In short
The episode examines what could go wrong or right if the U.S. strikes Iran amid Iran’s December protests and a January crackdown that some estimates say killed up to 30,000 people. Reporter Cora Engelbrecht speaks with anonymous Iranians who describe regime violence (including hospital staff laughing while patients are treated) and explain why some now “hope for” U.S. action despite fearing war. Key claims include: Trump issued repeated “red lines” but did not intervene when protesters were killed; U.S. military buildup may risk a wider regional war; and there is “no third way” in popular thinking.
Guests
Cora Engelbrecht (Iran reporting) and Kareem Sajjadpour (Carnegie Endowment policy analyst). Sajjadpour argues the U.S. can’t dictate outcomes like Iraq; decapitation could radicalize the regime; and any operation should degrade missile/repression capabilities while dividing security forces.
Notable examples
chants for Reza Pahlavi in conservative cities; references to the June U.S.-Israel war; and “Venezuela model” comparisons.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIranian Protests and U.S. Response
0:01 to 0:51
Discussion on the protests in Iran and the U.S. military buildup in response.
“If you're like me, your to-do list has the magical ability to grow even when you're in the middle of crossing things off of it.”
Iranian Protests and U.S. Response
1:05 to 2:05
Discussion on the protests in Iran and the U.S. military buildup in response.
“Summer is finally here, and that means it's time to rethink how I get dressed every morning.”
Iranian Protests and U.S. Response
2:08 to 2:23
Discussion on the protests in Iran and the U.S. military buildup in response.
“That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash radio hour for free shipping and 365-day returns.”
Iranian Protests and U.S. Response
3:02 to 4:12
Discussion on the protests in Iran and the U.S. military buildup in response.
“When protests ignited across Iran in December and reports emerged that the regime was killing thousands of protesters, Donald Trump threatened to intervene then and there.”
Voices from Iran
4:12 to 6:04
Personal accounts from Iranian citizens reflecting on their situation and hopes.
“It is the topic that every two Iranian would speak about when they would ever meet.”
Complex Emotions about War
6:04 to 12:21
Iranians express mixed feelings about foreign intervention and potential war.
“And fearing a foreign invasion in these circumstances is just kind of laughable, if you ask me.”
Reporting from Cora Engelbrecht
12:21 to 13:44
Details about Cora Engelbrecht's reporting on the Iranian situation.
“All of these people asked to remain anonymous.”
Reporting from Cora Engelbrecht
14:54 to 15:18
Details about Cora Engelbrecht's reporting on the Iranian situation.
“Families around the world are facing widening gaps in health care and nutrition, but solutions are within reach.”
Historical Context of U.S.-Iran Relations
15:30 to 18:45
Explore the historical backdrop of U.S. intervention in Iran.
“It was a piece of covert business involving the CIA and British intelligence.”
Current U.S. Strategy and Its Implications
18:45 to 22:14
Discuss the complexities of U.S. strategy toward Iran under Trump.
“So I think that's the context of how we got to where we are now.”
Show all 17 chapters
The Future of Iran's Political Landscape
22:14 to 25:44
Analyze the potential outcomes of regime change and its risks.
“number two reserves of natural gas, number three reserves of oil, has this, you know, one of the longest continuously inhabited civilizations in the world, and it's punching way below its weight.”
Power Dynamics Within Iran
25:44 to 28:12
Examine the power structure and elite influences in Iran.
“That is something that I would be concerned about.”
Power Dynamics in Iran
28:12 to 29:48
Explore the hierarchical structure of power in Iran and the ideological battles shaping its future.
“So if you think about power in Iran as like a pyramid, shaped like a pyramid, at the top of that pyramid is Ayatul Khamenei.”
Protests and Public Sentiment
29:48 to 31:09
Understand the widespread grievances against the Islamic Republic and the economic triggers for protests.
“authoritarian, but it's also economically and socially authoritarian.”
Reza Pahlavi's Role in the Movement
31:09 to 33:48
Discover Reza Pahlavi's influence on the current political landscape and the nostalgia for his father's reign.
“people were saying Javid Shah, long live the Shah.”
Challenges Facing Opposition
33:48 to 35:08
Examine the radicalization of Iran's opposition and the complexities of democratic aspirations.
“And so there's that perception of him, and there's also the perception that he is trying to hijack a democratic movement for his own autocratic ends.”
U.S. Policy Considerations
35:08 to 37:49
Analyze the risks and potential U.S. actions regarding Iran amid rising tensions.
“And I worry that the tendencies of this opposition movement are not entirely democratic.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00WNYC Studios is supported by TaskRabbit. If you're like me, your to-do list has the magical ability to grow even when you're in the middle of crossing things off of it. At least twice a day, I wish for an extra set of hands. But I've only got the two, and that's why I love TaskRabbit. When your to-do list keeps growing, TaskRabbit is ready to help. Just pick a trusted tasker and they'll show up and get it done. And taskers are often available to help the same day. TaskRabbit connects you with skilled taskers in your area for moving, furniture assembly, home repairs, yard work, mounting, and more.
0:32We run a small business out of our not-huge apartment, and sometimes the box situation is a little much. When we need to offload to the storage space, we call TaskRabbit so we can actually relax at the end of the day. When life happens, your to-do list grows. Get ahead of it now and get$15 off your first task at TaskRabbit.com or on the TaskRabbit app using promo code NEWYORKER. Taskers book up fast, especially for same-day tasks, so book trusted home help today. That's$15 off your first task using promo code NEWYORKER with the TaskRabbit app or at TaskRabbit.com. WNYC Studios is supported by Quince.
1:08Summer is finally here, and that means it's time to rethink how I get dressed every morning. Goodbye warm and cozy, and hello light and breathable. But I still want to look put together, and that's why I keep coming back to Quince. They focus on high-quality essentials that look and feel so good, all in summer fabrics like breathable linen and soft organic cotton. Premium basics without the premium markup, so I can look elevated and effortless without taking a hit to my wallet. Need some base layers? Their tees are soft, sleek, and easy to wear. And if you need some defense against the office AC blast, the organic cotton sweaters are gorgeous.
1:43Summer's a great time to refresh your home, too. Quince offers custom upholstered sofas, ceramic cookware, premium bedding, and so many other beautiful things for your living space, I'm really finding myself recommending Quince to everyone for everything. I have been living in their micro-ribbed cotton tanks. So cute for the summer heat. And when I need something extra, their denim jacket pairs with those tanks beautifully. Elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to quince.com slash radio hour for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada, too. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash radio hour for free shipping and 365-day returns.
2:20Quince.com slash Radio Hour. WNYC Studios is supported by Intention to Treat. Every day, doctors use medical devices to monitor a patient's health. But what if the device is flawed and gives the wrong vital sign reading because of the color of someone's skin? Everyone needs to be warned. Every hospital, emergency department, because relying on this device is killing people. To hear all episodes of The Race Equation from the New England Journal of Medicine, subscribe to Intention to Treat. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.
3:02Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. When protests ignited across Iran in December and reports emerged that the regime was killing thousands of protesters, Donald Trump threatened to intervene then and there. He did not. But the Pentagon began building up a huge military presence around the Gulf region. And meanwhile, the regime, it turns out, may have killed as many as 30 ,000 of its own people, according to some estimates. Iran has seen huge protests in the country before. And the regime has responded with violence before. But this time seems something of a different order of magnitude.
3:42some Iranians who oppose the regime have been in the crazy position of hoping for the U.S. to strike, to bomb their own country, even if it leads to full-scale war. Reporter Cora Engelbrecht has been recording her conversations with people in Iran about what that could all mean. Now we've altered or overdubbed their voices to protect these people from reprisal. It is the topic of the past 40 days. It is the topic that every two Iranian would speak about when they would ever meet. One of the people who spoke with me is a young man who works in a hospital about four hours north of Tehran. I mean, I'm having a very difficult time processing all these different thoughts because on theory, like on paper, I would be against a foreign intervention.
4:37I would believe that democracy would only come from within. But looking back at what happens, where are these criminals going to go? Like, we're not going to vote no way, not in a million years. This hospital worker was stationed in two different emergency wards during the peak of the regime's lethal crackdown on nationwide demonstrations in January. In the weeks since, he has sent me evidence he collected of hundreds of casualties, many of them trauma injuries, from these emergency wards where he was stationed. These people, these plaincloth agents, for example, remember the grandmother that I told you about?
5:19The grandmother that was brought in debt to the hospital? The granddaughter who was shot in the ear was crying all the time. and the daughter of that grandmother was undergoing a mental collapse. During that entire time that we were attempting CPR on the old woman, the clinical agents just stood there laughing and showing no empathy whatsoever. They were laughing. Essentially, mortal enemies were treating the patients like animals. Seeing that, realizing that we are already these people's mortal enemies, helped us realize that we are at war to a degree, to a good degree. And fearing a foreign invasion in these circumstances is just kind of laughable, if you ask me.
6:17Can you hear me? Yeah, yeah. How are you feeling? is too hard. This is an activist who lives in Tehran. She's in her 20s. She was actually in prison during the Women's Life Freedom protests in 2022. Over the past few weeks, she's been attending a lot of funerals commemorating people who were killed in January. For years, she told me she would have never dreamed of supporting foreign intervention. but now faced over and over again with the undeniable brutality of the violence from the past months, she's shifted her view. She can't help but want some kind of action from the United States which would eliminate the regime.
7:07I don't know. You read the book Waiting for Godot. Yes. Yes. It's like we are waiting for you, Godot. And we want to attack us because we can't fight back with the governments. And I don't know. I think that's a miserable situation for my people. You know, war is not good. And we saw that the war and the foreign engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq and Palestine is too bad. And it's continuing over these years. But it's like we have two ways. One, the regime kills us. Two, the foreign country kills us. You know how upsetting that is? It's really upsetting. This woman is an activist in her mid-30s, and she told me she's participated in every political uprising, starting with the Green Movement in 2009.
8:32She was in her teens then, so her whole adult life she's been protesting the current regime. She said that the 12-day war in June with the United States and Israel was still fresh in her mind and had actually made her more cautious about joining the demonstrations in late December. This time, I kind of... This time, I kind of... I did not participate, right? I just... I observed. Like, I mostly went to the streets by car. It was both the fact that I was scared by the violence and also by the prospect, because it was, it started, it did not start, but it picked up with a monarch's cult. It was a monarchist movement, and I had the feeling that it's kind of like a counter-revolution.
9:24Like many I spoke with, she expressed some distrust and skepticism for the royalist movement that has served around the former crown prince Reza Pahlavi. He's the exiled son of the former Shah of Iran, and he hasn't been in the country since 1978. The thing is that the foreign pressure is, it's not humanitarian completely. We are all very well aware of that. aware of that. It seems like a tool for them, a negotiation tool, an excuse. It's not even what they're negotiating for, and it's naive to think so. But I'd say this whole situation, this whole dualism that either the Islamic Republic stays or there is a war and there is no third way, this is a dangerous mindset.
10:10I don't want to choose one of them. I choose neither of them. to be honest i wake up i feel like i wish there was a war i don't share that with anyone but that's just inside my head i wish there was a war and we were over with it but i am quite sure about myself that i do not want that right it's just personal mood swings i have come across people waiting for war in that sense i mean like waiting for a celestial catastrophe like a miracle that can, you know, save them from this situation. And that's kind of suicidal, you know? People who are very senselessly waiting for that beautiful moment of the skies being bombarded and the earth catching fire and everything exploding and destroying.
11:01I mean, it's a suicidal wish. To me, it sounds people who are living, especially people in Tehran, because Tehran was affected more than other cities. When you say that Tehran was more affected than other cities, what are you referring to? Are you referring to the 12-day war? Yeah, yeah, the 12-day war. I mean, we're talking about two traumas. And wishing for that to happen again, it just comes out of frustration and feeling that in either way, if there is a war or not, you have no control over your life and being. What in that, are there any kernels of hope and all that? When you think about the future right now, what is giving you hope, if anything?
11:53That is a very hard question. But it's a very difficult thing to find hope. Maybe we will transition to a democracy, or maybe we won't. Maybe things will get even worse. but we're not in a situation to worry about this because we are way beyond the no-turning-back points, you know.
12:21Voices from Iran. All of these people asked to remain anonymous. You can find some extraordinary reporting from Cora Engelbrecht all at newyorker.com. We'll continue on Iran and its relationship with the United States in just a moment. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour.
12:54The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by AT &T. Summer is great for many reasons. The best reason? Our plans we made finally making it out of the group chat. Because there's more time to fit everyone in. Whatever you've got in store this summer, capturing those memories is a must. And AT &T has your summer essential in the iPhone 17 Pro. Its center stage front camera auto adjusts the frame to fit everyone into group selfies. You don't even have to turn your phone. No awkward cropping or asking strangers to take it. Just the perfect group selfie every time. And AT &T makes sharing those moments with everyone easy.
13:31Because you got to share the pic or it didn't happen, right? Right now at AT &T, ask how you You can get iPhone 17 Pro on them with eligible trade-in. Requires eligible plan. Terms and restrictions apply. Subject to change, visit att.com slash iPhone or visit an AT &T store for details. Support comes from WISE, the smart way to manage the currencies you need around the globe. Fed up with losing out to hidden fees when you send your money abroad with your everyday bank? Choose the smart way. WISE. You can count on the exchange rate you'd usually find on Google. No unwelcome surprises. Plus, ditch that where's my money feeling.
14:12Most transfers arrive in under 20 seconds. Join millions saving billions on hidden fees. Be smart. Get wise. Download the Wise app today. T's and C's apply. This show is supported by Odoo. When you buy business software from lots of vendors, the costs add up and it gets complicated and confusing. Odoo solves this. It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales. Odoo is all connected on a single platform in a simple and affordable way. You can save money without missing out on the features you need. Check out Odoo at odoo.com.
14:50That's odoo.com. WNYC Studios is supported by Helen Keller International. This is a moment of growing urgency. Families around the world are facing widening gaps in health care and nutrition, but solutions are within reach. Just 75 cents can provide treatment for neglected tropical diseases, and$2 can protect a child's sight and health. For a limited time, donations are being matched, helping expand that impact. Learn more at HelenKellerINTL.org. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. When the United States instigated a regime change in Iran in 1953, it didn't do so with aircraft carriers.
15:36There was no shock and awe. It was a piece of covert business involving the CIA and British intelligence. Together, they engineered the overthrow of the elected prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, because his government was pursuing a plan to nationalize Iran's oil industry. There were also concerns about the influence of communists in Iran. But contemporary Iran is not Venezuela. Does Donald Trump want to force Iran to make a nuclear deal to replace the one that he scrapped in his first term? Or is he really seeking regime change? To understand how this complex situation might play out, I called on one of the best sources I know on Iran, Kareem Sajjadpour.
16:20Sajjadpour is a policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and he writes about the Middle East for foreign affairs and other publications. Let's begin our conversation about now with the most obvious resonance. In 2002-2003, the American government looked on the leadership of Iraq, quite rightly, as horrific. And we went to war with Iraq, and it was a catastrophe. Right now, the United States, under Donald Trump, is amassing a gigantic military force around Iran. What do you make of American intentions here, and what is the wisdom of them? Well, I think part of the challenge we have, David, is that it's not clear in President Trump's head what his intentions are and what his endgame is.
17:23if we rewind, the reason we've gotten ourselves into this situation is that when these protests began in Iran in late December of last year, 2025, President Trump initially said to the Iranian regime, if you kill protesters, there's going to be consequences. The United States is locked and loaded and ready to protect them. He later went on to issue, by my count, at least nine more of those red lines, warning Iran that if it kills protesters, the United States was going to have their back. And he incited protesters to the streets. He said, go and seize your institutions. And Iran drove a giant truck through Trump's red lines.
18:13By some accounts, the regime killed as many as 30 ,000 people over a 48-hour period. We don't know for a fact. And it was very clear that the regime in Iran totally flaunted President Trump's red lines. And there's recent history on this one when President Obama issued a red line against the Assad regime in Damascus against using chemical weapons. You know, Assad used chemical weapons, and that was one of the critiques, foreign policy critiques of Obama's presidency, that that red line wasn't enforced, and what are the implications and messages for other adversaries if we don't enforce red lines?
19:00So I think that's the context of how we got to where we are now. But there is in the context also that the United States, I think it was Phil Gordon, a national security figure for Democrats, for Obama, as well as for Kamala Harris. I think Phil Gordon once said, we invaded Iraq fully and it was a disaster. We invaded Libya partly and it was a disaster. And we kept out of Syria and it was a monumental disaster. And now with Iran, the humanitarian question of the killing of thousands of demonstrators is without question. The question is what to do about it. The big question is, does the United States have the power to transform Iran's government?
19:56Or the right. Or the right. Or the right. Listen, I think that if the last two and a half decades of Middle East history had turned out differently, I think we'd be having a very different conversation right now. Now, I do believe that Iran is a very different place than Iraq and Afghanistan. But I do think we have to be very honest in saying that the last two decades has proven that we don't have the ability to dictate our preferred outcome in Iran. We don't have the ability to dictate who comes to power the day after a military attack. We're told all the time that Iran, unlike other countries in the region, is quite pro-American.
20:48What does that mean and what does that imply for what's going on now? Well, I think this is simply stated after 47 years of living under a theocracy whose identity has been premised on death to America. It's the most secular society, I would argue, in the Middle East and the least anti-American, the most pro-American. And I think most Iranians have also reached this conclusion that so long as the ethos of their government is death to America and death to Israel rather than long live Iran, this country will never fulfill its enormous potential as a nation. There's a lot of nostalgia. It's an interesting phenomenon, having nostalgia for a period which you never lived, because three-quarters of Iranians were born after the revolution.
21:36But they do have this nostalgia for the stories they heard about life before the revolution, when people had social freedoms, when Iran had a dignified place in the world, when the Iranian passport could get you places, when the country wasn't an isolated pariah state. And so it's not to say that people want to be a lackey of the United States, but I think there's a basic recognition that this nation, which in my view should be a G20 nation, it has the human capital for it, it has the natural resources for it, number two reserves of natural gas, number three reserves of oil, has this, you know, one of the longest continuously inhabited civilizations in the world, and it's punching way below its weight.
22:27It could be South Korea, it behaves like North Korea. And so I think there's a recognition among Iranians that this radicalism, this anti-imperialism, anti-Americanism has just led the country into a ditch. And if the country is ever to fulfill its potential. It needs more tolerant government. It needs a government that prioritizes national interests before ideology. So I believe that it's a society which is capable of representative democracy. But authoritarian transitions are not usually popularity contests. They're not usually dictated by, you know, the vote of people. It's oftentimes, you know, when that power vacuum comes to be.
23:15Who can mobilize violence? Well, I remember on the brink of the Iraq War, I forget who said it in the Bush Circle, maybe it was Kenneth Edelman, that we would be greeted, American soldiers would be greeted by flowers and candy. And to be sure, in the first couple of days, there were scenes of ecstasy when statues of Saddam Hussein were toppled in Baghdad. What is predictable in Iran? Let's say the combined military and intelligence forces that are arrayed around Iran succeed in that way, in that immediate way, if that's what the operation is. What's in place to fill that vacuum? So it depends on what kind of operation we conduct.
24:04If we choose to assassinate Iran's supreme leader, and the people I talk to both in Washington and in Israel believe that if we do take military action, there's a better than 50 % chance that we will try to target Iran's supreme leader, that has very different implications than if we simply go after their missile program and nuclear program and maybe Revolutionary Guard outposts. It's my view that even within the regime, there is a recognition that this status quo is not tenable. A friend of mine who's a political science professor in Tehran told me that at the beginning of the revolution, the regime was composed of 80 % ideologues and 20 % charlatans.
24:53And now it's the reverse. Only 20 % are true believers in this system, and 80 % are just going along for financial, political expediency. And so most people in that system recognize that it's not sustainable, and they're waiting for the supreme leader to die. Now, what happens if instead of dying a natural death or some kind of internal coup, he's taken out by American missiles? That, in my view, is an enormous risk, an enormous gamble, that instead of this evolutionary process happening, it could radicalize and mobilize the true believers in that system to actually try to preserve power among themselves.
25:46That is something that I would be concerned about. If Ayatollah Khamenei were 50 years old, perhaps I would think differently. But martyring an 86-year-old, I think, is fraught with some risk. It seems to me one of the dynamics in Iran that maybe people aren't thinking about enough is that the real establishment in Iran is the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is not only a military and intelligence establishment, but it comprises much of the economic elite, factories, ports, all kinds of enterprises. And there's an upper crust of the Revolutionary Guard Corps that's quite rich and entrenched, and they have the weapons.
26:33So if, in fact, the Supreme Leader were killed, and even more in the intelligence and military elite were killed, you'd still have the Revolutionary Guard Corps there. They're not going to be wiped out. Isn't that what would come to power? And what would that portend? So that is a very valid concern that what are you going to do with 150 ,000 plus Revolutionary Guardsmen and their affiliated militia members, the Basij militia, who are usually much more ideological in their worldview. And that is a concern that I have if the goal turns out to be a decapitation operation to try to topple the regime.
27:26Because these folks, as we saw in post-Saddam Iraq, they're armed and they're organized. Now, I don't want to claim that they're monolithic. There are not 150 ,000 true believers. But what I learned from observing the Iraq war is that 1 % of society can make life hell for 99 % of society if they're willing to go out and conduct suicide bombings and things like that, if they feel like they're not going to have any role in the countries tomorrow. And so that, I think, is so critical for Iran's future, for any opposition movement or democratic movement, to try to figure out a way to co-opt these folks under a very big tent.
28:12So if you think about power in Iran as like a pyramid, shaped like a pyramid, at the top of that pyramid is Ayatul Khamenei. His turban is at the top of that pyramid. All the powerful people below him are not wearing turbans. They're the military commanders. And in some ways, I think the future of Iran will be shaped in part by the battles between these men. because some of them are ideologues who want to continue with the culture of the revolution and death to America and what I call Vision 1979. But there are others among them who are not Democrats. I'm not arguing that they're Democrats, but they recognize, they appreciate power, and they believe that in order to entrench their power and even enrich themselves, it behooves them to throw out Shiite nationalism and anti-imperialism and replace it with Iranian nationalism.
29:17And again, they're not Democrats, but they're nationalists. And so I think that is going to be one of the determining fights for Iran's future. It's very interesting to see the mixed nature of the protests this time. Tell me a little bit about the nature of the demonstrations this time and their extent and who they include? Yeah, so I think one thing that is important for people to understand about why the Islamic Republic is so despised by such a large percentage of its population is that it's not only politically authoritarian, but it's also economically and socially authoritarian. It tries to micromanage every aspect of people's lives, what you're wearing, what you drink, what you eat, what movies you watch, what music you listen to.
30:05And for that reason, the grievances against this regime are so widespread. And so in this particular instance, the trigger was economic. It was rapidly depreciating currency. It's remarkable when you compare Iran's currency now to 1979, it's depreciated more than 99 % since the 1979 revolution. And so what we saw with these protests was the trigger was economic, depreciating currency. And then very quickly, within a couple days, they quickly went to death to the Islamic Republic. And they spread throughout the country. For me, the things that were very eye-opening were these slogans of long live the Shah and death to the Islamic Republic in these cities which were conservative strongholds of the regime, in cities like Mashhad and Qom, in the town of Khomein, the birthplace of Ayatollah Khomeini, people were saying Javid Shah, long live the Shah.
31:12Well, speaking of the Shah, his son, who's now a man of a certain age, has lived abroad, obviously, nearly all his life. But his name keeps coming up, not only in foreign affairs articles and things like this or in the newspapers, but in the chants of the demonstrators, what role does he play or not play in this entire drama? So Reza Pahlavi has spent the last 47 years in exile, mostly in suburban Washington, D.C., in Potomac, Maryland. And, you know, he has been very consistent in opposing the Islamic Republic and advocating democracy. But it's only been in the last several years that people have begun looking to him for leadership and chanting his name.
Read the full transcript
32:03I do believe that he could win. If there were to be a free and fair election in Iran, I think he could actually win an election inside Iran. Really? Do you think he has intentions of coming back to Iran and playing that role? So what he said is that he aspires to serve as a bridge between Iranians and democracy. He's always been consistent in saying, you know, my goal is not to be king. You know, if people want to vote for a constitutional monarchy, I'm willing to play that role. But that is not my aspiration. Isn't there some romanticization going on here about the Shah and the Shah's reign? I mean, the Savak, the secret police of the Shah, was not exactly a benevolent association.
32:49There was a lot of repression under the Shah. There was a lot of corruption as well. Do Iranians, young ones or old ones, they look back on this regime as Valhalla? So that's the thing about nostalgia, David, is that you remember things with rose-tinted lenses. And especially for people who the vast majority of this society of 92 million people were born after the 1979 revolution. So they don't have direct recollections of the bad things that were associated with the Shah's government. But they see the images of how life was. They hear the stories which their parents tell them, which, you know, now in hindsight, I think the vast majority of people who participated in the 1979 revolution think it was an own goal.
33:44It was a mistake and their lives were much better. And so for that reason, I think a lot of people have looked to Reza Pahlavi as someone who represents where they want to go as a nation. The pessimistic view about him is that he's trying to be either an Ahmad Chalabi-type figure or— Ahmad Chalabi being the figure in Iraq who the Bush administration put its chips on to kind of—it sounds almost absurd to even say it—rebuild democracy in Iraq and be installed by America. Indeed. And so there's that perception of him, and there's also the perception that he is trying to hijack a democratic movement for his own autocratic ends.
34:43Now, as someone who's known him for a couple decades, I actually think that exactly the opposite is probably not true, which is that I actually think that he himself does have democratic ends. But what's happened inside Iran is that the regime is so brutal that the movement, the opposition against the regime has become very radicalized. And I worry that the tendencies of this opposition movement are not entirely democratic. It's monarchist. It's authoritarian. And it's out for retribution. And that is something which is difficult for him to control. I have to ask you, I know you're an analyst more than you are an advocate, to say the least.
35:34What do you hope the American government does? And why? You know, I always quote Kissinger, in which he said that a lot of the major decisions you have to make in government are 5149. And for me, this isn't a no-brainer either way. We haven't really talked about the potential risks. I mean, there are risks that Iran unleashes missiles against U.S. bases in the Persian Gulf, that they go after our allies in the Gulf, and that this requires the United States to then intervene more forcefully. And even though we didn't intend to, we've triggered a regional war, which very few Americans support. Those are risks that we need to take very seriously.
36:25At the same time, I go back to these red lines that the president drew, that on nine occasions, he said, if you kill protesters, there's going to be consequences. And I do think that impacted people's risk calculations. I guess what I would advise the president is, I think, an operation which can degrade the Islamic Republic's malign capabilities, whether it's missile capacity, it's repressive capacity. and it serves to not further unite the regime's security forces, but divide the regime's security forces. If that operation is tenable, I think that's an operation which I would be prepared to, and who am I?
37:23I'm an analyst sitting in my home in Washington, D.C., but I think that that is a defensible operation. So in other words, it's an operation that's an extension of what happened last June rather than a full-blown invasion or decapitation of the regime. Exactly. And David Petraeus said this earlier. Earlier today, I was listening to him. And it's a very important point. And that is that the Venezuela model seemed to go much more smoothly than anyone expected. And Nicola Maduro is sitting in a jail cell now in New York. And the seeming success and facility of that Venezuela model has maybe distorted our understanding of how challenging this operation in Iran might be.
38:19And this is why you're starting to see leaks internally from the Pentagon wanting to pump the brakes before we get ourselves into something which could be totally different than what we anticipate. Kareem, thanks so much. I'm very grateful to you. Thank you, David. It's a pleasure. Kareem Sajidpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. See you next time.
38:54The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Our theme music was composed and performed by Meryl Garbus of Tune Yards, with additional music by Louis Mitchell and Jared Paul. This episode was produced by Max Balton, Adam Howard, David Krasnow, Jeffrey Masters, Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Sommer. With guidance from Emily Botin and assistance from Michael May, David Gable, Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett. And we had assistance this week from Richie O2 in London. The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part by the Cherena Endowment Fund.
39:50My name is Madeline Barron. I'm a journalist for The New Yorker. I focus on stories where powerful people or institutions are doing something that's harming people or harming someone or something in some way. And so my job is to report that so exhaustively that we can reveal what's actually going on and present it to the public. You know, for us at In the Dark, we're paying equal attention to the reporting and the storytelling. And we felt a real kinship with The New Yorker, like the combination of the deeply reported stories that The New Yorker is known for, but also the quality of those stories, the attention to narrative.
40:32if I could give you only one reason to subscribe to the New Yorker it would be maybe this is not the answer you're looking for but I just don't think that there is any other magazine in America that combines so many different types of things into a single issue as a New Yorker you know like you have poetry you have theater reviews you have restaurant recommendations, which for some reason I read even though I don't live in New York City. And all of those things are great, but I haven't even mentioned the other half of the magazine, which is deeply reported stories that honestly are the first things that I read.
41:09You know, I'm a big fan of gymnastics and people will say, oh, we're so lucky to live in the era of Simone Biles, which I agree. We're also so lucky to live in the era of Lawrence Wright, Jane Mayer, Ronan Farrow, Patrick Raddenkief. And so to me, it's like I can't imagine not reading these writers.
41:31You can have all the journalism, the fiction, the film, book, and TV reviews, all the cartoons, just by going right now to newyorker.com slash dark. Plus, there's an incredible archive, a century's worth of award-winning work just waiting for you. That's newyorker.com slash dark. And thanks. you
From the publisher
As Donald Trump and his Administration threaten to attack Iran, their motivations remain unclear. Does the President want to force Iran to make a nuclear deal, to replace the one that he scrapped in his first term, or is he really seeking regime change? To understand how this all might play out, David Remnick speaks with Karim Sadjadpour, a policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who writes about the Middle East for Foreign Affairs and other publications. Citing the disastrous precedents in Afghanistan and Iraq, Sadjadpour notes, “the last two decades has proven that we don’t have the ability to dictate . . . who comes to power the day after a military attack.”
Plus, After protests over the economy erupted across Iran late last year, reports emerged that the regime was killing protesters. Donald Trump threatened to intervene, but did not. Estimates vary widely, but some note that thirty thousand people or more may have been killed. Now, as the U.S. sends a huge military force to the Gulf, Iranians are waiting for war—and many in the country are in the shocking position of hoping for conflict, if it will end the Ayatollah’s government. The reporter Cora Engelbrecht has been recording her conversations with sources on the ground about what that could mean. Their voices were altered or overdubbed for our story, to protect them from reprisal.
New episodes of The New Yorker Radio Hour drop every Tuesday and Friday. Join host David Remnick as he discusses the latest in politics, news, and current events in conversation with political leaders, newsmakers, innovators, New Yorker staff writers, authors, actors, and musicians.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.




