In short
Podcast Summary: The News Agents - Episode: "Why does Kemi Badenoch want an even smaller Tory party?"
Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Emily Maitlis, Jon Sopel, and Lewis Goodall delve into the political maneuvering of Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative Party in the UK, as she aims to steer the party further to the right. The episode debates whether this strategy is effective for attracting voters or if it risks alienating a significant portion of the electorate. The discussion shifts later to U.S. foreign policy under Trump regarding Iran, focusing on the implications of potential military intervention amidst ongoing protests in the country.
Key Themes and Discussions
Kemi Badenoch's Leadership and Strategy
- Rightward Shift: Badenoch asserts that the Conservative Party should move further to the right, indicating a rejection of centrist ideas and urging moderates to "get out of the way."
- Party Dynamics:
- Recent defections to the Reform Party (e.g., Robert Jenrick, Nadim Zahawi, Suella Braverman) highlight internal conflicts.
- Badenoch's rhetoric suggests a strong stance against any centrist opposition, potentially isolating moderate voters.
- Critique of Strategy:
- The hosts debate the wisdom of Badenoch's approach, questioning whether it may alienate moderate voters crucial for election success.
- Historical context is drawn from previous British politics, where successful parties maintained broader coalitions.
- Prosper Movement: A response from moderates within the Conservative Party, seeking to reinvigorate centrist ideas and potentially attract voters that are currently swaying towards the Liberal Democrats.
Broader Implications for Conservative Party
- Political Landscape: The discussion reflects on the need for political parties in the UK to adapt to changing voter sentiments and the dangers of narrowing their ideological base.
- Conservative Identity: The episode questions whether Badenoch's tactics will resonate beyond her party's right-wing base, potentially leaving a void for centrist voters seeking representation.
U.S. Military Intervention in Iran
- Trump's Military Threats: The conversation shifts to Trump's remarks about deploying a "beautiful armada" to Iran, amid ongoing protests and governmental crackdowns on dissent.
- Protester Dilemmas: The hosts discuss the desperate situation faced by Iranian protesters, confronting severe government repression and questioning whether U.S. military action would genuinely support democracy or serve American interests.
- Perspectives from Iranian Activists: Insights from an activist highlight skepticism about U.S. intentions, asserting that Iranian needs for autonomy and democratic representation are often overlooked in geopolitical maneuvers.
Key Takeaways
- Badenoch's Leadership: Her insistence on a rightward shift may strengthen her base but risks alienating moderate voters, potentially endangering the party's electoral prospects.
- Political Strategy: The need for a broad coalition within political parties is underscored, as narrowing ideology may drive voters to seek alternatives outside the current party structures.
- U.S. Foreign Policy Complexity: The episode illustrates the intricate balance between supporting international democracy and pursuing national interests, particularly in volatile regions like Iran.
Conclusion This episode of *The News Agents* provides a comprehensive analysis of Kemi Badenoch's leadership approach within the Conservative Party and the implications of U.S. military threats against Iran. The hosts skillfully dissect the evolving political landscape while emphasizing the importance of staying attuned to the needs of diverse voter demographics.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOKemi Badenoch's Approach
1:00 to 2:00
Discussion on Kemi Badenoch's strategy to renew the Conservative Party.
“It's Lewis and Kemi Badenock, as I say, she's trying to get back on the front foot.”
The Shift to the Right
2:00 to 4:00
Exploration of Badenoch's rejection of centrist ideas and its implications.
“about her rightward direction for the party need to get out of the way.”
Defections and Responses
4:00 to 6:00
Analysis of recent defections from the Conservative Party and Badenoch's reactions.
“We're in the business of helping conservatism.”
The Rise of Centrism within the Party
6:00 to 8:00
Discussion on the emergence of a centrist group within the Conservative Party.
“Either you represent all strands of left opinion or the conservative case right opinion, or somebody is going to represent those voters for you.”
Kemi Badenoch's Political Strategy
8:00 to 10:00
Critique of Badenoch's dogmatism and its potential impact on elections.
“And she's got to remind people that she does have a message and a place.”
Coalition Building in Politics
10:00 to 12:20
Examination of the necessity for broad coalitions in successful political parties.
“But of course, as we know, when he got into office, he was dry as dust economically.”
The Future of the Conservative Party
12:20 to 14:01
Speculation on the Conservative Party's direction and challenges ahead.
“And I think if he were back here now, presumably he would be much closer to the sort of generic position on immigration.”
The Shift in Political Strategy
14:01 to 14:48
Discussing the shift in political strategy by Farage and Badenoch and its implications.
“You know, it's all very well being your authentic self, but in which case, you should just be a party of one.”
Badenoch's Alienation of Voters
14:49 to 15:29
Exploring Badenoch's approach to politics and the risk of alienating core voters.
“But they are trying to broaden the appeal and bringing new voters to the tent.”
Implications for the Labour Party
15:30 to 16:05
Examining how the current situation presents opportunities for Keir Starmer and Labour.
“it kind of goes back to the discussion we had on Monday.”
Show all 18 chapters
US Military Intervention in Iran
16:34 to 18:28
Analyzing the potential for US military intervention in Iran amidst current tensions.
“Discover how today's story affects your life.”
Protest Dynamics in Iran
18:29 to 22:20
Discussing the complex dynamics of protests in Iran and the regime's response.
“This is based on UN and external projections.”
Interview with Negin Shirai
22:21 to 28:01
A conversation with activist Negin Shirai about the situation in Iran and US involvement.
“shot to death there are people as you say still going out still trying to look as if they have protests within them, even at the funerals of their loved ones.”
The Iranian Struggle for Change
28:09 to 29:52
Discussion on the current struggles in Iran and international perceptions.
“But I think the message that's coming from inside the country is more out of frustration of international community who's been watching this massacre happening in the country and doing nothing about it.”
Geopolitical Influences on Iran
29:52 to 31:34
Exploring how foreign powers have impacted Iran's political landscape.
“They're saying the killing is justified and they have to kill people.”
Challenges Facing Iranian Protesters
31:34 to 34:38
Analyzing the difficulties faced by Iranian citizens in their protests.
“So it's a country that has been in a battleground of powerful forces.”
The Role of International Support in Iran
34:38 to 36:10
Emphasizing the need for international assistance for Iranian civil society.
“They believe it's another form of dictatorship in place.”
The Future of Dissent in Iran
36:10 to 36:42
Speculating on the possible outcomes of the current unrest in Iran.
“and they killed them and nothing has happened.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Andrew Marr:This is a Global Player original podcast. I was elected by Conservative Party members to renew and rebuild. That is exactly what I am doing.
0:20But we're not just renewing with policy, we are also renewing with standards, conduct, our discipline and our culture. and the people who don't agree with this direction need to get out of the way.
0:33Lewis Goodall:That was the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, trying to regain some momentum after that string of defections to reform, taking a quite unorthodox approach, basically saying to figures in her party's centre that she doesn't really want them.
0:48Andrew Marr:Is she right to say she won't be swayed by those centrists who may want to join her or is she cutting off a whole tranche of voters who just haven't made up their minds yet? Welcome to The News Agents.
1:06Lewis Goodall:The News Agents.
1:07Andrew Marr:It's Emily.
1:08Lewis Goodall:It's Lewis and Kemi Badenock, as I say, she's trying to get back on the front foot. Her party's obviously been rocked by this series of defections. We've seen Robert Jenrick, we've seen Nadim Zahawi, we saw Suella Bravman just this week. and of course one approach or one response you might take to that and some people have speculated this might be the case is to say okay reform are going off to the populist right the conservative party is going to be the place of the center right the moderate right and that is a sort of clear open vacant bit of political space which you could say kind of exists in british politics right now what used to historically be called one nation conservatism kemi bay knocking at speech today to Conservative members has taken precisely the opposite approach.
1:49Lewis Goodall:She has actually said in explicit terms that centrist ideas, and we can maybe talk about what that might mean, but centrist ideas are no longer wanted in the Conservative Party, arguing that one nation type Tories or others who have qualms about her rightward direction for the party need to get out of the way. In fact, she said explicitly that the party has been moving to the right every day and every week since she became leader. Yeah.
2:13Andrew Marr:I mean, that line, interestingly, was removed from the speech in its latter draft. Yes, for time, they said.
2:19Lewis Goodall:They said for time.
2:20Andrew Marr:Who knows? But I think we should try and unpack whether she is onto something here or whether she is just isolating people. Because she essentially, I guess, is fighting people on two flanks at the moment, or at least she would see it as a fight. she's losing Jenrick and she's losing Suella to reform. And as she said, it's not that they disagree with any of her policies. The way she put it was like they just wanted to be leader and it turns out that I am. To those who are defecting, who don't actually disagree with our policies, I will say, I'm sorry you didn't win the leadership contest. I'm sorry you didn't get a job in the shadow cabinet.
2:57I'm sorry you didn't get into the Lords, but you are not offering a plan to fix this country. This is a tantrum dressed up as politics.
3:08Andrew Marr:So she's kind of waved them goodbye. Off you go. You have your temper tantrum somewhere else. But she's also facing a sort of newer reformatted group, which had its inaugural reception last week, which is a movement called Prosper. And they are names of the One Nation Tory party from the past. frankly. They are Ruth Davison, they are Andy Street, they are Amber Rudd, either former leaders, former mayors, former MPs, former cabinet. And they have come together essentially to reinvigorate centrism within their party, believing that millions of moderate voters who might be conservative are now looking for a home.
3:54Andrew Marr:And I think what's really interesting is that just as they sort of put their heads above the parapet and said, you know, Kemi, we're trying to help you. We're in the business of helping conservatism. We want to breathe new life into the centre of conservatism. Kemi's gone, no, shut up. I don't need you. And I guess the point is she doesn't dare give ground to reform on anything that might be construed as a weakening of her position on immigration. So is she right to say, centrist, back off, back down, get out of my way, when so many of the seats at the last election could have gone to the Conservatives, but went instead to the Lib Dems?
4:35Lewis Goodall:I think she's wrong to say it, and she could have been right to sort of act as if she were saying it. And what I mean by that is this. Look, if you're a party, I think one of the big stories of British politics over the last 15 years has basically been, we're supposed to have a two-party system, First Past the Post kind of funnels voters into two of the big parties. That's how it's worked historically anyway. And in order to be, the Labour and the Conservatives want to be the main two parties. So in our system, what that means is you have to be big tents. You have to have big, broad coalitions.
5:04Lewis Goodall:And historically speaking, certainly for the post-war period, much of the post-war period, that was true. You know, the Labour Party had Jeremy Corbyn. Blair never tried to get rid of him. Conservative Party had people all the way in recent years from, say, David Cork to the left, Jacob Rees-Mogg to the right. They all existed within the same party. One of the stories of the last 10 years or so has been that these two parties, in their own different ways, have become narrower, more sect-like, more doctrinaire, more dogmatic. And the net result of that has been that they've become less popular.
5:33Lewis Goodall:And then they are both often surprised and express surprise that they have become less popular. The reason is, is because you're basically telling lots of voters not to vote for us. That's what they're basically saying. It's happened with the Labour Party, with the left. For example, I lose count sometimes of the number of sort of people on the Labour right, for example, who basically say they don't want left wing voters or they don't want these very left wing policies, but then get really angry with, say, people who are going to the Greens or whoever it happens to be, because they say you're going to split the vote.
6:01Lewis Goodall:Well, you can't have it both ways. Right. Either you represent all strands of left opinion or the conservative case right opinion, or somebody is going to represent those voters for you. I think the danger for Kemi Beidnock, I think she is right to say that much of the energy on the right of politics, in fact, on politics generally right now, is on the right rather than the centre right. I haven't heard lots of convincing kind of diagnosis or prescriptions from the centre of the Conservative Party as to the problems with Britain and what they're going to do about it. The problem is, so it's all very, it's fine in a sense to sort of focus your efforts on those things.
6:34Lewis Goodall:But you don't need to explicitly tell centrist voters not to vote for us or vote for you. Because in that case, you'll get the, as you hint at Emily, basically what you're doing is opening a big, big space open for, say, the Liberal Democrats to represent them for you.
6:48Andrew Marr:I don't think she's talking to voters. But voters could hear it. Of course. But I think what she's doing, funny enough, and what those around her are acknowledging is she's playing to her strength of dogmatism. And there is something about her demeanour. She's very straight talking. She's always enjoyed being straight talking. Her problem actually in the past has often been that her first line on a policy was great. And then as soon as you prod it and you go, what does that mean? Well, help me unpack that. Well, what are you saying about maternity leave? What are you saying about cultures that you don't agree with?
7:22Andrew Marr:She has nowhere to go. And I think what they've done is they've allowed her to sound strong. There is probably less to this, weirdly, than the sort of physical importance of its delivery. I was speaking to somebody in her team who said the Conservative Party under her leadership is not diverted one way or the other by reform or any other narrative. It's more about her retaining the direction she's set out. The right stroke centre narrative is one crafted by commentators, not her. And so I wonder if they're just giving her space to sound strong about something in a week when she might be buffeted by the Amber Rudds.
8:07Andrew Marr:She might be buffeted by the Suellas. And she's got to remind people that she does have a message and a place. and presumably there will be people who don't actually sit there questioning whether they are centrists or whether they might be centrists who just go, oh, I like her, she sounded strong, oh, that sounded credible, oh, she sounded competent. And if you're just going for those kind of adjectives, you're not, I mean, most people, frankly, are not ideological in the country. Most people don't sit there kind of working out where they are on the left to right sort of pH value system. They just kind of go, oh, I liked her, she spoke well or she sounded competent or she knows her mind.
8:46Andrew Marr:Maybe that's what they're playing for at this point.
8:48Lewis Goodall:Perhaps. But I think you can also say, look, I think Badenock's dogmatism clearly is a strength. It's also, I think, a profound weakness because you have to be a supple politician. If you're going to build a coalition that can win an election, which needs to be, at the very minimum, 30 % to 35 % plus, you need to expand.
9:03Andrew Marr:And how far that has come down. Yeah, you need to expand.
9:06Lewis Goodall:When Badenock, I mean, let's not forget, when Badenock became leader, the party was polling in the mid-20s, was winning council by election. Like, that's no longer the case. So she's got to expand. Her job is to expand the coalition. And so although I think I think ideologically, she is right to say that much, as I say, the energy of politics, at least on her part of the spectrum, is on the populist right. I can see why she wouldn't want to cede all of that ground to reform. But likewise, politics sometimes is about sending signals about who you are, even if it's not who you are. So, for example, David Cameron was always way more right wing than he appeared.
9:38Lewis Goodall:I mean, David Cameron was an unreconstructed neo-Thatcherite, certainly in economic terms. Right. But when he becomes leader, he sends off, you know, he's sort of doing press conferences where he's handing out smoothies and he's, you know, doing the famous going up to the Arctic and being seen, suggests that he cares about climate change because he's in the Arctic or the hug a hoodie thing, which he never really said. But it was a speech that kind of became associated with him. It sort of denoted a turn to a sort of compassionate, compassionate conservatism. But of course, as we know, when he got into office, he was dry as dust economically.
10:06Lewis Goodall:And that's what I mean. I mean, there was a greater awareness in the past that at the very least you had to send signals to the voters that you are alive to the fact that, you know, when you're constructing a political party, you're not building a sect, you're building a broad coalition. So I do think that, you know, Baden-Ock's insistence on ideological coherence is a curious thing to do precisely at the moment, precisely at the moment when space is opening up for her. So, for example, at the moment, we talked earlier in the week, haven't we, what is the difference between the Conservative Party and reform right now?
10:36Lewis Goodall:She's actually, there is a world where politically she could actually try and make a difference. What she's doing is insisting that there is no difference. It is a political strategy, but I'm not sure it's a very credible one.
10:46Andrew Marr:I'm not sure that's right. I think the... Well, can I read you a bit of the speech?
10:49Lewis Goodall:Let me just briefly say, she said this. A party that wants stronger borders and has done the work to leave the ECHR. A party that wants to stop bankrupting our country by de-industrialising and destroying manufacturing under the guise of net zero. We've done the work and will repeal the Climate Change Act. We're a party that will stop our country's welfare addiction. This is a part of people that wants to get on in life. We've done the work and have made a fully funded plan to scrap stamp duty.
11:12Andrew Marr:Which bit of that would Farage disagree with? Well, I think, interestingly enough, the welfare addiction is a really interesting place because she wants to gain conservative, traditional conservative economics against a party who, as we know, is very conflicted on whether they are fiscally to the left or fiscally to the right. I mean, immigration is centre stage for Farage, but I don't think he's worked out whether he wants to be a big state in a sort of Trumpian way, you know, or whether he wants to be conservative small state and bring down taxes. I think that is good ground for him.
11:44Lewis Goodall:Although we all kind of know what he thinks deep down. I mean, the party is certainly confused. I think we all know what Farage thinks. Well, Farage wants to be the leader of the Conservative Party.
11:51Andrew Marr:I mean, ideally, he'd like to be the, you know, a conservative prime minister. And this is his way round. But that actually takes us on to an interesting question, which is, has everything moved to the right a bit? And you invoke David Cameron. And obviously, if you think back to the austerity years now tempered in government by Nick Clegg and the Lib Dems. But look, you know, he still brought in an austerity agenda. He still brought in a bedroom tax, which was pretty horrific. He still brought in cuts to disability allowance. He was pretty right wing. And I think if he were back here now, presumably he would be much closer to the sort of generic position on immigration.
12:32Andrew Marr:Absolutely would be completely. So everything has shifted in a way. So I don't know whether she is giving up in policy terms anything particular on the sort of centre, centre left.
12:44Lewis Goodall:But I don't think Cameron, I agree. And as I said myself, I think that Cameron was a far more right wing figure than the kind of vibes he emitted and the press that he created suggested. So I think you're absolutely right. I think a young David Cameron today would absolutely be sensing where the kind of political winds were glowing and where the politics of the Conservative Party were. And he would place himself exactly in the middle of it. But I don't think he would have given a speech like that. I don't think he would have said in explicit terms to the party's centrist. And then that can be read, therefore, to the more centrist voters at large or, you know, people who may be centre right, but are a bit concerned about kind of the populist right.
13:19Lewis Goodall:Basically, we're not the party for you. That is a weird thing to say.
13:22Andrew Marr:But I think this all comes down to personality. That's exactly my point. And I mean, both Cameron and Blair, and obviously Cameron was frequently called the heir to Blair, were about this sort of big sort of public hug in a way. Come in. We will make you feel great. The sun let uplands away. You'll feel great. If you look at Farage now, and somebody recently said he's managed to make populism sound unpopular. It's quite hard now. The language coming out of Farage's mouth. It's not particularly welcoming. It's not warm. It's not cuddly. and I think Kemi is almost sort of imitating some of that this is who I am you need to come to me I'm not going to start coming towards you
14:00Lewis Goodall:yeah it's a social media age thing as well it's a kind of like the idea of being authentic is better than being authentic and strident yeah for sure although Farage I suppose my point is Farage I mean you mentioned the welfare stuff I've no doubt at all Farage doesn't really he definitely doesn't want to spend money on welfare but you're right they've been making those noises and sounding more statist but why have they been doing that they've been doing that precisely because they know as well they've got to broaden than their coalition. You know, it's all very well being your authentic self, but in which case, you should just be a party of one.
14:25Andrew Marr:But reform is an invention, don't forget. So reform is an invention about not being like other political parties. Therefore, you're starting with an absolute clean slate. And what is on it? People hate immigration that's too high. And then you're making up the rest as you go along. That's what we see from Farage the whole time. I mean, he's kind of making up the economic policy as he goes because he's got loads of people, Red Wall Labour voters that have now come over to reform because their standard of living isn't going anywhere are not going to want to see cuts to welfare particularly.
Read the full transcript
14:57Lewis Goodall:Oh, for sure. But exactly. But they are trying to broaden the appeal and bringing new voters to the tent. Whereas what I find curious about Baden-Ock, who, you know, speeches are always, I mean, I read the speech and, you know, there are some really interesting, there are some interesting parts of it. And she's clearly thinking about politics, you know, conceptually. But I don't understand a strategy which actively tries to alienate voters who not so long ago were part of your coalition. and you still have MPs. Let's not forget, she's now down to, what, 115 MPs? I mean, what does she want? These small centre-left MPs to go another one?
15:24Lewis Goodall:Yeah, yeah. I mean, how small do you have to get before you get the ideological coherence that you want, right? And I think, again, though, it kind of goes back to the discussion we had on Monday. I mean, you're absolutely right. There will be differences, particularly on welfare and kind of the role of the state, I think. But again, this schism on the right feels just increasingly, more than anything else, more and more personal. If Bainock is saying, basically, my agenda is not so far from Farage's or very similar. You know, my project is one of the right and Farage's project is self-evidently a project of the right.
15:53Lewis Goodall:Then it makes the whole schism even less explicable than it was before.
15:56Andrew Marr:Well, it's also very good news for Keir Starmer at this point. If Keir Starmer and the Labour Party just say, come on in, we will find a broad church. We will find a tent for you. We want all ideas. We want every idea and we want all the experience. Yeah, I don't think that the Prosper team are about to join Labour, but they're not being made to feel very welcome in the Conservatives right now. In a moment, is the US gearing up for military intervention in Iran? And what would that look like with Trump's so-called beautiful armada?
16:29News you can trust and the conversations that matter.
16:32Andrew Marr:With award-winning journalists at the heart of the stories from the UK and around the world. Breaking news here in Edinburgh. I'm Simon Marks. My American Week is next. Reporting from the heart of Cardiff. Discover how today's story affects your life. Listen on our free Global Player app or the new LBC app. LBC, leading Britain's conversation.
16:58The News Agents. And by the way, there's another beautiful armada floating beautifully toward Iran right now. So we'll see. I hope they make a deal. I hope they make a deal. They should have made a deal the first time. Iran doesn't know what is about to hit it.
17:19Andrew Marr:In other words, Trump is talking about a possible US attack with his beautiful armada, the USS Abraham Lincoln, which is stationed in waters now which would make it possible for it to attack Tehran. And if you think that this is about coming in to save democracy, if you think this is about America trying to be the world's policeman in a place that is going through the seeds of revolution or counter-revolution, the uprising of protesters against the regime, then many people inside the country are actually much more clear-sighted, much more sceptical about what Trump intends to do because he spelled out today and in recent days that this is still about a deal.
18:11Andrew Marr:This is still about a deal with the Iranian administration. This is a deal that would see Iran cleaned, cleansed of its nuclear capabilities. And so protesters now are really confused because they are dying in their thousands. We know that the The death toll sits somewhere between 20 ,000 and 30 ,000 in the last few weeks. This is based on UN and external projections. And the protesters are desperate to see someone, somewhere, take action against their regime. But is Trump's beautiful armada going to deliver them that freedom? Not so sure.
18:51Lewis Goodall:Meanwhile, there are continued crackdowns on dissents, continued examples of murder from the authorities reports just in the last 24 hours of a 19 year old influencer being shot dead by security forces and there continues to be of course an internet blackout which has prevented iranians from telling the rest of the world in the main what is going on nonetheless as these crackdowns really extraordinary report bit reporting from the ft today on this as these crackdowns have continued and got worse and public shows of dissent or displays of dissent on the streets have become less and less possible.
19:25Lewis Goodall:Iran is being gripped by all its social media internally, is being flooded by Iranian families showing pictures and videos of funerals of protesters. And they're doing something that you might not imagine. Families and friends dancing, clapping, clapping at the funerals as music blares all around them. Just listen to a bit of this.
19:57Lewis Goodall:So dancing at funerals, EFT says, not unprecedented in Iran, but nonetheless, this recent trend is going further, clearly as an act of defiance against the theocracy. Women dancing, when it's been banned previously, expressions of grief and joy, festive funerals are basically being transformed into an act of resistance, which tells you something about the feeling in Iran right now.
20:19Andrew Marr:Yeah, and we've been talking to people in the diaspora and some who have given us their contacts, friends, family on the streets of Iran and trying to paint a picture of what that is like right now. And of course, when Trump tweeted, posted, what, nearly two weeks ago, that help was on the way, many people took that as a sign that they could go out and protest. They were emboldened to actually head to the streets because for that glimpse, for that moment, they thought it meant liberation is on the way. They thought that if they went into the streets, their own government would be too scared to act against them.
21:02And clearly the opposite was true.
21:06Andrew Marr:And there is an eye hospital, the Farabee Eye Hospital, that has treated 1 ,000 eyes, we hear, in the last 10 days for pellet wounds. 17 people at least shot in both eyes. In other words, they are trying to blind people. They are trying to scare people who are in the crowds. And at some points they are just shooting point blank with rubber. I think that the fact I was told last night was the ratio of rubber to real bullets used to be four to one. And now it's more like one to two. In other words, they're not even pretending that they're just trying to disperse the crowds. They are trying to shoot people dead within them.
21:46Andrew Marr:And so you have people who might have been in two minds about what Trump, what America, what intervention looked like two weeks ago. But now they're saying, well, we need something, right? Is Trump and the US, Abraham Lincoln, the Armada, is that the only thing on offer now? and does anyone believe that what looked like the beginning of an overthrow of Khomeini at the beginning of this year looked like that was possible it was in the grasp doesn't look like that at all the army is clearly still on the administration side the protesters have been shot to death there are people as you say still going out still trying to look as if they have protests within them, even at the funerals of their loved ones.
22:36Andrew Marr:But I think the sense of whether we're about to see the overthrow that, I mean, you were talking about here on the news agents two weeks ago, looks really distant now. Well, one person that we've been in touch with is Negin Shirai. She's a former journalist. She is an activist. She is joining us from a country which is not Iran, and it's not even the UK, because the Iranian administration has been targeting both her and her family. Negin, thank you for joining us. Can we start with the news that's coming out of the US right now? Donald Trump telling us that a massive armada is heading to Iran and warning us that time is running out.
23:13Andrew Marr:When you hear that, do you feel relief or concern with what may be about to happen? I feel big concern because when you read what he wrote, it's this like underline, you know, between the line, there is a message to the Iranian government. And that's what scares me more than anything, which is his aim at the end is making a nuclear deal, making sure that he's getting what he wants. And that has nothing to do with the massacre that's happening inside the country and the people dying. And especially now, a lot of people have been arrested and we don't know what happens to them in the prison. And we're really worried about that.
23:58So this is contrary to what he the message he was putting out there at the beginning of these protests. You know, after the first 10 days, he was saying if there is any death on the streets, I'm going to attack. Then that changed to if there is any execution, I will attack. And then now it's changing to if there is no nuclear deal, I will show you. So I think when you look at his patterns and what he does at the end, it's not about the democracy and it's not about the people of Iran. And everyone knows that. But also, I think for people inside the country, there is still a glimmer of hope that some sort of help should come from outside to help them to stop the killing.
24:40But would it be effective even if there is an attack by Donald Trump and, you know, Islamic Republic doesn't come to the table? I really don't know. I feel I have a feeling that Islamic Republic, there's two scenarios here. Either they're going to continue until there is no opposition left in the country. They're going to continue killing. They're going to continue the arrest. that has been their pattern for the last three weeks, or there's going to be an attack by U.S. in one way or form. If that attack is successful, which is really a big if, then we would have Iran which is in conflict. So I don't think he would be successful in the government with one attack.
25:25Then at the same time, if it's a full-on war, which we don't see it happening yet with the, you know, the armies that is in the Middle East and all of that. I think then it leads to a lot of infightings and a lot of other players inside the country trying to gain power. So it's a scary time.
25:45Lewis Goodall:Do we think that in terms of an attack on Iran, obviously, lots of Iranians have been asking Trump to do it. And it's something that seems to be growing in appetite as well on the American right within the Republican Party. And yet at the same time, he also says, maybe we can reach a deal. That's quite confusing, isn't it? Because either it's about Iranian freedom, democracy, the regime ending, or it's about some sort of geopolitical arrangements between the Iranians and the Americans. Are you clear in your mind what this armada is for? I'm clear. I think it's for the geopolitical reasons and it's for oil and it's for China, because China has a lot of influence inside Iran.
26:24They have this massive deal with the Iranian government that they're selling the sanctioned oil really cheap to the Chinese. And this contract was going to last until 2045. And there is a growing influence because of the sanctions. Iran became even more close to China. It was close to China, but now it's like this massive collaboration. So that's one part of it. Then for Donald Trump, when was it about people or democracy? I don't believe for a moment that Trump is after democracy. And he's been really clear in that messaging, in all of his attitudes inside the US and outside the US. So I don't think anyone is fooled, even my mom, who's 80 years old in Iran and lives under this regime, and is really angry at the regime, which she understands.
27:12And she told me that she doesn't believe Trump is after democracy or thinking about them. But the feeling is we're helpless here. There is no help coming from anywhere. And this government is trying to kill us. And there is no shame in that for them. And they will continue until there is no opposition in sight. So if there is someone, even a bully, who doesn't care about us and might, you know, do something that as a side effect we would benefit of it, then let them do that. I think that's the feeling of a lot of people inside the country. I won't argue the same for the people who are outside.
27:54We've seen a lot of protests that are asking for Trump to attack. And it's a far right fraction of the Iranian society, especially in diaspora, which has a different mindset in mind of what they want. They want to implement the monarchy in place of the Islamic Republic. So their mandate is different. But I think the message that's coming from inside the country is more out of frustration of international community who's been watching this massacre happening in the country and doing nothing about it. imagine they're infants who's been killed on the street by shotguns they're people who's been in a hospital bed with the hospital equipment still attached to them who's been shot in the head so when you see that in your life on a daily basis you would react to that you would cling to anything that is out there that might be able to help you.
28:59Andrew Marr:So you don't think, I mean, listening to you, Negan, you don't think that Trump wants regime change. You don't think he's going to topple the Ayatollah. And you don't think that there is help coming from any other source. Is that right? I mean, are you basically saying the Iranian people can't win this one on their own? Yes, so I've been a journalist for more than 20 years. I've been a journalist inside Iran. I've worked outside as well. I work with a lot of activists in different parts of the world, in Myanmar, in Sudan. So I know how the authoritarian regimes work, and especially the mindset of the Islamic Republic.
29:43They're in that last leg of survival. For them, it's a moment that they have to cling to power. And that's why we see even the reformers who always try to keep their face and saying, oh, you know, where there is, we would be more modern and, you know, try to open up the country. They're saying the killing is justified and they have to kill people. So we are in this existential moment for the Islamic Republic. people know and have that feeling inside the country that no one is, that it belonged to that government, would defect at this moment. So there's no defection. They're going to continue fighting until the end.
30:26And for Trump, it was obvious even from the beginning that for him, it's about what he can gain from any given situation, for him, for himself, and for the U.S. so in that scenario there is nothing for him to gain from a democratic Iran there is a lot of things to gain keeping the you know as they they used to call it in foreign policy containment of the Middle East so making sure that the flow of the oil continues making sure the players in that region are playing the hands that he wants and then at the end benefiting from that that's the end of it. It doesn't matter how many people are killed on the street.
31:09It doesn't matter what the people are demanding. And we've seen in the Iranian history for the last 150 years, more than that, Iranian people over and over again, every time they try to do a democratic transition in their own country, it's been stopped by the foreign forces. It's a curse of our country that we are in a really geopolitical situation, that everyone has an interest in it. We are really rich on oil and minerals. So it's a country that has been in a battleground of powerful forces. It was powerful once. It lost the power. And then now it's always been, you know, divided between the sources.
31:49We've never been colonized, but it's a country that during the World War has been run by other countries. We've been divided between Russia and Britain at some point. We had, you You know, the coup against our elected prime minister, Mossad there. So it's been the trend over and over again. And unfortunately, what I see at this moment in history is the history is repeating itself.
32:15Lewis Goodall:Do you think, do you have much sense of, and there's been much speculation about this, do you have much sense of what the death toll might now have been, now this has been going on for some weeks? And also, obviously, there's been a lot of hope and speculation that maybe this would finally be the set of protests that would lead to the collapse of the Ayatollah's regime? Given this has now been going on for some weeks, do we think that those hopes have been far-fetched? So the death toll, the UN special rapporteur talked about, the 20 ,000 people dead. The human rights organisations are starting to, you know, documenting more, but it's really difficult because of the internet shutdown and the remote places that the deaths are happening.
32:59So, for example, yesterday there was a news came out that one of the organizations could confirm and, you know, say this is correct. In this village that none of us heard the name before, there was like two people shot down a couple of days ago by checkpoints. You know, they were stopped at a checkpoint. Their mobile phone was checked. They were released and 10 meters later they were like shot down by the Pudis forces. There is a crazy frenzy of killing happening in the country, still ongoing. So I would argue that we would see the rise of the numbers because of how widespread the protests were, how many are happening already now on the ground, and also the fact that a lot of people who've been wounded are scared to go to the hospitals because they've been killed in the hospitals as injured people and because they can get arrested and then the body is returned to the family a couple of days later.
33:58So there's a lot of infections going around and people are in the homes. I would argue that the dissent hasn't happened. That has been one of the biggest factors that happened in 1979. So they were like the police forces stopped collaborating with the government. Right now, the situation is that the security forces are so embedded within the Iranian regime mindset and indoctrinated into that, that I don't see the dissent necessarily happening at this moment, and we've seen it. The other part of it, I would argue, is that the opposition is not organized enough. The democratic opposition is not organized enough.
34:37So the only opposition that is organized at the moment, and we hear the name, is Pahlavi and the Monarchists, which is the far-right values, and their manifesto has been read by people inside the country, especially labor activists, students who are the ones who are driving the protests and are the civil society in Iran for years, they haven't bought into that. They believe it's another form of dictatorship in place. So even if right now anything happens, I think there would be a fight against if monarchy come into place from inside the country, the minority groups, the different groups. So there is also this gray area of a society that hasn't decided they want they they know we know based on the statistic that is coming from iran that they are pro-democracy they don't have a representation and i think that's the biggest challenge if we manage to get that in place there are efforts in the civil society outside iran we are part of it which we are trying to create a two years transition for the Iranian people, what happens within these two years, how the transitional justice processes will start, how the constitutional assembly will start.
35:53But this kind of activities needs international support. It cannot be done in vacuum. It needs money. It needs a lot of budgets and support from international community. So until there is infrastructure like that, I don't think that dissent would happen. I don't think there's enough power inside the country to go against this massive killing because people thought in this round that if they go to the streets en masse in millions, especially because Trump said, if there is a killing, I would attack, they thought this time the government wouldn't kill them. and they killed them and nothing has happened.
36:32So in that situation, I would feel in the short term the people would go through to depression. There's a lot of anger on the ground. But what happens after, there is another element missing at this moment. How that can happen, I really have no clue at this moment.
36:54Andrew Marr:Negan Shiragi, thank you so much. Thanks for joining us. Thanks, Negan. Thank you.
37:08The news agents. It's pretty unusual, but nobody knows when they saw the gun, how they saw the gun, everything else. The bottom line, it was terrible. Both of them were terrible. The other was terrible, too. And I'm not sure about his parents, but I know her parents were big Trump fans. Makes me feel bad anyway. But I mean, I guess you could say even worse, they were tremendous Trump people, Trump fans. And, you know, the daughter was, she was, I don't know if you could say radicalized, maybe radicalized, maybe not. I don't know. But I hate to see it. I hate to see that.
37:42Lewis Goodall:So that is President Trump weighing in, giving his assessment on the killing of Rene Good and of Alex Preti. And even for Trump, you've got to say it's pretty grotesque. Grotesque, basically saying that he feels worse about one than the other, precisely because in his view, I don't know where he's got this from, but the parents of one were Trump supporters and the others were not.
38:05Andrew Marr:Yeah. And he was commenting on both the deaths and his take on Alex Preti, with whom he doesn't, as we've heard, have as much sympathy. He was the ICU nurse, was that he was essentially a fool to be carrying a gun. Now, to put this in context, Minnesota is an open carry state. He was carrying a gun, a concealed carry, which is allowed. He had a gun licence. And the Second Amendment allows you to take a gun with you. Yes, even to a protest. Now, it's a weird place for us, this, isn't it, to be sort of trying to unpick the row that is unfolding. because I would say that most Brits are not big fans of Second Amendment rights.
38:48Andrew Marr:We are not big fans of weaponry on the streets of any city. And yet here is the NRA trying to defend citizens who were carrying guns because it is a constitutional right against a president who has always been very friendly to the NRA, who is now making citizens who carry guns legally feel like they were doing wrong. And so you've got this very interesting juxtaposition now, haven't you, where you've got gun lobbies, not just the NRA, but lots of, you know, guns for American people, lots of these different sort of lobby groups saying, why is he having a go at ordinary American citizens? But they don't really want to back left-wing demonstrators, so they end up sort of attacking Tim Walsh and saying it's the governor's fault for allowing the protests and there shouldn't have been these protests in the first place, but if there are going to be protests, then they should be allowed to carry guns.
39:39Lewis Goodall:It puts us in, all of us, I think, in a kind of slightly weird headspace. It is, isn't it? Where sort of we're the ones going, well, he had the right to bear arms and maybe exposes. Do I think actually, I express it or anybody, having been to them and seen how high the tensions are running there, do I think it's a good idea that anyone takes guns? No, I don't. That isn't exculpatory of what happened. That doesn't excuse what happened. But I just don't think in any protest or anything like that, just in the same way that I don't think, you know, all of those people who took guns on the January the 6th riots, that that was a very good idea either.
40:11Lewis Goodall:And I think we would have been hearing, imagine if the Biden administration or the Capitol Police had just sort of attacked and then shot on sight anybody who was carrying a gun during January the 6th. I think we'd have heard quite a different tone and different analysis from Trump and others if that had taken place.
40:24Andrew Marr:Isn't the point that once again, we're falling for it by having a discussion about something completely tangential to the one that we should be having, which is the murdering of US citizens on the streets by federal ICE agents. In other words, we should be talking about the process or lack of process. We should be talking about why there isn't a judicial investigation. We should be talking about why there isn't a criminal investigation into either of those deaths. But yet we're all having this sort of Second Amendment rights chat, which is sort of vintage Trump. You know, he's managed once again to sort of make you turn the page and go off down this rabbit hole so that nobody's chasing what on earth ICE were doing on the streets of Minneapolis for the last three weeks.
41:08Lewis Goodall:Or frankly, just going back to that first clip of Trump saying that he's more bothered about one than the other because of their political affiliation. I mean, there's only two explanations for that. Either he knows it's grotesque and he's literally seeking to troll the families and everybody, which is grotesque, if not psychopathic. Or he's been so grotesque for that long and he's been so sort of adult and pickled in that particular type of politics for that long that he doesn't even know it's grotesque, in which case it's basically a form of psychopathy. You know, this is the president of the United States.
41:35Lewis Goodall:And again, we just get so inured to it. But honestly, I mean, there's been plenty of people talking about his decline in mental acuity. I mean, it's so hard to tell with Trump because he's always said things like this. But just listening to that now and the fact that barely causes a ripple and we shrug our shoulders. That's the grotesque thing.
41:48Andrew Marr:We'll be back tomorrow.
41:49Lewis Goodall:We'll see you then.
41:50Andrew Marr:Bye bye. Bye for now.
41:51Lewis Goodall:This has been a Global Player original production.
From the publisher
Kemi Badenoch has told her party not to get in her way as she steers it further to the Right. Is this the correct assessment of what the Conservatives needs to attract voters back? Or is she way off?
Later, Trump has threatened Iran with his big beautiful armada. Does he have any concern for the protestors getting killed in their tens of thousands thousands? Or is this all about US interests?
The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
