133. Suella's speeding, Japan in focus, and what's the point of the G7?

24 May 2023 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary

Podcast Title

The Rest Is Politics Podcast Description: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart explore current affairs in the UK and globally, providing in-depth analysis and discussions on political issues while emphasizing the importance of civil discourse.

Episode Title

133. Suella's Speeding, Japan in Focus, and What's the Point of the G7?

Episode Overview In this episode, Campbell and Stewart cover a range of significant topics:

  • The implications of Suella Braverman's speeding scandal.
  • A historical overview of the G7 and its current relevance.
  • The influence of religion on politics.
  • Recent political dynamics in Japan and events surrounding the National Conservatism Conference.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Suella Braverman's Speeding Scandal
  2. Background: Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary, has faced scrutiny for allegedly attempting to avoid attending a speed awareness course after being caught speeding.
  3. Ministerial Code Breach: This incident marks a potential second breach of the Ministerial Code for Braverman.
  4. Public Response: The media's questioning of Braverman highlighted her repetitive defense, drawing criticism and skepticism about her intentions and character.
  5. Political Implications: Discussion on whether Prime Minister Rishi Sunak can afford to retain Braverman, given that her dismissal could galvanize her supporters.
  1. National Conservatism Conference
  2. Global Phenomenon: The conference is not limited to the UK; it has international participation, including representatives from the U.S. and Europe.
  3. Influence of Figures: The conference featured controversial figures like Viktor Orban and rhetoric that aligns with far-right populist sentiments.
  4. Contradictory Ideologies: Highlights the contradictions within conservative ideologies espoused at the conference—balancing tradition with radical modernization.
  1. Reflections on Labour's Position
  2. Public Sentiment: Observations from Campbell and Stewart suggest that the Labour Party, under Kier Starmer, is perceived as weak and lacking a clear vision.
  3. Audience Engagement: In discussions with public audiences, Starmer received strong support regarding potential leadership, but struggled to communicate Labour’s strategy effectively.
  1. G7 Summit Analysis
  2. Historical Context: The G7's formation and evolution from the Group of Five in the 1970s, with reflections on its significance in current geopolitical dynamics.
  3. Global Power Shift: Discussion on how the G7, once representing 70% of global GDP, now holds only about 30% of the global economy.
  4. Contemporary Issues: Focus on how the G7 interacts with nations like China and India, which are now significant global players.
  5. Zelensky's Influence: Ukrainian President Zelensky's participation was a focal point of the recent summit, overshadowing other discussions, particularly about nuclear disarmament.
  1. Political Landscape in Japan
  2. Cultural Insights: Stewart shares experiences from Japan, highlighting its unique cultural heritage and political complexities.
  3. Political Dominance: Discussion on the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the challenges it faces amid public discontent.
  4. Future Implications: The episode concludes with reflections on potential shifts within Japanese politics and the broader implications for global relations, especially regarding China.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Governance and Accountability: The conversation navigates themes of accountability in governance, particularly in light of Braverman's scandals and the implications for Sunak's leadership.
  • Conservative Ideologies: The National Conservatism Conference reveals deep divisions within conservative thought, challenging the traditional foundations of the party.
  • Labour Strategy Needs Clarity: For Labour to effectively challenge the incumbent government, it must provide a coherent and relatable vision that resonates with voters.
  • G7's Relevance: As global dynamics shift, the G7 must adapt to include emerging powers and face contemporary challenges more effectively.
  • Japanese Political Frustration: The sentiment among Japanese youth reflects a growing desire for change and a departure from established political dynasties.

---

Conclusion In this episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, Campbell and Stewart provide insightful commentary on crucial political events and trends, making clear the interconnected nature of domestic and international politics. Their discussions underscore the importance of effective communication and accountability in governance as political landscapes evolve.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. EdBlinds .com It's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because AdBlinds .com, the only thing we treat better than Windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:49Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Alistair Campbell. And with me, Maurice Stewart. Sadly, yet again, we're going to have to talk about Sweller Brabhaman and National Conservatism and the neck migration figures coming out. We're going to talk a little about Scotland and also about something that Rory and I both picked up last week on our travels in the UK about the way that Labour has seen at the moment, which I think is worth discussing. And then we're going to go into the G7. Zelensky's Master Class, but also Rory happens to be in Japan where the G7 was so, so you said you were to talk a little about Japan a little bit about G7 and G8 summits and frankly, whether there's much point.

1:30But Rory, let's kick off with Suurella, as I like to call her. Yeah, well, let me start by paying tribute to the fact that your book is now the number one bestseller in the United Kingdom. Are you completely exhausted? You've been charging up and on the country talking to every school in the country. Now, I've enjoyed talking to the schools, actually. And I'm not really exhausted. No, the only thing that I found utterly exhausting was I left Glasgow on Sunday at seven. I left my hotel at 7 .30am and I finally walked through the door just as the second half was starting in the four o 'clock kickoff on Sky.

2:06So that was a pretty troubled train journey home, pretty troubled train journey and I added to the irritation, which you were presumably missing part of a football game that you wanted to see. I wasn't that bothered about the game to be absolutely frank, but it was just one of those journeys where everything seemed to go wrong. And at the very same time, as people pointed on Twitter, I was on the bullet train heading between Tokyo and Nagoya. So why do the Japanese do trains so well? Well, we're going to speak to that in the second half and part of that is enormous amounts of public spending. But to tell us about Suurella, brother, and your least favourite person, I guess, or one of your least favourite people?

2:41No, no, no, she's not. Well, I think she's part of my least favourite government for a long time. No, she's got into trouble again. This time, a story involving her time as a turning general. For overseas listeners to remind everybody, Suurella, brother, is the home secretary. She represents the right wing faction on the conservative party. She was a leading Brexit here. She competed to be Prime Minister. She was a big backer of Boris Johnson and she is occupying one of these three great officers of states. So she's real in a sense of a big, big factor in where she's the next cabinet. And now, sorry.

3:16And also, the reason that she's there is because during the leadership election that led to Suunak being crowned as it were, she dropped her backing, her vocal backing for Boris Johnson. She didn't get involved in the Let's Bring Back Johnson campaign. And clearly some sort of deal done. She was forced to resign when she was in the list trust cabinet over a breach of the Ministerial Code. That was to do with leaking documents to an MP who should not have been seeing them. And then within minutes of Suunak becoming Prime Minister just literally a few days later, she's back in the cabinet. And now she's charged again with breaking the Ministerial Code.

3:58This time over allegations that when she was done for speeding, she asked first a civil servant and then a special adviser, whether it will be possible for her to do it rather than get points on her license to do a speed awareness course but one -on -one. So she didn't have to go and sit with the Hoy Paloie. So as an alternative against three points of license, you can send a speed awareness course typically with maybe 20 people in a room, private sector provider explains things like driving five miles an hour more, doesn't get you there any quicker than you expecting. Have you done a speed awareness course?

4:32I've done two and I vividly remember something from the first one which I remember which did not happen in the second one. Okay. And this was one of those acronyms, coast. And I do actually remember this and I do think of it sometimes when I suddenly realize I'm driving too fast. And coast is concentration, observation, anticipation, space and time. And I remember that from and actually every time I drive it's up by all street near the angel and every time I drive past the building where I had that speed awareness course, I remember it and I always slowed out. It's funny how these things sort of get into your head.

5:12Just on the coast thing, I'm obviously I spend a lot of time saying to my eight -year -old and six -year -old just concentrate but I don't find it's very useful. I'm coming to the conclusion that telling people who aren't concentrating to concentrate doesn't really help them to concentrate. No, I think I don't agree with that. I think that if I tell myself I am losing concentration, I can get it back. But the point about Suvella -Solar Brevenman is that where I think she might come unstuck, yesterday she was quizzed by the media, she was quizzed in Parliament because she was doing home of his questions or something else.

5:48And she just had this line, I was last summer, I was court speeding, I didn't dispute the offense, I didn't dispute the sanction, but she just kept repeating the same thing again and again and again and again. Where I think she might come unstuck is the fact that her advisors, and this would be her special advisor, told the media that actually there had been no case at all at some point in this story. Then the other thing they said, which I think just underlines what happens when you sort of your stories unraveling. So she was the attorney general at the time, not only about when you were in government, but I know that when I was working for the government, if my memory serves me correctly, the attorney general did not have protection, okay?

6:35The home secretary does have protection, and one of the lines being used about why maybe she considered that it would have been appropriate and reasonable for her not to have to go to her speed awareness course with lots of other people is that her protection team would have to go as well, okay? But she didn't have a protection when she was the attorney general, but I suppose she was home secretary by the time she was making the request, is that right? That's a good point. That is a good point. But what do you think the real reason is why she didn't want to go on it? She thought she'd be embarrassed that the media would show pictures for sitting with 19 other people and it would somehow be a humiliation.

7:09I mean, what's the deal? I would be very surprised if this is earlier in her career. I'm not 100, I think she's a very well -known political figure now because of Rwanda and stop the boats and all that stuff. I think Suela Brabham could go to quite a lot of speed awareness courses around the country, maybe we'd have a bloody clue who she was. I get a sense of her being a bit of a narcissist. I don't know about you, but my sense of her is she just loves all this attention, and I think she loves the fact that part of the narrative around her is that Sunak's scared to get rid of her, and I think she's either trying to provoke Sunak to sack her.

7:46She probably thinks if you're right that most tourists think that they're going to lose the next election, she is clearly lining herself up to be the main representative of the right, the hard right of the Conservative party. And of course, if she gets sacked, that is better for her in those circumstances than having to resign over something that is self -evidently scandalous. Yeah, so maybe actually Rishisunak can't really afford to sack her over her not wanting to do a speed awareness course because that will be used by Suela Brabham's supporters to say this was a trivial thing, this was ridiculous and turn her into a martyr.

8:24I mean, you've been saying for weeks that you think Rishisunak is desperate, Sakha. Now, I don't know if you've had any further conversations with people in the Conservative party about that, but I don't know. I get the feeling that he quite likes having her there because she can do a lot of the nasty stuff and he doesn't really have to get his hands to dirty with it. Well, let's move on to the National Conservatism Conference that we spoke about a bit last week, which was this bizarre moment where last weekend, just at the moment where Rishisunak was trying to make some important announcements and meetings in Latzky on Ukraine and preparing for the G7 summit.

8:59Suela Brabham and led this extraordinary conference called National Conservatism Conference and I've been digging into it a bit more and I hadn't realized this. The National Conservatism Conference isn't only a British thing at all, it's a global phenomenon and it's had some big conferences in the US, conferences in Italy, so Rhonda Santis is there on website talking about how Thorda is the great space for freedom. Dan Prager is out there saying the left is trying to destroy Western civilization, so this is extraordinary round about how in the Guggenheim there's a golden toilet into which people can defecate and this shows that the left is trying to destroy art as well as everything else.

9:43And it's an extraordinary revelation of something disturbing because you see Georgian Maloney being profiled in Italy and Viktor Orban is right up there on the website. So Viktor Orban, I mean just remind people, this is a guy who the right look to or that part of the far populist right look to because he's closed to university, he's put academic bodies under government control, he's put most of the press in Hungary under direct party control or indirect party control. So what I really want to say to people like Michael Gove and Swallow Bravaman and Danny Kruger who are attending this conference is there are some very odd edges to this which are deeply disturbing for the conservative party in which they should be distancing themselves.

10:27They had a US senator as I said, J .D. Vance who backs Trump in saying the election was stolen in 2020. And then I suppose the second thing that struck me looking for conference is how very odd that side of conservatism is they combine a whole series of very contradictory things on the one hand. They seem to be standing up for tradition, you know my sort of conservatism, they talk about Evan Burke. But actually if you listen to Michael Gove, he's not really a Tory and that sense at all. He calls himself a wig. He's often in terms of kind of radical modernization. He's not very comfortable with land ownership in Britain.

11:01He wants to take away VAT from private schools. Then you have other people who are standing up and saying they want bigger families. But the same people who say they want bigger families are supporting radical free market economics which is one of the contexts which are forcing both partners to have to work. Edmund Burke's name was on the backdrop by the way because it was the one of the think -towns with the carries his name that was that was part sponsoring this event. And you mentioned Danny Kruger I was on that TV program with him on the day that this conference was happening. He and Miriam Kates are the two sole, they're the only directors of the company that has been set up to promote this thing.

11:41And I think that Miriam Kates is an interesting example of what you're talking about as well because she is part of this. What I would describe is very right -wing Christian evangelical movement. There are a lot of which is about essentially about saying the big problem in the world is birth. We haven't got enough children being born. Therefore women need to go back to a much more traditional role. They have pretty the Christian evangelical movement in the States with very very strong views on abortion and such light. So I think you're right that this is far more insidious. Your point about it being an international network is this related to the whole Steve Bannon thing or is it separate from that?

12:24It seems to be separate from Steve Bannon. But it is interesting. Miriam Kates is an MP. She comes from a Christian family. Danny Kruger was actually part of the conservative movement quite a long time. He's an Etonian who I guess must be now in his late 40s. He's the son of Prulith, the famous cookery writer. He was David Cameron's speech writer. He ran against Tony Blair in such field, got himself in trouble in those days for calling for the creative destruction of the NHS, which was a reference to Hegel. He said afterwards, but people didn't interpret it as a reference to Hegel. What is it?

13:03He shows out. He was ahead of his time though because they're basically doing it now, aren't they? And then he became one of Boris Johnson's private secretaries in number 10 before he was elected as an MP. And he again, a very Christian and set up a Christian charity and very much sees a former conservatism and tradition about the book. But what's so odd about it is that conservatism that sometimes sounds in Britain as though it's about Britain and British tradition is also curiously allied to some of the organizers and speakers who are active in Israeli politics, who are themselves Israeli settlers or are connected with people who are connected to Trump or the Republican right in the US.

13:50And again, Douglas Murray, who spoke was somebody who's also been very outspoken against Islam. He was the one who said we shouldn't stop being nationalists, because the Germans mucked it up twice in the last century. Exactly. And he's also somebody who I used to argue with a great deal because he was a great near -conservative and defender of the Iraq war. So there's something about this style of conservatism that still confuses me. There's no different ideological things that I've mentioned here, but somehow they sit together. On the Christianity point and Christian evangelicals, I mean, I am not a person of Christian faith unlike you.

14:30Were I to be so? Is this me just reflecting my own politics? But I always imagine that I was the badger that Christ was far more of a socialist than a conservative. Okay. I think he had a view of the world, which was about helping the poor and building people up. And yet, the evangelical right in the States appears almost monolithically to be Trumpian. So defending a liar, an adulterer, somebody who abuses power, things I would have thought Christ would have been against. It's completely bewildering, isn't it? It's totally bewildering. And I think even the Christian right in the US struggle to explain it, but you get these extraordinary bumper stickers which are sort of portraying Donald Trump as the Messiah and as a guy, champion of the church.

15:21It's true also in the paradoxes of a lot of these people in the UK supporting Boris Johnson whose personal life is a kind of flagrant, a sort of attack on almost all the values that they seem to wish to uphold. And I think it's to do with an anxiety, a much representing materialist atheism. I think this goes right the way back to the 1930s or even the late 19th century. And the Citroen Germany too, that the Christian parties tended to allow themselves on the right because they're left with seniors, anti -Christian. But don't you think on the on Bravaman, that Sunak who is coming over is quite a weak character and quite a weak leader at the moment, I think?

16:01Don't you think he would be involved in the strength and if he just stood up and said, look, it's perfectly clear that Soil of Bravaman, she's failing on the main policy agenda, in particular the immigration. We've got the net migration figures coming this week which are going to show yet another failure on that front. And added to which it's being scandal upon scandal upon scandal. He promised that he would lead a government professionalism accountability integrity and I'm very, very sorry Soil of it, you've got to go. Would that well accept you just contradict yourself because you pointed out that in a sense she would like to be fired for something like this, like not attending a speed awareness course because that would make her into a matter of strength in her position.

16:43Yeah, it would be. I will, no, but I'm thinking there from her perspective that puts her in poor position as the representative of the right. I'm saying from his perspective, vis -a -vis the country that it was strengthened at a time when he is coming over is very, very weak. Well, I think he and Kierstam are both coming across as weak and that's very clear in almost all the polling. So I'm not going to question that if you look at a lot of the polling, weak as a word that comes up for Kierstam or weak as a word that comes up for Rishis inek. Just sticking on Labour, you and I did two events together last week, one in Harrogate, one in Leeds.

17:20I did six other events, three in Scotland and three schools and I asked the same questions of all the audiences as you and I asked of the audiences in Harrogate and Leeds and got almost identical answers and remind people what the questions were. So the first question was, who do you think will be Prime Minister in two years time? And between 80 and 100 percent basically said Kierstam. We gave them a choice of Starmas, Sunak or somebody else and about eight between, Lois was probably about 75, the highest was 100 percent saying Kierstam. We then asked them either to name any of the five missions the Labour has at the heart of its strategy or to give the summary of Labour's economic strategy in a sentence.

18:05And apart from Harrogate, where one guy put his hand up and said he could do it, he gave a good fist of it and I, as a candidate, had it so doubt that he was. But for the rest of it and he could any manage four out of five, could he? He got three and a half ready, he didn't get the whole way. So I think there is a real problem in that which Labour have to fix, I think is a matter of urgency because I think that it is definitely possible to get over the line in terms of winning an election on the narrative that the Tories of the worst government we've ever had and they've got to go. But you won't be able to do the things, the difficult things that are going to have to be done as a government unless you have buy -in for the change that you're offering.

18:50Kier yesterday made quite a big speech about the National Health Service and it got a fair amount of coverage. But even today, I've been getting quite a few messages from friends who are in the NHS saying, you know, went down okay, some saying it went down badly because of specific policy ideas. But I think the point that Osborne, George Osborne made in our interview with him on the leading channel, that you need at this stage to be able to say what your economic strategy is, what your health strategy is, what your education strategy is, what your foreign policy overall is. In a nutshell, you've got to be able to communicate it in a way that people say, yes, that's different and that's why I won't win them.

19:27It's very, very unfortunate. I mean, JLP polling does these polls and they did one 26, 27th April where they do word clouds. In a word, please describe your view of Kier Starmer, 2086 UK adults. And the central word cloud at the moment is weak, boring, useless. Now, I don't like those kind of words. I'm not very comfortable applying them to Kier Starmer. I'm not very comfortable applying them to Rishi Suneag either. I mean, I think, as I keep saying on this show that I think Rishi has actually doing a much better job than his predecessors. He's much more of a grown -up. He's running a good cabinet.

20:03But where I do agree with you with both of them, neither of them I think are quite managing to really communicate a clear vision to the public. And Rishi Suneag, I suppose, maybe because they've got more control of the media, you do people I suppose can get to the fact that he wants to get inflation down, get growth and stop the boats. Right? Whatever we think about that. We sort of know that. With Kier Starmer, I'd love to hear your views on this. I went through an evolution as a politician, which is that I was tempted initially when people said, what is your vision to say? Well, I just want to run things well.

20:40I don't believe in big flashy visions. But I realized when actually I was able to answer that question. So when I was running for leadership and I was clear that what I wanted to do is stop a no -deal Brexit and stop Boris Johnson. That things became much, much easier for me. And again, when I was running as London mayor, once I could see what I really wanted to do and communicate it again and again and again, things became much easier for me as a politician. I think Kier Starmer has got to get beyond what he'll feel, which is, well, I'll be more competent, which worked fine against Boris Johnson, but isn't going to work as well against Rishi Suneag because the two of them seem too similar in that respect.

21:21They both seem like sort of technocratic managers. I think Kier is developing as a politician in a way that hopefully I think we'll see him become prime minister and actually be quite a good prime minister because I think the lot of the qualities that he shows in terms of his overall commitment to public service, whether it was the DPP, the way that he could clearly address his problems in a serious way. I think that will stand him in good setting government. However, I think that to get into government, you have to counter this sense that, because I think the choice deliberately want to create this sense that they're all the same.

21:58They're all as bad as each other. Yeah, we're, we've been terrible. Yeah, nothing much has changed, but you're really think that guy's any better. I think he's got to flip this sort of boring thing. I don't think he's boring and I don't think he's particularly weak. I think actually if you think about how many, I'm not even sure that Tony would have expelled a former leader from the party in the way that Kier does. That's the sort of sign of strength. I think some of the policy decisions that he's taken, even this thing about, he gets a lot of criticism for dumping on the pledges that he made to become leader, but it was interesting that the event I did in Glasgow on the book, at Glasgow City Halls, and there was quite a big crowd and he just chised it up and he said, am I missing something?

22:39He said, I actually quite the look at the look at his key style. He seems quite ruthless to me. And I thought that was an interesting observation that this guy, his name was James. He actually thought there's a steal in there that is about getting into power. And I think what I like about the way Kier has conducted himself is that we've said this before, stage one decontaminate the Labour Party brand stage two take on the Tories stage three, set out the alternative gender. Now, what I don't like that I think the mission's approach is quite good as an overall thing, but if I've just got them in front of me, secure the higher sustained growth in the G7, well that's a great thing if you can do it.

23:15It's, yeah, and let's just get to a sort of somebody who thinks a lot about phrases. I mean, it doesn't exactly trip off the tongue does it to secure the highest sustained growth in the G7 and it slightly sounds like what they wanted to do was say, be the fastest growing economy in the world. And then someone said, oh, well, I'm not quite sure what we can say that. So then they said, how about fastest growing the G7? Oh, I'm not sure about that. Can we stick in the word sustained because that might be able to. Yeah. And what it's saying, what actually that says is that we want to get the economy growing again.

23:49Yeah, I think that's a simpler way to say it. And at the same time, and I think Rishi Sunex word for that is grace, isn't it? He just uses the word grace. So they're big. And that's another problem. It's not really a differentiator. His first one isn't actually different from the government. So the next one, mate, and this is where I think they have had a little bit of traction, mate, bread and a clean energy superpower. Yep. And also that is the environment linking to the economy. Yeah. Next one, building NHS fit for the future. That's okay. Mate, Britain, streets safe, pretty standard. And then the last one, break down the barriers to opportunity every stage, which again, I think is worthy and noble, but it needs, it needs greater harsh, greater sharpness.

24:30It was all very sharp. It's because the, as you say, it's a lot of words at every state break down the barriers to opportunity. The other thing that's missing there is the cost of living crisis. Rishi Sunex has put half, half inflation right there at the centre of his things. It's, I'm surprised, Keir, hasn't put that bang there because I would have thought inflation cost to living is the number one issue in British politics. I think these missions are either downside of our surveys. And let's see, we go through the audiences that we spoke to and the ones I did, we're talking a cohort of about 4 ,000 people now.

25:10Okay. Yep. One of whom could name three and a half of the missions. Okay. So that's the downside. They've not cut through. The upside of that is that between now and the election, I think these should become the basis for five very, very clear specific pledges that maybe are less global, less grand, less grandiose that actually sort of bring them down maybe to a, to a level closer to people. I mean, to remind people, I mean, Rishi's Sunex five promises are we will have inflation grow the economy, reduce debt, cut waiting lists and stop the boats. Yeah. And you can see where the electorate is for that.

Read the full transcript

25:53You can see where the stop the boat electorate is. The whole country is in support of cut waiting lists. I guess the conservatives are on the reduced debt side and the whole country is on half inflation. So I mean, we all agree there are huge problems with where the conservative government is and it seems unlikely that they get reelected. But presumably if you were in Rishi's Sunex position and you were communicating for them, that's probably as bad as good as you can do if turns to defining something to take you into the next election. But if you were in the number 10 comms machine, would you think that that was a pretty good stab at coming up with five things if you're on Rishi's Sunex side to take him into next election?

26:34Possibly. I don't think they're very ambitious. And also I don't think they necessarily hang together. And I think the stop the boats thing is such an obviously polarizing populist move. At a time when I thought soon that was going to possibly reverse the populism banwagon, which the toys have been riding. But it is hugely popular. It does seem to be very, very popular. I'm not convinced about that. I don't think it's I think you can get very, very different views on this. I think for a lot of people it's something that just underlines why they don't like the choice that they're focusing on something that they so here we are today with the net, this week with the net migration figures.

27:10And actually we're going to see that those people coming over on boats are a very, very small part of a much bigger problem, which actually business for example once fixed. Well, so I don't know. Most of the polls we can share some of this and stuff are pretty consistent in putting a legal migration right up there as one of the top forests use among voters and top two amongst those who've backed or is in the last election. Yeah, but I think these you've got to be very careful about these polls. They tend to reflect what the is kind of in the media at that time. Yeah, I don't deny there are lots of people who think that the the issue is people who are coming here who shouldn't be coming here.

27:50However, I think there is a broader debate on migration, which particularly in the business community. We saw in those people that we were speaking to in leads last week where they they were they were recognised that they're there are massive shortages in labour market, there are skill shortages which they feel can't be fixed. And therefore, really soon up, I think rightly this goes back to your point about being more grown up than Johnson and Truss and Bravaman is saying we have to be a bit careful about how we handle this debate. So they're trying to create all the focus on the votes. Essentially, there's a distraction for the more serious challenge they're facing or which they're failing by their own standards.

28:27And the big, big story there, absolutely as we as we move towards the break is that the UK is going to take in over half a million people in net migration this year. Yeah, that is over 300 ,000 more than we're taking in last year and it's one of the highest numbers on record. And if you look at the composition of the people coming in, there's been an extraordinary shift away from hundreds of thousands of people coming from the European Union towards the largest numbers now coming from South Asia and from Sub -Saharan Africa. And also the numbers inflated, I guess, by Hong Kong and Ukraine as well.

29:01Hong Kong, Ukraine and Afghanistan had an impact on this big impact on it, but it is a big change in the composition of Britain and it's an interesting one for conservative government to be doing because I guess most of the Brexit voters or many, many of people who voted Brexit were doing so to reduce the immigration immigration was a big issue for them. And I don't think they meant by that. We want to reduce immigration from the European Union and take a lot of immigration from other places in the world unless I'm missing something. You agree with that? No, I do agree with you. Final point before we go to break, just a quick observation about Scotland, the dialogue against independence, I think, has definitely moved.

29:39I think there was a sense around lots of people that I met, a sense around the SMP that they really are in quite considerable, particularly trouble, which is obviously a massive opportunity for labour. And the second thing worth reflecting on again is the local elections in Northern Ireland, pretty stunning success for Sinn Fein, and that suggests. I think it's probably about them, the people there wanting to give a message to the other parties, get on with getting these damned institutions back up and running. But it also is the moving the dial possibly in the direction of Sinn Fein's overall goal.

30:14Very good. Let's take a break.

30:21This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's coal plunges, could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

30:57They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally, and you can join a session literally at the click of a button, change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % of their first month at BetterHelp .com slash Rest Politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash Rest Politics.

31:29Welcome back to the REST's Polities from me, Alice Campbell. And me, Rory Stewart. And Rory, we talked about briefly about Chinfain there and Polities in Ireland. Very good traction for the Leo Veratka interview on leading. If people haven't heard that, just search Leo Veratka leading podcasts. REST Shok, I thought very interesting on all sorts of things and artificial intelligence on the future of healthcare, which you know is more about than most prime ministers, because he's a doctor. He's a doctor. And also, I was fascinated by what he said about how the reason why the relationship with America matters so much is because they feel that for the last decade, the UK government hasn't listened to Dublin, but they always listened to Washington and basically Ireland gets his messages now through Washington.

32:16That was a very interesting observation to me. And a lovely bit also, which I think we've talked up for on the psychology of politicians on how bitterness and paranoia plays into the mentality of it. And jealousy. And jealousy. Exactly. Now, shall we talk about the G7, which became the of a lot of me as a lensky show? Yeah. Well, a little bit before we, I wish I'd bring you in on G7, because you don't a lot of G7 stuff, but very, very quick primer for people to remember. G7 emerged predictably from a sort of meeting of a group of five countries that have been grouped with six countries. By the 1970s, became the G7.

32:51And in those days, those countries were, let's hope we're going to be able to name them. Actually, Rory, I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to create you. Okay. Well, 1973, it was a group of four, and it was a group of four finance ministers, and that was Secretary Treasury in America Schultz. Helmets Schmidt, the, from West Germany, G -Sky, Westown, from France, and Anthony Barber from the UK. And they met in Washington in the White House. They became known as the Library Group of Four, because they met in the White House Library. Later that year Schultz suggested that Japan be added, and Japan was added, and that became the group of five.

33:351974, all five members suddenly had changes in leadership of the country. As George Prompidou died, and G -Sky had his name became Prime Minister, Brant in Germany, Nixon in America, and Tanaka in Japan all had to quit because of various scandals. We had two elections in the year, and therefore, Gerald Ford, who was Nixon's successor, decided, let's move it up from finance ministers, let's have a meeting of the leaders. And how are those things logically connected? Why, why the political turmoil suddenly meant move from finance ministers to leaders? I don't, because Gerald Ford thought that the finance ministers could do so much, but they ought to be a forum where the leaders could meet in more relaxed setting than would normally be the case.

34:24And then in 75, Helmut Schmidt, he, with the French, proposed adding Italy. This was obviously trying to get more of a European input, so it became the group of six. And then in group in 1976, Harold Wilson, who had been the leader of the UK, he resigned, Jim Calam became Prime Minister, and Gerald Ford decided that he felt they needed another more experienced English speaker. Therefore, Pierre Trudeau of Canada was added and it became the group of seven. And just remind people, it's Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the United States, as well as the EU. And at that date when you're talking about these were the seven largest economies in the world, and not just the seven largest economies, they were about 70 % of global GDP.

35:14I know. What is it now about 30? Yeah, and now we're down to about 30%. And and now of course, the countryside, China and India are in the top seven, but are not turning up at the G7. And this is one of the big question marks. So it's gone from being representing the seven largest economies in the world, and 70 % of the world economy, to now presenting itself as as an excuse for not including China primarily, as representing a gathering of major powers with Western values. And of course, for many years, Russia, for several years, Russia was added, it became a G8. And that was something you guys did, right?

35:49That was something that you did on the planet. I think they're very first one was, I think it joined the group for the first time in 97, which was in Denver. I don't remember Yeltsin, yes, he was at that. And I think that they got kicked out a few years ago, 2014 invasion of Crimea. Yeah. Exactly. But also you mentioned India there. So Modi was at this G7, and so was Lula from Brazil, and so was Albanese, and there were others who, so what's happening is that it's sort of evolving into something different. And Gordon Brown was very much in favor, I know of. He was very focused on the G20s, or the G20 was a much more important body.

36:27So I think it will evolve. It's funny last night, when I knew we were going to talk about this, I had a quick flick through my diaries to look at some of the G7s I went to, and sort of interesting. If I give you the highlights, most European summits, I can remember some pretty serious policy stuff. But if my highlight of the first one in Denver, the two highlights, the first was Northern Ireland was totally our preoccupation, and it was actually, I remember trying to persuade Bill Clinton to go out and do a doorstep, and it really pissed off his team that I got him to go out and do a doorstep with Mike Bronson of ITN.

37:01But the other highlight was the fact that Chuck Barry was there. That was big. Then we had the, we were then the UK was the chair of the next one. That was in Birmingham. And what I remember about that one, the first was the Frank Sinatra died. The second was a story that we've talked about before. The Japanese prime minister Hashimoto decided he wanted a said the good luck message to Kenny Dalglish, because Newcastle and I during the Cup Final. The next thing I remember was Boris Yeltsin at a dinner being very much strong opinions in Russian, but he had this very meek interpreter who spoke incredibly softly.

37:47So Yeltsin would be shouting at Borelig, and then the interpreter would be trying to translate the shouting at Borelig, but nobody could hear what she was saying, because he was shouting so loud the over the top. No, he was just as she was in order, if you, unless you were sort of, I'm sure Yeltsin could hear what she was saying, but nobody else could. So the poor man, none of you had any idea what he was talking about. So he was waiting to get your reactions to his rant, and he was getting nothing back. Well, people, people, I remember Bill Clinton, I've ever Tony Blair, at one point, just mowling the word madhouse to Bill Clinton, who loved all that stuff.

38:22He just thought it was hysterical. And in the other really funny moment that that one was Bill Clinton, the somebody in the UK protocol team said that one of the worst things about having to have the was that somebody's job virtually full -time was to go around, take removing statements from all the flowers that were on display. So like the dinner table, all the flowers, the stamens, when you were arriving at the sort of red carpet, we were lying with flowers, and people had removed the stamens. And I said, why are they doing that? It's because Clinton's allergic to the stamens of flowers. So I said to, one of the sort of downtime bits, and I said to Bill Clinton, he said, God, you must cause a lot of trouble around the world with this stamens allergy.

39:02And he says, it's bullshit, it's not true. Everywhere I go in the world, it's in the protocol notes, Bill Clinton is allergic to the stamens of flowers. So that was that was Birmingham. Then there was Cologne, and what I remember from Cologne was that Yeltson was ill. And I also remember Syrac going into a complete rant about Newvelle cuisine. How he hated the fact that you got these big plates with silver platters on top of them. And when the platters were removed, there was this tidy portion of food there. And was that not a French invention? It may well have been, but it was not one that was appreciated by the French tissue.

39:41Japan, the next one in Japan, I'm going to read your line from my diary here where you like this. This was in Okinawa. I do remember swimming in the sea. So at one point, we left for the G8 to palis up the road from the hotel. Clinton was late because of the MEPP, Middle East Peace Process Tours. Shereded in bother, Shereq arrived last, and in the end, TB was in hysterics, and it was possibly the most pointless meeting he had ever attended, in live and only by Shereq's extraordinary rudeness to Larry Summers, the American Secretary of the Treasury. And the next day, Saturday, July 22, TB over breakfast.

40:17In eight presidential suites in eight five -star hotels, there are currently eight leaders asking eight Sherpas and eight press secretaries, what the hell are we all doing here? And I have no memory of anything that we actually discussed in that one. Then there was Genoa, which became Burlusconi, which was in charge of that one. And that was where the anti -clobealization protests started, since when they all had to move to safer places. So now, and then we come to the one that is the I come from grief in Scotland, as you know, and it was Glanegal's 2005. So it was a big event for grief. It's the biggest thing that ever happened in our neighborhood.

40:57And actually, it was the moment when G7 has been quite useful. That's when it pushed ahead with its debt relief, which was a huge move, and led to almost 100 % debt relief for many countries in Sub -Saharan Africa. Unfortunately, we'll probably have to get there again pretty soon, because a lot of countries are now heavily indebted. I remember George Bush as well, but using the G7 as part of his push on AIDS and antivirals and all that stuff. That's right. It's an amazing American programme, PEPFA, and then everyone getting in behind that one. Oh, George, every Bush is really extraordinary bipartisan achievement on AIDS.

41:33And then I guess it comes from, it's again, sort of 2018 Canada, where Trump starts throwing his weight around, demanding that Russia is put back in again, and you get this real stand -off with essentially with Angela Merkel saying the man's being ridiculous. And again, he disrupts it at the following year too. There's that very famous picture. I think it was at G7. Was it when Trump sort of sitting behind a desk looking like a sort of spoiled child and Merkel and Macron and others, sort of, they've almost got pleading looks on their faces. He refused to sign the economic communicate for the first time in 2018.

42:09I mean, it's very odd thing. I mean, I went only to the development minister's part of it when I was in the cabinet, which was that year it was in France, so we were all went off to Paris. I was served something that looks suspiciously like New Vel cuisine sitting around the table with a lot of G7 development ministers. And we were trying to focus on Ebola, but I completely failed to get the other ministers to commit the money to Ebola in the way that I wanted and ended up only really getting the commitment by taking the head of the American navigation head of USAID, Mark Green for a walk along the sand.

42:42It is interesting that these I mean, they attract so much global media attention and there's a lot of work goes into them. The point about Sherpas, these are the people that are kind of constantly in dialogue with each other, usually civil servants, but sometimes politicians. And they're essentially planning their planning the outcome. So the next G7 will already be in planning and Kishida, the Japanese prime minister, he's you know, he's been spending much of the last year preparing for this summit, chose Hiroshima because his main ambition for the meeting was to push for global nuclear disarmament.

43:17That was the whole point of this G7. And of course, Zelensky, I mean, really was the only show in town and therefore nuclear disarmament as I mean, were you even aware that that was the main theme of the conference? I think I mean, it's only from here in Japan, there's a lot of focus on the fact that it happened in a place where an untold number of people died, whether it was 140 ,000 or 300 ,000, we still don't really know how many people were killed by that atomic bomb. But yeah, the symbolism of that is very, very clear to people and it's very, very important to Japanese political culture, but you're right, it became and felt like very much two things.

43:53Firstly, a very focused on Zelensky and secondly, from where I'm speaking in Japan, it was particularly being perceived by the Chinese as a very hostile act. And I mean, this is where the G20 is so different because the G20 includes China, Russia, Saudi Arabia. It's got a very, very different tone to the G7 in terms of the G7 increasingly sort of standing for the sort of minority, Western tradition in a world where the bricks, Brazil, Russia, India, China, now have a larger economy combined than the G7. Yeah, yeah. I mean, I wonder where they will evolve. Let's talk about South Korea, Australia, you know, becoming added to it, but because I think part of the thinking is that they're liberal democracies as well as market economies, that's sort of part of the thinking.

44:40But it could look quite outdated pretty quickly, I think. Very good. Well, finally, Japan. Yeah, tell us what you're doing in Japan. So here I am in Japan. I spent the day at Isijingu, which is an extraordinary shrine reaching back 1600 years and where the main buildings are reconstructed from scratch every 20 years. And one of the arguments for doing it is it keeps the living craft traditional life that people are relatively confident that the buildings you're looking at are the same buildings you were looking at in the seventh century paradoxically because there are only 20 years old. Because I don't think I fully understand that.

45:19So they are 20 -year -old buildings that are exact, exact replica of their predecessor. And the great points about doing it every 20 years is you never lose touch with the craft tradition. You can be certain that you're remaking it and exactly the same techniques and technology that it was done but in the last time round. And it's an extraordinary place because it is at the heart of the emperor and the heart of shintoism, which is not quite clear whether it really is a religion. I mean, it's a profound sense of Japanese spirituality and attachment to nature and rocks that preceded Buddhism. But also part of a Japanese religious psyche which doesn't really distinguish, Japanese friend of mine was joking today that many Japanese are born shinto or sort of as it were baptized shinto, marious Christians and dyes Buddhists without really feeling a very strong need to identify.

46:19And when I asked whether there was a conversion to shintoism, I realized there was a translation issue and certainly the Japanese in the room said we don't really recognize the notion of conversion that religions doesn't feel like that to them. In a way that in the West we very much feel either you're a believer or you're not a believer. But in Japan it seems to be that you can live in a sort of suspended ambiguity longer. They do good temples don't they? They do great temples, extraordinary temples, extraordinary food. But Japanese politics we've talked about a little bit. I mean at the moment our current leader is from the LDP which is this party that dominated Japanese politics.

46:59And really in a sense is the products of the American occupation after the Second World War. So Japan was defeated, the Americans came in, they rewrote the constitution. And then there was a very strange moment in the 1940s, 1947 where the Americans panicking over the rise of communist China changed direction particularly in Japan and reversed their course on unions, on breaking up the conglomerates on war criminals and essentially and they did pretty similar things I think with the German security service in West Germany began allowing backends and pretty right wing figures who had been associated with war crimes during the Second World War into keep political positions.

47:40And this created a world in which Japanese politics has really been dominated largely since the Second World War by families who are often old samurai families many of them coming from one very small part of Japan. These are all people who go to Tokyo University. The current leader in Japan is the son of a politician, the grandson of a politician his cousins and minister, his uncle was prime minister and his uncle's father and grandfather was so ministers. So getting onto the bus leaving the temple, the young Japanese woman just said to me, we are completely fed up with these people. They are all the same.

48:13These are it's a narrow political family. It doesn't represent us at all. They all feel like the same people and it doesn't really matter which parties empower, but in particular the LDP which is back and again has had a stranglehold on Japanese politics for 60, 70 years surviving the most unbelievable corruption scandals. Yeah, the answer is that the number of political parties in Japan is phenomenal. It's just that many of them have sort of no point nothing percent of the vote. But if you look up a full list of them, I think my favorite is probably the party to realize a bright Japan with a female emperor.

48:55They got not 0 .0 to 2 % at the last time. But this is really important and the research really important is that there's a real problem with the imperial succession. So in Japan, the way the Americans wrote the constitution, the Japanese royal family are only allowed to marry either other members of the royal family or members of the aristocracy, but the Americans also abolish the aristocracy. So there's nobody really that they can marry. So the Japanese royal family shrunk to about 10 people. And if a woman in the Japanese royal family marries a commoner, they cease to be royal. So currently in an obsession where the emperor has a daughter, and it's impossible for the daughter to marry anyone because there's nobody left in the royal family that she can marry and she can't marry anyone else to remain royal.

49:40Why did they only get 10 ,200 and 60 years? It's very unfortunate because the one who wrote out of this is to allow women to take over his empress which currently doesn't seem to be possible. So there's a big crisis. And this is a royal family that goes back 130 generations. I've just looked up before this. The ones that got 0 .0 % were the wake up the Japanese party. They sound like fun. Parties to take over US military base in Okinawa to Tokyo party. That's another big issue and has been for a long time. I know they have huge issues, but they all have these parties. And I guess that these parties are a response to the frustration that the woman on your bus is reflecting that the parties at the top are just the same old crew doing the same old stuff.

50:27But even at the top by the way, you've got a constitutional democratic party, you've got a communist party, you've got a social democratic party, you've got the NHK party, you've got the, here's another one for you, where the happiness realization party. That's good. Well, I vote for that. I vote for that. But the children's party got 50 ,662 votes. The metaverse party got 19 ,000 votes and the smile party got 5 ,409 votes. Yeah, I've got to give that's not very many. Anybody interested? We can send some links in our literature that we distribute, but maybe a figure to really look at to understand post -war Japanese politics very clearly.

51:06The great figure is a man called Tanako Kakuiya, who completely dominated Japanese politics, became prime minister in the 1970s, stepped down in the most colossal corruption scandals. He lived in something called the Mejuro Palace. He was a construction magnet, and he would hand out 100 million yen bundles to other politicians, and he ran his entire own faction in the LDP. And despite these various corruption scandals and judicial procedures, he continued to dominate right the way through to the 1980s. So I'll send out the whole link because to understand how this man from a relatively hard -scrabble background on the frozen north managed to break into this world of samurai elite politicians, and then, despite the corruption scandals, continued to run this LDP faction of the inside as well.

51:56It's also a sign of conservative party. The current leader comes from something called the Kuchikai faction or the Pond faction, which is the faction, which is, I guess, more of the sort of one nation Tory tradition we'd say in the UK. And he's meant to be more progressive, more friendly towards welfare, more friendly towards the environment. So in a way, I suppose, if a party has dominance for too long, and maybe this is true of the conservative party in Britain, you begin representing the public by factions breaking apart within the party. Well, they do have a pretty good, they have pretty speedy turn around of their prime minister down there.

52:33And I think that is partly a consequence of the factionalism. But Japan, generally, they've been pretty stagnant for a long time, but actually, you can only see the Japanese seem in a pretty good place in the moment. Well, I did, it's interesting, isn't it? So there's been some positive recent stuff, but on the big scale, the big scale is Japan grew like a rocket from the Second World War to 1989, became the second largest economy in the world. And when we think about the current anxieties about China in the United States, in the 1980s, it was all about Japan, and there were all those novels produced about how the Japanese were going to take over the world, and everybody's very worried about Japanese nationalism.

53:10And then suddenly, 1989, 1990, everything ground to a halt, and the Japanese economy basically has not grown since 1990. I mean, that was the period, 1989, the Imperial Palace in Tokyo, the land of the Imperial Palace was worth more than Manhattan, and Tokyo was worth more than the entire mass of the United States. It was this extraordinary since when property price, I think, some areas of Tokyo, are still 10 % of what they were in 1989. So, but there's stock markets just at a record high. Okay. And the barks are half the way. Mr. Buffett. Yes. largest foreign destination of investment side of the US is now currently Japan, making industries returning to Japan.

53:51So there, you know, I think there are things they can point to. I thought it was the other interesting thing that came out of the G7 was the extent to which the Prime Minister Kishida clearly was wanting to push the other leaders into a pretty strongly rhetorically at least robust position on China. I noticed that Rishi Sunei, in his press conference, was very much sort of, he's obviously drawn to void questions about Tsua Le Brava one, but he was very focused on that sort of very tough message on China. And that relationship between China and Japan, which as you say is going to define the region in so many ways, but it was interesting to me that they were using the opportunity, not least with these other leaders there, like Modi, like Lula, to say we have got a real problem and it's on our doorstep and you guys need to be more seized even than you are.

54:41And of course, that's something that Modi is going to respond to well because I think there's opportunities for India in presenting itself as the great growing superpowers that counterbalance the China. As Leo Reifke said, China's growth is in many ways defined our world in the last couple of decades and it might be India in the next couple of decades. Very good. Okay, well maybe something on which to end on those wise words, which can be listened to on the podcast leading. Good to talk to you soon. Speak soon, bye bye.

From the publisher

How was the G7 formed, and what is the point of it today? What will the consequences be for Suella Braverman following her speeding scandal? How does religion influence politics?

Join Alastair and Rory as they answer these questions, plus a discussion on the history and politics of Japan, what happened at NatCon, and why Bill Clinton is never in the same room as a flower stamen...

TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up.

Instagram:
@restispolitics

Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics

Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen

Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
133. Suella's speeding, Japan in focus, and what's the point of the G7?The Rest Is Politics · 56 min
Listen in VO