In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics US - Episode 144: This is Trump's Plan for Venezuela
Hosts
- Anthony Scaramucci: Former White House Director of Communications and Wall Street financier.
- Katty Kay: US Special Correspondent for BBC with nearly 30 years of experience covering US politics.
Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts discuss the implications of the recent capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and delve into the potential U.S. interventions in Venezuela and other countries, examining the motivations and consequences of such actions.
Key Topics Discussed
- Nicolas Maduro's Capture
- Maduro is currently facing legal proceedings in New York following his capture.
- Discussion of the legality of the U.S. action, with contrasting views on its compliance with international law.
- Scaramucci's Perspective: Believes that prior examples (like the extraction of Manuel Noriega) suggest that the U.S. has considerable latitude in national security matters, despite potential violations of international law.
- Public Opinion on U.S. Actions
- Recent polls show divided opinions among Americans regarding the U.S. intervention in Venezuela.
- Only 24% support the U.S. taking control of the country, suggesting a lack of consensus and concern over the implications of regime change.
- Trump and Rubio's Disagreement
- Scaramucci notes apparent contradictions in Trump and Rubio's statements regarding the U.S. role in Venezuela, specifically whether the U.S. will run the country or simply leverage it for geopolitical gains.
- The FAFO Doctrine
- Introduction of the FAFO doctrine (Fuck Around and Find Out), indicating a more aggressive U.S. foreign policy stance under Trump.
- This doctrine implies that countries that challenge U.S. interests will face consequences, as evidenced by the situation in Venezuela.
- Oil as a Central Issue
- The importance of Venezuelan oil reserves — controlling them is viewed as a strategy for not only stabilizing Venezuela but also enhancing U.S. geopolitical power.
- Concerns about the perception of U.S. actions resembling past exploitative interventions (e.g., Iraq).
- Challenges Ahead
- Discussion of the complexities involved in stabilizing Venezuela post-Maduro, including:
- Collaborating with the military and managing the collectivos (armed militia groups).
- The need for extensive investment in the country’s infrastructure.
- The potential for civil unrest if economic conditions do not improve.
- Comparative Historical Context
- Hosts compare Venezuela's situation to historical cases (e.g., Peru, Colombia, Argentina) to illustrate the difficulties of rebuilding a nation post-conflict.
- Acknowledgment of the educated Venezuelan diaspora that could contribute to rebuilding efforts, albeit with hesitation due to historical traumas.
- Future U.S. Foreign Policy Implications
- The potential implications of Trump’s rhetoric regarding other countries, including Iran, Cuba, Mexico, and Colombia.
- Speculation about whether military intervention is likely in these regions and the political ramifications domestically and internationally.
Conclusion The hosts conclude the episode by reflecting on the potential outcomes of U.S. involvement in Venezuela and the implications for global politics. They express concerns over the lack of a coherent plan from the U.S. administration and emphasize the importance of a thoughtful approach to foreign policy moving forward.
Key Takeaways
- The U.S. intervention in Venezuela raises significant legal and ethical questions.
- Public opinion is divided, indicating a cautious stance among Americans regarding international military operations.
- The FAFO doctrine illustrates a shift in U.S. foreign policy that may lead to increased tensions globally.
- Long-term stabilization of Venezuela will require extensive planning, investment, and local cooperation to avoid exacerbating the situation.
Additional Notes
- Next Episode Teaser: The hosts hint at discussing Marjorie Taylor Greene and her insights into the MAGA movement in the next bonus episode, encouraging listeners to subscribe for more in-depth political analysis.
For more content and to become a member, visit [The Rest Is Politics US](https://therestispoliticsus.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOVenezuela's Political Turmoil
0:45 to 2:52
Discussion on Nicolas Maduro's current legal predicament and its implications.
“Then in the second half of the program, we're going to look at what President Trump is saying about this in the context of other countries.”
Legal Implications of Intervention
2:52 to 4:36
Critique of the legality surrounding the U.S. extraction of Maduro.
“Two, I would never have sanctioned that.”
Oil and Geopolitical Strategy
4:36 to 6:28
Analysis of why U.S. interests in Venezuelan oil drive political actions.
“could be in support of attacking a NATO ally and occupying territory of a NATO ally.”
Challenges of Military Collaboration
6:28 to 8:56
Exploration of the complexities of U.S. military involvement in Venezuela.
“And the Wall Street General says the problem with that is that it makes, as you just said, it makes this look like a mercenary operation.”
Plans for a New Government
8:56 to 12:00
Discussion on the proposed interim government structure and challenges ahead.
“She's on board with Donald Trump's plan.”
Economic Stabilization and Aid
12:00 to 14:02
Outline of economic plans and the necessity of U.S. aid for recovery.
“I mean, I'm not hearing, that's why I asked you what the plan is, because I know that you've been speaking to people who are involved in this.”
U.S. Aid and Infrastructure Needs in Venezuela
14:02 to 15:19
Exploration of the urgent infrastructure needs in Venezuela and U.S. aid's role.
“is confident that they're going to sort of do what the U.S.”
Challenges of Rebuilding Venezuela
15:20 to 16:41
Discussion on the complexity of rebuilding Venezuela and the lack of U.S. willpower.
“If you break it, it's pottery barn, right?”
Oil Production and Economic Impact
16:42 to 18:50
Analysis of the implications of Venezuelan oil production on the U.S. economy.
“And he says they don't want to risk being optimistic because things have been so bad for 25 years that it's hard for them to see the light.”
The Hypocrisy of U.S. Intervention
18:51 to 21:50
Critical examination of the U.S. government's approach to regime change in Venezuela.
“and detailed planning that would make Venezuelan expats or Venezuelans themselves confident that this is more than just a kind of mercenary oil grab on behalf of the United States.”
Show all 17 chapters
Historical Parallels in Regime Change
21:51 to 22:22
Comparison of Venezuela's situation to historical regime changes and their outcomes.
“I'm hoping that this is good for the Venezuelan people.”
The FAFO Doctrine Explained
22:23 to 23:04
Introduction to the new 'FAFO' doctrine and its implications for U.S. foreign policy.
“Did you see the great ass kisser of Lindsey Graham standing there?”
Trump's Threats to Other Countries
23:05 to 25:02
Discussion on Trump's mention of other countries for potential U.S. intervention.
“Not just Venezuela, it turns out, potentially, because last night as he was flying back from Mar-a-Lago, the president actually mentioned five other countries that he may have in his sights for US intervention.”
The Impact on Cuba and Latin America
25:03 to 28:03
Exploration of how U.S. intervention in Venezuela may affect Cuba and neighboring countries.
“When this podcast started in April of 2024, did people think that Katty Kay would be the more profane of the two podcasts?”
Analyzing Trump's Foreign Policy Threats
28:03 to 29:48
Discussion on Trump's approach towards Iran and Mexico, focusing on military intervention and drug cartels.
“Ask Albanese or ask Albanese or Carney when Trump is acting nuts.”
Congress and the Limits of Power
29:48 to 34:04
Exploration of congressional power regarding presidential military actions and the implications for political parties.
“I don't know who would be for more drugs entering their country, especially people that have children.”
Cuba: A Strategic Consideration
34:04 to 36:55
Debate about the strategic importance of Cuba and its potential economic collapse under current tensions.
“The Democrats, you know, did well in the elections in November because there was a perception that Donald Trump is focused on Iran.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:06Hello and welcome to The Rest is Politics US with me, Kattie Kay. And me, Anthony Scaramucci. And our very quiet start to 2026. As we are speaking on this Monday morning, January the 5th, Venezuela's captured president, Nicolas Maduro, is heading into a courthouse in New York. You may have heard our emergency episode that Anthony and I did on Saturday with our initial reaction, both of us having spoken to people, to what happened in the country and to the extraction of the president. We're going to update you on that because obviously things are moving pretty fast on that. So we'll give you an update on what the situation is now and what people are saying about it and what the chances are for success.
0:46Then in the second half of the program, we're going to look at what President Trump is saying about this in the context of other countries. And we will discuss the FAFO doctrine and fill you in on what the FAFO doctrine is. Forget the Monroe doctrine. This is the FAFO doctrine and what it means for the rest of the world. So, Anthony, let's start because you got quite a lot of pushback during our live stream on Saturday from people saying that you were overly positive about what had happened and pointing out that this is in violation of international law and potentially in violation of US law. But actually, I would dispute that.
1:23I've spoken to constitutional lawyers and even members of Congress who I think will investigate this and who are coming out and saying he should have consulted Congress. But I think some of them are doing that kind of in anticipation of things going wrong and to be on the right side of things if it goes wrong, which it may do. I think the president has an awful lot of latitude when it comes to U.S. national security. George H.W. Bush did something similar in Panama when he extracted Daniel Noriega in 1989 and got away with it. So I don't think U.S. law is in contention here. But you were being criticized for ignoring the legal implications of America simply going in and extracting a foreign country's president and suggesting that this could be a good thing that President Trump has done.
2:06I listened to what you said and you were saying that you wouldn't have approved of this and that there are a lot of problems that Venezuela could have because of this and that it's not clear that this is going to work. But do you want to respond to those criticisms about the international legality of this? I'm going to maintain my view and if people don't mind, I'm going to restate it a little. But I also want to point out, if you've been listening to this podcast, nobody listening to this podcast was surprised about the action. We said it was going to happen. We predicted it was going to happen.
2:39We explained that they would hit the port and then they would go after Maduro and they would capture him. They offered him the opportunity for asylum. He said no to that. And so now he's here in New York in the court system. But I did say, one, in violation of international law. Two, I would never have sanctioned that. I don't think Harris would have. Biden wouldn't. There are Republican leaders that wouldn't because you're in a territory that once you go over into that territory, regime change has not worked for the United States, has not. And we have lots of areas. We can go all the way back to the Vietnam War, certainly Iraq and Afghanistan.
3:19in. And so I would like to focus on what goes on here in the United States and not there. Why did it happen? And could there be some positive externalities of it? I did try to suggest that. But one of the number one reasons why this happened, and I want to push it over to you here in a second, Caddy, but it does have to do with the oil. And it does have to do with that 17, 18 % of the world's known oil reserves. And you add those to the US oil reserves and the Canadian oil reserves, you've now put the U.S. in a geopolitical position on the table, which is more powerful, and it can also change U.S.
3:59policy in places like the Middle East, et cetera. People don't want to hear that. That's fine. I wouldn't have done it. I think it was illegal, but I'm telling you why they did it. The big issue for the United States is going to be, we were once seen as a benevolent superpower, and now we're seen as an aggressor. And the rhetoric around Greenland, I holistically denounce. And I will say this, if this woman who's married to Stephen Miller is putting out tweets with Greenland being striped with the American flag, if they think that is something that's going to fly, I don't understand how the American people could be in support of attacking a NATO ally and occupying territory of a NATO ally.
4:47I don't understand how they could even take cover in anything here. On the Greenland stuff, we're going to talk about all of that in the second half, because there's a lot already to talk about on Venezuela, because there's been polls that have come out even since this happened that suggest the American people aren't thrilled with what the president has done. There was a Washington Post text poll, they texted 1000 people and got responses to it just kind of over the course of the last couple of days. That's the most updated information we have. And Americans are split on this mission, which I think is kind of stunning.
5:18Because usually when you have a successful Delta Force mission that goes very well, just militarily, you would tend to have a lot more support for it. The fact that the Americans are split on it, I think is worrying. Now that might just point to our split country. But here's the more worrying number for the White House going forward, only 24 % of Americans support the U.S. taking control of Venezuela. And you've had this bizarre situation over the course of the weekend where you've got Donald Trump saying we're going to run it, re-saying we're going to run it last night on Air Force One, while Marco Rubio, his Secretary of State, is trying to equivocate and say, actually, no, this is not about running the country.
5:57This is not about regime change. This is about leverage. We're going to use the leverage of an oil blockade to get the results that we want. I think on the oil side of things, it's so worth talking about because you've got the Wall Street Journal coming out this morning in their editorial saying that President Trump is speaking too much about oil. Remember, he spent a month, a couple of months talking about drugs. There's been almost no talk about drugs in the last 48 hours. It's been all about oil. Trump has said, we want access to the country's oil. And the Wall Street General says the problem with that is that it makes, as you just said, it makes this look like a mercenary operation.
6:34I mean, this does smack of 2003 when people are saying, are we going to Iraq because of the oil? I get Marco Rubio in a slightly condescending way, who was on every Sunday show yesterday was saying, people who say that this is like Iraq or Libya are basically idiots and don't understand it. I get it. Venezuelan's not Iraq or Libya. It's not Vietnam. It has a long history of democracy. That doesn't mean that when you go into a country and you take out the leadership, that you're not going to have problems. I mean, he seems to be saying because it's not Iraq and Libya, this is going to go smoothly.
7:08But my question to you is, what's the plan? Here we are two and a half days after as we're recording. Do you think the administration has a clear plan of succession of how this is all going to work? I'll give you the plan because obviously I've talked to the people that organized the abduction. I'll give you the plan. They are going to work with the military. So the opposition leadership does not have the support of the Venezuelan military. And so Trump didn't say that in the press conference, but that's the reason why they're not going with the opposition. They went to Delce Rodriguez and they told her, you can be the person, so therefore it's technically not a regime change.
7:52It's the arrest and the removal of a narco-terrorist from your country, but you still have the same government in place. And now the U.S. government is going to try to work with the Venezuelan military, okay, to stabilize the country. And I said this last week and said it three weeks ago. The plan is to have a 24 to 30 month stability interim government run by Delcey Rodriguez. Now, her rhetoric was probably a little too hot for Trump last week, which is why he started threatening her, which was, I think, a mistake by the president. I think her rhetoric was choreographed and coordinated because she's now on a balance beam between the Bolivar Communist Party, the people inside the country that want regime change and their military.
8:43Right. So that unholy trinity is going to be a very difficult thing for her to manage. Yeah. Not a position I would like to find myself in. Correct. So which is why she was. But I have I have talking to people that have spoken to her directly. she is on board with Rubio's plan. She's on board with Donald Trump's plan. And they're going to try to do this. But remember something, it's not Afghanistan, but they have these groups inside the country called the collectivos, which are armed militia. They're gangs. They're drug traffickers. They've been, by the way, running around Caracas the last couple of days.
9:21They have. And they've been installing their own level of power and their own level of authority on various neighborhoods. And these are spungling networks, Caddy, that are still going to exist. And they will obviously fragment out into violence when necessary to serve their monetary interests. And I'm leaving out the Cuban operatives in country, the Russian operatives in country. You know, this is a - The Iranian operatives in country. This is a complete mess. Another thing Maduro was doing that Trump wanted to stop, He was selling the Chinese oil at a 20 % discount, and he was selling it to them in rennenbi or gold.
10:06And you know the whole petrodollar diagram. I don't have to map it out for everybody, but if you want me to, I'm happily map it out. But since Henry Kissinger's doctrine in 1974, the U.S. wants everything run, the most valuable commodity in the world. the U.S. wants priced in U.S. dollars because it forces all the other nations' caddy to hold U.S. dollars in reserve, which gives the Federal Reserve and the U.S. government a tremendous amount of flexibility to print dollars. So again, I'm trying to tell people what is actually happening and the real politics of it. If you want to get into the ideology of it, of whether or not it should have happened, I'm in general agreement with Alistair.
10:49It should not have happened. And it is a violation of international law. If they want to take another step further and go after Greenland, I think you're going to have a dissonant community here, a more activated dissonant community here. I think you're right that that's the ideology. And I think there is an aim of the Americans to control not just oil supplies, but refinery production. And that would give it a huge amount of geopolitical clout beyond the Western Hemisphere. I think this is a more than just a Western Hemisphere play. But I think there has to be questions being asked. And that's why I asked you if they have a real plan for how to run this, because just saying, OK, well, if you, Delcey Rodriguez, don't cooperate, look what's going to happen to you, you'll end up in a prison.
11:40And even if they take out some of the most corrupt, most ruthless people like the interior minister, and they decide, OK, to put him on a perp walk too, you still have a long term planning and maintenance operation and investment operation that has to happen into Venezuela. And I'm not sure that just having an embargo around the country and threats is enough. I mean, if you, these collectivos, all the people that have been making money within the military, which is basically the military from gold and oil and drugs, who's to say that in six months time or a year's time, they don't decide, actually, we need to start making that money again.
12:23I mean, I'm not hearing, that's why I asked you what the plan is, because I know that you've been speaking to people who are involved in this. What is the actual concrete day-to-day plan for how they keep security, how they run the election system, what the law enforcement is? In preparation for the podcast, I'm going to give you their six-point plan, and I'll do it quickly. They want political and institutional reform, and they want to move genuinely towards democratic governance, which means that they're going to have to sort of revamp their current political system. We'll talk about the colectivos and the incentives on them in a minute.
13:02Okay, so they definitely want to revamp the judicial system. This is something Rodriguez has said to them. They have to eliminate the corruption in the judicial system to make the Venezuelan people feel that that system is less biased than it currently is. But what? They're just taking Rodriguez's word at this, who has been Maduro's number two for all of these years and has been involved in the rape and pillage of the judicial system? No, I think they are taking a combination of words. I think there are dissidents inside country, and I think there are expat, Venezuelan expats that live outside of the country who have family members that are still in the country.
13:45And I think they're taking a blended word, and I think they've gone to Rodriguez and said this, and she's in agreement with it. economic stabilization and reform. I think the U.S. is going to have to come up with an aid package, whether Elon Musk likes it or not, but they're going to have to come up with an aid package and they're going to have to do something to stabilize that currency. Okay. And so that's a big part of this. This will be U.S. aid going in once the U.S. is confident that they're going to sort of do what the U.S. wants. Okay. And then there's going to be a big push by the U.S.
14:21government to push foreign investments like you say Chevron, or it could be Royal Dutch Shell, but there'll be a whole group. It won't just be oil caddy. They need electrical infrastructure. They need communications infrastructure. They need healthcare infrastructure. The healthcare system in Venezuela has flat out failed. 60 % of the hospitals in Venezuela have no running water. Okay, just to tell you how dire the whole thing is, okay? A friend of mine who's, I spoke to a Venezuelan economist yesterday about this, and he described this as akin to the Soviet Union post the fall of the Berlin Wall.
15:01It's Soviet-level reconstruction that's needed, which is an enormous amount of investment and time and patience from whoever is going to be running this. And I just don't know that America has that level of time and patience and investment in it. I think this is the central problem. This is the problem. You broke it. It's what Colin Powell said about Iraq. If you break it, it's pottery barn, right? He said, if you break it, you're going to have to fix it. We don't have the will to fix these things after we break them. And so then the real question is, will the Venezuelans themselves, will the expats and will the current opposition forces, political and otherwise, inside Venezuela want to fix it?
15:43But you did mention something at the beginning that I want to go back to. If you don't incentivize the people that are making money right now off the drugs and the oil to make money in a different or potentially better or more lucrative way, you're going to be in a civil war in Venezuela. Okay. But again, as I've said, I want to remain hopeful for those people, and I want to say prayers for those people. They're one of the richest countries in the world if you look at their mineral resources and you look at the oil and gold, et cetera. But it's mismanaged, Caddy, and they have the poorest living standards.
16:20I agree with that. No, I mean, I have many Venezuelan friends who will tell you, and that's why I think you're not seeing many tears, obviously, for Maduro going. And you're seeing some optimism. And I'm asking Venezuelan friends, you know, do you feel optimistic now who have family members there? And they say there's this kind of eerie calm. This one guy said to me, look, my family members are all at the beach this weekend. It's like, you know, nothing has really changed. And he says they don't want to risk being optimistic because things have been so bad for 25 years that it's hard for them to see the light.
16:52I think people who are outside of the country who are not at the moment rushing to say they're going to go back, by the way, they want to wait and see how this turns out. But I think the biggest question is whether I understand what you say, that Rubio understands the situation well, I'm told. He has a small group. It's not a very big group of people. The bench is not very deep who have been planning for this. and I get that this is not analogous to Libya and Iraq and Vietnam, but you take out a leadership, you have to replace it with something and then you have to think, I mean, there's already reports that Venezuelan ships are escaping the blockade.
17:35Oil tankers are suddenly kind of getting through that blockade already by turning off their transmitting signals and things. So this is going to be harder, I think, than Donald Trump, who sounds to me, when I listened to that whole press conference that he gave on the plane last night, he sounds like he's on the high that presidents get when they successfully use military force. And we'll get into kind of all the other countries that he managed to threaten during that mini press conference. But he's just seeing the short term. And there's a huge long term. You're not going to get oil production up, certainly not by the midterms in any significant way.
18:11You might get some kind of reduction in global oil prices on the anticipation of Venezuelan oil coming on stream. But you and I know that's going to take a long time. American oil companies are going to look at this carefully and cautiously. They're not going to run in. I mean, the president is being pretty equivocal when he was asked about this directly, which of the oil companies have said to you that they're going to go in. Actually, he didn't name any names because they've been burned. They know that the infrastructure is shot. They know what this is going to take. They know how hard this is going to be.
18:44So I think I'm just not hearing from the administration the level of hubris and caution and detailed planning that would make Venezuelan expats or Venezuelans themselves confident that this is more than just a kind of mercenary oil grab on behalf of the United States. And even that oil grab may not work. Let me make a comparison to Peru in the 1990s, post-conflict Colombia, and Argentina in 2002, after it had to go through that major monetary restructuring. All of those countries came back. Okay, what Venezuela has going for it are world-class oil reserves, arguably the number one oil reserves knowable in the world.
19:31They've got an educated diaspora willing to return to the country. Only willing to return if it works out. I'm not hearing Venezuelans jump at going back because I think the reintegration will be harder than people suggest. But anyway. Okay. All right. But I'm giving that as a potential. Okay. You have damaged but rebuildable infrastructure and you have geographic proximity to the US market and you have an administration now that's likely to lift the economic sanctions and provide economic aid. Okay. And somebody should be listening in right now and say, wow, this is so very hypocritical. There was a great meme on social media today, Caddy, where it said Maduro's arrested, but then ICE realizes he's in country.
20:19So they deport him back to Venezuela. off and then the process happens again. You're laughing because you see the circularity and you see the ridiculous hypocrisy to it. So again, I am sitting here saying to you that I'm heartbroken at my country's government. I'm heartbroken at the decisions that they're making that are outside a set of rules and norms that have served the global population well for the last 80 years. But we're now here. What will happen, and I'm hopeful that this will generally be better for the Venezuelan people. I'm hopeful. If it isn't, if it isn't, it'll be a disaster like in Afghanistan or Iraq, which is why when someone says regime change, in my mind, based on a historical prism, I would not be pushing regime change.
21:13Can I make one other note to the White House? If you are going to get into the business of regime change, and OK, you're keeping the vice president in position for the moment, but this is still a change of the Chavista regime effectively. It would help if you had some of the organizations of government who had experience in doing that. The United States Institute of Peace had a long history of helping with post-conflict situations. The United States USAID, long history of actually helping rebuild the structures of government and the healthcare system, etc. that you need. But unfortunately, they got rid of those things.
21:49And now they seem to be getting into the business of regime change without some of the better tools and knowledge banks of the people who know to the extent that it's possible to help to do that. I think this is messy. I'm hoping that this is good for the Venezuelan people. I understand that you've got Venezuelan expats saying this could not be worse because it has been so bad for Venezuela that let's just give this a try at least. And I hear that argument. I just wish we heard a little bit more detail and anticipation of the potential problems. Because Donald Trump last night flying back from Mar-a-Lago sounded just like he was on a kind of rah-rah high.
22:28Did you see the great ass kisser of Lindsey Graham standing there? I mean, it's just you can't be more revolted than that. Right. I mean, Lindsey, where have you gone, man? Yeah. So this is what MAGA is thinking. I mean, you've got MAGA voices out all over social media. You know, hold on a second. This is the no new wars president plotting regime change in Venezuela and a host of other countries. And who does he have standing next to him? One of the biggest neocons in the administration, Lindsey Graham. We're going to take a quick break, come back and explain what FAFO is.
23:04Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US, more on Venezuela. Not just Venezuela, it turns out, potentially, because last night as he was flying back from Mar-a-Lago, the president actually mentioned five other countries that he may have in his sights for US intervention. Colombia, Mexico, Iran, Greenland and Cuba, all places that the president is looking at. And this, I think, gives us a hint. The best way of understanding this administration is just to listen to what President Trump says. A few months ago, you might have heard the president say, well, actually, we're going to go after a whole lot of other countries or threaten a whole lot of other countries or say that he hopes that those regimes will fall as well and think that doesn't really mean anything.
23:49I think that after what happened in Iran and the strikes against Iran's nuclear facility, what's happened in Nigeria recently, and now, of course, what's happened in Venezuela, any country and any foreign leader that hears Donald Trump say something and says, OK, I'm going to dismiss this as just trolling the liberals is probably missing something because there is a new doctrine, a new term that is going around. Washington, D.C. at the moment coined the FAFO doctrine, the fuck around and find out doctrine. And this is the Donald Trump doctrine. If you mess with us, if you mess with the United States, either when it comes to trade or when it comes to having our resources that you want or not being pro-American enough, however Donald Trump wants to define that, then you fuck around at your peril, as Nicolas Maduro has found out.
24:41So there is this new doctrine in place, which is the FAFO doctrine. It applies particularly, I think, to the Western Hemisphere, but not exclusively because he did mention Iran last night as well. So do you think Donald Trump is serious when he says and threatens this list of other countries last night? Or is this just him throwing out words? Before I answer that question, I just have to ask a question. When this podcast started in April of 2024, did people think that Katty Kay would be the more profane of the two podcasts? I'm not being profane. I'll tell you, I didn't think that. I mean, I would have bet against that on Cal.
25:19Excuse me. You say more curse words than me. Period. Period. The end. Period. The end. This is not my doctrine. The White House has embraced this doctrine after this terminology was, I think it's the Atlantic that first came up with it. I'm just happy that you are the one saying it and not me because everybody thinks I'm the profane one. But here's what I would say to you about FAFO. Can't believe we're even saying this. But anyway, yes. OK. The FAFO doctrine. It is ridiculous. OK. And so I will maintain that we are not going to attack and or invade Greenland. I will maintain that even stupid weathervane Marco Rubio would say, I can't be a part of that.
26:02Hexeth, of course, would do anything Trump wants. He's now demoting Senator Mark Kelly. He's made that announcement this morning because they don't like what Mark has said about Trump. So they're going to demote him, which is a bunch of ridiculousness and hurts our military culture. Which actually, as you've reported on the podcast before, Anthony, the military doesn't like. The people inside the military don't like the way they're treating Mark Kelly. They do not like it at all, Caddy. They do not like it at all. Number two, okay, Cuba. I do think that Rubio would support regime change in Cuba.
26:39Support it. He would love it. Okay, yes. So we got to be careful there. And I think the Cubans have got to be thinking about that. And I don't think the Russians are going to help the Cubans because the Russians want that actually, weirdly, because they think that'll fortify their actions and give them justification to Trump for what's going on in Ukraine and eventually, in their minds, Moldova and others. This is why this is an unmitigated disaster, by the way. And I think Cuba, of all of those five countries, Cuba is the most likely to suffer from this because they are so dependent on Venezuelan oil.
Read the full transcript
27:15They supplied Venezuela with doctors. Venezuela supplied them with oil. If this embargo actually is effective and is watertight, then this could have a big impact on Cuba. And we know that the Cuban economy is shot already. But on the other hand, the Cuban economy has been shot for a long time and there hasn't actually been regime change from within. And I think it would have to happen from within. I think Mexico and Colombia are interesting. It's interesting that he mentioned both of those. He seems to like Claudia Scheinbaum much more than he likes President Petro, the left-wing Colombian president, is up for re-election next year.
27:49And one Latin American analyst said to me yesterday, look, the worst thing that could happen for the United States if it wants to get rid of Petro is to be seen to be intervening in Colombia because that will rally support around the existing president. I mean, it's that kind of Iranian thing, right? If you go after the country. Ask Albanese or ask Albanese or Carney when Trump is acting nuts. Right. Yeah. But but let's go through these. OK, so Iran or Iran. How do you say Iran? I say Iran. You say Iran. But you can say whatever you like. We're all for freedom of speech and pronunciation on this podcast.
28:23All right. Well, I'm going to say Iran, okay? I'm going to tell you he's doing nothing there. Nothing. Number one, it's too far away. Number two, they've already done the pantomime thing with the bombing and they moved their uranium before the bombing and he's going to leave Iran alone. And that's just an idle threat. So let's keep going. Mexico. Okay. Now, he is not going to do anything against the Mexican president, but could there be military interventionism against supposed drug cartels? I think actually of all of these, that's of all of the countries he's mentioned, strikes against the Mexican drug cartels is the most likely.
29:02Now, you know, for people listening in Miami, they know this is true. And people not listening from Miami, I'm telling you that it is true. the drug volume, the supply of drugs entering the country is way down, Katty. Yes. Okay. And so I'm for that. Now, people could be mad at me for being for that, but I am for that. You mean you're for striking the drug cartels? Well, no, I'm not for striking the drug cartels. Again, I think that's a violation of the international borders, but I'm for the reduction of drugs entering into the country. I had to just clarify that because otherwise you're turning into the rest is politics, US.
29:42major neocon striker around the world. I'm against the strikes, but I am for less drugs entering the country. I don't know who would be for more drugs entering their country, especially people that have children. Especially when they cut the cocaine with fentanyl, which ends up to make it more addictive. I mean, this is a disaster, yes. And which ends up killing people and makes them more addictive in the whole thing. But that's an argument for not needing to strike the drug cartels, by the way. If the flows coming into America are already declining, striking the drug cartels with kinetic activity would be a bit of an odd choice at this particular moment.
30:18But then you don't understand Trump. And I'm not saying you like Katty Kay. I'm saying a generic you because he wants to strike the drug cartels. So in his brain, I'm Mr. President and I do things different than other presidents. And past precedent means nothing to me. In fact, past precedent is a bad thing. It was weak. In the Trump doctrine, strength resorts order, weakness invites chaos. But what he is missing, what he's missing is that if you do it in a rules-based framework, the way Bush and Reagan did, you could have disagreed with the Libyan strikes in 1986. That was a retaliation for a Libyan bomber in a German disco, if you remember that.
31:08And you could disagree with the Noriega arrest, but it was done inside the conformity of a rules-based system. And this is being done arbitrarily, and this is being done capriciously. Now, on your show this morning, Morning Joe, I watched the interview of Chuck Schumer, and Joe should have asked them the following question. So, Chuck, you disagree with this. What power, congressional power, do you have to stop this? And if you don't have the congressional power to stop this, what are you going to do as a dissident or an activist to organize against this? And what is the answer to that, Cady? I don't think they really have an answer because Congress is defanged.
31:56Normally in these situations, whenever a president uses power like this in this way, which probably in the US system is legal, as I said earlier, you get the opposition party denouncing it and you get a few stragglers from the president's own party also denouncing it. And you get Congress pressing for its right to speak through the War Resolution Act. But this Congress has been defanged because the Republican Party is defanged. So I don't think they have any power to stop this. So I'm going to tell you that you're past the sell-by date on all of these politicians now. And I'm going to tell you that while Mondami, to me, is making a mistake by getting himself involved with this, okay, that's the direction that the Democratic Party is going to go in.
32:46So he's tweeting out, the new mayor is tweeting out that he's against the strike and he's called Trump and told him not to do the strike and so on and so forth. And Trump's laughing. You know why? Because he wants him to be a national figure. He wants him to be the face of the Democratic Party going into the midterm elections. But that's where it's going because the moderate Democrats cannot come up with an idea to push back on Trump. And so the hard left, the AOCs, the Bernie Sanders, Zoran Mandani are going to be the guy. I disagree with that. I think because you'll still have the Democrats around the country talking about affordability.
33:27And that's how they if they are going to win the House back in the midterms, that's how they're going to do it by keeping the focus on prices and by pointing out, because I do think Trump is going to have to explain at some point, given the polls on this and how little support he has on this, he's going to have to explain at some point how this helps the American public and how this helps ordinary Americans. and what Democrats need to do is keep focused on affordability and on ordinary Americans and the problems that they're facing with prices and suggest their own solutions to that. That's why they did well.
34:04The Democrats, you know, did well in the elections in November because there was a perception that Donald Trump is focused on Iran. He's focused on Gaza. He's focused on Ukraine. He's traveling around the world. And some of those global trips were important, but he's not focused at home. This sounds to me like, do you remember, did you ever watch that film Finding Nemo? Yes, of course. One of the best films ever. Anyway, there's the pelicans in Australia going along, scooping up the fish saying, mine, mine, mine. And that's what, this is Donald Trump at the moment. Mine, Greenland. Mine, Cuba.
34:34Mine, Mexico. Mine, Colombia. Mine, Venezuela. Without explaining to the American people why we need all of these places and activity in all these places. I don't understand a president with a 36 % approval rating flexing like this and then having successful military operations and still then getting a mixed result in the polling and then still willing to forge ahead. But I'm going to tell you Greenland? No. I'm going to tell you Mexico, a maybe. And I'm going to tell you Cuba to me. If I had to rank them, I think you're saying Mexico, Cuba, but I'm saying Cuba, Mexico because of the Rubio involvement.
35:18I think they're hoping Cuba does itself. But look, I think it is whether other countries around the world could just dismiss that list and say he's not really going to do it. It is extraordinary that he's in a position of saying this and the ripple effects to other countries and how they now assess the United States and this presidency for the next three years, I think can't be discounted. Okay. We're going to come to a close, but we are in our bonus episode. Before you promote the Marjorie Taylor Greene, let me ask you this question. We're role-playing now. You're Marco Rubio. I am Delcy Rodriguez, the interim head of Venezuela.
35:55Okay. Yeah. And I'm calling you and I'm saying, little Marco, probably not saying that. I'm probably saying big Marco. I'm saying very big Marco, very big Marco. Do I send the oil to Cuba? Because the people are going to need the energy and they get free oil from us, which is the economy's dilapidated. And little big Marco says what? Do not send the oil to Cuba if you want to stay out of a courtroom. in Brooklyn. So don't send the oil. Okay. So little big Marco, I'm not going to send the oil, but you're going to have a full on economic collapse. With a refugee exodus. Yes. And you say what little big Marco?
36:41I'll say the full on economic collapse will lead to regime change and the people will rise up against those wicked socialist dictators and Cuba will become an America-friendly country. The only problem I have is that it's a little hard for me to sell Cuba as an action to Donald Trump because Cuba doesn't have any resources. So Donald Trump will come back and say, I don't actually really care that much about Cuba. And so we have learned nothing from Rumsfeld and Cheney. We've learned nothing. And I think that's the message. Now, go ahead. We're going to talk about Marjorie Taylor Greene, which I think is an important issue.
37:20I think it's a very important issue. Why is she so important? If this is Trump's interventionist presidency, it's clearly already grating on parts of his MAGA coalition because they were promised, remember, America first, sort of a much more isolationist second term. So in our bonus episode this Wednesday for our founding members, we're going to go deeper into where those cracks are forming within MAGA around this issue. And we're going to focus in particular on one of his most fiercely loyal supporters who since turned against him and is now leaving Congress. And that's Marjorie Taylor Greene.
37:53She has a fascinating story. But much more importantly, she is a very interesting insight into what is happening and what may yet happen in the MAGA movement. So sign up at TheRestIsPoliticsUS.com to hear that episode. It comes out on Wednesday. Thanks for listening, everybody. We'll see you later this week. You are profane and you are promotional. I mean, you are really good at this, Gadigay. And I do love a bit of Finding Nemo. All right, guys, we'll see you shortly.
From the publisher
Which countries could be in Trump's sights after Venezuela? Are Donald Trump and Marco Rubio at odds over how Venezuela should be handled? What is the president’s plan for running the country?
Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more.
Become a Founding Member: Go deeper into US politics every week with ad-free listening, members-only miniseries, early access to live show tickets and a bonus members-only Q&A podcast every week. Sign up at therestispoliticsus.com
Instagram: @RestPoliticsUS
Twitter: @RestPoliticsUS
Email: therestispoliticsus@goalhanger.com
Producer: Fiona Douglas, India Dunkley
Video Editor: Kieron Leslie
Social Producer: Charlie Johnson
Senior Producer: Callum Hill
Exec Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




