In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics: US - Episode 52: Musk vs. MAGA: Civil War in Trumpworld
Hosts
- Anthony Scaramucci: Former White House Director of Communications and Wall Street financier.
- Katty Kay: US special correspondent for BBC with nearly 30 years of experience covering US politics.
Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts delve into the ongoing conflict within the Republican party, exploring the tensions between tech industry leaders, exemplified by Elon Musk, and the traditional MAGA base, personified by figures like Steve Bannon. They also pay tribute to former President Jimmy Carter, reflecting on his legacy.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- The Republican Civil War
- Conflict: The episode centers around the rivalry between Elon Musk and Steve Bannon amidst the MAGA base.
- Elon Musk's Position: Musk is portrayed as currently gaining favor within the MAGA sphere, enjoying a stay at Mar-a-Lago while navigating political dynamics.
- Steve Bannon's Strategy: Bannon's increasingly aggressive stance against Musk is seen as a desperate attempt to reassert his influence within the MAGA movement.
- Public Response: Discussions on public reactions to their conflict, highlighting the vulgar exchanges that have emerged.
- H-1B Visa Controversy
- Visa Background: H-1B visas are critical for high-skilled workers, especially in the tech industry.
- Bannon's Nativism: Bannon's faction within the GOP argues against the influx of foreign workers, pushing for more focus on American workers.
- Musk's Viewpoint: Musk stands against this nativist perspective, emphasizing the necessity of H-1B visas for innovation and economic growth in America.
- Economic Argument: Data from the American Enterprise Institute suggests that H-1B visa holders create additional jobs for Americans, challenging the anti-immigrant sentiment within the party.
- Revisiting Jimmy Carter's Legacy
- Personal Tribute: The hosts discuss Carter's humility and dedication to humanitarian efforts post-presidency.
- Critique of Presidency:
- Positive Aspects:
- Carter's efforts towards peace in the Middle East, particularly between Egypt and Israel.
- His commitment to social justice and community service after leaving office.
- Criticism:
- His handling of the economy during his presidency, particularly inflation.
- His approach to foreign policy was seen as overly idealistic and lacking realism, leading to significant challenges, including the Iran hostage crisis.
- Contrasts with Modern Politics
- Carter vs. Trump: The episode posits a contrast between Carter's values and the current GOP, particularly under Trump’s leadership, which is characterized by a transactional approach.
- Political Dynamics: Discussion on how previous administrations have reacted to their predecessors, setting a pattern of political responses based on the failures or successes of the past.
---
Key Takeaways
- Civil War in GOP: The episode highlights the complexities of the current Republican party, illustrating a power struggle between traditional populist sentiments and the tech-driven economic perspective.
- Immigration Debate: The hosts emphasize the economic contributions of immigrants, stressing the need for a balanced approach to immigration and economic growth.
- Carter's Dual Legacy: Carter embodies both the challenges and ideals of American leadership, serving as a case study in humility, service, and the consequences of political decisions that resonate even today.
---
Conclusion
This episode of *The Rest Is Politics
US* offers a rich discussion on the intersection of tech, politics, and the historical legacy of leadership in America, emphasizing the ongoing tensions within the Republican party and reflecting on the lasting impact of Jimmy Carter's presidency. The insights shared by Scaramucci and Kay provide a nuanced understanding of current and historical political dynamics.
Listen to the full episode [here](https://therestispoliticsus.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:06Welcome to The Rest is Politics US. I'm Katty Kay with our first episode of 2025. Well, happy New Year, Caddy Kay. I'm Anthony Scaramucci. It's nice to be with you again. What are we talking about, Caddy Kay? Well, we're going to talk about, even though it's New Year and you'd think everybody was going quiet, they're clearly not down at Mar-a-Lago because there's been a little bit of a bust up in MAGA world. So we are going to talk about Elon Musk and his running battle. that's got kind of spicy with Steve Bannon over visas and why it's important and who we think is going to win that battle. And then in the second half of the program, we are going to talk about Jimmy Carter, who of course died earlier this week and we'll look back at his presidency.
0:54And I'm particularly interested, Anthony, in your thoughts on his post-presidency and what it tells us about presidencies today. So we're going to take a few minutes to pay tribute to Jimmy Carter. But first of all, I haven't asked you, have you had a good Christmas? Have you had a good New Year? Did you have fun with the family? Well, if you're watching on YouTube, my head is the size of a jack-o'-lantern from overeating. It can barely fit in the screen. But I'm doing my best, Caddy. I'm trying to sweat it off. It was the brutal amount of legendary eating. Let's just put it that way. When you live in an Italian family, it's heavy, heavy caloric intake.
1:28I don't think you look a gram, since we are talking European, a single gram heavier. Anthony, you did very well resisting all of those things. Lie to me. I want all the women in my life to lie to me. I'm at the age now in my life where I just want everybody to lie to me. Tell me I look good. Tell me I'm not fat. Exactly. Could that be our New Year's resolution? Just ask everyone around us to lie to us? I want the truth in politics, Caddy. I just don't want the truth as it relates to my personal vanity. My memory is perfect. Of course, now I have my bionic eyes, so they're good. I haven't put on a single pound ever.
2:07All of that. You know, I think that's a very good way to start. You're rubbing it in there with the ever. I'm Italian. We go up like a roller coaster. All right. What do you want to talk about, girl? You and I are at least being nicer to each other than Elon Musk and Steve Bannon. Not a bad segue there. Who have had a little bit. I don't think their language has been what you could call in the spirit of the season. Well, I mean, listen, I was on the 23rd of December. I was on CNN. Wolf Blitzer asked me a question about this. And I said that, listen, this is born from my life experience. Elon, back up off the politics.
2:45You don't need to be that aggressive with the politics. You've got an amazing life, made$400 billion back off the politics. I said, they're going to hurt you. I didn't mean they were going to physically hurt you. These are very malicious, very malevolent people, and they'll start doing things to you and your business and your personal life that are just not fun. I've had this experience, Caddy. They'll put him on the front page of tabloids and they'll light him up. Now, maybe he wants that and he doesn't care. But my thing about Steve Bannon, I have met a lot of bad people in my life. But I have never met anybody like Steve Bannon because Steve Bannon has got – And again, we've talked about this.
3:25Thank God he's so ugly, but he's the triple threat. Okay. And let me explain that. Okay. He's well-read. He's incredibly malevolent. And then he has that dark attention seeking madness. Okay. So we're now in the dark attention seeking madness phase. He's come out of jail. His podcast is doing okay, but he's nowhere in MAGA world. He's nowhere. And so now he's trying to make a flank move. He's trying to assess if he is the heartbeat of MAGA, if he's the core of MAGA. And he's going after Musk in a way that's not endearing him to Trump and is not endearing him to the people in the inner circle. And so this is a fascinating thing that's going on as a civil war taking place.
4:15Musk is winning that war right now. He's been located at Mar-a-Lago,$2 ,000 a night at a cottage right outside the mansion. Apparently asking for food out of hours. He's kind of demanding. Yeah. And he's got his son X on his shoulders and he's got his mom with him. And he's winning that war for now. But I've seen this thing play out. And I guess what I would say to you, because you've been around politics a long time, if 40 of us went into the administration, had very bad experiences with Donald Trump, so bad that we went out and publicly spoke about the danger of Donald Trump. I'm on Wall Street, and we say on Wall Street, past performance is not an indication of future results.
4:59We have to say that as a disclaimer. But in politics, Caddy, is past performance an indication of future results, or is this the new and improved Donald Trump with a new and improved team, and they're just going to govern brilliantly with no skirmishes. I spent four years covering Donald Trump and was exhausted by the end of it because of the sheer chaos. It's government by chaos. That is his theory of government. And part of that is ideological, that you want to do that because you want to throw everything up in the air and you don't believe that the way things have been done were productive, whether that's ideologically productive or practically productive or economically productive.
5:37And so you want to destroy things. That's the whole point of sort of populism is to try and destroy things. And it doesn't look to me, and we haven't even got to the administration yet, but it doesn't look to me like the next four years are going to be any calmer. We should fill people in on what this kind of row is about within MAGA at the moment. And it's all over the issue of immigrants and visas and whether people who are high skilled workers from around the world should get what are called H-1B visas. And these are visas that particularly go to people with master's degrees. Many of them go to people who are very educated from India, from China, from Europe, but predominantly from countries with high numbers of engineers, of software coders, and they go and work in Silicon Valley and some in other areas too, but Silicon Valley has really exploded the number of H1B visas.
6:30Tesla alone is now number 16 in 2024 in amongst the companies that brought people in on these H1B visas. Tesla brought in 742 H1B visa recipients. The row has broken out between the Steve Bannon purist, more nativist, these jobs should go to Americans and Silicon Valley shouldn't be being given a free pass in allowing foreign workers to come in and take away American jobs. You've had people like Laura Loma, who is this right-wing influencer, Laura Ingraham, who is a Fox News personality host, even Nikki Haley, weighing in actually on the side of Steve Bannon saying, hold on a second, these tech bros shouldn't just be allowed to open America's doors to foreign workers, they should make more effort to train and employ and skill up American workers.
7:32You're seeing the pure sort of populist nativist element of MAGA up against the high tech, high earning, let's focus on economic results and profits world of Silicon Valley. and it's exploded into this ugly war with, this is a family show, so perhaps we shouldn't be using these words, but Elon Musk saying that you could go fuck yourself in the face to Steve Bannon and the MAGA crowd who don't want these foreign workers to come in. And Steve Bannon replying by saying, we're going to rip your face off and that you should sit back and study Elon Musk. You can't just arrive at the party and suddenly say, you know how to govern.
8:14What is it with faces? Why do they keep going after each other's faces like this? Well, I mean, it's a reference to Tropic Thunder. Tropic Thunder is a movie we're not allowed to see anymore because you've got Robert Downey Jr. in blackface and you've got in the movie, they use that expression, go blank yourself in the face. But there's something about this that I want to give some footnotes to, and that is Republican history. Republicans made a decision about 20 years ago that the H-1B visa was an important part of the American body politic. And this goes to what Lee Kuan Yew once said about America.
8:55So the founder of Singapore was interviewed in his late 80s by Graham Allison, the dean of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. And Graham Allison said to Lee Kuan Yew, he was probably one of the most brilliant leaders of his time. And he turned that little island off the coast of Malaysia into a, probably on a per capita basis, one of the most successful economic engines in world history. Henry Kissinger once said about Lee Kuan Yew, if he had only had a bigger nation, so many good things could have happened. But what he said about America is that America is an idea. It's a culture. It's not placed on a broad line and a result of which you can get to America and you can assimilate in America.
9:40You can be British American or Italian American or German American, and you can do it quite quickly. I think he used five years. Which Steve Bannon and co. don't like the idea of, by the way. They hate it. But this is something that's happened in America. And by the way, there's been Americans that have hated that from day one. I guess, you know, once they killed off all the Native Americans, they said, okay, we got here first. The actual Americans. Yeah, exactly. Well, you actually didn't get here first. And then when waves came over, they said, well, you don't belong here. That's called American nativism.
10:11It's a form of racism. They did that to my grandparents. They told them to go back to Italy, et cetera. They did it to the Irish. They did it to the Jews. They did it to the Germans, to the Mexicans. They do it to everybody. Exactly. I'm not saying they just did it to the Italians, do it to everybody, but it's very important. So what Lee Kuan Yew says to Graham Allison becomes the platform for the Republican Party for several decades, which is that this is a tractor beam, this country, for the great intellectual capital of the world. It can arrive here. It can assimilate. It becomes American, these people.
10:44And they go on to do great things. And it's a font of innovation. The reason why Elon Musk is so hot about it is that he believed that. And so he showed up here. He was the recipient of an H-1B visa. Yeah. He naturalizes. He goes on to great success sphere. Sergey Brin, I can name hundreds of very successful people. There's a gentleman by the name of Shiram Krishnan, who is the one that they start this controversy over. And it's interesting because he's a brilliant guy. He worked at A16Z. He lives in London. He's a personal friend of mine. Every time I'm in London, I spend time with him. And he's just a brilliant, gentle person, a real gentle man.
11:23And he's going to go into the administration and he's going to work on the AI projects with David Sachs, and people are upset about it because he's not purely American, he's been naturalized into America from India. So that's a question for you, Anthony. Are they upset about Sri Ram Krishnan because he's not American? Or are they set because he is in favor of allowing more non-American high-skilled workers to come into America and drive economic progress in the country. Is it just because he's not American? If he was Danish and coming in to the administration, would there have been this backlash against him?
12:00I would say no, probably wouldn't be. I kind of agree. But this is the gist of the whole thing. They're going to fight over this and they're going to say that we're going to close the border. We don't need Albert Einstein anymore. We'll do without Albert Einstein. Americans need these jobs and Americans need to be propped up and we don't need to draw from the rest of the world. We're America, this sort of American egotism, this American centrism, if you will. And it's a very big danger. Mitt Romney, when I worked on that campaign in 2012, he was an H-1B visa guy. And he said, when you graduate from a school here, Stanford, Harvard, wherever it is, we want to staple a green card to your diploma.
12:45That was the actual words. And Trump actually used those words on the All In podcast a few months ago, the Mitt Romney words. And I worked with Donald Trump on Mitt Romney's campaign. We did two fundraisers in Trump's Trump Tower triplex apartment. And the reason why this is so interesting is that Trump has actually, the brilliance of Donald Trump, I've said this repeatedly, he talks out of both sides of his mouth. I hate H-1B visas, America, America, America. And then he's out with the tech bros. I love H-1B visas. Let's staple a green card to everybody. And he probably doesn't have an ideological position on this.
13:22No, he doesn't care. He'll go with whatever he thinks serves his own interests better. When he's with the tech bros, he needs their money. He wants them to help them get reelected. Fine with the H-1B visas. If he's in the MAGA crowd and he needs the MAGA voters, I hate the H-1B visas. I'm a little bit of an idealist. I've thought the American presidency you have to deal with the real world the way it is, but there's a little bit of a normative quality of the American presidency. Reagan understood that where you're searching for the ideals and you're trying to push the country towards those ideals.
13:54So let me ask you this question. If you were in the seat of this controversy, and forget about the politics of it, Cady, what's best for America? I think it's indisputable that America's success, not just historically, but even since COVID has been driven by its more open door policy towards immigration. The American Enterprise Institute, which is this conservative think tank, libertarian pro-business think tank in the US has done a study that showed that for every H1B visa holder who's allowed into the US, that creates 1.83 jobs for Americans, almost two jobs, right? So you bring in an H-1B visa holder from India, from China, from Ukraine, from Mexico, a high-skilled performer who helps grow American companies, that provides more jobs for American companies.
14:48But I can see, and I think we've all learned during the course of the 2024 election that however much economists produce the data showing that migrants into the US drive economic performance and drive growth and drive wealth and prosperity in this country, even if those migrants are not coming into America legally, and we're talking about the high-tech, high-skilled workers, even the non-high-tech, non-high-skilled workers are driving economic growth in America that is the envy of most European economies. You still have to deal with the fact that that produces a backlash. And I think that's what's fascinating about what we're seeing play out in MAGA world this week, where you've got the Steve Bannons now calling for 100 % moratorium on all immigration until we get this thing sorted.
15:38I mean, he's basically saying, no more migrants into the US. But is that just cutting off your nose to spite your face? I mean, his argument would be that by allowing in foreign workers, it's a kind of lazy route to economic success for these tech companies and what they really should do is invest in the American worker and that this gives them a cop-out in a sense. They can just bring in somebody who can't then go and leave Amazon or leave Tesla to go and work for another company. They're kind of tied to that company and you get an American worker who has more rights, more freedom to move around, but you've got to invest in those American workers and that these kind of high-tech, high-profit companies are doing the thing that is not good for America in the long run.
16:25I mean, I always worry about people being nativists. And I particularly in a country like America, which is so founded on the ideals and the benefits of immigration, it seems to me like a nativist streak is not going to help the country in the long run. Okay, well, you side with Elon Musk, sounds like. So not on everything. I am worried about how Elon Musk is weighing into lots of country's politics. And I do worry about having unelected billionaires with the amount of power he has. But on this issue, it seems to me that the data in favor of immigration for the American economy, and therefore actually for Americans, is pretty incontrovertible.
17:07Yeah. So I would just say to everybody listening, if you're American and your family is from an immigration story, which it would obviously have to be, unless you're a native - Unless you're a Native American, unless you're a Native American, I don't understand how you could side against this. Let me try you on the counter argument, which is, are these tech companies benefiting and not really giving back to America because they aren't investing in America? It's giving them a kind of loophole and they're avoiding the responsibility of investing. And we know that the American education system is not performing well compared to other education systems around the world on many metrics.
17:46Does this allow them to sort of duck their responsibility to the American education system and American workers? Yeah, you see, that would have been the better argument for Bannon. If Bannon had said, listen, I get the H-1B visas for the Einsteins of the world, but what these companies are actually doing is they're using a loophole and they're bringing in software engineers that are not the Albert Einsteins and they're bringing in other waves of people where in fact we do have people in the United States that could do those jobs and we would want these companies to be more focused on that and maybe we could snipe up the and make it sharper the H-1B visa thing.
18:26You mean as opposed to saying if you're going to do that we're going to rip your face off? That's not like the most sophisticated argument he could have come up with. But we're in the attention economy now, right? So those are how we get each other's attention. Such a good point. blank each other in the face and do this, that. Boys, grow up. Not this group of people, Katty. No, no. This is going to get worse before it gets better. But here are three things I would say about this. Number one, is there a civil war? Like I say, the answer is there is, but it looks like Bannon is losing that war. I think the big issue for the MAGA people are the tech bros MAGA.
19:01Well, let me give you a newsflash, Katty K. They are not MAGA. They are for their specific personal wealth and personal interests. Is Donald Trump MAGA, Katty Kay? Well, that's the good question. Is he? Well, he was certainly MAGA in 2016 because he needed MAGA. Now he doesn't have to run for office again. Who does he want to hang out with? I suspect he is more inclined to the tech bros and the billionaires. Okay, so Donald Trump, let me give you a newsflash, all you MAGA people, not saying that there's like even one MAGA person listening to us, But if there was one MAGA person listening to us, I would say, hey, my brother, Dalton's not MAGA.
19:39Calm down. He's not MAGA. He's a wet towel for your forehead. He's a transactionalist. He could care less about you if this is good for him. He wants to cut some deals for his family in the Middle East. He wants to do some transactions. He knows Musk is helpful to him with the social media business, and he's not MAGA. Okay, so let's just put that out there. And then the second question is, will these civil wars continue? And I think the answer is yes, but we're leaving out Susie Wiles because she made an announcement this week, which I thought was fascinating and very interesting. She said, listen, you're coming into this administration.
20:19Your social media account is going dark. Okay, now that means any cabinet person, anybody trying to get an appointment in the administration, go dark on your social media. But here's the beauty of this. Elon Musk's not going in that administration, catty catty. He's not even, this department is a non-department. It should be called N-N-DOGE. N standing for not Department of Government Efficiency because there's no department, right? It's going to be the sleepy doge. Right. So that point is there's going to be skirmishes, but there's going to be less than people think, less than people think, because there's going to be some muting going on inside there that people should recognize.
21:07And then quickly, my last point is that what will happen to Steve Bannon, and I believe Steve Bannon gets pushed harder to the fringe. Because I know from personal experience, Trump does not like Steve Bannon anymore. Stopped liking him in July of 2017. But he does like Laura Loma. I mean, there are people around Steve Bannon and he likes Laura Ingraham when she's on his side. I mean, there are people in that world that he still wants to curry favor with, it seems. Otherwise, she wouldn't have been flying around the country on the campaign plane with him. But that's Trump. He's classically, he's got two people inside one body.
21:46And so he wants that out there. He wants the controversy. What's the star sign that you always refer to? He's a Gemini. He's a perfect Gemini. But the problem with Trump, he's got, it's like they're like evil twins, Caddy Kay. I mean, usually there's like one good one in there, but he's got like two bad ones, right? No, but I just got to finish. So Laura Lomer, these people, he'll throw them chum. He'll throw them butane to light the fires. But he's not. He's not MAGA. And that is the weirdest thing about Donald Trump. He would much rather... By the way, Howard Stern, the shock jock DJ, Trump had been on his show, I don't know, hundreds of times, said something brilliant about Trump.
22:29He says, guys, you're supporting him. He doesn't like you. You're not going to be at his table for New Year's Eve. Okay. He doesn't like you. Okay. Also, he doesn't want to shake your hand because he's a germaphobe. You like him and you think he's your savior, but he does not like you. Just give me the newsflash on that because we know him from New York and we know who he likes. Okay. You know, I love the fact that you curse on this, but I'm going to use a curse word here because it's very appropriate. I really don't like cursing very much, but I was repeating what they were saying. You fired in another curse, you know, Sandra Dee, you fired in another curse.
23:05We're not counting. But he is a star effer. Okay. And for those of you outside the United States, what is that? I want to be around stars and I want to name drop that I was. Oh, did you know I just did a podcast with Caddy Kay? Because I am a little bit of a star name dropper. I drop your name all the time, Caddy, in case you didn't know. I drop it all the time. That's very sweet of you. And Trump wants to do that. He gets on the phone with people. This is why he left the documents in the bathroom. He gets on the phone with people. Can you believe I just talked to so-and-so and I had this guy at my wedding and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
23:39MAGA people, you're not on Trump's list. Okay. Just got to give you the newsflash. This infighting is going to be different this time. There's no real election. There's a clock ticking. It's four years and done. Trump's going from 78 to 82. Going to be infighting because he can't help it. It's just going to be very different. One other thing I would say though, I think that's been interesting about this week, and being out of the country, you hear a lot about it, is the degree to which people are watching Elon Musk with trepidation. Because I think you're right, there's going to be infighting and it'll be different from the first time around.
24:12But a lot of people, and I know this from conversations I've had with European diplomats in the last week or two, are watching how is Elon Musk going to use his power and his proximity to Trump to meddle in other countries' politics. We've already seen him describing reform, Nigel Farage's party in the UK, as the only hope for British politics. We've seen him really weigh in on German politics. He wrote an op-ed in the Welt newspaper, and he said that the far-right party, the Alternative für Deutschland, which is compared to having fascist roots in Germany and fascist ideology in Germany, that that is the only hope again for saving Germany.
24:56This has caused an enormous amount. We saw him weigh in. You and I spoke about this on Canadian politics, but the way he's done it in Germany this week. I mean, the AFD is really seen as on the far right wing of European politics. And this causes consternation and his relationship with Donald Trump. So how this all pans out. I mean, if Elon Musk were to be cut off by Donald Trump and Trump were to disown him and have a major falling out with him, that would be less worrying to European leaders. But I know that European diplomats are thinking, okay, we might have to deal with tariffs under Donald Trump, but what do we do about Elon Musk?
25:35How do we manage Elon Musk, who at the moment has this good relationship with Donald Trump, but how do we manage his interfering in our domestic politics in a way that they see as super unhelpful? and potentially worrying. And the fact that he is going for these parties that are on the kind of extremes of European politics is something that they're watching closely. And honestly, I've been told it's one of the things that is preoccupying them the most about Trump 2.0. These are great questions. We'll have to see what happens, but we do know something about Elon. He's not this free speech absolutist because when they were coming for him on his own feed, no bueno, know, he didn't like it.
26:15And he was pulling people. He was suspending people's accounts. And so if you're a politician in Europe, and this is a microphone, it seems to be like a little bit of an alt-right microphone right now, more so than anything else. It'll be interesting to see what Linda does there. Linda, of course, being the CEO of, I know Linda from NBC and not well, but it'll be interesting to see what she does because she was trying to bring in people like Don Lemon from the left. Of course, Elon fired him after the first interview. And so it's an all right platform. And so you don't want to get in the gnashing with Elon Musk.
26:50That would be my recommendation to a European politician. Beat him on the battlefield. Don't beat him in social media. And when he walks around on the halls of Congress with X on his shoulders, they're going to be extraordinarily nice to him because the Doge thing polls well with the American people. Now, nothing will happen and it'll be this ineffectual program. But his relationship with Trump certainly at the moment gives him power at home and abroad. So you're stuck there. Don't go after Elon Musk. It'd be my recommendation. It's not going to help you. Okay. We're going to take a quick break and be back to talk about the legacy of President Jimmy Carter.
Read the full transcript
27:30This is a paid ad for BetterHelp. In moments of stress, we tend to turn to whoever's in reach, that flatmate in the kitchen, the barista on a slow morning, the stranger who simply asks you how you're doing. It can help, but being heard isn't always enough, and the more confidently people speak, the more we mistake it for wisdom. But if you're dealing with anxiety or loss or something that's been weighing on you, what you need isn't noise, it's actual experience, somebody who really knows their craft. BetterHelp has spent over a decade helping people find that match a short questionnaire sets your preferences and they'll connect you with a therapist who fits it's completely online it's fully flexible and if your first counselor doesn't really feel right for you you can switch at any time there's no pressure no extra cost as the largest online therapy provider in the world better help gives you access to credentialed mental health professionals with a wide range of expertise our listeners get 10 % off their first month at betterhelp.com slash tripus.
28:28That's betterhelp.com slash tripus.
28:39Welcome back, everybody. This week, we have been thinking about President Jimmy Carter, who died after how many months was he in? 22 months. He was sent to hospice. They said he had one. That's right. This is one of the toughest people that we have had in our history. Obviously, he is the only president of the 45 presidents thus far. I mean, Donald Trump being such an evil bastard, he may live to be 250 years old, Donald Trump. That's a prediction by me on our podcast. But he's the first president to get to 100. And he was told when he entered hospice that he would have a month or two in hospice.
29:19He lasted 22 months. Yes, I feel like I have prepared Jimmy Carter's obits too many times. And every time I've done it, I've actually felt come away sort of heartened because he does in so many ways, and we can talk about his president's legacy, but just to talk about him as a human being, I've always found him, his humility, yes, he was stubborn as a Georgia mule, they used to say when he was in government, and that may have been part of his problems as a president. But his post-presidency, he has done something that other recent presidents haven't done. He hasn't gone away and made a lot of money on the speaking tour or from having entertainment businesses or hobnobbing with global leaders.
29:59He really, he went back to his - He's not selling Bibles with his name on it, Katya? I didn't see that. He's not selling Bibles or sneakers or anything else with his name on it. He went back to his home in the Plains, Georgia. And at one point, the value of his home after his presidency was less than the value of the Secret Service cars parked outside of his home, giving him protection. And I think that says an awful lot about who Jimmy Carter was as a person, his commitment to trying to use his post-presidency really to work on initiatives around peace, around poverty, the fact that he's carried on teaching Sunday school at his local Sunday school.
30:39I know that one should perhaps measure a president. And maybe this is why Jimmy Carter is interesting to measure a president by what they achieved during their presidency. But for me, it's the legacy of Jimmy Carter, the person, and his commitment to faith and values that represents in many ways the best things about America and modesty and frugality and not trying to be. I mean, he's the antithesis of everything that you have seen in Mar-a-Lago over the last couple of weeks. And in a way that is Jimmy Carter. So, you know, it's interesting because everyone is waxing beautifully about Jimmy Carter.
31:15There's a few people on the right that are negative, and they're explaining to you some of the things that he did that were negative. And I was a young man. Well, talk about those a little bit. What is it the people on the right don't like about him? Yeah, I was actually in middle school when Carter was president. And my dad, who was in a union, hated Jimmy Carter. And my dad was actually a Republican because the Republicans controlled the union in the area that I lived in, Nassau County. And so he hated him because he blamed him for the inflation, sort of the Joe Biden thing. We had rampant inflation in the 70s.
31:49But the irony of that is the inflation started primarily because Richard Nixon unclipped the US dollar from the gold standard. And so that was going to cause inflation one way or another. And Carter was standing there on watch when the inflation really started to wave into the US. But here are three things for the president, I would say, and I'm going to say three things that he really hurt the world, Jimmy Carter. People are not going to like me saying this because he's been sainted in many quarters and he's going to have a state funeral and he deserves a state funeral on January 9th. But the three things that Carter did well was he was a healing sort of a guy.
32:24He was bringing us out of Watergate. He didn't go after Jerry Ford for the pardon of Richard Nixon. I mean, slight rhetoric there, but not major. He was trying to heal the country. That's number one. I think it's important to point that out. One thing quickly, I would add in Vietnam, the 1960s, the civil rights era. I mean, America had been through an awful lot of tumult. Well, let's take it back to the Kennedy assassination. Yes. We had soaring idealism in the beginning of the 60s. The assassination left people with a lot of cynicism. The war, we got quagmired into that war. And then of course we had Watergate.
32:59And so Carter was trying to pull us out of that. And I think in general, people felt that about him. And so I give him positive marks on that. Number two, believe it or not, he was raising the defense budget. When he left, if you go to the Carter library, which I have been to, One of the hallmarks that they try to promote in the library is that he put a 5 % increase in the defense budget at a time when America was still fiscally minded and they were really trying to manage budget deficits. And Reagan unleashed the real big deficit spending. But Carter was at least seeing the world towards the end of his presidency the way it actually was, not the way he wanted it to be.
33:37And then the third thing was he ushered in the Middle East peace deal between the Egyptians and the Israelis, which helped the Middle East in some ways. And it did add to the security apparatus for Israel. And which took that stubbornness of character we were talking about. Yeah. Okay. So those are the three things on the positive side. On the negative side, however, is that he was not a realist. And when you're not a realist in a job like that, he didn't read Siddhartha. Hermann Hesse writes about karma in Siddhartha. And in the book Damien, this is a great famous German writer, Hermann Hesse.
34:16He writes in Damien about the Abraxas in our personalities. We have good and evil in our personalities. If you're going to be the American president, you have to understand that. You have to understand the complexity of that. It's just not all white or all black. black, there's grays out there, and you have to shoot through the grays to get to the best of what you can get to for the world and for people. Carter didn't get that at all. And so he's very righteous. He pulled the Americans out of the Olympics in 1980 as a result of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Think of the hypocrisy. We're going into Vietnam for our political reasons.
34:50Okay, they're going into Afghanistan for their political reasons. he boycotts. This sends morale in the United States spiraling. Second thing he does is he gives a speech with a sweater on and he says that America has entered a malaise. You can't do that as president. You can't go to your people and say, oh, by the way, you guys suck and here's the reason why you suck. You can't do that. That sweater speech, that very famous speech, killed him from a tempo in the US. He gave that after having spent 10 days up at Camp David, kind of in retreat with a stream of visitors coming in to see him. And that was what he came up with.
35:29That's too much of a moralism, frankly, and that hurt him. And the third thing he did was he botched the Middle East. He had Kissinger come to see him and say, hey, I know we're supposed to support the Shah and we put the Shah up and people will remember this. And we have a great brother podcast called The Rest is Classified, where they can talk to you about what the CIA and MI6 did in Iran in the early 1950s when we took out Mossadegh and we installed the Shah. And so we had a close relationship with the Shah. He was a repressive person to his citizens. And Kissinger said, don't bring him into the country.
36:09We have to figure out a way to negotiate with these clerics in Iran. If you bring him into the country. We're going to have holy hell in the Middle East. 44 years later, we do have a big national security - Still. Israeli security problem in the Middle East. So these are things from his righteousness, he mishandled these things. And these are legacies, Caddy, that we're still dealing with. Okay. So having said all of that, I'll just finish on this one point. He had a deal going to get the hostages back. And had he gotten them back, he probably would have won the presidency. You think he would have run even though his approval ratings were so low because of the inflation and the malaise issue?
36:48Well, I think it would have helped his approval ratings. It was a very slow - It would have been a big triumphant moment close to the election. Yes. And it broke for Reagan at the end because it appeared that the hostage situation was hopeless. But we now know that the Reagan guys, in violation of the Hatch Act, were negotiating with the Iranians. They were out there in the Middle East meeting through third parties. And they basically said, you're going to get a better deal from us if we win than Jimmy Carter. And of course, they let the hostages go on the 20th of January, right as Reagan was being inaugurated.
37:25And listen, that's the ugly side of politics. That's the real side of politics. There were too many blind spots in Jimmy Carter's personality. The other thing he did as a post president is, you know, he was quite harsh on Israel. He was quite harsh on certain things going around the world. Now, he was very good on ringworm. He was very good on trying to sanctify democratic elections around the world. Like with everybody, Cady, it's a mixed bag. He wrote a book basically accusing the Israelis of apartheid, which is a position that is sort of anathema and has been in American foreign policy, but actually in European foreign policy, There are many voices who would say that the Israeli government had treated the Palestinians in a way that was the segregation of Palestinians and the putting down of Palestinians, that that was not an unfair criticism.
38:18So, and I think the criticism of Jimmy Carter is getting some revision in the light of the war in Gaza and the treatment of people in Gaza. But he stuck his neck out in a way that was made very many people uncomfortable and he was accused of anti-Semitism by some American Jews and by some Israelis. So he didn't make himself popular in Israel. I think the other thing that, and we should explain why the sweater speech was so damaging to him. Jimmy Carter came in after Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, and he was the simple peanut farmer. He had literally grown up in a house where there was not access to kind of social services or electricity.
39:00He'd grown up a poor kid in Georgia and he came from a Southern Baptist background and he wanted to strip away the kind of what he saw as the rather imperial trappings of the Oval Office. He wanted to make the Oval Office much more accessible, low key, less grand, less pomp and circumstance. He invited members of Congress over to breakfast famously and didn't give them the kind of full White House fry up, gave them a couple of pieces of toast and a pastry. And that didn't go down well with the politicians he was trying to negotiate with. And the sweater speech was, again, it was part, I mean, we can talk about the content of that speech in a second, but putting on a sweater was his way of saying, I am no grander than the American people.
39:46I am one of you, a small D Democrat, making the White House more accessible, more genuinely the people's house. But actually, American voters kind of like having a president who is up on a pedestal and has a bit of grandeur and has some of the pomp and circumstance. And they respect some of that, I think. They do want their commander-in-chief to be this rather grand figure. I mean, they are not electing a prime minister in that respect. I've spoken about this before, how a British prime minister walks into a room and the press corps doesn't stand up. Jimmy Carter walked into a room as president and everybody stood up and he didn't like it.
40:27He banned the playing of call to the chief when he was president. I think doing away with some of those trappings actually hurt him with American voters. They wanted something they could look up to. I think the other thing that hurt him is that he didn't understand in calling on Americans in the middle of the oil crisis of the 1970s to sacrifice, to turn down their heating, to drive less often, to carpool when they could. He misread the American public. And I don't know if this is something specifically about America, but it did make me think of Europe today where you and I have spoken about this around climate change.
41:09There's a lot of flight shaming in Europe. People will call you out for taking a plane instead of taking a train or for traveling at all because you shouldn't be using up fossil fuels when the planet is burning. You don't get any of that in America. Americans, I think inherently, they like to think that there is a solution that is technological. We'll work hard. We'll find the solution. But don't tell us to sacrifice in that way. Don't tell us to turn down our air conditioning or our heating. And I I think Jimmy Carter, in a weird way, coming from Georgia, may have actually had a bit more of a kind of Scandinavian sensitivity to that.
41:46But he misread his public. He asked Americans to be something they're not. There's a journalist by the name of Chuck Thompson. He wrote in the Columbia Insight. I lifted this for our podcast. So a shout out to Chuck Thompson. He said that Jimmy Carter misunderstood that the Americans feel that they have a providential right to urban pickup trucks. And I think that sums it all up, Katty Katty. Yeah. Okay. Just what you just said about Europe versus America. Give me the gas guzzling pickup truck and stop your nonsense. And when Reagan got into power, he understood this. And what did Reagan do? He ripped the solar panels off the roof of the White House.
42:33He said, this is nonsense. And he ripped them off. And most people cheered that caddy. So listen, America, obviously different place than the rest of the world. We're still using the imperial unit system of measurement here. I mean, right or wrong, you have to understand your public. Yes, exactly. And he missed that. But listen, praise to him for his public service. praise to him for his selflessness in so many different ways. But what we know about our lives, and it's just a fortunate truth about us as human beings, you need tough people in that job, but tough people that are also flexible in terms of what they see as right and wrong in our world, Caddy.
43:16And it's a hard thing to ask people because he was trying to do the right thing. And as a result of which he got a lot of things wrong. Yeah. And I think it's also interesting that you look at what happened with Jimmy Carter. He was a reaction against Richard Nixon, really. And then you get Ronald Reagan, a reaction against Jimmy Carter. And you see this pattern happening so often in America in modern history, where you get somebody in who is a reaction against somebody else. George W. Bush comes in promising to restore dignity to the Oval Office. Barack Obama comes in after George W. Bush promising to make America purple and heal some of the divisions.
43:56He fails to do that, but that's what he does. We have said this before. Donald Trump is elected in part in reaction to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama was elected. Obama would hate to hear that said, but that was the pushback from some of the MAGA people. Joe Biden is elected in reaction to the chaos of Donald Trump's handling of the COVID period. And then Donald Trump is reelected in reaction to the Bidenomics and inflation. It may be fair or it may be unfair, but time and again, you see presidents being elected because of who was elected before them or because of the presidency that happened before them.
44:34One question for you, when Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter in 1980. To some extent, it was the kind of battle of hope and optimism against malaise and tighten your belts of Jimmy Carter. And it set up, I think, an idea in American politics that you won elections by being the candidate of optimism. That's how Ronald Reagan had beaten Jimmy Carter in 1980. And for me, that lasted 36 years until Donald Trump was inaugurated in 2016 and talked about a period of American carnage. And Donald Trump is not the candidate of hope and optimism. So I have a question for you, which is, do you think that period, that 36-year period where it was the optimist who was elected, is now being ended by Donald Trump?
45:26And are we in for a period where you get elected by playing on fear and anger? So I'm going to take the other side of this for a second. I actually think to Donald Trump supporters, he is that. I know he's not that to me, and he certainly probably isn't that to you based on what you just said, but he is that to them. They see America as broken. They see America as a laughingstock. They see America with a porous border. they see all of this forever wars and they see Trump coming in calling all of that out and he's going to come now and fix that. And make America great again. Yeah, make America great again.
46:02So it's a weird thing. But he does it in a very different way from Ronald Reagan did, right? Ronald Reagan talked about the hope of America, the optimism of America, the shining city on the hill. That is not the language of Donald Trump. It was very hard. When Reagan got shot, he was meeting with a group of union officials. When he came out of the hotel and he got shot under his armpit and the bullet lodged in his lung and it missed his heart by about an inch and he almost died. What they said about Reagan at that moment was very interesting. It was March 30th, 1981. And they said, oh, wow, he was out there talking to the union officials.
46:37He was trying to get the country together. So there was an optimism plus unity. What Trump is, you're my people, the other people are not my people it's us versus them and if you're with me be optimistic for you and me not them you see that's the danger and i think that's what you're sensing in donald trump and that's something that reagan didn't have and carter was a little bit too realistic carter was a little bit too detail oriented as we both know he famously used to keep track of who was playing tennis on the White House tennis court. He just had the wrong skill set for that job. Good person, did a lot of good things, but had the wrong skill set for that job.
47:25And we're still dealing with the aftermath of that. The Iranian situation could have been a different situation. And by the way, the Cuban situation, I mean, I know this is not the rest of history, but let's just talk about this for a second. Eisenhower's decisions during the revolution, which were fortified by Kennedy, okay, sent the trajectory of US-Cuban relations into a 65-ish year spiral. And that island is suffering right now. I mean, they barely have electricity on that island. And I know we can debate whether it's in our interest or not in our interest at this point in our history, not to figure out a way to help those people.
48:07but that started in the Eisenhower administration. And this situation with the Iranians started in the Carter administration. So these presidents, when they make decisions, they have consequence, Caddy, and they have consequence that could last multiple decades. Did Joe Biden fall into the Jimmy Carter trap in the sense that every president never wanted to be Jimmy Carter again? Maybe they like his post-presidency, but they didn't want to replicate what he did. He did it slightly differently, but did Joe Biden in a period of inflation sort of not blame the American people and tell them to turn down their heating or turn down their air conditioning, but try to tell them actually it's not what you think it is, that actually it's getting better.
48:52Inflation is coming down. Unemployment is coming down. I mean, it wasn't the same message, but it was similar in tone of not really empathizing with the problem that they were going through, but trying to kind of tell them to buck up, as my mother would have said. I mean, I think there's some relevancy and truth to that. I'm not saying either of them could have done more about the inflation. Inflation is notoriously difficult for any president to handle, but I just wonder whether we will look back at some of the parallels there. I just think that that job has a lot of imagery to it as well. And the president, from an image perspective over the last four years, didn't do himself any good.
49:28But as we pointed out, he broke his foot. He didn't wear the boot afterwards. Now he's got that stultering walk. He has lost a step in terms of his cognition. And by the way, since we're talking after New Year's Day and there were terror attacks in the United States, he came to the podium. And I thought he looked 100 at the podium. And I don't think he looks like the American people don't feel that he has a command anymore. And it could be you say, well, that's because he's a lame duck, but it could also be his appearance, caddy. And that's a terrible thing for me to say, but I'm just pointing it out.
50:05And so Reagan understood this. Trump understands this. Obama understood it for sure. Okay. There's a media presentation aspect to these jobs and people see you and they want to see vigor. They want to see strength. The question really is, and this goes to your point, is Trump an idealist? Okay. Because what you got with Reagan was the hope, aspiration, optimism, and the idealism. I don't think any of us see Trump as an idealist. Maybe he does, but I can't literally look to anything in his record that points to that idealism. But anyway, before we go, if you don't mind, I know you've been partying.
50:45If you don't look hungover, by the way, you look great. I've been home, by the way. I'm doing nothing, but very boring life. Very boring. But I want to give us a plug, if you don't mind. I want to talk a little bit about January 6th, which is my birthday. I'll be 61 this year on the 6th of January. Have you ever told us that? Have you ever told us that January 6th is your birthday? At least twice a podcast, I mentioned it. Unbelievable that on my birthday, we had a insurrection. And you and I have put together this, in my mind, a brilliant four-part mini-series on this, the aftermath of the 2020 election and the insurrection that took place.
51:23And tell us a little bit about that before we let these people leave. We're very pleased with this. We worked hard on it along with our producers at Goldhanger, who have done an amazing job pulling what is quite a complex and extraordinary narrative of that day into this miniseries. It's called Storming the Capitol. We're going to look at the whole story starting off with the 2020 election itself, Joe Biden's victory through Donald Trump's attempts to undermine that victory right up to the day of January the 6th and those horrifying scenes that we watched in real time. If you can't wait to hear all of the episodes of our series, sign up to become a founding member over at therestispoliticsus.com.
52:04And then you can get all four episodes straight away on Monday the 6th of January, as well as ad-free listening and access, of course, to our exclusive members-only Q &A out every Sunday. So that's the January the 6th mini-series, and it begins, of course, on January the 6th, which, for those of you who didn't know, is also Anthony Scaramucci's birthday. A good place to leave it. We'll see you next week, and we'll see you, our members, for our Q &A on Sunday. And otherwise, do join us again next week. We'll be back with more. Okay, that's it from us. We'll see you next week. Thank you so much for joining us.
52:40Thank you.
From the publisher
Who will prevail in the Republican civil war: the tech bros or the MAGA base? Why are H–1B visas causing a stir? And, how should we remember President Carter?
Join Katty and Anthony as they answer all of these questions and more.
The Rest Is Politics US is powered by Fuse Energy, a green electricity supplier powering homes across England, Scotland & Wales. Use referral code USPOLITICS after signing up to win a TRIP merch bundle. Learn more at https://getfuse.com/uspolitics ⚡
Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅
Instagram:
@RestPoliticsUS
Twitter:
@RestPoliticsUS
Email:
TRIPUS@goalhanger.com
Assistant Producer: India Dunkley and Alice Horrell
Video Editor: Jake Liascos
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Fiona Douglas
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Head of Digital: Sam Oakley
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor, Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




