of systemic issues rather than relying on scapegoating and denial.
Conclusion This episode of *The Culture Journalist* provides an in-depth analysis of the broken job market in America, contextualizing present challenges within a long history of economic policies and capitalist dynamics. Richard D. Wolff’s insights challenge listeners to reconsider how we understand work, value, and the systemic nature of economic failures.
For further insights and discussions, listeners are encouraged to visit [The Culture Journalist Substack](https://theculturejournalist.substack.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:14Hello, it's Andrea and Emily here with Cujo. So it's October, but we haven't gotten the expected September jobs report yet because the government shut down. But the last batch of stats from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, released in August, showed that job growth continues to be sluggish and unemployment is up. New York City, for example, added less than 1 ,000 jobs in the first half of the year. That's the slowest growth outside of a recession in decades. So all this confirms what many of us have already been talking about anecdotally for a while now, whether that's in Reddit job hunter forums, in Discord chats, or whenever we've seen another dreaded open-to-work badge pop up on someone's LinkedIn.
1:00The job market sucks. This obviously isn't the first time many of us have had to deal with an employment squeeze. Shout out to anyone who graduated in the late 0s or early 10s. But it does feel like the first time we're unsure where to point the blame. Is it Trump's tariff policies, AI and automation, offshoring, interest rates, all of the above? None of the above? Why is this so hard to wrap our heads around, and what makes this moment different? To get some answers, we turn to someone who has made a career out of seeing the economic big picture. Not just the numbers, but the social, political, and cultural forces that inextricably shape them.
1:42His name is Richard D. Wolfe, Rick for short, and he's one of the world's foremost Marxist economists, known for his non-orthodox thinking and game-changing approach to class analysis and economic methodology. And full disclosure, I was fangirling out a little for this one. Rick's work on class and labor were tremendously influential on me as a sociology student, and they played a big role in my senior research project. So we invited Rick on to get his two cents about why it's so hard to find a job right now. What resulted was a wide-ranging conversation about why work is a pretty unfair deal in the first place, how capitalism produces the precarity so many Americans are experiencing right now, and his belief that the tightening labor market is just the latest symptom of an empire and economic system on the verge of collapse.
2:32We discuss how what we're seeing with the job market today is really just the latest phase of a process that's been going on since the 1970s. The shaky economic reasoning behind Trump's tariff and immigration policies, and why his promise to bring back jobs to America by levying taxes on imported goods is probably not going to leave any of us better off. We also get into why China seems to be thriving, including a fourfold increase in wages for its working class, while stagnation or stagflation seems to be the name of the game over here. Rick had so much to say that we've actually ended up doing this conversation in two parts.
3:10We'll be back with part one just after the break. and just a heads up if you were tuning in last episode you probably heard that we recently introduced a send us a tip button that brings you straight to a pretty simple checkout page where you can tip us a dollar or two to just kind of let us know that you're enjoying what we make it's kind of like tipping a barista for a morning cup of coffee but instead of a cup of coffee you're tipping us for an hour or more stuff that you download straight into your brain well we have a little incentive for those of you who are thinking of tipping but haven't tipped yet.
3:44Sometime in the next month, hopefully by Halloween, potentially a little bit after Halloween, we are going to be hosting a little hauntology reading group where we get a group of people together, read a couple of essays, and talk about the concept of hauntology as articulated by people like Mark Fisher and Simon Reynolds and Derrida, because we've been seeing a lot of hauntological vibes in the air with so much sort of like nostalgia and retro content floating through the cultural ether. So if you send us a tip or if you're already a paid subscriber, we are going to collect everybody's emails and be sending out an exclusive invite to join us for this reading group.
4:28And hopefully it'll be fun. Hope to see you there. Tip your friendly neighborhood podcaster.
5:00Hey guys, we are back with Rick Wolf. Rick, thanks so much for joining us. My pleasure. Glad to be here. So we didn't get a jobs report for September because the government shut down. But August's report showed a continuation of the trend of job growth slowing and the unemployment rate rising. Private sector data looked even grimmer, suggesting a loss of 32 ,000 jobs. Why, in a nutshell, is it so hard for so many Americans to find a job right now? Because the jobs aren't there is the simplest answer to give you. And for many years now, this is not an issue we can lay to the feet of Mr. Trump, although he's making it worse.
5:39But for many years, politicians have very carefully chosen to manipulate these numbers, to spin them in one way or another. So it's kind of hard not to be overwhelmed unless you're trained in this area. by the sheer multiplicity of interpretations. You can see it in the fact that the hoopla around the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is the government agency most of us turn to to get these numbers on a regular basis. Mr. Trump fired the director. He didn't like what he was hearing from her. Nobody had ever questioned her work before, but none of that mattered. just to give you a brief idea. How do you handle a person who has been unemployed for a year versus a person who's been unemployed for a week?
6:32I mean, you can lump them all together, but is that really useful? Don't you need to come to terms with it and incorporate it somehow? And then there's a debate over that, a debate, by the way, which is ongoing. It hasn't been resolved. Then there's a difference between a person who's got a part-time job because that's what he or she wants versus a person who can't get a full-time job and has to settle for a part-time job. That's a very different story about what's happening in the economy, depending on which of those it is. And then there's the weird way of counting people whose jobs are, how shall I put it, intermittent.
7:15The fast food person or the barista in a coffee shop. Or the gig work. Yeah, or who doesn't know from one week to the next how many hours she'll have, when they'll be, you know, she may answer the questionnaire, I'm employed, because on some level she is. And no one has trained her to understand, well, you know, in another way you're not, because it's not secure. It's not a job, on and on. So that's one of the reasons why you saw earlier this year a massive revision, because it turns out that information often doesn't come for two or three or four months. For example, the original data for the month of March to take into account what you now know about March.
8:08And then that typically means you miscounted April and May because of what you didn't see in March. On and on. Long story short, it's crystal clear that the glowing comments about the state of our labor market were wrong. Whether that was intentional or not, or a mixture, I would tend towards a mixture, but it really doesn't matter. You can't put very much reliance on it. You certainly can't put much reliance on a particular month. What you can do is see trends. And there is unmistakable where we are. We are in a long-term, now almost a year-old, trend of declining jobs. People are being laid off.
8:58People are leaving a job and are not replaced by the employer. We should remember, in our society, in a capitalist system, employment is held hostage. Whether or not you get a job depends on whether there's an employer in your environment who can make money hiring you. If that employer can, then there'll be a job for you. If the employer, rightly or wrongly, doesn't think a profit can be earned, they're not going to hire you. Think of it this way. No employer is going to pay you, let's pick a number,$25 an hour, arrange for you to come starting next Monday morning, show up at nine o 'clock, stay until five, and give you$25 at the end of the day or the end of the week, unless your being there adds to the quality or the quantity of whatever they make in that place more than$25.
10:02If your employer is not able to get more than$25 worth of additional stuff to sell by having you there, they're not going to pay you$25 to sit there, right? People don't want to understand this about capitalism because it's not very nice. According to the U.S. Census, 3 % of our people are employers, and that includes self-employed. 3%. So 97 % of us are held hostage in terms of the jobs we can get by the profit calculations, which, remember, are just guesses, guesses about what the future will bring. So 3 % of the people's guesswork determines our jobs. Now, I defy you, just between you and me, I defy you to justify that if you have even the amount of commitment to democracy.
11:03Three percent of the people, employers, determine by their own calculations about the future, which are guesswork, whether the 97 % of us have jobs or not. That, I would submit to you, is already, before I give you any other evidence, reason why capitalism ought to make you grimace. When you were referring earlier to how the stats that we have, you know, they can only reflect so much of what's going on, or they only offer a partial glimpse. How is the big picture maybe different from what is even captured in those statistics alone? I'll just spell out a few of them for you. Think about the semi-conscious or half-conscious tendency of people to equate an employment number with a work number.
11:56There's a huge number of people who do work all day, every day, by the way, often seven days a week, not five, who are not counted. The classic example that is even taught to us as students in economics courses until recently. Now it's a little bit out of date, but until recently, an enormous number of women were quote-unquote homemakers, housewives, words like that, which if you think about it and if you study it, which people did, is work. Those people are working all day, every day, as hard as the people who go to the office or the people who go to the store and so on, but they're not counted.
12:40So whether people are working or not, if that's what you're interested in understanding, the employment number is very much a small piece. Let me give you the big macro numbers. We have a population in America, about 330 million people. We have a labor force. That's the people we look at to get unemployment numbers of about 160 to 170. So right off the bat, be aware that half of our people are not counted. Nobody asks them, are you employed? Are you unemployed? If you're encountered by the government agencies that do this, they ask you, are you working? If you answer yes, you're counted as employed.
13:27If you answer, no, I'm not working, you are asked a second question. Basically, are you looking for work? If you answer, yes, I am, you're counted as unemployed. But if you answer the second question, no, I'm not looking, you are not in the labor force, and you are not counted. So, for example, suppose you had a few million people who at this point are not in the labor force. They're at home, they're in school, they're in jail, and for whatever reason, they leave those places and start answering the questionnaire, I'm looking for work. You would suddenly see a spike in the unemployment numbers in America, which you would falsely assume might mean that people are losing their jobs.
14:23Has that ever happened? Uh-huh. Is it happening now? Yeah. Is it possible to look at the numbers in a disaggregated way? If you're a specialist and you know where to look, yeah, you can get some estimates of those things. And by the way, those are debatable too. The history may help. Why are we so focused on unemployment? Why is that number so big? Why does every politician who can get away with it tell you, I'm bringing jobs here to, you know, Milwaukee or wherever the place? What is this about? First of all, you know, just as a human being, you know that having a job or not is certainly important, but it's not the be-all and end-all of your life.
15:09Most of your hours of your life are not spent at work. They're 24 hours a day, and you probably work eight of them. Okay, it's your friendships, it's your family, it's your passions, your hobbies, whatever. So you're not capturing much if you're just focused in on jobs. So why would they do that? Why wouldn't they develop metrics or measurements of all the other dimensions of your life? You know, but there are people who do that. In many European countries, they have a statistic called work-life balance, and it measures or tries to exactly what it says. It's trying to understand, are you happy in your job?
15:52And one of the ways that that question is asked is, how does it work when you balance your personal life, your home life, your intimate life on the one hand with your workplace life on the other? Because that balance is not only crucial to you as a person, it's actually very crucial to your work. And it's very important. But none of that is captured. Why then? And the answer is that capitalism from the beginning had a problem, which I'll explain in a moment. And that problem led it to constantly produce job loss, constantly to throw people out of work. Not because they weren't working hard, they were.
16:39Not because they were not doing the tasks that were assigned to them, they were. But for other reasons that the employer lumped under the heading, well, it's not profitable, so I'm going to have to let you go. Okay, so the working class finds itself in a system where its jobs are forever precarious. And by the way, never has that been more true than in the United States right now. In Europe, there's a joke, and the joke goes like this. We no longer have a proletariat, we have a precariat. end. And that's to signal that everybody's insecure about their job situation. Why does it happen? Well, you all know, and everyone watching or listening to this program knows, but I'm going to give you the answer anyway.
17:33Suppose, just for example, a factory that makes ladders, little wooden ladders that you can climb up and down. Okay, the employer knows I have to buy wood and tools and hammers and nails and all the other stuff to convert wood, lumber, into ladders. And then he has to hire a person who uses the tools and equipment to transform the raw material, lumber, into ladder. Let's suppose, again, to make things real simple,$100 for tools, equipment, and raw materials, and your labor adds another$100 worth of value. So the latter sells for$200. Now the employer, this is just the way capitalism works. The employer takes the$200 he gets from selling the latter.
18:25By the way, footnote, a ladder you made. You made it. He sells it. There's a little magic there which may bother you. If you're an American, it typically bothers you unconsciously. But here's what it is. The minute you finish, the second you finish making the ladder, it belongs to somebody else. The fact that it was your hands or your brain make no difference. You did it. You don't get it. The employer gets it. And the employer is interested, not because he likes ladders, or for that matter, whether he likes you. He's interested in making money by selling the ladder. Okay, he sells it for$200.
19:11Here comes the prize. He takes $100 out of the$200 to replace the tools, equipment, and raw materials used up by you in making the ladder. That leaves him with$100. Now, he could give you the$100, because after all, your labor added that hundred in value. But you know that never happens. And you know why? Because he would then, out of this whole activity, he would get nothing. He's not going to take the time, the trouble, the anguish to do any of this if he doesn't come away with something. And he comes away with something called profit that's his. Now, here comes the punchline that you have to live with.
19:57The only way your employer makes a profit, the only way any employer makes a profit, is by not giving the workers the value that their labor added in production. In other words, if you've ever had the experience walking home from your job, say at five o 'clock, passing that storefront that has those wonderful words, happy hour in the window, that's because the bartender knows what you do, that it's happy in there and that that's what makes it different from the previous eight hours of your day. You feel screwed. You feel ripped off. You feel taken advantage of. And I'm here to tell you, not as your therapist, but just as an economist, That feeling you have, you're absolutely right.
20:53It would only be odd if you didn't feel that way. It's as if you said to me while somebody was kicking you, you smiled at me and insisted nobody's kicking me. And I'm staring at you and there's somebody kicking you. And I know the problem here is in your head. something in your brain needs you not to see what is happening to you. I'm telling you, you're ripped off every day. But Americans don't want to hear it, and so they don't believe it. So everybody has agreed, let's talk about the job. Let's let the employer believe he or she is off the hook if they provide us with a job. Even though you know from your own life that you can be provided with a job that makes you miserable, that makes you wait for the day.
21:47You can give the middle finger to that employer and never go back again, right? So it's never been a job. The quality of that job and how it engages your skills, your capabilities, your spirits is every bit as important as the literal job. But we can't deal with that in capitalism because capitalism produces people who have to be blind, deaf, and dumb, because if they weren't, the system wouldn't last five minutes. Americans will say the following sentence, I will never work for an employer who doesn't pay me what I'm worth. Then I had a professor who explains to them, poor person, you'll never have any job because the one thing you'll never get is a job that pays you what you're worth, because then there's nothing in it for the employer.
22:44And then I take them through it. They see it. But the interesting thing is they won't retain it more than an hour or two because the whole society is mobilized culturally to keep you not seeing. You know, it's like people who visit New York City and you ask them, what's it like, you know, stepping over poor people that are lying in the street? And they look at you and they say, I didn't see any of those. I said, I live in New York City. I see them every day. If you like what you're hearing on this episode, there's a place where you can join the conversation. It's called Cujoplex, and it's a private online hangout zone on Discord where smart, cool weirdos just like you, you know, people who like talking about the evolving state of independent culture, can congregate, share links, and talk about the news of the day.
23:36We've had some great conversations lately about creative economies, media theory, AI, politics, the future of journalism, and even the records and TV shows we've been obsessing over this year. Some of our chats have even inspired episode ideas. You can get access to Cujoplex, along with our monthly bonus episodes, by signing up for a paid subscription over at our Substack. That's theculturejournalist.substack.com. They saw them. I don't want to see them, but they saw them. So one thing that I have noticed, obviously, also we just were programmed to believe and there's a lot of truth that's currently that we need a job to survive.
24:19There has been a marked shift in how American workers seem to be experiencing the job market and their relationship to work. I know that just a couple of years ago, I think it was like late 2021, maybe early 2022, there was the Great Resignation where there were a lot of jobs or it felt like there was a lot of jobs or certain kinds of jobs. And there was this kind of meme on the Internet that everyone was resigning. There was the anti-work movement. People felt, oh, I'm going to say, you know, F you once and for all and leave. And now we have kind of the opposite thing going on. But it didn't begin, as we've said, with Trump.
24:56You know, there was this massive downward revision by the Bureau of Labor Statistics suggesting that things were already heading this direction towards the end of the Biden administration. Just briefly, what are some macro forces that have been at play, you know, even before Trump took office that helped explain how he got here? I know that even in England, for example, where the Labour Party is in charge, you're seeing some similar pictures. So it can't just be Trump. No, no, for sure not Trump. The great resignation had to do, and there have been a lot of studies, so I'm confident about this.
25:28It had to do with the fact that people don't want to understand either, that we have had in the last 10 years, two momentous crashes of the capitalist system. We had the so-called subprime mortgage crash of 2008 and 2009, and then we had the so-called COVID-19 crash in 2020, more or less. Just to give you an idea, 50%, half of the workers of America were out of work for at least a week or longer during the pandemic, many of them much longer, months at a time. So you have had a shock to the American working class that enforced not going to work for a while. And people experience what it's like not to go to work.
26:23So when the pandemic was over and they had to go back, they discovered inside themselves the hatred, the resignation, the rage they felt about the job. Now, you're right. That rage had been building up. It wasn't just the conditions of the pandemic, which were bad, but it wasn't that. Well, what was it? Here's the three forces I would tell you about. And the two of them are the most important. Starting really back in the 1970s, which is a big watershed shift in American economics, in the capitalist system here. The employers of this country discovered something. They had what you might call an aha moment, you know, wow, you know, the light bulb goes off and suddenly they see.
27:11What did they see? They saw an America which for the last hundred years has been a place of pretty big labor struggles, big strikes, big walkouts, and working class mobilized, particularly in the 1930s. Millions joined unions, and the wages were pushed up in this country, and the employers were making enough money around the world. Remember, after World War II, the United States is the only economy that emerges in good shape. All the other potential competitors are wiped out. Russia, Japan, China, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, they're a wreck. And the percentage of our young men who went to fight much smaller than in any of those countries.
28:01So we didn't lose the life, we didn't have the injuries, and we didn't have the destruction. Better than that, we came out of the war having rebuilt our economy because we had come out of the Great Depression of the 1930s. All our efforts to overcome capitalism's greatest crash ever, the 1930s, we couldn't figure it out. What finally put the people back to work was the war. We took half the unemployed people and stuck them in a uniform, and the other half got jobs making the uniforms. And so we had everybody taken care of, more or less. We come out of a war. You may have heard of the Marshall Plan.
28:41We wanted to make money rebuilding the very economies our bombers had destroyed. You're going to watch that in Gaza in the years ahead also, and it'll be equally revolting. But in any case, we lent them the money, and they bought the equipment, and they rebuilt their economy. By the 1970s, they were rebuilt. They had come back. Germans and Japanese are very resourceful people. And in the 1970s, Americans began to notice that an automobile didn't have to be called Ford or GM or Chrysler. It could be called VW or Toyota or any of the other names we all now know. And the United States was in trouble.
29:23It hadn't prepared for this competition. it. It somehow thought it was King of the Hill forever, something which no empire has ever been and no system has ever been. By the way, if you want to get the punchline of everything, we are now living through the decline of the American empire and the decline of our system. It's very difficult. It's producing weird people all over the place. You see them on TV saying things you never thought a reasonable person would be saying to you, led by the fat orange man at the top. Look at it. I digress. Here's the story. American corporations realized that the rest of the world had not seen the increase in wages that the American working class did.
30:14And because the 1970s saw the invention of the jet engine, meaning you could get from here to China in a matter of hours rather than days, plus the internet, also the 1970s, which meant you could supervise a factory in China almost as easily and readily as you used to supervise the factory across the street in Pittsburgh or Syracuse or any place else. And Americans began what has never stopped. An exodus. Corporations shutting down in Philadelphia, in New York. Desperate, closing, closing, moving production out of the United States. Never stopped. That's why Mr. Trump runs for president, I'm going to undo all of this.
31:08I'm a MAGA. I'm going to go back to what it was, which of course he can't do, but it's a wonderful promise. And Mr. Biden and Mr. Bush and Mr. Clinton didn't even make the promise. They couldn't do it either, but they didn't make the promise. He makes the promise. We'll come back to why that's so successful. But an enormous number of jobs disappear. Or to be more accurate, they are now held by Chinese people, by Indian people, by Brazilian people, by all kinds of people who will work for much lower wages. Notice the CEOs who make the decision to close the factory in Chicago and open it in Shanghai, they're motivated by profit.
Read the full transcript
31:57They can now get the work done so cheaply by low-paid workers over there. Plus, the Chinese government is eager to bring the jobs, gives them all kinds of help. It's so profitable, they're still ahead, even though they now have to pay the cost of a shipper of freight, a boat, to bring all that crap back. You can see how profitable it was. Jobs are gone. Second, automation. It's the era of the computer. First, the computer, then the robot, and now artificial intelligence. Three major technical breakthroughs allowing the employer to fire the worker and replace the worker with the machine. And this is as old as capitalism.
32:46It's really important that you understand this is profit-driven. And who are the workers? If you understand this, you can do an enormous service to American politics. Who are the workers that the employer is most interested in getting rid of by either moving to another country or replacing him or her with a machine? The answer, the highest paid worker. That's the one you want to get rid of. Well, who were the highest paid workers in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s? Here we go. White, male, Christian union members. Those are the ones who had risen to the top in our sexist, racist culture for the last 200 years.
33:34Women, service jobs, lower paid jobs, retail jobs. Come on. Black people, same story. Brown people, same story. So who gets really hit with this capitalist move? Answer, the mega world, the core constituency of Mr. Trump. White, male, Christian union workers. Maybe not so many union workers. That depends on the power of the union to influence them. But plenty of union workers have been voting for Mr. Trump to the chagrin of the labor movement and of the Democratic Party, who took all those people for granted. But those are the two major things that discombobulated the whole thing. The Democrats could have become the champions of stopping this.
34:27They didn't. It's very important. They failed. They are a failed political party. The Republicans cashed in. The Republicans are just as responsible. They were cheerleading, going abroad. That was globalization. And we were all going to have the benefit of cheap underwear because it was made in China. And we do. You've noticed that, right? Our underwear, really, seriously, is cheap. Our clothing is cheap. Our shoes are cheap. Very important to American capitalism. Why? Because it's over. The Chinese aren't going to send us cheap anymore. They don't need to. They're a bigger, more powerful economic unit now than we are.
35:11The world is completely different from what it was 20 years ago. But most Americans live in what my psychotherapist wife teaches me is denial. Americans do not want to see this. They don't see it. So, you know, they have 800 theories of what's going on. But you can see the disorientation if you understand the economics. Because, of course, what should have happened is that the white male Christian union men should have pointed the figure of blame at the corporate CEOs, who are the ones who made the decision to automate or to leave. Those corporate CEOs have American flags on their truck, but they abandoned the United States when it proved profitable to do so.
36:02But white male Christian Americans never got the chance to blame the corporations. Why? Because it's not allowed to talk like that in the United States. The Republicans don't talk like that. The Democrats dare not talk like that. Who do you have? You have socialists and people like me. We talk about it all the time. But what happened instead was genius. I mean, not Mr. Trump, but some of his advisors who saw in the rage of those white male Christian unionists a political opportunity unlike anything else available to them. So they jumped right in, and they had an answer for the white male Christian union man.
36:50You know what causes your problem? Two things. Number one, immigrants. What? A country of 330 million people is not having its economy shaped by 10 to 12 million undocumented immigrants. That's total bullshit on a scale that if a student handed that in, my right-wing professor would give him an F, let alone me. But the genius you made it were, invasions are coming. They're taking away our job. You spoke to the rage by scapegoating some person you made a plausible evil. And then the Democrats, they're bringing them in to get votes from those immigrants, you'll see. So it's a plot of the immigrants and the Democrats.
37:41They're the ones you should hate. So they do. And the big corporations give them a pass. And the Democrats, who had the chance of a lifetime, be the ones to stand up and say, it's the corporate leaders. You know that. You go to work every day. You know who makes the decisions because you know it's not you. They tell you what door to come in and out. They tell you what bathroom to pee pee? Stop. You know what the story is. The Democrats could have come in. They could have. Two of them did. Bernie and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. They at least said it. Didn't say it as often as they could have, but give credit where it's due.
38:24But they are two little voices in a Democratic party that tries to keep the lid on them all the time anyway. Meanwhile, Trump had the public relations sense to be able to at least speak to the feeling of disillusionment that people had, speak to their economic suffering and then divert their attention away from the corporations to immigrants and other groups. He saw the opportunity and he took it. You know, it is so pathetic. And I don't want to waste your time, but a tariff, which is his signature thing, a tariff is a tax. So notice with me that the Republican Party, of which Mr. Trump is the leader, has distinguished itself for the last century in being the political party against taxes.
39:13They're forever running. I'll lower your tax. Mr. Trump is hitting the American people with an enormous new tax. Talk about showmanship. He's getting away with that. Everybody who used to support the Republicans because they were anti-tax now supports them with a tax. Now, he's had to do some extraordinary things. For example, when you listen to him, he keeps saying, tariff, I'm going to get the Chinese with this tariff. Chinese people don't pay tariffs in America. The only people who pay tariffs to the United States are Americans. So he fudges it, right? He needs to tax everybody, which is why, by the way, our prices are going up.
40:01This is a tax on the American people and American business by the Republican anti-tax party. And no one says anything. Talk about ideological befuddlement. And the Democrats, where are they? They're asleep. They're not doing anything. You know, Italy, I don't know if you follow these things, Italy had a general strike last week. The whole country shut down. Why? Because the unions who led the general strike were in turn led by the very large and powerful dock workers union. And why? Because the dock workers union had already stopped loading any boat that was going to or from Israel in protest against the horror of Gaza.
40:50I mean, whether you agree with that or not is not my point, but you're seeing the French government collapse yesterday morning. This is a prime minister who had been in the job 26 days, and he's already resolved. Everything's falling apart. All I want you to get in your heads, please, we're falling apart. This society is not different. It is the same thing. And for the same reasons, we're turning on each other, pointing the finger of blame rather than figuring out, whoops, we got a problem here, which we can either handle by beating each other up or by getting together and sitting down with who the new big kid on the block is.
41:39Unless anyone misunderstand me, it's China. It's the brick. That is the up-and-coming part of the world. And again, whether you like them or not, I could care less. Are there problems in China? Loads of them. They're not a perfect society. No one needs to imagine that, least of all the Chinese. They're very smart. They work very well. They're doing fantastically. The record of the last 40 years, as grim as it is about the United States, is virtually euphoric about China. And I'd be the last one to tell you that. But it's true. And what's the point in pretending otherwise? The average wage in China of the worker has gone up four times in the last 25 years.
42:27The average wage of the United States has gone up about 10 percent. You understand, this is not a sustainable arrangement in the world. And we're living through a half-blind denial refusal. And we have a president will act like he's somebody from the 1960s or 70s when the United States did have the dominant position. It doesn't have it anymore.
43:09I just wanted to jump in with a follow-up that we had about everything we were just talking about with the tariffs. You know, as you're saying, obviously, this is like a big part of his economic agenda, you know, ostensibly to raise more money for the government, strong arm businesses into bringing jobs back home. But, you know, ideally bringing about what he's touted as a kind of reindustrialization of America. You've been very outspoken both on here and elsewhere about how this will not work. But can you talk a little more about is the issue with using tariffs in and of themselves? Like we know that leftists like Bernie and even Joe Biden have also supported forms of economic protectionism.
43:47Or is it more the specific way that Trump is using them? No, I'm afraid Mr. Biden was not one inch closer to solving the problems than Mr. Trump. That's why Mr. Biden, or for that matter, Kamala Harris, lost. Because a lot of the people that normally would have voted for them didn't. They had no reason to. Nothing was happening that was giving them a better feeling about their own situation or what was facing their children down the pike, et cetera, et cetera. And Mr. Trump doesn't either. What you're watching is lots of well-choreographed political theater that has nothing to do with the reality.
44:28I can show it to you very easily. If Mr. Trump is going to succeed, or if Mr. Biden was, in bringing industrial jobs back to America. He would have to make America a very attractive place to do that. Now, he didn't do that. Putting a tariff doesn't make the United States attractive. What it does is make it more expensive if you're producing the shirt in China, because when it's sold at Walmart or Target, it has to carry the tax on it. Meanwhile, however, the same Mr. Trump, who's trying to get the businesses, he says, to come back and doing it by hitting them with a tariff is doing things inside the United States that make it monumentally unattractive for any executive in his right mind to come here.
45:25Let's start. The government shut down. That's the biggest red flag you could wave in the face of a CEO of any company. I'm John Smith. I'm the CEO of something with a factory in China. I see that my president wants me to put it back in Chicago and leave China. I'm not going to do that if the government isn't working here, if the two major parties are at each other's throats, threatening each other with prison or worse. That's a red flag. Here's another one. The country is sending its own troops into its own cities. What? What? You want me to move my factory closer to that? You got to be crazy.
46:10I'm not doing that. I'm not in a million years am I doing that. I don't care what Mr. Trump says. He wants me to go into a war zone. Mr. Vance, his vice president, spoke glowingly about hoping to see troops in many of America's larger cities. Oh, really? That's what the vice president wants? I'm not going there. That'd be crazy. You can't predict what he's going to do from one day to the next. Why would you make that costly move to relocate your factory if the next day Trump's going to say something different? That's right. Not just, I mean, I advise, in my life, I've advised corporations to move a factory loses you six months to a year.
46:52You've moved, right, from one apartment to another. It's disorienting. You ought to put shit in boxes and take it out, all the rest. To move a factory is a big deal. It's very costly. You lose all the workers where you're leaving. You need to find a new group of workers where you're going. That's going to take training and a job. Nobody in their right mind is going to do that. If you were to undertake it now, your factory wouldn't be up and running until Mr. Trump is no longer the president. And therefore, who the hell knows what comes next? And as if this weren't enough, the largest city in the country, New York, is about to elect a Muslim socialist as its mayor.
47:36What? Again, this is not to do with whether you like or don't like socialism. It's about these are not the circumstances you're looking for to situate your investment. We haven't begun yet to see what the rest of the world is going to do. So the uncertainty, which I could give you a lecture about, in economics, it's well understood. The biggest thing about holding back a movement of a factory or an office or a store is uncertainty. Now that maybe we've settled down to what the tariffs are actually going to be, and I think they've settled down because Mr. Trump's advisors have told him, this is a colossal mess that you have made.
48:22Now we're going to see, however, what the reaction in the rest of the world is. And that reaction is going to be retaliation. It's going to be all the other governments in the world, all the other corporations in the world, trying to figure out how best to navigate this new world economy, one in which the United States and its key allies, the G7, are the smaller economic unit relative to China and its BRICS allies, who are the larger, quite a bit larger economic unit. And those companies and those countries are going to take steps that impact our economy more than his tariffs ever did. We are going to have people lose their jobs because foreigners are not going to buy from the United States.
49:18They don't want to have anything to do with a country as messed up as this one. Again, I'm going to just give you two examples. There's a complete crisis in the farm sector of the United States. The whole, you know, Midwestern part of the United States that grows the grain, you know, the wheat and the corn and soybeans and all of that. Why? Just to give you an idea, soybeans is a major crop in this country. Many, many farmers, and therefore many, many communities, depend on growing soybeans and selling them. The largest single consumer of soybeans in the world is the People's Republic of China.
50:02China this year decided to buy no American soybeans anymore. They used to buy them all. It turns out China can get soybeans from Brazil. Now, you know, Brazil is an immense country and very fertile land and all the rest. Okay, Brazil is part of BRICS. So is China. Brazil is overjoyed. Mr. Lula, a socialist who's in charge in Brazil, can go to the Brazilian farmers and say, now you know why you supported me. I'm building an alliance with China, and China is going to buy your soybeans into the indefinite field. Wow. Mr. Trump is now promising the American farmers$10 to$20 billion in a payoff to compensate them so they don't go out of business.
50:56You want to move into a country doing that? Really? Now the United States exports all kinds of things. Countries and companies all over the world are saying, I don't want to do business. Even if I do business with America, I want to do less than I used to. I don't want to get caught if this crazy Trump guy does even more weird stuff than he's already done. You can't do this, play this theatrical game for your white male Christian union workers who are angry, and imagine it doesn't have any other consequences you need to worry about. That's wrong. You're not solving America's economic problems.
51:39Or let me put it this way. For anything you're solving, I can show you six problems you're making worse. One more example, just to show you, because there's a little bit of economics here. 15 years ago, a competition began to produce electric vehicles. You know, the electric car, electric truck. The car companies we all know participated in that competition. Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, so forth. Okay, now 15 years later, it's over. We have a winner. The cheapest, highest quality electric vehicles are made, in case you don't know, by the BYD Corporation. If you never heard of it, that's because you're an American.
52:23A few weeks ago, I was in Paris, France. All the taxis that I encountered were BYD. They were Chinese cars and trucks. Why? Because they're the cheapest and the best. It means that everywhere in the world where there is a transition going on from gasoline-fueled vehicles to electric, battery, et cetera, vehicles. What everybody wants to buy, what every producer who needs cars or trucks wants to buy are BYD, because it's the best quality at the lowest price. You can get a fully functional truck for$30 ,000 and you can't do that anywhere else. It's the same with phones too, right? I've been hearing the same thing.
53:08There's a smartphone that's supposed to be a million times better than the iPhone and all that. And it's like, I'm forgetting the name right now, but it's wildly popular everywhere else. The camera's better. The service is better. Blah, blah, blah. And it's - You're watching the same with TikTok. As soon as the deal is made, Americans get TikTok. The Chinese will develop Big Bang and that will replace TikTok and we'll get the whole horse shit over again. But let me finish with the cards. BYD, why those letters? They're English. Stands for Build Your Dream. It's the name of a Chinese company that took those English words and adopted the initial BYD for the company.
53:49Mr. Trump in his first term put a 25 % tariff. So if you want to buy a$30 ,000 car here in America, you'd have to spend$30 ,000 to bring the car here and then pay a 25 % tariff to the local dealer before you could pick it up. Mr. Biden raised that tariff under pressure from Ford and GM to 100%, which meant that when Mr. Biden left office and Kamala Harris promised not to touch it, if you wanted that car and you were an American, you had to pay$30 ,000 to get the car shipped and another$30 ,000, 100%, to Uncle Sam as a tariff, so the car would end up, or the truck would end up costing you$60 ,000 if you're an American.
54:38To your competitor, anywhere else in the world, that truck is available for$30 ,000. You know what that means over the next few years? Americans are going to go out of business because they can't compete. Because the stupid, stupid tariff was a process in which you're watching a man shoot himself in the foot and you're screaming at him, that's your foot, you moron. It's going to hurt. No, no, he says, blam, blam. And then we are all sitting here five years later and we know, of course, why his foot hurts. This is ridiculous what he's doing. The United States is more intertwined with the world than ever before.
55:25Why is that? Because we just had 50 years of globalization in which we cheered everybody going abroad and we thought it was wonderful and we celebrated multiculturalism. Here's one more thing, looking at the two of you that I've got to say. During the very time that those white male Christian unionists were losing their jobs and feeling bitter that nobody listened to them, neither of the major parties gave a damn that they could see. They did notice that the whole country was involved in things like Black Lives Matter and the Me Too movement. What did they notice? That people, including politicians, seemed to be concerned about black and brown people and how they were treated, and female people and how they were treated.
56:17What was not cared about was white, male, Christian. That's why they're so angry at women. That's why they're so angry. That's why white supremacy is coming back. Because the Republicans not only turned them against the immigrants, it used that Democrats only care about women, and they only care about black and brown. Recipe for success. You've got to understand that, otherwise we will not undo this stuff. And who knows how far it will go. Vice President Vance wants you women to be breeders again. I didn't make this up. Please go look it up. It's not me. Not me. You have to have babies, lots of them, and spend, you know, your years from 18 to 40 doing that.
57:12That's your job. We don't care what happens before. We don't much care what happens to you after that. But we need more babies. It's extraordinary what we are going through. Is there some sense of women and people of color are taking our jobs? Is that what it is? Like we want them out of the workplace and we want immigrants gone so we have more jobs? Yes, you can never pull these things off without there being a grain of truth. You can't make it up completely out of nothing. I mean, sometimes they do that and sometimes that works. But you're much safer if you're going to pick a scapegoat that you can make some sort of plausible case of it.
57:54Yeah. One of the ways capitalists deal with workers, if they're paying them more money than they want to, is not just to go abroad to find cheaper workers, but go find cheaper workers and bring them here. If you're the capitalist who does a service, you can't export your local Starbucks. Starbucks is a service. It's got to be down the street from where you live so that people can get their coffee. So how are you going to make that profitable if people are used to high wages? Answer, immigrants. Bring immigrants in. The poorer the country, the more desperate they are, the better. And here's what you do.
58:35Not only do you pay them less, but you won't even see that, again, with the statistics, like our earlier discussion. Why? Because the employer knows that this is Maria. She's an undocumented immigrant from, I'll pick something, El Salvador. door. So now it's Friday and you're supposed to pay her her wage. It's supposed to be$284. So you hand her an envelope and she opens it up and it's$200. It's not$284. What is she going to do? She has to come back to the job. She has no other way to live. She may have a couple of kids depend on her. Can she go to the police and complain since it's against the law?
59:12She dare not do that. She's an undocumented immigrant. The police are the last people she wants to have anything to do with. The employer knows that. The employer has been doing that for years. It's standard operating practice in retail, in fast food, in construction, in all those industries where immigrants abound. Is there therefore a white worker who walks by the Starbucks or walks spy, whatever else, and notices a black or a brown or a female worker and wonders, is that the job I could have had? Sure. Does that happen? Yeah. It doesn't account for anything significant in our economy. By the way, those industries, retail, fast food, construction, and what's called entertainment, the restaurants and stuff like that, they had been complaining bitterly to Mr.
1:00:11Trump, trying to get deportation of immigrants stopped. For them, it is an enormous headache and a problem. They don't want it. They never did. They want those people here because they know they're going to have much more problem ripping off a native-born who will go to the police, who has friends, who isn't intimidated, all the rest. So that kind of brings us to our next question, which is that seemingly the economic theory underlying Trump's scapegoating of immigrants is that if we let fewer foreign workers into the country or deport the ones that are already here, this will somehow magically create more and better paying jobs for American born citizens.
1:01:00Is this in any way economically realistic, this idea at all? That's just make believe. There are people who really believe this. Yeah. Look, I can show you polls about Americans who believe that the earth is flat. It might worry you, but it's a large percentage. And when you ask them, how do you know it's flat? And their answer is because I never fell off the end. Okay, all right. Let me put it to you this way. The vast majority of undocumented immigrants have no wealth, which means the only way they survive here is by going and getting a job, which the overwhelming majority do. They get a job.
1:01:42It's a lousy job. The conditions stink. stink, the salary stinks, etc., etc., but they have a job. And as I told you before, when you get a job in the private sector, which is where they get the job, they produce a profit for their employer, because otherwise they wouldn't have that job. So who is the beneficiary of the immigrant? It's not just the immigrant who gets a wage, it's the employer of the immigrant who gets the profit without which there would be no wage paid to that worker. So the damage by getting rid, by deporting that person, you're not just depriving him or her of the wage, but you are depriving whoever they spent that money on of the income they earned that way.
1:02:35The local bodega, the local bowling alley, the church into which a few pennies are put in the basket on Sunday, or whatever, and you're depriving the business that hired them of the profit. And that will have consequences, you idiot. Don't you have to at least ask the question. The damage we're doing to the immigrant has to be set against the damage we are doing to our own economy by not having the profit and not having the wage spent by that person. If the employer can't find a Native American to do the work at that price, the employer may go out of business. And then what? Say a little bit more about what impact you see these policies having on the job market currently into the future?
1:03:32Well, let's see. The job market has been declining roughly eight or nine months. Mr. Trump's crusade against immigrants is going on roughly eight or nine months. Oh, might there be a relationship? Of course there is. Of course there is. It's not the only thing going on. I don't want to, you know, A doesn't cause B. There are too many other things going on that impact both A and B. But sure, it's a factor. It's making the job market lousy. Look, you're deporting people who were a source of demand. Millions of people being rounded up. Those people were buying, you know, Twinkies at the store, and they were buying, you know, little shoes for their children.
1:04:19They're not buying anything. They're back in El Salvador, or Brazil or Paraguay, wherever they came from. By the way, the country to which most immigrants are sent back is Mexico, because they all, not all, but most of them came through Mexico. Okay, what's happening in Mexico? It used to be with the millions of people from Mexico who worked in America, that they would send back a part of their money to the family they left behind. In economics, these are called remittances. If you go to any Hispanic neighborhood in Philadelphia, in New York, anywhere else, you'll see stores that offer the service of wiring money back to Mexico or the other Central American countries.
1:05:04Okay, that meant for Mexico that people for whom Mexico did not have enough jobs, could now leave Mexico, cross the border into Texas or Louisiana, and find jobs. So they solved the problem of unemployment by exporting, you might say, the unemployed. But that brought them a double benefit, because the people who went to the United States made enough money not only to sustain themselves here in the United States, but to send money back to the grandma or the wife or the children or whatever back home. And so it was last time I looked at Mexican statistics, the second or third largest source of foreign income flowing into Mexico were the remittances.
1:05:58Okay, now let's ask the question, what happens when you reverse, when the ice drives terrified people back into Mexico. They have nothing. These are the poorest people we have. So they arrive in Mexico. They have nothing. Now they need a job. There isn't one. And now Mexico, which can't give them a job, has lost the remittances it counted on. You know what you're doing in Mexico? You're producing a social revolution. it will blow up. And that will either mean a left-wing shift or a right-wing. And in their country, a right-wing shift brings you the following. An explosion of the drug business, which is the only thing you can do in Mexico if you can't get a regular job.
1:06:49Pays reasonably well. It's a bit risky, but everybody's got an understanding with the Mexican police and army and everybody looks the other way. I mean, it's a very sad story. They have a left-wing government, the woman, Scheinbaum, who's the president of Mexico. So she's an unknown how she's going to navigate this. But this is a very serious problem. And not just for Mexico, for Guatemala, Nicaragua, all of those countries are watching a tsunami of returning unemployed and a drying up of the remittances. You know, the United States has a responsibility. It has said it controls Latin America since the Monroe Doctrine of 1830, 200 years of domination by the United States.
1:07:43they can't now say oh we're nothing we're spectators you're not a spec you helped shape the economies of this part of the world that have no work for people that starve people that put them in impossible dangerous guerrilla warfare situation so they leave and come here of course they do and now you punish them by throwing them back you know the morality of this is so disgusting You don't even know where to start. But it is also a program that cannot work. Look, I'll even go further. If you're a serious Christian, or for that matter, any religion, it doesn't matter, and you take your ethical commandments, whatever you call them, seriously, you don't hurt other people.
1:08:37You don't take joy in other people's suffering and so on. You want to tell me how the American people are going to understand what they are doing to immigrants? Come on. What? But I must tell you, over the last three weeks, I have watched, as I'm sure you have, pictures on the television of the American military shooting boats in the Caribbean near Venezuela. Four boats in which human beings were literally blown to death four different times. The excuse given by our president and by his defense secretary was that these people were in the drug business. Okay, I'm an American. Being in the drug business is not a capital crime.
1:09:29We do not execute people who are arrested and convicted of being drug business people. We imprison them and we don't kill them. Mr. Trump, without any evidence, who knows what's in that boat? Without evidence, functioned as the police, the jury, the judge, and the executioner. Wow. You are on the road to fascism. not because of this or that policy. When that happens, when you don't even know whether there were children in the boat, you didn't bother to arrest them, and you are proud, and you're telling the Venezuelans, we're going to do it again. Wow. I don't know what it takes for a population to rise up.
1:10:22No one ever does until it happens. It's coming closer. There isn't the outcry that there needs to be. And there isn't the outcry that I think is coming. When it comes, it'll be very strong. I may not even remember when it comes how it felt about those boats, but they're in there somewhere. It's one of those things that novelists say, once you see it, you can never unsee it. It's imprinted on your brain. And I think that's happening. And watching another child terrorized in some ice rain. You know, wow. Wow. There's some concern over the past few weeks whether we'll even be able to safely have these kinds of conversations in public anymore over here.
1:11:06I mean, hopefully we will. I have friends who are telling me, and they mean it, that they turn me on and they say, the day comes I turn you on and you're not there, I'm leaving. And I say, where are you going? And then I get New Zealand, Canada, Europe, Asia. Americans, in a way I have never seen in my lifetime, are thinking about leaving. I still teach at the university. I have students who are changing their doctoral dissertation topic halfway through in order they can do something that will require research in Europe. They want to get out of here. They're afraid. And they're not out there publicly.
1:11:53They're just afraid. All right. Thank you so much, Rick. It's been a pleasure. Take care. Same here.
1:12:07was produced and edited by Emily Friedlander and me, Andrea Dominic. Our theme music is by Mark Donica. To check out more, head to our Substack. That's theculturejournalist.substack.com. And if you like what you're hearing, leave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts or share us with friends to help support independent journalism.
From the publisher
CUJO is a podcast about culture in the age of platforms. Episodes drop every other week, but if you want the full experience — including access to our CUJOPLEX Discord and the Weather Report, a new monthly episode series where we take stock of where the cultural winds are blowing and tell you what’s rained into our brains — we recommend signing up for a paid subscription.
Paid subscribers can now watch our video roundtable on Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another with film critic Joshua Rivera and Macho Pod cohost Drew Millard. They’ll also receive an invite to our upcoming “hauntology” reading group, which we’ll tell you more about soon. (Just so you know: We’ll also be inviting anybody kind enough to tip us a buck or two to support our work).
It’s October, and we still don’t have the September jobs report because the government shut down. But the data we do have shows a clear trend: Job growth is slowing, unemployment is ticking up, and cities like New York are seeing the weakest labor market gains in decades. If you’ve noticed more “Open to Work” badges on LinkedIn, heard stories about people applying to thousands of positions, or felt the chill in your own job search, you’re not imagining it: The job market sucks right now, and things have been headed in this direction since before Trump took office.
To wrap our head around how we got here (tariffs? offshoring? AI and automation?), we brought on the best person we could think of to explain it: Richard D. Wolff, a longtime faculty member at places like The New School and UMass Amherst, author of myriad books on economic methodology and class analysis, a founding director of Democracy at Work, and one of the most prominent Marxist economists in America. (Full disclosure: Rick’s work on class and labor were tremendously influential on Andrea’s work as a sociology student.)
In part one of our two-part conversation, Rick explains why today’s shaky job market is just the latest phase in a decades-long trend that began in the 1970s—and, in his view, a symptom of an empire (and economic system) on the verge of collapse. We also get into the flawed logic behind Trump’s tariff and immigration policies, the real reasons offshored jobs aren’t “coming back,” and why China’s working class is seeing wage growth while American workers are stuck in place.
Follow Rick’s work at Democracy at Work—and watch his Economic Update podcast.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit theculturejournalist.substack.com/subscribe




