Why are college coaches paid so much?

28 May 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Indicator from Planet Money

Episode Title

Why are college coaches paid so much? Episode Description: In this episode, the hosts explore the phenomenon of high salaries for college football coaches, challenging assumptions about their economic viability and comparing them to university presidents' salaries. The discussion features insights from experts and athletic directors illustrating the financial landscape of college sports.

---

Key Concepts and Discussions

Introduction

  • College football coaches often earn more than university presidents.
  • Example: University of Alabama football coach salary approaches $11 million; University of Georgia football coach salaries exceed $13 million.
  • The University president’s salary typically around $1 million.

Economic Rationale for High Salaries

  • Greg Byrne, Athletic Director at the University of Alabama, discusses the profitability of football programs:
  • Football and basketball generate substantial revenue.
  • Other sports often operate at a loss, but football supports these through its profits.
  • High-profile coaches are seen as essential for attracting students and enhancing the university's brand.

The Economic Model

  • Football programs are considered the "engine" that drives revenue for athletics.
  • Increased enrollment linked to football success:
  • Example: Alabama's enrollment rose from 25,000 to 40,000 under Coach Nick Saban.
  • Successful teams create a buzz that helps promote the university.

Counterarguments by Economists

  • Andrew Zimbalist, a sports economist, questions the economic sense of paying high coach salaries:
  • Schools often don't see a substantial revenue increase proportional to the high salaries of coaches.
  • Many athletic departments report annual losses averaging $20 million.
  • Evidence for brand enhancement through successful coaches is inconsistent.

The Artificial Market for Coaches

  • Zimbalist argues that the college sports market is not a typical free market:
  • Tax Benefits: College sports programs enjoy various tax advantages.
  • Public Ownership: These programs don’t operate under the standard profit motives of private companies.
  • Subsidies: Significant financial support from universities and state governments.
  • Student Tuition: Students often indirectly subsidize athletic programs through tuition.
  • Non-paying Athletes: The absence of salaries for athletes has historically freed up funds for coaches’ salaries.

Administrative Complications

  • College presidents juggle multiple responsibilities, including:
  • Fundraising from donors,
  • Managing alumni relations,
  • Overseeing faculty and student satisfaction,
  • Handling local community relations and infrastructure maintenance.
  • Past attempts by presidents to reform athletic pay structures often led to pushback and diminished influence.

Case Study

University of Alabama

  • Athletic Director Greg Byrne justifies the spending on high salaries:
  • Funds for coaches come from distinct revenue streams (e.g., ticket sales, donations) separate from student tuition.
  • He emphasizes that financial allocations do not take away from student resources.

Conclusion

  • While some institutions may find value in investing heavily in athletics, the sustainability and rationality of this model vary widely across colleges.
  • The episode prompts a re-evaluation of the economic strategies behind athletic spending and its implications for college finances.

---

Key Takeaways

  • College football coaches' salaries are often exorbitantly high compared to university presidents.
  • The profitability of athletics, particularly football, is a complex issue influenced by various economic factors.
  • The market for college sports is artificially structured, leading to significant financial losses that contradict traditional business models.
  • Institutional commitment to athletics varies, and decisions on coach salaries are often reflective of broader strategies related to brand and student engagement.

---

Production Credits

  • Produced by Cooper Katz McKim and Corey Bridges.
  • Engineered by Sina Lafredo.
  • Fact-checked by Sierra Juarez.
  • Edited by Cake & Cannon.
  • Production by NPR.

---

This markdown document summarizes the key discussions and insights from the podcast episode, providing a structured overview of the economic considerations surrounding college football coach salaries.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00NPR

0:11Student loans are getting serious now. If you don't pay, the government will soon start to do things like bring in debt collectors and garnish wages. So it's worth looking at exactly what tuition and fees are paying for. You've got building maintenance, administration, professor's salaries. Yeah, and what about the highest paid college employee? That's often the football coach. Yeah, take the University of Alabama. Its football coach is getting paid close to$11 million. University of Georgia, its football coach, was paid over$13 million last year. Meanwhile, the college's president was getting paid only about$1 million.

0:52This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Darian Woods. And I'm Adrian Ma. Today on the show, why are college football coaches paid so much? Does it really make economic sense? We crunch the numbers after the break.

1:10This message comes from NPR sponsor, Capella University. Learning doesn't have to get in the way of life. With Capella's game-changing FlexPath learning format, you can set your own deadlines and learn on your own schedule. That means you don't have to put your life on hold to earn your degree. Instead, enjoy learning your way and pursue your educational and career goals without missing a beat. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more at capella.edu. This message comes from BetterHelp. As a dad, BetterHelp president Fernando Madera relates to needing flexibility when it comes to scheduling therapy.

1:53I have kids under 18, so time is very limited. That's why at BetterHelp, our therapists try to have sessions sometimes at night, depending on the therapist or during the weekend. So I think that's what we need to tell the parents. You're not alone. We can help you out. If a flexible schedule would help you, visit BetterHelp.com slash NPR for 10 % off your first month of online therapy. To learn about why a football coach might be valuable for a university, we spoke to Greg Byrne. Greg Byrne is the University of Alabama's athletic director. So he's the one that hires the coaches. You know, we actually spoke to him mid-game.

2:34About our baseball game, we have the SEC tournament. We're up 2-1 on Missouri in the bottom of the sixth. I love that he's so dedicated to his job he wouldn't even tear himself away from a game to do an interview with you. Yeah, you know, sometimes his eyes were drifting, but you know, he's multitasking. Last year, Greg hired football coach Kalen DeBoer for that annual salary of almost$11 million. That puts him in the top 10 highest paid coaches in the country. And so we asked Greg, what's up with that? And he said, look, the football team turns a very healthy profit. So does basketball. But then they have a lot of other sports that don't make money.

3:10And so it's an economic model where football is the engine that pulls the train. It generates the revenues for us to be able to have broad-based programming across the board to not only offer great opportunities for your student-athletes, but it's a way to get people involved and engage with your university like few other things can. Along with turning a profit, Greg says the football team helps attract students. I grew up in Eugene, Oregon, a long ways away from Tuscaloosa, Alabama. I may have been the only student at my high school of 1 ,200 kids that knew where Tuscaloosa, Alabama was because I was such a college sports nut.

3:49And Greg points to Alabama's previous coach, Nick Saban. After a dry decade and a half, Saban brought the team to a national championship victory in 2009. And when Saban arrived, the student body was around 25 ,000. And we've gone to over, you know, 40 ,000 now. So it's almost like they're a coach, but they're also a form of advertisement. They are. I mean, when you're the head football coach at the University of Alabama, the recognition goes throughout the country. Greg is arguing that a top coach means a better football team, which means more ticket sales and also more buzz that can boost enrollment.

4:26OK, so case closed. It makes economic sense for colleges to pay top dollar for football and basketball coaches. Not so fast, Adrian. Andrew Zimbalist is a sports economist at Smith College. Unquestionably, there are individual cases of it, Alabama or a few other cases. But the general phenomenon is, no, they don't benefit from these large salaries. Andrew has run the numbers. He's looked at what happens when a new coach is brought in with a high salary. You know, if you're paying some coach$7 million and there's not a$7 million spike in revenue, then it's not paying off for you. In fact, Andrew finds that at the top leagues, athletic departments are each losing an average of$20 million or more a year.

5:14So the pricey coaches might not be paying off in terms of ticket sales. But what about increasing the school's brand? Basically, that evidence is not robust. Some people who look at it sometimes find a small benefit. Sometimes they find no benefit at all. Sometimes they find a negative relationship. That's not to say that it couldn't happen at a particular school. It can happen at a particular school, but does it happen as a regular process? It doesn't seem to. And therefore, the notion that you should make these investments in the form of losses, 10 and 20 million dollar losses every year on your team doesn't hold up as a positive economic strategy.

5:55So in general, if building up a top athletic department in a college does not make economic sense, why is it so widespread? I mean, in at least 39 states, the person with the highest salary on public payrolls is either a football coach or a basketball coach. The explanation is that it's an artificial market. It's not a normal business commercial market. Andrew says we shouldn't think of the market for football coaches as free markets, like the market for, I don't know, sandwiches or living room furniture. And he has five reasons. First, college sports has a bunch of tax benefits. Secondly, these programs are publicly owned, meaning they don't have private shareholders demanding they turn a profit each year.

6:39Third, there are often large subsidies from the university and state governments. Fourth, the students often subsidize sports through their college tuition. And finally, until recently, college athletes didn't get paid, and so there was more funding available for the coaches' salaries. So you don't have any of the normal discipline that happens in a typical commercial market when you move over to college sports. And for that reason, even though college coaches are being paid, it can be argued, a market salary. It's a very artificial and jiggered market. Meanwhile, the college president has a lot on their plate.

7:17Raising money from donors, keeping the alumni happy, keeping the faculty happy, keeping the student body happy, dealing with the local town, dealing with buildings and grounds and deferred maintenance. And then there's this other thing called athletics. And athletics is part of the culture. It's something that all the alumni love and like. And rather than trying to reform college athletics and create a different set of incentives and pressures. College presidents decide simply to leave it alone. The few college presidents historically who have stood up and said this is unacceptable, this is shameful what we're doing, they've gotten their wings clipped.

7:55This battle between presidents and athletic departments goes way back in American history. In the early 1900s, there was a president at UNC Chapel Hill who was, according to the New York Times practically run out of town after criticizing the athletic department. Fast forward to today, a 2009 survey of university presidents with major football programs found that 85 % felt that football and basketball coaches' salaries were excessive, but they felt they couldn't control them. And so let's go back to the University of Alabama, which pays nearly$11 million a year for one football coach. We did some math, and that's about$266 per college student at Alabama.

8:39And so we asked athletic director Greg Byrne whether that money was well spent. Do you think the students, you know, might be wondering, hmm, what if I had a$266 discount on my tuition fees? Well, those are two different buckets that the revenue comes from to pay for those things. The revenue to pay for our coaches' salaries come from revenue that we generate through ticket sales, through donations, through our conference revenue and television packages. So I can understand the question, but it's just completely two different sets of buckets of revenue that those are being paid by. In other words, Greg says students do not subsidize Alabama's football coach because the football program pays for itself.

9:22And maybe Alabama is a special case where it does pay off. But not every college can be a superstar school. You know, each institution has to decide what works for them. If you look at smaller colleges, let's say, they've decided, many of them, that athletics is worth investing in. And that it creates engagement for the university in many different facets. And they've decided that's a way to invest and market their program. but that's up to that individual institution. Any other final thoughts you want to leave us with? Well, I hope we win the baseball game today. What's the score now after the end of the interview?

10:03Still two to one. Okay, holding the line. That's right, we're in the top of the seventh now. And in case you're wondering, Alabama did end up winning the game. The baseball coach earns about$900 ,000 a year. Peanuts. What a steal. This episode was produced by Cooper Katz McKim and Corey Bridges. It was engineered by Sina Lafredo. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Cake & Cannon edits the show, and the indicators of production of NPR.

From the publisher
If you had to guess, would you say the president of a university usually makes more money than the football coach? Well, you may be wrong. A college's football coach is often their highest paid employee. The University of Alabama pays its football coach on average close to $11 million. Today on the show, why are college football coaches paid so much? Do their salaries really make economic sense?

Related episodes:
Why the Olympics cost so much (Apple / Spotify)
Want to get ahead in youth sports? Try staying back a year (Apple / Spotify)

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Fact-checking by
Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Why are college coaches paid so much?The Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO