In short
Podcast Summary
The James Altucher Show Episode Title: Finding Connection in a Divided World with 'Super Communicator' Charles Duhigg Date: [Insert Date] Hosts: James Altucher with Charles Duhigg
Podcast Description James Altucher interviews leading peak performers across various fields, focusing on their "Choose Yourself" stories—moments of personal struggle and reinvention. The podcast features individuals who have achieved success through unique paths, finding financial freedom and meaning in their lives.
Episode Overview In this episode, James Altucher speaks with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and bestselling author Charles Duhigg about the challenges of communication in a polarized world. The conversation is prompted by recent events highlighting division in society, notably the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Concerns Over Discourse
- James expresses discomfort with the current level of public discourse in the U.S., particularly following divisive events such as political violence.
- He declined an invitation to speak at the Oxford Union, feeling the situation was not being handled appropriately.
- The Nature of Communication
- Charles Duhigg discusses concepts from his book *Super Communicators*, emphasizing that effective communication fosters connection.
- Humans are inherently wired for connection, which is crucial for resolving disagreements and building understanding.
- Types of Conversations
- Duhigg categorizes conversations into three types:
- Emotional: Involve feelings and personal experiences.
- Practical: Focus on facts and outcomes.
- Social: Deal with group dynamics and public perception.
- Misalignments in these conversation types can lead to breakdowns in communication.
- Strategies for Better Communication
- Duhigg encourages asking "deep questions" to uncover shared values and experiences rather than sticking to surface-level interactions.
- Techniques like mirroring, looping, and careful listening help ensure that people feel heard and understood.
- The Role of Curiosity in Conflict Resolution
- A key strategy discussed is to respond to anger and disagreement with curiosity—“When you’re feeling furious, get curious.”
- This approach opens pathways for understanding rather than escalating conflict.
- Handling Clichés in Conversations
- Duhigg suggests that personal experiences can help dissolve clichéd arguments, paving the way for deeper understanding.
---
Key Takeaways
- Connection Over Conflict: Fostering a sense of connection is vital for effective communication, especially during contentious discussions.
- Emotional Intelligence: Recognizing and addressing emotions in conversations allows for more productive dialogues.
- Understanding Perspectives: By understanding the motivations and experiences behind differing opinions, individuals can find common ground, even when they disagree.
- Societal Responsibilities: Both individuals and larger institutions, like Congress, have a role in promoting constructive communication and reducing polarization.
---
Actionable Challenge Duhigg challenges listeners to engage with someone they disagree with, asking them to share why a particular issue matters to them. The goal is to listen empathetically and seek understanding rather than argument.
---
Additional Resources
- Books by Charles Duhigg:
- [Super Communicators](https://www.amazon.com/Supercommunicators-Unlock-Secret-Language-Connection/dp/0593243919/)
- [The Power of Habit](https://www.amazon.com/Power-Habit-What-Life-Business/dp/081298160X/)
- [Charles Duhigg’s Website](https://charlesduhigg.com/)
---
Episode Chapters
- [03:08] James on division and speaking at the Oxford Union
- [06:06] Introduction of Charles Duhigg
- [07:00] Discussion on political violence and polarization
- [19:36] Importance of deep questions in building trust
- [34:50] Challenge for listeners to ask someone “why does this matter to you?”
---
This episode serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of empathy and connection in communication, particularly in times of division. The insights shared by James and Charles offer practical guidance for navigating complex conversations in a polarized world.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Being an entrepreneur is a 24-7 job. And when you're hiring, you need a partner that works as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share with your network, get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. For one thing, you can post a job. LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people. You get qualified candidates. At the end of the day, the most important thing to your business is the quality of the candidates.
0:30And with LinkedIn, of course, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Based on LinkedIn data, 72 % of small and medium businesses say using LinkedIn helps them find high-quality candidates. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash altature. That's linkedin.com slash altature to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. This message comes from Capital One. The Capital One Venture X Business Card has no preset spending limit, so the card's purchasing power can adapt to meet business needs.
1:09Plus, the card earns unlimited double miles on every purchase, so the more a business spends, the more miles earned. And when traveling, the Venture X Business Card grants access to over a thousand airport lounges. The Venture X Business Card. What's in your wallet? Terms and conditions apply. Find out more at CapitalOne.com slash VentureXBusiness. Today on the James Altucher Show. It's my camp versus your camp. It's my side versus your side. I'm right and you're wrong. Regardless of how you feel about his politics or his positions, I think one thing that was admirable about Charlie Kirk was that he engaged in those debates, right?
1:46He invited that dissent and invited that disagreement. He was willing to sort of step into the arena and to grapple with it. Even when you disagree with each other, feeling a connection to each other, right? Feeling like I have heard you, I've listened closely, you have heard me, you've listened closely to me in return. We understand what the other person is trying to get across. That instinct to connect with people is so deeply hardwired into our brains. It is the reason why it is homo sapiens superpowers, our ability to communicate and connect. It is what has made us the dominant species. and it's so hardwired into our brain that all you need is like a glimmer of it to entice and encourage the other person to connect with you.
2:29There's this phrase I love called when you're feeling furious, get curious. This isn't your average business podcast and he's not your average host. This is the James Altucher Show.
2:50I am obviously really concerned about just the level of discourse in this country. It's almost a cliche to be concerned about it at this point. But particularly since the Charlie Kirk assassination, there's been so much division, division, division. I watched the video, probably I shouldn't have. It really had, watching anybody get killed is going to have an emotional effect on you. I didn't realize what was going to happen in that video before I saw it. And then I was invited to speak at the Oxford Union, which is this society at Oxford started in 1823. It's the most prestigious debate society on the planet.
3:32There's presidents, kings, Nobel Prize winners have all been invited. And for some reason, I was invited. I honestly have no idea why they invited me and how my name even came up to them. You know, there were some issues I saw that they had debated recently, which I didn't know if I wanted to go. I was confused. And people were telling me, no, no, just say yes, it's so prestigious. And so then all this stuff happened. And I don't like when anybody celebrates any death at all. And it seemed to me that that's what was happening. Regardless of politics, I don't give a shit. but I didn't like the fact that the president of the Oxford Union seemed to be ignoring the fact that a death was involved.
4:17Politically, I don't know where he stands. I don't even know where I stand, as many of you know, at this point. But I decided to say no to that, and I felt... You know that a no is correct when you feel kind of like relief afterwards when you're trying to decide something, and I felt that relief. But in any case, I just get very disturbed. I see every day now my feed on social media is filled with just all this divisiveness. And it's scary to me that people are legitimately hating each other to the point of death. So I invited on Charles Duhigg. He wrote the book, Super Communicators. It also just came out in paperback by coincidence.
4:58I didn't know that. And Charles came on the podcast and I just asked him, how do you communicate with people who are so divisive? Regardless of the issue, regardless of the side of it. And in a short period of time talking to Charles, I learned so much and he made me think about so many things as he often does on this podcast. So here's our discussion.
5:28Charles, I really wanted to bring you on because, look, as we know, you've been on the podcast many times. You wrote a book called Super Communicators about how to communicate better in a world which is basically being torn apart by lack of communication. And right now, because of all these events, I'm thinking in particular, like let's not, you know, try to overanalyze this. Particularly the Charlie Kirk assassination has sent an already divided world into an even more divided world. what is going on from your perspective well I think it was a tinderbox to begin with right and you had someone who was very popular among conservatives and very unpopular among liberals his death is obviously an enormous tragedy there's no justification ever for violence for political violence for assassination it should be condemned regardless of where it originates from or who its target is but I think into that tinderbox was thrown this very tragic killing and and I think that whenever we feel threatened we tend to revert to our most comfortable place which over the last 10 or 15 years has become polarization right it's my camp versus your camp it's my side versus your side I'm right and you're wrong and so we're seeing a lot of that but I think the other thing that's happening right now is that we're seeing two very different conversations happening.
6:58So among conservatives who loved Charlie Kirk and who knew him, this is really an emotional conversation, right? This is a conversation about this tragedy, about his wife and his children, and losing this bright star. Among people who did not like Charlie Kirk, on the other side, this seems more like a practical conversation. They're saying, look, this is the consequence of policies that make guns easy to own. This is the consequence of language that incites us. And so you see these two kind of clashing conversations. Last time we had talked, we talked about the fact that there's what research in neuroscience tells us is that there's three basic kinds of conversations, the emotional, the practical, and the social.
7:39And what we're seeing right now is some people on the right having an emotional conversation and people on the left having a practical conversation. And then wading into this are these kind of chaos entrepreneurs who really like just basically trolling each other. And they're trying to make it a social conversation. And so because people aren't having the same kind of conversation at the same moment, it's very, very hard for us to hear each other. It's very, very hard for us to feel connected to each other. Yeah. I mean, have you seen the, I mean, it's almost gory to ask, but have you seen the video of him being shot?
8:17I've It is really disturbing. I wasn't expecting it. I looked for it on purpose because I didn't believe that, oh, it's probably like how sometimes people are shot at from a distance. They survive. The bullet graze. Kind of like what happened with Trump. I've never seen like it's like a death right in front of you. It's really horrible. And I know probably 100 million people have seen that video, and I think it's almost dramatic then for people to discuss it. Like I just seeing it, you start to cry because it looks so awful. And then when people, let's say you're on the right and you see people literally celebrating it on the left, like there's no, you can't sugarcoat that.
9:00People were dancing around and saying, yay, even like respected people. Like there's some discussion how the president of the Oxford Union Debate Society was celebrating it. And I mean, there was no ifs, ands, or buts. And I should say, I didn't see any of that. I saw a great deal of debate and I didn't look closely. So it might've been out there and I just didn't see it. But I didn't see people celebrating his death as much as saying, you know, I don't think he's as much of a clear cut figure of sympathy as others are portraying. But if you tell me that there were people celebrating it, I'll believe you, I just didn't see that.
9:35By the way, he's not, there's lots of ways anybody would disagree with him. He had opinions that were where he had thought them out, but they're extreme. Like, you know, you're more likely to have his opinion if you're a religious, conservative, very religious, very conservative citizen, which, you know, tens of millions of people are, but tens of millions aren't. Regardless of how you feel about his politics or his positions, I think one thing that was admirable about Charlie Kirk was that he engaged in those debates, right? He invited that dissent, invited that disagreement. He was willing to sort of step into the arena and to grapple with it.
10:15And I never saw him... Sorry to interrupt. I'm not being a good communicator, but it just occurred to me, it's almost as if he's read your book, Super Communicators, because he would do a lot of those techniques of mirroring and looping and so on. He would try to keep the temperature levels really low when very angry people will get up at the mic and debate him. I think that's right. I think that he always had a policy of engagement, which I think is refreshing. Now, I will say, he is someone who sought out debates rather than agreements, right? As far as I know, and again, I'm not really a student of Charlie Kirk studying his statements, but my impression is that he's someone who sought out debate.
10:58And the goal oftentimes wasn't necessarily to come to a reconciliation as much as to air each side's thoughts in contrast to each other. And that is something that super communicators do really, really well. Another thing that's important to super communicators, which I don't know if it was important to him, it might've been, it might not have been, is that even when you disagree with each other, feeling a connection to each other, right? Feeling like I have heard you, I've listened closely, you have heard me, you've listened closely to me in return. We understand what the other person is trying to get across and we can actually say it back to them even better than they could say it to us in the first place.
11:37That's an important aspect because it gets to what the heart of communication is. We think of communication as an information transmission device, but the sharing of information is actually just a byproduct of communication, of how our brains have evolved to communicate. The goal of communication is to make us feel connected to each other because as pro-social beings and as a pro-social species, feeling connected to each other has helped us survive. And so it's great when we can have an intellectual conversation or even an emotional conversation. I can learn from you, you can learn from me. But what's really the mark of a success is do we feel at least a little bit more connected to each other?
12:15And I think that Charlie Kirk did that even with people whom he disagreed with and who disagreed with him. Because he was willing to engage with them, they felt a sense of kinship even if they disagreed on issues.
12:31Take a quick break. If you like this episode, I'd really, really appreciate it. It means so much to me. Please share it with your friends and subscribe to the podcast. Email me at Alcantara at gmail.com and tell me why you subscribed. Thanks.
12:52so things have gotten really busy for me lately and i've asked for it like i'm doing all things i love doing and wanting to do but i'm very busy and i have to be focused on every single thing and some of these things that i do during the day like like basically i'm helping run three different businesses. Plus I'm doing three podcasts a week and I have to read and prepare for each podcast. I'm writing a book. Those are just like my professional career things. And then I'm doing all sorts of other things. And I often have to switch from meeting to meeting to meeting and my brain has to stay focused.
13:30And I don't want to take any stimulants that's going to get me like overhyped or overstimulated or not. I really want to function optimally. I don't think this is going to last forever. Well, I hope it doesn't last more than a month like this. But basically, I had to figure out what to do. And I really can't highly recommend enough Huel, H-U-E-L, and their black addition powder. It's like a complete meal. So you feel full, focused, and I feel more ready for the day. It actually works. So at less than$3 per meal, it's packed with 40 grams of plant-based protein and 27 essential vitamins and minerals, no added sugar, gluten-free, tastes great with flavors like salted caramel and chocolate.
14:18Plus it keeps me full for hours. That's key. I don't wanna be like hungry during all these meetings. And it's perfect for breakfast, lunch, or post-workout. And just when you thought Huel had everything covered, they just dropped a first-of-its-kind super greens drink in a can. and it's called the Huel Daily Greens Ready to Drink. So you forget powders, forget those pills. This is your daily greens. No mixing, no mess, quick and convenient without compromising nutrients. Don't go for those compromising nutrients. It's sparkling and comes in flavors like blueberry, apple, peach, 42 vitamins, minerals, and superfoods, only 25 calories, four grams of fiber, one gram of sugar made by dieticians.
15:04So try Huel with 15 % off for new customers today using my code ALTATURE at Huel.com slash ALTATURE. Fuel your best performance with Huel today.
15:24Being an entrepreneur is a 24-7 job. And when you're hiring, you need a partner that works as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share with your network, get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. For one thing, you can post a job. LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people. You get qualified candidates. At the end of the day, the most important thing to your business is the quality of the candidates.
15:56And with LinkedIn, of course, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Based on LinkedIn data, 72 % of small and medium businesses say using LinkedIn helps them find high quality candidates. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash altature. That's linkedin.com slash altature to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
16:30Being an entrepreneur is a 24-7 job. And when you're hiring, you need a partner that works as hard as you do. That hiring partner is LinkedIn Jobs. When you clock out, LinkedIn clocks in. LinkedIn makes it easy to post your job for free, share with your network, get qualified candidates that you can manage all in one place. For one thing, you can post a job. LinkedIn's new feature can help you write job descriptions and then quickly get your job in front of the right people. You get qualified candidates. at the end of the day, the most important thing to your business is the quality of the candidates.
17:01And with LinkedIn, of course, you can feel confident that you're getting the best. Based on LinkedIn data, 72 % of small and medium businesses say using LinkedIn helps them find high quality candidates. Find out why more than 2.5 million small businesses use LinkedIn for hiring today. Find your next great hire on LinkedIn. Post your job for free at linkedin.com slash altature. That's linkedin.com slash altature to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply. And so do you think in order for this to work, both sides have to be willing to play the role of, hey, I want to connect? Yeah, I mean, I think yes.
17:45I think if somebody genuinely doesn't want to connect, right, if they're like, look, I just want to yell at you and I want you to stand there and mutely take it, then you're probably not going to have a lot of luck connecting with them, right? But I do think that we all have this instinct to connect. I mean, the truth of the matter is that when you're in an argument with someone and you just take a moment and you say, look, I totally hear what you're saying, but I want to let you know how this issue makes me feel because it makes me feel scared or it makes me feel worried or it makes me feel unhappy.
18:18That when we do that, oftentimes the other person does connect with us a little bit. And they say, look, I don't want you to feel scared. I mean, I disagree with this. I think that everyone should have a gun and you think that guns should be illegal. We disagree on how to preserve our safety, but we both want safety. We want safety for our kids. That instinct to connect with people is so deeply hardwired into our brains. It is the reason why, it is Homo sapiens superpowers, our ability to communicate and connect. It is what has made us the dominant species. And it's so hardwired into our brain that all you need is like a glimmer of it to entice and encourage the other person to connect with you.
18:58And that doesn't mean that you're best friends. It doesn't mean that you agree with each other. It doesn't mean you're going to cry on each other's shoulders. But it does mean that you feel some kinship as two humans trying to make their way through the world. Let me ask you to, just as like for me to see and understand, let me ask you to steel man both sides. And I'll pick a specific situation. So in Congress, the day after or the day of, I don't even know, the Charlie Kirk's assassination, one congressman, I think she was Republican, asked for a moment of silence or a moment of prayer. And I guess the Democrats didn't want that and the Republicans did want that.
19:39So there was actually like a shouting match. Clearly the congressmen have not read your books. Yeah. I think what happened there is that someone called for a moment of prayer. And then again, I might be wrong on this, but if I remember correctly, a Republican asked for a prayer to be read out loud or something to be read out loud in addition to the moment of silence. And then there was an objection because that hadn't been done for previous victims of gun violence who had received a moment of silence on the floor. Regardless, it's a dumb debate, right? Like it's clearly people who don't actually care about this issue as much as they care about sort of the theater of making a point.
20:18And I think you're right. Look, in Congress, there aren't a lot of people who want to connect with each other. The truth of the matter is, this is hardwired into our brain. But the U.S. Congress has managed to find a lot of the people who have been able to undo that hardwiring in a very visceral way. And that's scary, because I feel like Congress been, okay, there's been periods of history where it's been more heated than other periods of history. But I feel like in general, throughout my life, Congress in general got along with each other. Democrats and Republicans got along with each other. And now they don't at all.
20:51Yeah, Democrats and Republicans. And I think there's a lot of reaching across the aisle. I think there's a lot of reasons for this. Also, I don't think it's universal, right? I think that there are, I talk to a lot of people in Congress and a lot of them say, I do want to work with my colleagues. I do work with my colleagues. We got stuff done together. But then we have these performers who have really gotten these big stages. It's certainly not limited to one party. What's happening now is that you get more rewarded for it than you used to in the past. It used to be that people really wanted Congress to do their job.
21:21They really wanted them to get together, and they really wanted them to pass good laws. Now, because of gerrymandering, the primary is oftentimes more important than the general election, because of the rise of a media sphere that rewards extreme behavior rather than good policymaking, because of the rise of social media, we see that now it's much more rewarding to have an enemy than to make a friend. And most of us avoid that, but some people don't. And so if you were to steal man both sides, so you're a congressman talking to a congressman, you're AOC talking to Marjorie Taylor Greene or Marjorie Taylor Greene talking to AOC, how would you discuss this?
22:01Because, and I bring this up, not that this is such a weird example, but this is the example. It's neighbor versus neighbor right now on the streets talking about these issues. Well, I don't think it's quite that bad on the streets, to be honest with you. I don't know. I have family who live in conservative states and I don't see them going to war with the liberals living nearby. But I would say, so the first thing I would say is that AOC and Merger Taylor Greene should probably not have that conversation. I don't think either of them really want to connect with the other side. Let's say we have Congressman X and Congressman Y and they come from different states and one's a Republican and one's a Democrat.
22:37How do we sit down together? I mean, this happens all the time. Like literally this is what Congress does. And if you talk to Congress people about how they actually spend their time, What they'll say is, I spend most of my time in Congress trying to understand what's important to the people whom I have to work with because I need them to support me. And they want to know what's important to me because I have to support them, right? There is a system that is built into our politics that you have to work with people who disagree with you. And that doesn't mean reaching across the aisle. Oftentimes, you have Democrats who don't agree with other Democrats and Republicans who don't agree with other Republicans.
23:14That disagreement is at the heart of why we thought the American experiment was worth pursuing. That if you brought people together from different perspectives and they came to a consensus, that consensus would probably be better than any of the answers they came up with on their own and apart from each other. And so I think that the first thing that would happen is that people should ask each other, what matters to you, right? In the book, in Super Communicators, we talk about deep questions. that many of the questions we ask are what are known as surface questions, but that there's much more powerful questions that are known within psychology as deep questions.
23:51And a deep question is something that asks about our values or our beliefs or our experiences. And that can sound intimidating, but an example of that is if you meet someone who's a doctor, instead of saying, oh, what hospital do you work at? Which would be a surface question. Asking, oh, why'd you decide to go to medical school? Which is a deep question, right? It's an invitation to the other person to tell us who they really are, to tell us about their values and their beliefs, their experiences. And so I would say, when Congress people sit down with each other, when it's not firebrands who are just trying to get attention, oftentimes they start the conversation by saying, you know, why did, getting elected to Congress is really hard.
24:31It's a major sacrifice. What was it about this that was important to you? What is it that you want to get done while you're here? That's a deep question. It asks someone why they're here, who they are, what they care about. And if I know what you care about and I can share with you what I care about, we might care about different things, but there's probably some aspects of those things that we have in common. And moreover, if I know what you care about and you know what I care about, then we can figure out how to come to a compromise and give you what you need and give me what I need. Yeah, so that's good.
Read the full transcript
25:05So even if they don't really know the answer to that question, they're going to come up with an answer, and that's something to work with. Here's an example. Let me ask you a deep question. Why do you do this podcast? There's a cynical answer and a good answer. I do this podcast because it does give me an opportunity. When I read a book like Super Communicators, for instance, I don't understand everything I read. Because I have a podcast, I could actually call the author, you, and ask really dumb questions that I don't understand with the excuse that, oh, I'm trying to make it easy for my listeners to understand.
25:43But actually, I'm really trying to learn how to communicate better with my wife or a business partner or whatever. Which, by the way, is a big part of why I became a journalist is exactly the reason I could call people up and ask them questions that I was just interested in. Yeah, like a podcast is not quite journalism, but it's a form of kind of that outreach to the public and being the intermediary between a private person like yourself who's put something out and the public audience. I'm the intermediary. Same with journalism. So wait, is that the cynical answer? No, that's the good answer.
26:14The cynical answer is there's a performance aspect to almost everything I do, whether it's writing or podcasting, building social media, or even building a business. I don't think that's cynical. I don't think it's cynical at all. But let me tell you what you just said. You told me so much about who you are, right? Here's what I know about you. I know that you are someone who likes to learn. I know that you're someone who has enough intellectual humility to know that even if you're exposed to information, sometimes you need something more to help it really become knowledge. I know that you're someone who doesn't mind being on the stage, being out there, being a public intellectual.
26:51Now, if I was trying to convince you, James, I want you to invest in my company, what I would probably say is I would try to appeal to those things that you care about. Let me tell you why I'm making an investment in my company or let me tell you why voting for me, let's say I'm trying to get your vote, why voting for me will help you achieve your goals because I promise you can call me anytime. I'm going to have access to all this new information. It's really interesting. I'd love to share it with you. Also, I'd love to have you join my campaign and it's kind of a little bit of a high profile, right?
27:20Once I know what you want, I know so much more about you. I know how to talk to you. I know how to talk about the things that matter to you. And particularly if I share that about myself, If I say, you know, the reason I'm running for Congress today is because I had a kid who was at a school while a school shooting was going on. And I'm just, I'm scared for them. And I want to make change that makes that better. Now you know so much about me. Like at that point, when we know this about each other, we can't help but feel closer to each other. There's actually an instinct, again, hardwired in our brain known as social reciprocity, that makes it impossible for us not to feel a little bit closer to each other.
27:56That's the glue that's held our species together since we evolved. You're so right. And then you look through history. There are times when society is divided. I'm right and you're wrong. Take the 1850s, slavery. One senator beat up another senator on the Senate floor. I think it was like 1859 over this issue. Because there's obviously, they felt strongly that there was no middle ground. Hopefully they felt strongly. I think they used their walking cane to like beat the guy over the head until he was unconscious and almost dead. Right, so basically, and that's, I think, I feel like that's what's happening now, that basically if you don't agree with me, you might as well be dead.
28:40So, okay, so here's the thing I would say, because I think there is one thing in what you just said, which is not completely accurate, which is that you said, there are times when we all agreed with each other. But if you think about the times that we're proudest of as a country, it is not when we all agreed with each other. it is when we disagreed with each other, but we did so in peaceful and productive ways. Right? Let's take the Constitutional Convention, the writing of the Constitution. Basically what you had is you had a group of people who literally hated each other, who for months at a time would go into a room and just argue nonstop, and they would write these jeremads about how bad the other people were, but they knew how to disagree with each other in a way where eventually they could write a constitution together.
29:24They founded this nation. And the same thing is true of the civil rights movement. It's not that people agreed with each other, even within the movement itself. It's that they knew how to disagree politely. World War II, there was huge, huge debates over whether we should enter World War II, what the correct strategy was once we were in World War II. And again, it wasn't that everyone agreed with each other. It was that we disagreed with each other, but we knew how to disagree in ways that were helpful. That's what we're missing today. It's not that we're all gonna be on the same page you're reading from the same hymnal.
29:55It's that we need to learn how to disagree with each other better. What if there's no incentive? Like you said, a lot of times people are disagreeing with each other now, and I'll use Congress as an example, but it could be anybody, because there's political reward or there's reward within your subculture for just disagreeing. Yeah, so I think the key there is that we stop giving out those rewards, right? If you have a kid, and every time the kid picks a fight with you, you give them a piece of candy, they're going to learn to pick fights with you, right? They're not going to learn to go to bed on time.
30:29They're not going to learn to do their homework. They're going to learn, if I just fight with dad and I tell him he's wrong, eventually he's going to feel bad and he's going to give me some candy. That's exactly what's happening right now. And as parents, what we do is we stop rewarding our kids for bad behavior. And as Americans, that's what we have to start doing right now. And it's hard. It's hard because it means that we don't sort of get that gleeful dopamine hit when our side scores a point against the other side and we feel good about it. We have to tamp down on that instinct. And this is where we have to be better citizens and we have to be more mature adults.
31:08Because if we stop rewarding bad behavior, it will go away.
31:24This is what I've been waiting for. Look, I've done 1 ,500 podcasts, a ton of podcasts about health and particularly anti-aging. I've had on every anti-aging expert on the planet. And finally, gummy bears to help me with anti-aging. These are the first ever longevity gummies powered by MitoPure, a delicious, easy way to put more energy into your day and to treat yourself. The only clinically proven urolithin A gummy for strength and healthy aging from the inside out. And I've taken it as supplements, but I'm not really a supplement taker kind of person. I'd much rather just take a bunch of gummy bears and eat it like candy.
32:08You can't really tell how much it's working. And sometimes you don't know for sure, is it just, are you thinking this? But it does improve energy. Tests show it increases muscle strength by up to 12 % after 16 weeks. These gummy bears deliver 6X more urolithin A than a glass of pomegranate juice, which, by the way, I was taking a ton of pomegranates as well. So this is the number one doctor-recommended urolithin A supplement. It's vegan, gluten-free, non-GMO, clean label project certified, NSF content certified and free of major allergens and artificial ingredients. MitoPure is the only clinically proven form of urolithin A.
32:50So if you want to stay strong and energized now and as you age, then you have to try MitoPure gummies. My friends at Timeline are offering 20 % off just for my listeners. So head to timeline.com slash Altature to get started. That's timeline.com slash Altature. Your cells will thank you.
33:17We're spending more than ever. I hate my job. The price of everything has gone up. AI is threatening my job. It's crisis after crisis. Nothing is working out. I can't find a job. We're one disaster. Take control of change. I need a change. disruption is the force of change stop the chaos stop the madness take control read james patterson's disrupt everything and win
33:47let's take an issue like gun control which is coming up in part because of the charlie kirk stuff i honestly and people never believe me on this like i metty hassan came on my podcast and I said, really, on most issues, I either don't know what to think or I'm neutral. And he said, I don't believe you, nobody's neutral. But I honestly feel like I am, like take control. I honestly don't really know what to think. I don't have enough information. Everybody on either side is, I'm the kind of person, the last person I speak to, I'll agree with because they had the latest statistics, seems reasonable to me, I have no idea.
34:22But people don't believe me and then they'll get angry because they think I'm lying about being neutral. But I also sometimes get angry when I think people are just blindly on one side as opposed to another. I'll get angry at Republicans who think we should have guns to protect ourselves just in case their government goes awry. And I get angry with Democrats who think no guns ever. And then later they want to defund the police. And who knows? Everybody goes to extremes. So how do I not get angry at the people who are so blindly on one side? Because I do get angry. And then B, how do I try to have discussions where I'm learning about these issues?
35:05Well, okay, so let me ask you this. Do you have kids? Yeah. Do your kids do things that you wish that they didn't do that it would be easy to get angry about? I've had a strategy their whole lives for this, which is to never get angry, but even to tell myself, don't get angry, get disappointed and then tell them why I'm disappointed. Which is great. So why don't you apply that to folks who, on this gun control issue or gun rights issue? I guess because I don't want to offend people. So let's say a good friend of mine is just blindly on one side. I'm not going to say I'm disappointed in you for only thinking this way because I have respect in many other ways for this friend.
35:47So it feels like that's too much. So my guess is that when it comes to your kids doing something wrong, even though you feel disappointment, which you probably do, and tell me if I'm getting this wrong, is that you probably say to them, look, I think this was the wrong thing to do. Can you walk me through why you did it? Right? I wouldn't say that, but that is a good way to have done it. Because when someone's a little kid, when someone's four years old, I'm just going to say, I'm disappointed you hate your sister this way. No, but a pretty common phrase in our household, and I think most others, is like, use your words.
36:18Tell me with your words. Don't use your fists. Use your words and tell me what you're feeling, right? What we're doing is, I think you're exactly right. It is very easy for us to get angry at someone else. And if we just take it, there's this phrase I love called, when you're feeling furious, get curious. Because if in the moment that you are angry, if you just take half a second and say, look, before I tell you why you're wrong and you're an idiot, tell me more. Like, tell me more about why you believe this. I promise you what you're going to hear is something that helps put it into context for you.
36:56And that doesn't mean you're going to agree with them, right? But you're going to hear someone saying that they should never take away our guns. Our guns are the most important thing. It's the only thing that can stop tyranny. And if instead of saying, yeah, but they kill children, if you just say, tell me, tell me what, this issue seems really important to you. Tell me why it's important to you. And they're going to say something like, look, the way I got to know my dad is we went hunting together. and I want to get to know my kids. And if you take away guns from me, I'm going to lose this opportunity to really bond with my kids.
37:24That's something you understand. Now, that doesn't mean you're going to agree with this guy. You're going to say, oh, we should have all guns. Assault rifles are definitely necessary. But it does mean that there's something now you understand about where he's coming from. That what he's talking about is he's talking about a sense of closeness that weapons represent for him. And then you can share, look, I just want to tell you about my experience with guns. The reason why this is important to me is because my kid was at a school when there was a shooting and it's traumatized him. And now that other person knows it's not that you hate guns or that you hate this person.
37:56You hate the feeling of being unsafe. You hate that your children had to feel unsafe. These are things that we have in common that we can connect over, even if we disagree with each other. That makes sense. I'm just wondering like, what if on either side, like one, there's cliches. So one side could say, well, you know, guns don't kill people, people kill people. And on the other side, you could say, if gun laws allow for even one innocent death, then that's too much. And both are cliches. Both are not really accurate. And how do you deal when everybody kind of just falls to cliches when you're trying to get that understanding?
38:29Well, when you ask people about their personal experiences, that's when the cliche falls away, right? It's very easy to use a cliche when I'm talking about millions, hundreds of millions of people. But when I say to someone, tell me about your experience with guns. Like, when have you used guns? How have they touched your life? nobody's cliched at that point because they're talking about the personal experiences. Nobody says, well, like all people, I am aware of the statistics on guns, right? That's not, so I think the key here is that if you ask a deep question, if you ask someone about their values or their beliefs or their experiences, and you don't have to do it in a really clumsy way, you can just say, tell me why this is important to you.
39:07They're not going to say cliches. It's when we feel like we have to defend an entire side of something that we start spouting cliches. Yeah, and that's interesting too. Like sometimes I find myself in a position where I'm defending a side I don't really want to defend. You ever get in a situation like that? And how do you avoid that? Well, I mean, first of all, it's kind of fun sometimes, right? Like oftentimes what I'll say is I'll say, look, I'm going to make an argument and I only believe at 30%, but I want to try it out. Let's see how it flies. And I think that, you know, I'm very often telling people what my confidence interval is around what I'm saying.
39:44And it's never very high, right? It's never like, I'm 100 % confident in what I'm telling you. It's always like, I'm like 60 % confident that I might be right. But that 40%, if you convince me that it's bigger than that, I'll listen to you. I like that approach, actually, of omitting your confidence level. Oh, absolutely. And the truth of the matter is that we keep the door open. But oftentimes, a conversation is not, if we all knew exactly what we believed, then most of the time we wouldn't even have to have conversations. I don't have to dialogue with you. I know what I believe. I know what you believe.
40:22It's fine. Most of the time when we have conversations, it's because we don't entirely know what we believe, and we're trying to figure it out. When we're talking to the other person, we're also talking to ourselves, and we're always surprised by the words coming out of our mouth as anyone else. And so we shouldn't be held to being perfect when we have a conversation. And a question for you, does this make you feel better? It does because it shows me that there is a path that the country can take to be more united. But let me ask you, are you optimistic or pessimistic? I'm optimistic. I'm optimistic because we've been through tough periods before and we've made it through.
41:00Now, I think what's happening right now with the polarization, with some of the threats to speech, with some of the stuff that's going on in Washington, D.C. is worrisome to me. I'm not going to downplay how concerned I am. But I think that the arc of history is long and that it does arc towards a better life. The way that we create that better life is we take responsibility for it. And so I'm going to issue a challenge to you and to all of your listeners, if that's okay. Which is, I think that sometime this week and the next seven days, find someone you disagree with on some issue and ask that, just say, look, I want to understand more about what you believe and why it matters to you so much.
41:41Can you just tell me a little bit about why this issue seems so important to you? Don't argue with them. Just listen. And in fact, listen so well that you can repeat back to them. Say, look, what I hear, I think I hear you saying is this. Let me make sure I'm getting this right. And if you do that, and then you share something about yourself, you and that person will feel closer to each other. You will understand where they're coming from better. And really, I'm just imagining this, particularly in situations I might feel strongly about. It's going to be very hard to do, but I'm going to try this challenge.
42:15I'm going to put the relationship before the topic. It's not just putting the relationship before the topic. It's also that, let's say it's some issue, let's say it's Israel and Gaza, where people just seem very fanatical in their perspectives. You're not going to convince the other person that they're wrong and you're right. You're not telling them you're an idiot. Here's all the facts that you don't know. That's not going to work. If you actually want to change their mind, then you have to be willing to have a conversation with them where they might change your mind. Yeah. Well, Charles, look, this has been an issue that's really bothered me this past week about communicating in this country.
42:52I appreciate you coming on at short notice. It's just by coincidence, your book, Super Communicators, which we last talked about about a year ago, is now out in paperback this week. So I'm glad you came on. Yes. Charles Duhigg, super communicators, New York Times bestseller. Also, you came on for The Power of Habit, excellent book. So I really appreciate you spending the time. I know you're really busy. Thank you for having me. I'm going to call you again the next time the country is divided. Good, let's do it. Let's do it. I love it. Thanks, Charles. Hopefully it'll be a long time. I will talk to you soon.
43:33This September, CBS hits are streaming free on Pluto TV. I'm coming in hot. For this month only, you can watch full seasons of the CBS shows you love. From the courtroom drama of Madlock to the heroics of Fire Country. Go back to where it all began in NCIS Origins. Or watch the hilarious hauntings of ghosts. All for free. Full seasons of the CBS shows you love. This month only on Pluto TV. Stream now. Pay never.
From the publisher
A Note from James
I’m really concerned about the level of discourse in this country. It’s almost a cliché to say that now, but especially after the Charlie Kirk assassination, the division feels overwhelming. I even got invited to speak at the Oxford Union—the most prestigious debate society in the world—but ultimately declined because I didn’t like how the whole situation was being handled.
I can’t stand when anyone celebrates a death. Regardless of politics, it disturbs me. And every day, my social media feed is filled with more division and hatred. So I wanted to talk with Charles Duhigg. He wrote Super Communicators (now out in paperback) about how to actually connect with people in a world that seems torn apart. Even in a short conversation, I learned so much from him—things that made me think in new ways.
Episode Description
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and bestselling author Charles Duhigg (Super Communicators, The Power of Habit) joins James to explore how we can talk to each other in an age of polarization. From tragic political violence to everyday disagreements with family and friends, Charles explains why humans are wired for connection, how to ask better questions, and what it takes to turn conflict into understanding.
This episode is a practical guide to becoming a better communicator—especially when the stakes are high.
What You’ll Learn
- The three types of conversations—emotional, practical, and social—and why mismatched conversations cause breakdowns.
- How to ask “deep questions” that uncover values and experiences, not just surface facts.
- Why mirroring, looping, and listening carefully make people feel truly heard.
- How to handle anger and cliches with curiosity instead of combat.
- Why disagreements don’t destroy democracy—bad communication does.
Timestamped Chapters
- [03:08] James on division, Oxford Union, and why he turned down an invitation
- [06:06] Why James brought Charles Duhigg on the podcast
- [07:00] Political violence, polarization, and clashing conversations
- [10:42] What made Charlie Kirk an effective communicator
- [12:21] Communication as connection, not just information
- [13:21] Do both sides have to want connection?
- [15:20] Congress, partisanship, and performative politics
- [19:36] How “deep questions” build trust and reveal values
- [21:10] James on why he podcasts—and Charles’s analysis
- [23:39] Social reciprocity and feeling closer through vulnerability
- [24:23] History shows the value of disagreement done right
- [26:00] Why we reward bad behavior—and how to stop
- [27:09] James on gun control neutrality and frustration
- [29:00] Parenting lessons applied to political disagreements
- [30:00] “When you’re furious, get curious”
- [31:53] Moving past cliches by asking about personal experiences
- [33:08] Admitting confidence levels in arguments
- [34:19] Is Charles optimistic about America’s communication future?
- [34:50] A challenge for listeners: ask someone you disagree with “why does this matter to you?”
- [36:09] Closing thoughts: Super Communicators now in paperback
Additional Resources
- 📖 Super Communicators by Charles Duhigg
- 📖 The Power of Habit by Charles Duhigg
- 🌐 Charles Duhigg’s website
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.



