185. Global perceptions of Israel-Gaza, Labour-Lib Dem bad blood, and Chinese economic crisis

24 Oct 2023 · 54 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 185

Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss several pressing global issues, focusing on:

  • The Israel-Gaza conflict and its international ramifications
  • The political dynamics between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats in the UK
  • The economic crisis facing China

Key Discussions

  1. Israel-Gaza Conflict
  2. International Perception: The potential impact of an Israeli ground invasion on international views of the conflict is a significant concern.
  3. Media Coverage: Differences in media tone are noted, particularly between Israeli and Arab sources, with Arab leaders using stronger language (e.g., terms like "war crimes" and "genocide").
  4. US-Israel Relations: The episode touches on President Biden's support for Israel, noting past criticisms of Netanyahu and the implications for US foreign policy.
  1. UK Political Landscape
  2. By-Elections Analysis: The recent by-elections in the UK are discussed, particularly the implications for the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats.
  3. Labour's significant gains are noted, with swings of over 20% in some areas.
  4. Tensions between Labour and the Lib Dems are highlighted, with accusations of tactical voting and negative campaigning.
  5. Future Implications: The importance of Scotland in the upcoming national elections is emphasized, especially concerning Labour's strategy for a majority.
  1. Chinese Economic Crisis
  2. Belt and Road Initiative: The episode marks the 10th anniversary of the initiative, highlighting its significance in expanding China's global influence through infrastructure investments in over 150 countries.
  3. Current Economic Challenges: Campbell and Stewart discuss critical issues facing China's economy:
  4. Real estate crises led by major defaults (e.g., Evergrande).
  5. High youth unemployment rates, with estimates suggesting between 20-25% of young people are unemployed.
  6. A reliance on manufacturing and exports in a changing global trade environment.
  7. Geopolitical Implications: Concerns are raised about how economic instability in China could lead to more aggressive foreign policies, similar to Russia's actions under economic pressure.

Key Takeaways

  • The episode presents a nuanced view of current international conflicts and domestic political challenges in the UK, focusing on how these issues intersect and influence global dynamics.
  • The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexities behind political rhetoric and media portrayals, especially in the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
  • The analysis of China's economic situation offers insight into how domestic challenges can have broader implications on international relations and geopolitical stability.

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* provides an in-depth examination of critical global issues through the lens of UK politics, emphasizing the interconnectedness of international relations and domestic political landscapes. The insights from Campbell and Stewart encourage listeners to think critically about the implications of these discussions on the future of global politics.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy Adfree Listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again, early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. I'm Chris Hadfield. I'm an astronaut, an author, a citizen of planet Earth. Join me for a six -part journey into the systems that power the world. Real conversations with real people who are shaping the future of energy. No politics, no empty talk. Just solutions focused conversations on the challenges we must overcome and the possibilities that lie ahead.

0:38This is on energy. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. She's made up her mind to live pretty smart. Learn to budget responsibly right from the start. She spends a little less in puts for into saving. She keeps her blood fresh, her low and credits go raises. She's gotten it right out of her life. She tracks her cash for Wallace French at night. Boring money moves make kind of lame songs, but they sound pretty sweet dear wallet. BNC Bank brilliantly boring since 1865. Right now at the Home Depot, you'll find storage solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tote to protect your tools.

1:22Or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap fit lids. Or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot. How doers get more done?

1:50Welcome to the rest of politics with me, Alistair Campbell. And with me, Rory Stewart. Now this is our first main episode since the bi -elections. We should talk about that. Obviously the world, media and political debate still dominated by the Middle East. So lots on that. And we both want to talk about China. You've been going on for some time about the Chinese economy. And I do think one of the most interesting, barely noticed things last week was the 10th anniversary of the Belt and Road Initiative, where Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin had yet another major love in. So we're talking about that as well.

2:22Should we kick off with the bi -elections? Yeah, some of the bi -elections. So just to remind people, these were two bi -elections. One of them caused by a very controversial thing, Chris Pincher, who'd been the MP for Tamworth, was essentially the figure who was the final straw that broke the camel's back of Boris Johnson's government. He was a man who had been accused, it seems, quite clearly, and Boris Johnson was aware of it, of some form of sexism, preparatory assault, and Boris Johnson made a joke about it, continued leaving him in government. And then there was a second episode, which led to him being suspended from the conservative party and was the thing that triggered the final rebellion against Boris Johnson.

3:02So it's the bi -election in his seat. And the other bi -election is the bi -election to replace Nadine Doris. Now, Nadine Doris will be familiar to many, many listeners, but for international listeners, she is a conservative member of parliament who was very much from the self -identify kind of working class, blue collar, right wing of the conservative party, hated David Cameron, George Osborne, and what she saw as this kind of a liter, centrist version of the conservative party, felt that all her Christmases had come at once when Boris Johnson became prime minister. She was one of his very earliest supporters and remains to this day, a passionate supporter.

3:43She's controversial, in other ways, she was very, very outspoken as a culture secretary. She made a number of gaps, very unpopular with a lot of the media. She went on, I'm a celebrity, and this was controversial again, because it involved her taking time off parliament to go on a reality TV show. She's ready to say her commitment to her constituency was best limited. Well, that definitely was a lot of the excuses. But she also has a certain kind of support. I mean, she definitely appealed to a certain kind of vote, right, I don't know how many, and she has a prominent role presenting a TV program on talk TV, and is a big, big figure.

4:22She's a sort of minus celebrity, I guess, in British politics. She tried to trigger a bi -election, basically to damage Rishi Suna, because the only person she dislikes more than David Cameron is Rishi Suna, so she wasn't prepared to have a bi -election. At the time, it's all the other, so essentially, I think the conservative party, and talk about Chinese banks later, but China got out of its debt crisis in the 1990s by moving all its bad debt into a new vehicle and getting it all out of the way at once. I think they were hoping to do that by elections. But she was absolutely damned if she was going to give him anything, not least, because he's scotched her getting an opportunity to get into the House of Lords.

4:57So she's tried to choose the maximum moment of pain, tried to time it to coincide with the release of her book, but her book was then delayed. Anyway, those were the elections, and what happened in these elections? Labour, transdom. And you're a good friend, Julian Keegan, the Education Secretary. Now, education, maths is a big part of education, Roy. How can she possibly say, quote, there was no swing to Labour? Yeah, that's unfortunate. Yeah, that's unfortunate. The swing, we've now had four violations in a row. Selby and up in North of England, rather than in Scotland, and now these two were the swing to Labour, three of them from the Conservatives, one from the SMP, has been over 20%.

5:38And the exception was up -spitched. So the reason everyone was looking at this carefully is that up -spitched was, which was Boris Johnson's old constituency, the swing was only 6 % and the Conservatives held the seat, was astonished everybody, and there was a brief moment of sort of hope with the then Conservative Party thought, oh, we're made a second, we were expecting to lose up -spitched by the outside, we didn't. Maybe there's some clever formula here, and it tempted them down the route of saying, maybe we kept up -spitched because we went hard against the ultra -larmation zone, and maybe if we attack green environmental policies, we may be able to hold our base here.

6:12But all of that seems sort of back -fired. I think so. And I don't know where they go from here, because, look, I thought Labour, Peter Karl, and Pat McFadden, who were running the campaigns. I thought they were... We liked Peter Karl. And we liked Pat McFadden, but they both were absolutely clear in victory that they understood there was still an awful lot of work to do, because of a lot of storage data. I hope I'm not speaking out of school here, but was there not actually a moment of doubt where, on the eve of the poll, people were, where was this really going to work? Absolutely, I went to bed, because one of them said to me, it looks like we're only going to win Tamworth, not MedBeds.

6:46And what do you think it was that briefly panic, and what... In the worst case scenario, when they thought they weren't going to get a 20 -point swing, what was it that they thought might have meant that they might not take midbeds? I think it was the Lib Dems. I think actually there's a bit of repair work to be done between Kierstarm and Eddaevi. Peter Karl was really angry at the Lib Dems, because, you know, they talked about tactical voting and pulling at their punches. They went through the entire campaign, saying they were convinced they could win it. The numbers at the start suggested Labour was the only party they could beat the Tories.

7:20But the truth is, the Lib Dems really fought a hard campaign against focused on Labour, and quite nasty at points. I don't want to go into the detail, says, but anyway, it was felt like a nasty campaign, in which certainly the Labour candidate felt that the Lib Dems were getting quite personal, going after his private life, quite a lot of cultural abuse. And that is actually, this is one of the reasons, as listeners will know, that people from the Conservative Party when we grumble about the Lib Dems, often what we say is that they seem very nice, but when you're actually down on the ground because it's your campaign, they're often the nastiest street fighters of all.

7:52Listen, I don't mind tough fighting in a campaign. I think both of them need to accept. And I think theoretically they do, that this next election, there is an opportunity, really, to do real damage to the Conservatives. And that is obviously the interest of both Labour and the Liberal Democrats to do that. And I think that if you talk to both Eddaevi and Kierstarm, as we have on the podcast, they both go around with the lists in their pockets of the seats that they know they have to go for. Labour probably started to extend that list a little bit, particularly given what's happened in Scotland.

8:24But at the same time, they know where the focus has got to be. And this was quite a nasty traditional three -way marginal fight. So I think just final things to wrap this up, because the top line is absolutely right, huge swings towards Labour, and confirms basically what we've been seeing in the opinion polls for a year now, which is 15 points at least, Labour lead over the Conservatives, a couple of small things. One of them is that one of these seats was a very heavy leave voting seat voted for Brexit in 2016. And people thought maybe that might mean the Conservatives would have more of a chance, didn't make any difference.

8:56The other thing is that we were up in Scotland together on Friday. It was an amazing event actually for, for listeners. Alistair invited me along to an event, the journalist Charity. And it's a lovely, lovely charity, which supports, I suppose, journalists who are on their upwards. And somebody made a joke about whether that's likely to be the most popular charity in the morning. I think the charity for politicians on their upwards could be the second, at least popular charity. Yeah, but Boris Johnson could help a few of those. I don't know if the money is making. Anyway, in that, somebody pointed out, I think that, if I did, it was Anna Sawa, the Labour leader in Scotland, who I just sitting next to, said to me that, is...

9:38Did you like my seating plan? It was your seating plan. It was good. I was going to be sitting next to Hogan's use of, but he got stuck in the storm. It was a Boris Johnson moment in sense for Hogan's use of, which is that he'd put out a warning as the Scottish government. Do not travel unless absolutely essential. Absolutely, sir. I can't believe you didn't think that sitting, having lunch with those wasn't essential anyway. So I'm glad he followed his own rules. So it was Anna Sawa? Anna said that if the, if Labour manages to take 25 seats in Scotland at the next election, they only need a 5 % swing in their favour in England to get a majority.

10:13If, on the other hand, they were not to perform well in Scotland. They'd need a 15 -point swing in England to secure a majority. So Scotland, it is really central as a battleground because it has a really disproportionate impact on the result. Yeah. What did you make of Alice, by the way? I thought that was a deliberate seating plan. I wanted to... We should play my interview, Matthew. I'm rather fond of him. I mean, he's, I think he's got a lot going from me. He's also, though, got a real trademark sort of cheeky, chappy jokes going on a great deal. There's a lot of sort of charming jokes going on.

10:46So I need to get down to the substance of it. Yeah, he's got a lot of charm. I thought it was interesting. We did our show of Hans thing. We did the one that we always do in the UK, where there was a majority saying, here's going to be Prime Minister. And this was mainly a business and media audience. And there was also a slight majority for Anna Sawa's next first minister as well. There we are. There you go. Right, let's turn to the Middle East and what's going on there. I've actually been looking in the last 48 hours at quite a lot of the Israeli and Arab media. And quite a different tone to a lot of it.

11:23And so just to remind, listen, I mean, obviously Israeli media means a lot of things. There's quite a lot of interesting... Yeah, but left wing Israeli media. I'm talking about the sort of harrots and Jerusalem posts and the sort of main titles that people know about. Those are titles that have traditionally been quite critical of Netanyah. And there still are. And that's the point is that I think Netanyah who is in a lot of our media is like we're kind of forgetting. We're deliberately forgetting a lot of the things that we were saying about him not that long ago. Interestingly, his meeting with Joe Biden.

11:52It's not that long ago that Joe Biden was saying Netanyah who's not welcome in the White House. This is the kind of thing that people have been reminded. And but the thing that really struck me was the coverage of the summit that King Abdullah, where because of the attack on the hospital, the meeting with Biden was canceled. But these meetings went ahead with some of the Arab leaders. And the language that was being used about Israel was just of a different level to what we're hearing from our own leaders and politicians. So King Abdullah talked about war crimes. One or two of the voices they talked about genocide.

12:27And there was a real feeling that that King Abdullah said in terms the sense we're getting in the Arab world is that Arab lives do not matter as much as Israeli lives. And just again for lessons, remember that this is existential, the Palestinian issue for Jordan. Because at least half the population of Jordan is Palestinian. Yeah. But it was, I mean, and King Abdullah who is, he's kind of faded in different parts of the world as the moderate guy. But his language was very, very strong. And I think that it would be interesting to maybe to pick through Joe Biden's visit. It was, I don't know if you watched his arrival, but it struck me that he was set there for the, obviously absolutely supportive of Israel, has he's been in all of his public statements.

13:16But it was very interesting. I sense that Joe Biden was about to sort of grab Netanyahu from a manly handshake. And Netanyahu sort of pulled him into this great bare hug. And, you know, we, we talked last night to Sayyad Vasi, former Tory cabinet minister, who was very, very critical of Netanyahu. And that's for a leaps of leading that we're putting out later this week. But I think that we've just got to be careful because I've, I've, I've worried about this from the word go that Netanyahu will take all the support and he will use that to kind of do the things that he thinks he has to do, not least to appease this very right when government of his.

13:54And meanwhile, the world leaders get trapped into this place where they can't criticize or they can't even call out without it being a massive diplomatic moment. So, let's just have been asking for some recommendations on things to read. King Abdullah's book, Last Chance for Peace, is definitely worth reading. That was a previous Last Chance for Peace. Yeah, previous Last Chance Peace, thoughtful, serious account of the peace process. Tom Friedman, always worth paying attention to from very rich Jerusalem. Good primer on this conflict. And actually, Tom Friedman's been very interesting over the last few days.

14:28So, New York Times guy. New York Times guy. New York Times colonist. Bit of a kind of celebrity colonist. When people were being particularly mean to him and the glory days of Tom Friedman being the most sort of famous competition in the world, there was actually something you could go online called a Tom Friedman column generator where you'd press a button and it would just write a Tom Friedman column for you. It always began with I was setting an attack C in Beirut and my attack driver. So, the food where it was a world leader. What did it pick by the bridge? Yeah, if one wanted to tease Tom Friedman, he's just been on, it's very worth listening to, but he's just been on a New York Times and if you were along with saying some very, very thoughtful, serious things, he also says, and one other thing I want to say is that I know literally everybody in Israel but I don't know anybody in this cabinet.

15:11And I know. And he says, and that's why I would not trust them prosecuting this war. So, everybody apart from the people who run the country. Yeah, yeah. So, he's very cross -plat that. Anyway, one of the things that he said though is that Biden has announced that he's going to be giving financial aid to Israel. And Tom Friedman said, Conditional. Absolutely. And he said conditional on not a single brick of another settlement being built. And this is the fact that after 1967 and after the Osir courts, which was the peace agreements, the 1990s, there was a clear attempt to define a two -state solution which meant that was meant supposed to be territory which was Palestinian territory, separate from Israeli territory, but a settler movement that began in the 1970s began planting Israeli housing in Palestinian territory.

16:02And once it's planted, the Israeli army then came and protect those settlers. And that's one of the reasons that the Palestinian state has been broken into lots of little chunks and a lot of the fences and wires and roads are there to enable these settlements. And it's also fundamentally why it's very difficult to imagine a two -state solution because to return to Osir, you would have to remove literally hundreds of thousands of Israelis who have deliberately gone out to settle those areas. And they're sort of colonizing those areas and Smotrich is one of these people. He comes from one of these communities because they believe they have a historic destiny to make these Palestinian areas Israeli.

16:44And Tom Friedman said, Hadakshutam Friedman swears, he says, if he fucking gives my tax -pairs dollars to allow me to continue on this path of building more settlements, fuck him, I want, he says, nothing I use to put the taxes up to 50 % if he's going to try to prosecute a war and try to build settlements. I mean, that again was something that came to our chat with Saeed, was that the world has turned its eyes away from this and the importance of these settlements has been going on. And people like Ben Gaviro and Smotrich and the Israeli Kabbalah, that has been the purpose of their political life.

17:18And of course, Netanyahu has been totally cynical. He needs these people for his government. And so his whole move, which we talked about in our interview with Yoval Nohari, a few weeks ago, these moves against the Supreme Court have basically been because the Supreme Court has been blocking settlements. I mean, not much, not half as much as it should have been, there's an enormous amount of illegal settlement taking place, but it's blocked some of them. And the settlers represented by people like Smotrich want to be doing much more. And secondly, it's been taking steps to try to hold the root of law and Israeli law on the ultra -orthodox and the military participation.

17:55And those are the two bits of the coalition that Netanyahu wants. And at the core of the whole problem is that Netanyahu's entire political beliefs really now seems in so far as he has them, because he's also a great political entrepreneur for 40, 50 years. Has been the idea that he can have a rapprochement and understanding with the other Arab states without actually having to grant any former serious Palestinian statehood that he can sort of ignore the Palestinian issue, normalize with the other Arab states. And more than that, and this is something that Said Oassi was talking about, he has deliberately facilitated and supported Hamas because he has felt that the way to discredit the Palestinian movement is to make everybody focus on Hamas and he's been able to say for 10 years, how can I possibly negotiate with these people?

18:52The Palestinian Authority and the West Bank is corrupt and useless. And the other lot of Hamas were a bunch of terrorists, so what am I supposed to do? And he thought the whole thing was under control. Could fight these kinds of wars from time to time and that Hamas were not going to do something fully crazy. They weren't like the Islamic State because they wanted to govern Gaza. So there was a sort of idea that he could indefinitely prolong the situation. It's apparent to him within that context as well, the role of Qatar, because they have been delivering services. And again, with Netanyahu's full knowledge and support as a way of keeping the place under control.

19:32And now of course, they seem to be absolutely central to the hostages issue. You know, I'd love to know what's going on inside the minds of the military and also inside the minds of the American political and military establishment. Whether part of Joe Biden's visit was in a sense to buy time to stop this ground invasion whilst these hostage negotiations were going on, whether actually they make far greater focus on the hostage issue and whether the ground invasion just goes quiet for a while. I don't know, but it's... I, what I find about Netanyahu, I look, I met him a few times and, and always felt, yes, he's a political entrepreneur, incredible survivor, an amazing bullshitter.

20:16And I forget the very first time we met him, John Holmes, who was Tony Blair's main diplomatic advisor. And I said, what's Netanyahu like? Said, 24 carat bullshitter. Now, and he at the moment, just remember where he's coming from. Massive protests about these judicial reforms. A sense almost. I remember the IDF Israeli Defence Force at Preservice was saying that they weren't going to serve. You've had him up for corruption charges. And now he's a war leader. And the one thing you know about Netanyahu, he's not going to waste a crisis in terms of his own political survival. And meanwhile, with these incredible right wing forces inside his own cabinet, not the war cabinet, but inside his own cabinet.

20:58And I said, the other thing, which is not really... We haven't seen much in the Western media, but again, I've seen lots reading the Israeli and Arab media. These voices like Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister, like former heads of Mossad, like former heads of the military, who are basically saying he's got to go, even during this crisis. So Netanyahu is coming over as the strong man leader that he likes to be. But I think politically he's in a much, much weaker position than he was. So I think two things that are central to focus on over the next few weeks and months. Firstly, obviously at the core of the whole thing.

21:32Is the horror of the Hamas attack, that terrorist attack, the killing of innocent civilians, the taking of those hostages, and the question of how on earth those hostages are returned. But for Israel now, the question is how the response works. And the two things there are the military response. How do you fight your way through an urban area like that, without causing unbelievable opportunities for Palestinians to talk about atrocities, since civilians being killed and use all the power of social media to amplify? We saw this with the hospital catastrophe, which there's a lot of evidence now pointing to the fact that that was a Islamic Jihad rocket landing in a car park.

22:15And yet incredible cycle of media benefit to Hamas from that, because they were able to use that event to totally derail the Biden visit, derail all these things. So now this will be repeated a hundred times once that ground invasion starts. So that's the first problem. How does Israel do a ground invasion without massively strengthening world sympathy for Palestinians, because there will inevitably be civilians killed in the ground invasion? And then the second big question is, and then what next, what's the second step? And we've talked about whether that is Israel being forced to try to occupy Gaza in order to prevent Hamas taking over?

22:56Yeah, meanwhile, there's the other thing going on is that the border with Lebanon and his Bollar, who are far more armed than Hamas, where the skirmish is being going on. And I think the other thing that Joe Biden and Blinken and the other world leaders who have been out there have been trying to do is to stop the Israelis from responding overly to the provocations that are coming from there. But that one is that one is a tender box right now. And I think maybe not now because we don't have the time, but I think pretty soon we should do an episode looking at what is the two -state solution, what is a one -state solution, what might peace look like, and why is peace so difficult with hundreds of thousands of settlers now in the territory that's supposed to be part of that Palestinian state?

23:45It seems to me that what the Americans are genuinely worried about is this thing becoming a major regional conflict, where Iran, who back, as a proxy, back has been in Lebanon, that they feel actually they're now so engaged in this, that it kicks off in a way that frankly we haven't seen for a long, long time. And that's kind of, that's why this is so scary at the moment. I mean, of course you've got the humanitarian catastrophe, which is awful. You've got the inability to get the humanitarian aid in. And I'm sure lots of people are working hard on trying to fix that. But on the bigger picture, I think this is as tense as it's been for a very long time.

24:25And that's the other thing that I'm picking up in reading these more of the Arab media is that their concerns are even deeper than ours at right now. Well, from the Arab point of view, just maybe to conclude on this for the break, if you are an Arab sunny government, so if you're Jordan or Saudi or UAE, you are worried in two different directions. Your population, your street is very, very hostile towards Israel, very pro -Palestinian. But at the same time, you were very worried about Iran. And Israel, and this is one of the reasons why there was this sort of reproche on these Abraham accords, which were driven through actually under the Trump administration, where Israel began speaking to Saudi and UAE, was about their desire to try to have account amounts to Iran, because Iran is now in a very strong position, as you say, in Lebanon, in Syria, in Iraq, in Yemen.

25:17Iranian proxies have been firing rockets into the territory of the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. They feel deeply, deeply threatened. Partly because Saudi Arabia has a very large sheer population. This is a sheer sunny conflict within the most of the world. So, as you said, there is a very, very difficult two -way struggle in the minds of many of these Arab leaders. On the one hand, feeling strong historical links to Palestine, on the other hand, being absolutely terrified about Iran getting more power in the region. Final point, I don't know whether we can put voice notes in the newsletter, but I've got a very interesting voice note from somebody who's on the ground who works for the charity Medical Aid for Palestinians.

Read the full transcript

25:58And it was just chilling to the logistical problems of trying to do something as simple as delivering medical aid right now. And so, I think it was, it was like a ten -minute voice note just kind of explaining what it was like right now. And I think we should probably just give people a sense of that. I was at the time, I was trying to find somebody actually on the ground that we could maybe talk to, but it was proving quite difficult. Part of the problem is the telecoms that's gone down, the electricity's gone down, people can't recharge their phones. So, it's actually surprisingly difficult to get here.

26:30Right along that side.

26:38This isn't ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as a therapist to work through these ideas, calmly objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

27:14They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. It's obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So, talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash Rest Politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash Rest Politics. Let's play Burlington's, guess that price. Back to school means, back to saving. We're bringing you kids jeans starting at them. Hold on a minute, just $11 .99.

27:50Burlington's acing this test. What about character backpacks? We've got them starting at $12 .99. Burlington's done it again. How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trends starting at $11 .99. Saving is now in session. Burlington deals, brands, wow. Styles on Selection is very by location. Put us in a box. Go ahead. That just gives us something to break out of. Because the next generation 2025 GMC terrain elevation is raising the standard of what comes standard. As far as expectations go, why meet them when you can shatter them? What we choose to challenge, we challenge completely.

28:37We are professional grade. GMC .com to learn more.

28:47So welcome back to the Dresses Polities. Me, Anastakamble, and with me, Rory Stewart. I think we should tell listeners about what's been going on with some of the interviews that we've been doing. The leading channel, which people know about, where we've had people like Pancwa O 'Lean and Tony Blair and Hillary Clinton and all sorts of other people to reason may. And we've recently done these special interviews on the RESTIS Politics Feed with you from Noah Harari and with the Palestinian Ambassador. And we're going to be doing, as well as doing the every Monday we're trying to get that into you out.

29:20We will be doing more on the Middle East and we'll put those interviews on leading starting with Sia De Vasi. And we should also just chat a little bit about the one that's on there this week, which nothing to do with the Middle East. We recorded it before this current crisis blow up. And that was with your friend, Tech Bro Billionaire Reid Hoffman, which I enjoyed a lot more than I thought I would. Yeah, I was taken with that. I like the chemistry on that. I was a bit skeptical about whether Alistairn Reid were going to really hit it off. I thought it was lovely and I'm really pleased that we're also expanding out.

29:52We have done quite a lot for people who are interested on AI on leading. But Reid is a really interesting, major cultural figure. He's not just one of the wealthiest men in the world and the founder of LinkedIn and a big AI entrepreneur. But he's also a really interesting political plan in the United States where he's been the leading campaign already in many ways, financially against Donald Trump and supporting Joe Biden. But he also is rather sort of interesting and reflective about life, about finances, about the difference in Britain and the US. Well, I love this stuff on friendship actually.

30:26That was really interesting. He should write a book on friendship. He's definitely got a different take on it to a lot of people. Well, I spoke to him again this weekend and he keeps putting off this book on friendship. So we need to try to get him to encourage. He's currently saying, I've got to do more an AI, I've got to do more an AI. I'll get onto the friendship. Will AI destroy friendship? There's a book. That's a book. No, I think the leading podcast, if there's anybody listening who hasn't tried it, I think it's a lovely thing to get into because we have every different type of person. We have sport stars.

30:58We have business people and entrepreneurs. I think we might start bringing more creative people in. We've got people with amazing current affairs knowledge. We've got former prime ministers, world leaders. I was last night talking at St Martin's in the field, at church in London. And the priest who was hosting me was saying, one of his very favorite things is the leading podcast. He'd really liked, for example, the dynamic in the infu with Michael Ignatiev. And he really liked, George Fue with Mary McLeese, with the two that he picks out. They're not high profile ones. But I think that there's something in the leading podcast for everybody, depending on your sensibility.

31:39Excellent. Well, that's enough plugging of our leading podcast. Let's talk about China. You've been wanting to talk about the Chinese economy for a long time. And I guess you're coming at it from a negative perspective in terms of how well the Chinese economy's been doing. And I want to talk about the Belt and Road initiative, which I think history is going to look at as one of the most significant pieces of economic, diplomatic power play ever. Yeah. I think Belt and Road is fascinating. I'm really pleased that we're getting onto that. And we're getting onto that. It's the 10th anniversary. Yeah.

32:10Yeah. And so they had the anniversary last week, Xi Jinping and his full pomp. But it was interesting. The extent to which Putin was the very much the main other figure. They had these other leaders from around the world, or band -aid list to say popped up. But Putin was the guy. I mean, this ridiculously long red carpet, the big hugs with Xi Jinping. Putin was the one who spoke after Xi Jinping. I mean, okay, they didn't do the kind of no limits friendship thing that they'd done in the past, but it was very, very close, very, very warm. You know, you really got the sense of this is a, this is a separate power structure for the world.

32:46And so far as Xi Jinping's concerned, the economy and the economic spread of Chinese power is absolutely fundamental to that. But you think the Chinese economy is in a bit of a mess? Well, yes. I mean, let me, let me start by sort of trying to new our set a little bit by saying before we get on to the fact that it's in a bit of a mess, I think we just have to begin with the fact that it is absolutely in all this. One of the things that we sometimes talk about, which I still find is very, very difficult to get our heads around, is that the British economy was still larger than the Chinese economy in 2005, right?

33:20When, when, when you were coming into office in 1997 and you were, you just stopped there, Roy. So when labor empire, the economy was bigger than China. And now, now, now, 97 times, China's seven times larger than the British economy, it became larger than the British economy, 2005, larger than the German economy, 2006, larger than the Japanese economy, 2007. And this is because since 2013, China has been 40 % of all global growth compared to 22 % out from the US and only 9 % from the EU. So you get a sense of how these kind of global growth, not as a global economy, but a global growth. Yeah.

33:59So while the EU has been about 9 % of global growth, China's been 40 % of global growth. And therefore, the statistics around China, before we get into the problems there, and are just absolutely staggering. It's 20 % of the global economy. It's had growth rates averaging nearly 10 % over 30 years. So put that in context, and in Britain, we're pretty pleased if we get about 2 % growth. So as you can imagine, if you were doing the maths on your own investments, somebody growing at 10 % of the year, this should do you have any, somebody growing at 10 % a year manages to grow very, very much more quickly than someone growing at 10 % of the year.

34:34Largest manufacturing economy in the world, largest exporter of goods, fastest growing consumer market, second largest importer of goods, largest recipient of foreign direct investment, largest outward investor, world's largest labor force. So I mean part of the core is it's 1 .4 billion people. And a growing middle class? Incredible sorry around the middle class. I mean, I first went to China in 1979. I was not a boy's spy. A child's spy. A child's spy. No, I mean, it was amazing. I mean, I still remember it because 1979, with my family, with my family, my parents, yeah. And everybody was still in blue mouse suits, little red books being carried around.

35:22Everybody on bicycles, we moved around on bicycles. It was a very, very poor country. You know, 708 million people living in what we would now describe as extreme poverty, living on less than a dollar a day. And since then, Dongsi -Alping, who came in and the 1979, opened up to the Chinese economy and created this 30 years of 10 % growth, which meant that hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of extreme poverty. We've ended up with three 400 million of a Chinese middle class. And some of the stats around it aren't still absolutely staggering. I mean, China produces half of the entire steel in the world is produced by China.

36:04Produces 70 % of the world's sex toys. It's the world's largest automobile manufacturer. 70 % of the world's sex toys. That's a good figure isn't it? I can say my first visit to China was very different to yours because it was to Shanghai. And I could not believe the place. This was in the probably the late 90s. And so because my image of China was very much the one that you'd described, it was mind -blowing to see this phenomenal energy. And that growth has been driven. This is where being a dictatorship does help because they just don't have to worry about the stuff that we have to worry about.

36:46They can't kind of plan for the long term. As Xi Jinping now, the Belt and Road Initiative, which is now covering 150 countries, and more to come, an interesting, some of them like Spain and Ireland. Just quickly, let's just then I'll hand back to you. The Belt and Road Initiative is came out of a Chinese vision of essentially building out the infrastructure to connect the world. Roads, bridges, dams, enormous projects. So Pakistan, 42 billion dollars worth a minute. The numbers are staggering. I remember the normal smug stuff that you get from British ambassadors. And in those days when I was the minister responsible for Pakistan, Ambassador would say smuggly to us.

37:32Well, I think Britain is the number one country in Pakistan. And at that time, we were spending about 350 million pounds a year. And China just announced 42 billion. This is 100 times more going into Pakistan. And it's repeated this. I mean, obviously, we talk a lot about China and Africa, the enormous investments. In Zimbabwe, there are 150 ,000 Chinese people, many of them working. A few go to Kenya as part of this. The train line between Mombasa and Nairobi, not just designed by Chinese, funded by Chinese, built by Chinese, but it's actually run by Chinese. So Chinese people on the train making the train.

38:10I saw a thing on the BBC website recently. It was a BBC guy in Asia reporting on this high speed rail in Indonesia. And it was going and the Japanese had been in line to do this job. And then last minute, they, well, not last minute, but they switched to China. And it was just something, I read this on the week that the HS2 project was cancelled or the extension was cancelled. And you mentioned Zimbabwe. I think there is a real worry in Africa that a lot of that there is this whole thing about, you know, they've got them on debt, the debt and so -called debt and trapman. But these economies are not able to build at the pace that they need to build out without this support.

38:58And meanwhile, Xi Jinping is able to project it almost like the Americans projected the Marshall Plan. It's like the world is an ames. And we are going to take the leadership role and rebuilding it. And one way of thinking about why this is staggering and interesting, Belt and Road, is that the current estimate is that the US and its allies put on the US spent $3 .7 trillion on the interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan. And achieved so little. I mean, Afghanistan, we literally went in 20 years to go to get rid of a Taliban government, spent 20 years, spent one and a half trillion dollars left and handed it back to a Taliban government again.

39:35This is complete fast. But that is almost exactly the same amount that China spelt on the Belt and Road Initiative. And the difference in what China got out of that investment compared to what the US got out of its investments in Iraq and Afghanistan. I think that's why the imagery of President Xi and Putin was so kind of powerful and alarming. Because there you have a situation where the West has been drawn into this war provoked by Putin in Ukraine, which is going on. And now it's becoming more difficult for the Ukrainians, not least because there's now this other war going on. And of course, they're more or less sitting that one out.

40:16The focus on that one now very much on America taking the lead. And as you say, the figures on trade so that the World Bank reckon that the Belt and Road Initiative is going to boost trade flows in the 155 participating countries by 4 .1 %, cutting the cost of trade by between 1 and 2 % and growing the GDP of those countries by an average of 2 .63 to 3 .9%. So you're talking about huge economic development alongside massive concerns about the environment, about human rights and about this the whole debt trap diplomacy. And so the critics will say it's a different form of neocolonialism. But for China, and maybe this is the best, this is the time for you to go on to some of the economic problems they've got.

41:07But in terms of projecting both power and growth, I think you'd have to say the Belt and Road Initiative has been a pretty big success. Yeah, I think it's I mean, the question I guess is can these countries service their debt? I mean, a lot of this was China was making a lot of cash, put a lot of money in places like Ghana, Femme sells having to default on their debt. And so I think China may have trouble being repaid for a lot of these assets. But yes, let's move on. So let's take it as red that China is an enormous economy. And it's particularly well positioned in certain sectors, very, very well positioned for the energy transition.

41:46So it dominates the world in manufacturing of wind turbine solar panels. And the processing is things like cobalt and lithium, which are essential for batteries. World's largest producer of electric vehicles, the Chinese are buying electric vehicles domestically, far more enormous than anyone else. And China's becoming a very, you know, it's the world's largest automobile manufacturer, a huge export of oil and bills. So take that as red. However, at the hearts of this is property that that triggered this problem. So a lot of the Chinese economy, nearly 20 % of the Chinese economy has been connected with property and the building of new apartment blocks.

42:22And this is this enormous middle class, hundreds of millions of people who as they've better themselves both want to get a house, but also see it as an investment vehicle, bit like the Brits, like the house was an extraordinary opportunity to make a lot of money. The house prices were going up very, very steeply. And you know, it's true in the United Kingdom. Many people who lucky enough to buy a house a few decades ago have made more money on the inflation value of the house than they ever made from their salaries, same as China. But as the Chinese economy began to hit various kinds of buffers, COVID, big problem for many other economies and supply chain problems, and other problems that we'll talk about a little bit in the next couple of minutes.

43:03The housing market began to get hit very hard. And the first thing that began to go wrong was a company called Evergrand, which is the largest housing developer in the world, which defaulted in 2021. And it was founded in 96. I mean, it gives the sense that these Chinese companies are very, very recent. And in about 15 years had sort of dominated its huge sectors, the Chinese economy in a pig farming, bottled water, financial investment, all this kind of stuff. And in 2020, the Chinese government began to get very, very worried about the state of the balance sheets of these companies. They were borrowing too much.

43:42You can see how they could service the debt. So the Chinese government tried to step down and put rules in place to try to protect investors and stop these companies borrowing more. And as they put those rules in place, COVID came along. And these companies began to fold. Evergrand, and then another huge company called Country Garden. And they end up with enormous numbers of unbuilt apartments. So, and the numbers again are staggering, 55 to 82 billion worth of unbuilt apartments. So put that in context that the British government every year will, you know, spend a few hundred billion. So this is maybe, that's seven, eight percent of the total budget spend on the British government just tied up in unbuilt apartments.

44:21But more than that, $390 billion, which, you know, maybe a third of the entire spend on the British government in suppliers, you know, all the painters and decorators and builders. And, and of course, at the core of this is the Chinese consumer because people have bought apartments off plan. And these apartments have not been built. What the companies were doing was taking the money that you get off plan. It's got, it's got slight feel of the subprime mortgage at the American crash. So you've got Evergrand finished 300 ,000 homes last year, but have got 720 ,000 to still to build, which have nonetheless been bought as it were.

44:59And what's the other thing that's been going on is, is just, I don't know if you can look into this, is youth unemployment. So what's happening on that? So youth unemployment is terrifying. And again, we can talk a lot about Chinese data and statistics. And the suspicion is that China is not being completely open about its youth unemployment statistics because it's too worrying. But in the official statistics, at least between a quarter and a fifth of the 16 -25 year old population is currently unemployed. And this is terrifying because in this huge economic boom from 1980s, people were just flooding into work.

45:33Fantastic achievement unemployment. And Chinese parents sending their children increasingly to university, expect them to get a job. And now many of my friends in China are talking about the fact that increasingly their kids are just living at home. They're not even appearing in the unemployment statistics because they're not even really going out to try to find work. They've sort of given up on the ability to get work. And you can sense that in a whole series of ways. I mean, you talks about the amazing speed with which China has built things like high speed rail and done these infrastructure investments.

46:06But you could argue that China may have completely overdone it, that it's done it too fast, and that a lot of these rail lines will turn out to be unaffordable. And that Shenzhen, for example, which is this huge new economic zone near Hong Kong, built out sort of staggering seven tube lines. So as the Chinese economy has got itself into trouble, the world economy got the financial crisis 2008 China sort of saved the world economy through big public investment. And again, during COVID, essentially when these things happen, the Chinese government says to all these local governments, spend borrows, spend borrows, build all the infrastructure dreams you ever had, this is the time to do it.

46:46And of course, the kind of logic to that and it's sort of worked for the Chinese economy. But you then end up with seven underground lines built around Shenzhen. And not only are they going to really struggle to cover the debt payments because they borrowed the money to build these things, they're actually going to struggle to even cover the maintenance costs on these lines. I mean, in Britain, we are sort of familiar with this because of this man that we all hate called beaching who closed all our train lines. But the reason beaching did this is that the British government concluded in the 1960s that we simply could have fought.

47:18Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So where does it go? Where does the Chinese economy go? And what's the impact for that on the rest of the world? If the Chinese economy goes belly up, we're all a bit of a problem, aren't we? Yeah. So I think we really hit doom and gloom in July when GDP projections have fallen down to 3%, which would be a dream in Britain, but is terrifying in China, which is used to 910%. Explicit. I hope that Ray was not listening to us here. Yeah, we haven't really taken on the UK ray with the debt of growth anyway. Consumer prices went housing prices began to collapse. Investment was weak.

47:55We talked about youth unemployment. Now, the recent figures are a little bit more optimistic on some of these indicators. But the fundamental structural problems are, I think, threefold debt is China getting itself into a horrible debt trap that it's not going to be able to get itself out of. It got itself into what felt like a very bad debt trap in the late 1990s, but it grew so fast that it got itself out of that. Second, it's still a very, very dominated by manufacturing. 40 % of its economy is industrial manufacturing. And a loss of this is about export. And that depends on the strength of the world economy, European economy growing, American economy growing.

48:36That's good for China because it's selling goods, but actually the European economy has been struggling. The third thing is, of course, we're not in an age that we were in the 1990s of everybody loving free trade. It's becoming more and more protectionist, which means that it's more difficult for Chinese goods to get out there. And the US is a very striking example of this. China still exports enormously to the European Union. So I think 20 % of European imports come directly from China. But the US, for a whole series of reasons, this is Trump putting on tariffs. This is Biden beginning to subsidize his own industries.

49:09And this is the decoupling de -risk scheme. There's been huge pressure to move investment away from China. Jake Sullivan, the national security advisor that we talk about a great deal, has essentially been going around telling companies to get out of China and to reshore to Mexico and Canada. So, Mexico and Canada are now ahead of China in terms of exports to the US. It's huge. Yep, it's amazing. Absi -stag running. And it's happened quite recently. Mexico is now doing 16 % of US imports compared to only 11 -12 % from China. And the benefit for the US is that those Mexican exports are full of US goods, lots of US parts, because they're going back and forth across the border.

49:50So nearly 40 % of the things that the US imports from Mexico are American, 40 % of the products American. Whereas when they import from China, it's only about 6 % of American products. And it also avoids having to move stuff across the Pacific because after COVID people got very worried about supply chains. You'll remember when you're, I don't know, with you all of things on Amazon, but suddenly things got delayed because instead of a ship taking a month to get across the Pacific, it was taking three months to get across the Pacific, you can get things out of Mexico in two weeks. So, what does this all mean?

50:20This means that in dealing with its debt crisis coming out of the housing problem, China is no longer in the environment that it was in in the 1990s when it could rely on free global trade and these growing economies to be able to grow itself out of the problem. And it's also, of course, facing this demographic problem for the first time, the Chinese population is beginning to drop. And this means that China, which was on track to overtaken dollar terms, the US economy, may not actually get that. It's growth may begin to slow that it doesn't actually become the largest economy world. And in the really worst case scenario, it could be another Japan.

50:58And what do we mean by that? Well, we mean that in the 1980s, Japan was everything. Paul Kennedy wrote this book, essentially arguing, rice and four of the great powers, Japan was going to take over. You'll remember there were movies, die hard, for example, it's all about an enormous Japanese company, and Japan was buying up the world. And it was leading in technology, you know, all the most impressive technological developments from Japan, the Royal Palace compound in Tokyo was worth more than the whole of Manhattan. Since when's Clarosis? Since when, Scorosis. And you know, I was talking to you from Japan about the fact that the travel age and time is traveling with her house was worth 10 times more in 1990 than it is today.

51:41And Japan hit a buffer, which was all about debt in the end. And it never came out of it. It just stalled. And so if this happens, China will remain an enormous economy for a very long time to come. But it is facing problems which will create internal problems. And I guess this will also lead to the question of, and this was an argument I was having with the Chinese friend. Does this make the world safer? So she was arguing, well, if there are economic problems at home, teaching things are going to give up on adventures and places like Taiwan, I'd argue the opposite. I'd argue that as we saw with Putin, when economic problems hit hard in Russia, what he did was respond by distracting people through invasions of Crimea and Ukraine, I think it's perfectly possible that as the economic problems deepen in China, Xi Jinping will be more encouraged to make aggressive nationalistic moves against places like Taiwan to distract his population.

52:34And to give the Americans something else to worry about, he was remarkably positive, much more positive than you've been in his speech. The Belton Road Initiative represents the advancing of our times and the right path forward. We must announce ideological confrontation, geopolitical rivalry and block politics. And he focused on unilateral sanctions and the decoupling of supply chains. In other words, he's projecting himself as the great sort of the new globalizer. And the Americans is now putting up all these barriers. But there will be Chinese business people listening to that. Who would be worried?

53:10And we'll be blaming him. I mean, there will be some internal Chinese saying, wait a second, you're aggressive confrontation policy. So he came in in 2012, has driven this decoupling and derisking. The reason we're in this travel, the reason we're not exporting what we used to to the United States is because of you. And there will be many people nostow chick for the days of Dung Siang Ping and Jiang Xie Min who tried to go for a much more no problems policy towards the United States. Well, if any of you from Chinese governments listening, we'd love to have Xi Jinping on leading. We might even go learn, would we learn Mandarin entirely?

53:50We could work on that together. Definitely. So there we are. He'd be very, very happy. Yeah, there's the deal. If we get to, if Xi Jinping, we will work on our matter. We'll both do. Yeah, excellent. Okay, Rory, we've covered a fair bit today. China, Middle East, Labour Party, Tory Party. And we'll see you tomorrow for question, Don. See you tomorrow for question time.

From the publisher

Would an Israeli ground invasion shift international perceptions of the conflict? Why is Labour unhappy with the Lib Dems? Is China teetering on the brink of economic chaos?

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
185. Global perceptions of Israel-Gaza, Labour-Lib Dem bad blood, and Chinese economic crisisThe Rest Is Politics · 54 min
Listen in VO