In short
The episode covers three linked stories: (1) OpenAI’s financial burn and runway ahead of an IPO, (2) a White House export-control fight that effectively bans Anthropic’s model access for foreign persons (including inside the company), raising fears of a broader “deemed licensing” regime for foreign AI talent, and (3) an enterprise talent war where OpenAI and Anthropic hire heavily from Salesforce.
Key claims and examples
OpenAI burned $3.7B in Q1 (over half of revenue) but has $73B cash/marketable securities; it had expected $25B burn for the year. Anthropic’s “Claude” access (“Fable 5”) was suspended for nearly a week after a Commerce Department letter tied to jailbreak/vulnerability risks (citing Amazon’s findings). Macropolo data suggests foreign-born AI conference paper authorship up to ~40% (increasing in 2024). OpenAI/Anthropic hired ~40–45 Salesforce employees in 2024; Anthropic hired 45, OpenAI ~40, including Denise Dresser (ex-Slack) to OpenAI.
Guests
Leo Schwartz (tech/politics reporter); Kevin McLaughlin (enterprise software reporter); Mike Dinsdale (CEO, PowerLaw; former CFO at DoorDash and DocuSign); Varun Parmar (SVP/GM, Adobe Gen Studio and Firefly for Enterprise).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOOpenAI's Cash Burn and IPO Scrutiny
0:45 to 1:50
Discussion on OpenAI's financial situation, including cash burn and IPO implications.
“And cash burn could likely also fluctuate a lot.”
Anthropic's Government Showdown
1:50 to 4:23
Analysis of the White House's regulatory challenges faced by Anthropic.
“My colleagues Leo Schwartz, Stephanie Palazzolo, and Aaron Wu published exclusive reporting on the panic that has been happening behind the scenes.”
Export Controls and Foreign Talent Issues
4:23 to 6:35
Exploration of export controls affecting foreign employees at AI companies.
“And what is the, let's be clear, what is the government's fear exactly?”
Anthropic's Licensing Regime Concerns
6:35 to 9:32
Discussion on potential licensing regimes and the impact on AI workforce.
“I think the next important thing, though, to keep in mind is what the legal rationale of this letter is basically saying is if any foreign person outside the U.S.”
Salesforce Talent Pipeline to AI Companies
9:32 to 11:28
Investigation into the hiring trends of Salesforce employees by OpenAI and Anthropic.
“Are you talking to people inside the company there?”
Significance of Salesforce Employee Movements
11:28 to 14:00
Examining the importance of Salesforce's employee transitions to AI companies.
“That is Leo Schwartz, our tech and politics reporter here at The Information.”
Salesforce's Influence on Startups
14:00 to 15:00
Explore how startups leverage Salesforce's expertise for sales and marketing.
“But when you look at how the startups are trying to build their sales and marketing engines, they are definitely going to Salesforce.”
The Shift from SaaS to AI
15:00 to 18:00
Discussion on the changing perceptions of enterprise software in talent acquisition.
“I mean, so maybe, you know, the other way to think about this is then how the Salesforce employees are changing OpenAI and Anthropic.”
Salesforce Acquires Finn
18:00 to 19:50
Analyses of Salesforce's acquisition of Finn and its implications for the market.
“pour jet fuel on the engine and see what happens okay last question for you Kevin we haven't had you on since Salesforce bought Finn.”
Introduction of Mike Dinsdale
19:50 to 20:40
Introduction of Mike Dinsdale, CEO of PowerLaw and former CFO of DoorDash.
“That is Kevin McLaughlin, our enterprise software reporter, here at The Information.”
Show all 20 chapters
SpaceX Shares and Market Dynamics
20:40 to 23:00
Discussion on the future of SpaceX shares and market trends post-lockup.
“So what are the acute events right now that we should be watching for with respect to SpaceX shares over the next few months?”
Diversifying Investments with PowerLaw
23:00 to 24:20
How PowerLaw aims to provide access to private tech companies for investors.
“And then ultimately, perhaps we have data centers and space and so on, which is longer term.”
CFO Perspectives on AI Adoption
24:20 to 27:30
Insights from Mike Dinsdale on how CFOs should approach AI investments.
“But the flagship fund is just giving a diversified basket of what we think are the best of the best big tech.”
The Challenge of Token Management
27:30 to 28:00
Discussion on the balance CFOs must find in managing token usage.
“And that's where DoorDash has just excelled and was really excelling before AI was as impactful as it is today.”
Navigating Token Usage in Business
28:00 to 31:51
Learn how companies balance token use for efficiency with the need to add real value.
“But it's just assessing whether or not your business really can survive.”
Introduction to Adobe's AI Advertising
31:51 to 32:20
Explore the changes in digital advertising driven by AI, featuring Adobe's insights.
“Digital advertising has been dominated by a handful of tech giants for years now, but AI has changed the game entirely.”
The Evolution of Advertising with AI
32:20 to 36:50
Understand how AI is transforming advertising from impressions to interactive experiences.
“So I want to start this discussion with AI advertising, because we have talked on this show a lot about how big giants like OpenAI are diving headfirst into AI advertising.”
Emerging Trends in Media Networks
36:50 to 42:14
Discover how media networks are optimizing their advertising offerings and evolving their strategies.
“So, you know, the user wants to make sure that there is an objective recommendation that the LLM is making.”
The Evolution of Advertising with AI
42:14 to 44:38
Explore how AI is transforming advertising and brand engagement.
“So when they are creating all of the content, it's just not just an ad that needs to do lower funnel conversions.”
Early Insights on Chatbot Ad Effectiveness
44:38 to 45:40
Discuss the potential effectiveness and costs of AI-driven ad units.
“If you look at the typical CPM rates, just look at OpenAI, you know, started off at launch with$60 for the CPM or the CPC was between$3 to$5.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:13Kevin McLaughlin:Welcome, everyone, to The Information's TITB. My name is Akash Pasricha. It is Wednesday, June 17th. Before we get to the show today, we have a big scoop from our team here at The Information. Our OpenAI reporter, Aaron Wu, just revealed that the company burned through$3.7 billion in the first quarter. That is more than half of its revenue. Now, it does have$73 billion in cash and marketable securities on its balance sheet. So, still plenty of runway. Of course, with an IPO coming up, much of this is going to be scrutinized. And cash burn could likely also fluctuate a lot. We previously reported that OpenAI was expecting to burn$25 billion this year.
0:56Kevin McLaughlin:We will keep you posted on that. You can check out more details on our website. Today on the show, our tech and politics reporter is fresh off a trip to D.C. He has exclusive details about the White House's latest battle with Anthropic and the concerns that big tech has around the crackdown on foreign AI talent. We'll then talk with our enterprise software reporter about OpenAI and Anthropics' recent hiring spree of Salesforce employees. I'll then talk with the CEO of PowerLaw. That is one of those companies that gives public market investors private market exposure. Mike Dinsdale is also the former CFO of DocuSign and DoorDash.
1:36Kevin McLaughlin:That should be a fun one. And to wrap the show, we are going to play a conversation that I had with our partner, Adobe, about the current state of AI advertising. It's going to be a fun show, so let's get right on into it. Anthropics' latest showdown with the government has repercussions not just for its own business, but also for OpenAI and for the tech sector at large. My colleagues Leo Schwartz, Stephanie Palazzolo, and Aaron Wu published exclusive reporting on the panic that has been happening behind the scenes. I want to bring on Leo to share more with us about what he found. Leo, welcome back to the show.
2:13Kevin McLaughlin:It's great to have you back in New York from DC. I want to recap things just a little bit here. So we know that the US government says that Anthropic is going to need a license to make this model available to foreign persons inside the company. Anthropic says, if I'm going to comply with this, I have to suspend access to the model entirely. So Fable 5 goes down for a little while. It's been nearly a week. It still hasn't come back. You go to D.C., you ask some questions. What did you find out? I think it's important to keep in mind that this looks like an export control, but in reality, it's a de facto ban.
2:51The letter that we saw from the Commerce Department that they sent to Anthropic on Friday does lay out legal justification, arguing why, because of military intelligence risks, Anthropic wouldn't be able to export its models to users around the world, as well as have access for foreign employees within the country in reality as we know and as david sacks tweeted last week this was done basically as they frame it a last resort to make sure that anthropic couldn't release its model after different risks of vulnerabilities had been surfaced but as we reported yesterday the fear for a lot of companies is well even if this was basically just a tool the administration used to convince anthropic to shut down its models does this actually mean now that we have a de facto licensing regime for foreign employees working at AI companies?
3:43And this is a huge issue because a massive amount of talent comes from China and other countries who are working domestically at these labs.
3:50Kevin McLaughlin:Now, when you say a de facto licensing regime for foreign employees, so this is basically adding uncertainty to the question that, hey, if tech companies have foreign employees and companies have cutting-edge models, it's not just Anthropic, but this could extend to all tech companies. Is that the idea? That's the fear. I mean, right now, it's only Anthropic. And we reported over the weekend when this disagreement was just beginning that the government doesn't have an intention to extend it. At the same time, what this letter that we obtained from the Commerce Department said was, again, because of these risks of Anthropix models ending up with military intelligence users in China or Russia or other foreign adversaries, we have to shut this down, not only to every single foreign person outside the U.S., but within the company as well.
4:47Kevin McLaughlin:And what is the, let's be clear, what is the government's fear exactly? They don't lay it out in the letter. We know from the reporting that we've done, from other public reporting, that this surfaced after Amazon did a report finding evidence of a jailbreak or vulnerabilities in an anthropic system. We know that Anthropic and the White House had discussions about that. Anthropic said that it seemed to be a simple fix. The White House obviously thought it was more severe. And then they used this legal rationale that created essentially a licensing program where if Anthropic wanted to make its model available to anyone outside the U.S.
5:24as well as any foreign person in the U.S., including at their company, they would need a license. Obviously, what that really means is you're not going to be able to access it. Okay.
5:35Kevin McLaughlin:So I know they don't say it in the letter, but I mean, just stepping outside of the letter for a minute, what the government's concern is, is just what? That people outside of the United States will get access, maybe even a look under the hood at these cutting edge models and then basically be able to replicate it in maybe some kind of nefarious way, right? That's what I understand the concern to be? Well, it's more that this vulnerability, which Anthropic says is basically available in most publicly released models, including GBT 5.5, essentially allows people to find potential bugs or be able to protect against potential bugs.
6:16They say this is a simple fix. It's not really something that we need to address. But how it's been explained to me from the government side is, well, you're saying mythos is the most powerful model ever made. If this vulnerability exists, we don't really know the ramifications for this. But should it end up with a military user in China, that could be a huge risk and it shouldn't be made public. I think the next important thing, though, to keep in mind is what the legal rationale of this letter is basically saying is if any foreign person outside the U.S. or in the U.S. from any country has access to this, there's a risk it could end up with China or Russia.
6:54And lawyers that I spoke with about this language described that as a pretty big leap.
6:59Kevin McLaughlin:Okay, so I'm thinking about how many employees at big tech companies were not born in the United States and have immigrated from other countries. Do we have any data on how big this pool of employees is? I imagine this is what? Like, this has got to be 25, 35, 40 % of employees? What's the number? It's hard to get good data on this. We saw data from an analytics firm called Macropolo that basically used as a proxy the amount of foreign-born people who are publishing papers at leading AI conferences, and they found that it was anywhere as high as 40%, that that number was increasing in 2024. I think the number is easily in the hundreds or thousands at these companies.
7:45and certainly it's well known that companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are heavily relying on this talent and that if there were some sort of system where these researchers weren't able to work on advanced models, that would certainly be debilitating for the companies.
8:03Kevin McLaughlin:Now, another interesting layer of your reporting in the story is you sort of answered, you looked at the question, well, has this perspective from the government, is it new with Fable 5 or has it been simmering for a while, even before that? What did you find was the answer to that question? So it's really interesting. This has actually been a story I've been trying to report for weeks. We heard rumblings that this came up from some administration officials during very early conversations around the executive order, which was signed in June. As a brief recap, There was a whole disagreement about whether that order would create a voluntary system for companies to share their models with the government ahead of release or a mandatory system.
8:47Of course, the Trump administration said this will never be mandatory. But our reporting shows that there had been some conversations about restrictions to foreign persons at companies being able to work on models. This was incredibly unpopular to companies. It was quickly shot down. It never happened. And I also have other reporting that this idea of export controls or deemed export controls, which basically applies export controls outside the country to employees or people within the country, had been surfaced repeatedly by administration officials for months. But everything I'd heard while reporting that was this basically could never happen just because of how unpopular it is.
9:24And, of course, we saw on Friday it did happen, but only for Anthropic.
9:31Kevin McLaughlin:What's the word on the ground from OpenAI specifically? Are you talking to people inside the company there? So we have reporting in this new piece of a memo that executives sent out on Slack to employees over the weekend, right after the initial reporting about the Anthropic White House blowup happened, where they basically doubled down on the idea that they understand how important foreign employees are to the company, that they were telling that to the Trump administration, and that this was something that would be on their radar as the situation unfolds. I mean, my sense, speaking with sources across the AI industry is there's not really a fear right now it's going to extend beyond Anthropic.
10:10But I would just continue pointing back to this letter, which I think is really telling in that it lays out a clear legal justification for creating a licensing system around any model, not just Anthropics, if the government deems it too dangerous to be released publicly.
10:27Kevin McLaughlin:What do you think comes next in this story? What are you watching for? So the White House and Anthropic are currently trying to reach some sort of accord that would allow Anthropic to re-release its models. I think the appetite is not to have any sort of legal recourse in which Anthropic would sue over this, but instead to be able to figure out some fix for the vulnerability in which both the government and Anthropic feel secure to have the model back out there in the public. It's Wednesday now. We know that they've been fiercely discussing this for days. There's no sign of an agreement yet, but it could come this week.
11:04And something else to keep in mind is that the Anthropic and OpenAI CEOs, as well as many of the top Trump administration figures, including Trump himself, are at the G7 summit right now in France.
11:16Kevin McLaughlin:Okay, so lots to discuss there in France over some escargot and some nice wine. I'm sure they'll have some nice conversations. Leo, I want to thank you for coming on. That is Leo Schwartz, our tech and politics reporter here at The Information. OpenAI and Anthropic are looking to Salesforce for talent. That is according to a new exclusive story from my colleagues, Kevin McLaughlin and Laura Bratton. I want to bring on Kevin to share more with us about what they found. Kevin, welcome back to the show. It's great to have you here. Thank you, Akash. So how hot is the Salesforce to Anthropic OpenAI pipeline right now?
11:59Well, this year it's definitely picked up quite a lot compared to even last year in terms of distinct, direct Salesforce employees who went to OpenAI and Anthropic. Anthropic has hired more than 45 people from Salesforce this year. OpenAI is around 40. It's definitely picked up a lot this year.
12:19Kevin McLaughlin:And are these senior employees that are jumping ship or are they junior developers? Did we find out that? Well, it's mostly sort of mid-ranking salespeople, with the exception, of course, of Denise Dresser, who went to OpenAI last December to become chief revenue officer. She was the former CEO of Slack. This year, Brian Landsman, who was the former CEO of Salesforce's App Store and also led its global industry partnerships, he moved earlier this month to become VP of global partnerships. Anthropic has generally not been hiring senior people directly. Of course, Paul Smith, the chief commercial officer, joined last July, but he did not go directly from Salesforce.
13:07He was at ServiceNow. He worked at Salesforce about a decade ago, but definitely a lot of enterprise infusions to the labs lately.
13:16Kevin McLaughlin:Yeah, and I should say that the ServiceNow to AI Lab pipeline is also pretty strong. Colin Fleming, the chief marketing officer. I think he's at OpenAI now. But I want to go back to Salesforce specifically. So this is a question I know our editors probably asked you, but so we have 40 odd people who have jumped from OpenAI and Anthropic, I'm sorry, Salesforce to OpenAI and Anthropic each. Salesforce has 80 ,000 employees. Why is this important? Why should we be paying attention to this? Well, first, it is important to note that Anthropic and OpenAI have both hired lots and lots of people from other companies like Google, Meta, and Microsoft.
13:57So we're not trying to make too much of this. But when you look at how the startups are trying to build their sales and marketing engines, they are definitely going to Salesforce. And it makes a lot of sense that they're doing so. Salesforce, since its inception 27 years ago, has been very good at selling the next big thing uh they're actually doing so right now with agent force their agent building product and so it would make sense for the startups which are having which have a similar goal right now of trying to get companies enterprises to adopt ai it would make sense that they would go into the salesforce ranks to look for people who could sell that vision
14:36Kevin McLaughlin:and how is salesforce trying to retain their talent i i don't think that they i didn't get any sense that they are. We did hear that, you know, Mark Benioff wasn't thrilled when Denise Dresser left. Like you said, it's a Salesforce is a giant company. I don't think that these this movement is really affecting them to any great extent. But it is kind of interesting. I mean, so maybe, you know, the other way to think about this is then how the Salesforce employees are changing OpenAI and Anthropic. I mean, how have we seen their offering now change in the market or at least how it's being positioned?
15:13It's pretty early, and I definitely, we've looked for signs of that. I think we found a couple of signs. OpenAI wants customers to sign long-term contracts. That is something that salespeople from Salesforce and every other enterprise vendor are really good at because that is the vision you're buying into. You're not buying products. You're buying what's going to happen over the next three years from the result of buying those products. And so, yeah, I think it's a little bit early. Clearly, like I said before, the thing that sales and marketing people, I would say, are really good at is selling the future, selling a vision, talking to corporate CIOs and other executives saying, you know, get on board with this and you're going to see good results.
16:03Kevin McLaughlin:Kevin, you know, the broader question I'm sort of wondering here in this enterprise software to AI company shift is our enterprise software companies, even if their stock prices stay, let's say they, you know, maybe they come back up. Maybe the SaaS apocalypse was a little overblown. Whatever happens to share price is one thing. But I guess what I'm wondering is this whole idea that enterprise software is less, you know, that the old school SaaS companies are less cool. You know, why would you want to work for a SaaS company when you could go work for even an application layer company? You know, like, I mean, I was going to say Finn, but Finn, because Finn just got acquired by Salesforce.
16:42Kevin McLaughlin:So you might just end up right back at Salesforce. But I mean, is this like a concern that software executives have right now that their companies are like less cool for talent? Well, as somebody who's covered enterprise software for more than 20 years, I have to say I bristle when I hear that because enterprise software has always been cool. There is no question. We've seen this over and over and over again. And yes, maybe it doesn't get the same headlines as the latest startups do and the AI startups do. But I mean, look, we've seen this. Okay, let's go back to AWS 15 years ago when cloud computing was relatively new.
17:27They had to build an engine of salespeople and marketing people and technical support and all these roles that are now part of an engine, really, that the labs are looking to plug into their own operations. So enterprise software, it is a proven system. Google has learned it. you know you can just list the it's a long list of companies who have adopted it so I would say the fact that the startups are hiring the enterprise software software people in large numbers now from places like Salesforce I think it shows that they're they're ready to sort of pour jet fuel on the engine and see what happens okay last question for you Kevin we haven't had
18:08Kevin McLaughlin:you on since Salesforce bought Finn. Any initial reactions to that acquisition? Seems like a pretty logical move here, but is it a defensive play or offensive? Well, yeah, I mean, I would say that we had been hearing for some time that Salesforce was interested in sort of buying an established business and customer service to plug into the AgentForce product and its overall broader enterprise AI efforts. Yeah, I think that customer service is the single largest business for Salesforce and or one of them. And, you know, it makes sense. Finn is the Finn agent in particular was growing very quickly in recent years.
18:53And so, yeah, I think, you know, formerly known as Intercom, Finn is an up and comer that is itself sort of reinvented itself along the way and sort of found a way to catalyze new growth. And yeah, I think that it makes a lot of sense. It's certainly, and also when you look at Salesforce and, you know, they haven't been doing as many large deals as they used to do many years ago. And so, you know, the price tag was within what you would expect Salesforce to be willing to spend these days.
19:27Kevin McLaughlin:It was more moderate than what Salesforce has typically spent on these giant acquisitions which I think should make shareholders relatively happy. It's not the, what was Slack? 20-year-old was$28 billion. $28 billion, yeah, okay. So I think$3 billion, we can stomach that much. Okay, Kevin, well, I want to thank you for coming on. That is Kevin McLaughlin, our enterprise software reporter, here at The Information. SpaceX shares are still up about 45 % from their IPO price If it stays well above where it debuted, chances are pre-IPO companies may see this as a window they need to go public. But given how big private companies have gotten, many financial firms have found ways to offer stock market investors exposure to private companies.
20:17Kevin McLaughlin:PowerLaw is one of those companies. It owns stakes in SpaceX, Databricks, OpenAI, Canva, and more. But the company itself is listed on the NASDAQ. Joining me now is Mike Dinsdale, CEO of PowerLaw. He is also the former CFO of DoorDash and DocuSign. Mike, welcome to TITV. It's great to have you here. Thank you very much for having me. It's great to be here. So what are the acute events right now that we should be watching for with respect to SpaceX shares over the next few months? I mean, with SpaceX, it's just as the lockup expires in terms of what we're thinking about and how we think about our position in SpaceX, which is actually our largest position in power law is about 20 % of our NAV.
21:03And so for us, it's obviously been a great IPO. We're really bullish on my company long-term. And so it's just as the lockup expires, we'll assess whether or not we keep it in the power law portfolio.
21:14Kevin McLaughlin:And so when will those lockups expo? Is it three months, six months, or is it specific dates? Right. The first lockup comes off in the next month and a half when the first Q2 reporting comes out. And then from there, I think it's every two months. And then it's fully unlocked in six months. That's six months. Okay. And tell me, I mean, I haven't really studied this, but have we seen significant drops in share prices at tech companies when that six-month lockup expires? Is that an observable trend? I think SpaceX is a much different animal just because there's just so much excitement about the company long term that I don't think we're going to see anything like we've seen before.
21:59I mean, we already haven't. You started off talking about just how large some of these private companies are. And SpaceX is obviously the largest in history in terms of IPO and also just the largest private company. So I think it's a completely different world in terms of SpaceX. I think OpenAI and Anthropik are similar. And then we get down to what we're doing, which is giving access to private companies to everybody. And so we're focused on giving access to privates to the 90 % of the population that has no access to private companies. And that's where we're building out PowerLaw on a series of funds.
22:35Kevin McLaughlin:So you say it's a different beast here with SpaceX. I mean, why do you think the share price will endear beyond the lockups? What is it about the business? Well, I think with SpaceX, it's a one-on-one. when you think about just space in its own right and launch, but really, for me, the embedded value is Starlink and just thinking about changing communications globally and all the offshoots related to that. And then ultimately, perhaps we have data centers and space and so on, which is longer term. But there's really no competition with SpaceX. But you don't think all this excitement about the IP...
Read the full transcript
23:13Kevin McLaughlin:I mean, this is a real concern for retail investors is you're buying it when the name couldn't get hotter in terms of at least perception, I guess. There's all this energy around the IPO. You're not concerned that retail investors are going to get the short end of this? Well, I think that there's, of course, always a concern there, but that's where PowerLaw, with what we're getting, buying into PowerLaw and having access to, in the case of our flagship fund, the 15 biggest and what we believe most influential private technology companies give some diversification, which obviously protects against any single name.
23:54How do you pick the companies? So in the flagship fund, it's really looking at what we believe are going to be the most influential companies over the next decade and having, and our thesis is all around concentration. So having a concentrated exposure to the best of the best, big private tech. And so in the flagship fund, it's across the board, so it's not as thematic. The next fund we're launching is going to be focused on AI. And so that will be concentrated across infrastructure, horizontal, vertical applications. But the flagship fund is just giving a diversified basket of what we think are the best of the best big tech.
24:31Kevin McLaughlin:And how do you compete against some of these other similar fund products? i think when we had robin hood on the show they launched sort of a similar fund uh other than just the selection of the companies and and you know sort of asserting that we have a better mix what is the the differentiation strategy yeah i mean in our portfolio we have 11 of the 18 names none of our competitors have and so we have a differentiated portfolio to begin with and then on top of that i i you robin had certainly has a great competitor but it's really a brokerage product focused on retail in a small segment of the market.
25:09What we're focused on is being structurally built into U.S. retirement, which is a$25 trillion opportunity in the U.S. alone, and then globally. And so we're the first venture group to do this. Robinhood is certainly a great company, but they are not venture investors. And so we sort of look at that and say it's easy to build a portfolio of what's obvious. But really what differentiates us is we've been around for 16 years, we are venture capitalists. We're in San Francisco. And so what's next? And that's where we're focused. And how do we build in names that perhaps aren't as well known to the market, but will provide long-term value in a way that we think differentiates us in our underwriting discipline and just heritage in venture?
25:53Kevin McLaughlin:I want to ask you, you have largely been a career CFO. You've been CFO of a number of companies, DoorDash, DocuSign, Gusto. CFOs are in an interesting moment here right now with AI. On one hand, they have to prioritize ROI. On the other hand, AI is expensive and you don't want to fall behind and you also don't want to get ahead of your budgets. How are you advising your CFO peers to look at this question right now? I think it's got to be an incredibly interesting time to be a CFO. So I haven't been a CFO for six or seven years. And I can talk about those two companies, specifically DoorDash and Dr.
26:36Stein, which I think are pretty insulated. I think that most of us are just scratching the surface on what AI can do in terms of productivity for all of us. I mean, just the work that I can do myself now is 10 times what it was a year ago. And so it's just got to be as a CFO driving in. It's not around thinking of AI as a SaaS cost line, but it's all around, is it going to help us create a real mode in our business? And do we have a mode even? Can someone else replicate this very quickly? And if we don't, so if it's just informational, that's a mode that will erode very quickly. If it's operational, which is what I think DoorDash and DocuSign both have in their own ways, then it is sustainable.
27:18And AI will just increase the mode versus decrease the mode.
27:22Kevin McLaughlin:operational you mean as far as helping the employees do their jobs no i'm talking more sort of a business model level if you look at say a docusign the value of docusign is absolutely not the e-signature component which is commoditized and can be replicated very quickly it's the operational component being built into workflow and things like this that's embedded in enterprise you know workflow applications which can't be replicated easily or in the case of doordash It's all around the three-sided marketplace and people and operations related to this. And that's where DoorDash has just excelled and was really excelling before AI was as impactful as it is today.
28:01But it's just assessing whether or not your business really can survive. And you do have something that's differentiated or can be replicated quickly.
28:09Kevin McLaughlin:What about the employees? So token maxing is something that has dominated headlines. And now we just wrote a story last couple of weeks that now Meta has sort of embarked on this new era, token minimizing. They haven't said it specifically, but they have said, look, we're going to make it a little more formal in terms of seeking approval to use certain allotments of tokens and stuff like that. That seemed inevitable. But I guess the question that I have for you as a career CFO is how do you balance this? I mean, you need tokens. Like, you know, there's no other way to increase your efficiency other than using the tokens.
28:52Kevin McLaughlin:How do you balance that? I mean, this seems like an incredibly difficult problem just when you think about, obviously, you want to promote the use of these tools to do good things, but you don't want to promote the use of the tools to do busy work. And I think that's going to be the tricky bit, which has to just go back to alignment around what are we trying to accomplish and are we accomplishing the right thing? like are we adding value versus just doing work for the sake of doing work which of course you can chew through tokens just doing that and i think that just goes back then that thinking about making sure that everyone's aligned on the goals of the company and what we're trying to achieve and focused on things that do add value but this is a very trick problem you know we face it even in our small firm at power law making sure that that people are focused on doing the right things and using the tools we have, and we have the same problem.
29:44Yeah.
29:44Kevin McLaughlin:What's the biggest piece of it? What's the biggest, I'm sure you have early CFOs in their careers or maybe established CFOs coming to you for advice and counsel. What's the biggest issue that they're having right now that they want your advice on? You know, I'm actually not as much involved in sort of direct inside of companies. we're really focused on building power law as a capital group and so all of my energy is around fundraising getting ready to launch we're launching our next fund in the coming weeks um and that will be focused on ai and so it's just thinking through any any particular focus within ai how are you going to think about the the makeup of that fund yeah i think like in a lot of ways the the infrastructure companies are a little bit easier because it feels like there's more defensibility when you start to get into horizontal applications to some degree.
30:38But for us, it's trying to make sure we understand which companies won't be assumed into Anthropic and OpenAI, which really are standalone companies and not just features. And it just seems that proprietary data sets or regulatory environments or things like this that just create mode that the big LLMs won't go into, that's where we're focused. which are really companies that will stand the test of time and can turn into large companies versus just -
31:09Kevin McLaughlin:Which companies are you looking at then? Well, I mean, there's things like Implied Intuition, which I think is an amazing company. Vast Data is a great company. And then you get into things that are focused on, say, medical, like open evidence or things like this, that I think do have defensible lanes. So that's where we're thinking, and that's where our heads are at, is how do we build a portfolio of 25 to 30 AI companies that really are focused on and have defensible modes that will be around for 10 years or 20 years. Great. Well, Mike, I want to thank you for coming on. That is Mike Dinsdale, CEO of PowerLaw here on TI-TV.
31:50Kevin McLaughlin:Our next segment is with our partner, Adobe. Digital advertising has been dominated by a handful of tech giants for years now, but AI has changed the game entirely. New players like OpenAI are now in the mix, and meanwhile, marketers are rethinking how to make and measure their campaigns. I recently spoke with Varun Parmar, SVP and GM of Adobe Gen Studio and Firefly for Enterprise about all of this. Here is that conversation. Varun, welcome to TITV. It's great to have you back. Yeah, excited to be here, Akash. Thank you. So I want to start this discussion with AI advertising, because we have talked on this show a lot about how big giants like OpenAI are diving headfirst into AI advertising.
32:37Kevin McLaughlin:And the perspective we have not covered as much on the show is how businesses are thinking about advertising on these platforms. This is a group that you talk to often in your role. How are businesses planning to approach AI advertising? Yeah, no, great question, Akash. So I think if we take a step back and we ask what is the jobs to be done by advertising, there's like really at the highest level two things. The first one is to decode the intent. And the second one is to monetize intent. And what we're seeing in terms of the future of digital advertising is that in decoding the intent, it's becoming hyper contextual.
33:15What do I mean by that? Essentially, an ad is not just a static banner. It's more conversational where the user types in their preference. And just like we have a conversation with an LLM app, you are having a conversation with the ad unit where it's uncovering your preferences and then recommending what the ideal product is. And that's what we call hypercontextual. And then in terms of monetizing intent, what's happening is that there's agentic conversion that's happening. So essentially, you know, an agent is understanding, you know, what your preference is and then making an offer, you know, giving you a discount code, you know, you know, recommending a product that's available right now, you know, that you could actually one click buy.
34:00Right. So all the brands, you know, are looking at these trends and saying, how can they participate in terms of, you know, these macro trends and then see higher conversion rates, you know, having much more efficient CPC and CPM rates as part of the process.
34:19Kevin McLaughlin:So if I'm understanding it correctly, in the old advertising era, the way that we often talked about it was impressions and then click through or conversions. Now it feels like there's a bit of a layered approach where you might have impressions, but then there's sort of a layer which is, well, did the person actually engage with the advertisement maybe through the chat interface like you're talking about? And then at the end, there might be a click through, but in the middle, there's sort of this other layer, which is, well, to what extent, you know, how do you get the agent to give a proper recommendation?
34:57Kevin McLaughlin:So it's kind of a more tiered approach to advertising. Am I understanding you correctly? That's right. That's right. You know, the North Star always with advertising has been around conversions. And conversion is when the user decides to purchase the particular product from the brand. And in the past, you know, there's been something called a scapy, which is the conversion event that is fired off. And then you can attribute, you know, to the specific advertising. Obviously, there's a user journey that needs to go in. So proper attribution needs to happen. But now what we're seeing with all of these LLM apps is that the marketing funnel is getting collapsed.
35:33So all the way from awareness to discovery to consideration to the actual purchase can be done in a single session where the user is going back and forth through the conversational experience. And what we're seeing is that in that experience, you know, the ads are evolving, you know, as well. And the ad unit is actually recommending things in terms of the intent of the user and saying, based on what you need right now, this is the best product that you should get. And while the traditional metrics around CPM and CPC, that's how these conversational ads or these next-generation ad units are also being priced, really what the big disruption or the big opportunity here is dramatically simplifying and accelerating the conversion event on the platform.
36:23Kevin McLaughlin:Right. So the ad unit of the future, it looks more like a chat interface rather than just a static ad. Exactly. And therein lies the opportunity and the challenge is that you want to make sure that when a user comes to your application in LLM app, that it's very clear to them what is the true conversational experience they're having versus what is the ad conversation experience you're having. because trust is really, really paramount. So, you know, the user wants to make sure that there is an objective recommendation that the LLM is making. But at the same time, you need to make sure that when an ad is presented, one, visually, it's very clear, so the user knows this is an ad.
37:04And then once the ad is presented, that they can also interact with it. So that's exactly, you know, where things are headed.
37:11Kevin McLaughlin:Now, what about if we go back to the large chatbot platforms, You know, there is this whole game of answer engine optimization and how I get my brand to show up in the most favorable way in these giant new search platforms, I guess you could call them. So how, what's the answer to that? Is that just really intelligent content management? Is it putting out more content? I mean, how do you ultimately get your brand to show up better in these platforms? Yeah. So I think, again, there are sort of two things that are happening here. One is sort of the structural shift that's happening where a lot of focus was on search engine optimization.
37:55So SEO is becoming SEO and AEO, and AEO is answer engine optimization. And players like Adobe and there are a few others allow you to get better brand visibility. So, you know, understanding what are the sources of information and data that lead to better placement of a brand as part of that conversation experience. You know, we know, you know, these algorithms will pay extra weights, you know, onto sources where, you know, there is a community of folks that are discussing what the pros and cons of a particular product is. There's an influencer, you know, that is doing a review and there's a bunch of comments that are put against the review.
38:40So there's like a bunch of things that these LLMs are doing in terms of better placement of the brand. And, you know, we help you amongst others in the industry to have a better, you know, visibility as part of these experiences. Right. So that's the first part. And then the second part that we are talking about is like, you know, if SEO is becoming SEO and AEO, The second part of this is what happens to SEM, search engine marketing, right? So what's the future of that? And that's where these new ad units are emerging. And our point of view is that it's a combination, you know, both AEO as well as these new ad units, which we are referring to as conversational ads, will lead to the true unlock, both in terms of discovery, but also conversions in these new application experiences.
39:26Right.
39:27Kevin McLaughlin:Now, OpenAI is just one of these chatbot platforms and it's just one publisher of ads. There are also a ton of other smaller publishers, I guess you could say, that will have to deal with this exact same question of how do they change their ad offering in terms of what they sell to brands and stuff like that. Do you have conversations with these publishers about what they want? What can you tell us about how they're thinking about their product? Yeah, no, absolutely. I think there's definitely a very big trend around commerce media networks, retail media networks, financial media networks, travel media networks.
40:09Essentially, all of these publishers that have a treasure trove of first-party data, right? You've been staying at Marriott, and Marriott knows you very well. and one of the big sort of areas of growth for them is around putting endemic and non-endemic ads on their platform, right? In the past, similar to what we've done, you know, with Search and some of the other digital properties is that, you know, there's a banner ad that's introduced, you know, just a heading and, you know, an offer, a CTA and an image and all of them are actually taking a step back and saying what the future looks like.
40:48So I think there are like two things that are happening there. One, there's a tremendous opportunity to go after the mid-market or the long tail, where typically these commerce media networks have relied heavily on large brands that actually had an army of folks who could create the creative, create the offer, create the placements and such. But there's a huge opportunity as part of their ad platforms to allow for self-service. This is where Adobe's product, Adobe Gen Studio for Commerce Media Network, which is this new offering that we released, comes in, where we seamlessly embed inside of the ad platform from these commerce media networks and enabling self-service.
41:28So that's one big vector of growth. And the second one that we just talked about is what does the future of the ad unit look like? So if that's going to evolve in the open web, you know, our belief and that of these publishers is that the ad unit, even on their properties, need to evolve, right? So what does a conversational experience around the ad look like if you go to Costco, if you go to Marriott, if you go to Amex and some of the other folks who have these commerce media operates? Yeah.
41:58Kevin McLaughlin:Well, and it's kind of interesting to me, you know, as you say this, I sort of have come to realize that whereas the old relationship between an advertiser and a brand was the brand gives the advertiser the content, the advertiser now in some ways has a has a widened role in terms of producing the content. because if the ad unit of the future, as you say, is sort of a chatbot-like interface and what I see depends on what I put in, then basically the publisher, they have more of a role now in, like you said, generating the content that inevitably would do the role of attracting a call to action.
42:38Exactly. Yes, yes, indeed. And I think herein lies the opportunity for all of these big advertisers is that more so than ever, I think the role of having a strong brand where the user, when they're going in and if they're searching for a shoe, they actually put in the brand of the shoe while they're asking for a recommendation becomes extremely important. So when they are creating all of the content, it's just not just an ad that needs to do lower funnel conversions. It needs to represent the brand as well. And the question is in the world where all of these systems are being run and optimized using AI algorithms, which are increasingly agentic, how do you maintain, augment, and present your brand in a way that actually drives loyalty and user engagement?
43:28So I think things like Adobe Brand Intelligence essentially allows you to codify not just what's written about your brand, but also how people interact with your brand, You know, building that model that can actually allow agents to understand what your brand is. And then, you know, right brand loyalty becomes extremely important.
43:48Kevin McLaughlin:Let me ask you one last question. So in this world here where we have this new ad unit, a chatbot-esque interface, do you have any early data on how much more effective those ad units are than static ads at driving people down the marketing funnel and ultimately converting them? And the reason I ask this is because I imagine that these ad units must be more expensive than just a static ad, not just because of how advanced they are, but there's also the whole compute underlying the interface to it. I mean, like using these models is not cheap, right? And so are they more effective? Do we have data there at all?
44:29Yeah, I think I would say, Akash, like these are early days. I think these are really early days and we are all trying to experiment and learn. I think one thing is for sure that these units are expensive. If you look at the typical CPM rates, just look at OpenAI, you know, started off at launch with$60 for the CPM or the CPC was between$3 to$5. And we're seeing like what the clearing price is with all of these DSPs, which is lower than that. So I would say they started off high. We are all learning in terms of what the conversion rates are. There is no publicly available report either from OpenAI or Google in terms of Google Gemini conversational ads around AI Max or Pmax.
45:06So none of that performance information is available. But our belief is that if you hyper-optimize the user journey, where in a short amount of time they get a recommendation that is aligned with what they were looking for at a price point that is amenable to them, then the conversion rates would be high. And you actually streamline the entire process of like, you know, awareness all the way to conversion. So, you know, it is a better experience and better experiences we know drive engagement and engagement in this case is actually leading to a conversion. So I would say early days, we're looking forward to more of the data, but really exciting times.
45:44Kevin McLaughlin:Great. Well, Varun, I want to thank you for coming on. That is Varun Parmar from Adobe here on TI TV. Awesome. Thank you, Akash. This is fun. That does it for today's show. A reminder, we are on this stream Monday through Friday at 10 a.m. Pacific, 1 p.m. Eastern. If you can't make it then, episodes are available on theinformation.com, on our YouTube channel, or wherever you get your podcasts. Make sure to follow us on social media on X, on LinkedIn, on Instagram, and on TikTok. I'm already excited for our next show tomorrow. Have a great rest of your Wednesday. Bye-bye for now.
From the publisher
The Information’s Tech and Politics Reporter Leo Schwartz talks with TITV Host Akash Pasricha about the White House's latest regulatory showdown with Anthropic and its broader implications for foreign tech talent. We also talk with Enterprise Software Reporter Kevin McLaughlin about OpenAI and Anthropic's competitive hiring freeze on Salesforce talent to build their enterprise engines, Power Law CEO Mike Dinsdale about giving public market investors private market exposure to massive players like SpaceX, and Adobe's Varun Parmar about the structural shift from SEO to answer engine optimization (AEO) in digital advertising.
Articles discussed on this episode:
https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-anthropic-tap-salesforce-talent
https://www.theinformation.com/articles/openai-burned-3-7-billion-first-three-months-2026
Subscribe:
The Information: https://www.theinformation.com/subscribe_h
Sign up for the AI Agenda newsletter: https://www.theinformation.com/features/ai-agenda
TITV airs weekdays on YouTube, X and LinkedIn at 10AM PT / 1PM ET. Or check us out wherever you get your podcasts.
Follow us:
X: https://x.com/theinformation
IG: https://www.instagram.com/theinformation/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@titv.theinformation
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/theinformation/
Chapters:
00:00 - Introduction
01:13 - OpenAI Q1 Cash Burn and Financial Runway
02:45 - The White House's De Facto Ban on Anthropic
12:35 - OpenAI and Anthropic Raid Salesforce Talent
21:00 - Power Law CEO Mike Dinsdale on SpaceX Exits
32:51 - Adobe’s Varun Parmar on the AI Ad Disruption
