47. Trump’s Cabinet Fiasco

6 Dec 2024 · 53 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes - The Rest Is Politics: US

Episode Title

47. Trump’s Cabinet Fiasco

Hosts

  • Anthony Scaramucci: Former White House Director of Communications, Wall Street financier.
  • Katty Kay: US special correspondent for BBC, covering US politics for nearly 30 years.

Episode Overview The hosts discuss the ongoing turmoil surrounding Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, the implications of his interactions with foreign leaders, and the political ramifications of actions taken by both Trump and President Biden.

Key Topics Covered

  1. Trump's Cabinet Picks
  2. Discussion centers on the nomination of Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense.
  3. Concerns about his qualifications and past controversies.
  4. Trump’s tendency to appoint loyalists regardless of their qualifications (e.g., Hegseth, Matt Gaetz, and Tulsi Gabbard).
  1. Political Implications of Cabinet Nominations
  2. Reasons for Trump's choice of nominees who lack traditional qualifications.
  3. The potential strategy behind these nominations: appealing to the MAGA base.
  4. The political dynamics surrounding the Senate confirmation process and Hegseth’s chances.
  1. Biden's Pardon of Hunter Biden
  2. Joe Biden's decision to pardon Hunter Biden amidst legal troubles.
  3. The political fallout and implications for Democratic arguments against Trump.
  4. The complex relationship between familial loyalty and political accountability.
  1. Trump’s Shadow Diplomacy
  2. Trump’s interactions with foreign leaders during the transition period.
  3. Concerns about the implications of Trump engaging in foreign policy as a private citizen.
  4. The impact of Trump’s actions on global perceptions and relations.
  1. Concerns of Former Officials
  2. Reports of former Biden officials fearing retribution and considering fleeing the country.
  3. The unusual circumstance where former civil servants feel unsafe post-election.
  1. Future of Trump's Political Influence
  2. Discussion of the Republican Party's potential trajectory and how they may distance themselves from Trump.
  3. Perspectives on whether Trump’s presidency will lead to significant changes in political norms and behaviors.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump’s Cabinet Controversies: The nomination of individuals with questionable qualifications reflects a broader strategy of solidifying loyalty over competency.
  • Political Fallout from Pardons: Biden’s pardon of Hunter Biden may complicate Democrats' arguments about politicization within the justice system.
  • Global Political Climate: Trump's continued influence reshapes international relations, creating unease among allies and adversaries.
  • Fears Among Former Officials: The potential for retaliation against civil servants raises concerns about the safety and integrity of the government.

Concluding Thoughts The episode highlights the continuing complexities of American politics, emphasizing the interplay of loyalty, qualifications, and the broader implications of Trump's actions on both domestic and international fronts. The hosts reflect on the uncertainty surrounding the future of both political parties in America as they navigate these turbulent waters.

Bonus Content For founding members, a special Q&A episode will be available discussing further questions raised during this episode.

Links and Resources

  • [The Rest is Politics US Website](https://therestispoliticsus.com)
  • Follow on Instagram and Twitter: [@RestPoliticsUS](https://www.instagram.com/restpoliticsus/)
  • Email: TRIPUS@goalhanger.com

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00The spirit of innovation is deeply ingrained in America. and Google is helping Americans innovate in ways both big and small. From improving emergency response times to protecting against cyber attacks, local, state, and federal governments are innovating with Google AI. This is a new era of American innovation. Find out more at g.co slash American Innovation. At Blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you, your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:42Because at Blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds.com now for up to 40 % off select styles, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:59Hello and welcome to The Rest is Politics US with me, Katty Kay, otherwise known as the slacker who takes one week of holiday after six months. Oh my God. That's how you're sorting? I was going to pay you a huge compliment, said that you were missed on this podcast. Thank you. And I've gone through Katty Kay withdrawal where I haven't said the word Katty Kay in about two weeks. I know that's a problem. It's a problem. What do you want to talk about? You tell me. What are we talking about? Oh, my God. Wow. Where to start? There is so much news. We're going to unpack a couple of the big stories of the week.

1:32What's happening to Pete Hegseth, the nominee to be Secretary of Defense, and why that looks increasingly in jeopardy. You and I both have got some reporting on that. Joe Biden's decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, who was facing two federal cases and possibly up to 25 years in prison. We'll do more on all of the turbulence in the inner circle. Some of the nominees, Kash Patel, who the news broke last Friday, but you and I haven't had a chance to talk about that on the podcast, who's slated to become the FBI director, vowed to overhaul the FBI leaderships, also has said that he's going to target members of the media.

2:13I have spoken to one of the lawyers for people who worked in government under President Biden, who are taking serious precautions about what they might do if there is going to be retribution and this extraordinary moment that we're in that we're even talking about this. And then after the break, we're going to talk about how Donald Trump is kind of already acting like he's back in the Oval Office. I mean, where is Joe Biden? The question of the week, what has happened to President Joe Biden. He's in Africa, actually. He may want to stay there, the way his numbers are tanking, not just amongst Republicans, but amongst Democrats as well.

2:49And quick look at how world leaders are sort of scrambling to adjust to the reality of a Trump presidency again. So, should we start with Pete Hegseth, who's been up on Capitol Hill this week. He was meant to go down to Mar-a-Lago on Thursday, but canceled that trip down to see Donald Trump because he is going to try one last ditch effort. When we're recording this, by the way, Thursday morning, so it's possible that by the time you guys listen to this on Friday, he will already be out of the running. I think you and I both agree that his chances of getting nominated are pretty slim. I've just been texting with a Republican lawmaker this morning who said that he thinks his chances are 50-50.

3:26The fact that they're already talking about possible replacements for Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, I don't think is a great sign. And we can talk about one of those people who I think is interesting. But what's happened there? I have two real questions. And you and I were texting earlier this week, Antonin, you raised the question, which I think is so interesting, and that I've been kind of trying to get to the bottom of, why has Trump nominated people like Matt Gaetz and Pete Hegseth, who have serious kind of personal issues, are not qualified for the jobs? You could put Tulsi Gabbard in that bracket of people not qualified with the experience necessary of running big organizations when there are lots of people who are very loyal to Donald Trump who believe in the MAGA agenda who are qualified.

4:14So kind of what's going on with that? Why is he doing? What's the psychology there of Donald Trump? And what do you think Pete Hegseth's chances are at this point? Well, I mean, there's a lot there. So I think he has no chance. And I think they've already jockeyed themselves into position to make sure that he doesn't have a chance. I think he's a relentless guy, which is admirable. And so he's going to make one more attempt. But I think there's a group of Republicans that are going to sink him. Democrats won't vote for him, of course. And there's three or four Republicans that won't vote for him.

4:47And then, as you know, what ends up happening is, if I know, Kat, you and four other Republicans are not going to vote for him, even though I don't want to vote for him, what I'll do is say, I'll vote for him. And this way, you know, you look like you're being more loyal to the president because you know you've got your other teammates are going to sink Pete Hexeth. But, you know, Trump is in Mar-a-Lago saying a couple of things because obviously I'm still talking to people in his camp. And the first thing he's saying is, my God, his mother took him out. Okay. My God. Okay. And so he's, he's mumbling to himself.

5:20Can you believe the mom took him out? Right. And you know, Trump, so you know, he's saying it. Although his mom Penelope has now been on Fox News saying she loves her son and she apologized to him and he's a reformed character. So I love the fact that his mom has been brought into this process, which adds to the kind of absurdity of the whole thing. So if you really love politics, okay, go find that YouTube clip. The poor woman, it was in a hostage crisis situation. The poor woman was sitting there sweating. She's trying to do a service to the country, but now she's back in there saying, oh no, I was just kidding.

5:56He's not a lascivious drunk and he's not a maniac. But I'm going to say three things about him and then something broad. Okay. Number one, he was buried by Jane Mayer. And I think you know Jane. Very good reporter from the New Yorker magazine and does a lot of this investigative reporting. And it's actually, I know Jane very well. I've known her for years. She's been on the money every time. You can kind of bank her reporting. Yeah. And so it's a well-documented story. And just as number two is John Tower. For those that don't remember who John Tower is, he was a senator from Texas. George Herbert Walker Bush in 1989 wanted him to be the secretary of defense.

6:37He was a drunk. He was an alcoholic. He made a pledge, the same pledge that Pete Exeth is making right now. If I'm at the top of the Pentagon, I won't drink. That wasn't enough. His chances were sunk. And I believe Pete's chances are sunk. And it's worth pointing out that Donald Trump, of course, doesn't drink, right? So for him, alcohol is an issue. And he has a brother who is an alcoholic. He doesn't have alcohol on Air Force One, for example. He's banned alcohol on Air Force One. So I think the drunkenness thing is a problem for him, more than the allegations of sexual abuse. And I'll leave that there.

7:11Yeah. I actually think the number one thing was the mom because I know Trump's personality. I know you're laughing, but I could just see Trump saying, oh, Jesus Christ. The mom's going after him. So that was it right there. Okay. So that's why the Mar-a-Lago trip got canceled. But the last thing, and I think this is the most important thing. And again, I like Pete. I work with Pete of Fox News. Any more than I should be operating on somebody's brain, Caddy Kay, he should not be. the defense secretary. He's never run anything. He doesn't have procurement capabilities. He doesn't have an ability to manage an organization.

7:49You're giving him the largest sub-organization in the American government, the Pentagon. It's just an absurd thing. And so hopefully people will say that. But you said something else that I want to address, which is why is he putting up these people that are not qualified? And there's an answer to that. He is Captain Ayab and he caught the whale. He caught the great white whale. The great white whale is his base and it's MAGA and he wants to chum that whale. And so what he's doing is he's taking chum, Pete Hagseth, Matt Gates, he's taking Tulsi Gabbard and he's throwing chum in the water to feed the whale.

8:25And by the way, if the whale eats the chum, that's great. If the whale doesn't eat the chum, that is also no problem for Donald Trump. He is not out on the airwaves. He's not out on Truth Social defending this person. I'll take you back to the Kavanaugh situation when Ryan Kavanaugh was up for the confirmation in the Senate for the Supreme Court. Trump was working on it. Trump was using then Twitter, not Truth Social. He hasn't done that for any of these people. I don't expect him to do that for any of these people. And this is really him saying, hey, I'm going to throw some chum in the water for my base.

9:02And if these guys get approved by the Senate, great. If they don't get approved by the Senate. I'm moving on as he did with Matt Gaetz. And by the way, I just want to give you this one piece because I got this from a senator, which I think is very interesting. They are tightening the noose. They see him as a lame duck president. They see him as having one more consequential election. That's 2026. After that, no mas for Donald Trump. One senator said to me, hey, in five years, I'll be running for reelection. Donald Trump will be in the rearview mirror. Okay. And so I don't care about Donald Trump the way he thinks I should care about.

9:40I think that's interesting. It's always good to have the reporting on that. I texted with this member of Congress this morning, a Republican, who was the one that said that he thought he had a 50-50 chance of getting in. And one of the names, I mean, this is always when you know in Washington when things are going badly, when the possible other names are already being mentioned. And we're hearing that Ron DeSantis could be a possible pick, Joni Ernst, who is the senator from Iowa, Republican senator from Iowa, who is herself a combat veteran, who met with Pete Hegseth on Wednesday and came out of it and kept saying was being asked by the reporters.

10:15One of the things that people perhaps don't understand about Washington is the great thing about Washington and Capitol Hill is that any reporter can just go up there. Any member of the public can go up there. You can get into any Senate building. You can get into any house building. And you can just walk down the corridors with a microphone. And if there is a member of Congress or a senator, you can stick a microphone in their faces and they can't get away from you. So you've got all of these reporters surrounding Joni Ernst, the senator from Iowa, and asking her, you know, how did the meeting go with Pete Hegseth?

10:47Because she is seen as critical in this voting process because she is a former member of the armed services herself. And she's saying that it was thorough and frank. Well, thorough and frank is code for this was a bad meeting that did not go well for Pete Hegseth. I didn't think he was great. That's all she would say. Thorough and frank, thorough and frank, thorough and frank. But she would also ask, look, could you be the possible Secretary of Defense if Pete Hegseth doesn't make it? And this member of Congress texted me and said, look, she has to play this very carefully because she can't be seen as the person that kills his nomination.

11:22So she can't say anything about that. She would be a very good Secretary of Defense. She actually has the qualifications. You could trust Joni Ernst with the nuclear codes. I think she is a nominee who would actually get bipartisan support. You'd get some Democrats voting for her, which in this particular Washington moment would be pretty remarkable. So once you start naming the other names, I think the chances of Hegseth making this is very slim. I think it's worth pointing out the competency stuff. There's been so much focus on the drinking, on the womanizing, on some of the things he said about women.

11:54But there's something else that I read that he said on Fox and Friends in June of 2020, and it was during the Black Lives Matter protests. And he was talking about the protests. And he said, the question is, do you send in the troops? Do you say, hey, this isn't going to happen anymore? or do you let Seattle sort of implode on itself? And then he compared it to kind of, you know, looking after a wayward child and how you would discipline them. And he said, it's the idea of you caught your kid with cigarettes underage. Do you take them away right away or do you force them to smoke every cigarette in front of you in the entire pack to learn the lesson of what's not going to work?

12:32And I think that kind of video, what he's saying there about the idea of using American troops on American people, which I know that a lot of people in the military have real concerns about. And I have heard from contacts in the Pentagon that you have soldiers saying, we're not going to do this. If we are sent out into the American streets because of legitimate protests, we're not going to start firing on them. We feel very uncomfortable with that. But just the slightly glib comparison of how you discipline your children compared to the enormity of what that would mean for America of sending troops out on the streets, which hasn't been done since the 1960s, I think is another reason why people have concerns about Pete Hegseth.

13:14And it's that competency element of this. And would this even serve the Trump agenda particularly well? Could he get the job done? So Hegseth, we agree, looking like he is in the rear view mirror. What are you hearing about Kash Patel? We haven't had a chance to talk about Kash Patel since the news broke. Kash Patel, who Trump would like to run the FBI, who has said very clearly that he has a campaign of retribution, not just against the media, but against other people who worked in the administration, who he feels betrayed Donald Trump by working on the January the 6th investigations, for example, working on the impeachment investigations, the Russia investigations.

13:56What do you think of Cash as a possible FBI director? Well, I mean, he would be an unmitigated nightmare. Yeah, just tell it how you feel. Yeah, I mean, and I've said this publicly, and so I'm probably going to be arrested by him. What were you, number 48 on the list or something? I think you're just bumping yourself up to number 10. Yeah, I was 48 on his list. You just want to get higher up the list, don't you? I do, and I feel upset that I've done so much work on this that I'm not higher on the list. I feel like I'm not getting enough attention about this, but I don't understand, Katia. Who is the person?

14:31Is it Susie Wiles? Does Susie Wiles not have much influence? I mean, this is what I'm starting to think is where is Susie Wiles? Who's the person, Gaddy, that says, you know, Mr. President, you won the election. You don't have to put up bozos, miscreants, drunkards and incompetence in these positions. Moreover, Cash Patel is not going to serve your interests. He's going to be a ridiculous distraction to you and to your presidency. And so why are we doing this? Why can't we go with somebody tensible? Christopher Ray's done a great job. You put him in the role yourself. Nobody's bothering you from the FBI.

15:08What are you doing this for? Why are you listening to the Steve Bannon podcast? And why are you, which you know is absolutely absurd, accepting the Kash Patel proposition that he should go after and arrest people on his enemies list who are just exercising their First Amendment right to talk and to be critical or not critical of various things that go on in the American system? them. So who is it, Katty? Who's there saying to him, it's in your best interest not to do this? Why are you doing this? Look, I think, I mean, this gets back to that question of why he's nominating these people and what it tells us about his state of mind and what he plans to do.

15:47And, you know, first don't underestimate the degree to which Donald Trump likes the way people look on television and thinks that if they're good on television, that's what he wants. It's how he judges people. It's how he, you know, that's effectively your resume and Pete Hegseth fixed that model. Kash Patel, he thinks is fiery and defensive of him on television and on podcasts. He likes that about him. I think there's a degree to which he's flexing. He feels he's won this massive mandate. And we should point out at this point, the mandate is looking less big at this point than it looked the week after the election.

16:21The Republicans are facing the prospect of a one seat majority in the House of Representatives. That is tiny. It's not a massive victory in the history of massive victories in America. I think he's challenging the Republican establishment and what is left of the establishment Republican Party in the Senate. He wants to see if they're going to defy them. He's kind of challenging them not to defy him. The charitable version is that he actually believes these are the best people to shake up the American system that he thinks is corrupt and bloated and inefficient. And he actually believes that Tulsi Gabbard can do that with the intelligence community, that Pete Hegseth could do that with the Department of Defense, and Kash Patel could do that with the FBI.

17:08There are people in the MAGA movement who would like to get rid of the FBI completely and see the FBI as being complicit in the impeachment investigations against him. And the FBI has become, to the extent that some FBI members have had to have security of their own, that the FBI has become a kind of tool of the Democrats, which is sort of ironic when you think of the history of the FBI and many of the FBI agents I've come across who are probably card carrying Republican voters. But the FBI has become a target of them. I mean, those are my thoughts on why he wants to do this. And I think you're right, he'll kind of move on very quickly.

17:42You know, there are people who worked in the establishment who were career appointees, right? One of the vice president, former Vice President Mike Pence's National Security Advisors, Olivia Troy, who is probably even higher on the list than you are. She has gone on television. She has spoken out against Kash Patel. She has said publicly that Kash Patel would lie about intelligence in a way that endangered intelligence operatives abroad, that he would make things up about US intelligence operations that put members of the intelligence community at risk. He has actually, Kash Patel actually on Wednesday launched a lawsuit against her for defamation for saying that.

18:22I suspect that might make his job harder. It looks a little hotheaded. I don't know that members of the Republican Party in the Senate who work in intelligence are going to particularly like that. I think they have real reservations about Kash Patel becoming the next head of the FBI. That's the question of the moment. The question of the moment is why he's doing this, why he is putting people in place who probably won't get confirmed and are not actually the most competent people for the job. You just think that he has the drumbeat. I'm embarrassed to admit this to you, but I do listen to it. Do you listen to Steve Bannon's podcast, The War Room?

19:00Do you listen to it? I have listened to it. I don't make it regular listening, but I probably should do. I have to listen to it because I did work with this son of a bitch and I did work on the transition team with him in 2016. I did work on the campaign with him. And I think he's the craziest, most malevolent, most evil person that I have interacted with in my lifetime. And I told Alex to this, that the reason why I believe in God is I think that God made Bannon so ugly to protect the civilization from Steve Bannon. He's got the skin products by Blotch and the contemporary hobo look and this, that, and other thing.

19:40But he's a very smart, very charismatic guy, very well read. And he's decided that he wants to wall off America physically and literally and metaphorically from the rest of the world. And I would just say this to you when I listen to the podcast, I say that is how Donald Trump thinks. Now, he can't articulate it the way Steve can. Donald Trump is not a literate guy. He's a very smart guy. He's got great political instincts. He's a very hard worker, but he's not a well-read guy. Okay. He may have had mind cough on his bed stand, but he probably didn't read it. Just thought it was funny to have it there because he's a little bit of a nut.

20:21There was a joke on the campaign in 2016 that Trump has written more books than he's actually read because of course he had a great ghostwriter writing these books for him. But I'm making the point that Bannon is in Trump's ear And Bannon is pushing this agenda. Bannon is pushing. The deep state is evil. Everyone that works in the American government is evil. They're either slackers or evil. And it's a big bloated system that needs to be destroyed by the Donald Trumps and the Kash Patels that now have an opportunity to try to destroy it. Even though, by the way, the American government, the civil service number of people employed in the American government is barely any bigger today than it was under Ronald Reagan, even though the American population is bigger.

21:05So some of this is myth making about the civil service. Yeah, exactly. But it's also, we have to blame somebody. You're unhappy with your life. I've got to blame somebody. I've got to scapegoat somebody. So I will just say this to you, that I believe that the president is going to get shot down on a couple of these ridiculous nominations. And I believe that he's not going to care. I think Trump is in a different spot today in 2024 than he was in 2016. I think he's looked at this and said, I've won. I'm not going to jail. My buddies that have feathered my nest, I'm going to put them in spots. Charlie Kushner, I mean, he set up a prostitute to go after his sisters.

21:51Jared Kushner's father who went to prison for doing this. Yeah, went to prison. Chris Christie prosecuted him. Such a great cast of characters. So sort of wholesome. Yeah. Trump pardoned him. Now he's going to be the ambassador to France. Okay. God bless. Maybe the French will like that. I'm just saying to you that Trump is a weird dude. The American people want Trump to be the president. The Democrats, unfortunately, they didn't give the American people a lot of choices. Again, I'm not criticizing Vice President Harris. I'm just saying he gave her 107 days. I did think that she could pull her off in 107 days because of the craziness around Trump, but obviously she couldn't.

22:29He's got four years here, but he's not going to be able to do any of the things that they're suggesting. We can talk about Doge if you want. We'll do an episode on that because I'm increasingly thinking that he's not going to get much of this done. Not going to get much of it done, but he's not going to care. He is going to go play golf. He's going to wear the 47 hat and he's going to run around with the Secret Service. He's going to hang out with Putin, and he's going to go talk to different people. He's going to Notre Dame this weekend to see the opening of the Notre Dame Cathedral. And I'm just letting you know that these people are not getting in.

23:04The Republicans are going to surprise people. They're shape-shifting on Trump right now, and they're looking at 28 and 32, and there will be no Donald Trump. Unless you tell me that Donald Trump's going to be successful in changing the Constitution and getting himself another term at age 82, which I don't think he's going to be successful with doing that, Katty. So for me, I'm watching this. I'm saying, wow, Trump won. He's not going to get done what he wants. And is he or is he not going to care? And the answer is he's not going to care. I did have a very interesting conversation this week with the lawyer who is representing and advising some of the people who are on that hit list, who worked in the administration, who worked on the national security side.

23:46And he's actually advising some of them to be out of the country on inauguration day in case Donald Trump issues executive orders, trying to round them up or trying to prosecute them in some sort of way. Now, the chances of that happening, and the lawyer himself said actually, given the stumbles that Donald Trump is making with these nominees, makes him think that actually this is the less formidable operation that we all thought it was going to be. There's a lot of reporting saying he's much more organized, he's much more efficient, Susie Wiles has got this down. And actually, you look at Matt Gaetz, and you look at Pete Hegseth fiascos, and you kind of think, well, actually, no, maybe this is the chaos it always was with Trump.

24:24But it was interesting. I mean, I just think it's worth reiterating that we are in a moment in American history, where a lawyer is advising people who worked in the civil service who worked for Vice President Mike Pence to be out of the country on inauguration day in case the retribution takes place and these people are put under arrest. Now, I don't know that that's going to happen. This lawyer himself says, maybe I'm being overcautious. But the very fact that we live in a country at a moment where people are being told, you may not be safe, you have to leave the country is in itself extraordinary.

Read the full transcript

25:01Yeah. I mean, this is why he was disqualifying to run this government and to run this prestigious, enormous, beautiful experiment in world history, but the American people have spoken. So if he starts to do that, I do think there will be a lot of clap back. Let me ask you this question. If you were on that list, and let's say you weren't 48 like me, Katty K, but you were in the top 10 and a lawyer called you and said, you got to get out of the country. Would you get out of the country? Yeah, I think I might possibly just be on vacation in London or Athens on that day. why not? Why take the risk?

25:37And this gets us to the Hunter Biden thing, because these people have not committed crimes. Nobody has charged them with anything. They were doing their jobs. They were taking part in investigations as part of their jobs. I have never heard any suggestion that Olivia Troy, for example, committed a crime. But you can hear from the other side, and I think this gets us to the Hunter Biden issue, you can hear already from the Trump people, well, they use the Justice Department against us. The Justice Department has been politicized. They went after Donald Trump. It was unfair. It was lawfare, the phrase you have used before.

26:11And they will say that's exactly the same as what Joe Biden is now doing with Hunter Biden. He is using the Justice Department to his own ends. He is making the process political. And I think that is why so many Democrats are very unhappy publicly. I mean, unusually, you have senators and members of Congress and people in the Democratic leadership very publicly saying they're not happy with what Joe Biden did in pardoning Hunter Biden, because it takes away the argument. And it's not equal. This is not apples and apples. This is apples and oranges. But it gives the Democrats a harder case when they try to say Donald Trump is a threat to democracy.

26:52Look what he's doing. In two years' time, if Donald Trump really is rounding people up, it's going to be harder for Democrats to say he's using the Justice Department for political ends because pardoning Hunter Biden is a political act, is using the Justice Department for his own personal reasons. I get it as a parent. I get it. Yeah, I have sons. I would never want my son who's been dealing with addiction. You don't want them to go to prison where there are drugs and alcohol in American prisons, but he'd always, he'd said, I mean, maybe if he'd not said adamantly again and again on tape, I'm not going to pardon him.

27:25That would be one thing, but pardoning him now, I think it was a mistake. Well, I always thought he was going to pardon him. Even when he said he wasn't going to pardon him. So he shouldn't have said he wasn't going to pardon him, right? Yeah, he shouldn't have said he was going to pardon him, but he would have been better off pardoning him in August. He thought it was a political football then, but he would have been better off saying, hey, this is my son. I put him through hell. He lost his mother in a car crash when I was 29 years old. He lost his brother. He's got huge problems. Yes, he's made mistakes, but you know what?

27:55I'm the president of the United States. He's my son. I have this ability to do this. I'm doing it. And if anybody has an issue with it, come see me. I'm doing it. It would have been a one-week news story, and it would have been over. When Roger Clinton was pardoned by Bill Clinton in the year, I guess it was 1999 or 2000, maybe it was January of 2000, nobody really cared. They understood that. But Roger Clinton had already served his time. Yeah, I understand. That was forgiveness. This is getting Hunter Biden out of prison. And this argument that, well, he was only targeted because his name is Biden and that the Trump administration will treat him unfairly.

28:30The sentencing will be extra harsh because his name is Biden. I understand that. And there may be some truth in that, but Hunter Biden got the job at Burisma advising Burisma and the money from Burisma because his name was Biden as well. This works both ways. I mean, the only reason he was useful to that oil and gas company in Ukraine was because he was close to President Biden. But remember, Kat, he also gave him a all-encompassing pardon all the way back to 2014, which knocked out his brother, Joe Biden's brother, and frankly, also knocked out Joe Biden. So if the Trump people went after Hunter Biden for the Burisma thing, he effectively checkmated the Trump people, you know, because Trump is upset about the Ukrainian impeachment.

29:17And that's why a guy like Elon Musk is saying that this man, Vindman, is going to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Of course, he was the whistleblower on the Trump situation where Trump was delaying armed shipment to the Ukrainians pursuant to the security agreement that we've had with the Ukrainians. And so there's a big thing going on right now. Is Trump going to go back and rehash the past and dig up on these people and go after question. Is he actually going to do it? Is he actually going to do it? But you've said something on this podcast. And before we go to the break that I need to emphasize, you said you would be out of the country.

29:55And so I just want you to think about this. You've lived in Washington for 25 years. And you said, if you were in the top 10 on that enemies list, you would find a way to be out of the country to see how things are going to go. And that tells you that we have a problem in the country. That tells you that there's a serious problem now in the country where there's a group of people that want to hijack and stress this system. I can guarantee you if you said things about Vice President Harris and she won this election, there'd be nobody talking to lawyers about leaving the country. Same with Joe Biden.

30:31Well, when Joe Biden won in 2020, there was nobody on the Republican side saying, I might have to be out of the country. I mean, that's not the way. I've covered so many transitions, that's not the way this works. And it is those kind of lower level people that are worried. And one of the things they're worried about is their passports could be revoked on day one, and that would stop them from leaving the country. So if they need to, they wouldn't be able to get out, which is part of the reason they're thinking of leaving. But the higher level people, there's also some reporting out, reliable reporting out this week that Biden is considering preemptive pardons for people like Liz Cheney and Dr.

31:05Fauci so that they could not be prosecuted by the Trump administration. I don't know if people like Cheney and Fauci want preemptive pardons because that might imply they've committed a crime, which nobody has ever suggested they did. But those people could be protected by media scrutiny, they're high profile. I think it's these kind of lower level people that are thinking they seriously need to take precautions because they're not household names. Okay. So I'm so upset about this. I had to tell you as a human being, somebody that's read the constitution somebody that's uh it has a love affair with this country and somebody that sees the country as a welcoming country culturally to other people i spoke at an event uh yesterday for a group of young entrepreneurs that are building businesses in this country 50 of those people caddy are born outside of this country moved to this country to start their businesses.

32:04And they were all in their 20s and 30s. And the notion that we are now going to upend this culture, that we're going to make people fear their government, or we're going to challenge the rights in the Bill of Rights that these people have. I don't think people understand the consequence of this. And I've said this to you, and I'll say one more time briefly, the freedom of the press creates the economic innovation. You teach a second grader that they can speak and think freely. They go on to create Facebook and Apple computer, and they go on and create Bitcoin. They engineer things. They build things.

32:41They think broadly. If you tell somebody that they can't talk about Cash Bedell or their dear leader, Donald Trump, like they do in other countries, you're in China, you say something wrong about the leadership, they send you to a re-education camp. So they have to steal our intellectual property. And so what people have to understand is that First Amendment right is not only there to hold people accountable, but it's there to create this massive, massive amount of economic innovation. It's just very, very upsetting to me. Yeah, I think it's a real question now. Is America's exceptional experiment in democracy looking a little less exceptional?

33:21And I want to end this on an upbeat note, if you don't mind that. I'm just very happy that you're not on the enemy's list like me and Olivia Troy. Okay. See that? You'll be able to stay in your beautiful house in DC. And by the way, I'm not going anywhere. So I may be talking to you from jail, you know, which is fine. Yeah. I hope that you just save up all of those phone minutes that you're allowed in federal prison to use on the podcast. Yeah. Okay. Can we just get that on the record? Yes. I'll be trading with my fellow inmates their time so I can speak with you and the rest of the politics people.

33:52On that cheerful note, we're going to take a quick break and come back and talk about who really is president already of the United States and where is Joe Biden.

34:05This is a paid ad for BetterHelp. In moments of stress, we tend to turn to whoever's in reach, that flatmate in the kitchen, the barista on a slow morning, the stranger who simply asks you how you're doing. It can help, but being heard isn't always enough. And the more confidently people speak, the more we mistake it for wisdom. But if you're dealing with anxiety or loss or something that's been weighing on you, what you need isn't noise, it's actual experience. Somebody who really knows their craft. BetterHelp has spent over a decade helping people find that match. A short questionnaire sets your preferences and they'll connect you with a therapist who fits.

34:41It's completely online, it's fully flexible and if your first counselor doesn't really feel right for you, you can switch at any time. There's no pressure, no extra cost. As the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp gives you access to credentialed mental health professionals with a wide range of expertise. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp.com slash TripUS. That's BetterHelp.com slash T-R-I-P-U-S.

35:13Welcome back to The Rest is Politics US with Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci. I took your line there, introducing yourself, but there you go. No, that's okay. We had so much to say in the first half that I wanted to save time. I was being efficient, but I wanted to save time because there's so much news going on. Actually, I did tweet out this week or blue skyed out. I'm on blue sky now. And I blue skyed out that this week has reminded me of covering the first Trump administration and just how there is so much news and so much of it is crazy that keeping on top of it all is very hard. And I get back to that thing I said a couple of weeks ago, which is we need to judge Trump by what he does, not what he says.

35:54But this week, we've had a reminder of that kind of diplomacy by tweet, with Donald Trump tweeting out things like, there's going to be all hell to pay if the Gaza hostages are not released by January the 20th, which is Inauguration Day. And the way he kind of tweets things that then puts allies and countries that have to deal with Donald Trump in this sort of, you know, what are we doing? How do we manage him? And I think I've had a couple of very interesting conversations over the last week with people talking about how do allies and even adversaries deal with Donald Trump? I mean, his whole madman theory, Nixonian theory of foreign policy that everybody in the world is going to be so afraid that I might go crazy and launch a nuclear missile or put 100 % tariffs on, that they're going to fall into line.

36:46I actually think if you look around the world this week, we've had democracy challenged in South Korea. Ukraine has heated up, not cooled down. The Middle East, with the incursion by rebels in Syria, heated up, not cooled down. There isn't much indication over the last week that even the prospect of Donald Trump becoming president has suddenly made the world a calmer place. I mean, so much there. I got to ask you these questions. Okay. So question number one, it's a Hatch Act violation for a private citizen to engage in foreign policy. Yeah. And yeah, he's been doing that ever since he was elected.

37:23I was going to ask you, how's he getting away with this? So let me just say this to you, and then I'm going to ask you the question. So in 2016, Shinzo Abe came to Trump Tower. I had the opportunity to meet the prime minister and he had a whole delegation from Japan. And then we went into a big conference room and the president-elect was talking with him. The very next day, Barack Obama called Donald Trump and he said, Mr. President-elect, out of respect for the protocol and respect for the system. Sounds almost quaint. Could you not meet with any more foreign leaders until the inauguration? I understand that they're going to call you and say congratulations and so on and so forth, but could you not have this sort of shadow diplomacy going on until you get the job.

38:12And Donald Trump at that moment said respectfully, yes, no problem. And so there were several meetings that we canceled as a result of that conversation. So here we are now. Not so much this time around. Yeah. So, but why is Joe Biden like no problem with that? And why is nobody calling him on that? Because again, it's a, you know, like there's a broken windows theory to these things, right? And And so when I worked for Mayor Giuliani, Commissioner Bratton, who was the police commissioner, said, we got to fix all of the broken windows here in this area. It'll send a message to people that we're serious about crime by focusing on the petite things.

38:53And so this is a small thing. It's not a very large thing, but it is just one more dent in the breaking down of the institutional processes and the respect for the system in America. I love the way you phrase that. I hadn't thought of that, Anthony. And it's so, you know, it gets a little bit back to what we were saying about how strong the system is that part of democracy is rules, but part of democracy is norms and traditions. And this is a norm and tradition, although in this case, there is the Hatch Act. It is actually a rule. But so far, Donald Trump has met with Javier Millet of Argentina.

39:33He's met with Justin Trudeau of Canada. He will meet with Emmanuel Macron of France this weekend. So that's three foreign leaders he's met with in person. He's also spoken, we know, with Putin, Scheinbaum, Orban. He's spoken with all of those people. And like you say, maybe phone calls is one thing and meetings is another. But it is a very unusual transition, again, in this respect, that Joe Biden has been in Brazil and is now, this week, has been in Africa and has been quiet. And Donald Trump is acting effectively like he's already president. and the power you can see, even from foreign leaders around the world, there was that kind of rather embarrassing moment at the G7 meetings in Brazil where Joe Biden was almost sidelined because you can tell allies and adversaries alike are totally focused on Donald Trump.

40:26And that is kind of unusual. And it's affecting the way that foreign countries are thinking, how do we deal with this? I'll just take a small example. Karen Pierce, who's the UK ambassador to the United States was due to leave at the beginning of next year. She's been asked by the Labour government to stay on in place because she has good relationships with the Trump people. They had been planning to put in a kind of Labour stalwart, somebody like David Miliband, for example, or Peter Mendelsohn, the ambassador's residence here. They've given up that idea. I mean, I think everybody is just scrambling because Trump is such an extraordinary president when it comes to foreign policy, they're kind of scrambling to think, how do they deal with him?

41:09I don't know. I mean, it's a good question why Biden is not calling him on this. I mean, I think that why are the Democrats so quiet on so much of this? They're not jumping on some of these extreme appointments. They're not calling out Pete Hegseth for being not qualified or Tulsi Gabbard for not being qualified to run the National Intelligence Department. I mean, it's like the Democrats generally have gone into this defensive crouch since the election, and they kind of need to find a way to fight back because at the moment, they're not doing anything. Here's the thing I would say to you, and please react to this.

41:52I'm going to beat you down. I'm Donald Trump and I'm going to beat you down. I'm going to break your norms. I'm going to break your system to the point where I'm going to normalize what I'm doing. And I'm going to anesthetize you from all of these micro breaches of the system. So when I breach it in a big way, okay, you're going to be, I can't, you know, I can't fight them. What's your reaction to that? Yeah. I mean, I think there's some of the kind of, you mean, it's sort of the bully in the playground analogy, right? You feel so cowed on everything. And the Democrats actually have spent much of the last week fighting amongst themselves, which probably is exactly what Donald Trump wants them to be doing.

42:37And they are still figuring it out. And yet they have reasons this week, not just the appointments, but they have not lost by a lot in the House of Representatives. They can be more robust in their response. Maybe they were just caught so by surprise that Donald Trump took the wind out of their sails and they haven't recovered it yet. So I have to say this as a point of leadership, and again, please react to it. If I were advising one of these people, which of course I'm not, but I would say, hey guys, why don't you wake up? It's 1 ,461 days. That is the Trump presidency or 132 Scaramucci's because I just divided that by 11.

43:20But let me ask you this. If I was your advisor, I'd be saying, hey, what the hell are you guys doing? Fight back. This guy is going to be a lame, but this guy is going to depreciate the way that new car comes off a lot on the first day. And if you're a world leader, pay attention. It's four years. Wait them out. think like the Chinese do. If you're a congressman, get on your front foot and say, hey, there's a new Republican Party coming. It's going to be very, very different from this party. We don't have to slouch our way downward into MAGA-ism. And you could be at the top of the heap if you hit this thing differently than people expect.

44:06It's only 1 ,461 days. What's your reaction to that. And it's less than that if you take in the midterms when the Democrats will have the chance to take back the House of Representatives. 730 days. I love your maths that you do this. And how many Scaramuchis is that since we like to put this in terms of Scaramuchis? Yeah. So that would be 66.4. Excellent. Okay, good. We can bring it back to a Scaramuchi. But just think about it, Katty, for a second. Okay. Yeah. That's all it is. It's not very much time. I know. This guy is 70 years old. They have nothing, right? They almost had the House of Representatives.

44:42A lot of people voted for them. You almost won the election. It's not a mandate. And start acting like that. What are you guys doing? Snap out of it. Just to get this back to the rest of the world, because I had a very one person who is being robust and who is thinking long term. I interviewed the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutter, the new Secretary General of NATO, earlier this week. And I asked him what he thought of some of the plans that are being floated about giving the occupied parts of Ukraine NATO status so they're protected and long term prospects for Ukraine joining NATO. And he is actually somebody who is being remarkably robust at the moment.

45:25And I was interested to hear him say and what he replied is, listen, we should not be even having these conversations about breaking the country up. We should be having conversations about keeping up our support for Ukraine. And by the way, and he didn't mention the Trump administration, but his message kind of to the United States and to critics of supporting Ukraine is, don't think this is just about Russia and Ukraine. If Russia manages to take any part of Ukraine in a formal way, that is a win for President Xi. There is an arc at the moment between Iran, North Korea, and China, and they are all watching what is happening in Ukraine.

46:03And I was just interested, as everybody is tiptoeing around Donald Trump, I was just struck by how forceful Mark Rutter was on what's happening with Ukraine. I was interested in your conversation last week with Alistair. And one of the things that Alistair said about hearing a European official talk about how there's more nuance in the Trump administration around Ukraine now than people had thought. And if you look at who he's nominated for Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg. Actually, Kellogg has a plan which would potentially involve more American aid for Ukraine. If Donald Trump puts a peace proposal on the table and the Russians reject it, Kellogg has said that he would advise at boosting American military support for Ukraine.

46:53So Donald Trump's position, I think, on Ukraine is one of the more interesting ones, as Alistair was saying last week, to watch. And it's not necessarily that he's going to sell out Ukraine on day one, as he has suggested. And I just think it's interesting that he chose somebody to be Ukraine envoy who is not ruling out more aid to Ukraine. So what do you say to the David Sachses, who are, David is a billionaire, Silicon Valley billionaire, big supporter of Donald Trump, helped Donald Trump break into the Silicon Valley network of VCs, always uses Russian talking points related to the Ukraine and so forth.

47:34And so what does Trump say to those people? And what do you think Trump comes out on the Ukraine? Is it the fear that the Democrats have that he's going to let Putin partition it and he's going to sign executive orders to more or less take the U.S. out of NATO? Is he doing that? or is he going to go in the opposite direction? And remember, he met with the incoming NATO president. It's another violation of the Hatch Act. He met with an incoming NATO president in Mar-a-Lago. And we both know the susceptible to flattery and so forth. Does he really want to pull the U.S. out of NATO? Remember, he's 78 years old.

48:18He won the election. He won the popular vote. It's still the most powerful military in the world, the strongest economy, does he need to cow to Vladimir Putin or can he flex on Vladimir Putin? I'm watching what Putin is doing around the world this week, supporting Bashar al-Assad in Syria. And Putin is kind of very much setting himself up against US interests globally. And I don't think Donald Trump wants to be seen as the person, as you've said before, who is the lackey to Vladimir Putin. And I just think it's interesting that he's nominated somebody as a Ukrainian envoy who takes a more robust position than the totally isolationist position.

49:00You look at Marco Rubio, you've said this as well, Marco Rubio, not an isolationist, a more traditional Republican, America should be a leader in the world politician. And on that side of things, you've got people who want American engagement, who would not want America to pull out of NATO, who still want America to be the leader in the world. And I just think that for Donald Trump, being seen as the leader who sold the West out to Vladimir Putin is not necessarily what he wants. And I think we are seeing in the tea leaves of who he's appointing. And that's why we're talking so much about these nominees this week is because this is giving us an indication.

49:40You know, policy is personnel. As you've always said, as I've always said, it's who you appoint. and who he's appointing are much more traditional in this respect than the let's get out on day one. Well, I'll have to see, but I'm sitting here thinking that it could go wrong, Katty. It could be a level of insanity in the country. There could be a level of insanity in our overseas relationships. Or we're going to be sitting here in three months and saying, wow, interesting. it. Somebody asked me, make a prediction for 2025 that would startle people. And I thought about it and my prediction was Donald Trump creates a path for Ukraine to join NATO.

50:25And people are like, what are you talking about? He's never going to do that. But he might do that. He might do that because again, it would fit who Donald Trump is, this unpredictable, reflexive contrarian. And he may be sitting there saying, you know what? 78, U.S. president, I'm going to let Ukraine join NATO. Might happen. Okay, we're going to leave it there on that cliffhanger. We hope you'll still be tuning in in three months time, by the way, because it looks like there is going to be an awful lot happening between now and then. We will see you next week on The Rest is Politics U.S. I'm Katty Kay.

51:03Thanks for listening. And of course, for our founding members, Anthony and I will be back on Saturday with with a special bonus episode just for you guys, where we're gonna take some of your amazing questions. Thanks again, guys. We'll see you next week.

From the publisher

What is going on with Donald Trump’s cabinet picks? Why are lawyers advising civil servants to flee the country? How is Donald Trump getting away with breaking federal law to meet with foreign leaders?

Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all this and more.

Become a Founding Member
Support the podcast, enjoy ad-free listening, gain early access to our mini-series, and get a bonus members-only Q&A episode every week!

Just head to https://therestispoliticsus.com to sign up today.

The Rest Is Politics US is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code USPOLITICS after signing up to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at https://getfuse.com/uspolitics ⚡

EXCLUSIVE NordVPN Deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/tripus Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee!

Instagram:
@RestPoliticsUS
Twitter:
@RestPoliticsUS
Email:
TRIPUS@goalhanger.com

Assistant Producers: India Dunkley + Becki Hills
Video Editor: Jake Liascos
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Head of Digital: Sam Oakley
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: US

All 253 episodes
47. Trump’s Cabinet FiascoThe Rest Is Politics: US · 53 min
Listen in VO