196. Why are the far-right on the rise?

29 Nov 2023 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 196: Why are the far-right on the rise?

Episode Summary In this episode, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart delve into several pressing topics in contemporary politics, including the potential restitution of the Elgin Marbles to Greece, the financial implications of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt's Autumn statement, and the rise of far-right populism in Europe, highlighted by recent elections in Argentina and the Netherlands.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. The Elgin Marbles Debate
  2. Background: The Elgin Marbles, ancient Greek sculptures, were removed by Lord Elgin while Greece was under Ottoman rule and have been a subject of controversy regarding their rightful ownership.
  3. Recent Developments:
  4. The Greek Prime Minister's visit to the UK sparked discussions about potentially returning the marbles.
  5. A reported cancellation of a meeting between Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and the Greek PM, following comments about the marbles being akin to a "Mona Lisa cut in two".
  6. Campbell criticizes this cancellation as a "petulant" political move and suggests it reflects poorly on the UK government.

Key Quotes

  • "Unless there's a deep explanation, I think it's a massive own goal." - Alastair Campbell
  1. Autumn Statement Analysis
  2. Context: In the Autumn statement, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced tax cuts, reportedly with a focus on addressing inflation and public services.
  3. Political Implications:
  4. Hunt's administration chose tax cuts over investing in public services, presenting a challenge for Labour in the upcoming elections.
  5. Campbell and Stewart discuss the implications of these cuts, including potential reductions in services and the management of public perception.

Key Points

  • Tax cuts were primarily politically motivated to position the government against Labour.
  • Significant cuts to public services are expected, which could impact the NHS and other vital services.
  1. The Rise of Far-Right Populism
  2. Recent Elections: The hosts examine the strong performances of populist leaders like Javier Milei in Argentina and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands.
  3. Analysis of Vilders' Victory:
  4. Vilders' party, PVV, capitalized on public dissatisfaction and a shift in traditional voting patterns, particularly among working-class voters who have abandoned the left.
  5. Discussion on the implications of coalition-building in the Dutch electoral system and the challenges posed by Vilders' extreme views.

Key Concepts

  • Populism as Protest Vote: Many voters are driven by dissatisfaction with the status quo, leading to support for far-right candidates who promise change.
  • Cultural Backlash: Rising anti-immigrant sentiment is a significant driver behind the success of far-right parties.
  1. Global Political Landscape
  2. Ireland: The hosts touch upon recent riots in Dublin fueled by misinformation regarding a violent incident involving immigrants, showcasing tensions around immigration.
  3. Africa: They briefly discuss instability in countries like Sierra Leone and the ongoing civil war in Sudan, highlighting the complex interplay of local and international interests.

---

Conclusions and Takeaways

  • The political landscape in the UK and Europe reflects a growing divide, with far-right populism gaining traction due to widespread disillusionment with traditional parties.
  • The dynamics surrounding tax policy and public service funding will be crucial in the lead-up to future elections, particularly for Labour.
  • The discussions about the Elgin Marbles and political apologies reflect broader themes of national identity and the legacies of colonialism.

Final Reflections The episode encapsulates the challenges faced by contemporary politics in dealing with legacy issues, economic pressures, and the rise of populist movements. The hosts advocate for a more engaged and informed political discourse to address these complex issues.

---

Additional Information

  • Podcast Links:
  • [The Rest Is Politics](https://therestispolitics.com)
  • Social Media:
  • Instagram: [@restispolitics](https://www.instagram.com/restispolitics/)
  • Twitter: [@RestIsPolitics](https://twitter.com/RestIsPolitics)
  • Email: restispolitics@gmail.com

---

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thanks for listening to the Restus Politics, sign up to the Restus Politics Plus to enjoy ad -free listening and receive a weekly newsletter. Join our members' chat room again early access to live show tickets. Just go to therestuspolitics .com. That's therestuspolitics .com. Right now, with the Home Depot, you'll find storage solutions made to fit your needs. Grab an HDX tough tilt to protect your tools, or keep your sports equipment contained with reinforced snap -fit lids, or stack up and make better use of your space with bins and totes built to last. Whatever your story, we've got the gear to keep it organized and protected at the Home Depot.

0:40How doers get more done?

0:56Gatorade, is it in you?

1:32The rest of the week, what with the autumn statement, the net migration figures, I'm going to talk about all of that. And I think we're also going to cover in the second half the the fire right in particular in the context of the elections in Argentina and the Netherlands and these shocking riots in Dublin. But I think we should kick off with something that sort of just happened in recent hours. And that is, I think, unless there's any deeper explanation, only be described as a temper tantrum by Little Rishi. Or misplayed politics. So to give people background, the Greek Prime Minister came to the UK.

2:14And he saw Kierstarma, and he was planning to see Rishi Sunak. And in some of the reporting that came out of his meeting with Kierstarma, there was press stories saying Kierstarma was open to the idea of at least lending the Elgin marbles back to Greece, which then led astonishingly to Downing Street, it seems, cancelling a meeting with the Greek Prime Minister. But what they say, the reason for the cancellation, was Mr. Tarkas doing an interview where he said that having the marbles partly in London and partly in Athens is like having Mona Lisa cut in two and in two places. And this is what was being briefed, I don't know.

2:53But the whole thing just strikes me as ludicrously petulant. And you don't think it's a very strange attempt to try to grab headlines that they were jealous that Starma had got press out of meeting with a head of government and people? In which case it's even worse. Can I just sort of, that one quickly, presumably if you're a leader of the opposition, it's a big win if you can meet a serving head of state. Well, yes and no. I mean, so Chris Mason of the BBC, he said this thing that it would irritate the Prime Minister, that a visiting Prime Minister would meet the leader of the opposition. That's complete nonsense.

3:28I mean, you sort of assume that if a visiting head of government is here, and unless it's just a quick in and out, if they've got time, most of them will meet the head of the opposition. Probably, yeah. Usually. So I just don't think it's that big of a... I mean, I don't think it's that big of a big deal. It's a big deal because it was the president of America. Right. But you know, when Neil Kennedy was leader of the opposition, he met Ronald Reagan as leader of the opposition. Now, as it happened, Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher sort of conspired to make sure it was a disaster, not least with the help of our frank fearless and not very free press.

4:04What just reminds that? This was a time when Labour was still committed to, you know, a natural nuclear disarmament. So it was a big deal. Neil going to see the White House sit down with Reagan. And I think it was just a memory. They didn't allow cameras in once that Neil had briefed about the meeting going well. They then briefed out that it had gone badly and that it wasn't very long and very, very... It was awful. It was awful. I wrote a piece from the New States, but it was to dearly to my colleagues at LaLobby because I remember the headline was, you guys are the pits. And it was about basically how Reagan Thatcher and most of our press had conspired to make this a disaster.

4:42And it was been incredibly disappointed because you said it would have been a really big deal, a big chance just before, presumably just for the 92 election, to establish Kennerka's a significant figure. Yeah. So when we were in opposition, because Clinton was in office and that went really, really well partly because they wanted it to. But the idea that the Greek Prime Minister, a bear in mind, this is a guy who the previous home secretary, Bravaman, is on record as saying that we have to work very closely with the Greeks in terms of managing some of these asylum and immigration issues. But I think the message this sends to the rest of Europe and the rest of the world is just bizarre.

5:23So unless there's a deep explanation, I think it's a massive own goal. And where do you stand, Rory? As I'm guessing, I'm guessing you're going to be there hours, we keep them. Where do you stand? Vinders keepers, losers, weepers, the organ marbles are ours. No. So when I told you that's what I told you. Yeah, exactly. First thing, just quick background on this. So these are obviously these amazing sculptures that were on the face of the Puthanum, the Great Temple in Athens. And when Greece was a province of the Ottoman Empire, ruled from Istanbul by the Turks since the Middle Ages, Lord Elgin, British aristocrat with a lot of money, a lot of interest in antiquities came into the church's title was what was this title?

6:06Ambassador extraordinary, a minister, plenty of potential of his Britannic majesty to the sublime port of Selim III, Sultan of Turkey. Very good. So he was the big abass of the Ottoman Empire and then came over and decided, and this was part of the whole tradition that had started the Renaissance of getting hold of antiquities and bring them home. But he pulled off the most extraordinary thing, which is that he convinced the Turkish government to allow him to buy the Elgin marbles from them, get some sort of paperwork and export license and took them back to Britain, about which they continued to be huge dispute.

6:39And even at the time there was huge disputes. So the kind of people that would impress you, sort of Byron and Shelley and all the Great Roman. I'm about to quote his perv. Very good. They were very, very cross -fit. It can't go so quote of the. So Byron wrote, dull is the eye that will not wait to see the wall, defaced by mouldling shrines removed by British hands, which it had best behoved to guard those relics near to be restored. Curse to be the hour when from their aisle they roved, and once again thy hapless bussam gourd and snatch thy shrinking gods to northern climbs aboard. Yep, there we are.

7:17So that's absolutely right. Good polarising issue back in the day. So I guess the obvious question for the British Museum, which is filled with antiquities from all over the world, huge chunks of Egypt, chunks of Greece, bits of China, etc. And the Stunogist British Museum, and to the Metropolitan Museum in New York, the Louvre, etc. I mean, after all, the Louvre has one Mona Lisa, which the Italians could well say they'd like back and hear the sound of the other, is of course the question when you begin returning things. And maybe it's inevitable. You know, Benin bronzes are on their way back.

7:53There's big moves from the VNAI, I think, to return some of the Mandalay treasures. And in fact, I think they've already begun that, and there's been returns also to Ethiopia, or at least strong discussions about returns with you. And George Osborne, is the current head honchoe of the British Museum, seemed broadly sympathetic to doing something. Yeah, his compromise is a sort of loan programme where technically they're only on loan to the Greeks, and the Greeks send us some antiquities on loan to the British Museum. But if you go to Athens, the most beautiful museum has been produced right next to the pathonon with gaps for the marbles, and it's actually in my personal view, a much more stunning space than we have in the British Museum.

8:36Would you presume to get fewer visitors? Yeah, argument might be fewer visitors. The old argument that the British Museum used to make quite pompous see is that they were good at protecting these antiquities. And of course, they get very excited about the fact that there was an explosion in the pathonon where an Ottoman munitions depot exploded and might have destroyed the marbles if they hadn't been removed before it exploded. I think we now say that they've become damaged over here because of all sorts of things. Exactly, definitely. And furthermore, partly, I think we painted them with things that we thought would protect them, and it seems to have partly corroded the imagery.

9:08So actually, the plaster cast taken off the marbles in the 19th century are actually crisper and cleaner than the actual marbles themselves. Now, before we go into the autumn statement, do you want to know the polling on the particular polling? So, at it was also Mori -Pole in 1998, that some time ago, just after we were in power, found 39 % in favour of returning them to Greece, 15 % in favour of keeping them, and 40 % have no opinion or would not vote if the question were put to a referendum. I don't believe that was ever opposed, by the way. In 2002, 59 % of British respondents thought the pathonon marbles blonde in Greece, 18 % that they blonde in Britain, and 18 did not know.

9:50So if Sunak is bizarrely trying to play this for politics, it's not at all clear to me who he's pitching to us. That it's a huge culture wall. And it feels a bit like a bit of a terrible own goal. No, it doesn't sound very exciting. I guess there might be some bits of the sort of British nationalist right that might be a bit more finders keepers, losers weepers about this. I suspect so. The people who think that we won the war on our own or all that stuff. Okay, autumn statement. Autumn statement. So we talked about the autumn statement in advance. You were tiptoff, weren't you? I'm expensive.

10:20Expensing, yeah. I'm pushing for it, expensing, yeah. Well, let's say the big context. We talked about this last week and the lead up to it. Because of inflation and because income tax thresholds were frozen, more and more people have ended up paying income tax, which meant that the government ended up with more than 20 billion pounds extra. And the question was, what was it going to do with it? And broadly speaking, there are three things that it could have done with it. I would have liked them to save the money in a prudent fashion because you never know what's going to happen in the future.

10:51Or pay down, don't pay down, don't. Yep. Another way of doing it. Exactly. Because debt interests, fine. Second thing you could have done is you could have invested it in public services because, of course, as inflation kicks in, in real terms, the money for public services decreases. So the pressure on the NHS, pressure on schools is growing. The third thing you can do is you can give the money away in tax cuts. And the government decided to do that last thing. And I think that was primarily, that's sort of macro level, a political move, because what it is doing is taking away money that otherwise could be handed to an income agreement.

11:25And it's presenting labor with a challenge to say we've decided we prefer tax cuts to investments in public services. Are you going to go along with that? Or are you going to say actually we'll do something else? Now that's the politics of it. And then once you've taken the politics into account, which is a big thing, what did they actually do with their tax cuts? Well, there I am very sympathetic. When it actually came to the decisions they made, I think they made some good ones. They decided to do things which you pointed out were probably less headline catching. So allowing companies to put off against tax capital investment, which is a good thing for growth, because they encourage its companies to invest some more in plant machinery, which were lights on the Britain.

12:02They've also made a cut to national insurance, which is also a good way of addressing taxes. It's better than a cut in the basic rate. Better than the cut in the basic rate of tax. Because it basically helps working people as opposed to rich pensioners. Exactly. And then they've also upgraded benefits. So I think the details of it, if they were going to make the big decision to do that are not bad. And labor is broadly speaking endorsement, haven't they? They haven't actually distanced themselves from it. But that again, may be political. Well, I think it is political, and it's also rather strange, because you're now going into a general election where Brexit, which has caused a lot of these economic problems, the OBR report confirming would be 4 % richer if we hadn't had the European Union, that's not going to be part of the election debate.

12:44Both sides would seem to be saying. And now it would seem that the massive spending cuts, which are locked in, there's a splendid graphic, which we should put in the newsletter, which I think the Institute of Physical Studies did, where it shows the money that he's being used to pay for these tax cuts in the coming years is almost directly correlates with the spending cuts there are going to have to be. So he's basically locked in the spending cuts. Yeah. But sorry, locked in in the Tory plans. So the challenge is, are they going to go along with these plans? Correct. So, it's a bit of austerity.

13:19So, they're locked in. And by the way, it's austerity that is almost on a par with Osborne's austerity. You've got your protected budgets. So, for example, you've now got local authorities, Tory and Labour, really essentially saying they are pretty much cut to the bone already, and they're looking at huge cuts after the next election. You've got prisons, which you and I have been talking about a lot, double digit cuts. You've got cuts into virtually every service apart from probably health and probably education. And I saw an astonishing stat. So, in 2000, year 2000, the share of overall public spending that went on health and social care was 26%.

13:582010, 32. Today 40, 2028 on these plans, 45%. So, in protecting health, and by the way, we've now got this consultants pay deal, which is not included in these fees. That's another 250 million. We've talked about this. The NHS workforce transformation plan on its own will add something like an additional 2 % to a government spending a GDP over a period. So, it's huge changes in the government budget. Now, Tim Shepman, who is a Sunday Times journalist, has written an article which my friend and mentor David Gulk drew my attention to saying that he thinks it's almost inevitable that there will be more tax cuts in the spring budget.

14:42David thinks this is very unlikely. And he points out that this is because, actually, if you look at the forecasts, the finances are under more pressure than people understand because traditionally, every year, the government is supposed to put up fuel duty by five pence plus inflation. And there's a temporary cut of five pence on fuel duty. Every year, sunny since I've been a government, they haven't done it, which means the government has to find at least five billion pounds in order to keep this cap on fuel duty. He's also said a precedent with alcohol in this one by freezing that. I mean, you're saying that you think he's sort of tried to do project a bit of crowd pleasing as it's called before the budget.

15:18I still think you'll find room for tax cuts because, look, the general judgment of the serious economists, if you look at people like the IFS and Resolution Foundation, some of the others that you sort of go to to kind of dig into the detail on this, I mean, if Paul Johnson who's pretty sober in his analysis, he said, you know, a lot of these figures are basically just made up. And somebody else talked about fairy tales and fiscal illusions. So then the challenges. So, I mean, listen, I think there's something in there. I don't think there's going to be tax cuts. I don't think he can afford to do tax cuts in spring budget.

15:50And the question is, is there smart politics and making the cuts now because some of these things kick in in January, so people will feel bad? But the real question is, what on earth is labor going to do? Do an opposition or doing government? Do an government because they're signing up to the Tory cuts, presumably because of the memory of 92. Remind people of the tax bombshell in 92, why that went wrong. Those were labor essentially committed to higher -char benefit and pensions. And what happened there is that the Tories have come up again with a pretty tough budget. And Neil Kennet quite understandably said, no, no, no.

16:23Given the promises we've made, given what we believe in, we believe there should basically be higher taxes and higher public spending. And that was completely consistent with Labour's position. But that then allowed the Tories to go into the 92 election and talk about Labour's tax bombshell. So is that the fear this time round as well? It might be, it is quite hard to do that. Even on this autumn statement, the tax burden is higher than it's been at any time since the late 1940s. It's only because we've got these lying newspapers that all said this was a huge tax cutting budget, autumn statement.

16:51It wasn't. The tax burden is still going up. But we've talked about that. The tax burden in Britain is still considerably lower. So it's quite hard. It's a lot harder, I think, for the Tories to project themselves as a low to two different questions. There's the tax burden overall, which is lower in Britain than it is in other European countries, but higher than it's been since ATLE. But the question for Labour is presumably, ideally, to find the money for public services they would like to tax people more. So do you think it would be impossible for a Labour party to say, actually, we disagree with what they've done, we disagree with these cuts, we would be investing more in public services this is the wrong way to go.

17:27Would that be catastrophic for their election? I mean, it's tough call. I'm not convinced it would be that catastrophic, because I think that I think millions of people can't, I think this is just end of the road time. It was very interesting to me how Hunt in the statement projects himself with an awful lot of confidence and brio, but it didn't last very long. And by the time they were doing this two in the studios later in the day, they were very much on the back foot. Now, Labour, I think, have to get themselves into position where the public feel an understanding of how tough economic conditions are and have the belief that Labour will make better choices.

18:03Now, would it be sensible to go into an election saying we're going to tax more, we're going to borrow more so that we can spend more? I think that is quite a difficult thing to do politically. But I do think there's something unreal about the fact that we're going into an election where neither Brexit nor projected massive cuts in public spending are really going to be on the agenda because neither party will talk about it. It's very odd, isn't it? Because Labour presumably will have to find £30, £40, £50 billion a year more if it's to make a real impact on things it wants to do on public services, on growth, and there's a huge amount of expectations around that.

18:38But at the same time, Rachel Reeves, who seems to be impressive, steady, competent is absolutely refusing to do that. So there's a real risk that Labour's going to take over and be signed up to really tough conservative spending cuts. And then they'll tell us all the chips are on growth. And where's the productivity going to come from? Because that's the other thing that you didn't, I couldn't find in this autumn statement is where where's all this productivity going to come from? To offset the problems we've got in the health service, school service, and the economy more generally. The other point I think Labour should be making far more aggressively is that essentially this is a government that now exists to try to lay traps for an opposition as opposed to a government that's trying to govern, which says to me that it's sort of run out of reasons to govern.

19:26On that second, I mean, I think that's a bit niche for public communication. I mean, I think exists to lay traps. I'm not sure that really plays with the average vote. Well, that average vote would be like, what do you mean by that? And then what do you explain? I do. I mean, is that this government seems to me as it's going to be the first parliament ever where disposable income is lower at the end than the beginning. Right. And this is their big idea, this expensive thing and cutting national insurance paid for by public spending cuts to come. But then the question is, what would Labour do? No, that's the problem.

19:58Let me finish point about why I think this is relevant. So when a government reaches that point, I think there are people out there thinking, for God's sake, we'll just have a general election. And the reason they're hanging on rather than going for a general election, which they're probably looking at the polls, they're going to lose, is actually a kind of crash and burn to try to lay traps for Labour. And if Labour do get into power, screw them over so that they're probably only for one term. And I think that is part now of some of the conservatives thinking. So the problem I think there is a public line is when you explain what laying traps means.

20:29Is it can sound a bit like your challenging Labour to tell you what their position is and they're refusing to do it, they're just going along with what the Tories say. And there's something in that. But I think this is this notion that the government has given up on governing. I think it's true. It's a call for people. Well, I'm not sure they've given up on governing. I mean, I think that was given the hand he's been dealt. I think a lot of the things they did were smart, thoughtful, but the overall picture, as you say, is catastrophic. I think the big problem for the Tories is not Jeremy Hunt's budget.

20:57The big problem for the Tories is Liz Truss and quasi -caughting. I think that they are not going to be able to recover from that blow to their economic credibility. They can do all they want to seem with Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt steady as you go and take the critic, but they've lost the ability to be a safe pair of hands because of what Truss and Caughting did. Even with the, you know, so if you look at the OBR growth forecasts are actually down. Borrow figures were slightly better. Taxes up, increased inflation, fiscal drag drawing, more and more people into higher tax bans, and debt at best stable.

21:34Well, the economy is in a terrible situation. I mean, there's no doubt that these very hard to push all of them. No, no, no. I didn't make it all a question for Labour. I didn't think they can pin it all on Labour, but I do think as we get closer to the election, people are going to say, and how's it going to be any different under the next slot? For sure. And Labour has an explain where they're going to get growth from either. And no idea what they're going to get growth from. Well, they've come up with this similar sort of, you know, to about planning and all this sort of stuff. And by the way, Roy, on planning and on nimbyism, which we agree is a big thing.

22:03I got sent something from one of your former constituents who wants to know whether you stand by something you did in 2014. Okay. Rory Welk, this is from your own website. Rory Welk comes decision to block wind turbine. And you launched, Rory, I cannot believe you did this. You launched something called Cumbria Windwatch to stop wind turbines. 100 % and I'll defend it to the hill. Go ahead. Because our income in Cumbria is from tourism. It's a national park area. Our landscape is very precious and it is catastrophic. But where are we going to? We're going to wind up there. We do have wind. We do have wind.

22:46We do have wind. We do have wind. We do have wind. Come on. No, I think it's a very, very poor short term decision for Cumbria. Those things will be up there for 50 years. They would destroy the landscape of words worth of Turner. We're bringing in 7 .5 million visitors a year. We have a tourism economy of two and a half million pounds a year. But isn't this classic? Do you think that every area of the country could say that something good about their area, even Stockton, the famous, what did he call it? I don't know. You exactly, James Clevely on Stockton, yeah. Have you ever called another human being a shithole?

23:15No, I don't think I've done that. Do you know if anybody who's ever called another human being a shithole? It sounds like a place reference, not a person reference. He certainly does. Now, on Nimbiasm and your good challenge to me, I think this is a good transition to Holland. Where the question of building houses in affordable housing is central in the next election, should we take a break?

Read the full transcript

23:38This is an ad from BetterHelp. At the moment, we're getting advice from everywhere. You just have to go on TikTok. Could be Alice's cold plunges. Could be my attempts to meditate or the digital detox that I'm doing in Colombia. But of course, one of the things that we know is that it can be incredibly valuable to talk to another human being, somebody who's actually been trained as the therapist to work through these ideas, calmly, objectively and professionally. And as the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a very diverse variety of expertise.

24:14They've got over 5 ,000 therapists in the UK. They've helped more than five million people globally and you can join a session literally at the click of a button. Change therapists anytime. So obviously not about fixing you, but it's about hearing yourself clearly, maybe for the first time. So talk it out with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10 % off their first month at BetterHelp .com slash rest politics. That's better H -E -L -P .com slash rest politics. Let's play Burlington's, guess that price. Back to school means back to saving. We're bringing you kids genes starting at a hold on a minute, just 1199.

24:51Burlington's aching this test. What about character backpacks? We've got them starting at 1299. Burlington's done it again. How about sneakers for the kids? A plus brands and right on trends starting at 1199. Saving is now in session. Burlington deals brands wow. Stalls on Selection is very about location. She's made up her mind to live pretty smart. Don't you budget responsibly right from the start. She spends a little less in puts for into saving. She keeps a blood pressure low and credits go raises.

25:34Boring money moves make kind of lame songs, but they sound pretty sweet dear wallet. BNC Bank brilliantly boring since 1865.

25:47Welcome back to the rest's politics with me Rory Stewart. And me Ernst Campbell. And one thing I said that I'd really like, we both like to do, is to encourage people to pick up on some of our leading episodes, which are these interviews that we have done with world leaders, with Arnold Schwarzenegger, some amazing recent interviews. If you want to understand Israel Palestine and the two states solution, got interviews coming on cop and climate. Probably I think some of the best ways of understanding the issues of our era and encountering some fascinating people is through the rest's politics leading.

26:21Would you agree? Fundamentally disagree Rory. I think it's absolutely. No, I do. And you know, I find it a bit weird that we get, we've had far more listeners for you and I, blathering on about the Middle East, say. And I'm not saying we don't kind of know a bit about it, in my view. But actually the feedback we've had for the last two on leading with Simon C. Bagmontifuri historian, Antonio Clouc, who has worked for both Israelis and the Palestinians, has been phenomenal. Before that side of Wassie and Palestinian Ambassador, so there's been a lot actually on the hip -proport. We do a lot more.

26:55So yeah, and then if you go back a bit, people like François Hollande. Yes. Tony Blair. Yes. Mary Maca -Leese. Yes. So yeah, people should check it out. I think you'd, you'd enjoy it. And there's something for everybody. There are public intellectuals, there are writers and thinkers, there are heads of state, there are former primers, there's people at Hillary Clinton taking you into the center of the war room when she's making, when the calls are being made on the attack on the Sun, bin Laden, etc, etc. So give it a go. Excellent. Now, shall we talk a little bit about Mr. Vilders in Holland, Mr.

27:31Millay in Argentina and also these shocking rights in Dublin? Where do you want to start with all that? Well, let's let's start with an atlas and the victory basically of hair, the Vilders, whose extraordinary organization, which isn't quite a political party called the PVV, has just taken the largest amount of seats by a big margin. So just a little, still relatively small proportion though, 37 out of 150. Yeah. So just an introduction to the Dutch electoral system because it's fascinating. I mean, it is pure proportional. So 150 seats, if you can get 150th of the vote, 0 .8 % of the vote, you get a seat.

28:12And it has been run by coalition governments almost forever. And it's been a very, very rigid system. Hair, the Vilders is famous for being the longest serving member of the Dutch Parliament, but he's only been in since 1998. And this is partly my friend, Monix Amont, who teaches at Yale points out because being a Dutch politician is unbelievably boring. I mean, to put it in contrast, the founder of the house, when I was in the House Commons, his latest 2019 Ken Clark, have been in since the early 70s. So the fact that the longest serving MP's only been in since 1998 gives you a sense of it. And the reason it's so boring is that everything is run on a party less system.

28:51So much so that Monix jokes that you might as well just have one person representing the party in Parliament because there's absolutely no disagreements within these parties. Does it make you less keen on social representation? Well, I think definitely this form is bizarre, really bizarre. And they signed coalition agreements where they have over the last few coalitions specified every single law that they're going to pass. So there's actually literally no point in Parliament at all. If you're in the government, you vote with every law that was agreed three years earlier, and if you're in the opposition, you vote against it.

29:24The reason we have this election is because that system broke down under the last coalition. And it breaks down when a surprise happens. If something that wasn't in the agreement happens, suddenly it breaks down. So Holland, moving forward, has gone through, I guess, what's happening in a lot of European countries. We broadly speaking, had three big parties, had a Labour Party, a Liberal Party, which is the party whose Prime Minister has been in for the last four elections. And it had a Christian Democrat party. And these three parties sort of dominated Dutch politics for a long time, and then it began to fall apart.

30:03And the left in particular in the Netherlands has really collapsed. If you put together all the left -wing votes in Parliament, they're only about a third of the seats. And that's largely because the traditional manual working class has completely deserted the left, just as they basically deserted the Socialist Party in France. And I think it's a problem for the STP in Germany as well. So, you know, Rotterdam, for example, which is a kind of big industrial port city, which was their bastion, doesn't vote for them anymore. Instead of which, those votes have begun to go towards far -right anti -immigrant parties of which, here at the Vilders Movement, is a big example, every...

30:42I mean, it's right, we pin him on the far right, but he started out as an advisor to Rotter, the outgoing Prime Minister, and it was when Rotter started to talk about supporting Turkish accession to the European Union that Vilders decided not for him and off he went. He's been around, as you say, for a very long time. I think he looked utterly stunned on the night of the election. And I think there's a warning in here for all parties that have way ahead in the polls, including Labour, actually, because it's interesting how many young people voted for him, and also how many people voted for him who didn't vote before.

31:19And I suspect a lot of people who told pollsters they were going to vote for somebody else. But the other thing that happened is that the Rotter's successor, who's a woman from Turkish immigrants background, she became the first of those sort of mainstream party leaders to stay, well, yeah, maybe we could do some sort of arrangement with Vilders Party, which in a sense, I think, pushed people who maybe were a bit reluctant to vote for Vilders, they, oh, well, he can't be that bad then. And I think that was a huge mistake by her. Now, we've got a very messy, remote friend, Jan Agafjortov, who's a Norwegian football and now commentator.

32:00And he said he'd like to hear his favourite podcast, he called it, talking about why we think what are the positive reasons that people vote for people like Vilders and Millay? And I've been trying really hard to think of it. I think a lot of it is a protest vote. But I think if you look at Trump, make America great again, I think it's they've somehow managed to capture alongside this vote for us against them, a sense almost of optimism. Hmm, provided you stick with in your own culture. Which was true, actually, of course, of Boris Johnson, because he, you know, for as many floors that we keep talking about endlessly, projected this sort of boostrish optimism, and a sense of things that we don't get done.

32:43And the problem, of course, always with the centre, is because it's been running things since the, I guess, the 90s. It always gave an impression of defending the status quo and defending the status quo often involved saying, well, it's all too difficult. You know, we can't really do this. We can't really get immigration under control. We're not allowed to do that. So politicians who say nonsense to that, we can change things are really important. And head to Vilders is, of course, not the first to these guys in Dutch politics. Pym fortune. Pym fortune. That's why the way Vilders, one of the reasons why Vilders has been for years, really surrounded by strong protection is not allowed windows in his office, because they're worried somebody will pop him off.

33:22That's right. He's exactly, he lives this very, very odd life. So Pym fortune, very different figure from head to Vilders. He was much, much more intellectual, much more flamboyant, very openly gay and celebrated his sexuality, as well as being radically anti -Muslim. And that gives you a sense of how different Dutch populism is to American populism. So there's no space in Dutch politics, for example, in the way there is in the US, for being anti -abortion or taking on LGBTQ issues. But you do have that in some of these, but like all that part of hishtic is very much, and that's what it's so called conservatism.

33:56Absolutely, but in the Netherlands, being on the far right is largely about Islam, and this began with Pym fortune. And again, it tells you something, again, I'm quoting my friend, Monix, about what Dutch tolerance means, because Dutch tolerance, going all the way back towards religion, didn't really mean liking or understanding the other side, it meant despising them, but leaving them alone. And there seems to be, its dominant culture is aggressively secular. And there's a sort of sense of total incomprehension of Islam. And Pym fortune really developed this. He said Islam is completely incompatible with secular, liberal progressive values.

34:37Vilders has lent him to that. He's also, of course, I talked about leaving Euro, leaving the EU, he seems to like Putin. He's interested in banning the Quran on the Selon and public. He's already retreating on quite a lot of these things. And saying he wants to put them in the fridge, he's just saying to leave my crazy ideas in the fridge. And that's what I presume is because he's trying to see what sort of coalition he could form. I think when he's 137 seats, which is fair for you more than those who came second and third, I think it's fair to say you can have the first go. Several of the parties already said no way they're going anywhere near him.

35:11That could create his own problems. I think he has to be Prime Minister. I think it's almost, in, I mean, I think you're right, constitutionally, theoretically, the liberals and the left could gang up and stop him becoming Prime Minister. But I think for the people who voted for Vilders, that would be such a catastrophic. But it's interesting how he's already trying to unwind, a bit like Malone has done it, Italy. Orban is the only one who survived the long time, actually. You know, Orban is now the longest serving European Union leaders. And he will be looking at this and thinking when it comes to the next European elections, he'll feel the right is on the march.

35:50He'll also feel that some of the policy in Ukraine, he can start to shift and also some of the policy on budgetate, particularly at the moment where Germany's in this complete economic mass due to the constitutional court. So part of that plan. So I think it's very likely he will become the Prime Minister and people are being too optimistically thinking, well, I think the coalition will be him with 37 seats. The old liberal party of Mark Rutger with 24 seats, the NSC with 20 seats, that's Omskirt, who's this very interesting figure who is ahead in the polls until two weeks before the election.

36:21Absolutely. And who were talking about because he'd come out of this scandal around child benefits, he'd broken, very unusually in this very kind of conventional, follow the party with politics, he broke with the Christian Democrats over the system and effectively the Christian Democrats turned their back on him and cheated him out of his ability to win the election. And out of nowhere really took 20 seats, which again is very, very difficult in the Dutch system. Again, on on Vilders, this is also reminiscent, I believe, of what happened with some of Frashe's parties. He doesn't have a proper political party.

36:55There's only one member of Vilders' party, which is himself. There's no party democracy. These MPs aren't allowed to speak unless he gives them permission. So literally, he chooses the candidates, there's no party members, and they can't look at his finance as properly because he's only technically an association not a political party, so he doesn't come out of the normal campaign finance rules. I see that the guy that he's put in charge of the coalition negotiations has already had to step down through some scandal. And this is what often happens to these hard -right leaders. We've seen it here whenever the BNP have got into local power that they tend to founder when it comes to actually governing.

37:29Now, Vilders, as you say, is a very experienced politician. Maybe he will prove as wrong on that. I'm not so sure that part of the driving of a deal in the coalition might be that he won't be prime minister. I think some of these parties might say, well, the only way we're going to do this is if you're not the prime minister. Yeah, or he waters down a great deal. Then loses a lot of the support that he's had. Drops most of his right -wing stuff, but probably keeps big restrictions on migration asylum seekers refugees. Yeah. Probably expels Muslim clerics, which will be popular with his base. But drop all this banning the Berk, shutting down mosques.

38:04Yeah. Now, one of the things though that might be worth watching is that he won't push ahead with a referendum because he probably wants to get the farmers party the BBB on -side, and they're absolutely believed that Dutch farmers are on the side of you. Both he and Le Pen. If there's one thing they've learned from Brexit, it's that it's not a very sensible idea. So they're both watered that down already. But he may well be no more European union accession. He may be no to European budgets. So he may be a problem for Europe. I think this is a good transition to Millay in Argentina. I've noticed from our conversational traffic and on the residence politics, what's that group?

38:41You're rather obsessed with his peruque. Absolutely amazing. And I think it's a big insight that we need to share with the world. I think it's almost on the level with my great idea that if you've lost something, it is where you think it is. The insight is that populism is all about hair. And Millay is actually known by our citizens as the wig. People draw comparisons between his ridiculous hair and Donald Trump's ridiculous hair. And Michael Fabricant. Amazing. And these politicians make huge jokes out of their heads. So I'll say again, get the villas, the populist leaders just taken over and out.

39:15Platinum died. Platinum died. And the Dutch newspaper says the most famous proxides since Marilyn Monroe. Johnson to. So I think there's definitely, definitely maybe not a whole book, but it's definitely a good article to be written on hair and populism. Well, I can't do it possibly. I can't do it. But Millay, a bit like villas, is finally is having to reckon with some of the consequences of his crazy apologists. And again, we don't know. So again, I was talking to an Argentinian who was very much saying, thank goodness we got him. Millay, it's the only hope for the country. Yes, he seems crazy, but a lot of it is a joke.

39:51Call complacency. Exactly. And I think the questions we move to Millay is, are we to be reassured by the fact that when they come in, everybody says, well, they're not quite so bad as people thought they watered down their policies or actually they're bringing quite good advisors and it's the people I haven't done. Exactly. And he's not dead. Exactly. And of course, without overdoing it, when some of these nationalist fascist movements took over in Europe from the 20s and 30s, there was a real tendency in the only day to say, oh, it's not too bad. They're probably going to be more moderate when they're in power.

40:22I don't know if you can place it at all. We should put in the news that you're a piece I saw in the conversation from a guy called Orelia Mondon who I'm assuming is French or Belgian, but anyway, he's at the University of Bath. I think he sort of thinks people like you and I possibly have fed into this by the constant use of the phrase populism. And I have in the past have worried about this because populism sounds quite popular. His, his, his, his, his, you know, if you're a populist, that means you're doing things to please the people. What's wrong with that? Whereas what he's think is his, his argument is that the far right is a dangerous political force and that the mainstream has done far too much to pander to it rather than challenge it.

41:06And I think that's what I was saying, perhaps, about the, the leader of Rutgers Party when she started to say, yeah, maybe. And when we talk about, you know, these people have legitimate concerns, which a lot of, for a lot of people, it's just racism. So I think that there's, we'll put it in the news letter is, it's a very interesting read suggesting, basically, that will, neither builders normally are shocks that actually we should have seen them coming. And in fact, we have seen them coming, but haven't worked out how to handle them. One of the, the things that we just talked about in the transition is this, what they call livelihood security in the Netherlands, which is the housing crisis.

41:40And it's partly because they have a green belt too. They have issues around night's shim pollution. You know, many, many young people are now living with their parents or they're living in camper vans. And of course, very unfairly, the right of blaming asylum seekers for the absence of housing. It's very familiar story, which we can see in Britain. But the litmus test, I think, really for all of this is going to be the French elections, because marine the pen is not going to have to need to compromise if she becomes present in the way that people like villas do. So the downside in this form to electoral systems of the PR system is that these people can get seats in parliament.

42:18The upside is that they're then forced to do a lot of compromises in order to try to keep her. If lapan manages to become president, she has as French president astonishing. As Macron has found, you can be hugely constrained by the national assembly. But I guess if she's going to win the presidential election, then, you know, the national assembly is probably going to shift in certain directions away. By the way, when I saw Francois Hollande recently, he said something very, very interesting. He said, he wondered whether with Brexit, Britain had hit peak populism, but the rest of Europe has yet to hit it.

42:55Now, I saw somewhere, Fraser Nelson, the spectator, saying that the great thing about Britain is that we don't have a populist party with representation in parliament. And I think that is rather to overlook the nature of the current government. I think we have a populist government. And I actually think soon, like, is becoming his own way as populist. Johnson. No, so I'm going to challenge that. I don't need anything like as populist as Johnson. I think the, and I don't think we have a populist government, nothing like what we're talking about with lapan. You think the problem is, you think the problem is like that?

43:24No, I think the challenge, there I was about to come onto that. I agree with you that the real question is, what do the conservatives do after the election? And I also agree that if they perform particularly bad in election, it will almost certainly be because they're flirting far too much with the populist right and not. And that's the point that there's not a problem about is making. But I also think Olaund is onto something I think compared to Vilders or Le Pen or Maloney. That's weird. And the film. Yeah, no, no, no, and it's also not just a question about the conservative party. It's also something very interesting about the Labour movement in Britain because we've talked about how the left has collapsed all over Europe, lost its working class voters, and in the cases like Holland or in Israel, the left has all but disappeared.

44:09It's barely a third of the vote. Whereas actually in Britain, the traditional left in the former Labour is holding up. So Britain does seem to be a bit of an exception, but that's always worrying because the long -term trends are the same in Britain as they are in Europe and the United States. And I think we may just be delaying this moment. Well, let's talk a little bit about Ireland and Dublin. I did a bit of pedultery the other day, Roy. I was interviewed on a podcast which presented by Mehar Martin for Matyshek, now the foreign minister in the Irish government. And he actually asked me on to talk about my book and populism, polarisation post truth.

44:50He asked me on before the riots, by the time we did the interview, it was in the middle of these riots until I tell it's about the riots. So there was an attack on some children and a carer, quite a bad attack. What does it mean? It means some Irish citizen assaulted some children. Correct. Why? Because they, we don't ever know. I don't know. And then the news got out. And then, like wildfire, somebody who, interestingly, I think he called himself Danny Boy on social media, but he did a minute -by -minute account of the messages that were going out from these far -right groups, including in Britain, including in different parts of Europe.

45:30So the world went around straight away that this is immigrant who's killing our people, Ireland for the Irish, Ireland first, then people on the far -right in Ireland with the following, essentially saying to people, come out, yeah, without, they obviously just, most of them, just the right side of the law, but essentially urging people to come out and fight. And literally within next to no time at all, there were buses being set on fire, police officers being attacked. And all based on a lack of knowledge, deliberate disinformation about what had actually happened. It's very strange, isn't it, Ireland?

46:08Because, you know, we were there together a couple of weeks ago. It seems to have a very, from, from an outsider's point of view, very mature, successful moderate government. It's had an amazing economic success story. It's leading European indicators across the board on a lot of key things. And yet it's also a place that, as we talked about, Sinn Fein, which is a very clear populist party, is now performing very, very well. And in which things like this happen. So even in one of the real success stories of Europe, with a very moderate government, you can see under the surface. Oh, yeah. Well, Miguel Martin in the interview that we did, he said that it's always been there.

46:44It's always been there. And, you know, admitted that kind of immigration was for these people was a real problem. Now, the other thing you notice when you're in Dublin, as opposed to say being here in London or any of the big cities in the UK, it's remarkably white. You don't, you kind of, if you see non -white people, you tend to notice them. So the fact that that could happen in those circumstances. And by the way, my favorite part of the whole horrible episode was the fact that the guy who stepped in and risked his own life to try and sort this thing all out was a Brazilian delivery driver.

47:19And the good Irish people have now been setting up tons of funds for him to become, hopefully a very wealthy delivery driver. But I think it just goes to show that, as you say, even in countries that we look in from the outside, I've got a very romantic attachment to Ireland, most of my experience of Ireland is through the Peace Pro Ceres, it's through lots of nice trips there and lovely people that I know. So it did come as a genuine shock. But I also think that both Meal and Leav Radke, Leav Radke made a very, very good response to it. He wasn't doing what that guy from Bath University is saying.

47:53He really was totally calling it out. These people do not speak for Ireland, they do not represent Ireland there. And he wasn't doing that thing of, you know, we understand the relationship we can get into. And I think we need a bit more of that challenge against his hard right stuff. Now, finally, before we finish, you quite rightly wanted us to talk a little bit more about what's going on in Africa. And we haven't really had a chance to do that. I mean, there's been an attempted coup in Sierra Leone, which has been really interesting because remember, we've had eight coups in Africa and just over a year.

48:25Is it you're including interesting? I mean, it didn't happen at the end. Clearly, units of the military seem to have tried to seize barracks. The current president himself was a brigadier who was involved in the military coup in the 1990s, but has now a democratically elected person. Sierra Leone suffering from many problems that are across Africa. I mean, huge inflation, huge hardship, massive youth unemployment, 60 % poverty. But the reason why it's worth looking at is it's a different part of Africa from where the great belt of the coups happened, which is across the Sahel. Look at him out.

49:02Sierra Leone is much further down on the west coast. And it's again, an example of the real fragility. In fact, it's a fascinating interview that the current president, Sierra Leone, gave to Al Jazeera, maybe not worth watching the whole thing. But it is amazing way Al Jazeera does this, did long, patient, long form interview with the president, Sierra Leone. About 15 minutes through, he's challenged on his own participation in coups. And he said, oh, yes, well, the coup that I'd in the 1990s was a good coup because you know, this government was corrupt and uselessness. And then four weeks later, they're trying to coup, they tell him, anyway, that then brings respect to Sudan and every year.

49:37Well, just not just on Sierra Leone though. I mean, part of the tension that's there is the fact that people are rather worried about how he won the election. So it's not just that he was involved in a previous coup. It's just that there's a lot of concern about whether he's kind of legitimate. Which is true in many, and this is the sad truth. I mean, we've talked about thin democracy before. We were understandably so excited by the movement of the world towards democratic elections in the 90s and 2000s. But for many people in these countries, the fact that there are elections is not very reassuring because a lot of these elections seem to be stolen.

50:10Power remains very concentrated. The economy is not performing. And that actually means that sadly, many friends of mine, I have who follow these as he's closely, don't really lament the disappearance of these democratic governments. Well, that's one to watch. And the other one, I think, which briefly should just talk about because we talked last week about how Ukraine, people are worrying that Ukraine is being forgotten with all that's going on in the Middle East. But Sudan is utterly horrific what's happening there now. And we've talked before about this civil war between the armed forces of government and these rapid support forces.

50:45There was again, Al Jazeera, there was a report the other day about this violence in Darfur that was, it was horrific to watch and interviews with people describing what had happened to them. And it was, it was honestly as bad as anything that we were seeing coming out of Israel and Gaza. And yet it's almost as if the world's media can't cope with more than one big thing at a time. So, so quick reminder on Sudan, the long standing president was toppled in a coup. There was a brief civilian government. And then basically there was a military coup. And then the two big generals in the military ended up fighting.

51:23There's the traditional military, which is run by a man called El Borhan. And against him is this man called Hamethi, Muhammad Hamdan, who runs the rapid support force, who is associated with a very disturbing group, which emerged in the 2000s called the Janger wheat militia, who represent primarily more nomadic pastoralist groups. He spent part of his youth as a camel herder from a tribal background. And we're used as these sort of militia groups in Darfur on these attacks, which people will remember, all the people remember, will the great human rights atrocities championed by people at George Cuny in the 2000s.

52:02And now the fighting has spread to Darfur. Again, we've got over 5 million internally displaced people, 1 .2 million Sudanese pushed across the border, many tens of thousands have killed. And again, a story that we have told when we have been analyzing Libya, for example, of proxy wars, because the hearts of this is the United Arab Emirates. So this man, Hamethi, was used by the UAE to fight in Sudan. They brought him over, paid him lots of money to bring over Sudanese mercenaries effectively to fight for them. In Yemen, partly with their support, he then got the major gold concessions in Sudan.

52:41So he's become a very, very rich man and his brother runs his company's out of Dubai. UAE has then given a 1 .5 billion dollar loan to Chad, put that context in time, budgeted a Chad a year, it's less than a billion dollars. And in return has been allowed to set up a base on the Sudan border, which has a sort of a hospital in it for public show, but with very few patients, but is basically a supply base for landing weapons, which are then moved over to Hamethi to back his side in the war against the Sudanese military. Were the Wagner group not involved in that as well? And the Wagner group are also supporting Hamethi and also brewing weapons and central allies.

53:19So this is really, really upsetting, obviously, for the US, the UK, who are part of something called the Quad with Saudi, which is supposed to be bringing, and UAE, which is supposed to be bringing peace. So UAE that's meant to be part of this alliance for peace is actually funneling weapons into one of the size just as they were funneling weapons in Libya. And meanwhile, Qatar emerging as the great broker in the hostage release is in the least. And of course, Qatar also has had a very complicated history because Qatar has also had close allies with particular factions in Somalia has allied itself with different groups in Libya.

54:00So this is, it does feel at times much more not sort of Cold War, more sort of 19th century in the politics where you have a dozen countries interfering in other states playing these sort of complicated games. And in the case of UAE, it's partly about then putting a lot of money into after they're buying mines and Congo, they're building ports all the way along the African Red Sea coast. They're making huge financial loans to governments. We shouldn't maybe keep plugging out of the zero as much as we do, but that is the only place where I've seen significant coverage of either of these two situations.

54:40And the other thing, I was actually channel hopping the other day and Fiona came in while I was watching the Alder Zero coverage of what's happening in the Middle East. And she made the point that you get a completely different picture to what you'll get watching. And I'd say most much of our news, I mean, it's horrific a lot of the time, but it's actually quite sanitized. Yeah. There's a lot of stuff that you'll see on Alder Zero, which we're not seeing. No, they're very unspoken. I mean, this interview with the Sierra Leonean president, the interviewer is much, much more blunt about what he remembers of seeing the atrocities and certainly injuring some of all of these little little shout out to Declan Walsh, who's a very good British, I guess possibly British American journalist for the New York Times who did some incredibly detailed reporting on the UAE support.

55:24And the New York Times still has the funds to do some amazing investigations. They use satellite imagery to compare the footprint of these UAE bases to the bases that they've been building in Libya and they then used air trackers to follow in every plane. And it's extraordinary sort of almost like a kind of intelligence operation. Well, on the New York Times being an intelligence organisation, we shall end this, so he's rested on a take. Thank you. See you next week.

From the publisher

Should Britain give the Elgin Marbles back to Greece? Will people be financially better off following Hunt's Autumn statement? Why have populists like Javier Milei and Geert Wilders performed so well in recent elections?

Join Rory and Alastair as they discuss these topics and more in today's episode of The Rest is Politics.

🌏 Get our exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ https://nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✅

TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics

All 501 episodes
196. Why are the far-right on the rise?The Rest Is Politics · 56 min
Listen in VO