In short
The episode argues that political violence and conspiracy have become mainstream in Britain, driven by “algorithmic politics” that rewards outrage and noise, plus foreign interference. It links three current stories: arrests of two men guilty of conspiring to carry out arson attacks on Keir Starmer’s home and former car; a proposed government social-media ban for under-16s; and the 10th anniversary of Labour MP Jo Cox’s murder. Guests discuss how Cox’s killing by far-right extremist Thomas Mair (with neo-Nazi sympathies) was meant to “detoxify” debate, but instead Britain has grown more polarised and more willing to believe conspiracies. Key examples include online “rent boys” rumours about Starmer and claims that arson was “paid for by the Russians.”
Guest backgrounds
Kim Leadbeater (Jo Cox’s sister, MP for Batley and Spen) and Jake Richards (Labour Justice Minister; lead on the government’s “men and boys” strategy). Jake also claims Labour must tackle anger via welfare reform, defence spending, and men’s mental health/role models.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Legacy of Joe Cox's Murder
2:12 to 3:22
Discussing the impact of Joe Cox's murder on political discourse in Britain.
“And in the past 24 hours, three different stories, seemingly unrelated, but actually broadly part of the same thing.”
Rising Threats to Female MPs
3:22 to 4:51
Exploring the increased levels of abuse faced by female MPs in the current political climate.
“And Kim Lebbeater, who, of course, is Jo Cox's sister and indeed her successor, but one in her old constituency in Batley and Spain.”
Reflections on Political Change Since 2016
4:51 to 6:53
Reflecting on how the political landscape has changed since Joe Cox's assassination.
“I was still a producer then at Newsnight, and I went up with Kirsty Walk, who presented the show there that night.”
The Role of Online Political Culture
6:53 to 8:21
Examining the influence of online political culture on the rise of political violence.
“The fact that an MP had been killed in that manner in the heat of a referendum campaign where the politics could not have been more charged.”
Political Violence and Its Justifications
8:21 to 11:33
Discussing the justifications and reactions to political violence from various sides.
“You know, yes, there was trouble last week in Belfast, which you reported on, Lewis.”
The Toxicity of Political Atmosphere
11:33 to 14:00
Analyzing the toxic atmosphere surrounding political debates and its effects on society.
“Just a small microcosm, an example of what I mean.”
Political Violence and Responsibility in Britain
14:00 to 28:00
Discussing the rise of political violence, conspiracy theories, and the responsibility of political culture in Britain.
“in the political debate around the referendum, which was reaching its crescendo at that time.”
The Legacy of Joe Cox's Murder
28:15 to 28:52
Discussion on the impact of Joe Cox's murder on political discourse and societal tolerance.
“I want to start with, you've posted today on it being the 10th anniversary of Joe Cox's appalling murder.”
Addressing Mistrust in Politics
28:52 to 29:43
Examining the deep mistrust in politics and the need for politicians to deliver on promises.
Challenges in Labour Leadership
29:43 to 30:48
Discussion on the leadership challenges within the Labour Party and recent mistakes.
Show all 21 chapters
Defence Spending and Government Accountability
30:48 to 32:18
Debate on the government's approach to defense spending and the implications of funding cuts.
“So I think on some of the big calls, we've got it right.”
Welfare Reform and Political Priorities
32:18 to 34:22
Discussion on welfare reform and the necessity of addressing it alongside defense spending.
“As ever in government, there are conflicts between the Treasury and different departments about trying to get money and appropriate funding.”
Public Sentiment and Labour's Challenges
34:22 to 36:02
Reflecting on public anger towards the Labour Party and the need for change and reform.
“With the Labour Party, we believe in work.”
Future Policy Directions for Labour
36:02 to 37:36
Exploring future policy directions and the need for radical thinking within Labor.
“We are putting more money into NHS the Labour government will always support the NHS but what kind of reforms do we need in our public services to meet the new challenges?”
Leadership Questions in Labour
37:36 to 39:59
Debate on leadership changes within Labour and whether Keir Starmer should remain.
“You've had two years and on your own account and your own telling, you've failed some of the big tests.”
Defence Spending and National Security
39:59 to 42:04
Discussion on the need for increased defense spending in light of national security concerns.
“It's not about the face at the top of this team.”
Addressing Political Leadership and Defence Spending
42:04 to 44:32
Explore the challenges of leadership in addressing defence spending and the Labour Party's responsibilities.
“And I agree with him that I think for decades now, there hasn't been a proper understanding of the needs of places like that.”
Men's Health and Societal Issues
44:32 to 47:28
Delve into the issues affecting men's health and the responsibilities of politicians in addressing these problems.
“and you are responsible for young men in the sense of that's part of the rage and what you can do about it and the toxification of youth.”
Disinformation and Political Challenges
47:28 to 49:58
Discuss the impact of disinformation on politics and the need for politicians to address online challenges.
“You need I think 81 MPs, is it, to launch a challenge and if someone does that then there'll be a contest between whoever that is and Keir Starmer.”
Political Future and Leadership Challenges
49:58 to 50:30
Consider the future of leadership within the Labour Party and the political challenges ahead.
“about some of the sacrifices and challenges that that will pose to them.”
Political Reflections and Future Events
50:38 to 53:36
Reflect on political achievements and upcoming events, including the significance of the Makerfield by-election.
“Apple Vacations, where your story starts.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thumbtack presents Uncertainty Strikes. I was surrounded. The aisle and the options were closing in. There were paint rollers, satin and matte finish, angle brushes and natural bristles. There were too many choices. What if I never got my living room painted? What if I couldn't figure out what type of paint to use? What if I just used Thumbtack? I can hire a top-rated pro that knows everything about interior paint, easily compare prices and read reviews. Thumbtack knows homes. Download the app today. This is a global production. When Joe Cox was murdered, the clarion call was, we must do something to detoxify political debate.
0:43Kim Leadbeater:To this day, I think it was perhaps one of the most, if not the most, disturbing and chilling days of my journalistic career. The political atmosphere and the political culture of Britain today is in a darker, dangerous, more noxious place. We are so much more willing to believe in conspiracy theory. Well, I've read it. Well, yeah, you may have read it, but it's bullshit. In our fractured algorithmic politics, your only incentive is to get heard. Your only incentive is to make noise. Police! Stay where you are! Police! Stay where you are! Police! Stay where you are! Stay there! Stay where you are!
1:24OK. With me? Up. Yes, yes, yes. Subject here! Stand still. Yes, yes. There we are for me. That is the police body cam footage of the arrest of one of those responsible for the firebomb attack on Keir Starmer's home and on his former car. It wasn't a straightforward crime. These were people trying to stir up division and fear paid for by the Russians. It's 10 years since the murder of the MP Joe Cox, which was meant to mark a turning point about division and anger and rage. But are we getting worse as a society? Welcome to The News Agents.
2:10It's John. And it's Lewis in Manchester. And in the past 24 hours, three different stories, seemingly unrelated, but actually broadly part of the same thing. As we heard at the intro there, the arrest of those two people found guilty of conspiring to carry out arson attacks on Keir Starmer's property. The ban being proposed by the government for under-16s on social media and this the 10th anniversary of the dreadful murder of the Labour MP Joe Cox. And at the heart of it is division, polarisation, misinformation, anger, rage and what can be done about it. Because when Joe Cox was murdered, the clarion call was we must do something to detoxify political debate.
3:06We must be able to learn to respect that people have different views and that if a democracy is to thrive, You can't just go around killing people you disagree with. And yet, arguably, here we are 10 years on from that murder. And although the Joe Cox Foundation is doing great work, you'd have to say that we feel as a country more polarised than ever. Indeed.
3:31Kim Leadbeater:And Kim Lebbeater, who, of course, is Jo Cox's sister and indeed her successor, but one in her old constituency in Batley and Spain. She's been interviewed as part of the 10 year anniversary. And I think it is very interesting what she had to say and chilling as well. Just listen to this. All the evidence shows that female MPs have more abuse, more threats. And what shocked me when I first got elected was how that has become normalized, not just by society, but by the MPs themselves. So they were very quick to reel off a list of court cases, people who've been arrested, you know, death threats, rape threats, all those things that have just become part of the job.
4:12And we've really got to sort of challenge that because that shouldn't be part of anybody's job. And I do think this is a political problem, but it's also a problem with society. and I've said this a few times recently I can't believe I go to my local hospital for a blood test and there are signs up saying please be kind to the staff so when did we become a country where we have to put a sign up saying could you just mind being a bit nicer to people and not abusing the people who are actually trying to help you you go to the local supermarket and the staff are wearing body cameras because they've faced such abuse and sometimes physical abuse and being attacked now I think we all just need to take a step back and think is that what we want our country to look like?
4:49And I really hope the answer's no.
4:51Kim Leadbeater:So there, Jo Cox's sister, who of course was the first MP to be assassinated for decades in Britain, previous ones generally related to the IRA, and saying that she thinks division in the UK is probably worse now than the run-up to Brexit and on that fateful day when her sister was killed by a far-right thug, Tommy Mair, on the streets of her own constituency and just before we get into the details of kind of that and about um what that might mean and why that might be i sort of just listening to her and just thinking today when i sort of realized or in the last day or so that it was a 10-year anniversary of that i a can't quite believe it's been a decade it almost seems like yesterday and i think one of the reasons that it seems like yesterday is that i actually remember going up there on the night that she was killed in Burstall, which is in the constituency.
5:44Kim Leadbeater:I was still a producer then at Newsnight, and I went up with Kirsty Walk, who presented the show there that night. And I do think that to this day, I think it was perhaps one of the most, if not the most, disturbing and chilling days of my journalistic career. And I say that partly because I have this image just sort of indelibly sketched on my mind of arriving there in this absolutely kind of very normal, typical Yorkshire town, sort of, you know, brown and black brick in every direction, lovely little library, lovely little high street, surrounded by ticker tape from the police or police tape.
6:23And just in the middle of the street, you could literally see Jo Cox's high heels,
6:29Kim Leadbeater:where she had run away, taken them off as she was being pursued by this far right lunatic wielding a gun and a knife. And seeing something like that doesn't leave you. And I remember that night thinking that it almost felt straight away, and I think this was true, that Britain had politically changed somehow. The fact that an MP had been killed in that manner in the heat of a referendum campaign where the politics could not have been more charged. At the time, I sort of felt, and there was a lot of commentary, and Kevin Ledbetter has referred to this, that it would almost be a kind of jolt, a kind of warning, a kind of sense that Britain was maybe looking over the edge and looking over the precipice of a different type of politics.
7:20Kim Leadbeater:And it felt that, however gingerly, Britain might pull back. And I'm not saying, by the way, that what I mean by that is that Romaine was going to win or should have won or had some monopoly on political civility. I'm not saying that. But certainly that referendum campaign had been one of the most politically charged and noxious at times of any type of politics that we had seen. As I say, there had been all of this commentary that actually Britain had sort of veered into that and would go back. Of course, what we know in a succeeding 10 years, it is that it has been the opposite. And I sometimes reflect and can't quite believe that, you know, in my journalistic career so far, I've reported on not just the assassination of one MP, but two MPs.
8:06Kim Leadbeater:And in the previous decades, the assassinations that had taken place had, as I say, largely been connected, didn't happen very often, with the IRA and the troubles and the armed struggle on the island of Ireland. This has been something quite different. And I think that Kim Leadbeater is absolutely correct to say that the political atmosphere and the political culture of Britain today is in a darker, dangerous, more noxious place than it was when her own sister was assassinated. yeah that is quite something to consider yeah it's so interesting hearing your reflections of that i mean i was you know years ago one of my first jobs as a political correspondent at westminster was to cover the eastbourne by election that had been brought about by the assassination by the murder of ian gall uh by the ira who was the tory mp and someone uh close to margaret thatcher and that just seems like a bygone generation, mercifully.
9:02You know, yes, there was trouble last week in Belfast, which you reported on, Lewis. But the troubles per se, as the troubles, you know, IRA prepared to launch mainland attacks, that is mercifully behind us. 2016, when that murder of Joe Cox happened, I was Washington based, and was so profoundly shocked because I was thinking, but that doesn't happen in Britain. This is what happens here. It happens here in America, where we've seen political violence, you know, as we've been a continual thread through American political history. And what you had in 2016 that I was reporting on extensively was, of course, the election of Donald Trump and whether there had been Russian interference in that election.
9:50And all the intelligence agencies concluded that, yes, there had been, interference, although Donald Trump would never, ever accept it and always called it the Russia hoax. But Donald Trump failed to understand what it was. It wasn't just that the Russians were saying, vote Donald, which broadly, that was the overall sense of the messaging. They were sowing dissent. They were sowing division in the country to turn one American against another. And that brings us to the second story that we were just talking about, which was these two guys found guilty of conspiring to carry out arson attacks. Now, you know, they were two relatively kind of low-life young men of Ukrainian descent, which in itself significant, but employed by a Russian agent with the code name El Money on Signal and asked to carry out attacks when they didn't even know what they were doing.
10:49But this was clearly a Russian effort to sow dissent, to bring division into the country, to be anti-Muslim, to be anti the right, giving mixed messages to whichever group happened to be that they're being targeted so that everyone would hate one another. and this seems to be a new political reality that we face in britain today and it's been you know iranian inspired attacks on jewish targets where you know low lives are paid a few quid and they go and set light to an ambulance or they set light to a synagogue and so it was in the case of starmer as well where they targeted a house that he used to live in his old car and a couple of flats in islington something else i would say about um joe cox in
11:39Kim Leadbeater:particular and what happened to her and what we've happened since because it was definitely the start of seeing more political violence in Britain um shaped I would say by the sort of the online political culture that was in place then and has become more sophisticated since the fact that the main arena that our politics now takes place is in is online we've seen more political violence during that time we've seen the threat as well not just successful but the threat of political violence online. I mean, I just reflect, for example, all those people defending Elon Musk over the course of the last week rarely seem to ever reflect on the fact that as a result of what he has said, there is a member of parliament and former minister who now requires round-the-clock security protection as a result of some of the conspiracies he spread about her.
12:25Kim Leadbeater:Just a small microcosm, an example of what I mean. But something that I think is particularly dispiriting and disturbing about the reaction to political violence since then is that whenever there is political violence now everybody always says the same thing we can't allow this to change us um we they come out with the same sort of sort of bromides but what we've seen basically and it has happened to some extent on both sides of left and the right is when political violence happens excuses to some extent are made for it and there is blame against the other side for the political culture that they say that side alone has created what do i mean by that well i remember john in in the wake of joe cox's murder um there was obviously some reflection and it had to be quite sort of tepidly expressed because it was so traumatic and politically difficult at the extent to which was it really a coincidence or or can we be sure that it was really a coincidence that the only assassination that we had seen up to that point for decades had taken place in the middle of a referendum campaign where the atmosphere was deeply toxic let's never forget that thomas mayor the man who murdered him, the court later heard, not only was he a far-right extremist, he had neo-Nazi sympathies, white supremacist literature around his house.
13:44Kim Leadbeater:The trial heard that he shouted phrases such as Britain first and keep Britain independent and talked about death to traitors, freedom for Britain. Now that was all taking place when perhaps it wasn't always explicitly put, but that sort of atmosphere, those sorts of sentiments, they were being readily expressed in the political debate around the referendum, which was reaching its crescendo at that time. And it was legitimate to talk about, I think, and was not talked about enough, actually, in the aftermath. To what extent was it that we can say, was it a coincidence that that assassination happened at that time when we hadn't seen anything like it before?
14:23Kim Leadbeater:But Farage and others would have said, and the Leave campaign at the time said, no, this guy's just a madman. He's just a complete madman. It's a complete coincidence. Okay, fair enough. But when we see left wing political violence, for example, when Charlie Kirk was so appallingly assassinated, what was we didn't hear people like that going, oh, it's just a madman. Oh, it's it's just someone just acting totally randomly. They say that the political culture up to that moment has contributed to that happening in all likelihood. Now, my view would be to say that all are kind of correct, that these things rarely come completely out of nowhere.
15:00Kim Leadbeater:And every side has a responsibility to try and regulate that sort of politics. But what's so depressing since Joe Cox's murder has been that that so seldom has actually happened, that when someone on your side, quote unquote, gets killed or gets hurt or gets threatened, then it's a complete outrage and politics is responsible. But when it's on the other side, it's the other way around. And I don't think we have adequately dealt with that at all in our politics since. And actually, it's got far worse. I mean, you know, when Thomas Mayer was talking about traitors, freedom for Britain, how much more, John, in that time, in these last 10 years, has that accusation of treachery or being a traitor been made?
15:38Kim Leadbeater:Those sort of existential accusations. It's so much more common now than it was even 10 years ago. And we wonder why stuff like this happens. Yeah, look, I think you make the point very well that you've got to condemn violence on all sides, wherever it happens. And you can't be kind of giving dog whistles that sort of kind of encourage it. And I would say that, you know, what Nigel Farage said in the wake of the appalling policing of what happened in Southampton and the and the death there of a young guy where the police didn't seem to take his injury seriously. and the idea that it was just because he was white and there's two-tier policing and then Nigel Farage coming out saying you know look I wouldn't be surprised if there was more trouble on the streets of Southampton over the coming nights and you think come on that is almost kind of an enticement to young people to think right okay I'm going to start throwing things at the police again and also our reaction to some of these things I think we are so much more willing to believe in conspiracy theory look at what happened after keir starmer's house that his uh you know he'd rented out to i think his sister yes when there was a fire there what did people say there was this whole absurd idea conspiracy theory that was about rent boys and keir starmer and that was everywhere john it was everywhere online it was everywhere and people i know people I think of as kind of educated sophisticated able to discern what is utter bullshit and what is not saying well I gather there's I gather there's something in this whole rumor about Keir Starmer and Rent boys what do you think I said we know nothing we know absolutely nothing there is absolutely nothing we know at this stage well I've read it well yeah you may have read it But it's bullshit.
17:33And I think that people's willingness to kind of go down these rabbit holes where they are fed crap and just think, oh, well, that sounds like a plausible one. I'll retail that down the pub or at the golf club. I just think it's nonsense. And I think that as well is corrosive to our political debate and our ability to make rational judgments. I kind of thought it was, you know, look, I kind of think it was pretty bold what the government announced yesterday to saying that under 16s need to be protected from the social media algorithms. Christ, a lot of over 16s need protecting from it as well, where older people are peddling absolute nonsense on the basis of no factual information and just thinking, well, it sounds like it might be true.
18:19I'll tell people it is true.
18:20Kim Leadbeater:So I think that's right. I think that this the reason I fear this is going to get worse before it gets better is because of, you know, what I think about so much now is basically being a sort of deeply algorithmic politics. Right. Which is even if you compare stuff to 2016, 2016, you still had, well, the broadcast media, traditional media, which was deeply imperfect, by the way, I'm not saying that, you know, that was got everything right. But the traditional media was still more powerful, more dominant. It definitely had a stronger mediating function. You know, there's those sorts of rumours that you just heard there to talk about there, John, would have been, you know, they still were far more suppressed if we had that sort of environment still.
18:57Kim Leadbeater:But also in 2016, we had a less fragmented politics than we do now. And the thing about and these two things feed into each other. But the thing about our current political situation is that, you know, when you have sort of two or two and a half big tent party politics, it means that the leading politicians of those parties and those coalitions, because they're big tents, their incentive is to soothe. Their incentive is to try in the main, not always. You do get more combative politicians sometimes like Margaret Thatcher, but their incentive generally is to try and bring people together to bridge the divide because your party, by definition, is a big tent.
19:32Kim Leadbeater:you have to do that in our fractured algorithmic politics your only incentive is to get heard your only incentive is to make noise you're either whether it's true whether it's not true whether it's half true whatever your incentive is to say the thing that the relatively small slender number of people in your smallish tent want to hear and as a result you get a politics which is far, far sharper edged than anything that we saw before. And, you know, if I think, I mean, what you also get is a politics which is more existential. You know, if I think about, again, even the last 12 months, John, I think this is quite new.
20:13Kim Leadbeater:We're starting to see, and we've seen it particularly in the wake of the terrible case of Henry Nova. We're starting to see a politics which is starting to talk, for example, in deeply existential terms about the idea of the white majority in this country. Again, this is very American, not something we've really seen before. The white majority in this country being discriminated against, being suppressed, their rights being put as second order or second tier, two tier by comparison to the minority. Now, these threads have always sort of existed under the surface to some extent in British politics.
20:47Kim Leadbeater:That was basically the argument of Enoch Powell in Rivers of Blood in 1968. But in 1968, he lost his job on the front bench of the Conservative Party. Today, he'd probably get a more senior job of whatever party that he happened to be leading. and you know let's see we saw Nigel Farage literally last week take to his new substack where he wrote 6 ,000 words 6 ,000 word thesis all about this idea that white people are now being suppressed in their own country now when politics starts to look like that and is being algorithmically driven because that did extremely well as you as you might expect then what you start to get is is is a politics where it's not just the case as it used to be that it was basically about left-right economic bargaining it's not just a case as it used to be that um people would treat their opponents as that political opponents now it seems our politics is driving us to political enemies i was thinking about a quote from roger scrutin the conservative philosopher dead now he once said um, so paraphrasing slightly, but he said something along the lines of, you know, um, the left problem, they won't talk to me because they think I'm evil as a conservative.
21:59Um,
22:00Kim Leadbeater:I'll talk to them because I just think they're mistaken. Now, what I think has happened in politics in this algorithmic age is basically everyone has become a bit like the old left, as Roger Scruton was describing. Everyone has come to believe that everybody is not, But there are people who disagree with them are not just wrong, but they're malign and they're seeking to destroy your or our or their way of life. And I think it's leading us into a politics which, as Kim Ledbetter is saying, is much darker than it was even 10 years ago. Lewis, you said something a moment ago, which I kind of been mulling on since you said it, which is, you know, it's going to get almost it's going to get worse before it gets better.
22:38Or, you know, the things can improve. I feel pretty gloomy about it. I I've just been following some of what's been happening in America and in terms of the use of deep fakes and AI to generate completely false images of politicians. And that is all being passed around on the social media. So you have no idea what is real. And it's pretty unpleasant. You know, the latest one is a sort of a Texan Democrat, James Tallarico, who may win the Senate for, you know, and there's an attack ad where he is dressed up in a dress singing a song about trans rights. Now, it's obviously false, but it's so kind of ghastly.
23:19And, you know, and it's not just that one side is using it. Everyone will use it. Everyone will use deep fake AI to cast aspersions on political rivals, but also to try and mislead the electorate into believing something that is completely untrue about them, about their behaviour. And there are just no boundaries in any of this, it seems. And so I don't know how you bring back that sense of responsibility. You know, Joe Cox 10 years ago was meant to have been the kind of the siren going off saying we've got to change. And 10 years on, you think, have we? Not really. It's got worse.
23:59Kim Leadbeater:and i think it's got worse as well i mean it's easy to blame political actors and it's um but i do think as i say this this this new type of politics that we're seeing you know it i think it's sort of boiling our brains you know politically interested people there are more politically interested people now i think than there were 10 years ago as someone you know you think politics really matters i think that's a really good thing and i'm glad of that but i think it's also true to say that um we've talked a little bit about this before in terms of the fact it's become harder to do journalism in the age that we're living in.
24:29Kim Leadbeater:I think the number of people who are politically interested and willing to have their views and assumptions challenged is becoming slenderer and slenderer by the year. Because again, what algorithmic politics does is that there is never any reward for stepping outside your tribe, right? There's never any reward. If, I mean, I sort of go back a little bit to, you know, that conversation we had And when I did that documentary about Keir Starmer with Channel 4, you know, and the sort of fury from some people that we talked about at that time who were almost like, Lewis, we think of you as sort of being on the left.
25:02Kim Leadbeater:Like, why are you going for Keir Starmer? It's like, yeah, but like, you know, it's got to be possible. It's got to be possible. Journalism requires a kind of base layer where you are able to say, look, I know you think this, but have you ever thought about thinking this? And the problem with the way that online life works is that the thing that is rewarded each and every time for you as a journalist or as a politician is to be telling the people who follow you exactly what they expect to hear from you. And in a way, if you go back, John, I suppose when you start your career or even like when I first started getting interested in politics in terms of like opinion formers and journalism, in a way, the reward was to be slightly different.
25:47Kim Leadbeater:right if you had a column say or let's say podcasts existed at that time the chances are the thing that you would be rewarded for is sometimes being a bit counterintuitive yeah or a bit iconoclastic is you're sort of reading a column or an opinion form you say oh i wouldn't expect them to think that because if you're saying the same thing over and over again each and every week then actually that's quite boring and your readers don't want that and your editors don't want that and you want to surprise and and regale and actually sort of say or tell your readers something surprising or have a scoop or a report that's surprising or cuts against the grain.
26:19Kim Leadbeater:Online life, online political life, journalistic life is exactly the opposite of that. You will never get reward from your people for saying something that they don't like or surprises you. And to be honest, you won't get reward from the other side either, because they either won't see your stuff because algorithmically it won't be sent to them. But if they do, there's very little reward for anyone on that side to either sort of praise you or endorse you or whatever, or you're might likely just think, well, this is just a one off. So I just think that what this politics is doing to us and what that sort of algorithmic politics is doing is driving us ever more week by week, year by year into a place where almost into almost hermetically sealed bubbles.
26:58Kim Leadbeater:And that's not a new observation, but I do think it is accelerating. And I think it makes genuinely makes democratic politics harder to sustain in a way that we've known it before. Well, in a moment, we're going to talk to Jake Richards, the justice minister, for his view on whether politics has become hermetically sealed and whether it is still OK to criticise your own government.
Read the full transcript
27:42Resorts in Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and top U.S. destinations. Use promo code JUNE26 for these limited-time offers. Start planning today at AppleVacations.com or contact your travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts.
28:06Well, we're joined in the studio now by Jake Richards, MP, who is the Justice Minister. And the lead on the government's men and boys strategy. And we'll come to that in a minute. I want to start with, you've posted today on it being the 10th anniversary of Joe Cox's appalling murder. Which I think sent a shiver through the political class on all sides. That what has happened to debate, what has happened to tolerance, what has happened to the ability to just disagree with each other. but without it becoming so utterly toxic and rancorous and yet i would say 10 years on we seem to be in a worse place than we were what can be done well i agree that we're in a worse place than we were 10 years ago and actually listening to brendan cox joe's husband on the radio today he agrees as well that things have got worse i think look it's difficult because there's a lot of warm words we can say about politics trying to unite people and we've got politicians who certainly try and divide but I think fundamentally there is a deep mistrust with politics for a failure to deliver and the British public have been promised things now for many years which politicians of all different colours have been unable to deliver on and I think if we as a political establishment for want of a better word government MPs parliament if we want to try and overcome this anger and toxicity in our public debate we have to get things right and we have to lead and we have to be honest with the British public about some of the trade-offs that that will mean so yes look there's stuff we can do as MPs and as the media to try and be careful with our language and work together when we can that is really important but I think fundamentally if we're going to undermine those that are trying to rupture our society we have to deliver on whether that be living standards better public services securing our borders and keeping our country safe do you do accept a mere culp of that i mean you've been in power now for two years this labour government you came in with a landslide majority and yet on so many issues it has seemed that you've been unable to offer that leadership and it's and it has felt like there has been a vacuum and we want to do this and kirsten will announce something and then there'll be a u-turn and it will disappear well i think look we're since the local elections there's been a debate in the labour party about what has gone wrong and the prime minister's led that debate in many ways and he's accepted that there were some might say he's responsible for it rather well yeah i think he's put his hands up he said just this week that he has to turn things around he has to show a better leadership we all do as part of a team in government we've accepted that there have been mistakes that we've made in the first two years of government which have really undermined our credibility and our ability to make those arguments and to deliver those change the most prominent one being the winter fuel debacle frankly which um is still the most well-known and at the same time most unpopular policy of the labour government we made some mistakes i think on the big calls for the prime minister he's got them right in the first two years whether that's on the global stage whether that is uh in our on the iran conflict just earlier this year and also on the economy remember when we took over the public finances were in a real mess and he's had to make very difficult sometimes unpopular decisions alongside the chancellor to offer that stability in the economy which has seen uh interest rates come down inflation begin to fall and also growth now more than we not as much as we want but certainly growth that has outstripped some of our competitors.
31:48So I think on some of the big calls, we've got it right. But we've undermined our case by making egregious errors and at times an inability to kind of take on the argument when we needed to. Well, last week, the end of last week, we see the resignation of John Healy, the Defence Secretary, someone who has not got leadership ambitions, someone who is a hard-working principal defence secretary who was trying to meet the challenge meet the moment where the world is a more dangerous place thanks to russia and all the rest of it and yet couldn't get the support couldn't get the financial support that he believes is necessary isn't that a damning indictment of the government of kirstama's leadership well i know john i know very well he's a friend of mine he was at my wedding and i know for a fact that he would not have taken that decision lightly.
32:40As ever in government, there are conflicts between the Treasury and different departments about trying to get money and appropriate funding. And that's happened. And that will continue to happen with Dan Jarvis. He's made it very clear that he wants to fight for more defence spending. And that's right. I do think that as a country and as a government, perhaps we haven't stepped back and actually recognised the new era we're entering. And the debate on this defence spending across the political spectrum is slightly divorced from the reality we are entering a new age we're in a new age but we're entering a new dangerous age where we're going to have to spend a lot more money on defence now we can talk about different percentages of GDP and different figures a lot more and as a country as citizens and as a government have we thought about the sacrifices that that will entail what is government not going to do in the next 25 years that it does now because it needs to fund defence spending I'm not sure that as a not just as a government and this isn't a criticism of us in government necessarily it's the criticism of our political debate have we properly approached that issue now we've seen the conservatives saying well just cut welfare and spend on defense it's not quite straightforward as that we've got to do something about welfare we've got to bring down the welfare bill but sort of saying that you can just do that very easily and fund defense spending and everything's going to be rosy it is cheap politics and not serious so we have to have a bigger broader debate about what we want to be as citizens and a society when it comes to defending our realm but i hear you say that, Jake, with the greatest respect Keir Starmer did try to take£5 billion out of the welfare budget to put it elsewhere and failed Yeah, and that was you know, I mentioned earlier So that is a failure of government that is a failure of governing, that is a failure of number 10 to make sure it's writ runs That episode last year was another was a bad episode for the government and for the country but what we are going to be doing, and Pat McFadden and Anna Milburn's report, which I know that this podcast has looked at in some detail, but we are going to be setting out sweeping reforms of how our welfare state works with the aim of, of course, getting people back into work.
34:43With the Labour Party, we believe in work. We know the intrinsic value of the Labour Party, not just in terms of the balance sheet, but the intrinsic value of work. But also we need to bring that welfare bill down. And we need to bring it down, not just to spend on defence, but also other public services as well. And that will happen. the approach last year was not right. And I think, again, there's a consensus across the Labour Party that it wasn't the right approach. But I also think there's a consensus, again, across the Labour Party. I think the characterisation of parliamentary colleagues that we're not up for welfare reform, that we're not able to make the difficult decisions is not right.
35:17We just need to do it in a more comprehensive way. And I think Pat McFadden and the work he's doing alongside Anna Milburn and others will achieve that. Much more sweeping reforms than were actually envisaged last year. You said, yeah, winter fuel allowance, we made a right old mess of that. Welfare cuts, yeah, we made a right old mess of that. John Healy resigning, yeah, we made a right old mess of that. Isn't there a point where the British people say, we've got a right to be angry, you're bloody useless at doing what you're doing? Look, the British people are angry. We saw that last May. We had local elections and we got battered across the country and actually most acutely in our heartlands, the places where the Labour Party was born.
35:55and that has caused and rightly caused a debate about what has gone wrong but most importantly what we do to fix it and i think actually when you look at that debate whether it's tony blair's essay keir starmer's response on substack uh our candidate in makefield um andy burnham and west streeting now you know i think there's a consensus amongst the labour party that when we came into government our ambitions did not meet the scale of the challenges that we face as a country and I think that there's an acceptance of that and we now need to in the second half of this parliament make sure that we amend that and meet those challenges and that means being more radical thinking bigger and making sure that we're able to get there but to do that John we have to face up to the trade-offs of some of these difficult decisions whether it's on defence spending whether it's on welfare reform whether it's on immigration where we still have too many small boats crossing our channel two years into a Labour government difficult decisions would be required whether it's on the future of the NHS where we have an ageing population which is going to cause structural pressures on the NHS over the next 10, 15, 20 years.
37:02We are putting more money into NHS the Labour government will always support the NHS but what kind of reforms do we need in our public services to meet the new challenges? What are we doing on the labour market and the fact that the artificial intelligence revolution is going to completely transform the jobs of the future? Do we have the skills policy that is going to meet that challenge? Those are the big questions and And that will involve difficult decisions. It's not going to be easy and it's not going to be all milk and honey. And I hope that the Labour Party debates those difficult decisions as well as our ambition to meet those challenges.
37:34Well, let's let's get to the heart of it then. You've had two years and on your own account and your own telling, you've failed some of the big tests. John, just to be fair, I think. Let me just finish my question. Isn't it time? You know, Keir Starmer's had a go. His approval ratings are in the toilet. He has shown himself unable to give that leadership, to bang heads together in the cabinet, to communicate a message of what this government is about, to deliver the policies. Isn't it time for someone else to take over? Maybe this is Andy Burnham's moment. I think the issues we've just been talking about, whether it's welfare reform, whether it's defence spending, the idea that you sort of just, well, let's change the bloke as it's at the top and everything is solved is just nonsensical.
38:19Whatever happens, whoever is the leader, the Prime Minister of our country in this period has to grapple with those big questions. And actually, just to be very clear, over the last two years, yes, mistakes have been made and we've talked a lot of them about this interview, but we have interest rates have been cut for thousands of families in my constituency. That means huge savings in their mortgage payments every month, which is completely transformative to their lives. We've seen waiting lists in our NHS come down consistently month after month after month. That's one of the biggest concerns for the British people.
38:50We've seen immigration numbers come down again. The top three issues for the country, cost of living, NHS, immigration, we are dealing with. So I don't accept that last two years we haven't made important changes. But I think there is an acceptance amongst the Labour Party and the Prime Minister himself that we have bigger changes to make to meet the challenges that the country faces in the next few years and indeed the next few decades. and we are up for that challenge the Labour Party is up for that challenge but to meet that challenge we have to be honest about the trade-offs that would involve to the British people.
39:20Okay I understand that there are difficult policy decisions ahead but the question of who leads this government is not just moot it's just you know I don't think it's realistic to say oh well you know we just don't change the bloke at the top and expect the problems to go away of course not but maybe it is time for someone else to have a go. Are you saying to me now that you want Keir Starmer in place and fighting the next general election? Keir Starmer has said he's going to fight. There's no challenge at the moment. But John, the point here... But what do you want? I want this Labour government to succeed.
39:51And the point here is that I don't think that... Do you think it can succeed with Keir Starmer as the Prime Minister? Absolutely. It can succeed with Keir Starmer as the Prime Minister because it's not about the personality at the top. It's not about the face at the top of this team. It's about whether we are serious, really serious, about tackling those big issues that we've talked about in this interview. because it's okay saying we want to. It's okay saying, yes, we need to be an ambitious Labour government. We need to be more radical on the economy, more radical on public services. That will involve difficult trade-offs in the context we find ourselves in.
40:25And we need to be serious about those and attack those arguments if we're going to make them. Jake, I want to pull the curtain back a tiny bit. You and I are both afflicted by supporting Tottenham Hotspur. Were Spurs right to get rid of Thomas Frank as their manager? Well, I know I can see where you're going with this, John. and the parallels you're seeking to draw. But when you've got a manager who is leading you into a desperate old state... Yeah, yeah. But running a country is not like being a football manager. I mean, I know where you're going on this, but we don't, as a country, want to get into a situation where you have a few bad results and you think, right, we just sacked the manager.
41:02It's slightly different to the football team. I actually think we should have sacked Thomas Frank much earlier. But I think in terms of... There are some who say the same about Keir Starmer. But I just don't think that this is a healthy political debate to be having. You know, we've had more prime ministers in the last... We're turning into Italy. I remember growing up and kind of looking at the churn of Italian prime ministers and the devastation, frankly, that had for their economy and their politics and their public life. We don't want to be getting into that situation. are you coming on the news agents today to say Andy Burnham isn't equipped to deal with those big issues those trade-offs ahead no because you know I think Andy in the argument he's making the campaign in Makerfield is a powerful one about the fact that politics for too long hasn't served constituencies like Makerfield towns outside of Wigan, Makerfield's very similar to my constituency in that it's a rural, post-industrial area on the outskirts of a town, in my case Rotherham, in his case Wigan.
42:04And I agree with him that I think for decades now, there hasn't been a proper understanding of the needs of places like that. So his argument, his vision, and some of his policy pronouncements have been healthy. My argument and what I'm trying to address in this interview is that regardless of who the leader is or what we want to do on some of these policy issues, there are difficult trade-offs, which I think the Labour Party sometimes ignores. And we have to tackle those head-on, whether it's on defence spending, which is in the news the most at the moment, whether it's on welfare reform. Do we need to spend more on defence?
42:41Absolutely, we need to spend more on defence. I mean, this government has already introduced the biggest upgrade in defence spending since the Cold War. We're spending£11 billion more this year on defence than we were in 2023, 2024. we want to spend we need to you know we we will do whatever it takes to keep our country safe but just just on that narrow point i yeah here you have defense spending yes it should go up says government minister the fact of the matter is that you know on keir starmer's letterbox at number 10 downing street it says first lord of the treasury yeah i mean he's in charge you know it's not just rachel reeves who's in charge of the money he's the first lord of the treasury he hasn't been able to get the money from other spending departments they've all said yeah you might want a bit of my budget but you're not having it that is a failure of leadership the defense investment plan will be published in before the native conference and john really resigned over what wasn't going to be in it clearly that that will um that defense investment plan will signal and set out a huge increase in defense spending now john um and i think he's in parliament right now standing up and making a speech will set out what his concerns about that and what more needs to be done.
43:50You don't just publish a defence investment plan, and that's kind of it. There's an ongoing conversation, of course, about the capacity of what we need to do within that budget as well, because I think, you know, Al Cairns, my colleague and former defence minister, set out that there's a lot of waste in the Ministry of Defence. You know, I think today he said every time he got a new submission from his civil servants, he couldn't believe the amount of money we were spending, which wasn't being spent effectively. So I'm sure that a lot of that money that we are investing in our defence sector could be spent more efficiently.
44:17and we need to look at that as well. So this is part of a conversation. I wish that conversation was happening with John in government still. It's not. But Dan Jarvis is now in that role and he will continue it. We started this conversation talking about anger and fury and you are responsible for young men in the sense of that's part of the rage and what you can do about it and the toxification of youth. England is playing its first match tomorrow night. I guess there'll be an awful lot of testosterone around can can politics and politicians do anything about this well look first you know the deputy prime minister is leading this piece of work and has asked me to work with him on it and it's it it there's two parts of it so politicians alone cannot fix some of the issues that are facing boys and men in our country they're deeply rooted in social history and cultural issues which are not immediately within a political sphere but i do think there are two things we can do one is amplification so there's a lot of good work already happening now that means about men's mental health men's health more generally this is the government that published england's first ever men's health strategy which i think was a really important step we are just yesterday i was in speaker's house with movember launching men's health week and trying to get men talking about their own health and mental health in particularly we know that male suicide is the biggest killer of men under 50 in this country this is a kind of phenomenon that we haven't grappled with as a society so i think as politicians particularly more famous politicians than me they have a responsibility to talk about this issue more but secondly i do think that across government we sometimes don't think about the male experience when we're making public policy so why is it john that one in three primary schools in our country doesn't have a male teacher you know when you think about there's so many children growing up without perhaps a father at home or even one that they are in touch with and they're at primary school without a male role model perhaps at all and that has really serious consequences why have we not as a as a government and previous governments really grappled with that issue i mentioned male suicides you know biggest killer of men under 50 is remarkable now we are doing good work we've invested millions of pounds in suicide prevention projects we're working with the premier league and samaritans on good work in that area but has there been the urgency in the health system over the past several decades on this issue no and i actually think we're streeting the previous health secretary went some way in in in in uh in fixing that so i think you know we talked about the social media ban um that we announced yesterday there's a massive issue about the radicalization of men online um both in the kind of manosphere in inverted commas uh some of the toxic misogyny but also quite serious fixation on violence which we've seen and you know it was touched upon in the southport inquiry as well and there's really serious issues around that too so part of this role i hope is about making sure that some of the specific issues and challenges that boys and men face are part of government thinking across the board and that toxicity and that hatred and the anger and almost the sort of you know the algorithm rewards anger and rage um you're doing taking measures to protect under 16s and protecting childhood and you know that's a very laudable ambition i just wonder what you can do about the over 16s because there's as much of it there you know there's as much conspiracy theory and crap out there of people getting furious and stoked by foreign actors as well yeah look disinformation uh and actually the role of artificial intelligence in that is going to completely transform our democracy over the next few years and decades and it's a massive challenge the government have taken some action about foreign interference in elections and we're passing legislation at the moment which looks at doing that but i think there is again a bigger conversation about what this means for our politics uh and also a kind of reflection for politicians about how we challenge some of the stuff online um you know because there's been a general view that well you don't want to challenge something because it just gives it more air but i wonder whether we are kind of over the cliff on that and that as a political um as frontline politicians we now have to spend a bit more time challenging some of the disinformation that's out there online um but again you you could spend all your day doing that and we do have a country to run and things to do so it's a difficult balance and that's a conversation we're going to have to have do you think there will be a leadership challenge we'll see over the coming weeks you know kia starmer has today been very clear that he's getting on with the job and the rules are very clear within the Labour Party.
48:56You need I think 81 MPs, is it, to launch a challenge and if someone does that then there'll be a contest between whoever that is and Keir Starmer. I could have given that answer. I'm asking your opinion of whether you think there will be one. I genuinely don't know, John, because I think that we'll see what happens in Makerfield. I was in Makerfield campaigning on Saturday for Andy Burnham and he said that he would join in if there was a contest, I think, but hasn't quite said that he wants to launch one. We'll see. We'll see whether there's a contest. But the point here is is that if there is a contest, if there is a contest, well, if there is a contest, or if there isn't, there is a debate about how we beat reform politically, but perhaps even more importantly, and linked, is meet these big challenges we face as a country.
49:40And to do that, we have to be honest about the difficulties and difficult trade-offs that that involves for the British public and in government. And I think whatever, if that debate happens in a contest or not, we need to be very honest about that. because the only way we're going to meet those challenges is by the public being brought along on the journey about some of the sacrifices and challenges that that will pose to them. Jake Richards, thank you very much. Thanks, John.
50:23on vacation packages, plus instant savings at select resorts in Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and top U.S. destinations. Use promo code JUNE26 for these limited-time offers. Start planning today at AppleVacations.com or contact your travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts.
50:50Kim Leadbeater:Your supposed political friends tell me your time is up. If you decide they're wrong, how will you persuade them? Well, look, we got a landslide victory in 2024 for a five-year mandate for this Labour government. I said at the time we will both invest in our public services and we will grow our economy. And many people said to me at the time, just as they are saying things to me now, that is not possible here. And if you look at the results, we have invested in our NHS, waiting lists have come down, biggest drop in 17 years just the other week, and at the same time our economy is stable and we have got the highest growth in the G7 at the moment.
51:29So very many times on my political journey people have said to me it is not possible, they said it is not possible to turn the Labour Party around, it is not possible to win an election, it is not possible if you do win an election to invest in your public services and stabilise the economy. Wrong every time and that is why I intend not to walk away from this but to carry on with what I was elected to do which is to serve this country and bring back the change that people desperately needed in their lives. Cape Verde not Spain. Well, Cape Verde result was quite remarkable I have to say. But look, we have got England tomorrow night.
52:03And the thing about the G7 is it finishes on Wednesday, just in time for me to get home to watch the match, which I'll be doing. That is Keir Starmer at the G7 Summit in Evian. But the waters are going to be stirred on Thursday in the by-election in Makerfield, where Andy Burnham might return to Westminster, not just as the MP, but a future Prime Minister. We will be in Makerfield tomorrow, taking the temperature. Join us then. Bye-bye. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Splash into Savings event from Apple Vacations is here. Now through June 25th, save up to$150 on vacation packages, plus instant savings at select resorts in Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and top U.S.
52:49destinations. Use promo code JUNE26 for these limited-time offers. Start planning today at AppleVacations.com or contact your travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. This has been a global production.
53:33Thumbtack knows homes. Download the app today.
From the publisher
10 years on from the murder of MP Jo Cox, there is a grim warning from her sister Kim Leadbeater: the atmosphere in politics now is "probably worse".
Leadbeater warns of people trying to "sow division" in our country - and that's a division that Russia is seeking to exploit. One of the arsonists convicted of trying to firebomb Keir Starmer's house had also been tasked by Kremlin-linked actors with putting up far-right posters, seeking to stoke community tensions.
How can it be that, after the tragic murders of Jo Cox and David Amess, our politics continues to slide towards polarisation, anger, and conspiracy?
Later, Jake Richards - justice minister and lead on the government's men and boys strategy - on the crisis facing young men and the crisis facing Keir Starmer and his party.
The News Agents is a Global Production.
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
