How Epstein threatened to "take down" President Trump

13 Nov 2025 · 41 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The News Agents - "How Epstein threatened to 'take down' President Trump"

Hosts

  • Emily Maitlis
  • Jon Sopel
  • Lewis Goodall

Episode Overview

In this episode, the hosts delve into the release of 23,000 pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, which expose troubling details about his connections to former President Donald Trump. The discussion aims to uncover whether these revelations could implicate Trump and scrutinizes the nature of their friendship long after Trump claimed it ended.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Release of Epstein Files
  2. Document Overview: Congress released 23,000 emails from Epstein's estate.
  3. Initial Reaction: The release was described as an "avalanche" of information following a few initial emails.
  4. Political Context: Trump previously called for the release of Epstein files but now appears resistant to their publication.
  1. Trump and Epstein's Relationship
  2. Past Friendship: Trump and Epstein were known to be friends for years, but the timeline of their relationship is under scrutiny.
  3. Epstein's Claims: Emails suggest Epstein considered himself capable of taking down Trump, raising suspicions about their connection.
  4. Cross-examination of Trump's Statements: Trump claimed to have severed ties with Epstein around 2004, but documents suggest continued interaction.
  1. Key Quotes from Emails
  2. Epstein mentioned in emails about having photos of Trump with "girls in bikinis" and interactions at Epstein's residence.
  3. There are discussions about Trump's knowledge of Epstein's activities, specifically whether Trump was aware of any illegal actions occurring in Epstein's properties.
  1. Public Sentiment and Responses
  2. There is mounting public pressure on Congress to release all documents related to Epstein, driven by victims' testimonies.
  3. Trump’s spokesperson denied any wrongdoing and claimed that the emails prove nothing about the President.
  1. Implications for Trump
  2. Political Ramifications: The hosts discuss how these revelations could affect Trump's political standing and his control over the MAGA movement.
  3. Potential for Further Investigations: The documents could prompt new inquiries into Epstein’s networks and connections among powerful figures.

---

Important Takeaways

  • Flooding the Zone: The sheer volume of documents makes it challenging for journalists to analyze the relationship between Trump and Epstein effectively.
  • Smoking Gun: While there is no direct evidence linking Trump to illegal activities, the emails raise significant questions about his awareness of Epstein's crimes.
  • Victim Advocacy: The ongoing discussion emphasizes the importance of victim voices and the need for transparency regarding Epstein's dealings.

---

Future Considerations

  • Additional Releases: If Congress votes to release more documents, including video evidence and survivor testimonies, it could reshape public understanding of the Epstein saga.
  • Trump’s Political Future: The hosts speculate on whether Trump will maintain his influence in the Republican Party amid growing scrutiny from both Democrats and his own party.

---

This podcast episode serves as a critical examination of the ongoing implications of the Epstein case, particularly concerning Donald Trump, highlighting the balance of political power and the quest for truth amidst scandal.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Emily Maitlis:This is a Global Player original podcast. What the hell are the House Republicans doing? They have the majority. You can't get the list? Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are. The person calling for the big boy pants to go on is a guy called Kash Patel. Then he was just a MAGA activist. Now he's the director of the FBI and singing a very different tune about the release of that cache of information about Epstein.

0:34Lewis Goodall:Without the FBI's help, without Trump's help, we nevertheless have now seen thousands more emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate. What do they all tell us about that relationship with the convicted paedophile and the President of the United States? Welcome to The News Agents.

0:58Emily Maitlis:The News Agents. It's John. It's Emily. And yesterday came a little trickle. Three emails released by Democrats about Epstein and Trump. It was followed by an avalanche. 23 ,000 emails sort of trying to flood the zone so that you just wouldn't know where to look. Now, the politics of this is critical. because Donald Trump, a few months ago, wanted the release of all the Epstein files. And then his attorney general, a woman called Pam Bondi, says to him, you ought to see what's in these files. Since when Donald Trump doesn't want the files released at all? And in Congress at the moment, you have a lot of Republicans who are hearing from their conspiracy hungry base.

1:45Lewis Goodall:I want to see what's in these files that you were all talking about before the election. And not just the conspiracy hungry base, but people who've heard the testimonies of victims who actually just want to get to the bottom of what he did. Exactly.

1:57Emily Maitlis:And so there is enormous pressure from the House of Representatives to have a vote to reveal everything that's in the Epstein files. And Donald Trump is doing everything he can to stop their publication, even though he's maintaining I did nothing wrong. There's nothing to see here. I'm absolutely innocent of anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein in a bad way. And people know that it's all a hoax. So why are you so resistant to it? And why are you sounding so tetchy when reporters ask you about it? Remember, Donald Trump loves to talk about everything at great length. This is him in the White House yesterday.

2:35Emily Maitlis:Thank you very much, everybody. Mr. President, are you prepared to negotiate with Democrats now?

2:40Lewis Goodall:Mr. President, I'm Jeffrey Epstein. Thank you very much. Thank you guys for knowing.

2:43Emily Maitlis:Mr. President, can you respond to these Epstein emails that were released today?

2:46Lewis Goodall:Thank you. Well done. What? No questions. The man who is renowned for his two-hour-long press briefings has decided that he's had enough. Why is this all so difficult then? That's the question. Well, the emails have been released. The House Oversight Committee in Congress is the body that has released them, and they have come from the Epstein estate. And as you say, there's 23 ,000, so it's going to be a jolly long episode. You might want to go for a long run or do some marathon training. Make a cup of tea now and then bring it back

3:18Emily Maitlis:in a really kind of thermal flask so it doesn't get cold too quickly.

3:21Lewis Goodall:But you've heard about that phrase, flooding the zone.

3:23Emily Maitlis:Yeah.

3:23Lewis Goodall:And in a way, that is the impact of having 23 ,000 emails that most people, most journalists, most publications are sifting through the stuff that is coming out. And as we speak, only a fraction of what is in those emails is known. There is so much stuff out there that no one can quite get a handle on what is being revealed. But I think part of our task today is to take you inside some of the emails you might have missed and see how it shapes the narrative of who knew what about the Epstein crimes. Because I think the central question,

3:54Emily Maitlis:is there a smoking gun that links Trump to Epstein? Well, we know they were friends for a long time, but that the friendship went on longer than perhaps we imagined. That's one question. And the other question is, was Trump involved in any of this? Was Trump aware of what was happening at Epstein's properties on them with the sort of people that were there.

4:17Lewis Goodall:Exactly. So there is nothing that we have seen that links Trump to any kind of criminal behaviour. But your question about who saw what is critical. And the other thing I suppose to remember is that Epstein was not only a paedophile, but a prolific, polished liar. So in a way, we have to start by taking everything in these emails with a pinch of salt. Nevertheless, the timeframe of the emails, the names they mentioned suggest, as you say, that several people who swore that they broke off their friendships with Epstein in the early 2000, Trump being one of them who said he didn't have any contact with him after about 2004, 2005, appear from these messages to have stayed in touch a lot, lot longer and to have been very close friends indeed with Epstein.

5:02Lewis Goodall:Epstein tries to present himself as a Trump insider. He suggests he wants to leverage his friendship with Trump to store up material. we would know that as compromise or blackmail, frankly. As Trump's campaign gains traction in 2015, Epstein asks a New York Times reporter, would you like photos of Donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen? A direct quote from one of the emails that's been released. We don't know those photos exist, of course. We don't think that the reporter ever got them. They were never sent. But he then goes on in the same sort of tranche of the emails to say Trump is so focused on watching girls in his Epstein swimming pool that he bumped into a glass door that left a nose print on the glass.

5:50Lewis Goodall:What does that tell you? It doesn't tell you that Trump is guilty of any specific behaviour. It tells you that Trump was in Epstein's house when his swimming pool was full of plenty of young women. and it's also calls into question the Trump narrative that, yeah, I kind of knew Epstein

6:09Emily Maitlis:back in the day, but, you know, long time ago and I wasn't ever around any of this sort of stuff. So, look, as you say, Emily, and it's absolutely critical to underline it, that, you know, just because Epstein says it does not mean it is 100 percent true. If you're looking at social media, you're going to find a ton of pictures of Donald Trump with young women, all AI generated at the moment. There's nothing that has come from this committee where you see Donald Trump and photos of him with young girls.

6:35Lewis Goodall:Exactly. But where it gets interesting is, remember that time frame that Trump said, he said two things, right? That he'd kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago because I think Epstein had made a move on one of the member's daughters. He said he'd had nothing more to do with him since 2004, 2005. That doesn't appear to be true from these emails. A few months later, an email from Michael Wolff, journalist, author, not a big fan of Donald Trump. Epstein asks what Trump might say about their friendship on a CNN presidential debate in the lead up to the 2016 election. And Wolf says, let him hang himself.

7:13Lewis Goodall:Valuable PR and political currency. If he says he hasn't been on your plane, he hasn't been in your house. In other words, he's suggesting that Epstein should keep something back as ammo, ammunition, in case he needs it. By 2018, the authorities are closing in on Epstein. This is the year before he took his own life in prison. This is after Trump has won the election. And it is after it's become clear that Alex Acosta, who was Trump's first term Labour secretary in his cabinet, was the one who signed off Epstein's plea deal in 2008. The sweetheart deal. The sweetheart deal. The deal that let Epstein walk away from trial and agree to an open prison arrangement for 18 months where he could come and go as much as he wanted to.

8:00Lewis Goodall:He made that trial disappear. A series of articles in the Miami Herald is what prompts the authorities to reopen a wide ranging criminal investigation. And in December of 2018, the year before he died, Epstein is writing to somebody in these emails not identified who says they're really trying to take down Trump. And Epstein replies, it's wild. I'm the one able to take him down again. Again, what does that mean? We don't know. Does he have anything? Does he just set himself up as the man who has stuff? But again, he's talking to Michael Wolff, the journalist. He says Trump knew about the girls as he asked Ghislaine to stop.

8:43Lewis Goodall:He knew Trump knew about the girls as he asked Ghislaine to stop. What does he know about the girls? I mean, does he just mean that Epstein kept borrowing or taking Trump's employees from Mar-a-Lago and using them as housekeepers or masseuse? We don't know what Trump knows.

9:01Emily Maitlis:Yeah.

9:01Lewis Goodall:But the question is out there now. What did Trump know about the girls that he asked Epstein? He asked Ghislaine to stop.

9:10Emily Maitlis:And this is why I think this matters so much. Look, as you said, and we're underlining again, Epstein is dead, so we can't question him. And there's a whole big kind of conspiracy theory world out there about did he really commit suicide or was he bumped off? And you kind of when you see messages like that, you know, I'm the one who could bring him down. You can see that there would be an awful lot of people, Prince Andrew, others. I'm not suggesting any wrongdoing at all, but you can see why a conspiracy theory would take hold that Jeffrey Epstein's death in prison. there's more to it than meets the eye and i think that again this explains the utter discomfort of the white house today that even though there is no smoking gun there's no gun with donald trump's fingerprints on it none of that that would be conclusive evidence in court is there at all yeah but it raises questions yeah and people are already conspiracy minded about why there's been so little about Epstein come out, why there is such efforts to suppress all this stuff, that I just think it feeds it.

10:13Emily Maitlis:And that is why it is so toxic right now for Donald Trump. And he's gone into fight mode where you can sense he's angry. And Caroline Levitt, his inimitable spokesperson, is out there trying to douse the flames. I have your statement about the new Epstein emails that have been released by House Democrats. Separate from why you believe the emails were made public, can you address their substance? Did the president ever spend hours at Jeffrey Epstein's house with a victim? These emails prove absolutely nothing other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong. And what President Trump has always said is that he was from Palm Beach and so was Jeffrey Epstein.

10:57Emily Maitlis:Jeffrey Epstein was a member at Mar-a-Lago until President Trump kicked him out because Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile and he was a creep. And this email you refer to with the name of a victim that was unredacted now and has since been reported on in this room, so I will go ahead and say it, Virginia Guffrey. And it was CBS's own reporting Ouija that recently wrote that Ms. Guffrey maintained, and God rest her soul, that she maintained that there was nothing inappropriate she ever witnessed, that President Trump was always extremely professional and friendly to her. And so I think it's a question worth asking the Democrat Party, and you should all go ask them after this briefing, of why they chose to redact that name of a victim who has already publicly made statements about her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and is unfortunately no longer with us.

11:45Lewis Goodall:OK, so the reason that the Democrats redact a name is that anyone, anyone, would always redact a survivor's or a victim's name if they were talking about them in sort of public documents. I think the question of why Virginia Dufresne never mentioned that she'd spent time with Trump is a good one. I think that that still is unanswered. She does in her memoir talk about Trump being very helpful to her when she started as a young woman at Mor-a-Lago and gave her babysitting jobs. But I think Caroline Leavitt has inadvertently let the cat out of the bag in this one because she has said more than she needed to, given that the president himself has always called it a Democrat hoax.

12:22Lewis Goodall:The two lines that Trump has come back with is that the Epstein files are a Democrat hoax and he didn't understand why anyone would be interested in this guy. So boring. He's dead. And the fact that Caroline Levitt is actually accepting, yes, this stuff does exist. Yes, it has come from the Epstein estate. Yes, there is a lot of stuff to get through. And you've got questions for the Democrats, I think tells us that this story is I mean, it's going to grow manifold from here. You mentioned Prince Andrew. There's a couple of things I just want to get through. Andrew Mountbatten. Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor.

12:56Lewis Goodall:Epstein confirms that the picture that Virginia Dufresne had taken with Andrew's arm around her waist was real. He says many of his employees had their pictures taken. She was on my plane. Yes, she had her picture taken with Andrew, as many of my employees do. That was in the email. Andrew, Prince Andrew at the time, told me that he thought it was a fake because he was in the wrong clothes and his hand didn't look like his own hand. And there's one other day I want you to think about as well, which is November of 2017, when Epstein claims in another email that he was going to spend Thanksgiving with Trump.

13:36Emily Maitlis:Say that date again for me.

13:37Lewis Goodall:Yeah. 23rd of November 2017.

13:39Emily Maitlis:So the first year of Trump's presidency, when Trump is president.

13:43Lewis Goodall:Right. We do not have any confirmation from Trump that he spent Thanksgiving with Epstein. This is all one sided. But let me just take you into the actual wording. November the 23rd, 2017, at 8.36 a.m. He talks about the three people that he's going to spend Thanksgiving with. David Fizell, Hansen, Trump. I mean, unless there is another Trump member that he's talking about. So they're talking about who they're going to hang out with on Thanksgiving on that morning, 23rd of November 2017, when it is no longer just Trump. It is President Trump. He has been in office a year.

14:21Emily Maitlis:And what's fascinating about that is that the rules of the road in Washington are whenever the president travels, the pool travels with him. You sit outside the house, the 12 journalists that are ascribed. So it will be public record where Donald Trump was on Thanksgiving, the first year of his presidency.

14:41Lewis Goodall:So that's where we should be going right now.

14:42Emily Maitlis:So I'm sure White House journalists will be asking that question of the White House now. Can we see the records? Because there will have been 12 poll reporters who would have been shadowing Donald Trump's movements all day and would know where he was. And I wonder whether we could literally find out who he spent Thanksgiving with.

14:59Lewis Goodall:And if he wasn't, again, go back to the emails with a pinch of salt. Maybe this is a man, you know, a prolific paedophile and liar and manipulator who wants everyone to think that he's more in touch with powerful people than he is. I mean, there's also one a year earlier, November the 13th, 2016. Again, alarm bells ringing in your head. It's a week after Trump has won the 2016 election where Epstein confirms in an email to Linda Stone that he is in Trump Tower. so if these dates match up to the kind of investigation that I think will ensue it is telling us that Epstein and Trump were not only in touch but in each other's company for almost a decade longer than we've originally been told.

15:46Emily Maitlis:And of course as I said again I'll say it one more time this may be all in Epstein's head it may never have happened there may have been no Thanksgiving there may have been no visit to Trump Tower This all could be made up. But what has happened now is there are lines of inquiry that journalists are going to pursue, which means that if Donald Trump today wants to talk about the economy or immigration or whatever it happens to be, this is going to consume so much oxygen and so much bandwidth about all these questions about Epstein. and you can be absolutely sure, and I know for a fact that this is just running rampant across America right now with all the questions that have been raised by these emails, that this is really starting to hurt Donald Trump

16:30Lewis Goodall:because all that people are talking about is Epstein. We are at the tip of the iceberg with the Epstein stuff for all the reasons you talk about. And let me put this in perspective. The 23 ,000 emails that journalists are right now sifting through are not even what we mean when we talk about the Epstein files as a tranche. There is video evidence, there is recording evidence, there are post-it notes, there are texts, there's all the rest of it. There are letters. That is a whole other tranche that if a vote goes ahead in Congress next week, we could see released in December. And if there is pressure on the DOJ, we will get the testimony of victims, survivors of Epstein, released from those who gave their evidence, their testimony 20 years ago.

Read the full transcript

17:14Lewis Goodall:And I should say we're focusing on the relationship between Trump and Epstein today because it is the one that is the most highly political right now. But there are many, many other names in these. Businessmen, heads of universities, scientists who are being named and who we will be presumably chasing up in the days and weeks to come. Trying to work out what kind of relationship they had with Epstein.

17:41Emily Maitlis:And Donald Trump is trying to turn the screws on Republican congressmen and women who might be thinking of voting with the Democrats for the release of these documents. And he's had a woman called Nancy Mason, a woman called Lauren Bovard in trying to say to them, don't vote for this, don't vote for this. And at the moment they're saying, no, I'm sorry, the public want to know this. You guys have been the ones telling us this ought to be released before the elections. You were the ones who were saying it was the Democrats who were covering up. We can't just go back to our voters and say, I'm sorry.

18:16Emily Maitlis:Yeah, we've changed our mind. And so I think Donald Trump is going to get himself into a losing position in terms of the politics of whether this is released or not. If he is confident there is nothing in it, then just say, of course, it ought to be released.

18:30Lewis Goodall:Yeah.

18:30Emily Maitlis:But you just sense and we've put all the provisos in. You just sense there is something there that he doesn't want to emerge.

18:38Lewis Goodall:Now, stay with us for one little bit of detail, which is going to try and make sense of the timing of all of this. You will know that the US government has been in shutdown, essentially. The government has not been functioning for the last 50 days because the Democrats wouldn't sign off on the Republican spending plan because it didn't include measures to extend the Affordable Health Care Act. So nothing has happened in American government for the last 50 days. But yesterday we saw the chink of light as things started to turn again. And one very significant moment happened around 9pm last night, which was that a congresswoman, Adelina Grijalva, who has been waiting 50 days to be sworn in, finally got sworn in.

19:29Lewis Goodall:She's a Democratic congresswoman of Arizona, and she became the 218th signatory on what is essentially a petition to release those Epstein files. The moment her name is signed on that list, none of the Republicans can remove their own name. None of the Democrats can remove their names. And the Epstein files petition goes ahead.

19:53Emily Maitlis:And the irony of that vote is that far from it being a majority of one or two, I reckon if Republicans know that they've lost it anyway, many more will vote for it because they'll want to be on the right side of this with their voters. And so it's possible that Donald Trump, I mean, you know, look, you never know. Donald Trump may be able to exert enough pressure on enough people that the Republicans back away. But so far, it doesn't look like they are. And Democrats are expecting many more Republicans to vote for disclosure, vote for opening this up so that people can see for themselves what those Epstein files contain.

20:32Emily Maitlis:Which, as you've said, Emily, it's not just about emails from the Epstein estate. This is about the criminal investigations into Epstein. It's about the interviews that have been held with Epstein, with victims, with associates and all the rest of it. It's a big tranche of information that is about to come out.

20:49Lewis Goodall:So politically, the question that we're also asking, aside from what we still need to know about that relationship between Trump and Epstein, is whether Trump still has control of the MAGA wing of his party. You mentioned Nancy Mace. That is a woman who is going for governor of South Carolina. Trump told her not to put her name on this petition. she went ahead anyway. In other words, she's worked out that the voters of South Carolina right now care more about knowing the truth, getting to the bottom of the Epstein files than they do about an endorsement from Donald Trump. He may even stop her.

21:27Lewis Goodall:You know, he may even stop her from standing. But she has worked out the political cost of not calling for the release of the Epstein files. And I think this is a really interesting moment. I mean, Trump always comes back from the dead. We know that. He's very, very good at the Lazarus revival. But it could be a turning point for many in his party who say, actually, that's not the future anymore. That is not the future. And I cannot, for the sake of my voters, end up on the wrong side of somebody who was clearly friends with a paedophile for a lot longer than we have known.

22:02Emily Maitlis:Look, if this happens, it's more than just a little hairline fracture in the MAGA movement. This will be a breach where Donald Trump has put all his weight behind stopping something and the MAGA movement, whether it be the podcasters like Joe Rogan, whether it be all the other people that have been out there backing Donald Trump. The Marjorie Taylor Greene. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

22:22Lewis Goodall:Who used to be his biggest fan and now stands very independently on this particular issue.

22:28Emily Maitlis:Yeah. And so it will be quite a moment, not just about Epstein and the victims and justice and what really happened and who he associated with. It's also about whether Donald Trump controls the movement that has propelled him for the last decade.

22:44Lewis Goodall:We'll be back in a moment, speaking to one of the key lawyers representing Epstein's victims and asking whether this new tranche is opening the door to further prosecutions.

22:59Emily Maitlis:News you can trust and the conversations that matter.

23:02Lewis Goodall:With award-winning journalists at the heart of the stories from the UK and around the world. Breaking news here in Edinburgh. I'm Simon Marks. My American Week is next. Reporting from the heart of Cardiff.

23:13Emily Maitlis:Discover how today's story affects your life.

23:16Lewis Goodall:Listen on our free Global Player app or the new LBC app.

23:20Emily Maitlis:LBC, leading Britain's conversation.

23:27Emily Maitlis:The News Agents.

23:29Lewis Goodall:Well, joining us now is a man who has followed the Epstein saga from inside. The US Attorney Spencer Coven has represented victims of Jeffrey Epstein going back, I'm going to say, Spencer, probably two decades now, right? Just for our viewers and listeners who don't know your work, just take us up to date with what you have done with the victims of Epstein.

23:51Emily Maitlis:Sure. Thank you for having me on today. So I represented victim number one to step forward to police and bravely tell her story to the Palm Beach Police Department back in 2007. So, yes, we're almost going on 20 years now of representing victims. And ultimately, I represented nine total victims of Jeffrey Epstein. But that first victim was the one that started this snowball down the hill of investigating Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and sexual exploitations. And then I've stuck with these victims over the years through all of the different iterations of state prosecution, federal prosecution, Crime Victims Rights Act litigation and his subsequent death and all of the other proceedings therewith.

24:38Lewis Goodall:And I just asked you how many of the 23 ,000 emails that have been released overnight you've got through. And you're aware of all this stuff. This is all material that you know about already, right?

24:50Emily Maitlis:Yeah, sadly, there's a lot of information in my head that I cannot disclose and could not disclose until it's out in the general public. So yes, these emails that were disclosed, they're nothing new. These were emails and communications that were disclosed in the Crime Victims Rights Act case that was filed here in the Southern District of Florida many years ago. That lawsuit was filed because the federal government violated my client and others' rights with respect to their abilities to discuss any plea deal before it was entered with the federal government. And a federal judge here in South Florida found that the federal government did violate their rights.

25:30Emily Maitlis:So these emails were part of that discovery in that case. But as I said, they were subject to a protective order so none of the lawyers or clients could talk about them.

25:38Lewis Goodall:So now they're out, now they're public. Tell us what this changes. I mean, for you, what is the most explosive or potentially dangerous part of this whole tranche of emails? Where does it take us to in terms of future prosecutions?

25:54Emily Maitlis:Well, I don't know that it takes us anywhere in terms of future prosecutions, but what I think it does do is it gives the public more of an open sight into what we have known as lawyers and advocates for the victims for years. And that is the true scope and breadth of Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell's attempts at leverage on powerful, influential people around the globe. We've always known this and we've always talked about it in general terms. But I think now with the disclosure of at least these emails, the general public is seeing the evidence that supports why advocates for the victims were talking about this for so long.

26:35Lewis Goodall:A lot of the initial work has been concentrating on that relationship between Epstein and Trump, bearing in mind, of course, that Epstein was a prolific liar and a manipulator. Does it actually take us any closer to understanding Trump's role in all this?

26:54Emily Maitlis:I think it's one step in that direction. Now, you must remember, back when I was litigating one of the first cases to be filed here in 2008, we issued a subpoena for the deposition, the sworn testimony of Donald Trump back then. This was pre-Donald Trump political career. And we issued that subpoena because we knew he had information due to the close relationship he had with Jeffrey Epstein and the issues that were surrounding Glenn Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago and recruiting victims at that location. But our focus wasn't Trump. Our focus was getting more information on Jeffrey Epstein at the time. So, you know, I think that the breadth of that relationship between Trump and Epstein has yet to be fully disclosed.

27:42Emily Maitlis:And I think that the general public needs to see the videotapes, the surveillance tapes that the FBI have, and the photographs that I believe they have in their custody. And that will really truly start to begin to tell the story. Do you think we will see that now? Well, we know the FBI has them. And now it's just a matter of whether or not our government is brave enough to make them produce them. So, as I've always said, on behalf of victims throughout this process for almost 20 years, we are hopeful. But unfortunately, the government has let down my clients time and time again.

28:16Lewis Goodall:Do you believe Trump's own account, which is that he cut off contact, he cut off his friendship with Epstein in around 2004, 2005, more than 15 years ago, he said in 2019?

28:32Emily Maitlis:So I do believe that the relationship did terminate at some point. The evidence that we saw in the litigation did show that there was this break and split between the two in the late 2000s at some point. But what's important to remember is, is that Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell were abusing young girls and trafficking young women dating back to the early 2000s, back when Trump and he were still friends. We know that Virginia Giuffre, for example, was recruited directly out of Mar-a-Lago. And whether you believe Trump's story that that's why he ended the relationship or not, their friendship, Trump and Epstein, dated back to when Epstein and Glenn Maxwell were actively participating in sex trafficking.

29:18Lewis Goodall:So in that tranche of emails that we've been reading overnight, there are clear indications from Epstein that he was with Trump. He says that he was meeting with Trump on Thanksgiving of 2017. He says that he was in Trump Towers the week after Trump won the election in 2016. Epstein. I mean, these are not obviously corroborated from Trump's side, but do you think these are all fabrications or do you think the two men did stay in touch, did meet up in much more recent years?

29:53Emily Maitlis:Well, I think that from what I have seen, much like we saw with Andrew, when he attempted to say that he had cut off all ties and then he's caught in Central Park taking photographs, walking with Epstein and staying at his home in Manhattan. There are a number of individuals that were wealthy, powerful, politically connected individuals that stopped talking to Epstein for a while, but then when it seemed like the dust had settled, reestablished contacts with him for some unknown reasons. So I would not be surprised if Trump was one of those individuals that felt that it was getting too heated with respect to the investigations going on with Epstein and what he was doing, that he broke contact.

30:40Emily Maitlis:But then when things seemed to be dying down, they have re-established contact, especially when Epstein presented to him, hey, look, I've got information. And if I use this information, it could hurt your career. So you better talk to me and meet with me.

30:56Lewis Goodall:So it was like a yo-yo. He could just pull them back when wanted to.

30:59Emily Maitlis:We know that they use leverage. We see that in the emails that they were utilizing that type of leverage, or at least discussing the concept of utilizing that leverage to Jeffrey Epstein's advantage. You see that in the email with Steve Bannon and discussions about leverage and what can be used.

31:17Lewis Goodall:Yeah. And Spencer, we're talking a month after the publication of Virginia Dufresne's memoir, a young woman who went on to take her own life earlier this year. I guess for you, you want to do best by victims and there will be many women probably looking at what is happening over the coming weeks and months and thinking, am I going to fight this? Am I going to come forward? Am I going to am I going to get closer to justice now? Are you hearing from them? Are you are you thinking you want to take on more cases? Or I mean, is the lesson of all this that it's barely worth the price?

31:57Emily Maitlis:Well, I appreciate you raising the issue because it's an important one. My clients cross the gamut from individuals who have still yet 20 years later never been named publicly and choose to remain that way, and others who have chosen to speak out. I didn't represent Virginia Dufresne directly, but I was very close friends with the attorney that did represent her. We worked together on the cases at the inception of this litigation. and you know it definitely takes a toll on a victim when someone has the type of wealth and power that epstein did to attack these girls integrity and lifestyle and follow them with trucks and private investigators and dig into their personal lives to intimidate them of course it affects them but what i would say to victims everywhere is that there continue to be gladiators fighters like myself and other attorneys that will fight for you to make sure that the truth comes out.

33:00Emily Maitlis:And had the victims not been brave enough to come forward in the case of Jeffrey Epstein, he may still be trafficking young girls even today. So it is only but for the courage of these young girls that were brave enough to stand up and come forward that he was able to be stopped in his tracks eventually, as well as Glenn Maxwell. and we need victims to speak up, talk about what's occurring, because for it to stop in the future, we need the bravery of these young women to speak about what's happened to them.

33:35Lewis Goodall:That courage has been so noticeable and so remarkable with those who've come forward. And sometimes they've had the evidence to present to us to show us what they mean. And one of those was the photo that Virginia Dufresne had taken with Prince Andrew then's arm around her waist, a photo that he told me in 2019 was probably a fake because he was wearing the wrong clothes or wouldn't have been upstairs or he didn't recognise his own hand. I mean, from this tranche of emails, Epstein has confirmed that photo is real. It kind of makes you wonder why people would come towards an interview or come towards a testimony with a lawyer and just tell lies that are so easily disproved?

34:22Emily Maitlis:It's absurd. It's absurd. But I mean, look, time and time again, we have seen politicians and wealthy individuals and powerful individuals around the globe just try to completely gaslight the general public when the information is right in front of them. And, you know, what I would say is that if people buy into those lies, they will continue to do it. And unfortunately, there are a group of individuals that regardless of what these powerful or wealthy individuals say, will believe them. And they know that, you know, there is a certain group of individuals that follow Donald Trump, for example, that he said it himself in his own words, I could shoot somebody in the middle of New York and get out of it and not be convicted.

35:14Emily Maitlis:So there are these individuals that are going to believe whatever they say. We've got to stand behind the truth, though, and we have to see the facts for what they are. And unfortunately, you know, with the current administration we have here in the United States and the evolving news that I've seen develop over the last 20 years, that line between truth and false has been blurred.

35:42Lewis Goodall:Last question to you, and this will probably matter much less than much of the other stuff we've been talking about, but there are many now who look at the kind of information that's emerging and say, if these emails are even halfway true, if he did have this compromise material on many other people. Is it so unlikely that he was murdered in prison? Is it so unlikely that Epstein didn't, in fact, take his own life? Where do you sit on that?

36:11Emily Maitlis:Yeah, well, I have always been consistent about this issue. And I believe I gave a quote to one of the UK papers, in fact, when he was first arrested. And I was the first individual to say he's not making it out alive. And I knew that because of what I have learned over the years of litigating these cases, what he had and the information that was there. So I have never been convinced that he took his own life in jail. How and who has been a question, but whether it occurred has not, at least not to me based on the information I've found and what I've seen. So, you know, that question still remains.

36:53Emily Maitlis:At the end of the day, though, what's important to understand is this was either a massive failure by our US Department of Justice at the time to allow something like that to happen in its most secure prison, or someone killed him. Those are really the only two options. And I think that option two is frankly more likely.

37:15Lewis Goodall:Spencer Coven, great to speak to you today. Thanks for your time. Thanks for having me.

37:28Emily Maitlis:The News Agents. Well, yesterday we told you about the machinations that appeared to be going on within Downing Street and their briefings about a potential plot to oust the Prime Minister.

37:43Lewis Goodall:And today we've had an apology from Keir Starmer to Wes Streeting, his health secretary, over the Downing Street briefings. and the Prime Minister said he'd launched an investigation to find out where those briefings came from and he's told lobby journalists that he's pretty sure it wasn't from number 10. I have to say we had the finger very firmly pointed for us at Morgan McSweeney as being the author of those briefings against West Streeting. But it sounds as if Morgan McSweeney has the full confidence, at least, of the Prime Minister.

38:18Emily Maitlis:Yeah, but there are many voices who are much more critical of him. And apparently there are cabinet ministers who've said that he should be going. On tomorrow's episode of the News Agents, I speak to David Blunkett, Lord Blunkett, Labour grandee, former Home Secretary, former Education Secretary, one of the key people during the Blair years. He's pretty clear about what needs to happen to Morgan McSweeney. Should Morgan McSweeney go as chief of staff? well if I were Keir Starmer I would say to Morgan look you've got great skills you helped enormously with me in building a winning team before the election now's the time for me to find you another role that you're good at and I will bring someone in with the overall experience that we need to be the chief of staff.

39:11Emily Maitlis:It's a particular role. It's about knowing about government and managing. It's about having been in a senior position where you've had to not only run the show, but manage people well. And that isn't rocket science, but it's a particular skill.

39:31Lewis Goodall:So beautifully done, but he's essentially saying time for him to move aside.

39:34Emily Maitlis:Time for him to move aside. And also, you haven't got the skills to be the chief of staff. You don't have what it takes to be the chief of staff.

39:40Lewis Goodall:I mean, actually, chief of staffs do tend to kind of swap over quite often. I think Keir Starmer, I mean, we've talked to at least three of Starmer's chief of staffs, and some of them are very phlegmatic about the length of their role. They say, look, you know, you go and you do a specific job, whether it's in opposition, whether it's in getting somebody elected, whether it's on a campaign or whether it's now in government. And, yeah, I mean, maybe what Blunkett's doing is recognising that one period of government is over and a new one has to start pretty quickly.

40:08Emily Maitlis:One period of campaigning is over. Labour have won the election. Morgan, you did a great job then. But governing, you're just getting in the way. And that seems to be his message. And he's fascinating about the problems that this current government faces, the challenges ahead, how difficult it is. His slight contempt about the way the civil service is operating right now.

40:28Lewis Goodall:that's all on the news agents tomorrow bye bye bye for now this has been a global player original

40:34Emily Maitlis:production

From the publisher

23,000 pages of documents from the “Epstein files” have been released by Congress. They reveal damning details, and suggest that Epstein and Trump were in contact long after the President has previously said.

In the emails Epstein said of Trump: "I am the one able to take him down".

So are Trump's connections to Epstein finally catching up to him? And do these emails really have the power to take down the President of the United States?

The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/

More from The News Agents

All 385 episodes
How Epstein threatened to "take down" President TrumpThe News Agents · 41 min
Listen in VO