Jens Stoltenberg on Putin, Trump and Europe’s future

24 Oct 2025 · 33 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Jens Stoltenberg on Putin, Trump and Europe’s Future

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: The News Agents Hosts: Emily Maitlis, Jon Sopel, Lewis Goodall Description: An award-winning daily news podcast that goes beyond the headlines with insightful analysis and a healthy dose of skepticism.

Episode Details Episode Title: Jens Stoltenberg on Putin, Trump and Europe’s Future Episode Description: Jens Stoltenberg, former NATO Secretary General, discusses the ongoing war in Ukraine, the rise of populism in Western democracies, and the complexities of dealing with Trump in the context of NATO’s future.

Key Themes and Discussions

Current State of the War in Ukraine

  • Duration of Conflict: The war is approaching its fourth year, with consistent motivations from Putin to destabilize Ukraine.
  • Putin's Objectives: Aimed at crippling Ukraine and testing the West’s resolve to intervene.
  • US Sanctions: Trump has recently imposed new sanctions on Russia, marking a significant but potentially inconsequential moment in the ongoing conflict.

Stoltenberg's Experience

  • Role in NATO: Served as Secretary General during NATO's most turbulent times, witnessing a shift in global power dynamics.
  • Book Release: "On My Watch: Leading NATO in a Time of War" reflects on his decade of leadership and the challenges faced.

Future of NATO and Conflict with Russia

  • Likelihood of Direct Conflict: Stoltenberg assesses that direct war with Russia is unlikely in the next decade, citing NATO’s unity as a deterrent.
  • Cyber Threats: While physical military threats to NATO allies are minimal, there are concerns regarding cyber attacks and sabotage.
  • Deterrence Strategy: Emphasizes the need for NATO to enhance military capabilities to prevent war rather than engage in it.

Political Dynamics and Leadership

  • Ukrainian Resistance: Stoltenberg acknowledges that many initially underestimated Ukraine's resolve against Russian forces.
  • Zelensky's Leadership: Reflects on President Zelensky’s unexpected emergence as a pivotal leader and his plea for a no-fly zone during the invasion.

Historical Context of NATO Expansion

  • NATO Enlargement: Stoltenberg argues that NATO's expansion is not a direct threat to Russia, but rather a response to the desires of Eastern European nations to join.
  • Criticism of NATO: He addresses claims from Russia about NATO being a security threat and argues against that notion, stating that NATO is a defensive alliance.

Reflections on US Leadership

  • Biden and Trump’s Approaches: Discusses the differing strategies of the Biden and Trump administrations regarding military support to Ukraine.
  • Military Support Hesitancy: Stoltenberg believes NATO allies were slow to provide military aid to Ukraine before and after the invasion, missing opportunities to deter aggression.

Insights on Political Trends

  • Populism in Politics: Stoltenberg reflects on the rise of populism in Western democracies and the implications for social democratic parties.
  • Advice for Progressive Politics: Suggests that center-left parties must address public concerns over cost of living and security to regain voter trust.

Key Takeaways

  • Unity as Strength: NATO's unity is a crucial factor in preventing direct military conflict with Russia.
  • Historical Miscalculations: Initial assessments underestimated Ukraine’s resistance and overestimated Russian capabilities.
  • Long-Term Military Commitment: A need for a sustained military support strategy for Ukraine to ensure its sovereignty and deter future aggressions.

Conclusion The episode provides a deep dive into the current geopolitical landscape shaped by the war in Ukraine, NATO's strategic positioning, and the challenges of political leadership in a time of rising populism. Jens Stoltenberg's insights offer a reflective perspective on the evolution of international relations in the context of contemporary threats and historical precedents.

For more information, visit: [The News Agents](https://www.thenewsagents.co.uk/)

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Lewis:This is a Global Player original podcast. The Russian full-scale war in Ukraine, perhaps incredibly, is edging towards its fourth year. Despite the endless oscillations from the Trump White House toward Putin, against Zelensky, away from Putin, back to Zelensky again, the fundamentals have remained remarkably constant. Putin wants to cripple Ukraine, and he's been willing to bet that he wants that more than the West wants to stop it. Trump has, this week, finally made good on his long-standing threat to impose fresh sanctions on Russia, the first of his administration. It's a moment, but it could also be the latest in a string of false dawns.

0:45Lewis:One man who has seen more of this war, at least the politics of this war, more than almost any other is Jens Stoltenberg, until recently the Secretary General of NATO. He was the man in the hot seat when the unthinkable came true, a full-scale land war on European soil. He was the man who had to contemplate whether World War III was about to unfold or at the very least whether the war in Ukraine was its starting gun. Stoltenberg is also a stalwart of international politics, former Prime Minister of Norway, one of that country's most successful post-war politicians. For 10 years, the leader of NATO in its most troubled period since the end of the Cold War, and again recently returning to his home country as Finance Minister.

1:33Lewis:I'm widely credited with helping turn around the troubled Norwegian Labour Party's fortunes into a shock election victory against populist conservatives in September's elections. He's just published a book, On My Watch, leading NATO in a time of war, and he's stepped into the Newsagent studio to reflect on a decade of turmoil, of shifting great power politics, of the rise of the radical right, and to answer that central question. Is the war in Ukraine the final chapter of Vladimir Putin's ambition, or merely its prologue? Welcome to the Newsagents.

2:14Lewis:The News Agents. Jens Stoltenberg, Finance Minister of Norway, again, as we've just been discussing. Welcome. Thank you so much for coming in. You've written this book, On My Watch, leading NATO in a time of war. Necessarily, it's reflective on your 10 years, your unexpected 10 years as NATO Secretary General. But before discussing the past, I kind of, I feel just talking to you, I just want to focus on the future, because in a way, it feels chilling and foreboding to ask it, but it feels necessary to ask it. With all of your experience of dealing with Russia, dealing with Putin, dealing with the Ukraine war, how likely do you think it is that this continent will find itself at war directly with Russia, let's say, in the next 10 years?

2:54I think that's unlikely.

2:56Jens Stoltenberg:And we don't see any imminent military threat from Russia against any NATO ally. What we do see is, of course, cyber threats, hostile actions like sabotage, airspace violations. but as long as NATO allies stand together Russia knows that we are much stronger than them and the purpose of NATO is not to wage war or to fight the war with Russia but to prevent war and we have been able to do so successfully by conveying our unity to any potential adversary including to Russia

3:32Lewis:So you think it's unlikely despite the fact that there have been British military voices saying that including our own chief of the defence staff who has said that we should consider ourselves to be in a pre-war position rather than a post-war position and many other voices as well basically saying the same thing but your assessment would be different you think that it's unlikely that there will be direct conflict i continue to believe

3:55Jens Stoltenberg:that's unlikely but but more importantly we can speculate whether the likelihood is five percent or ten percent or one percent or whatever it is but that's not the that's in a way not the main question the main question what can we do to minimize the risk of war uh which is a much more important issue and if you want peace, prepare for war. So therefore I strongly believe that we need to strengthen our deterrence and our defense, invest more in modern capabilities to do what NATO has agreed to do and that is to significantly ramp up our military capabilities. So this discussion about the likelihood, of course I'm not saying it's without any interest, but I'm saying that the more important discussion is what can we do to continue to preserve peace, by providing credible details.

4:41Lewis:Something Putin has obviously been doing, though, is he's been testing us, even in the last few weeks. I mean, he's been doing it repeatedly for a long time, but even in the last few weeks and months, this repeated incursion of Russian jets into NATO airspace, the Danes have responded very vociferously, so have the poles and so on. But do you think we have responded adequately to those incursions?

5:00Jens Stoltenberg:Yes, fundamentally, I think so. And I think that the way we should respond is a firm, but also a calm way. and we speak about many different types of airspace violations. Some of the drones, some of the jets. We had drones, many drones coming in over Poland. They were actually, many of them were shot down by NATO air defense capabilities. Dutch F-35s, German Patriots, Italian airwax surveillance plane, they operated together and helped to shoot down drones. Norway, my own country, we had this year three airspace violations. We have seen that before. we have a long border in the Barents Sea and also on land.

5:40Jens Stoltenberg:And we have seen it before. And what NATO does is that, Norway does, but together with NATO, is to intercept, to sometimes escort these planes. But the commanders, and I trust the judgment of the military commanders, those responsible to make the right decisions, they have deemed it not necessary to start to shoot. So these situations are different, and they have to be dealt with in a firm,

6:06Lewis:but the cold way you write about this in the book but you can you just take us back to that seminal moment of february 2022 and obviously there has been this build-up for some time and speculation that i think many of us on the outside did not seriously believe indeed president zelensky at the time was saying that it wasn't going to happen that putin would take the fateful decision to actually invade amount of full-scale invasion of ukraine when did you come to believe

6:34Jens Stoltenberg:that that was going to happen i started to realize that this was going to happen october november 2021 as far back as that yeah because we had so concrete so specific intelligence not only about the russian build-up that was obvious that they had big forces enormous capacity along the ukrainian border but we also got information about their intention it's it's easier to measure the capacity than intention but we had the combination of both the capacity and intention so it was clear that the build-up had as its purpose the aim was to invade ukraine winter 2022 what nato did and that's something we very seldom do is that nato and of course the united states we started to publish intelligence to be very transparent to actually tell the public that this is now happening.

7:29Jens Stoltenberg:But then, of course, one thing is to have the capacity the Russians had. We knew they had the plans, the intentions to invade. But, of course, until the soldiers start to march and the battle tanks start to roll and the planes fly, of course, a plan can be cancelled, changed on the last day before it's launched. So we made serious efforts in January and February to try to sit down the Russians and to prevent the war. We had a meeting in something called the NATO-Russia Council, which is a council established in the 1990s to have a better relationship between, or to institutionalize the relationship between NATO and Russia.

8:09Jens Stoltenberg:And we made an effort to prevent the war, but in that last meeting with the Russians in January, we realized that there was no way for a diplomatic path to peace. They had decided to use military force.

8:22Lewis:How much of this, when historians look back, do you think because we can argue and analyze about the long-term structural motives and structural reasons that led to that day and led to that that month you can talk about the fate of the post-soviet union states and the successor states and ukraine's relation to it and so on but how much of it do you think was purely about putin himself i.e if putin had not been there that we might have taken another decision or they might have taken another decision and i say that because you write in the book, it seemed Putin was no longer the person I had met in the early 2000s and with whom I had begun a collaborative relationship.

8:58Lewis:He was more suspicious, more willing to take risks, more hung up on his notions of recovering Russia's former greatness. How much of all of this is about Putin himself?

9:07Jens Stoltenberg:He made a decision and he has enormous power in Moscow. Then it's hard to say who would have been there if not Putin. But I tried to, in my book, to describe how I had worked with Putin for many years. Because you were prime minister of Norway in the early period when he was president. Yes, I met him first time in September 2000. He was a newly elected president of Russia. I was a newly elected prime minister of Norway. And we met and we had a good meeting. And I felt that he was a man that wanted to change Russia and to actually develop a better relationship with the West. And I believed so, but I was not the only one.

9:45Jens Stoltenberg:George W. Bush, of course, famously said that I've seen into the man's soul and you can trust him. Many of us were optimistic and maybe it was wrong all that he did then. But I think it's more likely that he gradually changed. He didn't have the courage to really open up because he realized, I think, after some years that democracy, rule of law, open societies was a threat to his power base. And therefore, he started to become more authoritarian.

10:10Lewis:And so when you encountered him again, what made you realize, what was it about him that made you realize this was a different sort of man?

10:16Jens Stoltenberg:It was not mainly what he told me and what he said, but it was mainly what he did. It started gradually, but of course Russia invaded Georgia in 2008. Then we had what we call the reset between the US and Russia, and we made a new effort to try to normalize the relationships with Russia. but then after 2014 and that was the year i i go to to nato and then of course it was harder and harder to believe that his intentions actually were constructive that he wanted to control ukraine and and to re-establish a world order with swears of influence where big powers can control what smaller neighbors can do or not do were you ever and this is a critique that one

11:01Lewis:hears in this country but also from others often on the right but also the left in that kind of horseshoe of politics about NATO, which is to say that without excusing anything that Putin has done, his argument has been and long been that NATO enlargement is a security risk to Russia. Now, the Secretary General of NATO, you more than anyone else have had reason to consider that in detail. Do you think that there is any justification for that critique? Could you understand if you were in the Kremlin why someone might feel that way i don't think there's any justification but i believe

11:39Jens Stoltenberg:that it may be some of the explanation and that's for me two very different things and of course russia they feel more encircled than they really are and and nato has never been a threat to them and this idea that nato enlargement is a threat you know that again is based on this idea that we will not respect democratic free decisions by democratic free nations. It's not NATO expanding aggressively to the east. It's the new free nation, democratic nations of Central and Eastern Europe that wants to join NATO.

12:16Lewis:On that basis, should we have allowed Ukraine

12:18Jens Stoltenberg:to join earlier? Yeah, but I mean, in principle, we have said that they will become a member. Then there have been a lot of hesitation and there is a full-scale war. and that hasn't happened. But this idea that Lithuania or Estonia or whatever it is, is a threat to Russia because they joined NATO, because they're bordering Russia. Well, Norway in 1949, when NATO was established, Norway was the only country at that time that bordered the Soviet Union. And Soviet Union said it's a provocation, it's a threat to the Soviet Union if Norway joins. Then London, Washington, Paris, the big powers at that time, they said no norway has the right to join it's up to norway to decide whether norway becomes a member of nato not moscow and i think that's the only way we can also deal with these issues today it's not moscow cannot have a veto on whether finland for instance can join the alliance and the paradox is that the purpose of this war from from russia has been to get less nato prevent ukraine from joining have less nato forces in eastern part of the alliance and not new any new members.

13:25Jens Stoltenberg:The reality is that Putin has gotten, the result is more NATO. Ukraine is closer to NATO than ever before. We have more NATO forces in this part of alliance and two new members, Finland and Sweden. And with Finland in, NATO's border with Russia has more than doubled. So the outcome is the exact opposite of what Russia wanted.

13:43Lewis:Did you, when you were sat in Brussels at NATO head quarters in early 2022, did you believe in your heart when you were also obviously having discussions with President Zelensky and so on? And indeed, there were discussions, as I recall, at the time about whether President Zelensky ought to leave the country. Did you think, in terms of the assessments you were seeing and in your bones, that Kiev would fall quite quickly?

14:03Jens Stoltenberg:Yes, I think we have to be honest. And in the book, I try to be as honest and as transparent as possible, because not only Putin believed that he was going to take Kiev within days and the rest of Ukraine within weeks, but the reality was that most NATO allies and most of our military experts also believed that ukraine would fall within weeks we were wrong and that's a good thing because the ukrainians proved much more courageous much more united and determined to fight the

14:33Lewis:russian invaders what are your memories of president zelensky at that time it must have been quite a thing when you were just talking to him seeing this man who was basically being reborn as a kind of 21st century jurchill yeah and the burden on him and the potential consequences of what might happen if this went wrong? President Zelensky I knew from before

14:54Jens Stoltenberg:because he became president in 2019 and we worked closely together in the time running up to the full-scale invasion but I didn't realize then what great leader he is and how he really took control of the situation and stated very clearly that he will be here in Kiev and fight and and mobilized his own people, his armed forces, the people of Ukraine, but also the international community in provide support. But I had some painful conversations with Zelensky a few days after the full-scale invasion, because when the full-scale invasion happened, we made two decisions that morning in the NATO headquarters with the North Atlantic Council, the governing body of NATO, and that was to step up support for Ukraine, as we did, but also to prevent the war from escalating to a full-scale war between Russia and NATO.

15:46Jens Stoltenberg:And of course, there is an element of contradiction in those two aims. If the only aim was to win the war, we could have sent in NATO troops. We didn't do that because we didn't want the war to escalate. And then I remember Zelensky called me, I think, two days after the invasion, and that was when Russian troops were on the outskirts of Kiev, and there was a risk that the whole city would fall. And then he said, OK, I accept that you are not sending in ground troops from NATO, but please at least close the airspace. Make sure that we can prevent the Russian planes and the drones and the helicopters.

16:21Jens Stoltenberg:If you do that, we can win. And then he begged for a no-fly zone. And he said, you have implemented a no-fly zone over Bosnia and Herzegovina, north Iraq. You have done it before. I know you can do it. And then I had to tell him that that will not happen. NATO will not close the airspace over Ukraine because to do so we need to shoot down Russian planes need to take out Russian air defense systems and by doing that we will have direct confrontation between NATO NATO forces and Russian forces and then we are in that war we don't want to have so yes we support Ukraine but no we're not willing to go into full-scale war with Russia That must have been a difficult conversation It was a very difficult conversation.

17:07Jens Stoltenberg:I continue to believe it was the right decision by NATO. But I also believe that despite the fact that NATO allies have now provided significant, substantial military support to Ukraine, the big mistake was that we should have started to do that much earlier, in particular in the period from 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea and went into Donbass up to the full-scale invasion in 2022. hardly any NATO ally and either NATO as an institution provided any significant military support to Ukraine. We provided some training, some equipment, but not lethal aid, not ammunition, not weapons, not air defense systems.

17:50Jens Stoltenberg:It was actually President Trump who changed that a bit by starting to deliver some javelins, anti-tank weapons. But the reality was that if we had If they had even more support earlier, the Ukrainians would have controlled much more territory today, or perhaps even prevented the full-scale invasion had they been stronger earlier.

18:08Lewis:Right, we'll be back with more with Jens Stoltenberg right after this.

18:16Jens Stoltenberg:News you can trust and the conversations that matter.

18:20Lewis:With award-winning journalists at the heart of the stories from the UK and around the world. Breaking news here in Edinburgh. I'm Simon Marks. My American Week is next. Reporting from the heart of Cardiff.

18:30Jens Stoltenberg:Discover how today's story affects your life.

18:33Lewis:Listen on our free Global Player app or the new LBC app.

18:37Jens Stoltenberg:LBC, leading Britain's conversation.

Read the full transcript

18:46Lewis:The News Agents. President Trump often says that the invasion would never have taken place if he had been president in February 2022. Do you think that's true?

18:58Jens Stoltenberg:No ally indicated any, as I say, will to provide enough military support to Ukraine to deter the invasion. But Trump is right that he started by deciding to do something that the U.S. has not done before, and that was to deliver some lethal aid, in particular the javelins. and they proved to be very crucial in the defense of Kiev in particular in the first weeks and days after. But it would have happened anyway, wouldn't it? No one can tell exactly what would have happened if... He seems pretty sure. Yes, but I will not go into that kind of speculation. But I'm only saying that what we saw from all NATO allies was support to Ukraine, but not a willingness to provide support and in particular military support on a scale which was big enough to deter Russia from invading.

19:52Jens Stoltenberg:We could have done it. And if we had done it, at least the Ukrainians would have been in a much better position today. And maybe even we could have been able to prevent the invasion. How do you think history will judge

20:03Lewis:President Biden's approach to the war? Leaving aside what should have perhaps happened before, but once the war began, how do you think history will judge him?

20:12Jens Stoltenberg:Well, he took the lead in mobilizing allies to really start to deliver. because, yes, we were too slow, in particular in the period. Boris Johnson says he did. That was him. OK, but they both did it. I mean, it's correct that the United States, the United Kingdom were among those allies that really pushed for more military support to Ukraine and stepped up themselves, but also many other allies. But, of course, not as big as the UK and the United States, but the Baltic countries, Poland, also Nordic countries, really started to deliver military aid. but the US took the lead meaning that they were and still is by far the biggest allies so of course they had more capabilities.

20:51Lewis:Do you think that the critique often was that Biden was willing to give them enough to survive but not to win do you think that was fair?

20:57Jens Stoltenberg:Not only Biden but but I think all of us we had even after full-scale invasion allies hesitated to give advanced weapons enough weapons and to commit for a long term. You think that was a mistake? No we should have done NATO allies should have done more earlier, both before the invasion, but also after the invasion. We had a big discussion about whether we could deliver long-range artillery many allies were against. Then after some time, and UK actually took the lead in delivering some of these weapons, the Storm Shadows, later the different battle tanks, and other allies delivered F-16s. But it took time.

21:31Jens Stoltenberg:And of course, had that been delivered earlier, Ukraine had been in a better position.

21:35Lewis:Just on Biden himself, in terms of how he performed over that time, you know, you saw him up close. I know in the book that towards the end of that time, Uriah, over the past couple of years, I had experienced how Biden periodically struggled to keep thread and mumbled, making it difficult to understand what he was saying. As head of NATO, of course, I couldn't weigh in on the discussion surrounding his candidature. But I sometimes felt a stab of guilt. What do you mean a stab of guilt?

21:59Jens Stoltenberg:No, in that context, I meant that he was so supportive of me and he was so supportive of NATO. So in one way, it would have been nice to support him. but I really followed the rule that when you are a Secretary General of an international institution like NATO with 32 allies, there are elections and domestic issues in all of them all the time, then you just have to stay out of domestic politics. But you noticed his decline. Yes, I did. Did that worry you? Yes, and we all saw it, not only in closed meetings, but also publicly. And of course, the NATO summit in July 2024, that was just after this debate where we had made many mistakes or gaffes.

22:45Jens Stoltenberg:And a lot of attention was on exactly that in the lead up to the summit. And then just a few days after or a couple of weeks after, he declared that he was not running for president. Did you worry that he was capable of taking the decisions he needed to take? Well, my feeling, but again, I am not an expert on these issues, but my feeling was that he was absolutely capable of taking decisions. And when we had discussions and we went into the issues, he understood and he was clear-eyed about those issues. But being a political leader, being a politician, it's not only about sitting there and read the papers and discuss the issues, but it's also about communicating, being on the scene or the stage.

23:25Jens Stoltenberg:And of course, we all saw that he struggled with that part of the role.

23:28Lewis:nonetheless once we got to november 2024 did your heart sink when trump was re-elected because of his antagonism at times towards nato the organization you were heading up

23:41Jens Stoltenberg:well i will not talk too much about my feelings but but of course i was concerned that we reached an administration that was not supportive of nato then i think what we have seen now as we saw also in the first period when president trump was president of the united states his first term is that his criticism is not mainly against nato it's mainly against nato allies not paying enough for nato and there are people around him who are more directly

24:09Lewis:antagonistic to nato and are more supportive of the russian position historically that this part of the war was because of nato expansionism a position you've yeah but anyway but what matters

24:19Jens Stoltenberg:for me is what the United States does. And first of all, they agreed at the NATO summit to step up and provide military support to Ukraine. We have now a NATO mechanism in place. I agree that that summit also this year, after I step down, that ensures funding for delivery of US weapons. So the US is committed to continue to deliver weapons to Ukraine. And we also see that the United States has not reduced its military presence in Europe. They're actually absolutely present. and we have significant military commitment.

24:51Lewis:Is he, when you watch the Alaska summit, is he getting played by Putin?

24:57Jens Stoltenberg:Maybe, I guess that's what Putin tries, but I think, again, action matters, and what matters for Ukraine is that we provide them with military support, and there is now a steady flow of NATO funding and US military equipment, and there is a need to talk to Russians if you want this war to end.

25:18Lewis:And when you watch the showdown in the Oval Office between Zelensky and Trump, you've had lots of dealings with Trump. You know how to talk to him. I think you probably know what he likes, what he doesn't like. When you were watching that, and their relationship, in fairness, appears to have recovered. But when we were watching that explosion, what were you thinking?

25:36Jens Stoltenberg:No, I was concerned because it is extremely important that there is a good relationship between Ukraine and the United States. Did Zelensky mishandle it, do you think? no but you know it was a difficult situation and and it went in the wrong direction but say that again yeah but then the good thing is that now they had a meeting just recently and the atmosphere there was obviously much more positive what's he like to deal with trump what's he like to deal with well he has a very different style and is sometimes more more more more direct but my approach was that yes president trump and i we disagree on different issues i'm a european politician and been prime minister in norway and and of course we disagree on issues like trade and tariffs or climate change but as secretary-general nato are focused on the issues that matters for you know those moments you know those moments when he's sort of going on a bit of a tirade let's put

26:29Lewis:it that way and he's talking and and whoever he happens to be talking it could be anybody it could have been you it could have been zelensky kia starmer whoever but he's talking and he's talking and he's talking and he's often making pretty outlandish claims about all that this that and the other what's it like to sit through that like what i've often wondered with those leaders

26:43Jens Stoltenberg:what's going through your head no but then then then i've tried to focus on the important issues and issues where we can find some common ground where we can make some progress and the most important issue during my meetings with him were was the issue of of defense spending and and and of course he had a different style he he used more direct language but but in core the message from him was the same as from President Obama and from President Biden.

27:12Lewis:Do leaders sort of slightly bristle, though, at the sycophancy they have to display? I mean, obviously, your successor, I mean, it was a bit misquoted, but the whole daddy thing, you know, and all that sort of stuff, the sycophancy that Trump demands, which is a bit different to any other American president we've seen, they don't demand that kind of court politics. People dropping whatever they're doing at the drop of a hat and turning up, and all 20 of them there, and he introduces them one by one. The comments that Mark Rutger has made. Does that stick in the throat of leaders, really, deep down?

27:39Jens Stoltenberg:Well, I actually prepared myself for these meetings, and also I had some language I had prepared before the meetings. And when it came to President Trump, I said many times, also in the meetings I said in the media, that his clear message is having an impact. Also, his clear message on the fence pending is having an impact, and that's correct. So when you saw those text messages from Mark Russo, what was your reaction to that? But again, I will not comment on what those in charge now deem as the right thing to do. Would you have sent messages like that? But I was not in the same position, not in the same situation.

28:16Jens Stoltenberg:What matters is that the Secretary General NATO does what he deems necessary to maintain the unity of the alliance. Because as long as North America and Europe are together in the strongest military alliance in history, we will prevent any military attack on any of us.

28:31Lewis:Is it true that he rang you up to ask for advice on how to get the Nobel Peace Prize?

28:36Jens Stoltenberg:Well, President Trump and I had a conversation in August. He called me, and the main topic of that conversation was tariffs and trade, because that was just before he announced some new tariffs. I also had the privilege of joining the Norwegian Prime Minister, Jóvala Skarstöre, in the White House in April. and again we discussed economy, tariffs, the Norwegian Serbian wealth fund and other issues and that's what I can say about that conversation. But did he just mention it at all?

29:08Lewis:Did he ask for some advice?

29:10Jens Stoltenberg:My message has been and continues to be, and that's also the Norwegian message on the Nobel Peace Prize is that it's not the Norwegian government, it is an independent...

29:20Lewis:Do you think he's a good candidate for it?

29:22Jens Stoltenberg:Again, since I'm a Norwegian politician, since it's very important to have a distinction between the Norwegian government and the Independent Peace Prize Committee, I will not give any advice on who will be the right candidate to pick.

29:34Lewis:One final thing. And it's sort of about Norwegian politics, but also how it might relate to British politics. You've been around politics and social democratic politics in the Norwegian Labour Party for a very long time. Progressive politics, social democratic politics, is struggling across Europe in different ways. Your own party, the Norwegian Labour Party, was doing very, very badly in the polls for a long time. You returned to government and, among other things, there did seem to be a bit of a change. And indeed, your party unexpectedly just won the Norwegian elections in September. You were going up against a populist party, the Progress Party, which was basically eating the traditional Norwegian Conservative Party.

30:12Lewis:It feels quite a similar situation to what's happening in Britain at the moment. You've got quite an embattled left of centre government headed by Keir Starmer. You've got Reform Party, which is on the rise. I just wonder, as a politician who's been around this for a long time, what your advice might be to Keir Starmer in terms of dealing with a populist threat in our politics.

30:30Jens Stoltenberg:First of all, I've always been very careful of giving advice. Just between us. No, but I mean, the thing is that there are so particular circumstances in each and every country that you have to know those details to make the right decisions in UK, in Norway, in Sweden, whatever. So domestic politicians, they are the best to make the decisions on domestic and national politics. Then I think in general, I believe that center-left parties, social democratic parties like my own, they have to take very seriously the concerns that many people have of cost of living, of uncertainty about all the changes which are taking place in our societies.

31:09Jens Stoltenberg:And that's exactly what the Norwegian Labour Party tried to do, including being credible on security and defense. When NATO was established back in 1949, the majority of the European countries were governed by labor parties, social democratic parties, and the Clement Attlee government here in the UK. So defense and security is something which is, yeah, it's a bipartisan thing, but social democratic parties should really maintain ownership to such an issue which is so important, especially in a more dangerous world as we live now.

31:42Lewis:jen stoltenberg it's been an absolute pleasure to me thanks so much

31:55Lewis:the news agents well i found that absolutely fascinating a reminder that jen stoltenberg's book on my watch is out now and with that i think i might finally just finally have impressed my norwegian wife's family yeah i hope it there well that is it from all of us for this week Thanks as ever to our production team on the newsagents. Rory Simon, Georgia Foxwell, Arvin Baddowell, Shane Fennelly, Natalie Inge, Anna Georgievich, Michaela Walters, Mikey Baggs and Jess Williamson. Our executive producer is Louis Dagenhart. Our editor is Tom Hughes. It's presented by Emily Maitlis, John Sopel and me, Lewis Goodall.

32:26Lewis:We'll be back on Monday. Remember to tune in to my LBC show this Sunday, Sunday with Lewis Goodall, imaginatively titled from 10 till 12. All the best political interviews and analysis. And unlike the competition, not boring. Have a lovely weekend. This has been a Global Player original production.

From the publisher

As Russia’s war in Ukraine grinds on and populist politics shake Western democracies, NATO is facing one of the most turbulent moments in its 75-year history. This Friday the former NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, joins Lewis to talk about the war in Ukraine, the rise of populism in the West, and how to deal with Trump.

The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/

More from The News Agents

All 385 episodes
Jens Stoltenberg on Putin, Trump and Europe’s futureThe News Agents · 33 min
Listen in VO