Why U.S. workers keep getting more productive

6 Jun 2025 · 9 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Indicator from Planet Money - “Why U.S. Workers Keep Getting More Productive”

Overview In this episode, hosts Adrienne Ma and Waylon Wong delve into the recent increase in U.S. labor productivity, a trend that has puzzled economists. The episode features Austin Goolsbee, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, who explores various theories behind the rise in productivity.

Key Topics Covered

  • Economic Snapshot: The episode begins with a review of job statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), noting the addition of 139,000 jobs and an unchanged unemployment rate of 4.2%.
  • Focus on Labor Productivity: Goolsbee emphasizes the significance of labor productivity growth, defined as output per hour worked. It is highlighted as a critical measure that can influence wages and economic health.

The Productivity Mystery

  • Historical Context: Productivity growth had stagnated around 1% annually in the 2010s, but has doubled to approximately 2% per year in recent years.
  • Recent Data Fluctuations: The episode mentions a recent decrease of 1.5% in productivity growth in the first quarter of 2025, prompting discussions on the volatility of productivity numbers.

Theories Explored Goolsbee outlines four theories regarding the rise in productivity:

  1. Remote Work Flexibility
  2. Argument: Increased remote work could lead to higher productivity.
  3. Critique: While flexibility may raise productivity levels, it does not explain sustained productivity growth over time.
  1. Labor Reallocation
  2. Argument: The "Great Resignation" allowed workers to shift to more fulfilling jobs, potentially increasing productivity.
  3. Critique: This movement is seen as a one-time event rather than a sustainable change, as workers have largely settled into new roles.
  1. Surge in New Businesses
  2. Argument: A rise in new business applications during the pandemic might correlate with higher productivity.
  3. Critique: Similar to previous theories, the impact is viewed as temporary rather than a sustained trend.
  1. Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  2. Argument: AI may be a transformative factor that could enhance productivity in the long term.
  3. Historical Comparison: Goolsbee draws parallels to past technological advancements, like electricity and computers, which eventually led to significant productivity increases.
  4. Skepticism: It is noted that the effects of AI might not yet be fully apparent in current data.

Conclusion Goolsbee remains committed to investigating the productivity puzzle, suggesting that multiple factors may be at play. The discussion reflects ongoing debates in economics about the sources of growth and productivity trends.

Final Thoughts The episode wraps up with a reminder of the complexity involved in understanding productivity changes, encouraging listeners to consider the interplay of various economic factors.

---

Related Episodes

  1. What Keeps a Fed President Up at Night - [Listen on Apple](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-indicator-from-planet-money/id1320118593?i=1000702927801) / [Listen on Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/episode/6pEUssVpaNSVQNCCZZwIjb?si=0bd33cbb0b904cf9)
  2. Productivity and Workforce Whiplash - [Listen on Apple](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-indicator-from-planet-money/id1320118593?i=1000583887062) / [Listen on Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/episode/589mbFwXSJE5y2meZVF9d4?si=66eb2c852930464e)

Credits

  • Production Team: Cooper Katz McKim (Producer), Neil Rauch (Engineer), Sierra Juarez (Fact-Checker), Kicking Cannon (Editor).
  • Music: Drop Electric

For more insights, listeners are encouraged to explore the broader context of economic changes, technological advancements, and their influence on the labor market.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01NPR.

0:11This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Adrienne Ma. And I'm Waylon Wong. It is Jobs Friday. We've got the latest numbers in the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In May, the economy added 139 ,000 jobs, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.2%. If you're a faithful indicator listener, you know that we like to look at the BLS's, what they call the Employment Situation Report, every month, because it's a snapshot of how everyday people are doing in the economy. But there are other ways that the BLS measures how working people are doing. And that is what we're looking at today. A data series that gets one economist particularly excited.

0:52It's the greatest unsung series that if you say, what should we be watching? That's what you should be watching. I would recognize that economist voice anywhere. Oh, yes. Welcome back to the chat. Austin Goolsbee, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Yes, he is back. And this unsung data series he's obsessed with is labor productivity growth. It's a measure of worker output. For the last couple of years, this number, for the most part, has been increasing in a significant way. And the thing is, economists don't know exactly why. So today on the show, Austin Goolsbee takes us on an economic mystery hunt of sorts.

1:33He walks us through some of the different theories about why this number has been going up. It's the case of the perplexing productivity growth.

1:45This message comes from NPR sponsor Capella University. Sometimes it takes a different approach to pursue your goals. Capella is an online university accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. That means you can earn your degree from wherever you are and be confident your education is relevant, recognized, and respected. A different future is closer than you think with Capella University. Learn more about earning a relevant degree at capella.edu. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Ameriprise Financial. Chief Economist Russell Price shares how market research can help investors.

2:22Our research is focused on explaining economic or financial market behavior so that the investor feels more confident with the well-designed investment portfolio and personalized financial advice. For more information and important disclosures, visit Ameriprise.com slash advice. Ameriprise Financial cannot guarantee future financial results. Securities offered by Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC, member FINRA, and SIPC. This message comes from Grammarly. From emails to reports and project proposals, it's hard to meet the demands of today's competing priorities without some help. Grammarly is the essential AI communication assistant that boosts your productivity at work so you can get more of what you need done faster.

3:05Just a few clicks can tailor your tone and writing so you come across exactly as you intend. Get time back to focus on your high-impact work. Download Grammarly for free at grammarly.com slash podcast. That's grammarly.com slash podcast. The basic measure of labor productivity is output per hour. Economists use data from gross domestic product reports to calculate this number. Oh, so there are not literally Bureau of Labor Statistics employees just fanning across the country counting how many widgets every factory is making? Yeah, they're not like, oh, five zipper teeth today. Yeah, it's actually tallying up the value of those widgets.

3:43Or for a restaurant, it would measure sales per worker. That is how the BLS calculates productivity. Now, when we talked to Chicago Fed President Austin Goolsbee in April, he told us that patterns in the productivity data can be hard to spot. It's like when your kids are growing, you can look back at markers of pencil on the doorframe, but in the moment, they just look the same as they always looked. When Austin studied those pencil marks on the doorframe of the economy, he noticed something. Productivity took a hit at the start of the pandemic, which is not surprising. And then it started rebounding in late 2022, which is maybe also not surprising.

4:25But then it kept looking really quite good, better than pre-COVID. And now we've got two solid years where productivity growth has been well above the previous decade or two trend line. That's really where the mystery began. If you look at data from the 2010s, labor productivity grew around 1 % a year. But compare that with rates that we've seen more recently, which are more like 2 % a year. But aren't there always twists and turns in a mystery? BLS data released yesterday showed that productivity growth actually fell 1.5 % in the first quarter of 2025. So we called him Austin to see what he made of this drop.

5:10Productivity is a really noisy number, so you've got to be careful. Austin said if you look at first quarter GDP, that number was a little weird. It showed a decrease because of a surge in imports ahead of tariffs. And remember, GDP numbers feed into the productivity number. Just recognize stuff like that goes up and down a lot over a year, a decade. It's, of course, much smoother. And for productivity, that's the time frame you want to be thinking about. And bottom line, Adrian, as Austin told us in April, economists like to root for more productivity. There is a very real sense in which if productivity growth is higher, even modestly higher, for a sustained period, everything is wonderful.

5:57Our wages can grow faster without inflation. The interest rate doesn't have to go up in the short run. At the end of the day, it is productivity that made us the richest major economy in the world. Yeah, I mean, the U.S. is still a global leader in terms of productivity. So you can see why economists like Austin are so fascinated with it. So Austin walked us through four possible explanations. Theory number one, more people working from home. You got a couple of researchers going out and making the case that people can be more productive per work or per hour if they can have that flexibility. When you're kind of kicking the tires on this idea, do you look at, you know, which industries are showing productivity growth?

6:45because that seems like it is a largely people type in at their desks kind of story. Yes. And look, you're channeling your inner economic researcher. That's exactly the style. Oh my gosh, that's so nice of you to say. That's the style. I'm glad you took that as a compliment. That's exactly... It was not intended as one. It was intended as a compliment, but not everyone would take it as such. If that is the main cause, that's just a one-off. That would increase the level of productivity, but that's not a reason why the growth rate would continue. So in Austin's view, flexibility does not explain the sustained productivity growth.

7:26So let's look at theory number two, what economists call labor reallocation. That they call it that is exactly why you never want to hire a person with a Ph.D. in economics to work on your marketing. This is just the idea of the great resignation. maybe it allowed people to leave jobs that they were sick of, go into something that motivates them more, that they're more suited to, and they had an explosion of productivity. But sort of like the flexibility theory, this reshuffling is also a one-off event in Austin's view. A lot of workers moved to new jobs they liked better, and they stayed. They didn't keep moving around.

8:07So on to theory number three, new business creation. There's been a surge in new business applications in the U.S. starting during the pandemic. And historically, new businesses often have faster productivity growth or higher productivity. So there has been some argument maybe the economy's productivity went up because we have all these new firms. Again, I'm a little nervous that that sounds like a one time. So we're down to our last theory, and that is artificial intelligence. Austin says most economists think it's still too early for the effects of AI to show up in the data. Still, he finds AI to be an intriguing lead in this economic mystery.

8:54That's because there are historical examples of new technology leading to longer term productivity booms. So electricity comes in. It is electricity production where there's a massive increase in productivity. Then, after a little bit of time, it kind of filters its way through the economy and you see a boom in productivity in the most electricity-intensive industries. So aluminum gets more productive. And then with another lag of a lot of years, people start building businesses around the presence of electricity. And then you see the productivity continue. These technological ripple effects show up throughout history, like in the Gilded Age, which we talked about in yesterday's episode and which we'll link in the show notes.

9:48Another place you can see these ripple effects are with the introduction of computers in the 20th century. So if AI proves to be as transformative, that could boost productivity in a lasting way. Is it tricky to tease out then if it could be AI or if it's something that maybe started earlier than what we think of as AI? Could you still attribute this to the computer boom that you were talking about earlier? Now you're there's an old he was he was my teacher and he was a famous economist, Bob Solo. And he used to have this phrase, he said, when economists talk about the sources of growth, they always end up going down in a blaze of amateur sociology.

10:28And there is a sense in which it might be many things. So Austin Goolsbee, economic detective, remains on the case. Sounds like economists are going to be super productive trying to figure this out. See what I did there? Does that mean we have to be more productive doing stories about it? I hope not.

10:51This episode was produced by Cooper Katz McKim with engineering by Neil Rauch. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Kicking Cannon is our show's editor, and The Indicator is a production of NPR.

11:04This message comes from BetterHelp. To mark World Mental Health Day, BetterHelp is thanking the therapists who change people's lives all around the world by providing accessible mental health support. With over 12 years of experience matching clients with therapists and one of the world's largest online therapist networks, BetterHelp can help you find the right therapist. Visit BetterHelp.com slash NPR for 10 % off your first month.

From the publisher
For the last couple of years, U.S. labor productivity has been on the rise. And economists don't know exactly why. So today on the show, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago plays economic detective and helps us investigate some different theories about why U.S. workers seem to be more productive than in prior decades.

Related episodes:
What keeps a Fed president up at night (Apple / Spotify)
Productivity and workforce whiplash (Apple / Spotify)

For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Fact-checking by
Sierra Juarez. Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from The Indicator from Planet Money

All 542 episodes
Why U.S. workers keep getting more productiveThe Indicator from Planet Money · 9 min
Listen in VO