151. The Greenland Crisis, NATO’s Future, and ‘Reality TV’ Diplomacy with Senator Chris Coons

24 Jan 2026 · 18 min · 7 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics: US - Episode 151

Episode Overview

  • Title: The Greenland Crisis, NATO’s Future, and ‘Reality TV’ Diplomacy with Senator Chris Coons
  • Hosts: Anthony Scaramucci (The Mooch) & Katty Kay
  • Guest: Senator Chris Coons (Democrat, Delaware)
  • Location: Davos, Switzerland
  • Release Date: [Insert Release Date Here]

Episode Description This episode discusses the implications of former President Trump's controversial interest in Greenland, its potential impact on NATO relationships, and the broader dynamics of U.S. diplomacy. Senator Chris Coons shares insights from his recent congressional delegation to Copenhagen, emphasizing concerns about U.S. actions and their effects on international alliances.

---

Key Topics and Discussions

  1. Greenland Crisis
  2. Concerns from Denmark and Greenland:
  3. Danish representatives express alarm over U.S. intentions regarding Greenland.
  4. Greenlandic representatives share feelings of imminent threat and fear for their families.
  5. The long-standing alliance between Denmark and the U.S. is put at risk due to perceived disrespect.
  1. NATO’s Future
  2. Senator Coons’ Perspective:
  3. The notion of the U.S. attempting to acquire Greenland is seen as damaging to NATO credibility and U.S. international relations.
  4. A bipartisan response among some Republican senators against Trump's Greenland strategy is noted, emphasizing national interest and ally trust.
  1. Reality TV Diplomacy
  2. Analogy to Reality TV:
  3. The approach taken by Trump is likened to a reality show, with concerns that dramatic actions may lead to severe consequences globally.
  4. Coons suggests that this strategy may lead to NATO's destabilization and economic conflict.
  1. American Public Reaction
  2. Polling Data:
  3. Recent polls indicate a significant disapproval (75% of Americans, including 50% of Republicans) regarding Trump’s aggressive stance toward Greenland.
  4. Economic issues, such as the cost of living, are emerging as top concerns for voters, overshadowing foreign policy distractions.
  1. Recommendations for European Allies
  2. Unified European Response:
  3. Coons urges European leaders to establish clear red lines regarding U.S. aggression and to stand firm against any threats to their sovereignty.
  4. Emphasizes the importance of NATO in maintaining a united front against global adversaries like China and Russia.
  1. Cultural and Political Divisions
  2. The Culture War:
  3. Discussion on how Trump uses cultural issues as a means of galvanizing his base while neglecting significant policy issues.
  4. The importance of the Democratic Party effectively communicating its vision and policies to reconnect with American voters.
  1. Legal Measures Against Trump’s Actions
  2. Judicial Resistance:
  3. The role of Democratic attorneys general in challenging various actions taken by the Trump administration, with a high success rate in court battles.
  4. The need for Democrats to articulate a clear plan for governance and priorities moving forward.
  1. Future Implications
  2. Long-term Trust Issues:
  3. The potential long-lasting impact of Trump’s policies on U.S. relations with allies and the need for rebuilding trust.
  4. Historical parallels drawn to past divisions in the U.S. and the need to unify against external threats.

---

Conclusion Senator Chris Coons’ insights highlight the precarious state of U.S. diplomacy under Trump's leadership, especially concerning NATO and allies. The episode underscores the critical need for clarity and unity among European leadership and within the U.S. political landscape as the nation navigates pressing socio-economic issues alongside foreign policy challenges.

---

Additional Resources

  • Podcast Website: [The Rest Is Politics US](https://therestispoliticsus.com)
  • Follow on Social Media:
  • Instagram: [@RestPoliticsUS](https://www.instagram.com/RestPoliticsUS)
  • Twitter: [@RestPoliticsUS](https://twitter.com/RestPoliticsUS)

---

*Note: These notes summarize the key points and discussions from the podcast episode for easier comprehension and reference.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Senator Coons on Greenland Crisis

2:36 to 4:03

Discussing the reactions from Denmark and Greenland regarding U.S. claims.

“He led that congressional delegation to Copenhagen to try to address the crisis over Greenland.”

The Impact of U.S. Actions

4:03 to 6:38

Exploring the implications of U.S. threats to take Greenland on international relations and domestic politics.

“To me, it's a little bit like a reality television show.”

Europe's Response to U.S. Threats

6:38 to 8:12

How European leaders should respond to the U.S. regarding Greenland and NATO.

“And so if he goes ahead with it and it blows up NATO or it starts a terror for with the EU, I think that becomes a decisive issue in the midterm elections, which are now just a little over 10 months away.”

Democratic Messaging Challenges

8:12 to 11:01

Senator Coons emphasizes the need for a unified Democratic message.

“And the president is the great general of the culture war.”

Legal Actions Against Trump Administration

11:01 to 13:32

Discussing the legal challenges against Trump's policies and their implications.

“Most folks want to say, well, what do the Democrats stand for?”

Military Adventurism and Politics

13:32 to 14:05

Examining the political implications of Trump's military actions.

“And how will we do it better going forward?”

The Evolving Landscape of US Military Power

14:05 to 18:06

Explore the implications of US military strategies and their impact on global alliances.

“All we were talking about in Washington is the Epstein files and how the president and the Department of Justice slow-rolled, refused, delayed.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03This is an advertisement for BetterHelp.

0:05Anthony Scaramucci:In politics, Anthony and I are always talking about power. Who's got it? Who hasn't? But the systems that function best are often the ones that aren't seen at all. It's the organizing, the remembering, the emotional temperature control. A lot of women carry that weight quietly. March brings International Women's Day, a celebration of progress and a reminder that progress doesn't cancel expectation or reduce the demands that are placed on so many women. You know, Katty, when you're the dependable one, competence can quietly turn into obligation. Yeah, women do so much of all of that emotional labor and all of the labor that goes on behind the scenes.

0:42Anthony Scaramucci:When everything runs smoothly, we rarely ask what the cost is. Therapy gives you room to step back from that role and ask what feels heavy and where boundaries might need to be drawn. BetterHelp matches you with qualified therapists through a short questionnaire. And if the fit isn't right, you can switch at any time. Your emotional well-being matters to you, but it also matters to everybody else in your life. Find support and feel lighter in therapy. Sign up and get 10 % off at betterhelp.com slash trip US. That's better, H-E-L-P dot com slash trip US. This episode is brought to you by Cologuard.

1:18Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45. The Cologuard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, Cologuard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening. If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your healthcare provider about the Cologuard test. Cologuard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at colagar.com slash screen. Some things are just better in person. High fives, hugging your dog, and shopping for Crocs. If you've never been to a Crocs store, you're missing out.

1:53Sure, you can find us online, but when you step inside our shop, you'll get it, and your feet will feel fantastic with a fresh pair of classic cloths, or cozy slippers, or beach-ready sandals, or even sneakers. Everything's ridiculously comfy, and you can even pick out gibbet's charms to personalize your new pair. Go check out your nearest croc store. You deserve that in-person moment.

2:22Anthony Scaramucci:Welcome back to The Rest is Politics, U.S. With me, Katty Kaye. I'm here with Anthony Scaramucci, of course, and we are lucky to be joined here in Davos by Senator Chris Coons, the Democratic senator from Delaware, who has just flown into Davos from Copenhagen. He led that congressional delegation to Copenhagen to try to address the crisis over Greenland. Senator Coons, you've just come with a bipartisan delegation from Copenhagen to Davos. When you're in Copenhagen, you're meeting with Danes, you're meeting with people from Greenland. What was your impression of their fear level about the prospect of the United States trying to take over Greenland?

2:58Well, the Danes were very concerned, even alarmed. The Greenlandic representatives we met with talked about how the whole country, all 57 ,000 of them, are overcome with a sense of the imminence of a possible threat. We had particularly moving conversations with Greenlandic representatives about the impact on their children, on their families, that they believe an attack is imminent. From the Danes, it was more a sense of deep disappointment, even an offense, because they've served and fought and died alongside Americans. They lost 52 combat deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. They've been our ally for 225 years.

3:38And 25 years ago when we were attacked on 9-11, they didn't ask. They didn't hesitate. They deployed Afghanistan to Iraq, served alongside us in the ISIS mission. We have a long and close partnership. And the general mood from the prime minister to college students to business leaders to think tank professionals was one of – this was unthinkable. and it also really hurt them. To me, it's a little bit like a reality television show. He'll de-escalate after all the drama, but at some point he's going to upset leadership around the world where they're going to take him more seriously and put some teeth back into him and could cause an economic crisis, an economic war, etc.

4:22And so is there anything, given what you know about the Senate and the procedures, that we can do to sort of slow that down? There is, but it requires the majority, Republican senators, to demonstrate some courage, to take some risks. And there are a number of members of the Senate who have publicly spoken out against the threats to take Greenland because it is so harmful to our national interests. It really hurts our credibility as a partner and ally. It'll hurt our economy. And there's no clear benefit to the United States. So folks have been more forward-leaning. I've been traveling with Senators Tillis and Murkowski.

5:00They've given both very strong floor speeches against this and very public speeches against this. But we need more than two. And there are more senators who are reaching out to the president and his advisors. But frankly, when we didn't stand up against unqualified nominees and when we didn't stand up against the misuse of tariffs in the first term and in the first year of the second term, we're inviting abuse of these core powers.

5:25Anthony Scaramucci:Could Greenland be the breaking point for Republicans? A question I get asked a lot when I'm in Europe is, where is the Republican Party? I actually get asked, where is the Democratic Party too? But where is the Republican Party and what would make them stand up to Donald Trump? Are you suggesting that Greenland could be the answer to that? This is wildly unpopular. Amongst your Republican colleagues? And Delawareans. I mean, millions of Americans want us to deal with the cost of living. That's one of their top issues is the cost of groceries and health care and housing. And we're not doing anything on that.

6:00And they're beginning to see a whole series of Venezuela, the Christmas bombing of Nigeria, the strikes against Iran, the threats of strikes against Cuba or Colombia. And they're saying, hang on a minute. I thought, Mr. President, I thought you ran on lower my prices, make America healthy again, no new foreign wars. And he's seeming to take a whole series of military actions that don't make a ton of sense to them. The most recent polling I've seen, 75 % of Americans of both parties, 50 % of Republicans disapprove of this threatening action. They don't see the benefit. And so if he goes ahead with it and it blows up NATO or it starts a terror for with the EU, I think that becomes a decisive issue in the midterm elections, which are now just a little over 10 months away.

6:50What should the Europeans do now? I think they need to come to a unified and clear position. And to communicate what their red lines are. We met with the Danish prime minister as well as foreign minister and defense minister. And the both Danish and Greenlandic prime minister has made very clear that they will not sell Greenland and they will not simply give it away. If the Europeans say, here you go, sorry for your luck, Denmark, you're going to lose this territory that's been part of your country for hundreds of years, that would deescalate. But what's next? Iceland, I mean, I think it was Churchill who said of someone else that the appetite only grows with the eating.

7:32And so if we're going to threaten allies for no particular benefit to the United States, what happens next?

7:38Anthony Scaramucci:Sounds like you're saying you want the Europeans to stand up and be a bit tougher with Donald Trump. I think they need to take a clear and firm stand because there's so much else we are doing well on together. NATO really has stepped up to carry the financial burden of arming Ukraine, of their own defense. The EU is about to conclude a tariff deal to deescalate and better integrate our economies. We're in a good place with the EU and NATO. But, you know, look, President Trump, I am really hoping is going to deescalate. If he doesn't, I think they need to be firm. So about the culture war in the United States, which you and I unfortunately know a lot about.

8:14And the president is the great general of the culture war. He's putting memes out where he's got the American flag on places like Venezuela and Canada. he's owning the libs by doing this and he's upsetting the weak beta Europeans. I mean, I'm just giving you his thought process.

8:32Anthony Scaramucci:Can I just say as a European, I take offense to that characterization of my cult? I don't see that. I'm not saying it. I'm channeling Trump. I mean, it's obviously not in our national interest, but what is he thinking? Oh, this is great. I'm owning the libs and that's what my base wants me to do. I think a big part of his brand and his success electorally has been being tough and standing up. And I do think the average American thinks that foreign aid was a waste of money, that our European allies have taken advantage of us, that his military strikes against Iran and Venezuela showed toughness and determination, and now people won't mess with us anymore.

9:11There is an element of truth to that. But there's also a bigger element of truth that we cannot possibly successfully stand up to China and Russia, our two principal adversaries in the world, without allies and partners, economically and militarily, we are made more secure and more prosperous by our global network of alliances. And what's concerning about the new national security strategy from the Trump administration doesn't clearly identify China as our biggest global adversary or pacing threat, doesn't clearly identify Russia as the aggressor in Europe, and instead focuses on culture war issues.

9:50To your point, you're such a great messenger for the Democratic Party, but I feel like broadly the Democratic Party's message is not being heard by the American people. Like, is there a way to convey what you're saying here more broadly? I think Democrats need to recognize that we lost the last election. It's not just that Donald Trump won it, it's that we lost it. And in critical demographics that we have always counted on, We have lost ground and are losing ground. And unless we are running positively, affirmatively on a vision that the average American can look at and see themselves in it, we're not going to win again.

10:25We may win control of the House by a few seats. We might come close in the Senate. But we're still going to be in a closely divided country where the principal issue in the last presidential election was cost of living. Principal in the midterms can be cost of living. Principal issue can be cost of living in the next one. And there are structural reasons why bringing the price of housing down quickly is hard. Dealing with the cost of health care is hard. Now, obviously, letting the Affordable Care Act health care subsidies expire at the end of this year, slashing Medicaid, which is going to come into effect next year, really harmful for the average American.

11:00But you're right. Most folks want to say, well, what do the Democrats stand for? And I'm doing a lot of talking about how we need a simple message with a few simple bills that says we're fighting for you, for your family, for opportunity. We're going to work hard to deliver security for you, both physical security and retirement and health care security. And we care about justice. We care about how we deliver those things. So we're going to fight for border security and for security inside the United States and reform our immigration system, but do it in a humane way. We're going to care about criminal justice reform, but we're going to deliver support for public safety and reduce crime and reduce addiction and reduce the harms to our communities.

11:41Anthony Scaramucci:We had a meeting earlier, the three of us, with a group of European executives. And one of the things I thought was really interesting that they were asking you is, where is the system and why is the American system not being able to stand against the excesses of this administration more effectively? And you pointed out something that I think many people here aren't aware of, which is how much has been done by Democrats around the country actually to try to constrain the president. And I think that'd be a useful thing in a world in which Donald Trump just sucks up so much oxygen and gets all of the attention.

12:16Anthony Scaramucci:There are things that are happening to contain him that aren't getting so much attention. Tell us about that. In federal court, there have been 500 cases filed against the actions of the Trump administration. Doge, shutting down, canceling, defunding, legally authorized, statutorily authorized and appropriated activities of the federal government. Democratic attorneys general and organizations that have challenged Trump's actions have won 75 % of those cases. And they've had significant consequences. But you're right, because President Trump is a reality TV master who, you know, keeps it on a cliffhanger and, oh, but look over here next.

12:54Next, he announces with great fanfare, we're cutting this or we're canceling this or we're shutting this down. And then there's a lawsuit. And then three months later, he loses. And then the money is restored or the program is restarted quietly. Now, with Doshi produced a lot of chaos and not a lot of savings, a lot of harm to our reputation around the world, a lot of harm to the hundreds of thousands of people who either retired from the federal government or were fired or whose organizations were shut down.

13:21Anthony Scaramucci:Or the people who use those federal government services who aren't getting as good services now. Whether it's the VA or Social Security. But now Democrats have to say, what happened? What's our plan? How would we have done it better? And how will we do it better going forward? We can't just spend all our time talking about Donald Trump. That feeds into this sense of frenzy and nothing is happening if all I do is breathlessly attack him. I got to tell you what I'm for and what I'm willing to do. More military adventurism ahead. Look, the more President Trump is successful with quick, sharp, targeted military strikes and does not get American troops involved into long-term conflicts, I think the more he will use that tool both to distract and to advance his sense of American power.

14:08All we were talking about in Washington is the Epstein files and how the president and the Department of Justice slow-rolled, refused, delayed. They've still only released about 2 % of the total documents. And the strikes in Venezuela totally changed the conversation. I'm not suggesting that that timing was aligned, but it certainly changed the subject. Almost no one's talking about the Epstein files in Congress right now because they are now so alarmed about the potential aggression against Greenland, the potential collapse of NATO, what's going on here, what's been going on there. Is Cuba next?

14:42Is Iran next? And so his military adventurism does change the subject when there's something inconvenient, like the expiration of the Affordable Care Act health subsidies, which happened right at the end of the year, right when there was a significant uptick in threats to strike Iran. The president encouraged protesters in Iran. They had huge nationwide protests. And he said, help is on the way. We're locked and loaded. We're ready. And then he stepped it back. That's partly because the relevant assets to carry out strikes in Iran were elsewhere. He wasn't prepared. They're largely deployed in the Southern Caribbean and the Western Pacific.

15:21You can't just carry out endless military adventures. We do have the world's most powerful and capable military, but it is not limitless. And so there are costs to this, both operationally, financially, and in terms of our reputation. And the adventurism is the part that concerns me the most, because as we lose allies and as we lose legitimacy, we lose power.

15:43Anthony Scaramucci:Let me put on my anxious European hat, and it's a question I get asked a lot when I'm here, which is how can we ever as Europeans, as allies, have confidence in the United States again? It's going to be difficult. It will likely be the work of the rest of my life, should I be reelected in the Senate, to try and rebuild. but we're going to have to reconfigure a lot of what has been the military alliance that's kept the peace for 75 years and the economic partnership that has made Europe and the United States prosperous. And if the next couple of years produces a fundamental shift where NATO collapses and no longer exists, the consequences for our bases, for our ability to project power, for our security will be dramatic.

16:31If we bear the costs of a tariff fight, which would be the worst one since the Great Depression, that what is keyed up here literally would be as bad as the Smoot-Hawley tariffs that kicked off the Great Depression, then we're in a very different place. If it is instead that there's been a roller coaster ride that was uncomfortable, that was terrifying, that was alarming, that was concerning, it partly depends how populism ends, how the Trump administration ends if it does. If the successor to him who is elected runs on and wins on the same sort of culture war and America's tough and America's back and America first, and we don't care about America alone, it'll be very hard to restore that confidence.

17:13There may be admiration for our innovation or our culture or our nation and its beauty, but a skittishness or a distance in terms of alliances and partnerships. On the other hand, we have fought through very hard times domestically before. In the run-up to the Second World War, the United States went through a profound period of self-doubt, of deep divisions. I'll remind you, America First was first a theme among those who said we shouldn't get involved in the wars of Europe. And this was a time when there were huge rallies of the American Bund that was pro-Nazi, that was pro-Hitler. That division deep in the United States, we made a clear decision and moved past it.

17:56I think the same has to happen now, where Americans see the sacrifices that we made slipping away from us, and we move and move in the right direction.

18:05Anthony Scaramucci:Senator Koontz, thanks so much for joining us here in Davos.

18:15Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rince will take your laundry and hand-deliver it to your door, expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens, or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card, and leave the laundry to us. Rince. It's time to be great.

From the publisher

Is Trump’s Greenland stunt risking NATO—and a global crisis? Could Greenland finally make Republicans break with Trump? Is America losing its allies’ trust under Trump?

Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci are joined by Democrat Senator, Chris Coons in an exclusive interview at Davos.

Instagram: ⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠

Twitter: ⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠

Email: ⁠⁠therestispoliticsus@goalhanger.com⁠⁠

Producer: Fiona Douglas, India Dunkley

Video Editor: Kieron Leslie 

Social Producer: Charlie Johnson 

Senior Producer: Callum Hill

Head of Digital: Sam Oakley

Exec Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: US

All 253 episodes
151. The Greenland Crisis, NATO’s Future, and ‘Reality TV’ Diplomacy with Senator Chris CoonsThe Rest Is Politics: US · 18 min
Listen in VO