In short
Whether the U.S. should tax AI to fund an “AI dividend” and protect workers, amid fears of job loss and wealth concentration since ChatGPT.
Guests/backgrounds
Alex Boris, New York State Representative and Democratic congressional candidate; computer scientist who worked at machine learning startups. Martha Gimbel, executive director of Yale’s Budget Lab policy think tank.
Key claims
Boris argues AI is being adopted faster than government can protect people; he proposes (1) limiting business deductions for AI costs and (2) a “token tax” on commercial AI use to fund cash payments, retraining, and education. Gimbel questions the “why” and is skeptical of token taxes because they tax inputs (e.g., AI subscriptions) rather than final output, potentially mis-targeting incentives.
Notable examples
Token pricing (OpenAI up to $30 per 1M output tokens); call centers vs biochemists; a cited survey where 96% of businesses haven’t changed hiring due to AI.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to the Tax Debate on AI
1:01 to 1:54
Discussion on wealth disparity due to AI and the call for an AI tax.
“The AI race has made a lot of people richer, but most of those gains seem to have gone to those already with metaphorical bathtubs full of money.”
Alex Boris's AI Tax Proposals
2:52 to 4:07
Discussion of Alex Boris's proposals for taxing AI and funding an AI dividend.
“See website for full details and important safety information.”
Understanding the Token Tax
4:07 to 5:30
Explaining the concept of a token tax and its implications for AI use.
“At the moment, AI is generally not taxed.”
Critiques of AI Taxation
5:30 to 8:00
Discussion with Martha Gimbel on the potential issues with taxing AI.
“Martha Gimbel is the executive director of the Budget Lab, a policy think tank at Yale University.”
The Future of AI and Job Market
8:00 to 10:06
Exploring the potential impact of AI on the job market and economy.
“A standard corporate tax or reform in the capital gains system, things like that, will do a better job of capturing the revenue that's generated from that.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01NPR.
0:11There's a lot of fear out there that AI could eliminate a ton of jobs, form a permanent underclass, and enrich just a few people. Right now, we haven't seen large layoffs, but tech hiring is slow, and we've seen huge growth in wealth at the top since the launch of ChatGPT. Yeah, just scan the rich list. Elon Musk, Oracle's Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Google's Larry Page. These are all people whose wealth is ballooning with the race to build AI. The richest 26 Americans' wealth has grown an estimated 127 % since November 2022. too. And so if this is just a taste of the future, some lawmakers are demanding we tax AI and give the rest of us an AI dividend.
0:59This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Darian Woods. And I'm Waylon Wong. Today on the show, should we tax AI? The AI race has made a lot of people richer, but most of those gains seem to have gone to those already with metaphorical bathtubs full of money. Yes. Meanwhile, everyday workers aren't seeing big pay raises. We speak to a congressional candidate who wants to tax AI, and we talk to a tax expert who has her reservations.
1:29Support for NPR and the following message come from Spectrum Business, providing connectivity solutions to help your business stay online and on track. Delivering fast, reliable internet, phone, TV, and mobile solutions, all backed by 100 % U.S.-based support. They offer scalable plans and straightforward pricing. Spectrum Business, reliable connections, responsive support, and tailored solutions that power your success. Learn more at spectrum.com slash business. Restrictions apply. Services not available in all areas. This message comes from LinkedIn. As a small business owner, you wear many hats.
2:05You're the owner, the marketer, the seller, the hirer. With LinkedIn, you have the tools to help you boost your visibility, find prospective customers, and find the best team for your small business, all in one place. So while LinkedIn can't hang up all of your hats, it makes it easier to wear them all. Learn more at linkedin.com slash indicator show. This message comes from HIMS. Notice your hairline creeping back? HIMS makes it simple to do something about it. Get access to prescription treatments with finasteride and minoxidil, ingredients that can help stop hair loss and regrow hair. Visit hems.com slash indicator.
2:45Compounded drug products are not approved or evaluated for safety, effectiveness, or quality by the FDA. Rx required. See website for full details and important safety information. Individual results may vary.
3:00New York State Representative and current Democratic Congressional candidate Alex Boris has a range of measures he's proposing to fund an AI dividend. Alex Boris is an interesting politician on AI because he really knows the technology. He's a computer scientist who's actually worked at machine learning startups. I'm saying what all Americans are saying, which is this is happening way too quickly and government right now doesn't seem up to the task to protect us. Alex's AI dividend would be a direct cash payment to Americans. We would also pay for jobs retraining and education to help workers laid off by AI.
3:38Alex has two main ways he's proposing to tax AI, which will help fund this dividend. The first is by reducing the ability for businesses to deduct AI costs as a normal business expense. Right now, our tax structure actually incentivizes laying people off to invest in AI. We put huge taxes on hiring a human or keeping a human hired. We have employment taxes, we have payroll taxes, we have requirements for benefits, and we put huge discounts on using AI. At the moment, AI is generally not taxed. In some states, like here in New York, I'll pay a sales tax if I use AI. But for businesses using AI, let's say they use ChatGPT, they'll actually deduct that expense from their revenue, so they pay less tax.
4:24Alex's second proposal to raise government revenue from AI is what's called a token tax. So a token is the basic unit of these large language models, and it can be either a small word or a piece of a word, but it is the computational unit that a model uses in processing language and understanding. So asking a chatbot for, I don't know, a lunch recommendation might only use a few tokens, but asking it to generate an essay on the major themes of war and peace would use a lot more tokens. Large AI users are charged by the token. As of this recording, OpenAI charges a standard rate of up to$30 for 1 million tokens of output.
5:07So that war and peace essay, that'll cost you a few cents. OpenAI, what is it good for? Alex says we can think of this token tax as just a tax for commercial AI use. Subscriptions, data usage, whatever. The basics of it are taxing the commercial use of AI, the times when you're using AI to replace a human. But taxing AI might have unintended consequences. Martha Gimbel is the executive director of the Budget Lab, a policy think tank at Yale University. The thing that I think is a little bit frustrating for the tax nerds, so, you know, for the 15 of us, is why, right? Like, what are you trying to do?
5:50Martha says the reason that the why is important is because addressing different problems means using different policies. So if you are interested in decreasing energy usage, you would design the tax one way. If you are trying to discourage the use of AI overall, then you might design something like a token tax. Martha says she's skeptical of a token tax because it's a tax on businesses' inputs. So for a call center, your inputs might be office supplies, rent, workers, and an AI subscription to help answer customers' questions. In general, economists tend to like taxing the final output rather than inputs because it means that you don't produce as efficiently.
6:39This is the same reason that economists don't like steel and aluminum tariffs. Yeah, it's like the government steering how businesses should be run, not leaving that to business managers. Martha says, what would happen if it turned out that not that much AI computing power was required to replace all the call center workers? Yeah, I mean, like we all like to think that our problems are individual and special. Well, mine are. But most of us calling this call center, we have the same issues. And maybe the AI bot doesn't have to work very hard. They don't need that many tokens. And the token tax isn't aimed at getting, you know, at the increasing profit that that company is seeing from that because there isn't as much AI usage as there was relative to like the number of workers that they had.
7:25Martha says contrast this with a hypothetical biochemist who might want to use a lot of AI tokens. If you're taxing per token and you have a scientist in a lab trying to cure cancer and they're using a ton of tokens, they then bear the cost of the token tax, whereas the call center that doesn't require as many tokens to replace its workers doesn't. Martha would prefer that lawmakers look at existing policy gaps that would be an issue with or without a big wave of job losses due to AI. A standard corporate tax or reform in the capital gains system, things like that, will do a better job of capturing the revenue that's generated from that.
8:12In other words, Martha says, focus on the loopholes in the current system that means companies in general don't pay their fair share of taxes from profits. She also wants the unemployment insurance system to be more generous to help laid off workers, whatever the cause. We brought these critiques to lawmaker Alex Boras. Are there existing tools that are more about general inequality or general ways that we tax corporations that don't kind of presuppose a particular pathway for the technology to evolve? Why does AI need to be taxed specifically? AI is the first technology ever developed where the makers of the technology are explicitly saying that they're trying to replace all human labor.
8:57Every other technology before was by default a complement to human beings, not a substitute. Now, it doesn't mean that the labs will succeed, but having attacks to deal with that difference, that this very well could be about replacing human beings, is narrowly tailored and targeted at exactly the thing we're trying to get done. Are you trying to slow down the adoption of AI? And if so, do you think there's a risk that American rivals like China might advance AI faster if the U.S. is taxing AI and they're not? I don't primarily think so, but I also think that we shouldn't be incentivizing replacing humans with AI.
9:38That's the current policy. I think we should continue research into AI, especially AI safety. But if we're constantly thinking about the race to roll it out everywhere and to everyone, we're going to devastate the economy. We're going to devastate the job market. We're going to devastate our kids. That's not the way to win this race with all of those costs. Right now, AI hasn't devastated the labor market. Martha points to a census survey of businesses. It shows that 96 % of them haven't changed their hiring because of AI, and 2 % have actually increased their hiring because of AI. But if that starts to change, you can bet that policymakers will be looking at proposals like Alex's.
10:21This episode was produced by Angel Carreras and Julia Ritchie with engineering by Cole Takasugi Chernavin. It's fact-checked by Tyler Jones. Kate and Cannon edits the show and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
10:38This message comes from Grainger. For the ones who get it done, Grainger offers the professional-grade products you need to get the job done. With fast delivery and access to technical product experts ready to help you meet any challenge. Call, click Grainger.com, or just stop by. Every episode of It's Been a Minute, NPR's What's Happening in Culture podcast starts by asking three questions. Who? How? Why now? If the culture's asking it, we're talking about it. At NPR, we stand for your right to be curious and indulge your cultural curiosity. Follow It's Been a Minute wherever you get your podcasts, and we'll break down the zeitgeisty topics that are filling your feed.
From the publisher
We speak with Democratic congressional candidate, Alex Bores, who wants to tax AI. Also, we talk to a tax expert who has her reservations.
Fact checking by Tyler Jones.
Your Next Listen
— It's come to this: Human certification in the age of AI slop
Connect with The Indicator
— Sign up for The Indicator’s brand new newsletter
— Buy the Planet Money book
— Find our socials, YouTube and more!
— For sponsor-free episodes, subscribe to NPR+
See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.
NPR Privacy Policy




