In short
The News Agents - Episode Summary: Q&A: The Case for Keir, 2026 Elections, and Is Britain Ungovernable?
Episode Overview In this festive Q&A edition, hosts Jon Sopel and Lewis Goodall tackle listener questions about the political landscape in the UK, the performance of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, upcoming elections, and the challenges of governance. They engage in humorous banter while providing insightful political analysis.
Key Topics Discussed
- Festive Banter
- Light-hearted opening with humorous exchanges about who to tell to "F off."
- Mention of Emily Maitlis' absence and playful remarks about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
- Listener Feedback
- The importance of tone in political journalism, with a listener suggesting a need for more balanced coverage of Prime Minister Starmer’s achievements.
- The Case for Keir Starmer
- Discussion about Starmer's political journey and the perception of his leadership.
- Key points made in defense of Starmer:
- Restoration of some stability compared to the previous chaotic Conservative government.
- Focus on integrity and standards in politics.
- Efforts to address significant economic issues inherited from the previous administration.
- Initiatives in public services like health and relations with Europe.
- Challenges in Starmer's Leadership
- Critique of Starmer's popularity and public perception, with suggestions that he needs to showcase a more relatable side.
- The struggle between authenticity and the political persona he presents to the public.
- The impact of his media presence and how it affects public perception.
- Upcoming Elections in 2026
- Importance of local elections in May as potential indicators of Starmer’s future.
- Overview of significant US midterm elections and their implications for Trump's political future.
- Is Britain Ungovernable?
- Discussion on the impact of social media and public disillusionment on governance.
- Analysis of the complexities and systemic issues facing the UK political system today.
- Debate over whether the current challenges are due to individual leaders or structural problems within the political landscape.
Key Takeaways
- Political Landscape: Governance has become increasingly complex due to the rapid pace of political events and public expectations, exacerbated by social media.
- Starmer’s Leadership: While there are arguments for Starmer’s competence and integrity, his effectiveness and public appeal are under scrutiny.
- Elections as Indicators: Upcoming elections will be critical for assessing public sentiment and the political future of both Starmer and his party.
- Long-term Challenges: The notion of ‘ungovernability’ reflects deeper issues in the political system, suggesting that solutions require more than just a change in leadership.
Closing Remarks The episode combines humor with serious political analysis, culminating in reflections on the future of British politics and the need for leaders who can effectively navigate the complexities of modern governance.
For more insights and episodes, visit [The News Agents website](https://www.thenewsagents.co.uk/) or listen on Global Player.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Jon Sopel:This is a Global Player original podcast. Hello and welcome to an extra special festive edition of The News Agents. Why are you looking at me like that? It just sounds like we're sitting down for a story with Mother. No. Hello children. Shall we begin? No, we're building up. This is welcoming the audience. Ah, I don't like doing that. Well, what is wrong with you? How long have you got? Why do you always have to insult our audience? Well, you're the one who swears at them. No, I'm bringing them in.
0:31Lewis Goodall:I'm bringing them in. And actually, appropriately enough, in our final show before Christmas, we've got a particularly festive question from John in Essex, who says, famously, Emily was told to, apologies to my mother, fuck off by Marjorie Taylor Greene. If Lewis and John could tell one person to F off, who would it be and why? Well, she already did it. Emily Maitlis. Too late.
0:51Jon Sopel:Too late. Marjorie did it. And she did it with such gusto. Also, Emily's not here to answer back, so frankly, that would be quite good. Yeah, perfect, good. Perfect. Because we'd be in a lot of trouble. Indeed. This year, I suppose the person who has made me want to say fuck off more than anyone else is J.D. Vance. You know, coming over, lecturing Europe on free speech, then piling into what a hellhole London is and how it's, you know, become a sewer and all the rest of it. We do not have a homicide rate in the UK anywhere that compares with every city in America. you do not fear for you're going to be shot dead in london frankly you do not have a huge problem with free speech you have people who are civil to one another a far cry from what you see a lot of the time in america so bugger off stop telling us that europe is rotten when you don't have the exactly the most perfect place yourself to live in but you just didn't avail yourself of your own
1:51Lewis Goodall:opportunity. You asked, say, who you would tell to fuck off. You just told him to bugger off. Which is very World War II, I must confess. I changed it. I said fuck off at the top and bugger off at the bottom. Okay, fine. You? I would never say that to anyone, John. No, of course not. I'm not that offensive. Too polite. Too civil. I'm far too polite. Far too civil. What I'm more intrigued by to learn is, of course, with Marjorie's great conversion to be one of liberalism's great folk heroes, I just wonder what she'd say to Emily now. Can you imagine? Come for dinner. Oh, I love you, darling. I love you.
2:25Lewis Goodall:I love you. You're so like-minded. They'd be all over each other, like a rash, a Christmas rash. Welcome to the News Agents.
2:35Lewis Goodall:The News Agents. It's Rudolph. It's Comet. Where's Mrs Claus? Yeah, where is she?
2:42Jon Sopel:Not here. Weird that. And the elves. Right. We're going to start with a question from Amanda. Hello, News Agents. I really enjoy your show and the way you tackle political issues with energy and insight. Should we just leave the question there and just kind of dwell on that bit of it? Or should I carry on? Dwell on it? You want to dwell on it? I want to dwell on the insight and the wit and the wisdom that we bring. And honesty. Yeah, and honesty. But I wanted to offer a listener's perspective on your coverage of the current Prime Minister. I completely understand that scrutiny and criticism are essential.
3:13Jon Sopel:That's the role of good journalism. At the same time, I sometimes feel the tone leans heavily towards derision, especially around his personality or presentation. On the show. No way. Rather than the substance of what he's trying to do. I'd love to hear at least one segment where you look at his achievements or the challenges he's working through with some depth that you don't always apply to your critiques. Thanks for your work put into the podcast each week, Amanda. That's such a good question. I mean, in essence, the case for Keir Starmer.
3:48Lewis Goodall:I think that if you were, you know, one of the Starm troopers, as they were nicknamed for about 10 seconds. Weird that that didn't stick. If you were one of his acolytes and there aren't. And I think it's very telling that there aren't many of these people. I don't just think it's about the substance. I think there aren't that many Keir Starmer big friends in politics. You know, he's never had a faction of his own, really. He's been adopted by different ones at different times, but he's not got a sort of long pedigree in politics. He doesn't have that. He hasn't got lots of outriders out there.
4:15Lewis Goodall:Tom Baldwin, his biographer, is probably one of the only ones. The sort of people that Corbyn had a lot of, for example, because he needed to go into the media day after day and just argue the case. And you don't hear that very much. And I think that's partly particular to Starmer and his trajectory into politics and the sort of politics he has, which is highly ideological. I think, though, part of it is already getting to the criticism. I think part of it is about about him. and I think if you were putting the case for him you would say that look here is a man who I think has restored we talk a lot about like sort of the idea that the chaos hasn't stopped I don't think that's totally true I think that things are more stable than they were at the sort of fag end of the Tory period that's partly about the parliamentary majority I think he is a man who and some people will object to me saying this because some people believe and I can see the case that's been made some people believe that he's deeply mendacious and dishonest and cynical.
5:09Lewis Goodall:I actually think he does care about integrity in politics. I think he is someone who does want to... I think standards in politics do matter to him. That doesn't mean he doesn't duck and dive. I think that he isn't a politician. The thing that I would say most about him, actually, if I was making the case for him, the biggest thing I think that's different about this government and the last government, not so much on the Sunat, but certainly what came before, is this is not a government that wakes up every single morning thinking about how it can use its bully pulpits of politics to create division and to exploit division for political purposes.
5:43Lewis Goodall:I think it genuinely believes in its members to not adhere and subscribe to that mode of politics, which is a politics we saw a lot of, particularly in the Johnson years. And I think that if you were making a case for this government, and more generally, the character of that, for all of its other problems, is what I would say.
6:02Jon Sopel:i suppose if i was doing the case for keir starmer your starting point would be to look at you know the inheritance that he had when he came into power in july 2024 and the enormous kind of problems with the budget and the fact that there was a you know a deficit that hadn't really been clear and that there would be the need to raise taxes in a way that you know he probably I mean I think they knew they would have to raise taxes and I think that there was an element in which there was wishful thinking or dishonesty over the level of the problems that Britain faced but it was a pretty awful inheritance the black hole that Rachel Reeves had to deal with so you start from that point of view which was completely different from Tony Blair which is the obvious point of comparison in 1997 when you know the economy was absolutely humming after various humiliations that the Tories had been through but was nevertheless in a very good place when Blair took over power so he started from a very bad place he has tried to do the things that he said he would do about you know cutting waiting lists in the health service you know increasing the number of operations that are happening and all the rest of it so you know in public services you can see what they're trying to do.
7:21Jon Sopel:Positioning in terms of a closer relationship with Europe but not going back into the European Union, I think you'd say that's a bit of an achievement. I think overseas, the way he's played Trump, which is an incredibly difficult hand to play, he's played that adroitly. I think in the relations with Europe and lobbying on behalf of Ukraine, he has done well. I think the trade deal with India, again a significant achievement so i think on all those sort of fronts you would say that he's done well i think what i also liked about keir starmer when he was running for government was to be honest enough to say you know what it's complicated you can't just pull a lever and press a button and something happens instantly to re-deliver economic growth these things take a long time I think that would have been so much more effective if he'd been able to keep telling the story of we're doing the right things.
8:19Jon Sopel:It's just going to take a bit of time to get there. I think the telling of the story of what this government is doing has really let him down. But him saying, you know what, governing is complicated and it's hard and it's tough and it's hard yards, all the rest of it, I think is the right thing to be saying after we had the ludicrous populism of Johnson, when, you know, Brexit was going to be magnificent, it was going to solve all our problems, we were going to be free, all this thing, and it turned out to be absolute bullshit. I think that feeds populism when you get people who make simple analyses of problems and they're really complex.
8:52Jon Sopel:So I think in Keir Starmer's favour, he's done all of that. Those are the positives if you want to make a case for Keir Starmer.
9:01Lewis Goodall:But what also feeds populism is failure, political failure, particularly from mainstream forces. And I fear that despite all of those things, and in particular, I would just add as well, I think he does approach the job clearly with a certain level of seriousness, you know, which is important. I think he loves the job. I think he loves the jobs and takes it very seriously. I know you might say that's a low bar, but I don't think every prime minister of recent history actually can be said for. And I think that does matter. And often when people are almost demanding him to, you know, we do it on the show and I've done it, you know, you want to create more content, sort of like try and dominate the media conversation more.
9:32Lewis Goodall:I can understand people's frustration sometimes. We're like, he's not a bloody circus entertainer. You know, he's supposed to be the prime minister. Unfortunately, he governs in the era in which he finds himself governing. And, you know, successful politicians bend themselves around that media and political environment. I fear that Starmer's demerits is that he is incapable, unwilling or incapable of so doing. And that matters because you could argue that what we're going through now is a sort of last chance saloon for more mainstream political forces to succeed and be seen to succeed. That's how high the stakes are.
10:03Lewis Goodall:And in their place, replace them. We know not.
10:06Jon Sopel:I would say from my own interactions with Keir Starmer, from the people I know who know Keir Starmer much better than I do, that broadly speaking, I think he is a decent man. He is a decent, honourable man. Whether that is enough. And as exactly as you say, Lewis, you know, the circumstances which you find yourself, you've got to be able to adapt yourself to them. I think that's where his problem is. He struggles to adapt to the circumstances that he's in. And basic sort of decency is not going to get you that far.
10:39Lewis Goodall:Well, you are correct to say that, I mean, if you think about the inheritance, they were unusual in the sense that most governments, if you think about difficult inheritances government have had over the past 30 years, last couple of times we've changed party. In 1997, Blair had broken public services, but an economy, as you say, which was in reasonably robust health. Cameron in 2010 had a broken economy, but public services, which were in robust health, this government came in with public services being completely broken, and the economy being, you know, whatever the Tories say now, you know, pretty difficult in all sorts of ways, particularly in terms of levels of debt and so on.
11:09Lewis Goodall:So all of that is there. And Starmer recognised that, and he talked in the language of that big diagnosis. He talked in the language of saying, we have got terrible inheritance, we need to take radical, drastic action. And I think his undoing is recognising that diagnosis, but not having, being seen to have much of a prescription.
11:25Jon Sopel:Yeah, and just to amplify the point about Europe, I remember being in Paris at a conference and there were people from Macron's inner circle there who were talking about how they just didn't trust Boris Johnson. They didn't believe him. They thought he was a liar. They thought he was completely untrustworthy. And it was impossible to do any kind of business with him because of his duplicitousness. And I don't think you would hear that at all in the councils of Europe.
11:51Lewis Goodall:Well, I don't feel embarrassed by him as prime minister. I mean, I didn't feel embarrassed by Sunak either. And I didn't feel embarrassed by David Cameron or Theresa May. So, you know, again, these are low bars, but there have been moments over the... And I don't feel embarrassed about politics right now, but there have been times over the past 10 years where you weren't able to say that, or I wasn't anyway.
12:08Jon Sopel:And so, you know, from that point of view, Starmer, it's a tick. So, Amanda, thank you for that question. Well, let's go to this question from James Kimber, which is kind of related to what we've just talked about. Let me just... Starmer's horrible popularity ratings have been top of the news for weeks and his robotic appearances don't land well with the public. However, I've heard that he can go to Arsenal, sink six pints, is known as six beer kia, returning home for dinner with his family like he's drunk nothing. Does Starmer need to show his human side more to claw back any semblance of popularity with the general public?
12:46Lewis Goodall:My booze doesn't touch the sides with me. I can drink with the best of them. I'm basically an alcoholic
12:52Jon Sopel:I find it hard to believe that he's drinking six pints at Arsenal I don't know
12:58Lewis Goodall:I'm sure it's a nickname that he probably quite enjoys last time he sank six pints
13:02Jon Sopel:I don't know I think it's always dangerous when a politician comes before you and says my favourite band is X and then they can't name a single hit that the band have had or whatever it happens to be where you try and show look at me, I'm an ordinary bloke I'm just like everybody else You know, I mean, it's great if you can pull that off. And, you know, for God's sake, Farage does manage to pull that off with the Hale fellow, well met, bloke down the pint with the Rothmans in one hand and a pint of beer in the other at hand. You know, Farage can do that. I think Keir Starmer, if he was to suddenly show us inside the house and him cooking scrambled eggs for his kids for breakfast, I don't know, whatever it happens to be.
13:44Jon Sopel:I just think we think confection. Don't believe it. I'm not buying it.
13:48Lewis Goodall:yeah and i think that one of the intriguing things about starmer is that there are genuinely authentic things about him and yet when he's being authentic no one believes him and i'm sure we've spoken about it before on the show but you know i think there is no greater embodiment of that than him and football you know something about which he is genuinely authoritative and passionate one of the few prime ministers along with gordon brown probably who genuinely love football and you know clearly it's a big part of their leisure life you know it's a big part of their sort of wider a cultural life.
14:17Lewis Goodall:And yet when he speaks about it, it somehow doesn't ring true. You know, he starts to descend into kind of slightly weird things talking about, you know, the halftime orange or starting talking, sort of romanticising it, talking about it in a sort of nostalgic way, which somehow doesn't seem authentic, even though he really is very authentic. I think that might just be because, you know, he sounds like a politician when he's talking about football. And then you can have people who know way less, politicians who know way less about football, sounding less like a politician and therefore, ironically enough sounding more authoritative even when they're not there is just something about starmer these things sort of bounce off he's a man also i think of his generation who doesn't find it necessarily that easy to reveal his inner life he once said that he never dreams i remember once speaking to someone who worked for him asking i think for this show i think so like asking you know whether we could do a sort of you know couple of episode profile of him spend a load of time with him and they said you know yeah lewis in theory would love to but you know you should know as I think you probably do know by now, you know, what you see is kind of what you get with it.
15:14Lewis Goodall:There ain't loads else going on, right? He is who he is, ironically enough. And it's almost like the irony of this is, I often write, is that we're a public or the voters are demanding authenticity, demanding more, when actually he is authentically himself. It's just that the reality is, ironically enough, we don't like it. We, in some ways, are demanding more inauthenticity from him at the same time as demanding his authentic self, which is actually basically what we've got.
15:39Jon Sopel:He's not a stand-up comic. I think that's fair. He's not going to do well at the Edinburgh Fringe. He's not an extrovert in that sense. I remember when Emily and I interviewed him, when he was opposition leader, and he was going to the World Economic Forum in Davos, and we were in this room set up where we were waiting, and he pokes his head round the door and says, oh, shall I come back later? Come on, you're the alpha male. You're the big beast here. You're the leader of the opposition who wants to be our next prime minister. You walk in and command the room. And I don't think he quite does that.
16:15Jon Sopel:And that's just not who he is. He's not a kind of assertive personality where when they talk or when they walk in the room hushes. I don't think he has that effect on people. And that is who he is. I don't know about whether you can be less robotic as you know, you put it in the question, James. I don't know how you do that if broadly speaking that is who you are a rather shy person thoughtful person considerate you know loyally I mean he is loyally he does choose his words with care he does speak slowly he's not a natural kind of funny man in that sense.
16:54Lewis Goodall:Again, I think that's fair. John Sopel in the pub until closing, of course, your nickname. Maggie Taylor via Instagram says, politics has never felt more divisive. And there's another three years of Trump. What election should we be looking out for? Oh, this is right. I love this. Elections are we looking out for in 2026? And how might they impact the political landscape? Well, I mean, our bread and butter, of course, is UK and US. And obviously, people will know already about the elections here in May. They're going to be really big, probably big for Keir Starmer's future in Scotland, in Wales and in English local councils as well.
17:27Lewis Goodall:The midterms, of course, already back round again in November. Third of the Senate up, all of the House up, clutch of other races around the country as well. Basically the last referendum on Trump that there's going to be in the United States. His name won't be on the ballot, but clearly as they always are, they are sort of plebiscuits on the administration as it exists now. And it would have real consequences because if the Dems were to retake both houses or either house, the House is easy, the Senate is harder, But if they retake either, once again, they get the power of impeachment. They get the power of subpoena.
17:58Lewis Goodall:They can start launching all sorts of investigations, just like they did last time when Trump was there. Trump, that's why Trump has been trying to gerrymander it as much as possible, because he knows how damaging that will be. And then other places in Europe, some very interesting elections coming up, I think, in the spring in Hungary, which, again, will be considered a real kind of bellwether on where populism is. Obviously, Orban has been there now since 2010 and the Israeli Knesset elections in October, which again will be a referendum on Netanyahu, which could have huge consequences in terms of what happens next in the Middle East and beyond.
18:29Jon Sopel:Yeah, I mean, just picking on a couple of those, I mean, the Israel elections, which you mentioned last, I mean, this dreadful government have just announced 19 new settlements to be built in the West Bank. of further evidence of how they want to scupper any possibility of a two-state solution. If Israeli public opinion moves against Netanyahu and the ghastly people who are part of his coalition, then that has significant effects, not only for Israel, but also for the Palestinians as well, and potentially for the region, because one of the reasons that Saudi Arabia, for example, gives why it won't establish diplomatic relations with Israel is because Israel won't do anything towards a two-state solution.
19:11Jon Sopel:And so if you get any sizable change there, that will be significant. Orban, of course, is the big holdout in the EU about taking tough action on Russia over the invasion of Ukraine. And can you imagine in America, as you say, Lewis, if the Democrats have control of the House? I mean, if you look at the money raising that has gone on and the corruption that has gone on and the enriching of the Trump family that has gone on in the past year. Where to begin? I mean, where to begin? I mean, those investigations by the Oversight Committee and the Judiciary Committee and all the rest of it over how pardons were given and granted and what was given in return for those pardons, the money that has gone into building the White House ballroom, the trade deals where there were side deals for the Trump family.
Read the full transcript
20:00Jon Sopel:It goes on and on. Bitcoin. Crypto. It just goes on.
20:05Lewis Goodall:Yeah, I mean, think about just the impact, you know, one House committee, admittedly on a very, very high profile subject in the form of Jeffrey Epstein, has had on world news throughout the course of the year. And, you know, U.S. House committees, they sound boring and tedious, but they can because they have this extraordinary power under the U.S. Constitution. And that's why Trump, as I say, has been gerrymandering. Of course, I'm most looking forward to, Josh. I'm sure you will be. Oh, come on, come on. Well, we've got the Cook Islands general election coming up. Oh, I knew it. I was thinking the Solomon Islands must be doing an election.
20:34Lewis Goodall:Cook Islands coming up. Big rematch, I think, between the Cook Islands party, imaginatively named, and the Democratic Party. And, of course, Cook Islands United, who probably beat them 3-2. Yeah, beat them 3-2. Do you want to have a little bit of trivia, John? The Cook Islands party, which, of course, you'll be aware, emerged victorious in the 2022 Cook Islands general election, winning 12 seats plus two. They got 44 % of the vote. How many votes do you think that was? Oh, 44 % of the vote on the Cook Islands. 2 ,742. Oh, you've just lost out on a free deployment to the Cook Islands, which I'm surprised, frankly, you have not already pitched for at some point over the course of this year.
21:10Lewis Goodall:No, it's 3 ,890. So the Cook Islands party will obviously be doing their best nationalist nationalist party, of course. They'll be looking to try and defend as many of those.
21:19Jon Sopel:You know how there's that description of journalists as wide, shallow pools who know a little bit about a huge number of subjects. And as soon as you said the Cook Islands, I thought Cook Islands. I know absolutely sod all about anything to do with the Cook Islands.
21:32Lewis Goodall:Well, if you're listening from the Cook Islands, do send John a note with some interesting tidbits. And who knows, some stories that he may or may not be able to cover from the Cook Islands through the course of 2026. We'll be back just after this.
21:48Jon Sopel:News you can trust and the conversations that matter.
21:51Lewis Goodall:With award-winning journalists at the heart of the stories from the UK and around the world. Breaking news here in Edinburgh.
21:57Jon Sopel:I'm Simon Marks. My American Week is next. Reporting from the heart of Cardiff. Discover how today's story affects your life. Listen on our free Global Player app or the new LBC app. LBC, leading Britain's conversation.
22:17Jon Sopel:The News Agents. Let's have this voice note from Paul in Cambridge. Hello. My question is a simple one. Has Britain become ungovernable? has the rise of rage-baiting social media algorithms coupled with what is probably a genuine seemingly inexorable national decline ensured that no government will ever command the support of the majority of the electorate again have we essentially moved into a post-governance era i'd be fascinated to know your thoughts many thanks so i kind of think that obviously governing has become immensely more difficult because I think you've alluded to it Paul in your question about some of the toxic currents that are there that make it so difficult to govern but I still think that there is respect for law and order in this country it's not an anarcho state where you can't get anything done and I still think that there is a process by which laws are being made I agree with you.
23:23Jon Sopel:I think governing has become immeasurably more difficult. And I think the level of cynicism and the lack of trust that we have in politics and politicians. And that's not just new to Keir Starmer. It was there during the Johnson years, made worse during the Johnson years. You know, arguably goes back to 2008 and the financial crash and people feeling that, God, politics is not working for me. so I think it's got a long history and I do think it's getting worse but I'm not ready for the Council of Despair yet
23:55Lewis Goodall:yeah I think it's a really intriguing question and I think one that we should grapple with more because particularly the way that we do journalism in this country and anywhere really it's natural that we get distracted by the sort of day to day there's a sort of strain of thought which is like god our politicians are just so useless why are they so useless and we just go from personality to personality and we hope we'll just get new personalities in different departments or in different bits of government and we'll think, oh, well, that'll solve it. And yet it doesn't. And I think we have had too many, quote-unquote, failed prime ministers now to just sort of go, God, these were just really useless people, right?
24:29Lewis Goodall:Or we've had so many sort of, quote-unquote, useless ministers who just go, right, this was supposed to be about the quality of our politicians. Something must have happened, either with the British state itself or with finding itself incapable of dealing with the problems that we've got for whatever reason, and perhaps something more systemic. And I do think that there are systemic factors at work here. It's quite interesting. When Boris Johnson resigned, he basically said a sort of quite throwaway remark, but I think he probably is right. If we're just thinking about the personal authority of prime ministers and the fact that so few of them seem to have much authority over their parties anymore is a problem in a parliamentary system.
25:04Lewis Goodall:He said, I just, they all need to get off Twitter and they all need to get off WhatsApp. And I think there is some truth to that, right? Which is that particularly the WhatsAppification of politics and parliament, You can overdo this stuff, but I think it does add to a certain level of fever within British politics, both on the journalistic side and the relationship we have with politicians and with each other. I mean, you know, between the years of what, say, 1979 and 2010, we had four prime ministers. That seems, even just between 1979 and 1997, this huge long period of conservative domination, we had two prime ministers, just Thatcher and Major.
25:44Lewis Goodall:That feels difficult to reckon with. I don't think it would be impossible. But I think changes in technology mean that political time have basically sped up. It's like dog years now. That's one of the reasons when we're talking about the Starmer government, sometimes feel like we're talking about a government that's been in for four or five or six or seven years. It's only been in for 18 months, but so much now takes place. There are so many events which take place and the speed of politics is so fast that I think that politics itself, the speed of politics has accelerated, which means that it is difficult to govern.
26:13Jon Sopel:I suppose if you were to take a deterministic argument about it and say, was the Labour rebellion over welfare reform set to happen irrespective of what Keir Starmer did because the Labour Party has become ungovernable? I'd say no, it didn't have to happen like that. I think there were things that the Labour government could have done that number 10 could have been much more adroit in selling the policy and preparing the ground for it. So I don't think it was inherently, you know, because we've become ungovernable that the policy failed. I think it failed because Keir Starmer didn't handle the whole selling of that policy particularly well.
26:53Jon Sopel:And therefore, is governing more difficult? Yes. Is it impossible? No. And I just think that, you know, if the whip's office had been kind of really doing well, you've still got the power as the prime minister to hire and fire ministers, which keeps a certain number of people on board because they're ambitious and therefore they want preferment or they want to be sent on interesting fact finding trips to the Cook Islands or wherever it happens. Can't wait. See you in 2026. Yeah, or wherever it happens to be. So the power of patronage is still enormous on the part of the prime minister. It's just that I don't think the operation of this particular government has been that good in dealing with the things that can upend you.
27:35Jon Sopel:I fully accept it's become more difficult, but I don't think it's inherent that it's impossible.
27:40Lewis Goodall:I think there are clearly structural factors at work which make governing harder than it used to, although it's always been hard. If you've been sat here with Jim Callaghan or Clement Attlee or Ramsey MacDonald, and by the way, I really wish I were, then, you know, they would tell you governing is really, really, really difficult. Every prime minister finds that. I think it's true to say partly things are just referred to technology, speed of events, the expectation on the modern state and modern government to have answers about everything and to have it now. Now, people's own, the electorate's own patience with the pace of political change makes things harder.
28:12Lewis Goodall:The economic situation is difficult because we're now a country with 100 percent of debt to GDP, which we haven't been for a long time, which puts constraints on the choices that are available to you as a government. Parliaments and parties have become more disputatious, more rebellious. People often say they like that, but the net consequence is it actually makes it harder to govern in our parliamentary system. All of that is going on. I also think we have had, in general, fewer people of quality go into politics and more buffoons, for various reasons, go into politics. I think the quality of our MPs probably has come down a bit.
28:45Lewis Goodall:You can overdo it, but I think that's true. I think what it means is two things can be true at once, which is to say that it is not all the fault of individuals within the system. But I think there are real systemic factors which lead to the appearance of ungovernability in our politics. Add into that, foreign policy and geopolitical events are really difficult as well, by the way. But I think what it means is, is that the individuals, because of those systemic problems, have to be even better. Your leadership has to be world class almost at any given moment at any given time. And we probably haven't had that.
29:13Lewis Goodall:So the systemic problems have got harder. The individuals have got worse. But in terms of the fundamental governability of Britain, as you say, John, there are other countries in the world you could point to and say that structurally speaking, they have got bigger problems structurally than we have. The United States, with all of its disagreements in terms of the difference between federal and local, the polarisation that has taken place there makes it very, very difficult to govern. The sort of legitimacy of the state in many ways in America is under question in a way that it isn't in Britain.
29:38Lewis Goodall:France, we see the problems of the Fifth Republic, with Parliament that can't deliver a majority for anything, that relationship with the president, the unions and so on. Britain has got its problems, particularly around devolution in Scotland in the long term, what happens there. But actually, I think one of the disappointments about Starmer has been that for the first time, And we had a government with a big majority, which on paper you would think would be able to govern as it saw fit and have the strength of that system. And they haven't been able to do so. But I don't think structurally you could easily have a government and a prime minister.
30:07Lewis Goodall:Not easily, but you could have a government and a prime minister who could govern. And this one just appears not to be able to do so. Yeah, I heard Tony Blair the other day framing it in a rather similar way to you.
30:18Jon Sopel:Not the same way. He used his starting point, 2010, and he held this up. he's held up a smartphone and he said the invention of the smartphone and suddenly you know access to whatsapp access to social media meant that suddenly you've had six prime ministers since 2010 in the 15 intervening years whereas you know look at the sort of stability that you had before that and he says that you know exactly that i suppose the point that you're making that you just look at what's happened to our politics since the smartphone came along and you suddenly see the chaos that it has brought and the difficulty that it has led to in terms of governing well it's probably no surprise that as we've entered the kind of attention deficit era of our lives culturally
31:03Lewis Goodall:that that would feed into politics no surprise that as our own attention spans have lessened yeah that suddenly within politics the churn has increased and we've seen that in other places as as well, particularly in a system like ours, which is parliamentary rather than presidential. So you can't say, you know, that that's a definite sort of cause of it. But I think that it's clear technology is having a factor. But as I say, I think you could compete with that. I think you could beat it. But I just think you need even better leadership, even better quality of political vision than you did even in the past where it was essential.
31:33Jon Sopel:I wonder how the Thatchers or the Blairs, you know, master politicians who commanded, you know, had their flaws, but they were pretty effective political leaders in their own ways would have managed in the social media age i think
31:46Lewis Goodall:it's very interesting i obviously it's so hard to know but i think also you can look at a slightly different argument right and you can say in a way and i do think that blair and thatcher because they're the ones that we talk about as the most commanding the sort of titanic political figures right of the certainly the maybe even certainly election winners certainly big election winners but certainly since the 1970s you know they they dominated politics they were both colossus like in their in their period they defined their eras in so many ways you could make an argument to say that, you know, that is the unusual thing.
32:12Lewis Goodall:We were quite unusual in Britain having two clearly, whatever you think about them personally, exceptional political leaders who dominated politics in their own ways, in the ways that they did. Some of that was contingent and some of it was clearly down to them and the sort of people they were. That's quite unusual. If you go back to the period before, you do have more of a churn of prime ministers. You do have prime ministers. I think the average prime minister since the war has lasted for, I think this might have been before the trust period, so she might bring down the average, but let's exclude her.
32:40Lewis Goodall:I think it's three years and 11 months or three years and 10 months. You know, this is not, it's not unusual to have reasonably, in the grand sweep of British political history, to have a churn of prime ministers, to have no one who dominates. I think we're slightly conditioned by the Thatcher, Blair examples of thinking that's the normal. And actually, in British historical terms, it's not the normal. Right, another question now from Urza. I hope I'm saying this correctly. Bajkoli, you've all asked some of the toughest questions on television. when was the last time you were truly caught off guard by an answer oh that's good it's a great
33:11Jon Sopel:question but we were discussing it before we started the record and we were both scratching our heads thinking well when was that because it's so rare that politicians say something you think bloody hell i can't believe they've just said that i mean i suppose i had a slight sense of that when we interviewed uh lammy in his office at the justice department we had kind of tried to war game the interview and we thought he would close down any questions relating to closer relations with the european union and he didn't really close it down he kind of went there the question customs union that is not currently um would you welcome our policy that's not currently where we are but you can see countries like turkey with a customs union seemingly benefiting and seeing growth in their economy um uh and and again that's self-evident yeah and it is those
34:10Lewis Goodall:moments when politicians commit news in a way that maybe you don't necessarily expect them to to do and then that is the moment you have to be on the ball with it right and sometimes like one of the challenges is even making sure you're listening to hear it because sometimes you go back to an interview and you realise a politician has committed news or said something and you you weren't quite again you're already thinking about your next question because you're almost anticipating in your own head that they're just going to say what you think they're going to say and obviously that's the last thing you want to do right because then you've missed the moment although sometimes it can have the other effect as well because sometimes they might say something and then you go back almost asking them to reaffirm it so you've got it even cleaner or crisper and to really hammer it home and then they'll say no i don't mean it like that or something like that and therefore you undermine the story so it's kind of those little tricks
34:53Jon Sopel:The moments are few and far between. From when I first started in political journalism, Hesseltine walking out of Cabinet and there was one crew in Downing Street. There was an ITV crew. It wasn't a BBC crew. It was an ITV crew. And the political producer then came over to the BBC, a woman called Joy Johnson. And she was there in Downing Street and suddenly Hesseltine walks over to the Cabinet and says, I've just resigned from Cabinet. I'll be making a fuller statement later on. I thought, bloody hell, no one expected that. You know, sure, there'd been a row going on within the cabinet over the sale of Westland helicopters and all the rest of it.
35:27Jon Sopel:And, you know, relations with Europe and whether it should go to Sikorsky or whether it should go to someone else. You know, all of that was going on. But no one anticipated that Hesseltine would just walk out. And the real core, blimey, shocking moments happen very, very rarely indeed.
35:42Lewis Goodall:Yeah, I mean, I suppose the moments that it does happen is when, and again, something about which you have to be on your guard, right, is when politicians have a go at you, which sometimes they'll do and some do it more than others, right? Because then you have to, it becomes a slightly different exercise. It becomes more pugilistic and you have to kind of parry off what they're saying or they'll say, you don't really know this, do you, have you read this, whatever, you know? And you always, I'm always very conscious of that. That could happen at any moment. That's the moment of potential embarrassment.
36:09Lewis Goodall:And actually, if I were a politician, I probably shouldn't say this, I would do it more often, you know, because that's a, and it's a careful line. you don't want to be too aggressive because people don't like it. You can sound arrogant or conceited or you've got something to hide. But very often it can be quite effective, although you never know how it's going to go. Even worse, of course, when they decide to basically end the interview, which is when I was thinking about this is what I thought about. Galloway was the master of what we were just talking about in terms of being aggressive. He would routinely be aggressive.
36:36Lewis Goodall:So if you're going to interview Galloway, you kind of know you need to be prepared. I interviewed him on LBC last year and he'd basically done another interview where he said that he did not want his children to be taught that gay relationships are exactly the same and as normal as a mum and a dad and kids. And so I asked him about it, and this is what he said. Just to recap what you said there, I don't want my children to be taught that these things, i.e. gay relationships and heterosexual relationships, are equal because I don't believe them to be equal. We'll come back to the question of the other word you used, which is normality, but specifically on being equal.
37:07Lewis Goodall:Why aren't they equal?
37:08Jon Sopel:Lewis, we won't actually come back to it, because, first of all, that's not what this interview is about. you got this interview to talk about the election. Secondly, this is a clip.
37:16Lewis Goodall:You don't think that these are important remarks? Lewis, this is a clip of a clip.
37:20Jon Sopel:Lewis, this is a clip of a clip. It's an edited clip of an edited clip. No, it's not.
37:26Lewis Goodall:No, it's not an edited clip. No, it's not. It is a full 90 seconds of what you said.
37:32Jon Sopel:No, it isn't. You clipped out the point about the 97 genders. No, no, no.
37:39Lewis Goodall:That's a separate question. You chose... You clipped it out.
37:42Jon Sopel:Gender what? I don't think I don't know what I said. Gender what?
37:45Lewis Goodall:We just played what you said, Mr Galloway. We want to know.
37:48Jon Sopel:You clipped it out. Look, I'm not going to have a Barney with you because... I don't want a Barney.
37:52Lewis Goodall:I'm just trying to understand what you said.
37:53Jon Sopel:Look, I came on here to speak about the elections. Of course. Now you're ambushing me. It's not an ambush, Mr Galloway. With an edited clip. It's not an edited clip. It's an unedited clip. I've got a simple answer. Why aren't gay relationships equal to heterosexual relationships, Mr Galloway?
38:10Lewis Goodall:Listen to the whole thing tonight I've listened to the whole thing I've listened to the whole thing Why aren't Mr Galloway you're not No you're misleading my listeners in saying that You're misleading my listeners You're misleading my listeners in saying that Because we have not edited the clip That is a full 90 second exchange You did edit the clip You cut out the transgender bit The transgender bit is separate You are the one who chose to introduce Yes it is part of the longer two and a half minutes
38:38Jon Sopel:I'm going to hang up now because you fool me into thinking.
38:39Lewis Goodall:You don't want to explain yourself. It's not a fool. You're a politician. Oh, grow up, Mr Galloway. Come on.
38:44Jon Sopel:Or fool me thinking that your request that I come on and talk about the elections was genuine.
38:50Lewis Goodall:Of course it was genuine. Well, there you go. You heard it there. Mr Galloway refusing to.
38:56Jon Sopel:That is a great moment. I love you telling George Galloway to grow up.
39:00Lewis Goodall:Well, I mean, you know, I hate it. I don't know about you. My absolute bet noire is when politicians say that white is black. Well, A, that, first of all, it was not. I mean, obviously, I think Donald Trump has clearly been listening to that. And Galloway maybe should have taken some lessons. He'll probably sue me for$10 billion now, whatever it is. But, you know, yeah, that and just sort of mislead people about it. That's number one. But number two, also, when they come on and when they're a politician, it's fair enough with the sort of, you know, if someone's not a politician, you book them to come on about a particular subject and whatever.
39:28Lewis Goodall:When you're a politician at the time, he was the leader of a party. I don't know if he still is, but with the Workers' Party, you know, he'd been elected as an MP. I mean, you know, it's fair game for an interviewer to ask you about what they want to ask you about. Of course, you can give a heads up and say, and sometimes that's better because they'll have time to think about something. But ultimately, if you're a politician, you should be prepared to be asked about anything, particularly stuff you yourself have said. You can't then turn around in the middle of an interview and go, well, we agreed to do it about this topic.
39:59Lewis Goodall:We'd done that topic. And he'd said this a week before or whatever it was. and naturally I decided to ask him about it because guess what? He would have had gay constituents in his constituency who might not particularly have appreciated being told that their relationships are not as normal as a heterosexual relationship. Was there any comeback after that interview? No, I don't think so. I think that was it. You know what? I think it served us both well in our own ways. It was the first edition of the Sunday show and that got written up and he enjoyed having a go at me and that was it. There you are.
40:23Lewis Goodall:Win-win.
40:23Jon Sopel:All is not a zero-sum game. We will be back in a moment with a very important final question.
40:37Jon Sopel:the news agents so our final question really is a very important question to end this episode of the news agents on and i am as intrigued by the answer as all of you tony from glasgow thank you for your question i follow lewis on instagram thank you tony and it feels like every night he goes out for a fancy dinner. I wonder if he can cook himself a meal. I mean, let me just add Tony to the question. I wonder whether he ever pays for a meal because he's always putting photos and I wonder whether it's some dodgy deal. I pay for all my meals. Some dodgy deal. Oh, I had a wonderful meal at Joe's Cafe today.
41:20Jon Sopel:Pictures of the meal and all the rest of it. Come to Joe's Cafe.
41:23Lewis Goodall:Anyway, go on Lewis. No, I pay for all my meals. Are you going to the football again anytime soon? I pay for my... I've got a season to get. All right, well, this is going to get very early days, Keir Starmer, isn't it, very quickly? Because you've never had a meal out in your life, have you, John? No, I'm not posting endlessly pictures of how.
41:35Jon Sopel:Because you don't know how.
41:37Lewis Goodall:Until quite recently on Instagram, you were called John Le Savant for reasons no one understood. Right. Just answer the question, Lewis. Tony from Glasgow hasn't got all day. Look, I'm not one of life's great chefs. Fortunately, my wife has many, many talents, and she's a great cook. But, you know, the girl deserves an evening out now and again, doesn't she?
41:53Jon Sopel:The girl deserves an evening out now and again. She does. We just had you having a go at Galloway a moment ago. The girl deserves an evening out. She does. Oh, my God. The unreconstructed alpha male.
42:07Lewis Goodall:Again, I would say dodgy, dodgy territory once more. Louis Goodall. Do you want a few more facts about the Cook Islands? No. You do. Come on, you do.
42:16Jon Sopel:Just because you have spent the last half hour looking up obscure facts on the Cook Islands. Go on, then. Two more facts before we go.
42:23Lewis Goodall:Well, you know, once, can I tell you that Saturday the 4th of July, 1892, never took place on the Cook Islands. Because it went from the Gregorian calendar? No. The Gregorian calendar was well in place by 1892, John. What do you think it is? The Holy Roman Empire? Come on. But I'm close to the answer. No. They shifted on the international date line. They shift from being aligned with the Americas to Australasia in 1892. So they moved the international date line. So Saturday the 4th of July on the Cook Islands never took place. Another fact, there were no traffic lights on the Cook Islands. Rarotonga, which is the main island, has no traffic lights at all and until recently only had one roundabout, which locals still occasionally refer to as the roundabout.
43:04Lewis Goodall:So that's good, isn't it? Oh, and birthdays can be national events. Important birthdays, especially the 21st and 50th birthdays, often involve huge communal feasts where extended family and the entire island sometimes just turn up. We should do that.
43:17Jon Sopel:That is it from us, the newsagents. This episode was sponsored by the Cook Islands Tourism Board. Oh, you'd hate that. Where Lewis Goodall will be there.
43:24Lewis Goodall:I'll be having a lovely dinner there, won't I? Exactly.
43:26Jon Sopel:when we see the photos of Lewis eating supper in the Cook Islands we know what has happened we're off to Rarotonga baby we will see you on Christmas Day but in the meantime have a lovely run up to Christmas bye bye
43:39Lewis Goodall:bye bye
43:39Jon Sopel:this has been a Global Player original production
From the publisher
It's the final Q&A edition of 2025 and Jon and Lewis answer your questions - including the elections to look out for next year, whether algorithms are making the UK impossible to lead, plus - is there actually a decent case to be made in the defence of Keir Starmer?
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
