Episode 376: Climbing The Wealth Ladder

25 Sep 2025 · 57 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Rational Reminder Podcast - Episode 376: Climbing The Wealth Ladder

Overview In this episode of The Rational Reminder Podcast, hosts Benjamin Felix, Cameron Passmore, and Dan Bortolotti are joined by Nick Maggiulli, COO at Ritholtz Wealth Management and author of *The Wealth Ladder*. The discussion revolves around Nick's framework for wealth accumulation and the evolution of financial decision-making as wealth increases.

Key Points

  • Introduction of Guest: Nick Maggiulli
  • Chief Operating Officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management.
  • Author of *The Wealth Ladder* and *Just Keep Buying*.
  • Known for simplifying complex financial concepts.

The Wealth Ladder Framework

  • Definition of Wealth Ladder:
  • A structured approach that divides wealth into six distinct levels.
  • Levels range from less than $10,000 to over $100 million in net worth.
  • Levels:
  • Level 1: Less than $10,000
  • Level 2: $10,000 to $100,000
  • Level 3: $100,000 to $1 million
  • Level 4: $1 million to $10 million
  • Level 5: $10 million to $100 million
  • Level 6: Over $100 million

Financial Decisions and Changes Across Levels

  • Decision-Making Shifts:
  • Financial strategies should evolve as wealth increases.
  • Spending, income generation, and investment approaches differ at each level.
  • 0.01% Rule for Spending:
  • Spending should be limited to 0.01% of net worth daily.
  • Aims to give individuals permission for lifestyle inflation once they build wealth.
  • 1% Rule for Income:
  • Income opportunities should generate at least a 1% increase in net worth.
  • Helps assess the value of side hustles or additional income streams.

Opportunity Cost of Time

  • As wealth increases, individuals should reassess how they allocate their time.
  • Wealthier individuals may find their investments generate more income than their jobs.

Income vs. Wealth Data

  • Strong correlation observed between income and wealth.
  • 95% of households earning over $200,000 have a net worth exceeding $200,000, indicating that higher income typically translates to higher wealth.

Climbing the Wealth Ladder

  • Mobility Statistics:
  • 20% of households move up at least one wealth level in 10 years.
  • Downward mobility is less common, with only a 10% chance of falling down a level.

Education and Wealth Advancement

  • Education becomes critical when moving from Level 1 to Level 2 (financial safety).
  • Investing and strategic financial decisions become more vital at higher levels.

Challenges of Higher Wealth Levels

  • Individuals may face unique challenges, including social dynamics, trust issues, and lifestyle pressures at extreme wealth levels.

Key Takeaways

  • Understanding 'Enough':
  • Level 4 is often seen as the “enough” level for many, where individuals have sufficient wealth to live comfortably.
  • Diversification and Asset Composition:
  • As people climb the wealth ladder, their assets shift from non-income-generating (like cars and homes) to income-generating (stocks, real estate, business investments).

Conclusion Nick Maggiulli emphasizes the importance of evolving financial strategies as one climbs the wealth ladder. His approach encourages individuals to think about not only their financial wealth but also the other dimensions of wealth, such as social, mental, and physical health, ultimately leading to a more holistic view of financial success.

Related Links

  • [Nick Maggiulli's Blog - Of Dollars and Data](http://ofdollarsanddata.com/)
  • [The Wealth Ladder on Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593854039)
  • [Just Keep Buying on Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/Just-Keep-Buying-Proven-wealth-ebook/dp/B09FYHZXBN)

Additional Resources

  • [Rational Reminder Website](https://rationalreminder.ca/)
  • [Meet with PWL Capital](https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p)

This episode provides a practical, data-driven framework for understanding financial decisions relative to wealth accumulation, useful for both individuals and financial advisors alike.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03This is the Rational Reminder podcast, a weekly reality check on sensible investing and financial decision-making from two Canadians. We are hosted by me, Benjamin Felix, CIO, and Cameron Passmore, CEO at PWL Capital. Welcome to episode 376. And this week, we welcome back a longtime friend of ours, Ben, Nick Majuli, who has a new book out, The Wealth Ladder. Terrific book, terrific framework. I thought the conversation was great. Now, we've known Nick a long time. He was first on episode 255 when his first book, just keep buying came out. And that was a great conversation. We keep in touch with Nick fairly often.

0:43So it was great to see him again. It is great to see him. And like you said, we've known Nick for years. When we recorded with Barry, however long ago that was, we met Nick in New York City at their office. Seven years ago. Yeah. And they're much smaller. And he says at the end, they jokingly call us the Ritholtz of the North. We got to know Barry and Josh and Nick and the people at Red Holtz right there in Midtown Manhattan. And you're right. I remember that day we visited Barry in the office with microphones and boy, that was early on. Barry made some offhand comment about how he has a studio at Bloomberg and he couldn't imagine schlepping all that equipment around.

1:20We were like, here we are schlepping the equipment. Oh yeah, it's funny. Nick sent us copies of his book. He wrote a very nice note in the front cover. in the one I got, I'm sure same as yours, Cameron. It's an interesting book and an interesting way to think about the progression of wealth over the life cycle and how people can move from, as Nick said, that the buckets are somewhat arbitrary. He's talking about this concept of the wealth ladder, which is moving up different levels of wealth and how decisions about spending, time use, investing change as you move up those different rungs on this wealth ladder.

1:56But that ladder rungs, the specific numbers that you attach to them are somewhat arbitrary, but just the general concept that decisions change as the amount of wealth that you have at your disposal increases, I think is a pretty interesting idea. And Nick talks through how some of those decisions change and also his observations based on looking at a bunch of US data just on how the composition of wealth changes over time, which I think is interesting in very broad terms because the data he has are not super specific, but in very broad terms, what types of behaviors get people from one wealth ladder to another, whether income or spending is more important to move up.

2:32Up and down. Up and down. Yeah, that's right. What leads to extreme wealth? Like he says, what gets you up to level four, which is the one to$10 million rung is not going to get you up to level five. Those kinds of ideas, I think it is an interesting framework. I enjoyed reading the book. I think we had a good conversation here with Nick. We mentioned the two books he's written. Nick is the chief operating officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management, which he says is now a 70 plus person firm. So hats off to the Ritholtz gang. He's also author of the weekly blog of dollarsanddata.com, which as he puts, it focuses on the intersection of data and personal finance.

3:09I mean, he is a data nerd, self-professed data nerd, which is a great framework and certainly resonates with us in our audience. I think it's a bit of a change of pace relative to talking with an academic about their research, but I think this is super practically useful. And I think Nick has a lot of interesting insights. All right. He's a good guy. Let's go to our friend, Nick Majuli.

3:33Nick Majuli, welcome back to the Rational Reminder podcast. Thanks for having me back on, guys. Appreciate it. Super excited. We talked new. I did enjoy reading your book, read it a couple of days ago. It was good. That's great. I appreciate it. All right. So Nick, what is the wealth ladder? The wealth ladder is a new framework for thinking about building wealth that basically argues that your financial strategy should change over time. When I say over time, I really mean as you build wealth. As your financial situation evolves, the thinking around the decisions you make in terms of your spending, your income, your investments should change as well.

4:09How it does this, it breaks wealth into six distinct levels, and this is all in US dollars. I know you guys are Canadian, so I I think we can probably just use the same translation for Canadian dollars, and it's probably close enough, even though the exchange rate's a little different. I think there's slightly less wealth in Canada than the US, so it probably actually maps decently well. So in the US, these six levels are level one is less than$10 ,000 in net worth. And by the way, this is net worth. So it's all your assets minus all your liabilities. Less than$10 ,000 is level one. Level two is$10 ,000 to$100 ,000.

4:40That's level two. Level three is$100 ,000 to a million dollars. Level four is 1 million to$10 million. Level five is 10 million to$100 million. And level six is 100 million plus. And the thinking behind this, obviously, it's a log scale. So everything multiplied by 10. If you just memorize level three is 100 ,000 to a million dollars. And then you can just go up by multiplying by 10 or go down by dividing by 10. And that actually divides the United States pretty nicely in terms of the distribution. About 20 % of households are in level one. So that's less than$10 ,000. 20 % are in level two, which is 10 ,000 to 100 ,000.

5:1740 % are in level three, which is middle class in the United States, I would say, which is 100 ,000 to a million. And then you have 18 % of households in the United States that are in level four, that's one to$10 million. And then the top 2 % is level five and six. And level six in particular has 11 ,000 households. And there's a very, very elite small group that are in that 100 million plus range. And there's only about 30 ,000 of those people in the world. So the US has about a third of all the centimillionaires. But from that, you can just start to see like, wait, so my income decisions might change across the ladder.

5:48My spending decisions might change. My investment decisions or how they're allocated might change. And we can get into all of that. So why do you think this concept of ladders is so important? I think the idea of a wealth ladder has been talked about for a very long time. People just say it like, oh, you're climbing the wealth ladder. It's just like a common concept that's been thrown around. I've at least seen it in the literature in terms of just how people talk about this thing. And I said, okay, why don't I actually define this? Why don't I try and make it into a real thing? I'll come up with levels.

6:16I'll come up with different strategies that have to fit within each level, et cetera. I just realized that financial advice should change over time. Yes, there's a lot of great strategies. You can be like, hey, just buy a globally diversified index fund, save money. That's going to be a great strategy for most people. And that's going to work for like probably 60 to 70 % of people. But for some people that are deeply in debt or something, they need a different strategy. And for those that are trying to really build extreme wealth, the S &P 500 is not going to get you there by itself unless you have a super long time horizon or a really high income.

6:47I think realizing that, that there's other strategies out there and just thinking about this more holistically is what got me to this point. What is the 0.01 % rule for spending. The 0.01 % rule basically states that you take your net worth and you multiply by 0.01 % or divide by 10 ,000. And that is roughly how much your wealth should generate on a daily basis. And that's my assumption here. And if you actually do that 0.01 % per day, which is about one basis point a day, that ends up being 3.7 % a year, which is a more conservative 4 % rule. It's like a 4 % rule in disguise. And the idea here, the goal isn't to say, hey, you should spend 0.01 % of your net worth every day.

7:29It's when you're making that marginal spending decision, if that marginal spending decision is less than 0.01 % of your net worth, then don't worry about it. It's almost like a triviality rule. Let's say you have a net worth of a million dollars. That means that all else equal, your net worth should be going up by about$100 a day conservatively. So if you're at a nice restaurant and you're like, oh, do I want to get this salmon or the burger? And the difference in price is 10 bucks or 20 bucks. Who cares? It's less than that$100 amount. Just buy the thing and don't worry about it again. Buy the thing you want if you want the salmon, assuming.

8:01The whole purpose of this rule was I'm trying to allow for lifestyle creep because I think right now the personal finance community, the only real argument I hear is, oh, no, you can't let your lifestyle creep. You have to keep your spending the same no matter how much you make. I think it's a little strong. I want to allow some lifestyle creep, but only after you've built wealth. Hey, I've done the hard work. I've saved this money. I've invested it. I've built this financial base. And as that base gets bigger, you get to spend a little bit more over time. That's the assumption behind it. And I think it's very conservative.

8:33Of course, I'm not recommending someone spends 0.01 % of their wealth every day. But if you're doing this on occasion, it's not going to be a big deal. That's how I tried to solve the problem of allowing some lifestyle creep, but only after you've demonstrated the financial discipline to get there. I'm curious, Nick, if you have some examples as people really climb up the ladder, do you have some idea of examples of how spending decisions might really change as you climb? If you think about the big spending decisions most people make, it's going to be like in a handful of categories, your house, your car, how often you're traveling, where you travel to.

9:06So you start thinking about these categories and I mapped all these categories onto the different levels on the wealth ladder. So for example, in level two, which once again is$10 ,000 to$100 ,000 in wealth, once you're in level two, and by the end of level two, you have what I call grocery freedom. So when you're at a grocery store, you're like, okay, the difference between buying one item versus the maybe more premium version of that item is going to be anywhere from like, let's say, $1 to$10. And that's where level two is. You take$10 ,000 times 0.01 % is$1. $100 ,000 times 0.01 % is about$10.

9:41So that marginal choice, can I afford to get this nicer version of this thing at the grocery store? Yes, you can once you're at the end of level two. When you're in level three, I call that restaurant freedom because now once you're at a restaurant, you can kind of buy what you want by the end of that level. Level four is what I call travel freedom. That's where you can start to, okay, maybe I'll buy a slightly nicer seat on the airplane. I'll stay at a nicer hotel. And then it goes from there. I think level five is where I say house freedom, where you can basically get a house almost anywhere you want.

10:06Now, not any house, but by the time you have 10 million bucks, you can basically live in any neighborhood. You can kind of just go from there. As you start seeing your wealth increase through these levels, the spending categories change and thinking about the level of freedom you have. This is not a perfect metric. I'm just trying to come up with rough ideas of thinking about this. If you were in level four, you just start getting travel freedom. It's not like, okay, I have$1 ,001, now I can go crazy. No, you probably still fly coach, you probably still are staying in a cheaper hotel, maybe once in a while you can upgrade something slightly.

10:37But as you get deeper into level four, halfway through 5 million bucks, yeah, you can probably stay at a nicer hotel, you can get a nicer seat on the airplane. I think that's the thinking behind it is because you've shown the financial discipline. So the reward is more spending. What most people do is they say, oh, your income's gone up a lot. Now you can spend more. I don't like that because income's fickle, it comes and goes. Imagine an athlete, they have a five-year career. Yeah, they have an insane income, they could spend a ton of money. But once that dries up, they have no wealth. At the end, what happens?

11:08There's always that cautionary tale of athletes that go broke and things like that. I think it's because they spent based on their income, not their wealth. It's a framework for how much you can spend, but it also gives people a license to spend once they reach certain levels of wealth, which to your point earlier, I think is a problem for a lot of people. And once again, the whole point of this stuff, it's not that this thing is perfect. It's I've had so many people have problems with spending money and like, oh, I got to do this. I got to do that. I tried to come up with a framework that could help them stop worrying about this.

11:35I had someone who's worth four or$5 million. He's like, I don't worry about the grocery store prices anymore since talking. I'm like, you didn't have to worry about the grocery store prices probably yet decades ago. But the fact that now you're actually changing your behavior is good. And don't sweat the small stuff, focus on the things. If you're in level four, do I want to get a first class seat? Or do I want to just maybe get an emergency exit row seat for like middle level four? That's a fairer question than one you should think about. Not, oh, do I get the cage-free eggs versus the standard eggs.

12:02Just get what you want. If you want the cage-free eggs, get them. So that's the 0.01 % rule. What is the 1 % rule? So similarly, the 1 % rule is for making income decisions. So if you do 0.01 % times your net worth, that's usually a very small number. It's how much you're spending. For income decisions, I think this is very helpful, especially if you're like a freelancer. You're always evaluating income opportunities. If you have a nine to five job and that's your only income, this is not as helpful if I'm being honest. but the idea is take your net worth, multiply by 1%. And if this income opportunity, the side hustle, whatever is not going to create at least 1 % increase in your net worth, then you shouldn't do it or you should just reconsider it maybe.

12:41And so I think there's people like, oh, I'll take on this client. And after all the work you do and everything, you're like, wait, this client is actually not even going to move my net worth by 1%. Why did I do all this? It's not a perfect rule either, but it's made as a secondary check on the thinking you already have about something. So you may feel a certain way about a certain decision. Do I want to take on this side job? Do I want to do this side hustle? Do I want to take on this client, et cetera? You're like, I'm not sure. Well, is there a mathematical framework I can use? Yeah. Do 1 % of your net worth.

13:08Is that person or is that opportunity going to at least increase that by 1 %? Time matters too. If someone said, hey, you can clap your hands, I'll give you$100, everyone would do it because it just takes basically no time. But in the grander scheme of things, think about how this framework can help you with income decisions. How does thinking about the opportunity cost of time change as you go up the ladder? As you move up the ladder, in theory, you're investing more. You have more assets. Those assets are throwing off more income. You have to really think a bit more about the types of income opportunities you take on.

13:44Is this job worth my time? This is even in your own career. Imagine you get to a point you're in... This usually happens for people, I think, in level four, because you get to a point where your investment portfolio could be earning more than you. And even by a considerable amount, what you do on the investment front is far more important than what happens in terms of your job or something like that. Thinking about that is very important because now the opportunity cost of your time is going up. You don't want to overdo this. Tim Ferriss recently talked about this. You can put a value on your time that's super high.

14:15You're like, oh, my time's worth$1 ,000 an hour. If you view everything in your life that way, any second of something that's not optimized, you're going to freak out. It's a bad way to go through life. So I'm not saying to do that. I'm just saying when you're thinking about things like, oh, should I take on this job? Do I need to keep working? What's the point? All those types of questions should be related to the opportunity cost of your time. Not, oh, should I go to my child's birthday party? I'd rather just go work and I can make$1 ,000 or something. I don't want you to start making those trade-offs, but I think the trade-offs that do matter are like income decision versus another income decision, that's where you want to really think about those things.

14:51You look at a ton of data in the book. How strong is the relationship that you observe between income and wealth? I consider it the strongest relationship in personal finance. And I know you guys have had people on the show that talk about expense management, and I do think it's important. I don't want to say expenses or nothing, but if you just look at the data, it's very rare to have high income and low wealth or low income and high wealth. The data is overwhelming. I tweeted something today. 95 % of US households with an income over$200 ,000 have a net worth over$200 ,000. So anytime someone's like, income doesn't matter.

15:28I know someone that has a high income and they spend it all. They're in the 5%. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm not saying that person's lying. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying, that's the 5%. I would rather focus on the 95 % and the thing that's probably actually going to help you, which is your income. I talk about this concept and I still get so much push back on it. People are still like, oh no, it's because you're buying too many lattes, this and that. Where's the data that supports this? I'll be the first person to shut up and say, you know what? I was wrong.

15:57I have not seen the data to support it and no one can show me. And every data that I've looked at shows a very, very high correlation between income and wealth. Someone's going to push back and say, well, Nick, if you have a lot of wealth and it's invested, it's going to be creating a lot of income. Of course, this is like a flywheel. You have higher income, you save it, you invest it. That's now wealth. That wealth throws up income. It creates a flywheel where more income creates more wealth, which creates more income, et cetera. So if that's your counter argument, that's my point. This is exactly true.

16:26The wealth is creating the income and vice versa. That's all I'm trying to say. I'm not saying expense management doesn't matter at all. But if you have to think about what am I going to do over the next five years, I think your spending is not the place to spend all that time. And it's more of your income. Speaking of data, how common is it for households to actually climb the wealth ladder? Depends over the time period. So I have this data here. I looked at 10-year and 20-year periods. This data is different. Most of the data I talk about is from the Survey of Consumer Finances, which looks at household snapshots, just different households over time.

16:58There's another study called the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which follows the same set of households over time. And I use that data to see, okay, if I see a household today and I look at them in the next snapshot 10 years later, or that's probably two snapshots later, where are they? Are they in the same wealth level? Are they up, down, et cetera? Over a 10-year period, about 20 % of households will increase by at least one wealth level, and 3 % will have increased by two wealth levels. And over a 20-year period, about 33 % of households will have increased by one wealth level, and about 5 % will have increased by two levels.

17:33There is upward mobility, even in the United States, despite what people say. It's good mobility, but this is not just mobility like, oh, I gained wealth. I gained enough wealth to get into a new level. And so for some of those people, that's going to be a marginal increase. For others, it could be a 10x or more jump. For those that went up two levels, their wealth went up at least 10x over a period of a decade or two. What about the other direction? How common is it for households to fall backwards on the ladder? So regardless of time period, the downward mobility is about the same. So there's about a 10 % chance of falling down a level within 10 years or 20 years.

18:05So that's actually good. It shows that there's not necessarily like over a longer period of time, there's more downward mobility. It's about the same. Going down two levels, it's going to be about 2 % of households. Once again, going down a wealth level is not necessarily necessarily always the result of something really bad happening. I think it could be you're in retirement, you pull down your money. It could happen, you fall down on wealth level. It's not necessarily a bad thing. You expected that to happen. There's also cases of divorce. Two individuals are in a household. They divorce. They have to split their assets.

18:33Now you have two individuals possibly at a lower wealth level. You take anything multiplied by 0.5, you could see how you could fall down a level. In addition, there's investment things that can happen. If you have a lot of your money, let's say you have a business and almost all of your networks in that business and something bad happens to it. We go through a COVID-like scenario, you own a bunch of restaurants, you could see how you'd fall down a level or two. So those are examples of how that happens. It is rare though, which is the good part. And so once again, only about 12 % of households will experience a downward shift in level over a 10 or 20 year period.

19:03But what that tells you is most people actually stay in the same wealth level over a 10 year or a 20 year period. Most of them will be in the same wealth level. That doesn't mean they didn't build wealth, but they didn't build enough wealth to jump out of their level. I think this is very common in like level three and level four, because once you're in these levels, especially level four, it's the hardest one to get out of. I think it's something like 64 % of households that are in level four today, or at least based on the historical data, 64 % of those households will still be in level four a decade from now or two decades from now, one way or the other.

19:32It's very difficult to break out of these levels once you get there, because the strategies that get you in there may not be the same as the strategies that get you out. And we can go into that later. I'm curious, Nick, if you have any idea which level might be most common to fall down. Once again, there's limited data on this because the panel study income dynamics doesn't have too many households in this level, but it's technically based on the data I have level five, those with 10 million to a hundred million dollars are most likely to be in level four, one to$10 million of all the levels. So of all of them, anyone that's most likely to fall down, it's technically level five.

20:07Why do I think that is? Divorce, as I just mentioned, I just talked about the concentrated holdings. All my money's in this one business and it's worth 20 million bucks. Right now you're in level five. Something happens to that business, you could see your fortune wiped away. That's what we see in the data. Once again, there are not enough households in this data to really be like 100 % definitive. But based on what I've seen, that's what the data looks like. It makes sense. How do these people that are billionaires go to zero? They bet everything on one thing or there's fraud in their company or there's all sorts of weird things where they're not diversified.

20:37I think concentration is fundamentally the issue there. How does the composition of wealth change as people move up the wealth ladder? So in general, there's like this trend from let's say levels one and two to like levels three to four to levels five to six, where the main assets that people own in levels one to two is mostly like their car. And then it starts to become their home by like levels two to three. And then as you go into like levels four and five, it starts to become their retirement accounts, stocks, things like that. And then five and six is where you're starting to see private business ownerships, equity in your own company, or you have equity in a startup that got very big and either sold for a lot of money or it's just worth a lot of money.

21:17So that's what we tend to see in the data. In general, this trend is from less income producing assets to more income producing assets over time. Of those in levels one to three, less than 25 % of their assets are in income producing assets. And by the way, your home is not considered an income producing asset. Your primary residence is not considered one in this instance. Compare that to levels four to six, and over half of their assets are in income producing assets. So that includes your retirement accounts, real estate, stocks outside like a brokerage account, and private businesses. And so when you just look at that over time, and this was in chapter three of the Wealth ladder, I'm walking through every single asset class and just showing you, okay, here's all the levels and here's the distribution of the percentage of their assets in each level allocated to that particular asset class.

Read the full transcript

22:05And it's interesting because for those lower on the wealth ladder, they just don't have money to go and buy stocks. They don't have money to do all this stuff. And so it's very obvious, but as they do start to get money, you start to see, okay, they buy a home. And then after they buy a home, then they have a retirement account and then they start to own stocks and then maybe they even have a business. So it's kind of that progression of the wealth ladder and makes it very useful for those that are looking at these types of things. What do you think the key takeaway would be for the listeners from the data of shifting wealth composition?

22:34It's more income producing assets all the way up. I wrote about this in the first book in Just Keep Buying. I said, the continual purchase of a diverse set of income producing assets. I wrote that back in 2022, did not have this data yet. And looking at this data now, I'm even more convinced of that. There's one of the charts in the end of chapter three where I take all this together and I say, okay, look at just the percentage of income producing assets for each wealth level. And it just increases in every single one. Level two has more than level one. Level three has more than level two, et cetera, all the way up the wealth ladder.

23:04That's my main takeaway. The people that have the most wealth also tend to have most of their money. Not even just most, they have more money, obviously, but a higher percentage of their assets are in these types of asset classes that are income producing than those lower on the ladder. It's interesting. It kind of makes sense. A vehicle and a house are fixed, then a variation in value. Obviously, you can get really expensive houses, but someone with a medium or moderate level of wealth is probably not going to have a crazy expensive house. And so the rest of their assets are going to go into other stuff.

23:35And then you have the flywheel effect that you mentioned earlier with those income producing assets are going to increase in value over time. All makes sense. A big part of your book is going through the strategies of how you can get from one wealth level to the next. And that's probably the most interesting part of the book, which I think was the point. Can you talk about the strategies for moving from level one to level two? So the strategy in each level is going to be different because of obviously the starting point. The obvious strategy that most people would say in level one, level one, once again, you have less than$10 ,000 in wealth.

24:04You could even be in debt. It doesn't matter, just less than 10K net worth. And I think the solution there is to get to safety of some sort. Obviously, you're going to hear people say, get an emergency fund, financial safety. my more expanded way of thinking about safety is who do you have in your network? Do you have friends, do you have family that can help you out while you build that safety? And then you can help them out later, help other people out in your network. And I think that's really important because we always like to measure wealth in financial terms and like, hey, what's on your balance sheet?

24:34But there's a lot more wealth out there in terms of networks, friends, family, as I said, that can really help you get out of a dire financial situation. And so that's what I I would say to focus on. Of course, everyone knows, oh, I need to get an emergency fund. That's pretty out there. That's not a cutting edge idea. I think the thing that's a little bit different here is what are the other types of wealth I can rely on to get myself out of this? And this is a very common thing in the third world. There's this great book called Portfolios for the Poor. And these people are the best budgeters on the planet because they have so little that they have this network of borrowing they do.

25:08And okay, I owe this person money. And And they even do stuff that doesn't even make sense to someone. If you know mathematics, it wouldn't make any sense, but it actually makes a lot of sense behaviorally. For example, they will take out debt at maybe not a crazy interest rate because they know if they don't do that, they won't save money. And so they take out debt as a forced savings mechanism because if they just had a bunch of cash sitting there, they would just spend it all right away. There are behavioral tricks, and it's not everybody that does this, but there was just some shocking things.

25:36You read this, like, oh, that's very interesting. But just a lot of ways of thinking about budgeting and how you get to safety and using your network to do that. Where on the ladder does pursuing education become really important? From a financial perspective, it's definitely level one and probably most important in level two. Because by the time you're out of level one, you can kind of say, hey, you know, I have a base of safety and I can use that to now invest in myself. And this is not true, for example, of high schoolers going into college. A lot of these people don't have$10 ,000 in assets.

26:06I didn't either. But I think through my family, I've never been in level one, even though technically my net worth was below 10 ,000 when I graduated all through college. But through my family, I would say as a proxy, I was at least in level two. And some people are higher than that. So when I'm thinking about education, I'm saying like, hey, you're in a spot where you can take this risk. Even if my education didn't pay off, I still would have been fine. I could have come home, stayed with my family. I could have lived at home and got a job and done whatever. That's not true of a lot of people.

26:35And so for those that aren't in that situation, you kind of have to get to some sense of financial safety before you can really start investing in your education a bit more. And that's unfortunate, but I think that's what's true. Now, once again, that's the financial side of education. I think education from a spiritual or personal growth side is important, regardless of your wealth level. If you just want to learn more, I think that's great. But if we're just talking, what's the financial payoff? It's the most important and definitely in level two, because that's, you're either early in your career or you just need skills to kind of get out of that level where you can really change the trajectory of your life.

27:05If you get a good paying job or something, that can get you into level three or level four. All you need is time now. So I think education is the thing to think about. And once again, education is a very broad term because I'm not just talking college degrees. You can go and there's blue collar work, there's trade schools, there's other types of skills out there, learn sales. I think of all the skills out there that are going to be valuable in the future, I think sales is still going to be one of the most valuable because AI is not going to be able to do it. I things like that. I really think people are going to buy from people.

27:36AI will do a lot of other research and other things that are really important, but I still think sales is going to be an incredibly valuable skill. And if you get very good at it, the sky's the limit. You can sell luxury real estate in New York City and make a killing doing that. Okay. So that was to get from level one to level two, we're talking about budgeting and social networks. Yeah. Safety. Safety, right. Okay. Then level two to level three, education. What does it take to get out of level three. I think that's where investing really starts to play a bigger role. Obviously, time is the big vector in all of this.

28:07With enough time, saving money, investing, et cetera, that gets you into level four, et cetera. It's not that investing is not important in level one or level two or anything like that, but the payoff and the impact is literally 10 times smaller. If you say, oh, I have$10 ,000 invested. Okay, let's say you have a 10 % year, that's a thousand bucks. I mean, that's not nothing, but now you have$100 ,000 invested and now that's 10 ,000. At some point, your portfolio starts to compete with you in terms of how much you can save. That is the big unlock. And especially by the time you're in level four and get deep into level four, it's probably going to start earning more than you.

28:41Kind of rebuilding yourself as like a financial asset equivalent. You can imagine like, okay, I'm trying to rebuild a worker that goes out and earns money for me. So in level two, that worker doesn't make that much money. Your spending is going to be far more important. Your income decisions, how you do your career is going to be more important. By the time you get to level three, that little financial asset equivalent is a bit bigger. And now it's probably maybe not making the same as you, but it's really helping. It's like having an assistant that's there earning you money. And then as you get deeper into level three, and especially into level four, that thing actually starts making more than you.

29:11And that's where the real unlock is. And so I really focused on investing in level three. It was why I wrote Just Keep Buying for the proverbial level two to level three household that wants to get deeper into level three or into level four. I fundamentally believe that's it. It takes a long time and you got to save and hustle away at that. But I think that is the way to do it. And there's a ton of data that shows it can be done. You talk in the book about having a side hustle. Would you worry about a side hustle distracting people from their main career? Oh, definitely. I probably should have mentioned that a bit more.

29:44It depends what your career is. In my case, my side hustle is I've been blogging on the internet for nine years. I know I've written a few books, et cetera. I did that because I had hit a cap in my job, my old job. There was no way I was going to earn more. I'd have to go get an MBA or a PhD. So I was capped out. So if you're in one of those positions where like, hey, I'm going to get 3 % to 4 % raises for the next 20 years unless I do something else, then that side hustle really isn't as much of a distraction. If you're in a career where like, oh, I could get a promotion and then this happens, that's a different story.

30:16So I think you have to really think about your situation. And I don't think a side hustle is necessary. I think for some people where maybe they're in an industry or position where like, hey, for me to get to that next level, to get a real big jump in pay or anything like that, it's just not going to happen or it's going to take much longer than I thought, then maybe a side hustle can make sense. I also enjoyed it too. I think there's also some personal enjoyment in side hustles because people do them because they love them, I'm guessing. That's not always the case, but in my case, that was true.

30:43And so when you're thinking about, should I do a side hustle? Yes. Think about, is this going to distract from my main career and could that send me off on the wrong path? And then also think about like, do I enjoy this thing? And that's another piece of it. Your side hustle, I think led you to change careers and go into something that has much bigger upside. I asked the question because I've never done a side hustle. The closest thing I've done is the content stuff, but I did that as part of my career. So we kind of took different paths to get to a very similar place, I think. Yeah, exactly. I was doing this on the side and then I got recruited to join a wealth management firm.

31:17This is not technically through them, but yes, it does help bring in clients here and there. That's helpful in its own right, but it's just interesting that you have that alignment. And so it's nice to have that. And so yes, now there is more potential in my actual career than there was before, but I started this on that side path and now the side path veered into the main path somehow. How important is controlling spending in level three, either to get out of it or to even stay in it? The biggest expense for those in level three in general is their home. And you see that in the data in terms of their assets, of all the asset classes they own, their primary residence is the largest one.

31:52When I was looking at data on some of the mobility data in terms of, let's look at households that start in level three today, and then 10 years from now, they're still in level three and compare those households to those that start in level three and make it to level four. What were the differences? One of the biggest differences is those that made it to level four had higher income. So once again, income is one of the big things. But the other thing I saw was that the spending between these two groups was almost identical. So even though the people that made it to level four had more income, and so that obviously helped them save more, the people that didn't make it to level four spent almost as much as the people that did.

32:30There is a keeping up with the Joneses. So here's an example where like spending can matter. And I do start to see that in the data. But once again, if I had to pick, if I'm talking to the person that's in level three, and I think they're going to still be in level three in a decade, I'm not going to tell them to cut their spending. I'm going to tell them to grow their income because it's going to just make it so much easier because they grow their income. Their spending is not going to go up that much, at least based on the data I saw. Those that went from level three to level four did spend a little more than those that stayed in level three, but didn't spend that much more.

32:58They're spending almost the same amount of money, but they're making so much more. That's where the wedge is. It's in making more money. And so to some people, this is going to sound obvious, but at least in the United States and the financial media, this is not an obvious point because there are still so many people that beat the spending horse. Just keep on bringing this argument up over and over. And I'm not saying it doesn't matter for a small subset of people. It definitely does. But for the vast majority, it is the income that is the lever. Earning and investing is going to get you into level four.

33:27What does it take to get up to level five? Because the jumps in wealth started becoming really big. I call level four the no man's land of wealth, because once you're in level four, you don't need to get out of level four. You don't even need it. For some people, you don't even get a level three. In certain places in the world, especially in like Europe, because the social safety net is so much better. I think level three is the enough level in Europe, in the United States, where healthcare costs are much higher. I would say Canada is probably between, I would say Europe and the US in terms of how I would think about it.

33:53So you probably need to be level four, even in Canada to kind of really feel that financial independence and everything. Why say level four is the no man's land of wealth, because the stuff that got you in there is very unlikely to get you out. And I can just do some simple math, which I brought from the book that demonstrates this. Imagine today you have an investment portfolio. I'm just making it very simple. A million dollar investment portfolio, you've already done that, which is an accomplishment. So congrats on doing that, however long it took you to get there. It's earning 5 % a year. Let's assume this is inflation adjusted.

34:24And you're adding$100 ,000 a year. How long does it take you to get to 10 million? So how long does it take you to get from the beginning of level four to level five? The answer is 28 years. Take your financial calculator, run it yourself, you'll see. 28 years. So it's going to take you almost three decades of grinding it out, saving$100 ,000 after tax, a considerable amount of money, while earning 5 % a year after you've already made a million bucks. So you can see the math is not your friend once you're in level four. And even if you're like, well, Nick, I'm going to save even more. I'm going to save$300 ,000 a year.

34:57like an example, you're almost making probably$700 ,000 a year pre-tax. Even then it takes 17 years. Even with saving 300K a year, 5 % return starting with a million, you can see that standard nine to five jobs, save, invest in your 401k or your retirement account, whatever, and let the markets do the thing for you. It's not going to get you there without a very long time and grinding for a long time. So the better solution, if someone really wants to get into level five is what are those people that get into level five and how do they get there? Besides the celebrities, athletes, entertainers, put those people aside, let's assume you're not them.

35:33It's business owners. It's all entrepreneurs. And so you basically have to start a company and sell it for tens of millions of dollars and you have most of the equity. Or you join a company very early, it's like a startup and it sells for hundreds or millions or billions of dollars. And your net take ends up, you're an Nella in level five. That's why if you look at the data, the vast majority of those people have most of their money in business interests, and especially in level six, which is 100 million plus. It's just overwhelming what the data shows on that. And so I was just trying to emphasize that if you want to do that, that's the big decision.

36:06Do you go out on your own, start a business? Or do you say, hey, you know what, I'm comfortable not doing that and just doing my thing here? Or you could even take your foot off the gas. That's another option that no one's thinking about, which is the whole coast fire idea. I've saved enough or if I stopped saving right now, I would be able to get to retirement. I just need to cover my current expenses. And so I think that's the big decision point. And I think a lot of people rationally say, hey, I'm not going to keep grinding just to build more wealth. It's not going to really improve my life.

36:34And they pull back. And I think that's the right thing to do for a lot of people. And I unfortunately don't think enough people do that. So someone finds themselves in level fours as the one to$10 million rung. What kinds of things knock people out of that? So we already talked about some of them earlier, divorce, personal things of that nature. If you're not diversified, some bad investments, you have most of your money in one thing. I have friends that have a lot of their money in tech. They're like in the queues or even a levered queue and they have 50 % of their assets in there and they're like, hey, it's going great.

37:08And it is going great for them. But if that turns, we saw what happened in 2022. If that had extended further, it would have been really bad. And I actually think the 2022 bear market was going to get much worse. Just this whole chat GPT happens at the end of 2022. And that's been the bull market ever since we're off to the races. And so if that doesn't happen in that way, who knows where tech valuations would be today. If I had to pick what are the two things in the US especially could be health issues, but those are rare and they happen, but they're rare. It's going to be health issues, divorce, and over concentration.

37:40How do you lose wealth? How does that even happen? You're not going to be spending down necessarily. That could happen if you're in retirement. So there is that class of people who are kind of level four and they pull down. But if you actually look at the retirement data, most retirees do not spend down their portfolios. They just don't do it. They spend their income, they spend up to what their investments return, but they just don't withdraw. One in seven retirees actually pull out and actually have a portfolio. We talk so much about the 4 % rule and no one uses it, sadly. But that's at least the data I've seen.

38:08I've looked at data that a large percentage of people use the 4 % rule. There's a Canadian paper showing the same thing. Retirees in Canada spend way less than they could. I knew you'd have a paper, Ben. The fact that the Canadians and the Americans think the same on this is like, yep, that's probably true then. And I get it. You're worried. I don't want to spend all my money. A lot of people aren't well-versed in the 4 % rule and know all that. They're like, I'm going to spend it and there's going to be a market crash and then I'm going to go through. I talked to a lot of retirees and they're like, I have nothing I want to spend on.

38:41They don't want to fly private. All these things that you're like, oh, spend it on this or that, they don't want to do. They don't want to get and travel to the other side of the world and be on a 10-hour flight or something. They just can't be bothered with a lot of this stuff. And so I think they're very content and they just don't want to spend money. And so it's really hard to be like, oh, spend more. They don't want to. I think a lot of it's the separation of income and capital too, where people will spend their dividends, but they just don't want to spend their capital. Even if that's wrong, we can tell them, hey, that's wrong.

39:07You could spend more, but people don't want to hear that. Live off the income is such a great line. And so never touch the principle, basically. Yeah, exactly. What are the downsides of reaching level five when you start to get into that more extreme wealth? I'll bucket level five and six together. You have to think about all the different ways that your life will change. Not just, okay, yes, I have more money. I have to manage it. There could be the stress of managing the wealth. That's financial in some ways, but the loss of possible trust. If you meet someone and they know you're wealthy. It also depends how if this is stealth wealth or not.

39:39If you're known as being wealthy, I think it changes it a little bit or people could like look you up and realize how wealthy you are. You'll never know, does this person like me for me? Are they just after me for my money? This is where like old friends are really important because they liked you when hopefully you weren't in level five, et cetera. So you got along with them then, which is great. And so I think that's one thing. Family dynamics change a bit more. Maybe there's an expectation because you have so much money. Maybe if you're like low in level four, no one's like, oh my gosh, you have all this money and you're rich and you can do all this stuff.

40:07But if you're in level five or even deeper into level five, you could do tons of stuff with your money. There's the social almost pressure or maybe expectation, or what are you doing with that money? Or maybe you should be donating or this or that. So there's a lot of these things that happen, even your own motivation. When you're level four, you're like, okay, at least I can still grind to do more. But by the time you're deep into level five, you have so much money, you would probably never consume it. it really changes your motivation to work, all sorts of things. So I talk about all these in the book and the different ways that these can impact you.

40:39Now, I know what some people are going to say, it's first world problems, world's tiniest violin, who cares about this stuff? But I do believe more wealth can actually ruin people's lives. I know some people will like, oh yeah, I'll agree with that. But inside they're like, I don't actually agree with that. But I really believe there's a lot of people out there that more wealth that actually made them worse off than if they never had that wealth. I believe it. We did a whole episode, episode 145 of this podcast with Jennifer Risher, who wrote a book about exactly that, about the challenges of extreme wealth and all the ways it can affect social dynamics.

41:09It's a real problem. It's a funny thing to call a problem. I think people are quick to criticize calling it a problem, but it's a real thing. There's a different type of struggle that people in those situations have. How much do you think people's lifestyle changes when they go, say, from level four to five or even five to six? I think it's more of a personality thing than that's going to determine if there's going to be a lifestyle change. There's certain types of people that it doesn't matter what's in their bank account. They will just never spend that much money to like, let's say, fly private.

41:39Five grand an hour, 10 grand an hour. They're just not going to pay that. I think there's others who will say, OK, what happens when you start to get into level five? That's where you can start to fly private. There's actually a guy named Preston Holland. He's the private check guy on Twitter, and he has a really good date on this. There was a Money Wise episode where he's talking about the middle of the bell curve for where people really start to fly private a lot is about $20 million in wealth or$2 million in annual income. These are very far right tail, exceptional people in terms of either wealth or income.

42:08And so that's where we start to see it. They start to show up at around$10 million in wealth, but they really are showing up the most at 20 million bucks. So that's the kind of consumption change that can happen. Once you get into 100 million, now you can start talking about yachts and all sorts of other things. Obviously, it depends on the size of the yacht, et cetera. There's no way to stop your consumption if you really want to go all out. You can start buying companies. You can really start impacting people's lives in a much bigger way. That's the big difference is, especially those in level five, if you had a business or you sold a business, you had the ability to influence a lot of people's lives that you had the business with.

42:43So I think that's another thing to think about. not just consumption, but how your money can impact society just through the decisions you make. How long does it typically take people to reach each rung on the wealth ladder? It really depends. I have some data in chapter 10, which looks at this. Because I don't have an annual snapshot, I can't be like, okay, it takes 4.7 years or something. I have them in five-year snapshots. And because of that, I can say, okay, what percentage of people started in one level and then got to another level over time? For example, on page 153, there's a matrix, which shows the starting wealth level on each one of the rows and then the ending wealth level along the columns.

43:20So you can imagine is like a matrix. 46 % of people that are in level one will still be in level one 10 years later. 30 % will have made it to level two. 22 % will have made it to level three, et cetera. And so you can look at this little matrix here and do it over a 10 year period. And I have it over a 20 year period as well. And you can see what percentage of people, so you can say, Hey, I'm in this level today. What's the probability I'm going to be in that level. And it only goes to level five because we just didn't have any level six people in the data and they're very hard to find. But either way, you can run the math and run the numbers and say, okay, this is the rough percentage of the chance I'm going to be here in 10 or 20 years.

43:56And I think over a 10-year period, it's going to be about 24 % of people will have moved up at least one level. Over a 20-year period, it's going to be about 34%, I think, something like that. Roughly a fourth will move up over a decade and a third will move up over two decades. So that's the thinking. So if you're like, okay, well, where am I at today? It's probably going to take at least 10 to 20 years to move up a considerable number of levels. So it does take time. And unfortunately, there's no shortcut to that. And I think the whole point of that chapter was to really show that idea and say, hey, look, it does take a long time.

44:30And here's the data showing that. And so there's all these get rich quick things out there, obviously, that we've all heard about. But I really wanted to show people, this does take more time than you think. And here's the data to prove that. despite what your favorite Instagram influencer, whoever says, the data shows it takes more time than most people think. I think you showed a pretty clear relationship between age and wealth too. The people in each bucket just tend to be older than those in the bucket below them. So the median age in each wealth level is as follows. Now, once again, if we just said, what's the median age in the United States, that should be like the level one age because all else equal, everyone in theory starts in level one.

45:07That's like the base level. So the median age in level one is 42, which is probably close to what the median age in the whole United States is. In level two, it's 44. In level three, it's 54. By level four, once again, which is$1 to$10 million in wealth, it's 62. Level five is 64. And level six is 66. So as you can see, it's monotonic. It's always increasing. each level, the median age goes up, but you really see the biggest jump from two to three, which is 44 to 54, and then three to four, which is 54 to 62. And so let's just imagine a hypothetical median person. So if you're in level two at 44, it takes you roughly 10 years to get to level three.

45:47And then from level three to level four, it takes another eight years. I know that's not exactly how this works statistically, but the median ages are about that far apart. You can assume that it's going to take you 20 years to go from level two to level four, all else equal. It's another way of thinking about this, but it's something that you could in theory use. What do you think those data say about the importance of time and just staying in the game to accumulate wealth? I wanted to show the data in a way that set the right expectations because this is a long journey. It really does take a lot of time.

46:17People that go up more than two levels within a short period of time, it's very rare. And the only people I know that have done it are those that had a business and they sold it and up being in level six. And so maybe they would have started in level two or three and they end up in level six, working in that business for half a decade, a decade at least, if not longer. And so thinking through that, I just want people to know how long this actually takes so that when they are on their journey, they have to realize it's going to take time as well. What does the typical millionaire household look like?

46:45So I actually pulled some data for you guys outside of just the book. Some of this was in the book, but I pulled a little bit extra just so we can walk through it all. So the median age, When we say millionaire household, I'm just looking at level four, which is one to 10 million. Technically, I would have to include level five and six, but let's just say level four to make this a little bit easier. Median age is 62. The median household income in that bracket is about $200 ,000. The median net worth is actually 2 million. What does that tell you? Okay, even though level four is one to 10 million, half of those people have less than 2 million.

47:17The other half are 2 million to 10. So you can think, obviously, home equity is a big piece of that. What's the median liquid net worth in there. So drop home equity, drop retirement. It's about 700K. So about 33 % of their net worth is liquid. So if you're in level four right now, you can be like, okay, how much of my net worth is liquid? I don't want to say on average, but the median household, median liquid net worth in there is about$700 ,000. In terms of their asset breakdown, the median millionaire is going to have about 32 % on average in their primary residence, about 24 % in their retirement accounts, 12 % in stocks outside of their retirement accounts.

47:52in stocks and mutual funds, about 9 % in other types of real estate, 9 % in business interests. Of course, this is on average, there's gonna be a lot of households with zero, a lot of households with a considerable amount in business interests, 6 % in cash, 6 % in something else. So a very small percentage in some other non-asset that I haven't listed here, and then 3 % in their car. On a$2 million household, which is the median net worth, 3 % in vehicles means your vehicles are worth about 60K or something. So that's kind of the breakdown of what a typical millionaire household in the US looks like.

48:24And once again, you're going to have people on all sides of that. 5 % of households in their 30s are in level four. So it's a very small percentage, about 15 % of those in their 40s are in level four. And once again, this is in chapter 10. So just thinking through this data of what is the typical millionaire household look like, it's someone who's a little bit older, they're on the verge of retirement, they're probably going to start pulling from those retirement assets, their household income is about 200K a year. Super interesting just to hear how the data breaks down and what that typical millionaire household looks like.

48:54How do you think people should think about enough in quotation marks when it comes to financial wealth? This is the whole premise of the FIRE movement. What is your enough in figuring out what you need for financial independence? I think that's why level four is, if I have all the levels I think about, not just because I'm in level four, but because I think this is where people have these philosophical debates because you start to get to a point where even the typical person spending by the time you're in level four, depending like where you are in level four, you'll have enough income to live a decent life.

49:25Where that is exactly is going to vary person to person, but it's usually going to be somewhere in the, let's say, 2 million to$5 million range for like most people. So you start getting in there and you start to think that's enough to like live a pretty decent life just off the income of a portfolio of let's say that size, thinking through that is really the big decision you have to make in level four. Where is that enough? Every person that I say is going to be different. I think it's going to be somewhere in level four for most people in the US and especially Canada. I think in Europe, it's probably a bit lower because the social safety net's higher.

49:57Healthcare costs aren't as exorbitant as they are in the United States, et cetera. So it's up to you really. But if I have to pick what is the enough level, it's going to be level four and probably just a mid-level four to maybe later half if you really want to be conservative. I don't think you need to get to level five. What other types of wealth do you think people should focus on building? So I took this framework from Sahil Bloom, who came out with a book called Five Types of Wealth. One of them is obviously financial. And so the other types would include social, time, mental, and physical.

50:28And I think these are ones that are easily overlooked simply because they're harder to measure. You can go open your brokerage account, you can open your bank account see a number. You have a scoreboard, so to speak, that you could use if you really wanted to compare yourself, all this type of stuff. You can't do that as easily with your social relationships. It's not just like the number of friendships, you had the depth of them. I don't have a social scorecard. You can say, oh, maybe my health can be looked at or something. But even then, you don't track that. Maybe you see that once a year.

50:56It's not the same. So because of the measurement issue, I think it's very easy to overly focus on financial wealth, especially those that have done so well financially. Oh, I'm doing well at this thing. This is what I do better than everyone else. And so you overly focus on it. The sacrifices, you end up messing up other parts of your life as a result. So you maybe don't spend as much time with your kids. You neglect your health. You suck up all your time. You're like, I want to make more money. So you take every meeting, you say yes to everything. And next thing you know, you don't have time to do a lot of things you want to do.

51:23And so thinking about these other types of wealth, which is the main thrust of part three of the book, is where I start to really open this up. We start very broad talking about the wealth ladder. I get very specific talking about each level in part two. And then part three is like, okay, what does this actually matter for? And what are the bigger issues you need to think through as you're, quote, building wealth in your life? And so those are the four I would focus on is time, social, mental, and physical. Good framework. How do you hope that individuals and financial advisors who read this book should use it to improve their decision-making?

51:56Most financial advisors, I don't want to say this across the board, but I think the typical clientele is going to be somewhere in that level four bracket, maybe high level three, low level four. And that is where as an advisor, you can really empower your client to think about these types of decisions. Okay, we have this level of income, you have this much net worth, here's your house, etc. What do you actually want to do in the future? Do you want to start a business? Do you want to have a coast fire scenario where you pull back? Now, I know advisors are going to be incentivized to tell them to keep working, keep adding funds, give an AUM fee, especially.

52:28Everything's incentivized to keep adding more to the system. I understand that. At the same time, there is this fiduciary responsibility you could have of, hey, we also need to think about what's the thing that's going to make the client most fulfilled as well. And sometimes that may not necessarily mean maximizing their well. For advisors in particular, it's the level three, level four types of conversations that are going to really help people. It's not that the level one and two conversations won't be helpful. That could help other people and their clients' lives, but it's just thinking about it more holistically.

52:58And for me, it's what is that framework and what's the decision we're talking about with the typical client? And it's going to be someone who's high net worth, and they're having some sort of debates about what to do tax-wise, what to do with their job, whether they want to move, planning for their children, et cetera. These are all the types of decisions that roll into that level four bucket. We have a twist on our final question for you, Nick. How did writing this book affect how you think about success in your own life? I'm in level four. And so many of the decision points I was thinking about personally were a lot of the decision points I was writing about in the book.

53:36The same things that are happening to those people in level four, I'm thinking about those things. Do I go all in on writing? Do I like stop working a corporate job? I thought about that. Do I stop writing and just do the corporate job and chill out and not have to worry about this anymore? Do I want to coast fire? Do I want to start my own business? These are all the things I've thought about. I think the bigger question that I eventually realized after when I was doing all this writing and thinking about success, I define success as a living life on your own terms, whatever that means. And so I'm still thinking through what does that mean?

54:08I think that's the bigger question for most people. It's not even just like, okay, if living life on your own terms is my definition of success, then what are the terms that I actually want? And what are the liabilities I want to take on? I've had people say, oh, Nick, you should start a podcast. You should start clue, but there's a lot of work that goes into it. You guys know this. I write once a week and don't get me wrong. As hard as that is, it's relatively easy relative to putting together a podcast, editing, coming up with questions, finding guests. I think there's just so much more work involved.

54:37And so there's liabilities to success that I think a lot of people don't think about. And I'm trying to figure out what are the liabilities I'm comfortable with. And writing one blog post a week for me and an occasional book is just enough liability to keep me happy. I'm still debating what are the things I would consider putting on my plate because something else has to come off the plate as a result. And so I'm trying to figure out that balance personally. Great answer. Great to have you on again, Nick. Great to see you. Congratulations on a phenomenal book. I appreciate it. It's always great chatting with you guys and Cameron.

55:06I know we go way back discussing the Ritholtz of Canada, as I called you guys back in the day. So it's been very fun going back and forth with you guys over the years and obviously been watching you on the YouTube channel and everything. It's so cool. So definitely a fan over here in the States. Awesome. Thanks, Nick.

55:48Thank you.

56:04Thank you.

56:31Thank you.

56:53Neither One Digital nor PWL Capital has any obligation to provide revised statements and or opinions in the event of changed circumstances.

From the publisher

Are your financial decisions evolving as your wealth grows? In this episode of the Rational Reminder Podcast, we welcome back Nick Maggiulli to unpack his approach to climbing the wealth ladder and creating the life you want. Nick is the Chief Operating Officer at Ritholtz Wealth Management, the author of The Wealth Ladder and Just Keep Buying, and creator of the blog Of Dollars and Data. He is renowned for his ability to take the complexity out of finance and for his deep knowledge of investing. In our conversation, Nick explains his new framework for building wealth in his new book, The Wealth Ladder, and he unpacks how spending, income, and investing should change from one level to the next. He breaks down his .01% and 1% rules for spending and income, how the opportunity cost of time changes with wealth, and what the data reveals about income, wealth, and asset composition between different levels. Nick also shares strategies to progress between levels, insights on the challenges of extreme wealth, and why focusing on non-financial forms of wealth is important. Join us for a practical, data-driven framework for thinking about financial decisions and what truly constitutes ‘enough’ with Nick Maggiulli!

Key Points From This Episode:

(0:00:00) Nick Maggiull, his new book, and his background at Ritholtz Wealth Management.

(0:03:48) The Wealth Ladder, its different levels, and why he thinks the concept is important.

(0:06:59) Hear about the 0.01% rule for spending, and examples of The Wealth Ladder levels.

(0:12:09) Unpack the 1% rule and how the opportunity cost of time changes up the ladder.

(0:15:00) Explore how income determines wealth and how to move up and down the ladder.

(0:19:47) Which level is the most common to fall, and how wealth changes up the ladder.

(0:22:34) What shifting wealth composition indicates and how to move from level one to two.

(0:25:48) When education should be the focus, and what it takes to move out of level three.

(0:29:41) Discover the pros and cons of a side hustle and why controlled spending is crucial.

(0:33:32) Learn the key to reaching level five and why people fall out of levels four and five. 

(0:39:20) Insights on the downsides of extreme wealth and how it impacts lifestyle. 

(0:42:54) How long it takes to climb the ladder and the correlation between age and wealth.

(0:46:10) Why financial persistence is vital and what a typical millionaire household looks like.

(0:49:00) Find out what constitutes ‘enough’ financially and examples of other forms of wealth.

(0:51:56) Nick shares what he hopes readers will take away from the book and how it impacted his view of success.

 

Links From Today’s Episode:

Meet with PWL Capital: https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p

Rational Reminder on iTunes — https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rational-reminder-podcast/id1426530582.
Rational Reminder Website — https://rationalreminder.ca/ 

Rational Reminder on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/rationalreminder/

Rational Reminder on X — https://x.com/RationalRemind
Rational Reminder on TikTok — www.tiktok.com/@rationalreminder

Rational Reminder on YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/

Rational Reminder Email — info@rationalreminder.ca

Benjamin Felix — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/

Benjamin on X — https://x.com/benjaminwfelix

Benjamin on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminwfelix/

Cameron Passmore — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/

Cameron on X — https://x.com/CameronPassmore

Cameron on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/cameronpassmore/

Nick Maggiulli — http://ofdollarsanddata.com/

Nick Maggiulli on LinkedIn — https://linkedin.com/in/nickmaggiulli/

Nick Maggiulli on Twitter — https://twitter.com/dollarsanddata 

Nick Maggiulli on Instagram — https://instagram.com/nickmaggiulli

Ritholtz Wealth Management — https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/

Episode 145: Jennifer Risher: Talking About Money — https://rationalreminder.ca/podcast/145

Episode 255: Structured Products — https://rationalreminder.ca/podcast/255

The Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID) — https://www.bls.gov/cex/cecomparison/psid_profile.htm

Preston Holland on X — https://x.com/prestonholland6

 

Books From Today’s Episode:

Just Keep Buying — https://www.amazon.com/Just-Keep-Buying-Proven-wealth-ebook/dp/B09FYHZXBN

The Wealth Ladder — https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593854039

Portfolios of the Poor — http://www.portfoliosofthepoor.com/

The 5 Types of Wealth — https://www.the5typesofwealth.com/

 

Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)

More from The Rational Reminder Podcast

All 184 episodes
Episode 376: Climbing The Wealth LadderThe Rational Reminder Podcast · 57 min
Listen in VO