46. The Golden Age of Corruption

28 Nov 2024 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics: US - Episode 46: The Golden Age of Corruption

Episode Summary In this episode titled "The Golden Age of Corruption," hosts Anthony Scaramucci (The Mooch) and Alastair Campbell discuss the potential for a new era of corruption in the United States, particularly in light of Donald Trump's political maneuvers. They explore the implications of a possible second Trump term, the silence of Democrats in the face of corruption, and the broader impacts on democracy both in the U.S. and globally.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Corruption in the Trump Era
  2. Scaramucci posits that the U.S. is entering a "golden age of corruption."
  3. Discussion Points:
  4. The normalization of corrupt practices within government.
  5. Rumors of financial transactions that raise ethical concerns.
  6. The long-term effects on trust in public institutions.
  1. Tariffs and Economic Policy
  2. The discussion begins with Trump's announcement regarding tariffs, claiming they will address drug trafficking and illegal immigration.
  3. Key Insights:
  4. Scaramucci questions the effectiveness of tariffs as a tool for such issues, emphasizing they often negatively impact American consumers.
  5. Historical context provided on Trump's past tariff policies and their implications.
  1. Rule of Law and Political Accountability
  2. Scaramucci expresses concerns about Trump potentially being above the law due to a lack of prosecutorial action against him.
  3. Consequences Discussed:
  4. Erosion of respect for legal institutions.
  5. The potential for widespread corruption as individuals in power feel emboldened by Trump's actions.
  1. Democratic Party's Response
  2. Both hosts critique the Democrats' passive response to rising corruption.
  3. Notable Points:
  4. A lack of a cohesive strategy or strong candidates to counter Trumpism.
  5. Internal disarray within the party and leadership challenges facing figures like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden.
  1. Foreign Policy Outlook
  2. Speculation on Trump's approach to international relations, particularly regarding Ukraine.
  3. Discussion Highlights:
  4. Trump’s past relationships with foreign leaders and current geopolitical dynamics.
  5. The implications for U.S. support to Ukraine and how it might differ under a second Trump term.

Key Takeaways

  • The Normalization of Corruption: The narrative suggests that a second Trump presidency could exacerbate corruption in governance, with implications for American democracy.
  • Economic Policy Concerns: Tariffs are presented as a blunt instrument unlikely to resolve complex social issues, with Scaramucci highlighting the disconnect between Trump’s rhetoric and economic realities.
  • Democratic Disorganization: The current Democratic leadership is portrayed as lacking direction, unable to effectively counter Trump’s influence and rhetoric.
  • Impacts on Global Relations: The podcast raises alarms about the potential shifts in U.S. foreign policy under a Trump administration, particularly regarding alliances and international commitments.

Conclusion In this episode, Scaramucci and Campbell articulate significant concerns about the trajectory of American politics under potential future leadership from Trump. They delve into the implications of corruption, economic policy, and the current state of the Democratic Party, offering a critical lens on the future of U.S. governance and its role on the global stage.

Call to Action Listeners are encouraged to stay informed and engaged with political developments, highlighting the importance of active participation in democracy.

---

Additional Notes

  • For bonus content and more in-depth discussions, listeners are invited to join the podcast's membership club at [therestispoliticsus.com](https://therestispoliticsus.com).
  • Follow the podcast on social media for updates and insights on upcoming episodes.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00The spirit of innovation is deeply ingrained in America. and Google is helping Americans innovate in ways both big and small. From improving emergency response times to protecting against cyber attacks, local, state, and federal governments are innovating with Google AI. This is a new era of American innovation. Find out more at g.co slash American Innovation. Lemu, Lemu and I always tell you to customize your car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. But now we want you to feel it. Cue the Emu music, Lemu. save yourself money today increase your wealth customize and save we say that may have been too much feeling only pay for what you need at liberty mutual.com liberty liberty liberty liberty savings very underwritten by liberty mutual insurance company affiliates excludes massachusetts experian is your big financial friend helping you explore credit card offers with confidence some cards are labeled no ding decline which means if you're not approved, they won't hurt your credit scores.

1:01See Experian.com for details. Applying for cards labeled no ding decline won't hurt your credit scores if you aren't initially approved.

1:15Hello and welcome to a special edition of The Rest is Politics U.S. It's Thanksgiving week here in the United States. So happy Thanksgiving to everybody, even if you don't live in the U.S. We don't have Katty Kay with us this week. She's on vacation. In fact, she's on a remote beach somewhere celebrating her family's Thanksgiving. But you have the proletariats in the house, okay? That would include myself and Alistair Campbell. Alistair, welcome to the Restless Politics U.S. edition. So good to see you, by the way, my friend. How are you? I'm okay. I've got to tell you, though, Rich, honestly.

1:48Katty Kay, first of all, she's a Brit. What on earth is she doing celebrating Thanksgiving? Secondly, your podcast has been going how long now? The rest is politics US. Six months, maybe. Six. Yeah. Six months. Roy Stewart and I have been going, I don't know, two, three years or something. We have not missed a single week. Yeah. So what is this vacation stuff that Katty K does? What's that all about? I don't know. I think she's onto something. It's the true American spirit of leisure. You and me, man, we're in the good. I'm rowing the boat, man. You know, I learned from my grandfather, row the boat without complaint.

2:22You know, I used to say to him, he'd say, what's the sense of complaining? Nobody listens, Alistair. Row the boat, man. So I want to talk about three things with you in the first half, if you don't mind. I want to talk about tariffs. What does the Trump presidency mean to the rule of law? We've uncovered some corruption already in the transition team. And then let's talk about the future of democracy, not only here in the United States, but democracies under assault around the world. And what does that mean? But I want to go with tariffs because you were in the administration, the Blair administration, and you had to deal with tariffs on both sides, imposing them on goods coming into Britain or at least negotiating that with the EU and then dealing with whatever was happening with the US.

3:05And so what are your thoughts generally on tariffs? And what do you think of Trump's proclamation last night on Truth Social and X, where he's saying he's going to have anywhere from 30 to 200 % tariffs? And he's saying this is to prevent the arrival of drugs and illegal immigrants into the country. I mean, that is quite a link to make. Do you remember when we were together in New York, when you were calling the election wrong? Was I the only one calling the election? Roy did as well. Roy did as well. But not you. I love you, man. You are the best. I got it wrong. I do admit that. Okay. I said to you, when Trump talks about tariffs, does he understand what he's talking about?

3:48Because he was saying at that time that if he puts tariffs on, let's say, goods coming in from China, that that was going to be cost paid by the Chinese. A bit like with his wall and the Mexicans. You know, don't worry, America. And now that is obviously not true. And yet people have been voted for him and he couldn't have been clearer that tariffs are going to be a big, big, big part of his economic strategy. So he's now announced he's going to do 25 % tariffs on goods coming from Canada and Mexico on day one. Okay. And then a bit more on top for goods from China. I mean, what I can't get my head around is in his first term, didn't he do a trade deal with these guys?

4:29He did. He did. Yeah. Yeah. And we've abided by most of that trade deal. Everyone says, you know, on the right that Biden left all the tariffs in place. He did not. Biden surgically went through the list of tariffs. And I'll just give you my 30 second view on tariffs. Having studied it, I'm also good friends with Robert Lighthizer. He's got a great book on this called No Trade is Free. It's a big history of trade. What Biden did was he surgically went through the tariffs, his team, and where governments are financing private enterprise and they're helping them compete. They kept those tariffs, in some cases, believe it or not, even increased them.

5:07But where it was helping the American consumer to get the services or the goods into the United States, they actually did eliminate the tariffs. I'm assuming that Trump is going to reimpose those. But you're asking a really good question. He knows that the consumer pays the tariffs. He likes that lie because it sounds good to low information voters, but he does know that. And what he also likes doing, and you may or may not remember this, in 2020, he said to the Mexicans, I'm going to ram 25 % tariffs. He needed something from them. The president of Mexico called him and said, hey, what do you need?

5:42Well, this is what I need. He guess he wanted more military, Mexican military patrolling their border on the southern side of the US. And then literally two days later, he said, I'm revoking my proclamation of tariffs. It's this sort of herking and jerking. And this is this overbite, this over-exaggeration that represents Donald Trump. So this stuff that he did yesterday, is this just negotiation? I think it is. So I think what he's doing is the same thing. I think the world was very shocked for season one of The Apprentice White House edition. But I think the The world is no longer shocked, okay?

6:20I think the world is like, okay, he's a television star. He's going for ratings. He's going to say ridiculous things and he's going to cast ridiculous characters because he's into ratings. And so I think this is a salvo. I know this sounds a little crazy, but I also think he would love to weaken the stock market going into January 20th. The stock market is his ultimate barometer. Forget about polls, Alistair. Forget about sentiment, cabinet discussion, feedback from friends. The stock market for Trump is the ultimate barometer. So if he imposes those tariffs and it crashes the market during his term, no bueno for Donald Trump, okay?

7:01He'll go in reverse on that stuff. But I just think this is now predictable. And I would say to people around the world, he's not going to do that. There's no way he can impose those tariffs without hurting the US economy. I mean, he'll find his way out of it sometime in the first or second week of the presidency, saying they've done this or that, and he'll declare victory without imposing those tariffs. Now, that doesn't mean he's not going to put other tariffs in because he thinks that the Chinese have been unfair to the US. And frankly, you know this. In some cases, they frankly have been. And I think that's now a bipartisan idea.

7:37What do you think? What I want to know is we sit here like in Europe and we're thinking, right, well, he's talked about 60 % on China, 200 % if they go after Taiwan, and sort of, you know, 10, 20 % for kind of the bit of the world that we're in. And then there's a discussion in Britain about whether because of Brexit, we sort of can somehow carve ourselves out of that. But the fact that he's gone for Canada, first of all, what is that about? Is that basically saying I don't like Justin Trudeau? Well, it's a combination of those things. He probably doesn't like Justin Trudeau, and he probably thinks rightly or wrongly that some migrant transfer is starting to come through the north.

8:19I don't have the exact numbers on that, Alistair. It's minuscule compared to what's going on at the Mexican border, but there is people trafficking and there's also potential drug smuggling going on. But the great irony of all this stuff is you know and I know some of it's actual people walking, border crossings, cars, but there's a lot of plane activity. Planes land all over this country, un-FAA approved. Drugs are taken out of the planes and then they take off, or planes are dropping drugs in the Gulf of Mexico and there are boats out there picking them up. I mean, unfortunately, this sort of nefarious activity is happening.

8:57I don't know if tariffs, which is a very blunt instrument, is going to stop that. It sounds good. It's a simplistic idea, but it doesn't get to the real issue. Right. Imagine you're back with him in the White House. You got granted a 12th day and it's today, right? How do you make this link? I can already feel my eye twitching. Hold on. Let me hold down my eye from twitching. Okay. Go ahead. Okay. Keep talking. How does he, Ryan, you're going out to do a briefing based upon what he's just put on his social media network. Oh my God. How do you make this link between tariffs and the thing about drugs?

9:36You say that we want to punish these governments because they are lax in terms of their controls on their side of the border. They're lax in terms of the drugs that are in their countries. Yeah, but drugs are illegal. You're not going to put tariffs on drugs. They're illegal. No, no, no, no, no. I'm saying I'm punishing these countries by, I'm punishing their economies and I'm punishing their corporations to get their governments to act and be more stringent on the enforcement of drugs. I understand that the tariffs are not on the drugs. Obviously, they're illegal and they get smuggled into the country, but I'm trying to incentivize through negative incentives.

10:16Okay. the governments around the world to stop the trafficking of drugs into the United States. I think if I was in the White House press room listening to you say that, Mooch, I'm not buying it. Well, okay. Well, that's why he's got a 27-year-old in that position now, right? This poor woman is going to be, you know, her tongue is going to come out of her mouth like a bow tie. It's going to be so twisted as it comes out of her mouth, right? But that's what happens, you know. But, you know, I don't have a lot of time with you and your time is precious. We've done the tariffs. I don't think they're getting imposed.

10:49We'll see what happens. Let's switch to the rule of law. I think we're entering a golden age in America. Let me tell you what that golden age is. It's the golden age of corruption. I think we're going to have such wide scale equivocating corruption. So you can join the cabinet. You can join as an undersecretary, but wired to my personal bank account$100 ,000. Okay. Well, why not? Everyone else is doing it. God only knows what is going on with family members. God only knows what's going on with underlings. He's opened the space for that. The other thing he did, which is he got off all these cases.

11:32These were real and legitimate cases, but Trump knew if he won the election, the Department of Justice since 1973 has had an honor agreement. This is not in our constitution or anything like that. It's an honor agreement that they will not prosecute sitting American presidents. So Jack Smith went to the judge yesterday and said, yeah, this election interference case where we have tremendous damning evidence, we're dropping the case. Oh, the worst case of all, Alistair, is he left the documents in the bathroom and he had Chinese spies and Russian spies joining Mar-a-Lago. And the agency's upset, MI6 is upset, and we've got an unbelievable amount of evidence in the complaint.

12:15That's also been dropped. And I am asking you the following question. Doesn't that create licensing? And doesn't that create space for all these people? Trump gets away with everything. We'll get away with it too. The fish stinks from the head down. He's got this man, Boris Epstein, caught by his own team, caught by his own team, wanting to take a bribe to get people into the government. And by the way, in 2016, Paul Manafort was caught getting a loan from a banking official in Chicago. And the banking official wanted to be Secretary of the Army. And Paul was pushing him very hard. And I interviewed the guy.

12:54And I sent a text to Jim Mattis. I said, this guy's a bozo. He shouldn't be anywhere near the secretary. I don't know why we're even interviewing him. I did it as a favor to Paul. And Paul kept pushing, kept pushing. I sent out a few more emails. I said, certainly we can find somebody more qualified than this. We landed on Mark Esper. I don't know how well you know Mark. He's a very accomplished guy. And then he went on to become the secretary of defense. He's a real gentleman and American patriot. But I was a witness, Southern District of New York, because they uncovered all those emails. The Department of Justice called me and said, hey, we've seen these emails between you and Secretary Mattis.

13:31Could you come in and testify? And voluntarily, by the way, otherwise they would have subpoenaed me and I did. And this guy went to jail for two years for bribing Paul Manafort. Okay. So now we're back there again. What happens to these people? Does Trump just pardon them? Does Trump punish them? You tell me. I think we're heading into the golden age of corruption worse than the teapot dome scandals in the 1890s. Well, listen, if I'm right, your entire political democratic system is founded on the notion that no single person, including the president, should ever be above the law, right? Donald Trump has now been, thanks to the system, thanks to the system's failures to nail him during the four years when he was out of power, thanks to the democratic system of the people reelecting him as president.

14:22And now, thanks to special counsel Jack Smith doing, as you've just said, getting rid of these charges against him, he is above the law. Now, as you say, it rots from the top. If he is above the law, the lack of respect that people then have for the institutions of law, I think, spreads. And this stuff about the money, I mean, can you imagine what the discussions that are going on between his sort of current sidekick, Elon Musk? Elon Musk's the richest guy in the world, right? How many government departments that Musk has now sort of got his hands into, how many of those departments actually have a role in making him even richer?

15:02And how can that ever be justified in a system of government? And throw into that, Anthony, the fact that he's not doing the FBI checks on the people that he's bringing in, he's put them out of the equation, he's not signed the official transition thing. So he's not taking the public money that he could get for the transition process, because as you say, he's using the private money. That's a kind of undermining of the, it seems to me, of several foundations of your system of government. So there's a wrinkle in our system of government. There was a presumption that an honorable person would rise to the presidency.

15:38And so there was a benefit of the doubt for that honorable person. They would give them pardon powers. But of course, the honorable person would be judicious with those pardon powers. There was a presumption that, okay, there could be snafus, but this is an honorable person, so we're not going to prosecute them for minor things that have happened while they're president. They weren't expecting insurrections, and they weren't expecting the president to foment one, and they weren't expecting the president to take documents and put them in his bathroom. That wasn't stuff that they were expecting.

16:09And so we're there now, and there's a great movie that one of my friends, Gabe Sherman, wrote the screenplay on. It's called The Apprentice. If you haven't had a chance to watch it, I heartily recommend it because it's based on a lot of factual information about Trump's rise and the coaching he got from Roy Cohn. And of course, for listeners outside the United States, Roy Cohn was a very famous, hard ass, hard edge New York lawyer. He worked for Joe McCarthy in the 1950s during the big Red Scare where everyone was being accused of being a communist. And he hurt a lot of people. He was a very insidious sort of a guy.

16:45He liked inflicting pain on people. And he said something to Donald Trump. He said three things to Donald Trump. He said, never back down, never admit defeat under any circumstances, and never, ever apologize for anything. Those were the three things that Roy Cohn rammed into Donald Trump's head. That manifestation has led to the cretin status that Trump has, but it's also led to his rise. These tactics have been very successful for him, Alistair. He backed down on Matt Gaetz. Well, you know, but Matt Gaetz is an object in his field of vision, okay? He ran Matt Gaetz over with the, you know, that tank, that car that they let him drive in, whatever they call it, you know, the monster or whatever it is.

17:27He just ran him right over with it. He didn't care. And then five minutes later, he went to Pam Bondi. So when you say he backed down on Matt Gaetz, hey, Matt, I'm putting you up for this. If you can't make it, I actually could care less about you. I've got another person in the wings. But there is a wrinkle there, okay, that Trump has now picked up. So the Trump antenna, because he's got very good political instincts, just went up and the antenna is blinking on the top of his head. He says, wait a minute, the Republicans are growing backbones in the Senate because I know the inside story. I talked to several Republican senators and full disclosure, I'm still a Republican.

18:05I've donated to many of these people. You'll see me on the - Hey, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on. On the night in New York, you said you were going to become an independent. Well, I did. And there's a good chance that I will. But if these Republicans back up what they're doing right now, I probably will stay Republican. Because these guys went to Gates and Vance behind closed doors. And they used some expletives. But they said, NFW, you're not getting confirmed. So you can have a show circus and a show trial here. It'll embarrass you. It'll embarrass the president. We're going to read the ethics report into the congressional record about your nefarious sexual activity with underage women.

18:48Okay. And we're going to blow you out of the water. So if you want to do that, there's going to be no recess appointment for you, none of that other stuff. Are there going to be any more of these appointments that get the treatment? The Matt Gaetz treatment? Yeah. I don't know. It's a good question. McCarthy is telling people that he thinks Hegseth will get through and Tulsi Gabbard will get through. but there are senators saying that they won't get through. But Tulsi Gabbard, is she - Can I interrupt you for one second? Our producer is saying, you said you were now an independent. No, I said I was thinking about it.

19:21These are our producers riling me up. I'm still a Republican. It's very hard to break ranks. What is your football team again? They're one up north. It's called Burnley. Okay, Burnley. Okay, so you're just going to drop Burnley? I mean, they suck apparently. I don't know, but if they did suck - No, they don't. No, they don't. But if they did suck, you would just drop them like right away? No, but the question wouldn't even arise. So therefore, I would never be on a live stream in New York saying that I was going to drop them. It just wouldn't happen. Well, I mean, all right. We got a bad manager now in Donald Trump.

19:52I got a little emotional. I mean, what the hell? I mean, you know, it was an emotional night for me. I got a lot wrong and I'm on the deportation list. It was a tiny bit of emotional. Okay, the trouble is I'm feeling this step-by-step return. And then when the 27-year-old gets sacked after three weeks, he's going to pick up the phone. He's going to say, hey, Mooch. No, no, no, no. I'm a major loser now. He just tweeted about me. Call me a major loser. How much does this guy love me? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, it's probably like a 15, right? But go to the rule of law for a second, okay? Go to the rule of law.

20:30If you were sitting here in the opposition and now all the rules are being broken, everything's being stretched, what do you do? Do you play dirty like they do? Do you get on a high horse of righteousness? What's the political strategy, Alistair? God, it's so hard because, of course, I think that what was at the heart of the Democrat strategy in the election is they genuinely felt that in their tale of two futures that they were telling, a big part of it was we're good people, not bad people. We tell the truth. We don't tell lies. We believe in the rule of law. We believe in international institutions, et cetera.

21:08He says the opposite and he wins. So that makes it a difficult judgment for them. I'm surprised at how little this stuff is being called out by the big guns inside the Democrat party. I don't get a sense of them really firing on any cylinders at all about that. Is that because I'm in Britain or is it because they're not doing it? It's a really good question. I think they're in disarray. I think that it's been said, but it bears worth repeating that Biden really screwed them because Biden said, I'm old. I'm going to serve one term. I'm going to help you guys find my successor. Love the power. I'm going to stay in power.

21:47And they didn't flex on him in any way. And so he's got them in disarray. I can't see the successor. I don't think Harris is going to be successful if she runs again. It's interesting because I thought she was going to win. But when I did that interview with you and Rory, and it was back in April of this year, I did say that he would be more fearful of Gavin Newsom. Turned out that she couldn't win, but it is also unfair to her. They only gave her 107 days. So she's been weakened. Newsom, I think, is going to jump the shark. He's going to turn 60. Democrats do better with the younger people, Alistair.

22:26So, Richie Torres, somebody that you and I interviewed, I don't think he's prime time for 28, but could he be a 32 or a 36 aspirant? It's possible. We don't know at this point, but AOC wants it. She's too hard left for me, frankly, but she's got the charisma and the work ethic. But I don't see the person that's galvanizing the party. I don't see the Obama that comes in and says, okay, I'm going to represent the opposition. I'm going to represent the shadow government, as you guys would call it. And here's what we stand for. And here's how we're going to rebut what's going on in Trump world. I don't see it.

23:07No. Is it harder because they're still in power or they're still in office? So Joe Biden is still there. Kamala Harris is still there. Yeah, he's the president, she's the vice president. So anybody else who comes and starts maneuvering, that's what it looks like. Yeah, you can't do it. So they have to wait. I presume they have to wait till Trump gets in. But I really think there's a lot of damage being done now by him to the country before he's even got there. And I'll tell you the other thing he's doing, which reminds me of the Brexit debate here. So the Brexit debate here, 52 % to 48%, so it was close.

23:40But the way that the winners reacted to it was as if they'd got 100%. We can do what we want. Trump's doing that, helped by this totally false narrative that he's pushed that this was some kind of landslide. And he's redefining landslide in so many different ways. I mean, I was looking at some of the figures. So if you want to talk about a landslide, you go back to Lyndon Johnson, 64. He wins by 22.6%. Yeah, big. Nixon, 23.2. Reagan in 1984 by 18.2. And since then, there's never, ever been a double-digit win. And he, Trump is down, and I think he's the third smallest popular vote win. But they're talking and behaving like, I am all-powerful.

24:27Now, that is a narrative that has to be pushed back, because otherwise that's what makes him do some of the stuff he does. And I'm just shocked at the absence of the Democrats from the debate. Oh, yeah, for now. But I mean, what could happen, though, is the Republicans in the Senate that hate Trump grow a little bit of a spine and they say, OK, you're entitled to pick people, but you're not entitled to pick abnormal people. So we're we're going to take a break. But when we come back, I want to talk to you about Europe because you're the expert there. And I want to make some predictions about the Ukraine in the Middle East with you.

25:02And then I want to talk about season two of The Apprentice White House edition. How is it going to differ from season one? How are the cast going to shape up in the screenplay? All right. We'll be right back. We'll be right back. That sounds good. See you soon.

Read the full transcript

25:20This is a paid ad for BetterHelp. In moments of stress, we tend to turn to whoever's in reach, that flatmate in the kitchen, the barista on a slow morning, the stranger who simply asks you how you're doing. It can help, but being heard isn't always enough, and the more confidently people speak, the more we mistake it for wisdom. But if you're dealing with anxiety or loss or something that's been weighing on you, what you need isn't noise, it's actual experience, somebody who really knows their craft. BetterHelp has spent over a decade helping people find that match. A short questionnaire sets your preferences, and they'll connect you with a therapist who fits.

25:55It's completely online, it's fully flexible, And if your first counselor doesn't really feel right for you, you can switch at any time. There's no pressure, no extra cost. As the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp gives you access to credentialed mental health professionals with a wide range of expertise. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp.com slash TripUS. That's BetterHelp.com slash TripUS. at blinds.com it's not just about window treatments it's about you your style your space your way whether you diy or want the pros to handle it all you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right from free expert design help to our 100 satisfaction guarantee everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows because at blinds.com the only thing we treat better than windows is you visit blinds.com now for up to 40 off select styles plus a professional measure at no cost.

26:52Rules and restrictions apply.

26:57All right, welcome back to The Rest is Politics US. I'm Anthony Scaramucci. And I'm not Caddy Kay. I'm Alistair Campbell. You're definitely not Caddy Kay in so many ways, Alistair, but we won't get into that in this podcast, okay? But let's go over what we're going to talk about right now. We're going to talk about the Ukraine, the Middle East, Europe, but also how is this season of the Trump show going to differ from the last season of the Trump show. But I want to start with Ukraine and your opinion of how Donald Trump is going to handle Ukraine from a perspective in Europe. I should point out to listeners that the reason that Dimitri is saying Ukraine is because the Brits on this podcast have pointed out to him that those who say the Ukraine, well, it's okay if you're French, because l 'Ukraine, that's what they say, right?

27:48The Ukraine, because like they say, les Etats-Unis or la Grande Bretagne. But the Ukraine is used as a bit of an insult to Ukraine. It's like saying it's like, you know, it's like the Alps. It's a sort of region rather than a sovereign state. You Brits are really too much. I can't use the word fascist when it's describing Donald Trump. Too glib. Oh, you can. I can't use the preposition the. All right. I'm really trying I feel like you are like Dr. Doolittle, and I'm unfortunately in Covent Garden right now. I don't understand English. But go ahead. Keep going. So I think that the cartoon picture that emerged of Trump during the campaign is he says he's going to sort out Ukraine in 24 hours.

28:33That means he's basically going to roll over to Vladimir Putin and give it away. and Zelensky will just have to suck it up because the truth is, without the American money going in, there's no way that they can carry on this war in the same way they've been fighting it. The Europeans aren't going to step up. So that was the kind of cartoon caricatured view. And I said on the original, we call it the original rest is politics or the British rest is politics. No, because we're global. But anyway, I said the thing with Rory, that I was speaking to somebody who was at the G20, who said that Trump had been much more nuanced in a phone call that he'd had.

29:08He said that he thought that the situation in Ukraine had the capacity to become as complicated as the Middle East. Now, if that's right, is he already thinking that the 24-hour thing, that's just one of those figures of speech that nobody took seriously? Don't need to worry about that. The kind of the mood music with Putin has been interesting. And the Russians, you know, they didn't kind of celebrate Trump's second coming in the way that they celebrated the first coming. Now, deep down, I've got no doubt at all that they're very, very happy that he won rather than Kamala Harris. But I wonder if there's going to be something a little bit more unexpected in the way they deal with Ukraine.

29:44That could be my wishful thinking, but that's what I think. So I want to fortify that. He met with the incoming or the new president of NATO down at Mar-a-Lago. Sources are reporting back through the military that Trump is being way more nuanced. Inside the campaign, my friends are telling me Trump does not like I'm Putin's lackey. He hates that narrative. It drives him crazy. I think he's been very fawning over Putin over the last nine years that he's been in politics. but he's now 78. He won the popular vote in the largest economy with the biggest military, and he may not want to be Putin's lackey here.

30:27You may know this, and it's pretty well reported that the night of the election, they were showing naked pictures of the incoming first lady on state television in Russia. So that's telling you that they're trying to say to him, hey, hey, we've got some dirty goods on you, some compromise, so be careful with us. And I don't think that went over well in Trump land, the naked pictures of Melania on state TV. So I guess would it surprise you with Marco Rubio and Mike Walsh in positions of more typical Republicans in terms of the way they lean on foreign policy if the world is surprised about Trump's position on the Ukraine.

31:14Where would you put Rubio in the kind of traditional Republican Party political spectrum? Where would he be? He's energetic Jeb Bush. And so remember, Jeb Bush is his mentor. Jeb Bush helped him rise when he was governor of Florida. He was close to the Bush family. It got strained in 2016 when they were both running for president together. I think Jeb didn't like that. He thought Marco needed to take a back seat to him, but he's tight with Susie Wiles. Remember, she's a longtime political operative in Florida. She helped DeSantis get elected. She's the one that influenced and convinced Donald Trump to endorse DeSantis.

31:55That was a very close 2018 race. And so you're in a situation where these guys think like neocons. And what is a neocon? America's got might. America needs to flex on people to get them in line. Now, obviously that wasn't successful in Afghanistan. Turned out that it wasn't successful in Iraq, but this is different. This is the European theater. And I see Putin as a rationalist. So I don't see Putin as a madman. I see Putin as a rationalist. He wants to stay in power. He knows if he projects power outside of his country, it creates a lot of nationalism, as a result of which it creates popularity for him inside the country.

32:37He controls the media. When people go to war, Alistair, George Orwell, one of your most famous writers, people go to war, we're always at war. It creates nationalism. We both remember George Herbert Walker Bush out of the Gulf War with a 93 % approval rating. Obviously, he went on to lose the election. Winston Churchill losing to Clement Attlee after the war's over. But Putin knows he's got to keep a war going. He's 72. He wants to stay in power until he dies, sees himself as a successor to Joe Stalin. But I don't see him as a madman. I don't see him deploying a nuke somewhere. I mean, if he does that, that would be a big shock.

33:18I know he's threatening to do that. What do you think? I think on the, so far as this relates to Ukraine, that I don't think Trump will want this to be his first big foreign policy outcome, because I think it's very, very hard to see how he will project that as a success for him. Ending the war is not enough, because there are going to be consequences to that that don't necessarily get played out in front of what you call your, you know, low information voters, but which are going to have big strategic consequences in Europe. And the sense that I was getting from this guy who'd spoken to Trump, the G20 leader, was that he was more onto that than maybe we thought, and that he's worried about the idea that his Ukraine becomes like Biden's Afghanistan.

34:04You know, it sounds great, you ended it, but then there's absolute chaos and mess. The other thing I wanted to pick you up on something you said earlier, which I thought was really interesting, you said he hates the image of being Putin's lackey. If you were Zelensky, would you use that or would you get others to use that? How would you, if that sort of really plays into it, how would you exploit that? Because it's kind of on that level that he operates, isn't it? I feel like Trump is in a different place today. This is just me. He was nervous, Alistair. If it was November of 2016 and we were at Trump Tower, he was projecting confidence, but he was nervous because I can remember it.

34:43He was listening to people. He was concerned about the presidency. He was trying to follow the rules. When he got there and they were attacking him, again, taking it from his point of view, when they were attacking him, he was like, okay, I have to fight back, the special prosecutor, this, that, and the other thing. Now, weirdly, Joe Biden has made Donald Trump stronger with Trumpism and stronger with MAGA. How did he do that? He's had a four-year break in the action to ruminate and stew about what he did wrong in Trump 1. And so now he's coming back into Trump 2 with a vengeance. But one of the things that he wants to do is he wants to stump Alistair Campbell, Anthony Scaramucci, and other pundits.

35:28He wants us to think he's going one way, and then through misdirection, he goes in a completely opposite direction just to shock people. There was a great scene in H.R. McMaster's book, which I'm still laughing about. I read H.R. book. And he said, so Tillerson and I were meeting with Trump. It was a problem in Venezuela. And we both looked at him. Okay, sir, we briefed you. Yes, I understand what to do. Yes, you're going to meet the press in two minutes. Yes. Okay. The one thing we do not want you to do, please don't say to the press that we have any military options on the table. We don't want to inflame the other leaders in South America.

36:03Trump gets to the microphone and says, I just want everybody to know we've got military options on the table. And this is this reflexive contrarianism. That's a description from H.R. McMaster that describes Trump. So whatever the general consensus is, he may just do the opposite for the sake of doing the opposite. That's literally how he thinks. He's not sitting there like Tony Blair or Bill Clinton and say, okay, I have a grand strategy. I'm going to bomb these areas of Kosovo. I'm not going to put any ground forces in. Hopefully, it'll stop the ethnic cleansing, right? And here's my strategy.

36:42There's no thought behind it. It's a reflex. The other thing is if you're coming in with a thought and a strategy and he doesn't own it, he's not going to use it. You have to go to him and say, here are the options. Here are 10 things that we should do. Here are the top three things. And then he picks it. I know it sounds childish, but I'm just telling you that how that shit works, you know? And the pictures, you have to have the pictures of him with his makeup. You can have pictures of him from the side because he looks really fat from the side. And he don't like pictures of himself from the side, but he likes pictures of himself from the front with the suit tie and the jacket hiding the belly.

37:21You know why you laugh at that, Alistair? Because you know what I'm saying is true, right? Yeah, no, but what I'm going to ask you is what will he be like when he's sort of looking at social media and he's seeing all these hilarious memes of him and Elon Musk either being in love or being married or being sumo wrestlers, eating cakes all day. Yeah. No, he hates it. He hates it. He hates it. So people online should keep doing that stuff. Yeah. On more than one occasion and repetitively, he has said, yeah, people say that I like negative publicity, that negative publicity is just as good. All publicity is good.

37:57That's a bunch of blah, blah, blah. Okay. I only like positive publicity. Okay. But what Trump does like is being on the top fold of a broadsheet paper. Okay. And I think I told you that story. He was so excited to see himself on the top fold of a broadsheet paper. He said, this running for president is just fantastic. I'm always on the top fold. That's funny. The only newspaper I've got with me, Mooch, is yesterday's New York Times. And there he is, top of the front page there with his cabinet. And then he's over here again with his tariffs. Yeah, he loves that. That's a perfect front page. By the way, that's his favorite paper.

38:31He hate reads that paper because they hate him, but that's the New York, that's his hometown's paper. So he's been intoxicated with that paper. But I just want to say, because I know we're going to close out here in a second, but I just want to say that there's going to be a couple of things that I want to predict and get your reaction to that are going to be different about season two. Okay. So the first one is the one we just talked about, which is the Ukraine foreign policy. It's going to be different than what MAGA thinks because he put neocons in. And so remember, personnel is policy. Put neocons into state and national security, you're going to get neocon theory and neocon projection of policy.

39:13But the second thing is that the Doge thing is going to go absolutely nowhere. And I want to get your reaction to that because it's not even a department of the government and it hasn't even been formed. And he weirdly sent Ramaswamy and Musk to Siberia. And I think he did it intentionally. I think he said, okay, you two guys, you've helped me. Ha ha, I like you guys, but you're not really going to be part of this government. I'm sending you to Siberia. You're somebody that would remember Simpson Bowles. There was a bipartisan study to cut the fat of the government. They presented it to Paul Ryan and Barack Obama.

39:50They both looked at it and said, oh, that's great. Where's the paper shredder? And they put it right into the paper shredder, right? And by the way, my buddy Mulvaney, who was one of Trump's chief of staff, he's a good friend of mine. I'll quote him. He says, Elon's got a better chance of getting a colony on Mars than he does of getting anything implemented from Doge. Okay. So I don't think that's going to work out. Again, these are just predictions of mine. I'd like to get your reaction. On that one, I hope it's right because I have the sense of Musk becoming a dangerous, unhinged character with a lot of untrammeled power.

40:29And dangerous, unhinged characters with untrammeled power have a habit of doing a lot more damage than other sorts of characters who might have power. So I hope he gets his wings clipped and I hope he ends up in quite a lot of political difficulties as a result of having taken the course he's taken. I was talking to somebody yesterday who's known Musk over a period of time, who said he has become a completely different person, a completely different person. Now, is that power corrupting? Is it wealth corrupting? Is it the drugs? Is it the thing with his child who's trans? What is it? I don't know if you follow this, but the sense of him being utterly obsessed with the UK at the moment is really just weird.

41:10So I hope he ends up in flames, to be absolutely frank. I don't mean literal flames. He's saying things about the UK and, you know, just let me know, are they true or not true? That's the information. So he's saying that thought police are arriving on people's doorsteps if they put out improper tweets. Is that nonsense? Of course it's nonsense. What they're doing is if somebody incites racial hatred and that's a criminal offense, then they might look at it. Right. But there's this guy called Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. He calls himself Tommy Robinson because that's a great British patriot name.

41:44And he's in jail at the moment for defying court orders about defaming somebody in a film. Okay. And Musk keeps retweeting this guy and saying people should look at this film because it shows that Britain's become a police state. and you're thinking you Mr. Musk you're the richest guy in the world you've got a lot of business interests you've got sort of you know more access to space than pretty much any other person on earth and you've suddenly become the friend in chief to the president the new president of the United States what the fuck do you think you're doing playing around with this sort of silly Twitter politics and that says to me that he's a guy imploding or exploding I'm glad what you said about Doge because he is projecting that on his own social media channels.

42:28He's projecting almost like a joint presidency. And I imagine that Trump hates the idea of Musk as a joint president as much as he hates the idea of being Putin's lackey. Yeah. No, listen, I mean, you know how to do this better than anybody. Drop a few President Elon Musk bombs on the top half of a broad sheet paper. Is Elon President Musk? Is Elon co-president? And Trump's head will explode. He doesn't like it. How will he get rid of him? How will he get him out of his head? Well, he's already done it. He's already done it. See, that's the irony. People don't realize that he's already sidelined them.

43:03Okay. But he's still hanging around. He's still hanging around. He's still hanging around. But Trump's telling people privately that he's annoyed by it. He's telling people privately, look, the guy spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the campaign. If he wants to hang out and have an iced tea at Mar-a-Lago, let them. But remember what Ben Franklin said about house guests, right? They should be treated like fish. Fish. Fresh fish, right? Three days to get the hell out of my house, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. So he's been there now for 15 days. But listen, I applaud Elon Musk's accomplishments as an entrepreneur.

43:34I mean, it's hard to take that away from him. He's built two incredibly successful companies. Other companies that he's touched have gone very well, but we're not good at everything else, okay? I may have a legal degree, but you certainly don't want me operating on somebody's brain. Musk knows how to land a rocket back from space impeccably, but he may not be the right guy for politics. And so what sometimes happens to people, and I've seen this on Wall Street, I am rich, therefore I'm definitionally a polymath and I'm definitionally know something about everything. And oh, by the way, I know more about that than you do, even if you're an expert in that field.

44:14You see what I mean? And there's an arrogance that comes with affluence that we have to be careful of. My final point before we go, and it's been lovely talking to you as ever, Mooch, is there's a guy we talked, Roy and I talked about on our podcast this week, a guy called Franz Timmerman, who's a former European official. He's now the leader of the opposition in the Netherlands. He did the Winston Churchill lecture in Zurich last week. And he said this of the Trump government. He said, the re-election of Trump marks a watershed moment in the transatlantic relationship. One gets the impression of a government of billionaires billionaires by billionaires for billionaires.

44:49Now, is that fair or not? It might be. We'll have to see how it is. That's your golden era of corruption. Yeah, it might be that. We have to see. Again, though, Trump's such a mixed bag, he put dissent in place. He's a gentleman. He's a very smart guy. A billionaire. He is a billionaire, but he's a traditionalist. You can be a billionaire and a decent person. Ask Mike Bloomberg. If Mike Bloomberg was running the country, you'd be very happy because you wouldn't like every position he's taking, but you'd be like, okay, this guy's fair-minded. He's a patriot. He's trying to do the right job for his fellow citizens.

45:25Basant is like that. Whatever you think of Marco Rubio, he may not like every one of his positions. You're a Labor Party member, but he's got good intentions, Marco Rubio. I know Marco 15 years. Again, don't agree with everything he says, but I do like him. There's a mixed bag going on. And the good news is my rebuttal to the gentleman in Zurich that you're referring to would be there are still good people around the hoop and there's 5 ,000 people that this man has to staff into the executive branch. There's not enough extremists to go around to fill all those jobs. There just isn't, in my opinion, based on my observation.

46:07Last time around, he left loads of those positions empty to give more power to the ones who were there. Yeah, he did that because there was a lot of confirmation problems too with the people that he wanted to put in. And remember, I think I told you this, one of the reasons why at the end of his presidency, there were very few confirmed cabinet members, because only a confirmed cabinet member could knock him out of the box using the 25th Amendment. You see what I'm saying? And so he left them in these acting positions because Tillerson and those guys in the first couple of months of the presidency said, the guy's nuts.

46:44We got to think about, they were dropping to the media. We're thinking about invoking the 25th Amendment. So we'll see. We're either going to get a crazy situation or we're going to get a 78-year-old golfer who's got Susie Wiles and Marco Rubio running a lot of things. We'll see. It's going to be one or the other. But it's a pleasure as always. Happy Thanksgiving to you, even though you don't celebrate it. Katty K, if you listen, happy Thanksgiving to you. I imagine a holiday is going to be so rich that she won't have time to listen to her week off podcast. I'm shocked. I mean, I always thought Katty was a hard worker, real grafter, put it in for the team.

47:23Anyway, there we are. Oh, my God. Listen to you. Always happy to step in and help, Mooch. So before we go, I just want to let people know we have a bonus episode for our founding members coming out on Saturday. day. Katty recorded this, of course, before she went on vacation. You can hear that by signing up at therestospoliticsus.com. Okay. And that would really be helpful to me. Sign up and subscribe, please. And don't worry, Katty K will be back with us next Friday. Alistair, unfortunately, will not be back next Friday, but hopefully we'll get you back soon. Okay. Lots of love to you and your family and a great holiday to everybody around the world.

47:59Take care. Bye-bye. Thank you for listening.

From the publisher

Is the United States entering a new age of corruption? Why are Democrats staying silent? What will be different about a second Trump term?

This week, Anthony Scaramucci is joined by Alastair Campbell to answer all this and more in this episode of The Rest Is Politics US.

Become a Founding Member
Support the podcast, enjoy ad-free listening, gain early access to our mini-series, and get a bonus members-only Q&A episode every week!

Just head to therestispoliticsus.com to sign up today.

The Rest Is Politics US is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code USPOLITICS after signing up to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at getfuse.com/uspolitics ⚡

EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/tripus Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee!

Instagram:
@RestPoliticsUS
Twitter:
@RestPoliticsUS
Email:
TRIPUS@goalhanger.com

Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Assistant Producer: India Dunkley
Producers: Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Digital: Sam Oakley
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: US

All 253 episodes
46. The Golden Age of CorruptionThe Rest Is Politics: US · 49 min
Listen in VO