In short
Whether racism has become “normalised” in UK immigration debate, using Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s “colonised by immigrants” comments as a case study; also discusses a separate political/civil-service controversy about appointing cabinet secretary Antonia Romeo.
Guest backgrounds
No named guests in this episode. Hosts are Lewis and Emily (The News Agents). Mentions Natalie Fleet (Labour MP for Bolsover) in a later segment, but she is not interviewed in this transcript.
Key claims
Ratcliffe’s “colonised” framing echoes far-right tropes (invasion/replacement) that remove immigrants’ agency; his figures are challenged (ONS population estimates differ). Starmer’s condemnation is portrayed as a unifying, decisive response. Later, Simon MacDonald claims he warned Starmer about Romeo; hosts argue she was already vetted and the intervention may reflect a “boys’ club” culture.
Notable examples
Enoch Powell’s 1968 “Rivers of Blood”; Nigel Farage’s “toned down” response; ONS population figures (67m in 2020 vs Ratcliffe’s 58m); Mandelson/Epstein and the criminal justice system failing victims.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOJim Ratcliffe's Comments and Backlash
0:53 to 1:03
Discussion on Jim Ratcliffe's colonization remarks and public response.
“This is a Global Player original podcast.”
Jim Ratcliffe's Comments and Backlash
2:14 to 3:38
Discussion on Jim Ratcliffe's colonization remarks and public response.
“And as Emily was saying, this is Sir Jim Ratcliffe.”
Historical Context of Immigration Language
3:38 to 6:06
Exploration of the historical implications of colonial language in immigration debates.
“Portraying those who come here as a hostile invading force is quite another.”
Normalization of Rhetoric in Politics
6:06 to 8:14
Analyzing the normalization of radical language in political discussions about immigration.
“The irony is, just briefly, the irony is, if they read that book, they would be reminded that the irony is, they all tell us we should be much prouder of the British Empire.”
The Impact of Far Right Ideology
8:14 to 10:08
Discussion on the influence of far-right ideologies on language concerning immigration.
“And we've seen this as part of a pattern.”
Economy, Immigration, and Misconceptions
10:08 to 14:01
Examining the connection between immigration, economic issues, and public misconceptions.
“That is exactly what Enoch Powell was writing and talking about in 1968 in his Rivers of Blood speech, which of course is so infamous within British politics.”
Racism in the Immigration Debate
14:01 to 23:08
Explores the implications of racism in discussions surrounding immigration and economic issues.
“But to the point, I guess now, which is that we've stopped talking about numbers and that seems to me relevant.”
Political Dynamics in Migration Policy
23:20 to 28:01
Analyzes the current political landscape regarding migration and the implications of leadership changes.
“It's the cabinet secretary who is standing by the front door who says, welcome, prime minister.”
The Dynamics of Civil Service and Politics
28:01 to 37:01
Exploring the tensions and changes in civil service under political scrutiny.
“I mean, look, it is an absolutely extraordinary intervention, the McDonnell intervention.”
Victims' Voices in Political Discourse
37:18 to 42:00
Natalie Fleet discusses the importance of focusing on victims in political narratives.
“There are lots of people that speak to me all the time, and they praise me, and they've got things to say, and I just don't, I have embedded it so deeply that this is my fault.”
Show all 11 chapters
Racism and the Justice System
42:00 to 43:03
Exploring the failures of the justice system and societal outrage towards crime.
“It completely fails victims of sexual violence, literally day after day, week after week.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Are you trying to get weight loss support through telehealth, but it feels overwhelming and rushed? Check out orderlymeds.com now. Orderlymeds.com was built to be different. Here, you connect with real doctors who take the time to understand your goals, review your eligibility, and guide you through a plan that's right for you. Orderlymeds provides access to proven GLP-1 medications like somaglutide and terzepatide, including both name brand options and personalized compound versions when appropriate. So you have choices backed by clinical oversight, not guesswork. It's a simpler, more supportive telehealth experience designed around people who want clarity, care, and confidence in their weight loss journey.
0:38And your medication is delivered directly to your home in discreet packaging. So your experience stays private from start to finish. Do your research. Ask the right questions. Then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. Again, that's orderlymeds.com slash podcast.
1:03This is a Global Player original podcast. He's a nice, I mean, I know Keir, he's a nice man, I like him. But it's a tough job and I think you have to do some difficult things with the UK to get it back on track because at the moment I don't think the economy's in a good, you can't afford, You can't have an economy with 9 million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in. I mean, the UK is being colonised. It's costing too much money. It will cause... It'll be colonised. It'll cause... The UK is being colonised by immigrants, really, isn't it? That is Jim Ratcliffe. He is the face of the Manchester United Board, describing the UK as colonised.
1:49Is he wrong? Is he racist or is he just deeply out of his depth?
1:55Lewis Goodall:This follows a trend that we've seen from those at the top of politics and beyond. To use language and terms and ideas that were once the preserve of the far right and the way that they spoke about immigration. Is that now, in 2026, the new normal? Welcome to the News Agents.
2:20Lewis Goodall:The News Agents. It's Lewis. It's Emily. And as Emily was saying, this is Sir Jim Ratcliffe. He's a British billionaire industrialist, funnily enough, resident in Monaco, an immigrant there, founder of the chemicals giant INEOS and a minority owner, major control over Manchester United. He, as you heard there with Sky News, Ed Conway, talking about how he thinks Britain economically is going wrong. And part of the story of that is that Britain has been colonised by immigrants, linking high levels of immigration to social and economic strain. As I was saying there, we can talk about it a bit more.
2:59Lewis Goodall:The language of colonisation used to be the preserve of the far right when talking about immigration. It seems to have become more and more normal, just tripping off the tongue there. of Sir Jim in a rather casual way. It has this morning, as you might imagine, or this afternoon, sparks some outrage and condemnation. The Prime Minister's Keir Starmer has condemned it as offensive and wrong. We've also heard Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, say this. These comments go against everything for which Manchester has traditionally stood, a place where people of all races, faiths and none, have pulled together over centuries to build our city and our institutions, including Manchester United FC.
3:36Lewis Goodall:Calling for curbs on levels of immigration is one thing, Portraying those who come here as a hostile invading force is quite another. It is inaccurate, insulting, inflammatory and should be withdrawn. So Jim has clarified or issued a sort of apology this afternoon, saying that he was sorry if some people were offended by it. Yeah, Jim Ratcliffe, for context, is not just a billionaire, but reckoned to be Britain's seventh richest man. But that didn't stop him in 2020 moving to a place where he could avoid paying. It's estimated by the Justice Minister around four billion pounds of tax to the UK government.
4:18Obviously, a much lower rate of tax from Monaco. Not too much then. No. So he made a few savings being a Monaco resident before he started entering the immigration debate. Did he colonise Monaco, do you think? It's a very good question, isn't it? Because I think to step back for one minute to talk about immigration in numbers, which was how we kind of traditionally used to do it. We used to say, you know, this is what's happened. This has been the change. I mean, ironically, we could very well end up in a place where net migration is round about zero by the summer. But put that to one side for a moment.
4:55We have talked about immigration being high in numbers terms. but to say colonise is the bit that really sticks in the crawl. Not only is it, as you were referencing, a right-wing trope that suggests somehow that puppet masters are redesigning the sort of native population of Britain to make it look like it's full of people that just pushed their way in here but it's also a failure to recognise that colonialism began with this country and the size of our colony. They are here because we were there.
5:34Lewis Goodall:Well, these people always tell us that colonialism wasn't such a bad thing. Right. It's okay when we do it. It turns out it's fine. It's fine. It's terrible. Just make your mind up. But as anyone who's written or researched or looked at the whole construct and ideas around colonialism, Satnam Sangara, not least, I mean, he's written Empire Land. an extraordinary book about exactly this subject. They are here because we were there. We went out. We had the biggest empire in the world. And so actually to then turn around and say, what are you all doing here? It's kind of crazy. The irony is, just briefly, the irony is, if they read that book, they would be reminded that the irony is, they all tell us we should be much prouder of the British Empire.
6:15Lewis Goodall:The British Empire was the biggest freedom of movement block that has ever existed. At one point, you know, about 750 million people had the right to come and work and live in the UK. Yeah. So here he is. And instead of talking about it in a numbers term, he's using this, I think we can say, very strongly racial language. And one of the questions before we came on air was, frankly, with our own team and our editors trying to work out whether we were shocked by this or not. and part of me thinks actually I wasn't shocked. This has sort of become normalised language now, normalised for billionaires, not all billionaires I should add, normalised for people who are sort of looking to farage perhaps and reform to reshape the country.
7:04But I do think, I mean, one of the loveliest ironies of this is that he's obviously, as I said, the face of Man United football team, which not only has an incredibly diverse fan base in Manchester, and further afield, an incredibly diverse player base, but is also one of the founders of Kick It Out, you know, this whole anti-racism charity and campaign to kick racism out of football. And here you have a guy who's making his millions or spending his billions on an English football team who is importing, let's say, racism right to the heart of it again.
7:41Lewis Goodall:And you're right, we had that discussion because, yeah, Yeah, frankly, the use of this sort of language, particularly from the radical right of politics, reform, that has become commonplace. But I think it is important that we kind of market and talk about it, particularly when it's coming out of the mouth of. And as I say, quite casually, I think, you know, just sort of tripping off the tongue of, you know, such a senior British businessman and such an influential person. Because I do think it does tell you something about how widespread and normalized that language and idea has become. And we've seen this as part of a pattern.
8:16Lewis Goodall:Let's just think about politics over the last five years or so. We've had a Home Secretary, Sir Le Braverman at the time, now in reform, talk about an invasion of our southern coast. We've had Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister's ethnicity as an Englishman, even as a Briton, questioned because of his race. We've also had a former Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary, now in reform, Robert Jennerick, talking about going to Birmingham and it being a mark of a lack of integration and a form of displeasure not to be able to count a single white face you know this has a cumulative toll and it does move as we talk as you say you know the Overton window does shift on what sort of language is normal and just to focus a little bit on why I think colonization is a really really problematic term it absolutely feeds into a long established trope of the far right which is the idea that it isn't just people who we're inviting in because that is ultimately what legal immigration at least which is the vast majority of immigration is we are whether we should or not we are inviting people and asking people and allowing people legally to come and do jobs in the uk or study in the UK or live in the UK or whatever it happens to be.
9:32Lewis Goodall:That is an act of power and agency. This idea from the far right that actually what is going on is either an invasion or a colonisation removes that agency. It removes that power. It suggests that immigration is something that is being done unto us, to us, rather than something that we are elected to do. It suggests that a foreign power is taking and control and settling in Britain and dominating, displacing or exploiting the indigenous population and imposing their culture and language on us. And there is someone for whom those ideas are absolutely synonymous. And it is Enoch Powell. That is exactly what Enoch Powell was writing and talking about in 1968 in his Rivers of Blood speech, which of course is so infamous within British politics.
10:20Lewis Goodall:And those ideas which got Enoch Powell chucked out of the Conservative Party at that time are now, I would argue, pretty central to at least a core part of our politics, certainly on the right. And as we see from Jim Ratcliffe there, are becoming, I think, normalised within certainly elite parts of British society and elsewhere. Well, let's hear what Nigel Farage had to say when he was asked about them this morning. So Jim Ratcliffe, one of the richest Britons in the world, of course, the boss of INEOS, and now a major shareholder in Manchester United Football Club, has caused outrage by his comments.
10:51So what's he actually said? Well he said that our population has gone up from 58 million to 70 million and that with 9 million people of working age on benefits, we don't need mass migration. He said much of the country had been colonised by immigrants. Now that word was a controversial word and he said, OK, if you don't like the word, we'll tone it down. But just think about this. You ask yourself why public services have diminished. You ask yourself why rents have gone through the roof. The population explosion has done that. And then you look at parts of London, for example, where the road names, the underground signs, aren't just in English, they're in a foreign language as well.
11:34One million people living in this country don't speak any English at all. Four million people living in this country barely speak passable English. And that's the point that he was making, that big areas of our towns and cities have been changed into something completely different to what they were, and that it's all making us poorer. And I don't really care if number 10 is in uproar, or if much of mainstream media find his comments too difficult. I believe firmly that Jim Ratcliffe is right. Well, to coin a phrase, I think Nigel Farage has there just colonised a lot of what he thinks Jim Ratcliffe was saying because he's invented a lot of context which was never spelled out in the interview.
12:19But critically, I think, Nigel Farage did not repeat that phrase, colonised. He turned it into something that he wanted to talk about instead. Jim Ratcliffe's own figures are wrong. I mean, let's just get that out. The Office for National Statistics, which I have to say, a lot of people are now checking and quoting. So if the worst that comes of this actually is that more people know the true stats rather than the Jim Ratcliffe stats, then that's not a bad thing. The Office of National Statistics, the ONS, estimates that the population was 67 million in 2020, not 58. In other words, it has crept up by about two.
12:59We're now at about 69 just south, just below 70. So there has been an increase. Nobody's denying that.
13:07Lewis Goodall:We had a lot of immigration around that time. That's undoubtedly true. We can see the immigration figures, but it's not a correct number that he's using. And the fact that Farage sort of commandeered what someone else had said, didn't then use that phrase colonised because he recognises, even Farage recognises that it is controversial, but turned it into something which is like the sort of, I don't know, I'm going to say the every man's understanding of what's wrong with this country, which is the signs are in a different language. Really? Does that offend you? Do you hate signs in a different language?
13:42I have to say, I think there's, in terms of the London Underground Network, we think there's one sign, right? Whitechapel famously in another. I mean, I don't know how sort of small your life is that you have to be really, really angry about one sign having two languages on it.
13:59Lewis Goodall:He's not. We both know he's not. It's complete. No, no, no, no. He couldn't care less. But to the point, I guess now, which is that we've stopped talking about numbers and that seems to me relevant. Or at least we stopped talking about the correct numbers. We're still using the wrong numbers. We've stopped talking about numbers because somehow it is easier to make this case that our economy has sunk because of the colour of the people, because of the quality of the people, because of the culture of the people. Now, has Jim Ratcliffe got a point about our terrible economy? He has. You know, the figures came out this morning showing that we have barely grown.
14:39We've had, I think, 0.1 % in the last quarter, 1.3 % overall. Our economy is barely grown. It is the simplest thing in the world to blame immigrants for the fact that our economy is sinking. And there are so many other areas you can start to look, Not least the failure to actually secure anything after Brexit that helped us make up for the 4 % loss to GDP that that decision has cost us. We could go on. I can go on. But it just seems to me so simple to turn around and say immigrants are costing you your jobs. And we know even economically, take the culture away from it, economically, that is not true.
15:19Lewis Goodall:As ever with these things, it's a deeply reductive, simplistic take. I mean, for example, you know, we want to build more houses. We know for a fact we don't have sufficient skills in the country right now to build the houses that we want, where we're going to get them, we'll have to get them from abroad. That creates some jobs, maybe it takes away from others. It's a complicated picture that we rarely have that discussion, something we've talked about before. I think it is absolutely worth dwelling, exactly as you said, Emily, on the question of moving from numbers to culture. Because numbers is, of course, you know, first one to recognise and say, over the last few years, we always talk about the boats, but just thinking about legal migration, certainly the end of the last decade, start of this decade, we had very high immigration numbers, historically high.
16:00Lewis Goodall:You know, at one point, net migration, you're nudging up to a million in a year. I think it is entirely legitimate and right that people question that, query that, ask questions of the government at the time, of course, with the Conservative government at the time, and real questions about the capacity for Britain to absorb that rate of churn and change. And it is also true to say that it's perfectly legitimate as well to have a conversation about integration and about whether some cultures or some people from certain countries are much worse at integrating than others and having that conversation.
16:30Lewis Goodall:I don't think liberals or progressives or anything should be afraid of that conversation. It's perfectly, perfectly proper conversation to have. And if you don't have it, you leave it to the right and the far right. That said, this obsession, which is a far right idea, which is that in a way, the numbers don't matter. What matters is that there are some people who will never be assimilated, whose cultures will always be, those people will always be incompatible with our own. That takes you down a different route. And this focus on this question of colonisation or invasion or whatever you happen to be, the reason it is damaging and the reason I think all mainstream politicians, including on the centre-right, should fight it is because it plays into some very dark impulses, which is immigrants aren't coming to join us, they're coming to replace us, and they're not coming to add to our society or even change our society slightly they are coming to erase our society and that is something that we are seeing a conversation we're seeing at the very top of politics on the radical right including from the united states and from maga who themselves in their own national security strategy have talked about the idea of europe facing civilizational erasure so this is all part of a much bigger picture of the politics of the medical radical right and how they perceive what are, whether they like it or not, objectively, our ethnically diverse 21st century societies.
17:52And that's why, I guess, to go back to the very first question I asked on this episode, my sense is that Ratcliffe is more than anything just out of his depth on this.
18:03Lewis Goodall:I think he's a symptom of what we're talking about rather than someone who's necessarily that. Yeah, what I would say is you're completely right. The numbers question is one we have the whole time. The integration question is a conversation we have the whole time. But it's almost as if he has heard the kind of words like colonisation in the ether and just sort of assume that that is now normal. And the question that we're really asking, I guess, is, is that because it is normal, because these are part of a conversation that no longer stops people in their track and says, actually, don't fall for this.
18:38Lewis Goodall:I think algorithmically, for certain parts of our life, it is very normal. These conversations are everywhere. This sort of this audio, if you like, the audio tape of those kind of words is everywhere now. And I think politically, what this has done at the end of a very tumultuous week, actually, is given Keir Starmer, bizarrely, a lifeline. It is an absolute life belt that he has been thrown to bring a very fractured party together. Now, I have to say, that is not, I'm sure, the primary reason that he came straight out the traps and condemned the remarks of Jim Ratcliffe. But when you have been facing down your party, when you have been facing down a Scottish Labour leader who actually called for you to go, whether you have women in your party thinking that you're running essentially a Labour boys club or a Downing Street boys club, To be able suddenly to find the one place on which the entire party will be cohesive, I think will have been something of relief for Keir Starmer, for the prime minister.
19:43And we're always talking about the fact that you don't often see that much sort of decisiveness. You don't you don't see that much ideology from the PM. You don't see that much instant response. This is somewhere where he absolutely knew what he wanted to say very definitively, very clearly, very directly. he's managed to put what he thinks is racist language back in its place and in so doing enter parliamentary recess on a note that everyone in the Labour Party will agree on.
20:10Lewis Goodall:This is I think the challenge for more mainstream political forces on the centre-left and centre-right in terms of this endless debate. I mean you and I have talked about this show endlessly at politicians over the years endlessly which is how do you calibrate it that you are both addressing people's concerns and talking about it whilst not doing so in a way that potentially makes the problem worse. And that is a difficult thing to calibrate. I'm certainly not one of those people who think the best thing you can do is just sort of not talk about this at all and just say, actually, it's about totally other questions.
20:40Lewis Goodall:It's about the economy. It's about whatever. I don't think that's right. I think that mainstream forces have to address these cultural questions. But I think the way you do it is precisely by drawing lines in the sand. And you can absolutely be vehement about questions like this when it comes to... It's perfectly fine to have these conversations. When it comes to talking about colonisation, talking about invasion, talking about some of the themes we heard Farage there, there is a real space, I think, an opportunity for politicians like Starmer and other mainstream politicians to appeal to what I think is actually the mainstream common sense position of most of the British public, which is that they certainly want this to be controlled.
21:15Lewis Goodall:they're unhappy with some of the numbers that we've seen in recent years but i think that most people are not in that conspiratorial place yet when we're really talking about colonialism or reverse colonialism or whatever and as you say emily in a way and i think this is a challenge for farage and another reason why they're not going to be talking about the numbers so much and focusing on the cultural questions is as you say net migration is coming down and it's forecast to come down substantially by the end of the parliament who knows as you say it could be at sort of net zero. So then suddenly, where's their song to sing?
21:45Lewis Goodall:Because they can't talk about massive numbers anymore. So they have to start talking about the people who are already here and the idea that we've already been colonised and start talking about re-immigration or whatever. That's why they're starting to talk like this. Yeah, and I have a hunch that more British people would say, I prefer people in this country, be they immigrants or not, who come and pay their taxes rather than billionaires who bugger off to Monaco and don't. But he's an expat, you see. He's not a migrant. He's an expat. It's very, very different. Very, very different. Very different.
22:16Lewis Goodall:We'll be back just after this.
22:21Breaking news, in-depth analysis and trusted voices, all in one place. From award-winning journalists asking the questions that shape your world. Prime Minister, you talked about doing patriotic things. Welcoming the leader of the opposition, leader of the Conservative Party, Kevin Batenau, back to the studio. The leader of the Liberal Democrats. Sir Ed Davey. The news that matters from the UK and around the world and why it matters to you. Listen on our free Global Player app or the LBC app. LBC, leading Britain's conversation. When people turn to telehealth or weight loss, they're looking for real support.
22:55That's why more people are choosing orderlymeds.com. Orderlymeds connects you with real doctors and access to proven GLP-1 medications like semaglutide and terzeptatide. No guessing, just a more supportive experience and all shipped directly to your door in discreet packaging. Do your research, ask questions, then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Individual results may vary. Now medical advice eligibility required. Seasite for details.
23:26Lewis Goodall:The News Agents. So there has been so much news and the pace has been so fast with the Mandelson affair that one story that actually is a really big story has basically slipped down the headlines a little bit but I think it's about to make a bit of a comeback and that is the role of the cabinet secretary and the cabinet secretary is the most senior civil service in the country they lead the civil service they're one of the chief aides of the prime minister they're basically the guy it always has been a man so far might be about to change basically the man the prime minister turns to to try and get his agenda through the civil service and kind of the machinery of government it's the person the prime minister meets when the newly elected prime minister goes through the front door of number 10.
Read the full transcript
24:06Lewis Goodall:It's the cabinet secretary who is standing by the front door who says, welcome, prime minister. And there was a new cabinet secretary about 14 months ago, a guy called Chris Wormald. I reported on the show earlier this week, he has been sacked, or at least he's been told that he is on the out. Keir Starmer apparently unhappy with him as cabinet secretary. And he was also, though, the man that was being asked to be in charge of the process of all of these files being released in relation to Peter Manelson. There's been lots of speculation now as part of this clear out of number 10, including the cabinet secretary, as to who might replace him.
24:42Lewis Goodall:And even this, yet again, appears to be falling foul of a vetting problem. That's right, because the woman in the frame for this job to replace him is called Antonia Romeo. And she has been one of the civil service real high flyers. She was at the Justice Department. She's currently working alongside Shabana Mahmood in the Home Office. And Keir Starmer is said to have been very impressed with her handling of the small boats issue. In other words, the sort of questions that we were just talking about in the first half of this episode, bringing migration numbers down and bringing illegal migration under control, have been her remit in the last 18 months or so.
25:20And last night, there was a pretty extraordinary intervention. As a man who was at one time her boss, he was head of the diplomatic service until 2020, permanent non-secretary of state at the FCO. His name is Simon MacDonald and Lord MacDonald, we should say. He gave an interview to Channel 4 News where he basically suggested that he had warned number 10, Keir Starmer, about Antonio Romeo. Just have a listen. Due diligence is vitally important. The Prime Minister has recent bitter experience of doing the due diligence too late. It would be an unnecessary tragedy to repeat that mistake. I mean, they are saying that she's already been approved as suitable for this job.
26:07So why do any more process? I repeat, the due diligence needs to be thorough. If the candidate mentioned in the media is the one, in my view, the due diligence has some way still to go. Well, I mean, that takes me to the fact that she was investigated when she was working for the Foreign Office, when you were running the Foreign Office. Are you saying they need to go back to that process? Yes. I would prefer to go into detail with the team in number 10 rather than your viewership. But yes. Just to kind of break this down for you, he's essentially saying, I've been trying to warn Downing Street, I've been trying to warn Keir Starmer not to hire this woman, and they've been ignoring me.
26:53Now, we should try and give you some background to this, which was that about a decade ago, She was being investigated for questions of behaviour, of bullying at one stage. She was cleared by the Cabinet Office, but she was investigated by the Foreign Office. Since then, as I say, she's done a lot of high profile jobs. She's worked at the Justice Department. In fact, by some reports, she was fairly instrumental in alerting people to Dominic Raab's behaviour. When he was her boss there, he was the justice secretary that was fired, essentially, or resigned over bullying allegations. And this Foreign Office Mandarin, Simon MacDonald, is absolutely right on the surface of things to say due diligence is vital, right?
27:37I think if there's one thing at the end of this very confusing week, we can all agree. It's that it's better to vet people properly before you appoint them. It would have been better to understand the email chain between Mandelson and Epstein before you appointed him. It would have been better to understand the relationship that Matthew Doyle had with somebody who has now pled guilty to paedophilia before you appointed him to the Lords. All these things are true. And yet I guess we are opening up this space where it looks as if this whole idea of vetting can be used to cancel, suggest, insinuate people who have actually already been cleared by procedures and have very senior jobs already.
28:16And I do think there's a danger here that that kind of intervention looks quite dinosaur and quite wrong footed in an era where, for understandable reasons, the prime minister is trying to clear out some of the old stuff, is trying to get a sort of new look and a new feel, is trying to get, frankly, more women around him.
28:37Lewis Goodall:I mean, look, it is an absolutely extraordinary intervention, the McDonnell intervention. I don't think anyone can quite remember anything like it when you have a... Well, they can because he was the one who called on Boris Johnson to go. I mean, at that time it worked, right? Yes, although what I mean is that was a civil servant talking about a politician, right? So to have such a senior former Mandarin sort of member of the civil service class go on the airwaves basically saying, I want to get involved in this job appointment process is very, very odd. You know, the tension, I think, within government about it is running very hot.
29:04Lewis Goodall:There's also been an absolutely blistering government source quote with them hitting back saying, this is a desperate attempt from a senior male official whose time has passed, but spent their career getting Britain into the mess it finds itself today. This is from a government source quoted in the Times. A computer says no culture that cannot challenge the status quo. Antonia is a disruptor. She isn't settled with the status quo. She's one of the few senior officials that has always fought against a computer says no culture embedded in the British state. This is the sort of language that we saw at the height of the real sort of populist term with Boris Johnson, and the way that conservatives at that time were talking about officials and the machinery of the state.
29:43Lewis Goodall:And I have to say, I do think, I'm talking to a few Labour people about this this morning. I think they absolutely do see it that way. One of the stories of the last 18 months has been a real, I wouldn't quite say poisoning, but certainly a real deterioration of relations between the civil service and Labour. You know, you think about when Labour came in and they were talking about, you know, we're wanting to work with the civil service, we're going to have your backs, unlike the last law. One of the things, if you talk to Labour spads, one of the things they'll often say to you quietly gingerly under their breath is dominic cummings wasn't wrong about everything and he wasn't wrong about the way the state works and we heard keir starmer say it aloud remember he talked about too many civil servants being happy in the kind of tepid bath water of decline and there is a feeling that machinery of the civil service doesn't work there is a feeling that mcdonald kind of embodies that and embodies the kind of desires and the kind of ease of the civil service class and they do want to have someone go in and disrupt it and the reason they're unhappy with Wormald is because Labour say that you need to have sort of shock therapy for the British state but they appointed Wormald who many people will say kind of embodies a lot of the worst tendencies of the civil service class that's the way they talk about him anyway so that's the kind of tension which is going on behind the scenes.
30:51I was very curious when I heard that last night the interview go out and I tried to get a sense of where this is coming from I ran it past a couple of sort of fairly high profile Labour women. And one of them said, very frankly, I can't say he's wrong because what do I know? Other than there have been processes that were all followed. She's already had the highest vetting possible. And I've seen people being openly hostile and misogynistic towards her. If I had to state my life, I'd say this is a him problem. Now, I don't want to be part of a coterie of people who automatically believes that all the men are guilty.
31:32and all the women are absolutely fine because I don't think that forwards the discussion in any shape or form. But I do think this takes us once again to the heart of something that we've sort of come close to, which is the whole idea of a boys' club. And it's very hard to define because it is not open misogyny quite often and it is not sexism in the same way that we sort of think of sexism playing out, you know, in sort of earlier decades. It's something that is exclusionary without ever being entirely spoken out loud. It's that sense that you're in the room, but you're not really in the room.
32:18You're part of the discussion, but your words aren't really going in. And I would say that Antonia Romeo is not like that. She's really, you know ballsy she's quite direct she's very frank about what she says and what she thinks she will be if she is next to Keir Starmer in this role she will be outspoken and she will be in his ear and she will make no bones about what she tells him and I wonder whether it is just part of this whole question of like do we let them in or do we keep them out do we let them in or do we keep them out because there is still this culture where you can point to a room you can say oh look it's half and half.
32:56Look at the cabinet. Lots of women, lots of men. Look at the room. Lots of women, lots of men. But it's who is actually speaking, who's actually being listened to, who's actually been taken seriously. And that's why I think there's still a lot of women who think, yeah, don't end up in your sort of football metaphors and your fighting metaphors and your trenches metaphors. Like just do something that stops it being a boys club.
33:17Lewis Goodall:It's tricky though, isn't it? Because Dominic Raab lost his job because of bullying, because that was considered to be, you know, it's a breach of the ministerial code. Now, you know, we don't know what happened with Antonio Romero, so I'm not, you know, I don't think it's right for us to sort of speculate in that way. But for example, I suppose, if theoretically they were a candidate for the permanent secretary job and there had been an example of bullying, and of course it all depends on how serious it was and so on, but if it's disqualifying for Raab, ought it not be disqualifying for that person?
33:45Lewis Goodall:I don't know. Well, you're absolutely right, but to go back, the reason Raab left was because the report found against him and he had already offered to resign if it found against him. In this case, she has been vetted. Like, she's already working at the Home Office. You know, if she can work at the Home Office, why can't she work in Downing Street? If she's been vetted and it was 10 years ago and nobody's found anything substantial, then why are we starting to ask that now? Well, I agree. And I think you can hide a lot behind this idea of vetting. You know, get your vetting right when you need to vet people, but don't re-vet people just because you might have a personal grudge against them.
34:17Lewis Goodall:Well, yes, and that's why I do think this particular intervention is weird. And I would just say as well is that I think that I think, like I say, I think that there is a strong case. MacDonald said there, oh, you had cabinet secretaries who served many prime ministers. And that was historically the norm. I think things are changing and have changed. I think that there is a widespread actual consensus from left to right, actually, that the machinery of the state in Britain today is not fit for purpose. Somebody needs to break something. I am so struck, you know, I've spoken over the years to conservative spads, Labour spads, conservative politicians, Labour politicians.
34:52Lewis Goodall:And I'm very struck that there is such a similarity consensus in how they talk about their ministerial experience. They'll often say and, you know, sensible ones will say, yeah, there are some brilliant civil servants. We are supportive. But I'm really struck as well. If you talk to politicians, particularly Labour politicians who were in the last Labour government and have come back, they all again say some of the thing, which is they feel the state, the British state has been hollowed out. It's not as agile as it was. The people aren't as good as they were. The quality of the advice they get and the people in those jobs isn't as good as they were.
35:22Lewis Goodall:And I'm struck by the number of people who will say, again, it's a Cummings idea, but basically agree with it, which is, you know, that you could have the civil service, but double the salaries. Then you'd have better results because you would have a situation where you're getting better people for longer and you'd have better outcomes in terms of policy. You know what they do in France? It's really interesting. The civil servants work on essentially one area of expertise their entire life. So if you want to build a fast track train, you get the civil servants who know exactly how to build a fast track train.
35:52And that is what they know. They're not sort of actually shuffled around as much. They are allowed to sort of sit there and learn and expand on a brief for a decade at a time, which is what sort of beds in, I guess, expertise.
36:04Lewis Goodall:And it's very telling that, for example, the civil service fast track salary, which is the fast stream salary, I should say, which is the, you know, supposed to be the brightest and the best getting the civil servants in. It's barely moved in a decade. You know, it's symptomatic of that. And so I think that there is look, whatever remains other problems that she may have had, who knows? I think the feeling within Labour is that she if she is a disruptor and someone that can really help with the reform of the state, which needs to happen, whoever it is, whether it's her or someone else. That is the sort of figure that you need at the top of the civil service, whoever is prime minister.
36:35we'll be back in a moment
36:42when people turn to telehealth or weight loss they're looking for real support that's why more people are choosing orderlymeds.com orderly meds connects you with real doctors and access to proven glp1 medications like semaglutide and terzeptatide no guessing just a more supportive experience and all shipped directly to your door in discreet packaging do your research ask questions then Then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Individual results may vary. Now medical advice, eligibility required, C-site for details.
37:17The News Agents. There are lots of people that speak to me all the time, and they praise me, and they've got things to say, and I just don't, I have embedded it so deeply that this is my fault. This is my fault. I behaved inappropriately. I did the wrong thing. And this is my fault. And I genuinely believe that I will believe that till the day that I die. I'm going to say it a million times, that it isn't, I'm going to tell women it isn't their fault. but everything about us, not the things we say, the way that we behave speaks to victims. So you know right now Epstein victims, our fired victims they are watching what we do.
38:07They're not listening to what we say and what we're doing is we're taking their story and their bravery and we're using it to get rid of Morgan McSweeney, to tell a story about men, to ask questions about who knew who, who knew what, and what parliamentary method can we use to blame the government. It's right the government's held to account, but if we were talking about the victims, with the same passion that we're speaking about how wrong the government were, I think it'd be really beneficial for the government.
38:36Lewis Goodall:That is Natalie Fleet. She is the Labour MP for Bolsover. She's been the MP there since 2024, speaking to me for Friday's episode. about the last couple of weeks that the Labour Party has experienced, that the country has experienced, Epstein, the Mandelson affair, Morgan McSweeney and so on. And as you can hear in her voice there, she is deeply, deeply passionate and moving about the experiences of victims, not just Epstein's victims, but other victims of sexual abuse as well. Not least because, as she will tell us in that interview, she herself was a victim at the age of 15 of grooming, as a result of which she had her now 25-year-old daughter.
39:17I think those words will resonate with so many women who have listened to the conversation that we've been having for the last two weeks. I don't mean we, I mean the nation. And listened to how we've sort of managed to turn it into a is Keir Starmer fit to be Prime Minister? And just gone, what the fuck? Like, how did that become the central issue when the Epstein files dropped? How did that ever become the actual question that we managed to put to ourselves after seeing what was in those files? And she speaks so eloquently, doesn't she, about what it is like to be raped. I mean, I'm not even going to colour that.
40:04What it is like to feel shame that is not hers, that should never have been hers. what it is like to carry around this ridiculously misplaced guilt that so many victims live the rest of their lives with. And somehow we've turned it into a conversation about whether we like the policies or the politics of our leaders. And I do think that that asks a really important question, which is, of course, we have to look at who has protected who. We have to look at who has promoted who. Should Manelson have ever been given the job? Of course he shouldn't. I think plenty of people recognise that. Should Keir Starmer have been a little bit more diligent with how he interviewed and how he asked and how curious or lacking in curiosity he was?
40:52Of course. but somehow I do think it asks a bigger question which is have people just brought their own causes their own dislikes their own issues their own ends right to the question of whether Keir Starmer is fit to be prime minister because yeah it's not great I mean it's not great to promote the friend of a paedophar both times it is not great to be so uncurious that you're not asking the right questions. It is not great to essentially allow the wrong people to dominate these extraordinary places in our public life. But please, let's not make it about our own ends all the time if you didn't like the guy anyway.
41:34Lewis Goodall:Something I've thought about a lot this last couple of weeks is how much attention we in the media, the press, our political culture, we place so much emphasis on symbolism. This whole debate this last couple of weeks has been, well, he was a friend of this person and he continued to be a friend even though he knew what he knew, which is bad. And like, it's a moral failing and that is clearly bad. But like, I suppose what Natalie's saying in this episode tomorrow, and I think what you're saying there, Emily, is like, if we reserve that same level of outrage for the realities, right, for the facts of what these people experience, of our justice system, which is completely, you know, for want of a better expression, just completely screwed, right?
42:13Lewis Goodall:It completely fails victims of sexual violence, literally day after day, week after week. if there was that same level of complete indignation on the front pages, then we'd probably be in a better place, right? Exactly. You do need a grading system. Somebody who's committed torture against women is a lot, lot worse than being the friend of a friend of a pedo or somebody who didn't realise that they had continued a friendship with a pedo until after that. And if we are putting everyone in the same bucket, which is you're all as bad as each other, you're all the same, you've all got your snouts and the truffle, the rest of it.
42:46I think we're failing everyone because we're not even discriminating between real crimes and what I will call sort of adjacent crimes. And that is a that is a bizarre place for us to end up.
42:57Lewis Goodall:Or just tolerating a criminal justice system, which allows pedos to get away with what they do year after year. And that full episode, that full conversation with Natalie Fleet will be available on Friday. You'll be able to watch it on YouTube and, of course, listen to it as always. Looking forward. We'll see you then. Bye bye. Bye. This has been a Global Player original production. Amen.
From the publisher
Jim Ratcliffe, the part owner of Manchester United, multi-billionaire and Monaco based non dom, has taken the government to task for allowing immigrants to “colonise“ the U.K. Does he realise he’s using a far right trope? Have we become immune to racism in the immigration debate? And why did a successful businessman not even check his facts on the numbers?
Later - why has a foreign office civil servant lashed out at the woman primed to become Keir Starmer’s cabinet secretary? Does he know something we don’t or is this the “boys club” mentality in action?
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
