AI Ignites VC Frenzy, Unpacking Shifting Founder Dreams & Investment Strategies | Aug 11, 2025

11 Aug 2025 · 38 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Information's TITV

Episode Title

AI Ignites VC Frenzy, Unpacking Shifting Founder Dreams & Investment Strategies | Aug 11, 2025

---

Episode Overview In this episode of The Information’s TITV, host Akash Pasricha discusses the ongoing venture capital boom driven by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). Joined by guests Natasha Mascarenhas, Jon Sakoda, and Bain Capital Ventures' newest partners Abby Meyers and Ron Miasnik, the conversation explores the unprecedented deal-making climate in Silicon Valley, shifting founder aspirations, and investment strategies within AI and other sectors.

Key Discussions

  1. Current VC Landscape
  2. Venture Capital Activity: Contrary to expectations that VCs are on vacation, the summer of 2025 marks an unprecedented level of venture capital activity due to AI.
  3. Natasha Mascarenhas's Reporting: Reports indicate that a year ago, fundraising was polarized; however, more companies are now qualifying as "the best" and are managing to secure funding.
  4. Frenzied Deal-Making:
  5. Increase in unsolicited term sheets from investors.
  6. Example: Mercore received a $2 billion valuation term sheet only two years post-establishment, showcasing rapid valuation growth.
  1. Changing Dynamics in Due Diligence
  2. Tectonic Shift in AI: Jon Sakoda describes the AI boom as a super cycle, leading investors to preemptively secure deals without traditional due diligence processes.
  3. Investor Behavior: The rush for potential category-defining startups has caused a significant uptick in investment activity, often ignoring the standard pacing of due diligence.
  1. Dry Powder Dynamics
  2. Understanding Dry Powder: Dry powder refers to the capital available for investment after accounting for disbursements.
  3. Current Status: While there is a spike in investment, the fundraising environment is weak, leading to a decline in dry powder levels.
  4. Illiquidity Concerns: Over $1 trillion sits in illiquid assets, affecting the venture capital ecosystem's ability to mobilize funds.
  1. Venture Capital Trends
  2. Structural Changes: Firms are adapting by raising larger funds to keep pace with the capital-intensive nature of AI startups.
  3. Investment Focus: Venture capitalists are exploring opportunities in traditional sectors that are ripe for AI disruption, such as insurance and construction.
  1. Founders' Mindset
  2. Shift in Founder Aspirations: Sam Lessin notes that founders today are looking for “optionality,” desiring to maintain flexibility in their commitments rather than pursuing long-term, high-risk ventures.
  3. Impact of COVID and Market Changes: Recent social and economic disruptions have created an environment of uncertainty, leading founders to hesitate in making long-term commitments.
  1. AI Subsidization in VC
  2. Subsidizing AI Products: Lessin draws parallels between current AI investments and past consumer internet strategies, noting that many AI startups are effectively subsidizing their growth, raising concerns about sustainability.
  3. Market Dynamics: The belief in AI’s potential fuels investment, but there's skepticism regarding the long-term viability of these rapidly growing companies.

Featured Guests

  • Natasha Mascarenhas: Venture Capital Reporter at The Information, discussing the current state of VC and market trends.
  • Jon Sakoda: Partner at Decibel, providing insights on AI investment dynamics and due diligence evolution.
  • Abby Meyers & Ron Miasnik: New partners at Bain Capital Ventures, focusing on traditional sectors and technology's transformative role.

Conclusion The episode effectively outlines how AI is reshaping the venture capital landscape, influencing founders’ approaches to building businesses, and driving a significant investment frenzy in both traditional and emerging sectors. As the dialogue unfolds, it becomes clear that while the AI boom presents vast opportunities, it also leads to new challenges and questions about the sustainability and long-term implications of current investment practices.

---

Additional Resources

  • [Article Discussed in Episode: Unsolicited Term Sheets, Declining Dry Powder, Inside AI Deal Rush](https://www.theinformation.com/articles/unsolicited-term-sheets-declining-dry-powder-inside-ai-deal-rush)
  • Sign up for the [AI Agenda newsletter](https://www.theinformation.com/features/ai-agenda) for ongoing updates and insights.

---

Viewing Details TITV airs on YouTube, X, and LinkedIn at 10 AM PT / 1 PM ET, Monday through Friday. Tune in for more tech news and analysis.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:13Welcome everyone to the information's TITV. My name is Akash Pashrich. It is Monday August 11th and I am so excited for today's show. I gotta say, it is feeling like the dog days of summer right now, but we have got a busy, busy show planned for you today. We're gonna get to the NVIDIA and AMD news from over the weekend. We are also talking to Bain Capital Ventures' newest partners. They are both coming on the show. We're also gonna talk about one venture capitalist view that founders aren't dreaming anymore. I'm excited to get that take, but I wanna start off with a big story that we published this morning at The Information.

0:48You might think that all venture capitalists are off vacation in Europe right now, but the truth of the matter is that venture has never been busier because of the fact that AI has every investor on their toes. And I want to bring on our venture capital reporter, Natasha Mascarenas, and also John Sakota from Decibel to talk about this phenomenon. Natasha and John, welcome to TITV. It's great to have you here. Great to be here. Thanks for having me. So, Natasha, tell us about the story you wrote this morning. Yeah, listen, I've been reporting on venture capital for the better part of a decade, and it is definitely the busiest summer I've seen yet.

1:23So the story was pretty inspired by that. About a year ago, you would hear from venture capitalists, and they would tell you that it's a tale of two cities in fundraising right now. The best companies can raise and the others can't. Fast forward to this summer, there's a lot more companies that fit into that best category. And so we're seeing sort of unprecedented speed to write checks, unsolicited term sheets, and just a lot of pretty frenetic deal making in Silicon Valley. So that was my goal with this story was really to put some words to paper there. And so tell us about some of the examples you found.

1:56I mean, you know, these are stories of venture capitalists giving term sheets unsolicited to founders. I mean, tell us about some of the examples that you got to. Yeah, definitely. One example that I ran into pretty quickly was a company called Mercore. It helps companies like OpenAI and other AI startups work with contractors or find full-time employees. And I ran into an example where one of their lead investors, Felicis, preempted them with a$2 billion value term sheet about, you know, when the company was only two years old. Two billion, that's a funding round. Yes, a funding round. So the funding round valued the company at$2 billion, about 100 times its run rate, its revenue at the time.

2:39And at the same time, when I chatted with the CEO, Brendan Foody, he was saying that he's actually had to tell his investors to not send unsolicited term sheets. So even at this one example, it's a tale of two stories. They don't want it, but it does work sometimes. In other examples, you're seeing investors sort of look to court founders for six months or weeks before the company, they actually approach the company. And it all points towards a lot of investor excitement and trying to do work in stealth beside a company that's maybe ignoring your tax. So John, I mean, what happened to due diligence?

3:15What happened to that? Well, what I would say is AI is perhaps the biggest super cycle. It's a tectonic shift that we've seen. And I think it's a space that is hyper competitive. So I think you have people who are doing a lot of work up front. They're trying to research every single possible startup that's growing quickly. And then if they can find one that they think could be a category killer, they will try to preempt and get in. Because as Natasha has reported, the valuations go up incredibly quickly, incredibly fast. So if you don't get in early, it is incredibly difficult to get in at a reasonable price.

3:56John, I want to talk to you about, you know, your portfolio companies that must be going through this right now. We heard examples of, again, founders saying, just give us a second to breathe. I mean, we don't need the term sheet just yet. I mean, isn't it distracting for founders to try to build a company when you have to be so worried about, do I fundraise? Do I not fundraise? Do I, like, you know, how do I manage this? I'm really glad you're asking that question. Often when we launch a company, we might get somewhere between 50 to 100 inbound emails from investors. Now, that does not necessarily mean that you're going to get 50 to 100 term sheets.

4:30but certainly the demand is there. So if you do have a really promising company that could be a leader in this new tectonic shift, investors want to see if they can get in as quickly as possible. So it does very much feel like a frenzy. John, I want to get to the data that you guys collected in a second, but very quickly, Natasha, this idea of a preemptive deal or being preempted or getting an unsolicited offer. I mean, does that definition change depending on who you talk to definitely changes depending on who you talk to i mean there's many shades of it in some cases it's truly a classic preemption where an investor has done work on you shows up and offers you a term sheet at evaluation they think is fair in other cases it's a little sneakier than that i spoke to some investors who said that the word has lost all of its meaning the word being preemption and a lot of founders will say that they're getting preempted but in fact, they have been sliding over their financial information, doing coffee meetings, and sort of doing a fundraising without actually doing a fundraising.

5:35And so exactly like John said, 25 emails, 25 even verbal offers does not necessarily lead to 25 term sheets. So definitely digging into what the word means. So it's kind of just like, you know, you can walk on the street and say, oh, we were, it was unsolicited when really it was like, well, we actually had three coffees, you know, before we got the turkey. If you're giving your financial information away and you're taking investor meetings, you're fundraising, even if you're not saying you are. Yeah. John, your firm collects this interesting data set around dry powder. Tell us about what you found there.

6:09Yeah, for the past decade or so, in collaboration with the information, we have been tracking how much venture capital is available for startups. So as you might imagine, It's a relatively simple formula. It's the amount of capital that is raised, and that represents the dry powder. It's the amount of money that can be raised. And then obviously we deduct the investments. So dollars in minus dollars out is effectively the dry powder. In COVID, we saw a tremendous run up in dry powder. We saw record levels of fundraising. and it really peaked in 2023 on the back of what were incredibly strong fundraising years in 21 and 22.

6:51So we were at around 300 billion. Natasha and I had been studying this for many quarters now. The number hadn't really come down dramatically and we were wondering why that was the case. And anecdotally, it just didn't feel like the industry was that slow. So it just felt like at some point, the money's got to flow. And the reality is that really in the last six months and really leading up to this moment, we've seen a real unleashing now of the capital. It is at a run rate that is record-setting. I mean, the levels that we're at now are surpassing 2021 levels. On the flip side, we don't have strong fundraising.

7:33So this is one of the reasons why you see such a decline in dry powder is that you have incredibly strong levels of investment, but you have some of the weakest fundraising numbers that we've seen in a while. Why is that? Well, this has been relatively well known in the industry. We're now sitting on over a trillion dollars of illiquidity, so private assets, and the LPs have wanted to see more distribution. So we have not as much liquidity as we would like to have. Now, there's been very positive signs of this changing. So the Figma IPO is one example, the WIS acquisition by Google. These are examples of money coming back into the system, which of course, people would want to invest in AI.

8:17But until that part changes, the LPs have not had enough of their own dry powder to commit to venture capital. So on the one hand, we have the beginning of this incredible super cycle yeah but on the other hand we're on the tail end of what has been a a period of illiquidity and it just needs to catch up but natasha i mean you know we've talked on the show about right the ipo window it's not as open as some people would hope and yet you have these giant private funding rounds which are offering some kind of liquidity or at least the secondary market is getting hotter warmer you know so is that not helping at all with this it definitely is and i think it's actually you know a third factor i came across when doing this reporting was really seeing companies like google and meta and microsoft be willing to pay pretty high price tags for companies in the space and so before if you backed a small technical team that had maybe a few million dollars in revenue it would either be zero or a formal exit um now there's some downside risk protection and so that's why i think you're also seeing and i include this in my piece, investors just go earlier, not just more often, but earlier as well.

9:27So they don't have to wait for that huge exit. I mean, I know that Figma investors are super excited in this moment, but for everyone else, they're looking to a lot of different factors to get their money out of the market, even if it means, you know, not your classic headline grabbing acquisition or IPO. John, I want to come back to the pace of deal activity right now with respect to AI. Have venture firms changed their structure at all, or have they changed the way they play their game to adapt to this pace and move quicker? Well, I do think you're seeing the venture funds themselves supersize their funds in order to try to keep up with the capital-intensive nature of AI.

10:11So in some ways, we are in the beginning of a new tectonic shift, and it is one that requires quite a bit of capital. So I think there's been numbers reported. So they're raising more, right. Yeah, on average, AI tends to be a more unprofitable and more capital-intensive paradigm than other ones. So we see companies now burning maybe$5 for every dollar of revenue that they're reporting. These are numbers that were recently reported by Silicon Valley Bank. And anecdotally, a lot of companies are either at low gross margin or negative gross margin. So you see in some ways like a need to overcapitalize your company for the hope that you can get enough market share, enough volume in order to drive your margins back up.

10:56Right. I mean, more what I was trying to get at was, you know, at Decibel, for example, given that you have to move quicker to be competitive in this market. I mean, have you guys changed the structure of your firm at all insofar as, you know, maybe the associate is talking to the partner quicker or, you know, given that there's less time to do due diligence, you know, have you changed the way that you research companies? How have you adapted? Thank you for asking. Decibel specifically, in order to respond to these kinds of deal cycles, from the very beginning when we were founded, we did not actually have a hierarchical or layered system.

11:35And partially for this reason, I think in order for a firm to be able to compete at the speed of the market, it needs to be able to make decisions incredibly quickly. So in some ways, the flatter the organization, the more in sync an organization is, the easier it is to be able to meet founders where they are. I also think in some ways, specialization is a big part of that. If you are explaining to your partners everything that's going on in the market, it is incredibly difficult to keep up with the pace of the market. And so in some ways, by becoming a specialist, you can operate at a much faster speed because there's just a lot less explaining to do.

12:10Natasha, last question for you. What questions are you trying to answer now coming out of the story? Yeah, I mean, listen, I think what John said about venture capitalists sitting on less and less dry powder if this investment cadence continues for the foreseeable future is a huge storyline to prove out, right? I mean, are we going to see investors, investment firms shut down because they've overspent and they didn't have enough runway? I mean, investors all the time talk to startups about maintaining their runway and being smart about the way that they spend their money. But we're going to need to see venture capitalists do that as well.

12:46And that's what I'm watching. Great. Well, thank you, Natasha and John, both for coming on. John, thank you for sharing that data with us. It was great to have you both here. That is Natasha from The Information and John from Decibel. Okay, for our next story, before we get to our next guest, I want to talk about a big story out of NVIDIA and AMD from over the weekend. Now, you might remember last week, both companies got the green lights from the U.S. government to sell a version of their chips in China. But yesterday, the Financial Times reported that both companies will give the U.S. government a 15 % cut of their chip sales in China, which is quite the arrangement.

13:21You know, we were talking about this earlier this morning in the newsroom, and I think the most interesting part of this story is just how far NVIDIA is willing to go to make sure that developers in China don't actually move off its hardware. I mean, at this point, it's less about how much money they can make in China from those chip sales, and it's more about stopping developers from moving to use competing firms' chips. And so really, it is an unprecedented arrangement, and we look forward to seeing how that evolves. Now, for our next segment, Bain Capital Ventures has also had a busy summer.

13:52Over the past few months, they have led investments into healthcare companies, construction companies, legal tech companies, and the company also just named two new partners, Abby Myers and Ron Yasnick. They are both two rising stars in the land of venture capital, and I want to bring them on both to talk to us about what they've got planned for their new gigs. Abby and Ron, welcome to the show. Thanks for having us, Akash. Thank you so much, Akash. Great to be here. So you are the newest partners. How'd you guys celebrate? Well, I think Ron was headed to IC today, so I may have had the more fun celebration, but got together with some friends on KitKat this weekend.

14:29Okay. Ron, how was the IC? In a few hours, I'll let you know. There you go. All right. Well, look, let's talk about what you both are focused on. Abby, you have this interesting area. You are looking at AI, but you're also, you've invested largely in companies outside of AI. Tell us about what you've been working on. Yeah, I think AI is a really foundational and transformative technology, and I think it's touching everything we do. But I think I also spend a lot of time thinking through the questions of kind of what secular trends or market disruptions are happening that necessitate new technology.

15:05I think if we look at precedent kind of breakout tech companies, there's often some kind of technological advancement, but sometimes there isn't. And there is almost always some kind of market disruption, change in how we do things that requires a new technology. So I focus on Series B and beyond application software and AI investments. And I kind of try to take the lens of how our market is changing, how are secular trends impacting how we live and work, and what type of technology do we need to keep up. Right. And so what sectors specifically have you been focused on? recently i've been spending a good amount of time on technology for physical work and kind of the real world so one com yeah um maintain x is one company we recently doubled down on that i'm really excited about and what do they do their computerized maintenance management system so they put software into the hands of frontline workers that help them track work manage assets and it feeds back a lot of data to their broader organizations um i think to to the kind of point of secular trends.

16:09There is a tremendous labor shortage in the front line. Meanwhile, there's kind of supply chain pressures starting with COVID up until the reshoring, nearshoring that we're seeing right now. And I think there is kind of an unprecedented need for technology to optimize real world activities. So that area is something super exciting. Ron, you've been looking at stuff outside of AI as well, right? Yeah. So I'd say my two primary focus areas of Bain for the past couple of years have been one. I've been actually, you know, working to build out a practice in Israel. So Bain Capital has had a long history of investing in Israeli startups, starting over a decade ago with companies like Redis and Armis.

16:48And we really, you know, made a commitment to double down on that ecosystem again about a year or two ago. And it's been we've been really active out there, right? So we've now deployed 150 million plus dollars into the ecosystem over the last year focused, I'd say, mostly but not exclusively on security companies. The system in Israel has long produced incredible companies, incredible entrepreneurs with a core of security, given the kind of the military background, but also over time, not only security companies, and we invest in a handful of fintech companies, infrastructure software companies out there and are excited to double down on that ecosystem.

17:23The other team that I've been... Go ahead. I was going to ask you, You know, as it relates to the startup ecosystem in Israel, what has changed over the past year that you've noticed? I think really, I'll take it in a few different ways. One, over the past five to 10 years, we've seen Israeli founders dream bigger. I think if you look at the history of the Israeli ecosystem, it started off with a series of very technical teams solving very particular problems and then mostly getting acquired by larger American companies. And really over the past five, 10 years, Israeli entrepreneurs have become more commercial, more ambitious with the goal of building independent unicorn scale public companies in Israel.

18:03Right. And so we've started to see that secular trend over the past five, 10 years. And I think it's become more clear than ever over the past year or two. And why do you think, I mean, what do you attribute that to? Yeah, it's a good question. It's really a maturing ecosystem, right? I think, you know, at its core, one of the, at its core, Israel was, or one of the things that makes Israel strong is this military training that everyone goes through, right? Every single person in Israel, the next line item on the resume after high school is the army, right? And so Israelis from age 18 get trained in very complex, deep cybersecurity and infrastructure software problems in a very entrepreneurial, high-risk environment, right?

18:40And so a lot of these folks then go spin out from the army and go start startups. And so that's been the history of the ecosystem for a while. But as those startups started going better and better, and they're starting to become more capital in the ecosystem, Israeli entrepreneurs started to become more sophisticated in company-building methodologies, then a lot of times the second run and third run of these founders, they're ready to swing bigger, right? And so now I'd say actually the default pitch we see in Israel is we want to go aim for a big public company. So there's a lot of second and third time founders that are coming back.

19:11Exactly, exactly. And now there's second, third time founders, there's layers of angel investors and venture capital funds in the ecosystem that have been through the rounds a couple of times. There's layers of engineering management and financial management and product management in a way that is not dissimilar from Silicon Valley, right? An ecosystem that's progressed over the past couple of decades. And we're just seeing the quality be world-class. and so we're really excited to double down. Abby, I want to come back to you and I want to come back to this idea of what's interesting outside of AI right now.

19:41You had this investment in this company called WAP and I want you to tell us about what the company does and I also want to ask you about your due diligence process because I read online, one of the things you did for your due diligence was that you were talking to creators on Discord and Reddit as you were researching the company. I mean, we do that as reporters but I didn't know people do that as venture capitalists. So tell us about what that company is and how you found it. WAP is kind of like Shopify for the creator economy. The trend that we noticed was there was a new generation of digital entrepreneurs that were building online goods.

20:19So things like communities where their followers could interact, online courses, games, all of that. And they needed infrastructure to manage subscriptions and monetize their followings. And there was real demand to have infrastructure that let them monetize their following across all the ways they wanted to in one place. And so WAP kind of provides that digital commerce infrastructure to enable this new generation of creators. And so during the diligence process, I think that I realized that I just didn't fundamentally understand this kind of wave of creators, and I really wanted to. And so I thought the best way to get smart there was to put myself in the shoes of, say, a 20-year-old male day trading enthusiast and join those groups, kind of interact as one of the folks using the WAP platform.

21:13So spend a good amount of time in, call it their top 15, 20, as well as some just random picks across the platform to understand just how deeply and eagerly people were engaging. with this new type. What was the most surprising thing that you learned? I think just how active and just the communities were and just how engaged the community members were. I had no, I think, understanding of how huge this shift was. Bron, let's talk about your investments outside of AI or, I mean, adjacent to AI, I should say. You've also been paying attention to these, you know, traditional industries, stuff like insurance, homeowners association.

21:54Why have you been focused there? Yeah, I think one of the things that we're realizing more and more is that a lot of the opportunity for applying AI and a lot of enterprise value creation opportunity in AI comes from these more traditional service sectors, right? In places that traditionally Silicon Valley does not go, you know, does not hang out in as much, right? And so we're actually seeing a lot of incredible founders and surprisingly as well, technical talent be really, really interested in working on these really nichey, historically unsexy industries, right? And moving over to work on, like you're saying, homeowner associations, PEOs, property managers, insurance administration, 401k administration, all these other parts of the world, primarily because, one, there's a huge market opportunity there and there's an opportunity to put AI into these more traditional industries.

22:37But these are also really interesting technical and commercial problems. Right. You're hanging out in these other in these different in these with these people in places and areas that you don't run into in Silicon Valley. And so actually a lot of what we've seen our role as as Bain Capital is to be that bridge. One of the cool parts of being at Bain for the past couple of years is that Bain Capital actually, in many ways, primarily is a global asset manager. You're talking about Bain Capital, the Bain Capital, the asset management company, the private equity company, not Bain Capital Ventures here.

23:08Yeah, but we're all one large organization. And so at the end of the day, when you sit at Bain Capital Ventures, you are able to touch the rest of the world in a really meaningful way. And so a lot of times the insights that come from our private equity colleagues or our credit colleagues or our insurance colleagues that work at other funds at the firm inform then our investing that happens on the venture capital side. So how do you plug into that then as a venture team? So we spend a huge amount of time with our private equity teams going and assessing the AI opportunity in more traditional industries.

23:35Right. They will come to us and say, hey, we're looking at buying this big company. We're looking at assessing this new market. What do we do with AI here? right? And then we can go help them and actually introduce them to engineers to go plug into these companies. We sometimes say, hey, well, we actually think there's a market opportunity to go build a business that, you know, the businesses that we own can go buy, right? Or sometimes we look at a market end-to-end with our private equity colleagues and say, hey, actually, we think we can disrupt this, right? We think there's an opportunity to go build a net new player that's actually a more traditional service business in a more AI-needed way.

24:07And so what is AI actually doing then for these businesses? Yeah. So I guess there's a couple of things they might do. One is there's a lot of internal operational efficiency, right, that you can go, that AI can go really improve, right? And so, you know, there's many, many internal processes and operations in these companies that are, you know, historic, that are still live in, you know, 20 or 30 years ago. So like finance and stuff like that? Finance and operation, you know, many of these companies, many of these businesses at the end of the day are still running on backs, right? And so you have, you know, his text in, text out processes that are hyper legacy that that are a trivial task for an LLM.

24:47And and so I can completely transform these. But actually, in many ways, more interestingly to us, I can actually completely change the customer experience. Right. There's many of these industries, you know, whether again, TPAs, PEOs, homeowners associate, we kind of consider these like the three letter acronym industries. These kind of more more legacy service sectors where customers have gotten used to having, two-week turnaround times with 30 % inaccuracy rates and not getting a call back from their customer service rep. And so we see a huge opportunity now with AI to go completely transform not only the internal operations of these businesses, but also the customer experience and do it in a much more vertically integrated manner.

25:30To actually not only build tools and point solutions for these businesses, but also take on these markets end-to-end. Build the next generation law firm, build a next generation accounting firm, build the next and in a way that that was just not possible when you didn't have the type of automation. Yeah. Right. Well, look, Abby and Ron, it's you have two very interesting focus areas. I had never heard of WAP and I had also not really heard of AI, you know, automating some of these traditional industries, although that is something we've written about the information. And I'll link a few of those stories in the show notes.

26:01But thank you both of you for being here. Congratulations on your new appointment as partners. That is Abby and Ron, the newest partner at Bain Capital Ventures. Okay, our next guest is a friend of the show. Sam Lesson is a general partner at Slow Ventures. The company counts Robinhood, Airtable, Solana, and Postmates among its investments. He is also the husband of Jessica Lesson, our founder and editor-in-chief. Sam, welcome back to the show. Always happy to be back. So we were texting last night, okay? And one of the things that you seemed a little bit concerned about is this idea that founders aren't dreaming anymore.

Read the full transcript

26:36And I got to ask you what you meant by that. Well, it's not that they're not dreaming. I think that what's interesting is, I think, the appeal of traditional startups where you're kind of sinking 10 years into a journey you're really passionate about. It's getting complicated for a lot of them. I mean, you saw this with the windsurf, right, where you saw the kind of founders bail even on something that's kind of working, right? And I think what's happened is a bunch of social factors that I think have gone on in the last few years, whether it was COVID or the GME GameStop crypto nexus or whatever you want to call it, that in these times of like massive disruption where things are changing so quickly, people are really nervous to really commit effectively over long periods of time.

27:15And so what you're seeing is kind of like the founder dream in a lot of ways are really smart people. They're saying, look, I want to work on things, but I want optionality, right? I want to be able to like pick my right journey and I don't want to miss the big swerve. And I think that's an interesting shift in kind of patterns, right? You're not seeing people make these like long-term startup. in a lot of cases, or when you do, the question is why, right? In a way that I think wasn't the case historically. So is this good or bad for the startup ecosystem? It's just different. I mean, I think like the reality is, you know, it really, it's just different.

27:45There's an argument that given the level of abstraction and APIs and infrastructure that now exists that didn't exist even 10 years ago, maybe not even five years ago, that kind of the most successful things do look like this. Like you have the right idea, you incept something new and you get a wildfire or a moment out of it, which then kind of is the value in a lot of it. I mean, there's a whole other problem about how you compensate early teams, right, in this type of a world where so much of the value gets pulled forward because as soon as something moves, it's worth infinity, right? But it's just different.

28:14I think what I think the reality is, the big story is that especially as seed investing, all the patterns that we're all used to are changing very rapidly. And, you know, I think you can't just apply old thinking or the old patterns of how you search for companies. You need to be looking for different entrepreneurs and different styles of building. But, you know, I hear you say this and it just sounds to me like, you know, patience is something that is running low for founders these days. And it feels like people are, you know, look. People are definitely impatient, I think, in general. I think the reality is you have a very liquid labor market.

28:48You have a very liquid social experience. I mean, I think Tinder is a great example. Like who wants to commit to a long-term relationship when you have Tinder on demand, right? It's a little bit simplistic, but you get the point. So, look, I think there, what does that mean? Will there be opportunities for people who can make long-term commitments that others might miss? Yeah, probably. You know, will there be a lot of people who kind of not only job hop, but startup hop? I mean, it used to be like the third employee or the fifth employee, you'd expect startup hopping. But the founders, you wouldn't.

29:16You're clearly seeing founder hopping in a lot of ways. So, is it good or bad? I think it's just different. I think it kind of is meeting the moment and reality of where we are from a development cycle and where the opportunities are. But there is, you know, it's a double-edged sword. I don't think it's all good, for sure. Has that changed at all, like, the profile of who is starting companies? You know, are people starting companies later, earlier? Are they taking, you know, more or less risk? It's too early to tell. I think, like, look, the reality is we're in a moment of a lot of disruption.

29:47And, you know, with the little finger quote, chaos is a ladder, right? And so I think there's a lot of change going on right now, and there's a lot of interesting trends. I think it's too early to tell how all this bakes out. you know, are we, you know, we're in a bubble, what type of bubble, you know, where does it pop? What's real? What's not? You know, how are these founder predilections changing in real time? Like what's permanent versus just a momentary disruption because COVID messed everyone up, right? And I think these are kind of like the questions you have to ask right now. You know, I think you have to go back to basics, which is there's no question.

30:17It's been harder and harder. The legibility of startups to investors has gone way down post-it. You can't look at an app early and say, oh, this person has judgment or this is good because the app is good because, you know, LOMs make it all too close. Like it's too hard to re-signal in it. Your first customer is good for you. You got a million dollars. It used to be a big deal. You got your first million dollars in a quote unquote ARR. No one cares anymore, right? It's like too easy with platforms to find the first customers. CAC always goes up. And so that's kind of out the window. And so I think everyone's kind of searching for how to do early investing well in this era where startup founder profiles are changing, where the metrics you can look at and how you can read what's a good and bad startup is changing, et cetera.

30:59People will figure it out. The world will move on. Good companies will be started. But it's way too early to say this is how it's going to be as much as you got to go back to ground zero and think from first principles about where you spend your time and money. I want to ask you about another tweet that you put out recently. You were talking online about how VCs are subsidizing AI products and services and how this looked very similar to products that we saw, you know, 10 years ago with Uber and stuff like that. Talk about that. Yeah. I mean, like, look, it's pretty, everyone knows this, right?

31:28Which is that if you look at kind of the amount that a lot of these kind of, you know, layers on top of, you know, the base models are, you know, the subscription revenue they're charging versus like what they've got to be paying on the backend, the numbers have never made any sense, right? You know, they're subsidizing this stuff. And so people get very excited. And that's happening also at the base layer where, you know, the cost of building these large models and scaling them like way outstrips the revenue. So you have these like very big revenue growth numbers, but we all, everyone knows who's paying attention that you're selling dollars for 50 cents, right?

31:59So that's kind of understood. I think the analogy that's interesting is the other place we saw dollars sold for 50 cents was in the consumer internet a decade plus ago, right? Where, you know, the joke that, you know, younger millennials, especially urban ones, lived this incredible life subsidized by venture capitalists with doordash and class pass and like all these startups that kind of were you know again effectively selling dollars for 50 cents some of them survived right some of them spent spent spent and then basically knocked out all their competitors and then jacked pricing right um you know uber being the best example of that right um so it's not like an unreasonable spend to oblivion strategy maybe but it is it's a very risky strategy and it's not necessarily a very healthy strategy um you know in the response to that in the consumer world is, you know, you had like, for instance, the subscription beauty companies, you had this big wave of young women obsessed with beauty products because they were basically being paid for by venture capitalists.

32:51You then had the response to that, this like clean girl aesthetic where like effectively the younger kids, when they came up, could no longer afford the products because they got priced properly and it changed the whole aesthetic, you know, in young culture. And so I think the question of like, how is this all going to play out in AI? Again, we don't know, but it's pretty obvious what's going on. And I mean, how long do you think it takes then for, you know, this to sort of get under control? Well, look, I think it all comes down to this question of belief, right? And, you know, a lot of these things are, you know, what we have right now is a hyper cycle of nearly religious belief in AI.

33:27And everyone kind of knows, I mean, the information's reported that, for instance, like, we're like, where are the productivity gains from some of this stuff? In some places, they're quite real. In a lot of places, they aren't. They're all on experimental budgets for most companies. companies, you know, there's a huge incentive to play the game no matter what. You know, if you're the CEO of a company and you're profitable, where am I going to put my profit? And the whole market wants to hear an AI story and they'll actually even pay you for an AI story because they really want that AI story. Well, guess what?

33:54You're going to buy an AI story, right? You're going to tell them an AI story. And so, you know, that game of belief can go on for a long time. You know, if you believe in capitalism, eventually you pay the Pied Piper, right? Eventually this stuff has to rationalize. But the timeline on how that happens, I mean, we don't know. You know, it comes down to these macro factors, you know, around the money. It comes down in the Fed. It comes down to macro factors and a lot of things. But I think at the most fundamental level, there's only two things that stop the bubble, stop the party. One is some sort of major disruption that makes people really go back to ground in terms of what value is and what they want to code it or some sort of displacement that really spooks people.

34:33The other is a better narrative, right? And if someone comes up with a better narrative, then that will become the hot thing. And all of a sudden, AI will be the less good cousin. But that's kind of the key thing here is AI setting everything else down. It's a great narrative, and it's a narrative everyone's willing to pay for, at least until they're not. I want to ask you about one thing before you go, which is that we've got Circle reporting earnings tomorrow for the first time. You've been involved in crypto. What kind of questions are you sort of focusing on here with respect to stable coins?

35:06look i think the use of stable coins broadly makes all the sense in the world when you think globally um you know it's one of those things where you can talk about the politics and the history but in the end of the day the idea that you have some sort of digital trusted dollar digital thing that you can move around the world you know to pay suppliers and go cross board it all makes sense you know there's nothing that the story makes a ton of sense and circle you know is one of the few players who's really done the legwork and the hard work after a lot of iterations to make it happen. There are all sorts of downstream questions, like how much do local stable coins matter versus just the US dollar stable, right?

35:39Like, what does that configuration look like long term? There's lots of people that argue if your contracts are written locally, local stables really matter. There are people that argue that all that matters is the US dollar stable. So these are all kind of subplots is what I would say. The only macro plot that matters is the regulatory side, honestly, because it makes total sense. You know, there have been regimes and certainly the big banks don't necessarily like this because it hurts their margins and their power structure. And so really, like, when it comes down to what happens to stables, that's the only thing that really matters, but there's a lot of subplots that change the flavor of how this plays out.

36:12But what about questions facing Circle's business specifically? You know, in the end of the day, I think the thing that I give Circle and Jeremy a lot of credit for is Circle's been around this game a long time, right? And this is not their first rodeo. I mean, they have big part to play in kind of the pushing stables in a bunch of different directions over time, but that wasn't their first business. You know, it wasn't where they started necessarily. And I think that that's actually the most interesting thing is so many of these things come down to the actual founders and then kind of what they're in it for and what the teams are optimized for.

36:44The thing that Circle has proven, and I have a lot of respect for them, is they have a theme, which is around crypto, and they've been unbelievably flexible to meet the moment and continue to do that. So, you know, obviously their earnings matter short term and like showing that they're having success in stables and where they're going. Obviously, it all makes a lot of sense. But I actually think the real story in a lot of these companies is their durability. And to this point, like, are they in it for a quick hit or are they on the long haul? I think Circle has proven over their long history and many business models and many parts of what they've done that the theme is crypto.

37:15The team is Jeremy and Co, right? And they're in it for the long haul. And I think that's worth something. Great. Well, Sam, it's always a pleasure to have you on the show. Thank you so much for being here. That is Sam Lesson from Slow Ventures. Well, that does it for today's show. A reminder that we are on this stream Monday through Friday at 10 a.m. Pacific, 1 p.m. Eastern. I want to thank Amazon Web Services, who is our presenting sponsor for this production. And I want to thank you for tuning in. We really do appreciate your viewership. I am already excited for our next show tomorrow. And so until then, bye-bye for now.

From the publisher

Host Akash Pasricha dives into the unprecedented boom in venture capital fueled by AI, joined by Natasha Mascarenhas and Jon Sakoda. Bain Capital Ventures' new partners, Abby Meyers and Ron Miasnik, reveal their focus on "physical work" tech and traditional industries benefiting from AI. Finally, Sam Lessin of Slow Ventures shares his candid thoughts on founders seeking "optionality" and how VCs are "subsidizing" AI products, drawing parallels to the early consumer internet era.

Article discussed on this episode:

  • https://www.theinformation.com/articles/unsolicited-term-sheets-declining-dry-powder-inside-ai-deal-rush

TITV airs on YouTube, X and LinkedIn at 10AM PT / 1PM ET. Or check us out wherever you get your podcasts.

Sign up for the AI Agenda newsletter.


More from The Information's TITV

All 304 episodes
AI Ignites VC Frenzy, Unpacking Shifting Founder Dreams & Investment StrategiesThe Information's TITV · 38 min
Listen in VO