205. The Secret Message in Todd Blanche’s Senate Hearing

16 Jul 2026 · 37 min · 11 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that two Capitol Hill confirmation hearings—acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, Jay Clayton—functioned as public loyalty tests for Donald Trump rather than truth-telling about the 2020 election and related legal obligations.

Key claims

Clayton avoided saying “Joe Biden won” despite repeated questions; Blanche showed obstruction on Epstein transparency, including refusing to meet survivors if they have lawyers (Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey dispute that claim).

Notable examples

Blanche’s “I am the president’s lawyer / I am Trump’s lawyer” remark is framed as a “Freudian slip”; both men are described as “safe” but dangerous equivocators. The second half covers renewed US-Iran hostilities: attacks on US bases, Strait of Hormuz blockades, possible Karg Island strikes, and fears of “forever war” due to shoddy MOU wording and US incompetence.

Guests

none; hosts are Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Overview of Capitol Hill Hearings

0:45 to 2:36

Discussion about recent confirmation hearings for Todd Blanche and Jay Clayton.

“And so for all of you people that are built close to the ground like me, there's hope for all of us, I guess I would say.”

Loyalty to Trump in Hearings

2:36 to 4:23

Analysis of the loyalty displayed by Blanche and Clayton to Trump during their hearings.

“But let's start, Anthony, with those hearings.”

The Ramifications of Loyalty

4:23 to 7:22

Exploration of what would happen if Jay Clayton acknowledged Biden's election victory.

“You know, I know Jay personally, and I've had dinner with Jay.”

The Confession Booth Analogy

7:22 to 10:02

A creative role-play imagining Jay Clayton in a confession booth addressing his integrity.

“I think he was told by White House officials, if you fail this test, the Democrats are going to ask you this, and there's election fraud.”

Todd Blanche and Epstein Hearing

10:02 to 12:29

Discussion on Todd Blanche's hearing and his stance on meeting Epstein survivors.

“And for the Catholics out there, that's 200 Hail Marys and 500 rosaries, and you can get out of jail free.”

Contrived Statements or Freudian Slip

12:29 to 14:00

Debate on whether Todd Blanche's statement about being Trump's lawyer was intentional or a slip.

“So if he's Attorney General, I don't think we learn more about the Epstein files.”

Analysis of Todd Blanche's Senate Hearing

14:00 to 18:16

Explore the implications of Todd Blanche's statements and Trump’s eligibility for a third term.

“Okay, and let me tell you something, okay?”

Current Situation with Iran

18:16 to 20:52

Discuss the escalating conflict with Iran and the implications for US military strategy.

“Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US.”

Economic Impact of Military Actions

20:52 to 26:56

Evaluate how military actions affect oil markets and the long-term geopolitical landscape.

“Do I think this is going to go on for another two and a half years?”

Israel's Role in Ongoing Conflicts

26:56 to 28:05

Analyze the motivations behind Israel's military actions and political strategies.

“He picks Rogan and he goes on Rogan, three-hour show.”
Show all 11 chapters

The Political Landscape and J.D. Vance's Challenges

28:05 to 32:21

Explore the dynamics of Israeli politics and J.D. Vance's political maneuvers within the Republican Party.

“He is the strong guy that will protect Israel.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07Hello and welcome to The Rest is Politics US with me Katty Kay feeling kind of despondent after the very sad England loss but I'm glad that you have brought the appropriate t-shirt Anthony Scaramucci. I think that's a little on the nose actually. I actually think you could have been a little bit more empathetic today.

0:27Katty Kay:For those listening, it says the British blew a 13 colony lead and there's George Washington with his sunglasses on.

0:32Anthony Scaramucci:I think that's a little harsh today. I was cheering for the three lions yesterday.

0:37Katty Kay:I was disappointed to see that. But I will say this, Caddy, as somebody who's vertically challenged, there was a bunch of five foot seven people running around playing against a group of giants and they were beating up on them. And so for all of you people that are built close to the ground like me, there's hope for all of us, I guess I would say. So Anthony Scaramucci, Lionel Messi in the same bracket is what we're saying. That is good. It's a delusion of grandeur. We are roughly the same height, although I'm sure that we don't have the same body fat composition, but we are roughly the same height.

1:13Katty Kay:But listen, to quote Tony Pastor, who's one of the founders here at Gallhanger, you can't defend against a lion like that. You know, you're going to end up getting clawed. But anyway, listen, it was a phenomenal World Cup run for the English team.

1:30Anthony Scaramucci:And everybody should tune in to Gary Lineker and co. on The Rest is Football on Netflix because they're doing a great job of analyzing how that match went down. Those of you who need a bit of therapy, like in my house, tune in there. Okay, for us, it's been a very busy few days on Capitol Hill. There have been two extremely heated confirmation hearings, and we're going to discuss the grillings of both the acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who wants to become the Attorney General and take over from Pam Bondi, and Trump's pick for Director of National Intelligence, of course, to take over from Tulsi Gabbard, Jay Clayton.

2:05These hearings were kind of exercises in how much loyalty can I show to Donald Trump. In the second half of the show, we are going to talk about the new wave of strikes on Iran. Blockades have been reinstated on the Strait of Hormuz.

2:20Anthony Scaramucci:I have been told that global oil supplies really have no buffer zone and we're close to running on empty. What does that mean for the global economy? But also, how on earth could this whole process have been run so incompetently? So we'll talk about that in the second half. But let's start, Anthony, with those hearings. I watched the hearing several hours each between Todd Blanche and the senators and Jay Clayton and the senators. And my takeaway was that this was a big loyalty test, that loyalty to Donald Trump was being tested in public. And both of these men, Jay Clayton and Todd Blanche, who are respected figures otherwise, well known in Washington.

3:05These are not the kind of Bill Pulte, Cash Patel sort of fringe joke figures as those guys are seen in Washington. These guys have a long history and long reputation and they are respected. And yet, over the course of those hearings, both men in separate ways chose to show that they were going to put their loyalty to Donald Trump and their fear of Donald Trump over any expression of candor. And I think what we saw on Capitol Hill recently was American democracy and the elections process being tested. And I'm not sure it holds up because both of these guys in separate ways show that they are not prepared to say to Donald Trump, Joe Biden won the 2020 election.

3:54Our elections were free and fair in the case of Jay Clayton. And in the case of Todd Blanche, they are not prepared to say, we are going to make sure that a deal that gives Donald Trump immunity from tax prosecutions or investigations is completely ripped up because that is what

4:12Anthony Scaramucci:the president wants. He wants that immunity. I mean, it was, again, it was in the kind of, you know, shocking but not surprising categories to hear these two men fall over themselves in the way that they did. What did you think?

4:23Katty Kay:You know, I know Jay personally, and I've had dinner with Jay. Jay's attended our conference in Wyoming. I have an enormous amount of respect for Jay. He's a very thoughtful guy. Which is what I hear from a lot of people in this town. He's a partner. It was a partner at Sullivan Cromwell. He's a very respected guy. And I will say this, he's going to get confirmed because he is a safe pair of hands in that job in a room surrounded by crazies. But I want to just ask you a question. What if Jay Clayton had said to Senator Ossoff, and I want to set the scene for everybody, Senator Ossoff from Georgia asked the question, who won the 2020 election?

5:07And Jay got combative with them and more or less wouldn't answer the question other than to say that Joe Biden got the electoral votes and the election was certified for Joe Biden. But I guess the implication was that the vote count was fraudulent. This is President Trump's statement. Of course, there's been lawsuits, can't find any fraud. We've looked through the 2020 election. Every single person, like a Sherlock Holmes, scant little to no zero fraud, et cetera. But Jay Clayton is forced, because of this loyalty test, not to flat out say, Joe Biden won the election, Joe Biden got more votes, Joe Biden, et cetera.

5:44him. But, Caddy, what if he did? What would have been the ramifications for Jay Clayton vis-a-vis Donald Trump if he had just said to John Osler, you know, Joe Biden won the election? What would have been the ramifications?

5:58Anthony Scaramucci:I think he'd have been pulled. I think he would not be up for director of national intelligence. And Bill Pulte, who is less competent and more of a conspiracy theorist, would become director of national intelligence. Now, you could, I suppose, make the argument that Jay Clayton, who, as you say, is a respected guy, refused when not just one senator, four different Democratic senators asked him very simply, did Joe Biden win the 2020 election? One of them, John Ossoff, says, this is a job interview. You will be in charge of intelligence. Under the intelligence remit comes the integrity of American elections.

6:38Did Joe Biden win the 2020 election. And the word salad, I mean, it's really worth those of you who want to go and have a quick look at that clip, do it, because it is a fantastic example of verbal gymnastics.

6:52Anthony Scaramucci:I mean, he's been taking lessons from Simone Biles or something. It was phenomenal the way he got away with it. And he just sort of sits there in silence and he's pushed and he's pushed and he won't say the words win and Joe Biden in the same sentence. And I guess he may be saying to himself, well, if I do, the president will get on the phone to me immediately and say, okay, you failed the test, you're out, and Bill Pulte is in, and that would be worse for American democracy. I mean, maybe that is the rationale that he's giving himself. Is that what you're suggesting?

7:25Katty Kay:Listen, I think you're 100 % right. I think he was told by White House officials, if you fail this test, the Democrats are going to ask you this, and there's election fraud. And Trump is speaking this evening. He's got something very important to say to the American people tonight. And I guess it's related to the 2020 election. So that would have been very bad for Jay Clayton. But now it's time for trip US role play. Okay. And so you are now a Roman Catholic priest, which is very unlikely, Katty.

8:00Anthony Scaramucci:Well, there's quite a lot of problems with that. Quite a lot. But I just want you to hear me out. You and I'm Jay Clayton. I'm Jay Clayton because he's a fellow Catholic. Right. Now I'm coming into the confession booth and I am saying to my priest, I'm saying, you know, I just told a very big lie. I'm not George Washington. I went before the Congress and I couldn't speak with the integrity about the election. But father or sister, the reason I did this was to protect the country. The reason I did this is this was a patriotic duty of mine. Did I impugn my moral integrity? Did I do it for the greater good of the country?

8:43Please help me with my moral and relative equivocation. And you say, Jay, my child, at the beginning of that hearing, did you put your hand on the Bible and swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? I did do that. Yes, I did.

9:04Anthony Scaramucci:Did you tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, Jay, my son? Well, that's why I'm here in the confession booth. I sort of didn't. But again, this is for the greater good of the society. We can't have the Joker, whose name I can't even remember, Pulte, I guess his name is, be the chief. Can we? Jay, go and read Hannah Arendt, because she is the one that will warn you that democracies get destroyed by leaders who put in place loyalty over competency in the aim of destroying the institutions of democracy. And if you stand there in the Senate, my son, and you say that you are telling the truth, and then you do not tell the truth over something as consequential as whether an American election was stolen, then you are destroying trust in institutions.

9:55You are good, Catty K. Could I make a good priest? Oh, God, my puppy would be so proud of me. And for the Catholics out there, that's 200 Hail Marys and 500 rosaries, and you can get out of jail free. Okay, let's go to Epstein. Yeah. Because now I'm flipping over to Todd Blanche, and I want to talk about Epstein for a second. Blanche apologized. He said in about 1 % of the documents, mistakes were made, but he did not commit to meeting with the survivors. What do you say about that?

10:28Anthony Scaramucci:So that's interesting because I was talking to Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey, the two congressmen who have brought this new Epstein Transparency Act, Epstein Transparency Act 2.0. And I was just speaking to them earlier this morning on Morning Joe. And one of the things that Todd Blanche said that has confused everybody, because there were 10 Epstein survivors in that hearing. And one of the senators, Dick Durbin, was pressing Todd Blanche on whether he would meet with those survivors. Are you going to meet them? Are you going to meet them? And eventually Todd Blanche says, well, I would love to meet with the survivors, but if they have lawyers, I can't meet with them.

11:13And both Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey, we were on set together, listened to the clip and looked at me quizzically and said, that's just not the case under American law.

11:23Anthony Scaramucci:There is no reason that he can't meet with them. Remember, by the way, he went and met with Ghislaine Maxwell down in her prison and then she got transferred to a less secure prison. But anyway, that's another issue, perhaps. But he could meet with the survivors. He is choosing not to meet with the survivors. And I think we are in a week, Anthony, where between the Blanche hearing and the new Epstein Act and J.D. Vance going on Joe Rogan's show and saying that they had a communications problem around the Epstein files, not a moral, ethical, political problem, but a communications around the Epstein files.

11:56I think the whole Epstein file issue is back on the front pages again here. He was less combative than Pan Bondi. He did express more empathy for the survivors. He did say in principle he'd be happy to meet with the survivors. But I don't think we got much more from him than we did from Pan Bondi, frankly.

12:17Anthony Scaramucci:And it's still, Todd Blanche, according to Congressman Massey and Ro Khanna, has been a huge obstructionist. when it comes to getting the Epstein files out. So if he's Attorney General, I don't think we learn more about the Epstein files. He's going to be Attorney General. Cornyn's going to vote for him, even though he's talking about this$1.8 billion weaponization fund and so forth as being inappropriate. Cornyn is squawking, but he We will vote for him. But, Cady, something happened. And I want you to answer contrived or accidental and Freudian slip. Contrived or Freudian slip. And I'm going to read this to you, okay?

13:02He is Trump's lawyer. He said, I am Trump's lawyer. Excuse me.

13:09Anthony Scaramucci:Spell that out a little bit more. Do the setup. up. So he was asked about his responsibilities. He was asked about how he sees his responsibilities. And he said, well, I am the president's lawyer. I am Trump's lawyer. And as you know, I have said repeatedly on this program, the Department of Justice has become the Trump family law firm. So he said this and then he took it back. But, Caddy, was that contrived? and then, excuse me, I'm taking it back. Or was that a Freudian slip? I think it was a Freudian slip. I mean, it's interesting that you think it may have been - You think it was contrived.

13:51Yes, absolutely. I think it was contrived. You think he wanted to get out there, I am Trump's lawyer, and then quickly say, I am not Trump's lawyer. 100%. I was Trump's lawyer. Because this guy is a buttoned up guy. Okay, and let me tell you something, okay? Todd Blanche, if you want to go into an aging chamber and go from a 48-year-old looking guy to a 68-year-old looking guy in one year, go work for Donald Trump and go work at the Department of Justice. Because this guy literally looks like he's aging like the Indiana Jones enemies in episode one of Indiana Jones. Okay, so to me, I think he contrived that, and I think he said that to the audience of one, and then he pulled it back.

14:42But he did say something, and this should reassure people listening here, and I quote, I don't believe he is eligible for a third term. And I have said repeatedly on the podcast that Donald Trump is not running for a third term.

15:00Anthony Scaramucci:He's not running for a third term, I agree. And there's one other thing that happened this week that if you're looking for green shoots in the American democracy and the eventual survival of the republic, which we are predicting on this program, the republic of the United States is going to survive, is that Donald Trump paid Caddy Kay$5.6 million this week to E. Jean Carroll. He abided by the court. Yeah. And he has consistently done that. And again, what is Trump after? I want glory and vanity. I want your attention because I'm a miserable SOB and I want money. But you know what? He's going to be checking out at the end of two and a half years.

15:49And Todd Blanche told you that because that was also contrived, Katty K. That's a message. But, okay, two questions for you. First question, if Donald Trump was 10 years younger, would he go for a third term? 1 ,000%. Maybe even five years younger. Totally agree. Okay, second question. Might even go for five terms. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

16:11Katty Kay:I'm permanently staying, not leaving. I'm never, ever leaving. So then the second question is the broader question from yesterday of both Blanche and Clayton, who we've established, are competent people. Do you think competent people who won't

16:30Anthony Scaramucci:contradict Trump on paper are more worrying than ideologues like Bill Pulte or Kash Patel, who say things out loud? No, no.

16:40Katty Kay:These are the John Kellys. And I hate to say this, but I see Clayton and even Blanche, by the way, because he's doing Trump's bidding, but he's generally keeping the cauldron from blowing its top. These are the people that we're going to look back on and say, wow, they equivocated. Wow. It broke his principles, but you know what? We needed some people like them around because otherwise this would be a full-on disaster going on. Now, when Patel came up, Blanche defended him. Let's just set the scene for that and I know we'll go to our next topic. But when Patel came up and they were calling him a loser or whatever they were calling him, Blanche got angry about it.

17:35Katty Kay:But let me tell you something. He thinks Patel is a loser. Okay. You could roll tape and we could analyze it together. And I'm telling you that Patel, I think, is on the way out.

17:49Anthony Scaramucci:I think so too. I think spending all this money on planes is pissing the president off. He doesn't like that. This man gets confirmed. He's going to go to the Trumpster and he's going to say, you got to get rid of the beer guzzling lunatic. Who's taking private jets to go and see his girlfriend playing concerts. Yes. That's another prediction on this podcast. Okay, we're going to take a break and come back and talk about the latest on Iran.

18:17Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US. Quick update on where we are on Iran at the end of this week. We thought it was worth talking about this because we are actually back at war with Iran at the moment.

18:29Anthony Scaramucci:Tehran has launched fresh attacks against American military bases in neighboring Gulf countries, including in Jordan and Bahrain and Kuwait, which suggests that those military bases are no longer safe for American troops going forward. And the US military says that it has inflicted six hour waves of strikes in multiple locations. And the president is reportedly weighing a ground invasion of Karg Island again, which is the island where a lot of the Iranian refineries are. 90 % of Iran's oil passes through there. This would put American troops at risk. But this is something that apparently he has weighed just in the last couple of days.

Read the full transcript

19:14Anthony Scaramucci:He went on Fox News and says, I don't want to negotiate now. But then he also told reporters that Iran better behave and threatened to target Iran's energy infrastructure if Tehran failed to return to talk. So it's a little confusing, but there are reports that they are weighing more extreme military options at the moment. J.D. Vance, by the way, has been on Joe Rogan's podcast. We mentioned that, talking about a whole load of things because Joe Rogan's podcast is even longer than our podcast. And he said, interestingly, those who reject negotiations with Iran offer no realistic solution beyond endless and ineffective bombing.

19:55Anthony Scaramucci:Joe Rogan recorded that, I think, on Tuesday, Anthony, but it looks a little bit like that's what his boss is doing at the moment, rejecting negotiations in favor of endless and ineffective bombing.

20:06Katty Kay:There's a lot going on here, but let's go back to Versailles. We're signing the MOU in Versailles. Great ceremony. Yeah, and Caddy Kay is taking the over or the under that the MOU is going to last. We're talking about the day that it's signed. Is the MOU going to last and they're heading for peace or are we going to be in perpetual war? And Caddy Kay says we're going to be in perpetual war because that's what you said. So you ding, ding, ding, you deserve credit for this. But the real question I have for you, will the Trump administration end? and will we still be at war on again, off again with Iran?

20:45Go ahead.

20:46Anthony Scaramucci:That is a great question. So that would be another two and a half years because the Trump administration ends in January of 2029. We're in July of 2026. Do I think this is going to go on for another two and a half years? I don't think it can go on for another two and a half years, and here's why. We are a serious crunch moment around global oil supplies. I had a conversation with somebody who had been formerly in the CIA who covered oil markets and oil supplies for the CIA, who said to me that we're kind of running on empty, that there really are just not very many buffers left. And commercial shippers are not happy about the idea of sending their ships through the Strait of Hormuz, especially now that the bombing has restarted.

21:38Anthony Scaramucci:But they weren't anyway. A lot of the traffic that the White House was boasting about picking up was actually ships that had been sitting idle inside the Gulf coming out. It wasn't new ships going in and out again. And all of these alternative routes that people are talking about, the new pipelines, lines, the new train lines. This analyst said to me, it takes years to map, engineer, finance those routes. So anyone who's thinking that those routes are going to pick up the slack anytime soon, that is a pipe dream. I don't think the world can afford for the Strait of Hormuz to stay shut for the next two and a half years.

22:18Anthony Scaramucci:They are going to have to find some way to have some kind of understanding. And it may be that it's slightly on again, off again, but there's going to have to be some understanding that gets oil out through that strait. You think we're going to be at this scale of war for the next two and a half years, Anthony?

22:35Katty Kay:No, I don't think we're going to be at this scale of war, but I'm going to take the other side of this now and say that this is going to be a protracted battle because the politics in Iran right now and the US hatred and the hatred towards Donald Trump are such where there's always going to have to be some level of antagonism to keep the regime together. I think the economic situation is fragile in Iran, and so they're going to find a way to get the oil through the strait. But what happened last week, you always got to follow the money caddy. And so what happened last week is Lloyd's, they went from a 0.001 % of cargo as a premium to a 5%.

23:15Okay, so when that happens, that's very, very bad for oil markets. That's why oil markets pop from like the 70s to the 85 zone.

23:23Anthony Scaramucci:That's because the shipping container owners don't believe it's safe to get there. It's way too expensive. Exactly. It's way too expensive. But here's what I did like. It's$85 a barrel, not$114. Two things. We've only just resumed the bombing and it's already gone from what's low 70s up to$85. Right, but it didn't go to$114. No, it didn't go to$114. It didn't go back to the super intense prices. I think the traders are saying that this is negotiations by another means. And to your point, the SPR is drained. And so the patience is borrowed. But the market believes that both sides want to deal. But I do think you're going to get oil flowing, but people sticking fingers in each other's eyes during the next two-year period.

24:11unless you're telling me something very dramatic happens in Iran and the economy causes a collapse of the IRGC, which I don't see happening. But I mean, anything can happen.

24:21Anthony Scaramucci:Can I just say one other thing though, quickly on that before we go to another, is that it's very worth everybody reading. Ali Vaez, I hope I've pronounced his name right, who's an Iran expert at the International Crisis Group, has done a really good op-ed in the New York Times in which he makes the case for this becoming a forever war. along the lines of what you're describing. But what Ali is saying is that what's interesting is that both sides see the MOU, the Memorandum of Understanding, as a continuation of war by other means and not as a bridge to peace. And in a way, they both went into it thinking, we're not actually prepared to make the compromises that are necessary to get a real peace deal.

25:04Anthony Scaramucci:This is just a way for us to prolong this process. And his argument, having studied lots of conflicts, is that that is how you get into forever wars, when there is not actually a desire on either side to make the compromises necessary to end the war. My biggest concern around all of this is that we just have a lack of competence on the American side. And I think The renewal of attacks this week, what has happened this week, has underlined the fact that the Memorandum of Understanding and this famous now paragraph five, which is one sentence, which is the sentence that says that Iran is going to make its best efforts to allow transit through the Strait of Hormuz, was so shoddily worded that it could be interpreted by the Iranians as we're going to make the best effort to have them.

25:59Anthony Scaramucci:the ships go exactly where we want them to go so that we can monitor and control and potentially charge them in that process. And that was Donald Trump rushing things. He is impatient. He's sloppy. He put in charge Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, who do not have years of experience of negotiating these things. They negotiated it in 21 days as opposed to the 20 months it took to negotiate the JCPOA and they didn't have seasoned lawyers going over every word in that document saying, is this word open to misinterpretation? Is this phrase going to be solid? And I think what has happened this week is a huge display of the worrying lack of competence that we have in this process at the top.

26:45Anthony Scaramucci:And that's what might make this continue. So that's my base case. We're going to be fighting and oil is going to be shipping, but we're going to be fighting while the oil is shipping. I want to go to sitting vice president, J.D. Vance. He picks Rogan and he goes on Rogan, three-hour show. Rogan has been decidedly critical of the forever worse. And so he's now going to sell the Rogan people on the administration's approach, but he says something, Cady. And I'm going to quote him now. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, people inside the Israeli government are running a well-funded campaign to keep the war going, and I quote, indefinitely.

27:31And then he cites the Times, doesn't mention him by name, but it's Brad Pascal. It's basically Trump's former campaign manager. He basically says he's a paid conservative of the influencer that's out there, okay, pumping the idea of keeping this going. You know, I thought there was a bite to that against Israel. Okay, now Vance then after the show was over, he broadly pushed back, blah, blah. But he did say that the Israelis want to keep this war going indefinitely.

28:04Katty Kay:What are your thoughts on that?

28:06Anthony Scaramucci:Look, I've spoken to people in Tel Aviv who know far more about Israeli politics than I do, who have been right since October the 7th asserting the idea that Benjamin Netanyahu wants a forever war, whether it's a forever war in Gaza, whether it's a war in Lebanon, or whether it's a forever war against Iran, because that is the way he keeps the Israeli public on side by highlighting the threats against Israel. He is the strong guy that will protect Israel. And staying in office is his ticket to staying out of jail. Because if he is out of office and is no longer the prime minister, he can be sent to jail on corruption charges.

28:50Anthony Scaramucci:So I think there is an argument that you've been hearing for the last few years that that's exactly what Benjamin Netanyahu wants. And I think the doves inside the administration, the J.D. Vances and Marco Rubio had a moment of supremacy over the last few weeks where they managed to pull Donald Trump back around the negotiations of the MOU back from these attacks. But now with the news that Donald Trump is considering, and who knows, I mean, it's Donald Trump, he could change his mind again tomorrow, right? His mind is made up until it's not made up. But with the news that he is considering going much further with attacks, potentially with some kind of ground invasion of Karg Island, it's the hawks who are in the ascendancy again.

29:38Anthony Scaramucci:And that is good news for Benjamin Netanyahu. I think what is interesting to me about the Vance interview on Rogan is how does he politically get out of this? How does he manage to persuade the anti-interventionist, America first side of the Republican Party that he always wanted to refrain from going into Iran whilst saying what he needs to say to support the president? It's a very tricky needle for him to thread.

30:13Katty Kay:I would not have gone on Rogan if I was J.D. Vance. I know he thought about this. Rogan gets too much attention. Donald Trump wants all the attention on him. He set himself up with a loyalty paradox now because he can't have it both ways with Donald Trump. You can't be the peace-loving and forever war negotiator and then go on Rogan and try to sell the Trump administration's policies. that sort of good cop, bad cop stuff doesn't really work. You're either with Trump or you're against Trump. And I think he's going to get set up as the fall guy here in this situation. I think he's going to get blistered by Trump.

30:51I think it was a mistake for him to go on Rogan. But having said that, listening to the interview, Vance is a smart guy. And if he is running in 2028, which is not clear to me that he is, he's still the front runner, Caddy, even though everyone's eyes are on Rubio. He's still the front runner because he is the vice president of the United States. Okay.

31:13Anthony Scaramucci:Do you want a little bit of gossip? Please. You know, I spend weekends out in Virginia, about an hour or so outside Washington. Apparently, the Vances are looking to acquire a property out there, which I suspect is Usher Vance wanting to get the heck out of Dodge at weekends with all her children. But also, doesn't that indicate to you that he's planning to stay around in DC for a while? You don't go and find yourself a farm in Virginia an hour outside of Washington. I don't know if they're renting it or buying it. That's what I need to find out. But anyway, it made me think, oh, maybe they are planning to stay for a while.

31:49Anthony Scaramucci:In which case, maybe he's planning to run because he's not going back to the Senate.

31:52Katty Kay:He's not going to win. And he probably doesn't have enough self-awareness to run. So he'll probably run. There'll be a blood sport between him and Rubio. We'll see. But he's a smart guy. I read both of his books, and you can dislike J.D. Vance. He's a smart guy, but threading the needle with Donald Trump the way he's trying to do has never worked, Katty Kay. He could be the first person to do it, but I seriously doubt that. Look for the bombs to go off over J.D. Vance's head. And talking of that, Anthony and I are going to do a series for our founding members

32:25Anthony Scaramucci:on J.D. Vance, the heir apparent in the Republican Party. We're going to be releasing that in August. You can become a founding member, of course, by joining us at therestispoliticsus.com. And on the website, you can also get tickets to our live tour of the US in October. We're super excited about that. Come and join us and we'll be taking your questions. That's it for this week. We'll be back on Monday. Thanks so much for joining us. Thanks for listening, guys.

32:51Katty Kay:Thanks, guys. We'll see you next week.

33:08Hello, everybody. We've got some exciting news for you. That's right, Caddy. We are holding a summer sale on our founding member subscriptions. From now until the end of August, you can get a year's membership to our show for a third off. I think that's a real bargain. Okay, you just need to use the code SUMMER26 when you sign up for an annual membership and you'll unlock ad-free listening. You'll get our bonus episodes and of course our exclusive mini-series. We've got a series covering Marco Rubio, Elon Musk, Trump's health, and so much more, including these very popular caddy, these question and answer sessions.

33:47So head to the rest is politics us.com to claim this discount. We'd love to have you with us in the club. We'll have plenty to talk about over the next few months. So make sure you don't miss out. What more could our listeners want, Caddy Kay, than this uninterrupted sound of our voices? Maybe not my voice, but certainly your voice, Caddy. Okay, we want to accompany you on all your summer travels. So go to the code SUMMER26, rest is politics, us.com and sign up.

From the publisher

What were the key takeaways from Todd Blanche and Jay Clayton’s confirmation hearings? Was JD Vance’s interview with Joe Rogan a major misstep? And, is Trump in a ‘forever war’ with Iran? 

Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more. 

Summer sale is here: get an annual membership for a third off with code SUMMER26. That's ad-free listening, every bonus episode, and full access to our exclusive members' series. Sale ends August 31st, so grab it before summer's over.

Buy your tickets for our North America tour here

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up to our free newsletter here⁠⁠⁠⁠

Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestPoliticsUS⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠therestispoliticsus@goalhanger.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Video Editor: Kieron Leslie

Social Producer: Charlie Johnson

Assistant Producer: Alfie Rowe

Producers: Fiona Douglas, India Dunkley

Executive Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: US

All 253 episodes
205. The Secret Message in Todd Blanche’s Senate HearingThe Rest Is Politics: US · 37 min
Listen in VO