Why do the Conservatives have a problem with Muslims praying in public?

18 Mar 2026 · 41 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that Conservatives are increasingly hostile to Muslims in public, using a controversy over Ramadan prayers in Trafalgar Square. It discusses Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy’s claim that “mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination,” defended by Keir Starmer as “British values” rhetoric. The hosts contrast this with Trafalgar Square’s history of public religious events (Sikhs, Jews, Christians) and with the Ramadan “open iftar” attended by about 3,000 people including London mayor Sadiq Khan. Key examples cited include Conservative figures and online right narratives about “Islamists” and Muslim “bloc voting,” plus alleged double standards versus other faiths. The episode also covers a separate segment on GB News impartiality, featuring Alan Rusbridger’s investigation into Ofcom enforcement.

Guests

Alan Rusbridger (former Guardian editor; led the GB News review).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Context of the Controversy

1:03 to 2:20

Discussion on the remarks made by the Shadow Justice Secretary about Muslims praying in public.

“Her position is that the Shadow Justice Secretary is defending British values when he says Muslims praying together in Trafalgar Square are not welcome.”

The Iftar Event

2:20 to 4:20

Overview of the iftar event in Trafalgar Square and its significance.

“And the event that took place in Trafalgar Square was a collective breaking of the fast as Ramadan drew to a close in London.”

Nick Timothy's Perspective

4:20 to 5:40

Examination of Nick Timothy's comments on public prayer and perceived domination.

“at last, you've seen the light or words to that effect.”

Tommy Robinson's Influence

5:40 to 7:50

Discussion on Tommy Robinson's reaction and the shifting political landscape.

“It has been used by Christians and by no denomination at all.”

Political Ramifications

7:50 to 9:30

Exploration of the implications of the Shadow Justice Secretary's comments for the Conservative Party.

“And even in the last month or so, we had Kemi Bainock herself, who has certainly not resiled from Timothy's, Nick Timothy's comments.”

Multiculturalism vs Integration

9:30 to 12:40

Debate on the British model of multiculturalism and its challenges regarding Muslims.

“Well, the square is next to a church so I think you have to remove the church from this.”

Conclusions on Public Discourse

12:40 to 14:00

Discussion on the nature of public discourse and how it relates to religious expression.

“with regard to Muslims, which is, I think, where the sort of inconsistency comes.”

Evaluating the Conservative Party's Internal Dynamics

14:00 to 18:01

Explore the tensions within the Conservative Party and their implications on public perception of Islam.

“of his party because this all happened in Prime Minister's questions.”

Public Expressions of Religion in Politics

18:01 to 22:55

Discuss the changing landscape of public religious displays and their societal impacts.

“You don't have to worry about Nick Timothy.”

Double Standards in Religious Celebrations

22:55 to 25:56

Examine the perceived double standards in how different religious celebrations are treated in public.

“Zach Polanski is now a leading politician, second in the polls.”
Show all 19 chapters

Double Standards in Religious Celebrations

26:24 to 26:41

Examine the perceived double standards in how different religious celebrations are treated in public.

“Listen on our free global player app or the LBC app.”

Double Standards in Religious Celebrations

27:30 to 27:40

Examine the perceived double standards in how different religious celebrations are treated in public.

Media Accountability and Free Speech Concerns

27:41 to 28:00

Analyze the implications of media impartiality and the government's oversight of broadcasting standards.

“A new world investigation into GB News has found hundreds of shocking breaches of the rules of impartiality and accuracy.”

The Investigation into GB News

28:00 to 29:11

Understanding the investigation into impartiality breaches at GB News.

“have turned GB News into the reformed channel.”

Review Methodology Explained

29:11 to 30:54

Learn about the methods used to assess GB News programming.

“I want to get your response to Keir Starmer and him sort of throwing it back on Ofcom's plate in a second.”

Critique of GB News Programming

30:54 to 33:02

Examining how GB News programs exhibit bias and fail impartiality standards.

“same way the Met Police or any police force does, to complaints.”

Ofcom's Role and Response

33:02 to 37:18

Discussion on Ofcom's regulatory approach and its implications for broadcasting.

“They're all top-notch journalists, and I've read all their reports.”

The Role of Israel in Current Conflicts

42:01 to 42:46

Explore the argument that the U.S. involvement in conflict is driven by Israel's interests.

“This war is not being waged on behalf of American national security objectives to make the United States safer or richer.”

Changing Loyalties in the MAGA Movement

42:46 to 43:33

Discuss the shifting perspectives among MAGA influencers regarding Donald Trump's stance on Israel.

“And I'm telling you right now, MAGA is dead.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Less support through telehealth, but it feels overwhelming and rushed. Check out orderlymeds.com now. Orderlymeds.com was built to be different. Here, you connect with real doctors who take the time to understand your goals, review your eligibility, and guide you through a plan that's right for you. Orderlymeds provides access to proven GLP-1 medications like semaglutide and terzepatide, including both name brand options and personalized compound versions when appropriate. So you have choices backed by clinical oversight. not guesswork. It's a simpler, more supportive telehealth experience designed around people who want clarity, care, and confidence in their weight loss journey.

0:37And your medication is delivered directly to your home in discreet packaging. So your experience stays private from start to finish. Do your research, ask the right questions, then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. Again, that's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Individual results may vary, not medical advice eligibility required. See site for details.

1:02This is a Global Player original podcast. Her position is that the Shadow Justice Secretary is defending British values when he says Muslims praying together in Trafalgar Square are not welcome. Mr Speaker, even Tommy Robinson, I can hardly believe I'm saying this, has said today that if the Shadow Justice Secretary had made these hateful comments two years ago, the Conservative Party would have kicked him out. Now, Tommy Robinson isn't some sort of moral signpost. He was pointing out how much their party has changed. They're more inclined to his views, and he's right about that. The fact that he's stitting on her front bench shows she's too weak and has got absolutely no judgement.

1:47That is Keir Starmer talking about the Shadow Justice Secretary, Nick Timothy, who, commenting about a group of Muslims getting together in Trafalgar Square, to mark the iftar when Muslims break the fast during Ramadan, said mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. A row has now broken out between the two main parties. Is Kemi Badenokh prepared to disavow the words of her own Justice Secretary or does she agree with him? Welcome to the News Agents.

2:26The News Agents. It's John. It's Emily. It's Lewis. And the event that took place in Trafalgar Square was a collective breaking of the fast as Ramadan drew to a close in London. It's the final week. And the event was part of the Ramadan Temp Project Ramadan Festival. And around 3 ,000 people, including Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, attended this open iftar. and it was designed to be for all faiths, for races and backgrounds, united in the heart of our capital to break the fast, honour the values of the holy month and send a message of hope. That was the message of Sadiq Khan. Nick Timothy has seen it in a completely different way, pointing out that actually in Trafalgar Square, across the road is the church, St Martin's in the field, and that actually doing this so close to a church was showing active domination as if we are bigger than you and intimidating the people in the church.

3:27Yeah. And his tweet was accompanied by a picture of people praying, you know, bending down on their knees. And he put out this post which suggested somehow it was threatening to the fabric, the Christian fabric of the country. And just to read that tweet, he says, too many are too polite to say this, but mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The Adham, which declares there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger, is when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. Perform these rituals in mosques, if you wish, but they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions.

4:06So he is, I guess, making the point that Trafalgar Square should be a public place. and if you want to pray or in his words call for the domination of Muhammad and Allah, do it in your mosques. He has been cheer led on by Tommy Robinson who has said, at last, you've seen the light or words to that effect. The Overton window shifted. Thank you, Nick Timothy, which is why Keir Starmer was referring to him. Let's just hear Tommy Robinson in his own words. I want to use this to congratulate. Where am I? blaze green room, but I want to congratulate and thank every patriot, everyone who stood up, everyone who refused to be silenced, everyone who played their part in shifting the Overton window so far, so much that a Conservative Member of Parliament now feels comfortable to state these facts.

5:03Now, if this would have been 12 months ago, 18 months ago, two years ago, no MP would have said anything like this. Do you know why? Because the left had the monopoly. They would have absolutely crucified him. The Conservative Party would have kicked him out. Do you know why now they can say this? Because of you. Because you took to the streets in your millions. You have given confidence to people to speak the truth and know that there's support for that truth, for that feeling, for that pride, for that courage, for all of it. It's there now. You did it. So just to clarify, Trafalgar Square has been used for Sikhs to celebrate their festivals, by Jews to celebrate Hanukkah, their festivals.

5:46It has been used by Christians and by no denomination at all. But only when the Muslims went to pray in the last week of Ramadan did it strike a chord into the shadowed Justice Secretary's heart that he felt the need to tweet. I think this has to be viewed in the light of a wider radicalisation on the right of British politics. I think Tommy Robinson's right. I think too, not often you say that, particularly on this show, but, you know, two years ago, three years ago, you probably wouldn't have had the shadow justice secretary saying something like this, basically saying that it's OK to be Muslim in this country as long as you're quiet about it and we don't see you.

6:28That's basically what the kind of critique is of saying this is an act of domination. But I think that not just in the Conservative Party, but on the right of British politics generally, we see again and again use the phrase, Emily, one of our favourites. You know, the Overton window is shifting and shifting and shifting. Well, now it's Tommy Robinson telling us about the Overton window. That's a change of the Overton window, isn't it? Tommy's window. So, look, you know, if we go back, say, five years or so, there was a sort of watered-down inquiry into accusations of Islamophobia or anti-Muslim sentiment in the Conservative Party.

7:03It found, even then, councillors calling for Muslims to be banned from the party, thrown from bridges, forcibly sterilised, members in anti-Islam Facebook groups, offenders nonetheless quietly reinstated after short suspensions. We had the then leader of the Conservative Party, I think he wanted to be leader at that time. Boris Johnson, you know, writing columns about women looking Muslim women looking like letterboxes. We had Suella Braverman when she was in the Tory party claiming Islamists were running the country. Lee Anderson, when he was in the Tory party, said they'd taken control of the London mayor.

7:34We see on the wider right, the online right in British politics, which is now the driving seat, the driving force of much of the right of politics now. Now, constant references to the idea that London in particular has fallen, partly because it's got a Muslim mayor that it's been taken over by Islamists. And even in the last month or so, we had Kemi Bainock herself, who has certainly not resiled from Timothy's, Nick Timothy's comments. In fact, she's defended him. You know, after the Greens won the Gorton and Denson by-election, basically saying that Muslims uniquely had voted because they were being sectarian, because there was a Muslim bloc vote, It's an accusation that she would never have made about other religions or other groups of people.

8:14So I think that, you know, you've got to see it in a party or in the guise of not just a party, but the sort of wider right, which seems uniquely to have a problem with Muslims. It isn't just and I think there is a legitimate conversation to be had about multiculturalism and multiculturalism versus integrationism and so on. But the target of their ire, whenever they're talking about multiculturalism, always seems to be the same group, i.e. Muslims. And that, if you're a British Muslim, I can completely understand, you would find that a big problem and troubling. And Emily, you talked about Trafalgar Square and the history of Trafalgar Square.

8:51I think what's really interesting is that, you know, one of the metaphors about the way that debate has become so polarised in this country is that in the public square you can't debate these ideas. Trafalgar Square is literally our public square. It is where groups, left-wing groups, right-wing groups, protest groups, religious groups, nationalist groups, all sorts, will go to Trafalgar Square to kind of have their day out or whatever it happens to be. I'm looking at a picture right now of a group of presumably British Hindus celebrating Diwali. Or when Rishi Sunak... And the Easter procession or Hanukkah or whatever.

9:28it happens to be. Okay, so to put Nick Timothy's point in full, because he's just responded to some of the criticism in the last three hours, he said the point is not that Sikhs have danced on Trafalgar Square or that the Passion Play has been hosted there, neither is the point that Muslims have gathered on Trafalgar Square the point is that mass ritual prayer in public, he says next to a church, is an act of domination. Well, the square is next to a church so I think you have to remove the church from this. But I guess what he's pointing to is an idea that when people gather of whatever their faith or whatever their creed, you can dictate what they do and don't do, right?

10:09So are you really going to say, well, come on Sikhs, you're allowed to dance, but no praying, right? You're allowed to gather and celebrate the end of the festival of Ramadan, but no praying. Do you understand what they're saying when you call them dominant? Or is it just the fact that a lot of people turned up? I mean, is it the language? Is it the fact? Is it the motion of prayer? Or is it just that he got scared by the number? Right. And I don't still think from his tweet, even his explanation, we understand that. I don't understand how you differentiate between an act of prayer and an act of celebration or an act of festivity.

10:46Well, I suppose the answer to that would be, and this is where I think Nick Timothy has got this wrong, is that he is conflating Islam and Islamism. You know, an extremist interpretation of the Koran, which justifies kind of whatever is happening, attacks on whoever you want to attack and all the rest of it. Islam is not doing that. It's not that those Muslims are not seeking to... I don't think he's talking about Islamism. I think he is talking about Islam. He's talking about Adhan, which explicitly denies other religions, including Christianity. Frankly, Nick, every single religion thinks it is the most important religion because otherwise how would you ever get anyone to follow your religion?

11:28I mean, he said, I'm not saying everyone there is an Islamist. But then, I mean, that undermines itself. But the point is, the Pope thinks that Catholicism is the best religion. And the Jews think of themselves as the chosen people. Everyone thinks their own religion is the right religion. Otherwise, why on earth would you follow it? It's like following a football team. So, look, you know, if you are looking at areas where there is an attempt at domination, I mean, I think that Friday prayers in a lot of countries, you know, if you kind of see the Friday prayers that would take place in Tehran at the height of the revolution or other Middle Eastern countries, those were very political events.

12:00It was a chance to burn the stars and stripes, burn the US flag, burn the Israeli flag. You were, you know, you were enemies of the West. And there was a political movement to a lot of that. So would you say no Friday prayers should be allowed in Trafalgar Square? Well, I wouldn't say that. I would say that if it was becoming a deeply political event that every Friday people were gathering in Trafalgar Square and burning. And it was threatening. And it was threatening. Then, yeah, of course. Well, look, also, I mean, this ultimately goes down to or comes down to our model, the British model of multiculturalism, which is, as I say, basically, it feels to me that the one the Conservative Party is quite rapidly moving against and moving against in particular with regard to Muslims, which is, I think, where the sort of inconsistency comes.

12:43Because, look, I mean, if the objection, which you could make, and this is what a French style secularist would say, we have no religious events in public spaces because that goes against our... No headscarves, no crosses, nothing. Laicite, as the French say, secularism, because it's intimidating and the state doesn't permit it and non-religious people shouldn't have to see it or come into contact with it. okay you can say that but what you can't say or at least you can say it but then you start getting into some pretty dark territory i think is that um and you can definitely say what he's if we go down the french style that is very contrary to all of our country our kind of traditions but if it's muslim only events if you're basically saying you have a particular problem with muslim style group prayer not only is that inconsistent not only does it send a very quite dark message to to british Muslims but it's actually unlawful it would be unlawful religious discrimination because you would basically be saying that certain groups that we like or find unthreatening say Hindus or Sikhs or whatever can take to public squares and can celebrate and celebrate their religion but this particular group can't and so and that is just and that creates all sorts of problems for the French by the way their model has not succeeded either in fact and ours has been much more successful historically.

13:57So what is interesting I guess politically is where this leaves the leader of his party because this all happened in Prime Minister's questions. This is meant to be the chance for Kemi Badenok to fire five questions at the Prime Minister after which she has put him on the spot. And she tried to sort of talk through the relationship between Epstein and Mandelson, which obviously has been rumbling along pretty consistently since the beginning of this year. And he turned the tables on her and said, will you disavow your shadow justice? I don't know what it is about that role of shadow justice secretary, but everyone seems to become radicalised in a matter of weeks.

14:33You know, darling Jenrick has now fled the party in Suella with him. But isn't it interesting that she is now in this fix where she's got to decide, right? She's got to decide whether she follows him or she slaps him down or she lets Keir have a win on this or she has to justify him. I mean, she's just come out yesterday, right, with, I presume, a very strong advisor in her ear who said, just sound rational, just sound normal, stick to economics, don't play the culture wars, don't follow Trump down this weird dark rabbit hole of wherever he's going, just be the person that sort of rises above it all.

15:14And now she's in danger of getting pulled into this totally new, right, cultural rabbit hole, which I don't think makes her look very strong. Well, I think that in every fibre of her being, she probably agrees with Nick Timothy. I think instinctively she agrees with Nick Timothy. So is that a winning recipe for the Tories? More Islamophobic? Well, I mean, she rejects the context of Islamophobia. I mean, that's part of this whole thing. Right. That's another way in which this, you know, I think Muslims find particularly problematic, which is that, you know, Kevin Badenock has disputed the existence of Islamophobia.

15:50You can have anti-Muslim hatred, but her argument will be, and this is a sort of received wisdom on the right now, that you can't have Islamophobia and you shouldn't have a definition of Islamophobia because we want to be in a position of critiquing Islam. So that's been another kind of front in this ongoing battle on the right. I do think one of the huge changes that has taken place over maybe a 20, 30 year time span is the sort of public show of religion. that actually when I was growing up, I didn't see menorahs being put up in public for Hanukkah. You didn't see them around. And do you like that?

16:24Well, I just think it's something that has changed. When I moved to America and, you know, the building where the BBC is on kind of M Street, you know, it got to Hanukkah and a menorah went up. And I thought, really? Or political parties. This is a thing that started in the last few years. It's sort of part of digital life, I think, you know, sort of political parties wishing you a very happy Easter. like this is from all the lads at the Labour Party we wish you were very happy Easter or you know actually the Conservative Party tweeting out like pictures of a crucifix and going hallelujah he is risen on Easter Sunday and like it's quite new right these sort of like forcible expressions of religion.

17:00But it's interesting I was asking our sort of wider team here you know does anyone else you know trying to gauge a sense does anyone find that uncomfortable you know are we we work right next to Trafalgar Square if you walk past that would you find it uncomfortable And actually, quite interesting to hear some of the views, which is like, no problem with that. But if that was a Jewish festival, I would be more worried. I'd be more worried about the anti-Semitism because we know that anti-Jewish crime is much less picked up than anti-Muslim crime. You know, I think the anti-Jewish crime is half as often prosecuted as anti-Muslim crime.

17:39So, you know, their point was like, I love everyone being able to celebrate in Trafalgar Square. But if I was Jewish, I wouldn't want to be at an event like that because I wouldn't feel safe. Frankly, I would not feel safe. But that is also the point. I'm sure that's true. But it also illustrates the point, right, is that there is no way if there was a celebration of Judaism of whatever form in Trafalgar Square. Nick Timothy ain't complaining about it. Right. There's no way in a million years. You don't have to worry about Nick Timothy. No, of course. So it's different worries. But just, you know, in terms of particularly, I mean, for example, I mean, you know, imagine I mean, it is, you know, Ramadan is coming to an end.

18:12Ede, I think, on Friday. I mean, imagine, I mean, that's another element of this, right, which is the timing. Imagine if in the Jeremy Corbyn era of the Labour Party, or even today, someone from the Labour left, you know, who had been accused of anti-Semitism in the past or whatever, you know, had decided in the week of Hanukkah or whatever to, you know, really criticise a Jewish festival or whatever it happened to be that has taken place in Trafalgar Square, there would have rightly been uproar about it. But on half of British politics at the moment, there will basically be some applause for Nick Timothy, for, you know, saying the brave thing.

18:44And ultimately... Well, that's his first line, too polite to say this. So what he's... I mean, he is coming from a very similar place, I think, of generic, which is, it's that kind of, are you thinking what I'm thinking? You won't dare say it, but I'm doing the work for you. I think what a lot of Muslims worry about, a lot of, you know, those of us who believe in a pluralistic society, which is until recently, what, you know, was something of a consensus in British politics, that there is a sort of systematic effort going on on the right, particularly online now, to present ordinary Muslim religious life and civic life as inherently threatening, as inherently dark and sinister and antithetical to British life.

19:25And I think to hear that basically being articulated, at least to some extent, from the Conservative frontbench, I think that is new, or at least it is part of a trend which has not been advised to British life. The Jews in this country do feel threatened, not by Islam, not by Muslim prayers in Trailer Square, but they do feel threatened by the protests that have become so dominant in parts of central London over the last two years, which have been anti-Jewish, which have had anti-Semitic elements, not all of them, but there has been a very steady anti-Semitic element to them. And so I think what has happened is that, you know, Badenock and others have been on pretty clear ground when they've condemned the anti-semitic rhetoric of some of the marchers right which has taken place week after week but this has spilled into a question of prayer.

20:14I think you've got to distinguish between the sort of what is religious faith and you know the idea that a protest could take place outside a synagogue or a synagogue itself would be attacked when worshipers are just going to practice being a Jew or an attack outside a mosque because someone happens to hate Muslims, as happened in Finsbury Parka a while back. I think that is just reprehensible. I think that anyone should be able to practice their faith how they want to. And if they want to have a Hanukkah, you know, as happened around my way, you know, last December, that they were going to be the first night of Hanukkah, they were going to be the light, candles were going to be lit on the, you know, near where we live.

20:56And it was a public event and there was no problem at all. and it was kind of very nice and community driven fine but that's not the same as supporting the state of israel or hating the state of israel supporting iran or hating the state of iran i think it's just the conflation between if you are a religious person if you're a jew you support israel if you're a muslim you support the and that's dangerous by the way and that is so dangerous that is the stuff that i find really obnoxious and i just think that the trouble with the nick thing is that there that was about faith i don't think it was about domination i think it was about people he made that connection yeah and he made that connection and and i think it has to be viewed in through this lens which we're seeing more and more of on the right of british politics which is to basically make the idea of britishness more and more exclusive and that isn't just limited to race and islam by the way although they do focus on that a lot what have we seen as an increasingly central part of the online discourse on this we've talked about it on the show before over the last year or so the idea that for example rishi sunak not a muslim a hindu isn't english or isn't british and that has an inherently racial element right which is basically to make the idea of englishness or britishness white intrinsically white intrinsically um sort of intrinsically against someone who has come to this country either recently or not so recently and also you know fused into that something we see more and more of which i think you again if you're a leading politician you have to be wary of if you're talking about you know muslim domination of public spaces which is the idea of the great replacement theory which has again become absolutely central on the right i'm not saying timothy's articulating that exactly but this is the sort of thing which was once completely fringe and has become more and more central so it It's incumbent, I think, on leading politicians to be careful about what sort of flames they're fannying.

22:54And in that space, I think you'd also have to throw the Greens, right? Zach Polanski is now a leading politician, second in the polls. You mentioned Gordon and Denton. And part of their campaign was, I mean, it was very two-pronged. They had, you know, the lovely plumber from Greater Manchester. I'm a plumber, I'm a plasterer. And, you know, that spoke to huge numbers of people who said, great, you know, here's a practical woman, a can do woman. Great. Let's have her. And then they ran this sort of separate campaign, which was in Urdu, which was talking to specific parts of the community, which was not kind of explaining in Urdu about bin collection or explaining in Urdu about how to do your recycling, which had pictures of Modi, Narendra Modi, alongside Keir Starmer, as if to say, do you realise what Keir Starmer is doing?

23:44They ran a foreign policy campaign in the middle of Gorton and Denton. And I do think they have to take some responsibility. I mean, that is unprecedented. I mean, the Conservatives have done that about Kashmir in the past. And, you know, it's not completely unprecedented. I mean, maybe we should stop that more collectively. Yeah, I mean, you know, I sort of think if we're talking now, if we're treating the Greens as a grown up party, if we're treating their leadership and, you know, him as a major player now, which he will be in the next election, You do have to ask a question about whether you want to run sort of, I don't know, micro targeting different campaigns to different communities in different languages, talking about completely different things.

24:21It's not about it's not a linguistic point. It's about running completely different campaigns to try and speak to people about completely different issues in a way that is nothing to do with who actually represents Gorton and Denton. just going back to the example of france when i was paris correspondent i did a piece about laicite about the fact that you can have no religious symbols in school or in federal buildings and it was i think the row was over sikhs wearing a turban and so i was sent by the local prefecture to a school which was they were going to talk about how this is how they operate and there are no religious symbols it was december i arrived at this school and there's an enormous Christmas tree in the foyer to the school where they're talking.

25:03Pagans. Pagans. That's all right. It's a festive tree. It's not a Christmas tree. It's a festive tree. And I've done reporting on the Lestey in France as well. And that is precisely the kind of double standard which fuels resentment and actually fuels some of the extremism that actually has become a bigger problem in France. Not to say we don't have a problem because we do, but generally speaking, a bigger problem in France because radical elements, right, are able to say to maybe disaffected, potentially quasi-radical young Muslim guys in France, they're able to say, look, they don't like you.

25:34They don't want you here. They don't think you're actually French. And the evidence of that is all around you because they say there's licensure and there's no religious expressions, but there is for Christianity. And that has been the strength of the British system. And that's why I think we've got to be pretty careful about going down, basically institutionalising that double standards that I think that Timothy, Nick Timothy, would unwittingly do with his approach. We'll be back in just a moment on Ofcom and GB News.

26:23fuel costs for Keir Starmer to say yes to President Trump and send the Navy to protect Hormuz. The fallout of the Iran war. Follow it live on LBC. Listen on our free global player app or the LBC app. Are you trying to get weight loss support through telehealth, but it feels overwhelming and rushed? Check out orderlymeds.com now. Orderlymeds.com was built to be different. Here, you connect with real doctors who take the time to understand your goals, review your eligibility, and guide you through a plan that's right for you. Orderly Meds provides access to proven GLP-1 medications like semaglutide and terzepatide, including both name brand options and personalized compound versions when appropriate.

27:04So you have choices backed by clinical oversight, not guesswork. It's a simpler, more supportive telehealth experience designed around people who want clarity, care, and confidence in their weight loss journey. And your medication is delivered directly to your home in discreet packaging. So your experience stays private from start to finish. Do your research. Ask the right questions. Then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. Again, that's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Individual results may vary. Not medical advice. Eligibility required. See site for details.

27:41The News Agents. A new world investigation into GB News has found hundreds of shocking breaches of the rules of impartiality and accuracy. Yet Ofcom has repeatedly refused to take action. Andrew Neil says, just as Fox basically became the channel of Donald Trump, it is clear they have turned GB News into the reformed channel. We cannot let GB News propaganda turn our great country into their version of Trump's America. Either the government rules aren't fit for purpose or Ofcom isn't properly enforcing them. Prime Minister, which is it? Prime Minister. Well, he's right to raise an important question of free speech and our media.

Read the full transcript

28:33It is a matter for Ofcom and it's important that we let them deal with it. A really low-key response from the Prime Minister there to Ed Davis, who is talking about a major two-month-long investigation by the magazine New World into these breaches of impartiality at GB News. And what it focuses on primarily is not the breaches themselves, but the fact that Ofcom seems to consistently turn a blind eye to what is going on on that channel in a way it doesn't to other broadcasters. Well, the person who has run that investigation is Alan Rusbridger, former editor of The Guardian. and he joins us now.

29:12I want to get your response to Keir Starmer and him sort of throwing it back on Ofcom's plate in a second. But first, Alan, just set up for us what you went in to look at and what you found. Well, the problem with GB News is that it's got a very loyal audience who are broadly reform sympathetic and they never complain about it. Why would you? The regulator Ofcom only acts if people complain. So I thought it would be a good idea if we got a bunch of professional journalists from a range of backgrounds and newspapers and magazines and TV stations to do what most people are not doing, which is to watch the output, especially the evening programs.

29:56So we picked 15 hours of television, got 20 reviewers. Each program was reviewed by two people and asked them just to market against Ofcom standards, accuracy impartiality a range of voices due context due challenge all the things you'll be familiar with from your bbc days but this was specific ofcom regulations it wasn't like do you like the program no no no no and and nor were they asked do you do you agree with the political views it's just are you are they meeting the standards yeah exactly and we asked them to mark nought to five five completely compliant with Ofcom not at all overall it was 1.5 and then we went to Ofcom and said who's complaining about these programs and it was like no complaint no complaint no complaint one complaint so something has happened where the regulator is just not doing its job you've just said that a really interesting point which is Ofcom responds as presumably in the same same way the Met Police or any police force does, to complaints.

31:05Or the water companies. Right. And if there aren't complaints, then they don't feel the need to investigate. With the BBC, it is public money. We've all been in the middle of that. We know how strongly people feel about the public broadcaster because it's their own money. And when they see something, boy, do they complain if they don't like it. With Ofcom, you simply don't watch it if you don't like it. And therefore, yeah, nobody complains. planes and ofcom hasn't got any material to work with right isn't that the problem you know there's a case for opinionated tv um and um kia starmer's rather weak response talked about freedom of expression fine but that's not the law the law distinctly set up broadcasting to be different from fleet street fleet street highly opinionated and the idea was to have something that was tried to be impartial.

31:58And Andrew Neil said it. Andrew Neil, who set up this station, I spoke to him for this piece, and he said they've allowed it to become reform TV. Well, we know that in Hungary, Berlusconi's Italy, the leading party would have its own TV station, but I don't think that's what we ever wanted in this country. Alan, just let me ask you this about your methodology. were the people you had to review the programming were they of political like mind to you? I think they were right across the board so I've listed the publishers they work for The Economist, The Spectator, The Sunday Telegraph The Times, The Guardian, GQ so I think they're a pretty mixed bunch because we've just had a statement from GB News in the last few moments saying it now makes perfect sense because it is clear their so-called investigation is as partisan as it alleges our audience to be and its conclusions are as fundamentally flawed as its approach lacks objectivity and impartiality well there you go pot calls kettle black but don't you think there's anything to that no because i know who these reviewers are we didn't name them all because some of them are still working for publications that don't welcome them freelancing elsewhere.

33:22They're all top-notch journalists, and I've read all their reports. They've given timestamps, examples. Anybody can go back and check what their opinion is. And I thought it was a first-class piece of work. Give us an example then. Just to sort of put in an example of where they thought that the episode they're watching or the program they're watching would have come out with 1.5 % out of five. Well, there's a Matt Goodwin, reform candidates. So four days before he declared himself as the candidate in Gorton and Denton. And he ends this program by saying, oh, look, there's this by-election coming out.

34:03I think Labour are rubbish. I think reform might win. Four days later, he's the candidate. So this is a very interesting example of how the station works. So the four subjects that he tackled that day were all to do with immigration. This is a follow-on from your discussion about Nick Timothy. So they were, is Europe being overwhelmed by Muslims? Are too many Muslims coming here on boats? What do we do about the Muslims in refugee camps? And look what the Muslims are up to in the Netherlands. So the choice of subject immediately says these are all reform subjects. and he then will have four to one guests, people four agreeing with him and one not.

34:51He will be very abrasive and aggressive in interrupting the one person who doesn't agree with him. He ran a poll about who was agreeing with him and who wasn't. 97 % in the poll agreed with him and 3 % didn't. Putin figures. And they would have a sort of token lefty. They had one item on the Chagos Islands and the token lefty who works in PR said, oh, I'm afraid I don't understand that issue. So the bias throughout this programme is absolutely, I mean, you couldn't keep a straight face unless you're a GB News spokesman and actually defend that as being impartial. So why do you think Ofcom allows this to happen?

35:32It's not just about complaints. Ofcom sets rules on the standards that broadcasters have to upkeep. And it's not just about the BBC, as Emily was saying, which of course is publicly funded it's about sky it's about itv both of whom are channels that take this stuff really seriously well it when you listen to offcom people speaking they now talk about freedom of expression more than um impartiality and i think something has happened in the mindset there's a i looked at um you probably remember this that the offcom looked at the today program in 2017 who had nigel lawson on talking decrying climate change 12 page report from Ofcom saying this is disgraceful you didn't challenge him I mean really second by second analysis of the program and now nine years later they're just waving this stuff through so something has definitely happened I asked to speak to Ofcom having agreed to meet me they then said they wouldn't Do you think Ofcom's not fit for purpose?

36:34I think in this in this realm absolutely not and I asked Andrew Neil this question because Andrew Neil left the station when it was apparent which way it was going and he just said he thought they were just not up to it. Do you think they're scared of GB News? I mean is it a money thing or is it a fact that they don't think it's kind of public so they don't really care? GB News is very aggressive and tends to sort of challenge or judicially review and that costs them a lot of money. I think the problem is that it's gone on so long now it's difficult now to see how they would step in i mean there is a new chairman arriving at gb news soon uh gb news at ofcom uh you've muddled the two up sometimes uh michael grade is stepping down um and it remains to be seen whether a new chairman will come in and say come on we've got to to tighten us up because as the davy question said it can't be right for one political party to effectively have their own channel.

37:33So let me just read you what Ofcom have said in a statement. Our rules around due impartiality and accuracy in news ensure that audiences aren't misled and are offered a range of alternative views and perspectives. Importantly, due impartiality doesn't mean strictly impartial or neutral, nor is it a mathematical construct where equal airtime must be given to each opposing view. how broadcasters achieved due impartiality is not dictated by the regulator. It's an editorial decision for them and Ofcom does not impose a single approach. I don't even understand what that means, do you? Well, it means that you can do what you like, I think.

38:13So if you asked Ofcom if they thought GB News was impartial, they would have to say yes. I assume so, because they're not doing anything about it. There was a complaint recently about, there's a presenter called Bev Turner who interviewed Donald Trump in November. The most fawning interview was a former Ofcom regulator, of course, Chris Bennett-Vala, who set the standards when he was there, and he said it was just the most egregious example he had ever seen of a interviewer sitting there basically agreeing and urging the president on. And so the president says things like climate change is a hoax, the Chinese make wind farms but there are no wind farms in China things that are easily disprovable a 16 year old journalistic intern would know to push back on a challenge her response to that was to say oh it's wonderful that you drop all these truth bombs it gives people such joy 32 people complained about that to Ofcom and their response was well later in the middle of the night they had guests who did challenge us that so that's fine um i mean it it is an extraordinary approach so just bringing keir starmer at this point because he's asked directly by ed davy what are you going to do about ofcom and keir starmer seems to say well that's for ofcom yeah it's like haven't i got enough problems are you wanting to deal with ofcom as well i'm not going there well i think it's a problem about regulation when i was talking to andrew neil he said he said i think actually Britain is bad at regulation this devastating Channel 4 series on off water it feels to me a parallel we want clean water we want clean information in this country and the regulators are letting us down and I can see why Starmer's in some difficulty because Boris Johnson had a completely different approach you may remember when he got in Paul Dacre he obviously thought the way to nobble this is to put in somebody who thinks like me and when that failed there was this plot that nadine doris described where some black arts people in number 10 tried to put in a tory pier to run it and they ended up with michael grade after a two-year hiatus but i think it's a challenge if you're kirsten because something has gone wrong and i i would have thought he would he should be getting lisa nandy the culture secretary or the common select committee to ask some basic questions.

40:50I mean, just watch the stuff with a clipboard and you'll see that this is driving a coach and horses through what the regulations are. Alan Rutz-Bridge, thank you so much. Not at all.

41:16eczema glutide and terzeptatide. No guessing, just a more supportive experience and all shipped directly to your door in discreet packaging. Do your research, ask questions, then visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast for an exclusive offer. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Individual results may vary. Now medical advice eligibility required. Seasite for details.

41:41The News Agents. And just before we go, we thought we'd hear from erstwhile members of the Donald Trump fan club. Being a Trump supporter or being part of MAGA does not mean you have to accept another Middle East war without questions. This is Israel's war. This is not the United States' war. This war is not being waged on behalf of American national security objectives to make the United States safer or richer. This war is not actually even about weapons mass destruction, nukes, chem bio. No, this war is waged purely because Israel wanted it to be waged. This is embarrassing. We are the United States of America.

42:26Why are we allowing a foreign country to occupy our government? And now we see we I was removed from a religious liberty commission because I dared to speak out against Israel. It's no longer conspiracy, Pierce. What Israel wants, Israel gets. And we're witnessing that. And I'm telling you right now, MAGA is dead. Wow. So you will have probably recognized some of the voices in that compilation, including Megyn Kelly, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson. These are people who have been so strongly part of the MAGA influencer base. and they are now telling Donald Trump that he is wrong to prosecute this war in Iran, that he is Israel's puppet.

43:13I mean, we can read into that what we will. And that they no longer stand alongside him. What we're asking in the News Agents USA this week is how widespread that is. And what do people close to Donald Trump make of that? We've got an interview with somebody who's been right at his side for decades. We'll see you there. Bye bye. Bye for now. This has been a Global Player original production.

From the publisher

Nick Timothy is the Conservative shadow justice secretary. This week, he took issue with Muslims gathering in Trafalgar Square to celebrate the last week of Ramadan and the breaking of the Iftar fast with prayer. He called the gathering an "act of dominance" in a Christian country - right beside a church. Does Kemi Badenoch agree with him? Tommy Robinson certainly does...

Later - why has Ofcom got no teeth when it comes to GB News? A major investigation by The New World puts the question to the media regulator. And gets little response. Sir Ed Davey raised it with the Prime Minister today. Has GB News simply become 'Reform TV'? We speak to Alan Rusbridger.

The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/

More from The News Agents

All 385 episodes
Why do the Conservatives have a problem with Muslims praying in public?The News Agents · 41 min
Listen in VO