In short
Podcast Notes: The Indicator from Planet Money
Episode Title
Where the US got $20B to bail out Argentina
Episode Overview
- Hosts: Stephen Massaha and Waylon Wong
- Air Date: [Insert Date Here]
- Episode Description: The U.S. government has committed $20 billion to bail out Argentina using the Exchange Stabilization Fund. This episode explores the fund’s mechanisms, its history, and the implications of this bailout.
Key Concepts and Discussions
- Background on the Bailout
- Argentina's Economic Situation:
- Argentina has a history of economic instability, with severe depreciation of its currency, the peso.
- The bailout comes amidst significant financial distress for the country, raising concerns about American taxpayer money being used for a country with a poor repayment history.
- Political Context:
- The announcement was made during a government shutdown, leading to criticism from Democratic lawmakers.
- Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF)
- Purpose and Creation:
- Established in 1934 during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
- Initially aimed at stabilizing the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies and gold.
- Current Use:
- The fund is now used for various financial emergencies, including aiding struggling countries and stabilizing markets during crises.
- As of September, the ESF had a net balance of $43.5 billion, with the Argentina bailout drawing a significant portion of this.
- Historical Precedents
- Previous Uses of the ESF:
- Past interventions included guarantees for investments during the 2008 financial crisis and aiding Mexico in 1995 during a severe economic crisis.
- Comparison to Mexico Bailout:
- The Argentina bailout is unprecedented as it is solely U.S.-led, unlike the Mexico bailout which involved collaboration with other countries.
- Argentina’s isolation and lack of significant impact on surrounding economies differ from Mexico's situation.
- Economic and Political Considerations
- Rationale Behind the Bailout:
- Strengthening ties with Argentina, especially under President Trump's favorable view of his Argentine counterpart, Javier Milei.
- U.S. interests in Argentina's resources (natural gas, lithium) and countering China's influence in Latin America.
- Concerns Raised:
- Lack of public conditions tied to the bailout raises fears of potential financial quagmires.
- The possibility of future bailouts if Argentina's situation deteriorates again.
- Future Implications
- Potential for Additional Aid:
- Scott Bessent, a Treasury official, hinted at organizing an additional $20 billion package from private banks and sovereign wealth funds.
- Expert Opinions:
- Economist Monica DeBull expressed concerns over the sustainability of this approach, emphasizing Argentina's history of defaults and the need for more robust economic reforms.
Conclusion
- The bailout of Argentina through the ESF highlights the complexities of international finance and the unique circumstances that led to this decision. It opens discussions on U.S. foreign policy, the role of financial support to troubled economies, and the long-term consequences of such actions.
Related Episodes
- Dollarizing Argentina: [Link to Episode](https://www.npr.org/2023/12/20/1197956140/javier-milei-argentina-dollarize-economy-inflation)
Production Credits
- Produced by: Julia Ritchie
- Engineering by: Robert Rodriguez
- Fact-checked by: Sierra Juarez
- Editor: Kicking Cannon
- Production Company: NPR
---
Feel free to revisit the episode for in-depth insights and further details on the discussed points.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01NPR.
0:11This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Stephen Massaha. And I'm Waylon Wong. Last month, a reporter on Air Force One asked President Donald Trump about his administration's recent deal with Argentina. The country's currency, the peso, is volatile and had plummeted in September. And the U.S. government had agreed to extend Argentina$20 billion in what's called a swap line, which is essentially a loan. They're fighting for their life. You understand what that means? They have no money. They have no anything. They're fighting so hard to survive. Democratic lawmakers blasted a decision to prop up the Argentine peso during a U.S.
0:47government shutdown. They said the administration was being reckless with American taxpayer money. Money it might not even get back. So where did the U.S. get the money from and will it get it back? Today on the show, a peek at the 90-year-old emergency fund that the administration used for the Argentine lifeline. We look at how the government has tapped this money before and why it's doing it this time.
1:36AT &T. When you compare, there's no comparison. AT &T. This message comes from Apple Card. You left your wallet in the car. Or was it at home? No need to panic. With your iPhone, you can tap to pay using Apple Card with Apple Pay. And earn unlimited daily cash back when you do. Apple Card is ready when you need it. Subject to credit approval. Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch. Terms and more at applecard.com. Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. A rich life isn't always a straight line. Unexpected turns can bring new possibilities. With 100 years of experience navigating ups and downs, Edward Jones can help guide you.
2:20Let's find your rich together. Edward Jones, member SIPC. The government piggy bank we're talking about today is called the Exchange Stabilization Fund. It's been around since 1934. That's when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed a law that, among other things, set aside$2 billion for this special fund. The fund will be controlled by the Treasury Department. And the government can use the money to buy or sell gold or foreign currencies. The idea was to control the value of the U.S. dollar. Monica DeBull is a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. It's a research group focused on international trade and macroeconomics.
2:58Monica says it's hard to picture today, but back then, the value of the U.S. dollar was volatile. Remember, 1934 was the midst of the Great Depression. When your currency is fluctuating a lot, that can become a huge problem for companies that are dependent on, you know, flows of exports or imports. Because, of course, all of that is determined by the exchange rate. It can have a very big effect on consumers. It can even have a very big effect on the government. The U.S. economy did in fact face those dangers in the 1930s. So the Treasury tried to contain this volatility and did this by selling and buying currencies.
3:37Here's how this market intervention works. Let's say the U.S. dollar was falling in value against the Swiss franc. The Treasury could sell Swiss francs and buy U.S. dollars in foreign exchange markets. That would make the Swiss currency weaker and the dollar stronger. The need for this kind of market intervention went away as the U.S. economy became dominant. The dollar is now the world's reserve currency. It's used around the globe for trade and commerce. Its value has historically been very stable. Monica says the exchange stabilization fund kind of outgrew its name. There is really no need to stabilize the dollar as it were.
4:12So the ESF isn't really being used to do that anymore. In fact, the language around stabilizing the dollar was removed from the fund's mandate in the 1970s. And the Treasury Department found other ways to use this fund. One purpose is related to the International Monetary Fund. That's a group that lends money to countries in trouble. The IMF actually has its own kind of pseudo currency, something called special drawing rights. And the U.S. uses the exchange stabilization fund to hold this IMF currency. I'm picturing like a big cookie jar that has U.S. dollars and euros and Japanese yen inside.
4:48And then there's also this special IMF monopoly money. Yeah. Do you think the cookie jar is in the shape of a giant bald eagle or is it Uncle Sam's head? Can you do a like dollar shaped cookie jar? OK, I see it. I see it. To the pottery wheel, Stephen. Anyway, the fund does earn some income from interest and selling investments. Those profits go right back into the jar. As of September, the fund had a net balance of$43.5 billion. The$20 billion for Argentina represents a hefty chunk of this amount. The Treasury has dipped into this cookie jar for emergencies. For example, it guaranteed deposits in certain kinds of investment funds during the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008.
5:32It also backstopped certain loans to banks in the early part of the pandemic. And the government also uses this money to tackle economic emergencies in other countries. One of the most famous uses of the exchange stabilization fund came in 1995. Mexico had borrowed a lot of money in dollars that it could not pay back, and the Mexican peso was in freefall. President Bill Clinton announced that the U.S. would come to Mexico's aid. I have worked with other countries to prepare a new package. As proposed now, it will consist of a$20 billion share from the United States' Exchange Stabilization Fund, which we can authorize by executive action without a new act of Congress.
6:18Monica says the Clinton administration had strong economic and political rationales to extend Mexico that$20 billion. Mexico was certainly systemic in the sense that a crisis in Mexico would have had implications for the United States. But we should also remember that at the time, NAFTA had just come into being. And so, you know, there was great political interest on all sides not to see NAFTA sink because of a crisis in Mexico. And therefore, that was the other reason why the ESF was deployed in this way. And at first glance, the Mexico and Argentina situations look similar. Country with debt problems and a weak currency?
6:58Check. Political ally? Check. Even the nominal amount of money,$20 billion, is the same. But Monica says the Argentina package is unprecedented in a few different ways. For starters, the U.S. is going it alone on this aid package. That's different from the Mexico bailout, which was done in concert with other countries. It's also different from previous cases where the U.S. had coordinated with the IMF on aid. Monica says another way the Argentina example is unique is that there's no risk of other countries getting dragged down, even its neighbors. Argentina is a notorious economic basket case.
7:34Whoa, Hélène, forget the cookie jar. I feel like that's almost like swear jar territory. It is justified, though. Argentina has defaulted on its government debt nine times during its history. And it's this crummy track record that's largely isolated the country so that its problems tend to stay within its borders. A problem in Argentina does not spill over into the U.S. So there's that, you know, additional element of, let's say, something that's being done that is not exactly like what has been done in the past. It's an unprecedented use of the ESF. It may be unprecedented, but there are many reasons for the administration to support Argentina.
8:13President Trump considers his Argentine counterpart, Javier Malay, to be a friend. The country has natural gas, lithium, and other resources that interest the U.S. And there's a desire to curb China's influence in Latin America. And there's this. The New York Times and other media outlets have reported that former colleagues of Treasury Secretary Scott Besant stand to gain from an Argentine bailout. Some of his associates from his Wall Street days are heavily invested in Argentina. We did contact the White House and the Treasury Department for comment. We did not hear back. But CNBC talked to Scott Bessent last month.
8:48He said this trope that we're helping out wealthy Americans with interests down there couldn't be more false. No matter the rationale, economist Monica DeBull has concerns about the bailout structure. The U.S. hasn't publicly released any conditions for the$20 billion it's essentially loaning Argentina. She worries this lifeline has drawn the U.S. into a political and financial quagmire. Argentina has done a lot on the reform front, but there are still gaps. So the possibility that Argentina has another crisis in a few months exists. And then the question becomes, well, now that the U.S. has put money into Argentina so that it doesn't lose money in Argentina, will it have to help Argentina again if it falls into a problem?
9:32The answer to that is probably yes. The Trump administration, however, seems undeterred. Scott Bessent has said he's pulling together another$20 billion package for Argentina, but this time from private banks and sovereign wealth funds. Monica says that would be another unusual move.
9:52By the way, if you want to hear more about how the exchange stabilization fund was used in Mexico back in the 90s, you can listen to an episode from our Planet Money colleagues. It will be publishing tomorrow. This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Robert Rodriguez. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Kicking Cannon is our editor, and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
10:19This message comes from the Council for Interior Design Qualification. Interior designer and CIDQ president Siavash Madani discusses why certified professionals know that good design is more than just how something looks. Being NCIDQ certified means you've qualified to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public in the spaces that you design. Good design is never just about aesthetics. It's about intention, safety, and impact. So an NCIDQ certified interior designer must complete a minimum of six years of specialized education and work experience and pass the three-part NCIDQ exam. All three exams emphasize and focus on health, safety, and welfare of the occupants.
11:04Being NCIDQ certified means that you've proven your knowledge and skills through rigorous exams and are recognized as a qualified interior design professional. Learn more at cidq.org slash NPR.
From the publisher
The U.S. is committed to bailing out Argentina to the tune of $20 billion using a little known mechanism called the Exchange Stabilization Fund. On today’s show, what is this fund, why was it created and does Argentina have any hope of paying it back?
Related episodes:
Dollarizing Argentina
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




