Should 'surveillance pricing' be banned?

23 Sep 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Indicator from Planet Money

Episode Title

Should 'Surveillance Pricing' Be Banned?

Episode Overview

  • Hosts: Adrian Ma and Darian Woods
  • Focus: The episode discusses the concept of surveillance pricing, where companies use personal consumer data to set individualized prices. The dialogue centers around the ethical implications of this practice and whether it should be banned.

Key Concepts

  • Personalized Pricing: Pricing strategies tailored to individual consumers based on data like location and browsing history.
  • Surveillance Pricing: A term often used by critics to describe personalized pricing, suggesting a more sinister approach to charging consumers differently based on private information.

Main Discussions

  1. Market Practices:
  2. Traditional price tags in physical stores versus online pricing models that lack transparency.
  3. Companies may use data to price discriminate, charging different prices for the same product to different customers.
  1. Regulatory Attention:
  2. Recent interest in surveillance pricing sparked by Delta Airlines' announcement of AI usage for setting ticket prices.
  3. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been investigating this issue but has faced challenges in transparency and regulatory action.
  1. Consumer Data Collection:
  2. Companies track consumers using web browsers, cookies, and through purchasing data from third parties.
  3. Surveillance pricing can be seen as a natural extension of targeted advertising techniques.
  1. Scope of the Problem:
  2. The FTC's study revealed significant involvement of major companies in surveillance pricing practices, with over 250 companies engaged in these pricing strategies.
  3. Historical examples of differential pricing demonstrate potential consumer harm.
  1. Regulatory Responses:
  2. Some states like New York have started requiring disclosures about algorithmic pricing.
  3. Experts have mixed feelings about regulation; some argue it’s necessary while others believe it's an overreaction.
  1. Economic Perspectives:
  2. Economists like Jean-Pierre Dubé argue that pricing based on consumer data is not a new concept and can sometimes benefit consumers by providing lower prices to certain demographics, particularly smaller businesses.

Arguments for and Against Surveillance Pricing

  • For:
  • It can lead to lower prices for some consumers; tailored pricing strategies can allow businesses to cater to different market segments effectively.
  • Against:
  • It raises ethical concerns about consumer privacy and agency; many consumers are unaware of how their data is used to influence pricing.

Consumer Recommendations

  • To safeguard personal data from surveillance pricing:
  • Clear web browser cache regularly.
  • Use private browsing modes or VPNs.
  • Consider shopping in physical stores to avoid data tracking.

Conclusion The episode ends on a note that underscores the evolving landscape of pricing strategies in the digital age, the balance between personalized marketing and consumer rights, and the ongoing debates over regulation and ethical implications surrounding the use of personal data.

Related Episodes

  • [Is dynamic pricing coming to a supermarket near you?](https://www.npr.org/2024/03/06/1197958433/dynamic-pricing-grocery-supermarkets)
  • [Wendy's pricing mind trick and other indicators of the week](https://www.npr.org/2024/03/01/1197962344/weekly-indicators-wendys-tyler-perry-pce)

---

This summary encapsulates the discussions and insights presented in the episode, providing a concise overview of the key themes and arguments regarding surveillance pricing in today's economy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01NPR

0:11When you walk into a store, you're probably used to seeing price tags on everything. A little sticker or a sign that says to every customer, here is what the product costs. But when you shop online, there is no price tag. There's just the price you see on screen. And because of that, do you ever wonder whether the price that you see is the same as what others are seeing? Like, could companies use your online data, like your location and browsing history, to charge you more than somebody else? Sounds fishy, but the short answer is yes. It's a practice called personalized pricing, though to critics it has a more sinister name, surveillance pricing.

0:55This is The Indicator for Planet Money. I'm Adrian Ma. And I'm Darian Woods. Surveillance pricing was in the news recently after Delta Airlines said it's been using AI to set some ticket prices. And even though Delta says it does not engage in personalized or surveillance pricing, that hasn't stopped some lawmakers from wanting to ban the practice. So today on the show, we wade into this debate. Is surveillance pricing as bad as it sounds? And what, if anything, should we do about it? This message comes from Vanguard. Capturing value in the bond market is not easy. That's why Vanguard offers a suite of over 80 institutional quality bond funds, actively managed by a 200-person global team of sector specialists, analysts, and traders.

1:43They're designed for financial advisors looking to give their clients consistent results year in and year out. See the record at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation Distributor. This message comes from Dell Technologies. Your new Dell PC with Intel Core Ultra helps you handle a lot when your holiday to-dos get to be a lot. Luckily, the Dell PC helps you get it all done. Get yours at dell.com slash holiday. This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life.

2:28Find your pair at warbyparker.com or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country. In economics, there is a concept called price discrimination. It kind of sounds bad, but economists use it in a more neutral way, to describe a situation where different people are charged different prices for the same product. Like a movie theater might sell cheaper tickets to students or seniors. But when it comes to shopping online, you don't know if the price that you see is the same as what others see. And this creates the potential for what some call personalized pricing and others call surveillance pricing.

3:06So surveillance pricing is when companies collect data from consumers, like their location data, their demographics, their internet search history, to set individualized prices. And the goal is to charge each person the most that they're willing to pay. Sam Levine is a former director for the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection. And he says companies collect data on consumers in a few basic ways. They can track you through web browsers or cookies or through apps that you use. They can also buy that data from a third-party data broker. And once they have it, they can use it to target you with, say, personalized ads.

3:44Yeah, you probably know the drill. You Google for one pair of shoes, and then suddenly those pairs of shoes are kind of following you all around the internet. So creepy. So the same technology that's powering advertising can power pricing as well. So instead of just showing you an ad for shoes, if a company knows that you're really looking for shoes and maybe you're in a hurry to get them, they can raise prices on those shoes because they know you're really looking for it. We should say this is not illegal, but in theory, it's the kind of consumer harm Sam was looking for when the FTC started investigating this type of pricing last year.

4:20As part of these efforts, the agency demanded data from eight companies that allegedly offer quote, surveillance pricing products and services, end quote. The companies included names like Mastercard, JPMorgan, Chase, and McKinsey. I hear the theoretical argument behind it, but how big is the scope of this problem really? I think the scope is big and getting bigger. The FTC study we did, and that we released some of the results from in January, showed that just among the eight pricing consultants we looked at, they were working with more than 250 companies in industries ranging from grocery to hardware to apparel and more.

5:01Sam says companies have the technology and the motive to engage in surveillance pricing, and he thinks it should be banned. Here's the thing. It's really hard to say just how prevalent this practice is. Through a website called Consumer Watchdog, we did find a few documented examples that suggest there is a there there. For instance, in 2012, the Wall Street Journal found companies like Staples and Office Depot were showing different customers different prices for the same product. And they did that based on things like their location and browsing history. In 2015, the investigative news outlet ProPublica found the Princeton Review showed people different prices for online tutoring based on their zip code.

5:43And the result was that people living in areas with a bigger Asian population might have paid hundreds of dollars more for the same service. But these smoking guns are hard to find, in part because what companies do with our data is sort of a black box. And even though the FTC's investigation promised to shed more light on the practice, that investigation seems to be on pause after President Trump took office and installed new leaders at the agency. We repeatedly reached out to the FTC for an interview for this piece, and each time, a spokesperson for the agency said it has no comment. So what does Sam Levine think about all this?

6:19I really think the FTC's seeming inaction and lack of attention to this issue is quite worrying, and I think it's why states really need to step up. And some states are. New York recently passed a bill requiring businesses to disclose when they're offering customers personalized algorithmic pricing, in their words. Lawmakers in Georgia, Colorado, California, and Ohio have also proposed regulating or banning the practice. Still, some experts, like Jean-Pierre Dubé, are skeptical of this rush to regulate. The concept of a company using data that I wasn't aware they had to determine a marketing offer for me, I don't think that's all that new.

7:00Jean-Pierre is a professor of marketing at the University of Chicago who's studied personalized pricing. Calling things surveillance pricing is just a way of branding it in a very negative light so that people would have a hard time wanting to defend it. Because how could surveillance ever be good in a free country like America? Good point. It does not sound good. Jean-Pierre prefers a more neutral term like personalized or differential pricing. And he says it's not unusual for businesses to consider a customer's attributes and tailor prices accordingly. For example, think of a car dealer who sees a customer walk into the showroom with a fancy suit and a gold watch on.

7:39They might decide to charge them a little more because, you know, it seems like they can afford it. Yeah, classic haggling. But he says personalized pricing doesn't always mean higher prices. If I have the data that allows me to know what people's willingness to pay are, there's just as much interest in me lowering my prices to some people to serve customers that would otherwise not have purchased. So as long as I can charge you more than my cost of supplying to you, this is additional profits I collect. So some people pay more, some people pay less. To illustrate, Jean-Pierre told us about an experiment he and a colleague ran with ZipRecruiter, a company that makes money selling job-matching services to employers.

8:18And what they found was when ZipRecruiter tailored their pricing to different customers based on data they provided, more than 60 % of them were offered a lower price than they would have gotten if the company had just charged everyone the same flat fee. Most of these people being charged less were the smallest businesses. And so if you think small businesses deserve special advantages over large companies, then you would argue this seems a lot more equitable and fair. Now, it's important to note in this experiment, customers provided their data voluntarily. And that's different from the secretive, involuntary data collection critics of surveillance or personalized pricing talk about.

8:56And on this particular point, Jean-Pierre says he gets it. I think we have to be very careful about saying that charging differentially is unfair. But I would definitely agree with you that it feels like consumers are losing the agency over their personal information. On that note, if you're concerned about all of this, there are a few things that experts suggest you can do to lessen your exposure, like regularly clearing your web browser's cache. Seems pretty easy. You could use a private browser or a VPN. Inconvenient, but doable. Or go to a physical store and buy things in cache. That's going too far.

9:35This is Adrian's populist revolt.

9:42This episode was produced by Angel Carreras and engineered by James Willits. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Kate Conkannon edits the show and The Indicator is a production of NPR.

10:07slash switch. That's mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month five gigabyte plan required, equivalent to$15 a month. New customer offer for first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details. This message comes from Warby Parker. What makes a great pair of glasses? At Warby Parker, it's all the invisible extras without the extra cost, like free adjustments for life. Find your pair at borbyparker.com or visit one of their hundreds of stores around the country.

11:05full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See Mint Mobile for details.

From the publisher
When you walk into a store, you're probably used to seeing price tags on things, saying what they cost. 

But when you shop online, there is no price tag. There's just the price you see on screen. What if companies use your online data — like your location and browsing history — to charge you more than somebody else … or maybe less?

Today on the show: Surveillance pricing vs. personalized pricing. 

Related episodes: 

Is dynamic pricing coming to a supermarket near you?

Wendy's pricing mind trick and other indicators of the week

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.  

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Should 'surveillance pricing' be banned?The Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO