In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 179
Episode Title Is Keir Starmer ready to be Prime Minister?
Episode Description In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss various political issues including whether the Labour Party is ready for government, the situation of the SNP, and the impact of AI deepfake videos on elections, particularly referencing events in Slovakia.
---
Key Discussions
- Current Affairs in Israel and Gaza
- Ongoing Conflict: The hosts discuss the escalating violence in Israel and Gaza, noting the heavy toll on civilians.
- Reports of over 1,000 Israeli deaths and extreme attacks in Gaza.
- Significant implications for military tactics and humanitarian conditions in both regions.
- The challenge of balancing military responses with civilian safety.
- Social Media's Role: The spread of unverified information and allegations complicates public understanding of the conflict.
- Labour Party Conference Insights
- Keir Starmer's Leadership: Acknowledgement of Starmer's growth and effectiveness as Labour leader.
- His speech at the conference marks an important moment for the party, indicating a shift towards more concrete policy ideas.
- Focus on five key missions: growth, the environment, NHS waiting times, crime, and addressing class disparities.
- Public Reception: Starmer's conference address received positive reactions, showcasing a revitalized energy within the party compared to previous years.
- Political Strategies and Messaging
- Starmer vs. Sunak:
- Discussion of the different approaches in their speeches; Starmer's detailed approach versus Sunak's focus on specific policies, which were criticized for lacking coherence.
- Emphasis on how both leaders are navigating the political landscape amidst significant national issues.
- Deepfake Technology and Elections
- AI Deepfake Risks: The potential for AI-generated fake content to manipulate public opinion is explored.
- Examples include a misleading audio clip of Starmer that circulated before the episode was recorded.
- The impact of fake news in Slovakia’s recent elections highlights the necessity for vigilance against misinformation.
- Rising Threat: Campbell and Stewart express concerns regarding the future of political discourse, noting historical precedents and the dangers of AI in elections.
- SNP's Decline and Labour's Rise in Scotland
- Recent By-Elections: Labour's success in a recent SNP stronghold signals a shift in voter sentiment.
- Analysis of the SNP's challenges amid scandals and internal strife.
- Future Prospects: Discussion on how current dynamics might shape upcoming elections, with Labour potentially regaining ground due to dissatisfaction with the SNP.
- Global Humanitarian Crises
- Tragedy in Afghanistan: The episode briefly addresses the humanitarian disaster in Afghanistan following recent earthquakes.
- Calls for international support and cash assistance to aid affected populations.
---
Key Takeaways
- Starmer's Growing Influence: Keir Starmer is increasingly seen as a viable leader with a clear vision for Labour, marking a departure from the party’s recent past.
- Deepfake Concerns: The rise of AI technology poses significant threats to democratic processes, necessitating robust responses from all political parties.
- Changing Political Landscape in Scotland: Labour may be reclaiming its position in Scotland as political tides shift, particularly in light of SNP challenges.
---
Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* offers valuable insights into current UK politics, the dynamics of leadership change, and the implications of technology on political discourse. Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart provide a nuanced analysis that balances immediate concerns with strategic foresight.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Thanks for listening to The Rest Is Politics, sign up to The Rest Is Politics plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter, join our members' chat room and gain early access to live show tickets. Just go to TheRestisPolitics .com, that's TheRestisPolitics .com. This episode is brought to you by Sky, where you can watch the brand new series of political stroller, Cobra Rebellion. This is, if my counting is correct, series three. Ah, yes. Robert Carlisle, with a Y, is back as Prime Minister. I'm sure you're going to prove it's a Scott in number 10, which is what we want. That's what we want.
0:34Everybody. That's always good. Yeah, absolutely. So, this, this series, Prime Minister Robert Sutherland, facing more challenges than ever before. So, his popularity is plummeting. There's a new controversial police protest bill. His administration's plunged into chaos when an environmental demonstration ends with grave consequences. That's pretty familiar stuff. And as the inquest into the protest gets underway, the Prime Minister and his government begin to realise that all is not as it seems. With his daughter potentially in broir with a group behind it all, his interest in the case isn't purely political.
1:05The Rebellion will push Sutherland to the edge and force him to question what he's personally willing to sacrifice in order to stay in power. So, someone should appeal to both of us. I must admit, I did at times when I was working in number 10, worry what my daughter might get up to, but thankfully she went down the comedy route. Now, if you haven't watched Cobra before, it is a really dramatic political thriller. You do get that sense of being behind the scenes of a government that's in crisis, imploding. And you go right into the decision room. And of course, that's the place that you and I both had our experience of being.
1:41I can think about Cobra, which by the way people should understand all it means is cabinet office briefing room A. It sounds like it's sort of name after a snake, but it's as simple as that. But what comes to mind with me, 9 -11? We use it, obviously, as you can imagine, for a lot of things. But it was actually very useful during the floods as a way of getting all the operational data up and the weather information up and all the statistics up and making sure the police were under fire services were there, et cetera. Foot and mouth. That was quite a few Cobra situations. So, Alice, are you impressed by the cast?
2:13What were your thoughts on the cast? It's got lots of great actors. Very British. Victoria Hamilton is the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff, Jane Horricks plays the Secretary of State for Defence. David Aig is the Foreign Secretary. They're on top of really big issues, environmental terrorism, foreign corruption. So it is, I think, it's fair to say, one of the most popular shows that Skyve done. Well, on today's show, we're going to be talking about what it's really like to attend a Cobra meeting, which you and I have done on many occasions, and how to manage a full -blown crisis. So there you go.
2:44Keep listening to hear that and be sure to watch Series 3, Cobra, Rebellion, all episodes available on Sky and Now.
2:59Welcome to the rest of politics with me, Alistair Campbell, and me, Rory Stewart. And we're going to be talking about the Labour Party conference. We've recorded a bit later than usual for this part of the podcast. So as we could talk properly about a keyestime of speech. But I think we should start Rory with continuing pretty awful developments in Israel and Gaza. We just, in case listeners missed it, we did a podcast, we recorded podcasts about 24 hours ago. Judging by the reaction, we seem to get the tone and the balance about right, but it's very, very, very difficult to talk about this. And a lot of even worse stuff has come out today.
3:38I mean, we're talking about children that have been beheaded. We're talking about, I think we're now over 1000 for the Israeli death toll. The hostage situation is really complicating matters for the Israelis and how they handled it. And of course, Gaza now being subject to a level of a military attack that it's frankly never seen, even its long and bloody history. So how do you see things at the moment? Well, we're talking later on Tuesday evening. I was just listening to least two set who says that they reckon that they found 1500 Hamas fighters bodies who would have been killed in the course of the assault.
4:13There's a real problem on social media, which is that there are incredible allegations flying around on both sides of atrocities. Most of the reputable news agencies are being pretty cautious about repeating them because I think there's not always the evidence clearly. I mean, it was a horrifying terrorist attack and clearly the reprisals have involved a lot of innocent civilians being killed partly because it's very difficult to move around in Gaza. There was another strange thing that just happened. We're talking about half past four UK time, but five o 'clock Israel time. There have been a warning put out by Hamas that they were going to attack Ashkelom and they told all the inhabitants to leave before they launched a missile attack.
4:58In doing so, they were referring to the fact that the Israeli military will announce that they want people to leave before they launch an attack. Then an hour and a half later, it rained a very, very large number of missiles on Ashkelom. It seems as though Israel has now cut off electricity and water supply to Gaza. Now, as we mentioned in the podcast, almost all the electricity, water and telecommunications for Gaza for 2 .2 million people on that strip along the coast comes from Israel. So cutting that off, it's going to be very, very difficult. And as you know, you can run hospitals and central services, maybe off generators, but lack of electricity is very dangerous in many ways and lack of drinking water even more so.
5:45I thought it was quite interesting this morning, listen to James Cleveley, the Foreign Secretary. I mean, clearly, both the government and the Labour Party are both saying we will support Israel's right to defend itself, but he did clearly just use the word proportionate. And I wonder if there are fears that the pressure to do something really, really beyond anything that's ever happened before is there. I thought William Hague, your old party's former leader and former Foreign Secretary had an interesting piece in the Times today. The headlight was Hamas has set a trap that Israel must avoid.
6:19The conventional wisdom does seem to be forming. And I know no more about this than, you know, what I read and what I see and occasional conversation with people, but the conventional wisdom forming that this is in part related to the sense and the fear that Iran had, that what Biden was doing and trying to push Saudis and Israel closer together towards some sort of recognition and some sort of getting along. That this was there and Hamas's way of putting a stop to that. The other thing I think is was reflecting on, because this is now going to consume American foreign policy and security policy so much, is that there is probably a pretty difficult read across for Ukraine as well, which is why Putin is probably welcoming what's going on.
7:07Yes. I weirdly asked ChatGBT4 hypothetically what it thought would happen if an attack like this happened hypothetically because it stopped training in 2021, so it shouldn't be aware that this had happened. And it was astonishingly accurate in predicting the Israeli reaction, the fears about Iran, the way in which this would be perceived. And I think the only thing that made me sense is that what Hamas was doing to connect to your point about when in Hague was almost certainly expecting the kind of reaction that they've got and that their objectives are of course to draw the world's attention to Israel -Palestine, which of course has happened.
7:49Their objective will be to provoke a very aggressive Israeli military response and therefore get the international community more involved in trying to mediate. And as you say to stop the peace talks with Saudi Arabia, so if you'd step back from the terrorist attack to kind of the strategic objectives, that seems to be. But it's meanwhile, I mean, as you say, the ripple of consequences for everybody. I mean, these well over a thousand lives killed by this terrorist attack, touch people in every dimension, almost everybody that I know in the Jewish community in London has relatives or friends who are directly affected by this.
8:25Somebody pointed out that, you know, compared to the size of the Israeli population, it's only 10 million people. It's proportionately much larger than 9 -11. Oh, absolutely, as a proportionate, it's horrific. And now, I mean, I just can't even imagine what it's like living in Gaza at the moment. There was a very dramatic piece of reporting by one of the correspondents there who was reporting live justice. These attacks landed, you know, really quite near to them. And when you see those aerial shots of Gaza, it's kind of, it's how to imagine where you'd go. And at this point about hostages is, I mean, the hostages always complicate this sort of situation, which is why they appear to have taken so many.
9:06But I was checking out the facts. When one of his previous times as Prime Minister Netanyahu 2011, he traded 1 ,027 Palestinian prisoners, including 280 who were serving life sentences to get one Israeli soldier back. Yeah. And the problem is that, of course, once you've done that, this is what we'll be expected again. I mean, some of the CNN interviews, some of the fatter people are saying it's fine, just release every Palestinian prisoner and we'll release these hostages. So it's, no, it's, it's terrifying. You're at the Labour Party conference. I can see behind you a sort of amazing chart. Is that to do with the conference?
9:45I've actually, I've raised down from Liverpool to Cheltenham where I'm speaking. So that is a banner for the Cheltenham Literature Festival where I'm speaking later this evening and you're going to be here interviewing Theresa May. That's right. Yeah. I'll be interviewing Theresa May, which having had some practice with you and the leading podcast. But I have been in Liverpool and it was, it was really very interesting. As I said to you last week, I am a bit of a Labour Party conference o -phob. I wasn't particularly looking forward to it, but there was a, it's hard to put in words, the kind of energy that was there and the sort of excitement and it wasn't just kind of Labour Party people, it was business people, it was media people.
10:32You really did feel that there was something quite significant happening and Keirstheim's speech was, I'd say, without a doubt, I mean, I'm pretty rough critic of speeches and, you know, he'd be the first to admit, he's not, he's not Barack Obama, but that was the best conference speeches made by a long, long way. It was very interesting to talk to the people who've been at both conferences, be they journalists, be they business people, charities and so forth. They really were saying, look, last week felt like they were just tired and out of it and this feels like this remarkable energy. It's a strange thing.
11:09I remember the early Cameron conferences, that sense that all this sort of lemming thing, heard mentality, all the businesses suddenly flock in one direction or another. People remembered that was true just before Labour came in. Did conference speeches match for a bit less than they did in the past? I mean, there may be not covered. I haven't seen quite as much coverage in the media, as you would have got. It was at a conference, wasn't it, the Tony Blair did that famous clause for a moment or have I got that wrong? No, that was obviously right. That was his first conference as leader. Now, with that look, what this conference is happening clearly in the shadow of events in the Middle East, so it won't be the lead story on the news tonight, I wouldn't think, whereas normally a Labour or Tory leaders conference speech will dominate the media.
11:53So it won't get this sort of cut through in the way that a conference speech leader speech might normally do, but I actually think more important than that in a way is that the content, what I sense from it, and I think we have to kind of acknowledge here that Kirstner has been perhaps more effective as a leader than we've given credit for, because what I saw today, you know, we've talked often or I've talked often about these three stages of his leadership, decontaminate the Labour Brand Post Corbin, show the choice of unfit to govern and then set out the alternative. What you got a sense of today, it wasn't a manifesto, there wasn't the detail, there'll still be people saying where's the detail, but in terms of what he would like to be able to do as Prime Minister, and he took the five missions that you and I've talked about before on growth, on the environment and energy, waiting lists, crime, law and order, and also the shattering the class ceiling.
12:48And you could see the message to the party about where he now wants the campaigning to be on those, a lot about housing, building 1 .5 million new homes on the energy thing. I mean, it was, it was interesting to see the audience react as positively to him, essentially saying he thinks Suneak has taken a very wrong turn in winding back on, on climate, and he's going to go in the other direction as it were. Just quickly on that, is he actually, I did read the speech, but I didn't, he didn't actually say he was going to reinstate the 2030 target city, which is disappointing in a way, because that's quite important for investment.
13:22Put it this way, he certainly didn't row back from that, and he said, whereas the Suneak is rowing back, he wants to speed ahead. And I think what it was, it felt like a really important chapter in this third stage of that strategy. And although he did quite a lot of the kind of Tory bashing that you expect at a Labour party conference, there wasn't that much of it. And what there was was about signalling a very different approach to how you do politics, and the values of the Labour Party. And given these not the most natural, great or utter, it was quite something to see several sort of standing evations in the middle of the speech.
14:01So, Rory, did you get my email? I sent you what I'm defining as the dear Rory section of the speech. So you sent me an email which goes, so if you are a conservative voter who despairs of this, if you look in horror at the descent of your party into the murky waters of populism and conspiracy with no argument for economic change, if you feel our country needs a party that conserves, that fights for our union, our environment, the root of law, family life, the careful bond between this generation and the next, then let me tell you, Britain already has one, and you can join it. It's this Labour Party.
14:38So Rory, come on. That's a cheeky moment, isn't it? What's your answer? Well, I think I think I needed a lot about it, did a lot of Theresa May's respect and service. Yeah, you know, I think all that stuff, I love love the stuff about the union, the environment, root of law, really, really excited about that, conserving anti -popular stuff. Not quite sure we can see yet the argument for economic change, but amazing. One of the big coups, wasn't it, was getting Mark Carney to endorse Rachel Reeves. And was that just tell us a little bit, let's step back for a moment, because we understand you'd love to speech, but give us a bit of the sort of planning around that.
15:13How do you think that worked? Would they have known for some weeks, they would have sort of held that back, and then how would you have handled the media strategy? Because I noticed in the newspapers this morning, that was the sort of big story, Mark Carney endorses Rachel Reeves. Just for listen, Mark Carney, obviously former governor of the Bank of England actually brought in by George Osborne, a conservative chancellor, so the Tories will be feeling pretty bitter about the fact that this guy, they appointed. Not only brought in by George Osborne, George Osborne sort of chased him to the ends of the earth and persuaded him, I think Mark Carney did find his experience during the whole Brexit, Johnson period, pretty horrific in terms of not dealing with a serious government.
15:51And then he'd gone by the time of trust, but I think Andrew Bailey his successor found exactly the same experience. So I'm guessing they'll have had that up there sleeves for a while. And what I'm just sort of going to, I mean, speculate for a little bit, give us a sense if you were doing it. I'm not saying this is what they did, but let's imagine this was 96, and you had a former Tories associated governor of the Bank of England. What would you do? You would have started a few weeks before reaching out saying, do you think you might be prepared to actually endorse us at conference? Go on, talk us through the steps of this.
16:22I suspect what, what, I suspect what may have happened, Rory, is that they were looking for endorses. Yep. They were looking for people in all sorts of fields that they could perhaps put on stage or have introduced us videos or, for example, last year they had Gary Neville, the football, ex -footballer, talking to Keir Starmer on stage, that kind of thing. It just sort of adds a little sort of stardust, I guess. But I think for this one, this will have been, I suspect, the development of a relationship over time between Richard Reeves and Mark Carney and Mark Carney, or possibly Keir as well. And then at some point, somebody would have gulped very hard and said, what do you think about actually going the whole way and endorsing us?
17:05And he might have said, what, do you mean actually going to Liverpool and the sitting in the conference? Well, if you feel a bit uncomfortable about that, we could maybe record a video, we could play it before Rachel speaks. What do you think of that? And he clearly felt sufficiently motivated to do that. I do think it was quite a coup. And I'll tell you the other thing that I thought was remarkable in the, I mentioned these several standing evations. One of them was in response to that bit that you've just read out. No, I've been at Lake Party conferences in the past where you almost said, you know, what do you mean we want to get Tories voting for us?
17:35You know what? Tories coming in here. I saw something the last night who's part of Keir Starmer's very, very close team. And I said, you know, is it all kind of done yet? Because our process, is anybody who's read my diaries or no, we used to write the speeches till the last minute. Yeah, there was even a time where Tony was literally scribbling on it as he was walking up the steps to the stage. This one has apparently been locked down as they called it for several days. And they thought they might have to change it after soon after speech. They didn't change it other than to kind of reflect one or two things that soon I could set.
18:09So he seems to have sort of, you know, decided very early on what he's going to say. He's got, he's got this guy Alan Lockie, who's a, who's I think one of the main speech writers, who's, I think clearly he's got Keir's voice. And that's really important in somebody who's what we call holds the pen because he's got loads of people feeding and things that they think they should be in there. But then you need somebody who's holding the pen. And I thought there were some really, really, really nice, nice touches. And there was a line, which again, I thought my appeal to you, politics should tread, tread lightly on people's lives.
18:45I thought that was quite nice. He was essentially saying there that, you know, this is about being an enabling government rather than, you know, or back to sort of status. And I thought he had, for somebody who's not a natural writer, unlike David Lamy, who yesterday you got the whole place going with this amazing sort of peroration. But Keir had several kind of these rolling oratorical moments where he's going through several lines of a speech, the clapping starts and he just keeps going and the clapping gets louder. So the feeling in the hall, very, very, very warm, quite sort of dramatic in terms of people, I think thinking this was a big moment.
19:22And I think in strategic terms, it was. So I like to Rishi Sunak's conference speech. I thought it was also very much in line with his personality. It was intelligent, it was provocative, it was clear. You got a sense that he believed what he was talking about. It wasn't very, I mean, it was a different style, wasn't it? It wasn't very kind of rich on oratory. It was very much, I've decided that HS2, the maths doesn't stack up. I'm going to cancel it. I'm going to do the thing on smoking. I'm going to do this thing on back, Laurie. But it was interesting because, I think as you said to me, you got the sense that these were things that Rishi Sunak personally cared about.
20:04It didn't, if once it didn't feel as though there was the kind of gap between what he was saying and what he was, what he believed. What I didn't feel in this speech was there was a kind of intellectual coherence to that. I didn't see how it all sort of hung together. Whereas I think what ran through Keir's speech today was this, I mean, there's the conference slogan, you know, get Britain's future back. But this sort, you know, he really was being setting out the missions and then going through them quite methodically in terms of policy. It's a good contrast, isn't it? What Rishi Sunak did also shows the risks of being very clear about policy.
20:37I mean, Keir Summer didn't actually really say in that speech exactly, you know, where he was going to put the tax rate, how he was going to generate this growth, how he was going to pay for the NHS or any of that stuff. I think the only major major new announcement, there were bits and pieces, but I think the new towns, the commitment to building new to several new towns, I think that's the first time I've heard that in a speech. It's interesting, it's provocative, but that's an example of the risk that any of them run that as soon as they say something clear, they get into trouble because there will be many people like me saying, whoa, wait a second, what's happening with the green belt?
21:09It's all very well talking about the grey belt, but where's the line going to be? Once we start chipping in, where's this going to end? You know, I'd rather see the grey belt turn back into richer nature rather than the grey belt being turned into housing. So what I thought from Rishi Sunak's speech is that by taking the risk of being specific, what he really laid himself open to was then days of people digging over the numbers and attacking it, whereas probably what Keir Summer did was smarter in political terms by not being too specific. It doesn't give people too much to chew into. Yeah, because the problem with Sunak's position was that the transport stuff fell apart almost instantly.
21:44Now, there will be devil in the detail, there always is. If you remember when Keir Summer first came out with these five missions and we discussed them on the podcast, can I just say on that, I think fives too many. I really do. I know you've just managed to memorize them and you made it through them. I literally, I think I've got quite a good memory. I wouldn't be able to get them back. I've kind of got NHS... Go, give energy. What was the fifth then? The fifth is the aspiration, shattering the class ceiling. That's sort of stopping these etonians like Nicholas Coleridge saying the only people in the world do matter etonians.
22:16Remember that one? Yeah, yeah. That was a good, good moment. That was really good. So, no, but I think what they're doing is, I think this will move to something closer to what is, I hate the phrase, but you know what I mean, a retail political offer. Right. What's in it for me? There'll be something in relation to all of those areas. But I thought there were just, what I liked about his speech, it fitted with this sense of sort of solid, pragmatic, strategic, both he and Rachel Reeves and several of the others who've spoken this week, they have improved so much in the job that they're doing and that feeds confidence as well.
22:54Can we ask the cheek cheeky question, did you contribute to that speech in any way, Alster? Sorry. Did you contribute to that speech in any way, Alster? No. In any way, did you have an opportunity to look at the speech and give a bit of advice and feedback? Rory, this is like me asking you where you are right now. No, no, I did not. I know Keir Starmer and I know people who work for him and I know people who've been working on the speech and I may or may not talk to them from, if I do talk to them from time to time. But did I have the kind of role, anything like the kind of role I used to have with Tony Blair, et cetera?
23:32No, I did not. And I think the other thing I'd say is that this did feel very much like his speech. They're bloody long these speeches, aren't they? Richie Cinex was an hour. This one I read and I was like, oh, I thought I'd got there and then I was reading more and more and more. You know, we like depth. We like a bit of depth. You don't think in the modern world they might give slightly shorter speeches. Does anyone actually really want to listen to an hour -long speech? I mean, why do they do that? But they both do it. It's not a Christian Keir Starmer. It's obviously the tradition where she Cinex did the same thing.
24:02I think these speeches are very, very important. You said earlier, are they more or less important than they were. I think, and it's very interesting, when the rest of his politics put out a tweet saying that you and I were recording the podcast a bit later to take in Keir's speech, any questions, folks and any comments, the comments were overwhelmingly positive, hundreds of them. So I think a lot of people will have watched it live. It won't get massive coverage because of the Middle East, but it's a moment. What would you lose if you made it a half hour speech instead of an hour speech? You're in the you gained something.
Read the full transcript
24:29You don't think it might be a bit better at half an hour. No, it might be, but I think that what the expectation of a conference speech is that people kind of touch most of the base, most if not all of the big bases. Gotcha. And it's also it's an event. I mean, it's like, it's partly for the morale of the party. The Labour party will have left that hall tonight feeling really about boiled up, really sort of ready for the fight, thinking they've got a plan and and that's important for motivation. And look, I like I do like a long speech. I like I like a thoughtful speech. I do. And look, you and I rage at this sort of, you know, the Twitter world and all that stuff, even though we rage on the Twitter world as well as about it.
25:09But Rory, do you know, by the way, you've heard about the protest at the start where it tells you about it. Yeah. Well, you got to tap it on the stage. This guy just appeared and ran onto the stage and started to spring all this glitter all in. Can I just put in a personal update there? So my first great appearance, the conservative party conference. Great appearance. Yeah, I was, I was giving my speech and I was attacked by a man dressed in a badger suit. Ah, is that because of your hedgehog speech? I was the environment minister and we were talking about badgers and TBs and this giant badger came charging onto the side of the stage.
25:38Well, of course, your friend Theresa May had a, remember she had the guy giving her the P -45. So this guy comes on the stage and he sprinkles all this glitter and stuff over and I thought it's just stop oil, but it wasn't. It's a, and I'm worried, Rory, that you may have directly radicalised this guy because it turns out his life's mission is to fight for sortition. Citizens assembly is those sortition, which is sortition. All sortition. Well, so Citizens assembly is done by sortition, but he wants the whole parliament done by sortition. He didn't really get through his speech long enough, but Keir sort of handled it pretty well.
26:15John Prescott was trending on Twitter. Oh, was, was he trying to get out of his seat? No, he wasn't there, but people were saying, why doesn't he do what John Prescott did? But Keir, he just stood there very, very calmly. I think there will be a bit of an ink, a little bit of a sort of inquest into how the guy managed to get on there in the way that he did, but he handled it very well. What he did was he waited until the guy had been dragged off and he then said, this shows why we've got to change from being a party of protest to a party of power. No, so I believe what he was going for is exactly what I might be interested in.
26:45So PR voting system and replacing the House of Lords with a Citizens Assembly. Ah, so you're now admitting that you radicalized him. You behind the, you're asking me very personal questions about my life. I am the glitter behind the, behind the assault. Well, anyway, he handled it very well. In a funny sort of way, I think because he did handle it well. He took his jacket off because his jacket was covered in all this stuff. He made a very nice crack about his wife wearing a beautiful dress. When he did this line about, this shows we have to move from being a party of protest to a party of power.
27:18Of course, it underlined stage one of that three stage strategy. This is a change party from the Corbin era. So in a funny sort of way, I think it, it rather helped him. Maybe it was set up by Labour Party headquarters, just silly. That would be terribly silly, cool to think that you should not ruin it. And if you're going to ask me whether I had any discussions about how this should start, I'm just not going to go there, okay? Very good. Now, as you have heard at the beginning of today's show, this episode of the RESTIS Politics is sponsored by Sky. And at the start of the show, you'll have heard us based talking about the brand new series of Cobra Rebellion, which is Sky's political thriller, about a government in crisis.
27:57It's one of those TV shows that ends up being quite prescient because it's realistic portrayal of issues today, such as, for example, the high -speed rail line, which they call Metro Ultraline, which is under scrutiny, maybe familiar to some of our listeners. I'm sure it is. And today, we want to talk a little bit about our own experiences of being in a Cobra meeting, Cobra, Cobra, and what it's like to be in the room during a full -blown emergency. So I suppose that it's hard what Cobra is, is the formal mechanism for crisis management in government, chaired by the Prime Minister, or in the Prime Minister's absence, the senior cabinet minister, there to bring together all the different bits of government and get on top of a crisis.
28:37Yeah. Give us your first experience of Cobra. And listen, let's just locate it, because when I did it, you'd walk down... And it was underground in one of the... Was it in a different place when you were going to Cobra meetings? Rory, I think that was information that could be deemed useful to an enemy. Well, it really took a while. One of the things that I did think is that actually it was very criticised in its early days, and it's been running right from the 70s. But by the time I got there was beginning to tighten up. I was quite impressed by the group of civil servants who staffed it. The civil contingency sector, they'd had real training in crisis management.
29:11I actually got one of them into talk to my class at Yale about how you do crisis management. And my strongest memory of it was during the days of the floods, which... Cobra, this 2015 and 2015, going on in Cobra in Yorkshire for many, many weeks, Lancashire, where they were always able to get the most up -to -date information up on the screens. We were able to get the fire service, the police around the table, and strategic communications people, the key strategic communications people, the key spending departments to make sure that we could really make decisions. So I thought it actually was one of the few cases in government where I really thought it was government done properly, properly staffed, proper committees, and it's actually how I would like to run a crisis response.
29:52Yeah, and I think that what's interesting about this TV series about it is, although it's television and it's obviously wants to look dramatic and have that sense of it being a thriller and so forth, there is something kind of exciting as the wrong word, but you know that when you go into those meetings, it kind of really matters because they only really happen when it is either something that's unexpected or something that's become a crisis. So if I think of some of the situations that we were involved in that required it, obviously several military situations, but also 9 -11, probably the most dramatic of all.
30:28And that makes seem to remember as one where actually there was kind of standing room only because there was so many people who felt that people felt had to be there, had all the security services, quite a few police forces, transport, infrastructure, all sorts of different people foreign policy diplomats. You know, it was a pretty crowded room and it was almost like, you know, there was a sense of this has the potential to be a really profound crisis and therefore an awful lot has to be gripped very, very quickly. And the thing about having a place where all the information flows into a central place, I think in a crisis you need that.
31:03And knowing who you've allocated to, there's a very funny but slightly disturbing piece by Jonathan Evans, who was the head of MI5, all which we can share, which he wrote for Russey, about the lessons he took from government, how not to manage a crisis, which is about all the classic problems that we saw, including things like optimism bias and the ways in which, you know, you convince yourself you don't want to happen on your watch and government often tends to be too slow to react. So one of the things in those meetings is absolutely vital to push people to look at the worst case scenario, make the decision to deploy the resources rather than the temptation, which is, oh well, maybe the problem will go away on its own, we don't want to waste any resources, but just get on top of it as soon as you can.
31:45Definitely, when you were saying that, that what came straight into my head was the way that we handled foot and mouth. I think we wanted it, we wanted to feel that it was better than it was, and that maybe we didn't do that sort of early stage catastrophizing and imagining the worst and then trying to prevent it from happening. Anyway, if any of these or other stories of your interest about what crisis management is like at the heart of government, watch series three of Cobra Rebellion, all episodes available on Sky and Now. Right there now. So let's move on to our next topic. One of the things we've discussed a lot recently, I think it's become a central theme of our podcast, is the way that AI can reshape politics, just as Twitter and Facebook did in earlier elections.
32:27And one of the big dangers you've been talking about this week are AI deep fake videos. So tell us a bit about some of those deep fakes. Well, over the weekend, there was an audio of Keir Starmer. I was sent it by God knows how many people, dozens. How did they send it to you? They were like, wow, isn't this worrying? Yeah, so some were saying the mass drops. This is the real him. He was basically sort of having an absolute tantrum shouting at somebody's effing and blinding and just to explain for instance, before we can analyze it, it was quite sort of subtle, wasn't it? So there was no, they didn't type to fake his face.
33:04They just had a picture of him and a bit of audio. And it was a bit crackly. And what it sounded like is someone recording on their iPhone while Starmer lost his temper at somebody for dropping an iPad, I think it was. Yeah. And it's rather sort of clever because it wasn't him doing something so outrageous, like in a massive racist anti -Semitic fakery. It was just trying to make out that this calm man was kind of grumpy and nasty to his staff and private. Is that right? Exactly. Exactly. It was sufficient for people to think, oh, well, that's him. I'm so remote removed from the images trying to portray.
33:43And it plays into this idea that they're all hypocrites. They're all lies. They're all the same. Now, to be fair to certain politicians, I noticed that Simon Clark was one of them, Tom Tugan had as well. There were quite a few Tories posting that saying there is a deep fake audio of Kier Starmer circulating. People should ignore it. And we all need to fight against this stuff. And they pointed to the fact that Rishi Sunat is going to be hosting a sort of AI event. Now, that's fine. And I approve of that. But I wonder how many Tories members would have circulated it. Certainly, I was getting a lot of this from hard left people who were sort of saying, here's your mate, Starmer, just as bad as every else kind of thing.
34:23And so God knows how much circulation it had. But that was, as you say, a relatively tame one. The other area where I think is worth looking at in recent weeks, we had the the election in Slovakia last weekend where this populist Robert Fisco regained power, having been kicked out in the first place through corruption. And there were lots of audio recordings that were doing the rounds on social media concerning his main opponent, Michael Simeccia, who is the leader of the Progressive Slovakia party. And these were discussions that he was having with how do you rig the election, how do you buy votes, whether there's something special that you could do with the Roma community.
35:07By the time it was established that this was a fake and it was an AI product, it had been doing the rounds during the two -day period when media outlets and politicians are supposed to be quiet. In other words, they have two days before the election where the media coverage stops and people are just meant to be sort of reflecting. That was being circulated during that period. Now, who knows how many people had their mind changed, impossible to prove. But what is interesting is that the exit poll, the progressives were in the front and by the time the vote came in, they'd lost. So I just think we've got to be very, very, very careful about this.
35:47I think I said before, when I was running to be Mayor of London as an independent, I had these companies approach me who were pitching to say, if I paid them lots of money, they could win the election for me. And they said, you know, we've been involved in 52 elections, we've won these elections in former Soviet states and we do it by setting up sock puppets and bots and paper counts and attacking your opponents. And they were talking those days about Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. Nowadays, I guess those very same companies would be pitching you on their ability to use AI. And it's interesting.
36:23I mean, I was thinking that the threat would be more obvious that it would be, you know, a day before the presidential election, you would have a deep fake of President Biden seeming very senile in a debate against Donald Trump or something. But this is actually, of course, it's shown me what it's more likely to be. It's more likely to be, and it's probably, I guess, clever of them to do things which seem rougher, seem to say, they've just been caught accidentally. The model for this, you remember Mitt Romney in 2012, one of the things that really damaged his electoral chances is he was recorded at a millionaire donor dinner being patronizing about poor people.
37:01And it would sort of been phoned by an iPhone in the corner and Mother Jones put it out September 2012. And I guess that's the sort of style they're going for, isn't it? Probably because it takes a bit longer to prove that Kierstammer hadn't lost his, lost his rag with some aid about dropping an iPad because it's not a public event. There's two real dangers here, I think. One of them is that people find it funny. That's the first thing. So I think sometimes these things will use humor. And people will sort of say, we shouldn't take you to a series because it's quite, it's actually quite funny.
37:34So if you, for example, I've seen a deep fake of Joe Biden falling over, falling off a stage. I've seen another one where he's sort of wandering around a beach looking a bit lost. And you know, when you sort of try to save people, this is really dangerous. Is that over God's say, who's going to take that seriously? I think it's the normalization of the, and using fairly trivial examples to normalize this. But it's really just about making people find it difficult to work out what's true and what's not. And I think that, you know, if we had, you know, in fair play to those Tory politicians who came straight out because they will also know that there will be people that will be able to do this to them as well.
38:14So all politicians, I think, have an interest in trying to stop this. But we know, we know for sure in the American election that the idea that Trump will say, oh, come on, guys, let's not do that stuff. Let's not play dirty. That's just not going to happen. And, you know, we've got a election going on, very important election going on very soon in Poland. And again, then that you look at the polls, the numbers are very, very tight. And yet the governing party are up to all sorts of tricks that are, you know, they've, they've completely sort of politicized in their favor, the state broadcaster.
38:47They've added these four questions, referendum questions that are all designed to sort of, in a sense, they're like leading questions that into the electorate so that they, they maybe think that the messaging of the election, the demot, the parliamentary election is actually also part of this broader referendum question, which of course gives them then more money to campaign. So there's a lot of, you know, politics, as they say, has always been a pretty rough, tough game. But I think the capacity for populist politicians in particular, really to play dirty, really to use technology, and any other black arts methods that come their way, I think we've got to be very, very wary.
39:26And that means we've got to stop finding this stuff funny. It really isn't funny. And we've all got a duty, I think, to call it out. Since Obama won with Jim Messina, his second term through this technique of microtargeting, which was really using big data to try to identify the exact buttons to hit every photo, the idea was, and this was something that I remember, and we went to a conference in 2015, and Jim Messina, who'd been Obama's person for some reason, had agreed to be hired by the conservative party. So before the 2015 election, I remember these lectures on how we were going to be using all this data that we got from supermarkets about your spending habits.
40:08And on the basis of that, you were supposed to be able to microtarget and work out that because, I don't know, because Alistair Campbell liked eating camon bear, we could hit him with something about the improvements, the NHS, and that would kind of get him out to vote conservative. What do my cheese habits got to do with my voting habits? Well, I think it was quite, this is where the geniuses in the vacuum seemed to believe they were going to be able to take all this data. They could work out what sort of issues would press my button. If you go back to the Brexit referendum when the the leave campaign were just sort of putting together these groups of people with different issues that they cared about, and they really targeted, for example, animal rights.
40:47Now, I can imagine in animal rights, which is one of those issues that kind of motivates some people more than any other. So if you imagine that you get hold of the data of all the people who's prime motivation in election is animal rights, and you put together an audio or a video like the one that we've just seen in videos of Keir Starmer talking about, you know, losing his temper, and actually having him in a throwaway remark sort of saying, well, who gives a fuck about animals anyway? You know, you can see how that can then just get used, and it wouldn't have to be done by parties. And the brilliant thing about it is that AI allows you to do that much more quickly, to replicate much more quickly, and do it at a much greater scale.
41:27So you could be, the machine learning can be targeting, as it were, 10 ,000 different subgroups, the population, the adjusting the message in real time, very, very quickly. One of the things you've all know, Harry said to me about two weeks ago, is that one of the big threats actually is the way in which AI would be perfect for generating a new type of QAnon type conspiracy. So obviously, QAnon, as this will remember, is this amazing conspiracy in the United States, which links child sex gangs to goodness knows what else, and is really mobilized by the Republican base to create particularly horrible views about Hillary Clinton.
42:04But those sort of conspiracies, these quasi -religious conspiracies are the sort of things that a large language model, you know, an advanced form of chat GVT, can generate very, very beautifully, very subtly, adjust it to almost everything, and bring in endless data and information to confirm whatever conspiracy theories you're trying to produce. Now, we're going to be talking in, we've already recorded, but we'll be putting it soon in the interview with your friend, Reid Hoffman, who's really big in the data world, and he had a very different view to the AI debate, didn't he? Then, same with Stafford Solomon, or you've all know, Harari, he really does see it as a positive, but I think it's quite hard in the political space not to be very worried about where this is going.
42:49Yeah, absolutely, absolutely, and what will happen very quickly, I think, is a sort of race to the bottom, that one party will start by doing it, and the other political parties will feel they have no option other than to follow. Well, I hope some of them just stand up against it, even at the risk of, have taking a hit, but it's a big thing to do. Well, now, S &P, your friend Peter Kellner, shared some quite interesting data, sorry, to remind people what happened, is that Labour achieved a very startling victory when there was a bi -election in an S &P seat, and a man who, I slightly appeal to me, because am I right in saying that he ran every single street in his constituency?
43:28I tried to walk through every village in my constituency. Is that right? He ran every street. This is Michael Shanks, who is clearly quite a good runner, but he decided he wanted to run up and down, or certainly along every single street in Glasgow. He said that there's quite a lot of cul -de -sac, which are a bit of an outback, because you have to do them both. And he took some fantastic pictures on the way. He became slightly obsessed, I'd say, with no ball sign, what are they called? No ball games here. And so he's got a picture of every no ball game, sorry, in Glasgow, which there are apparently plenty.
44:05But yeah, he did that. The other thing, I think, that is enormously to his credit, is that he did temporarily resign from the party over anti -Semitism, as indeed did my partner Fierner, although unlike Michael Shanks Fierner's yet to return. But what was interesting about Sir Peter Kellner had done some polling, which really does suggest that obviously the result was terrific for Labour, albeit on a very low turnout, but it was a big swing. But beneath it, you get the sense that the SNP are now being judged much more as most governing parties are. In just seeing through this prism of independence, and once people start to zone in on that about education, health and so forth, that they maybe don't do as well as they do when they're focusing very much on the questions of national identity.
44:58Gotcha. So, there was a time, of course, as you will remember, and as I remember very, very happily, when, frankly, Labour was pretty much unbeatable, unstoppable in Scotland, and we took lots and lots and lots of seats, that fell away. I should point out, Roy, in Murray, MP. Yes, he's cross this year, and he's raised it because it's you. That's every reason to be cross, because actually he was a friend of mine, and I completely wiped him. Do you have a correction to make? In my book, politics on the edge. I implied that Labour had lost all its seats in Scotland, and actually, of course, in Murray retained his, so they did retain his seat.
45:36He did. And there's now been double to two with Michael Shanks. What's happened in, according to Peter Kellner's latest, quite a big poll in Scotland, is that Labour's increased its vote share up to 28%. So, that's nine points up on the last election. And this, of course, you're just a snapshot. I don't think we should, you know, overlook that. SMP's on 37%. So, that's still ahead, but down eight. Conservatives are on 18. That's down seven points. Now, on that, if that were the voter general election, that would lead to a majority of seats for the SMP. They would get 34 out of 57, down from 48, out of the 59 that they were under the old boundaries.
46:19However, they would have a very narrow majority in around a dozen of those seats, and certainly based on the swing that we saw in Rutherglen last week, that would really put them under threat of a Labour win. So, that is quite a big shift. Yeah, and I think just to point out the obvious, which many lessons to be aware of, which is that there's a double where we also have the SMP, which is that there are legal and police investigations into the SMP allegations of a party funding, which involved Nicholas Surgeon, the former leader, ending up with the police actually turning up at our house and digging up her garden.
47:00That hasn't helped, and it also hasn't helped that the sitting SMP MP was toppled in a record petition because she'd broken her own COVID regulations. So, there were, I think, a lot of angry SMP voters staying at home, and the question is, are they going to be able to turn this around? Are they going to be able to get what they need, which is a positive, optimistic message to voters before the next section of how they're going to deliver change for them? Or is this the sign that they're really in deep decline? The fact that it seems that a lot of their own supporters, people who voted for them last time, kind of, it would seem want to put the independence question on the back burner.
47:39Does pose, um, to use, if with quite a difficult strategic question, I think? Because in a way, it's what gave Alex Salmond and Nicholas Surgeon such clear definition. But he's come in partly, as you say, because of the circumstances of Nicholas Surgeon's departure and then what's happened subsequently with this police investigation. Every time it seems to me, he tries to get his head up for a some sort of fresh start, something else happens to knocking back. So, last week, for example, it was the by -election. It was, you know, he was out all over the airwaves, essentially saying, this is really bad news.
48:13And meanwhile, the where this police investigation goes, we don't know. I should say on that, by the way, Roy, I thought Rishi Sunak making a joke about it was pretty off and possibly in defiance of contempt of call laws, but anyway, put that to one side. And what, so Peter's overall analysis is that, essentially, you've got three groups of people here. You've got 25 to 30 % of, of nationalists for whom independence absolutely matters more than anything else. You've got roughly that same number of people to whom unionism matters more than anything else. And then you've got about 50%, 40 to 50 % who have views, but those views are not dictating necessarily how they're going to vote a general election.
49:01The views that are, the issues that are driving them to a general election decision are health, education, jobs, cost of living. So, I just think that all in all, that means that the, you know, the mood in Scotland is changing. And it's changing because Labour is the party of opposition in the UK Parliament and the Scottish Parliament, that is playing in both places to, to Labour's advantage, I think. Yeah. There does seem to me that, you know, every time you and I talk about Scotland, we get lots of nationalists saying, you don't know what you're talking about, you know, you only come up here as sort of flying an out tourist, et cetera.
49:36But my sense both of what this poll says and what I've been hearing when I have been going up to Scotland and actually you and I going up there next week to do a charity event, I sense that there is quite a big change. And the fact of, I thought, such a kind of appealing, attractive candidate, I thought the, I thought he really was a good candidate. The fact that Keir Starmer has very quietly been visiting Scotland a lot in recent months. The fact that Anna Sarwa, the Labour leader in Scotland is now ahead of from the use of, in terms of his ratings, suggests to me that, you know, Labour can, for the first time in a long while, Ian Murray can start to think that he will not be alone after the next election.
50:14Also some interesting seats where potentially the Conservatives could have opportunities because there are seats where it's really a Conservative S &P standoff. And if the S &P falls, the Conservatives may pick up more seats in Scotland than one would expect and lose others. I mean, it's going to be interesting how that plays through. So can I just sort of very briefly not really sort of big subject conversation, but just put a brief shout out towards the tragedy in Afghanistan. We have had the most astonishing series of horrible earthquakes around the world, in Turkey, Morocco, and now Afghanistan.
50:48And this is the second earthquake to hit Afghanistan just over a year. This one out in the west around Harat, whole villages just wiped off the map, entire families killed. And of course, Afghanistan is a very poor country. It's now October, it's beginning to get pretty cold there, pretty bleak outdoors at this time of year. Still a very difficult situation where the Taliban government very much strongly in place, with its very regressive attitudes towards women and female education and female participation in the labour market. And as a result, a lot of sanctions still against the Taliban, not as much development assistance getting in us it should.
51:25And the Afghan people really at the brunt receiving end of this, and a real urgent need for people to get assistance, and particularly I'd argue again to return my old war horse, hobby horse cash assistance into these people who've lost their homes and who've lives have been completely upended. We're an earthquake where I'm fear over the next few days, we'll find many, many thousands of people were killed. And of course, be with all the focus on the Middle East at the moment, it won't get the global attention perhaps that it would it be it was happening in a different time in a different country.
52:01And some of the I was watching the news last night and some of these houses that we talk about houses collapsing, but lots of them were literally made of mud and just destroyed, absolutely destroyed. And you then saw these terrible pictures of of men, and it was all men of the obvious reasons of the Taliban digging with their hands through rubble, trying to find signs of life, absolutely horrific. It's extraordinary, isn't it? Well, okay, Alistair, thank you. We'll see you soon. Thank you very much. See you soon. Thank you.
52:43Support for this episode of The Restless Politics comes from Sky, and if you enjoyed our discussion on Cobra meetings today, I really think you'd enjoy the brand new series of Cobra Rebellion, all episodes of which are available on Sky and Now. So we spoke of what it's like to do with the crisis of the heart of government, the toll it can take on you, even a bit on how Cobra came about, what it means. So now we've been able to share some light on what it's like behind the scenes, we've hopefully wetted your appetite for a bit of drama, and I think the TV show makes a great pairing. I would say it provides a bit of proper escapism, and maybe sometimes puts a bit of the government, but it's actually remarkably well researched.
53:20And all the major themes the things viewers will recognize from the political debates we're having every week on the podcast. In fact, I have a vested interest here, because I remember one of the researchers very politely reaching out to me and trying to work out whether they'd got it right. So in this series, they're focusing on environmental terrorism, anti -protest bills passing through parliament, and the quandary for the PM at the heart of all this, which is the existential question how much is he willing to sacrifice to remain in power? Hmm, all of our regular themes are really on the age of impunity.
53:49What will the Prime Ministry's government do when tensions run high? Can they stick to their principles? So if you're up for something exciting to watch tonight, all episodes of Cobra Rebellion are available on Sky and Now.
From the publisher
Is Labour ready for government? What's causing the SNP malaise? Did an AI deepfake video contribute to the outcome of the Slovakian election?
Join Rory and Alastair for today's episode of The Rest Is Politics as they answer all these questions and more.
COBRA: Rebellion is now live on Sky & NOW - https://www.sky.com/watch/cobra
Starring Robert Carlyle as Prime Minister Robert Sutherland, COBRA: Rebellion is a Sky original production set in the heart of government during a major crisis.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




