In short
The episode argues that a Trump-led war escalation against Iran has created a long, unresolved stalemate that is economically damaging Britain and the wider world. It links higher oil prices and inflation/interest-rate risks in the UK to the continued blockade/ceasefire pattern, and claims US officials are treating the conflict as a “forever war” focused on preventing an Iranian nuclear bomb rather than ending the fighting.
Guests
John (host) and Emily Maitlis (host) and Lewis (host) discuss with Adam Crofton (FIFA/World Cup commentator).
Key claims
Trump’s “end it by surrender” approach fails because Iran won’t collapse; the US has “won militarily” but “lost economically,” worsening global markets. Pete Hegseth allegedly stonewalls cost questions and implies Iran will never get a nuclear bomb “while America is watching.” A “no quarter” order is framed as a war crime.
Notable examples
Bank of England warning of ~6.2% inflation and 6–7% food price rises; Brent crude hitting $126; Brent/US fuel price increases; Hegseth’s Congress exchange with Adam Smith; discussion of reopening the Strait of Hormuz as a possible short-term deal; World Cup pricing and FIFA security/police-escort controversy with Trump’s FIFA “Peace Prize.”
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Ongoing Conflict and Economic Implications
0:32 to 2:07
Discussion on the potential duration and consequences of the Iran war.
“This is a Global Player original podcast.”
Economic Consequences of War
2:07 to 2:50
Analysis of the economic impacts of the Iran war on Britain and inflation rates.
“And we've heard from Donald Trump there saying, Iran, please, please, please just surrender, which they're not going to do.”
Ceasefires and Negotiations
2:50 to 4:04
Examination of the intermittent ceasefires and stalled negotiations in the Iran war.
“has spelt out is a really dark picture for the next year or so.”
Stalemate and Military Strategy
4:04 to 6:12
Discussion on the military stalemate and the choices facing Trump regarding Iran.
“This is the first time we've talked about it around for a little while.”
Congressional Oversight and Accountability
6:12 to 7:27
Overview of congressional questioning of military leadership on war costs and strategy.
“Trump had a choice, which was to either basically accept a form of humiliation, which is that all of this, all of this war has basically, and all of this cost has basically yielded very little.”
Debating the Cost of War
7:27 to 8:50
Dialogue on the economic burdens of the Iran war versus the threat of nuclear weapons.
“And so America will then, well, what will it do?”
American Policy Towards Iran
8:50 to 11:21
Discussion on the historical context and future of American policy regarding Iran.
“I would simply ask you what the cost is of an Iranian nuclear bomb.”
Trump's Communication with Putin
11:21 to 14:00
Insight into Trump's interactions with Putin and the complexities of their discussions.
“They're not stopping Iran from making a nuclear bomb.”
Trump's Conversations on Iran and Ukraine
14:00 to 18:40
Explore Trump's discussions with Putin regarding the wars in Iran and Ukraine, showcasing his perspective and the surreal nature of the situation.
“Not telepathy, but telephonic communication with Putin.”
The State of the War in Iran
18:40 to 21:41
Discussion on the current status of the Iran war, the confusion in military strategy, and the implications of a stalemate.
“From a range of trusted voices and award-winning journalists.”
Show all 13 chapters
World Cup Developments and Ticket Prices
22:07 to 28:00
Analysis of the upcoming World Cup, including ticket pricing issues and the controversies surrounding FIFA's handling of events.
“Well, we're going to speak now to our old friend Adam Crofton, newly award winning Adam Crofton.”
Trump's Impact on the World Cup and Ticket Pricing
28:00 to 37:50
Explore how Trump's policies affect the logistics and costs surrounding the World Cup.
“But given that Trump was talking just last week about dropping Iran, banning Iran and replacing Italy, who didn't actually make the qualifying round through.”
Gun Law Changes and Political Implications
39:00 to 41:00
Discuss new rules easing gun ownership and their potential impact on society.
“See nutrition info on hero.co for sodium and sugar content.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Who doesn't love warm, carby comfort? This is a Global Player original podcast. Play by Donald Trump's own imagined rules in that fantasy land inside his head. The truth is that he hasn't ended the war in Ukraine. That means that the Iran war could last the same as the Ukraine war, which is not going to end anytime soon. But you have an American defence secretary basically bragging about the idea that he's instructed his own soldiers to commit war crimes. Yeah, turns out the world's favourite frat boy is actually a bit of a fascist. This is going to be a cost that escalates massively for America.
1:05And if it escalates for America, it escalates for us too. President Freddie and Ron, how long are you prepared to maintain the blockade? Could that go several more months? I mean, militarily, we've wiped them out. They have no military left. It's all the navies at the bottom of the sea. The air force is never going to fly again. We've got an amazing military. Now they have to cry uncle. That's all they have to do. Just say, we give up. We give up. The problem is the Iranians are not giving up. They are fighting fire with fire. And the consequences for the world economy are getting ever more perilous.
1:47The true cost to this country was spelt out this morning by the Bank of England, who's warned us that inflation could hit 6 % at the start of next year and food prices could rise by 7 % at the end of this year. How on earth do we get out of this war that Trump has started? Welcome to The News Agents.
2:13The News Agents. It's John. It's Maitlis. It's Lewis. And we've heard from Donald Trump there saying, Iran, please, please, please just surrender, which they're not going to do. And as a consequence of which, the price of Brent crude touched one hundred and twenty six dollars a barrel. That's the highest it's been since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The average price of fuel in America has topped four dollars thirty a gallon way, way higher than it was before the Iran war started. and yet look at the consequences in Britain. And what Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, has spelt out is a really dark picture for the next year or so.
2:58He said that inflation, as Emily said in the intro, could hit 6.2%, food prices 6 % to 7 % by the end of the year, warning of a possible need for forceful rises in interest rates. One scenario has as many as six rises in interest rates taking it to about 5.25 % and that will be absolutely crucifying for homeowners who are on variable mortgage rates and will suddenly see the cost of their borrowing going through the roof. And for what? What is there to actually show for this? The last time that we were looking at interest rates going through the roof was not that long ago actually. It was 2022 when Rishi Sunak was in power at the end of the Covid pandemic, right?
3:45So we were just doing a quick check and inflation was at 9.6 % then, which is horrendous. But that was after a global pandemic that affected the entire world. And now we're looking at something that could be just two percentage points lower than that, which is entirely self-inflicted. What was that about? This is the first time we've talked about it around for a little while. Obviously, not least because there has been, we've been in this weird stage of the war, which is that we've had these ceasefires which have been renewed. Intermittent talks, which look like they're going to be renewed, but very often aren't renewed.
4:22And to great fanfare, usually Trump, but sometimes Iran, say actually, you know, they're pulling the negotiators away. They're not actually going to withdraw, particularly bizarrely the other day. Trump said that he was not going to send Vance and his negotiating team because it costs a lot of money to send people over there, which is pretty sort of grimly, darkly hilarious when you consider this war has already cost about 20 billion dollars to the federal government and counting. 28 billion. And they reckon that's a low ball number. Right. It's way higher than that. That doesn't include the reconstruction of all the US bases.
4:51So they think they've underestimated that. And doesn't include all of the indirect economic effects, which we've, you know, you've just both been been been talking about. and we're in this period where as a result it still feels in terms of the economic consequences which Andrew Bailey is talking about it feels like this really weird artificial period economically you know it does feel a little bit like you know those days in the pandemic when we were sort of looking and hearing weird things that were coming from Lombardy and going like what's on over there and you could sort of feel a kind of darkness coming and I think economically speaking that is where we are because it was so striking you know when the ceasefire first was announced oil prices tumble because everyone thinks right we're there we're there you know we're at the point where trump is willing to talk they probably ran is willing to talk they probably tumbled before the announcement was made because that's how trump rumbles yeah anyway yeah yeah that's true that's certainly true there's lots of people making a lot of money but we're finally there and i think what the markets are now waking up to is something that we've been talking about for a little while which is that as a result of the way that trump has gone into this war without an end game without any obvious sense of kind of what might be acceptable, both to him and to the Iranians as a kind of end point, they are at stalemate.
6:03They are at stalemate because there is no obvious way of unlocking the fact that Iran, the regime there, is not falling. And as soon as it became clear that it was not going to fall, Trump had a choice, which was to either basically accept a form of humiliation, which is that all of this, all of this war has basically, and all of this cost has basically yielded very little. Or he had to up the military, actually up the and intensify the military operation and perhaps even consider ground troops, something that he's clearly not willing to do. So we are at an impasse and every day that impasse endures, the global economy worsens and worsens and worsens.
6:42If Leo Tolstoy was alive today, he'd be writing no war and no peace because that is the space we are in now where, yeah, missiles aren't being fired, bombs aren't being dropped. But neither is anything happening towards reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Nothing is happening about Iran's nuclear material. And you can just see a world in which, you know, we've had Donald Trump calling together meetings with his kind of military commanders saying, what are my options? And talking about ground troops again and talking about all these other things to break the impasse. And you've then had a statement from the Supreme Commander of Iran saying, you know what, if you start firing at us, we're ready to start firing at you.
7:25We will make your lives hell. And so America will then, well, what will it do? Will it just say, OK, well, we better hold off. And so you've just got this total impasse where what you could see happening is that America agrees to some kind of short term deal, which would look like an absolute defeat, whereby the Strait of Hormuz gets reopened because we talked about how much oil prices have gone up and the shock that is coming to the world's economic system, which we are in the foothills of right now, in return for nothing to happen on the nuclear material that Iran has. And as you say, Emily, so what has been achieved at the end of that, if that's how it comes to pass?
8:09Well, yesterday, Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of War, was called before Congress for the first time since the Iran war began. And there are a series of utterly extraordinary exchanges where he is accusing members of Congress who are asking him about the cost to America of the Iran war, i.e. doing their actual job. He's accusing them of gotcha questions. Just listen to him talking to Congressman Adam Smith. Do you know how much it will cost Americans in terms of their increased cost in gas and food over the next year because of the Iran war? I would simply ask you what the cost is of an Iranian nuclear bomb.
8:54I'm going to give you that opportunity. I would simply ask you what the... You're playing gotcha questions about domestic things. You're saying it's a gotcha question to ask what it's going to be in terms of the increased cost of gas and food. Why won't you answer what it costs to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear bomb? I give you that, sir. What would it cost? What would you pay to ensure Iran doesn't get a nuclear bomb? What would you pay? I reclaim my time. Do you not know? You had no one do the analysis of what the increased cost of gas and food on the American people are going to be? What is the cost of Iran holding that straight at issue with nuclear weapons?
9:26So the fact that he's treating a member of Congress as if it was a sort of dogship member of the press, which is frankly how Pete Hegseth talks to the rest of us most of the time, because they are asking about the cost to normal Americans of this war. And all that Hegseth can say is, well, how much would it cost if it was a nuclear bomb? And I think that is quite critical because what Hegseth has said is there will never be a nuclear bomb whilst America is watching Iran. In other words, he is setting open this idea that it is a forever war, right? Right. Because if America is going to constantly, constantly be on the back of this regime without changing regimes to make sure that they never do anything, then that is an investment in making sure that Iran never, ever has a nuclear bomb forever.
10:18Right. This is this is going to be a cost that escalates massively for America. And if it escalates for America, it escalates for us, too. So there are two things about Hegseth and that appearance. The first thing to say, and you made it clear that this was the first time that he'd answered questions from congressional leaders. Extraordinary. How unbelievable is it that a war that has been going on for weeks and weeks and weeks, and this is the first time that anyone from the executive is held to account by the lawmakers that pay the bills for the Pentagon, I'm taking such resentment and umbrage at the question.
10:56And I'm sorry, Ro Khanna's, I mean, look, Pete Hegseth is right to say what price Iran getting a nuclear weapon. Of course, that's a perfectly fair question. But the idea that he absolutely stonewalls the question of how much is it costing Americans today is so tone deaf when they're seeing the price of gas rise. And who knows what's going to happen to interest rates in America if the same thing is going to be happening in Britain. They're not stopping Iran from making a nuclear bomb. That's that's the whole point of this. They are not stopping anything from happening that wasn't happening before, except for oil getting through the Strait of Hormuz.
11:31Well, that's what I was going to say. I mean, again, we all come back to the sort of circularity of this war, which is that at precisely the moment it became clear that the Iranian regime wasn't going to fall, then everything goes back basically to the same question that American foreign policy has been asking itself for 10, 15, 20 years, 30 years, which is how do you stop Iran from getting a nuclear bomb? And there have been, long been, two schools of thought on that. The Hawks, the neocons have always been pushing and saying what we need to do is take them on militarily. We can defeat them militarily.
12:04The Doves, those who say are sceptical of that, basically say, look, it's not going to work down the barrel of a gun unless we were going to literally invade it with hundreds of thousands of troops and who knows what the consequences of that would be. So we've got to make a deal with them. And so basically we are, Pete Hex is there saying, what's the cost of getting a nuclear, of Iran getting a nuclear bomb? Nothing, as you say, Emily, about what they are currently doing actually take us any closer to that point. Because right now, all that's happening is it's rocking the world economy. And just saying, actually, just something else that was brought up there.
12:34Quite extraordinary again, John. You said it's the first time that he's been asked about this. True. It's also amazing. We've kind of got used to these kind of, you know, absurdly bellicose, kind of macho, small dick energy kind of things from Hegseth at these things. And he was asked if he stood by a statement that American troops would allow no quarter, no mercy for our enemies. And he said the military under his leadership fights to win. Seems quite kind of benign, that no quarter thing. Just remind people what it means. A no quarter order is one to kill all enemy combatants, even those who are badly injured or have surrendered.
13:10And as one of the Democrats on the committee pointed out, that is literally a war crime under the Americans own military uniform code of military justice and international war. So this is how far we've gone. Right. Like the whole thing is not necessarily even managing to yield the thing that everybody wants, which is no nuclear war. But you have an American defense secretary with his hair slicked back shouting with his suit that's far too small, basically bragging about the idea that he's instructed his own soldiers to commit war crimes. Yeah, turns out the world's favourite frat boy is actually a bit of a fascist, right?
13:43You don't have to scrape the surface too far to find that authoritarian streak in him. And Trump was also asked in a press conference last night, he'd been on the phone to Vladimir Putin. Now, this is where it all gets complicated. Trump said he had telephonic communication, right? Not telepathy, but telephonic communication with Putin. And Putin asked if there was anything he could do to help him with Iran. Now, that is a total mindfuck because the last time we looked, Iran was actually being helped by Putin to work out where American targets were coming in. So the fact that Trump and Putin are now talking about how to end the Iran war is just sort of a surreal step too far.
14:24But Trump was asked by Caitlin Collins of CNN whether he thought the Iran war or the Ukraine war would end first. And Trump quite likes that question because obviously, well, let's just listen. Let's have a listen to his answer. On your call with President Putin today, do you think the war in Iran ends first or the war in Ukraine? Well, we talked about more about the war in Ukraine, but he would like to be of help. I said, before you help me, I want to end your war. So we had a good talk. I've known him a long time. I think he was ready to make a deal a while ago. I think some people made it difficult for him to make a deal.
15:01But we talked more about Ukraine. But which war do you think ends first? um that's an interesting question you know coming from you that's very interesting which war would end first i don't know maybe they're on a similar timetable so when you first hear that you think oh trump's very flattered because he likes the idea that he's a peace man he's going to win the noble peace prize he's going to end more wars but actually the truth is that he hasn't ended the war in ukraine and that's now been going on more than four years and if they're on the same timetable, then again you'll start thinking, well that means that the Iran war could last the same as the Ukraine war, which is not going to end any time soon.
15:41I mean, actually it's even more depressing when you think that he could be in for the long haul on Iran too. There is a common thread in what he said there between the Iran war and the Ukraine war. You know, when he said the problem is that for Vladimir Putin, he wants to make a deal he wants to make, but there are some people who are just blocking it yeah those bastard ukrainians who keep on fighting and resisting and refusing to surrender and the same problem is there in iran those bastard iranians just won't surrender and roll over and accept they keep fighting back they keep fighting back and it's this kind of total lack of awareness on his part that you know what countries under threat tend to try and fight quite hard to defend themselves and don't play by donald trump's own imagined rules in that fantasy land inside his Except it's even more absurd than that, isn't it, John?
16:31Because, I mean, you know, as appalling as it is, the Russians and Ukrainians, it's still clear what they're fighting for. Ukraine's fighting for its national survival and Russia is still fighting to try and cripple Ukraine and take as much territory as it can. The war is ongoing. This war is weird because it's sort of ongoing and all the economic effects are certainly all ongoing, as we say, worsening. But the actual military side of things, Trump has basically, at least for now, given up. and he's tweeting out all of these threats, you know, no more Mr. Ice Guy and all of that. But you get the sense the Department of Defense, the Department of War, and the federal government, and Trump's administration is now slightly at a loss as to know what to do, whether to pick up the fight and resume the fight or just continue deferring and postponing because simply at this point now, the plan did not go as it was supposed to.
17:22Militarily, they're confused and bewildered as to what they could even do next because clearly, you know, despite everything they've thrown at Iran, it has not succeeded in achieving its objectives. And you just get the sense of complete confusion and bewilderment as to what the next move should be. Well, they keep saying we've won militarily. Well, you've won militarily, but you've just lost economically. And you've agreed a ceasefire. And you've agreed a ceasefire in return for what exactly? Nothing. It's a really interesting war in that sense. I mean, I would always take an economic cost, frankly, to, you know, more human deaths, right?
17:56So on the one hand, I'm sort of relieved that we're not, you know, we're not pushing further kind of, you know, aren't you going to get your boots on the ground? All that stuff has stopped, right? They're not going to get boots on the ground. I don't know what happened to those Marines. I'd be amazed if they did. It'd be extraordinary. So I would say this is the best kind of stalemate. But having said that, it doesn't need to be happening at all. I mean, nothing that they were going to achieve is going to be achieved now. So all we're talking about is damage limitation, which is vast. and this can't go on and on and yet that is exactly what it seems is going to happen.
18:31Back to Tolstoy. You better give him a ring. Yeah, I'm going to ring up. Leo, it's John here. He's a listener, I understand. No war and no peace. I reckon if you rang up a publisher they'd take it. From you. We'll be back in just a moment.
18:48From a range of trusted voices and award-winning journalists. Good morning, I'm Nick Ferrari. It's time to get to your calls. Find out the latest news and hear every side of the story. There is also a judgment I made that was wrong. I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson, and I apologize again to the victims of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who were clearly failed by my decision. The pendulum has become turbocharged over the last few days, swinging hither and thither with gay abandon. So where is it now regarding the Prime Minister? Listen on our free Global Player app or the LBC app. LBC, leading Britain's conversation.
19:53where your story starts.
20:02Mr. President, this is your prize. This is your peace prize. There is also a beautiful medal for you that you can wear everywhere you want to go. I'm going to wear it right now. Okay, let me hold. Ah, fantastic. Excellent. It was a beautiful medal handed to Donald Trump last December by FIFA president Gianni Infantino. And Trump looked delighted. He hasn't won a Peace Prize, but he has got something from the football guy. He's won the FIFA Peace Prize. Sorry, you're right. The FIFA Peace Prize. He's won the first ever FIFA Peace Prize. And look, the World Cup is just over a month away. and invariably in advance of these huge international tournaments, there are the odd glitches and things that are going wrong.
20:59But what's happening in America right now? It talks to FIFA. It talks to America. And it's a pretty unhappy combination. I mean, just as kind of the one example that stands out about the way that fans are going to be ripped off is that this normally$12 train fare return from Penn Station in New York to the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey is now going to cost$150 or$160 during the World Cup. Instead of 12. Instead of 12. It's about 20 miles. And that applies to kids and seniors alike. They're all going to have to pay$160 just to get out to a stadium. And there are complex reasons for it. But the fans are going to be absolutely royally screwed by this World Cup.
21:50And then you've got the whole issue of certain nations, not whose fans won't be able to get there. You've got the issue of whether people want to go there. I mean, aren't allowed to get there. Banned from getting there. And who can possibly afford to go to a World Cup in the way that people have done, you know, at previous World Cups where it hasn't been that prohibitive. But the costs are astronomical. Nicole. Well, we're going to speak now to our old friend Adam Crofton, newly award winning Adam Crofton. Well done, Adam. And just tell us if it feels as weird from where you're sitting as it does to the stories we're getting here.
22:24Well, it's a World Cup, so it's always rocky in the preparation. We should, you know, we should say that, first of all, you know, previous ones, Qatar, Russia. But this has been a pretty extraordinary kind of runway to the World Cup. You know, it kind of started with most famously the Trump Peace Prize in December given by the FIFA president. And then, you know, since then, there's just been this series of issues, whether it's around the cost and the prices of the World Cup. Of course, Iran's involvement or potential non-involvement in the World Cup. The issues of Mexican cartels earlier in the year as well.
23:07It really has just felt like one thing after another, one news story after another. Like to the extent where, you know, if you're a reporter just trying to sort of get on with a long term feature ahead of this World Cup, it's just been impossible because every single day there is new stuff breaking on it. You mentioned the Trump Peace Prize last December, a moment of TV gold for many of us. Trump awarded with this gold statue by FIFA's Gianni Infantino for reasons I think none of us entirely understand. But whether that moment forged something between the two of them is a kind of live question now, because we're reading that Infantino himself has asked for Pope level protection, a motorcade during the World Cup in those Vancouver football matches.
24:05And Vancouver have said, oh, no way. What is all that about? Well, it's really interesting because when FIFA travel, I mean, so this is this is kind of blown up around FIFA's annual congress this year in Vancouver, which has been taking place this week. And when FIFA travel to these events, they really do like take cities over. I mean, I was in the one in Asantean in Paraguay last year, and it was like Asantean became a militarised city for the kind of 48, 72 hours that FIFA were in town. There was just police, state police, absolutely everywhere. And I think FIFA has sort of become quite used to this.
24:48Now, FIFA have denied this week that they made this request or that Infantino was involved in this request. but these kind of police escorts I mean it was kind of compared by the Vancouver police to like a pope level or head of state level police motorcade escort where you're allowed to go through red lights and all of that kind of thing and they basically said we don't think this is necessary based on our security assessment or a good use of taxpayer money but it is written in to a lot of the host city contracts during the World Cup that FIFA VIPs, FIFA president, will be given police escorts.
25:27I'm not sure it will be on the level of heads of state, but that is the treatment that FIFA have become very used to. It makes me think that this is all spiralling out of control about FIFA imagining itself to be this kind of supranational body that is above any nation state, that you can charge whatever you like for tickets, that you can make whatever amounts of money that are available. And it's just seemed, I think for the ordinary football fan, it just seems increasingly obscene. Yeah, and it's felt that way. I must say that the issue of pricing is interesting because the FIFA argument is that they are in North America, which is the most expensive sports economy in the world, where what they're using is this very controversial dynamic pricing, which is, you know, to be fair, what we often see in kind of machine ways through airlines and concerts and other forms of tickets, particularly in America.
26:34And US sports tickets are expensive. Now, there is expensive, and then there is what FIFA have been charging for these World Cup games where, you know, pretty run-of-the-mill group stage games have been, you know,$500 to$700 in some cases as the kind of starting price. And then it's becoming dynamic based on the level of interest. And, you know, look, I think I was sent some of kind of their current ticket sales for their games in Los Angeles earlier this month. And, you know, some of their games are selling pretty well. You know, games like the Iran games in Los Angeles, where there was a huge Iranian diaspora, you know, was already tracking at kind of over 50 ,000 tickets sold for a 70 ,000 ticket stadium.
27:23And that may not have included hospitality as well. So, you know, some of those games, despite the prices are doing really well. Others, interestingly, including the US men's national team opening game against Paraguay, where even like the lower price tickets are over$1 ,000, which is just mind boggling, we're only at around$40 ,000. So that shows that they may have to drop these prices at a certain point. I don't want to turn everything into politics, Adam. That's your job. Well, okay, that's a lie and I do. But it is interesting that the Iran game is selling out and obviously there is this huge, as you said, diaspora community there.
Read the full transcript
28:02But given that Trump was talking just last week about dropping Iran, banning Iran and replacing Italy, who didn't actually make the qualifying round through. It does seem as if there is, you know, people are sort of, you know, voting in this way by buying the tickets, right? Yeah, and I think both FIFA and, I mean, FIFA would never admit to this, but also, you know, the people buying these tickets are kind of just taking the bet of Trump says a lot of stuff and nobody ever really knows whether he's going to follow through on stuff that he says. I mean, clearly in the case of Iran, there's been times where he's absolutely followed through.
28:42But he's not going to ban the Iran team now, is he? I mean, he's not. No, I mean, you'd be very, very surprised. But there's been some very uncertain moments within that. You know, they, I mean, Infantino went to see him at the White House. This must have been maybe six weeks ago and comes out about midnight. And Infantino puts on Instagram because that's how most of FIFA's communication now works. It doesn't work through sort of official FIFA releases. It just comes on Infantino's Instagram and basically says, you know, he's spoken to Trump. And of course, Iran will be welcome. And of course, Iran won't have a problem.
29:20And then I think the next day, Trump was sort of posting about, you know, he wouldn't care whether Iran come or not. So it was very embarrassing for Infantino that, you know, he would go to the White House, appear to get these assurances. Then Trump the next day would appear to sort of call that into question in some respects. But at this stage, it doesn't feel more than that. You know, there's been no material moment where, you know, the US government has said the Iran national team can't come or won't come. But there is question about whether some of the Federation officials who have alleged ties to the IODC will be allowed.
30:01Right. And Adam, you mentioned dynamic pricing, which we get in terms of ticket sales and they want to see the top price they can go for. But this is starting to feel like a racket in so many other departments, whether it's the trains, whether it's the tickets for public transport, whether it's the way they're charging, I don't know, parking or hotels. These are all the sort of questions of infrastructure, which in a normal World Cup are meant to enable more people to get to these games more easily. and in sort of Trump's America it feels like there is just an extra price on absolutely everything no definitely I mean just talk through some of the train prices the usual train which would take you from New York Penn Station in Manhattan to MetLife Stadium in New Jersey which is about an 18 mile journey it's normally a$12.90 return for the special event train for if you are going to the World Cup games they it was announced a couple of weeks ago that's going to be$150 right so that gives an idea of the markup that's being made now I actually don't think this is all about being in kind of Trump's America in this case I think part of what's going on here is that FIFA's model is that they take their tournament into countries and FIFA take all of the revenue from ticketing sponsorship broadcast even the parking fees fifa are charging like 250 in some cases to park your car they take all of these revenues um while the cities are expected to pay all the public transportation costs the increased security costs and the security costs for fifa events are kind of off the scale particularly when you get into what america charges for policing in any case and a lot of these burdens are falling on the cities.
31:58And these cities, when the bids were made seven or eight years ago, were talking about economic impact and they were projecting huge, huge, huge uplift in economic impact. However, as is so often the case, as you get closer to these mega sports events, the cities aren't really seeing that uplift in the way that was projected. And what you're now seeing is their attempt to claw back some of these costs by transferring it on to World Cup visitors rather than their own taxpayers, which is an interesting debate because it's, you know, should, I guess what you could argue is, should the average low-income person who is going to work from Manhattan to New Jersey have to take on that cost over a period of time, or should it fall to somebody who is probably an affluent World Cup visitor.
32:50That's the argument they're making. The counter argument is don't bid for something you can't afford in the first place. Look, Adam, we spoke to you when the Qatar World Cup was going on and the problems there were around that and the ideological objections about Qatar hosting the World Cup. We've got it happening in America now. Do you think the fans are going to turn up? Because the fans turned up in Qatar and it was, broadly speaking, a pretty well-run World Cup and there were all these facilities that were laid on without the price gouging that went with it. I mean, I just look at the sheer cost of it.
33:30If you were an England fan and you think you're going to get through the group stages and then you're going to get to the knockout stages and, you know, please God, you get to the World Cup final. If you went to every match, you would have to be a very very wealthy person to pay for that yeah i mean we've already seen the stories about you know people remortgaging houses and selling houses and things like that i mean but that's no with all due respect most normal nobody normal does that um you know to to go to to go to a football match um it was always going to be a really hard world cup for fans to attend in the sense of it's three countries so you know so it's already really vast you know if you're trying to follow England you're going from Dallas to Boston to New York possibly to Mexico you know there's Atlanta and Dallas again for semi-finals you you are always going to have to be pretty affluent to do this but the level of the ticket pricing now combined with hotel prices which started off just astronomically when the draw was made in December I mean there was like we did an assessment that showed across the 16 cities across North America I think the hotel prices were like 350 to 400 percent up which just just gives you gives you a sense of it so you do have to be extremely wealthy and that is having an impact now on host cities you know who as I said were looking for this economic impact and I think a lot of them are now coming to terms with this will largely be a domestically attended world cup which will mean that the the stadiums are pretty well sold because america is huge and there's and there's a lot of people in the three countries that will go to these games but you won't have that impact of people staying in the hotels and and going to museums and spending money in the way that a tourist would which was the original point of it and and is meant to be the point of a world cup that's what it increasingly feels like and even then it's a world cup for a pretty small percentage of americans who can actually afford it yeah adam you started this um whole chat by saying it's kind of always the way and certainly we feel like we've been here before you know what are we doing with russia the controversy around that what is the world cup doing in qatar the controversy around that and at the end of the world cup all anyone remembered was that brilliant um argentina victory and the football kind of won out I mean do you think do you think this is just par for the course that we always think it's going to be a shit show and then the football sort of you know becomes the thing that that lasts in the memory I was speaking to someone who works at FIFA a couple of weeks ago and they said they basically said even we can't mess up taking the best football players in the world to the biggest economy in the world and not having everyone at the end of it saying what a great football tournament and that's kind of the reality of what tends to happen by the end of it you know once you're a couple of weeks in and you've got the best players in the world in incredibly high jeopardy games that they only play in every four years I mean we could have a quarter-final in Kansas City of Portugal against Argentina it'd be the first time Ronaldo and Messi have played against each other in what will be both of their last World Cups I mean that by that stage that's what people are going to be talking about however you know i think there are going to be i think a lot of these stories are going to run and run during the world cup i mean that you know there's still even issues around you know four of the countries who are competing um senegal ivory coast iran haiti you know their their people are under travel bans There's exemptions for the athletes, but, you know, in some cases, there's countries at their first World Cups or first World Cups for 50 years or whatever.
37:18And their fans can't travel to the tournament, which for FIFA, it's completely unheard of and unprecedented. But the revenues that they are making for it,$11 billion in Fantino keeps coming out and saying we're going to make and we're going to redistribute this to the world of football, which is their model that, you know, 90 % of it goes back. And then it just so happens that next year it's FIFA election time. So one member, one vote, all the federations get lots of money. So that makes them very, very happy with FIFA. And that's how they ride it out. Yeah. And 11 billion is, what, half an Iran war so far.
37:53Not quite half. Not quite half. Adam, thank you so much. Thank you very much.
38:06Love bread, baked goods, and pasta, but not the way they make you feel? What if I told you there are macro-friendly options that don't taste like sawdust and sadness? Satisfying sandwiches, fully loaded bagels, noodles that can stand up to your favorite chunky sauces. All delicious. Crave-worthy and smart, each serving of Hero Bread has up to 19 grams of protein and 32 grams of fiber, and just 0 to 5 grams net carbs and 0 grams sugar. Hero Bread bakes with heart-healthy olive oil and delivers the soft, fluffy, flavorful experience you love. Breakfast burritos, schmear-loaded bagels, real mac and cheese.
38:39Hero Bread bakes loaves, bagels, and tortillas that don't taste or feel like cardboard. Noodles that don't fall apart in hearty sauces. Plus, limited-edition small batch bakes like the 2-grams Net Carb Hero Croissant or 1-gram Net Carb Hero Cheddar Biscuit, handmade in a Sonoma-based French bakery. Shop now on Hero.co. Use code IHEART for 10 % off. That's hero.co. Per serving, not a low calorie food. Some products contain allulose. See nutrition info on hero.co for sodium and sugar content.
39:13So on Monday's episode of the podcast, we talked about what had happened at the White House Correspondents Dinner and the attempted shooting that took place, how the guy was arrested. And then we look back over the years when there was the attempted assassination on Ronald Reagan and there was a change in gun laws as a result of that in 1981. And we said, will anything happen now? And we said, not a chance. And I'm afraid to say we were wrong. I think something is happening. Yeah, absolutely. There has now been an announcement that's going to be a big change from the Act of Attorney General, Todd Blanche.
39:50They are going to repeal the rules of what the law actually allows by cutting unnecessary red tape. In his words, we're replacing confusion with clear, straightforward language so that everyday Americans don't need a law degree just to understand their rights. If you want to understand what that actually means, it is 34 new rules to make it easier to own a gun. Easier. Easier to own a gun. So the lesson from Washington is that you need to make it easier for people to have a gun. Yes. It would mean that essentially all the questions around background checks, you know, the absolutely critical questions around who is allowed to own a gun have been getting in the way.
40:34red tape bureaucracy. So thank God we'll clear off some of that. You don't need a law degree to own a gun. We'll cut out some of that. 34 new rules to make it easier. I'm so happy for the gun manufacturers that they'll be able to sell more guns. I'm so happy for the gun shops that they'll be able to sell more guns. Happy days. This is a good day for America. We'll see you tomorrow. Bye-bye. Bye for now. This has been a Global Player original production.
From the publisher
The Bank of England Monetary Policy Report might sound like a dry and dusty economic report - and often it is - but today's made for truly shocking reading for Britain.
Its analysis shows living standards are already falling and, as a result of Trump's war in Iran, inflation could go above 6%, and as many as six rises in interest rates might be needed by the end of this year. That would mean rocketing mortgages, eye-watering increases in food prices, and job layoffs with the UK economy stunned by the fallout from Trump's war with Iran. Is there any sense of a way out of this mess from the White House? Or is Trump happy to sink the global economy if it increases his chances of pummelling the regime in Tehran into submission?
Later - 40 days until the world's most prohibitively expensive World Cup kicks off. Is America actually trying to keep people away?
The News Agents is a Global Production.
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
