In short
Podcast Summary: The Indicator from Planet Money - Episode: How much is AI actually affecting the workforce?
Overview This episode discusses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the workforce, particularly focusing on white-collar jobs. It features insights from economist Laura Veldkamp and historian Josh Freeman, drawing parallels between current AI developments and historical labor shifts during the Industrial Revolution.
Key Points
AI's Impact on Employment
- Dramatic Predictions:
- Jim Farley, CEO of Ford, predicts AI will replace half of all white-collar jobs in the U.S.
- This prediction reflects broader concerns about AI's disruptive potential in the job market.
Historical Context
The Industrial Revolution
- Comparison to AI:
- The episode compares the current AI revolution to the Industrial Revolution, which transformed the workforce over a century.
- The Industrial Revolution both improved life expectancy (from <40 years to around 80) and diminished living conditions for many, emphasizing the dual nature of technological advancements.
Research Insights
- Laura Veldkamp’s Research:
- Focused on the labor share of income in the financial sector as a measurable effect of AI.
- Found that the adoption of AI could lead to a 5% decrease in labor share, similar to trends observed during the Industrial Revolution.
- Suggests that while workers may receive a smaller share of profits, the overall revenues of firms are likely to increase, potentially resulting in higher earnings for skilled workers.
Current Workforce Trends
- Job Replacement vs. Complementation:
- Entry-level positions are expected to see substantial reductions in human involvement due to AI.
- Higher-level positions may experience AI as a complement, enhancing productivity rather than outright replacing jobs.
Economic Implications
- Profit Distribution:
- This increase in firm profitability raises questions about how profits should be divided among workers and corporations.
- The risk of monopolization is significant, as early adopters of AI could dominate the market, mirroring the monopolistic trends seen during the Industrial Revolution.
Future Considerations
- Policymaking and Regulation:
- There are open questions about how to ensure fair profit distribution in an increasingly AI-driven economy.
- Lessons from the Industrial Revolution suggest that achieving equitable sharing of wealth from technological advancements may require significant regulatory frameworks and struggle over generations.
Conclusion The conversation highlights both the opportunities and challenges posed by AI in the workforce, drawing essential parallels with historical labor transformations. Economists and policymakers must navigate these changes carefully to ensure fair outcomes for workers amidst the evolving economic landscape shaped by AI.
---
Related Episodes
- [AI creates, transforms, and destroys… jobs](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ai-creates-transforms-and-destroys-jobs/id1320118593?i=1000637979392)
- [The golden ages of labor and looms](https://www.npr.org/2024/07/17/1197961085/history-of-labor-movements)
Production Credits
- Produced by Cooper Katz-McKim
- Engineered by Robert Rodriguez
- Fact-checked by Sierra Juarez
- Edited by Patty Hirsch
- The Indicator is a production of NPR.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01NPR.
0:11This is the Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Darian Woods. And I'm Waylon Wong. A couple of months ago, Jim Farley, the CEO of Ford Motor Company, took the stage at an event called the Aspen Ideas Festival. He was there to talk about the future of the economy and the importance of skilled trades. And as he sees it, something of a crisis. Hiring an entry worker at a tech company has fallen 50 percent since 2019. Is that really where we want all of our kids to go? And then Jim Farley kind of just drops in this huge prediction. Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the U.S.
0:52Half of all white-collar workers. That is quite a pronouncement from the CEO of a major company. And Jim Farley's not the only executive talking in these dramatic terms about how AI might upend the economy as we know it, like it could be a 21st century version of the Industrial Revolution. You mean like a generations-long transformational era of human history that will change life forever for you and me? Well, we only have nine minutes. So today on the show, we will talk to an economist who's found one small but fascinating way to measure the impact of AI on workers. That's coming up after the break.
1:29We sum up all of human progress. We can do it.
1:38This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy. That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out. See the record at vanguard.com slash audio. That's vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. This message comes from Dell Technologies. Your new Dell PC with Intel Core Ultra helps you handle a lot when your holiday to-dos get to be a lot.
2:23Luckily, the Dell PC helps you get it all done. Get yours at dell.com slash holiday. This message comes from Mint Mobile. Starting at$15 a month, make the switch at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront payment for three months. Five gigabyte plan equivalent to$15 a month. Taxes and fees extra. First three months only. See terms. When it comes to AI and the future of work, we've seen evidence that AI is doing what Ford CEO Jim Farley talked about. It's replacing jobs in fields like coding and customer service. We've also seen how AI can help people be more productive or efficient at work. We did a recent episode where we heard from listeners who are using AI for manual or tedious tasks like writing emails and analyzing data.
3:10This is a burgeoning area of research for economists like Laura Veldkamp. She's a professor at Columbia Business School. And the debate over whether AI is replacing or complementing jobs got her mental wheels turning. I started thinking about the process of knowledge production, because AI doesn't produce cups and plates and goods, it produces knowledge. And so in thinking about the knowledge production process and how it was changing, I was looking to history to guide my thinking about, well, when else have we seen major changes in production processes? And it seemed like the Industrial Revolution was the most natural parallel.
3:47The Industrial Revolution took more than a century to unfold and spanned multiple continents. It is really difficult, probably verging on irresponsible, to try to summarize such a large, complex era of human history. But that's what Josh Freeman is here for. I'm a historian, and I studied the history of labor and industry in particular. If you had lived during this period of history, what job do you think you would want? Ah, well, I would like to be a rentier, where you didn't have to have a job. You just lived off the labor of your tenant farmers or the interest off of your bonds. You know, early industrial work was mostly not pleasant.
4:31Passive income is the dream, Darian. Or at least so many emails are informing me in my spam folder. Those are sent by AI. Anyway, Josh says that when you zoom out on the industrial revolution, you can see how it both improved and diminished human life on practically a cosmic scale. If you look at England, which is usually considered the first place for the Industrial Revolution, in the mid-18th century, so that's 1750, the average life expectancy was less than 40 years. Today, it's around 80. So that's the most basic measure, and you've doubled. On the other hand, you and I and everyone else is facing a planetary crisis from the Industrial Revolution that may seriously impact the future of our species.
5:20So, you know, in the biggest scale, you can see both the upsides and the downsides. Of course, this increase in life expectancy was not a straightforward or linear path. People's health actually got worse as they moved into crowded, polluted cities and worked dangerous factory jobs. It took generations of organized labor activity, government regulation, and advancements in healthcare to change these conditions. Ultimately, Josh says the Industrial Revolution redefined people's relationship with their home life, with nature, even with their basic sense of time. And it's too early to know whether AI is upending human civilization in the same way.
5:59But economists like Laura Veldkamp are trying to study AI-related changes in smaller doses. And they're doing this by zooming in on things they can measure. Laura set out to capture essentially how bosses and workers are splitting profits. There is a technical term for this. It's called the labor share of income. So think about the money that a business makes. Some of that money comes back to workers in the form of wages and benefits. And that percentage is the labor share of income. It both represents how important labor is in the output, what share of value it's adding, but it also represents what share of the income that labor should receive.
6:36Laura says the labor share of income fell during the Industrial Revolution. This is because the adoption of new machines meant less human labor went into producing goods. Laura wanted to know if this is happening with AI and today's knowledge workers. So she and a colleague studied workers in the financial sector. They picked that industry because it's been an early adopter of AI. There is entry-level work that Laura thinks will require less human involvement over time, like maintaining databases, and then moving up the career ladder, AI is more of a complement than a substitute. For example, Laura says workers at financial firms are using AI to analyze data to make investment decisions.
7:16And here's what Laura and her colleague found in their research. They predict that AI could lead to the labor share of income in knowledge work dropping by 5%. So if you think of profits or GDP as a pie among firms that are adopting AI, workers are receiving a smaller slice of the overall pie. Laura says this 5 % decrease is similar to what happened to the labor share of income during the Industrial Revolution. So that's one potential parallel between then and what's happening with AI today. And Laura says it's not necessarily bad news for workers that they're getting a smaller slice of the pie.
7:54And that's because the overall pie is getting bigger. We find that a worker who has AI skills in the financial sector is making about$22 ,000 a year more than somebody who doesn't. So they may be getting a smaller slice of the pie at their firm, but their firm's likely to be much more profitable. And so as a result, that smaller slice is still more take-home pay. A smaller slice of a bigger pie. So this gets us into big questions about fairness. Like, how should workers and corporations split profits? Laura says the Industrial Revolution offers lessons here too. What we saw in the Industrial Revolution is that there were a few firms that adopted these new technologies and became monopolists.
8:38This was the era of robber barons, right? And, you know, great capitalists. And they were insanely rich at a time when most people were desperately poor. And so I think there's a risk that we could follow the same path here, where there are early adopters that become monopolists and have an enormous amount of market power and squeeze us as consumers and us as workers to get most of the rents. Concerns about a small group of companies controlling those rents or, you know, the AI pie are on Josh Freeman's mind, too. He points out that in the U.S., there used to be lots of automakers and steel makers and airplane manufacturers.
9:17These industries got concentrated over multiple decades. Josh says so far, AI seems to be different. We're starting from extreme concentration. You know, that's the way it's beginning. So that is a somewhat different dynamic, kind of monopolized from the get-go. And will that shape the way this unfolds across the society and who benefits? You know, those are still very open questions. Open questions that Laura says policymakers and regulators will have to grapple with. You know, if AI is going to make all those companies more productive and wealthy, how should those spoils be divvied up? And if the Industrial Revolution is any guide, figuring out how to share this pie could take generations of struggle between government regulators, bosses, and workers.
10:05And computers. Oh, I forgot about the computers. Yes, they're waiting in the wings. Do not cut them out. This episode was produced by Cooper Katz-McKim and engineered by Robert Rodriguez. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez and edited by Patty Hirsch. Kicking Cannon is our show's editor, and The Indicator is a production of NPR. This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification. Interior Designer and CIDQ President Siavash Madani explains the value of having an NCIDQ certification. An NCIDQ certified interior designer must complete a minimum of six years of specialized education and work experience and pass the three-part NCIDQ exam.
10:49All three exams emphasize and focus on health, safety, and welfare of the occupants. It's really about the implementation of design. Good design is never just about aesthetics. It's about intention, safety, and impact. We take the responsibility of protecting the public seriously. The space needs to be functional, safe, and accessible. To learn more about NCIDQ certification or to hire a certified designer, visit cidq.org slash NPR. This message comes from EasyCater, committed to helping organizations order and manage food for all their business needs. With online ordering from favorite restaurants, employee meal programs, and tools to see and control food spend at easycater.com.
11:37This message comes from NPR sponsor, Capella University. Interested in a quality online education? Capella is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu.
From the publisher
There’s been a lot of big talk about how artificial intelligence is going to replace white collar workers. But what data do we actually have around AI’s impact on the workforce? Today on the show, we speak to an expert who has measured one aspect of these changes. She tells us how this moment in AI compares to the Industrial Revolution.
Related episodes:
AI creates, transforms, and destroys… jobs
The golden ages of labor and looms
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.
Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




