181. Trump’s Dinner Shooting and Iran’s Desperate Deal

27 Apr 2026 · 42 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting and its implications for U.S. security and political violence; then Iran’s proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz while delaying nuclear talks, and how Trump may respond.

Guests/backgrounds

Katty Kay (journalist; hosted/covered U.S. politics; attended the dinner multiple times, including 2011 and 2015) and Anthony Scaramucci (political commentator; co-host). They reference Michael Glantz (CAA television agent) as the viral example of someone staying seated and eating after shots.

Key claims

Security “did their job” but protocols may need redesign for scenarios beyond a lone attacker; Secret Service funding shortfalls are criticized. Political violence is framed as rare in data, yet social media fuels “tribal” conspiracy theories and a “Luigi Mangione phenomenon” (martyr/fanbase dynamics). On Iran, the White House portrays the offer as desperation; hosts doubt “pipelines exploding” claims and argue the real driver is economic leverage.

Notable examples

Michael Glantz eating burrata during the shooting; Trump’s CBS/60 Minutes exchange with Nora O’Donnell over a manifesto; discussion of possible succession risk if multiple top officials were targeted; Iran/Strait of Hormuz reopening proposal and alleged tanker arrivals in India.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Reactions to the Shooting

1:27 to 1:54

Discussion on Michael Glantz's calmness during the shooting at the dinner.

“I would like to think I'm a cool customer and would have carried on with my burrata salad.”

Security Concerns Raised

1:54 to 2:41

Exploration of security issues and political violence surrounding the incident.

“The shooting has, of course, raised questions about American security around the president.”

Details of the Shooting Incident

2:41 to 5:15

A thorough recounting of the shooting events at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

“Should we quickly run through what happened on Saturday night?”

Evaluating Presidential Security

5:15 to 7:39

Analysis of the effectiveness of presidential security and public safety.

“So, I can't imagine you're going to have anything quite like the White House Correspondents Association dinner.”

Political Violence and Rhetoric Today

7:39 to 11:39

Discussion on the normalization of political violence and its implications.

“actually being out there in public and meeting the American people?”

The Luigi Mangione Phenomenon

11:39 to 14:06

Exploration of the rise of political violence and its societal implications.

“In 2025, there were five left-wing terrorist attacks and only one right-wing terrorist attacks.”

Social Media and Modern Tragedy: The Impact of Online Narratives

14:06 to 18:07

Explore how social media shapes public perception of tragic events.

“RFK, or Martin Luther King Jr., if you just go back and look at it, look at the news reporting, et cetera, you didn't have this happy effect.”

Trump and the Correspondents' Dinner: Conspiracy Theories and Reactions

18:08 to 22:36

Discuss the reactions to Trump’s interview and conspiracy theories surrounding recent events.

“And there's probably 100 MAGA influencers that almost within the same minute of each other are sending out messages that the ballroom needs to be promoted.”

Security Concerns and Presidential Succession

22:37 to 26:28

Analyze the implications of security at public events and presidential succession.

“These podcasts are not censored by the corporate media.”

Iran's New Proposal: Diplomatic Moves and Tensions

27:45 to 28:00

Examine the recent Iranian proposals and their implications for U.S. relations.

Show all 19 chapters

Iran's New Proposal for Peace Talks

28:00 to 28:46

Learn about Iran's latest offer and the implications for the peace talks.

“But where do you think things are right now with the peace talks?”

Trump's Comments and Iranian Desperation

28:46 to 29:34

Discussion on Trump's remarks and the perception of Iranian desperation.

“This is actually the scene from the beginning of a Tom Clancy novel, Red Storm Rising, exactly this, that a country's oil capacity explodes because they can't shut down production quickly enough.”

Potential Risks of Russian Involvement

29:34 to 30:29

Exploring the implications of Russia as a guarantor for Iran's uranium.

“I mean, I don't know how you read this latest offer or whether you think this gets us further to clarity on how this all ends.”

Iran's Strategic Military Assets

30:29 to 31:21

An analysis of Iran's military capabilities and the ongoing economic pressure.

“How do we feel about the Russians being the guarantors of Iran's highly enriched uranium?”

The Economic Game of Chicken

31:21 to 32:17

Examining the economic standoff between the U.S. and Iran.

“They still have, as you pointed out last week, missile inventory, drone inventory.”

Trump's Objectives and the JCPOA

32:17 to 34:04

Understanding Trump's goals regarding the Iran nuclear deal and past agreements.

“game of chicken in a way of the American economy versus the hold that the Iranians have over the global economy and how much the global economy is suffering.”

Perceptions of Trump and Public Opinion

34:04 to 35:31

Analyzing public sentiment toward Trump and his administration's policies.

“I don't know if he's going to manage to do that.”

Iran's Economic Resilience

35:31 to 37:58

Discussing how Iran is managing its economy under U.S. sanctions.

“Because if you were to take all of the approval ratings, there's been a slew of polls, including a recent Fox News polls.”

Future Political Implications

37:58 to 38:31

Speculating on the political fallout for the Republican Party due to the Iran situation.

“We're going to go 16 to 14 months,$9 a gallon of gas, no fertilizer in the farmland.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Anthony Scaramucci:This episode is brought to you by Whoop.

0:07Katty Kay:Whoop is one of my favorite all-time products. It's clear we're living through pretty stressful times right now. It's easy to underestimate how much that can affect our sleep and ability to stay focused day to day.

0:21Anthony Scaramucci:Yeah, avoiding burnout can feel like a full-time job in and of itself.

0:25Katty Kay:Whoop helps with the bit people miss. That shows what actually is going on beneath the surface, Caddy. It's a screenless wearable device that monitors your sleep, recovery, lifestyle, and stress.

0:39Anthony Scaramucci:Yeah, and this matters to me. It even looks very elegant.

0:42Katty Kay:Did you hear that, guys? Whoop is so stylish that even Caddy K will wear the Whoop.

0:47Anthony Scaramucci:It's the little gold clasp. I like that.

0:49Katty Kay:I'm telling you, I had no idea how much my old routine was impacting my health. But since using Whoop and making those small adjustments, I've already started to feel the difference. Better sleep, clearer thinking, even more energy.

1:03Anthony Scaramucci:Head to join.whoop.com slash politics to get started with Whoop today.

1:21Anthony Scaramucci:Hello and welcome to The Rest is Politics US. I'm Katty Kay.

1:25Katty Kay:I'm Anthony Scaramucci. Katty, would you have eaten your salad if you heard gunshots outside the ballroom?

1:31Anthony Scaramucci:I would like to think I'm a cool customer and would have carried on with my burrata salad. I know Michael Glantz very well for a while. He's a television agent at CAA and he He is the agent who is having a viral moment because rather than diving under the tables at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, after the shots were fired, Michael very coolly sat there and carried on eating his burrata salad. We are going to talk about the events at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. The shooting has, of course, raised questions about American security around the president. Was the president safe?

2:05Anthony Scaramucci:Were security protocols carried out as they should have been? I think it also raises interesting questions about the level of political violence and rhetoric in this country. We know that the shooter was inspired by hatred of the president and his cabinet. So we'll talk about that. And then in the second half of the program, we're going to talk about this new peace deal that has been sent by the Iranians to open the Straits of Hormuz, but delay discussions about the nuclear program. The White House is kind of putting out a message that this shows how desperate the Iranians are. I've spoken to a couple of people who aren't quite so sure about that.

2:41Anthony Scaramucci:Should we quickly run through what happened on Saturday night? I was not at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. You've been once, right, to that dinner, that wonderful celebration of the right of the free press.

2:53Katty Kay:I was there in 2011 when Barack Obama was roasting Donald Trump. And I sat at the Fox News table with Donald Trump in 2015. Do you like going? No, I didn't really like it, to be honest. 2016 was the last time I was there. I've been to it three times.

3:10Anthony Scaramucci:I've been about 10 times. The first time I went, I actually went into labor during the dinner, Bill Clinton was speaking. And then I kind of gave up going about 10, 15 years ago. I decided that it wasn't necessarily the most edifying of events.

3:24Katty Kay:But anyway, do you think they're going to do another one in 30 days?

3:28Anthony Scaramucci:This is what the president has wanted. So there was a shooting just to quickly bring you all up to speed in case you don't know what happened. A man checked himself into the hotel. The White House Correspondents Dinner is held at the Hilton Hotel. Those of you who listened to our Reagan series will remember that that is the hotel where Ronald Reagan was shot. It's held every year in the basement ballroom of this hotel. A man had checked himself into the hotel, which you are allowed to do as a guest. But then that man took a couple of guns and a knife and rushed the security and was motivated by a hatred of the president and his cabinet.

4:05Anthony Scaramucci:and he tried to get into the room. He didn't get anywhere near the room, but he did fire off some shots, which had all of the journalists jumping under the table. And the president afterwards said that he would like the event as a celebration of the right to free speech and the freedom of the press, which is what this event is meant to be about, to be held within 30 days. It's an incredibly hard event to pull off, Anthony. People fly in from all over town. It's not just one dinner. There are parties all weekend long in Washington. Georgetown, where I live, has been packed with people in suits and some addresses all going to different parties.

4:40Anthony Scaramucci:You get a lot of celebrities come in. You get CEOs come in, heads of all of the media corporations come in. Trying to get time on those people's schedules to redo this within 30 days, I think would be very tricky. I'd be surprised if it was held at least in that format in 30 days' time. I'm sure that Donald Trump would like to give the speech that he had prepared. Apparently, it was about an hour long. He was going to absolutely roast the American press corps, which he thinks has been very unfair to him. He would like to have a chance to give that speech. If there is something held, I imagine it will be smaller.

5:17Anthony Scaramucci:So, I can't imagine you're going to have anything quite like the White House Correspondents Association dinner. First of all, let's deal with the security and then let's deal with the kind of political culture. What do you make of how the security held up at the event?

5:29Katty Kay:Well, listen, nobody got hurt. Obviously, thank God the Secret Service agent who was shot had a protective vest on. But I, and again, I don't want to be critical of this situation because again, the Secret Service did their job. But you'd have to ask a lot of open questions here. Open question number one would be, do you need more magnetometers or do they need to be further away from a ballroom like that? And do you need then a crisscross set up. So if someone comes through the magnetometer, they can't get a straight shot into the ballroom. If he was moving faster or maybe there were, let's say there were four guys that rushed that magnetometer with guns and they took out a few of the Secret Service agents, God forbid, and one of the guys got into the ballroom and let's say it wasn't a shotgun, but an AR-15, I think they could have done tremendous damage.

6:21Katty Kay:So I think it's going to require people to think about the setup for these things and to add an additional layer of protection.

6:31Anthony Scaramucci:Just to clarify, the ballroom is on the kind of second basement level. He only got a level above that. He wasn't actually on the level where the ballroom is. So, he was a level above the basement. He would have had to go down another layer of stairs and there were more security agents on the level below where the basement is. So, he would have had to, He kind of got to the first ring of security. He would have had to get through a second ring of security. And I am told there are other security assets that the public doesn't even see around. So there was quite a lot of security. But one question I have is, and I want to get your thoughts on this, can you ever, short of confining the president to the White House compound, can you ever guarantee a president's safety 100 %?

7:19Anthony Scaramucci:I mean, the president is going to go out there and give rallies. I've been to those rallies. Yes, you go through a mag, but again, somebody could rush those mags. I'm just wondering if the expectation is a little unrealistic. I mean, if this security worked, how much more do you want to up it at the expense of the president actually being out there in public and meeting the American people?

7:43Katty Kay:I think all of those points are important ones. But still, even though it was on the second level, caddy. If you had, let's say, 10 people, it would have been difficult. They have to rethink this, and they have to make an assumption as opposed to a lone gunman. Maybe there's a 10-person gun situation. What do you do in that situation? I think there's a secondary issue here which relates to the dysfunctionality of the American government. Secret Service is unfunded right now. If you go to the Department of Homeland Security, and you talk to these guys, or you listen to somebody like Representative James Comer, who's railing about this stuff.

8:23Katty Kay:We have 70 days now following the February shutdown where the Secret Service is unfunded. Okay, so we're asking men and women to take a bullet for the President of the United States and other people in the Cabinet, but we want to stiff them on the payroll. I don't understand why we're doing this, and it just speaks to the raw incompetence of our political leadership to allow something like this. I guess the last point on this, which I'd like you to opine on, is how about the normalization of this sort of behavior? So we've had three assassination attempts on Donald Trump since July of 2024, and the market didn't move.

9:05Katty Kay:Bitcoin market is the only one trading overnight, didn't move. there's no general reaction some people at goal hanger were like should we do a emergency podcast related to this and i think your reaction to it was i could sum up your reaction the best was why and the answer is we didn't because no news really came out of it so i guess i guess have we've gotten so crazy with the trump administration that we've normalized the abnormal i mean we've

9:35Anthony Scaramucci:had a rough year in terms of political violence with the shooting of Charlie Kirk and now this assassination attempt, if it was directly targeted at President Trump, against President Trump. And clearly, the rhetoric online on both sides is very high at the moment. You've got the language that the president uses against the press and against his opponents, calling them horrible people, etc. You've got also language from the left accusing the president, I hate to bring this up, of fascism and of being a threat to American democracy. Maybe this is a moment to think about the language that all of us use, because I think that is all being driven online.

10:17Anthony Scaramucci:But actually, I mean, if you look at it compared to the 1960s and 1970s in America, this is a moment of less political violence generally. One thing that has changed, I'd come across, Anthony, a couple of weeks ago, actually, and I went back and looked at it yesterday, a super interesting report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, CSIS, which had looked at political violence recently. because the trend in America until very recently was that political violence came actually much more from the right, from right-wing extremists than it did from left-wing extremists. But 2025 was the first year in more than 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumbered those from the far right.

11:06Anthony Scaramucci:So I guess that begs the question, what is happening on the left that they are suddenly picking up their number of terrorist attacks and attacks of this kind of nature compared to on the right. I mean, is it that the right feels happy that President Trump was reelected and so they aren't taking to the guns? Or is it that the left feels unhappy and unhappy with this administration and so they're resorting to the tactics which have traditionally been the tactics of the right in this country? So, overall political violence. And there are actually very few. In 2025, there were five left-wing terrorist attacks and only one right-wing terrorist attacks.

11:48Anthony Scaramucci:If you go to the data, the incidence of attacks is actually very small. In a country of 350 million people, I would say that's pretty small. But I think that the language makes it seem that we are living in a moment of extreme violence. And obviously, it goes without saying, guys, any attack is one attack. Too many.

12:10Katty Kay:I mean, Katia, maybe I'm too old-fashioned at this point in my life, but I sort of feel like it's unfair to... You old-fashioned. I don't know. I feel like the statement I'm about to make is very old-fashioned. I just don't feel like it should be left-wing or right-wing accusation. These are nuts from a right-leaning person, and there's a nut on the right that's prosecuting political violence. He just happens to be a nut. Doesn't matter what his political persuasion is. The same thing for the people on the left.

12:40Anthony Scaramucci:I mean, one of the dispiriting things, the president said everyone came together, but I think one of the very dispiriting things about what happened on Saturday night is how quickly this became political with people on the right saying, you see, this shows that the left are a bunch of crazy lunatics and they're violent and you have to tone down your attacks on the president because this is going to be what happens. And every time there's an attack from the right, the same happens on the left. I mean, people use this to justify their own political positions.

13:08Katty Kay:I think there's something broader. And I think, unfortunately, you and I are going to be talking about this for some time to come. And that is what I would call the Luigi Mangione phenomenon. And what is that? That are younger people that are incredibly dissatisfied with what's going on. And they see an act of violence, an assassination of a CEO, or God forbid, an assassination of a president as their duty to be a martyr in a society where they feel hopeless. And so for me, the other problem for this is that there is a fan base for this stuff. If you think about what's going on here in New York for Luigi Mangione as he's on trial, or you think about the people that would cheer political violence, I think that's another big issue that the country has to address.

14:00Katty Kay:You know, in the 1960s, when John Kennedy was slain, or even his brother, RFK, or Martin Luther King Jr., if you just go back and look at it, look at the news reporting, et cetera, you didn't have this happy effect. There was no Luigi Mangione phenomenon going on. There was like, okay, this is absolutely tragic, and we have to figure out a way to resolve it. Now, it's fueled by social media it's fueled by these manifestos i mean he dumped a manifesto i'd like you to talk a little bit about the nora o'donnell interview with president trump which was aired last night you know this guy's idea was i'm going to do this uh likely get killed or survive but my manifesto is going to live on in social media so i mean you know you had nora o'donnell reading it to President Trump.

14:51Katty Kay:What happened in that interview last night?

14:54Anthony Scaramucci:Before I get to Nora's interview, which actually I think was very good, I mean, quickly, you and I in that Reagan series that we did talked about how America came together after Reagan, the attempted assassination attempt on Reagan at that same hotel where Cole Allen tried to assassinate the president, we think on Saturday night. So, there does seem to be this instant tribalism, an instant splintering into different camps. And the other thing I think that was kind of depressing, I felt about Saturday night was the number of people, smart people who said to me, oh, was this a setup? Was this real?

15:35Anthony Scaramucci:As if somehow the president had orchestrated the whole thing in order to distract from Iran. It did distract from Iran because yesterday, on, I was watching television a lot on Sunday. The only story was about the White House Correspondents' Dinner. Now, you've got a whole bunch of journalists in Washington, they were part of the story. Maybe that, not to disparage my colleagues, maybe that makes us talk about ourselves a little bit longer.

15:59Katty Kay:Can you answer that question, though? In your opinion, I have mine, obviously. Was it a setup?

Read the full transcript

16:03Anthony Scaramucci:No, nor was the Butler shooting a setup. But I think we live in a world where people, the level of conspiracy theories fueled by social media and particularly the COVID pandemic has risen in the country recently. And in a tribal world that we're living in, people reach for conspiracy theories. I remember saying to you after the Butler shooting that I had been at an event with some very senior Democrats who had worked in the Biden administration or the Obama administration, smart, smart people who said, oh, we reckon that, you know, Trump orchestrated this whole thing in order to boost his approval ratings.

16:43Anthony Scaramucci:I just think that's what it would take to do that. The absolute uproar that there would be if that was ever uncovered. I mean, the idea that the president or anyone around the president kind of Watergate style hired this 31 year old from California and got him to check into the hotel and then launch this attack on the White House Correspondents Dinner, I find absurd. But it's interesting how many people i don't know whether you've heard the same thing anthony whether you heard people saying to you uh was this real on saturday that was the first reaction of a lot of

17:15Katty Kay:people who don't like president well i mean listen tucker carlson had an open question on his show yesterday about whether or not it was real listen i don't i'm with you i'm not a big believer in these conspiracies i think the butler thing was prima facie the charlie kirk thing even though there's questions about it, I still think is prima facie. And I think this is prima facie. But the one thing that would make people raise alarms is the way they capitalized on it. So they rush down to the White House briefing room, they get into the briefing room with their tuxedos, and they're answering questions of reporters and their tuxedos and evening gowns.

17:54Katty Kay:And they've got messaging coming out of the White House where lots of their MAGA supporters are on the same text thread, there's a communique that goes out from the White House that you need to now support the ballroom and the activity around the construction of the ballroom. And there's probably 100 MAGA influencers that almost within the same minute of each other are sending out messages that the ballroom needs to be promoted. And so when you step back from that, you can say, oh, see, this was all coordinated and blah, blah, blah. But -

18:25Anthony Scaramucci:Because it gets him off Iran. It gets the conversation away from Iran. It gets the conversation onto the ballroom. Correct.

18:30Katty Kay:But I think that that is a reaction to what happened. I don't think the event was planned. And I think this is, again, another big problem. And this is where our adversaries have won.

18:41Anthony Scaramucci:They've divided us. They've made us, pushed us into these camps. And we believe things that aren't true.

18:46Katty Kay:No question. They've made us believe things. Catherine Belton wrote about this in Putin's People six years ago, where she explained all the server farms that were set up outside of Moscow to drive public opinion away from each other and to create heated, bullyish tribalism on the net. But the president is the bully in chief, as we both know. I mean, he's a keyboard warrior. But tell us about his conversation with Nora O'Donnell, where he is saying to her that the Democrats in the press are almost the same, one and the same, is his exact quote.

19:23Anthony Scaramucci:Look, you and I were texting about that interview. So, Nora O'Donnell's a correspondent for CBS News and she did a long interview, a sit-down interview with President Trump for 60 Minutes program. On Sunday, this was his first sit-down interview. He's called into a lot of shows over the weekend, but this was his first sit-down interview. And at one moment, Nora O'Donnell points to Cole Allen's online manifesto in which he allegedly wrote, I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to cope my hands with his crimes. What's your reaction to that? She asked the president. The president looking kind of slightly flustered and angry says, well, I was, here's his quote.

20:05Anthony Scaramucci:I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you're horrible people, horrible people. Yeah, he did write that. I'm not a rapist. I didn't rape anybody. At which point Nora, and this credit to her, this was a very good journalistic instinct, said, oh, do you think he was referring to you? She interrupted. And then Trump really got angry and said, I'm not a pedophile. You can read that crap from some sick person. I got associated with stuff that has nothing to do with me. I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones who are involved with it.

20:40Anthony Scaramucci:Let's see Epstein and other things. I listened to that and kudos to Nora for thinking of jumping in there. First of all, you never want to be in the position of saying I'm not a pedophile and I'm not a rapist, I would say. What do you reckon? You're the comms person here. If you were in the comms, director of comms, what would you have been thinking at that particular moment?

20:58Katty Kay:Well, I mean, listen, Trump can get away with anything. He can say anything, do anything. And so a normal person, certainly, no, you don't want to be in a situation where you're telling somebody that, no, I didn't beat my wife last night. You know, I mean, how are you going to get out of that one? You can't prove a negative. So, but Trump can get away with anything. I found the most interesting part of that, he's calling her despicable and all those different things. But he sat for the interview.

21:25Anthony Scaramucci:Yes. And he didn't get up. We were texting and saying, was he going to get up and leave? Did he want to get up and leave? It was great television, by the way. So, no, he didn't get up and leave.

21:33Katty Kay:Yeah. He's not getting up because he's got David Ellison and Larry Ellison in his pocket. They did an event at the White House prior to the White House Correspondents Dinner where CBS was there. Obviously, Nora O'Donnell was at that event as well. And so remember, some of that is a little stage two. Is a little performative. So let me give you my, not conspiracy theory, but this is my surmise, and you can push back if you don't agree. But the president's looking at the new CBS, the new, new CBS, and he says, okay, I got this under control. I've silenced ABC. They got Stephanopoulos to pay$16 million.

22:11Katty Kay:We've put a little bit of a lid on CNN. It's now going to be owned by the Ellisons. And CBS, you just come at me all the time. You got Barry Weiss over there that has sort of curbed that. And so, you know what? Let's let her say something vicious to me so that it doesn't look like I've got this thing completely under control. And by the way, the FT over the weekend wrote a great piece on this. I think the reason why the podcast industry, Goldhanger, etc., is doing well is that these podcasts are unfiltered. These podcasts are not censored by the corporate media. And so I almost feel like that Trump was doing that.

22:50Katty Kay:It was a little bit of cosplaying, Caddy, so that Trump could say, oh, look at the way they attack me. They're no better than the Democrats, where he is basically saying to himself, they are a lot better than the Democrats. I got this thing under control now.

23:06Anthony Scaramucci:I think you're right. But I think also Trump likes to have somebody to fight against. I mean, I think the message of the last year and a half is that Trump does better and he does better in the polls and he does better in public opinion when he is in a position of opposition. And his problem slightly at the moment is that he controls everything. He hasn't got anyone to fight against. So having the press as a which has very low approval ratings as a sparring partner is a much more useful position for him to be. And he likes to be able to say you're a disgrace to Nora O'Donnell rather than pretend that they're all buddy-buddy because they've all gone through a shooting together at the White House.

23:43Anthony Scaramucci:One other thought quickly on security, and then we'll take a break and come back and talk about Iran. Pop quiz for you. President Trump, J.D. Vance, and Mike Johnson were all at the White House correspondence dinner. I think this is going to prompt some security reviews around how many senior members of the cabinet and the line of succession are in a room at the same time, because if all three of those figures had been taken out, who would be the president today of the United States?

24:14Katty Kay:So are you saying that RFK's raccoon penis is not in the line of succession? Is that what you just said?

24:23Anthony Scaramucci:How did you come up with that?

24:25Katty Kay:No, I just was thinking about the various things that could be in the line of presidential succession.

24:32Anthony Scaramucci:No.

24:33Katty Kay:I'm just checking on you. You know, I have to keep it real here, Katty.

24:37Anthony Scaramucci:The president, for all of our, just to clarify for our dear listeners, RFK's raccoon penis would not today be the 48th president of the United States. It would be Chuck Grassley, who is the president pro tempore of the US Senate. And how old is Chuck Grassley? Like 583. And if he was not available because he's 583, it would be Marco Rubio, who is the Secretary of State, who is the fourth in line of succession, were the president to die. If you want to find out more about Marco Rubio, this would make him very happy because we are doing a series for our founding members on Marco Rubio and his enormous ambition.

25:20Katty Kay:I did say that for a reason. And the reason I said that is that -

25:24Anthony Scaramucci:As opposed to a gratuitous Monday morning thing.

25:25Katty Kay:No, I said that for a reason. I mean, it was not just a shock value. I just think that we've lost our way. When you and I were growing up and you started in journalism or even when we were in college, even if we had people mudslinging at politicians, which they've done for 5 ,000 years, there was some level of respect and decorum. But the president has stripped all of that out of the United States now to the point where he's getting shot at and we're not even really responding to it anymore. The stuff that he puts out on the social media, we're numb to ending civilizations, open the F and straight.

26:05Katty Kay:And so, you know, I think the raccoon fits into all of that in terms of the insanity of it. And, you know, whoever came up with the word sane washing to me, you know, needs an award in the Oxford Dictionary because we're we're doing too much sane washing of all this stuff. But I did also do it for your reaction, Kat. I just want you to make sure you know that as well.

26:26Anthony Scaramucci:I need it. We're going to take a break.

26:31Katty Kay:Fox News is now streaming live on Fox One. When news breaks, we don't just report it. We go beyond the headlines to get the full story. Get live coverage, in-depth analysis and perspectives from the voices you trust, all in one place. Whether you're at home or on the go, stay connected to the stories shaping our world. Stream Fox News on Fox One. Download today.

27:05Katty Kay:Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US with me, Anthony Scaramucci and Caddy Kay.

27:11Anthony Scaramucci:Caddy Kay was still trying to figure out what to wear to the Royal Garden Party to which I've been invited at the British Embassy this afternoon. So if I'm a little distracted today, I'm focusing on dresses.

27:21Katty Kay:How many times have you met the king, Caddy?

27:23Anthony Scaramucci:I have not met the king before, So this will be a great pleasure for me.

27:26Katty Kay:You never met him when he was Prince Charles as well?

27:29Anthony Scaramucci:No, he met my parents. He came to stay with them when my father was an ambassador. He and Diana actually came to stay with them. But I have not met the king himself.

27:38Katty Kay:Okay, well, I want to hear all about it. Photos will be forthcoming. Good. I want to hear all about it. So let's talk about what's going to be on the president's mind because he was in the Situation Room over the weekend, looking at the proposals that are coming in from the Iranians, none of which he likes, which is why he canceled the Whitcoff-Kushner flight to Islamabad. But where do you think things are right now with the peace talks?

28:07Anthony Scaramucci:So, Tehran has submitted a new proposal overnight to the White House through Pakistani the intermediaries. And the offer outlines a framework to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, but push any discussion of the nuclear question further down the road. There are some people in the White House who are reading that as a sign that the Iranians are desperate, that this American blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is depriving them of oil revenue because they can't sell their oil. And so now they are finally coming to the table. That's what the White House is saying, President Trump said something odd on Fox News in an interview yesterday where he said that in three days' time, the Iranian pipelines would explode, he said, and therefore destroy Iran's oil infrastructure because they are being surged with oil that is not going anywhere and there's no release.

29:06Anthony Scaramucci:This is actually the scene from the beginning of a Tom Clancy novel, Red Storm Rising, exactly this, that a country's oil capacity explodes because they can't shut down production quickly enough. I don't know if that's where the president got this idea from, but I called up somebody who's an ex-CIA oil analyst on the Middle East who said, this is ridiculous. It's just silly. They know how to shut down production. The Saudis have shut down production. The Iraqis have shut down production. It is not going to explode. But the White House is trying to put out the message that this shows how well the blockade is going, that the Iranian regime is on its last legs, and so they are prepared to come to the table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

29:46Anthony Scaramucci:I mean, I don't know how you read this latest offer or whether you think this gets us further to clarity on how this all ends. It's possible that President Trump still could bomb the Iranians. I'm being told that is not being ruled out, but clearly he doesn't want to and he wants to get out of this still. So I I don't know that this new offer goes anywhere.

30:08Katty Kay:There's been some discussion about the Russians becoming sort of one of the guarantors here where the Iranians, they're suggesting the Iranians to move the uranium to the Russian soil.

30:22Anthony Scaramucci:Is that why the Iranian foreign minister is going to Moscow?

30:25Katty Kay:Well, that's the speculation. The papers are reporting that. I guess the real question is, are we comfortable with that?

30:32Anthony Scaramucci:How do we feel about the Russians being the guarantors of Iran's highly enriched uranium? That sounds like an excellent idea.

30:40Katty Kay:So it's sort of like what Maitre Cane's once said about the stock market. He said, the stock market, I'm in a beauty pageant. It's not for me to pick which stocks are beautiful. I have to ascertain what my fellow judges think. And in this case, it's really up to Donald Trump, right? Because he has a love affair with Putin. Maybe he's comfortable with it. And if he is comfortable with it, would that change the peace negotiations? Obviously, I'm not comfortable with it. But for me, I think there's something else going on that the discussion about having cards and not having cards and the president constantly saying they can call us and constantly saying they're completely decimated.

31:18Katty Kay:We have all the cards. Well, it turns out that that's not really true, Katty. They still have, as you pointed out last week, missile inventory, drone inventory. speed boats all over the Strait of Hormuz that can wreak havoc, rocket-fired missiles that they can take into the strait to blow up tankers. And so for me, it's always going to come down to the economic chicken. Who's got enough money to hold out? And are we going to go to$9 gas prices at a 4th of July barbecue here in America? And so what are your thoughts there? Because I'll leave with mine, I don't think the Americans or Donald Trump himself have the toleration for that.

32:00Katty Kay:And I think if you understand the Iranian culture versus the American culture, I think they do. But what are your thoughts?

32:06Anthony Scaramucci:I think that Trump is hoping that he can squeeze the Iranians. And if he squeezes them enough economically, they will come to the table. We're in this kind of game of chicken in a way of the American economy versus the hold that the Iranians have over the global economy and how much the global economy is suffering. And of course, that affects the American economy. And there's all the conversation now about high jet fuel prices, which is much more of a problem at the moment in Europe, but will become a problem here in the US. So, I think if we're July the 4th, and this is not resolved, then the president has a serious problem, because I I think American people really won't like that.

32:46Anthony Scaramucci:That's why he's trying to say they only have three days. I'm told they have three to four months still, the Iranians, of economic viability. So this game of chicken could go on for quite a lot longer. I had an interesting conversation on Friday night with Congressman Mike Turner, who, of course, is very steeped in intelligence and foreign relations issues in the House. And he said that for Trump, the priorities are, and this is why I think this deal won't work, the priorities are the uranium, that he really does want to show that he is the president that sorted the uranium issue and pushed back Iran's ability to produce highly enriched uranium and potentially a nuclear weapon.

33:30Anthony Scaramucci:And the measure for him is Obama's, of course, because he's Trump. He just wants to do better than the Obama deal. So he wants to be able to push back their ability to produce a weapon 20 years. And the other thing that Congressman Turner told me is that he really doesn't want any money to be transferred on pallets to the Iranians. And he keeps referring to this weakness in the original JCPOA, which was that the Iranians got some of their unfrozen assets. A lot of it actually was in Swiss francs that was transferred in hard cash. And he doesn't want that image. Trump wants to be able to say, I got a better deal than Obama did.

34:07Anthony Scaramucci:I don't know if he's going to manage to do that. But if he does, I think at that point he declares a victory and gets out.

34:13Katty Kay:So, Caddy, why does the president get a pass? And what I mean by that, he's sound asleep on camera in the Oval Office. He's dozing off and waking himself back up. If Joe Biden was doing that, there would be a national outcry of sleepy Joe Biden. If you look at the Obama deal now and you study the actual deal, the actual deal looks pretty good. And the actual deal comes without$60 billion spent in the Strait of Hormuz. Again, that's just the military expenditure by the United States to prosecute the war. It's not the economic damage that's taking place as a result of the war and the rising prices, the fertilizer shortage and all that other stuff.

34:59Katty Kay:Why does President Trump, what is it about his brand where he gets a pass for falling asleep in the Oval Office and on every metric, the way the thing is going right now, I'm going to stipulate and you can disagree that he's going to get a worse deal than the Obama deal because you have to add the 60 billion.

35:18Anthony Scaramucci:Well, he's already spent more, right? Because the Iranians got 55 billion. So it's already cost us more. And that's, as you say, just from the bombing. Right. So why does he get the pass then, Katya? I don't think he does get a pass. I honestly don't think he's getting a pass. Because if you were to take all of the approval ratings, there's been a slew of polls, including a recent Fox News polls. He's being decimated in the polls on this. If the American people were to vote tomorrow and Donald Trump's name was on the ticket, if they had the ability, they would boot him out of office tomorrow. There's no way he would be reelected.

35:49Anthony Scaramucci:So there's not much that he can't be removed instantaneously. He goes to the midterms. Maybe he doesn't care. His name's not on the ballot at the midterms. Maybe he just wants to have a Democrats running the House so he gets somebody to fight with again. That's quite possible. And he'd quite like the Democrats to win in the midterms. But he doesn't get a pass. I think everything you see in the country in terms of polling on how the people feel about his handling of the economy, which is why this White House Correspondents Associated dinner is like a two or three day story. In the end, yes, maybe people are focused on it for a couple of days.

36:23Anthony Scaramucci:Actually, what will matter for Donald Trump and the Republican Party is how they're doing on the economy. And this war is hurting them. So I actually don't think he is getting a pass.

36:33Katty Kay:Neil Ferguson has a team of researchers. They're estimating that three to 3.2 million barrels per day still being produced by the Iranians. The Americans are saying there's a blockade, but the Indian government has reported that 34 tankers that are Iranian oil supplied tankers have arrived in India through the blockade. And so the president, as we've pointed out, is letting certain tankers go through because he doesn't want to blow up the Indian or the Chinese economy while this war is going on. And so I guess, again, another question, that's good for the Iranians. That gives them more money. So your reporting is four to six months.

37:15Katty Kay:I said last week that I thought they had 45 days. And so I just want to go back and I want to say that your reporting is actually more accurate because what is happening is they're getting a lot of upfront payments from their oil partners.

37:31Anthony Scaramucci:Yeah, the Chinese are giving them upfront payments.

37:33Katty Kay:Exactly. And so that's increasing the runway that they have. They may have had 45 to 50 days earlier in the month, but now it looks like they're going to go six months. Again, Neil Ferguson is saying six to 14 months now of usable reserves with over$30 billion in the Iranian central bank of hard currency. So again, caddy, the US is going to be tolerant. We're going to go 16 to 14 months,$9 a gallon of gas, no fertilizer in the farmland. That's what's going to happen.

38:10Anthony Scaramucci:That's politically unsustainable for the Republican Party. And if they do badly after the midterms and Donald Trump really is a lame duck, who knows, maybe you will actually get voices of dissent from the Republicans in the Senate and the House who find a spine and decide this is not actually doing them or their party any good. So no, I don't see America going that long. Okay, guys, we are going to wrap it up there. If you would like to listen to our series on Marco Rubio, which seems particularly relevant at the moment and his extraordinary ambition, unfortunately, poor old Marco Rubio, even though he's fourth in line to succession to the throne, as it were, is not at the moment king.

38:51Anthony Scaramucci:He's still only Secretary of State or, as he's known in Washington, Secretary of Everything. You can listen to that series by becoming a founding member. Join up at TheRestIsPoliticsUS.com. And we'll see you back here on Wednesday.

39:05Katty Kay:Thanks, guys. See you on Wednesday.

39:26Anthony Scaramucci:to your license plate or VIN and get a real offer down to the penny. No back and forth, no surprises, just an experience you can trust. Like your offer? Accept it. Schedule a pickup, and we'll come to you with a check in hand. Your car, your timeline, your terms. Visit Carvana.com to sell your car today. Delivery fees and terms may apply.

From the publisher

What does the White House Correspondents' Dinner attack tell us about US politics? Is the Secret Service able to protect the President? And, is Iran’s new peace proposal the key to unlocking the Strait of Hormuz?

Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more.

Become a Founding Member: To hear our Marco Rubio series and go deeper into US politics every week with ad-free listening, members-only miniseries, early access to live show tickets and a bonus members-only Q&A podcast every week. Sign up at ⁠⁠⁠⁠therestispoliticsus.com

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up to our free newsletter here⁠⁠⁠⁠

Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠therestispoliticsus@goalhanger.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Video Editor: Kieron LeslieSocial Producer: Charlie JohnsonAssistant Producer: Alfie RoweProducers: Fiona Douglas, India DunkleyExecutive Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: US

All 253 episodes
181. Trump’s Dinner Shooting and Iran’s Desperate DealThe Rest Is Politics: US · 42 min
Listen in VO