Should the families of organ donors be compensated?

2 Mar 2026 · 9 min · 4 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Indicator from Planet Money - Should the Families of Organ Donors Be Compensated?

Episode Overview In this episode of *The Indicator from Planet Money*, hosts Adrian Ma and Waylon Wong discuss the controversial topic of compensating families of organ donors. Economists Kurt Sweat and Alex Chan argue for government reimbursement for families of organ donors, exploring the economics behind organ donation, its inefficiencies, and the potential benefits of financial incentives.

Key Points Discussed

  • Personal Experience with Organ Donation: Kurt Sweat shares his emotional experience witnessing organ donation firsthand, emphasizing the life-saving potential of organ transplants.
  • Current State of Organ Donation:
  • Over 100,000 individuals are on the National Organ Transplant waiting list.
  • Annually, more than 5,000 people die while waiting for organ transplants.
  • The U.S. government spends between $30 to $45 billion yearly on healthcare for patients on the waiting list, highlighting the economic implications of organ donation inefficiency.

Proposal for Compensation

  • Compensation Details:
  • Kurt and Alex propose that the government should cover funeral expenses for organ donors’ families (estimated at $6,000 to $8,000).
  • Additional support could include travel and accommodation costs for families during the donation process.
  • Expected Outcomes:
  • The proposal could lead to a 9% to 35% increase in organ donations each year.
  • Thousands of lives could be saved, while also reducing government healthcare spending related to waiting list patients.

Challenges and Concerns

  • Legal Issues:
  • The proposal currently violates the National Organ Transplant Act, which prohibits the exchange of human organs for valuable consideration.
  • The law was enacted in response to unethical practices in organ donation, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations in any compensation model.
  • Ethical Considerations:
  • While some believe financial incentives could undermine the altruism of organ donation, others argue that existing financial incentives in the medical field (e.g., surgeons, organ procurement organizations) create a disparity.
  • Alex Chan argues that compensating donor families would make the system fairer, especially for those financially burdened.

Expert Opinion

  • Shelly Snyder’s Perspective:
  • Shelly Snyder, executive director at Donate Life Kentucky Trust, discusses the importance of clear policy guardrails to maintain public trust in the organ donation process.
  • Emphasizes that decisions to donate are often made during emotionally vulnerable times and should be free from monetary influence.
  • She suggests raising public awareness and separating reimbursement processes from discussions about organ donation to protect the integrity of the decision-making process.

Conclusion The episode presents a compelling case for reevaluating the current policies surrounding organ donation compensation. While the arguments for financial support are strong, ethical and legal concerns remain significant hurdles. Ultimately, the discussion encourages listeners to think critically about how to balance compassionate care with the practical realities of healthcare economics.

---

Related Episodes

  • [Too many subscriptions, not enough organs](https://www.npr.org/2023/03/24/1165947234/too-many-subscriptions-not-enough-organs)
  • [Your Organs, Please](https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/10/28/452655987/episode-518-your-organs-please)

Additional Information

  • Production Credits: Produced by Angel Carreras, engineered by Kweisi Lee, fact-checked by Sierra Juarez, edited by Cake & Cannon.
  • Support: For sponsor-free episodes, listeners can subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or [NPR Plus](http://plus.npr.org).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Kurt's Experience with Organ Donation

0:46 to 1:42

Kurt Sweat shares his firsthand experience witnessing organ donation.

“Afterwards, Kurt tagged along with the transplant team as they transported the heart from this operating room in New Mexico to an OR in California.”

The Economics of Organ Donation

2:53 to 5:15

Discussion on the market inefficiencies in organ donation and proposed solutions.

“Whenever you have a demand for something and a limited supply, you've got a market.”

Legal and Ethical Considerations

5:15 to 7:35

Exploring the legal implications and ethical concerns surrounding compensation for organ donation.

“Except for a few potentially glaring issues.”

Shelly Snyder's Perspective

7:35 to 10:02

Shelly Snyder discusses the importance of clear policies and honoring generosity in organ donation.

“and talk about another potential issue with their proposal.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Stacey Vanek Smith:NPR.

0:11Stacey Vanek Smith:Kurt Sweat remembers one of the first times he watched a surgeon remove the heart from a deceased patient. I'm very queasy with blood and there's obviously a lot of blood. There's obviously a very bad stench in the operating room, things like that, that kind of you don't expect.

0:26Cardiff Garcia:It was 2021, and at the time, Kurt was a grad student at Stanford studying economics, although most of the people in the operating room did not know that.

0:36Stacey Vanek Smith:Someone mentioned I'm a student, and they assume I'm a med student or something. I remember they asked me to tie knots on the gown, and I don't know how to do that. So, you know, I was just like, you know, I'm the wrong kind of student. Afterwards, Kurt tagged along with the transplant team as they transported the heart from this operating room in New Mexico to an OR in California. There, another patient was waiting. Knowing that this person's heart was going to a young boy at the pediatric hospital at Stanford, I mean, it was just amazing. It's been a few years since Kurt first witnessed how organ donation can save a life.

1:15Stacey Vanek Smith:And the experience stuck with him because in his own nerdy econ brain way, Kurt wants to help save lives, too. This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Adrian Ma.

1:28Cardiff Garcia:And I'm Waylon Wong. Today on the show, Kurt and his colleague Alex Chan get into the economics of organ donation. And they argue why the government should financially compensate donors and their families.

1:42Stacey Vanek Smith:Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. A rich life isn't always a straight line. Unexpected turns can bring new possibilities. With a hundred years of experience navigating ups and downs, Edward Jones can help guide you. Let's find your rich together. Edward Jones, member SIPC. This message comes from ADP. ADP knows any new technology, any old competitor, any trendy thing, even a trendy thing that everyone knows isn't a great idea, but management just wants us to give it a try for a bit, can change the world of work. So whether it's a last-minute policy change or adding a new company holiday, ADP designs forward-thinking solutions to help businesses take on the next anything.

2:30Stacey Vanek Smith:ADP. Always designing for people. This message comes from Greenlight. Ready to start talking to your kids about financial literacy? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app that teaches kids and teens how to earn, save, spend wisely, and invest. Start your risk-free trial at greenlight.com slash NPR.

2:53Stacey Vanek Smith:Whenever you have a demand for something and a limited supply, you've got a market. And when it comes to the market for human organs, Harvard economist Alex Chan says the stakes are brutally clear. With more than 100 ,000 people on the National Organ Transplant waiting list, the consequences of market inefficiency are the difference between life and death. So the level of inefficiency is also staggering, right? In this market, more than 5 ,000 people every year die waiting for organs. They're waiting for kidneys, livers, hearts, and lungs. The government spends billions of dollars a year on healthcare for people on the waiting list.

3:30Stacey Vanek Smith:For example, in recent years, it's spent between$30 to$45 billion a year on dialysis and other treatments for people dealing with chronic kidney disease. That accounts for actually a huge part of our national budget. through Medicare and other sources. So this is not just a life and death decision, but also a decision that is a huge amount of implication on our fiscal stability as a country.

3:53Cardiff Garcia:Recently, Alex and his colleague Kurt Sweat came up with a proposal they say could help increase the number of organ donations, would save lives, and save the government money in the process.

4:04Stacey Vanek Smith:And here's their idea in a nutshell. When a person dies in the hospital, their organs might be donated if they're a registered organ donor or the family gives consent. In either situation, Kurt says the government should reimburse donors' families for their funeral expenses. But that's not all. Other things that might be covered are things like support for the donor family. Think travel and hotel rooms for a family that want to be near their loved one throughout the donation process. The amount of compensation might be capped at$6 ,000 to$8 ,000, the typical cost of funeral services. And by offering this incentive to everybody, Alex and Kurt believe more families would consent to their loved ones' organs being donated, and more people would choose to become registered donors in the first place.

4:49Stacey Vanek Smith:And the result, they estimate, would be a 9 % to 35 % increase in the number of organ donations each year.

4:57Cardiff Garcia:Wow. I mean, that's a really big range, obviously, but even the low end of the range, 9%, seems very significant to me. And as a result, they say thousands more lives would be saved. And the government would save money as there would be fewer people on the wait list in need of expensive, long-term medical treatment. So on paper, seems like a pretty good idea, right?

5:18Stacey Vanek Smith:Right. Except for a few potentially glaring issues. The first being that under the current law, this whole proposal is illegal.

5:27Cardiff Garcia:Oh, minor detail. Minor detail.

5:30Stacey Vanek Smith:And the backstory to why is actually pretty interesting. The story sort of goes that there was someone who wanted to go to other countries and pay people to donate one of their kidneys. Because kidneys, you have two. So you could do a living donation. They wanted to basically go pay people elsewhere to do that and then bring the kidneys back to the United States.

5:51Cardiff Garcia:This is like getting into urban legend territory for me.

5:54Stacey Vanek Smith:Right?

5:55Cardiff Garcia:Yeah. And when we first heard this, we had a hard time believing it. But indeed, in 1983, a Virginia doctor named H. Barry Jacobs formed a company called International Kidney Exchange. According to an article in The Washington Post, he talked about sourcing organs from, quote, U.S. citizens and third world indigents.

6:16Stacey Vanek Smith:This is a great way to make money. I go somewhere, I get the kidneys cheap, I bring them back to the U.S., I transplant them, and I charge a bunch of money. And everyone thought, that's just, that's terrible, that's icky.

6:27Cardiff Garcia:It is terrible.

6:29Stacey Vanek Smith:Yeah, I think I understand the ick factor is pretty strong here.

6:35Cardiff Garcia:Off the charts, yeah. Shortly after this, Congress passed the National Organ Transplant Act, which, among other things, outlawed the exchange of any human organs for, quote, valuable consideration. And on the one hand, this obviously makes sense. Like, imagine if the market for organs revolved around wealthy people paying for the organs of poor people. That would be incredibly dystopian, like an episode of Black Mirror.

7:00Stacey Vanek Smith:Absolutely. On the other hand, though, what Alex and Kurt are proposing here is far from that. And Alex argues that tweaking the law to allow compensation for donation has some existing precedent. Like, after all, he points out that people can get paid for donating blood plasma. And a person who donates their whole body to medical research is actually allowed to have their funeral costs covered. It's like an interesting dilemma, right? Like whole body you could pay, the blood plasma you could pay, but sort of somewhere in between the organs, not okay.

7:32Cardiff Garcia:But let's put aside the legal issues for a moment and talk about another potential issue with their proposal. The ethics. Is it even right to offer this sort of incentive to people in exchange for their decision to donate? Here is how Alex sees it.

7:48Stacey Vanek Smith:People worry that financial incentives will corrupt sort of this gift of life that is a pristine thing, the whole transplant process. But if you think about the process more holistically, right, a lot of players already have incentives. He says the transplant surgeon is paid to do the surgery. The organizations that procure organs are paid for that work. But the donors and their families? They are the true heroes of the story. They are the folks who actually are left out of the system where incentives are embedded.

8:17Cardiff Garcia:He says allowing them to be compensated for funerals, hotel, and travel costs, that would actually make the system more fair, particularly for people who might struggle to afford those things.

8:29Stacey Vanek Smith:When you're well off, you can afford to hang out in the hospital nearby and you could skip work. Where if you are a family of donors who are less well-resourced, now you are not allowed to be there with your loved ones, even though you have both made a heroic decision. So after hearing Alex and Kurt make their case, we wanted to get a sort of second opinion from someone who works with people who've actually made that heroic decision. And so we reached out to Shelly Snyder. Shelly is an executive director for Donate Life Kentucky Trust, which is a nonprofit that provides education and financial support to donors and their families.

9:03Stacey Vanek Smith:Financial strain is very real for families. I think we also have to consider, though, that any policy would need really clear guardrails and separation from the decision to donate in order to protect that public trust. She says people are often making this decision at an emotionally vulnerable time, and she doesn't want them to feel like their decision is being influenced by money.

9:30Cardiff Garcia:One way of avoiding this might be through raising public awareness, running ad campaigns, letting people know that compensation for donation is a thing long before they ever have to actually make the decision. Another might be making sure that people responsible for discussing donation with families are separate from those who would handle reimbursements. In the end, Shelley says, it should be about honoring people's generosity.

9:55Stacey Vanek Smith:The people who say yes to donation are doing it because they want to save another human's life. And that always needs to remain at the forefront of the reason for making that decision to donate their organs as a registered donor or to donate their loved one's organs. And that's what organ donation has always been built on.

10:23Stacey Vanek Smith:This episode was produced by Angel Carreras and engineered by Kweisi Lee. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Cake & Cannon is our editor and the Indicators production of NPR.

10:37Stacey Vanek Smith:This message comes from Capella University. That spark you feel? That's your drive for more. Capella University's FlexPath learning format lets you earn your degree at your pace, without putting life on pause. Learn more at capella.edu. This message comes from Easy Cater, the workplace food platform. Easy Cater helps organizations order food from favorite restaurants, meet dietary needs, and stay on budget. With employee meal programs, flexible payment options, and 24-7 customer support all on one platform. Learn more at easycater.com. This message comes from BetterHelp. International Women's Day is this March.

11:17Stacey Vanek Smith:Time to celebrate all women, the leaders, the caregivers, the hype friends, the how-do-you-do-it-all types. Women deserve to be reminded how much they matter, and that therapy offers a space to care for themselves. BetterHelp makes it simple by matching you with a qualified therapist based on your needs and preferences. Visit BetterHelp.com slash NPR for 10 % off.

From the publisher

Two economists get into the business—and stakes—of organ donation, and they argue why the government should financially compensate their families.

FYI, we are going on a book tour! Planet Money’s first ever book comes out in April. We’ll be celebrating in about a dozen cities. There’s a limited edition tote bag included with your ticket, while supplies last. Details, dates and how to get your ticket at planetmoneybook.com.

Related episodes: 
Too many subscriptions, not enough organs 
Your Organs, Please 

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.  

To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Should the families of organ donors be compensated?The Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO