Why is Burnham getting blamed for a global debt crisis?

2 Sep 2026 · 37 min · 11 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode discusses why UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is being blamed for a global debt crisis, focusing on the first face-to-face PMQs joust between Burnham and shadow/PMQs lead Kemi Badenoch. Key claim: rising UK government borrowing costs are driven mainly by global factors (inflation repricing of debt, geopolitics, war, and broader Western deficits), not by Burnham personally; UK-specific pressures include weak productivity and the Liz Truss legacy.

Notable examples

Badenoch cites borrowing costs near late-1990s lows turning higher; she asks what Burnham will cut to convince markets. Burnham responds mainly with tax cuts (VAT removal on electricity; business rates cuts). The episode also covers defence spending tensions (3%/3.5% GDP targets) and the “triple lock”/benefits debate as a future political test.

Guests

Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang (Las Culturistas).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Kewpie Mayo: A Culinary Delight

0:34 to 1:40

Discover the unique qualities of Kewpie mayo and its culinary uses.

“You know when people try a new food and suddenly it's like, wait.”

Burnham's PMQs Performance

1:40 to 3:02

Analysis of Andy Burnham's performance in his first PMQs since summer.

“which is what is currently happening in terms of government borrowing costs, UK government borrowing costs, nearly at their lowest point now since the late 1990s.”

The Battle of Ideas

3:02 to 4:32

Exploring the adversarial dynamics between Burnham and Bainock during PMQs.

“And this was much awaited because obviously we've had this weird situation where Andy Burnham has basically been prime minister for the summer holidays.”

Government Borrowing Costs Discussed

4:32 to 6:06

Discussion on the implications of UK government borrowing costs.

“This was followed by Bajnock asking the Prime Minister what he was going to do to cut government spending to convince the markets that the UK is credible.”

Welfare Reform and Spending Cuts

6:06 to 8:10

Insights into the discussions surrounding welfare reform and spending cuts.

“You saw both the fluency there and the self-confidence on both sides.”

John Healy's Leadership Role

8:10 to 9:48

Examination of John Healy's influence in the current government landscape.

“And actually, for the course of those five questions, he couldn't really answer it.”

Global Debt Concerns

9:48 to 12:11

Understanding the global debt crisis and its impact on politics.

“much more so than starmer who's very controlled he really thinks aloud you know he sort of shows his workings, which I think is both positive and negative.”

Global Debt Crisis Overview

14:00 to 24:25

Discusses the rising government debt globally and its implications.

“The government debt is rising the world over.”

Case Study: Lindsay Clancy Trial

24:52 to 28:06

Examines the controversial trial of Lindsay Clancy regarding maternal mental health.

“They're down 21 with just over six minutes remaining.”

Mental Health and Responsibility in Tragic Cases

28:06 to 38:12

Explore the complexities of mental health issues in the context of a tragic case involving a mother and her children.

“She was put on 12 different types of medication.”
Show all 11 chapters

Apple's Shift on Lake Ontario Naming

39:45 to 40:42

Discussion on the implications of Apple's decision regarding the naming of Lake Ontario.

“If you were listening yesterday, and if you weren't, why not?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Who says Halloween only lasts one day? With Wayfair, one night of Halloween becomes a whole season at home. From larger-than-life yard decor and moody lighting to festive accents for every room in the house, Wayfair has what you need to make Halloween feel like magic all in one place. Because the best Halloween memories aren't made in just one night. They're made all season long. Shop Halloween decor now at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. This is Matt Rogers from Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. This is Bowen Yang from Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang.

0:34You know when people try a new food and suddenly it's like, wait. That's the reaction a lot of people are having when they first try Kewpie mayo. It's the one with the red cap and the little baby on the bottle. You've probably seen it in the grocery store before. And if you've ever just walked past it, some people would say that's a huge mistake. Because this mayo is different. Most mayonnaise uses whole eggs. Kewpie only uses egg yolks, which gives it this rich umami flavor. It's smoother, deeper, and almost buttery. Once people try it, they start putting it on everything. Egg sandwiches, fries, burgers.

1:07Some fans even swear by dipping pizza crust in it. And once you notice it, you start seeing it everywhere. Chefs use it. Restaurants use it. People who really care about flavor use it. Never tried it? Grab the bottle with the red cap next time you're at the store. Put it on just about anything. Then you'll understand. QB, the original Japanese mayonnaise. This is a global production.

1:30Lewis Goodall:This was the first proper face-to-face joust between Bainock and Burnham. I think what did we learn from it? There was one issue that was hanging over everything and Bainock did talk about it, which is what is currently happening in terms of government borrowing costs, UK government borrowing costs, nearly at their lowest point now since the late 1990s.

1:51Andy Burnham:So he managed to get away with it this week, I would say, as somebody who can sort of remind the Tories that they were in power for 14 years, remind the Tories about Liz's Trust. I'm not sure that he's going to be allowed to answer as little in the weeks to come. There are people at number 10 who are across this rather than just saying, I'm sorry, love, you're on your own. You need to sort this out for yourself. I know you've got, you know, a heavy constituency postbag on this issue, but tough titties, you know, get on with it. I haven't heard that one for a while. No, we haven't. It's nice to be back.

2:21Andy Burnham:Don't hear that in rural France very often. Can I congratulate the Prime Minister on his stamina? Three hours. Yesterday. Yesterday. That was Kemi Baden-Ock at Prime Minister's Questions congratulating Andy Burnham on the length of his statement. Yeah. After a three and a half hour stint in the Commons yesterday, Burnham was back for his first PMQs of the term. Who won? Welcome to the News Agents.

3:01Lewis Goodall:The News Agents. It's John.

3:04Andy Burnham:It's Maitlis.

3:05Lewis Goodall:It's Lewis. And this was much awaited because obviously we've had this weird situation where Andy Burnham has basically been prime minister for the summer holidays. And so this was Westminster truly back. Admittedly, as Kemi Badenock was saying there or hinting at there, it was we got a bit of a preview of it yesterday because Andy Burnham did do a three hour session on the floor of the Commons where he took questions from over 100 MPs. Nonetheless, this was the first proper face to face joust between Baden-Ark and Burnham. I think what did we learn from it? Well, I think we can say a few things.

3:37Lewis Goodall:One is, is that as always happens with an incoming prime minister or incoming leader of the opposition, they promised to end punch and duty politics. They promised to end point scoring. And it lasts for precisely less than the duration of one prime minister's questions. In my view, rightly so, because we have an adversarial system for a reason. And nonetheless, they did, I think in a pretty fluent way, admittedly, on both sides go for each other. I think this promises to be one of the more interesting contests between the prime minister and the opposition we've had for some years. I think both Bainock and Burnham, proper battle of ideas, both fluent performers.

4:11Lewis Goodall:But there was one issue that was hanging over everything. And Bainock did talk about it, which is what is currently happening in terms of government borrowing costs, UK government borrowing costs. inched higher today, nearly at their lowest point now since the late 1990s, after they've been caught up in what is admittedly a global move, which is pushing government borrowing costs higher for most Western governments. This was followed by Bajnock asking the Prime Minister what he was going to do to cut government spending to convince the markets that the UK is credible. Here's their exchange.

4:46Andy Burnham:Personally, I think it's delightful that he wants to make everyone happy. but a prime minister needs to be a leader, not a people pleaser. He's talking about working together on welfare. I already made that offer, but that does mean cuts. He wants to bring the welfare bill down by spending more money. Yesterday, the prime minister told the House that his summer of promises would be paid for by reprioritising within government. So what exactly has he cut? Well, in terms of what has he cut, tax is the simple answer to that question.

5:30Mr Speaker, within days of taking office, I indicated that we would remove VAT off electricity bills. And that, Mr Speaker, will help people with the cost of living. And then days later, with the support of my right honourable friend, the Chancellor, we said that there would be a cut in business rates for pubs, social clubs, live music, venues. So this government lowering the cost of living, lowering the cost of business. And that is what we will continue to do. You saw both the fluency there and the self-confidence on both sides. I also think there's an element in which you are seeing Kemi Badenok kind of, OK, how do I approach Andy Burnham?

6:19I knew how to fight Starmer and it was Starmer would be brittle. And so if you could poke fun at him, you would get somewhere with him. I don't know whether she's yet found her mojo yet on how to deal with Burnham because he is a he's a very slick communicator. He's very capable. I think on the substantial point about the cost of government borrowing that you're talking about a moment ago, Lewis, I mean, you can have Andy Burnham standing up there and saying, you know, what have you done? I've cut taxes. Well, I don't think we'll be hearing that after the 28th of October when the budget comes.

6:51because, as you say, the cost of government borrowing, you know, this kind of ghastly phrase, fiscal headroom, any fiscal headroom that the government had that was bequeathed by Rachel Reeves has gone with the cost of what the government needs to spend to borrow money in the markets now. And that is going to have a really profound effect, I think, on our politics over the coming period.

7:15Andy Burnham:I thought it was quite a grown-up exchange. And I think, if I'm honest, that Kemi edged it over Burnham today. I thought there were moments where he was clearly slowing himself down because it was the first time. And he looked like he was buffering a little bit. You know, there were sort of moments where he was waiting for the answer to come to him as he spoke. And when he came out of that line, what have you cut? And he said, tax. Yes, he gets great cheers from the Labour benches. But actually, he hasn't answered the question. And her question still stands, which is, it's all very well coming in with the vibes.

7:51Andy Burnham:It's all very well coming in with the optimism. But if you agree with me, Kemi, that we need to cut the welfare bill, what are you going to do? Where are you showing me that stuff? If you believe that we have to bring welfare down, if you believe that we have to bring the debt down, how are you going to do that? And actually, for the course of those five questions, he couldn't really answer it. And even though he made overtures to her, to the Conservatives, to work together on things like welfare reform, he definitely didn't want to concede anywhere where his policies would actually, you know, cut in.

8:33Andy Burnham:And so what does he do? He starts playing the same old Labour tunes, you know, a bit of Liz Truss, fair enough, a bit of Andrew Griffiths, who's now Kemi Baden-Ock's side as Shadow Chancellor, who was, you know, very much a supporter of Liz Trussonomics. So he managed to get away with it this week, I would say, as somebody who can sort of remind the Tories that they were in power for 14 years, remind the Tories about Liz Truss, remind Kemi Baden-Ock that the person at her side was part of the problem in the first place. I think that's fine for now. I'm not sure that he's going to be allowed to answer as little in the weeks to come.

9:07Andy Burnham:And it was interesting, even one of his own backbenchers, and maybe, you know, this is expected and normal and this is what we're going to see more of now. But the chairman of the Defence Select Committee, Tan Desi, urging the prime minister to commit to spending 3 % of GDP on defence. Now, of course, they would say that. And of course, he will say, I'm not going to announce my budget here in the Commons today. but you will start to see now that everyone's relaxed that he can actually utter a sentence and he can hold the commons and he can win a bar election he's going to get some pressure from his own backbenchers as well as from those opposite and i think that's what you're just starting to

9:43Lewis Goodall:get the sense of now yeah look um and i think that one of the most interesting or more interesting things that burnham did say and burnham is definitely someone as prime minister who uh much more so than starmer who's very controlled he really thinks aloud you know he sort of shows his workings, which I think is both positive and negative. You heard him do that a little bit at Prime Minister's Questions where he talked about, he was asked by Tam Desi about defence spending. And he said, you know, one of the reasons he appointed the Chancellor, John Healy, in the first place was because of his views on defence spending.

10:16Lewis Goodall:And we all know, I mean, this has been one of the interesting questions over the summer, happened last week in an interview with Sam Coates at Sky. John Healy sort of slightly resiling from actually the thing about which he resigned from the Starmer government and arguably inflicted the sort of ultimate final body blow on Keir Starmer, which was basically saying, you, Keir Starmer, you, the Prime Minister, are not willing to do what it takes to keep this country safe by funding defence spending adequately. John Healy gave an interview last week where he indicated he's the Chancellor now and maybe he himself would resile from those commitments, which obviously sets up a really awkward question, which was, well, hang on a minute, if you as Defence Secretary-Chancellor thought that Keir Starmer wasn't keeping the country safe because he wasn't spending X amount of money on defence.

11:02Lewis Goodall:Surely, by definition, you're not doing the same and this Prime Minister won't be doing the same if they don't do it. And Burnham, again, actually was correcting that a little bit, Prime Minister's questions there, by saying, one of the reasons, as I say, that he appointed Healy is because he believed that and he said that he would fulfil our NATO requirements. But, of course, if he does that, John, to go to your point, That fiscal headroom is nearly now non-existent and would imply, because if we're talking about getting to 3 % of GDP and then 3.5%, we're talking about tens of billions of pounds potentially on defence, which is potentially really means a sort of swinging scythe for other government departments.

11:40I've been really struck by the way they have sort of knitted together this kind of complicated argument, which explains why John Healy is not going back on his words, even though we're not getting to 3%, which is to say there will be a review of spending which will take place in the spring next year. And we're not going to talk about getting to 3 % by the end of the decade. We're talking about getting to 3.5 % by 2035. Nice long way away. That's a long way away. Just think how far. We're going to do draconian things. That's a long grass, I see. We are going to do some really draconian things in 2034 when we may or may not be the government and have to make those very, very, very difficult, painful spending decisions.

12:28Honestly, I do think that it is a fudge, and it's obvious that it's a fudge. Given what John Healy said, given that he was prepared to resign from the government, and deliver, as you say, the coup de grace to Keir Starmer, and yet becomes Chancellor and says, oh, yeah, well, 3%, yeah, down the road, have a look at it in the new year, see where we get to. I mean, really, I think if you're Keir Starmer, you would feel royally pissed off with John Healy for having done what he did to him as Prime Minister and now does this from his elevated position in one of the great offices of state as Chancellor.

13:07Yeah.

13:08Andy Burnham:I mean, I think if you're being cute about it, you say that I'm sure John Healy cared very deeply about defence. I'm also sure that he saw this as an opportunity to inflict a mortal wound into Keir Starmer to get rid of him. And he came out of it looking quite good. And, you know, I think it's been said before that one of the things that Burnham appears to have endorsed essentially in his cabinet picks is disloyalty to Starmer. Right. So the people who stood up against him, who went to him, who said no more are the people who've been rewarded with the top jobs. And Healy, you know, par excellence is the person who delivers the mortal blow and ends up with the top job.

13:51Andy Burnham:So I think there is there is a sort of bigger framing of that, which is not just about the digits of defence spending in that. But I do think to the broader question, which is, you know, as Harry Cole, I think, has put it in the sun, the summer is now over, the storm clouds are gathering. This is not just a Burnham problem. It is not just a Britain problem. The government debt is rising the world over. In the US, they have now hit, I think it's 40 trillion. Right. So they are they are off the charts. The deficit, I think, is at is it two trillion? I mean, it's it's huge. Three trillion here. OK, so if you're looking across the board, you are not able to say, just like we couldn't with the financial crisis.

14:37Andy Burnham:Oh, this is something that Northern Rock has done wrong or this is something that British banks have done wrong. This is across the board. Right. And it's not least to do with where we are with the whole geopolitics of Iraq. Although the only thing I'd say to that is that I looked at these sort of debt charts. The New York Times published a table of, you know, where Japan was, where Germany was, where the US was, where Britain was, where France was. And look, every graph showed the cost of government borrowing going upwards, but we're much higher than everywhere else. Well, we're somewhat higher.

15:08Lewis Goodall:I mean, but in fairness to Burnham, I mean, that isn't Burnham's fault. No, no, no. I mean, you're right. I mean, that is a reflection of... Historic factors. Yeah, like just the weakness of the UK economy, the Liz Trust legacy, which so many people, including I'm sure the now Shadow Chancellor, wish to flee from and wish to forget. Yeah. And I have to say, I mean, Emily's already hinted at one person. I mean, some of the hypocrisy in some of elements of the press who, you know, now interview Liz Truss as if she's some sort of great guru. It's just whilst at the same time wishing to, I think, try and create some sort of equivalence with Burnham and Labour in terms of what is going on with the debt crisis at the moment.

15:48Lewis Goodall:The sort of thing that we saw with Liz Truss is comic. I mean, it's comic. I mean, Emily's already talked about some of it. Let's look at the facts. Japan's 10-year yield has reached 3 % for the first time since 1996. Germany, long known as a safe haven in terms of European debt, has reached its highest borrowing level since 2011 at the height of the Greek crisis. US 10-year yields, as Emily said, are now nearly 5%, a 19-year high. Yes, ours are at their highest since 2008. And yes, there are specific historic British reasons for that about the weakness of our economy, including, as the Prime Minister said as well, by the way, Brexit, which has lowered our productivity and made us less able to weather financial storms.

16:31Lewis Goodall:But let's be clear, right? Tokyo, Berlin, Washington, they're not having problems with their borrowing costs because of Andy Burnham. Right? Like that is just clearly fanciful.

16:40Andy Burnham:He's been incredibly, incredibly influential on the world. Yeah, exactly.

16:42Lewis Goodall:That is just clearly fanciful. It is true, of course, that because of a global reprice of inflation debt, the Iran war, which of course many of these people supported at the time, that is creating global problems as well as the big AI boom in debt that we're seeing. That is creating global problems, which Britain is affected by. And it is true that there is some concern about potential spending plans under this Labour government, which Burnham will have to address. But these are relatively marginal forces by comparison to the big structural questions, which are global and worldwide. and are, just briefly, to be distinguished with what happened with Liz Truss, which was a specific British phenomenon, not mirrored around the world, caused by her incompetence.

17:23Well, I thought one of the most absurd things at Prime Minister's questions today was when Kemi Badenot tried to draw a parallel with Andy Burnham's tax cuts on, you know, so some kind of business rates for pubs and clubs, which is going to cost a tiny amount of money, and tried to draw a parallel with Liz Truss's unfunded tax cuts of the top rate of tax and all the rest of it that was going to cost£25 billion, which is what really spooked the markets. And then her Chancellor comes along and says, well, we might go a bit further, actually. Yeah, exactly. So the idea that what Andy Burnham's done since he's become Prime Minister, as the Prime Minister for the summer holidays, is do something that is akin to what Liz trusted in the kamikaze budget is just ridiculous.

18:10Andy Burnham:But I think where you're right is that this whole idea of thinking out loud. He's very good at diagnosis. We get that, right? He's very good at saying, well, I can see that's a problem and obviously the prisons and that's going to be a problem. And it's quite nice to talk back to, you know, the electorate and tell them that you understand what the problem is. There is going to be a moment where it's like, yeah, okay, now what? And he's already had this from Jim O 'Neill, who is a close friend of his, the sort of Mancunian at his side. I'm sure they still are now.

18:40Lewis Goodall:Well, it's interesting, isn't it?

18:41Andy Burnham:I mean, Jim O 'Neill, he probably followed this saga, but was the one who was his appear. He's also very wealthy in his own right, you know, from money made in the city, ex-Goldmans. And he was invited into the cabinet, decided not to be because he didn't necessarily think he'd agree with Burnham's wealth tax. And he's now sort of gone not rogue, but he's kind of become quite outspoken and said, well, Burnham has to get rid of the the triple lock. Right. Jim O 'Neill is not alone. And a lot of Tories, people who've now left, we should say, the cabinet, people like Jeremy Hunt are now saying, get rid of the triple lock, things they never said when they were actually in power and had the power to do it.

19:17Andy Burnham:And so I think they're throwing this at Burnham, which is setting up the political versus economic sense. You know, everyone can see the economic sense in, frankly, turning around to pensioners and saying, you've already got two locks on this. You're going to be fine. Get rid of the triple lock. It would really save a lot of money. and Burnham kind of going, well, he's already pledged not to, right? So there are going to be, I think, a few, you know, sort of no exit doors. He's now shutting them down on himself. If he sticks to no removal of the triple lock, that's gone. So what's next? He's already said no more income tax.

19:54Andy Burnham:OK, that's gone. What next? No more VAT. Really? So what's next? Then you are getting into a place where Kemi Badenot can really actually squeeze him and say, you've left yourself no room to actually cut any of the spending that you promised.

20:08Lewis Goodall:And I think this is where John's right in terms of where the politics of all this is going now and what the politics of the autumn probably looks like. Because for me, I think what it will, if this global bond market instability continues, or it's not really instability, it's just going in one direction, which is becoming, it's becoming more expensive for governments to finance their debt, including ours. then the big mismatch of course will be the politics on which Andy Burnham ran and the economic reality on which he must which he must oversee and which affects him and afflicts him as it did with Keir Starmer because of course the big test will come if Lord O 'Neill is right which is that the bond markets it will be helpful and I think he must surely be right on this the bond markets might want something to show the government seriousness about tackling the long-term debt and deficit to show that Andy Burnham is more than simply the Prime Minister of Good Times and Mary England.

Read the full transcript

21:05Lewis Goodall:And the question is what that is, which the median Labour MP will accept, where the politics of the Labour Party will accept. You know, the sort of intersection between what the bond markets want and what the PLP will take is not necessarily clear. Now, is that something about the triple lock? Is that something about benefits? I think this will be ultimately the test of Burnham's political authority over the PLP and his political will. And of course, it is ultimately that test which Starmer himself flunked, which was over benefits, arguably from which his government never recovered. So it seems to me that that is going to be one of the central narratives or one of the central themes of this autumn is that mix or that combination, that difficult situation that he must now navigate between bomb marker reaction, which is real.

21:54Lewis Goodall:It's not unique to Britain, but it is real. And the politics on which he ran, which, let's be honest, was more spending, more intervention, more expansionism rather than any kind of contraction. I was talking to a Labour researcher for a Labour MP the other day and was asking kind of, have you noticed any difference between the Stammer operation and the Burnham operation? She was saying it's just chalk and cheese. The extent to which number 10 are trying to wrap their arms around to listen to you. What are your concerns? what is your MP's areas of expertise? Because we want to be able to put your MP, whoever it is on the media to argue our case.

22:36And it would be great to have you working alongside us. So I kind of think that probably Andy Burnham has got more latitude now to push Labour MPs to do things. And I also think that the PLP...

22:48Andy Burnham:It didn't work last time when they didn't. No, exactly. That's what you take away. He's understanding retail. He's understanding the need to put his arms around people and to hear their concerns. And if they've got problems, even down to the software they're using, the way they're all communicating with each other. He seemed that there are people at number 10 who are across this rather than just saying, I'm sorry, love, you're on your own. You need to sort this out for yourself. I know you've got a heavy constituency postbag on this issue, but tough titties, get on with it. I haven't heard that one for a while.

23:18Andy Burnham:No, we haven't. It's nice to be back. Don't hear that in rural France very often. No, well, it's good to be back in London. We're glad to have you. What is that old for saying? Yeah, exactly. How do you translate that? But I think it does speak to the fact that Burnham has understood, one, that he needs to get the PLP on board. And two, it's better to have him on board when you're telling them they've got to take really unpleasant medicine. Because also, they're not going to get rid of another Labour leader. Exactly. They can't. They can't do it again. Yeah. So if Andy Burnham has got tough messages to deliver, I don't think it's going to be very easy for the PLP to say, oh, we're not having that, you know, and have an attack of the vapours.

23:55Lewis Goodall:I'll tell you what things have declined haven't they since yesterday Derrida yesterday tough titties today did he say much about that Derrida

24:02Andy Burnham:it's all about words

24:03Lewis Goodall:it's all about words

24:05Andy Burnham:as FR David would say words don't come easy to me I think we need to bring some Roland Barthes or Dissocieur into this discussion there's no recovery

24:13Lewis Goodall:for you now after the expression you just used we'll be back just after this

24:25Who says Halloween only lasts one day? With Wayfair, one night of Halloween becomes a whole season at home. From larger-than-life yard decor and moody lighting to festive accents for every room in the house, Wayfair has what you need to make Halloween feel like magic all in one place. Because the best Halloween memories aren't made in just one night. They're made all season long. Shop Halloween decor now at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. They're down 21 with just over six minutes remaining. This is the moment, baby. This is the moment we separate the dogs from the boys. And if you ask me, I only got one question.

25:02Do you got that dog in you? Because it's never about the winners or the losers, but it is about the difference between those brave enough to put some action on the game and those who just want to watch from the sidelines eating off-brand pizza rolls. So sit down, lock in those picks, and trust that dog in you. Underdog. At least your dog.

25:22Lewis Goodall:Terms may apply.

25:30Members of the jury, I've got your question, and the question is, after many hours of deliberation, we are unable to come to a unanimous decision. I brought you back out because I know that this was a long trial. I know there were over 80 witnesses. There were over 300 exhibits. and but because of that I'm going to ask you to go back out keeping in mind all the instructions that I gave you to go out and to continue your deliberations at this time.

26:06Andy Burnham:That was the judge in the trial of Lindsay Clancy a 36 year old former maternity nurse who killed all three of her children three years ago in January of 2023. It is the most extraordinary case which is unfolding in America now, which has divided people on whether she is guilty or whether she cannot be deemed responsible, because she has argued that she killed all three of her children because of postpartum psychosis, hallucinations, depression, an activity in her brain that happened as a result of charbath. We call it postnatal depression, but she took it a step further and she says it was the psychosis that pushed her to do this.

26:57Andy Burnham:Now, on the one hand, I think a lot of America's thinking, hang on. This was a woman who in cold blood sent her husband out. Her husband went to get a takeaway delivery, pick up some medication. She judged how long he'd be at the house for. And she systematically killed three of her children, the eldest first, the baby last. And then she threw herself out of her own bedroom window in an act of, we assume, attempted suicide, having slit her wrist. She never expected to survive this. And what has been extraordinary about this case is how many people, particularly women, have come to her aid, come to support, literally stood outside the trial, which has been going on throughout the month of August, wearing pink, driving up to Massachusetts.

27:51Andy Burnham:The trial's just outside Boston. And they have come to support this woman because they feel that the medical establishment, that the health service, the health system of America has not served her properly. She tried to get help. She complained about her depression. She was put on 12 different types of medication. She told people, she warned people she was suicidal. She warned people that she'd had images or visions of actually destroying, killing her children. And yet nothing was done that would save them or indeed you could argue her and of course you know in terms of the demonology of evil or whatever there is nothing worse than killing your own children in so many ways and you would expect sort of kind of the the media commentary on this to be she is an evil woman and there can be no redemption for somebody this bad and that hasn't been the way it has played out in America.

28:55And, you know, yes, mostly women, but her husband, who's now living... Her ex-husband. Her ex-husband is now, who's living alone, is standing by her and saying, you know, she was trying to seek help. And I think it's, as you say, Emily, when you read the way it unfolded in the lead up to the killing of the children, what an indictment of America's provision of mental health where what happens is you go to a doctor you say you're having these dark thoughts you say you're not sleeping you say you're insomniac you've you know all the rest of it and they just throw more and more drugs Ambien doesn't work we'll try this one instead this drug doesn't work we'll try that one instead and as long as you've given someone a prescription for more treatment then you know I'm happy I've done my duty according to the Hippocratic Oath as it's understood in america and just the lack of interest the lack of concern is one aspect of it the other aspect of it i think that's really interesting which is a legal part of it is that there are all sorts of cases where you can claim insanity or whatever but they're in the in the register or whatever they're of mental health postpartum psychosis is not there.

30:19So if you say it was that which led me to have these hallucinations and led me to kill my children, that isn't considered part of any sort of medical definition. And therefore, it's very hard to mount that as your defence in a court case.

30:39Andy Burnham:Look, the jury is completely unresolved on this one, which is why after 18 hours of deliberation, you know, five days, is the judges had to send them back and say, we need a unanimous verdict on this because they can't come to a decision. And essentially, these are the possibilities in front of them now. They could find her not guilty, which would mean she literally goes free. That's considered highly unlikely. They could consider her not guilty by reason of insanity, which would hinge, I guess, on this undiagnosed postpartum defence. Now, it seems extraordinary that that could still be considered undiagnosed, seeing as she herself self-diagnosed, said she was suicidal, tried to get help, checked herself in.

31:25Andy Burnham:I mean, she actually checked herself into a hospital like the month before. And that would mean she was detained in hospital. And then I guess there's first degree murder. And from what I understand, the prosecution have gone for this. They want her to be found guilty of first degree murder because, as you say, a mother who has killed all three of her children systematically in a window in which she knew her husband was out of the house. And she killed them in a way that I think, I mean, this is graphic, but it was with exercise sort of elastic bands. So it was something that clearly took physical effort, physical effort and time, actually.

32:01Andy Burnham:And so I think this is why the prosecution think we're going to just nail her for first degree murder. No woman who's out of her mind sits down and works that out and the order and the length of time she's got and the distance her husband will be and all the rest of it. But there are people, psychologists, who will argue that this is how psychosis works. You can be totally rational in one moment and totally driven by dark forces and voices inside your head. And she described, her defence described how she'd heard a male voice telling her to kill her children. I mean, this is the most appalling case, frankly, that you can imagine in a sort of any family court, isn't it?

32:42But I suppose what struck me is that we have come a long way as a society, that we are prepared to argue it, see it in this way, that the jury is completely sort of humstruck by what to do on this.

32:55Andy Burnham:because it was 1999, which is what, 25 years ago, when Sally Clark, do you remember the mother of two children who both died of, it turned out, of a sort of heart defect related to cot death, was accused of shaking them, shaken baby syndrome. She had some terrible expert witness who came along and said there was absolutely no chance on earth that this could happen once, let alone twice. And it turns out that he was wrong because he didn't understand the gene that both children were carrying. She later died. It was considered she died of a broken heart. But people were so critical of her at the time.

33:33Andy Burnham:How could she have done this? How could that have been? How could a mother do this to her children when she has later been proved to be completely not guilty, innocent of their deaths and probably died along with her guilty verdict? to where we are today, which is a woman who has clearly committed the actual acts of murder, somehow being deemed possibly to not be criminally responsible for them. And, you know, look, there are bits and pieces. We don't want to present this as a simple black and white story that it's definitely this or it's definitely that. There are areas of kind of the evidence that, you know, Apparently she hadn't talked about when she was initially interviewed by the police about having hallucinations.

34:22That came later after she got with her defense lawyer was taken on. There's also a call that her husband made where he's ringing from the CVS chemist when he's gone out to collect the drugs. And it's a very brief call. And he said, I felt she was distracted. So she was able to take a call while she was in the middle of killing the children. And so there are other things that make you think, maybe this is more troubling than it seems. But I think you're absolutely right that the willingness of people to accept that there are these things of postpartum psychosis that can drive you to do appalling things, even though you can be a rational, functioning human being some of the rest of the time.

35:07Yeah, I think it's really interesting.

35:09Andy Burnham:And the crowdfunding that has come out there. So her husband was the one who started crowdfunding for her legal support. He wanted to raise, I think,$10 ,000 and they got a million. And so clearly, I mean, it seems extraordinary. These are not presumably people who are supporting a woman who kills her children. These are people who are supporting what they recognise as a totally undiagnosed disease that is probably rampant in American society that has never actually been acknowledged before now. You know, and it almost feels like this is not to her case specifically, but it feels like the sort of the battle cry for women who've gone.

35:47Andy Burnham:Yeah. Do you know what so many people go through that has never had a name before that has never had a sort of place in our in our legal precedent before that has never that people have never attempted, frankly, to understand before now? That's why they're giving money to this. And I think that that in itself is a sign of enormous progress. You know, people always think that the birth of a child is a cause for enormous celebration. And of course, a new baby coming into the world is a wonderful thing. But an awful lot of people, you know, I've known people who've had postnatal depression. It's really kind of tough when everyone is saying, oh, you must be so elated.

36:22I'm sure you're tired.

36:23Andy Burnham:She's a maternity nurse. She literally works with babies the whole time. And there was some interesting detail in the New Yorker article, actually, which was about after her baby was born. She kept on phoning home to check how it was like she was so worried about how her child was. I mean, it's sort of it's slightly incomprehensible that you could be so worried about how your baby is that you will put up monitors in the room and call home and check and call, you know, the social services if you think something's not right and then be the person that ultimately ends their life. And that is where the prosecution have got into difficulties because they want to get a first degree murder conviction for her.

37:05It was premeditated and planned and it was, you know, the darkest possible thing. But they also acknowledge that she was a loving mother to these children. So hang on. So where did this switch get flicked that she suddenly turns to a cold blooded killer from loving mother? and i think that you can understand why this is a case that has electrified america because and and you know and we were talking about it in the office and it's kind of it's gripping and it's disturbing and it's sort of uplifting in the in that narrow sense that people are talking about something that you know is obviously very serious and affects a certain number of women and now is being treated seriously as maybe an explanation for some dark things that happened.

37:54Andy Burnham:And we just don't know which way the trial is going to go. And we will bring you more when we find out what the jury think. We'll be back in just a moment.

38:11Who says Halloween only lasts one day? With Wayfair, one night of Halloween becomes a whole season at home. From larger-than-life yard decor and moody lighting to festive accents for every room in the house, Wayfair has what you need to make Halloween feel like magic all in one place. Because the best Halloween memories aren't made in just one night. They're made all season long. Shop Halloween decor now at Wayfair.com. Wayfair, every style, every home. This is Matt Rogers from Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang. This is Bowen Yang from Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang.

38:45You know when people try on new food and suddenly it's like, wait. That's the reaction a lot of people are having when they first try Kewpie mayo. It's the one with the red cap and the little baby on the bottle. You've probably seen it in the grocery store before. And if you've ever just walked past it, some people would say that's a huge mistake. Because this mayo is different. Most mayonnaise uses whole eggs. Kewpie only uses egg yolks, which gives it this rich umami flavor. It's smoother, deeper, and almost buttery. Once people try it, they start putting it on everything. Egg sandwiches, fries, burgers.

39:20Some fans even swear by dipping pizza crust in it. And once you notice it, you start seeing it everywhere. Chefs use it. Restaurants use it. People who really care about flavor use it. Never tried it? Grab the bottle with the red cap next time you're at the store. Put it on just about anything. Then you'll understand. Q-P, the original Japanese mayonnaise.

39:45If you were listening yesterday, and if you weren't, why not? We were talking about how Donald Trump had renamed Lake Ontario Lake America and how Google had capitulated. And for all their maps in the US, it is now Lake America. And we reported how the Apple Corporation were holding out, holding firm. It was going to be Lake Ontario. Yes.

40:12Andy Burnham:And thanks to our brilliant producer, Natalie, she has come up with the headline of the day. Apple crumbles because Apple has now gone the way of Google. It's decided that it's a new week and it's a new boss in town. And actually, Google was right and Trump is even more right. And why should we hold out by calling it Lake Ontario? Ontario, which has been known by for like thousands of years. We're going to call it Lake America too. So Apple has crumbled. Well done. We'll see you tomorrow. Bye-bye. Bye now.

41:11This has been a global production. Who says Halloween only lasts one day? With Wayfair, one night of Halloween becomes a whole season at home. From larger-than-life yard decor and moody lighting to festive accents for every room in the house, Wayfair has what you need to make Halloween feel like magic all in one place. Because the best Halloween memories aren't made in just one night. They're made all season long. Shop Halloween decor now at Wayfair.com. Every style, every home

From the publisher

Andy Burnham faced Kemi Badenoch for his first PMQs and while she chose to open the session with some innuendo, the hard questions soon came. Burnham has shown himself adept at diagnosis but less quick to nail his solutions to the mast. How long does he have to NOT answer questions when debt is rising and the economic headwinds are moving against him? Is he prepared to spell out - in this summer of optimism - where the pain might fall and trade offs might be made? And why are some commentators comparing him to Liz Truss? Is he being unfairly blamed for a wider global trend not of his making?

Later, why is a Massachusetts jury unable to decide if a woman who killed her three young children is guilty of murder? The trial of Lindsay Clancy has divided America - with many supporters believing her the victim of postnatal phsychosis. How does the law deal with that?

The News Agents is a Global Production.

The News Agents is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/

More from The News Agents

All 384 episodes
Why is Burnham getting blamed for a global debt crisis?The News Agents · 37 min
Listen in VO