191. Braverman sacked and Cameron returns

13 Nov 2023 · 52 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 191: Braverman Sacked and Cameron Returns

Overview In this emergency episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart discuss significant political events in the UK, including the dismissal of Suella Braverman as Home Secretary and the surprising return of former Prime Minister David Cameron as Foreign Secretary. The episode features live audience interaction, allowing listeners to engage with the hosts and contribute to the discussion.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Suella Braverman's Dismissal
  2. Context: Braverman was criticized for her controversial statements and failure to clear an article she wrote, leading to her sacking.
  3. Implications: Campbell and Stewart discuss whether Braverman's dismissal signals Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's authority over his cabinet and reflects on the moral values of his leadership.
  4. Public Sentiment: Some constituents express sympathy for Braverman, viewing her stance on immigration as resonant with their views, raising concerns about her potential as a martyr figure within the Conservative Party.
  1. David Cameron's Return
  2. Reappointment as Foreign Secretary: Cameron’s return is framed as a bold move by Sunak, aimed at stabilizing the Conservative Party and potentially moving it towards a more centrist position.
  3. Concerns and Criticisms:
  4. Cameron’s previous tenure is scrutinized, particularly regarding Brexit, austerity measures, and foreign policy decisions.
  5. The risk of financial controversies linked to Cameron's past, including the Greensill scandal, could overshadow his reappointment.
  1. Reactions and Audience Engagement
  2. The hosts take live questions and comments from the audience, discussing the implications of the reshuffle and the dynamics within the Conservative Party.
  3. Mixed reactions suggest that while some view Cameron's return positively, others feel it represents a return to outdated policies and perspectives.
  1. Analysis of Political Strategy
  2. Reshuffle Strategy: The reshuffle is seen as a tactical response to political pressures and a need to recalibrate the party's image amidst declining poll numbers.
  3. Cameron’s Challenges: The episode highlights the challenges Cameron faces, particularly in addressing contemporary issues without being tied to past failures.

Key Takeaways

  • Leadership Authority: Sunak’s ability to manage dissent within his cabinet is questioned, particularly with Braverman’s vocal opposition to government policies.
  • Historical Precedent: Cameron's return as a Foreign Secretary from the House of Lords is discussed in the context of historical political practices in the UK.
  • Public Perception: The hosts emphasize the importance of understanding broader public sentiment beyond the immediate political class, as many voters may hold differing views on figures like Cameron and Braverman.

Conclusion This episode of *The Rest Is Politics* serves as a timely analysis of the shifting dynamics within UK politics, focusing on cabinet reshuffles, the implications of past leadership choices, and the ongoing struggles within the Conservative Party. Through interactive audience engagement, Campbell and Stewart explore the multifaceted reactions to these significant political changes.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. At Blinds .com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100 % satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

0:32Because at Blinds .com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Visit Blinds .com now for up to 40 % off site -wide, plus a professional measure at no cost. Rules and restrictions apply.

0:49Welcome to the Restus Politics with me, Alistak Campbell. And me, Rory Stewart. And it's being quite a day. The very, very good news that solar braverman, who should never have been appointed in the first place, has finally been sacked as home secretary. And the sort of jaw -dropping news that David Cameron, former prime minister, is now back as the new foreign secretary. Lots of other changes still going on around us. We'll come on to those in a minute. Anyway, as a result of that, we listened. We listened to you all. Those of you who said there must be an emergency podcast. So we hit the button.

1:26That's wonderful. And we can see an amazing stream of comments already coming in. I don't know whether you've ever done these things, Alistair. But we've got about 75 comments and already saying things like Alistair and Rory for King and Queen or petition to make Gary never on the foreign secretary. I'm very glad it was in that order. So anyway, for those of you who are listening on the podcast, we're doing things a bit differently. We're recording a live and interactive podcast on YouTube. If you're listening to this on Spotify, Apple podcasts, wherever else you might get your podcast, this might sound a bit different than usual.

1:59We'll be reacting to news as well as taking live questions from listeners on the live stream. And if any of your friends are sort of doing terrible things like having a day job and unable to join us now, this will go out as it were a normal podcast as soon as we get all the sort of graphics and that stuff put on there. So let's get going, Rory. Pretty, pretty big potatoes, I'd say, whether it will change the dial of our politics, I'm not sure. But my God, wouldn't I have liked to be in the... I've been trying to get Tady Blair to talk to me about what it was like backstage at the Senator's yesterday.

2:34But if you think that there's Sudak walking in front of former prime ministers, including David Cameron, who probably has already lined up, past James Clevally, who's about to shift from a job that he wants to keep to one that he doesn't necessarily want to do, then past Bravaman, who is about to sack Bravaman and Clevally then lay a wreath together, and then they will troop it backstage to have teared and cakes. Would it be great? Well, we need to get your friend turning on to talk about it. So I think for the first thing, just to, I guess, set the context for reshuffles, this is going to be a very big deal obviously for Rishi Tuneck.

3:13He won't have waited until this morning to line up David Cameron for the job. Obviously, you don't ask the person into Downing Street, if they're going to say no. So he probably would have lined him up a few days ago, and they will have been waiting for the timing. What's the right time to get rid of Suela Bravaman? And I guess one of the calculations was, why not do it on Thursday? Why not do it on Friday? Why not do it on Saturday? And I'm guessing the answer is that they were waiting to see how the demonstrations panned out. What's your view on the timing bit? Well, I think if he was talking to David Cameron about coming in as far as the secretary, I think that sounds to me like a done deal.

3:52Once they'd sorted out a few questions, I suspect they've had to sort out questions about how David Cameron becomes accountable from the House of Lords. They'll have had to sort out questions, which they'll be asked about, about money. David Cameron is on a former Prime Minister allowance, which is a very, very large whack of cash. Does he also take a full salary alongside that? All the sort of difficult questions, they'd have probably asked about the politics of whether he now has to go out as a defender of the government's Brexit position, which he, we know he doesn't support. Does this make austerity more difficult for the government, given that he's, as it were, with Osborne its chief architect?

4:32I think that have gone through that. Cameron will then have said, okay, I'm up for it. I think he would have, a braverman, of course, has lobbed in this hand grenade of the article in the Times undermining the police. I don't think they could have done anything of this nature over the weekend, either on the Saturday because of the protests going on or on the Sunday because of the armistice, because of the remembrance day events in whitehall themselves. So I think he probably did have it. for the Monday. And of course, it does mean there are consequential changes. So Cameron goes in his foreign secretary, braverman out, James Cleveley, and he said, you know what, I said to Fiona yesterday when we were watching the Senate's House, I said, that is going to be a picture.

5:15You know when the two of them walk together. And Fiona has been saying for a while now, and I think she may have a point that Cleveley is probably more of a contender for the leadership than braverman. Braverman, I don't think does have the support that she thinks she has. I think she has a lot of vanity and a lot of ambition. I'm not sure she has support. But to see the two of them together, that must have been a moment and a half a sullac. He watches them, and he's the only person that knows what he's about to do probably. Nathan, well, let's take it back to the question of what it means to firstly get rid of braverman, and then we'll move on to what it means to get rid of to bring in Cameron.

5:56So getting rid of braverman first, I think the first thing is obviously you've been pushing for it for a long time. You've been saying it's very important. And I think it's a litmus test of whether a Prime Minister is able to keep authority in his own cabinet. I mean, she broke the rules. She was supposed to clear an article that she didn't clear. And it's also a question, I guess, of his moral values. He's been clearly allowing sullac braverman to remain in the cabinet, saying things that we presume that he's uncomfortable with for a long time. And I've explained it in terms of fights within the Conservative Party.

6:35He's now got rid of her. And what do you think are the risks that she will be a sort of martyr and the Conservative Party will now tell themselves to pieces? Well, I think she's a symptom of them tearing themselves to pieces anyway. You've said several times that the Conservative Party has almost become like a sort of series of factions. I think she said she was channeling Arnold Schwarzenegger. She basically was saying, you know, I'll be back. You haven't heard the last of me kind of thing. I think she will cause trouble. I think, look, if you're going to cause trouble for a Prime Minister while you're literally sitting at his right hand inside the cabinet, then the idea you're going to stop causing trouble for him once you're out the cabinet is an onslaught.

7:20She'll cause trouble. The question is whether it has traction. And I think my sense is what sullac is trying to do by bringing back Cameron some of the other changes. There's a mixed picture of the other changes. We'll come onto those. But I think what he's trying to do, frankly, is do what he should have done when he came over when he first moved into Downey Street from number 11, which is to get the Conservative Party to more sensible, grown up position. My worry if I were him was whether frankly it's all too late and whether the questions that are going to surround David Cameron related to Brexit, related to austerity, related to his financial dealings.

7:58I think the green silt thing will hear a lot about that again. But I think with Bravaman, it's intolerable. You cannot have a Prime Minister who is willfully and deliberately undermined in the way that she undermined him. You just cannot tolerate so let's start with the fact that in a sense he's got no option other than to get rid of her. I was talking to an MP this morning as the news came through. And he said, well, quite a lot of my constituents have got quite a lot of sympathy with sullac Bravaman and agree with quite a lot of the things she says. So I guess that's one type of risk.

8:40I don't know a lot of what Bravaman says sympathise with her on immigration, on boats, probably agree with her on. They may not agree with her about her comments about her, but her people, but they probably don't like seeing tents in cities. They probably don't like, and this is a very sensitive point, but I'm assuming that there are a lot of voters out there and some of my constituents would have been like this, who do not like the sight of people walking through London with Balaklava's on an islamist band -alas because it reminds them of ISIS and terrorism and islamist demonstrations. And so there's a possibility that she may try to use this issue to position herself in the sort of anti -work vote.

9:30She will do that without a doubt, and there is a constituency for that. But the other thing we shouldn't forget is that her record of home secretary has been pretty hopeless. Now that can now disappear into the ether because she no longer does the job. And what you'll see happen, the way the media will treat her now will be very different, because they will see her as somebody who's going to be interesting because she can undermine the people who are now in power. But I think she underestimates how much she's undermined herself by the manner of her conduct. Most people, maybe not all these Tory party members who gave us trust and gave us Johnson, but I think most decent people actually, whatever they think of the Prime Minister, don't like somebody who's out there just sort of deliberately undermining them for their own ambition.

10:19And also the stuff that you were quoting there that people support her on, it is to my mind, it's the populist stuff. I don't believe she thinks for a second that sending people to Rwanda is the way to resolve the votes problem. I don't believe for a second that she actually thinks it's a genuine, you know, it's a crisis facing the country that makes the Prime Minister make it one of his five priorities, his classic populism. Now I think, Soonak, if he's got any sense at all, in my view, we'll use this as the moment to signal real change. But I just think he may be, it just may be too late. Can I just bring in the comments coming down the right hand side of the screen?

10:55So we don't, we normally have this going on and they've been pouring in so fast. It's very difficult to keep up with. I'm trying to concentrate on you and my eyes going to these comments. But it's going everywhere from people saying 25 % of people, nothing like that. And people saying 0 .01 % of the 300 ,000 demonstrations to other people coming in saying it's 75 % you left wing not, you know, so it's extraordinary kind of running commentary on this. That's that's Rory, can I just tell you it's why I level look at the comments. I occasionally dip in but I'm sure the, but I'm trying to sort of, here's one.

11:31Here's a good one. Well, let's just explain this. Why is David Cameron returning by entering the House of Lords even legal? To my, by my reckoning, he's at least the, since the, since what we might call modern times going back, you know, last century, I think is the sixth foreign secretary who's done the job from the House of Lords. So it's certainly not illegal. It's a bit of Victorian for sure. Yeah. And can I just come in on that? It really has a Victorian feel. So people will remember that traditionally cabinet ministers could come from the House of Lords or House of Commons. We had prime ministers who came from the House of Lords back in the Victorian era.

12:06So, you know, famously, lots of these people, Lord Salisbury would be an example. And foreign section, these people like Lord Palmerston, Duke Wellington, but it's been a pretty long time in British politics since this has happened, the, the famous recent or relatively recent example that people remember is Alec Douglas Hume who'd been the prime minister, then being brought back to be foreign secretary. But of course, that's more than 50 years ago now. Yeah. You've had Lord, you had, I think the last, you had Carrington under that, and he resigned over the four because he wasn't the previous prime minister.

12:41You had Douglas Hume, as you say, Lord Halifax and before them, Lord Reading and Lord Curzon. Yeah. And we can now, I think, I think someone's going to correct me, but I think Lord Reading had been an MP before he entered the House of Lords. Right. Right. And I think that so David Cameron adds himself, dare we use your distinguished world, Rory? Is this a distinguished list or not? Well, it's a very interesting rest. I mean, Lord Reading, Mark's the Reading was a very interesting figure at the early 20th century. He was he was Jewish and he was incredibly able. He'd been, I think, section state for India.

13:18But it was a big reach for him to become foreign secretary. And one of the questions that's been asked on Twitter, which I want to stop you on for a second before we get on Twitter or is it? Sorry. It's not on the side of the YouTube. It's the live feed, live feed, YouTube. Either way, where you probably listened to him, but an Austrian listener has just asked either of one of us to become challenger of Austria. So, well, I was trying to, I was trying to obviously, in our last leading interview, you tried to convince Arnold Schwarzenegger to do that, but he wasn't having any of it. He wouldn't have it.

13:47He wouldn't have it. So, one of the things that came in on the feed is somebody saying, why didn't he bring in William Hague? And I think there's a very, very strong likelihood that he tried to get in William Hague and William Hague said, no. Hmm. Hmm. The other thing you never know about these re -shuffles until they kind of over and and even then you might never find out the full picture. But my understanding is that James Clevverly really did not want to do this, that he felt that he was doing a genuinely important job at an incredibly difficult time with the Middle East thing going on. To be fair to him, I think I said to you on a previous podcast, he has been holding the line for a more serious approach on this, where he brings David Lamy in, that he briefs Kierstarmher fully and that sort of thing, and that they tried to build a kind of consensus position.

14:40Whereas you've had the Bravaman's and the Goves who've been really wanting to stir this up for labor as it were. And I think he sort of felt that he was a bit of a round pegging around whole and now he's been shipped out just because she was doing the job in a way that was annoying soon. I can we should also put in the in the newsletter, there was a wonderful article which somebody sent me today from the independent just after a few days after soon, I became Prime Minister and the headline that was soon, no regrets over appointing Bravaman and saying that he felt that she'd learnt her lessons and nothing like this would ever happen again.

15:16Now, Rory, his question just gone through, would Rory accept a lordship and go into the cabinet for a really soon? If someone had offered me the chance to be foreign secretary, I definitely would have accepted you would have lost your your podcast co -host. All right. Okay. No, I think I think I know. Are you sure you're crawling messages to Rishi? Is that what they were about? There's just didn't work. Did they? Obviously didn't work. I obviously I've not been complimentary enough on the podcast about the whole conservative machine. Like, can I give you can I give you a question? How many foreign secretaries have there been since Brexit?

15:53Foreign secretaries since Brexit. Well, I can try to count it, can't I? So it was William Hague, Philip Hammond, Jeremy Hunt, I'm sorry, Boris Johnson, Jeremy Hunt. So I'm going to go for seven. It's seven. You're absolutely right. Seven. Seven since we've had eight environment secretaries since 2016, I'll give you a million pounds if you can list them within 30 seconds. I once almost got a million pounds off your track. You did. You did. You did. I'll tell you, list trust, Andrea Letzam, Michael Gove, Theresa Villiers, George Eusters, I've forgotten this guy. He's listed. Randall Giowadire, Rardina, Theresa Coffey, and now Steve Barkley, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, 16 housing ministers, as I said, we have six health secretaries.

16:42There's a great question from Jason Peel. Rory, you could have been the first podcasting foreign secretary. Actually, we've been amazing for Britain's soft power, isn't it? We could sort of rethink the foreign office, we just do our great podcast explainers. Okay, let's let me slow this down for a bit so that we're not completely distracted by the live feed and get into the question of the advantages and disadvantages of bringing in David Cameron. I'll have a first stab and then I'm going to have you. So, advantage, of course, it seems quite strong to have a former prime minister coming in to work for you.

17:17So, it seems like quite a confident thing that a former prime minister would agree to be underneath you. I think David Cameron has an advantage that he knows a lot of these world leaders very well. So, he wouldn't only be able to have the normal access for foreign secretary, but if he flies around the world, I suspect the heads of state will come in and say hello as well. I think he represents for many people, somebody who despite the catastrophic referendum was at least on the remains side, and in 2010, represented compassionate conservatism and a slightly more left wing vision of the conservative party.

17:58So, could be a move towards reconciliation and you can make that case for some of the other people that he's brought in, Victoria Atkins was also more on the remains side. And then the case against, I think there's going to be an enormous amount over the next few days of people going through what David Cameron has been doing with his finances over the last six, seven years, lobbying, representing. So, there'll be a real attempt to do that. I don't know whether journalists will find something, but that's going to be a big risk because that would change the story around from we've brought in a dignified big hitter to suddenly the newspapers being dominated by scandals around David Cameron.

18:40And I think the other thing is, at some point, getting into what his real record is on foreign affairs. I mean, I felt working for him, I got often very frustrated. I began to, obviously, once we saw the RG going on Boris Johnson coming, and I began to miss him more. But at the time, 2010 to 2016, I was often very much loggerheads with him on foreign policy. Anyway, every, I've got, you know how I love my little, my little letter of things. I've got an ABC, which I think is a bit of a problem. Osterity breaks it, China. He was the architect of Osterity. That's going to be a big part of a Labour's campaign.

19:21He is the guy who gave us the referendum, which has given us a lot of the mess that we often talk about. And I think for the Conservative party, he's views on China. Now, I'm sure he's a very slick, professional politician. He'll, whatever soon, he'll find a way of adapting. But I think that could become a problem. And the Greensill stuff, that's the kind of, you know, came and went. But the Lex Green still, as I understand it, is still under a criminal investigation. Overdealings in which David Cameron earned $10 million for lobbying. So all it would need would be something that we don't know to sort of trigger that one to come out again.

20:03And then it looks like soon, acts resetters has gone off kilter again. And people will be, we'll be looking for that. I think it's only fair, Rory, as you've got a book out at the moment, called politics on the edge, that we should take a little bit of a look of, I've just had a quick look through the index, the David Cameron in days. I've got to say, I think he comes worse out of your book than he does out of mine. First of all, and it might be related to the fact that I think the first mentioned it's basically him telling somebody that you're the last sort of person that they want in the last kind of person they wanted, Parliament.

20:38You basically say he's obsessed with the news and the news agenda. You weren't impressed by the fact that he considered himself to be an expert on Afghanistan because he's flown there for a few day trips. You thought back benches are sideline by him. He was too, he was too sort of in in -hok to financial services people. And let me just remind you, this may not help your future career. But I have to tell you, this is what you, this is your judgment on his approach to foreign policy. This is after he left. I did not regret his departure. Partly, I had not liked the way he approached foreign policy.

21:17He hadn't challenged the global financial system or questioned Obama's approach to Afghanistan. I felt he'd failed to prepare for a military threat from Russia, good point, and Miss Handel Libya and Syria and Miss Judge his charm offensive on China. Pretty dammit, Rory. Yeah, I don't think he's about to appoint me as an ambassador any time soon. I decide or outside the House of Lords. No, no. What's all that about the beat? But you do, you do. Well, let's say you told me he's not too special. Yeah, I think if I step back for a second, I think he is somebody who is very much a product of the 90s.

21:54He kind of came of age at the time the Berlin Wall fell. That's when he began his sort of political career. He went to the politics very early, straight from university. And his worldview was very much dominated by that. It was, and we talk about that era from about 1989 to 2005, a lot. And 2005, it's when he became conservative party leader. And that's when David Cameron's character was formed. So it was the era of John Major. It was, of course, the era of you and Tony Blair. It was an era when the US was unchallenged in the world, where the number of democracies in the world was doubling, whether the world was becoming more peaceful and prosperous all the time, whether it was this idea of liberal intervention, responsibility to protect the interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo that seemed to go well.

22:41All of that was what created him. And he never saw really how the world changed in 2005. He didn't see how the financial crisis was going to change things. He didn't see how Iraq and Afghanistan were going to humiliate foreign policy. He didn't really take on board the whitening inequalities that were emerging. He remained somebody who from 2010 onwards. And I think this is probably true of Ed Meliband and Ed Bulls, too. They're all the same generation. They're all part of the same products. Continue to act as late as 2015 as though they were still in that 89 to 2005 period. And my question, really, is as foreign secretary, can he adapt to a very, very different world order where Britain, in 2005, when he became conservative party leader, the British economy was still larger than the Chinese economy.

23:34It's now seven times smaller than the Chinese economy. So can he adjust to a very, very different world? Hey, what are you? That, well, I mean, I guess we'll see in the next day, few days, a sort of reaction. I think within the conservative party, it's made those who are not on the right, the hard right, like Bravaman, feel slightly happier with life, I suspect. I think it's saying to them, soon after he's decided that this whole sort of, you know, bang the drum, stop the votes, popularize, stop the votes, popularize everything, isn't doing them any good. The bi -elections were a disaster for them.

24:17They seem to be going backwards in most parts of the country. I wonder if also because of who and what Cameron represents, the kind of conservatives, and me represents, whether it's partly soon, like saying, look, I think for much of the Red Wall, we're going to have to let it go, but the way they're watching their backs is in the so -called blue wall. And I think what this is partly about is trying to turn a lot of those don't -nose in the polls, who are probably for matories back into the Tory camp. I think that's what this is about. But I think it's a bit late. And I think also it shows that one of my great heroes on strategy, Gary Kasparov, says, never change the strategy unless the fundamentals change.

25:00I don't believe the fundamentals have actually changed. They haven't changed in the soon after became Prime Minister. What's changing is his approach to it, but I don't believe it's because he actually needs to do this now, which is that he didn't do it when he should have done it. Do you think they're going to - it's absolutely - I'm mesmerizing what's going on in the live stream. I get all these people saying, why is Rory drinking a whole flag and of tea? Has he texted congratulations to David Cameron yet? Since I've got that 11 times, I'm going to respond. I don't think David Cameron likes me very much, and I think my texting him congratulations might go down like a bit of cool stuff.

25:36I have. I have. You have - I've said to - I've said to you, don't you think this is the perfect time for a three hour special on the rest of politics? Oh, how wonderful. How would it be great place to get all these views out on foreign policy and put me in my place? Would it - do you think they're going to use David Cameron now much more in the media that they'll put him out to do the Sunday shows that he'll become much more of a spokesman as they go into an ex -selection? Well, he's a - he's a good - technically, he's a quite good communicator. I mean, he, you know, I think he's a better communicator than Soonak by a long way.

Read the full transcript

26:20Better communicator than Hunt. They might do, but I think it's a big risk because he - what people will want to do, and even the sort of client journalists of which there are many, will want to sort of get into the guts of what this is all about. They'll want to sort of explore all the divisions. He won't get away, I think, with doing interviews without being pressed on Brexit or austerity. And on some of the big foreign policy decisions that you talked about, Robert Schlimsey - Schlimsey at the Franchial Times, who is, you know, quite a servant, but also quite a serious journalist. I don't even saw his tweet.

26:58It just said, time to do a thread on David Cameron's previous foreign policy achievements. They just said, one out of one. So there was no thread. So I think it would be, look, it's given what I think about this in general. I think it's bold. I think it's made them a bit more interesting for a bit. It means we're talking about Bravaman now in the past, which is I think quite a good thing for - So just to interrupt, Tara, what one thing possibly that they're doing there is you're suggesting that it actually suits Number 10 also because it moves the story on from Bravaman's bitterness to the question of Cameron.

27:38To the question of Cameron and also the question of whether this is soon trying to do a really genuine repositioning. So for example, we've got the Rwanda case coming up in the courts. Now I hear from sources close to sources who know lawyers. I hear that actually the government, there's a very good chance the government's going to win this. If that's the case, be interesting to see how the reaction is, but if they lose it, what Bravaman was all lined up to do was to go for this pull out of the European Convention on Human Rights. Well both Cameron and James Clevely now who's taken over from at the Home Office, both of them are on record as saying that would be a very, very stupid thing to do.

28:18So that presumably is dead. Does that then provoke these ERG people? The truth is though, this is what I tried via the podcast to tell soon I can use people from the word go. You can't trade, you can't trade with these people. You have to do your own thing and understand that between now and the general election, Soonak is pretty much safe. He's going to be there. If he's not, then the choice is done. I mean, and they might as well just all go home and not even bother having election. There's another interesting point when I thought, Greg Hans, the Tory chairman has been moved, just business. I think he did that before.

28:49And the new guy, Richard Holden, I suspect that's a new name to most of our listeners. But it's suggesting me that Soonak still needs to have a few basic lessons about politics because this guy's got a majority of 1144. Now to be the party chairman where you have to become a high profile defender of everything the government does and in the campaign, if that's your majority, I think he can wave by by to you see. Well, it's interesting. One is the often you're looking for people to put into party chairman who are real campaigners who really fight elections. And of course, someone with a marginal seat like that, small majority is somebody who has to work very, very hard on winning their seat, keeping their seat.

29:39But you're right. I mean, this is what happened to Chris Patton, who was the chairman for John Major. And then losing his own seat as the chairman. Although Chris Patton went on to do pretty well afterwards. Other bits, the reshuffle. So Steve Barkley will be frustrated. He was health secretary. He was meant to be. I don't think the NHS will be frustrated. The NHS not not be frustrated. But that's a very interesting move and we'll lead to some very strange dynamics around the cabinet table because Steve Barkley was very much brought in. He's an ex -management consultant, I think, former accountant to come in and really focus on remodeling the NHS.

30:24And a lot more money was put into the NHS. And he will feel, right, the or wrongly, that he's had the legs cut out from him in the middle of what he was trying to do. And he's been moved to the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which is a less senior position. You actually know it. I mean, when I was sitting at the cabinet table, you literally see ministers moved down the table. The seniority is how close you are to the Prime Minister. So he will be literally shifted down the table. And he's now basically become Furglesharkishaddo. Furglesharkishaddo. But of course, very frustrating for farmers and people who care about the environment.

31:01But you're going to get a sense that Denver is a second best job. Nick Batters on leading. She said it was just so frustrating to keep seeing these people moving around. And we've never had churn like this. And yet again, these ones who get sacked, we're going to nice big fat payoff. I see Nick Gibb is going. He must be about the longest serving minutes. So Nick Gibb is the other end of the spectrum. We often talk about how quickly people are reshuffled. But Nick Gibb has been an almost continuous there. It's a junior education minister, minister of state and education since 2010. Yeah. Which is 13 years.

31:42Which means that a most civil servant, senior civil servant, is often only in the role for a couple of years. So Nick Gibb would have seen six cycles of civil servants go through. Another example of that was George Eustace, who didn't do quite as long, but was a junior minister and then the section of state in Deffra for a very, very long time. Nick Gibb has stepped down saying that he has been, he's going to go on seems to be an ambassador somewhere. He's somebody who there was a lot of affection for in the House of Commons. He represented something unusual. Somebody who seemed to be willing to be a junior minister in the department and put in a dozen years.

32:18He put a lot of focus on improving British students scores in maths and seems to be quite effective. They've seen the same thing. I know that Fiona, who, who, who, who follows this very closely, wasn't always a fan, is that right? Yeah. I think, I mean, I was in a school today and I think most people in the education sector, the state education sector when you talk about Nick Gibb, they think he and go between them and on the north of a lot of, an awful lot of damage. There's a great question here from Sam Hills. I wonder if I was to regret turning down a peerage now that he would have had the opportunity to hold a city member of the cabinet to account.

32:56It will be interesting. He David Lamy, the shadow for unsecretary, has put out a statement saying that, you know, there needs to be some way that Cameron is answerable to MPs. I mean, and I guess this is the other thing that will happen because he obviously can't turn up in the House of Commons and the Lord's is much more sort of gentle in the way that it debates. I suspect the select committees will be gagging to get Cameron up before them. Yeah. Well, this question of accountability is, is really important. And I wonder as we think about the constitution, why exactly we couldn't be bold and say that a, section of state who's in the Lords can't go into the comments and answer questions.

33:41I know the answer is that, you know, the nobody who isn't elected a member of the House of Commons has allowed a passing to the Commons Chamber and all this sort of thing. But the principle of accountability seems to me pretty fundamental. And remind us a little bit about Mandelson, because that's, people were surprised, but it's not the first time it's happened recently. No, we just need to put out that. Yeah. Well, when Gordon became Prime Minister, Peter Mandelson was out of Parliament working in the European Commission and Gordon got him back, put him in the House of Lords and made him business secretary and first secretary of state.

34:17So it's not it's not unprecedented on the Labour side either. Do you think you might have thought about Theresa May? Yes, I think that's, I think if you were Theresa May, you probably would have been very attempted by the Royal Foreign Secretary. So I think he might have thought about Theresa May. I also stick to my view. I've got no inside information on this, but Rishi Tuneck is very, very close to William Hague. William Hague was his predecessor in Richmond. And if you read William Hague in the Times, he's talking up Rishi Tuneck a lot, was an early supporter of his leadership bit. I think there's a very strong likelihood he approached William Hague first, but interestingly, I think William Hague probably doesn't want to do that role.

35:01He's stepped out of the House of Lords. He stepped out of public life. I think he's been quite grateful to do that. And remember, he stepped down a year earlier as foreign secretary. And I remember him saying to me, I was very, very shocked that he would want to step down as foreign secretary because obviously it's a job that I and many, many other MPs would see as one of the great jobs in government. But he certainly found it pretty frustrating. I think probably conscious maybe that Britain's power isn't all that it was, but also to a lot of the time you feel like a traveling salesman, you know, for some foreign secretaries basically selling British armaments abroad and stuff like that.

35:38So he may have thought I've done that already. I don't want to do it again. We don't, we don't recently about the whole thing about families as well. I wonder what David Cameron's wife thinks about it. So I mean, if he's going to do the job and do it properly, he's going to be traveling a lot. He's going to be away a lot again. He's going to be under the caution again. He's going to be getting the scrutinised pretty heavily again. And I wonder whether I'd love to know what she's what she's thinking about. And while on the subject of spouses, this was on my list of things to raise and see what you thought, but it's coming from a question of Ahmed Ayjah Kaui.

36:16Interesting to see the new Secretary of State for Health, Victoria Atkins is married to the Managing Director of British Sugar. And she's diabetic. And do, yeah, do potential real or perceived conflicts of interest that we get discussed when re -shuffling a cabinet. The truth is that they do. And that was one, because I was aware of that connection, that was one that my my my antennae did prick up a little bit when I saw that. That's quite a, you know, we've got a big obesity strategy apparently and you've got the health secretary literally in bed. I also think this live streaming industry is attempting to troll me all the time.

36:51There's people sending things like Rory, the sticker under the cup or wave at my six -year -old. Well, I got one who said that my he said, my wife loves Rory more than she loves me. I get loads like that, but I just I just blank them out Rory. But you just just blank them out. Yeah. And there's one there. So 17 ,500 viewers, GB news don't get this in a week. I tell you about that. I don't know about that. So the somebody in the thread said, as a working class Tory voter, I can tell you this has finished him. So that that will be the somebody in the thread here expressing the view of the right to the conservative party, who liked this trust, liked Swela Brahmman, felt that Rishi Sunak betrayed Boris Johnson, felt that even though Rishi Sunak was a brexit here, he's too centrist for their liking and feel that bringing in David Cameron just confirms everything that they were suspicious of right back in 2010 and that drove them to vote for UKIP, I guess.

37:51Yeah, but I think just as there's a danger in us assuming that our excellent listeners on the thread represent the totality of public opinion. So I think there's a danger of thinking that the media represent the public opinion or that social media represents public opinion. And I think what this is about is trying to maybe get back in touch with those people who aren't that political, don't think about it too much, but probably don't despise John Cameron quite the way they maybe despise some of the people they've been seeing on the telly they have today like Brahmman and not to mention of course Johnson and Trust.

38:26I felt rather sick seeing them at the centre of the city yesterday. I really think it's utterly absurd that because she was prime minister of 10 minutes and you know he having wrecked the country in so many ways that they now their constitutional function is an annual reminder that they were once ludicrously prime minister. Well, so we've had the health secretary we've talked a little bit about Steve Barkley moving to Debra. There's also been the loss of some pretty substantial figures who were ministers of state. So they're technically junior ministers so they're not not sexually sustained but they're quite big figures within the party have stepped down.

39:05So Jesse Norman. So Jesse Norman in from 2010 very bright, very ambitious was somebody who came in with me and was absolutely tipped to be in the cabinet whose wife led on the the covid vaccine procurement and is an academic a he stepped down from transport. Neil O 'Brien who again very interesting voice in the conservative parties sometimes quite right wing on things like justice sometimes quite left wing on social justice been working closely honestly was like leveling up in the past. So that's a surprise resignation. Wilquence from a younger generation but again had been ahead of a parliamentary select committee has gone to.

39:56George Freeman who came in with me who was the science minister and has been was the science minister for David Cameron got back in again with Boris Johnson retained his job under Rishi and has really made life sciences his mission in life has stepped down as well. So there's something interesting going on because some of those figures are more in the center of the party they're not sort of Nadine Doris usual suspects. But don't you think that'll be people who are perhaps thinking about throwing in the towel before the election and moving on his MPs. Yeah I would I've never quite understood why you have to do that before an election right.

40:35A lot of people do because they want to look for a job before an election and they think if they get out ahead of the queue of everybody else. I think there is a fair amongst MPs particularly conservative MPs. The current polls hold and Kierstammer gets him with a 20 point majority there will be hundreds of people looking for a job in a single day. So I guess people will hope to be again those conversations earlier but I can't believe that's the only reason I I imagine that some of these people have actually been fired. There's a great question here from yellow letters. How come only some MPs are able to say they've been sacked?

41:11Rachel McLean said she'd been sacked whereas Tari's coffee says she has resigned. Well, I know quite a lot about that. Tell us about that. What is the difference between being sacked and saying you've resigned? Well basically what nice kind prime ministers tend to do in some circumstances is to alert people to the fact that it is highly likely that she's come to reshuffle they will not be in a job. So they might start to prepare a letter that can be put out that says I've decided now is the time to spend a little bit more time with my family and pruning my roses. Whereas Rachel McLean I suspect wanted to make a point.

41:54The point being that these guys aren't taking housing seriously if you know puts in the 16 ,000 minister. Yeah, so that's right isn't it? That most of the people, not all of them, some of them will genuinely have resigned but most of them basically have been politely sacked. Yeah. And some of them will take the opportunity to say I've resigned and some of them will say over my dead body I'm sticking here you're going to have to fire me. Are you in the job, are you genuinely disappointed that the call for to elevate Lord Stewart didn't come and I don't think it's realistic. I think one of the one of the things we've decided to do Anastras to try to be pretty open and blunt and I don't think I can get away half my cake needed to be.

42:39Who do you think is the good one about the economic aspect to be the foreign secretary? Okay, now the most is I unless he changes the foreign office set up. I think I'm writing saying that Andrew Mitchell is now the senior foreign office minister in the House of Commons. So that means we now have a foreign secretary in the House of Laws and a foreign minister in the House of Commons who is absolutely of the view that 0 .7 % of GDP should go on development and indeed that getting rid of Diffid was a terrible mistake by Johnson. So I wonder if that's one little sliver of good news out of this. Yes, I think it could be because of course David Cameron really embraced that commitment that was made under you guys so that commitment to spend 0 .7 % of GDP on international aid was made under the Black Brown government but Cameron brought it into law and actually hit the target.

43:32So when he came in in 2015 Britain was spending about six billion pounds a year in international aid and as we've discussed during austerity he increased that spent a 13 billion pounds. We put another 7 billion pounds a year into international development and this was he saw this and gay marriage as two of his really big achievements that he talks about a lot and since he's left he's been doing quite a lot with international aid and he wrote a big paper on international governance. So I think there's and of course Andrew Mitchell was his international development secretary so that pairing should be very good for development.

44:14Also a bit of a shout out for Andrew Mitchell he's just brought together a white paper that he's about to release will get hopefully a bit of an early glimpse before it's released to the public but I think there's going to be some promising things about some of the movements in which international development might go which hopefully will get cross -party approval. Of course if David Cameron is put up in front of the media let's just say that this becomes one of the threads that the media decided is an interesting one to pursue but soon I can a sense put some in his box and says no we're not shifting on that because that's going to set off flares with these crazy people on the right then of course that weakens the attempt to use Cameron to to change the look the image the brand call it what you will.

44:57So I think this is one of those things that frankly could be a good move but could also unravel depending frankly upon what Cameron now says and does and what people this what sort of demeanor people decide to take vis -a -vis and both inside the conservative party but also the media and the public. Yeah yeah I mean I'm just a final thing which we often say in in reshuffles. Remember it doesn't change much. But also remember how bizarrely amateur the system is that these people will be expected I remember this when I was moved I was moved I think I had five ministerial jobs in just about three years and what people maybe don't quite understand from the outside is that within two days if you're a new job you can be standing in the House of Commons answering questions on your new brief.

45:47I want to change the system and I'd like here's time to sign up for this to say people should spend a minimum of two years in their role as a minister and that when they take over there should be a three week training period to get them up to speed somebody's pointed out that James Clevelies gone from foreign section to home section so he will have had to when he became foreign secretary very rapidly learn about 150 countries that he knew next to nothing about he would have had to try to memorize the names their presidents find out how big they are now he's responsible for the hood of the police the hood of the security service all of immigration terrorism so responses in the UK and he's going to be standing up within two three days having to be confident about all those things.

46:34Yeah well we've whistleed on we've whistleed on wrong enough we should probably plug comfort euro on leading and we should say no no no but wait wait wait I have one for you quickly a football one which is just dreamed up I don't know I'm going to get bring it back it's football one um oh no actually it's asked to me but I'm going to ask it to you so can Rory insert Alistair explain the camera appointment in football terms please is it like Ronaldo returning to United or marino returning to Chelsea. Oh good one I'd say I'd say it's like it's like Darren anderton coming back for the next World Cup.

47:18I'll even go down a bed it's like Darren bed. Oh come on it's more than Darren bed it's more like it's more like it's more like some star player who may be getting a bit old isn't it isn't it like somebody who played in the World Cup but is now getting a bit creaky. Yeah I don't want even Gerald being brought back. I don't want to flatter a camera enough to say it's like Gaza but I guess you it's like maybe it's like Gaza coming back in 2010. Those of us those people who've been watching us live would be very interested to know whether you've enjoyed this experience of us sort of trying to talk to each other while reading your thousands of comments.

47:59Yeah and also abusing the bottom of my people keep saying how I looked at the label at the bottom of my mind. It's only a bloody label people get obsessed about the is the problem in the modern world worry. We care far too much about things that don't matter and not enough about things that do. Exactly. I don't give a damn about the label on you. Thank you very much. The real question that we should have been focused on is what is Cameron's policy going to be on Israel Gaza because he was a big backer of Israel. He's now right in the center of this and that for our podcast tomorrow morning is going to be more of a question than the label on the bottom of my mug.

48:32I think so. We'll talk about that. Now anybody who enjoyed this and wants to encourages to do more than I suggest that you subscribe to the Resties politics YouTube channel. Plush out for a comfort hero. I listened back to it today on the train up to a school in Bedford and I thought it was really good. Really interesting woman actually. So if you find this really extraordinary when I when we're doing the podcasts doing the interviews I'm so focused on doing the interview that I sort of I get a completely different experience when I listen back to it. I think that's right. I also love the fact that if anybody's thinking of doing a podcast who's listening to this I like the fact that there's two of us because it means when you're asking a question I can be listening to her answer to you and thinking about a new direction to go and I like the dynamic of having two people interviewing.

49:26I guess a bit of a luxury but I would encourage anyone podcasting for two people. It's very very important that your sycophantic text, Dariusie Sunei didn't result in you being put in hand. I need to take the advice from you on the texts. Yeah so comfort hero on leading definitely definitely worth listening to and we'll be back again very very soon with the podcast and with the question time. Oh in sunny Alistair at one point I think we had nearly three times as many people listening to us as we had in our royal Albert Hall show. Okay so that's that's that's so worth doing maybe. We could just live our lives on YouTube.

50:05You in a you in a sort of yeah what you do you like me surround my head. Do you think it looks do you think it looks good? Do you mind mind you mind you back that screw that. It's lovely. I like the dark in the back. I like the war lot in my hotel room. Look at that beautiful. That's really it's not nice. It's not nice. I did. I wanted to say that. I was commenting on that before you arrived. All right. Okay time to do my friend. Thank you all. Bye bye.

From the publisher

The emergency pod button has been pushed as David Cameron returns to politics and Suella Braverman has been sacked.

TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
191. Braverman sacked and Cameron returnsThe Rest Is Politics · 52 min
Listen in VO