In short
The episode debates whether Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch’s language at Prime Minister’s Questions is too brutal/bullying, or just effective “no-nonsense” politics. It centers on PMQs after Keir Starmer announced his resignation as Labour leader and Andy Burnham was expected to replace him. Badenoch is described as launching “brutal” attacks, including calling Labour’s Bridget Philipson a “spiteful class warrior,” criticizing education performance (including a claim about fewer teachers), and using harsh terms like “traitors,” “Gestapo,” and “betrayal.” The Speaker rebuked her for decorum. Reported follow-up includes Philipson and Liz Kendall confronting her after PMQs; Labour MPs reportedly plan to complain to the Speaker.
Guests
John, Maitlis, and Lewis (News Agents hosts).
Key claims
her style is “deeply online,” curated for virality; “betrayal” language is especially risky; her aggression may help her politically while cementing Philipson’s cabinet prospects.
Notable examples
YouGov favorability at 31%; earlier Badenoch comments about imprisoning civil servants; the “zero percent” teachers poll; Churchill-style “bear pit” debate.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOKemi Badenoch's Brutal Efficiency
0:00 to 0:38
A discussion on Kemi Badenoch's aggressive approach in politics and its implications.
“At Orderly Meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings.”
Kemi Badenoch's Brutal Efficiency
0:42 to 3:40
A discussion on Kemi Badenoch's aggressive approach in politics and its implications.
“Because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward.”
Reactions to Prime Minister's Questions
3:40 to 7:20
Analyzing the reactions to Kemi Badenoch's remarks during PMQs and their impact.
“there was always going to be an added interest today.”
The Nature of Political Discourse
7:20 to 12:00
Exploring how political discourse has evolved and the implications of harsh language.
“And if you walked up to the set, which I did, I actually walked towards the television set.”
The Online Political Persona
12:00 to 14:01
Investigating Kemi Badenoch's online political style and its influence on her image.
“I tell you what all this makes me think is that and it's quite interesting, you know, the media gets blamed a lot for what is happening in politics.”
Kemi Badenoch's Political Style
14:01 to 14:59
Explore Kemi Badenoch's approach to modern politics and public engagement.
“which does sort of brook no dissent and which is extremely direct and just sort of cultivated, everything cultivated, that sort of snark, that snarkiness.”
Public Perception and Favorability
15:00 to 16:45
Discuss the impact of recent events on Badenoch's public image and favorability ratings.
“He put the boot into all these politicians.”
Language of Betrayal in Politics
16:46 to 18:59
Analyze the implications of using 'betrayal' in political discourse.
“I question whether today's PMQ's performance helps her in that area.”
Dignity and Hypocrisy in Politics
19:00 to 20:14
Examine the contradiction between calls for dignified discourse and political outcomes.
“we know that there are people out there who hear something different to that which they might intend.”
Adversarial Nature of PMQs
20:15 to 22:48
Explore the confrontational elements of Prime Minister's Questions and their theatrical nature.
“And Badenock's spokesperson has apparently told lobby journalists, even while we've been sat here, saying that Kemi Badenock will absolutely not apologise for the language she used during PMQs.”
Show all 26 chapters
Challenges for Andy Burnham and Kemi Badenoch
22:49 to 24:56
Discuss the potential political clash between Andy Burnham and Kemi Badenoch.
“And that's kind of very hard to bat against.”
Reflections on Brexit's Impact
27:00 to 28:44
Reflect on the long-term effects of Brexit and public sentiment towards it.
“And now there are 17 million people that voted for Brexit.”
The Complexity of Brexit Sentiment
28:44 to 29:40
Discuss the mixed feelings towards Brexit and the reluctance to revisit the decision.
“this poll but pretty much from every poll that's been conducted for years now that there is deep deep unhappiness with the brexit settlement in every direction not just remain as you might I imagine, but Leavers as well.”
The Promised Benefits of Leaving
29:41 to 30:48
Analyze the failed promises of economic growth and sovereignty after Brexit.
“We wouldn't be able to have our own growth.”
Critical Voices on Brexit Strategy
30:49 to 32:44
Hear criticisms regarding the lack of clarity in what leaving the EU meant for citizens.
“I was in a room full of people last night.”
Public Perception of Freedom of Movement
32:45 to 34:24
Investigate current attitudes towards immigration and freedom of movement post-Brexit.
“I mean, just one bit on the polling that you were talking about, Lewis.”
The Disconnect in Brexit Discussions
34:25 to 36:25
Examine the disconnect between public opinion on Brexit and political narratives.
“I have to say, oh, I can taste the sovereignty as I just sat at a blue passport.”
Hope for Future Economic Changes
36:26 to 37:43
Discuss the hope for political change and economic improvement despite Brexit's aftermath.
“And I do that you will have these results.”
Reflections on Rejoining the EU
37:44 to 38:44
Consider the implications and public sentiment regarding potentially rejoining the EU.
The Evolving EU Landscape Post-Brexit
38:45 to 40:04
Explore how the EU has changed since Brexit and its impact on the UK.
“Well, I think it would depend on, you see, again, if it meant that we had to, you know, accept Schengen, accept Euro, accept everything else that we had carve-outs for.”
The Economic Costs of Leaving the EU
40:05 to 41:43
Analyze the economic impacts of Brexit on the UK and its relationship with the EU.
“We have fallen faster than any of the other nations.”
Political Obstacles to Re-engagement
41:44 to 42:01
Discuss the political challenges and public sentiment surrounding re-engagement with the EU.
“But I think A, as I say, my concern would be in terms of the direction the EU has gone and whether we could correct it and go back to a settlement that we'd be more happy with, A.”
The Political Fallout of Brexit
42:01 to 42:51
Discussion on the ongoing political implications of Brexit and public sentiment.
“Well, that's the single market, I suppose.”
Political Obstacles to Re-engagement
42:51 to 43:10
Discuss the political challenges and public sentiment surrounding re-engagement with the EU.
“I'm always in favour of the Norway option for personal reasons.”
Political Obstacles to Re-engagement
43:24 to 43:34
Discuss the political challenges and public sentiment surrounding re-engagement with the EU.
“Comp out of medications are not FDA approved.”
David Cameron's Resignation after Brexit
43:43 to 45:22
Exploration of David Cameron's decision to resign following Brexit vote.
“There are a lot of very shell-shocked people on the night of June the 23rd.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Jon Sopel:Summer is here. At Orderly Meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings. Whether you're celebrating the nice weather, starting a new chapter, planning a vacation, or simply looking ahead to what's next, this season can be the perfect time to invest in yourself and your health. If you've struggled with weight loss and are curious about GLP-1 medications, Orderly Meds can help you learn about your options. Through a simple virtual process, you can connect with licensed medical professionals who can determine whether treatment may be appropriate for you. Getting started is fast, convenient, and happens online from the comfort of home.
0:35Jon Sopel:This summer, consider a new approach to feeling your best. Visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast to learn more. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward. Compounded medications are not FDA approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details.
1:03Jon Sopel:This is a global production. Kemi Badenok started off, I thought, with brutal efficiency in the attacks that she launched. And then I think we were all watching it and started to feel a tiny bit uncomfortable. Is this going too far? He tweeted, there were gasps amongst us reporters in the press gallery at the sheer brutality of Kemi Badenock's attack on the Labour cabinet. Reeves' face was once again, it was a face that was trying not to cry. Kemi Badenock looks like she wears hobnail boots and is tough as nails and all the rest of it. And it's the hard woman of the Conservative Party who's taking the fight to Labour.
1:40Jon Sopel:And so for her supporters, her backbenchers, that looks good. and if you're Bridget Philipson and you've been called a spiteful class warrior maybe you wear that badge and think well there might be good that comes to me. Spiteful class warrior actually I don't think is a big problem. I've heard worse on the floor of the House of Commons and honestly I don't think Bridget Philipson will mind a bit. What happens to somebody who brings dignity to the office? They get turfed out by their own because frankly they're not electoral magic, They're not electoral gold dust. Dignity is a bit of a kind of like the loser's prize now.
2:14You know, you've done dignity. Well done. But yeah, fuck off. We still don't want you. Hands up if you think the education secretary is doing a good job. Even she doesn't think she's doing a good job, Mr Speaker. Even she doesn't think she's doing a good job. Just, oh, someone did. Someone did. Just for those, for those who raised their hands, the two people who raised their hands, Yesterday, a poll found that zero percent of teachers think the education secretary is doing a good job. Zero percent. She taxed private schools to pay for more teachers. But the number of teachers has gone down. It turns out appointing a spiteful class warrior as education secretary was a disaster.
3:05Jon Sopel:Traitors, spiteful class warriors. That was Kemi Badenok at Prime Minister's Questions today, earning a rare rebuke from the Speaker about the sort of language being used in our politics today. It was blunt. It was brutal. But was it bullying? Is this just what politics sounds like today? Or has it gone too far? Welcome to the News Agents.
3:36The News Agents.
3:37Jon Sopel:It's John. It's Maitlis. It's Lewis. And watching Prime Minister's questions, there was always going to be an added interest today. The first Prime Minister's questions, since Keir Starmer announced that he was resigning as Labour Party leader and that Andy Burnham is almost certain to take over from him. Kemi Badenok started off, I thought, with brutal efficiency in the attacks that she launched on the government, on the Labour back benches. And then I think we were all watching it and started to feel a tiny bit uncomfortable about, is this going too far? And, you know, to Emily, what you just said, is it bullying?
4:15Jon Sopel:And at which point, while we were thinking that, debating it, upstood the Speaker to warn MPs about the language they're using. First quarter of this year... Sorry, Prime Minister. can I just say let us think about the language we're using I think that'll be the first to leave can I just say think about the language we're using because when we leave this chamber don't be surprised when constituents feel they can use the same language against each other let us show a little bit more decorum and respect to each other so that was as John said the speaker rebuking Kemi Badenoch for her comments. And indeed, I know some of our colleagues in the press gallery, including GB News' Christopher Hope, echoing just how shocking at least some people in the chamber found it.
5:09He tweeted, there were gasps amongst us reporters in the press gallery. I mean, they've seen a few parliamentary sessions that have got, you know, pretty brutal over the years. At the sheer brutality of Kemi Badenoch's attack on the Labour cabinet and putative successor Andy Burnham at PMQs today. This wasn't the end of it. it has been reported. Jess Elgott from The Guardian saying that MPs have told her that Bridget Philipson and Liz Kendall, the science secretary, confronted Kemi Badenock about her language at PMQs after the session in the gallery where she called Philipson spiteful, which Kendall said was outrageous.
5:47Badenock is reported to have replied, I'm never going to stop talking about how spiteful you are. Philipson then hit back at Badenock saying the public are going to find out who you really are. So this bad blood, this acrimonious exchange developing after the session as well. And it is also being reported that Labour MPs want to complain officially to the Speaker about some of that language, talking about the Gestapo, talking about traitors and so on. It is not the first time that Kemmy Badenock has shown, let's put it more charitably, some steel at PMQ But it's clearly the moment at which Labour MPs feel most exposed to it.
6:27Look, let's put this in context. Kemi Baden-Ock fired a few straight arrows, frankly, at a party that probably is feeling pretty queasy about the way that they have behaved over the last 48 hours. There were very few people who stood outside number 10 or number 11, including the Chancellor herself, when the Prime Minister was making his speech. There were 200 or more MPs in that selfie that Andy Burnham took when he arrived at Westminster Hall for his, I mean, swearing in, but virtual coronation. And so I think what Kemi Badenok did in PMQs today was go for the jugular. She did not shy away from saying what I think many people around the country are thinking, which is that Keir Starmer has stepped down partly as a result of some terrible policies on behalf of his chancellor.
7:21and that actually it was not a particularly edifying spectacle for his own chancellor, not even to be outside sort of waving him off or being at least part of a farewell team when she'd stood beside him and had that job so prominently for the last two years. And if you walked up to the set, which I did, I actually walked towards the television set. But Reeves' face was once again a picture of somebody who was... Well, it was a face that was trying not to cry. I think, you know, we were asking ourselves, because we have seen her in tears in the Commons last time because she thought that Keir Starmer was about to fire her, to sack her, quite frankly.
8:05And we were trying to work out whether she was sort of holding her face in that grimace because she was angry at Kemi Baden-Lock's words or contorted because it was quite hard to get away from the truth of what she was saying or just, you know, coming to the reality that maybe her time as Chancellor is very much up, which is a pretty excruciating thing to have to sit through publicly. And I think the point is that that Kemi Badenot was kind of frankly hitting where it hurt as far as Reeves was going. But once she turned on Philipson, it started to have that sort of edge of mean girls because suddenly you've got sort of, what, two prominent Labour women in a row and two sort of working class women in a row and you're just going from one to the other without even a pause.
8:53Now, what she said about Philipson was, there are fewer teachers on your watch than when you came in. We fact checked that. That is true, right? So it's not that what she's saying is so shocking, but it sort of created an atmosphere that she was just kind of like going through,
9:11Jon Sopel:popping them off, right? I wonder whether at the end of this what you're left with is it being a net win-win. Because Kemi Baden-Ock looks like she wears hobnail boots and is tough as nails and all the rest of it. And is the hard woman of the Conservative Party who's taking the fight to Labour. And so for her supporters, her backbenchers, that looks good. And if you're Bridget Phillipson and you've been called a spiteful class warrior, maybe you wear that badge and think well there might be good that comes to me the deplorable me badge the deplorable me badge exactly and so they they all come out of it thinking yeah it's a bit of a net win i've got there i don't know i mean that's a very cynical view but they look the house of commons you know it was bombed in the second world war and churchill insisted that it wasn't redesigned when it was rebuilt he wanted it to remain the cockpit of debate of bear pit where people really looked at each other across the...
10:08Jon Sopel:A sword's length away. A sword's length apart, so that you felt that it was almost one-on-one combat taking place a sword lengths apart. I think that spiteful class warrior, actually, I don't think is a big problem. I've heard worse on the floor of the House of Commons. And honestly, I don't think Bridget Phillipson will mind a bit. I think that she has... I think what Kemmy Baynock has just done is cemented Bridget Phillipson's place in the next cabinet. because the best thing that you can be... Honestly, she'll get it on... You say, John, wear that badge. I wouldn't be surprised if she literally wears that badge, literally puts it on a badge because remember what Kemi Bainock is talking about there.
10:45She's talking about one of the most popular policies within the parliamentary Labour Party and actually within the public, which is levying VAT on private schools. Now, Kemi Bainock might not like that and I'm sure it's probably cost maybe the old Conservative MP a few quid as a result of it and maybe they don't like that very much and they've been against it from the start. Fine. But Bridget Philipson will wear that with pride. I think that there are other remarks, though, about that policy from Kemi Badenock, which she didn't say on the floor of the Commons. But when Badenock is talking about Gestapo, which she did with an interview with Tim Shipman the other day and Spectator in relation to that VAT policy.
11:19I think, you know, Winston Churchill will tell you this because he did this back in 1945. Maybe it's just a good idea not to bring the Gestapo into anything with regards to, you know, British political life, particularly VAT on private schools. I don't think the Nazis had a particular policy with regards to value-added tax on private schools. Godwin's Law in a nutshell, isn't it? It's like, how quickly can you get to a Nazi analogy from something completely unrelated to anything to do with the Second World War? Yeah, I'm not sure that Himmler had that many views on whether British school kids, British parents should be paying VAT on sending their kids to Marlborough College or whatever it happens to be.
11:56but anyway I do think that it is true to say that with regards to Badenow I actually quite like a pugnature style in the commons and I do think part of her shtick clearly I think actually possibly one of the reasons she's polling pretty well at the moment is that she does have and is cultivating this sort of aura of strength and being brusque and no bullshit and just sort of telling it how it is I do think you could make an argument to say that clearly the danger of that is that it goes too far and there is quite a long history now of her speaking let's let's put it um put it this way rather firmly about certain issues which has caused a backlash i mean people might remember during the 2024 leadership contest conservative leadership contest she said that she thought that between five to ten percent of civil servants should be in prison she was accused during her period as a cabinet minister there had been some suggestions that she had a rather bullying type of behavior towards her officials she suggested that her critics internally were covering up their own failures, gross incompetence.
12:55I tell you what all this makes me think is that and it's quite interesting, you know, the media gets blamed a lot for what is happening in politics. And it's quite interesting to sort of go into the bear pit, as you call it, and say, no, no, this is how politicians are actually speaking to and about each other. This is leave us out of this. But what strikes me and all those examples you've just given, Lewis, I think tell a story of somebody who is frankly terminally online and who is writing and indeed speaking to be clipped up. And that is the thing that's absolutely sort of gets me like if if the chamber is meant to be a place of proper debate, if it's actually meant to be a place where you argue on your feet and you actually sort of put policies or put ideas or put challenges to your opposition, which are then responded.
13:44That feels like a healthier place to be than somebody who comes with a few set lines or a few set tweets and just wants the virality of it. She's always felt like she's a deeply online politician. The way that she speaks, the way that she acts, she is very much a politician of the 2020s. And I think, you know, that way that online political culture is, which does sort of brook no dissent and which is extremely direct and just sort of cultivated, everything cultivated, that sort of snark, that snarkiness. You can hear it in the way that she interacts. But you can hear it as a sort of political trail video, can't you?
14:20You can hear them sort of using her interjections and sort of showing you what has happened. I mean, it feels very curated in a way, even though I'm sure she would argue it's just common sense and it's telling it like it is.
14:32Jon Sopel:I agree with that. But, you know, you go back to the Commons where debates on policy would happen. when there is a debate on policy in the house of commons the second reading of the whatever bill the place is empty because no one is interested in that they come in for prime minister's questions they want to see a punch-up they want to get written up on x or wherever it happens to be so that they get a good review of their performance in the comments we've just opened the news agents with that exactly who won pmqs yeah and i just think that you know so maybe she's smart maybe she's just being smart about the way you play modern politics which is to come out with ready made quotes and clips that will play well on x or insta or facebook or wherever it happens to be i mean my my question i suppose is is does she go too far is it does it tilt into that question of whether it's bullying or whether it's mean girls or whether it's just plain unpleasant that you You just think, oh, I mean, you know, I mean, when when Norman Tebbit was kind of right by Thatcher, Norman Tebbit did the boot boy stuff, the Chinkford skinhead.
15:40Jon Sopel:He put the boot into all these politicians. That just sort of rose above some of that. Whereas Kelly Badenock has taken it upon herself to be the boot person as well. And maybe we're just shocked because it's a female voicing it. Whereas, frankly, male politicians have patronised and booted female politicians for decades. Yeah, and that is also a good question. Are we kind of going, you know, to getting an attack of the vapours? Well, to your point, Kemi Baden-Ock is seeing her highest favourability to date, according to YouGov, which is 31%. Now, I'm not pretending it was as a result of what she said an hour ago in the Commons.
16:17this will go back to her win in Aberdeen South, the by-election of the weekend. This will go back to presumably how she handled some of the earlier debates that we were having around Henry Novak and around the sort of, you know, prime ministerial delicacies, I think, of how Keir Starmer resigned. But it is interesting that whatever she is doing or has done in, let's say, the last 10 days appears to be working. So she will take sucker from that.
16:46Jon Sopel:I question whether today's PMQ's performance helps her in that area. I think that I know for a fact that, you know, some of the people that are advising her about how she needs to kind of shape the leadership and get the party in the direction. It's going loved the way she reacted towards Henry Novak and thought it was very smart politics. Thinking about, you know, the way they fought Aberdeen South and concentrating on the government's energy policies and the shortcomings there. That was all very smart. And I think that they worry. about nastiness and coming over as a sort of you know as you say snarky always snarky i've actually think generally speaking um she uh look she has her own style and it's sort of i i don't actually think it's a huge problem in the comments really um and i think that i think there is one exception though i don't mind the class traitor stuff or the you know class warrior stuff as i said i think philipson will be very very content with that absolutely fine particularly given that andy Burnham will be choosing his cabinet.
17:44And Starmer was very complimentary about her as well. I do think there is one category of word which is complicated. And this is something which we hear in politics more and more which is treachery and betrayal. Betrayal is a really dangerous word I think in politics. The sort of stab in the back stuff. Now in fairness to Badenock she was talking about members of the cabinet betraying and being traitors to Starmer. It's hard to think of another word for what happened to Starmer in the past week. Well, perhaps, but it is a word which, you know, it is being invoked consistently, particularly by the populist right.
18:17And I would just say, and I suspect it might be that word more than spiteful that got Hoyle's ears pricked up. Because let's not forget that, you know, we've had two MPs killed in this country. We've had we've just gone past the 10th anniversary of Joe Cox's murder. and let's not forget the circumstances in which she was killed by a neo-nazi with loads and loads of material at his home basically about this idea that britain was being betrayed and everything like that so i'm not saying that badenock is invoking that there and it's the it's it's far more subtle but i do think the language of betrayal in politics has a very very long pedigree and i think senior politicians have to be careful about invoking it in any circumstances really because we know that there are people out there who hear something different to that which they might intend.
19:06I mean, over the Boris Johnson years, it was the Brexit betrayal. Yes. It was the one that was used constantly in the Commons to suggest anyone who didn't follow his steps was somehow letting the country down, not patriotic. I would say, though, I think there is a huge amount of hypocrisy in all this, because the one thing that we have all sort of lauded Keir Starmer for is restoring dignity to the office. You know, bringing back this sense of high office being sort of reputationally sound. And everyone said, yes, you know, he's restored dignity. He's sort of put us back in terms of good relations.
19:40What happens to somebody who brings dignity to the office? They get turfed out by their own because, frankly, they're not electoral magic. They're not electoral gold dust. Now, I understand why that happens. I'm not naive enough to say, you know, oh, I don't know why they did that or why they got rid of him. You know, we've been over that for weeks. but it does seem to me that dignity is a bit of a kind of like the loser's prize now you know you've done dignity well done but yeah fuck off we still don't want you and so i do i do think there's a hypocrisy between saying oh we're dying to get back to discourse we're dying to get back to civilized language we're dying to have this wonderful warm sane comfortable place but actually
20:20Jon Sopel:don't dare lose yes don't dare lose yeah look i think they're there unless it's a debate that has gone on for years and years and years that people say they want a calmer more moderate prime minister's questions no they don't they want they want the spectacle there's you know there's a reason why there it's shown live on tv most days you know most weeks when there's prime minister's questions on because you know it's a bit of theater that is utterly alien to american politics there's no nothing like it anywhere you know in the american political scene and yet we have this as part of our politics and it is a confrontational politics you are the leader of the opposition it's an official uh post in the you know in the constitution and you are there to oppose and you're there to kind of and if you're not going to score political points on a day when the prime minister has been felled by his own party i mean for god's sake when are you well i mean there was one um there was one fundamental truth that however she expressed it but he not was right about right which is that um yes they loved you if they liked him so much Why has he resigned this week?
21:21Which is fundamentally true. And Badenock's spokesperson has apparently told lobby journalists, even while we've been sat here, saying that Kemi Badenock will absolutely not apologise for the language she used during PMQs. Spokesperson said that he thought Badenock had been nice to Keir Starmer. I tell you, with friends like that, who needs enemies? In the chamber. And she felt sorry for him. He said there was very little aimed at the Prime Minister himself. This was about a cabinet which has let him down, about a group of Labour MPs who have let him down, and now they've got rid of him. One interesting sort of thing for the future, of course, is how Andy Burnham and Badenock face off at PMQs, because there you have potentially two very contrasting and very different styles.
21:59I think we could say box office. Well, I don't know. Well, yes, yes, maybe. I mean, look, but the thing is, in a way, Starmer and Badenock were sort of a similar-ish sort of temperament in the sense that Starmer would try and batter her like a lawyer with sort of facts and this, that and the other and kind of match her at some of her, maybe not match her invective, but match that kind of the sort of approach that she has. How long does Burnham's more sort of come by our all come with me kind of like approach, which is like let's work across party and I'm much more gentle and I'm placed, not politics.
22:27How long does that last? How long does that shtick last in the adversarial bear pit that is PMQ against a leader of the opposition who is more adversarial and more pugnacious than most? It'd be a very interesting spectacle. He was the one who said, I mean, years ago and obviously it never happened. But when he was health secretary, he was the one who said we need to find a cross party solution to social care. Now, good luck. Well, that's what I mean. There will be millions of people in this country who say I would like nothing more than to bang politicians heads together till the parties can work together to deliver, you know, a proper defence plan, a proper social care plan, a proper safeguarding children plan.
23:03and I mean I don't think you can argue that that kind of language makes you know makes working together out of reach but it it does suggest that we're not really at a place where we are going to sort of work in a rainbow coalition.
23:19Jon Sopel:I think the question about how does Kimmy Badenock approach Andy Burnham is a really interesting one and I also think how does Andy Burnham approach her you know on the US edition we've been talking about you know the influence of Zoran Mamdani on American politics and how there is this optimism and there is this hope and joy and pleasure in what he's doing. And that's kind of very hard to bat against. I mean, obviously, Kevin Bader will come and say, well, but look at the latest unemployment figures or look at the latest growth figures and whatever else. But, you know, Andy Burnham, if he keeps that bit of, you know authenticity as the kind of nice fellow with a smile on his face and i thought i wonder i think kemi might find that a very difficult thing i've just been um hearing from one of the advisors to her pmq's sessions i said did she go too far no exclamation mark she's had to put up with his kids condescending patronizing sanctimonious lectures as we all have for two years so there was a sense I guess in that of like right it's finally coming out.
24:25You're done I'm here. Well we had a little glimpse of what Bader not might say or think about Burnham because she did have something to say about Burnham of course didn't she at the very end where she said he's been let down that's Keir Starmer by backbenchers who don't understand that government is about tough choices. He's U-turned again and again and again to appease them and now they've abandoned him. What for? A pair of eyelashes and a black t-shirt. So Kemi I think starting as she means to go on with the Bade Knock Burnham contest. I mean, that is actually quite flattering. Whereas if you start painting him as the guy who led the heist, the guy who, you know, led a coup on his own leader.
25:02Yeah, but the public wanted it. Yeah, but I'm just saying you're back to the argument or the narrative of betrayal then. You betrayed your own party for what? You know, that's clear ground where the opposition will probably land. As she's still doing with Ed Miliband versus his brother in the election.
25:18Jon Sopel:I think if she just goes on the line of black t-shirt and eyelashes he's okay i think she's underestimating him somewhat given what he's you know given the political operation that has been unfolding over the past few weeks some of which we've seen in the past week and you know the make-a-feel by-election but there has been going on longer than this andy burnham is not to be underestimated many politicians would kill for those eyelashes.
Read the full transcript
25:52Jon Sopel:Summer is here. At Orderly Meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings. Whether you're celebrating the nice weather, starting a new chapter, planning a vacation, or simply looking ahead to what's next, this season can be the perfect time to invest in yourself and your health. If you've struggled with weight loss and are curious about GLP-1 medications, Orderly Meds can help you learn about your options. Through a simple virtual process, you can connect with licensed medical professionals who can determine whether treatment may be appropriate for you. Getting started is fast, convenient, and happens online from the comfort of home.
26:27Jon Sopel:This summer, consider a new approach to feeling your best. Visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast to learn more. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. orderlymeds.com podcast because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward compounded medications are not fda approved eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider individual results may vary see website for details
27:00Jon Sopel:it's been a hell of a long journey this i first got involved in neuroskeptic politics 25 years ago and the first election I contested, I managed to beat the late, great Screaming Lord Such by 164 votes, so I didn't come last. And now there are 17 million people that voted for Brexit. It's a victory for ordinary people, decent people. It's a victory against the big merchant banks, against the big businesses and against big politics. And I'm proud of everybody that had the courage in the face of all the threats, everything they were told they had the guts to stand up and do the right thing. The election was won in my view in the Midlands of the North and I think it was the old Labour vote.
27:47Jon Sopel:That was Nigel Farage 10 years ago today on the 24th of June when Britain had just voted to leave the European Union. David Cameron had resigned as Prime Minister after gambling and failing that britain would vote to remain and i stood on the ninth tee at turnbury golf course with donald trump as he'd come over to look at his golf courses and saying well of course i predicted all along that britain would vote to leave the european union it doesn't feel quite as joyous 10 years on yeah and obviously this is a moment where there is a lot of introspection about what has happened uh since and there was some really really interesting polling actually the times conducted as well as a focus as well as a focus group in earwash which was one of those places that kind of determined the referendum in so many ways and uh i thought in a way that absolutely summed up uh their reporting on it exactly where the country is which is you can see not just from this poll but pretty much from every poll that's been conducted for years now that there is deep deep unhappiness with the brexit settlement in every direction not just remain as you might I imagine, but Leavers as well.
28:59A quote from the piece that was explaining some of the polling results. It said, with very few exceptions, the long eaten voters we spoke to felt, as did the 1690 adults from across the country survey for us by YouGov, that Brexit had been a failure. Forgotten, disappointing and disastrous were words that were used to describe it. Although only one person in the focus group and a small percentage in the polling said that they would change their vote if the referendum were re-won. And this is the kind of curious politics that I think we find ourselves in, in a sort of post-Brexit settlement, which is basically we are deeply unhappy as a country with how the settlement ended up, but deeply, deeply wary about unpicking it because there is this collective memory of the angst and the turmoil and just the political oxygen endlessly that it would suck up to reopen it all again.
29:50Yeah. And I think if you cast your mind back, I mean, those of you who are old enough to the Brexit campaign, what people were being told was that their lives were shit predominantly because we were in thrall to the European Union, that without breaking free, we wouldn't be able to have sovereignty. We wouldn't be able to have our own growth. We wouldn't be able to have our own trade deals. In other words, the narrative that was formed was that everything that is wrong in your life probably goes back in some shape or form to our membership of the EU. And what has become apparent in the last 10 years is that without the EU, we have got poorer.
30:31Our growth hasn't come back. Our industry hasn't come back. And I'm not saying it was just a result of Brexit because ever since the financial crash, things have been stalling. We haven't seen wages increase. We haven't seen growth in the economy. This has gone on for 20 years, not just 10. But it was essentially a lie that was told to people by a very small, very elite political cabal who knew that there would be benefits from Brexit, predominantly for the architects of it. And it was quite interesting. I was in a room full of people last night. There's a book that's just come out called The Brexit Effects, and it has a sort of 40 different chapters from people across the spectrum.
31:12You know, I saw Richard Tice was there and I saw Jonathan Sumption and Marina Wheeler and a lot of people, you know, from the Leave side, a lot of people from the Remain side who had all sort of contributed chapters to this book. And one of those who stood up was Paul Johnson, the economist. and he's quite plain speaking. You know, he doesn't sort of mince his words, but he doesn't come at this from a particularly sort of openly political view. And he just said, look, the mistake that was made was it's fine to give people a choice between in or out, but you do have to spell out what that would actually mean and what that wouldn't mean.
31:54And I think, you know, I'm sort of paraphrasing some of his words, but he said it's absolutely fine for people to choose to leave the EU. What wasn't fine for them to pretend that their lives would become richer as a result because that was never going to happen and it never did happen.
32:11Jon Sopel:Also, the whole idea of taking back control, which was the great slogan of that time, I just don't know what it means. Why are we any more in control? And we look at the cost of borrowing in the bond markets. Are we in control of that? No, the bond markets are in control of that. You know, what is happening in NATO? Are we in control of that? No. Donald Trump's still in control of that. And I just think that the idea that somehow this was all worth it, I just I find the polling fascinating, but not surprising. I think it's virtually impossible to imagine a circumstance. If you think about it seriously, where we go back into the European Union, given the conditions that will be attached to us rejoining and given what the European Union will be demanding from Britain so that they don't go through another bloody psychodrama with the Brits not sure whether they want to be in or whether they want to be out.
33:07I mean, just one bit on the polling that you were talking about, Lewis. When you asked the question, would you support or oppose introducing freedom of movement between the EU and the UK? That was the big totemic question. You know, do we want all these immigrants coming in and stealing our jobs and all the rest of it? Now, this is just the poll from that one part of the world in Long Eton. It's only 20 % that strongly oppose or tend to oppose freedom of movement. In other words, 80 percent of people in that poll now either support it strongly or tend to support it or don't know. Now, if that was what the whole thing was about and if that's the thing that's stopping us from joining the customs union or stopping us from joining the single market or stopping us from actually working out an immigration policy now that does work to put more people in care homes, that does work to fill out the jobs in the countryside, that does work to actually provide hospitality and restaurants and all the rest of it with people who don't need visas coming in and allowing them to sort of open seven days a week.
34:08Genuinely, what's stopping us then? Well, I think, well, I think there's two really interesting questions about this. And one you've already alluded to, John, which is that, you're right. I mean, Emily, that freedom of movement thing is actually really stunning. It's staggering, isn't it? I have to say that was the only bit of the polling that really surprised me that actually, and I wonder whether there's part of it which is this you know one of the things that people will have experienced in their day-to-day lives as a result of Brexit one of the actual encumbrances because a lot of the rest of it you know largely can affect business and regulation that doesn't really affect me most of us on a day-to-day basis but people do see the impact on their ability to travel the impediments the fact you can only go for 90 days and then you give an 180 day period the passport you've all experienced you know those I you know I came back from Germany yesterday I I have to say, I did not feel the sort of strong fruits of sovereignty as I sat there.
34:58We liberated. I didn't feel that free. I have to say, oh, I can taste the sovereignty as I just sat at a blue passport. Had you got out of the vassal state of the EU. I know, and you really need to get my Irish passport. But anyway, so I think that maybe that is part of it. When they hear freedom of movement, that's what they now associate it with, those kind of checks and those difficulties. And yet and yet and yet, two things. in these in this polling as i say there is still a great deal of skepticism about the idea of rejoining and also we see that the guy who was you know as he says himself the sort of godfather the midwife you can be both those things at the same time of brexit nigel farage's party is leading in the polls and there is this sort of slightly curious disconnect isn't there between the fact that his signature achievement political achievement and contribution to british public life is Brexit and yet he is not discredited by the fact that so much of the population feel that Brexit was a bad idea and has gone badly and I think that part of the the explanation to that conundrum is that actually revealed not so much in the the quant bit of this polling i.e the hard numbers but in the qualitative bit in terms of what people are saying and I've heard this myself in in focus groups which is people often say that yes Brexit has been you know has worked out badly but that is because they think that this is right or wrong.
36:19They think it's just been done badly. They don't think that it was a problem intrinsically and structurally. Well, Nigel Farage himself says that. Indeed so. Michael Gove himself says that. And those who are anti-Brexit, I don't think have done a particularly compelling job, mainly because a lot of the Remain forces have just left this alone in recent years, in actually be willing to say to people, actually know that there were structural trade-offs here. It doesn't quite matter what you do. And I do that you will have these results. Look, I think that so much of Brexit, right, was born. We talked about this on the show before.
36:48It was born partly out of, in some cases, very, very comfortable people voting for it, which we don't talk about enough. People, frankly, were so affluent they didn't have much to lose. But it was also, as we know, born from places that even in 2016, you know, were in dire economic straits and had been for a long time. And they wanted and they bought into the hope that maybe Brexit would be enough of a jolt to the political and economic system that finally would incentivise Westminster political elites to think about them deeply, to craft a new economic settlement that worked for them. Now, 10 years on, we see that that hasn't happened.
37:26But as the people in this polling and these focus groups are saying, they still think it could happen and that it might happen. And that they would, rather than unpicking the Brexit settlement, like to see a situation where politicians simply try and address and create and make good on the promises that were made 10 years ago. I just think a jolt that makes you poorer is not the jolt you want. Although they were poor anyway. yeah but but you know if you look at what businesses are saying now they're like we're not any better off and we've got red tape and i now can't start to do the the trading that i was doing before or i can't you know work in spain or you know that's what one person is they're saying so i mean again it goes back to just a huge amount of of dissembling frankly which is yes it was always going to be very very prosperous for a very small number of probably men who are already
38:15Jon Sopel:millionaires i think this will go down as the greatest act of national self-harm that a sovereign nation has inflicted upon itself you know sometimes wars start and you know ukraine is bombed to pieces by russia and has no choice in it because russia started this bloody thing you know we voted for this thing it has left britain's worse off but the chances of it reversing seem to me negligible because as this polling data shows people think oh no please please god no What would you vote to go back in, John? If there was a referendum now? Well, I think it would depend on, you see, again, if it meant that we had to, you know, accept Schengen, accept Euro, accept everything else that we had carve-outs for.
38:59Jon Sopel:But what if we had the same conditions? If we had the same conditions, and I think, yeah, I would vote, I think we were better off inside the European Union. See, my thinking's evolved on this a little bit over time. I heard Jeremy Hunt sort of make a similar point yesterday that I kind of agreed with, quite rare for me and Jeremy Hunt, But, um, you Tory, I know, I know. But I, I, so, so you're right. I think it would be tempting if we could have the same conditions as we had before. That would be tempting, I must admit. But I have to say, I do think that, you know, the truth is, the truth is, and this is the tragedy of Brexit.
39:28Brexit was bad for us. It was also really bad for the EU. Because what the EU has done in the 10 years since, we were always the kind of leader of the pack that was arguing for more trade freedoms, less protectionism, less regulation on new emerging industries and so on. and in our absence frankly the EU has gone down the route of more protectionism dare I say a more dirigiste French direction that we were always somewhat battling against but we were big enough and ugly enough when we're in the club to basically you know usually fight our corner more often than not win in the 10 years since the EU has gone down I think has become a worse version of itself as have we and if you look at a lot of the emerging industries you know the city doesn't want to go back in now that's true they wanted to go stay in but now they don't want to go back in because they don't want the regulation back from brussels a lot of the emerging technologies ai robotics all of this stuff gene editing they don't want us to go back in because they don't want to be regulated under the the brussels you know under the uh yoke of brussels regulation and so although i think and i was always most concerned partly because the background from of the impact on you know the old heavy industries car making and things like that which has been really damaging it has been really really damaging i do think an incoming government now we would have to or a new vote now we would have to reckon not with what the eu was but what the eu has become and i think that is a more complicated question to be honest i would still welcome a political voice brave enough to say our gdp has gone down by four percent four percent in 10 years the french economy is doing badly the german economy it's not like the eu when we went in the eu or the ec at the end of the world was booming and we weren't so it was very attractive for us to go in.
41:07And if the EU now... We have fallen faster than any of the other nations. We've fallen faster, but I'm just saying that... And the point is that there is still... I hear you. I mean, I absolutely hear you, which is why I think any question that's asked has to be a very kind of thoughtful question. But the idea that we have shut ourselves off from that trading block when we are in such massive debt, when our growth is not coming in, when we do not see any of the economic benefits that were promised, I think you'd have to be just dumb to say I'm not prepared to re-engage with that question again.
41:40It's too big an amount of money that is within reach if we wanted it. But I think A, as I say, my concern would be in terms of the direction the EU has gone and whether we could correct it and go back to a settlement that we'd be more happy with, A. And B, my other question would be... We want them to join us, really, don't we? Well, that was always our attitude, unfortunately. Come over here. Yes, exactly. Yes, a channel full of fog, Europe cut off. but no yeah indeed and then the other question beyond an economic one for me as well would be the political one and i'm sure this would be brussels concern as well has a settled will developed exactly in the among the british population that this was a mistake and it needs to be correct certainly not and that's the problem right so that's why brussels will say you must be bloody joking exactly and that's a problem for us because it could potentially again suck up the next 10 years of political oxygen but it's also frankly would be one as you say john that the EU would likely treat as being completely radioactive because the last thing that they would want is for their political action.
42:36We kind of want the EEC, don't we? We want to go back to the 70s. Well, that's the single market, I suppose. And what's intriguing about that, of course, is that the biggest problem in the single market was always considered to be freedom of movement. And according to that poll, it's now fine. Although I think the Norway option... We've sorted it. We're fine. There we go. I'm always in favour of the Norway option for personal reasons. Right. We'll be back in just a moment.
43:04Jon Sopel:Summer is here, which means we all want to look and feel our best. A GLP-1 may be right for you. Visit orderlymeds.com to learn more about which GLP-1 you could be eligible for. Getting started is fast, easy, and happens virtually through telemedicine from licensed professionals. Check it out for yourself. Go to orderlymeds.com slash podcast. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Taking care of yourself feels great. Comp out of medications are not FDA approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details.
43:43There are a lot of very shell-shocked people on the night of June the 23rd. We hadn't really digested what had happened. And we hadn't really got to grips with what was coming at us down the line. But one person who made a pretty quick decision in the hours after Britain voted out was the then Prime Minister, David Cameron. He emerged at around seven o 'clock the morning after the vote outside 10 Downing Street and explained why it could not be him that, in his words, led the ship of Brexit. Because obviously it went against his own vote. And then this happened.
44:30Jon Sopel:Wednesday I would attend the House of Commons for Prime Minister's questions and then after that I expect to go to the Palace and offer my resignation so we'll have a new Prime Minister in that building behind me by Wednesday evening. Thank you very much. This is our day, Prime Minister.
44:56Right. And in the middle of all that Brexit hullabaloo, the thing, the one thing that people remembered from the David Cameron resignation was the humming. And the right. What next? Oh, wait, nothing. Wait, nothing, because I've just torpedoed my entire political career.
45:11Jon Sopel:See? Whoops. I look close to tears and David Cameron. Do, do, do, do. We'll be back tomorrow. Do, do. Right. Bye-bye. Bye. Right. This has been a Global Production. Thank you.
From the publisher
Kemi Badenoch looked like - not for the first time - she was going to make the Chancellor cry in the Commons today. She accused her of treachery and betrayal in her behaviour towards the PM. Badenoch then turned her sights on Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, and accused her of being a spiteful class warrior. Why was the Tory leader so vicious in her seeing off of Keir Starmer and his team? Is this the result of being terminally online? Is it a reflection of a more authentic politics? And if the public disapprove of this discourse why has her popularity seemingly improved?
Later, ten years to the day since the Brexit result - what are the places that voted leave feeling?
The News Agents is a Global Production.
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
