In short
Senator Bernie Sanders discusses his push for a nationwide moratorium (temporary freeze) on new AI data center construction, arguing it’s driven by wealthy tech firms and harms communities while AI/robotics advances too fast.
Guest backgrounds
Bernie Sanders is an independent U.S. senator from Vermont (in Congress since 1991). He cites conversations with AI figures including “godfather” Geoffrey Hinton and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. He also references activist Erin Brockovich and her organizing work against data centers.
Key claims
Data centers require huge electricity and water; one Utah proposal would need over 16 billion gallons of water annually amid drought. Sanders says AI threatens jobs, privacy, children’s cognition, and democracy via deepfakes and loss of human control. He argues NDAs between local officials and companies (e.g., Louisiana governor and Meta) undermine accountability.
Notable examples
New York’s data center moratorium; 14 other states considering restrictions; models “hacked into other entities”; Sanders’ letter urging CEOs to “avoid disaster”; planned next episode with Erin Brockovich.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Rise of Opposition to Data Centers
0:00 to 0:40
Explore the growing concerns around AI data centers and environmental impact.
“The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Amazon Music.”
The Rise of Opposition to Data Centers
1:41 to 2:54
Explore the growing concerns around AI data centers and environmental impact.
“Just about everybody in America seems to be up in arms about AI data centers.”
Senator Bernie Sanders on the Moratorium Act
2:54 to 4:28
Senator Sanders discusses his proposed legislation for a nationwide moratorium on data centers.
“And on today's program, I'm joined by a leader of that opposition, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.”
Concerns About AI's Rapid Advancement
4:28 to 6:00
Sanders shares his worries about the rapid development of AI and its implications.
“and I thought it was important to make it clear that that was unacceptable.”
The Risks of AI and Data Center Control
6:00 to 7:30
Discussion on the existential threats posed by AI and the loss of human control.
“damage they do in terms of the environment, water, as you mentioned, electrical bills.”
Interviews with AI Experts
7:30 to 8:52
Sanders recounts his conversations with top AI experts and their concerns.
“You mentioned you talked to Jeffrey Hinton, who has profiled at great length in The New Yorker, and you're absolutely right.”
Conversations with AI Industry Leaders
8:52 to 10:36
Sanders discusses his meeting with Sam Altman and the broader implications of AI developments.
“Now, no one knows exactly what the rollout is, when, how, what.”
The American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act
10:36 to 13:32
Understanding Sanders' proposal for a sovereign wealth fund related to AI profits.
“Although I am very happy to tell you, a number of months ago, I did a public meeting here on Capitol Hill in the visiting center.”
The Role of NDAs in Data Center Deals
13:32 to 14:00
Sanders highlights the implications of NDAs signed by local officials with AI companies.
“Second of all, to the degree that money is being made, I want AI profits to benefit ordinary Americans, not just Mr.”
Grassroots Resistance to Data Centers
14:00 to 18:32
Exploration of community pushback against large tech corporations and data centers.
“Mark Zuckerberg's outfit, on a$50 billion data center campus.”
Show all 14 chapters
Grassroots Resistance to Data Centers
19:48 to 20:48
Exploration of community pushback against large tech corporations and data centers.
“And those back-to-school vibes have me excited for a reset, starting with my wardrobe.”
Grassroots Resistance to Data Centers
20:54 to 22:08
Exploration of community pushback against large tech corporations and data centers.
“Now available in Canada and the UK, too.”
Senator Sanders on Technology and Governance
22:20 to 28:00
Senator Sanders discusses the relationship between technology and politics, including data centers.
“I'm David Remnick, and I've been speaking today with Senator Bernie Sanders.”
Bernie Sanders Reflects on His Political Victory
28:00 to 31:02
Explore Bernie Sanders' analysis of his electoral success and challenges faced.
“and he won by one point and he underperformed with working class voters and voters of color despite a very populist message.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Amazon Music. With Amazon Music Unlimited, you can listen to music, podcasts, and now audiobooks, all in one app. This includes popular titles like Project Hail Mary, one of the most beloved adventure stories by Andy Weir. I have been listening to this audiobook and constantly looking for any pockets of time during the day to turn it on and find out what will happen next in the story. So whether you're catching up on a podcast, listening to your favorite playlist, or, like me, getting lost in a great audiobook, it's all right there within the Amazon Music app.
0:31Amazon Music. Music, podcasts, audiobooks, all in one app. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Dell. Back to School starts now. Get long-lasting battery life on the Dell XPS laptop powered by Series 3 Intel Core so you can work from anywhere. Now starting at$6.99 with exclusive student pricing starting at$5.99. Complete your setup with savings on select monitors and must-have electronics and accessories. Limited-time deals and free shipping on PCs and more await you at dell.com slash deals. That's dell.com slash deals.
1:08The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Viking, committed to exploring the world in comfort. Offering destination-focused small ship experiences on all seven continents, with a shore excursion included in every port and programs designed for cultural enrichment. And every Viking voyage is all-inclusive, with no children and no casinos. Learn more at viking.com.
1:34The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC and The New Yorker. Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Just about everybody in America seems to be up in arms about AI data centers. Everybody except for the diehard AI boosters, the tech moguls themselves, and of course, this guy. You have to convince your community how great these things. You can't fight it. You have to go with it. And you're going to have all that protection, and we're giving you automatic protection. But you're going to make a tremendous amount of money. You're going to reduce taxes. and you're going to have something that if you don't have it, everybody else wants it.
2:15What's wrong with data centers? Even the simplest AI queries require quite a lot of computing power. So the data centers to house all those processors are gigantic. They consume vast amounts of electricity and water. One proposed data center in Utah, just one, would need over 16 billion gallons of water a year. That's the estimate. And that's in a state suffering from a chronic drought. New York has passed a moratorium on data centers, and 14 other states have considered similar restrictions. The anger about data center construction is rising in towns and counties all over the country. And on today's program, I'm joined by a leader of that opposition, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
3:01Now, Sanders has brought legislation to the Senate that calls for a moratorium on data centers nationwide. It's not a ban. It's a temporary freeze on new construction, and it allows for more research and more government input. It hasn't been voted on yet. That is why today we are announcing legislation to impose a moratorium on the construction of new AI data centers until strong national safeguards are in place. Sanders has been very concerned about artificial intelligence, mainly because of the threat it poses to many kinds of jobs. And last week, you sent a letter to the CEOs of the major AI companies, telling them to, quote, avoid disaster, stop building machines that humans cannot control.
3:51How are you? I'm great. Senator Sanders, welcome to the Radio Hour. Thank you. Back in March, almost a half a year ago, you and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez put forward the AI Data Center Moratorium Act. What led to your action? Well, a couple of fundamental reasons. Number one, it was clear to us that these very large big tech corporations owned by some of the wealthiest people in the world were just shoving their way through small communities and are doing significant environmental damage, raising electric rates, threatening scarce water supplies in some cases. and I thought it was important to make it clear that that was unacceptable.
4:43But in addition to that, I was worried, and I think Alexandria is as well, that this AI and robotics revolution is moving so, so quickly. It is so transformative that we have got to slow it down. It is going to impact every man, woman, and child. And I got involved in this, to be honest with you, not because I'm a tech nerd, but because I looked around me and I said, wait a minute. This stuff is moving lightning fast. And who is standing up and saying, what is this impact going to mean? What is it going to mean to workers, to our environment, to our kids, to our privacy, to our democracy? What is it going to mean in terms of the possibility of an existential threat if AI becomes smarter than human beings?
5:34So I'm asking these questions. I'm reading stuff. I'm talking to people. And I go down to the floor of the Senate. Virtually no serious discussion. So I think the most important point is slow it down. We've got to make AI and robotics work for ordinary people, not just to make Elon Musk and Zuckerberg even richer than they are. So the point is not just to slow down the construction of data centers and the potential damage they do in terms of the environment, water, as you mentioned, electrical bills. It's also to slow the process entirely. Who are you talking to? What kind of information are you getting about AI and its dangers and what you may see as its benefits as well?
6:15And who should decide these questions? I have talked to a whole lot of people. A number of months ago, I went to California where I talked to a lot of these guys, very smart guys. I talked to Mr. Hinton, Dr. Hinton, who is, as you know, one of the godfathers, Jeffrey Hinton, one of the godfathers of AI. We did a town meeting at Georgetown. and he told me, he said, look, set it up. AI will sooner or later become smarter than human beings. And it is then likely that human beings will lose control over AI, which could be an existential threat to the planet. And you know, David, what you're seeing, what have we seen in the last week?
7:06We have seen from open AI, we've seen from Anthropic, we've seen from Meta that they have lost control of some of their models that have hacked into other entities. So you've got all of these threats there, and we cannot allow Mr. Musk and a handful of multibillionaires to determine the future of humanity. You mentioned you talked to Jeffrey Hinton, who has profiled at great length in The New Yorker, and you're absolutely right. He was a godfather of AI in some senses and also one of the people who stand up now to talk in warning about it. Do you ever talk to the Zuckerbergs and the Musks and those kind of people to get their input?
7:47I talked to Altman. Yeah? I talked to Altman. That's a conversation I would love to have been a fly on the wall for. Tell me about your conversation with Sam Altman. It wasn't all that exciting. Altman is, I think, a very good salesman. Uh-huh. He is, you know, he's selling his product. What did he say to you? You know, what he says is that, I mean, literally, I think the same day or day before or later, he was to see Donald Trump. So the idea that he goes to see Trump, he goes to see Sanders. Wow, that's great, you know. He's talking to everybody. But I think, you know, what he wants to do, I think he's talking about as Trump is, well, we're going to have American share in the wealth and we're going to give them 5 % of our profits and so forth and so on.
8:27And that's kind of what he was talking about. Meanwhile, OpenAI and the other AI entities are spending huge amounts of money in campaign contributions through their super PAC to make sure that Congress does not do what should be done. But, David, here's the bottom line to me. Take a deep breath. Take a look at what AI and robotics can do economically in terms of displacing millions and millions of workers. Okay? That's a fact. Now, no one knows exactly what the rollout is, when, how, what. It will displace millions of workers. Are we prepared for that? No, we are not. It will have an emotional impact on the mental health of our kids.
9:13All right? You got kids now who are spending 5, 10 hours a day on their screens. You have 40 % of kids age 2 and younger who have tablets now. All right? This is re-altering the brains of our kids. Reading skills are declining. Writing skills are declining. Cognitive capabilities are declining. AI will only exacerbate that, I think, make it worse. Privacy rights. Hey, go to the doctor's office. Go to the, you know, have a bank account. Send out an email. Somebody will know what you are doing. What are we going to do about that? Protect privacy rights. Democracy. I don't know if you've had that experience.
9:54I've had the experience. Deep fakes. You know what a deep fake is? Of course. All right. They do it really well. Somebody could take me on your show right now and transform every word that I said, right? And people said, why did Bernie Sanders say that? Why does he say how much he loves Donald Trump? I'm surprised to hear that. How the hell are we going to know the difference, what is true and what is false? I think you're probably hearing Senator Sanders in conversations with people like Sam Altman, that if the United States acts too slowly, then the Chinese will win the AI revolution. Can I guess that that was one of the things he said to you?
10:34Yeah, it was. And, you know, that's the usual line. Although I am very happy to tell you, a number of months ago, I did a public meeting here on Capitol Hill in the visiting center. We had hundreds of people coming out. You know what we did? We had two leading AI scientists from the United States and two scientists from China, beaming in. And boy, did I get criticized for that. Imagine having American scientists talking to Chinese scientists. And of course, that is going on all the time anyhow. But we made it public. We had this public meeting. And I'm happy to say that, or maybe we should be scared, that even the Trump administration, which criticized me for that meeting, is now planning to meet with the Chinese because of what I suspect are legitimate concerns about existential threats, which takes me back to an issue again.
11:28Literally, in the last couple of weeks, we have had AI models breaking away from human control. That's just for the last few weeks. David, that is now. Understood. If we don't deal with this stuff, what's going to be the case next year, five years from now? You've also proposed an American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act. I did. Talk to me about that. How would that play a role in the effort you're describing? Two important factors there, one more important than the other. The first is the foundation of AI is human knowledge, right? The discussion that you and I are having this very moment will end up on the Internet, will end up within the AI world.
12:17It'll be part of the zillions of other aspects of human knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. It strikes me that if we as human beings create the foundation of what AI stands on, the people who do it should get benefits, financial benefits from that. And that's what a sovereign wealth fund would do. If AI profits, as I suspect it will, I want the American people to benefit from that, not just Mr. Musk and Mr. Zuckerberg. Second of all, more importantly, when we have 50 % ownership of the major AI companies, which is what the Sovereign Fund does, what it does is put public representation on the boards of every major company.
13:08So if a company comes forward and says, you know, we got this great idea, companies want it, we can eliminate 5 million jobs in the next year, somebody in the public will say, sorry, that is not what you can do. The public will have a voice there, be able to stop bad things, stop the undermining of our democracy, et cetera, et cetera. So the two goals of that one, more importantly, have the public represented on these AI companies to stop bad things from happening. Second of all, to the degree that money is being made, I want AI profits to benefit ordinary Americans, not just Mr. Musk and Mr. Bezos.
13:47One of the alarming aspects, and there are many about data centers, is that local and state officials have been signing nondisclosure agreements in deals with data and AI companies. For example, the governor of Louisiana is reported to have signed an NDA with Meta, Mark Zuckerberg's outfit, on a$50 billion data center campus. Is it legal for government officials to sign an NDA? What is the existence of these NDAs signal to you? Well, David, we're living in a moment. We're living in a moment. The law is not all that relevant anymore. We have a president who kind of doesn't believe in the constitution or the rule of law.
14:24I'm afraid his views have spread down to other Republicans. But what I would say, whether it's legal or not, I don't know. What I would say is if you're a small town, all right, and you got some volunteer members of the board of selectmen, right? These are guys who work for a living. They come to a meeting once a week. They volunteer at a time. And suddenly you got some multi-zillion dollar company with 18 lawyers and accountants coming in and say, we have a deal for you. And all you got to do is sign right here. And you're going to get, you know, money for, you know, property tax relief or schools or whatever you want.
14:58Just sign right here. These ordinary people taking on some of the largest corporations in the world. Not quite a fair fight. But what we have seen in the last many months, it's quite unbelievable, is you've seen a grassroots resistance that I think the big tech oligarchs never expected. That's what I want to ask you. How much is this picking up steam as an issue? God knows there's such a range of issues in this Trump era to focus on, on the left or anywhere else. How much has data centers picked up steam as a galvanizing issue? Yeah, you're absolutely right. There are a million issues that are out there.
15:40I mean, every day my office is dealing with 10 different issues. But I think what AI and these data centers have done has given people who often feel powerless, you know, what are they going to do about oligarchy in America? What are they going to do about a corrupt campaign finance system or the health care collapse in America? But you know what? Some company wants to come in and destroy your local environment. You know what? We can fight back. And boy, I'm sure you've seen some of these videos of local people taking on their poor little city councils. My God, mayors getting thrown out of office, all that stuff.
16:19I think people feel some sense of empowerment that they can actually stop something. But I think also, and maybe I'm wrong in this, but I don't think I am. What folks are saying is, look, I don't want this colossus to be in my backyard. It's ugly. It's disgusting. It's taking farmland. It's destroying our environment, water, electric rates, noise, heat, all that stuff. That's real. But I think in the back of the minds of many of these folks, and by the way, they are conservatives. They are progressives. They are moderates. There's something else going on. They're saying, what the hell are we doing?
16:57What is this going to contribute to? Is this going to result in my kid not being able to have a job? is this going to result in, you know, my not having any privacy? Why am I aiding these large corporations owned by the wealthiest people in the world who could care less about me? Let's stand up.
17:23I'm speaking with Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont. We'll continue this conversation in just a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.
17:50I'm Emily Flake, cartoonist at The New Yorker. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Bombas. Summer's here, and we are living for all things outdoors. Whether your thing is jogging, heading to the beach, or grilling in front of your stoop, Bombas makes your comfiest summer staples so you can make the most out of all your summer plans. They've got a whole line of pro-level, sports-specific socks for golf, yoga, the gym, and socks for every kind of runner. I personally do not run if I can help it, but I walk everywhere. And if I don't get my 10 ,000 steps in, my phone will yell at me. These socks are so soft and cushioned right where I need it, whether I'm doing a power saunter in the park or just running a million errands.
18:26Plus, they're airy, sweat-wicking. My feet feel as good after a long day of pounding the pavement as they did when I left the apartment. Head over to Bombas.com slash Radio Hour and use code Radio Hour for 20 % off your first purchase. That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com slash Radio Hour. Code Radio Hour at checkout. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Gusto. Running a small business means you wear all the hats. Hiring manager, payroll department, benefits team, you name it. Gusto is here to make your hat situation a little bit more wearable. Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses.
19:03It's all-in-one, remote-friendly, and incredibly easy to use. So you can pay, hire, onboard, and support your team from anywhere. With Gusto, you get great services like unlimited payroll runs for one monthly price. No hidden fees, no surprises. Or direct access to certified HR experts to help support you through any tough HR situation. There's so much more, and it's quick and simple to switch to Gusto. Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast. Plus, don't pay a cent until you run your first payroll. Try Gusto today at gusto.com slash newyorker and get three months free when you run your first payroll.
19:41That's three months of free payroll at gusto.com slash newyorker. One more time, gusto.com slash newyorker. WNYC Studios is supported by Quince. Autumn is right around the corner. And those back-to-school vibes have me excited for a reset, starting with my wardrobe. And that's why I'm heading to Quince. Quince is all about quality over quantity. They focus on everyday staples you'll reach for again and again, like ultra-soft organic cotton tees and premium Mongolian cashmere sweaters. Are last year's basics looking a little threadbare? Quince has you covered with premium denim and tailored chinos that start at just$60 but wear like a luxury brand.
20:20That's because everything at Quince is priced 50 % to 80 % less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen. So you're paying for high quality, not brand markup. And Quince goes way beyond the wardrobe. They've become my go-to for everything from home goods to skincare and even luggage. I just got the Voyage Nylon Split Travel Bag. It's got so many thoughtful touches and pockets galore. And it's perfect as a carry-on item or as a weekend bag for a quick getaway. I love it. Upgrade your everyday. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com slash radio hour.
20:53Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash radio hour. WNYC Studios is supported by Hero Bread. Okay, I love bread. But sadly, I love bread more than bread loves me. I can handle gluten, not to brag, but bread seems to hit my waistline like cake. Furthermore, I seem to have become a person who cares about her fiber and protein intake, and bread just wasn't helping me with those goals. That's why I was so excited to learn about Hero Bread. Look, I've messed around with low-carb breads and baked goods and most of them taste more like a cardboard box than something you'd actually want to eat, but not Hero Bread.
21:34Their sliced white and seeded loaves taste like actual bread without the hit to the scale and they help me meet those fiber and protein numbers. And Hero doesn't just do bread. We're talking tortillas, buns, bagels, plus fun new options like Hero Noodles, 32 grams of fiber, 12 grams of protein, at just 80 calories per serving if you're a numbers person, and limited-edition treats like lemon poppy seed scones and pan au chocolat. All keto-friendly, all packed with fiber, all high in protein and low in sugar, and most importantly, all delicious. So stop chasing your fitness goals by eating cardboard.
22:06Hero Bread is offering 10 % off your order. Go to hero.co and use code NEWYORKER at checkout. That's code NEWYORKER at H-E-R-O dot C-O.
22:20This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick, and I've been speaking today with Senator Bernie Sanders. Sanders consistently polls as one of the most popular politicians in the country, and he's taken up a cause that cuts across party lines. Resistance to data centers that are being built all across the United States. Sanders has been in Congress since 1991, so he saw the rise of the Internet from the vantage point of Capitol Hill. And I wanted to ask him about how the government has dealt with disruptive innovation in the past. How is this different from other historical instances in which there's rapid technological change?
22:59I don't mean, you know, horse and buggy movement, but the rise of the automobile, the rise of electricity, the rise of the Internet. But I have to tell you, Senator Sanders, when I would watch congressional hearings about the internet, I did not have any great faith in our elected representatives and their knowledge of what the internet was about. This was exemplified by watching a member, I don't remember if it was a senator or congressman, I believe it was a senator, asking the head of Facebook how they made money, not understanding a thing about these technologies. And they sounded like, you'll forgive me, the way my kids treat me with technology or I would have treated my parents with a certain kind of, you know, eyebrow-lifted condescension.
23:46And then they just went to town and did whatever the hell they wanted. And it resulted in one of the great transformations of human consciousness and behavior in the history of civilization. And it wasn't at all tempered by the efforts of our elected legislators. I mean, you're discussing a very significant reality. The way I see it is that you have this extraordinarily transformational technology. You know, you talked about electricity. We can talk about the Industrial Revolution, profound impacts. But it took place over a period of years. I think the difference about this one, David, it is moving much more rapidly than any other technological change.
24:32And it's going to impact us in every aspect of our life. Who we are as human beings and how we relate to each other, not to mention the economy and privacy and democracy and all the rest of that stuff. Number two, and then you pose a real concern. This is pretty complicated stuff, you know? And I can absolutely guarantee you that most members of the United States Senate are not, you know, steeped in the kind of knowledge that, in fact, we should have. And I include myself in that. You do. This is very complicated stuff. But I think at the least that we can do is call upon those people who do know what the impact of AI and robotics will be to help us design guardrails, which makes certain that these technologies work for ordinary people, not just enrich the very rich.
25:31That seems to me the goal that we've got to achieve. I gather you recently met with Aaron Marakovich to talk about data centers. What was that conversation? Like, probably different than with Sam Altman. Yeah, very different. She's an heroic figure. And I think she expressed to me a real surprise. I think she got into this kind of fairly recently, that people started calling her from all over the country. They were conservatives. They were progressives. And they said, we need help in organizing, in stopping these data centers, which are going to have such a destructive impact on our communities.
26:05I like Erin a whole lot. But considering the complexity and the technological nature of the question we were just talking about, does that also signal to you that it's time for a change of generations in the Senate, in the Congress, in the presidency as well? Well, there's always folks who are saying, you know what we need to change the country? We need more young people. We need more blacks. We need more gays. We need more women. We need more this. And I believe in all that stuff. And I've probably done as much as anybody in the United States Senate to get young people involved in the political process with some success.
Read the full transcript
26:42But this is not a quote-unquote, and it is also clear that younger people understand the impact of this technology better than older people. That's true, too. But at the end of the day, it's not generational. It's ideological. It's which side you are on. So you have plenty of young people here who are saying, yes, let's give the big tech companies everything they want. We've got to take on China. Let's go to war with Iran. Let's give tax breaks to the billion. I'm young. I'm the new generation. And you got a lot of us old fogies saying, maybe that's not a great idea. So I think we don't want to get caught.
27:18We do want young people in the process. Absolutely. And I run around the country trying to do that. But we need people who are prepared to stand up for the working class of this country, to protect our environment, to protect our constitution, to end bigotry, et cetera, et cetera. So to me, I don't look at it as generational. I look at it as ideological. Which side are you on? Are you on the side of the working class of this country? And as you may know, we just had some elections in Michigan the other day, which I think indicate that maybe the American people are in agreement. We certainly did.
27:52And we had on Abdul al-Sayed a couple of weeks ago, and he was heading toward what seemed like a 10 or 15 point victory and he won by one point and he underperformed with working class voters and voters of color despite a very populist message. How do you interpret that? Well, let me tell you something. I would look at it again, David, in a slightly different way. I happen to think that his victory was the most extraordinary and impressive political victory in the modern history of the United States of America. Don't get it twisted. I love America. I know exactly what America did for me. I saw it with a front row seat to what my life should have been but for America.
28:40But I love America enough to understand that America ought to be America for all of her children. Now you tell me, you studied these things, right? All right. And I want your opinion. Think back. You tell me of a candidate, a major candidate in the big race, primary, Senate primary, who took on the entire leadership of his own state, state of Michigan, Democratic leadership. Took on the Democratic leadership nationally here in Washington. Took on$70 million of super PAC and special interest funding. Okay. took on various levels of bigotry because he happens to be a Muslim, and he won the election.
29:27I have never seen a candidate take on all of that opposition and win an election. So to me, it was an extraordinarily impressive victory. Now, I got to tell you something about polling in Michigan. When I ran for president in 2016, literally the day before the election, We were told all about, Bernie, you're 20, 30 points down. You can't win. You know what? We got out of Michigan. We won someplace else because we thought we could lose. Ended up, we won. We had to hold a press conference someplace else to announce our victory in Michigan. I don't know what goes on with polling in Michigan. But please do not underestimate.
30:06I'm not underestimating at all. But I'm asking a very specific question about where he performed best and where he underperformed. Yeah, and that's fair. But I think what you're going to see is, you know, he was up against a popular governor. The governor came out against him. But it's similar to New York City. I mean, Mamdani did great, but black voters actually, he underperformed with them. Well, we will see what happens in the general election. I suspect that you're going to see a very strong coming together. And Hayley Stevens, by the way, was very gracious in her concession speech. She was.
30:40And she understands, as I do, that now is a time that we come together to defeat the most dangerous president in the history of the United States. And I think without any doubt, the black community will be there, the Latino community will be there, the working class community will be there. And to the degree that I can be of help to Abdul, I certainly intend to do that. Senator Sanders, I appreciate your time. Thank you so much. Thank you.
31:07Senator Bernie Sanders. You can read a terrific piece about his early life and political evolution by staff writer Jill Lepore at NewYorker.com. And of course, you can subscribe to The New Yorker there as well. NewYorker.com. We'll come back to the movement against data centers in our next episode in a conversation with the activist Erin Brockovich. Yes, that Erin Brockovich from the movie. She's now launched a project to track data center construction and log complaints from all over the country. I hope you'll join us.
32:01With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barge, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund.
32:26Hi, I'm Nicole Phelps, Global Fashion News and Features Director at Vogue and co-host of the Run-Through podcast. Each week on the show, our listeners get an all-access pass into the world of Vogue. On Tuesdays, join me as I interview influential designers like Calvin Klein, Rachel Scott, and Simone Belotti. On Thursdays, join Chloe Mal, head of editorial content at Vogue US, and Choma Nadi, British Vogue's head of editorial content, as they explore fashion through the lens of culture with guests like Doja Cat and Margot Robbie. Listen and watch the run-through with Vogue wherever you get your podcasts and Vogue's YouTube channel.
From the publisher
The data centers that power artificial intelligence are being built at a rampant pace, and are spurring resistance all over the country. Apart from public concerns about A.I.’s impact on jobs, privacy, and other aspects of life, data centers consume vast amounts of electricity and water. New York has passed a moratorium on new data centers; fourteen other states have considered restrictions. The Vermont senator Bernie Sanders is taking this fight to the national level. He and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have introduced legislation that calls for a nationwide moratorium on data centers to allow time for more research and public input on the issue. The furor, Sanders tells David Remnick, cuts across political divisions. The opponents “are conservatives, they are progressives, they are moderates,” he adds. “They’re saying, What the hell are we doing? What is this gonna contribute to? Is this gonna result in my kid not being able to have a job? Is this gonna result in my not having any privacy? Why am I aiding these large corporations owned by the wealthiest people in the world who [couldn’t] care less about me? Let’s stand up.”
Further reading and listening:
- “When Bernie Sanders Headed for the Hills,” by Jill Lepore
- “Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Fight the Oligarchy,” by Emily Witt
- “Geoffrey Hinton: ‘It’s Far Too Late’ to Stop Artificial Intelligence,” an episode of The New Yorker Radio Hour
New episodes of The New Yorker Radio Hour drop every Tuesday and Friday. Join host David Remnick as he discusses the latest in politics, news, and current events in conversation with political leaders, newsmakers, innovators, New Yorker staff writers, authors, actors, and musicians.The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC and The New Yorker.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.




